EP4241131A1 - Procédé de calcul d'une lentille de lunettes sur la base d'une approche de données volumineuses et d'un apprentissage automatique - Google Patents

Procédé de calcul d'une lentille de lunettes sur la base d'une approche de données volumineuses et d'un apprentissage automatique

Info

Publication number
EP4241131A1
EP4241131A1 EP21802700.1A EP21802700A EP4241131A1 EP 4241131 A1 EP4241131 A1 EP 4241131A1 EP 21802700 A EP21802700 A EP 21802700A EP 4241131 A1 EP4241131 A1 EP 4241131A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
individual
standard
user
eye
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP21802700.1A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Gregor Esser
Adam MUSCHIELOK
Helmut Altheimer
Wolfgang Becken
Anne Seidemann
Patrick KERNER
Martin Zimmermann
Lukas GROMANN
Leonhard Schmid
Dietmar Uttenweiler
Stephan Trumm
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rodenstock GmbH
Original Assignee
Rodenstock GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=78528958&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP4241131(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Rodenstock GmbH filed Critical Rodenstock GmbH
Publication of EP4241131A1 publication Critical patent/EP4241131A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00—Optical parts
    • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/024—Methods of designing ophthalmic lenses
    • G02C7/028—Special mathematical design techniques
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00—Optical parts
    • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/024—Methods of designing ophthalmic lenses
    • G02C7/027—Methods of designing ophthalmic lenses considering wearer's parameters

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a computer-implemented method for determining biometric data of an eye and a corresponding method for producing spectacle lenses, taking into account the determined biometric data. Furthermore, the invention relates to corresponding computer program products and devices.
  • One object of the present invention is to make extensive use of the advantages of biometric spectacle lenses without having the disadvantages of the complex measurement. This object is achieved by a computer-implemented method for determining biometric data of an eye, a corresponding device and a corresponding computer program product, and a method and a corresponding device for producing a spectacle lens with the features specified in the respective independent claims.
  • the present invention is based on the surprising finding that it is possible to determine or predict individual biometric parameters of at least one of a user's eyes with sufficient accuracy and precision using standard values of the user's eye determined as part of a routine refraction determination. It is therefore possible to calculate and produce individual biometric spectacle lenses with high imaging quality and wearing comfort, without a complex and cost-intensive measurement of the additional biometric data being necessary for this purpose.
  • a first aspect of the invention relates to a computer-implemented method for determining individual biometric parameters of at least one of a user's eyes.
  • the procedure includes:
  • the standard data comprising prescription data of at least one of the user's eyes
  • Calculation of individual additional data comprising at least one individual biometric parameter of at least one eye of the user based on the individual standard data and using a statistical model that describes a relationship between standard data and additional data
  • the statistical model using statistical analysis of a training data set with a large number of reference data sets has been derived, each of the reference data sets comprising standard data and the standard data associated additional data.
  • the method can also include providing the statistical model that describes the relationship between standard data and additional data.
  • the method can include providing the training data set and deriving the statistical model by means of statistical analysis of the training data set. Deriving the statistical model may include, for example, training an original (untrained) model using the training data set.
  • the model can include a number of model parameters which are changed or adapted during training with the training data set.
  • providing in the sense of the present application includes “determining”, “transmitting”, “receiving”, “reading out”, “retrieving from a memory, a database and/or a table”, “receiving”, etc.
  • Standard data are data from at least one of the user's eyes and possibly other data that is recorded in connection with an order for glasses (for example by an optician or an ophthalmologist).
  • the standard data can include data that is normally always recorded in connection with an order for glasses, such as prescription data.
  • the standard data can also include data that is usually optionally recorded or measured in connection with an order for glasses, such as the higher-order aberrations of at least one of the user's eyes, etc. This data can then be used to determine further additional to determine data (additional data).
  • the standard data can include data that has been recorded with a first measuring device or a first measuring method.
  • Additional data can be calculated on the basis of this data, which cannot be determined or measured with the first measuring device or with the first measuring method.
  • the additional data can include data which can be determined or measured with the first measuring device or the first measuring method, but not with sufficient quality (for example not with sufficient accuracy, precision and/or repeatability).
  • a measuring device when determining at least some of the standard data, can be available that allows some of the biometric parameters of at least one of the user's eyes to be taken into account when calculating an individual biometric spectacle lens to be determined.
  • the data recorded with this measuring device can then be used to determine additional individual biometric parameters that cannot be determined with this measuring device.
  • the first measuring device can be, for example, an aberrometer, which makes it possible to determine the aberrations of the eye, but not the aberrations of the cornea (which are measured, for example, with a topographer) and/or the anterior chamber depth (which, for example, is measured with a Scheimpflug camera will).
  • the method can be used to determine further biometric data, such as aberration of the cornea and/or the anterior chamber depth, based on the aberration data of the eye recorded with the aberrometer. If a topographer and/or a Scheimpflug camera is available, the corresponding measurement data can be used to determine the aberrations of the eye.
  • biometric data such as aberration of the cornea and/or the anterior chamber depth
  • the method can also be used if data not only cannot be determined or measured (because, for example, the appropriate measuring devices are not available), but also if the corresponding data are determined or measured in poor or insufficient quality.
  • the standard data can include data that is generated with a first (e.g. simple) measuring device or Measurement method have been measured, which provides data with a low or insufficient quality.
  • the data recorded with the first measuring device or with the first measuring method can be used to determine additional data which have a higher quality.
  • the additional data can correspond to data that has been recorded or can be measured with a second, more precise measuring device/measuring device type or with a second measuring method.
  • the standard data includes at least the prescription data.
  • the prescription data includes a distance prescription (i.e., the refraction data when looking at a far distance, e.g., infinity) and/or a near prescription (i.e., the refraction data when looking at a near distance, e.g., a reading distance).
  • the distance regulation of at least one of the user's eyes is composed of the parameters sphere (Sph), the cylinder (Cyl) and axis or of quantities derived from them, such as the components M (spherical equivalent), J0 (ortho-astigmatism ) and J45 (oblique astigmatism) of the power vector of the distance prescription.
  • the proximity regulation is also composed of the quantities sphere (Sph), cylinder (Zyl) and axis of at least one of the user's eyes or from quantities derived therefrom, such as the components M, J0 and J45 of the power vector of the proximity regulation.
  • the prescription data can also include the addition, for example in the case of progressive lenses and multifocal lenses.
  • the distance prescription, the addition and/or the proximity prescription can be determined, for example, by means of subjective refraction. It is also possible to determine the distance prescription, the addition and/or the proximity prescription by means of objective refraction or by means of a combination of objective and subjective refraction.
  • the subjective refraction determination is a method of refraction determination in which the visual impression that is subjectively felt by the user is taken into account.
  • the user is presented with different refraction glasses, wherein the user of the spectacle lens informs the refractionist of an improvement or a deterioration in the visual impression when the optical properties of the refractive lens in front change.
  • the objective refraction is carried out solely by means of an apparatus arrangement and can also record the refractive properties and the geometry of the eyeball.
  • Objective refraction can be performed using various devices such as refractometers, aberrometers, wavefront scanners, etc.
  • the standard data can include at least one of the following parameters:
  • Pupillary distance and pupil diameter can be determined using conventional measuring methods.
  • the standard data can optionally include at least part of the following data, the data having been recorded using a first measuring method or measuring device:
  • - Lower and/or higher order aberrations of the eye such as sphere (Sph), cylinder (Zyl), axis (or M, J0, J45), coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration, and/or other aberrations ; and or
  • - physical dimensions of the eye such as anterior chamber depth, eye length, etc.
  • - Data of the lens of the eye including, for example, lower and higher order aberrations of the lens of the eye (such as sphere (Sph), cylinder (Cyl), axis (respectively M, J0, J45), coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration and /or other aberrations); and/or construction and/or physical dimensions of the eye lens, such as curvatures and/or thickness; and or
  • the standard data can also optionally contain the following additional parameters: age, gender, ethnicity, place of order, height, intraocular pressure, blood values, anamnesis data or medical records (e.g. presence of diabetes), images of the retina, values of eye pressure, data of the anterior section of the eye (chamber angle) and/or data from the old glasses.
  • Additional data are biometric data of at least one of the user's eyes, which are determined (for example by an optician) in connection with an order for glasses.
  • the additional data can be data, for example, which are usually determined optionally (for example by the optician) in connection with an order for glasses.
  • the additional data and the standard data can at least partially contain the same parameters (such as aberrations in at least one of the user's eyes, etc.), with the parameters contained in the additional data and the parameters contained in the standard data being measured using different measurement methods or Measuring devices are detectable.
  • the additional data can include data that was acquired using an aberrometer, a topographer, a Scheimpflug camera, an OCT (ie an optical coherence tomograph or a method of optical coherence tomography, English: Optical Coherence Tomography), a biometer, and/or another measuring device or another method of objective refraction have been recorded or can be recorded.
  • OCT optical coherence tomograph or a method of optical coherence tomography, English: Optical Coherence Tomography
  • biometer ie an optical coherence tomography
  • another measuring device or another method of objective refraction ie an optical coherence tomography, English: Optical Coherence Tomography
  • the additional data can include, for example, the following biometric data or parameters of at least one of the user's eyes:
  • - Lower and/or higher order aberrations of the eye such as sphere (Sph), cylinder (Zyl), axis (or M, J0, J45), coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration, and/or other aberrations ; and or
  • - Data of the lens of the eye including, for example, lower and higher order aberrations of the lens of the eye (such as sphere (Sph), cylinder (Cyl), axis (respectively M, J0, J45), coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration and /or other aberrations); and/or construction and/or physical dimensions of the eye lens, such as curvatures and/or thickness; and or
  • the additional data preferably includes at least some of the following data or parameters: the higher order aberrations of the eye (such as coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration, etc.), the lower and higher order aberrations of the cornea (sphere (Sph) , cylinder (Cyl), axis (or M, J0, J45), coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration, etc.), the anterior chamber depth, the pupil sizes in the distance and near and/or under mesopic and photopic conditions.
  • the higher order aberrations of the eye such as coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration, etc.
  • the lower and higher order aberrations of the cornea sphere (Sph) , cylinder (Cyl), axis (or M, J0, J45), coma, trefoil, secondary astigmatism, spherical aberration, etc
  • the additional data in the reference data records can be, for example, data that has been recorded or measured in addition to the standard data when biometric lenses were ordered earlier, for example with an aberrometer, a topographer, a Scheimpflug camera, an OCT, a biometer and/or a other measuring device.
  • the individual ancillary data derived from a user's standard individual data and the ancillary data determined using the statistical model may, but need not, be the same type of ancillary data contained in the reference data sets and used to derive the statistical model.
  • the statistical model can be any statistical model that is derived from an existing data set (training data set) using statistical methods.
  • Exemplary statistical methods are regression (such as linear regression, nonlinear regression, nonlinear regression with an attention mechanism, nonlinear multi-task regression, nonparametric or semiparametric regression, etc.), classification methods, and other machine learning methods.
  • Machine learning algorithms are described, for example, in Jeremy Watt, Reza Borhani, Aggelos Katsaggelos: Machine Learning Refined: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • the statistical model receives at least part of the individual standard data and/or variables derived therefrom as input variables and calculates at least part of the additional individual biometric parameters or additional data from this.
  • the relationship between standard data and additional data specified by the statistical model can be a linear or non-linear relationship. Furthermore, the relationship can be multi-parametric.
  • Exemplary statistical models are linear or non-linear regression models.
  • neural networks which also include deep neural networks, can be used as non-linear regression models. It is also possible to use other non-linear regression models known from the field of machine learning.
  • the regression models, such as the neural network can be trained using the training data set provided.
  • the statistical model can also be a combination of several statistical models of different types, for example a combination of a linear regression model, a non-linear regression model (such as a neural network), a classification model and/or another statistical model.
  • the static model derived from the training data set can be stored in a suitable storage device such as a database, calculator, computational or data cloud. At least part of the training data set used for the derivation can be stored together with the statistical model.
  • the statistical model derived from a training data set can also be checked and/or modified continuously or at regular intervals, for example on the basis of new reference data sets. Accordingly, the method may include modifying the statistical model.
  • the input layer of the neural network is filled with at least part of the standard data and/or auxiliary variables calculated therefrom.
  • the output layer outputs values for at least one additional parameter or at least part of the additional data.
  • the neural network can preferably contain one or more hidden layers in addition to an input and an output layer.
  • the trained neural network specifies the connection between standard data and additional data.
  • the structure of the neural network (such as the number and types of layers, number and types of neurons in the different layers, the way the layers and neurons are linked to one another, etc.) and the learning algorithms can be different.
  • the statistical model which describes the connection between standard data and additional data, is derived using statistical methods on the basis of a training data set with a large number of individual data sets (reference data sets).
  • Each of the reference data sets can include, for example, standard data and the additional data of a specific user determined using suitable measurement methods.
  • the different reference data sets in the training data set can preferably include the data (standard data and additional data) from a large number of different users (reference users).
  • the additional data contained in the reference data records can include, for example, biometric parameters that are not contained in the standard data assigned to the additional data. It is also possible for the additional data contained in the reference data records to include biometric parameters which, although contained in the standard data associated with the additional data, have a lower quality. For example, the values of the standard data and the additional data assigned to this standard data can have been recorded using different measuring methods and/or measuring devices. For this purpose, existing orders for biometric lenses can be used to train a neural network or another statistical model with the data sets. In the case of a new standard order, the additional measurement data (additional data) can be calculated or forecast using the trained statistical model and based on the individual standard parameters contained in the new order. This means that biometric spectacle lenses can be calculated based on individual standard parameters and additional data calculated from them using the neural network or other statistical models.
  • the number of reference data sets can vary. For example, more than 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, 100,000, or 1,000,000 reference records may be used.
  • the reference data records preferably cover a large area, preferably the entire area, in which spectacle lenses can later be ordered.
  • the reference data sets can cover the range of refraction values, for example -20 dpt to +20 dpt for spheres and -8 dpt to +8 dpt for cylinders.
  • the method for determining individual biometric parameters of at least one of the eyes of a user can include transmitting the individual standard data and the calculated individual additional data to an external entity, such as a manufacturer of ophthalmic lenses, a manufacturing unit, a manufacturing device, etc.
  • a second aspect of the invention relates to a method for producing a spectacle lens, comprising:
  • the default data including a prescription of at least one of the user's eyes
  • the spectacle lens can be calculated, for example, using the method described in US Pat. No. 9,910,294 B2 or using another known method in which individual biometric parameters are taken into account when calculating the spectacle lens.
  • the method can also include manufacturing the calculated spectacle lens.
  • the spectacle lens can be, for example, a single-vision spectacle lens, a multifocal spectacle lens or a progressive spectacle lens.
  • a third aspect of the invention relates to a computer-implemented method for determining a statistical model, the method comprising:
  • each of the reference data sets comprising standard data and additional data associated with the standard data
  • a fourth aspect of the invention relates to a computer program product which, when loaded into and executed on a computer's memory, causes the computer to perform a method according to any of the above aspects.
  • a fifth aspect of the invention relates to a device for determining individual biometric parameters of at least one of a user's eyes, the device comprising a computing device which is designed to carry out the method described above for determining individual biometric parameters.
  • the computing device may preferably include: a standard data input interface for providing individual standard data of the user, the standard data comprising prescription data (such as a prescription distance and/or prescription proximity and optionally addition) of at least one of the user's eyes; an additional data calculation device for calculating individual additional data, comprising at least one individual biometric parameter of at least one eye of the user, the calculation being based on the individual standard data and using a statistical model, the statistical model using statistical analysis of a training data set with a large number of reference data sets has been derived, each of the reference data sets comprising standard data and the standard data associated additional data.
  • prescription data such as a prescription distance and/or prescription proximity and optionally addition
  • the device can comprise a model input interface for providing the statistical model.
  • the statistical model may be stored in a storage device, such as a database, a calculator, and/or a data or calculator cloud.
  • the device can provide a training data set input interface for providing the training data set; and a model calculation device for deriving or calculating the statistical model by means of statistical analysis of the training data set.
  • the statistical model can be created, for example, by training an original (untrained) model using the Training data set are derived or calculated.
  • a sixth aspect of the invention relates to a device for producing a spectacle lens, comprising:
  • a device for determining individual biometric parameters of at least one of a user's eyes according to the fifth aspect; a lens calculation device, which is designed to calculate the spectacle lens based on the provided individual standard data and the calculated individual biometric parameters.
  • the manufacturing device can also include a manufacturing device for manufacturing the calculated spectacle lens.
  • the above-mentioned devices for providing, determining, specifying or calculating data can be replaced by suitably configured or programmed data processing devices (in particular specialized hardware modules , computers or computer systems, such as computer or data clouds) can be implemented with appropriate computing units, electronic interfaces, storage and data transmission units.
  • the devices may further comprise at least one graphical user interface (GUI), preferably interactive, allowing a user to view and/or enter and/or modify data.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • the devices mentioned above can also have suitable interfaces that enable data (such as training data sets, reference data sets, (individual) standard data, (individual) additional data, etc.) to be transmitted, input and/or read out.
  • the devices can also include at least one storage unit, for example in the form of a database, which stores the data used.
  • the manufacturing device can, for example, be at least one CNC-controlled Machine for the direct processing of a blank according to the determined optimization specifications.
  • the spectacle lens can be manufactured using a casting process.
  • the finished spectacle lens can have a first simple spherical or rotationally symmetrical aspheric surface and a second individual surface calculated as a function of the individual standard data and calculated individual additional data.
  • the simple spherical or rotationally symmetrical aspherical surface can be the front surface (ie the object-side surface) of the spectacle lens.
  • the individual surface as the front surface of the spectacle lens. Both surfaces of the spectacle lens can also be calculated individually.
  • a further aspect of the invention relates to a spectacle lens which is produced according to the production method described above. Furthermore, the invention offers a use of a spectacle lens manufactured according to the manufacturing method described above in a predetermined average or ideal or individual usage position of the spectacle lens in front of the eyes of a specific user for correcting ametropia of the user.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary method for determining individual biometric data of at least one of the eyes of a user and calculating a spectacle lens
  • FIG. 2 shows an exemplary reference data record
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary linear regression model
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary non-linear regression model
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary non-linear regression model with an attention mechanism
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary multi-task non-linear regression model
  • FIG. 7A the spherical equivalent M [in Dpt] of the cornea as a function of the pupil diameter [in mm];
  • FIG. 7B shows the component J0 [in Dpt] of the power vector of the cornea as a function of the subjective ortho-astigmatism [in Dpt] contained in the standard data;
  • FIG. 7C shows the component J45 [in Dpt] of the power vector of the cornea as a function of the subjective oblique astigmatism J45 [in Dpt] contained in the standard data;
  • FIG. 8A shows the eye length as a function of the subjective spherical equivalent M [in Dpt] contained in the standard data
  • FIG. 8B shows the anterior chamber depth as a function of the subjective spherical equivalent M [in Dpt] contained in the standard data
  • FIG. 9 different biometric additional parameters of the right eye of a user in tabular form
  • FIG. 10 shows different additional biometric parameters of a user's left eye in tabular form
  • FIG. 11 shows the difference in the maximum peripheral astigmatism in the eye for a spectacle lens which was calculated using a method according to an example of the invention and for a conventional spectacle lens without using biometric data or using biometric standard parameters as represented by the Gullstrand eye;
  • FIG. 12 shows the percentage difference in the change in refractive index for a spectacle lens, which was calculated using a method according to an example of the invention, and for a conventional spectacle lens without using biometric data or using biometric standard parameters, as represented by the Gullstrand eye;
  • FIG. 13 shows the astigmatism in the image plane of the spectacle lens-eye system, the spectacle lens having been calculated using a method according to an example of the invention
  • Figure 14 is a graphical representation of an exemplary statistical model
  • FIGS. 15A to 15D exemplary predictions for the cornea topography for different standard parameters
  • FIGS. 16A to 16C show the deviations of predicted additional data (in this case the length of the eye) from actually measured data.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary method for determining individual biometric parameters of at least one of the eyes of a user and for calculating a spectacle lens based on the determined individual biometric parameters.
  • the procedure includes the following steps:
  • Step S1 Creation of a training data set from a large number of data sets (reference data sets) 10, each reference data set containing standard data 12 and additional data 14 assigned to these standard data.
  • the standard data 12 includes the distance prescription (Sph, Zyl, Axis or M, J0, J45) and the addition (Add) for bifocal, multifocal and progressive lenses.
  • the standard data further includes the pupil distance (PD), the pupil diameter and the prescription proximity (Sph, Cyl, Axis or M, J0, J45).
  • the additional data 14 can include at least one of the following data sets, for example:
  • parameters of the eye such as anterior chamber depth, eye length;
  • pupil sizes are distance, near, mesopic, photopic
  • Measurement methods are exemplary with an aberrometer, a topographer, a Scheimpflug camera, an OCT and/or a biometer.
  • Step S2 A connection between the standard data and the additional data is derived from the large number of reference data sets with the aid of statistical methods.
  • a statistical model is determined on the basis of the training data set, which describes the connection, such as the correlation(s), between standard data and additional data.
  • the determination of the statistical model can include, for example, training an originally untrained neural network with the training data set, which includes the plurality of reference data sets.
  • the trained neural network can be tested using a test data set and/or can be validated using a validation data set.
  • the test data set and the validation data set can each include a large number of data sets (reference data sets) from previous orders, for example a large number of the reference data sets shown in FIG.
  • a reference data set that is contained in the test data set is preferably contained neither in the validation data set nor in the training data set.
  • a reference data set included in the validation data set is preferably included in neither the test data set nor the training data set.
  • Step S3 Provision of an individual data record which only contains individual standard data.
  • the individual standard data can be recorded by an optician as part of an individual order for glasses for a user.
  • Step S4 Calculate individual additional data (additional data) based on the individual standard data contained in the individual data set provided in step S3 and further based on the relationship between standard data and additional data determined in step S2.
  • the individual standard data can, for example, be entered into the trained neural network from step S2.
  • the corresponding output data of the neural network can be used directly as the individual additional data. It is possible not to use the output data of the neural network directly, but to first subject this output data to further processing (such as, for example, checking for plausibility, smoothing, filtering, categorizing, conversion, etc.).
  • Step S5 Calculating an individual spectacle lens based on the individual standard data contained in the individual data set provided in step S3 and further based on the calculated individual additional data from step S4.
  • the calculation of an individual spectacle lens includes the calculation of at least one surface of the spectacle lens based on the individual standard data and the calculated individual additional data.
  • the surface calculated in this way can be the back surface or the front surface of the spectacle lens.
  • the "calculating at least one area of a spectacle lens” includes the calculation of at least a part of a surface or a piece of a surface. In other words, “calculating at least one area of a spectacle lens” means calculating at least part of the area or calculating the entire area.
  • the surface opposite the calculated surface can be a simple surface, such as a spherical, a rotationally symmetric, an aspheric, a toric, or an atoric surface. It is also possible to calculate both areas individually.
  • the individual spectacle lens can be calculated using a known method, for example using the method known from publication US Pat. No. 9,910,294 B2.
  • Figures 3 to 6 show exemplary statistical models 2, each based on of a data set 1 (training data set) are trained.
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary linear regression model with an input layer and an output layer.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary non-linear regression model with an input layer, an output layer and several hidden layers.
  • W 1 ⁇ R LxD , W 2 ⁇ R MXL and W 3 ⁇ R KxM denote weight matrices.
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary non-linear regression model with an attention mechanism.
  • the model has an input layer, an output layer, several hidden layers, and an attention layer with "H" attention heads.
  • ReLU Rectified Linear Unit
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary non-linear multi-task regression model for the processing of several tasks (Tasks 1 to T).
  • the model shown in FIG. 6 is based on the model shown in FIG. 5, which was modified for several tasks (Task 1 to Task T).
  • a common representation in the attention layer is used.
  • the dimensions of the output variables are given by the tasks, whereby the various tasks can have different dimensions.
  • the output variable f 1 can have the dimension K 1
  • the output variable f 2 can have the dimension K 2
  • the dimensional of all outputs is the sum of the dimensions of the individual outputs -
  • Figures 7 and 8 show the results for different individual biometric additional parameters (i.e. parameters contained in the additional data) calculated according to the method described above using the model shown in Figure 3 (i.e. using linear regression), compared to actually measured individual additional parameters and additional parameters according to the Gullstrand eye model.
  • the measured values are shown with small circles.
  • the solid line shows the statistically determined linear relationship between the respective additional parameter and the corresponding standard parameter (i.e. a parameter that is contained in the standard data) using the above-mentioned method.
  • the dashed line shows the parameter values according to the Gullstrand eye model.
  • FIG 7 shows the results for the corneal "M” (spherical equivalent) "J0" (ortho-astigmatism) and “J45” (oblique astigmatism) power vector components of the cornea, where:
  • Figure 7A shows the spherical equivalent M [in Dpt] of the cornea as a function of the pupil diameter [in mm] contained in the standard data;
  • Figure 7B shows the ortho-astigmatism J0 [in Dpt] of the cornea as a function of the subjective (Rx) ortho-astigmatism J0 [in Dpt] contained in the standard data;
  • Figure 7C shows the J45 oblique astigmatism [in Dpt] of the cornea as a function of the subjective (Rx) J45 oblique astigmatism [in Dpt] contained in the standard data.
  • FIG. 8 shows the eye length (FIG. 8A) and the anterior chamber depth (FIG. 8B), each as a function of the subjective (Rx) spherical equivalent M [in Dpt] contained in the standard data.
  • the subjective (Rx) spherical equivalent M, the subjective (Rx) ortho-astigmatism J0 and the subjective oblique astigmatism J45 are the components of the power vector of the distance prescription, which was determined by means of subjective refraction.
  • the Feme regulation is part of the standard data.
  • Figures 9 and 10 each show in tabular form different additional biometric parameters of the right eye ( Figure 9) and the left eye ( Figure 10) of a user with the following standard data:
  • Column 1 of the tables shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 gives the values for the additional biometric parameters according to the Gullstrand eye model.
  • Column 2 contains the values for the additional biometric parameters determined using the method described above on the basis of a statistical model specified.
  • the statistical model is a linear regression model such as shown in Figure 3 modified for multiple tasks. Actually measured values are shown in column 3. The measured values were recorded with the "LenStar 900" (Haag-Streit) low-coherence reflectometer suitable for measuring the distances between the refracting surfaces of the eye.
  • Figures 11 and 12 each show the differences in the properties of spectacle lenses (a total of 813 spectacle lenses), which have been calculated using a method according to an example of the invention, and conventional spectacle lenses without using a biometric model, which are based on biometric standard parameters such as those of the Gullstrand eye represents, are based..
  • the percentage difference between the change in refractive power in a spectacle lens calculated by a method according to an example of the invention and the change in refractive power in a conventional spectacle lens is plotted on the ordinate of FIG. 12, with both spectacle lenses having the same standard parameters.
  • the spectacle lenses which have been optimized on the basis of individual additional biometric parameters (additional data), the additional data being calculated or predicted on the basis of standard data using a statistical model, have very good optical properties on. A complex and cost-intensive measurement of individual additional data is therefore not necessary.
  • the training data set includes approximately 20000 reference data sets.
  • Each reference data set includes standard data and the additional data associated with the standard data.
  • the standard data includes the prescription data (the distance prescription converted to M, J0, J45) of a user's right eye acquired by subjective refraction.
  • the additional data include the cornea topography in Zernike representation and the anterior chamber depth of the user's right eye.
  • the training data set is used to train a linear regression model such as the model shown in FIG.
  • the trained model enables a prediction of each of the Zemike coefficients c n , m (x) of the cornea topography and the anterior chamber depth d CL (x) as a linear regression of the following features:
  • the predicted anterior chamber depth d CL (x) is:
  • di ⁇ denotes parameters of linear regression of the i-th feature to predict the
  • Z n,m denotes the (m,n)-th Zernike polynomial
  • X pup ,Y pup denote the pupil coordinates.
  • Figure 14 shows a graphical representation of the trained model for corneal topography.
  • the arrow height z of the comea topography is:
  • the terms of the sum of equation (10), determined by training the model are shown as versine plots, with the versine isolines in pm per unit of the respective feature (constant term, M, J 0 , J 45 , Add, M * J 0 , M * J 45 , M * Add, J 0 * J 45 , J 0 * Add, J 45 * Add ) and the pupil coordinates X pup , Y pup are given in mm.
  • FIGS. 15A to 15D show exemplary predictions for the cornea topography based on the trained model with different standard parameters M (spherical equivalent), J0, J45 and Add.
  • the pupil coordinates x pup ,y pup are indicated on the abscissa and the ordinate in FIGS. 15A to 15D.
  • Figures 15A to 15D each show from left to right the mean power of the cornea in Dpt, the sag of the cornea (cornea topography) in pm and the deviation of the sag of the cornea from the constant term in the cornea topography representation according to equation (10 ) (topography deviation).
  • FIGS. 16A to 16C show the deviations of predicted additional data (in this case the eye length) from actually measured data.
  • the measured eye length in mm is plotted on the abscissa.
  • the predicted eye length in mm is plotted on the ordinate.
  • the predicted eye length shown in Figure 16A is the eye length according to the Gullstrand eye model. This model has 0 input parameters. The accuracy of the prediction (95% confidence interval) is +/-2.4mm.
  • the predicted eye length shown in Figure 16B is determined using a trained statistical model with the spherical equivalent as an input parameter been.
  • the accuracy of the prediction (95% confidence interval) is +/-1.5 mm.
  • the predicted eye length shown in Figure 16C was determined using a trained statistical model with the spherical equivalent and the pupillary distance as input parameters.
  • the accuracy of the prediction (95% confidence interval) is +/-1.4 mm.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé mis en œuvre par ordinateur pour déterminer des données biométriques d'un œil et un procédé correspondant de fabrication de verres de lunettes en tenant compte des données biométriques déterminées. L'invention concerne en outre des produits-programmes d'ordinateur et des dispositifs correspondants. Le procédé de détermination de données biométriques comprend les étapes consistant à : fournir des éléments individuels de données standard de l'utilisateur, les données standard comprenant des données de prescription comprenant une prescription pour la distance et/ou la vision rapprochée d'au moins l'un des yeux de l'utilisateur ; et calculer des éléments individuels de données supplémentaires, qui comprennent au moins un paramètre biométrique individuel du ou des yeux de l'utilisateur, à l'aide des données standard individuelles et à l'aide d'un modèle statistique, qui décrit une relation entre les données standard et les données supplémentaires. Le modèle statistique est dérivé à l'aide d'une analyse statistique d'un ensemble de données d'apprentissage avec une pluralité d'ensembles de données de référence, et chacun des ensembles de données de référence comprend des données standard et des données supplémentaires attribuées aux données standard.
EP21802700.1A 2020-11-03 2021-11-02 Procédé de calcul d'une lentille de lunettes sur la base d'une approche de données volumineuses et d'un apprentissage automatique Pending EP4241131A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102020128958.8A DE102020128958B4 (de) 2020-11-03 2020-11-03 Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Brillenglases, Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen von individuellen biometrischen Daten sowie Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines Brillenglases
PCT/EP2021/080370 WO2022096454A1 (fr) 2020-11-03 2021-11-02 Procédé de calcul d'une lentille de lunettes sur la base d'une approche de données volumineuses et d'un apprentissage automatique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4241131A1 true EP4241131A1 (fr) 2023-09-13

Family

ID=78528958

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21802700.1A Pending EP4241131A1 (fr) 2020-11-03 2021-11-02 Procédé de calcul d'une lentille de lunettes sur la base d'une approche de données volumineuses et d'un apprentissage automatique

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4241131A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2023548196A (fr)
CN (1) CN116670569A (fr)
CL (1) CL2023001283A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102020128958B4 (fr)
WO (1) WO2022096454A1 (fr)

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2005215056B2 (en) * 2004-02-20 2011-06-09 Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) System and method for analyzing wavefront aberrations
DE102011120974A1 (de) * 2011-12-13 2013-06-13 Rodenstock Gmbh Helligkeitsabhängige Anpassung eines Brillenglases
DE102012000390A1 (de) 2012-01-11 2013-07-11 Rodenstock Gmbh Brillenglasoptimierung mit individuellem Augenmodell
DE102017007974A1 (de) * 2017-01-27 2018-08-02 Rodenstock Gmbh Belegung eines Augenmodells zur Optimierung von Brillengläsern mit Messdaten
EP3321831B1 (fr) * 2016-11-14 2019-06-26 Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH Dispositif de détermination de données de réfraction subjectives pronostiquées ou de données de correction subjectives pronostiquées et programme informatique

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102020128958A1 (de) 2022-05-05
DE102020128958B4 (de) 2022-07-28
CN116670569A (zh) 2023-08-29
WO2022096454A1 (fr) 2022-05-12
JP2023548196A (ja) 2023-11-15
CL2023001283A1 (es) 2023-12-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2802935B1 (fr) Optimisation de verres de lunettes au moyen d'un modèle d' il individuel
EP2564262B1 (fr) Procédé pour calculer des valeurs relatives à un verre de lunettes avec des données de prescription dépendant de l'angle de vision
DE102017007990B4 (de) Computerimplementierte Verfahren und Vorrichtungen zum Ermitteln individueller Aberrationsdaten oder zum Berechnen oder Optimieren eines Brillenglases für zumindest ein Auge eines Brillenträgers, Computerimplementiertes Verfahren zum Ermitteln optimierter sphärozylindrischer Werte für zumindest ein Auge eines Brillenträgers, Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines Brillenglases, Brillengläser und Computerprogrammerzeugnis
DE102007032564A1 (de) Verfahren zum Überprüfen und/oder Bestimmen von Benutzerdaten, Computerprogrammprodukt und Vorrichtung
EP2389611A1 (fr) Commande de design au moyen d'un polygone de design
WO2018087002A1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination de données de réfraction subjectives prédites ou de valeurs de correction prédites et programme informatique
EP3669230B1 (fr) Optimisation d'un verre de lunettes prenant en compte un modèle d'acuité visuelle
EP3130277B1 (fr) Refraction objective universelle
DE102020128958B4 (de) Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Brillenglases, Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen von individuellen biometrischen Daten sowie Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines Brillenglases
DE102020128951B4 (de) Verfahren zum Herstellen eines Brillenglases, Computerprogrammprodukt und Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen zumindest eines individuellen biometrischen Parameters
DE102018002630B4 (de) Angleich der subjektiven und objektiven Refraktionen
WO2022029150A1 (fr) Calcul amélioré de lentilles ophtalmiques
DE102021202442A1 (de) Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Computerprogrammprodukt zum Bestimmen einer Sensitivität zumindest eines Auges eines Probanden
DE102022200462B3 (de) Computerimplementiertes Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Fertigungskorrekturmodells für die Herstellung von ophthalmischen Linsen, Speichervorrichtung, Computerprogrammprodukt, Verfahren sowie Vorrichtung
EP3994519A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'optimisation de verres de lunettes, en particulier pour porteurs de cristallins intraoculaires implantés
DE102020128953B3 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung eines Brillenglases, Computerprogrammprodukt sowie die Verwendung des Brillenglases
DE102020115070A1 (de) Verfahren zur Herstellung einer Kontaktlinse oder einer Intraokularlinse

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20230504

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

TPAA Information related to observations by third parties modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCTIPA

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)