EP4413398A1 - Method for processing a gnss signal with a view to attenuating at least one jamming signal - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for processing a radio navigation signal originating from a satellite (SAT) and received by a radio navigation receiver comprising a plurality of receive antennas, each antenna being configured to receive signals originating from a satellite of interest (SAT), from at least one jammer and possibly from at least one other satellite (SAT') in given directions, the method comprising the following steps: detecting (E1), on the basis of the signal received by each antenna, at least one direction of a jamming signal; attenuating (E2, E2') the detected jamming signal in the detected direction; in which method detecting (E1) the direction of a jamming signal is based on determining a covariance matrix dependent on the signals received by each antenna given by (i), where Z is a matrix of size N x M in which each column corresponds to the signal received by each antenna, N denoting the number of samples acquired during a fixed period ΔT and M being the number of antennas.

Description

DESCRIPTION

TITLE OF THE INVENTION: Process for processing a GNSS signal in order to attenuate at least one interference signal

TECHNICAL AREA

The invention relates to a method and a device for processing, eliminating interference in signals received by an array of several antennas of a satellite positioning receiver or GNSS receiver (in English, “Global Navigation Satellite Systems”). And the invention applies in particular to the elimination of interference in a satellite signal received by such a receiver.

STATE OF THE ART

Satellite positioning systems, or GNSS systems (GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS) operate in the radio bands dedicated to this use located in the L band (i.e. between 1 and 2 GHz). Like any radio receiver, they are susceptible to accidental or intentional interference. Used in particular to facilitate transport (sea, river, land and air) and allow the smooth running of industrial, scientific and military applications, their jamming can endanger civilians, industrial processes and military personnel in operation. It is therefore necessary to deploy adequate anti-jamming solutions wherever necessary.

Such anti-jamming solutions are based on a spatial processing device comprising a Controlled Radiation Pattern Antenna (CRPA) located upstream of the GNSS receiver and aimed at mitigating the negative impact of jammers on receiver performance.

Such processing consists in forming an apparent antenna by weighting in amplitude and in phase the signals coming from elementary sensors before summing them so as to form a single signal. It is in fact a question of using a receiver of antennas separated in space and, by an adequate combination of the signals received by each antenna, to attenuate unwanted signals in all directions from which they originate.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The object of the invention relates to a signal processing method making it possible to eliminate interference affecting a signal received by an antenna array, for example a satellite signal received by a GNSS receiver.

To this end, the invention proposes a method for processing a radionavigation signal from a satellite received by a radionavigation receiver comprising several reception antennas, each antenna being configured to receive signals from a satellite of interest, of at least one jammer and possibly of at least one other satellite along given directions, the method comprising the following steps:

- detection from the signal received by each antenna, of at least one direction of a jamming signal;

- attenuation of the jamming signal detected in the detected direction; method in which the detection of the direction of a jamming signal comprises the steps of determining a covariance matrix depending on the signals received by each antenna given by R _zz = ^Z ^H Z with Z a matrix of size N x M where each column corresponds to the signal received by each antenna, N designating the number of samples acquired during a fixed period AT and M being the number of antennas; singular value decomposition of the covariance matrix where A _m are the eigenvalues, components being characteristic of wanted and interfering signals and other noise characteristics; comparison of the eigenvalues with one another so as to detect the presence of at least one interferer; determination of an indicator depending on a direction of arrival 0 between [0; 2TT[, the indicator being a function of a scalar between a signature pattern space of a jammer S(0) and U _AI which corresponds to the noise subspace of the noise space resulting from the decomposition, U _A , and S(0) being orthogonal for a jammer in the direction 0; a jammer being present in the direction 0 for which the indicator is below a given threshold.

The invention is advantageously completed by the following characteristics, taken alone or in any of their technically possible combination:

- the comparison comprises a determination of a number of jammers by comparing the eigenvalues two by two by successively calculating a coefficient p _{i M} = - ^L , i varying from M - 1 to 1 , the number of jammers being equal to i for p _{i M} greater than a determined threshold, preferably equal to ^s (Pi,M) _noise i

- the indicator is given by M(0) = log ₂ 1 | , a jammer being present in the direction 0 for which the indicator is below a given threshold;

- a number B of jammers detected is known, a jammer being present in the B directions 0 for which the corresponding indicator is lower than the threshold;

- the number of jammers detected is less than or equal to M - 2, the indicator being given by M(0) = Em=B+ilog2 l^m5(0)|, where B is the number of jammers, one jammer being present in the M - 2 directions 0 below the threshold;

- several directions are obtained over time for each jammer detected, the method comprising a temporal filter of the directions obtained for each jammer;

- the attenuation comprises the determination of a set of weighting coefficients w _CRPA or w^ _RPA associated with a satellite of interest making it possible to attenuate the jamming signal received in the directions thus detected and making it possible to attenuate the appropriate case the signals from other satellites so as to optimize the signal from the satellite of interest;

- the receiver receiving signals from a single satellite, the determination of the coefficient w _CRPA making it possible to attenuate the interference signal received in the determined directions comprises the steps of - determination of a reference vector w ⁽⁰⁾ =;

- determination of a weighting coefficient associated with each jammer or

- determination of a rectangular or square matrix of size 4 x (B + 1);

- determination of the set of weighting coefficients

^W CRPA ⁼ 71 with /i the first component of the vector J = (J) ^H = (fa ••• f _B -i fa) with

J = Jvfa = (JvC ^H JvC)- ¹ JVC ^H if B < 3 OR 7 = M ¹ if B = 3.

- the receiver receives signals from S > 1 satellites, the determination of the coefficient making it possible to optimize the received signal associated with a satellite of interest and making it possible to attenuate the jamming signal in the determined directions and that of the other satellites, comprises the steps for determining a coefficient of weighting associated with each satellite s: where fi, : denotes the wave number, d _m denotes the path difference with respect to the reference antenna, = ^is ' ^a direction of arrival the signal received from the satellite of index s, ^ _IM being the azimuthal component and ^ _EEV being the elevation component; determination of a weighting coefficient associated with each jammer in each determined direction determination of a matrix M of size M x (S + B) where S is the number of satellites, B is the number of jammers or jamming directions and M is the number of antennas: determination of the set of weighting coefficients associated with a satellite of interest with /i the first component of the vector W = 0 ^H = (j1 j2 • • • jS+BI js+B) with

(•) ^H : designating the operation “transposition (denoted (-) ^T ) + complex conjugation (denoted (•)*)”.

The invention also proposes a computer program product comprising code instructions for implementing a method according to the invention, when the latter is executed by a computer.

The invention is based on the fact that the power of the useful signals (GNSS signals transmitted by the satellites) is always much lower than the noise of the receiver. The eigenvalues of the signal space therefore mainly reflect the power of the interference signals received. In other words, λ _m are the eigenvalues of the components being essentially characteristic of the interference signals and other characteristics of the noise. The invention consists in exploiting the noise subspace obtained from the covariance matrix of the multipath signal supplied by the antenna array. A metric is constructed for a scanned angular domain by performing the scalar product between the eigenvector associated with the noise subspace and the spatial signature depending on the direction of arrival of the source to be detected. The metric thus formed reveals as many notches as there are sources present in the radioelectric environment picked up by the antenna array.

PRESENTATION OF FIGURES

Other characteristics, objects and advantages of the invention will emerge from the description which follows, which is purely illustrative and not limiting, and which must be read in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:

Figure 1 illustrates a receiver according to the invention;

Figure 2 illustrates a possible configuration of an antenna plate according to the invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates steps of a method according to the invention;

Figure 4 illustrates a distribution of the eigenvalues of a covariance matrix obtained from a matrix segment consisting of four Gaussian random signals of 1024 samples from four reduced centered Gaussian random variables;

FIG. 5 illustrates a metric obtained according to the method of the invention for detecting one or more jammers in a direction of arrival.

In all the figures, similar elements bear identical references.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a GNSS receiver 1 comprising an array of antennas, for example of patch type, arranged on an antenna plate 10 . The GNSS signals received by each antenna 11, 12, 13, 14 are transmitted to a processing unit 2 comprising several successive stages. A processing unit is for example a processor configured to implement various processing operations on the signals as will be seen below. Preferably, the plate comprises four antennas 11, 12, 13, 14. The following description is placed in the case of four antennas, but the invention also applies to a different number of antennas (denoted M in the following) . A configuration of an antenna plate is shown in Figure 2.

Furthermore, it is considered that the gain and phase calibration of the antennas has been carried out beforehand with appropriate hardware and software (algorithmic) means. Such an operation is indeed carried out before the acquisition. In a known manner, the calibration operation makes it possible to measure (in order to cancel them subsequently) the gains and dispersive phase shifts introduced by the reception chains associated with the antennas.

An incident signal s ₍ |, (where 4> designates the angle of incidence of the interfering signal) is received by each antenna connected to a stage 20 comprising radio units 21, 22, 23, 24 per antenna of known type allowing a filtering of the signals, amplification and transposition to an intermediate frequency lower than the carrier frequency of the received signal.The signals are then digitized by an analog/digital conversion unit 30 comprising an analog/digital converter 31, 32, 33, 34 by signal received on each antenna.

Each converter provides digital samples that contain navigation information (payload data), interference components and noise inherent in any radio transmission.

These digital samples are supplied to a module 40 which operates on the principle of the CRPA algorithm which makes it possible to attenuate signals due to jammers. It is considered here that a jammer is the transmission in one direction of jamming or interfering signals on the receiver 1.

Indeed, the samples received from each antenna are weighted by weighting coefficients which make it possible to attenuate or eliminate the components due to the jammers. In particular, these weighting coefficients make it possible to attenuate interfering signals in given directions, which amounts to creating, as it were, notches in the radiation pattern of the antenna array since certain directions are not taken into account in this case. .

Returning to Figure 1, the output signal of module 40 is therefore a linear combination of the weighted digital signals, i.e. for a sample n at the output: or again in vector notation s = Zw _CRPA where s is a signal whose interference due to jammers are attenuated, and where z _n is the signal from each antenna after analog-to-digital conversion and w _CRPA is the vector containing the weightings to be applied to each channel, M being the number of antennas.

Indeed, the set of coefficients w _CRPA makes it possible to attenuate the signals received in certain directions, the signal s being a linear combination of the signals received by each antenna weighted by weighting coefficients attenuating the signal in directions in which a signal of interference is received. The set of coefficients w _CRPA is a vector whose components are complex scalars.

Then, this signal s is supplied to a unit 50 which makes it possible to calculate the navigation data (not described here because it is well known to those skilled in the art).

Returning to module 40, the latter implements the steps of a process for processing the signals received in order to weight these signals in order to attenuate the interference described below and in relation to FIG. 3.

To do this, the unit 40 detects from the signal received and acquired (step E0) by each antenna, at least one direction of a jamming signal (step E1) then determines (step E2) for each direction weighting coefficients to be applied to the signals received by each antenna, these coefficients making it possible to attenuate the signal received in the direction of the jamming signal.

Acquisition (step E0)

An incident signal is acquired (step E0) and formed of several series of N samples (1 series per antenna). The incident signal can be written in matrix form. In particular, the incident signal s ₍ |, at the output of unit 30 (in vector notation) is given by where Z is a matrix of dimension N x 4 where N represents the number of samples acquired during the period AT=NT _S , T _s being the sampling period of the digitized signals coming from the unit 30 and the number 4 corresponding to the number of antennas. The signals s^ ^m) (k) (1 < m < 4), correspond to column vectors of dimensions N x 1:

It is assumed that the jammers are located in the azimuth plane (terrestrial jammers).

The matrix Z et has the dimensions: N×M, M being the number of antennas. The integer k indicates that we are considering the (k+1) ^th time slot (the first slot being indexed arbitrarily by 0). In summary, analog-to-digital converters provide a continuous "ribbon of signals" segmented into contiguous portions of duration AT. Each of these portions is indexed by k.

Detection of jammers (step E1)

In a step E11, the covariance matrix of the multipath signal received from the antennas is obtained. In particular, the multipath signal is considered divided into contiguous time segments Z(k) of N×M samples where M denotes the number of antenna elements of the antenna array and N the number of time samples to calculate the matrix of covariance R _zz as follows:

¹ _H Rzz = ZN

This matrix R _zz can be written in the following way by a decomposition into singular values (in English, singular value decomposition,

(SVD)) (step E 12)

M

Rzz ' Z _m U _m U _m m=l where A _m designates the eigenvalue associated with the eigenvector U _m

This decomposition can be interpreted in different ways. There are M + 1 possibilities:

^1st possibility (no jamming signal): the signal subspace corresponds to the empty set {0} and the noise subspace to {U^ - ^2nd possibility (1 jamming signal): the signal subspace corresponds to {t/J and the noise subspace to {U ₂ , - , U _M }

^3rd possibility (2 jamming signals): the signal subspace corresponds to {t/i, U ₂ ] and the noise subspace m ^th possibility (m - 1 jamming signals): the signal subspace corresponds to {U^ ... , and the noise subspace at

M ^th possibility (M - 1 interference signals): the signal subspace corresponds to {U^ t/wJ and the noise subspace to {U _M }

(M+1 ) ^th possibility (M jamming signals): the signal subspace corresponds to {U^ and the noise subspace at {0}

The invention consists in exploiting the noise subspace obtained from the covariance matrix of the multipath signal supplied by the antenna array. In what follows, we will denote the singular value decomposition of the covariance matrix as follows: R _zz = YAY ^H with Y = (Y! Y ₂ ••• X _M -i Y«) where denotes the set of eigenvectors and A = diagC^,/^, the set of eigenvalues which are respectively associated with them with >

Thus, the jammers possibly present in the radioelectric environment are detected (step E13).

Such detection consists in comparing the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix with a threshold.

Indeed, the decomposition into singular values of this matrix makes it possible to carry out a statistical interpretation of the acquired signals. The signal subspace, represented by the column vectors Y _1; Y ₂ and Y ₃ of the matrix Y, is an ellipsoid whose semi-axes correspond to these column vectors. Weighted respectively by the eigenvalues Â-L,  ₂ and  ₃ , they indicate the directions of greatest variation of the set of signals constituting the matrix segment. As for the noise subspace, it is represented at least by the column vector Y ₄ when the number of sources present in the radioelectric environment is less than or equal to 3. The table following characterizes the signal and noise subspaces according to the number of sources B present in the radioelectric environment:

In what follows, it is assumed that the interferers are two by two independent and that the noise power (AWGN) of the receiver is zero.

Let B be the number of jammers.

In the case where B = 1, the spatial signature of the source corresponds to a simple weighting and conjugation of the column vector Y ₄ :

Where “i e (C.

In the case where B = 2, the spatial signature of the sources (b _A and b ₂ ) corresponds to a linear combination of the column vectors Y ₄ and Y ₂ combined:

WHERE a ₁ ,b ₁ ,a ₂ , b ₂ ∈ C.

In the case where B=3, the spatial signature of the sources ( _br , b ₂ and b ₃ ) corresponds to a linear combination of the column vectors Y _1; Y ₂ and Y ₃ conjugate

Where a _lt b _lt c ₁₍ a ₂ , b ₂ , c ₂ , a ₃ , b ₃ , c ₃ ∈ (C.

If B < 3, we find that the product ^ _m ^T Y ₄ = 0 for me {1,2,3} since the matrix Y is unitary. Thus, if we want to cancel at most three jammers, the set of weights to use is ideally: w = Y ₄ If B > 4, the spatial signature of the interferers b _m for me {1, 2, ... , B] corresponds to a linear combination of the column vectors Y ₁ Y ₂ , Y ₃ and Y ₄ after conjugation: where a _lt b _lt c ₁₍ d _lt a ₂ , b ₂ , c ₂ , d ₂ , ... , a _B , b _B , c _B , d _B ∈ C.

Unlike the previous case, we cannot propose or construct a vector Y ₅ such that ^s _m ^T Y ₅ = 0 V me {1, 2, ... , B}. Indeed, if such a vector exists, it necessarily decomposes in the orthonormal basis B = (Y ₁ ,Y ₂ , Y ₃ , Y ₄ ) as follows:

WHERE a ₀ , b ₀ , c ₀ , d ₀ e (C.

Gold,

These considerations explain why we cannot cancel more than three jammers when an antenna plate comprising four antenna elements is used.

The generalization of this property to an arbitrary number of antennal elements is immediate. Note that we cannot cancel more than M - 1 jammers when an antenna plate comprising M antenna elements is used.

We now assume that we are in the presence of a noise of power a ² per reception channel (in the absence of sources, the singular value decomposition of the covariance matrix C _t ⁽⁰⁾ reveals the following eigenvalues: the conditioning of the matrix A is then close to 2). The method used to detect and identify the sources present is based on the comparison of the eigenvalues of the matrix Λ:

In the case where B = 1, we have:

The term P ^bl describes the power of the source (b ₁ ) in the semi-axis of the signal subspace (ellipsoid of dimension 1) that it generates.

In the case where B = 2, we have:

Terms two sources fa and b ₂ ) in the 2 semi-axes of the signal subspace (ellipsoid of dimension 2) which they generate.

In the case where B = 3, we have:

The t of the three sources (b1 b ₂ and b ₃ ) in the 3 semi-axes of the signal subspace (ellipsoid of dimension 3) that they generate.

In any case, the term fa, m e {1,2, 3, 4}, describes the noise power (AWGN) in the vector subspaces generated by the column vectors of the matrix Y.

The principle consists in comparing the eigenvalues (λ ₁ λ ₂ and λ ₃ ) of the potential signal subspace with that (Â ₄ ) of the noise subspace starting with _{λ 3} .

The comparison is performed iteratively as follows:

^1st iteration:

Initialize s ₃ (∈ IR ⁺ *)

If λ ₃ > s ₃ λ ₄ then B = 3 -> stop

^2nd iteration: Else initialize s ₂ (e IR ⁺ *)

If  ₂ > s ₂  ₄ then B = 2 stop ^3rd iteration:

Else initialize s ₄ (e IR ⁺ *)

If λ ₁ > s ₁ λ ₄ then B = 1 -> stop

Else B = 0 -> stop

The multiplicative coefficients s ₃ , s ₂ and s ₁ are determined from the distribution of the diagonal values of the matrix A resulting from the singular value decomposition of a covariance matrix obtained from a Gaussian matrix segment consisting of 4 Gaussian random signals from 4 independent centered reduced (or identically distributed) Gaussian random variables. Their value results from a compromise between probability of detection (PD) and probability of false alarm (PFA).

Figure 4 represents the simulated distribution of the eigenvalues of a covariance matrix obtained from a matrix segment consisting of four Gaussian random signals of 1024 samples from four reduced centered Gaussian random variables.

In the absence of sources, we find that:

To detect the sources, we propose to use the following thresholds:

In summary, to determine the number of interferers, one proceeds to a comparison of the eigenvalues between them by successively calculating a coefficient i varying from M - 1 to 1 , the number of interferers being equal to the smallest value of i giving p _{i M} greater than the threshold s _t which is preferably equal to 8 times ( ^{these values} depend on the number of samples N and are calculated once and for all, theoretically (when possible) or by simulation, during the design phase).

Once the number of jammers has been determined, it is a matter of determining their direction (step E14).

To do this, a metric is constructed for a scanned angular domain by carrying out the scalar product between the eigenvector associated with the noise subspace and the spatial signature depending on the direction of arrival of the source to be detected. The metric thus formed reveals at least as many notches as there are sources present in the radioelectric environment picked up by the antenna array.

The spatial signature of a jammer is defined as the response of an antenna array to a jamming signal. Such a signature is linked to the physical characteristics of the antenna array (such as the radiation pattern of the constituent antenna elements, the coupling between these antenna elements, etc.).

The antenna network and the afferent reception pathways have been previously calibrated. Calibration is the operation that estimates (using dedicated signals) and compensates for amplitude and phase deviations between channels due to physical differences between the components and lines that make up each unit of the reception (it has one unit per channel).

The spatial signature of a jammer is linked: to the path difference of the incident signal received by the antenna element m with respect to a reference antenna element (the antenna element 1 by convention). to the physical characteristics of the antenna array (such as the radiation pattern of the constituent antenna elements, the coupling between these antenna elements, etc.).

For example, in the case of an array made up of equidistant elements arranged on a straight line (aligned), the spacing must not exceed λ/2 (with λ the wavelength corresponding to the central frequency of the band of receipt considered). In our case (array consisting of 4 antenna elements arranged on the 4 vertices of a square as illustrated in FIG. 2), the spacing (corresponding here to the measurement of the side of the square) must not exceed λ/2 also. We assume the antenna elements are ideal omnidirectional antennas and that the reception paths are perfectly calibrated. Moreover, we will neglect the phenomenon of coupling between antenna elements. We note S(0) the spatial signature of a hypothetical jammer located on the horizon and whose azimuthal direction forms an angle 0 with a so-called reference direction. It is a vector of dimensions M x 1.

It is considered that the noise subspace is at least generated by the eigenvector U _M, that is to say the last one.

The metric is a function indicator of a direction of arrival 0 between [0; 2π [, the indicator being a function of a scalar between the spatial signature model of a jammer S(0) and which corresponds to the noise subspace of the noise space resulting from the decomposition, and S(0) being orthogonal for an interferer in the 0 direction.

Advantageously, such a metric is given by

In the presence of jammers, this metric presents notches in the directions of arrival θ _b of the jammers. The latter are detected by comparing the amplitude of the notches (local minima of M) with a predefined threshold TJ. We can therefore detect up to M - 1 jammers.

FIG. 5 illustrates the metric M(θ) in an exemplary embodiment. In this figure, the threshold is fixed at -15 dB, the notches being in the directions 0 for which the metric M(θ) is below either for 25 degrees and 330 degrees.

In the case illustrated in the figure, there are two jammers. It is considered to be the number determined in step E3. When there are more notches than jammers detected, then the directions for which the notches are below the set threshold are taken.

In order to guard against the appearance of false alarms on 6 _b , due to a fortuitous orthogonality of U _M with S(0) when the eigenvalues with me 1 ... M - 1 are comparable to λ _M , interference directions are successively determined in time to obtain a temporal sequence {θ _b } _t and this sequence is filtered with a Kalman filter (step E15).

Advantageously, the quality of the metric M can be greatly improved when the number of jammers B detected is less than or equal to M - 2, in this case the following metric can be used: In this way, the local minima are hollowed out and the rest averaged, which has the effect of increasing the probability of detection and therefore the performance.

Determination of the weighting vector (step E2)

We consider the case where the receiver receives the signal from a single satellite.

Once the directions have been determined in the previous step, for each of these directions, a weighting vector is determined to be applied to the signals received by each antenna, said vector making it possible to attenuate the signal received in the direction of the jamming signal.

In a way, this is about creating gain notches in the angular space in the directions determined in the previous step.

Thus, the interferers are detected using a specific module (comparing the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix to at least one reference value multiplied by a threshold) and their direction of arrival using a metric whose notches are compared to a threshold.

We place ourselves in an example where we can detect three jammers. The weighting w _CRPA is constructed as follows:

A reference vector w ⁽⁰⁾ associated with the satellite is determined (step E21): Such a vector makes it possible to have an initialization of the calculation of the vector of weighting.

A weighting coefficient associated with each jamming direction (here p=3 directions or jammers) is determined (step E22): Or : Consider the square matrix of order 4 (a reference vector and three interferers) (step E23).

Either by inverting M (M is built in such a way as to be always invertible provided that the directions of the jammers selected are distinct):

J = JVC- ¹

Or if we note J = (J) ^H = (j ₁ j ₂ j ₃ j ₄ ), the weight vector sought is given by (step E24):

^W CRPA ⁼ fa

More generally for B < 3 jammers we have:

In a complementary way, if only one jammer was detected during the preliminary detection step then the matrix M to be processed would be given by: JVC = (w ⁽⁰⁾ 4x2 size.

As JVC is no longer square, we cannot simply invert it: in this case we must calculate the Moore-Penrose inverse.

We then have:

J = Jvfa = (JvC ^H JvTr ¹ JvC ^H

J = (fa ^H = (fa fa)

^W CRPA ⁼ fa

Similarly, if two jammers were detected then the JVC matrix to be processed would be given by:

^W CRPA ⁼ fa- Alternatively, in the case of an arbitrary antenna plate, we have

Generalization to several satellites, several jammers, several antennas (step E2’)

In a complementary way, we are in the case where the receiver receives signals from several satellites

It is assumed that the receiver simultaneously receives signals from up to S satellites. The direction of arrival of GNSS signals is provided to the CRPA 40 module and includes two angular components, azimuth and elevation, and is noted as follows:

B interferers are considered (as in the case where a single satellite is present). The direction of arrival of the jammers is estimated as before and includes a single component, the azimuth, and is noted as follows:

It is assumed that the jammers are terrestrial (that is to say that they are installed on masts, on road vehicles or even on ships; they are not airborne) so that their direction of arrival presents only an angular component: the azimuth.

The antenna array used comprises M coplanar elements (patch antennas), arranged according to a given geometric configuration (linear, circle, disc, matrix, any). The antennas are indexed from 1 to M.

The antenna of index 1 is considered as the reference antenna (i.e. it is considered as the origin for the calculation of the path difference d between it and the other antennas).

We consider the case where the following condition is fulfilled:

(S + B) < M.

As before, it is sought to attenuate the signals in the directions of the identified jammers. For this, we calculate a weight vector per tracked satellite (it there are therefore, at each iteration, as many calculated weight vectors as there are tracked satellites). The idea is to cancel both the contribution of competing satellites of index s (there are S - 1) and that of identified interferers (up to B) by projecting "notches" of gain in the direction of these sources and to achieve a gain on the signals originating from the GNSS satellite of interest of index s.

The following set of weighting coefficients is calculated (step E21') with respect to each satellite (including the satellite of interest with index ^) (we speak of the reference vector for the satellite of interest): is the wave number. denotes the path difference with respect to the reference antenna (antenna of index 1). It depends on the geometric configuration of the antenna array. is a vector whose each component corresponds to a weighting coefficient.

Similarly, as regards the jammers, the following set of weighting coefficients is calculated (step E22')

The coefficient plays a role similar to that played by w ⁽⁰⁾ (see below before): this is a vector that we are going to "constrain" in order to create a gain towards the GNSS satellite of interest and gain notches towards the jammers and the other GNSS satellites (which would possibly be likely to disturb the reception of signals from the GNSS satellite of interest; this is usually not the case because in general the signals GNSS of the same system are designed not to interfere with each other).

Consider then the following rectangular matrix of dimensions M x (S + B) (the matrix is square if S + B = M) (step E23')

We then calculate the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of ) M:

Or, if it is square, we simply reverse it: J = JVC- ¹ where:

(•) ^H : designates the “transposition + complex conjugation” operation

If we denote W = J ^H = (/i / ₂ ••• js+Bi JS+B) then the set of weighting coefficients associated with the satellite of interest with index & is given

Claims

1. Method for processing a radionavigation signal from a satellite (SAT) received by a radionavigation receiver comprising several reception antennas, each antenna being configured to receive signals from a satellite of interest (SAT) , at least one jammer and possibly at least one other satellite (SAT') along given directions, the method comprising the following steps:

- detection (E1) from the signal received by each antenna, of at least one direction of a jamming signal;

- attenuation (E2, E2') of the jamming signal detected in the detected direction; method in which the detection (E1) of the direction of a jamming signal comprises the steps of determining a covariance matrix as a function of the signals received by each antenna given by with Z a matrix of size N x M where each column corresponds to the signal received by each antenna, N designating the number of samples acquired during a fixed period AT and M being the number of antennas; singular value decomposition of the covariance matrix where A _m are the eigenvalues, components being characteristic of the wanted and interfering signals and of other characteristics of the noise; comparison of the eigenvalues with one another so as to detect the presence of at least one interferer; determination of an indicator depending on a direction of arrival 0 between [0; 2TT[, the indicator being a function of a scalar between a spatial signature model of a jammer S(0) and which corresponds to the noise subspace of the noise space resulting from the decomposition, and S(0) being orthogonal for an interferer in the θ direction; a jammer being present in the direction 0 for which the indicator is below a given threshold.

2. Method according to claim 1, in which the comparison comprises determining a number of interferers by comparing two by two the eigenvalues by successively calculating a coefficient pi varying from M - 1 to 1, the number of jammers being equal to i for p _{i M} greater than a determined threshold, preferably equal to 8 (p _i,M ~) _noise .

3. Method according to one of the preceding claims, in which the indicator is given by M(θ) a jammer being present in the direction θ for which the indicator is below a given threshold.

4. Method according to one of claims 2 to 3, a number B of jammers detected is known, a jammer being present in the B directions θ for which the corresponding indicator is below the threshold.

5. Method according to claim 2, in which the number of jammers detected is less than or equal to M - 2, the indicator being given by M(θ) = where B is the number of interferers, one interferer being present in the M − 2 directions 0 below the threshold.

6. Method according to one of the preceding claims, in which several directions are obtained over time for each jammer detected, the method comprising a temporal filter of the directions obtained for each jammer.

7. Method according to one of the preceding claims, in which the attenuation (E2, E2') comprises the determination of a set of weighting coefficients w _CRPA or associated with a satellite (SAT) of interest making it possible to attenuate the jamming signal received in the directions thus detected and making it possible to attenuate, where appropriate, the signals originating from other satellites so as to optimize the signal originating from the satellite of interest.

8. Method according to the preceding claim, the receiver receiving signals from a single satellite, the determination of the coefficient w _CRPA making it possible to attenuate the interference signal received in the determined directions comprises the steps of - determination (E21) of a reference vector w ⁽⁰⁾ =;

- determination (E22) of a weighting coefficient associated with each jammer or

- determination (E23) of a rectangular or square matrix of size 4 x (B + 1);

- determination (E24) of the set of weighting coefficients

^W CRPA ⁼ /1 with /i the first component of vector J = Q7) ^H = (/i ••• / _B -i /B) with if B < 3 OR J = M ^-1 if B = 3.

9. Method according to claim 7, in which the receiver receives signals from S > 1 satellites, the determination of the coefficient making it possible to optimize the signal received associated with a satellite of interest and making it possible to attenuate the jamming signal in the determined directions and that of the other satellites, comprises the steps of determining (E21') a weighting coefficient associated with each satellites: : designates the wave number, d _m designates the path difference with respect to the reference antenna, = (^AZIM^ELEV ) ^{is the} direction of arrival of the received signal 25 from index satellite being the azimuthal component and being the elevation component; determination (E22') of a weighting coefficient associated with each jammer in each determined direction

- determination (E23') of a matrix M of size M x (S + B) where S is the number of satellites, B is the number of jammers or jamming directions and M is the number of antennas: determination (E24') of the set of weighting coefficients associated with a satellite the first component of the vector W = 0 ^H =

(/i /2 ••• /S+BI iis+B) with

(•) ^H : designating the operation “transposition (denoted (-) ^T ) + complex conjugation (denoted (•)*)”.

10. Computer program product comprising code instructions for implementing a method according to one of claims 1 to 9, when the latter is executed by a computer.