GB1561756A - Ethylene polymerization catalysts - Google Patents

Ethylene polymerization catalysts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB1561756A
GB1561756A GB3528576A GB3528576A GB1561756A GB 1561756 A GB1561756 A GB 1561756A GB 3528576 A GB3528576 A GB 3528576A GB 3528576 A GB3528576 A GB 3528576A GB 1561756 A GB1561756 A GB 1561756A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
film
prepared
gels
precipitate
chromium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
GB3528576A
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Gulf Research and Development Co
Original Assignee
Gulf Research and Development Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Gulf Research and Development Co filed Critical Gulf Research and Development Co
Publication of GB1561756A publication Critical patent/GB1561756A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F110/00Homopolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J27/00Catalysts comprising the elements or compounds of halogens, sulfur, selenium, tellurium, phosphorus or nitrogen; Catalysts comprising carbon compounds
    • B01J27/14Phosphorus; Compounds thereof
    • B01J27/16Phosphorus; Compounds thereof containing oxygen, i.e. acids, anhydrides and their derivates with N, S, B or halogens without carriers or on carriers based on C, Si, Al or Zr; also salts of Si, Al and Zr
    • B01J27/18Phosphorus; Compounds thereof containing oxygen, i.e. acids, anhydrides and their derivates with N, S, B or halogens without carriers or on carriers based on C, Si, Al or Zr; also salts of Si, Al and Zr with metals other than Al or Zr

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
  • Polymerization Catalysts (AREA)

Description

(54) IMPROVED ETHYLENE POLYMERIZATION CATALYSTS (71) We, GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, United States of America, of P.O. Box 2038, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230, United States of America, do hereby declare the invention, for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:- One of the principal commercial processes employed to manufacture high density linear ethylene polymers is to polymerize ethylene in the presence of a chromium oxide catalyst supported on silica. While the catalysts employed in this process are characterized as being a chromium oxide supported on silica, it is believed that the chromium undergoes at least partial reaction with silicon atoms to form complex molecules whose precise chemical composition has not been established with certainty. It is believed that at least a portion of the chromium is present in the hexavalent state.
In a specific aspect of this process, the polymerization is carried out in a liquid hydrocarbon medium having little or no solvent action on the resin being produced, and the resin, as formed, precipitates as fine solid particles. For this reason, this particular process is known in the art as the Particle Form Process. As used throughout this specification, the term Particle Form Process will be restricted to a process carried out in the presence of a chromium catalyst and carried out in a liquid hydrocarbon medium having solubility characteristics such that the resin, as produced, precipitates in the form of fine solid particles.
One of the limitations of the Particle Form Process is that the resins produced by the process have a relatively narrow molecular weight distribution and a relatively low melt flow shear ratio which conventionally is expressed as the ratio obtained by dividing the high load melt index (ASTM 1238-70, Condition F) by the normal load melt index (ASTM 1238-70, Condition E). For a number of industrial purposes, it is desirable to have available high density linear ethylene polymers having broad molecular weight distributions and high melt flow shear ratios.
Many workers have attempted to modify the Particle Form Process to expand its capability to manufacture ethylene polymers having broader molecular weight distributions and higher melt flow shear ratios. Such efforts have been directed principally to modifying the chromium oxide-supported catalysts employed in the process. The success of such efforts have been marginal, at best, and many workers in the art believe that the Particle Form Process inherently is restricted to the manufacture of ethylene polymers having narrow molecular weight distributions and low melt flow shear ratios.
In accordance with the present invention, the applicants have discovered a process for preparing a class of catalysts useful in the polymerization of olefins such as ethylene. The process of the invention comprises depositing a chromium compound upon an inorganic carrier containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties, the inorganic carrier being selected from (a) an amorphous precipitate of aluminium phosphate, (b) an amorphous precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in an atomic ratio of from 5:1 to 1:1, and (c) mixtures of (a) and (b), and said carrier having been prepared by neutralising an acidic solution containing Alia+ cations and P04--- anions in a molar ratio in the range of from 5:1 to 1:1 to form a solid precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties, and recovering the precipitate.
These catalysts, prepared by this process, when employed to initiate the polymerization of ethylene in Particle Form Process, have no observable induction period and provide ethylene polymers of significantly broader molecular weight distributions and significantly higher melt flow shear ratios than are obtained in the Particle Form process with prior art catalysts.
The invention also provides a process for the polymerization of olefins which uses the catalyst prepared by the above process.
Furthermore the invention provides a new type of polyolefin which is the product of a polymerization process using the catalysts of the invention.
One particularly desirable product of processing of the new type of polyolefin is polyethylene film.
In one embodiment the catalyst is prepared by (a) preparing an aqueous slurry of the inorganic carrier by neutralising an acidic aqueous solution containing Al+++ and P04--- ions, (b) admixing an inorganic chromium compound with the slurry of (a) to provide 0.14.0% by weight of chromium based on the total solids, (c) spray drying the slurry of (b), and (d) activating the dry catalyst of (c) by heating to a temperature of 350- 950"C.
Alternatively the catalyst may be prepared by (a) preparing an aqueous slurry containing chromium ions in addition to Al+++ and P04-- ions, (b) precipitating an inorganic material containing aluminium, phosphorus and chromium moieties by neutralising the acidic solution of (a), (c) drying the precipitate of (b), and (d) activating the dry catalyst of (c) by heating to a temperature of 350- 950"C, the chromium added in step (a) being sufficient to constitute from 0.1 4.00/,: by weight of the precipitate of step (b).
In another embodiment the catalyst is prepared by (a) preparing a strongly acidic solution containing Al+++ cations and PO4--- anions in a molar ratio in the range of from 5:1 to 1:1; (b) neutralizing the solution of (a) to form a precipitate; (c) calcining the precipitate of (c); and (d) impregnating the calcined precipitate of (c) with an organochromium compound.
Preferably the support is an amorphous precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in an atomic ratio of 3.5:1 to 1.1:1.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a photomicrograph (at 50,000 diameters) of the calcined amorphous aluminum phosphate precipitate prepared in Example i.
Figure 2 is a photomicrograph (at 50,000 diameters) of the calcined amorphous aluminum-phosphorus containing precipitate prepared in Example 2 and which has an aluminum-phosphorus atomic ratio of 2:1.
Figure 3 is a photomicrograph (at 50,000 diameters) of the calcined Al203 precipitate prepared in Example 3.
Figure 4 is a plot of the rheological data of an ethylene polymer prepared with a catalyst of the invention and an ethylene polymer prepared with a prior art catalyst.
Figure 5 is a plot of certain parameters of the melt flow properties of ethylene polymers of the invention and prior art ethylene polymers.
For reasons which will be developed, the catalysts of the invention differ significantly from the supported chromium oxide polymerization catalysts of the prior art, both with respect to chemical structure and catalytic activity.
The catalysts, when prepared in accordance with the preferred methods hereinafter described, contain a substantial portion of their chromium content in an oxidation state of less than 6. This is evidenced by the fact that the preferred.
catalysts have a green color as distinguished from the brown to orange color of hexavalent chromium compounds. This is true even if the chromium compound employed in the catalyst preparation is in the hexavalent state. It is known that CrO3, when heated to about 2500 C, will generally be converted to Cr2O3 and liberate oxygen. As will be subsequently demonstrated, the catalysts of the invention, when employed in the Particle Form Process, have no observable polymerization induction period.
The carriers or supports for the catalysts of the invention may be of two related and functionally equivalent types. The first type is an amorphous precipitate of aluminium phosphate. The second type is an amorphous precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in an atomic ratio in the range of 5:1 to 1:1 and preferably in the range of 3.5:1 to 1.1:1.
Amorphous precipitates of aluminium phosphate are known in the art. These precipitates are ptepared by neutralization of a strongly acidic aqueous medium containing aluminium cations and PO4-- anions in a substantially equal molar ratio. Such acidic solutions are prepared by dissolving in water a highly soluble aluminium salt and a source of PO4--- ions, usually ortho-phosphoric acid. The aluminium salt employed is not critical, provided only that it does not contain an anion which will form a precipitate in the subsequent precipitation step.
Aluminium nitrate and aluminium halides, particularly aluminium chloride, are the aluminium salts of choice for use in the invention. While certain phosphate salts such as triammonium ortho-phosphate can be used as the source of the PO4--- ions, ortho-phosphoric acid is the source of choice for providing the PO4--- ions.
The amorphous aluminium phosphate precipitate is prepared by neutralizing the acidic medium containing aluminium cations and phosphate anions. When the pH is increased to 6 or higher, the aluminium and phosphorus moieties precipitate from the aqueous medium. While in theory the neutralization can be carried out by mixing the acidic solution with an appropriate alkali in any manner, it is preferred to simultaneously add the acidic medium and the neutralizing alkali to a stirred aqueous medium. The two solutions should be added at controlled rates so that the pH is continuously maintained at a preselected pH in the range of about 6.0--10.0.
While a wide variety of bases can be used to neutralize the acidic medium, it is preferred to use ammonium hydroxide or an ammonium salt such as ammonium carbonate so that the aluminium-phosphorus precipitate will be free of metallic ions that might be incorporated into the precipitate, if inorganic metal-containing bases such as sodium carbonate or sodium hydroxide were used in the process.
While the precipitation reaction can be carried out over a wide range of temperatures, ambient temperature usually is employed, as no significant advantages are obtained by heating or cooling.
After the precipitation is completed, the precipitate is filtered, washed one or more times to free the precipitate of occluded ions, and dried. Thereafter, the precipitate is calcined in a conventional manner at a suitable teperature, typically in a range of 125-5000C. No advantages are obtained by calcining at higher temperatures and it is preferred to avoid calcining the product at temperatures above 1100"C., as some crystallization takes place at these higher temperatures. A product calcined for 4 hours at 1100 C. appeared to be crystalline and to have a rudimentary tridymite-type structure.
The calcined aluminium phosphate product is amorphous, and usually has a bulk density in the range of 0.25 to 0.5 grams/cm3, and has the appearance of a compacted mass of spherical granules having a diameter in the 1--5 micron range.
The second type of carrier for the catalysts of the invention consists of amorphous precipitates containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in which the aluminium and phosphorus are present in an atomic ratio within the range previously described. While it is possible to prepare precipitates having an aluminium/phosphorus atomic ratio of greater than 5:1, the ultimate chromium containing catalysts prepared therefrom give polymerization rates lower than desired in commercial practice.
The aluminium-phosphorus containing precipitates are prepared by the same procedures employed to prepare the aluminium phosphate precipitates, except that the molar ratio of aluminium cations to PO4--- anions is adjusted to a range from 5:1 to substantially 1:1, and preferably to a range from 3.5:1 to 1.1:1.
In physical appearance and gross physical properties, the calcined amorphous aluminium-phosphorus containing precipitates are virtually indistinguishable from the calcined amorphous aluminium phosphate precipitates previously described.
The similarity of the physical appearance of the two types of calcined amorphous precipitates is seen by an examination of Figure 1 and 2. Figure 1 is a photomicrograph (at 50,000 diameters) of the calcined amorphous aluminium phosphate precipitate prepared in Example !. Figure 2 is a photomicrograph (at 50,000 diameters) of the calcined amorphous aluminium-phosphorus containing precipitate prepared in Example 2 which has an aluminium-phosphorus atomic ratio of 2:1.
The calcined amorphous aluminium-phosphorus containing precipitates- over the entire range of aluminium-phosphorus atomic ratios operable in the present invention-show none of the characteristics of calcined Al203 precipitates.
This fact is established by an examination of Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 has been previously described and Figure 3 is a photomicrograph (at 50,000 diameters) of the calcined Al203 precipitate prepared in Example 3.
X-ray diffraction data also show that calcined aluminium-phosphorus precipitates do not have any of the characteristics of calcined Awl203 precipitates.
Two lots of (1) the aluminium phosphate precipitate of Examples 1, (2) the Al203 precipitate of Example 3, and (3) an aluminium-phosphorus precipitate having the aluminium and phosphorus moieties present in a 4:1 atomic ratio were calcined for, respectively, 16 hours at 900"C and 16 hours at 11000C. The Awl203 calcined at 9000C was a mixture of the gamma and alpha crystallite structure whereas the Awl203 calcined at 1 1000C was entirely of the alpha structure. The X-ray diffraction of the other two samples that were calcined at 9000C showed no evidence of any type of crystalline structure. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the product of Example 1 that was calcined at 11000C showed evidence of a rudimentary tridymite-type crystalline structure, which was quite different from the pattern of the Al203 product. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the aluminium-phosphorus precipitate (4:1 AI/P ratio) calcined at 11000C showed evidence of partial crystallization. The pattern was consistent with (I) an incompletely crystallized tridymite type structure (typical of certain crystalline AlPO4 structures) and (2) a gamma type Al203 crystalline structure.
As certain aluminium salts, ortho-phosphoric acid and ammonium hydroxide are soluble in certain polar solvents such as methanol, it is possible to prepare the previously described inorganic carriers by carrying out the indicated synthesis steps in such polar solvents or in mixtures of water and such polar solvents.
The catalysts of the invention are prepared by depositing a chromium compound on a carrier or support of the type previously described. The concentration of the chromium compound deposited upon the carrier is not critical, but ordinarily will be in the range of 0. l.0% and preferably in the range 0.2-3% and more especially 1.5-2.5%, expressed as free chromium. Thereafter, the catalysts are activated by being heated as subsequently described.
The chromium may be deposited on the carrier in almost any chemical form such as chromic anhydride or a salt such as chromium chloride, chromium nitrate and chromium acetate. Upon being heated in the activation step, the chromium is probably converted to a different chemical form. The precise chemical form in which the chromium exists after activation is not known with certainty, but it may exist as an oxide or a phosphate or may be incorporated into the structure of the support.
In one embodiment of the invention the catalysts are prepared by depositing chromic anhydride on the carrier. This can be done by simply admixing appropriate quantities of chromic anhydride and the carrier and tumbling the materials together in a suitable vessel at an elevated temperature under reduced pressure. Under these conditions, the chromium deposits itself substantially uniformly over the entire surface of the carrier.
In another embodiment of the invention the chromic anhydride or a water soluble chromium salt in an appropriate quantity may be admixed with the aqueous slurry of the carrier as it is prepared. Thereafter the slurry may be dried in any desired manner. One of the preferred methods for preparing the catalyst is to add the chromium compound to the aqueous slurry of the carrier and to then spray dry the slurry. This spray drying technique has the advantage that the catalyst is recovered with a particle size distribution that is convenient for use in the polymerization of ethylene. Typically, the catalyst prepared by the spray drying technique will have particle sizes in the range of 50--150 microns. Particles outside of this desired range can be removed by screening, but proper spray drying techniques can largely eliminate any need for screening.
The catalysts prepared as described above will be activated by being heated to an elevated temperature in the range of 350--950"C and preferably in the range of 700--925"C. The activation is conveniently carried out by the same techniques employed to activate the prior art catalysts previously described, as by being suspended and fluidized in a stream of heated oxygen containing gas.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a water-soluble chromium compound will be incorporated into the acidic solution employed to prepare the aluminium-phosphorus containing carrier. The precipitation of the aluminium and phosphorus moieties also precipitates the chromium compound which becomes intimately admixed with the aluminium and phosphorus moieties. When this carrier is heated to the activation temperatures previously described, highly active catalysts are obtained.
As earlier noted herein, the preferred catalysts of the invention have a substantial portion of the chromium compound in a valence state of less than 6.
This presents no problems so long as appropriate control of temperature is maintained in activating the catalysts. At temperatures above about 250"C. any hexavalent chromium oxides present decompose with the liberation of oxygen.
When activation temperatures above about 950"C. are employed, however, for reasons which are not fully understood, the polymerization activity of the catalyst declines.
In another embodiment of the invention, organochromium compounds can be deposited upon the supports of the type previously described. Examples of suitable organochromium compounds include dicyclopentadienyl chromium (II) and triphenylsilyl chromate. Other organochromium compounds that can be employed are those disclosed in the following-issued U.S. Patents: 3,157,712, 3,324,095, 3,324,101, 3,687,920, 3,709,853. 3,709,954. 3,756,998, 3,757.002, and 3,806,500. Such chromium compounds are dissolved in an appropriate solvent which then is used to impregnate the support, after which the solvent is removed by evaporation. With catalysts of this type, it is not necessary to heat activate the finished catalyst. The support will be calcined to temperatures within the range previously discussed before the organochromium compound is deposited thereon.
While the polymerization catalysts of this invention are employed in the conventional manner in the polymerization of ethylene, unexpected benefits are obtained by use of the catalysts of the invention. Specifically, when the catalysts of the invention are employed in the polymerization of the ethylene by the Particle Form Process, no observable induction period is encountered. By contrast, the prior art catalysts in which chromic anhydride is deposited on silica have a substantial induction period. Moreover; the ethylene polymers produced by the use of the catalysts of the invention in the Particle Form Process provide ethylene polymers having desirably broad molecular weight distributions and desirably high melt flow shear ratios.
In carrying out the Particle Form Process with the catalysts of the invention, the process can be controlled and/or modified by the techniques similar to those used with other catalysts in the Particle Form Process. By way of example, increasing the temperature of polymerization, other conditions being held constant, lowers the molecular weight of the polymer being produced. Similarly, the inclusion of hydrogen in the reaction zone lowers the molecular weight of the polymer being produced. The inclusion of higher monoalpha-olefins such as propylene and hexane in the reaction zone produces copolymers having lower densities than the ethylene homopolymers otherwise produced under the prevailing polymerization conditions.
The catalysts of the invention also can be employed to polymerize ethylene in a vapor phase, fluidized bed process, The ethylene polymers produced by such processes have desirably broad molecular weight distributions and desirably high melt flow shear ratios similar to those of the ethylene polymers produced by Particle Form Process.
The following examples are set forth to illustrate more clearly the principle and practice of this invention to those skilled in the art. Where references are made to percentages and parts, such percentages and parts are expressed on a weight basis unless otherwise indicated.
Example 1 This example will illustrate the preparation of a calcined amorphous aluminium phosphate precipitate.
A strongly acidic solution containing aluminium cations and ortho-phosphate anions in an equal molar ratio was prepared by dissolving 242 grams (1 mol! of aluminium chloride (AlCI3 . 6H2O) in 1 liter of distilled water and then adding 117 grams (1 mol) of an 85 , solution of orthophosphoric acid. Water was added to bring the volume of this solution up to 3 liters. A second solution was prepared by diluting 300 ml of concentrated 28 /" ammonium hydroxide with 300 ml of distilled water. This solution contained approximately 2.4 mols of ammonium hydroxide.
A stirred reaction vessel was charged with 1000 ml of distilled water. To this distilled water was added the previously described acidic solution at a rate of approximately 100 ml per minute. The ammonium hydroxide solution was added simultaneously at a rate sufficient to maintain the pH of the stirred reaction mixture at a constant value of 8.0. After the addition of the acidic solution was completed, the reaction mixture was stirred for an additional half hour. A total of 580 ml of the ammonium hydroxide solution was used. The precipilated aluminium phosphate then was filtered, washed with 3000 ml of distilled water and dried overnight at 1200C. The oven-dried granular material was calcined in air at 500"C in a muffle furnace.
Example 2 This example will illustrate the preparation of a calcined amorphous aluminium-phosphorus containing precipitate having an aluminiun-phosphorus atomic ratio of 2:1. The precipitate was made in the identical manner set forth in Example 1, except that the acidic solution was prepared by dissolving 750 grams (2 mols) of aluminium nitrate Al(NO3)3 . 9H2O in the 5 liters of distilled water before adding the 117 grams (1 mol) of 85 ,, ortho-phosphoric acid thereto.
Example 3 This example will illustrate the preparation of a calcined precipitate of Awl203.
which precipitate was prepared as a control to illustrate certain differences in the physical properties of calcined aluminium-phosphorus precipitates as compared with calcined Awl203 precipitates. The Al203 precipitate was prepared in exactly the same manner as set forth in Example 1, except that no phosphoric acid was added to the acidic aqueous solution of aluminium chloride.
Examples 4--7 Calcined amorphous precipitates containing the aluminium and phosphorus moieties in varying atomic ratios were prepared in the same manner as described in Example 2 except that the quantities of the aluminium nitrate and the orth- phosphoric acid were varied to give the desired aluminium-phosphorus atomic ratios. The ratios employed are set forth below: Example No. Al-P Atomic Ratio 4 1.5:1 5 3:1 6 4:1 7 9:1 Example 8 An acidic solution was prepared by dissolving 1000 g of Al(NO3)3 . 9H2O (2.67 mols) in 7 liters of distilled water. To this solution was added 153 g of H3PO4 (8501,).
(1.33 mols) with thorough mixing. A stock solution of NH4OH was prepared by mixing 1 liter of NH4OH (28%) with 2 liters of distilled water. This NH4OH solution was added slowly, with vigorous stirring, to the acidic solution until the pH of the acidic solution reached 8.0. A precipitate was formed during the addition of the NH4OH solution. After the pH of 8.0 was reached, stirring was continued for 10 minutes and the slurry was then allowed to stand for 2 hours. The precipitate was separated from the liquid by filtration and was washed on the filter with 10 liters of distilled water. The moist filter cake was stored in a sealed plastic container until ready for the addition of chromium.
Example 9 An acidic solution was prepared by dissolving 100 g of Al(NO3)3 . 9H2O (0.27 mol) in 2 liters of distilled water. To this solution was added 31 g of H3PO4 (85?,:) (0.27 mol) with stirring. A stock solution of ammonium carbonate was prepared by dissolving 119 g of NH4HCO3 in 1000 ml of distilled water and NH4OH was added to adjust the pH of this solution to 10.7. A reaction vessel was charged with 1000 ml of distilled water to provide a stirring medium. The acidic solution was added to this reaction vessel at a rate of approximately 15 cc per minute with vigorous stirring, and the ammonium carbonate solution was added simultaneously at a rate to maintain a pH of 10 in the reaction vessel. After all of the acidic solution was added. stirring was continued for 10 minutes followed by filtration. The filter cake was washed on the filter with 3000 ml of distilled water and the moist filter cake was stored in a sealed container until ready for the addition of chromium.
Example 10 Example 9 was duplicated except for two modifications. First, aluminium chloride was employed in lieu of aluminium nitrate. Second, the aluminium chloride and phosphoric acid were employed in a ratio to provide an Al:P atomic ratio of 1.2:1.
Example 11 An acidic solution was prepared by dissolving 10,000 g Al(NO3)3 .91120 (26.7 mols) in 50 liters of distilled water. To this was added 1555 g H3PO4 (13.3 mols) with stirring. A stock solution of NH4OH was prepared by diluting ammonium hydroxide (280) with an equal volume of water and mixing. A reaction vessel was charged with 10 liters of distilled water to provide a stirring medium, and the acidic solution was added to this at a rate of approximately 500 ml per minute, with vigorous stirring. The ammonium hydroxide solution was added simultaneously at a rate sufficient to maintain a pH of 8.0. After all of the acidic solution was added, stirring was continued for 10 minutes, after which the slurry was filtered. The filter cake was washed on the filter with 120 liters of distilled water. The moist filter cake, when removed from the filter, had a solids content of 19 n by weight.
The above procedure was repeated, and the two moist filter cakes were combined in a mixing vessel and reslurried with a quantity of distilled water sufficient to reduce the solids content to 9 wt Z. This slurry was spray dried and the product was collected in two fractions, a coarse fraction which remained in the collector at the bottom of the spray dryer and the fines which were carried overhead to a second collector. The total yield of product was 5117 g.
Example 12 7500 g (20 mols) of Al(N03)3 .91120 was dissolved 120"C. At the end of the second hour, the pressure was lowered to 8 kilopascals (approximately 0.08 atmosphere) and the temperature was increased to 170"C. At the end of the third hour, the temperature was increased to 180"C. At the end of the fourth hour, the pressure was lowered to 0.4 kilopascal (approximately 0.004 atmosphere) and the temperature was raised to 205"C. Heating was continued for an additional three hours under these conditions. The catalyst then was cooled to ambient temperature and air was bled into the Rotorvapor apparatus to bring the pressure back to atmospheric pressure. The orange-brown product then was transferred to a fluidized bed apparatus for activation.
The catalyst was activated by being heated to 7600C for a period of 5 hours while maintaining the catalyst in a fluidized condition by the passage of air through the fluidized bed. The air used for this purpose had been treated so that it had a dew point of less than -50"C. The finished catalyst was green in color. The color indicated that the valence state of the chromium has been reduced to less than 6.
Another method of preparing the catalysts of the invention is to impregnate the carrier with the chromium compound before the carrier is dried. This procedure is illustrated in Example 12 above. The chromium impregnated carrier must be dried before being activated. The drying may be carried out in any manner as by simply heating in an oven, removing the residual water by mixing with an azeotroping solvent such as ethanol and distilling off the water as an azetrope, or, preferably, by spray drying. The catalyst is activated as previously described.
The catalysts of the invention were evaluated in a standardized Particle Form Process that was run on a batch basis. In this standardized method a stirred polymerization reaction vessel was maintained in a heated jacket maintained at a temperature of about 110 C. The polymerization vessel was charged with the catalyst to be evaluated. A small quantity of dry, oxygen-free isobutane then was charged to the reactor, allowed to vaporize, and vented from the reactor to remove all traces of oxygen from the reactor. The reactor then was charged with 500 parts of isobutane and attached to a reservoir of polymerization grade ethylene gas maintained at a pressure of.3.5 megapascals (approximately 35 atmospheres). The reactor was in continuous open communication with the reservoir of ethylene gas with a flow meter being maintained in the ethylene line to measure the flow of gas to the reactor. During the charging period, the temperature of the vessel fell below 110 C, but normally the temperature was reestablished at about 110"C within a few minutes after the isobutane was charged to the reactor.
With the catalysts of the invention; polymerization started almost immediately with no observable induction period.* Each polymerization was run for 90 minutes and the flow meter was read at 10 minute intervals to determine if there was any change in the rate of polymerization with time over the 90 minute period of the polymerization. At the end of the 90 minute period, the flow of the ethylene gas was discontinued, -the reactor was vented, and the polyethylene was recovered and weighed.
Example 14 A series of four catalysts were prepared from the aluminium-phosphorus carrier described in Example 11. The carrier was calcined for 5 hours at 450"C in a muffle furnace with a slow stream of dry air (dew point less than -500C.) being passed through the furnace. Chromic anhydride in an amount equivalent to 1% or 2 ,} elemental chromium was deposited on the carrier by the technique described in Example 13. The catalysts were activated in a fluidized bed at a temperature of 5400C or 760"C for a period of 5 or 14 hours. Details of the catalyst preparations and the polymerization results are set forth in Table I.
Table I Polymerization Polymerization Catalyst Preparation Results Run Activation Activation Grams of Polymerisation Identification % Chromium Temp 0C Time, hours Polymer Rate (1) A 1 540 5 468 312 B 1 760 5 492 328 C 1 760 14 688 459 D 2 760 14 518 345 (1) Grams of polymer/gram of catalyst/hour.
with a commercial grade chromia catalyst supported on silica, induction periods of up to 50 minutes are frequently observed.
Each of the catalysts gave good rates of polymerization and there was no induction period. The rate of polymerization "as constant throughout each of the runs.
Example 15 Example 14 was repeated employing two levels of chromium with the aluminium-phosphorus carrier being calcined at 7500C. Details of the catalyst preparations and the polymerization data are set forth in Table II.
Table II Polymerization Catalyst Preparation Results Run Activation Activation Grams of Polymerisation Identification 0/ Chromium Temp "C Time, hours Polymer Rate (1) A 0.2 760 14 520 347 B 1.0 760 5 681 454 (I) Grams of polymerígram of catalyst/hour.
Again it will be noted that good rates of polymerization were obtained.
Example 16 The chromium containing spray dried catalyst of Example 12 was calcined for 5 hours at 500"C. in a muffle furnace in the presence of dry air having a dew point of less than -50"C. The calcined product was divided into several aliquots which were activated in a fluidized bed with dry air for varying time periods at varying activation temperatures.
The details of the catalyst preparations and the polymerization data are shown in Table III.
Table III Catalyst Preparation Polymerization Results Run Activation Activation Grams of Polymerization Identification Temp. "C Time, hours Polymer Rate (1) A 375 5 410 273 B 540 5 602 401 C 760 5 752 501 D 825 5 682 454 E 875 5 602 401 F 760 14 1014 767 (1) Grams of polymer/gram of catalyst/hour.
Example 17 Several carriers having varying Al:P atomic ratios were prepared as described in Example 11. Chromic anhydride was added to the slurries to provide 2 wt ' chromium in the finished catalyst. The catalysts were dried and calcined for 5 hours at 500"C. The dried catalysts were ground and the fractions having a particle size range of 43 to 149 microns were activated for 5 hours at 500"C. in a fluidized bed.
Ethylene polymers were prepared with each of the catalysts. The polymers' melt viscosities at 1900C., certain calculated HLMI/MI ratios, and rates of polymerization are shown in Table IV. The melt viscosities were determined as described in Example 19.
Table IV Al/P Ratio Polymerization Melt Viscosity HLMI/MI In Carrier Rate (1) @ 190"C. (2) Ratio 1.2 300 86 900 1.5 360 84 730 2.0 390 129 2500 3.0 350 172 480 4.0 228 204 821 9.0 10 (3) (3) (1) Grams of polymer/gram of catalyst/hour (2) Poisesxl0@l0 sex.~1 shear rate (3) Too little polymer was recovered to obtain rheological data.
From the above data and additional data not included in Table IV, it has been noted that the Al/P ratio of the supports has several effects on the catalysts of the invention and ethylene polymers prepared therefrom by the Particle Form Process.
First, the melt viscosity of the polymer at 1900C. increases with Al/P ratio. Second, the rate of polymerization decreases as the Al/P ratio is increased to above a ratio of about 4:1.
Although the anhydrous aluminium phosphate carriers having precisely a 1:1 atomic ratio can be employed in the practice of the invention, it has been observed that more consistent and reproducible results are obtained when the carriers of the invention have an Al/P ratio of at least about 1.1:1.0. In particular, the finished catalysts prepared from such carriers have a bright green color and give high rates of polymerization.
Example 18 Ethylene polymer was produced by a Particle Form Process by a continuous process employing a catalyst of the invention. The catalyst was prepared by depositing 2.2 weight % chromium on an aluminium-phosphorus precipitate prepared by a process as illustrated in Example 2. The chromium was deposited upon the support as chromium oxide by a process as illustrated in Example 12. The catalyst was activated by being heated for 15 hours at about 890"C. in a fluidized bed of dry air.
A continuous polymerization was carried out in a pressurized, circulating loop reactor having a volume of 55 gallons. The reactor was fitted with inlets for isobutane, ethylene, and catalyst slurry. The reactor also was fitted with a discharge outlet. The reactor was initially charged with isobutane containing a small percentage of ethylene. A catalyst charge of about 0.3 gram was added to the reactor to initiate polymerization. The reactor was heated to a temperature of 105"C. and, under these conditions, the reactor pressure was about 540--550 psig.
The polymerization began without an induction period. Throughout the duration of the run, isobutane was continuously charged to the reactor at a rate of 53 pounds per hour and ethylene was charged to the reactor at a rate of 20 pounds per hour. Fresh catalyst slurry was charged to the reactor at a rate sufficient to maintain the temperature constant. This required an average of 32 injections of 0.3 gram of catalyst per hour. Product slurry consisting of ethylene polymer, isobutane, unpolymerized ethylene and catalyst was continuously discharged from the reactor at a rate of about 75 pounds per hour.
Under the above-described operating conditions, the average residence time of ethylene in the reactor was about 3.5 hours. The product slurry recovered from the reactor had a bulk density of about 32 pounds per cubic foot. The reaction was carried out over a period of 24 hours and ethylene polymer was produced at a rate of just over 20 pounds per hour. The polymer had a melt index (ASTM 1238-70 Condition E) of 0.03.
Ethylene polymers produced employing the catalysts of the present invention differ in important respects from ethylene polymers of identical melt index (or identical molecular weight) produced by alternate prior art polymerization processes, e.g., ethylene polymers prepared by a Particle Form Process with a commercial chromia catalyst supported on silica. While such ethylene polymers may have identical melt indexes, the ethylene polymers have substantially different processing characteristics. Specifically, with the ethylene polymers made with the catalysts of the invention, the change of melt viscosity with applied shear is much greater than is the case with the prior art ethylene polymers. One significance of this fact is that ethylene polymers of very low melt index made with the catalysts of the invention can be extruded in conventional extruders by carrying out the extrusion at high applied shear rates. By contrast, prior art ethylene polymers of comparable low melt indexes simply cannot be extruded in conventional extruders.
The difficulties in extruding the prior art very high molecular weight ethylene polymers are discussed by L. V. Cancio and R. S. Joyner in their paper Gains are Made in Extruding HMW PE Powders, Plastics Technology, February 1975, pp.
4044.
Example 19 The melt flow characteristics of two resins were determined at 1900C. in a rheometer. The apparent melt viscosities of the resins at varying apparent shear rates were determined and are shown in Table V.
Table V Apparent Apparent Polymer Melt Viscosity (1) Shear Rate (2) Prior Art Resin 164 1.5 112 3.0 70 7.4 48 14.8 33 29.6 20 74.1 13 148 Resin of Invention 181 3.0 98 7.4 63 14.8 38 29.6 22 74.1 14 148 (1) PoisexlO3 @ 1900C.
(2) Sec. -' The ethylene polymer of the invention was prepared by the standard procedure previously described. The support for the catalyst was prepared as described in Example 12 and had an Al:P atomic ratio of 2:1. One percent chromium was deposited on the carrier which then was calcined at 500"C. The catalyst was activated with dry air in a fluidized bed for 14 hours at 760"C. A commercially available prior art linear ethylene polymer was employed for comparison purposes.
The approximate normal load melt index (MI) (ASTM 1238-70 Condition E) and the approximate high load melt index (HLMI) (ASTM 1238-70 Condition F) of the two polymers can be calculated from the data of Table V. The HLMI/MI ratio for the prior art polymer is approximately 130. The corresponding ratio for the polymer made with the catalyst of the present invention was approximately 760.
The higher HLMVMI ratio of the ethylene polymer of the invention indicates that the catalysts of the invention provide ethylene polymers which have an unusually broad molecular weight distribution. Such polymers inherently have better processing characteristics.
The data of Table V are plotted in Figure 4 on log-log paper to show the change in apparent viscosity (in poises) with apparent shear rate (in reciprocal seconds). The curves for both resins are approximately straight lines, but it will be noted that the curve for the ethylene polymer of the invention has a much steeper slope. The curve for the ethylene polymer of the invention has a slope of -0.65 (measured at 10 sec.-'), whereas the curve for the prior art ethylene polymer has a slope of -0.54. These negative slopes will be characterized as S values in the subsequent discussion.
Curves of the type shown in Figure 4 graphically illustrate the shearWthinning or pseudoplastic flow of ethylene polymers. When curves of this type are prepared for two ethylene polymers having identical or similar melt indexes, the polymer having the curve with the greater slope will exhibit greater shear thinning, or pseudo-plastic flow, and will flow more readily at high applied shear rates.
For purposes of the present specification, we will designate the slope of such curves as a slope parameter,"which we will represent by S, and which is the value of the negative slope of a plot of the natural logarithm of the polymer's apparent melt viscosity versus the natural logarithm of the apparent shear rate; such slope being measured at 10 sec.-t at 1900C. A comparison of such S values for the ethylene polymers of the present invention with the S values of prior art linear ethylene polymers, both values being determined on polymers of similar melt index, always demonstrates that the ethylene polymers of the present invention have larger S values.
For any family of ethylene polymers, the absolute value of S is a function of the polymer's melt viscosity level. The change of S with melt viscosity level can be characterized by use of a "viscosity reference parameter" which will be represented by AO and which is the natural logarithm of the polymer's apparent melt viscosity at I sec.-1.
Linear ethylene polymers heretofore available to the art and prepared with chromia catalysts supported on silica have a relationship between their weight average molecular weight and their number average molecular weight such that the ratio .NI iMn is approximately 10. For such prior art ethylene polymers, the approximate relationship between S and Ao is defined by Formula 1: 5=0.0813 A0-0.47 (1) The best curve for the relationship between S and Ao for the ethylene polymers of the present invention for S values within a range of about 0.61 to about 0.90 and Ao values within a range of about 12.3 to about 14.25, is defined by Formula 2: S=0.l06A0-0.71+0.2 (2) Typical experimental S and AO values for several ethylene polymers of the invention having Ao values from about 12.5 to 14.2 are set forth in Table VI.
Table VI Polymer Identification Ao S A 12.53 0.68 B 12.65 0.65 C 12.80 0.66 D 13.07 0.67 E 13.33 0.71 F 13.52 0.73 G 13.78 0.75 H 14.20 0.79 Where experimentally determined S values depart from Formula 2, the experimentally determined values are nearly always larger than the predicted values. Such departures from Formula 2 occur most frequently when the Ao values are below about 13.5.
A formula for the relationship between S and Ao for the ethylene polymers of the invention; valid for S values within a range of 0.61 to 0.90 and AQ values within a range of 12.0 to 14.5, which includes all presently determined experimental values is defined by Formula 3: S~0.0830Ao0.442 (3) Figure 5 sets forth a graphic representation of Formula 1 and Formula 2. It will be observed that the two curves are substantially parallel to each other, with the curve for Formula 2 lying to the right of the curve for Formula 1. The relationship between the two curves indicates that, when an ethylene polymer of the invention and a prior art ethylene have identical Ao values, the ethylene polymer of the invention always will have a significantly higher S value. Figure 5 also sets forth the limiting value of Formula 3 when S is defined by the formula: S=0.0830A0-0.442 The area defined by the lines joining A, B, C, D, and E includes the S and Ao values for the preferred ethylene polymers of the invention. To the best of the applicants' knowledge, no ethylene polymer reported in the prior art, or tested by them, has S and Ao values lying within this area of Figure 5.
The importance of the S values of ethylene polymers results from the fact that the physical properties of most articles fabricated from ethylene polymers are improved as the molecular weight of the polymer is increased. However, the melt viscosity of ethylene polymers also increases with molecular weight. The melt fabrication of ethylene polymers becomes increasingly more difficult as the polymer's melt viscosity increases. Polymer fabrication apparatus presently available cannot process prior art ethylene polymers of very high molecular weight for reasons discussed below.
When an attempt is made to extrude a prior art linear ethylene polymer having an Ao value of the order of 12.0 or higher, it is necessary to extrude the polymer at a minimum shear rate of about 300 sex.~' to obtain extrusion rates approaching the design output rate of the extruder. At these shear rates, the shear stress on the polymer at the die orifice exceeds about 3x 106 dynes/cm2. At these levels of shear stress, the quality of the extruded article is quite poor and its physical properties are poor. This results from a phenomenon known in the art as melt fracture, or melt instability.
By reason of the relationship existing between their S values and Ao values, high molecular weight ethylene polymers of this invention can be more readily fabricated with conventional fabricating apparatus to provide polymer articles of excellent quality and physical properties. The ethylene polymers of the invention having the optimum properties desired by the art have the following characteristics: (1) Melt flow properties conforming to the S--A, relationship of formula 3 previously set forth, (2) An Ao value in the range of 12.0 to 14.5, (3) An S value in the range of 0.61 to 0.90.
Especially preferred ethylene polymers of the invention are those having an Ao value in the range of 12.25 to 14.0.
By reason of their high melt flow shear ratios and the considerations discussed above, the ethylene polymers of the invention can be fabricated into articles of manufacture having significantly superior physical properties as compared to corresponding articles fabricated from linear ethylene polymers heretofore available to the art. These differences are particularly noticeable in the manufacture of film from ethylene polymers having very low melt indexes.
Example 20 Blown film of 2.5 mil gauge was prepared from the ethylene polymer of Example 18. The film was extruded through a 1-3/4 inch extruder employing a melt temperature of about 295"C., a pressure of about 5,600 psi, and a screw speed of 60 rpm. A blowup ratio of 3.8:1.0 was employed.
As a control, 2.5 mil gauge film was prepared from a prior art ethylene polymer prepared by a Particle Form Process employing a chromia on silica catalyst. This polymer had a melt index (ASTM 1238-70, Condition E), of 0.6. The extrusion conditions employed were those previously established as being optimum for this polymer.
Several physical properties of the two films were measured and are set forth in Table VII. In the table MD signifies a measurement in the machine direction, while TD signifies a measurement in the transverse direction.
Table VII Ethylene Polymer Property Present Invention Prior Art Film Density, g/cm3 (1) 0.954 0.959 Crystallinity, 4 (2) 78.6 70 Tensile at yield, psi, MD (3) 3870 4400 Tensile at yield, psi, TD (3) 4125 3600 Elongation at break, "/, MD (4) 475 200 Elongation at break, , TD (4) 500 2 Elmendorf Tear, g/mil, MD (5) 54 18 Elmendorf Tear, g/mil, TD (5) 49 39 Dart Impact at 26", g/mil (6) 38 25 (I)ASTM D 1509 {2) Determined by Differential Thermal Analysis (3) ASTM D882 (4) ASTM D882 (5) ASTM D1922 (6) ASTM D1709 The above data demonstrate that the film prepared from the ethylene polymer of the invention is remarkably superior to its prior art counterpart. It will be specificatlly noted that its measured properties in the machine and transverse directions are quite close to each other. This is a highly desirable feature in a film.
The film of the invention is much superior to its prior art counterpart with respect to elongation at break, Elmendorf tear, and dart impact, all of which are important film properties.
Blown film prepared from ethylene polymers of the invention has a significantly lower gel content than blown film prepared from linear ethylene polymers of the prior art. Moreover, what few gels are occasionally observed are smaller in size than the gels present in the prior art film.
The gel content of blown film is determined by counting the gels in 240 in.2 of the film and measuring the diameter of the gels observed. The film of the invention prepared in Example 20 contained fewer than 10 gels. Only one of these gels had a diameter between 1/64" and 1/32", with the remaining gels having diameters smaller than 1/64". The gel content of this film was actually lower than that observed with film prepared from good quality low density polyethylene resins. This observation is quite significant as it is recognized in the art that film prepared from low density polyethylene resins usually is substantially freer of gels than film prepared from linear ethylene polymers.
For comparison purposes, film prepared from linear ethylene polymer prepared by a Particle Form Process employing a chromia catalyst supported on silica typically will have well in excess of 40 gels per 240 in2. Typically five of these gels will have diameters of 1/32" or more, 15 of these gels will have diameters between 1/64" and 1/32", with the balance having diameters smaller than 1/64".
Ethylene polymers of the invention having relatively low molecular weights and relatively high melt indexes of the order of 0.5 or more (ASTM 1238-70, Condition E), by reason of their high S values, have extremely low apparent melt viscosities under the apparent shear rates employed in commercial extruders. As compared with prior art linear ethylene polymers of these melt indexes, the ethylene polymers of the invention can be extruded at significantly higher rates and with lower extruder power consumption. These factors significantly reduce the cost of preparing such extruded products.
WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. A process for preparing an olefin polymerization catalyst comprising depositing a chromium compound upon an inorganic carrier containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties, the inorganic carrier being selected from (a) an amorphous precipitate of aluminium phosphate, (b) an amorphous precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in an atomic ratio of from 5:1 to 1:1, and (c) mixtures of (a) and (b); and said carrier having been prepared by neutralising an acidic solution containing
**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.

Claims (17)

**WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **. Table VII Ethylene Polymer Property Present Invention Prior Art Film Density, g/cm3 (1) 0.954 0.959 Crystallinity, 4 (2) 78.6 70 Tensile at yield, psi, MD (3) 3870 4400 Tensile at yield, psi, TD (3) 4125 3600 Elongation at break, "/, MD (4) 475 200 Elongation at break, , TD (4) 500 2 Elmendorf Tear, g/mil, MD (5) 54 18 Elmendorf Tear, g/mil, TD (5) 49 39 Dart Impact at 26", g/mil (6) 38 25 (I)ASTM D 1509 {2) Determined by Differential Thermal Analysis (3) ASTM D882 (4) ASTM D882 (5) ASTM D1922 (6) ASTM D1709 The above data demonstrate that the film prepared from the ethylene polymer of the invention is remarkably superior to its prior art counterpart. It will be specificatlly noted that its measured properties in the machine and transverse directions are quite close to each other. This is a highly desirable feature in a film. The film of the invention is much superior to its prior art counterpart with respect to elongation at break, Elmendorf tear, and dart impact, all of which are important film properties. Blown film prepared from ethylene polymers of the invention has a significantly lower gel content than blown film prepared from linear ethylene polymers of the prior art. Moreover, what few gels are occasionally observed are smaller in size than the gels present in the prior art film. The gel content of blown film is determined by counting the gels in 240 in.2 of the film and measuring the diameter of the gels observed. The film of the invention prepared in Example 20 contained fewer than 10 gels. Only one of these gels had a diameter between 1/64" and 1/32", with the remaining gels having diameters smaller than 1/64". The gel content of this film was actually lower than that observed with film prepared from good quality low density polyethylene resins. This observation is quite significant as it is recognized in the art that film prepared from low density polyethylene resins usually is substantially freer of gels than film prepared from linear ethylene polymers. For comparison purposes, film prepared from linear ethylene polymer prepared by a Particle Form Process employing a chromia catalyst supported on silica typically will have well in excess of 40 gels per 240 in2. Typically five of these gels will have diameters of 1/32" or more, 15 of these gels will have diameters between 1/64" and 1/32", with the balance having diameters smaller than 1/64". Ethylene polymers of the invention having relatively low molecular weights and relatively high melt indexes of the order of 0.5 or more (ASTM 1238-70, Condition E), by reason of their high S values, have extremely low apparent melt viscosities under the apparent shear rates employed in commercial extruders. As compared with prior art linear ethylene polymers of these melt indexes, the ethylene polymers of the invention can be extruded at significantly higher rates and with lower extruder power consumption. These factors significantly reduce the cost of preparing such extruded products. WHAT WE CLAIM IS:
1. A process for preparing an olefin polymerization catalyst comprising depositing a chromium compound upon an inorganic carrier containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties, the inorganic carrier being selected from (a) an amorphous precipitate of aluminium phosphate, (b) an amorphous precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in an atomic ratio of from 5:1 to 1:1, and (c) mixtures of (a) and (b); and said carrier having been prepared by neutralising an acidic solution containing
Al+'+ cations and PO4-- anions in a molar ratio in the range of from 5:1 to 1:1 to form a solid precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties, and recovering the precipitate.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, in which th catalyst is activated by being heated to a temperature in the range of 350"C to 9500 C.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2 which includes the steps of (a) preparing an aqueous slurry of the inorganic carrier by neutralising an acidic aqueous solution containing Al+++ and PO4--- ions, (b) admixing- an inorganic chromium compound with the slurry of (a) to provide 0.14.0 /^ by weight of chromium based on the total solids, (c) spray drying the slurry of (b), and (d) activating the dry catalyst of (c) by heating to a temperature of 350- 950"C.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, which includes the steps of (a) preparing an aqueous slurry containing chromium ions in addition to Awl+++ and PO4-- ions, (b) precipitating an inorganic material containing aluminium, phosphorus and chromium moieties by neutralising the acidic solution of (a), (c) drying the precipitate of (b), and (d) activating the dry catalyst of (c) by heating to a temperature of 350" to 9500C, the chromium added in step (a) being sufficient to constitute from 0.l.0% by weight of the preceipitate of step (b).
5. A process as claimed in claim 1, comprising the steps of (a) preparing a strongly acidic solution containing Al+++ cations and PO4--- anions in a molar ratio in the range of from 5:1 to 1:1; (b) neutralizing the solution of (a) to form a precipitate; (c) calcining the precipitate of (c); and (d) impregnating the calcined precipitate of (c) with an organochromium compound.
6. A process as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the support is an amorphous precipitate containing aluminium and phosphorus moieties in an atomic ratio of 3.5:1 to 1.1:1.
7. A process for preparing an olefin polymerization catalyst according to any one of Examples 12 to 17 hereinbefore.
8. An olefin polymerization catalyst whenever prepared by the process claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7.
9. A particle form process for the polymerization of an olefin in which the polymerization is initiated by an olefin polymerization catalyst as claimed in claim 8.
10. A particle form process according to claim 9, in which the olefin is ethylene.
11. An ethylene polymer prepared by the process claimed in claim 10 having the following characteristics (a) having melt flow properties such that the relationship between its slope parameters and its apparent melt viscosity in poises at 1 sec.-'AD is defined by the formula: S > 0.0830A0-0.442 where S is the negative slope of the curve obtained from a plot of the logarithm of the polymer's apparent melt viscosity in poises versus the logarithm of the apparent shear rate in sec.-l, said slope measured at 10 sex.~1; and where Ao is the natural logarithm of the polymer's apparent viscosity in poises measured at 1 sec.-' at 190"C; (b) having an Ao value in the range of from 12.0 to 14.5; and (c) having an S value in the range of from 0.61 to 0.90.
12. An ethylene polymer as claimed in claim 11 where the Ao value of the polymer is in the range of from 12.25 to 14.0.
13. Film prepared from the ethylene polymer claimed in claim 11 or 12, said film being characterised by: (a) having values for elongation at break measured in the machine direction and in the transverse direction that are similar, and (b) having a low gel count, nearly all of such gels having diameters of less than 1/32 inch.
14. Film of polyethylene according to Example 20 hereinbefore.
15. A process for preparing an olefin polymerization catalyst according to claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described.
16. Polyethylene according to claim 11, substantially as hereinbefore described.
17. Polyethylene film according to claim 13, substantially as hereinbefore described.
GB3528576A 1975-09-10 1976-08-25 Ethylene polymerization catalysts Expired GB1561756A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61225275A 1975-09-10 1975-09-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB1561756A true GB1561756A (en) 1980-02-27

Family

ID=24452382

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB3528576A Expired GB1561756A (en) 1975-09-10 1976-08-25 Ethylene polymerization catalysts

Country Status (8)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5248583A (en)
BE (1) BE845754A (en)
CA (1) CA1068048A (en)
DE (1) DE2640100A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2323702A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1561756A (en)
IT (1) IT1069569B (en)
NL (1) NL7610099A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4364841A (en) 1980-12-31 1982-12-21 Phillips Petroleum Company Phosphate containing support with zerovalent chromium
US4364839A (en) 1980-12-31 1982-12-21 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalyst comprising chromium on silica/phosphate support
US4397765A (en) 1980-12-31 1983-08-09 Phillips Petroleum Company Phosphated alumina or aluminum phosphate chromium catalyst
US4444968A (en) * 1980-12-31 1984-04-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Olefin polymerization with phosphate supported zerovalent chromium
US4444966A (en) * 1982-05-05 1984-04-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Polymerization using phosphated alumina or aluminum phosphate chromium catalyst

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4444964A (en) * 1980-12-31 1984-04-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Polymerization process using phosphate supported chromium catalyst
US4364855A (en) 1980-12-31 1982-12-21 Phillips Petroleum Company Production of aluminum phosphate from concentrated mass
US4444965A (en) * 1980-12-31 1984-04-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Olefin polymerization using chromium on an aluminum phosphate produced from a concentrated mass
CA1168833A (en) * 1980-12-31 1984-06-12 Max P. Mcdaniel Production of aluminum phosphate from concentrated mass
DE3683816D1 (en) * 1985-08-29 1992-03-19 Grace W R & Co ALUMINUM PHOSPHATE WITH A HIGH PORE VOLUME.
US6461415B1 (en) * 2000-08-23 2002-10-08 Applied Thin Films, Inc. High temperature amorphous composition based on aluminum phosphate

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4364841A (en) 1980-12-31 1982-12-21 Phillips Petroleum Company Phosphate containing support with zerovalent chromium
US4364839A (en) 1980-12-31 1982-12-21 Phillips Petroleum Company Catalyst comprising chromium on silica/phosphate support
US4397765A (en) 1980-12-31 1983-08-09 Phillips Petroleum Company Phosphated alumina or aluminum phosphate chromium catalyst
US4444968A (en) * 1980-12-31 1984-04-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Olefin polymerization with phosphate supported zerovalent chromium
US4444966A (en) * 1982-05-05 1984-04-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Polymerization using phosphated alumina or aluminum phosphate chromium catalyst

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1068048A (en) 1979-12-11
FR2323702A1 (en) 1977-04-08
JPS5248583A (en) 1977-04-18
IT1069569B (en) 1985-03-25
FR2323702B1 (en) 1980-07-18
NL7610099A (en) 1977-03-14
BE845754A (en) 1977-03-01
DE2640100A1 (en) 1977-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4219444A (en) Ethylene polymerization catalysts
US4289863A (en) Ethylene polymerization process
CA1077463A (en) Catalysts for polymerizing olefins to spheroidal-form polymers
US3900457A (en) Olefin polymerization catalyst
EP0012147B1 (en) Process for the preparation of high density ethylene polymers in fluid bed reactor
KR100430198B1 (en) Ethylene polymers and methods for obtaining them
CA1286837C (en) Polymerisation of olefins using a modified ziegler-natta catalyst
JPH09503234A (en) Method for preparing catalyst support, catalyst for olefin polymerization, and method for olefin polymerization by the catalyst
GB1561756A (en) Ethylene polymerization catalysts
EP0584626A2 (en) Process for producing ethylene polymers having reduced hexane extractable content
DE19615953A1 (en) Process for the preparation of polymers of alk-1-enes in the presence of a supported metallocene catalyst system and an antistatic
CA1254717A (en) Magnesium hydroxide and process for its production
US4228260A (en) Supported chromium-oxide polymerization catalyst having a porous silica support used in the polymerization of olefins
CA1107270A (en) CATALYST FOR POLYMERIZING .alpha.-OLEFINS
CA1257863A (en) SOLUTION PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF POLYMERS OF .alpha.-OLEFINS
US4258159A (en) Process for the polymerization of olefins
US3959178A (en) Mixed hydrocarbyloxide treated catalyst activated at different temperatures
US4025707A (en) Mixed hydrocarbyloxide treated catalyst activated at different temperatures
US3121063A (en) Polymerization catalyst
US4093692A (en) Melt extrusion process
US4154915A (en) Process for producing polyolefins
US4192775A (en) Olefin polymerization catalyst
EP0661301A1 (en) Process for producing ethylene polymers having reduced hexane extractable content
US4304685A (en) Large pore alumina-supported transition metal alkyl
US4052544A (en) Ethylene polymerization catalysts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PS Patent sealed
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee