EP4272010A1

EP4272010A1 - Method for determining, using an optronic system, positions in a scene, and associated optronic system

Info

Publication number: EP4272010A1
Application number: EP21847711.5A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Alain Simon; Arnaud Beche; Jean SOULA; Pierre-Yves GUINET; Pascal JEROT
Original assignee: Thales SA
Current assignee: Thales SA
Priority date: 2020-12-29
Filing date: 2021-12-28
Publication date: 2023-11-08
Also published as: FR3118523A1; US20240069211A1; CA3203317A1; FR3118523B1; WO2022144366A1

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for determining, using an optronic system (18), positions in a scene (10), the scene (10) comprising reference elements (12) for known geographic coordinates, the optronic system (18) comprising the following elements which are integrated into the optronic system (18): a. a digital imager, b. a memory which stores, for each reference element (12) of the scene, an indicator representative of the point associated with the geographic coordinates of the point, c. an element that displays the indicators stored in the memory, d. a measurement module comprising at least one element selected from: a compass, a goniometer and a telemeter; and e. a calculation unit, the method being carried out by the elements integrated in the optronic system (18).

Description

DESCRIPTION

TITLE: Process for determining positions by an optronic system in a scene and associated optronic system

The present invention relates to a method for determining at least one position by an optronic system in a scene. The present invention also relates to such an optronic system.

During the surveillance of an operations scene, the determination of positions, local or distant, makes it possible to have information on elements of interest of the scene, and possibly to initiate actions against such elements. Thus, the more precise the positions determined, the better the control of the situation.

It is known in particular to determine such positions according to the measurements made by an optronic system on elements of the scene, and the position of the optronic system obtained by a satellite positioning system (GNSS for Geolocation and Navigation by a Navigation System). satellites).

Nevertheless, the accuracy of the position obtained by the GNSS is not always sufficient depending on the applications. In addition, GNSS signals are likely to be altered without the receiver or the operator being aware of this alteration, or even unavailable. The alterations of a GNSS signal are, for example, due to interference by spurious signals, masking by infrastructures or even multiple reflections of the GNSS signal. In addition, GNSS are also susceptible to being tricked by third parties.

There is therefore a need for an optronic system making it possible to determine positions in a more precise and robust manner.

To this end, the subject of the invention is a method for determining at least one position by an optronic system in a scene, the scene comprising reference elements of known geographic coordinates, the optronic system comprising the following elements integrated into said optronic system:

- a digital imager,

- a memory in which is stored, for at least each reference element of the scene, an indicator representative of said point associated with the geographical coordinates of said point,

- an element for displaying the indicators stored in the memory, - a measurement module comprising at least one element chosen from: a compass, a goniometer and a rangefinder,

- a calculation unit, the method being implemented by the elements integrated into the optronic system and comprising:

- a data collection phase relating to at least one reference element of the scene, the collection phase comprising, for each reference element, the steps of: o pointing, by the digital imager, of the reference element in the scene, o acquisition, by the measurement module, of at least one measurement relating to the reference element pointed to in the scene following receipt of a first acquisition command, o pointing, on the element display, among the stored indicators, of an indicator representative of the reference element pointed in the scene, o acquisition, by the calculation unit, of the geographical coordinates associated with the indicator pointed following the reception of a second acquisition command, o storage of so-called reference data, comprising the at least one measurement acquired and the geographical coordinates acquired,

- a phase of determining the position of the optronic system according to the reference data stored for the at least one reference element.

According to other advantageous aspects of the invention, the method comprises one or more of the following characteristics, taken in isolation or in all technically possible combinations:

- the indicators stored in the memory are geo-referenced points on geographical data, the geographical data comprising at least one element among: an ortho-image of the scene, a digital terrain model of the scene, a cartography of the scene and a digital elevation model of the scene, the memory preferably comprising, in addition to the indicators of the reference elements, indicators of all the geo-referenced points on the geographical data;

- the pointing step of an indicator comprises the display on the display element: o of the image of the scene comprising the reference element pointed by the digital imager, and o of the indicators stored in the memory ; - the phase of determining the position of the optronic system comprises the selection, by the computing unit, of a technique for determining positions from among a set of techniques for determining positions according to the nature of the element(s) of the module of measurement having acquired the at least one measurement corresponding to the reference datum, the position of the optronic system being determined on the basis of the selected determination technique;

- each element of the measurement module is associated with a measurement uncertainty and each geographical coordinate is associated with an uncertainty on said geographical coordinate, the phase for determining the position of the optronic system comprising the determination of an uncertainty on the position determined in function of the corresponding uncertainties on the at least one element of the measurement module and on the geographic coordinates;

- the phase of determining the position of the optronic system comprises the calculation of an approximate position of the optronic system according to stored reference data and the calculation of an optimal position of the optronic system from the approximate position and the baseline data set;

- the phase of determining the position of the optronic system comprises the evaluation of the integrity of the reference data, and the determination of an honest position according to the only reference data evaluated as being honest, and of the calculated optimal position ;

- the optronic system comprises a receiver for geolocation and navigation by a satellite system, called GNSS receiver, the method comprising a phase of determining the position of the optronic system by the GNSS receiver, called GNSS position, and validation or not of the GNSS position as a function of a position of the optronic system determined via the reference data, advantageously when the GNSS position has been validated, the method comprises merging the GNSS position with the position of the optronic system determined via the reference data used for the comparison so as to obtain a definitive position for the optronic system;

- the measurement module comprises an odometric goniometer or an odometric compass, at least one acquired measurement relating to the reference elements being an orientation measurement, the measurement acquisition step comprising: a. the acquisition of a series of images of the scene, the series of images comprising at least one image of the reference element, the images of the series of images overlapping two by two, and b. the determination, by the odometric goniometer or the odometric compass, of an orientation of the reference element with respect to the optronic system as a function of the series of images of the acquired scene;

- the method comprises a phase of determining the position of an object of the scene as a function of the determined position of the optronic system, of an orientation obtained from the object with respect to the optronic system and of a distance obtained between the object and the optronic system;

- the phase of determining the position of the object comprises the steps of: o acquisition of a series of images of the scene, the series of images comprising at least one image of the object, the images of the series of images overlapping two by two, and o determination of the orientation of the object with respect to the optronic system as a function of the series of images of the scene;

- the measurement module of the optronic system comprises at least one compass, the orientation of the object being obtained by a measurement acquired by the compass during pointing of the object by the digital imager;

- at least one element of the measurement module of the optronic system is a rangefinder, the distance between the object and the optronic system being obtained by a measurement acquired by the rangefinder during pointing of the object by the digital imager, where the distance between the object and the optronic system is the distance between the determined position of the optronic system and the intersection of a predetermined straight line with the ground of a digital terrain model, the predetermined straight line passing through the determined position of the optronic system and having for orientation the obtained orientation of the object with respect to the optronic system;

- the optronic system is chosen from: a pair of optronic binoculars and an optronic camera;

- at least one element of the measurement module is a magnetic compass, the method comprising an automatic calibration phase of the declination, of the measurements and of the simbleautage of the magnetic compass by means of measurements acquired for at least two reference elements, during pointing of said reference elements by the digital imager; the measurement module comprises a rangefinder and a goniometer, the determination of the approximate position of the optronic system comprising the automatic calibration of the bearing of the goniometer so that the goniometer functions as a compass, by means of measurements acquired with two reference elements, during pointing said reference elements by the digital imager. the measurement module comprises a rangefinder and an inclinometer, the determination of the approximate position of the optronic system being carried out by means of measurements acquired for three reference elements, during the pointing of said reference elements by the digital imager.

- the measurement module comprises a goniometer, the determination of the approximate position of the optronic system, as well as a determination of the bearing of the goniometer being carried out by means of measurements acquired for three reference elements, during the pointing of said reference elements by the digital imager. The invention further relates to an optronic system for determining at least one position by an optronic system in a scene, the scene comprising reference elements of known geographic coordinates, the optronic system comprising the following elements integrated into said system optronics:

- a digital imager,

- an element for displaying the indicators stored in the memory,

- a measurement module comprising at least one element chosen from: a compass, a goniometer and a rangefinder,

- a calculation unit, the optronic system being configured to implement a method as described above.

Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will appear on reading the following description of embodiments of the invention, given by way of example only, and with reference to the drawings which are:

- Figure 1, a schematic representation of a scene comprising reference elements (landmarks), as well as objects of unknown coordinates, an operator equipped with an optronic system is also present in the scene,

- Figure 2, a schematic representation of an example of an optronic system comprising elements integrated into said system,

- Figure 3, a flowchart of an example of implementation of a process for determining positions in a scene,

- Figure 4, a schematic representation of a first example of determining the position of the optronic system,

- Figure 5, a schematic representation of a variant of the first example of Figure 4, - Figure 6, a schematic representation of a second example of determining the position of the optronic system, and

- Figure 7, a schematic representation of a third example of determining the position of the optronic system.

In the following description, an absolute orientation is characterized by angles expressed with respect to a geographical reference. The most used are the azimuth angle which expresses the orientation in a locally horizontal plane (tangent to the ellipsoid associated with the geoid) with respect to the local geographic meridian and the elevation angle (or angle of inclination) which expresses the orientation in a vertical plane, with respect to the locally horizontal plane. A compass typically measures an azimuth. An inclinometer typically measures an elevation.

A relative orientation is defined with respect to another orientation (i.e. an angular difference between two orientations), characterized by the bearing angles in the horizontal plane and the elevation angles in the vertical plane. A goniometer typically makes it possible to measure a bearing and a site.

A scene 10 is illustrated by way of example in figure 1. A scene designates a theater of operations, that is to say the place where an action takes place. The stage is therefore an extended space with sufficient dimensions to allow an action to take place. The stage is typically an outdoor space.

The scene 10 comprises reference elements 12, also called landmarks or reference structures, having known geographic coordinates. Scene 10 also includes elements with unknown coordinates, also called objects 14.

To implement the method according to the invention, an operator 16 provided with an optronic system 18 is located in the scene 10. The optronic system 18 is therefore also an object 14 of the scene 10.

Each reference element 12 is a fixed and remarkable object of the scene 10. The coordinates (latitude, longitude) of each reference element 12 are known. Optionally, the altitude of each reference element 12 is also known.

The reference elements 12 are for example points belonging to the following elements: a construction (building, steeple, lighthouse, road, bridge, etc.) and a natural element (mountain, rock, top of a hill, vegetation, tree, etc.). In the example illustrated by FIG. 1, the reference elements 12 are constructions.

Each other element of the scene 10 other than a landmark is an object 14 of unknown position. In the example illustrated by FIG. 1, the objects 14 are trees, a vehicle, as well as the optronic system 18 itself. Those skilled in the art will understand that the term "object" is used in a broad sense, and also includes individuals present in the scene.

The optronic system 18 is, for example, a system of the type:

- optronic binoculars (digital imaging, in any spectral band) portable, tripod or turret-mounted or handheld, or optronic camera (digital imaging, in any spectral band) installed on a vehicle or other support (mast, tripod, turret, building, etc.), orientable (controllable line of sight), or

- an omnidirectional optronic camera installed on a vehicle or any other fixed support (mast, building, etc.), or

- a system of distributed optronic cameras, installed on a vehicle or any other fixed support.

The optronic system 18 comprises elements integrated into said optronic system 18. By the term "integrated", it is understood that the elements are physically and software incorporated into said optronic system 18. Such elements therefore form a single block in the optronic system 18.

The optronic system 18 is thus, advantageously, compact and light (preferably less than three kilos).

The elements integrated into the optronic system 18 include at least the following elements: a digital imager 20, a memory 22, a display element 24, a measurement module 26 and a calculation unit 28. Optionally, the optronic system 18 comprises, in addition, one of the following additional elements: a GNSS receiver 29 and an inclinometer 30.

The digital imager 20 is able to acquire images of the scene 10. Advantageously, the digital imager 20 is able to operate in several spectral bands, for example, in the visible and in the infrared.

The digital imager 20 is, for example, a camera.

Data is stored in the memory 22. The data includes in particular, for at least each reference point 12 of the scene 10, an indicator representative of said reference element 12 associated with the geographic coordinates of said element 12. The indicators are typically visual elements displayable on the display element 24 and making it possible to identify the corresponding reference elements 12 .

The indicators are, for example, symbols, textual data (name of the reference element 12) or geographic data, also called geographic products. Geographic products include one or more of the elements following: a cartography, an ortho-image (of satellite or airborne origin), a digital terrain model (DTM) and a digital elevation model (DEM). In particular, the DEM is an internal datum used to find the altitude of a point with known coordinates in latitude and longitude, or to measure a distance by ray casting.

In the case where the indicators are geographic products, the optronic system 18 further comprises a geographic information system (GIS) which groups together these products (the data) and the software(s) enabling them to be exploited. (view, manipulate, etc). Advantageously, the geographic information system integrates functionalities making it possible to modify the display, for example, to: center an image displayed on a position (using an actuator, such as a button, a joystick, a mouse pointer, stylus, touch support, eye tracker, etc.), modify the data display zoom (increase or decrease the zoom) by any means (mouse wheel, touch support, joystick / buttons, eye tracker, etc.),

- automatically reload the data in case of modification of the center of the geographical product (map, orthoimage...) or of the display zoom,

- point to an element of the map to obtain its geographical coordinates (using an actuator), or

- display on top of the geographical product (overlay) thematic layers containing different types of information (for example the intervisibility of the terrain calculated from the observation post).

The geographical coordinates of the reference elements 12 are, for example, in the form of metadata associated with said reference elements 12. The geographical coordinates are, for example, expressed by a latitude datum, a longitude datum and optionally a datum of altitude (provided by the digital terrain model for example). The precision errors associated with these data are also provided.

In one example, only the indicators of the reference elements 12 are stored in the memory 22, the set of indicators then forming a reference book.

Such a reference book can be completed by the operator 16, for example, during a mission preparation phase. This mission preparation phase can be carried out: - either directly with the optronic system which makes it possible to create references and enter their coordinates,

- or via an external mission preparation system. In this case, the optronic system has the means to import data (usb key, wifi, etc.).

Thus, those skilled in the art will understand that the references are either predefined (in mission preparation), or developed in situ, by selecting them on the GIS or by entering their coordinates directly.

For example, the positions of the reference element 12 are noted by the operator 16 on a geographic product as defined previously and recorded in the form of a list (reference book) in the memory 22.

In another example, the indicators stored in the memory 22 are geo-referenced points in the geographical information system, which provides latitude, longitude (and altitude data if the digital terrain model is on board for example ).

Preferably, the memory 22 comprises, in addition to the indicators of the reference elements 12, indicators of all the geo-referenced points on the stored geographical products. In other words, geo-referenced data (such as an ortho image or a map) is data in which each element (pixel, element) is associated with geographical coordinates. Thus, each element of a geographical product is a visual indicator representative of a point of the scene 10. This allows the operator to more easily find the visual indicator of the reference element 12 pointed to by viewing it in a environment presenting similarities with the observed scene.

The display element 24 is capable of displaying images coming from the digital imager 20 and/or data stored in the memory 22, such as the indicators of the reference elements 12.

The display element 24 is, for example, a display, such as an OLED screen.

The measurement module 26 is able to perform measurements relating to the reference elements 12 or to the objects 14 of the scene 10.

The measurement module 26 comprises at least one element, such as a sensor, chosen from: a compass, a goniometer and a rangefinder.

The compass is, for example, a magnetic compass or an odometric compass.

The term “odometric compass” is understood to mean a software tool suitable for carrying out absolute orientation measurements indirectly from images acquired from the scene 10. Thus, when the compass is an odometric compass, a calculation relating to the odometric compass is, for example, suitable for being executed by the calculation unit 28. In this case, the odometric compass is suitable for implementing a method for measuring orientation such as that described in application FR 3 034 553 A, and which will be described in more detail in the remainder of the description.

The goniometer is, for example, a physical goniometer or an odometric goniometer.

Similarly to the odometric compass, the term “odometric goniometer” is understood to mean a software tool suitable for carrying out relative orientation measurements indirectly from images acquired from the scene 10. When the goniometer is a goniometer odometric, a calculation program relating to the odometric goniometer is, for example, capable of being executed by the calculation unit 28. In this case, the odometric goniometer is capable of implementing an orientation measurement method such as that described in application FR 3 034 553 A, and which will be described in more detail in the remainder of the description.

The rangefinder is, for example, a laser rangefinder.

Calculation unit 28 is capable of receiving data from other elements integrated in optronic system 18, in particular images from imager 20, data stored in memory 22 and measurements made by the measures 26.

The calculation unit 28 is, for example, a processor.

In one example, the calculation unit 28 interacts with a computer program product which comprises an information carrier. The information medium is a medium readable by the calculation unit 28.

The readable information carrier is a medium suitable for storing electronic instructions and capable of being coupled to a bus of a computer system. By way of example, the readable information medium is a diskette or floppy disk (from the English name floppy disk), an optical disk, a CD-ROM, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM memory, a RAM memory, an EPROM memory, an EEPROM memory, a magnetic card, an optical card or a USB key. On the data carrier is stored the computer program product comprising program instructions.

The computer program can be loaded onto the calculation unit 28 and causes the implementation of a method for determining positions in a scene 10, when the computer program is implemented on the calculation unit 28 as will be described later in the description.

The operation of the optronic system 18 resulting in the implementation of a method for determining positions in a scene 10 will now be described in reference to the flowchart of FIG. 3. The determination method is implemented only by the elements integrated in the optronic system 18.

During the implementation of the method, the optronic system 18 and the objects 14 whose position it is desired to determine are fixed.

DATA COLLECTION (STAGE 100)

The determination method comprises a phase 100 of collecting data relating to at least one reference point 12 of the scene 10. The data collected relate to reference elements 12 visible from the optronic system 18 (within range and not masked) . The collection phase 100 comprises, for each reference element 12 considered, the following steps.

Pointing of the reference element(s) (step 110)

The collection phase 100 comprises a step 110 of pointing, by the digital imager 20, of the reference element 12 in the scene 10. By the term “pointing” relative to the digital imager 20, it is understood the alignment of a reference, such as a reticle, of the digital imager 20 on the reference element 12 in the scene 10 targeted.

Acquisition of measurements for each pointed reference element (step 120)

The collection phase 100 then comprises a step 120 of acquisition, by the measurement module 26, of at least one measurement relating to the reference element 12 pointed to in the scene 10 following the reception of a first command from 'acquisition. The first acquisition command is a validation carried out by the operator 16 of the optronic system 18, for example, via an actuator. The actuator is; for example, a button, a joystick, a mouse pointer, a stylus, a touch support, an eye tracker, etc.

A measurement taken by a compass makes it possible to obtain an azimuth angle for the reference element 12. A measurement taken by a goniometer makes it possible to obtain a elevation and bearing angle for the reference element 12, relative to another reference element 12. A measurement taken by a rangefinder typically makes it possible to obtain a distance for the reference element 12.

As an optional addition, during the measurement acquisition step by the measurement module 26, when the optronic system 18 comprises an inclinometer 30, a measurement of the elevation of the pointed reference element in the scene 10.

In an embodiment where the measurement module 26 comprises an odometric goniometer or an odometric compass, at least one acquired measurement relating to the reference elements 12 is an orientation measure. The acquisition step 120 comprises in this case: the acquisition of a series of images of the scene 10, the series of images comprising at least one image of the reference element 12, the images of the series overlapping two by two, and

- the determination, by the odometric goniometer or the odometric compass, of the orientation of the reference element 12 with respect to the optronic system 18 according to the series of images of the scene 10 acquired.

Advantageously, the series of images acquired allows: the change of field to zoom in on the target: in the series of images, the field of the camera is modified with each image (continuous zoom), so that for the small field, the target or the reference is imaged and pointed with maximum precision, and that moreover an image of the series has the field of view used during the calibration phase (generally a large field). The intermediate images are used to readjust the images relative to each other step by step. the acquisition of a target or reference outside the calibration panorama: if the pointed object is outside the panorama established in calibration, the series of images allows, by moving the camera during the acquisition of the series of images, to create an "image bridge" linking the target to the panoramic. both at the same time (zoom the target and point at a target outside the calibration pan)

In an example of implementation of the goniometer/odometric compass, it should be noted that the position of the observer intervenes in two cases: for the absolute orientation of the calibration pan, in order to calibrate the odometric compass by exploiting minus an absolute orientation in reference (not done for the odometric goniometer which is relative). for the fine calibration of the goniometer when the calibration has not been carried out over 360° (in the case of a calibration on a sector < 360°, it is necessary to have two reference orientations to re-estimate the focal length). However, fine calibration is not required initially because an approximate value of the focal length is available. In practice, the process is iterative: approximate calibration -> approximate position -> refined calibration -> refined position -> refined calibration -> refined position, etc. Consequently, when the position of the observer is unknown (GNSS absent or not functional) and the operator wishes to use the compass/odometric goniometer (because it is more precise than the other means):

- the odometric compass cannot be used in first intention. we first use the odometric goniometer (without prior knowledge of the observer's position) to record relative orientations on references, which makes it possible to determine the position of the observer, thus making it possible to initialize the compass (which can then serve in particular to locate objects).

This process then imposes the exploitation of at least 2 references in the scene.

More specifically, the orientation of the reference element 12 is obtained by implementing a method for measuring orientations such as that described in application FR 3 034 553 A.

More specifically, as described in application FR 3 034 553 A, according to this example, the method comprises a learning phase and an operational phase. The learning phase includes the following steps:

- acquisition by circular scanning by means of the optronic system 18, of a series of partially superimposed optronic images, comprising an image or several images of the scene 10 (step A1),

- automatic extraction from the images of descriptors defined by their image coordinates and their radiometric characteristics, with at least one descriptor of unknown orientation in each image overlap (step B1),

- from the descriptors extracted from the overlaps between images, automatic estimation of the relative rotation of the images and mapping of the descriptors extracted from the overlaps (step C1),

- identification in the images of at least one known precise reference geographical direction compatible with the desired performance, and determination of the image coordinates of each reference (step D1),

- on the basis of the descriptors extracted from the overlaps and mapped, of the direction and of the image coordinates of each reference, automatic estimation of the attitude of each image, called the fine registration step (step E1), and

- from the attitude of each image, the position and the internal parameters of the first imaging device, and the image coordinates of each descriptor, calculation of the absolute directions of the descriptors according to a predetermined image capture model of the device imaging (step F1).

The operation phase includes the following steps: - acquisition of at least one image of the object, in this case the pointed reference element 12, called the current image, from the optronic system 18 (step A2),

- extraction of the descriptors of each current image (step B2),

- mapping of the descriptors of each current image with the descriptors whose absolute direction was calculated during the learning phase, so as to determine the absolute direction of the descriptors of each current image (step C2),

- from the absolute directions of the descriptors of each current image, estimation of the attitude of each current image (step D2),

- from the image coordinates of the reference element 12 in each current image, the attitude of each current image, the position and predetermined internal parameters of the optronic system 18, calculation of the absolute direction of the element of reference 12 pointed, according to a predetermined image capture model of each current image (step E2).

Optionally, once the reference element 12 has been pointed and measured, a fine pointing step is possible, consisting in aligning an alidade on a precise point of an image (among the series of acquired images) of the measured reference. This step makes it possible to precisely refine the point of the reference element 12 which corresponds to the geographical coordinates of the reference designated in step 130.

Pointing of an indicator for each reference element pointed to (step 130)

The collection phase 100 comprises a pointing step 130, on the display element 24, among the indicators stored in the memory 22, of an indicator representative of the reference element 12 pointed to in the scene 10. During this step, pointing designates the alignment of a reference (digital pointer, stylus) on the indicator of the reference element 12 or the selection of the reference element 12 from a list (reference book).

In an exemplary implementation, the pointing step 130 comprises the display on the display element 24, in parallel or successively or superimposed: a. of the image of the scene 10 comprising the reference element 12 pointed by the digital imager 20, and b. indicators stored in memory 22.

For example, when the display is made in parallel, part of the display element 24 displays the image of the scene 10, and another part displays the indicators.

For example, when the display is made successively, the image of the scene 10 on the one hand, and the indicators on the other hand, are likely to be displayed on the whole of the display element 24. For example, when the display is superimposed, the indicators of the reference elements 12 are displayed superimposed (approximately) on the image of the scene (by projection in the space of the scene).

Acquisition of geographic coordinates associated with each pointed indicator (step 140)

The collection phase 100 then comprises a step 140 of acquisition, by the calculation unit 28, of the geographical coordinates associated with the pointed indicator following the reception of a second acquisition command. The second acquisition command is a validation carried out by the operator 16 of the optronic system 18, for example, via an actuator.

Those skilled in the art will understand that the order of steps 110 to 140 is given by way of example, steps 110-120 being interchangeable with steps 130-140 (it is possible to start by designating reference data, then make measurements on the corresponding object in the scene. Or do the reverse).

Storing reference data (step 150)

The collection phase 100 then comprises a step 150 of storing a so-called reference datum, comprising the at least one measurement acquired and the geographical coordinates acquired. Thus, in the memory 22, the known geographical positions of the reference elements 12 pointed to are associated with the measurements obtained for said reference elements 12 via the measurement module 26.

DETERMINATION OF THE POSITION OF THE OPTRONIC SYSTEM (PHASE 200)

The method comprises a phase 200 of determining the position of the optronic system 18 according to the reference data stored for the at least one reference element 12. The determination phase 200 is implemented by the calculation unit 28.

Advantageously, the determination phase 200 includes the determination of an uncertainty on the determined position of the optronic system 18 by exploiting uncertainties on the at least one element having acquired the measurements and on the stored geographical coordinates of the reference elements 12.

In one embodiment, the determination phase 200 comprises the selection, by the calculation unit 28, of at least one position determination technique from among a set of position determination techniques as a function of the nature of the elements of the measurement module 26 having acquired the at least one measurement corresponding to the reference datum. The selection is advantageously carried out automatically by the calculation unit 28. The position of the optronic system 18 is then determined on the basis of the or each determination technique selected.

When the measurements have been acquired by elements of a different nature, the calculation unit 28 is capable of selecting several different determination techniques. The results obtained following the implementation of these techniques are, for example, compared, averaged or weighted to obtain an optimized position (in precision) of the optronic system 18.

In one mode of implementation, to obtain the position, one proceeds according to the following diagram:

- A) Calculate an approximate position with a minimum of measurements / observations. This approximate position solution is obtained explicitly. For this, we have a number of observation equations identical to the number of parameters to be estimated (at least equal to two to only estimate a position limited to the horizontal plane).

- B) Estimate an optimal position by minimizing a distance metric. The metric is typically written as the quadratic sum of the distances from the position to the places corresponding to the observations, each weighted according to the errors of the measurements of the instruments and the coordinates of the references. The estimator used delivers a position and its covariance with all the available observations. One can use: o a batch approach minimizing the metric iteratively starting from the approximate position. This estimator advantageously uses the a priori information carried by the approximate position and its covariance by adding two or three equations depending on the dimension of the space in which the position is calculated. o a sequential approach of the Kalman filter type, updated by aggregating the various measurements incrementally.

- C) Estimate an honest position. To eliminate biased observations that may contribute to the estimation of the previous step. The purpose of this step is to: o Detect if at least one of the observations is an aberrant, o If so, identify which observation(s) is an aberrant, o If identified, exclude the aberrant measurement(s) (s) of the observation batch to feed an estimator as in the previous step. - D) Calculation of a definitive position (if GNSS present). This step finalizes the position calculation as follows: a. Evaluation of the state of the GNSS receiver according to the position it delivers and the uncertainty it associates with it with regard to the complete position obtained and its covariance. b. Insofar as the state of the GNSS is judged to be correct, calculation of the final position obtained by merging the integral position with the GNSS position according to their respective covariance and calculation of the covariance of the final position.

In particular, for A), the elaboration of an approximate solution is guided:

- Depending on the methods accessible or not (magnetic compass DMC), laser range finder (LRF), goniometer (GON), which makes it possible to adapt to the architecture of the optronic system,

Depending on the number of accessible landmarks, which makes it possible to decide on the type of approximate solution to use so as to have an approximate solution as soon as possible as the number of landmarks available increases.

A solution is described by the number and nature of the estimated parameters. It could be :

The planimetric or/and altimetric position of the optronic system. Reference point at the optical center of the digital imager 20,

Bearing or attitude of the goniometer,

From the calibration of the magnetic compass which can itself be modeled in three levels described here summarized: o Estimation bias of azimuth, integrating bias of the compass, error on or ignorance of the local magnetic declination, error or ignorance of horizontal component of the simbleautage. o Estimation of an azimuth correction model integrating bias, and periodic components modeling Hard and Soft Iron effects. o Estimation of a corrective model adding to the previous parameters two angles of rotation characterizing the trimming attitude.

A few use cases used to implement the method are described. To obtain an approximate solution, we initially place ourselves in the barycentric local geographical reference of the landmark(s) used. The angular directions are rectified accordingly in azimuth for the passage between plane and spherical geometry and in elevation (taking into account the effects of atmospheric refraction if precision is needed and depending on the availability of meteorological data):

- With magnetic compass and inclinometer o In entrance

■ Measurement of the geodetic coordinates of two distinct landmarks, and the associated Cartesian errors (planimetric and altimetric),

■ Two magnetic azimuth measurements (magnetometer and declination) and associated errors on landmarks,

■ At least one elevation measurement (inclinometer) and its error on landmarks. o Implementation

■ Approach 1: a position is estimated by triangulation as a locus minimizing the quadratic sum of 2 lines in space.

■ Approach 2: calculate the intersection of straight lines of the plane bearing on each landmark and adding TT to each of the two azimuth measurements. Then, the vertical position is calculated from the elevations on the landmarks and the planimetric position obtained.

■ In each approach, calculation of a covariance on the position obtained depending on the errors on the 2 landmarks and the errors of the angular measurements.

■ Calculation of the geodesic position of the system by means of the Cartesian solution in barycentric coordinate system. o On exit

■ Approximate geodetic position of the optronic system P _c

• Position covariance, 3x3 matrix described in Local Geographical Benchmark (RGL) A _c

With rangefinder and inclinometer, o At the entrance:

■ Measurement of the geodetic coordinates of three distinct landmarks, and the associated Cartesian errors (planimetric and altimetric),

■ Three elevation measurements on the landmarks.

■ Three distance measurements on landmarks. o Implementation

■ Calculation of the radius obtained by rectification of the distance and elevation measurement. ■ In barycentric frame, intersection of 3 circles centered on each landmark by estimation of the plane position in the RGL by solving a redundant linear system (Degrees Of Freedom: DoF=1 )

■ Estimation of the vertical position of the system with distances and elevations

■ Calculation of the geodetic position of the system o Output

■ Approximate geodetic position of the optronic system P _r

■ Position covariance, 3x3 matrix described in RGL A _r With goniometer, o Input

■ Three goniometer measurements on landmarks (azimuth and elevation) and associated errors o Implementation

■ Approach 1: by elimination of the bearing in the barycentric frame:

• Intersection of 3 capable circles by difference of the angular azimuth readings of the goniometer on the 3 landmarks.

• Estimation of the position as before with LRF by replacing the measurements of the inclinometer by those of the goniometer

• Estimation of the bearing on the 3 landmarks according to the plane position obtained

■ Approach 2: by calculating the bearing in the barycentric frame

• Explicit calculation of the deposit

• Intersection of 3 straight lines to estimate the plane position obtained by solving a linear system of 3 equations. o On exit

■ Approximate geodetic position of the optronic system P _G

■ Position covariance, 3x3 matrix described in RGL A _G

■ Approached bearing of the goniometer G _o

■ Standard deviation of the goniometer bearing a _Go . - With rangefinder and goniometer, o At the entrance:

■ Two elevation measurements on the landmarks.

■ Two distance measurements on landmarks.

■ Two goniometer readings, or angular deviation, on the 2 landmarks. o Implementation

■ Calculation of the barycenter of the 2 landmarks and the coordinates in the landmarks in the geographical reference of origin of this barycenter.

■ Calculation of the 2 radii obtained by rectification of the distance and elevation measurement in the plane.

■ Calculation of the characteristics of the goniometric circle passing through the 2 projected landmarks.

■ In barycentric frame, intersection of the 3 previous circles in the RGL by solving a redundant linear system (DoF=1)

■ Estimation of the vertical position of the system with distances and elevations.

■ Calculation of the geodetic position of the system

■ To refine the solution with regard to the proper use of elevations and azimuths taking into account the earth's roundness; estimation of the position and bearing of the goniometer using the previous approximate solution. o On exit

■ Approximate geodetic position of the optronic system P _Gr

■ Covariance on the position and bearing of the goniometer, 3x3 matrix described in RGL A _GT

In another example, at least one reference point 12 is considered, and the measurement module 26 comprises a magnetic compass and a rangefinder. The magnetic compass makes it possible to measure the angle with respect to the north under which the optronic system 18 sees the reference element 12, and to draw an associated straight line. The rangefinder makes it possible to determine the distance between the optronic system 18 and the reference element 12. This distance is plotted on the line drawn, which makes it possible to deduce the position of the optronic system 18. With regard to B), the search for an optimal position makes it possible to obtain a better performance of localization. It is carried out as soon as one has: an overabundant number of landmarks in mono-modality, a minimum number of landmarks but multi-modalities, an overabundant number of landmarks and modality mixed.

With regard to C, the search for an integrated solution is carried out as soon as possible and the search for an approximate solution as presented makes it possible to separately evaluate a level of integrity of the measurements, from the position calculation stage. approximate, that is to say without strong redundancy. For this we compare 3 situations taking the positions by the pairs of 2 modalities (a, /?) e {C, T, G} and carry out a comparison test of their average. In summary, the difference of the 2 positions is compatible with their covariance, with a threshold r, set according to the desired consistency probability. If < T then the 2 positions obtained according to the modalities a and p are coherent.

Thereby :

- if 5 _CG is coherent but neither 3 _c/r nor 3 _G;T are, then we can suspect a telemetry problem on a landmark.

- if 5 _GT is coherent but neither 3 _CT nor 3 _CG are, then we can suspect a problem with the magnetic compass.

This characterization of integrity is considered minimal in terms of integrity control because it does not make it possible to detect an error in the coordinates of a landmark. For this we use a process in several layers: a redundancy of information where all the landmarks are used in mono or intra-modality,

- a multi-modality redundancy comparing the inter-modality solutions obtained separately with a minimum number of landmarks, for example the solutions of all the possible modalities on 3 landmarks. information redundancy using a global test with all landmarks in all modalities feeding the same estimator.

A redundancy of distinct estimators of batch and sequential type, of Bayesian type to integrate the information of the approximate solution, producing a solution and its estimated covariance, and a comparison test of their respective estimates.

With regard to D, once the optimal position and its estimated covariance, we test the position and covariance of the GNSS receiver in order to: evaluate its state and inform the user, - to merge estimated position and GNSS position if the latter is considered credible. This makes it possible to obtain a definitive position of ultimate performance.

More specifically, to evaluate the state of the GNSS receiver, the procedure is as follows: o After estimation of an intact position P ₂₆ at the end of the preceding steps and the calculation of its covariance A ₂₆ with all the correct measurements on the reference elements 12 available, o After reception of the position P ₂₉ and its covariance A ₂₉ from the GNSS through the 'National Marine Electronics Association' (NMEA) standard messages, o A consistency test is carried out between the 2 previous distributions, and between the NMEA information and that of the GNSS receiver datasheet. The GNSS receiver is judged to be inoperative in the event of inconsistency and, on the contrary, to be operative in the event of coherence. In the latter case, the final position P _i8 of the optronic system 18 is obtained as

Expression in which the covariance on the final position is given

In summary of D), when the optronic system 18 comprises a GNSS receiver 29, the phase of determining the position of the optronic system 18 comprises the determination of the position of the optronic system 18 by the GNSS receiver 29, called GNSS position, and the validation or otherwise of the GNSS position by comparison with a position previously obtained for the optronic system 18 via the reference data (preferably the position with integrity). This notably makes it possible to verify that the GNSS receiver has not been jammed or tricked. When the GNSS position has been validated, a definitive position is obtained for the optronic system 18 by merging the GNSS position with the last position obtained for the optronic system 18 via the reference data (preferably the intact position).

In conclusion, in this example implementation, three levels of verification are proposed for the integrity of the solution:

In mono-modality and with an overabundant number of landmarks, methods similar to the Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) techniques of GNSS are used. The originality comes from the fact that we are working here with information of a varied nature (landmark coordinates + a type of angle or distance measurement depending on the modality) and that we are evaluating the consistency of all the estimated parameters not limited to not necessarily to the only position. In mixed mode, the originality comes from the fact that we also work jointly with several types of measurement.

In multi-estimator, on the same perimeter of information, batch and sequential in parallel.

In the following, examples are given illustrating the principles described above, in particular with reference to Figures 4 to 7.

It should be noted that for the sake of simplification the examples which follow are given for positioning in two dimensions (projection in the horizontal plane). In this case, the vertical component (altitude, elevation) is not considered and the problem as a whole is projected in a horizontal mean plane. The positions are then described by two parameters (planimetric position) and the angular orientations (of the landmarks or of the observed) are described by the single azimuth or bearing value. The distances measured can be used as they are, or preferably projected in the horizontal plane by involving the cosine of the elevation of the lines of sight if this is known.

The simplifying 2D hypothesis is sufficient (in terms of precision versus a need) in several cases characterized by: low relief (small difference in altitudes on the theater of operation), knowledge of altitudes (observer, observed) not required or not needing to be precise, an observation geometry (line of sight between observer and landmarks and observed) close to the horizontal (< 10°).

The calculations carried out to obtain the position are nevertheless quite adaptable to a 3D or 2D approach depending on the need. In particular, having a 2D planimetric position (longitude and latitude), obtained by using a local plan at the position of the sensor, and accessing a geographic product of the DTM/DEM type, the vertical component of the position is completed by interpolation in the DEM/DEM. Insofar as one does not access a DEM and that one is located on a structure above the ground (eg building), then the height of the structure is if necessary calculated by a specific measurement with l digital imager 20.

For each reference element 12, depending on the nature of the element or elements of the measurement module 26, the following measurements are likely to be obtained and used to determine the position of the optronic system 18: the absolute geographical orientation, measured by a compass, the angular deviation from another reference element 12, measured by a goniometer, and

- the distance to the optronic system 18, measured by a rangefinder.

For each reference element 12, depending on the active elements of the measurement module, there are therefore 7 sets of possible usable measurements (1 observation out of 3, or 2 observations out of 3, or the 3 observations) depending on the observations (measurements) available / carried out.

The principles of four techniques for determining the position of the optronic system 18 are given by way of example in the following according to the information available and/or used on each reference element 12:

- first technique: use of absolute angles measured by a compass (see figures 4 (2 landmarks) and figure 5 (3 landmarks)),

- second technique: use of distances measured by telemetry (see figure 6),

- third technique: use of angular deviations measured by a goniometer (see figure 7), and

- fourth technique: technique using measurements from sensors of a different nature, the fourth technique is based on a combination or a fusion of one or more previous techniques.

In one example, according to the first technique, only the absolute angular orientations of the landmarks, measured from the observation position (unknown, also called the position of the optronic system 18) are used. The first technique involves measurements made on at least two reference elements 12.

As illustrated by FIG. 4, for two reference elements 12A, 12B, the position of the optronic system 18 is located at the intersection of half-lines D1 and D2. Each half-line D1, D2 has as its origin a reference element 12A, 12B (the origin corresponds to the geographical coordinates acquired for the reference element 12) and has as its direction the angular orientation (signed) measured by the magnetic compass . The references Az1 and Az2 designate the respective azimuths of the reference elements 12A, 12B considered. The reference N denotes north.

When the number of reference elements is greater than or equal to three, as illustrated by FIG. 5 for three reference elements 12A, 12B, 12C, the intersection of the half-lines D1, D2, D3 does not occur in one single point (taking into account the errors on the angles, and on the position of the reference elements). The position retained is, for example, the result of an optimization of nonlinear equations resulting from a problem describing the geometry of the example. In another example, according to the second technique, only the distances of the reference elements 12, measured from the position of the optronic system 18, are used. In this example, the measurements are made on at least three reference elements 12.

As illustrated by FIG. 6, the position of the optronic system 18 is located at the intersection of circles C1, C2, C3. Each circle C1, C2, C3 is centered on a reference element 12A, 12B, 12C and has for radius the distance d1, d2, d3 measured for the reference element 12A, 12B, 12C. The intersection of circles C1, C2, C3 is not a single point (taking into account the errors on the distances, and on the position of the reference elements). The selected position is, for example, the result of an optimization of nonlinear equations resulting from a problem describing the geometry of the example.

In another example, according to the third technique, only the angular deviations between two reference elements 12 (pairs of reference elements), measured from the position of the optronic system 18, are used. In this example, the measurements are performed on at least two pairs of reference elements, i.e. at least three reference elements 12.

As illustrated by FIG. 7, the position of the optronic system 18 is located at the intersection of arcs of circles C1, C2. Each arc of a circle C1 , C2 passes through the two reference elements of a pair of reference elements, which form the extremities of the arc of a circle, and its radius is such that each point of the arc of circle C1 , C2 is the vertex of an angle (signed) 0AC, <C>AB equal to the angle measured between the two reference elements.

From four reference elements (three circular arcs), the intersection of the circular arcs does not take place at a single point (given the errors on the angles, and on the position of the landmarks). The position retained is, for example, the result of an optimization of the nonlinear equations resulting from a problem describing the geometry of the example.

In another example, according to the fourth technique, the position of the optronic system 18 is determined by using measurements from different elements of the measurement module 26, the measurements being available for each reference element considered, or measurements (one per reference element) carried out by different elements between the reference elements 12.

In general, in a simplified “2D” approach, determining the position of the optronic system 18 amounts to determining the intersection of several geometric loci: - half-lines passing through the reference elements 12, characterized by an absolute angle (half-lines resulting from absolute orientation measurement of the reference elements 12), and/or

- circles centered on the reference elements 12 and with a radius equal to the measured distance from the reference element (circles resulting from distance measurement of the reference elements 12), and/or

- arcs of circles passing through two reference elements 12 and whose radius and center coordinates are expressed as a function of the angular difference measured between the two reference points and the coordinates of these two points.

The intersection of these geometric figures is generally not concentrated in a single point but forms an intersection zone, taking into account the errors on the observations (errors on the angles, on the distances and on the position of the reference elements 12 ).

The fact of using measurements from elements of a different nature to determine the position of the optronic system 18 makes it possible to:

- reject measures that seem aberrant compared to other measures,

- calculate a minimized intersection (center of the intersection zone) which is retained as the position of the optronic system 18, and

- evaluate a precision associated with this position, which expresses the dimension of the intersection zone, accentuated by taking into account the precision on each measurement (precision on the angles, on the distances, on the positions).

OBJECT POSITION DETERMINATION (PHASE 300)

The determination method comprises a phase 300 of determining the position of an object 14 (observed) of the scene 10 as a function of the determined position of the optronic system 18 (observer), of an absolute orientation obtained from the object 14 with respect to the optronic system 18 and a distance obtained between the object 14 and the optronic system 18. The object 14 considered is visible from the optronic system 18 (within range and not masked).

The position of the object 14 is then obtained by calculation, by the calculation unit 28, of the geographical coordinate located at the end of the vector having as its origin the position of the optronic system 18, for orientation the absolute orientation of the object 14 and for length the distance between the optronic system 18 and the object 14.

Advantageously, the precision on the position of the object 14 is calculated according to: - the precision on the position of the optronic system 18, the precision on the absolute orientation of the object 14, and

- the value of the distance and the precision on the distance between the optronic system 18 and the object 14.

For the determination of the orientation, according to an example, when the measurement module 26 comprises at least one magnetic compass, the absolute orientation of the object 14 is obtained by a measurement acquired by the compass after pointing the object 14 by the digital imager 20, after automatic consideration of the magnetic declination (integrated into the device).

According to another example, the orientation of the object 14 is obtained by implementing a measurement method (odometric compass) such as that described in application FR 3 034 553 A. Such a method comprises in particular the acquisition of a series of images of the scene 10, the series of images comprising at least one image of the object 14, the images overlapping two by two. Such a method also includes determining the orientation of the object relative to the optronic system as a function of the series of images of the scene.

For the determination of the distance between the object 14 and the optronic system 18, according to an example, when at least one element of the measurement module 26 is a rangefinder, the distance between the object 14 and the optronic system 18 is obtained by a measurement acquired by the rangefinder during pointing of the object 14 by the digital imager 20.

According to another example, when the object 14 is on the ground, the distance between the object 14 and the optronic system 18 is obtained by a ray-tracing method from a digital terrain model of the scene 10. The distance obtained is then the distance between the determined position of the optronic system 18 and the intersection of a predetermined straight line with the ground of a digital terrain model. The predetermined half-line passes through the determined position of the optronic system 18 and has for orientation that obtained from the object 14 with respect to the optronic system 18.

Thus, the method for determining positions makes it possible to determine, on the one hand, the position of the optronic system 18 (observer), and on the other hand, if desired, the position of an object 14 of the scene 10 of unknown coordinates (observed) by means only of elements integrated in an optronic system 18 provided that the scene 10 comprises at least one reference point 12 of known position (bitter).

Such a method dispenses with the use of a GNSS receiver.

The data collection phase by means only of elements integrated into the optronic system 18 is particularly ergonomic for the operator 16. The display element 24 makes it possible in particular to easily establish a correspondence between the reference element pointed to in the scene 10 and the corresponding indicator stored in the memory 22 of the optronic system 18. The risk of error is thus reduced.

Furthermore, the fact that all the elements are integrated into the optronic system 18 makes it possible to determine the precision of the positions determined. Indeed, the details of the elements of the measurement module 26, of the geographical coordinates and any approximations in the calculations carried out are all centralized by the calculation unit 28.

Depending on the case, the process also allows:

Integrity verification (detection and rejection of an aberrant measurement or data), which reduces errors.

- Simplified calibration of the magnetic compass, which involves saving time. Ability to work without telemetry, i.e. passively (without wave emission), which improves discretion.

Helps the user to acquire landmarks (because everything is integrated), which saves time and improves performance.

Assistance to the user for the choice of measurements to be carried out (because everything is integrated), which allows a better performance.

Those skilled in the art will understand that the embodiments described above can be combined to form new embodiments provided that they are technically compatible. Furthermore, the embodiments described can also be supplemented by the supplements described below.

Calibration of a magnetic compass

As an optional addition, at least one element of the measurement module 26 is a magnetic compass, the method then comprises a phase of calibrating the magnetic compass (self-calibration) according to measurements acquired after positioning the optronic system (without GNSS) by means of : ideally at least two reference elements 12, even if only one could suffice with the rangefinder, in order to access a correct quality of position of the optronic system with an uncalibrated magnetic compass. “Position of correct quality” of the optronic system means quality equivalent to positioning with GNSS in standard mode. a set of orientations obtained from the attitude measurements of the images of the sector or panoramic acquired in the calibration phase and estimated by the odometric compass, dated by the clock of the optronic system. a set of orientations obtained from the magnetic azimuth and magnetic compass elevation orientation measurements dated by the optronic system clock. the time synchronization of the previous two sets of orientations.

A magnetic measurement correction model, for example, capable of implementing one of the following methods.

A first method consists in estimating a simple bias in azimuth using a measurement modality (rangefinder or goniometer) delivering a quality solution, including on a small number of landmarks. For example of minimum configuration, with 2 landmarks subject to 2 telemetries and 2 magnetic compass measurements. Even biased, the compass measurements are sufficient to determine the correct position solution among the 2 intersections of the distance circles in the plane. The projection in the plane being done with the elevation measurements of the inclinometer integrated or not in the magnetic compass. With a good position of the optronic system, it is then easy to determine the bias of the magnetic compass. In practice, this bias integrates the lack of knowledge of local declination, from the mounting of the compass to the optronic system and the bias specific to the magnetic azimuth measurement. With an overabundant number of measurements, the compass bias can be estimated.

A second method consists in solving only a corrective model in azimuth. The set of observations makes it possible to estimate the coefficients by solving a linear system; the transformation between the orientations of odometric azimuth ψ _c and magnetic is then written as a function of coefficients (α _k , β _k ):

The magnetic azimuth can be compensated by an approximate value of the local magnetic declination to give the value ψp _m , the independent coefficient of the azimuth β ₀ will at least integrate the residual error of declination and mounting of the DMC opposite of even imaging.

A set of M measurement pairs leads to M equations from which the parameters are extracted as the least squares solution of a linear system with A a matrix M x (2 K + 1), and B a vector M x 1 . With a modeling of order K = 2 integrating the 'soft' and 'hard iron' effects, the unknown coefficients β ₀ , α _1, β _1, α ₂ , β ₂ are obtained with: This method does not require any particular knowledge of magnetic declination. This is integrated at the first order term fi ₀ . To determine the attitude of an image of the optronic system from the measurements of the magnetic compass (and integrated inclinometers/accelerometers) it must first be simulated. This operation, which amounts to estimating the mounting angles between the sensitive axes of the compass relative to the axes of the reference track of the optronic system, does not have to be carried out each time it is used, provided that the mounting of the compass to the optronic system is rigid over time.

A third method estimates both the attitude of the magnetic compass and its similarity described by its attitude in the camera. The transformation between odometric V and magnetic orientations M is then written with the assembly defect matrix

Or equivalently, the inverse edit correction matrix:

Where :

Writing the correction rotation matrix as:

Writing an orientation of the magnetic compass M(ip _c , 9 _c ), forgetting the atmospheric refraction on its elevation 9 _C as:

Also recalling:

- that the simbleautage angles ip _s , 9 _s and (p _s are low, or known to within a few degrees, because the axes of the compass are mounted approximately parallel to those of the imaging channels. This then makes it possible to write them (ips, <p _s ) = (xp _s0 + dip _s , 6 _s0 + d6 _s , <p _s0 + d<ps) The rotation R _M ^V , nonlinear according to the unknowns ip _s , 9 _s and (p _s , is written in linear form according to the increments

(chp _s , d6 _s , d<p _s ~) as: that for the magnetic orientation, the coefficients (a _fc ,/? _fc ) being weak, the orientation of the compass M is written in the first order in the linear form:

For M magnetic orientations associated with M odometric orientations, we then have a nonlinear system with 3M equations and 3+2K+1 unknowns. This system is solved for example in an iterative way in a Levenberg Marquardt or Gauss-Newton approach by initializing the system with angles of simbleautage of zero values (ψ _so , θ _so - '/'so) = (0,0, 0). we then have a linear system with 2K + 4 unknowns, that is to order K = 2 the 8 coefficients ψ _s , θ θ _s , p _s ,β ₀ , α ₁ ,β ₁ , α ₂ ,β ₂ obtained after 3 to 4 iterations of Gauss-Nexwton for example.

For this method, the use of an (approximate) value of the local magnetic declination is recommended as soon as it is available within the optronic system. Indeed, the angle ψ _s of vertical or azimuth mounting is not different from the coefficient β ₀ to separate them more finely we add at least 1 equation to the previous 3M integrating at least one of the a priori information relating to the values a priori, resp. ip _s0 and β ₀₀ , and their associated standard deviation, resp. σψ _s0 and σβ _oo :

Thus, the realization, the acquisition of a panoramic or a sector as in FR 3 034 553 A, and the use of at least two landmarks to position oneself without GNSS makes it possible to carry out in complete transparency for the user , and this by means of the joint measurements of the odometric orientations and the orientations of the compass on the images used for the construction of the odometric compass:

- correction of compass measurements for local disturbances linked to soft iron and hard iron effects,

- the characterization of the simbleautage of the compass to the optronic system, the assembly between the different channels of the optronic system being predetermined.

These calibrations give the invention the following advantages:

Reduced implementation time of the optronic system 18.

Ability to display in virtual/augmented reality vector elements on the viewing screen presenting a direct optical path or digital images of the paths of the optronic system, including if the system undergoes rapid rotational movements or if the user observes extremely homogeneous areas for which it would be difficult to implement a visual goniometer in its location phase with a view to positioning an object 14.

- Improved object location 14 using the magnetic compass and a measurement of its distance,

Possibility of moving the optronic system and resuming calculations of object positions 14 with the calibrated magnetic compass without resuming its N-point calibration, when the magnetic environment has changed little and without resuming a calibration procedure to use a goniometer . The object location accuracy 14 then being mainly limited by the angular error contribution of the magnetic compass.

Assistance in the selection of reference structures

As an optional addition, the process described makes it possible to assist in the selection of reference elements. An example of landmark point selections is described below.

The user is optionally guided in his selection of reference elements 12 as soon as the optronic system 18 develops an approximate value of his position.

The acquisition of a new reference element 12 making it possible to refine the position of the optronic system 18, the relevance of the aid is likely to be refined after each new acquisition.

The reference elements 12 are extracted and accessible in the following 3 modes:

The book mode of reference structures.

GIS mode when extracted from integrated geographic products Mixed notebook and GIS mode.

The choice of landmark can be guided according to criteria of geographical proximity.

For the logbook / mixed mode, the choice of landmark can be guided according to: o Its proximity zone to the position of the optronic system (geographical mask and zone query on the reference logbook to filter the reference elements 12 candidates according to their coordinates), o Its distance to the optronic system 18: a distance mask that can be predefined in terms of optical visibility and another in terms of telemetry range. o Its angular deviation from the current orientation of the optronic system 18, or from a particular orientation chosen by the user. The orientation of the reference elements 12 of the notebook allowing them to be found: ■ in the field of view (FOV) of the current channel used, within angular errors.

■ outside the FOV by presenting an angular interval:

• weak enough to be visited with a low rotation of a few FOVs,

• large enough, several FOVs, to propose reaching the nearest reference element 12. In this case the directions (azimuth, elevation) can be materialized in the imager.

In notebook / mixed mode, the choice of landmark can be guided as before by displaying the indices of the structures on the ortho-image in particular.

The choice of landmark can also be guided according to performance criteria. A major aspect is to meet the following criteria, having an (approximate) position:

In notebook / mixed mode, which next reference element 12 of the notebook to choose and with which type(s) of instrument to perform the measurement in order to maximize the performance of the new position which would be estimated using this new information ( point and instrumental measurement(s).

In GIS mode, the user has great latitude in the choice of points, not known in advance rather than indicating a point to choose an area accessing the best performance by choosing 1 or even 2 new landmarks can be offered. In this mode the user can benefit from a preliminary preparation which consists in carrying out a semantic segmentation of the embedded ortho-images; embedded semantic information that can: o At least indicate the geological nature of the zones (forest, urban, river) of the zone o At best indicate the zones with a high probability of finding visible structures with vertical extension (buildings, trees);

In mixed mode, the possibilities of the 2 previous modes can be used.

In all modes, the reference structures can also benefit from filtering in terms of inter-visibility as soon as an approximate position of 18 is known and a DEM is ideally accessed in the absence of a DEM .

The type of reference elements 12 chosen by the user includes point positions extracted from reference elements 12. The extraction can be limited to:

A single point, we then call the reference structure by landmark points after adding geographic coordinates to it - and their associated errors, this will be for example the top of a water tower or another type of building that is very tall and has a marked summit that can be telemetered if necessary, the corner of a building, the roughness of a rock or a prominent mountainous artificial structure,

Two points of a structure, extracted from a geographic product in flat representation (map or digital reference image) which will then be based on a vertical or horizontal building edge type segment, road edge, sidewalk, edge or center of 'un chemin, d'une côte... The extremities of the segment, defined by the two extreme designations in the geographic reference product are characterized in altitude according to the DTM/DEM and the errors on these extremities according to the metadata geographic product. Its correspondence to one or more images of the optronic system 18 is done by designating in the optronic image ends which physically do not necessarily correspond to those designated on the reference image.

The choice between these two point/segment representations is made according to the accessible products. In the case of access to a geographical product, the choice between a point or segment representation depends on the structure of the elements present in the scene 10. Three cases arise in terms of choice depending on whether:

The user accesses enough remarkable points that are both discernible in the optronic image and in the digital reference image and can be extracted quickly and without ambiguity; then it works in reference point or landmark mode.

The user does not access any point as above but distinguishes one or more linear structures in the scene 10 having at least a common part in the optronic image and in the digital reference image; then it privileges the segment which it designates by 2 extremities in the optronic image and 2 other extremities in the reference image. The extremities of the 2 segments thus extracted do not correspond two by two but the important thing is that these segments define the same spatial direction in 10.

The user distinguishes at the same time one or more structures 12 at the same time point and linear; he can then designate the 2 types of structure, the processing in the calculation unit 28 being responsible for exploiting these 2 types of association of primitives for the calculation of the position of 18 and the attitude of its goniometer s' he has it.

Help in choosing measures As an optional addition, the calculation unit 28 is able to help with the choice among the instruments available in the measurement module 26 with a view to improving the performance by acquiring a specific reference element 12. This process allows the acquisition and filtering of the measurements with a view to their processing in the optronic system 18. The following criteria are preferably applied, namely criteria:

A performance objective because a magnetic compass describes a less precise location than a rangefinder, whereas a rangefinder and/or a goniometer are likely to provide correct quality when using 2 or 3 landmarks. instrumental availability, a visual or mechanical goniometer is not necessarily accessible on the optronic system 18, the first because it is in difficulty on a scene 10 appearing homogeneous in the images, the second because it adds a constraint mass to the system 18. expediency because the use of the magnetic compass and the rangefinder on a single structure 12 will provide a position error when the reference element 12 is located far (a few hundred meters) from the optronic system 18.

- energy constraints because a system may impose to operate by reducing its consumption to a minimum, in this case the use of more energy-consuming instruments may be prohibited. illumination constraints, if the user must respect an electromagnetic emission discretion constraint, then the range finder will not be used to illuminate objects 14, a stronger constraint can prohibit him from illuminating all the entities of the scene 10, including reference structures 12.

In addition, the minimum number of structure 12 to acquire depends on the level of security that one wishes to bring to the position information. In the following we note DoF the degree of freedom which corresponds to the number of observation equations reduced by the number of parameters to be estimated.

If a 2D position is estimated, using a DTM to deduce an altitude thereafter, the number of unknowns to be estimated is 2. It increases to 3 to estimate a spatial position. If a visual or mechanical goniometer is used, these numbers should be increased: by one unit if you also want to estimate the azimuth from the reading of its zero, by another 2 units if you want more estimate its attitude in order to determine the spatial attitude of the goniometer.

Also, depending on the type of position to be obtained, it will be necessary to have: for an approximate position; of a DoF > 0 for an optimal position; of a DoF > 1 for an intact position, assuming the potential presence of a single anomaly, it will take a DoF > 2 (DoF > 1 to detect it and 2 to identify the erroneous measurement).

Example of calculation of positions and errors (case of the goniometer)

An example of obtaining the geometric locus of possible positions of the optronic system 18 with 1 measurement of angular deviation on 2 reference elements 12, the sensitivity of the position locus to measurement errors and to the geometry of the reference elements 12 and the way of obtaining the position of the optronic system 18 with 3 reference elements 12. We detail here the process making it possible to obtain an approximate position by processing the angle measurements with the visual goniometer. We indicate:

- the plane position of the optronic system 18 (x ₀ ,y ₀ ) belongs to a circle, place, under which two landmarks of plane coordinates (χ ₁ ,y ₁ ) and (x ₂ ,y ₂ ) are seen and measured under the 'angle ₃ \ _{2 ±} \ The equation of the circle verifying: with :

- the precision with which this place is obtained depends on the quality of the coordinates of the landmarks and on the reading of the goniometer. Insofar as these 5 quantities can be vitiated by bias and noise, it is possible to deduce the bias and the noise on the parameters of the circle characterizing the measurement of the goniometer. In passing, let us point out that metric quality landmarks and a 1 mil quality goniometer give the goniometric circle a quality on the center of the class of a GNSS and on the radius of the class of a rangefinder (< 3m for the example) in a wide angular range (from 40 to 140° for the example). To fix the ideas, the covariance on the parameters with 2 landmarks separated by a base B having identical errors on their coordinates which are positioned symmetrically with respect to the optronic system: ₃

Either a covariance

These expressions contract the notations: a = &L ₃ ; Ax = x ₂ - x _r and Ay = y ₂ - y _r

- With 3 angle readings L _n , and 3 angular differences out of 3 landmarks, the position of system 18 is obtained as close as possible to the intersection of the 3 circles; this without ambiguity since the circle passing through the 3 landmarks does not pass as close to the position of system 18. For this, we simply solve the following system in which v _n represents a small quantity integrating the measurement errors:

Having 3 elements of reference 12 and therefore 3 of the previous equations, one can for example take the average of the 3 equations and subtract it from each of them to find the position as the solution of a linear system.

It is also possible to obtain the precision on the coordinates of the position (%o,y _o ) of the optronic system 18 by Analysis of the Mean and the Variance for example; by differentiating the previous expression:

Noting the 2 matrices of the left / ₀ and right / _M members; and taking hope where A _M is the diagonal block covariance of the

Furthermore, the azimuth of the zero reading of the goniometer is obtained with 3 readings of angles L _n , on 3 structure 12 of coordinates (x _n ,y _n ), the azimuth corresponding to the 'zero' reading of the goniometer, and allowing it to be transformed into an odometric compass, is obtained from the expression:

It is also possible to directly determine the position of the optronic system by means of 3 measurements of the goniometer on three reference elements (12), by the conventional method of bearing on 3 points using the 3 deviations of angular measurements of the goniometer. In the case of 3 reference objects for which goniometer measurements are available:

The value of the bearing of the goniometer is determined in order to transform it into a compass and to be able to locate objects (14) of the scene (10) more precisely thereafter,

- The covariance on the approximate position is determined by means of the errors on the reference objects and the errors on the angular deviations of the goniometer in order to: o initialize the calculation of the optimal position of the optronic system by adding measurements on other elements of reference (12), o to implement integrity measurements between positions resulting from different modalities of the optronic system.

Claims

1. Method for determining at least one position by an optronic system (18) in a scene (10), the scene (10) comprising reference elements (12) of known geographic coordinates, the optronic system (18) comprising the following elements integrated in said optronic system (18): a. a digital imager (20), b. a memory (22) in which is stored, for at least each reference element (12) of the scene (10), an indicator representative of said point associated with the geographic coordinates of said point, c. a display element (24) of the indicators stored in the memory (22), d. a measurement module (26) comprising at least one element chosen from: a compass, a goniometer and a rangefinder, e. a calculation unit (28), the method being implemented by the elements integrated in the optronic system (18) and comprising: a. a data collection phase relating to at least one reference element (12) of the scene (10), the collection phase comprising, for each reference element (12), the steps of: i. pointing, by the digital imager (20), of the reference element (12) in the scene (10), j. acquisition, by the measurement module (26), of at least one measurement relating to the reference element (12) pointed to in the scene (10) following reception of a first acquisition command, k. pointing, on the display element (24), from among the stored indicators, of an indicator representative of the reference element (12) pointed in the scene (10), l. acquisition, by the calculation unit (28), of the geographical coordinates associated with the pointed indicator following the reception of a second acquisition command, m. storage of so-called reference data, comprising the at least one acquired measurement and the acquired geographic coordinates, b. a phase of determining the position of the optronic system (18) as a function of the reference data stored for the at least one reference element

2. Method according to claim 1, in which the indicators stored in the memory (22) are geo-referenced points on geographical data, the geographical data comprising at least one element among: an ortho-image of the scene (10) , a digital terrain model of the scene (10), a cartography of the scene (10) and a digital elevation model of the scene (10), the memory (22) preferably comprising, in addition to the indicators of the elements reference (12), indicators of all the geo-referenced points on the geographical data.

3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the pointing step of an indicator comprises displaying on the display element (24): a. the image of the scene (10) including the reference element (12) pointed by the digital imager (20), and b. indicators stored in the memory (22).

4. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, in which the phase of determining the position of the optronic system (18) comprises the selection, by the calculation unit (28), of a technique for determining the positions among a set of techniques for determining positions according to the nature of the element or elements of the measurement module (26) having acquired the at least one measurement corresponding to the reference datum, the position of the optronic system (18) being determined based on the selected determination technique.

5. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, in which each element of the measurement module (26) is associated with a measurement uncertainty and each geographical coordinate is associated with an uncertainty on said geographical coordinate, the determination phase of the position of the optronic system (18) comprising the determination of an uncertainty on the determined position according to the corresponding uncertainties on the at least one element of the measurement module (26) and on the geographic coordinates.

6. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, in which the phase of determining the position of the optronic system (18) comprises the calculation of an approximate position of the optronic system (18) according to stored reference data and calculating an optimal position of the optronic system (18) from the approximate position and the set of reference data. Method according to Claim 6, in which the phase of determining the position of the optronic system (18) comprises the evaluation of the integrity of the reference data, and the determination of an integrity position according only to the reference data evaluated as being honest, and of the calculated optimal position. Method according to any one of Claims 1 to 7, in which the optronic system (18) comprises a receiver for geolocation and navigation by a satellite system, said GNSS receiver (29), the method comprising a phase for determining the position of the optronic system (18) by the GNSS receiver (29), called GNSS position, and whether or not to validate the GNSS position according to a position of the optronic system (18) determined via the reference data, advantageously when the position GNSS has been validated, the method comprises merging the GNSS position with the position of the optronic system (18) determined via the reference data used for the comparison so as to obtain a definitive position for the optronic system (18).

9. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, in which the measurement module (26) comprises an odometric goniometer or an odometric compass, at least one measurement acquired relating to the reference elements (12) being a measurement of orientation, the measurement acquisition step comprising: a. the acquisition of a series of images of the scene (10), the series of images comprising at least one image of the reference element (12), the images of the series of images overlapping two by two , and B. the determination, by the odometric goniometer or the odometric compass, of an orientation of the reference element (12) with respect to the optronic system (18) according to the series of images of the scene (10) acquired.

10. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, in which the method comprises a phase of determining the position of an object (14) of the scene (10) as a function of the determined position of the optronic system (18 ), an obtained orientation of the object (14) with respect to the optronic system (18) and an obtained distance between the object (14) and the optronic system (18).

11. Method according to claim 10, in which the phase of determining the position of the object (14) comprises the steps of: has. acquisition of a series of images of the scene (10), the series of images comprising at least one image of the object (14), the images of the series of images overlapping two by two, and b. determination of the orientation of the object (14) with respect to the optronic system (18) according to the series of images of the scene (10).

12. Method according to claim 10, in which the measurement module (26) of the optronic system (18) comprises at least one compass, the orientation of the object (14) being obtained by a measurement acquired by the compass during a pointing of the object (14) by the digital imager (20).

13. A method according to any one of claims 10 to 12, wherein: a. at least one element of the measurement module (26) of the optronic system (18) is a rangefinder, the distance between the object (14) and the optronic system (18) being obtained by a measurement acquired by the rangefinder during a pointing of the object (14) by the digital imager (20), or b. the distance between the object (14) and the optronic system (18) is the distance between the determined position of the optronic system (18) and the intersection of a predetermined straight line with the ground of a digital terrain model, the predetermined straight line passing through the determined position of the optronic system (18) and having for orientation the obtained orientation of the object (14) with respect to the optronic system (18).

14. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, in which the optronic system (18) is chosen from: a pair of optronic binoculars and an optronic camera.

15. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, in which at least one element of the measurement module (26) is a magnetic compass, the method comprising an automatic calibration phase of the declination, of the measurements and of the simbleautage of the magnetic compass by means of measurements acquired for at least two reference elements (12), during the pointing of said reference elements (12) by the digital imager (20).

16. Optronic system (18) for determining at least one position by an optronic system (18) in a scene (10), the scene (10) comprising elements of reference (12) of known geographical coordinates, the optronic system (18) comprising the following elements integrated in said optronic system (18): a. a digital imager (20), b. a memory (22) in which is stored, for at least each reference element (12) of the scene (10), an indicator representative of said point associated with the geographic coordinates of said point, c. a display element (24) of the indicators stored in the memory (22), d. a measurement module (26) comprising at least one element chosen from: a compass, a goniometer and a rangefinder, e. a calculation unit (28), the optronic system (18) being configured to implement a method according to any one of claims 1 to 15.