FI20216353A1

FI20216353A1 - Renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, thermal cracking method and products thereof

Info

Publication number: FI20216353A1
Application number: FI20216353A
Authority: FI
Inventors: John Jamieson; Gandarillas Andres Munoz; Antti Ojala
Original assignee: Neste Oyj
Priority date: 2021-12-27
Filing date: 2021-12-27
Publication date: 2023-06-28
Also published as: WO2023126567A1; TW202330885A

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method comprising thermal cracking, a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed usable in such a method and a cracking effluent obtainable by use of such a method. The method of the present invention comprises a step (a) of providing a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, a step (b) of thermally cracking the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in a thermal cracking furnace, optionally together with co-feed(s) and/or additive(s), and a step (c) of subjecting the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) to a separation treatment to provide at least a light olefin(s) fraction.

Description

RENEWABLE STABILIZED NAPHTHA-RANGE HYDROCARBON FEED,

THERMAL CRACKING METHOD AND PRODUCTS THEREOF

Technical Field

The present invention relates to a method comprising thermal cracking, a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed usable in such a method and products obtainable by use of such a method.

Background of the Invention

Thermal cracking, such as steam cracking, is a well-known and established route for upgrading conventional (mineral oil based) material. In recent times, thermal cracking of biogenic material has been investigated, while it was usually tried to achieve direct cracking of a biogenic feed (usually having high oxygen content) or to mimic conventional (fossil) feeds.

High value chemicals produced in the thermal cracking process (such as steam cracking) are ethylene, propylene, butadiene, olefinic C4, benzene, xylene and toluene. Of these high value chemicals light olefins, specifically ethylene and propylene are the most sought after in industry.

C4 olefins are also valuable products but may require additional refining steps to extract chemical and polymer grades of each individual component.

Aromatics are of less importance as there are other routes to their

N manufacture such as reforming of fossil naphtha. In addition, in steam

N cracking operations benzene may enrich in a pyrolysis gasoline fraction of the = cracking effluent which is typically valorised in fuels. Since there are stringent

N limitations in the amount of benzene allowable in such fuel products (due to

E 30 its carcinogenic effects) it may even become an unwanted by-product which © requires removal.

O

N In order to introduce bio molecules to the petrochemical value chain, and in - view of the above considerations, it is useful to employ a process that maximises the yields to light olefins while suppressing formation of aromatics, in particular benzene.

Brief description of the invention

The present invention was made in view of the above-mentioned problems and it is an object of the present invention to provide a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, a thermal cracking method employing the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed and products emerging from the method as well as their use and further processing.

The problem underlying the invention is solved by the subject-matters set forth in the independent claims. Further beneficial developments are set forth in dependent claims.

In brief, the present invention relates to one or more of the following items: 1. A method comprising (a) a step of providing a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, (b) a step of thermally cracking the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in a thermal cracking furnace, optionally together with co-feed(s) and/or additive(s), and (c) a step of subjecting the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) to a separation treatment to provide at least a light olefin(s) — 25 fraction.

N

O

N

N 2. The method according to item 1, wherein the thermal cracking step (b)

N is conducted at a coil outlet temperature (COT) selected from the range from

I 780°C to 880°C, preferably from 800°C to 860°C, more preferably from a e 30 820°C to 850°C.

LO

0

O

N

O

N

3. The method according to item 1 or 2, wherein the thermal cracking step (b) is conducted at a coil outlet pressure (COP) selected from the range from 1.3 bar to 6.0 bar, preferably from 1.3 bar to 3.0 bar. 4. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the thermal cracking step (b) is a steam cracking step. 5. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the thermal cracking step (b) is conducted in the presence of a thermal cracking diluent at a dilution within a range from 0.10 to 0.85, preferably from 0.25 to 0.60, such as 0.35 to 0.55. 6. The method according to any one of the preceding items, comprising a purification treatment to remove at least one of methyl acetylene, propadiene, CO, CO? and CzH2, preferably at least one of CO, CO2 and C2H>, as a purification stage (c') in the step (c) of separating at least the light olefin(s) fraction from the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b). 7. The method according to any one of the preceding items, comprising performing one or more further cracking operation(s) to provide further cracking effluent(s), wherein step (c) further comprises adding the further effluent(s) and/or fraction(s) thereof to the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) before and/or during the separation treatment.

S 8. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the

A thermal cracking in step (b) is carried out in the presence of co-feed(s).

N r 9. The method according to the preceding item, wherein the content of a 30 the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in the total cracker 3 feed is in the range of from 10 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably 20 wt.-% to = 100 wt.-%, 30 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 40 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to

N 100 wt.-%, 60 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 70 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 80 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, or 90 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, wherein the total cracker feed refers to the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed plus optional co- feed(s) and optional additive(s). 10. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the co-feed(s) comprise a fossil hydrocarbon co-feed. 11. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the co-feed(s) comprise a naphtha range feed. 12. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the total cracker feed has a sulphur content in the range from 20 to 300 ppm by weight, preferably 20 to 250 ppm by weight, more preferably 20 to 100 ppm by weight, and even more preferably 50 to 65 ppm by weight. 13. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the step (a) of providing the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed comprises a stage of subjecting an oxygenate bio-renewable feed to hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation to provide at least a liquid hydrocarbon stream, and a stage of subjecting at least part of the liquid hydrocarbon stream to fractionation and recovering at least the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed. — 25 14. The method according to item 13, wherein the hydrotreatment

O comprises at least the hydrodeoxygenation to provide a hydrotreatment

N effluent, and the hydrotreatment effluent is subjected to gas-liquid separation

N to provide a gaseous stream and a first liquid hydrocarbon stream, and

I at least part of the first liquid hydrocarbon stream is subjected to a

N 30 further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation, followed by

A optional further gas-liquid separation, to provide at least a second liquid

N hydrocarbon stream, and subjecting at least part of the second liguid

N hydrocarbon stream as the liguid hydrocarbon stream to the fractionation and recovering of at least the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed. 15. The method according to item 14, wherein at least a part of the first 5 liquid hydrocarbon stream and/or of the second liquid hydrotreatment stream is recycled back to the hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation. 16. The method according to item 14 or 15, further comprising subjecting the gaseous stream to a propane separation process to provide a stream enriched in propane and a stream depleted in propane. 17. The method according to item 16, further comprising subjecting at least part of the propane from the stream enriched in propane to dehydrogenation, preferably catalytic dehydrogenation, to produce propylene. 18. The method according to any one of items 13 to 17, wherein the stage of subjecting at least part of the liquid hydrocarbon stream to fractionation and recovering at least the renewable stabilized naphtha- range hydrocarbon feed further comprises recovering a heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction. 19. The method according to item 18, wherein — 25 the heavy liguid hydrocarbon fraction is subjected to further

O fractionation to provide at least an aviation fuel range fraction and a bottoms

N fraction.

N

I 20. The method according to any one of items 13 to 17, wherein

N 30 the stage of subjecting at least part of the liguid hydrocarbon stream

A to fractionation and recovering at least the renewable stabilized naphtha-

N range hydrocarbon feed further comprises recovering at least an aviation fuel

N range fraction and/or a diesel range fraction.

21. The method according to any one of items 18 to 20, wherein the diesel range fraction, the aviation fuel range fraction, the heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction and/or the bottoms fraction has an iso-paraffins content of at least 65 wt.-%, preferably at least 70 wt.-%, at least 75 wt.-%, at least 80 wt.- %, at least 85 wt.-% or at least 90 wt.-%. 22. The method according to any one of items 13 to 21, wherein the stage of subjecting at least part of the liquid hydrocarbon stream to fractionation and recovering at least the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed comprises at least subjecting at least part of the liquid hydrocarbon stream to fractionation to provide a naphtha range fraction, and subjecting the naphtha range fraction to stabilization, wherein the stabilisation comprises removing, preferably by means of a distillation technique, at least part of components boiling below 20°C, preferably at least part of components boiling below 25°C, at least part of components boiling below 30°C, at least part of components boiling below 40°C or at least part of components boiling below 50°C. 23. The method according to any one of items 18 to 20, wherein the heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction and/or the diesel range fraction has an iso- paraffins content of less than 65 wt.-%. — 25 24. The method according to any one of the preceding items, wherein the

O step (a) of providing a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed

N comprises:

N subjecting an oxygenate bio-renewable feed to hydrotreatment

I comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation to provide a hydrotreatment effluent,

N 30 subjecting at least part of the hydrotreatment effluent to gas-liguid

A separation to provide a gaseous stream and a first liquid hydrocarbon stream,

N providing the first liguid hydrocarbon stream as a liguid hydrocarbon

N stream or subjecting at least part of the first liguid hydrocarbon stream toa further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation, followed by optional further gas-liquid separation, to provide at least a second liquid hydrocarbon stream as the liquid hydrocarbon stream, and feeding at least part of the liquid hydrocarbon stream to a first distillation column, preferably a first stabilisation column, to obtain a first overhead fraction and a stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction, optionally using at least part of the stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction in diesel fuel and/or recovering from at least part of the stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction at least an aviation fuel range fraction and a bottoms fraction, separating from the first overhead fraction at least a fuel gas fraction and a naphtha range fraction, refluxing a portion, preferably at least 50 wt.-%, more preferably at least 70 wt.-%, even more preferably at least 85 wt.-% of the naphtha range fraction back to the first distillation column, feeding at least a portion of the naphtha range fraction to a second distillation column, preferably a second stabilisation column, to obtain a second overhead fraction, preferably comprising at least part of components boiling below 20°C, and a stabilised naphtha range fraction, separating from the second overhead fraction at least a further fuel gas fraction and light liquid hydrocarbons, and refluxing at least a portion, preferably at least 50 wt.-%, more preferably at least 70 wt.-%, even more preferably at least 85 wt.-% of the light liquid hydrocarbons back to the second distillation column, and — 25 recovering at least a portion of the stabilised naphtha range fraction

O as the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed.

N

N 25. The method according to any one of items 13 to 24, wherein the

I hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation further comprises

N 30 — hydroisomerisation. 2

N 26. The method according to any one of the preceding items, further

N comprising derivatisation of at least part of the light olefin(s) to obtain one or more derivate(s) of the light olefin(s) as bio-monomer(s), such as acrylic acid, acrylonitrile, acrolein, propylene oxide, ethylene oxide, 1,4-butanediol, 1,2-butanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 2,3-butanediol, adiponitrile, hexamethylene diamine (HMDA), hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), (methyl)methacrylate, ethylidene norboreen, 1,5,9-cyclododecatriene, sulfolane, 1,4-hexadiene, tetrahydrophthalic anhydride, valeraldehyde, 1,2-butyloxide, n-butyl mercaptan, o-sec-butylphenol, octene and sec-butyl alcohol. 27. The method according to any one of the preceding items, further comprising (d) a step of (co)polymerizing at least one of the light olefin(s) separated in step (c) and/or at least one of the bio-monomer(s), optionally together with other (co)monomer(s) and/or after optional further purification, to produce a biopolymer composition. 28. The method according to item 27, wherein the biopolymer composition is further processed to produce a sanitary article, a construction material, a packaging material, a coating composition, a paint, a decorative material, such as a panel, an interior part of a vehicle, such as an interior part of a car, a rubber composition, a tire or tire component, a toner, a personal health care article, a part of a consumer good, a part or a housing of an electronic device, a film, a moulded product, a gasket, optionally together with other components. — 25 29. A renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed for thermal

O cracking.

N

N 30. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according

I to item 29, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed

N 30 has a content of naphthenes in the range of from 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.-%

A based on the total weight of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

N hydrocarbon feed.

N

31. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to item 29 or 30, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of naphthenes of 0.2-10.0 wt.-%, such as 0.5-8.0 wt.-%, 0.5-6.0 wt.-%, 0.6 to 5.8 wt.-%, 0.8 to 5.8 wt.-%, 1.0 to 5.6 wt.-%0or1.2to 5.6 wt.-%. 32. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 31, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of olefins of 0.50 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.40 wt.-% or less, 0.30 wt.-% or less, 0.25 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, 0.15 wt.-% or less, 0.12 wt.-% or less, 0.10 wt.-% or less, 0.07 wt.-% or less, or 0.05 wt.-% or less. 33. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according toanyoneofitems 29 to 32, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total content of olefins and naphthenes in the range from 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.-%. 34. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according toanyoneofitems 29 to 33, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total content of olefins and naphthenes of 0.1 wt.-% to 8.0 wt.-%, such as 0.1 wt.-% to 6.5 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.8 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.9 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.0 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.1 = 25 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, or 1.2 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%. &

N 35. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according

N to any one of items 29 to 34, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

I hydrocarbon feed has a content of aromatics of 0.80 wt.-% or less, preferably

N 30 0.70 wt.-% or less, 0.60 wt.-% or less, 0.50 wt.-% or less, 0.40 wt.-% or

A less, 0.35 wt.-% or less, 0.30 wt.-% or less, 0.25 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-%

N or less, or 0.15 wt.-% or less.

N

36. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 35, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a ratio between the content of naphthenes and the content of aromatics of 1 or more, preferably 10 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more. 37. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 36, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total content of olefins, aromatics and naphthenes of 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.-%, preferably 0.1 wt.-% to 8.0 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 6.5 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.8 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.9 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.0 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.1 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, or 1.2 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%. 38. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 37, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of oxygenates of 1000 wt.-ppm or less, preferably 700 wt.-ppm or less, 500 wt.-ppm or less, 300 wt.-ppm or less, 100 wt.-ppm or less, 80 wt.-ppm or less, 60 wt.-ppm or less, 50 wt.-ppm or less, 40 wt.-ppm or less, or 30 wt.-ppm or less. 39. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 38, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of C17 and higher carbon number compounds — 25 of 1.0 wt.-% or less, such as 0.0 to 0.9 wt.-%, preferably 0.0 to 0.8 wt.-%,

O more preferably 0.0 to 0.5 wt.-% or 0.0 to 0.2 wt.-%.

N

N 40. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according

I to any one of items 29 to 39, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

N 30 hydrocarbon feed has a carbon range of 10 or less, preferably 8 or less, 7 or

A less, 6 or less, or 5 or less, and the carbon range is 1 or more, such as from

N 1 to 10,2 to 10, 3 to 10, 3 to 8, 3 to 7, or 3 to 6.

N

41. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 40, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interventile carbon number range (IVR) of 6.5 or less, preferably 5.0 or less, 4.5 or less, 4.0 or less or 3.8 or less. 42. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 41, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interdecile carbon number range (IDR) of 4.5 or less, preferably 4.0 or less, 3.5 or less, or 3.0 or less. 43. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 42, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interquartile carbon number range (IQR) of 2.5 or less, preferably 2.0 or less, 1.8 or less, or 1.5 or less. 44. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 43, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of C11 and higher carbon number components of less than 5.0 wt.-%, preferably 4.5 wt.-% or less, 4.0 wt.-% — or less, 3.5 wt.-% or less, 3.0 wt.-% or less, 2.5 wt.-% or less or 2.0 wt.-% or less. 45. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 44, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range — 25 hydrocarbon feed has a T95 temperature of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C

O or less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, or 140°C or less.

N

N 46. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according

I to any one of items 29 to 45, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

N 30 hydrocarbon feed has a T99 temperature of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C

A or less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, or 140°C or less.

47. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 46, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a final boiling point of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less, 180°C or less, or 160°C or less. 48. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 47, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an initial boiling point of 20°C or more, preferably 20°C to 60°C, such as 30°C to 50°C or 30°C to 45°C. 49. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 48, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a T5 temperature of 40°C or more, preferably 45°C or more, 50°C or more, 55°C or more, or 60°C or more. 50. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 49, wherein the difference between the T10 temperature and the T90 temperature of the renewable stabilized naphtha- range hydrocarbon feed is less than 100°C, preferably less than 80°C, such as 20°C to 75°C, 30°C to 70°C, or 40°C to 70°C. 51. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 50, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total paraffins content of 90 wt.-% or more, — 25 preferably 92 wt.-% or more, 93 wt.-% or more, 94 wt.-% or more or 95

O wt.-% or more.

N

N 52. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according

I to any one of items 29 to 51, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

N 30 hydrocarbon feed has a content ratio of i-paraffins to n-paraffins in the range

A of 1.7 or less, preferably 1.5 or less, such as 0.5 to 1.7, or 0.7 to 1.5.

53. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 52, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content ratio of i-paraffins to n-paraffins in the range of 2.0 or more, preferably 2.2 or more. 54. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 53, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is obtainable by a method comprising subjecting an oxygenate bio-renewable feed to hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation, and optionally to hydroisomerisation. 55. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to item 54, wherein the method comprises the hydroisomerisation. 56. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 55 obtainable by a method comprising: subjecting an oxygenate bio-renewable feed to hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation to provide a hydrotreatment effluent, subjecting at least part of the hydrotreatment effluent to gas-liquid separation to provide a gaseous stream and a first liquid hydrocarbon stream, providing the first liquid hydrocarbon stream as a liquid hydrocarbon stream or subjecting at least part of the first liquid hydrocarbon stream to a further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation, followed by optional further gas-liquid separation, to provide at least a second liquid — 25 hydrocarbon stream as the liquid hydrocarbon stream, and

O feeding at least part of the liguid hydrocarbon stream to a first

N distillation column, preferably a first stabilisation column, to obtain a first

N overhead fraction and a stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction,

I separating from the first overhead fraction at least a fuel gas fraction

N 30 and a naphtha range fraction,

A refluxing a portion, preferably at least 50 wt.-%, more preferably at

N least 70 wt.-%, even more preferably at least 85 wt.-% of the naphtha range

N fraction back to the first distillation column,

feeding at least a portion of the naphtha range fraction to a second distillation column, preferably a second stabilisation column, to obtain a second overhead fraction, preferably comprising at least part of components boiling below 20°C, and a stabilised naphtha range fraction, separating from the second overhead fraction at least a further fuel gas fraction and light liquid hydrocarbons, and refluxing at least a portion, preferably at least 50 wt.-%, more preferably at least 70 wt.-%, even more preferably at least 85 wt.-% of the light liquid hydrocarbons back to the second distillation column, and recovering at least a portion of the stabilised naphtha range fraction as the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed. 57. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to item 56, wherein the hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation further comprises hydroisomerisation. 58. The method according to any one of items 1 to 25, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of items 29 to 57. 59. A renewable thermal cracking effluent having a benzene content of 6.0 wt.-% or less, a total content of ethylene and propylene of 45.0 wt.-% or more and a carbon monoxide content of 0.25 wt.-% or less. — 25

O 60. Therenewable thermal cracking effluent according to item 59, having

N a benzene content of 0.01 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, such as 0.1 wt.-% to 4.0 wt.-

N %, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.6 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.4 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.2 wt.- = %, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.0 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 2.8 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 2.6 wt.-

N 30 C%, 0.2 wt.-% to 2.4 wt.-%, 0.3 wt.-% to 2.2 wt.-%, or 0.5 wt.-% to 2.0 wt.-

A % or less.

61. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to item 59 or 60, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of ethylene and propylene of 45 wt.-% to 65 wt.-%, preferably 46.0 wt.-% to 65.0 wt.-%, 47.0 wt.-% to 65.0 wt.-%, 48.0 wt.-% to 65.0 wt.-%, 49.0 wt.- % to 65.0 wt.-%, 50.0 wt.-% to 60.0 wt.-%, or 50.0 wt.-% to 55.0 wt.-%. 62. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items 54 to 61, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of ethylene and propylene and total C4 olefins of 45 wt.-% to 80 wt.-%, preferably 50 wt.-% to 75 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 70 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 65 wt.- %, or 55 wt.-% to 65 wt.-%. 63. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items 54 to 62, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of C4 olefins of at least 5.0 wt.-%, such as 5.0 wt.-% to 20.0 wt.-%, preferably at least 8.0 wt.-%, at least 10.0 wt.-%, or at least 12.0 wt.-%. 64. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items 54 to 63, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent is the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) of the method according to any one of items 1 to 25. 65. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items 54 to 64, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a carbon — 25 monoxide content of 0.23 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.21 wt.-% or less, 0.20

O wt.-% or less, 0.19 wt.-% or less, 0.18 wt.-% or less, 0.17 wt.-% or less,

N 0.16 wt.-% or less, 0.15 wt.-% or less, 0.14 wt.-% or less, 0.13 wt.-% or

N less, 0.12 wt.-% or less, 0.11 wt.-% or less, 0.10 wt.-% or less, or 0.09 wt.-

I % or less. a en 30 2 66. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items

N 54 to 65, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a C4

N monoolefin content of 6.0 wt.-% or more, preferably 6.5 wt.-% or more, 6.8 wt.-% or more, 7.0 wt.-% or more, 7.2 wt-% or more, or 7.4 wt.-% or more. 67. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items 54 to 66, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a 1,3- butadiene content of at least 4.5 wt.-%, preferably at least 5.0 wt.-%, or at least 6.0 wt.-%. 68. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to any one of items 54 to 67, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a toluene content in the range of from 0.2 wt.-% to 1.8 wt.-%, preferably 0.2 wt.-% to 1.6 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 1.4 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 1.2 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 1.0 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 0.9 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 0.8 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 0.7 wt.-%, or 0.3 wt.-% to 0.6 wt.-%. 69. A biopolymer composition obtainable by the method according to any one of items 26 to 27.

Brief description of drawings

FIG. 1 illustrates linear interpolation for obtaining c 50 value.

Detailed description of the invention

In the present invention, unless specified otherwise, contents and content ratios are provided on a weight basis. — 25

O Furthermore, i-paraffins (also referred to as iso-paraffins) refer to branched

N non-cyclic alkanes, and n-paraffins (also referred to as normal-paraffins)

N refer to linear non-cyclic alkanes. Total paraffins content refers to the

I summed content of i-paraffins and n-paraffins. Similarly, olefins refer to

N 30 linear or branched non-cyclic alkenes, including multiple unsaturated.

A Naphthenes refer to cyclic non-aromatic branched or non-branched alkanes,

N alkenes or alkynes, including multiple unsaturated. Aromatics refer to

N compounds having at least one aromatic ring.

Contents of n-paraffins, i-paraffins, olefins, naphthenes and aromatics can be determined using the PIONA method, which is a GCxGC analysis method, as published by Pyl et al in Journal of Chromatography A, 1218 (2011) 3217- 3223forthe GCxGC description. Regarding this publication, for samples that have been subjected to high severity hydroisomerisation the primary column and secondary column are preferably reversed to enhance separation and identification of the isoparaffins from n-paraffins.

In the present context, the term “renewable” or "bio-based” or ”bio-” refers to a material which is derived from renewable or biological sources in full or in part. Carbon atoms of renewable or biological origin comprise a higher number of unstable radiocarbon (*4C) atoms compared to carbon atoms of fossil origin. Therefore, it is possible to distinguish between carbon compounds derived from renewable or biological sources or raw material and carbon compounds derived from fossil sources or raw material by analysing the ratio of °C and !4C isotopes. Thus, a particular ratio of said isotopes (yielding the “biogenic carbon content”) can be used as a “tag” to identify renewable carbon compounds and differentiate them from non-renewable carbon compounds. The isotope ratio does not change in the course of chemical reactions. Examples of a suitable method for analysing the biogenic carbon content are DIN 51637 (2014), ASTM D6866 (2020) and EN 16640 (2017). The content of carbon from biological or renewable sources is expressed as the biogenic carbon content meaning the amount of biogenic — 25 carbon in the material as a weight percent of the total carbon (TC) in the

O material. As used herein, the biogenic carbon content is determined in

N accordance with EN 16640 (2017). In the present invention, the term

N “renewable” or "bio-based” or "bio-” preferably refers to a material having a x biogenic carbon content in the range of from 1% to 100%. en 30 2 In particular, the biogenic carbon content of the renewable stabilized

N naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, which may also be referred to as bio-based

N cracker feed is preferably more than 5 % and up to 100%, such as more than

20 %, more than 40%, more than 50 %, more than 60 % or more than 70 %, more than 80 %, more than 90 %, or more than 95 %, and may even be about 100 %. The biogenic carbon content of the oxygenate bio-renewable feed is preferably more than 50 % and up to 100%, preferably more than 60 % or more than 70 %, preferably more than 80 %, more preferably more than 90 % or more than 95 %, even more preferably about 100 %.

The biogenic carbon content of the renewable thermal cracking effluent of the present invention may be below 1 %, but is preferably at least 1 % and up to 100 %, such as at least 2 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 20 %, at least 40 %, at least 50 %, at least 75 %, at least 90 %, or about 100 %.

The biogenic carbon content of the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b), and of products and intermediates downstream the cracking step (b) may be below 1 %, but is preferably at least 1 % and up to 100 %, such as at least 2 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 20 %, at least 40 %, at least 50 %, at least 75 %, at least 90 %, or about 100 %.

In particular, the biogenic carbon content of the light olefin(s) (fraction) and/or the bio-monomer and/or the biopolymer composition may be below 1 %, but is preferably at least 1 % and up to 100 %, such as at least 2 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 20 %, at least 40 %, at least 50 %, at least 75 %, at least 90 %, or about 100 %.

By the term “optionally” or “optional”, a characteristic, feature or step that

N may be present, but is not necessarily reguired for carrying out the invention, is meant. r Unless indicated otherwise, all test method standards referred to in this text

E 30 are the latest versions available on December 1, 2021.

N Thermal cracking method

NN The method of the present invention will be described first.

The method of the present invention comprises a step (a) of providing a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, a step (b) of thermally cracking the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in a thermal cracking furnace, optionally together with co-feed(s) and/or additive(s), and a step (c) of subjecting the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) to a separation treatment to provide at least a light olefin(s) fraction.

The method of the present invention provides a light olefin(s) fraction. The method may comprise further purification of the light olefin(s) fraction to provide one or more light olefins, preferably of industry grade or even polymer grade.

The step (b) of thermally cracking may be referred to as “thermal cracking step”.

The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed preferably has an initial boiling point of 20°C or more, preferably within 20°C to 50°C. The initial boiling point is more preferably within 30°C to 45°C. The renewable stabilized —naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed preferably has a T95 temperature (95 vol- % recovered) of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, or 140°C or less. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed may have a T99 temperature (99 vol-% recovered) of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, or — 25 140°C or less, or a final boiling point of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or

O less, 180°C or less, or 160°C or less.

N

N The difference between initial boiling point and T95 temperature (T95-IBP) of

I the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is preferably at

N 30 least 50°C, such as at least 80°C. For example, the difference between initial

A boiling point and T95 temperature may be 50°C to 155°C, preferably 60°C to

N 120°C, 60°C to 100°C or 65°C to 90°C.

N

The boiling points and T## temperature(s), such as T95 temperature, are as determined in accordance with EN ISO 3405-2019. EN ISO 3405-2019 refers to the determination of distillation characteristics at atmospheric pressure, suitable for products boiling between 0°C and 400°C.

An initial boiling point of more than 20°C improves the suitability of the stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed for cracking in conventional steam cracking procedures. On the other hand, if the initial boiling point exceeds 50°C, a large amount of usable hydrocarbons may be lost (i.e. not valorised), which is not desired.

The term “stabilized” in the expression “stabilized naphtha-range” means that the content of C4 and lower carbon number compounds 5.0 wt.-% or less, preferably 2.5 wt.-% or less, more preferably 2.0 wt.-% or less, even more preferably 1.5 wt.-% or less.

In the present invention, the “renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed” contains at least 98.5 wt.-% hydrocarbons, preferably at least 99.5 wt.-%. In other words, at least 98.5 wt.-% of the feed are made up of hydrocarbons. Herein, hydrocarbons mean compounds containing only

C and H (carbon atoms and hydrogen atoms). This means that at most 1.5 wt.-%, preferably at most 0.5 wt.-% of the hydrocarbon feed may be made up of non-hydrocarbon species, such as heteroatom containing impurities or free water (free water according to ASTM D1364). The non-hydrocarbon — 25 species may specifically be free water and/or species containing carbon

O atoms, hydrogen atoms and a heteroatom, such as at least one of oxygen,

N nitrogen, sulphur or phosphorous. Such low levels of non-hydrocarbon

N species makes the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed

I particularly suitable for conventional cracking apparatuses so that no special

N 30 arrangements are required.

LO

O

N The thermal cracking step (b) may be a steam cracking step. Steam cracking

N is tolerant to possible impurities which are common in renewable material. In addition, the method of the present invention has shown to provide particularly good results when employing steam cracking.

Preferably, the thermal cracking step (b) is conducted at a coil outlet temperature (COT) selected from the range from 780°C to 880°C, preferably from 800°C to 860°C, more preferably from 820°C to 850°C.

The thermal cracking step (b) may be conducted at a coil outlet pressure (COP) selected from the range from 1.3 bar to 6.0 bar, preferably from 1.3 bar to 3.0 bar. In the present invention, a pressure value or range refers to absolute pressure, unless otherwise specified.

The thermal cracking step (b) is preferably conducted in the presence of a thermal cracking diluent. Any conventional thermal cracking diluent(s) may be used in the thermal cracking step (b). Examples of such thermal cracking diluents comprise steam, molecular nitrogen (N2), or a mixture thereof.

Dilution of the thermal cracker feed lowers the hydrocarbon partial pressure in the thermal cracking coils and favours formation of primary reaction products, such as ethylene and propylene. The thermal cracking diluent preferably comprises steam.

The thermal cracking step (b) is preferably conducted in the presence of a thermal cracking diluent at dilution within a range from 0.10 to 0.85, preferably from 0.25 to 0.60, such as 0.35 to 0.55. The dilution refers to a — 25 flow rate ratio between thermal cracking diluent and the total cracker feed

O (flow rate of thermal cracking diluent [kg/h] / flow rate of total cracker feed

N [kg/h]). The total cracker feed refers to the renewable stabilized naphtha-

N range hydrocarbon feed plus optional co-feed(s) and optional additive(s), but x excluding diluent. en 30 2 The individual components of the total cracker feed as well as the diluent(s)

N may be fed to the thermal cracking furnace as a pre-formed mixture, as

N separate streams or as a combination of separate stream(s) and pre-formed mixture(s).

The method may comprise a purification treatment to remove at least one of methyl acetylene, propadiene, CO, CO2 and CzHz, preferably at least one of

CO, CO2 and C2Hz2, as a purification stage (c”) in the step (c) of separating at least the light olefin(s) fraction from the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b).

The step (c) may comprise quenching and cooling the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b). Typically, at least a portion of CO, CO2, C2H2, or a combination thereof, is removed from the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) during the quenching and cooling. In certain embodiments, the step (c) comprises fractionating the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b). The fractionation may comprise separating from the cracking effluent a fuel oil fraction, a PyGas fraction, a hydrogen fraction, a methane fraction, a fuel gas fraction, and the light olefin(s) fraction, such as a C2 fraction (ethylene fraction), C3 fraction (propylene fraction), and/or a C4 fraction. The fractionation may be carried out in a single stage or as a series of fractionations, such as first separating a C2/C3 fraction and then recovering a C2 fraction and a C3 fraction by a second-stage fractionation.

The C2 fraction (ethylene fraction) and the C3 fraction (propylene fraction) are particularly suitable to be used for producing polymers, such as a biopolymer composition. Thus, in certain embodiments, the method — 25 comprises, in step (c), separating from the effluent of the thermal cracking

O furnace of step (b) a C2 fraction, or a C3 fraction, or both a C2 fraction and

N a C3 fraction, or a C2/C3 fraction comprising C2 and C3 as a light olefin(s)

N fraction, and optionally subjecting at least ethylene derived from the C2

I fraction, at least propylene derived the C3 fraction, or both ethylene and

N 30 propylene to a polymerisation treatment. The ethylene and/or propylene may

A be derived from the C2 and/or C3 fraction by further purification treatment(s)

N to obtain polymer grade material.

N

In a preferred embodiment, a fraction rich in C2 hydrocarbons (C2 fraction) is separated and this fraction is then further separated at least into a fraction comprising ethene and a fraction comprising ethane. Such separation of a fraction rich C2 hydrocarbons, e.g. a fraction comprising 30 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably at least 40 wt.-% C2 hydrocarbons, may be forwarded to a C2 splitter to provide a fraction comprising ethene and a fraction comprising ethane. Similarly, a fraction rich in C3 hydrocarbons may be separated and this fraction is then further separated at least into a fraction comprising propene and a fraction comprising propane. Such separation of a fraction rich

C3 hydrocarbons (C3 fraction), e.g. a fraction comprising 30 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably at least 40 wt.-% C3 hydrocarbons, may be forwarded to a C3 splitter to provide a fraction comprising propene and a fraction comprising propane. The fraction rich C3 hydrocarbons may be separated after the fraction rich C2 hydrocarbons has been separated or may be separated in the same stage. Each of these fraction may be recovered as a product fraction of the method or may be further purified or post-processes to give a product fraction of the method.

The method may comprise subjecting at least a portion of the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) to a purification treatment (¢’) within step (c) to remove at least one of CO, CO2, or C2H>. This is particularly advantageous in embodiments where at least a portion of the cracking effluent is subjected to a polymerisation treatment. CO, CO2, and CzH:z are polymerisation catalyst poisons and thus undesirable in a polymerisation — 25 process. An absorbent, an adsorbent, a reactant, a molecular sieve and/or a

O purification catalyst may be used in the purification treatment to remove at

N least one of CO, CO2, or C2H2, and decreases the regeneration frequency of

N the active material. =

N 30 The purification treatment to which at least a portion of the effluent of the

A thermal cracking furnace of step (b) may be subjected can be any purification

N treatment suitable for removing at least one of CO, CO?, or C2H2. Examples

N of such purification treatments are described in EP 2679656 Al,

WO 2016023973 Al, WO 2003048087 Al, and US 2010331502 A1, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

In certain embodiments, the purification treatment comprises contacting at least a portion of the cracking effluent with an active material, such as an absorbent, an adsorbent, a purification catalyst, a reactant, a molecular sieve, or a combination thereof, to remove at least one of CO, CO2, or C2H2.

The active material may comprise, for example, copper oxide or a copper oxide catalyst, oxides of Pt, Pd, Ag, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, or Ni optionally supported on alumina, Au/CeC optionally supported on alumina, zeolites, in particular type A and/or type X zeolites, alumina based absorbents or catalysts, such as a Selexsorb™ COS or Selexord™ CD, a molecular sieve comprising alumina, aluminosilicates, aluminophosphates or mixtures thereof, or any combination thereof.

The active material may comprise an adsorbent or adsorbents as described in WO 03/048087 Al on p. 11, 11 12 - p. 12, 11. 3; p. 12, 11. 18 - p. 15, 11. 29, and/or p. 17, 11. 21 - p. 21, 11. 2 and/or a molecular sieve or molecular sieves as described in WO 03/048087 A1 on p. 21, 11. 3 - p. 22 11. 26. The active material may comprise a purification catalyst or catalysts as described in US 2010/0331502 A1, paragraphs [0105] to [0116], or a molecular sieve or molecular sieves as described in US 2010/0331502 A1, paragraphs [0117] to [0119]. The active material may comprise a purification — 25 — catalyst or catalysts as described in WO 2016/023973 A1, paragraph [0061],

S [0062], [0063], and/or [0064]

N

N The purification treatment may be a purification treatment as described in

I EP 2679656 Al, paragraphs [0043] to [0082]. The purification treatment

N 30 may be a purification treatment as described in US 2010/0331502 A1,

A paragraphs [0092] to [0119], and/or paragraph [0126], and/or Example 2.

N The purification treatment may be a purification treatment as described in

N WO 2016/023973 A1, paragraphs [0056] to [0067]. The purification treatment may be a purification treatment as described in WO 03/048087 Al, p. 11, 11. 12 - p. 15, 11. 29, and/or p. 16, 11. 1 - p. 21, 11. 2, and/or p. 23, 11. 14 - p. 24, 11. 13, and/or Example 1 and/or Example 2.

Typically, impurities deactivate or foul the active material during purification treatment. Thus, the active material may be regenerated to at least partially regain its purification activity.

In certain embodiments, the purification treatment comprises at least one of the following steps: i) contacting at least a portion of the cracking effluent with a CuO catalyst to remove oxygen, ii) contacting at least a portion of the cracking effluent with Hz to remove C2H2 by hydrogenation, iii) contacting at least a portion of the cracking effluent with a CuO: catalyst to remove CO by oxidation, or iv) contacting at least a portion of the cracking effluent with a zeolitic molecular sieve to remove CO». Optionally, the purification treatment may comprises removing secondary impurities, such as at least one of COS,

H2S, or CSz, by contacting at least a portion of the cracking effluent with an activated alumina catalyst, such as Selexorb™.

The method may comprise performing one or more further cracking operation(s) to provide further cracking effluent(s), wherein step (c) further comprises adding the further effluent(s) and/or fraction(s) thereof before and/or during the separation treatment. — 25 Specifically, the cracking effluent obtained in step (b) may be combined with

O other stream(s), such as effluent(s) from further cracking process(s)

N produced in other thermal cracking furnace(s), i.e. further cracking

N effluent(s) and/or fraction(s) thereof, in step (c). The further cracking

I effluent(s) and/or fraction(s) thereof may simply be referred to as co-feed(s)

N 30 of step (c). In this case, the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step

A (b) preferably amounts to 10 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably 20 wt.-% to

N 100 wt.-%, 30 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 40 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to

N 100 wt.-%, 60 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 70 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 80 wt.-% to

100 wt.-%, or 90 wt.-% to 100 wt.-% relative to the summed amount of effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) and the co-feed(s) of step (c). A minimum value of 10 wt.-%, for example, ensures the presence of a certain share of material of biological origin, thus contributing to sustainability. Nevertheless, even minimum contents of material of biological origin being subjected to step (c) contribute to sustainability.

The one or more further cracking operation(s) are preferably carried out in one or more further cracking furnace(s). The one or more further cracking operation(s) may be thermal cracking operation(s) and/or cracking operation(s) other than thermal cracking, such as FCC (fluidized catalytic cracking).

The further cracking operation(s) may be carried out with any suitable feed, including fossil feed (crude oil-based feed), renewable feed or a combination thereof. The further cracking operation(s) are preferably carried out under conditions differing from step (b) in at least one of total cracker feed composition and cracking condition(s), such as COT, COP, or dilution.

The further cracking effluent(s) may be subjected to purification, gas-liquid separation and/or fractionation before being added in step (c) or may be added as such, i.e. as crude effluent(s). The addition may be carried out before the separation treatment of step (c). In this case, the further cracking effluent(s) is/are subjected to the separation treatment. This option is — 25 particularly suitable if a crude effluent is added as the further effluent. The

O addition may be carried during or after the separation treatment of step (c).

N In this case, it is favourable for the further cracking effluent to be at least

N partially subjected to purification, gas-liquid separation and/or fractionation x before being added in step (c). en 30 2 The thermal cracking in step (b) is preferably carried out in the presence of 3 co-feed(s).

Preferably, the content of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in the total cracker feed is in the range of from 10 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably 20 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 30 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 40 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 60 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 70 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 80 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, or 90 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%. The upper limit may also be 90 wt.-% or 80 wt.-%, i.e. the content may for example be in the range of from 10 wt.-% to 90 wt.-% or from 10 wt.-% to 80 wt.-%.

Employing at least 10 wt.-% renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed ensures that the effects of the present invention are remarkably pronounced. The total cracker feed may consist of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, i.e. the content thereof may be 100 wt.-%.

The co-feed(s) may comprise a fossil hydrocarbon co-feed. Fossil co-feeds, in particular fossil naphtha, are readily available and highly suitable for thermal cracking.

In the present invention, the “fossil hydrocarbon co-feed” contains at least 98.5 wt.-% hydrocarbons, preferably at least 99.5 wt.-%. In other words, at least 98.5 wt.-% of the co-feed are made up of hydrocarbons. This means that at most 1.5 wt.-%, preferably at most 0.5 wt.-% of the hydrocarbon co- feed may be made up of non-hydrocarbon species, such as heteroatom = 25 containing impurities, and in particular sulphur-containing impurities. &

N Preferably, the co-feed(s) comprise a naphtha range feed since this provides

N high compatibility with the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon

I feed. Moreover, since the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon

N 30 feed is a well-defined (narrow-range) feed, it is preferable to employ a

A narrow-range co-feed, such as fossil naphtha, in order to make full use of the

N benefits of the present invention. A particularly preferred co-feed is light

N naphtha, specifically fossil light naphtha. The light naphtha preferably boils in the range of from 20°C (IBP) to 120°C (FBP), such as from 30°C (IBP) to 90°C (FBP).

The total cracker feed preferably has a sulphur content in the range of from 20 to 300 ppm by weight, preferably 20 to 250 ppm by weight, more preferably 20 to 100 ppm by weight, and even more preferably 50 to 65 ppm by weight.

The inventors surprisingly found that a (total) cracker feed containing the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed (and optionally co-feed and/or additive) and having a sulphur content within the above-mentioned limits results in a significantly reduced coking tendency during thermal cracking.

As the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed typically has inherently low or no sulphur content, the sulphur may be incorporated in the total cracker feed by using a sulphur-containing co-feed, such as a fossil hydrocarbon feed. The sulphur may also originate, in part or in total, from sulphur-containing additive(s), including conventional cracking additive(s).

Specifically, any conventional thermal cracking additive(s) may be added to the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed of the present disclosure, to optional co-feed(s) or to a pre-formed total cracker feed or be co-fed to the thermal cracking furnace or may be added to thermal cracking diluent and thus fed to the thermal cracking furnace. Examples of such — 25 conventional thermal cracking additives include sulphur containing species

O (sulphur additives), such as dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), or carbon disulphide

N (CS2). DMDS is a particularly preferred sulphur additive. Sulphur additive(s)

N may be mixed with the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon

I feed, with optional co-feed(s) or with a pre-formed total cracker feed before

N 30 feeding to the thermal cracking furnace. Optionally, sulphur additive(s) may

A be added by injecting into the thermal cracking furnace a thermal cracking

N diluent, preferably steam, comprising sulphur additive(s).

N

The step (a) of providing the stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed may for example comprise subjecting an oxygenate bio-renewable feed to hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation, and to optional subsequent further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation, and conducting gas-liquid separation(s) after the hydrotreatment(s) to provide liquid hydrocarbon stream(s) and gaseous stream(s). In a subsequent stage, the optionally isomerised liquid hydrocarbon stream may be subjected to fractionation, from which at least the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is recovered. In addition, other fractions may be recovered from the fractionation, including but not limited to a fuel gas fraction, a diesel range fraction, aviation fuel range fraction, a marine fuel fraction and an electrotechnical fluid fraction. Additionally a propane fraction may be recovered at least from the gaseous stream(s) separated from the liquid hydrocarbon stream(s).

An exemplary aviation fuel range fraction may boil within a range from 100°C-300°C, such as within 150°C-300°C. An exemplary gasoline fuel range fraction may boil within a range from 25°C-220°C. An exemplary diesel fuel range fraction may boil within a range from 160°C-380°C. An exemplary marine fuel range fraction may boil within 180°C-600°C.

In general, a naphtha range fraction as disclosed herein may refer to a fraction having an initial boiling point of more than 0°C, preferably more than 20°C or more than 30°C, and a T95 temperature of 220°C or less, preferably — 25 2002%orless, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, 140°C or less. The naphtha range

O fraction may have a T99 temperature of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or

N less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, 140°C or less, or a final boiling point of

N 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less or 180°C or less. =

N 30 Unless specified to the contrary, the boiling characteristics in the present

A invention, such as the T95 temperature (95 vol-% recovered), the T99

N temperature (99 vol-% recovered), the final boiling point, the initial boiling

N point, the T5 temperature (5 vol-% recovered) and the T10 temperature (10 vol-% recovered) are as determined in accordance with EN ISO 3405-2019.

The step (a) in the above embodiment preferably may comprise the further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation subsequent to the hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation (HDO), and/or may comprise hydroisomerisation as a part of the hydrotreatment comprising at least HDO.

In other words, hydroisomerisation may be carried out in a separate further hydrotreatment after the hydrotreatment comprising at least HDO.

Alternatively or in addition, hydroisomerisation may be carried out as a part of the hydrotreatment comprising at least HDO, for example by means of a catalyst or catalyst system achieving both hydrodeoxygenation and hydroisomerisation in a single step.

The effluent from the hydrotreatment comprising at least HDO, which is referred to as hydrotreatment effluent, may be subjected to gas-liguid separation to provide a gaseous stream and a first liguid hydrocarbon stream.

At least part of the first liquid hydrocarbon stream may be provided as the liguid hydrocarbon stream mentioned above. Alternatively or in addition, at least part of the liguid hydrotreatment effluent stream may be subjected, in a subseguent stage, to the further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation to provide, preferably after gas-liguid separation, a — 25 second liguid hydrocarbon stream which may be provided as the liguid

O hydrocarbon stream mentioned above.

N

N The gaseous stream obtained in a second gas-liquid separation may be

I combined and processed together with the gaseous stream obtained in the

N 30 first gas-liquid separation. Condensable hydrocarbons, if any, may be

A separated from the gaseous stream(s), and combined with the liquid

N hydrocarbon stream.

N

At least a part of the first liquid hydrocarbon stream and/or of the second liquid hydrocarbon stream may be recycled back to the hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation. Such recycling may be suited to achieve temperature control.

The above-mentioned gaseous stream(s) may be subjected to a propane separation process to provide a stream enriched in propane and a stream depleted in propane. At least part of the propane contained in the stream enriched in propane may be subjected to dehydrogenation, preferably catalytic dehydrogenation, to produce propylene.

Propane (or a stream enriched in propane) may also be recovered from a stabilisation stage and subjected to such a dehydrogenation. The propane (or a stream enriched in propane) recovered from a stabilisation stage may be subjected to dehydrogenation in a separate reactor or may be combined with propane (or a stream enriched in propane) separated after hydrotreatment so as to improve overall yields of light olefins per unit oxygenate bio- renewable feed to hydrotreatment.

Alternatively, or in addition, such a C3-rich stream (i.e. the stream enriched in propane recovered after hydrotreatment, the stream recovered from stabilisation or a combined stream) may be subjected to thermal cracking, such as steam cracking, in a separate furnace. — 25 When a heavy liguid hydrocarbon fraction is recovered from the above-

O mentioned fractionation, the method may further comprise subjecting the

N heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction to further fractionation to provide at least

N an aviation fuel range fraction and a bottoms fraction. A suitable method for

I fractionation, as well as usable fractionation cut-offs, resulting fractions and

N 30 uses thereof are set forth in WO 2021/094656 Ai, the content of which is

A herewith incorporated in its entirety. In WO 2021/094656 A1, the bottoms

N fraction is referred to as an electrotechnical fluid.

N

Each of the diesel range fraction, the aviation fuel range fraction, heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction, the aviation fuel range fraction and the bottoms fraction may individually have an iso-paraffins content of at least 65 wt.-%, preferably at least 70 wt.-%, at least 75 wt.-%, at least 80 wt.-%, at least 85 wt.-% or at least 90 wt.-%. The iso-paraffins content is calculated relative to total diesel range fraction or respective other fraction. High isomerisation degree of the fractions, in particular of the diesel or aviation fuel range fraction, indicates that the production process was carried out in highly isomerising mode, e.g. under severe isomerisation conditions. In such a case, the yield of naphtha range hydrocarbons tends to be higher, and the naphtha range fraction also tends to have higher iso-paraffins content. This improves overall yield of the process of the invention.

The above-mentioned stage of subjecting at least part of the liguid hydrocarbon stream to fractionation and recovering at least the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed preferably comprises a stage of subjecting at least part of the liguid hydrocarbon stream to fractionation to provide a naphtha range fraction and subjecting the naphtha range fraction to stabilization. In this respect, the stabilisation may comprise removing, preferably by means of a distillation technique, at least part of components boiling below 20°C, preferably removing at least part of components boiling below 25°C, removing at least part of components boiling below 30°C, removing at least part of components boiling below 40°C or removing at least part of components boiling below 50°C. If desired, optional additional — 25 treatments, such as stripping with N2, Hz, or steam, to separate gases and

O impurities into the gaseous phase, may be performed on the liguid stream(s)

N during the fractionation stage.

N

I The stabilisation stage may form a part of the fractionation from which the

N 30 naphtha range fraction is recovered. Alternatively, or in addition, the

A stabilisation stage may be carried out as a separate stage after fractionation,

N i.e. removing the respective components from the recovered naphtha range

N fraction.

The stabilisation stage is preferably carried out by means of a distillation technique.

As used herein, distillation (or fractionation) may refer to any type of distillation, i.e. also to stripping, flashing, and any other similar separating operations based on differences in the vapour pressure of the components.

Selecting suitable feed rates, operating temperatures, pressures, equipment type and design, and other engineering details for the present fractionation disclosure will be within capabilities of a person skilled in the art.

The above-mentioned heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction and/or diesel range fraction may alternatively have an iso-paraffins content of less than 65 wt.- %.

The above-mentioned bottoms fraction may be subjected to a further thermal cracking, preferably steam cracking. This further cracking stage is preferably carried out separate from the thermal cracking step (b), i.e. in a different furnace and/or at a different time. The cracking conditions may be different from those employed in step (b), but the same conditions as useable in step (b) may be employed as well.

The step (a) may comprise hydrotreatment of an oxygenate bio-renewable feed, such as an oil and/or fat of plant origin, animal origin or other biological — 25 — origin. That is, as already pointed out above, the renewable stabilized

O naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed may be based on a hydrotreated oxygenate

N feed.

N

I The step (a) may comprise a step (a') of pre-treating bio-renewable oil(s)

N 30 and/or fat(s) for reducing contaminants in the oil(s) and/or fat(s) to produce

A the oxygenate bio-renewable feed. Alternatively, the oil(s) and/or fat(s) may

N be employed as the oxygenate bio-renewable feed without pre-treatment.

N

The pre-treatment step (a') may be a step of reducing contaminants containing S, N and/or P in the oil(s) and/or fat(s) to produce the oxygenate bio-renewable feed. Alternatively, or in addition, the pre-treatment step (a') may be a step of reducing metal-containing contaminants in the oil(s) and/or fat(s) to produce the oxygenate bio-renewable feed. Preferably the pre- treatment step reduces content of one or more of S, N, P, alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, Si, Al, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Cd, Pb, As, Cr, Ni, V, Sn.

Suitable methods for carrying out the pre-treatment step (a') comprise one or more selected from washing, degumming, bleaching, distillation, fractionation, rendering, heat treatment, evaporation, filtering, adsorption, hydrotreatment such as hydrodeoxygenation, centrifugation or precipitation.

These pre-treatment methods are simple and effective methods for removing the potentially catalyst-poisoning S, N and P contaminants as well as metal contaminants (metals and/or metal compounds), including metalloid contaminants, such as Si-containing impurities. The pre-treatment step (a') may comprise, in the alternative or in addition, at least one of partial hydrogenation, partial deoxygenation, hydrolysis and transesterification.

The oxygenate bio-renewable feed may comprise fatty acid ester(s) of glycerol.

The effluent of hydrotreatment and optional isomerisation is subjected to fractionation, preferably after gas-liguid separation. The fractionation may — 25 directly yield the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed or

O may further be treated, such a stabilized, to provide the renewable stabilized

N naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed.

N

I The total feed which may be subjected to hydrotreatment in step (a)

N 30 preferably comprises a hydrotreatment diluent comprising paraffinic

A hydrocarbons in addition to the oxygenate bio-renewable feed. A

N hydrotreatment diluent is particularly suited for temperature control during

N hydrotreatment, specifically during hydrodeoxygenation. The hydrotreatment diluent may comprise at least one of recycled paraffinic hydrocarbons from the hydrotreatment effluent and/or isomerisation effluent, renewable hydrocarbons obtained by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using bio-syngas, and fossil-based hydrocarbons. Preferably, the hydrotreatment diluent comprises recycled paraffinic hydrocarbons from the hydrotreatment effluent and/or isomerisation effluent. When employing a hydrotreatment diluent, the hydrotreatment feed preferably contains at least 2 wt.-% of the oxygenate bio-renewable feed, such as 2 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably 3 wt.-%, at least 4 wt.-%, at least 5 wt.-%, at least 6 wt.-%, at least 7 wt.-%, at least 8 wt.-%, at least 9 wt.-%, at least 10 wt.-%, at least 11 wt.-%, at least 12 wt.-%, at least 15 wt.-%, at least 20 wt.-%, at least 25 wt.-%, at least 50 wt.-%, at least 75 wt.-%, at least 90 wt.-% or at least 95 wt.-%, or at least 99 wt.-%. The feed which is subjected to hydrotreatment in step (a) may contain 99 wt.-% or less of a oxygenate bio-renewable feed, such as 2 wt.- %fto 99 wt.-%, preferably 90 wt.-% or less, 75 wt.-% or less, 50 wt.-% or less, 40 wt.-% or less, 35 wt.-% or less, 30 wt.-% or less, 25 wt.-% or less, wt.-% or less, 15 wt.-% or less, or 10 wt.-% or less.

When the hydrotreatment diluent comprises recycled paraffinic hydrocarbons 20 from the hydrotreatment step, the hydrotreatment feed preferably contains 10 wt.-% to 98 wt.-% of the recycled paraffinic hydrocarbons from the hydrotreatment step, preferably at least 25 wt.-%, at least 40 wt.-%, at least wt.-%, at least 60 wt.-%, at least 70 wt.-%, at least 75 wt.-%, at least 80 wt.-%, at least 85 wt.-%, at least 90 wt.-%, or at least 92 wt.-%. The — 25 hydrotreatment feed may similarly contain 98 wt.-% or less, 95 wt.-% or

O less, 92 wt.-% or less, 90 wt.-% or less, 85 wt.-% or less, 80 wt.-% or less,

N 70 wt.-% or less, 60 wt.-% or less, 40 wt.-% or less or 25 wt.-% or less of

N the recycled paraffinic hydrocarbons from the hydrotreatment step, such as

I 10 wt.-% to 25 wt.-%. The recycled product from the hydrotreatment step is

N 30 preferably a hydrocarbon, but may similarly be a material which is only

A partially deoxygenated and then recycled into the hydrotreatment step for

N further deoxygenation.

N

In the present invention, the hydrotreatment may involve, in addition to hydrodeoxygenation (HDO), decarbonylation and/or decarboxylation. These reactions give carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide and a hydrocarbon chain having one carbon less than the original chain.

The hydrotreatment, preferably HDO, may for example be carried out by feeding hydrogen and the natural fat or derivative thereof (co-currently or counter-currently) through a catalyst bed. A suitable process and apparatus is described in EP1741767 Al , see Figure 1 and items [0061] to [0064], herewith included by reference.

The hydrotreatment, preferably HDO, is preferably carried out at a temperature between 100°C and 500°C, preferably between 250°C and 350°C, more preferably between 280°C and 345°C, most preferably between 280°C and 310°C. A preferred pressure is 1 MPa to 20 MPa, a more preferable one 3 MPa to 10 MPa, the most preferable one being 4 MPa to 8 MPa.

The hydrotreatment, preferably HDO, may be carried out in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst containing one or more metals from Groups 6 to 10 of the Periodic Table (IUPAC 1990), preferably a supported catalyst, more preferably the above-mentioned one or more metals supported on alumina and/or silica. Preferred hydrogenation catalysts are alumina and/or silica supported Pd, Pt, Ni, NiMo, or CoMo. The most preferred catalysts are

NiMo/Al203 and CoMo/Al203 in sulphided form. — 25

O In the present invention, the term "hydrotreatment” is meant to encompass

N removal of oxygen from organic oxygen compounds as water i.e.

N hydrodeoxygenation (HDO), removal of sulphur from organic sulphur

I compounds as dihydrogen sulphide (H2S), i.e. hydrodesulphurisation (HDS),

N 30 removal of nitrogen from organic nitrogen compounds as ammonia (NH3), i.e.

A hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), removal of halogens, for example chlorine from

N organic chloride compounds as hydrochloric acid (HCI), i.e.

N hydrodechlorination (HDCI), removal of metals by hydrodemetallization, and hydrogenation of unsaturated bonds if present. When isomerisation is carried out together with the hydrotreatment, this may be accomplished, for example, by combined HDO and hydrocracking or by combined HDO and hydroisomerisation. Specifically, hydrocracking may be performed to increase — yield of naphtha range hydrocarbons, which is beneficial for the overall process.

The optional isomerisation, be it as a part of the hydrotreatment or carried out separately after hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation, results in higher yield of naphtha-range hydrocarbons, thus improving the overall yield of the method. In case isomerisation is omitted, the method can be adjusted towards production of other fractions, in particular at least a diesel range fraction, while making use of the naphtha range fraction as a side product. In this case, it is preferable to recover a diesel range fraction in addition to the naphtha range fraction.

The optional isomerisation, if included as a separate stage, may be carried out at a temperature selected from the range 200 °C to 500 °C, preferably 280 °C to 400 °C, and at a pressure selected from the range 20-150 bar (absolute), preferably 30-100 bar. The isomerization (isomerisation treatment) may be performed in the presence of known isomerization catalysts, for example, catalysts containing a molecular sieve and/or a metal selected from Group VIII of the Periodic Table and a carrier. Preferably, the isomerization catalyst is a catalyst containing SAPO-11 or SAPO-41 or ZSM- — 25 22 or ZSM-23 or ferrierite and Pt, Pd, or Ni and Al203 or SiOz. Typical

O isomerisation catalysts are, for example, Pt/SAPO-11/Al203, Pt/ZSM-

N 22/Al203, Pt/ZSM-23/Al203 and/or Pt/SAPO-11/SiO2. Catalyst deactivation

N may be reduced by the presence of molecular hydrogen in the isomerisation

I treatment. Therefore, the presence of added hydrogen in the isomerisation

N 30 treatment is preferred. In case the optional isomerisation is included as a

A separate stage, the hydrotreatment catalyst(s) and the isomerization

N catalyst(s) may not be in contact with the reaction feed (the oxygenate bio-

N renewable feed and/or the deoxygenated stream derived therefrom) at the same time. For example, the hydrotreatment and the isomerisation treatment are conducted in separate reactors.

The isomerisation may be a high severity isomerisation. High severity isomerisation in the present invention is meant to refer to any technologies achieving high iso-paraffins content in the naphtha fraction, typically 50-60 wt.-% or 55-60 wt.-%. High i-paraffins content (and high ratio between i- paraffins and n-paraffins) can particularly be achieved for paraffins having longer chains, i.e. having carbon numbers near the upper carbon number limit of the naphtha range.

In case hydrotreatment and subsequent high-severity isomerisation is carried out, the following procedure may be carried out, as exemplified on triglyceride-based biomass as an oxygenate bio-renewable feed. In a first step, the triglyceride based biomass is deoxygenated over a hydrotreatment catalyst, such as NiMo catalyst supported on Al203 under hydrogen pressure.

Sulphur components are preferably added to the inlet stream to keep the catalyst in the sulphided state. During the first step, triglyceride oils and fatty acids are converted to n-alkanes with minor amounts of branched alkanes (usually in the range of 1 wt%). Note that the oxygen content can be removed under the form of water (hydrodeoxygenation), carbon monoxide (decarbonylation) and carbon dioxide (decarboxylation). Oxygen removal by decarbonylation and decarboxylation consumes less hydrogen compared to hydrodeoxygenation but causes the resulting alkane to have one carbon atom — 25 less compared to the original fatty acid chain. In a second step, isomerisation

O is carried out over a molecular sieve impregnated with platinum, e.g. Pt/ZSM-

N 22.

N

I The method of the present invention may further comprise derivatisation of

N 30 at least part of the light olefin(s) to obtain one or more derivate(s) of the

A light olefin(s) as bio-monomer(s), such as acrylic acid, acrylonitrile, acrolein,

N propylene oxide, ethylene oxide, 1,4-butanediol, 1,2-butanediol, 1,3-

N butanediol, 2,3-butanediol, adiponitrile, hexamethylene diamine (HMDA),

hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) (methyl)methacrylate, ethylidene norboreen, 1,5,9-cyclododecatriene, sulfolane, 1,4-hexadiene, tetrahydrophthalic anhydride, valeraldehyde, 1,2-butyloxide, n-butyl mercaptan, o-sec-butylphenol, propylene, octene and sec-butyl alcohol.

The method of the present invention may further comprise a step (d) of (co)polymerizing at least one of the light olefin(s) separated in step (c) and/or at least one of the above-mentioned bio-monomer(s), optionally together with other (co)monomer(s) and/or after optional further purification, to produce a biopolymer composition.

In this context, acrylic acid is meant to include any type of acrylic-based monomers, e.g. those based on (meth)acrylic acid, (meth)acrylic acid esters, and/or (meth)acrylic acid salts. Acrylic polymers are meant to include any type of acrylic-based polymers, e.g. those containing structural units derived from (meth)acrylic acid, (meth)acrylic acid esters, and/or (meth)acrylic acid salts

The light olefins and/or bio-monomers may be (co)polymerized to give a biopolymer composition comprising for example polybutadiene, styrenebutadiene rubber, nitrile rubber, polychloroprene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene resin (ABS), styrene butadiene latex, TPE, nylon, such as nylon 6,6, polyurethane, methyl methacrylate-butadiene-styrene (MBS), nitrile barrier resin, butyl rubber, polyisobutylene, methyl methacrylate — 25 (MMA), MTBE/ETBE, polyolefin (co)polymers, polybutene-1, polypropylene

O (PP), ethylene-propylene-copolymer (EPM), polyether, polyether polyol,

N polyester, polymer or oligomer surfactant or ethylene-propylene-diene-

N copolymer (EPDM). =

N 30 The derivatisation may, for example, comprise at least one of oxidation and

A ammoxidation. Oxidation is preferably carried out by gas phase oxidation.

The polymerisation may be carried out in the presence of a polymerisation catalyst. The polymerisation may be initiated by means of a polymerization initiator.

The biopolymer composition may be further processed to produce a sanitary article, a construction material, a packaging material, a coating composition, a paint, a decorative material, such as a panel, an interior part of a vehicle, such as an interior part of a car, a rubber composition, a tire or tire component, a toner, a personal health care article, a part of a consumer good, a part or a housing of an electronic device, a film, a moulded product, a gasket, optionally together with other components. In particular, an acrylic polymer may be a water-absorbing polymer which may be further processed to produce a sanitary article, such as a diaper, a sanitary napkin, an incontinence draw sheet.

The present invention furthermore relates to a biopolymer composition obtainable by the embodiment of the method of the present invention including polymerisation of light olefin(s) and/or derivative(s) thereof.

Renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed

The present invention furthermore relates to a renewable stabilized naphtha- range hydrocarbon feed for thermal cracking.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a — 25 content of naphthenes in the range of from 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.-% based

O on the total weight of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon

N feed. More preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon

N feed has a content of naphthenes of 0.2-10.0 wt.-%, such as 0.5-8.0 wt.-%, =E 0.5-6.0 wt.-%, 0.6 to 5.8 wt.-%, 0.8 to 5.8 wt.-%, 1.0 to 5.6 wt.-% or 1.2

N 30 to 5.6 wt.-%. Naphthenes convert easily to aromatics, which are compounds

A possibly reacting to coke but not to desired products. Thus, it is preferred

N that the naphthenes content is low in the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

N hydrocarbon feed.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of olefins of 0.50 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.40 wt.-% or less, 0.30 wt.-% or less, 0.25 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, 0.15 wt.-% or less, 0.12 wt.-% or less, 0.10 wt.-% or less, 0.07 wt.-% or less, or 0.05 wt.-% or less. Olefins are undesired components in the renewable stabilized naphtha- range hydrocarbon feed of the present invention. That is, the inventors found that olefins have a strong coking tendency which is even higher than that of aromatics and, therefore, the content of olefins should be kept low. The olefins content may be 0%, i.e. no detectable amounts of olefins contained.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total content of olefins and naphthenes in the range from 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.-%. The total content olefins and naphthenes refers to the summed content of olefins and naphthenes based on the total weight of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed. More preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total content of olefins and naphthenes of 0.1 wt.-% to 8.0 wt.-%, such as 0.1 wt.-% to 6.5 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.8 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.9 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.0 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.1 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, or 1.2 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of aromatics of 0.80 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.70 wt.-% or less, — 25 0.60 wt.-% or less, 0.50 wt.-% or less, 0.40 wt.-% or less, 0.35 wt.-% or

O less, 0.30 wt.-% or less, 0.25 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, or 0.15 wt.-

N % or less. Aromatics, such as benzene, do not react into desired products.

N Rather, they tend to react to coke (i.e. they are coke precursors). Their

I presence in the feed thus reduces the yield of the desired products and their

N 30 content in the feed should be low. In the present invention, the content of

A aromatics is preferably low and may be 0.00%. The content of aromatics may

N be determined by the PIONA analysis.

N

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a ratio between the content of aromatics and the content of naphthenes (content by weight of naphthenes divided by content by weight of aromatics) of 1 or more, preferably 10 or more, 50 or more, or 100 or more. Both naphthenes and aromatics tend to increase the yield of cyclic compounds in thermal cracking. Thus, it is preferred that both are contained in low amounts.

However, if both are contained, naphthenes are preferred over aromatics.

The ratio has no specific upper limit and the ratio may even be infinite in case no aromatics are contained.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total content of olefins, aromatics and naphthenes of 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.- %, preferably 0.1 wt.-% to 8.0 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 6.5 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.8 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.9 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.0 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.1 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, or 1.2 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%. Naphthenes, aromatics and olefins are coke precursors and their content should be low. However, since it may be laborious to strongly reduce the content of all of these components, certain contents thereof can be tolerated. Nevertheless, their total content may be down to 0%, including 0%.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of oxygenates of 1000 wt.-ppm or less, preferably 700 wt.-ppm or less, 500 wt.-ppm or less, 300 wt.-ppm or less, 100 wt.-ppm or less, 80 wt.- — 25 ppm or less, 60 wt.-ppm or less, 50 wt.-ppm or less, 40 wt.-ppm or less, or

O 30 wt.-ppm or less. Oxygenates mean herein molecules containing carbon

N and hydrogen and further containing covalently bound oxygen in the

N structure (molecule). In the present invention, low amounts of oxygenates

I are preferred, including no oxygenates. On the other hand, in particular when

N 30 employing e.g. 10 wt.-% or more of a low-oxygenate co-feed (e.g. a fossil

A hydrocarbon co-feed), higher values, such as from 100 wt.-ppm to 1000 wt.-

N ppm may be used. In such a case, the effort for minimizing oxygenate content

N is minimized which increases overall efficiency of the process. Since the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed of the present invention is a naphtha range feed, the number of possible oxygenates is limited. In accordance with the present invention, the content of oxygenates is determined based on ASTM D7423 (determining C2-C5 oxygenates by GC-

FID, i.e. gas chromatography-flame ionisation detection), being modified to capture a longer list of oxygenates in the spectra. Specifically, the following oxygenates may be present in a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed of the present invention: ETBE (ethyl t-butyl ether), MTBE (methyl t-butyl ether), TAME (t-amyl methyl ether), DIPE (diisopropyl ether), propylether, isobutyraldehyde, butyraldehyde, isobutanol, n-butanol, sec- butanol, tert-butanol, methanol, acetone, vinyl acetate, ethyl acetate, MEK (methyl ethyl ketone), —isovaleraldehyde, valeraldehyde, ethanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, allylalcohol, diethylether, acetaldehyde, and others.

The total content of all oxygenates identified by GC-FID is assumed to correspond to the total content of oxygenates in the sample, i.e. in the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of C17 and higher carbon number compounds of 1.0 wt.-% or less, such as 0.0 to 0.9 wt.-%, preferably 0.0 to 0.8 wt.-%, more preferably 0.0 to 0.5 wt.-%, or 0.0 to 0.2 wt.-%.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a carbon range of 10 or less, preferably 8 or less, 7 or less, 6 or less, or 5 or — 25 less. The carbon range is preferably 1 or more, 2 or more, or 3 or more. Thus,

O the carbon range is preferably in a range of from 1 to 10, such as from 2 to

N 10, 3 to 10, 3 to 8, 3 to 7, 2 to 6, 3 to 6, 2 to 5, or 3 to 5. In the present

N invention, the carbon range refers to the difference between C_max and z C min (carbon range=C max-C min), where C max (highest occurring

N 30 carbon number) and C_min (lowest occurring carbon number) are determined

A by PIONA (GCxGC method described herein), and for determination of C_min

N and C max carbon numbers having a measured abundancy of 0.10 wt.-% or

N less are assumed to be absent. In other words, carbon numbers having a measured abundancy of 0.10 wt.-% or less are not considered when determining C min and C max, and thus when determining the carbon range.

The carbon range is more sensitive to low amounts of outliers in the carbon number distribution and thus more accurate than analysis techniques based on distillation characteristics, such as those determined in accordance with

EN ISO 3405-2019. In other words, the carbon range gives a good impression of the quality of the feed in terms of homogeneity.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interventile carbon number range (IVR) of 6.5 or less, preferably 5.0 or less, 4.5 or less, 4.0 or less or 3.8 or less. The IVR is the calculated carbon number range determined from a linear interpolation of data (accumulated content vs. carbon number) obtained from PIONA carbon number analysis. Similarly,

IDR, IQR, and c 50 (and other c xx values) are determined from a linear interpolation of data (accumulated content vs. carbon number) obtained from

PIONA carbon number analysis.

The IVR is the carbon number range containing 90% of the mass (i.e. from 5 wt.-% to 95 wt.-%). Similarly, the IQR (interquartile range) is the carbon number range containing 50% of mass from 25 wt.-% to 75 wt.-% and the

IDR (interdecile range) is the carbon number range containing 80% of mass from 10 wt.-% to 90 wt.-%. Similarly, the IOR (interguartile range) is the carbon number range containing 50% of mass from 25 wt.-% to 75 wt.-% and the IDR (interdecile range) is the carbon number range containing 80% — 25 of mass from 10 wt.-% to 90 wt.-%. Linear interpolation means that a content

O range between two carbon numbers is assumed to be linear. For example a

N sample containing 0%C1 (0% components having 1 carbon atom), 0%C2,

N 0%C3, 5%C4, 5%C5 and 8%C6 will have ac 2.5 value (i.e. fractional carbon

I number representing 2.5 wt.-% of the sample) of 3.5 (carbon number) even

N 30 though C4 is the lowest carbon number which is actually present. The c 5

A value (fractional carbon number representing 5 wt.-% sample) is 4 (C4) and

N the c 10 value (10 wt.-%) is 5 (C5), since the accumulated amount of

N C1+C2+C3+C4+C5 is exactly 10 wt.-%. The c 15 value (15 wt.-%) is between 5 and 6 (C5 is 10 wt.-%, C6 is 18 wt.-%). Linear interpolation is easily calculated such that e.g. the 15 wt.-% content carbon number (c 15 value) is calculated to be {highest carbon number not yet contributing 15 wt.-%) + 5 [ (15% {content of interest} - 10% {C5 accumulated content}) / (18% {C6 accumulated content} - 10% {C5 accumulated content}) ] =5 + [5%/8%] = 5+ 0.625, i.e. carbon number 5.625.

In other words, for determining the c XX value, the following equation is used: {highest carbon number not yet contributing XX wt.-%) + [({content of interest: XX wt.-%} - {accumulated content of highest carbon number not yet contributing XX wt.-%3}) / ({accumulated content of lowest carbon number for which accumulated content exceeds XX wt.-%3) - {accumulated content of highest carbon number not yet contributing XX wt.-%3})]

The linear interpolation can be easily understood from the graphical illustration of FIG. 1. In FIG. 1, the y-axis represents the accumulated content of compounds and carbon numbers are arranged on the x-axis ordered by their number. The bars represent individual content of compounds with the respective carbon number. The dots represent the accumulated content (cumulative mass fraction) for the respective carbon number and the line graph represents the linear interpolation (i.e. drawing a straight line between neighbouring dots). The carbon number where the line graph crosses the 50% — 25 cumulative mass fraction (horizontal line) is the c 50 value, which is slightly

O above 16 in FIG. 1, as shown by the dotted line.

N

N The IVR, IDR and IQR ranges are less sensitive to tail effects and thus provide

E more stable results than the carbon range. en 30 2 Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an

N interdecile carbon number range (IDR) of 4.5 or less, preferably 4.0 or less,

N 3.5 or less, or 3.0 or less. Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interquartile carbon number range (IQR) of 2.5 or less, preferably 2.0 or less, 1.8 or less, or 1.5 or less.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of C11 and higher carbon number components of less than 5.0 wt.- %, preferably 4.5 wt.-% or less, 4.0 wt.-% or less, 3.5 wt.-% or less, 3.0 wt.-% or less, 2.5 wt.-% or less or 2.0 wt.-% or less. For example, the content of C11 and higher carbon number components may be 0.0 to 5.0 wt.- %, or 0.1 to 5.0 wt.-%

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a

T95 temperature of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, or 140°C or less.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a

T99 temperature of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less, 180°C or less, 160°C or less, or 140°C or less.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a final boiling point of 220°C or less, preferably 200°C or less, 180°C or less, or 160°C or less.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an initial boiling point of 20°C or more, preferably 20°C to 60°C, such as 30°C = 25 to 50°C or 30°C to 45°C. &

N Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a

N T5 temperature of 40°C or more, preferably 45°C or more, 50°C or more,

E 55°C or more, or 60°C or more. en 30 2 In the present invention, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range

N hydrocarbon feed has low contents of light and very light components.

N

Having an initial boiling point and/or a T5 temperature within the above ranges improves the yield of valuable products, in particular propylene and ethylene, over C3 and C4 products in the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b).

Preferably, the difference between the T10 temperature and the T90 temperature (T90-T10) of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is less than 100°C, preferably less than 80°C, such as 20°C to 75°C, 30°C to 70°C, or 40°C to 70°C.

The difference between T10 and T90 value largely disregards outliers (tails) in the boiling distribution and is thus a stable and very reliable measure for describing the homogeneity of a composition. Within the above limits, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has been found to produce favourable product distribution while still making use of a considerable amount of the material, thus contributing to high overall yield improvement.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a total paraffins content of 90 wt.-% or more, preferably 92 wt.-% or more, 93 wt.-% or more, 94 wt.-% or more or 95 wt.-% or more.

The content of total paraffins in the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed of the present invention refers to the summed amount of — 25 n-paraffins and i-paraffins relative to the total weight of the renewable

O stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed. The inventors found that a high

N amount of total paraffins further increases the yield of valuable products and

N reduces coking tendency. =

N 30 Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a

A content ratio of i-paraffins to n-paraffins in the range of 1.7 or less, preferably

N 1.5 or less, such as 0.5 to 1.7, or 0.7 to 1.5.

N

An i-paraffins to n-paraffins ratio within the above limits provides a particularly high yield of ethylene. In the present invention, the ratio is defined on a weight basis, i.e. content by weight of i-paraffins divided by content by weight of n-paraffins.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content ratio of i-paraffins to n-paraffins in the range of 2.0 or more, preferably 2.2 or more.

An i-paraffins (iP) to n-paraffins (NP) ratio within the above limits provides a particularly high yield of propylene. In other words, by appropriately adjusting the i-paraffins to n-paraffins ratio, it is possible to adjust the product distribution towards desired products, thus providing higher flexibility of the product range.

An intermediate range within 1.7 to 2.0 may be employed as well, though being not preferred because it is not optimal for ethylene production and not optimal for propylene production.

In addition, such a high iP/nP ratio lowers viscosity and improves mixing characteristics and blendability, which is particularly (but not exclusively) beneficial when employing a co-feed in the cracking step.

Preferably, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is — 25 obtainable by a method as disclosed for the above-described step (a) of

O providing the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in the

N method of the present invention.

N

I Specifically, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed is

N 30 preferably obtainable by a method comprising hydrotreatment of an

A oxygenate bio-renewable feed and optionally isomerisation. The method

N preferably comprises the isomerisation.

N

It is to be noted that the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed employed in the method is preferably the renewable stabilized naphtha- range hydrocarbon feed disclosed herein, i.e. having the characteristics mentioned herein.

In an embodiment, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed may be obtainable or obtained by a method comprising subjecting an oxygenate bio-renewable feed to hydrotreatment comprising at least hydrodeoxygenation to provide a hydrotreatment effluent, subjecting at least part of the hydrotreatment effluent to gas-liquid separation to provide a gaseous stream and a first liquid hydrocarbon stream, providing the first liquid hydrocarbon stream as a liquid hydrocarbon stream or subjecting at least part of the first liquid hydrocarbon stream to a further hydrotreatment comprising at least hydroisomerisation, followed by optional further gas-liquid separation, to provide at least a second liquid hydrocarbon stream as the liquid hydrocarbon stream, and feeding at least part of the liquid hydrocarbon stream to a first distillation column, preferably a first stabilisation column, to obtain a first overhead fraction and a stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction, optionally using at least part of the stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction in diesel fuel and/or recovering from at least part of the stabilised heavy liquid hydrocarbon fraction at least an aviation fuel range fraction and a bottoms fraction, separating from the first overhead fraction at least a fuel gas fraction and a naphtha range fraction, refluxing a portion, preferably at least 50 wt.-%, more preferably at least 70 — 25 wt.-%, even more preferably at least 85 wt.-% of the naphtha range fraction

O back to the first distillation column, feeding at least a portion of the naphtha

N range fraction to a second distillation column, preferably a second

N stabilisation column, to obtain a second overhead fraction, preferably

I comprising at least part of components boiling below 20°C, and a stabilised

N 30 naphtha range fraction, separating from the second overhead fraction at least

A a further fuel gas fraction and light liquid hydrocarbons, and refluxing at least

N a portion, preferably at least 50 wt.-%, more preferably at least 70 wt.-%,

N even more preferably at least 85 wt.-% of the light liguid hydrocarbons back to the second distillation column, and recovering at least a portion of the stabilised naphtha range fraction as the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed.

Cracking effluent

The present invention further relates to a renewable thermal cracking effluent having a benzene content of 6.0 wt.-% or less, a total content of ethylene and propylene of 45.0 wt.-% or more and a carbon monoxide content of 0.25 wt.-% or less. The benzene content may be 0.01 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, such as 0.1 wt.-% to 4.0 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.6 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.4 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.2 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 3.0 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 2.8 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 2.6 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 2.4 wt.-%, 0.3 wt.-% to 2.2 wt.-%, or 0.5 wt.-% to 2.0 wt.-% or less.

Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of ethylene and propylene of 45 wt.-% to 65 wt.-%, preferably 46.0 wt.-% to 65.0 wt.-%, 47.0 wt.-% to 65.0 wt.-%, 48.0 wt.-% to 65.0 wt.-%, 49.0 wt.- % to 65.0 wt.-%, 50.0 wt.-% to 60.0 wt.-%, or 50.0 wt.-% to 55.0 wt.-%.

Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of ethylene and propylene and total C4 olefins of 45 wt.-% to 80 wt.-%, preferably 50 wt.-% to 75 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 70 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 65 wt.- %, or 55 wt.-% to 65 wt.-%. — 25 Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of C4

O olefins of at least 5.0 wt.-%, such as 5.0 wt.-% to 20.0 wt.-%, preferably 8.0

N wt.-% to 20.0 wt.-%, 10.0 wt.-% to 20.0 wt.-%, or 12.0 wt.-% to 20.0 wt.-

N %. =

N 30 The total C4 olefins refer to 1-butene, 2-butene (including cis-2-butene and

A trans-2-butene), 1,3-butadiene, and isobutene. The total content of ethylene

N and propylene and total C4 olefins may also be referred to as total content of

N valuable light olefins.

The renewable thermal cracking effluent is preferably the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) of the method of the present invention.

Similarly, step (b) of the method preferably provides an effluent of the thermal cracking furnace having the properties of the renewable thermal cracking effluent mentioned herein.

Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a carbon monoxide content of 0.23 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.21 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, 0.19 wt.-% or less, 0.18 wt.-% or less, 0.17 wt.-% or less, 0.16 wt.-% or less, 0.15 wt.-% or less, 0.14 wt.-% or less, 0.13 wt.-% or less, 0.12 wt.- % or less, 0.11 wt.-% or less, 0.10 wt.-% or less, or 0.09 wt.-% or less.

Carbon monoxide acts as a catalyst poison for polymerisation catalysts. It is thus favourable to minimize its content in an early stage, thus reducing the efforts required to remove it. The present invention provides means to achieve very low CO contents even without the need for CO removal.

Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a C4 monoolefin content of 6.0 wt.-% or more, preferably 6.5 wt.-% or more, 6.8 wt.-% or more, 7.0 wt.-% or more, 7.2 wt-% or more, or 7.4 wt.-% or more. The upper limit may for example be 15.0 wt.-%, such as 13.0 wt.-%. In other words, the renewable thermal cracking effluent may for example have a C4 monoolefin content in the range of 6.0 wt.-% to 15.0 wt.-%, such as 6.5 wt.- = 25 C%to 13.0 wt.-%. &

N Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a 1,3-butadiene

N content of at least 4.5 wt.-%, preferably at least 5.0 wt.-%, or at least 6.0 z wt.-%. The upper limit may for example be 15.0 wt.-%, such as 13.0 wt.-%

N 30 or 11.0 wt.-%. In other words, the renewable thermal cracking effluent may

A for example have a 1,3 butadiene content in the range of 4.5 wt.-% to 15.0

N wt.-%, such as 5.0 wt.-% to 13.0 wt.-% or 5.0 wt.-% to 11.0 wt.-%.

N

Specifically, the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed of the present invention is particularly suitable for achieving high butadiene content.

In other words, this feed is similarly suitable as a fossil naphtha and thus may be co-feed with fossil naphtha in broad blending ratios without a drop in the butadiene content.

Preferably, the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a toluene content in the range of from 0.2 wt.-% to 1.8 wt.-%, preferably 0.2 wt.-% to 1.6 wt.- %, 0.2 wt.-% to 1.4 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 1.2 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 1.0 wt.-

C%, 0.2 wt.-% to 0.9 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 0.8 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 0.7 wt.- %, or 0.3 wt.-% to 0.6 wt.-%.

A thermal cracking effluent of the present invention is particularly suitable for further upgrading into monomer(s) for polymerisation.

Examples

The present invention is further illustrated by way of Examples. It is to be understood that the Examples shall in no way limit the present invention.

Thermal cracking of five feed compositions (C1, C2, C3, E1 and E2) was evaluated. A fossil feed composition (C1) corresponds to a conventional fossil light naphtha. The remaining four feeds correspond to hydrotreated and isomerised bio-renewable fat/oil having varying degrees of isomerisation and boiling point range. Of these, feed composition C2 is a broad-cut naphtha — 25 composition, feed composition C3 is a highly isomerized diesel range

O composition, feed composition E1 is a stabilized naphtha range composition

N and feed composition E2 is a stabilized and highly isomerised naphtha range

N composition. =

N 30 PIONA data and oxygen content of these composition are shown in the

A following Table 1

Table 1:

Component | a | | c3 | Er | E2 n-paraffins (nP) 34.0% | 33.1% 41.4% i-paraffins (iP) 39.9% | 59.5% | 91.5% | 53.9% olefins (0) naphthenes (N) | 25.49 aromatics (A) 10 ppm *n.a. means not available / not measured

The following Table 2 shows boiling properties (according to EN ISO 3405- 2019) and carbon number analysis based on PIONA data correlating carbon number (assumed to be a float number by linear interpolation) vs. content range (by weight) of the total composition and calculated IQR, IDR and IVR values.

Table 2: a | 2 | ce | E1 | E2 [BP (0 voi%) 187°C 5 vol% Temp. (15) 246°C 95 vol% Temp. (T95) 295°C | 137°C | 122°C 309°C | 170°C | 137°C

Comin (measured)

C_max (measured) eso | 53 | 69 | 161 | 62 | 63

S es | 59 | 96 | 177 | 79 | 77 e cos | 59 | 107 | 179 | 85 | 80 s

N

” [carbon range | 3 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 5 = *IBP= initial boiling point, FBP=final boiling point, c 05= Fractional carbon = number corresponding to 5% of the mass when sorted by ascending carbon number

S (c 10 and others similarly, as explained above)

Comparative Examples 1, 2, 3 and Example 1 and 2

The five compositions were subjected to steam cracking at two distinct coil outlet temperatures (COT) of 820°C and 850°C at a dilution (water/oil ratio) of 0.5 and a coil outlet pressure (COP) of 1.7 bar (absolute).

The resulting yield of relevant products are shown in Table 3 below.

Table 3: 6 | CEx2 | CEx3 | Ext | Ex2

Ta joja | a | e

COT 820°C ethylene propylene ethylene +propylene butadiene | 44 | 58 | 67 | 66 | 59 touene | 06 | 16 | 27 | 06 | 04 [carbon monoxide — | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08

COT 850°C ethylene propylene ethylene+propylene

C4 monoolefins 60 | 72

O 10 As can be seen from the above data, the steam cracker feed compositions E1

N and E2 according to the present invention provide low aromatics and high

N light olefins yield, especially at relatively low COT. In particular in comparison

I to conventional (fossil) naphtha, low COT may be employed while still

N achieving high yield. Furthermore, low coke formation was observed for the

A 15 inventive compositions and for fossil naphtha composition C1. Further, the

N cracking effluent produced from fossil naphtha shows high benzene content.

N It is assumed that this is because benzene is contained if the fossil naphtha cracker feed in relatively high amounts (and does not convert in the cracking process) and because fossil naphtha contains high amounts of naphthenes which are converted to aromatics, such as benzene as well.

The low-to-moderately isomerized composition E1 particularly provides improved yield of ethylene and butadiene and the highly-isomerized composition E2 provides particularly good yield of propylene and C4 monoolefins.

N

O

N

I jami o 0

LO

0

O

N

O

N

Claims

Claims

1. A method comprising (a) a step of providing a renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, (b) a step of thermally cracking the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in a thermal cracking furnace, optionally together with co-feed(s) and/or additive(s), and (c) a step of subjecting the effluent of the thermal cracking furnace of step (b) to a separation treatment to provide at least a light olefin(s) fraction.

2. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the thermal cracking step (b) is a steam cracking step.

3. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the content of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed in the total cracker feed is in the range of from 10 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, preferably wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 30 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 40 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 50 20 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 60 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 70 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, 80 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, or 90 wt.-% to 100 wt.-%, and the thermal cracking in step (b) is preferably carried out in the presence of co-feed(s), wherein the total cracker feed refers to the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed plus optional co-feed(s) and optional additive(s). — 25

O 4. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the N total cracker feed has a sulphur content in the range of from 20 to 300 ppm N by weight, preferably 20 to 250 ppm by weight, more preferably 20 to 100 x ppm by weight, and even more preferably 50 to 65 ppm by weight. en 30

2 5. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, further 3 comprising an optional step comprising derivatisation of at least part of the light olefin(s) to obtain one or more derivate(s) of the light olefin(s) as bio- monomer(s), and (d) a step of (co)polymerizing at least one of the light olefin(s) separated in step (c) and/or at least one of bio-monomer(s), optionally together with other (co)monomer(s) and/or after optional further purification, to produce a biopolymer composition.

6. A biopolymer composition obtainable by the method according to claim

5.

7. A renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed for thermal cracking.

8. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to claim 7, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of naphthenes in the range of from 0.1 wt.-% to 10.0 wt.-% preferably 0.2-10.0 wt.-%, such as 0.5-8.0 wt.-%, 0.5-6.0 wt.-%, 0.6 to 5.8 wt.-%, 0.8 to 5.8 wt.-%, 1.0 to 5.6 wt.-% or 1.2 to 5.6 wt.-%, based on the total weight of the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed, and/or wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of olefins of 0.50 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.40 wt.-% or less, 0.30 wt.-% or less, 0.25 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, 0.15 wt.-% or less,

0.12 wt.-% or less, 0.10 wt.-% or less, 0.07 wt.-% or less, or 0.05 wt.-% or — 25 less. S

N 9. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according N to claim 7 or 8, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon I feed has a total content of olefins and naphthenes in the range from 0.1 wt.- N 30 C%fto 10.0 wt.-%, such as 0.1 wt.-% to 8.0 wt.-%, 0.1 wt.-% to 6.5 wt.-%,

A 0.1 wt.-% to 6.0 wt.-%, 0.2 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%, 0.5 wt.-% to 5.5 wt.-%,

N 0.5 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.8 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 0.9 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%,

N 1.0 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, 1.1 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%, or 1.2 wt.-% to 5.0 wt.-%.

10. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of claims 7 to 9, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a content of aromatics of 0.80 wt.-% or less, preferably

0.70 wt.-% or less, 0.60 wt.-% or less, 0.50 wt.-% or less, 0.40 wt.-% or less, 0.35 wt.-% or less, 0.30 wt.-% or less, 0.25 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, or 0.15 wt.-% or less.

11. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has a carbon range of 10 or less, preferably 8 or less, 7 or less, 6 or less, or 5 or less

12. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according to any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interquartile carbon number range (IQR) of 2.5 or less, preferably 2.0 or less, 1.8 or less, or 1.5 or less, and/or the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interventile carbon number range (IVR) of 6.5 or less, preferably 5.0 or less, 4.5 or less, 4.0 or less or 3.8 or less, and/or the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has an interdecile carbon number range (IDR) of 4.5 or less, preferably 4.0 or less, 3.5 or less, or 3.0 or less.

13. The renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed according — 25 to any one of claims 7 to 12, wherein the renewable stabilized naphtha-range O hydrocarbon feed has a content of C11 and higher carbon number N components of less than 5.0 wt.-%, preferably 4.5 wt.-% or less, 4.0 wt.-% N or less, 3.5 wt.-% or less, 3.0 wt.-% or less, 2.5 wt.-% or less or 2.0 wt.-% I or less, and/or the renewable stabilized naphtha-range hydrocarbon feed has N 30 a content of C17 and higher carbon number compounds of 1.0 wt.-% or less, A such as 0.0 to 0.9 wt.-%, preferably 0.0 to 0.8 wt.-%, more preferably 0.0 N to 0.5 wt.-% or 0.0 to 0.2 wt.-%. N

14. A renewable thermal cracking effluent having a benzene content of 6.0 wt.-% or less, a total content of ethylene and propylene of 45.0 wt.-% or more and a carbon monoxide content of 0.25 wt.-% or less.

15. The renewable thermal cracking effluent according to claim 14, wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a total content of ethylene and propylene and total C4 olefins of 45 wt.-% to 80 wt.-%, preferably 50 wt.-% to 75 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 70 wt.-%, 50 wt.-% to 65 wt.- %, or 55 wt.-% to 65 wt.-%, and/or wherein the renewable thermal cracking effluent has a carbon monoxide content of 0.23 wt.-% or less, preferably 0.21 wt.-% or less, 0.20 wt.-% or less, 0.19 wt.-% or less, 0.18 wt.-% or less,

0.17 wt.-% or less, 0.16 wt.-% or less, 0.15 wt.-% or less, 0.14 wt.-% or less, 0.13 wt.-% or less, 0.12 wt.-% or less, 0.11 wt.-% or less, 0.10 wt.-% or less, or 0.09 wt.-% or less. = O N N N N I jami o 0 LO 0 O N O N