EP4196613A1 - Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer - Google Patents
Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancerInfo
- Publication number
- EP4196613A1 EP4196613A1 EP21785975.0A EP21785975A EP4196613A1 EP 4196613 A1 EP4196613 A1 EP 4196613A1 EP 21785975 A EP21785975 A EP 21785975A EP 4196613 A1 EP4196613 A1 EP 4196613A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- breast cancer
- cells
- bacterial
- tna
- ipa
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 208000026310 Breast neoplasm Diseases 0.000 title claims abstract description 123
- 206010006187 Breast cancer Diseases 0.000 title claims abstract description 121
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 title abstract description 40
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 title abstract description 6
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- GOLXRNDWAUTYKT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(1H-indol-3-yl)propanoic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CCC(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 GOLXRNDWAUTYKT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 115
- BXFFHSIDQOFMLE-UHFFFAOYSA-N indoxyl sulfate Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(OS(=O)(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 BXFFHSIDQOFMLE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 91
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 76
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 claims description 67
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 31
- 102100040653 Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase Human genes 0.000 claims description 28
- 101710136122 Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase Proteins 0.000 claims description 28
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 claims description 28
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 26
- 210000003171 tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 23
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 claims description 13
- 244000005709 gut microbiome Species 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 241000030716 Alistipes shahii Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 241000588768 Providencia Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000011319 anticancer therapy Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 claims description 6
- 201000005389 breast carcinoma in situ Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000115153 Bacteroides xylanisolvens Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000193403 Clostridium Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000701474 Alistipes Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000606125 Bacteroides Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000588722 Escherichia Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 abstract description 4
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 abstract description 2
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 abstract description 2
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 163
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 85
- 102000003984 Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 52
- 108090000448 Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 52
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 50
- 108010001511 Pregnane X Receptor Proteins 0.000 description 49
- 102000000804 Pregnane X Receptor Human genes 0.000 description 49
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 41
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 28
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 25
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 description 25
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 22
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 22
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 19
- RWSXRVCMGQZWBV-WDSKDSINSA-N glutathione Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)NCC(O)=O RWSXRVCMGQZWBV-WDSKDSINSA-N 0.000 description 19
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 19
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 19
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 19
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 19
- 206010027476 Metastases Diseases 0.000 description 17
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 17
- 230000036542 oxidative stress Effects 0.000 description 17
- 239000000524 Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substance Substances 0.000 description 16
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 16
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 15
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 15
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 14
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 14
- SIKJAQJRHWYJAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Indole Chemical compound C1=CC=C2NC=CC2=C1 SIKJAQJRHWYJAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-VIFPVBQESA-N L-tryptophane Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(C[C@H](N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 14
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 239000003981 vehicle Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 13
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 13
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000010149 post-hoc-test Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 12
- 102000014156 AMP-Activated Protein Kinases Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108010011376 AMP-Activated Protein Kinases Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 102000000905 Cadherin Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108050007957 Cadherin Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 238000011529 RT qPCR Methods 0.000 description 11
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tryptophan Natural products C1=CC=C2C(CC(N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 229960004308 acetylcysteine Drugs 0.000 description 11
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 11
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 11
- PWKSKIMOESPYIA-BYPYZUCNSA-N L-N-acetyl-Cysteine Chemical compound CC(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(O)=O PWKSKIMOESPYIA-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000001085 cytostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 10
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 102000005369 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 108020002663 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 9
- 102000011779 Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 108010076864 Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 239000003963 antioxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229960003180 glutathione Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000002493 microarray Methods 0.000 description 9
- XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M propidium iodide Chemical compound [I-].[I-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CCC[N+](C)(CC)CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 9
- KPKZJLCSROULON-QKGLWVMZSA-N Phalloidin Chemical compound N1C(=O)[C@@H]([C@@H](O)C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](C[C@@](C)(O)CO)NC(=O)[C@H](C2)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H]3C[C@H](O)CN3C(=O)[C@@H]1CSC1=C2C2=CC=CC=C2N1 KPKZJLCSROULON-QKGLWVMZSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 8
- 229940054051 antipsychotic indole derivative Drugs 0.000 description 8
- 230000001640 apoptogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 8
- 150000002475 indoles Chemical class 0.000 description 8
- 230000003859 lipid peroxidation Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000001338 necrotic effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 8
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- XMAYWYJOQHXEEK-OZXSUGGESA-N (2R,4S)-ketoconazole Chemical compound C1CN(C(=O)C)CCN1C(C=C1)=CC=C1OC[C@@H]1O[C@@](CN2C=NC=C2)(C=2C(=CC(Cl)=CC=2)Cl)OC1 XMAYWYJOQHXEEK-OZXSUGGESA-N 0.000 description 7
- 102000016938 Catalase Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108010053835 Catalase Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000000118 anti-neoplastic effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 7
- 229960004125 ketoconazole Drugs 0.000 description 7
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 7
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- GIANIJCPTPUNBA-QMMMGPOBSA-N (2s)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-nitramidopropanoic acid Chemical compound [O-][N+](=O)N[C@H](C(=O)O)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 GIANIJCPTPUNBA-QMMMGPOBSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 102100033053 Glutathione peroxidase 3 Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 101710119049 Glutathione peroxidase 3 Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 230000003078 antioxidant effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000007705 epithelial mesenchymal transition Effects 0.000 description 6
- 244000005702 human microbiome Species 0.000 description 6
- PZOUSPYUWWUPPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N indole Natural products CC1=CC=CC2=C1C=CN2 PZOUSPYUWWUPPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- RKJUIXBNRJVNHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N indolenine Natural products C1=CC=C2CC=NC2=C1 RKJUIXBNRJVNHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000009401 metastasis Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008599 nitrosative stress Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000003762 quantitative reverse transcription PCR Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 6
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 102100027186 Extracellular superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 102100033044 Glutathione peroxidase 2 Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 101710119052 Glutathione peroxidase 2 Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 101000836222 Homo sapiens Extracellular superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 241000736262 Microbiota Species 0.000 description 5
- 102000044820 Zonula Occludens-1 Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 230000006907 apoptotic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000000546 chi-square test Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000824 cytostatic agent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 201000004933 in situ carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 230000002601 intratumoral effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000011278 mitosis Effects 0.000 description 5
- JVJFIQYAHPMBBX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-hydroxynonenal Chemical compound CCCCCC(O)C=CC=O JVJFIQYAHPMBBX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102100040069 Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 101710150756 Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108010072220 Cyclophilin A Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108010001202 Cytochrome P-450 CYP2E1 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102100024889 Cytochrome P450 2E1 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010024636 Glutathione Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 241001559542 Hippocampus hippocampus Species 0.000 description 4
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 4
- 102000001776 Matrix metalloproteinase-9 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010015302 Matrix metalloproteinase-9 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 4
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102100034539 Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010009711 Phalloidine Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000003559 RNA-seq method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 108020004459 Small interfering RNA Proteins 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 108700007340 Zonula Occludens-1 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000004663 cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012137 double-staining Methods 0.000 description 4
- 102000015694 estrogen receptors Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010038795 estrogen receptors Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000008194 pharmaceutical composition Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000026731 phosphorylation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000006366 phosphorylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 4
- 231100000338 sulforhodamine B assay Toxicity 0.000 description 4
- 238000003210 sulforhodamine B staining Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009469 supplementation Effects 0.000 description 4
- QOFZZTBWWJNFCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N texas red-X Chemical compound [O-]S(=O)(=O)C1=CC(S(=O)(=O)NCCCCCC(=O)O)=CC=C1C(C1=CC=2CCCN3CCCC(C=23)=C1O1)=C2C1=C(CCC1)C3=[N+]1CCCC3=C2 QOFZZTBWWJNFCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-XLOQQCSPSA-N Alpha-Lactose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)O[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-XLOQQCSPSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 102000000412 Annexin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108050008874 Annexin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000282326 Felis catus Species 0.000 description 3
- 241000237858 Gastropoda Species 0.000 description 3
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 101000702691 Homo sapiens Zinc finger protein SNAI1 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000020 Nitrocellulose Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000588777 Providencia rettgeri Species 0.000 description 3
- 239000006180 TBST buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 101150009943 Tgfb3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000010162 Tukey test Methods 0.000 description 3
- 102100035071 Vimentin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 102100030917 Zinc finger protein SNAI1 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 238000011888 autopsy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 3
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 3
- IOOMXAQUNPWDLL-UHFFFAOYSA-M lissamine rhodamine anion Chemical compound C=12C=CC(=[N+](CC)CC)C=C2OC2=CC(N(CC)CC)=CC=C2C=1C1=CC=C(S([O-])(=O)=O)C=C1S([O-])(=O)=O IOOMXAQUNPWDLL-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 3
- 108010082117 matrigel Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 206010061289 metastatic neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002438 mitochondrial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 229920001220 nitrocellulos Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000003573 thiols Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 210000004881 tumor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000004614 tumor growth Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 3
- RVBUGGBMJDPOST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-thiobarbituric acid Chemical compound O=C1CC(=O)NC(=S)N1 RVBUGGBMJDPOST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4',6-Diamino-2-phenylindol Chemical compound C1=CC(C(=N)N)=CC=C1C1=CC2=CC=C(C(N)=N)C=C2N1 FWBHETKCLVMNFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KJLPSBMDOIVXSN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-[4-[2-[4-(3,4-dicarboxyphenoxy)phenyl]propan-2-yl]phenoxy]phthalic acid Chemical compound C=1C=C(OC=2C=C(C(C(O)=O)=CC=2)C(O)=O)C=CC=1C(C)(C)C(C=C1)=CC=C1OC1=CC=C(C(O)=O)C(C(O)=O)=C1 KJLPSBMDOIVXSN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000007469 Actins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010085238 Actins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108090000672 Annexin A5 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004121 Annexin A5 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 241000193464 Clostridium sp. Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000000116 DAPI staining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010051392 Diapedesis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 101710094971 Fibroblast growth factor-binding protein 1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100023590 Fibroblast growth factor-binding protein 1 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 2
- 229910020700 Na3VO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- MWUXSHHQAYIFBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitric oxide Chemical compound O=[N] MWUXSHHQAYIFBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000003992 Peroxidases Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 241000233805 Phoenix Species 0.000 description 2
- 229940124158 Protease/peptidase inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 102000001708 Protein Isoforms Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010029485 Protein Isoforms Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000001253 Protein Kinase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 239000012083 RIPA buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NKANXQFJJICGDU-QPLCGJKRSA-N Tamoxifen Chemical compound C=1C=CC=CC=1C(/CC)=C(C=1C=CC(OCCN(C)C)=CC=1)/C1=CC=CC=C1 NKANXQFJJICGDU-QPLCGJKRSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000003815 abdominal wall Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000002835 absorbance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000002777 acetyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 2
- YJVBLROMQZEFPA-UHFFFAOYSA-L acid red 26 Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].CC1=CC(C)=CC=C1N=NC1=C(O)C(S([O-])(=O)=O)=CC2=CC(S([O-])(=O)=O)=CC=C12 YJVBLROMQZEFPA-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013543 active substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000000577 adipose tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001851 biosynthetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- VHRGRCVQAFMJIZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadaverine Chemical compound NCCCCCN VHRGRCVQAFMJIZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 231100000504 carcinogenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000030833 cell death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009087 cell motility Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000019522 cellular metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005754 cellular signaling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004087 circulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004292 cytoskeleton Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 231100000135 cytotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000003013 cytotoxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000326 densiometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001378 electrochemiluminescence detection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006539 extracellular acidification Effects 0.000 description 2
- MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate Chemical compound O1C(=O)C2=CC(N=C=S)=CC=C2C21C1=CC=C(O)C=C1OC1=CC(O)=CC=C21 MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001943 fluorescence-activated cell sorting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002806 hypometabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002952 image-based readout Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003364 immunohistochemistry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001394 metastastic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000017074 necrotic cell death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003305 oral gavage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001575 pathological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000137 peptide hydrolase inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108040007629 peroxidase activity proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000012660 pharmacological inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 2
- YBYRMVIVWMBXKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride Chemical compound FS(=O)(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 YBYRMVIVWMBXKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- -1 phospho-Acetyl Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 208000037821 progressive disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108060006633 protein kinase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- IHIXIJGXTJIKRB-UHFFFAOYSA-N trisodium vanadate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-][V]([O-])([O-])=O IHIXIJGXTJIKRB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 210000005239 tubule Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- PLVPPLCLBIEYEA-WAYWQWQTSA-N (z)-3-(1h-indol-3-yl)prop-2-enoic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(\C=C/C(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 PLVPPLCLBIEYEA-WAYWQWQTSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NHBKXEKEPDILRR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,3-bis(butanoylsulfanyl)propyl butanoate Chemical compound CCCC(=O)OCC(SC(=O)CCC)CSC(=O)CCC NHBKXEKEPDILRR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XGILAAMKEQUXLS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(indol-3-yl)lactic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CC(O)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 XGILAAMKEQUXLS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011725 BALB/c mouse Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108020000946 Bacterial DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000005623 Carcinogenesis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000011727 Caspases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010076667 Caspases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000016362 Catenins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010067316 Catenins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010009944 Colon cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000001333 Colorectal Neoplasms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010012735 Diarrhoea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000001061 Dunnett's test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940102550 Estrogen receptor antagonist Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 102000018233 Fibroblast Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050007372 Fibroblast Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004315 Forkhead Transcription Factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000852 Forkhead Transcription Factors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- VWUXBMIQPBEWFH-WCCTWKNTSA-N Fulvestrant Chemical compound OC1=CC=C2[C@H]3CC[C@](C)([C@H](CC4)O)[C@@H]4[C@@H]3[C@H](CCCCCCCCCS(=O)CCCC(F)(F)C(F)(F)F)CC2=C1 VWUXBMIQPBEWFH-WCCTWKNTSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102100033039 Glutathione peroxidase 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101001014936 Homo sapiens Glutathione peroxidase 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000826399 Homo sapiens Sulfotransferase 1A1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000826397 Homo sapiens Sulfotransferase 1A2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- SMEROWZSTRWXGI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lithocholsaeure Natural products C1CC2CC(O)CCC2(C)C2C1C1CCC(C(CCC(O)=O)C)C1(C)CC2 SMEROWZSTRWXGI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007807 Matrigel invasion assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102100031701 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101710114687 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930040373 Paraformaldehyde Natural products 0.000 description 1
- LCTONWCANYUPML-UHFFFAOYSA-M Pyruvate Chemical compound CC(=O)C([O-])=O LCTONWCANYUPML-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 239000012980 RPMI-1640 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012722 SDS sample buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102100023986 Sulfotransferase 1A1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100023984 Sulfotransferase 1A2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 244000269722 Thea sinensis Species 0.000 description 1
- 108050001370 Tight junction protein ZO-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000056172 Transforming growth factor beta-3 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000097 Transforming growth factor beta-3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010065472 Vimentin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000193450 [Clostridium] symbiosum Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001467 acupuncture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010064926 acyl-CoA carboxylase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000013566 allergen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001028 anti-proliverative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000002246 antineoplastic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006851 antioxidant defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005975 antitumor immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003149 assay kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037358 bacterial metabolism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001815 biotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000008275 breast carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- UDSAIICHUKSCKT-UHFFFAOYSA-N bromophenol blue Chemical compound C1=C(Br)C(O)=C(Br)C=C1C1(C=2C=C(Br)C(O)=C(Br)C=2)C2=CC=CC=C2S(=O)(=O)O1 UDSAIICHUKSCKT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004611 cancer cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036952 cancer formation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001516 cell proliferation assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002975 chemoattractant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002512 chemotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009643 clonogenic assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000096 clonogenic assay Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000002052 colonoscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000002758 colorectal adenoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004624 confocal microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009615 deamination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006481 deamination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000013872 defecation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003964 deoxycholic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003828 downregulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007783 downstream signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003937 drug carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002919 epithelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- DNJIEGIFACGWOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethyl mercaptane Natural products CCS DNJIEGIFACGWOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000007741 female breast cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000002276 female breast carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229940126864 fibroblast growth factor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229960002258 fulvestrant Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000034659 glycolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010842 high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000984 immunochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003365 immunocytochemistry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002055 immunohistochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002650 immunosuppressive therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- PLVPPLCLBIEYEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N indoleacrylic acid Natural products C1=CC=C2C(C=CC(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 PLVPPLCLBIEYEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PCKPVGOLPKLUHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N indoxyl Chemical group C1=CC=C2C(O)=CNC2=C1 PCKPVGOLPKLUHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000000936 intestine Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000001990 intravenous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 description 1
- SMEROWZSTRWXGI-HVATVPOCSA-N lithocholic acid Chemical compound C([C@H]1CC2)[C@H](O)CC[C@]1(C)[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@@H]2CC[C@H]([C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C)[C@@]2(C)CC1 SMEROWZSTRWXGI-HVATVPOCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000006166 lysate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003470 mitochondria Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008437 mitochondrial biogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006686 mitochondrial oxygen consumption Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000394 mitotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009826 neoplastic cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000771 oncological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002018 overexpression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004792 oxidative damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036284 oxygen consumption Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002866 paraformaldehyde Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000546 pharmaceutical excipient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009038 pharmacological inhibition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000136 polysorbate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002451 polyvinyl alcohol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000010837 poor prognosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010839 reverse transcription Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012679 serum free medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004666 short chain fatty acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000021391 short chain fatty acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003584 silencer Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002356 single layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- FHHPUSMSKHSNKW-SMOYURAASA-M sodium deoxycholate Chemical compound [Na+].C([C@H]1CC2)[C@H](O)CC[C@]1(C)[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@@H]2CC[C@H]([C@@H](CCC([O-])=O)C)[C@@]2(C)[C@@H](O)C1 FHHPUSMSKHSNKW-SMOYURAASA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000000528 statistical test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001839 systemic circulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960001603 tamoxifen Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- YNJBWRMUSHSURL-UHFFFAOYSA-N trichloroacetic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C(Cl)(Cl)Cl YNJBWRMUSHSURL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- IMNIMPAHZVJRPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N triethylenediamine Chemical compound C1CN2CCN1CC2 IMNIMPAHZVJRPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004879 turbidimetry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000005048 vimentin Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000036642 wellbeing Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
- C12Q1/6886—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6888—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms
- C12Q1/689—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms for bacteria
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/106—Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/118—Prognosis of disease development
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/158—Expression markers
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Oncology (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the field of diagnosis and treatment of early stage breast cancer. Specifically, a method is provided for determining whether a subject has early stage breast cancer by measuring the bacterial tna operon in a sample from the subject. Specifically, bacterial nucleic acid coding for the TnaA peptide or the TnaA peptide is measured. A method for mitigating breast cancer promotion and/or progression in a subject is also provided.
Description
Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of diagnosis and treatment of early stage breast cancer. Specifically, a method is provided for determining whether a subject has early stage breast cancer by measuring the bacterial tna oper- on in a sample from the subject. Specifically, bacterial nucleic acid coding for the TnaA peptide or the TnaA peptide is measured. A method for mitigating breast cancer promotion and/or progression in a subject is also provided.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Dysbiotic microbiota, associated with oncological diseases, is termed the oncobiome. Oncobiosis of the distal gut is associated with breast cancer [1-11]; importantly, among the oncobiome studies common microbiome changes were identified [12, 13] suggesting a common root for the pathogenic role of the oncobiome. It remained a question whether oncobiotic transformation of the microbiome has a causative role in carcinogenesis in breast cancer or if it is an epiphenomenon. Bacterial metabolites can provide a link between the microbiome and cancer cells through the circulation [34]. Among these metabolites, short chain fatty acids, lithocholic acid and cadaverine have cytostatic properties [27, 28, 34, 39]. In breast cancer, the metabolic capacity of the microbiome is suppressed [4, 27], suggesting that the production of cytostatic metabolites decrease in breast cancer. Indolepropionic acid (IP A) and indoxyl sulphate are bacterial metabolites produced by the deamination of tryptophan [28, 40]. Approximately, 4-6% of tryptophan is metabolized to indole-derivatives through bacterial enzymes [41]. In germ-free mice, serum tryptophan levels increase, highlighting the burden of microbial degradation on tryptophan levels [42-46]. Tryptophanase (TnaA) [40] is a key enzyme in converting tryptophan into indole derivatives. Its gene can be found in the tryptophanase operon of which TnaA denotes tryptophanase enzyme. In the pathway that yields IPA, tryptophan is converted to indole lactate, then to indole acrylic acid, and subsequently to IPA [48]. Indoxyl sulphate (IS) is a metabolite of tryptophan [49]. Bacterial metabolism converts tryptophan to indole [49-51] that subsequently enters the systemic circulation. Indole is hydroxylated by Cyp2el and sulfated by SULT1 and SULT2 enzymes in the liver [49]. IS reenters circulation and is excreted through the kidneys. Indole-derivatives can activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor [49,52].
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a first aspect the invention provides a method for determining whether a subject has breast cancer, comprising determining the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject, wherein a decrease in the level of said nucleic acid sequence and/or gene product is indicative of the presence of breast cancer in the subject.
A method is provided for determining whether a subject is at an increased risk of developing breast cancer, comprising determining the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of
a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject, wherein a decrease in the level of said nucleic acid sequence and/or gene product is indicative of the presence of an increased risk of developing breast cancer.
Preferably the nucleic acid sequence is a nucleic acid sequence coding for tryptophanase (TnaA) or a portion thereof. Preferably the gene product is TnaA protein or a portion thereof. In another preferred embodiment the gene product is RNA.
In another aspect indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in preventing or mitigating initiation of breast cancer is provided. Also, indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in mitigating the promotion and/or progression of breast cancer in a subject is provided.
In another aspect indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in preventing or mitigating initiation of breast cancer is provided. Also, indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in mitigating promotion and/or progression of breast cancer in a subject is provided.
In yet another aspect the invention provides a method for mitigating promotion and/or progression of breast cancer in a subject, comprising determining the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject, administering indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and/or indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to the subject to provide or restore physiological serum concentration of indolepropionic acid and/or indoxyl sulphate if the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in the sample is lower than the corresponding reference value, and optionally monitoring the presence of breast cancer in the subject and/or the serum level of indolepropionic acid and/or indoxyl sulphate in said subject, and if necessary, administering another anticancer therapy together or without the administration of indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and/or indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In yet another aspect the invention provides a method for preventing breast cancer or mitigating initiation of breast cancer in a subject, comprising determining the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject, administering indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and/or indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof to the subject to provide or restore physiological serum concentration of indolepropionic acid and/or indoxyl sulphate if the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in the sample is lower than the corresponding reference value, and optionally monitoring the presence of breast cancer in the subject and/or the serum level of indolepropionic acid and/or
indoxyl sulphate in said subject, and if necessary, administering another anticancer therapy together or without the administration of indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and/or indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In yet another aspect a method is provided for promoting selection of the appropriate anticancer therapy for a patient having breast cancer, wherein a) the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject is determined and optionally al) the number and characteristics of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are determined from a tumor sample obtained from the patient, b) the appropriate anticancer therapy is selected based on the value obtained in a) and optionally on the value and characteristics obtained in al), wherein the level of the nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of the gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon correlates and/or is indicative, preferably proportional of the number of TILs.
In yet another aspect a method is provided for predicting survival for a patient having breast cancer, wherein lower expression of fecal TnaA predicts shorter survival time.
In any one of the aspects of the invention the nucleic acid sequence is preferably a nucleic acid sequence coding for tryptophanase (TnaA) or a portion thereof. In any one of the aspects of the invention the gene product is preferably TnaA protein or a portion thereof. In any one of the aspects of the invention in another preferred embodiment the gene product is RNA.
In any one of the aspects of the invention the bacterial tna operon is preferably from bacteria forming part of the gut microbiota, preferably of the healthy gut microbiota.
In any one of the aspects of the invention the bacterial tna operon is preferably from Providencia spp, Alistipes spp, Bacteroides spp, Clostridium spp, Escherichia spp.
In any one of the aspects of the invention the bacterial tna operon is preferably from Providencia rettegri, Alistipes shahii, Bacteroides xylanisolvens, Escherichia coli or any combination thereof.
In any one of the aspects of the invention the breast cancer is preferably stage 0 (in situ carcinoma) breast cancer according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system. Preferably, the cancer is stage 0 breast cancer and the test sample is compared to a reference value typical of the absence of stage 0 breast cancer, preferably to a reference value derived from healthy individuals (i.e. individuals not having breast cancer).
In any one of the aspects of the invention, the subject is preferably a human, preferably a female, more preferably a post-menopausal woman.
In any one of the aspects of the invention, the sample preferably comprises gut microbiota. Preferably the sample is feces.
In any one of the aspects of the invention, the level of the nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon, the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon, the level of IPA and the level of IS
in the sample from the subject is compared to a corresponding reference value derived from the appropriate corresponding sample(s) from individuals not having the breast cancer, preferably from healthy individuals.
In another aspect a pharmaceutical composition comprising indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and/or indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient or carrier is provided. Preferably the pharmaceutical composition is for use in preventing breast cancer, mitigating breast cancer initiation, mitigating breast cancer promotion or mitigating breast cancer progression. Preferably the pharmaceutical composition is administered to provide or restore physiological serum concentration of indolepropionic acid and/or indoxyl sulphate in a subject having in situ breast cancer or a lower level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or a lower level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon. In preferred embodiments the pharmaceutical composition is used with another anticancer agent(s), preferably in combination with an estrogen receptor antagonist compound, such as tamoxifen or fulvestrant.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1. Supplementation of mice transplanted with 4T1 breast cancer cells with indolepropionic acid (IP A) reduces metastatic burden. Female Balb/c mice (n=10/10, 3 months of age) were grafted with 4T1 cells and were treated with IPA (1 nmol/g q.d. p.o.) or vehicle (VEH) (n=10/10) for 14 days then the mice were terminated. Upon autopsy (A) the total number and (B) total and (C) individual mass of primary tumors were determined. (D) The infiltration of the primary tumors to the surrounding tissues was scored. The (E) number of mice with metastasis were plotted and the (F) total, as well as, the (G) individual mass of the metastases were measured. In tissue sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from the primary tumors (H) lymphocyte infiltration and (I) mitosis score were determined. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test, except for panels D, E and I, were chi-square tests were conducted. *** indicate statistically significant difference between vehicle and treated groups at p <0.001.
Figure 2. . Indolepropionic acid (IPA) reduces cell proliferation in cellular models of breast cancer. (A) 500 cells/well 4T1 cells were seeded in 6 -well plates and were then treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 7 days then colonies were stained according to May-Grunwald-Giemsa that were analyzed using the ImageJ software (n=3). (B) 4T1 cells were seeded in 6-well plate (75.000 cell/well) and treated with the indicated concentrations of IPA for 24 hours and stained with propidium-iodide then analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) 4T1 cells (75.000 cell/well in 6 well plates) were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours the ratio of necrotic and apoptotic cells were determined with staining by propidium-iodide - FITC Annexin double staining using the V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit and measured by flow cytometry (n=3). (D) SKBR-3 (5.000 cell/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and were then treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then total protein content was assessed in SRB assays (n=3). (E) SKBR-3 (200.000 cell/well) cells were seeded in 6-well plates and were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours the ratio of necrotic and apoptotic cells were determined with staining by propidium-iodide then analyzed by flow cytometry. (F) SKBR-3 (200.000 cell/well) cells were seeded in 6-well plates and were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours the ratio of necrotic and apoptotic cells were determined with staining by
propidium-iodide - FITC Annexin double staining using the V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit and measured by flow cytometry (n=3). (G) Human fibroblast (7500 cell/well) cells were seeded in 96-well plates and were then treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then total protein content was assessed in SRB assays (n=3). (H) Human fibroblast (200.000 cell/well) cells were seeded in 6-well plates and were then treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then the ratio of necrotic and apoptotic cells were determined with staining by propidium-iodide then analyzed by flow cytometry (n=3). Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, except for panels D, E and F, were Dunnett’s post-hoc tests were conducted. * or *** indicate statistically significant difference between control and treated samples at p <0.05 or p<0.001, respectively.
Figure 3. Indolepropionic acid (IPA) induced oxidative stress, cellular energy stress and decreased the proportions of cancer stem cells. 500.000 cell/well 4T1 cells were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then (A) lipid peroxidation was measured by TBARS assay and (B) 4HNE expression was assessed by Western blotting (representative figure, n=3). In the same cells (C) the protein expression of NRF2 and iNOS were determined by Western blotting (n=3), while (D) the mRNA expression of catalase (cat) was determined by RT-qPCR (n=3). (E) The expression of the indicated proteins (pACC, ACC, FOXO1 and PGC-i ) were determined by Western blotting. (F) 100.000 cell/well 4T1 cells were treated with the indicated concentration of IPA for 24 hours then the proportions of aldehyde dehydrogenase-positive cells were determined in Aldefluor assays using flow cytometry (n=3). For Western blots a typical experiment was displayed. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test, except for panel F, where Student’s t-test was used. *,** and *** indicate statistically significant difference between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively.
Figure 4. Indolepropionic acid (IPA) induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET). 100.000 cell/well 4T1 cells were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then (A) cellular morphology was observed using Texas Red-X Phalloidin and DAPI staining (representative figure, n=3). Scale bar corresponds to 25 pm. Mesenchymal cells are characterized by stress filaments that are absent in epithelial cells; for details on morphology see [27] Fig. S3. (B) Normalized resistance was measured in ECIS impedance based experiments (representative figure, mean ± SD, n = 1). (C-D) In IPA-treated 4T1 cells the expression of the indicated genes were determined in (C) RT-qPCR (n=3) and (D) Western blotting (n=3). 0-actin was used as a loading control. For Western blots a typical experiment was displayed. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post -hoc test, except for panel D, where chi-square test were conducted. * and ** indicate statistically significant difference between control and treated samples at p <0.05 or p <0.01, respectively. Abbreviations: Vimentin (Vim), fibroblast growth factor-binding protein 1 (FgfBpl), snail family transcriptional repressor- 1 (Snail) and P- catenin) E-cadherin, zonula occludens-1 (ZO1).
Figure 5. Indolepropionic acid (IPA) -elicited oxidative stress has central role in mediating IPA-elicited antineoplastic effects. 4T1 cells (500.000 cell/well - TBARS, 100.000 cell/well - ALDH, 1.500 cell/well - SRB) were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours with or without the antioxidants, as indicated. Subsequently, (A) thiobarbituric acid-re active substances, (B) the fraction of Aldefluor -positive cells
and (C) total protein content was determined. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test. *, ** and *** indicate statistically significant difference between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p<0.01 or p <0.01, respectively. Abbreviations: TBARS - Thiobarbituric acid-re active substances, ALDH - Aldehyde dehydrogenase, SRB - Sulphorhodamine B, GSH - reduced glutathione, NAC - N-acetyl-cysteine
Figure 6. AHR and PXR are responsible for the IPA-elicited antineoplastic effects. 100.000 cell/well 4T1 cells were treated with IPA in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours with or without the inhibitors, as indicated. Subsequently, (A) the actin cytoskeleton was stained using phallodin-Texas Red and morphology was assessed using confocal microscopy. On the same cells (B) lipid peroxidation was determined by TBARS assays and (C) the expression of the indicated proteins were determined by Western blotting. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test, except for panel A, where chi-square test were conducted. *, ** and *** indicate statistically significant difference between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p<0.01 or p <0.01, respectively. Abbreviations: n.s. - non-significant, PXRi - PXR inhibitor, AHRi - AHR inhibitor, ACC - acyl-CoA carboxylase (an AMPK target protein).
Figure 7. Higher expression of Pregnane X Receptor and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor prolongs survival in breast cancer. The effect of expression of (A) AHR or (B) PXR on survival in breast cancer was analyzed by kmplot.com, a freely accessible database. On panel (A) effect of PXR expression on survival is depicted with the data acquired from RNAseq experiments. On panel (B) effect of PXR expression on survival is depicted with the data acquired from microarray experiments and patients were stratified as a function of receptor expression. On panel (C) effect of AHR expression on survival is depicted with the data acquired from RNAseq experiments. On panel (D) effect of AHR expression on survival is depicted with the data acquired from microarray experiments and patients were stratified as a function of receptor expression. Total survival rates were assessed and all samples are represented.
Abbreviations: NR1I2 - pregnane X receptor, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), Pregnane X receptor (PXR). The database was assessed the 19th February 2020.
Figure 8. Higher intratumoral expression of Pregnane X receptor (PXR) and nuclear Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) shows correlation with low-grade and lower-mitosis breast cancers. (A) TMA was stained with the indicated antibodies. A typical staining pattern is shown. The bar is equivalent of 50 pm. Cases in TMA were scored for receptor expression using the H-score system. (B-E) H-score of the nuclear expression of the AHR receptor were related to (B) stage of the disease, (C) mitosis score, (D) tubule formation, (E) histological subtype. (F-H) H-score of the expression of PXR receptor were related to (F) grade of the disease, (G) mitosis score and (H) mitotic index. Statistical significance on panels B and F was determined using ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test, while on panels C, D, E, G and H Student’s t-test was used. Stage 0 (in situ carcinoma) and stage 1 patients, Mitosis score 2 and 3 patients and Tubule formation score 1 and 2 patients were handled together due to low number of cases. Abbreviations: Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), Pregnane X receptor (PXR), no special type (NOS).
Figure 9. The fecal expression of TnaA shows correlation with the pathological and clinical features of breast
cancer. (A-B) The abundance of bacterial TnaA DNA was assessed in human fecal DNA samples from cohort study. The ct values lower than 45 are shown in Providencia rettgeri. Median values indicated by a line. On panel A all patients and controls are compared, statistical significance was calculated using Student’s t-test. On panel B patients were stratified based on the stage of the disease and statistical comparison was made using ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s or Tukey’s post-hoc tests. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution.
*,** and *** indicate statistically significant difference between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively.
Figure 10. IS treatment in tumor-bearing mice reduces the infiltration capacity of tumors to the surrounding tissues and reduces metastatic capacity
Female Balb/c mice were grafted with 4T1 cells and treated with IS (2 pmmol/kg q.d. p.o.) or vehicle (VEH) (n= 10/10) for 14 days before sacrifice. Upon autopsy (A) the total number of primary tumors and the (B) total and (C) individual mass of primary tumors were measured. (D) The tumor infiltration rates into the surrounding tissues were scored. (E) The number of mice with metastases, (F) the total mass of metastases, and (G) the individual mass of metastases are shown.
Numerical values are represented as average ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated using Student’s t- test (two-tailed) except for panel D, where a Chi-square test was used.
* and *** indicate statistically significant differences between vehicle and IS groups at p <0.05 and p <0.001, respectively.
Figure 11. IS has cytostatic properties without affecting cell death
(A) 4T1 (1500 cells/well), MCF7 (4000 cells/well), SKBR-3 (5000 cells/well), MDA-MB 231 (3000 cells/well), ZR75-1 (3000 cells/well), and (E) human fibroblasts (7500 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with IS at the concentrations indicated for 24 hours. Total protein content was evaluated using Sulphorhodamine B assays (n=3). (B) 4T1 cells (500 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with IS at the indicated concentrations for 7 days. Colonies were stained according to May-Grunwald-Giemsa and counted using ImageJ software (n=3). (C) 4T1 (75,000 cells/well); MCF7 (150,000 cells/well); SKBR-3 (200,000 cells/well), and (F) human fibroblasts (200,000 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with the indicated concentrations of IS for 24 hours. Cells were stained with propidium-iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry (n=3). (D) Cells were treated with IS in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours. The ratios of necrotic and apoptotic cells were determined by double staining with propidium-iodide and FITC Annexin, using the V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit, and subjected to flow cytometry (n=3).
Numerical values are represented as average ± SEM. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined on panel A, B, and E by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc tests; all samples were compared to controls. On panels C, D, and F ANOVAs were conducted followed by Tukey’s post-hoc tests.
*, **, and *** indicate statistically significant differences between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p<0.01, and p <0.01, respectively.
Figure 12. Indoxyl sulfate treatment induces oxidative and nitrosative stress
(A) 4T1 cells (500,000 cells/well) were treated with IS at the concentrations indicated for 24 hours. Lipid peroxidation was measured using TBARS assays (n=3) and (B) 4HNE expression was determined by Western blotting (representative figure, n=3). (C) Nitrotyrosine was detected by Western blotting (representative figure, n=3). In the same cells (D) the protein levels of iNOS and NRF2 were determined by Western blotting (representative figure, n=3). (E) The mRNA expression levels of the indicated genes were determined by RT-qPCR (n=3).
Numerical values are represented as average ± SEM. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Durmett’s post-hoc test, where all values were compared to control.
* and ** indicate statistically significant differences between control and treated samples at p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively.
Abbreviations: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS); 4-hydroxynoneal (4HNE); nitro-tyrosine (NTyr); inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS); nuclear factor 2 (NRF2); glutathione peroxidase 2 (GPX2); glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3); superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3); catalase (CAT).
Figure 13. IS treatment induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and blocks cellular migration
(A) 4T1 cells (100,000 cells/well) were treated with IS in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then cellular morphology was observed using Texas Red-X Phalloidin and DAPI staining (representative figure, n=3). Scale bar corresponds to 25 pm. (B) Total impedance was measured by ECIS (representative figure, mean ± SD, n = 1). (C-D) After IS treatment of 4T1 cells, the expressions of the indicated genes were determined using (C) RT- qPCR (n=3) and (D) Western blotting (representative figure, n=3). (Lactin was used as a loading control. (E) 4T1 cells (50,000 cells/well) were treated with the indicated concentration of IS for 24 hours and, subsequently, the percentages of migrated cells were determined using a Corning Matrigel invasion chamber (n=3). Cells were counted by Opera Phoenix High Content Screening System using Harmony 4.6 Software.
Numerical values are represented as average ± SEM, except for panel B, where average ± SD was plotted. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Dunnetf s post -hoc tests, except for panel A, where a Chi-square test was conducted. For Dunnetf s tests, all comparisons were made to controls.
*, **, and *** indicate statistically significant differences between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p<0.01, and p <0.01, respectively.
Figure 14. IS treatment renders cells metabolically less flexible and reduces the proportions of cancer stem cells (A) 4T 1 cells (2000 cells/well) were treated with IS in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours then cells were subjected to a Seahorse XF96 analysis. The mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were measured and plotted (n=3). (B) The expression levels of the indicated proteins were determined by Western blotting (n=3). (Lactin was used as a loading control. (C) 4T1 cells (100,000 cells/well) were treated with the indicated concentration of IS for 24 hours then the proportions of aldehyde dehydrogenase-positive cells were measured by Aldefluor assay using flow cytometry (n=3).
Numerical values are represented as average ± SEM. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Durmett’s post-hoc tests, except for C panel, where a Student’s t-test (two-tailed) was used. For the Dunnetf s post-hoc tests, all comparisons were
made to controls.
* indicate statistically significant differences between control and treated cells at p <0.05.
Abbreviations: phospho-AMP-activated protein kinase (pAMPK); AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK); phospho-Acetyl Co-A Carboxylase (pACC); Acetyl Co-A Carboxylase (ACC) and Forkhead box protein 01 (FOXO1).
Figure 15. Pharmacological inhibition of AHR and PXR block IS -elicited antineoplastic effects
(A) 4T1 cells (100,000 cells/well) were treated with IS in the concentrations indicated for 24 hours with or without the inhibitors, as indicated. The actin cytoskeleton and nuclei were stained using Texas Red-X Phalloidin and DAPI, then the morphology was assessed using Leica PP8 confocal system (representative figure, n=3). On the same cells, (B) lipid peroxidation (TBARS assays) (n=3) and (C) the proportions of the ALDH1 -positive 4T1 cells (n=3) were measured. (D) Expression of the indicated proteins was determined by Western blotting (representative figure, n=3). (Lactin was used as a loading control.
Numerical values are represented as average ± SEM. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Dunnetf s post-hoc tests, except for panel C, where a Student’s t-test (two-tailed) was used. For Dunnetf s tests, all comparisons were made to controls.
*, **, and *** indicate statistically significant differences between control and treated samples at p <0.05, p<0.01, and p <0.01, respectively.
Abbreviations: non-significant (ns); PXR inhibitor (PXRi); AHR inhibitor (AHRi); phospho-AMP-activated protein kinase (pAMPK); AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK); phospho-Acetyl Co-A Carboxylase (pACC); Acetyl Co-A Carboxylase (ACC).
Figure 16. Higher expression of Cyp2El prolongs survival in breast cancer patients
The effect of expression of Cyp2El on survival in breast cancer was analyzed by kmplot.com, a freely accessible database. The data depicted stems from data acquired from microarray experiments and patients were stratified as a function of receptor expression. Total survival rates were assessed and all samples are represented. The database was assessed on March 30, 2020.
Figure 17. Higher expression of Sultl Al or Sultl A2 prolongs survival in breast cancer patients
The effect of expression of Sultl Al and Sultl A2 on survival in breast cancer was analyzed by kmplot.com, a freely accessible database. The data depicted stems from data acquired from microarray experiments and patients were stratified as a function of receptor expression. Total survival rates were assessed and all samples are represented. The database was assessed on March 30, 2020.
Figure 18. Fecal protein expression of E. coli TnaA correlates with the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The fecal protein expression of E. coli TnaA is higher in patients with higher proportions of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. (A) E. coli total lysate was run on an SDS-PAGE gel, was transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and was probed with an anti-TnaA antibody. (B-C) Fecal samples of 36 low TIL patients (0-20% TIL) and 11 of high TIL patients (30%< TIL) were assessed by Western blotting using an anti-TnaA antibody. Protein content-normalized values were obtained. Values were tested for outliers using Grubb’s method, one value was omitted from the low TIL group. (B) Normalized TnaA expression was plotted. (C) On values from
low and high TIL patients liner regression was performed.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Bacterial indole biosynthesis has been found to be suppressed in breast cancer. The level of DNA from a bacterial tna operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene from a bacterial tna operon may be used as an early indicator of the presence or risk of breast cancer. “Bacterial indole synthesis” refers to the potential of the microbiota to produce indole derivatives, such as IPA and IS from tryptophan, in which process tryptophanase is a key enzyme. The level of “bacterial indole synthesis” may depend on the number of bacteria capable of producing indole derivatives, e.g the number of bacteria comprising a coding sequence for a tryptophanase enzyme or the rate of expression of the enzyme or the level of activity of the enzyme or the level of the enzyme. The level of bacterial DNA coding for tryptophanase and the level of tryptophanase were found to be lower in fecal samples derived from patiens diagnosed with early stage breast cancer than in healthy controls. The term “human microbiota” refers to the microbes capable of living in or on the human body. The terms “gut microbiota” and “gut microbiome” refer to species of the human microbiota living in the human gastrointestinal tract. The term “microbiome” and “microbiota” as used in the description may refer to both the human microbiota and human microbiome and the gut microbiota and gut microbiome, preferably to the gut microbiota and microbiome.
Accordingly, the invention provides a method for diagnosing breast cancer or the risk of developing breast cancer in a subject by measuring the level of a DNA sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon and/or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject, wherein the test sample comprises microbiota of said subject.
The term “reference level” in a corresponding sample indicating the absence of breast cancer (e.g. stage 1 breast cancer) refers to a sample of the same type (e.g. blood, feces) from an individual or a group of individuals not having the breast cancer (e.g. stage 1 breast cancer).
The reference value is derived from individual(s) not having the cancer (stage) to be diagnosed. Preferably, the reference value is derived from healthy individual(s).
The “stage” of a cancer in this description is to be understood as a stage determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system anatomic staging. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (TNM system) staging system was used according to the 7th edition. Early stage breast cancer, as used herein, refers to stage 0 and/or stage 1 breast cancer according to the AJCC TNM staging system.
The methods for measuring the level of DNA, RNA or protein are well known to the skilled person and include e.g. quantitative real time PCR assays, (faecal) immunochemical tests, Western blot, turbidimetry, antibody and mass spectrometry-based assays, RT-coupled new generation sequencing. Guidance is also found in the Examples, and in e.g. Liang et al [105]; E. Nabizadeh et al. [106]; Goedert et al. [107]; Xie et al. [108].
It is also possible to search appropriate databases for bacteria known to be present in the human body, preferably in the human gastrointestinal tract, preferably in the intestine, wherein a DNA sequence coding for a tryptophanase was annoted. Accordingly, a screening method is provided, wherein bacteria suitable to indicate the presence of early stage breast cancer may be screened for. In the screening method an appropriate database
is searched for bacteria wherein a DNA sequence coding for a tryptophanase has been annoted. By measuring the level of such bacteria or the DNA sequence from the tna operon from such bacteria or the level of a gene product of a gene of the tna operon in healthy individuals and early stage breast cancer patients, bacteria suitable to indicate the presence of early stage breast cancer may be identified. Such databases (e.g. the Human PanMicrobe Communities (HPMC) database, the NIH Human Microbiome Project, the Integrated reference catalog of the human gut microbiome) are well-known to the skilled person, and may be found in e.g. Turnbaugh et al. The human microbiome project: exploring the microbial part of ourselves in a changing world. Nature 2007; 449(7164): 804-810, e.g the KEGG database.
Microbial indole biosynthesis by the gut microbiome is repressed in early stages of breast cancer
To assess the link between bacterial IPA biosynthesis and breast cancer behavior, we assessed the capability of the gut microbiota to synthesize indole derivatives. To that end, we identified bacterial species in which tryptophanase operon was mapped using a database search, and designed primers to the regions coding for TnaA. We measured the abundance of the DNA coding for TnaA in fecal DNA of recently diagnosed patients vs. healthy controls (published in [3]) using qPCR.
When comparing patients against healthy individuals, the abundance of TnaA in Providencia rettgeri and Alistipes shahii was significantly reduced in patients, and there was a similar trend in Bacteroides xylanisolvens. Next, we stratified patients as a function of the stage of their disease. The decrease in TnaA abundance was accentuated in stage 0 (in situ carcinoma) patients not only for P. rettgeri, A. shahii and B. xylanisolvens, but also for a general probe on Clostridium species.
High TnaA expression is directly proportional with the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.
We have assessed protein level changes to bacterial indol biosynthetic enzymes. The antibody commercially available was against the TnaA protein of E. coli origin. We stratified the patients based on the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and found that TnaA expression was trend for higher in patients with higher TIL. In good agreement with that finding, we found correlation between TIL and E. coli TnaA expression in breast cancer patients by performing linear regression.
Indolepropionic acid reduces the progression of breast cancer in vivo.
As first step, we examined the effects of IPA supplementation on tumor growth by grafting 4T1 breast cancer cells to 20 female Balb/c mice to the left and right side (200.000 cell to each site). Half of the mice received vehicle (sterilized tap water) as control, while the other half of the mice received IPA (1 nmol/g bodyweight). Per os IPA treatment did not inhibit the growth of the primary tumor, as neither the number of tumors, nor the total, nor the mass of primary tumors differed with IPA treatment. However, IPA treatment drastically reduced the level of infiltration to the surrounding tissues. IPA treatment reduced the number of mice bearing metastases and the total mass of metastases, although the mass of the individual metastases did not change. We assessed the histology of the primary tumors and found that the infiltration of lymphocytes was increased and mitosis score of the tumor cells was decreased in the IPA-treated mice.
Indoxyl-sulphate reduces the severity of breast cancer in vivo
Balb/c female mice were grafted with 4T1 breast cancer cells. Half of the mice received vehicle (sterilized tap
water) as a control, while the other half received IS (2 pmol/kg bodyweight). The IS dose corresponds to a 4 pM serum concentration similar to the serum reference range of IS in humans [52]. Per os IS treatment did not inhibit tumor growth, however, IS significantly reduced the infiltration of the primary tumor to the surrounding tissues. Furthermore, IS treatment reduced the number and mass of metastases.
Indoxyl sulfate treatment inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells
IS reduced proliferation in multiple cell lines (SRB assays in 4T1, MCF7, SKBR-3, MDA-MB-231, ZR75-1). The anti -proliferative effects were confirmed in 4T1 cells using clonogenic assays. The proportions of apoptotic and necrotic cells in culture did not change significantly after treating with IS concentrations corresponding to the human reference concentrations. IS had no effects on non -transformed, primary human skin-derived fibroblasts.
Indolepropionic acid inhibits hallmarks of cancer
We opted for the 4T1 cells as our model for the subsequent experiments. IPA reduced the proliferation of 4T1 cells in colony forming assaysWe assessed whether IPA, in concentrations corresponding to the reference concentration and found that IPA did not increase either the proportions of propidium-iodide positive necrotic, or the Annexin-FITC - propidium-iodide double positive apoptotic cells.
We also assessed whether the effects, described above, are specific for only 4T1 cells, but can also be elicited in another breast cancer cell line. IPA, in a similar concentration range used for 4T1 cells, decreased cell proliferation as measured in SRB assays; it did not increase necrotic or apoptotic cell death in SKBR-3.
Finally, we found that IPA does not inhibit cell proliferation or exert cytotoxicity in primary, non-transformed human fibroblasts.
Next, we assessed whether IPA can modulate other cancer hallmarks. Although the role of oxidative stress in breast cancer was long debated, recent studies consistently showed that increased oxidative stress is responsible for cytostasis or cancer cell death [30, 65-69]. We assessed different oxidative stress markers to explore the redox status of IPA-treated cancer cells. IPA treatment increased lipid peroxidation, as measured by TBARS assay and by the formation of 4HNE indicative of enhanced oxidative stress. Enhanced oxidative stress was in parallel with the reduction in the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), a transcription factor responsible for the expression of antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase. In parallel, we observed the enhanced expression of inducible nitrogen monoxide synthase (iNOS), an enzyme promoting nitrosative stress.
Finally, we assessed markers of cellular energy stress (pACC, ACC, FOXO1 and PGCip) and cancer stem cell- ness (aldehyde dehydrogenase [70]). IPA treatment reduced the proportions of cancer stem cells, while inducing the markers of cellular energy stress.
Another important feature of breast cancer is epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). IPA treatment of 4T1 cells reverted EMT that was evidenced by dose dependent conversion of 4T1 cells to epithelial morphology. In good agreement with that, IPA treatment induced the resistance of cellular monolayer to electric current, indicative of better cell-to-cell and cell-to-surface binding. Finally, we assessed epithelial and mesenchymal markers at the protein and mRNA level. IPA treatment induced the expression of mesenchymal makers (Vimentin (Vim), fibroblast growth factor-binding proteinl (FgfBpl), snail family transcriptional repressor-1 (Snail), and P-catenin; and it upregulated the expression of epithelial markers (E-cadherin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO1)
Indoxyl sulfate inhibits numerous hallmarks of cancer
We assessed whether IS can modulate cancer. First, we assessed oxidative/nitrosative stress markers, as these are major regulators of cancer hallmarks and cancer progression. Levels of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE), both markers of lipid oxidative damage, increased when cells were treated with IS (Fig. 12A-B). Next, we assessed nitro-tyrosine (NTyr) levels that indicate protein damage and nitrosative stress. NTyr levels were induced by IS treatment (Fig. 12C) suggesting increased damage to cells by reactive species and damage to cellular lipids and proteins. These changes correlated with the increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Fig. 12D) and the decreased expression of glutathione peroxidase 2 and 3 (GPX1 and GPX3), superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3), and catalase (cat) (Fig. 12D-E).
The 4T1 cells reverted the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) after IS treatment, evidenced by dosedependent conversion of 4T1 cells to epithelial morphology (Fig. 13 A), coinciding with increased resistance (Fig. 13B). In good agreement with these findings, the mRNA and protein expression of mesenchymal markers (vimentin (Vim), fibroblast growth factor -binding protein 1 (Fgfbpl), transforming growth factor beta-3 (Tgfb3), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), snail family transcriptional repressor- 1 (Snail) and P-catenin decreased, while the expression of epithelial markers (E-cadherin and tight junction protein- 1 (ZO-1) increased (Fig. 13C-D). In addition, cells migrated less in a Boyden-chamber experiment (Fig. 13E).
IS treatment had a profound effect on cellular metabolism. IS treatment reduced ECAR rendering cells hypometabolic and metabolically less flexible (Fig. 14A). Surprisingly, the hypometabolic switch coincided with the induction of key energy sensors, including AMPK or FOXO1 (Fig. 5B). AMPK activation upon IS treatment was marked by phosphorylation of its alpha subunit on Thrl72 and the phosphorylation of a key AMPK target protein, ACC on Ser79 (Fig. 14B). Finally, the proportions of ALDH1 -positive cancer stem cells decreased upon treatment with IS (Fig. 14C), a feature that is linked to changes in cellular metabolism.
IPA-induced cytostatic and antineoplastic effects are mediated by reactive species production
EMT, as well as, cancer stem cell characteristics are modulated by reactive species [71, 72]. With enhanced oxidative stress upon IPA treatment it was likely that the suppression of these features may be oxidative -stress driven. To get an insight on whether IPA can modify oxidative stress to exert cytostatic effects on breast cancer cells, we assessed the effects of thiol reductants glutathione (GSH) and N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), as well as mitochondria-targeted antioxidant Mito-TEMPO, on IPA-mediated cancer hallmarks. As expected, the application of general thiol reductants (reduced glutathione (GSH) and N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC)) reduced the IPA- induced increase in thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances suggesting a reduction in IPA-induced oxidative stress. Furthermore, GSH and NAC treatment protected against the IPA-induced decrease in ALDH1 -positive cancer stem cells. More interestingly, a mitochondrial antioxidant, Mito-TEMPO, protected against IPA- induced cytostasis. These data suggest that IPA-induced reactive species production has a central role in eliciting the widespread antineoplastic effects of IPA.
IPA exerts its effects through aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and pregnane-X-receptor (PXR)
IPA has multiple receptors [40], of which we investigated pregnane-X-receptor (PXR) and aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) in detail in our study. We used pharmacological inhibitors of AHR (CH223191) and PXR (ketoconazole [51, 52]) to interrogate the involvement of IPA receptors. Inhibition of AHR and PXR abrogated or
quenched several IPA -induced features, namely, IPA-induced reversion of EMT, TBARS production, induction of NRF2 and AMPK (as marked by the phosphorylation of ACC).
We assessed whether the expression of AHR and PXR correlates with survival in human breast cancer using the kmplot.com database [63]. First, we assessed the RNAseq datasets and found that the quartile of the patient population with the highest expression has advantage in survival over the quartile with the lowest expression both in the case of PXR and AHR. Next, we assessed the microarray data as well, where we were able to stratify patients as a function of receptor expression. Expression level of AHR did not have a clear impact on breast cancer survival, nevertheless, there was a trend for better survival in the high expression quartile, similarly to the RNAseq data. Importantly, higher expression of PXR provided better survival with breast cancer, particularly during the first 4-12 years after diagnosis and for estrogen receptor-positive cancer cases. (See Table 5 in Examples.)
These in silica data were complemented by characterizing the intratumoral expression of AHR and PXR in a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of 88 patients (the TMA was published in [30]). When AHR expression was considered in the whole cell, it did not show any consequent change, nevertheless, when we scored only the nuclear fraction of AHR that represents the active AHR [73], we found that AHR nuclear score (i.e. AHR activity) decreased with the progression of the disease. Furthermore, AHR activity was lower in highly proliferating tumors, in tumors with lower differentiation) and in not otherwise specified (NOS) tumors as compared to lobular tumors. PXR expression decreased as Nottingham grade of the patients increased and in tumors with high proliferation rate.
High extracellular tryptophan levels associate with worse survival in breast cancer (Table S8 [101]). The levels of an indole derivative, 3-indoxyl-sulphate that is a downstream metabolite of tryptophan degradation and indole-propionic acid formation, is downregulated both in estrogen receptor -positive and -negative cases ([102] Additional file 3, Table S3 Fine 44). Furthermore, in breast tumors there is a negative correlation between Ki67 positivity (a proliferation marker) and 3-indoxyl-sulphate levels ([102] Additional file 9, Table S8 line 130). These data suggest that indole derivatives support the survival of patients with breast cancer and that their levels are downregulated with progressive disease. These observations are also in good correlation with the intratumoral expression pattern and activity of AHR and PXR that are downregulated with the progression of the disease.
In breast cancer oncobiosis bacterial tryptophan metabolism is suppressed and this seems to be the most profound in early stage, in situ carcinoma cases. Decreases in IPA releases the cytostatic lockdown of breast cancer cells. Eater stage and aggressive cases are characterized by lower expression or lower activity of metabolite- elicited signaling. Apparently, oncobiosis seems to play a role in breast carcinoma progression but not in the initiation of the disease.
IS exerts its effects through the AHR and PXR receptors
As the next step, we wanted to assess which receptors are responsible for the IS -elicited effects. Indoxyl derivatives exert their effects through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and pregnane-X -receptor (PXR) [53]. We applied pharmacological inhibitors to interrogate the involvement of AHR and PXR in IS signaling. The AHR inhibitor, CH223191, and the PXR inhibitor, ketoconazole, were applied. Both CH223191 and ketoconazole
blocked IS-elicited mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (Fig. 15A). Inhibition of AHR and PXR also attenuated the IS-induced increases in TBARS (Fig. 15B) and suppression of ALDH1+ cells (Fig 15C). In addition, IS- induced expression of E-cadherin was blocked by CH223191, but not by ketoconazole (Fig. 15D). In contrast, the phosphorylation of ACC and AMPK was blocked by both agents (Fig. 15D).
Higher expression of the isoforms of SULT and Cyp2el correlate with better survival in breast cancer.
We assessed how the expression of IS biosynthesis enzymes affects the survival of breast cancer patients. To that end, we assessed an online database, kmplot.com. Higher expression of Cp2El and SultlAl and Sultl A2 in tumors correlated with better survival in breast cancer patients (Fig. 16-17, Table 3). Furthermore, the protective effect was lost in triple negative cases (TNBC) (Fig. 16-17, Table 6-13).
Fecal TnaA expression is lower in patients with E-cadherin negative tumors
First, we compared the TnaA expression in E-cadherin positive and negative tumors. E-cadherin is a predictive factor for metastasis formation and poorer clinical outcome. The fecal expression of E. coli TnaA was lower in E-cadherin negative cases as compared to E-cadherin positive cases.
Fecal expression of TnaA is low in lobular subtype of breast cancer
The fecal protein expression of E. coli TnaA as a function of the histological subtype. We found that the fecal expression of E. coli TnaA enzyme was lower in lobular subtype than in the ductal, not otherwise specified and mixed cases.
Low or absent E-cadherin expression was associated with reduced disease-free interval and overall survival, larger tumor size, higher histological grade, development of distant metastasis and tumors negative for estrogen receptors, in general, poor prognosis. The finding that TnaA expression was lower in E-cadherin negative cases is in good agreement with the observation that oncobiosis supports metastasis formation in breast cancer.
Indolepropionic acid (IP A) has antineoplastic features. IP A supplementation decreased the infiltration of the primary tumor to surrounding tissues, the number of metastases, cellular movement and diapedesis, while, at the same time, induced antitumor immune response, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition, oxidative stress and influenced metabolism through two IPA receptors, AHR and PXR. IPA did not exert its cytostatic effects on non-transformed cells, exhibiting tumor cell-specific effects. IPA exerts its antineoplastic modultion through the AHR and particularly the PXR receptors.
IPA treatment increased oxidative and nitrosative stress through the inhibition of the expression of NRF2 and a subsequent reduction in cellular antioxidant defense (e.g. downregulation of caspase expression). In addition, IPA induced iNOS expression and enhanced mitochondrial reactive species production.
NRF2 and iNOS have profound roles in setting the redox balance in cancer cells [66, 93]. Increased oxidative and nitrosative stress is cytostatic in breast cancer [30, 65, 68, 69]. Increase in reactive species production is vital to exert the cytostatic properties of IPA. Furthermore, oxidative stress is a key regulator of cancer cell stem-ness [94], and higher levels of oxidants switch cancer stem cells to lose their stem properties [95-97]. IPA treatment reduced the proportions of cancer stem cells, an effect that was reverted by the addition of thiol reductants.
IPA induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET). Inducing MET slows down cell movement, diapedesis and metastasis formation. In our models we observed that IPA supplementation reduced metastasis formation.
In addition to these findings, we showed that IPA induces AMPK, FOXO1, and PGCip, enzymes inducing mitochondrial biogenesis, in an AHR/PXR-dependent fashion. The activation and overexpression of these enzymes were shown to be associated with better survival in breast cancer [27, 53, 99, 100]
High TnaA expression, indicative of higher IPA production, is directly proportional with the number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.
High extracellular tryptophan levels associate with worse survival in breast cancer (Table S8 [101]). The levels of an indole derivative, 3-indoxyl-sulphate that is a downstream metabolite of tryptophan degradation and indole-propionic acid formation, are downregulated both in estrogen receptor-positive and -negative cases ([102] Additional file 3, Table S3 Line 44). Furthermore, in breast tumors there is a negative correlation between Ki67 positivity (a proliferation marker) and 3-indoxyl-sulphate levels ([102] Additional file 9, Table S8 line 130). These data suggest that indole derivatives support the survival of patients with breast cancer and that their levels are downregulated with progressive disease. In addition to these, we showed that the IPA biosynthetic capacity of the microbiome is reduced in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, especially for women with in situ carcinoma. These observations are also in good correlation with the intratumoral expression pattern and activity of AHR and PXR that are downregulated with the progression of the disease, or were lower in aggressive, highly proliferative and undifferentiated breast cancer cases. Decreases in IPA releases the cytostatic lockdown of breast cancer cells. Later stage and aggressive cases are characterized by lower expression or lower activity of metabolite-elicited signaling.
EXAMPLES
Chemicals
Chemicals, among them, indolepropionic acid (IPA), indoxyl-sulphate (IS), glutathione (GSH), N-acetyl- cysteine (NAC), Mito-TEMPO and ketoconazole were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA) unless otherwise stated. IPA was used 0.4 pM and 0.8 pM. [40, 49, 50]. IS was used at concentrations of 2 pM and 4 pM, which correspond to the normal human serum concentration of IS [53,60,61]. GSH and NAC antioxidants were used at final concentration of 5 mM. The mitochondria -targeted antioxidant Mito-TEMPO was used at concentration of 5 pM. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) inhibitor, CH223191, was obtained from MedChemExpress (MCE, Monmouth Junction, USA) and was applied at concentration of 10 pM. Pregnane X receptor (PXR) downstream signaling was inhibited using ketoconazole at final concentration of 25 pM [51, 52], The Silencer Select siRNAs targeting AHR (AHR— siRNA ID: si 198) and PXR (NR1I2— siRNA ID: sl6910) and the negative control siRNA #1 (cat.no. 4390843) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) and each was used at a final concentration of 30 nM.
Cell culture
4T1 murine breast cancer cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, R5886) medium containing 10 % FBS, 1 % penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine and 1 % pyruvate at 37 °C with 5 % CO2.
MCF7 human breast cancer cells were maintained in MEM (Sigma-Aldrich, M8042) medium containing 10 % FBS, 1 % penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine at 37 °C with 5 % CO2.
SKBR-3 human breast cancer cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma- Aldrich, 1000 mg/1 glucose, D5546) medium containing 10 % FBS, 1 % penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine at 37 °C with 5 % CO2.
Human primary fibroblasts cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma- Aldrich, 1000 mg/1 glucose, D5546) medium containing 20 % FBS, 1 % penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine at 37 °C with 5 % CO2.
In vitro cell proliferation assays
Cellular proliferation was assessed using Sulphorhodamine B assay and colony forming assay as described in [53]. Cells were seeded in a 96-well plates (4T1- 1500 cell/well; MDA-MB-231 - 3000 cell/well; SKBR-3 - 5000 cell/well; MCF7 - 4000 cell/well; human fibroblast - 7500 cell/well) in complete medium and were treated with the indicated concentrations of IS, IPA or Mito-TEMPO mitochondria-targeted antioxidant (5 pM) at the presence of IPA (0,8 pM) for 24 hours. Then cells were fixed in 50% trichloroacetic acid (TCA - final concentration: 10 %) and the plates were incubated for 1 hour at 4°C. Plates were washed 5 times with water and stained with 0.4 % (w/v) sulphorhodamine B solution in 1 % acetic acid. Unbound dye was removed by washing 5 times with 1 % acetic acid. Bound stain was solubilized with 10 mM Tris base and the absorbance was measured on an automated plate reader (Thermo Labsystems Multiskan MS, Walthman, Massachusetts, USA) at 540 nm.
For colony forming assays, cells were seeded in a 6-well plate (4T1 - 500 cell/well; MCF7 - 1000 cell/well; SKBR-3 - 1500 cell/well) in complete medium and were cultured with the indicated concentrations of IPA for 7 days. After treatment, the plates were washed twice with PBS. Colonies were fixed in methanol for 15 minutes, dried and stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa solution for 20 minutes. Cells were washed with water and the colonies were determined using Image J software [54] .
Detection of cell death
IPA or ISinduced cytotoxicity was assessed by propidium iodide (PI; Biotium, Fremont, CA, 40016) uptake assays as in [55]. Cells were seeded in 6-well plate (4T1 - 75.000 cell/well; MCF7 - 150.000 cell/well; SKBR-3 - 200.000 cell/well; human fibroblast - 200.000 cell/well) and treated with the indicated concentrations of IPA or IS for 24 hours, then stained with 100 pg/mL PI for 30 minutes at 37°C, washed once in PBS, and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, BD Biosciences).
To assess changes in apoptotic and necrotic cell death we used an Annexin V+PI double staining assay kit (Invi- trogen, Oregon, USA, V13242). Cells were seeded in 6-well plate (4T1 - 75.000 cell/well; MCF7 - 150.000 cell/well; SKBR-3 - 200.000 cell/well; human fibroblast - 200.000 cell/well) treated with the indicated IPA or IS concentrations for 24 hours. Then cells were stained with 100 pg/mL PI solution and 5 pl FITC Annexin V according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The number of apoptotic and necrotic cells were counted using FacsCalibur flow cytometer.
2.5 Electric Cell-substrate Impedance Sensing (ECIS)
ECIS (Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing) measurements (ECIS model Z0, Applied BioPhysics Inc. Troy, NY, USA) were used to monitor cell-to-cell and cell-to -surface connections. 4T1 cells were seeded (40.000 cell/well) on type 8W10E arrays. Cells were treated with vehicle , 0.4 pM or 0.8 pM IPA or 2 pM or 4
pM IS for 20 hours and total impedance values were measured for 24 hours. Multifrequency measurements were taken at 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000 and 64000 Hz. The reference well was set to a no-cell control with complete medium. ECIS assays were performed similarly to [27].
Immunocytochemisry
Immunocytochemistry was performed similarly to [27]. 4T1 cells were grown on glass coverslips for 1 day, and treated with the indicated concentrations of IPA, IS and the AHR inhibitor, CH223191 (10 pM), or the PXR inhibitor, ketoconazole (25 pM), for 24 hours. Then the cells were washed in PBS, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes and permeabilized using 1 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 minutes. Cells were then blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour and incubated with TexasRed-X Phalloidin (T7471, 1:150, Invitrogen, Oregon, USA) for 1 hour at 4°C. Cells nuclei were visualized with DAPI (R37606, 1:10, Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) and rinsed in PBS twice for 10 minutes. Coverslips mounted in Mowiol/Dabco solution. Confocal images were acquired with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope and were processed using LAS AFv3.1.3 software. Typical mesenchymal-like and epithelial-like morphology of 4T1 cells are shown in [27], mRNA preparation and quantitation
Reverse transcription-coupled PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed similarly to [56]. Total RNA from cells were isolated using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA). For the assessment of the expression of indicated genes 2 pg of RNA was reverse transcribed using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The qPCR reactions were performed with the qPCRBIO syGreen Lo-ROX Supermix (PCR Biosystems Ltd., London, UK) on Light- Cycler 480 Detection System (Roche Applied Science). Gene expression was normalized to the geometric mean of human 36B4 and cyclophyllin values. Primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Murine and human primers used in RT-qPCR reactions
Bacterial TnaA quantitation
The human fecal DNA library from breast cancer patients and matched control women was published in [3]. For the assessment of the abundance of bacterial Tryptophanase (TnaA) coding DNA in human fecal, DNA samples 10 ng of DNA was used for qPCR reactions. Primers are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Primers for the determination of abundance of TnaA using RT-qPCR reactions
Quantitation of fecal E. coli TnaA protein
Fecal proteins were isolated as described in [28] and [108]. Fecal samples (100 mg) were lysed in 500 pl RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 % SDS, 1 % Triton X-100, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, protease inhibitor cocktail) and sonicated (Qsonica Q125 Sonicator,
Newtown, Connecticut) 3 times for 30 seconds with 50% amplitude. After centrifugation, 8 pl - mercaptoethanol and 25 pl 5 X SDS sample buffer (50 % glycerol, 10 % SDS, 310 m Tris HC1, pH 6.8, 100 m DTT, 0.01 % bromophenol blue) were added to each 100 pl extract. Then, fecal protein samples were heat-
ed for 10 minutes at 96 °C and held on ice until loading. Protein extract (40 pl) was loaded on 8 % SDS-PAGE gels and proteins were separated and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. Ponceau-red staining took place after transfer, but before blocking. Ponceau-stained membranes were photographed and used in subsequent analyses. Membranes were cut at the 70 kDa standard and the top part was blotted for TnaA (E. coli TnaA, 1:2000, Assaypro (33517-05111)). Membranes were blocked in TBST containing 5 % BSA for 1 hour and incubated with anti-LdcC primary antibody overnight at 4°C. After washing with lx TBS-TWEEN solution, the membranes were probed with IgG HRP-conjugated peroxidase secondary antibodies (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc, Beverly, MA, USA). Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence reaction (SuperSignal West Pico Solutions, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Blots were evaluated by densitometry using Image J software and antibody signals were normalized to total protein stained by Ponceau - red (Sigma-Aldrich).
Aldefluor assay
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity was measured using Aldefluor Stem Cell kit (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). 4T1 cells were seeded on 6 well plates (4T1- 100.000 cell/well) and treated with the indicated concentration of IPA or IS for 24 hours. Cells then were collected and prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For positive control samples SKBR-3 cell line was used based on the manufacturers’ instructions. Changes in the level of ALDH was determined by flow cytometry and the results were analyzed by using Flowing Software 2.5.1. Aldefluor assay for assessing sternness was performed similarly to [28, 57, 58].
Seahorse metabolic flux analysis
Changes in oxygen consumption rate (OCR, reflecting mitochondrial oxidative capacity) and pH, termed extracellular acidification rate (ECAR, reflecting glycolysis) were measured using an XF96 oximeter (Seahorse Biosciences, North Billerica, MA, USA). The 4T1 cells were seeded in 96-well Seahorse assay plates (4T1, 2000 cells/well) and treated with vehicle or the indicated IS concentrations for 24 hours. The OCR and ECAR values were recorded every 30 minutes to monitor the effects of IS treatment. Data were normalized to protein content and normalized readings were used for calculations.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
SDS PAGE and Western blotting was performed as in [59]. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% TritonX 100, 0.5% sodium deoxycolate, ImM EDTA, ImM Na3VO4, 1 mM PSMF, 1 mM NaF, protease inhibitor cocktail). Protein extracts (20-50 pg) were separated on 10% SDS polyacrylamide gels and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Then membranes were blocked in TBST containing 5 % BSA for 1 hour, and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing with lx TBST solution, the membranes were probed with IgG HRP-conjugated peroxidase secondary antibodies (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA). Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence reaction (SuperSignal West Pico Solutions, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Blots were quantified by densitometry using the Image J software. The primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Table 3.
Table 3. List of antibodies used for Western blot
Determination of lipid peroxidation
Lipid peroxidation was evaluated by determining the production rate of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substrate using the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay as described in [60]. The 4T1 cells were seeded in T75 flasks and exposed to to AHR (10 pM) and PXR (25 pM) inhibitors together with IS (2 p or 4 pM), or different concentration of IPA or Mito-TEMPO mitochondria-targeted antioxidant (5 pM) /GSH and NAC antioxidants (5 mM) / AHR (10 pM) and PXR (25 pM) inhibitors together with IPA (0,4 pM or 0,8 pM) for 24 hours. Cells were washed in PBS and scraped, then collected by centrifugation. After adding 8.1% SDS, 20 % acetic acid, 0.8 % thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and distilled water to the pellet, the samples were heated at 96°C for 1 hour. Samples were cooled down on ice and centrifuged. The absorbance of the supernatants were identified at 540 nm. The levels of 4-hydroxynonenal (4HNE) -modified proteins, as marker for lipid peroxidation were also assessed using western blotting.
Invasion
Matrigel invasion assays were performed with 4T1 cells using Coming BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (Corning, NY, USA). Cells were seeded in the chambers (50,000 cells/well) in serum free medium and grown
overnight. Then, the cells were exposed to the indicated concentrations of IS for 24 hours. The lower chamber was filled with 4T1 medium with lOOng/ml SDFl-alpha (Sigma-Aldrich, SRP4388) as a chemoattractant. Cells were prepared and stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (VWR, PA, USA, 340374T 341972Q) dye according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then analyzed on the Opera Phoenix High Content Screening System using Harmony 4.6 Software. Migration was calculated from the percentage of migrated cells through the Matrigel control membranes.
Animal study
Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Debrecen and the National Board for Animal Experimentation (1/2015/DEMAB) and were performed according to the NIH guidelines (Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals) and applicable national laws. Animal studies are reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.
Experimental animals were BALB/c female mice (14-16 weeks of age, 20-25 g). Animals were randomized for all experiments. Mice were bred in the “specific pathogen free” zone of the Animal Facility at the University of Debrecen, and kept in the “minimal disease” zone during the experiments. No more than 5 mice were housed in each cage (standard block shape 365 x 207 x 140 mm, surface 530 cm2; 1284 L Eurostandard Type II. L from Techniplast). Cages were changed once a week, on the same day. Animals had paper tubes to enrich their environment. Dark/light cycle was 12 hours, and temperature was 22 ± 1°C. Mice had ad libitum access to food and water (sterilized tap water). The animal facility was overseen by a veterinarian. A total of 20 female mice were used in the study, 10 randomly selected control and 10 IP A fed mice.
4T1 cells were suspended (2xlO6/mL) in ice cold PBS-Matrigel (1:1, Sigma-Aldrich) at 1:1 ratio. 20 female BALB/c mice received 50 pL injections to their second inguinal fat pads on both sides (105 cells/inj ection site). Tumor growth and animal wellbeing was controlled daily.
IPA treatment was administered by oral gavage in the dose of 1 nmol/g body weight once a day on each day of the experiment. The dose was planned not to exceed the serum reference concentration of IPA [40, 49, 50]. Animals received single daily oral IPA treatment. IPA stock was prepared in sterilized tap water at lOOx concentration (15 mM) for storage at -20°C. IPA stock was diluted each day to a working concentration of 150 pM in sterile tap water before treatment. Animals received a daily oral dose of 100 pl/30 g bodyweight from the IPA solution (10 mice) or vehicle (sterilized tap water, 10 mice). Researchers involved in IPA and vehicle solution administration were blinded. Treatment was administered every day at the same time between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. Animals were sacrificed on day 14 post grafting by cervical dislocation, then primary tumors and metastases were collected for subsequent analysis.
IS was administered by oral gavage at a dose of 2 pmol/kg as a bolus once a day. The dose correlated with the serum reference concentration of IS [53,60,61]. IS stock (60 mM) was prepared in sterilize tap water and stored at -20 °C. The IS stock solution was diluted on the day of treatment. Animals were randomized into two groups, 10 mice were treated with IS and 10 mice were treated with vehicle (sterilized tap water). The researchers administering IS and vehicle solutions were blinded. Treatment was carried out every day at the same time between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. Animals were sacrificed on day 14 post grafting by cervical dislocation, and primary tumors and metastases were harvested for subsequent analysis
Upon autopsy primary tumors were visually evaluated and scored based on their infiltration rate into surrounding tissues and macroscopic appearance of the tumor [27, 28]. Tumors were classified as a “low infiltration” class if the primary tumor remained in the mammary fat pads without any attachment to muscle. “Medium infiltration” tumor means that the tumor mass attached to the muscle tissue, but did not penetrate to the abdominal wall. In the case the tumor grew into the muscle tissue and totally penetrated the abdominal wall, it was scored as a “high infiltration” tumor. For the assessment of primary tumor infiltration rate the researchers were blinded. Both primary and metastatic tumor masses were removed from the animals and were measured on analytical balance in preweighed Eppendorf tubes. From the sections of HE-stained, formalin- fixed, paraffin embedded tumor tissues tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) content was determined as the number of TILs per 100 tumor cells.
Human studies
We assessed the abundance of the bacterial TnaA coding DNA in human fecal DNA samples. We used two cohorts in the study.
Cohort 1.
Cohort 1 consisted of fecal DNA samples and were used for the quantitation of the TnaA coding DNA. The cohort involved 48 controls and 46 breast cancer patients.
The human feces samples were collected from healthy volunteers and breast cancer patients by collaborators at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO), the Institute for Genome Sciences at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, and RTI International. The study protocol and all study materials were confirmed by the Institutional Review Boards at KPCO, NCI, and RTI International (IRB number 11CN235). The study results were published in [3]. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants. That cohort was designed and powered to compare healthy controls versus breast cancer patients, but we also stratified patients using the available clinical data.
Cohort 2.
This cohort was used in assessing the Intratumoral expression of IPA receptors. The TMA study was carried out using archived tissue blocks of 88 breast cancer patients.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues from breast cancer surgeries were collected and tissue microarray (TMA) blocks were built [62]. The cohort is described in [30]. The study was approved by the local ethical committee at the University of Debrecen. That cohort was designed and powered to compare healthy controls versus breast cancer patients, but we also stratified patients using the available clinical data.
Cohort 3.
Fecal protein expression was assessed in a cohort of female breast cancer patients of 35 participants with a mean age of 57 years. Samples from stage I-III and Nottingham grade 1-3 patients were used in the study. The average stage and grade were not statistically different amongst the groups. The cohort was published in [ 108].
The collection and biobanking of feces were authorized by the Hungarian national authority (ETT). Patients and healthy volunteers meeting the following criteria were excluded from the study: 1) has a previous history of breast cancer or had been operated due to neoplasia, 2) has a disease of unknown origin, 3) has a chronic contagious disease, 4) had contagious diarrhea 6 months prior to enrollment, 5) taken antibiotics within the 6 months
prior to enrollment, 6) had chemotherapy, biological therapy, or immunosuppressive therapy 6 months prior to enrollment, 7) used intravenous drugs 12 months prior to enrollment, 8) had piercing, tattooing, acupuncture, or other endangering behavior or action 12 months prior to enrollment, 9) exposure to an allergen to which the enrolled individual had been sensitized to, or 10) underwent colonoscopy 12 months prior to enrollment. The first morning feces was sampled; samples were frozen and deposited in the biobank within two hours after defecation. Samples were stored at -70 oC until subsequent use. We obtained informed consent from study participants. The patient’s routine pathological data were assessed in the study and were compared to the fecal expression of E. coli TnaA.
Tissue Microarray, immunohistochemistry and analysis
TMA in combination with immunohistochemistry was performed as in [61]. From every block there were three replicates and the staining was assessed applying H-score system [62]. In immunohistochemical studies, Leica Bond Max™ protocol was used. The antibodies and conditions are listed in Table 4.
Table 4. List of antibodies and conditions used in tissue microarray (TMA) analysis
Database screening
The kmplot.com database [63] was used to examine the connection between gene expression levels (AHR and PXR) and breast cancer survival in humans. The case numbers are listed in Table 5 (below). The sequence of the TnaA ORFs was retrieved from the KEGG (www.genome.jp/kegg/), the PATRIC (www.patricbrc.org/) and the Uniprot (www.uniprot.org) databases.
Statistical analysis
For the comparison of two groups, we used two tailed Student’s t-test, unless stated otherwise. Fold data were log2 transformed to achieve normal distribution. Statistical significance was determined for multiple comparisons with one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s or Dunnetf s honest significance difference (HSD) post-hoc test. All data are presented as average ± SEM unless stated otherwise. Texas Red-X Phalloidin-labelled fluorescent pictures were analyzed using Cell Profiler 2.0 followed by Advanced Cell Classifier 3.0. FACS results were analyzed using Flowing Software 2.0. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 7 software unless stated otherwise.
Statistical analysis
All data are represented as average ± SEM, and n denotes the number of patients in a group. Statistical tests are mentioned in figure captions. For statistical analysis Graphpad 8.1 software was used.
TABLE 5. LINK BETWEEN AHR OR PXR EXPRESSION AND BREAST CANCER PATIENT SURVIVAL The effect of expression of AHR or PXR, Cyp2El or Sult isoform on survival in breast cancer was analyzed by kmplot.com, a freely accessible database. Total survival rates were assessed and all samples are represented in different subpopulations of breast cancer. Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 6. Breast cancer survival and SULT1A1 (203615_x_at)
Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 7.
Breast cancer survival and SULT1 Al (215299_x_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 8.
Breast cancer survival and SULT1A2 (207122_x_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 9.
Breast cancer survival and SULT1 A2 (211385_x_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 10.
Breast cancer survival and CYP2E1 (1431_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 11.
Breast cancer survival and CYP2E1 (209975_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 12.
Breast cancer survival and CYP2E1 (209976_s_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
Table 13.
Breast cancer survival and CYP2E1 (222100_at) Numbers in bold represent statistically significant results.
SEQUENCE LISTING
< 110> Debreceni Egyetem < 120> Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer
<130> 126589KOH
<160> 36
<170> Patentin version 3.5
<210> 1
<211> 22 <212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > CAT Murine forward primer
<400> 1 ccttcaagtt ggttaatgca ga 22
<210> 2
<211> 20
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > CAT Murine reverse primer
<400> 2 caagtttttg atgccctggt 20
<210> 3
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > VIM Murine forward primer
<400> 3 ctccagagag aggaagccga aag 23
<210> 4
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > VIM Murine reverse primer
<400> 4 cctggatctc ttcatcgtgc agt 23
<210> 5
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > FgfBpl Murine forward primer
<400> 5 caaggtccaa gaagctgtct cca 23
<210> 6
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > FgfBpl Murine reverse primer
<400> 6 agctccaaga ttccccacag aac 23
<210> 7
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Tgfb3 Murine forward primer
<400> 7 ggcgtctcaa gaagcaaaag gat 23
<210> 8
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Tgfb3 Murine reverse primer
<400> 8 ccttaggttc gtggacccat ttc 23
<210> 9
<211> 20
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > MMP9 Murine forward primer
<400> 9
cattcgcgtg gataaggagt 20
<210> 10
<211> 20
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > MMP9 Murine reverse primer
<400> 10 acctggttca cctcatggtc 20
<210> 11
<211> 18
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > GPX2 Murine forward primer
<400> 11 gttctcggct tcccttgc 18
<210> 12
<211> 21
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > GPX2 Murine reverse primer
<400> 12 ttcaggatct cctcgttctg a 21
<210> 13
<211> 18
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > GPX3 Murine forward primer
<400> 13 ggcttccctt ccaaccaa 18
<210> 14
<211> 20
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > GPX3 Murine reverse primer
<400> 14 cccacctggt cgaacatact 20
<210> 15
<211> 19
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > S0D3 Murine forward primer
<400> 15 ctcttgggag agcctgaca 19
<210> 16
<211> 20
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > SOD3 Murine reverse primer
<400> 16 gccagtagca agccgtagaa 20
<210> 17
<211> 21
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Cyclophilin A Murine forward primer
<400> 17 tggagagcac caagacagac a 21
<210> 18
<211> 19
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Cyclophilin A Murine reverse primer
<400> 18 tgccggagtc gacaatgat 19
<210> 19
<211> 21
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> 36B4 Murine forward primer
<400> 19 agattcggga tatgctgttg g 21
<210> 20
<211> 21
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > 36B4 Murine reverse primer
<400> 20 aaagcctgga agaaggaggt c 21
<210> 21
<211> 22
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > AHR Human forward primer
<400> 21 ttgaaccatc cccatacccc ac 22
<210> 22
<211> 22
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > AHR Human reverse primer
<400> 22 gaggttctgg ctggcactga ta 22
<210> 23
<211> 22
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > PXR Human forward primer
<400> 23 agtgaaggtt cccgaggaca tg 22
<210> 24
<211> 22
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > PXR Human reverse primer
<400> 24 ttgtcacaga gcatacccag ca 22
<210> 25
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Cyclophilin A Human forward primer
<400> 25 gtctcctttg agctgtttgc agac 24
<210> 26
<211> 21
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Cyclophilin A Human reverse primer
<400> 26 cttgccacca gtgccattat g 21
<210> 27
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> 36B4 Human forward primer
<400> 27 ccattgaaat cctgagtgat gtg 23
<210> 28
<211> 21
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > 36B4 Human reverse primer
<400> 28 gtcgaacacc tgctggatga c 21
<210> 29
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Alistipes shahii Forward primer
<400> 29 gcctcgaaga cgatcaagga gat 23
<210> 30
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Alistipes shahii Reverse primer
<400> 30 tcgaacatga tgctgaacga cat 23
<210> 31
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Providencia rettegri Forward primer
<400> 31 cgtttacgtg agggagggat ttc 23
<210> 32
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223 > Providencia rettegri Reverse primer
<400> 32 accgcacgaa caccagattc taa 23
<210> 33
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Bacteriodes xylanisolvens Forward primer
<400> 33 aactggaaat cccgttcaaa gga 23
<210> 34
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Bacteriodes xylanisolvens Reverse primer
<400> 34 gtacgggttt gccgtatttg tea 23
<210> 35
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Clostridium sp. Forward primer
<400> 35 gatggaaegt ccaaacactt teg 23
<210> 36
<211> 23
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Clostridium sp. Reverse primer
<400> 36 atattttccg ccttccggaa ett 23
REFERENCES
1. Flores, R., J. Shi, B. Fuhrman, X. Xu, T. D. Veenstra, M. H. Gail, P. Gajer, J. Ravel, and J. J. Goedert. "Fecal Microbial Determinants of Fecal and Systemic Estrogens and Estrogen Metabolites: A Cross-Sectional Study." J Transl Med. 10 (2012): 253.
2. Fuhrman, B. J., H. S. Feigelson, R. Flores, M. H. Gail, X. Xu, J. Ravel, and J. J. Goedert. "Associations of the Fecal Microbiome with Urinary Estrogens and Estrogen Metabolites in Postmenopausal Women." J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 99, no. 12 (2014): 4632-40.
3. Goedert, J. J., G. Jones, X. Hua, X. Xu, G. Yu, R. Flores, R. T. Falk, M. H. Gail, J. Shi, J. Ravel, and H. S. Feigelson. "Investigation of the Association between the Fecal Microbiota and Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: A Population-Based Case-Control Pilot Study." J Natl Cancer Inst. 107, no. 8 (2015): djvl47.
4. Goedert, J. J., X. Hua, A. Bielecka, I. Okayasu, G. L. Milne, G. S. Jones, M. Fujiwara, R. Sinha, Y. Wan, X. Xu, J. Ravel, J. Shi, N. W. Palm, and H. S. Feigelson. "Postmenopausal Breast Cancer and Oestrogen Associations with the Iga-Coated and Iga-Noncoated Faecal Microbiota." Br J Cancer 23, no. 10 (2018): 435.
5. Jones, G. S., H. Spencer Feigelson, R. T. Falk, X. Hua, J. Ravel, G. Yu, R. Flores, M. H. Gail, J. Shi, X. Xu, and J. J. Goedert. "Mammographic Breast Density and Its Association with Urinary Estrogens and the Fecal Microbiota in Postmenopausal Women." PLoS One. 14, no. 5 (2019): e0216114.
6. Fruge, A. D., W. Van der Pol, L. Q. Rogers, C. D. Morrow, Y. Tsuruta, and W. Demark- Wahnefried. "Fecal Akkermansia Muciniphila Is Associated with Body Composition and Microbiota Diversity in Overweight and Obese Women with Breast Cancer Participating in a Presurgical Weight Loss Trial." J Acad Nutr Diet 9, no. 18 (2018): 164.
7. Luu, T. H., C. Michel, J. M. Bard, F. Dravet, H. Nazih, and C. Bobin-Dubigeon. "Intestinal Proportion of Blautia Sp. Is Associated with Clinical Stage and Histoprognostic Grade in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer." Nutr Cancer. 69, no. 2 (2017): 267-75.
8. Zhu, J., M. Liao, Z. Yao, W. Liang, Q. Li, J. Liu, H. Yang, Y. Ji, W. Wei, A. Tan, S. Liang, Y. Chen, H. Lin, X. Zhu, S. Huang, J. Tian, R. Tang, Q. Wang, and Z. Mo. "Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women Is Associated with an Altered Gut Metagenome." Microbiome. 6, no. 1 (2018): 136.
9. Banerjee, S., T. Tian, Z. Wei, N. Shih, M. D. Feldman, K. N. Peck, A. M. DeMichele, J. C. Alwine, and E. S. Robertson. "Distinct Microbial Signatures Associated with Different Breast Cancer Types." Front Microbiol. 9 (2018): 951.
10. Kwa, M., C. S. Plottel, M. J. Blaser, and S. Adams. "The Intestinal Microbiome and Estrogen Receptor-Positive Female Breast Cancer." J Natl Cancer Inst. 108(8). (2016): djw029.
11. Howe, C., S. J. Kim, J. Mitchell, E. Im, Y. S. Kim, Y. S. Kim, and S. H. Rhee. "Differential Expression of Tumor- Associated Genes and Altered Gut Microbiome with Decreased Akkermansia Muciniphila Confer a Tumor-Preventive Microenvironment in Intestinal Epithelial Pten-Deficient Mice." Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1864, no. 12 (2018): 3746-58.
12. Parida, S., and D. Sharma. "The Power of Small Changes: Comprehensive Analyses of Microbial Dysbiosis in Breast Cancer." Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 11, no. 19 (2019): 30042-3.
13. Dakubo, G.D. "Body Fluid Microbiome as Cancer Biomarkers." In Cancer Biomarkers in Body Fluids. Cham: Springer, 2019.
14. Kirkup, B., A. McKee, K. Makin, J. Paveley, S. Caim, C. Alcon-Giner, C. Leclaire, M. Dalby, G. Le Gall, A. Andrusaite, P. Kreuzaler, P. Driscoll, J. MacRae, E. Calvani, A. Ghanate, S. Milling, M. Yuneva, K. Weilbaecher, T. Korcsmaros, L. J. Hall, and S. D. Robinson. "Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota by Antibiotics Results in Accelerated Breast Tumour Growth and Metabolic Dysregulation." bioRxiv (2019): https://doi.Org/10.l 101/553602
15. Velicer, C. M., S. R. Heckbert, J. W. Lampe, J. D. Potter, C. A. Robertson, and S. H. Taplin. "Antibiotic Use in Relation to the Risk of Breast Cancer." JAMA. 291, no. 7 (2004): 827-35.
16. Tamim, H. M., J. A. Hanley, A. H. Hajeer, J. F. Boivin, and J. P. Collet. "Risk of Breast Cancer in
Relation to Antibiotic Use." Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 17, no. 2 (2008): 144-50.
17. Sergentanis, T. N., F. Zagouri, and G. C. Zografos. "Is Antibiotic Use a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer? A Meta- Analysis." Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 19, no. 11 (2010): 1101 -7. .
18. Satram-Hoang, S., E. M. Moran, H. Anton-Culver, R. W. Burras, T. M. Heimann, I. Boggio, G. R. Dykstra-Long, P. A. Wood, R. Zulka, G. Hufnagel, and K. K. Bahan. "A Pilot Study of Male Breast Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System." J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 29, no. 3 (2010): 235-44.
19. Wirtz, H. S., D. S. Buist, J. R. Gralow, W. E. Barlow, S. Gray, J. Chubak, O. Yu, E. J. Bowles, M. Fujii, and D. M. Boudreau. "Frequent Antibiotic Use and Second Breast Cancer Events." Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 22, no. 9 (2013): 1588-99. .
20. Elkrief, A., L. Derosa, G. Kroemer, L. Zitvogel, and B. Routy. "The Negative Impact of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy: A New Independent Prognostic Factor?" Ann Oncol. 30, no. 10 (2019): 1572-79.
21. Friedman, G. D., N. Oestreicher, J. Chan, C. P. Quesenberry, Jr., N. Udaltsova, and L. A. Habel. "Antibiotics and Risk of Breast Cancer: Up to 9 Years of Follow-up of 2.1 Million Women." Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15, no. 11 (2006): 2102-6.
22. Velicer, C. M., S. R. Heckbert, C. Rutter, J. W. Lampe, and K. Malone. "Association between Antibiotic Use Prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Breast Tumour Characteristics (United States)." Cancer Causes Control. 17, no. 3 (2006): 307-13.
23. Aragon, F., S. Carino, G. Perdigon, and A. de Moreno de LeBlanc. "The Administration of Milk Fermented by the Probiotic Lactobacillus Casei Crl 431 Exerts an Immunomodulatory Effect against a Breast Tumour in a Mouse Model." Immunobiology. 219, no. 6 (2014): 457-64.
24. Hassan, Z., S. Mustafa, R. A. Rahim, and N. M. Isa. "Anti-Breast Cancer Effects of Live, Heat-Killed and Cytoplasmic Fractions of Enterococcus Faecalis and Staphylococcus Hominis Isolated from Human Breast Milk." In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 52, no. 3 (2016): 337-48.
25. Mendoza, L. "Potential Effect of Probiotics in the Treatment of Breast Cancer." Oncol Rev. 13, no. 2 (2019): 422.
26. Ranjbar, S., S. A. Seyednejad, H. Azimi, H. Rezaeizadeh, and R. Rahimi. "Emerging Roles of Probiotics in Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Their Therapeutic Potential." Nutr Cancer 71, no. 1 (2019): 1-12.
27. Miko, E., A. Vida, T. Kovacs, G. Ujlaki, G. Trencsenyi, J. Marton, Z. Sari, P. Kovacs, A. Boratko, Z. Hujber, T. Csonka, P. Antal-Szalmas, M. Watanabe, I. Gombos, B. Csoka, B. Kiss, L. Vigh, J. Szabo, G. Mehes, A. Sebestyen, J. J. Goedert, and P. Bai. "Lithocholic Acid, a Bacterial Metabolite Reduces Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Aggressiveness." Biochim Biophys Acta 1859, no. 9 (2018): 958-74.
28. Kovacs, T., E. Miko, A. Vida, E. Sebo, J. Toth, T. Csonka, A. Boratko, G. Ujlaki, G. Lente, P. Kovacs,
D. Toth, P. Arkosy, B. Kiss, G. Mehes, J.J. Goedert, and P. Bai. "Cadaverine, a Metabolite of the Microbiome, Reduces Breast Cancer Aggressiveness through Trace Amino Acid Receptors." Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 1300.
29. Vergara, D., P. Simeone, M. Damato, M. Maffta, P. Lanuti, and M. Trerotola. "The Cancer Microbiota: Emt and Inflammation as Shared Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Plasticity and Progression." J Oncol. (2019): doi: 10.1155/2019/1253727.
30. Kovacs, P., T. Csonka, T. Kovacs, Z. Sari, G. Ujlaki, A. Sipos, Z. Karanyi, D. Szeocs, C. Hegedtis, K. Uray, L. Janko, M. Kiss, B. Kiss, D. Laoui, L. Virag, G. Mehes, P. Bai, and E. Miko. "Lithocholic Acid, a Metabolite of the Microbiome, Increases Oxidative Stress in Breast Cancer." Cancers (Basel) (2019): doi: 10.3390/cancersl 1091255.
31. Buchta Rosean, C., R. R. Bostic, J. C. M. Ferey, T. Y. Feng, F. N. Azar, K. S. Tung, M. G. Dozmorov,
E. Smirnova, P. D. Bos, and M. R. Rutkowski. "Preexisting Commensal Dysbiosis Is a Host-Intrinsic Regulator of Tissue Inflammation and Tumor Cell Dissemination in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer." Cancer Res. 79, no. 14 (2019): 3662-75.
32. Ingman, W. V. "The Gut Microbiome: A New Player in Breast Cancer Metastasis." Cancer Res. 79, no. 14 (2019): 3539-41.
33. Yager, J. D. "Mechanisms of Estrogen Carcinogenesis: The Role of E2/E1 -Quinone Metabolites Suggests New Approaches to Preventive Intervention— a Review." Steroids. 99, no. Pt A (2015): 56-60.
34. Miko, E., T. Kovacs, E. Sebo, J. Toth, T. Csonka, G. Ujlaki, A. Sipos, J. Szabo, G. Mehes, and P. Bai. "Microbiome-Microbial Metabolome-Cancer Cell Interactions in Breast Cancer-Familiar, but Unexplored." Cells. 8(4). (2019): E293.
35. Zitvogel, L., M. Ayyoub, B. Routy, and G. Kroemer. "Microbiome and Anticancer Immunosurveillance." Cell. 165, no. 2 (2016): 276-87.
36. Zitvogel, L., R. Daillere, M. P. Roberti, B. Routy, and G. Kroemer. "Anticancer Effects of the Microbiome and Its Products." Nat Rev Microbiol 15, no. 8 (2017): 465-78.
37. Viaud, S., R. Daillere, I. G. Boneca, P. Lepage, M. J. Pittet, F. Ghiringhelli, G. Trinchieri, R. Goldszmid, and L. Zitvogel. "Harnessing the Intestinal Microbiome for Optimal Therapeutic Immunomodulation." Cancer Res. 74, no. 16 (2014): 4217-21. .
38. Routy, B., E. Le Chatelier, L. Derosa, C. P. M. Duong, M. T. Alou, R. Daillere, A. Fluckiger, M. Messaoudene, C. Rauber, M. P. Roberti, M. Fidelle, C. Flament, V. Poirier -Colame, P. Opolon, C. Klein, K. Iribarren, L. Mondragon, N. Jacquelot, B. Qu, G. Ferrere, C. Clemenson, L. Mezquita, J. R. Masip, C. Naltet, S. Brosseau, C. Kaderbhai, C. Richard, H. Rizvi, F. Levenez, N. Galleron, B. Quinquis, N. Pons, B. Ryffel, V. Minard-Colin, P. Gonin, J. C. Soria, E. Deutsch, Y. Loriot, F. Ghiringhelli, G. Zalcman, F. Goldwasser, B. Escudier, M. D. Hellmann, A. Eggermont, D. Raoult, L. Albiges, G. Kroemer, and L. Zitvogel. "Gut Microbiome Influences Efficacy of Pd-l-Based Immunotherapy against Epithelial Tumors." Science. 359, no. 6371 (2018): 91-97.
39. Tang, W., V. Putluri, C. R. Ambati, T. H. Dorsey, N. Putluri, and S. Ambs. "Liver- and Microbiome- Derived Bile Acids Accumulate in Human Breast Tumors and Inhibit Growth and Improve Patient Survival."
Clin Cancer Res 11 (2019): 1078-0432.
40. Roager, H. M., and T. R. Licht. "Microbial Tryptophan Catabolites in Health and Disease." Nat Commun. 9, no. 1 (2018): 3294.
41. Yokoyama, M. T., and J. R. Carlson. "Microbial Metabolites of Tryptophan in the Intestinal Tract with Special Reference to Skatole." Am J Clin Nutr. 32, no. 1 (1979): 173-8.
42. Wikoff, W. R., A. T. Anfora, J. Liu, P. G. Schultz, S. A. Lesley, E. C. Peters, and G. Siuzdak. "Metabolomics Analysis Reveals Large Effects of Gut Microflora on Mammalian Blood Metabolites." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, no. 10 (2009): 3698-703.
43. Browne, C. A., G. Clarke, T. G. Dinan, and J. F. Cryan. "An Effective Dietary Method for Chronic Tryptophan Depletion in Two Mouse Strains Illuminates a Role for 5-Ht in Nesting Behaviour." Neuropharmacology. 62, no. 5-6 (2012): 1903-15.
44. El Aidy, S., W. Kunze, J. Bienenstock, and M. Kleerebezem. "The Microbiota and the Gut-Brain Axis: Insights from the Temporal and Spatial Mucosal Alterations During Colonisation of the Germfree Mouse Intestine." Benef Microbes. 3, no. 4 (2012): 251-9.
45. Mardinoglu, A., S. Shoaie, M. Bergentall, P. Ghaffari, C. Zhang, E. Larsson, F. Backhed, and J. Nielsen. "The Gut Microbiota Modulates Host Amino Acid and Glutathione Metabolism in Mice." Mol Syst Biol. 11, no. 10 (2015): 834.
46. Gao, J., K. Xu, H. Liu, G. Liu, M. Bai, C. Peng, T. Li, and Y. Yin. "Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Intestinal Immunity Mediated by Tryptophan Metabolism." Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2018): doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00013.
47. Agus, A., J. Planchais, and H. Sokol. "Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease." Cell Host Microbe. 23, no. 6 (2018): 716-24.
48. Smith, E. A., and G. T. Macfarlane. "Dissimilatory Amino Acid Metabolism in Human Colonic Bacteria." Anaerobe. 3, no. 5 (1997): 327-37. doi: 10.1006/anae.997.0121.
49. Danaceau, J. P., G. M. Anderson, W. M. McMahon, and D. J. Crouch. "A Liquid Chromatographic - Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for the Analysis of Serotonin and Related Indoles in Human Whole Blood." J Anal Toxicol. 27, no. 7 (2003): 440-4.
50. Rosas, H. D., G. Doros, S. Bhasin, B. Thomas, S. Gevorkian, K. Malarick, W. Matson, and S. M. Hersch. "A Systems-Level "Misunderstanding": The Plasma Metabolome in Huntington's Disease." Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2, no. 7 (2015): 756-68.
51. Huang, H., H. Wang, M. Sinz, M. Zoeckler, J. Staudinger, M. R. Redinbo, D. G. Teotico, J. Locker, G. V. Kalpana, and S. Mani. "Inhibition of Drug Metabolism by Blocking the Activation of Nuclear Receptors by Ketoconazole." Oncogene. 26, no. 2 (2007): 258-68.
52. Cancilla, M. T., M. M. He, N. Viswanathan, R. L. Simmons, M. Taylor, A. D. Fung, K. Cao, and D. A. Erlanson. "Discovery of an Aurora Kinase Inhibitor through Site-Specific Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry." Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 18, no. 14 (2008): 3978-81.
53. Fodor, T., M. Szanto, O. Abdul-Rahman, L. Nagy, A. Der, B. Kiss, and P. Bai. "Combined Treatment of Mcf-7 Cells with Aicar and Methotrexate, Arrests Cell Cycle and Reverses Warburg Metabolism through Amp-Activated Protein Kinase (Ampk) and Foxol." PLoS One. 11, no. 2 (2016): e0150232.
54. Rueden, C. T., J. Schindelin, M. C. Hiner, B. E. DeZonia, A. E. Walter, E. T. Arena, and K. W. Eliceiri. "Imagej2: Imagej for the Next Generation of Scientific Image Data." BMC Bioinformatics 18, no. 1 (2017): 529.
55. Bai, P., E. Bakondi, E. Szabo, P. Gergely, C. Szabo, and L. Virag. "Partial Protection by Poly(Adp- Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors from Nitroxyl-Induced Cytotoxity in Thymocytes." Free Radic. Biol. Med. 31, no. 12 (2001): 1616-23.
56. Szanto, M., A. Brunyanszki, J. Marton, Gy. Vamosi, L. Nagy, T. Fodor, B. Kiss, L. Virag, P. Gergely, and P. Bai. "Deletion of Parp-2 Induces Hepatic Cholesterol Accumulation and Decrease in Hdl Levels." Biochem Biophys Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease 1842, no. 4 (2014): 594-602.
57. Dai, Z., Z. Wu, S. Hang, W. Zhu, and G. Wu. "Amino Acid Metabolism in Intestinal Bacteria and Its Potential Implications for Mammalian Reproduction." Mol Hum Reprod. 21, no. 5 (2015): 389-409.
58. Fiorillo, M., M. Peiris-Pages, R. Sanchez- Alvarez, L. Bartella, L. Di Donna, V. Dolce, G. Sindona, F. Sotgia, A. R. Cappello, and M. P. Lisanti. "Bergamot Natural Products Eradicate Cancer Stem Cells (Cscs) by Targeting Mevalonate, Rho-Gdi-Signalling and Mitochondrial Metabolism." Biochim Biophys Acta 4, no. 18 (2018): 30061-6.
59. Nagy, L., J. Marton, A. Vida, G. Kis, E. Bokor, S. Kun, M. Gonczi, T. Docsa, A. Toth, M. Antal, P. Gergely, B. Csoka, P. Pacher, L. Somsak, and P. Bai. "Glycogen Phosphorylase Inhibition Improves Beta Cell Function." Br J Pharmacol. 175, no. 2 (2018): 301-19.
60. Mabley, J. G., P. Pacher, P. Bai, R. Wallace, S. Goonesekera, L. Virag, G. J. Southan, and C. Szabo. "Suppression of Intestinal Polyposis in Apcmin/+ Mice by Targeting the Nitric Oxide or Poly(Adp -Ribose) Pathways." Mutat.Res. 548, no. 1-2 (2004): 107-16.
61. Csonka, T., B. Mumyak, R. Szepesi, J. Bencze, L. Bognar, A Klekner, and T. Hortobagyi. "Assessment of Candidate Immunohistochemical Prognostic Markers of Meningioma Recurrence." Folia Neuropathologica 54, no. 2 (2016): 114-26.
62. Stenger, M. "Calculating H-Score." http://www.ascopost.com/issues/april-10-2015/calculating-h- score/ (accessed 2019. 01. 07.).
63. Lanczky, A., A. Nagy, G. Bottai, G. Munkacsy, A. Szabo, L. Santarpia, and B. Gyorffy. "Mirpower: A Web-Tool to Validate Survival-Associated Mirnas Utilizing Expression Data from 2178 Breast Cancer Patients." Breast Cancer Res Treat. 160, no. 3 (2016): 439-46.
64. Goldberg, A. A., A. Beach, G. F. Davies, T. A. Harkness, A. Leblanc, and V. I. Titorenko. "Lithocholic Bile Acid Selectively Kills Neuroblastoma Cells, While Sparing Normal Neuronal Cells." Oncotarget. 2, no. 10 (2011): 761-82.
65. Luo, M., L. Shang, M. D. Brooks, E. Jiagge, Y. Zhu, J. M. Buschhaus, S. Conley, M. A. Fath, A. Davis, E. Gheordunescu, Y. Wang, R. Harouaka, A. Lozier, D. Triner, S. McDermott, S. D. Merajver, G. D. Luker, D. R. Spitz, and M. S. Wicha. "Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cell State Equilibrium through Modulation of Redox Signaling." Cell Metab. 28, no. 1 (2018): 69-86.
66. Pacher, P., J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet. "Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease." Physiol Rev 87, no. 1 (2007): 315-424.
67. Szabo, C., H. Ischiropoulos, and R. Radi. "Peroxynitrite: Biochemistry, Pathophysiology and Development of Therapeutics." Nat Rev Drug Discov 6, no. 8 (2007): 662-80.
68. Davila-Gonzalez, D., D. S. Choi, R. R. Rosato, S. M. Granados-Principal, J. G. Kuhn, W. F. Li, W. Qian, W. Chen, A. J. Kozielski, H. Wong, B. Dave, and J. C. Chang. "Pharmacological Inhibition of Nos Activates Askl/Jnk Pathway Augmenting Docetaxel-Mediated Apoptosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer." Clin Cancer Res. 24, no. 5 (2018): 1152-62.
69. Pons, D. G., M. Nadal-Serrano, M. Torrens-Mas, A. Valle, J. Oliver, and P. Roca. "Ucp2 Inhibition Sensitizes Breast Cancer Cells to Therapeutic Agents by Increasing Oxidative Stress." Free Radic Biol Med. 86 (2015): 67-77.
70. Ozsvari, B., M. Fiorillo, G. Bonuccelli, A. R. Cappello, L. Frattaruolo, F. Sotgia, R. Trowbridge, R. Foster, and M. P. Lisanti. "Mitoriboscins: Mitochondrial-Based Therapeutics Targeting Cancer Stem Cells (Cscs), Bacteria and Pathogenic Yeast." Oncotarget. 8, no. 40 (2017): 67457-72.
71. Bao, B., A. S. Azmi, Y. Li, A. Ahmad, S. Ali, S. Banerjee, D. Kong, and F. H. Sarkar. "Targeting Cscs in Tumor Microenvironment: The Potential Role of Ros-Associated Mirnas in Tumor Aggressiveness." Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 9, no. 1 (2014): 22-35.
72. Tang, S., L. Yang, X. Tang, and M. Liu. "The Role of Oxidized Atm in the Regulation of Oxidative Stress-Induced Energy Metabolism Reprogramming of Cafs." Cancer Lett. 353, no. 2 (2014): 133-44.
73. Fujii-Kuriyama, Y., and J. Mimura. "Molecular Mechanisms of Ahr Functions in the Regulation of Cytochrome P450 Genes." Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 338, no. 1 (2005): 311 -17.
74. Smith, A., J. F. Pierre, L. Makowski, E. Tolley, B. Lyn-Cook, L. Lu, G. Vidal, and A. Starlard- Davenport. "Distinct Microbial Communities That Differ by Race, Stage, or Breast-Tumor Subtype in Breast Tissues of Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White Women." Sci Rep. 9, no. 1 (2019): 11940.
75. Banerjee, S., Z. Wei, F. Tan, K. N. Peck, N. Shih, M. Feldman, T. R. Rebbeck, J. C. Alwine, and E. S. Robertson. "Distinct Microbiological Signatures Associated with Triple Negative Breast Cancer." Sci Rep. 5 (2015): 15162.
76. Xuan, C., J. M. Shamonki, A. Chung, M. L. Dinome, M. Chung, P. A. Sieling, and D. J. Lee. "Microbial Dysbiosis Is Associated with Human Breast Cancer." PLoS One. 9, no. 1 (2014): e83744. .
77. Fernandez, M. F., I. Reina-Perez, J. M. Astorga, A. Rodriguez-Carrillo, J. Plaza-Diaz, and L. Fontana. "Breast Cancer and Its Relationship with the Microbiota." Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018): doi: 10.3390/ijerphl5081747.
78. Wilmanski, T., N. Rappaport, J. C. Earls, A. T. Magis, O. Manor, J. Lovejoy, G. S. Omenn, L. Hood, S. M. Gibbons, and N. D. Price. "Blood Metabolome Predicts Gut Microbiome Alpha -Diversity in Humans." Nat Biotechnol. 37, no. 10 (2019): 1217-28. .
79. Urbaniak, C., J. Cummins, M. Brackstone, J. M. Macklaim, G. B. Gloor, C. K. Baban, L. Scott, D. M. O'Hanlon, J. P. Burton, K. P. Francis, M. Tangney, and G. Reid. "Microbiota of Human Breast Tissue." Appl Environ Microbiol. 80, no. 10 (2014): 3007-14.
80. Chan, A. A., M. Bashir, M. N. Rivas, K. Duvall, P. A. Sieling, T. R. Pieber, P. A. Vaishampayan, S. M. Love, and D. J. Lee. "Characterization of the Microbiome of Nipple Aspirate Fluid of Breast Cancer Survivors." Sci Rep. 6 (2016): 28061.
81. Hieken, T. J., J. Chen, T. L. Hoskin, M. Walther- Antonio, S. Johnson, S. Ramaker, J. Xiao, D. C. Radisky, K. L. Knutson, K. R. Kalari, J. Z. Yao, L. M. Baddour, N. Chia, and A. C. Degnim. "The Microbiome of Aseptically Collected Human Breast Tissue in Benign and Malignant Disease." Sci Rep. 6 (2016): 30751.
82. Wang, H., J. Altemus, F. Niazi, H. Green, B. C. Calhoun, C. Sturgis, S. R. Grobmyer, and C. Eng.
"Breast Tissue, Oral and Urinary Microbiomes in Breast Cancer." Oncotarget. 8, no. 50 (2017): 88122-38.
83. Costantini, L., S. Magno, D. Albanese, C. Donati, R. Molinari, A. Filippone, R. Masetti, and N. Merendino. "Characterization of Human Breast Tissue Microbiota from Core Needle Biopsies through the Analysis of Multi Hypervariable 16s-Rrna Gene Regions." Sci Rep. 8, no. 1 (2018): 16893.
84. Meng, S., B. Chen, J. Yang, J. Wang, D. Zhu, Q. Meng, and L. Zhang. "Study of Microbiomes in Aseptically Collected Samples of Human Breast Tissue Using Needle Biopsy and the Potential Role of in Situ Tissue Microbiomes for Promoting Malignancy." Front Oncol. 8 (2018): 318.
85. Viaud, S., F. Saccheri, G. Mignot, T. Yamazaki, R. Daillere, D. Hannani, D. P. Enot, C. Pftrschke, C. Engblom, M. J. Pittet, A. Schlitzer, F. Ginhoux, L. Apetoh, E. Chachaty, P. L. Woerther, G. Eberl, M. Berard, C. Ecobichon, D. Clermont, C. Bizet, V. Gaboriau-Routhiau, N. Cerf-Bensussan, P. Opolon, N. Yessaad, E. Vivier, B. Ryffel, C. O. Elson, J. Dore, G. Kroemer, P. Lepage, I. G. Boneca, F. Ghiringhelli, and L. Zitvogel. "The Intestinal Microbiota Modulates the Anticancer Immune Effects of Cyclophosphamide." Science. 342, no. 6161 (2013): 971-6.
86. Xie, W., Y. Huang, W. Xie, A. Guo, and W. Wu. "Bacteria Peptidoglycan Promoted Breast Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Adhesiveness by Targeting Toll-Like Receptor 2 in the Cancer Cells." PLoS One. 5, no. 5 (2010): el0850.
87. Kim, C. H. "Immune Regulation by Microbiome Metabolites." Immunology. 154, no. 2 (2018): 220- 29.
88. Zelante, T., R. G. lannitti, C. Cunha, A. De Luca, G. Giovannini, G. Pieraccini, R. Zecchi, C. D'Angelo, C. Massi-Benedetti, F. Fallarino, A. Carvalho, P. Puccetti, and L. Romani. "Tryptophan Catabolites from Microbiota Engage Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Balance Mucosal Reactivity Via Interleukin-22." Immunity. 39, no. 2 (2013): 372-85.
89. Venkatesh, M., S. Mukherjee, H. Wang, H. Li, K. Sun, A. P. Benechet, Z. Qiu, L. Maher, M. R. Redinbo, R. S. Phillips, J. C. Fleet, S. Kortagere, P. Mukherjee, A. Fasano, J. Le Ven, J. K. Nicholson, M. E. Dumas, K. M. Khanna, and S. Mani. "Symbiotic Bacterial Metabolites Regulate Gastrointestinal Barrier Function Via the Xenobiotic Sensor Pxr and Toll-Like Receptor 4." Immunity. 41, no. 2 (2014): 296-310.
90. Lamas, B., M. L. Richard, V. Leducq, H. P. Pham, M. L. Michel, G. Da Costa, C. Bridonneau, S. Jegou, T. W. Hoffmann, J. M. Natividad, L. Brot, S. Taleb, A. Couturier -Maillard, I. Nion-Larmurier, F. Merabtene, P. Seksik, A. Bourrier, J. Cosnes, B. Ryffel, L. Beaugerie, J. M. Launay, P. Langella, R. J. Xavier, and H. Sokol. "Card9 Impacts Colitis by Altering Gut Microbiota Metabolism of Tryptophan into Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligands." Nat Med. 22, no. 6 (2016): 598-605.
91. Sonner, J. K., M. Keil, M. Falk-Paulsen, N. Mishra, A. Rehman, M. Kramer, K. Deumelandt, J. Rowe, K. Sanghvi, L. Wolf, A. von Landenberg, H. Wolff, R. Bharti, I. Oezen, T. V. Lanz, F. Wanke, Y. Tang, I. Brandao, S. R. Mohapatra, L. Epping, A. Grill, R. Roth, B. Niesler, S. G. Meuth, C. A. Opitz, J. G. Okun, C. Reinhardt, F. C. Kurschus, W. Wick, H. B. Bode, P. Rosenstiel, and M. Flatten. "Dietary Tryptophan Links Encephalogenicity of Autoreactive T Cells with Gut Microbial Ecology." Nat Commun. 10, no. 1 (2019): 4877.
92. Zhang, L., R. G. Nichols, and A. D. Patterson. "The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor as a Moderator of Host-Microbiota Communication." Curr Opin Toxicol. 2 (2017): 30-35.
93. Smolkova, K., E. Miko, T. Kovacs, A. Leguina-Ruzzi, A. Sipos, and P. Bai. "Nrf2 in Regulating Cancer Metabolism." Antioxid Redox Signal (2020): doi: 10.1089/ars.2020.8024.
94. De Francesco, E. M., F. Sotgia, and M. P. Lisanti. "Cancer Stem Cells (Cscs): Metabolic Strategies for Their Identification and Eradication." Biochem J 475, no. 9 (2018): 1611-34.
95. Trachootham, D., J. Alexandre, and P. Huang. "Targeting Cancer Cells by Ros-Mediated Mechanisms: A Radical Therapeutic Approach?" Nat Rev Drug Discov 8, no. 7 (2009): 579-91.
96. Kai, K., Y. Arima, T. Kamiya, and H. Saya. "Breast Cancer Stem Cells." Breast Cancer. 17, no. 2 (2010): 80-5.
97. Vera-Ramirez, L., P. Sanchez-Rovira, M. C. Ramirez-Tortosa, C. L. Ramirez -Tortosa, S. Granados- Principal, J. A. Lorente, and J. L. Quiles. "Free Radicals in Breast Carcinogenesis, Breast Cancer Progression and Cancer Stem Cells. Biological Bases to Develop Oxidative-Based Therapies." Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 80, no. 3 (2011): 347-68.
98. Yang, J., C. Ding, X. Dai, T. Lv, T. Xie, T. Zhang, W. Gao, J. Gong, W. Zhu, N. Li, and J. Li. "Soluble Dietary Fiber Ameliorates Radiation-Induced Intestinal Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Fibrosis." JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 41, no. 8 (2017): 1399-410. .
99. Hardie, D. G. "Molecular Pathways: Is Ampk a Friend or a Foe in Cancer?" Clin Cancer Res. 21, no. 17 (2015): 3836-40.
100. Cheng, J., X. Shuai, J. Gao, M. Cai, G. Wang, and K. Tao. "Prognostic Significance of Ampk in Human Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis." Oncotarget. 7, no. 46 (2016): 75739-48. .
101. Auslander, N., K. Yizhak, A. Weinstock, A. Budhu, W. Tang, X. W. Wang, S. Ambs, and E. Ruppin. "A Joint Analysis of Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Data Uncovers Enhanced Enzyme -Metabolite Coupling in Breast Cancer." Sci Rep. 6 (2016): 29662.
102. Tang, X., C. C. Lin, I. Spasojevic, E. S. Iversen, J. T. Chi, and J. R. Marks. "A Joint Analysis of Metabolomics and Genetics of Breast Cancer." Breast Cancer Res 16, no. 4 (2014): 415.
103. Newman, T. M., M. Z. Vitolins, and K. L. Cook. "From the Table to the Tumor: The Role of Mediterranean and Western Dietary Patterns in Shifting Microbial-Mediated Signaling to Impact Breast Cancer Risk." Nutrients. (2019): doi: 10.3390/nul 1112565.
104. Chiba, A., A. Bawaneh, C. Velazquez, K. Y. J. Clear, A. S. Wilson, M. Howard-McNatt, E. A. Levine, N. Levi-Polyachenko, S. A. Yates-Alston, S. P. Diggle, D. R. Soto-Pantoja, and K. L. Cook. "Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Shifts Breast Tumor Microbiota Populations to Regulate Drug Responsiveness and the Development of Metastasis." Mol Cancer Res 18 (2019): 1541-7786.
105. Liang et al Fecal Bacteria Act as Novel Biomarkers for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Colorectal Can- cer.ClinCancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):2061 -2070
106. Nabizadeh et al. Association of altered gut microbiota composition with chronic urticaria Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 119 (2017) 48-53
107. Goedert et al. Fecal Microbiota Characteristics of Patients with Colorectal Adenoma Detected by Screening: A Population-based Study. EBioMedicine. 2015 Jun; 2(6): 597-603
108. Xie et al. Fecal Clostridium symbiosum for Noninvasive Detection of Early and Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Test and Validation Studies. EBioMedicine. 2017 Nov; 25: 32^4-0
108. Sari, Z.; Kovacs, T.; Csonka, T.; Torok, M.; Sebo, E.; Toth, J.; Toth, D.; Miko, E.; Kiss, B.; Szeocs, D., et al. Fecal expression of E. coli lysine decarboxylase (LdcC) is downregulated in E-cadherin negative lobular breast carcinoma. Physiology International 2020, DOI: 10.1556/2060.2020.00016.
Claims
1. A method for determining whether a subject has breast cancer, comprising determining the level of a nucleic acid sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject, wherein a decreased level of said DNA sequence or gene product is indicative of the presence of breast cancer in the subject.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the nucleic acid sequence is the nucleic acid sequence coding for tryptophanase (Tna A) or a portion thereof and the gene product is Tna A protein or a portion thereof.
3. The method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the bacterial tna operon is from Providencia spp, Alistipes spp, Bacteroides spp, Clostridium spp, Escherichia spp or any combination thereof.
4. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the bacterial tna operon is from Providencia rettegri, Alistipes shahii, Bacteroides xylanisolvens, Escherichia coli or any combination thereof.
5. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the breast cancer is stage 0 breast cancer according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system and the test sample is compared to a reference value typical of the absence of stage 0 breast cancer, preferably to a reference value derived from healthy individuals.
6. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the sample is feces and comprises gut microbiota.
7. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the subject is a human, preferably a female, more preferably a post-menopausal woman.
8. A method for promoting selection of the appropriate anticancer therapy for a patient having breast cancer, wherein a) the level of a DNA sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon or the level of a gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon in a sample obtained from the subject is determined and optionally al) the number and characteristics of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are determined from a tumor sample obtained from the patient, b) the appropriate anticancer therapy is selected based on the value obtained in a) and on the value and characteristics obtained in al), wherein the level of the DNA sequence from a bacterial tryptophanase (tna) operon or the level of the gene product of a gene of a bacterial tna operon is indicative, preferably proportional to the number of TILs.
9. Indolepropionic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in mitigating progression of breast cancer in a subject.
10. Indoxyl sulphate or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in mitigating progression of breast cancer in a subject.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
HUP2000268 | 2020-08-11 | ||
PCT/HU2021/050049 WO2022034349A1 (en) | 2020-08-11 | 2021-08-10 | Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP4196613A1 true EP4196613A1 (en) | 2023-06-21 |
Family
ID=89662991
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP21785975.0A Pending EP4196613A1 (en) | 2020-08-11 | 2021-08-10 | Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP4196613A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2022034349A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4303325A1 (en) * | 2022-07-05 | 2024-01-10 | Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft | Method for determining bacterial metabolites for individualized nutritional adjustment |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20180015072A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-01-18 | Zhifang Zhu | Tryptophan is a pro-drug for infectious diseases and cancers |
EP3638816A1 (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2020-04-22 | Debreceni Egyetem | Methods for diagnosing breast cancer |
EP3830300A1 (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2021-06-09 | Debreceni Egyetem | Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer |
CN111346081B (en) * | 2020-03-12 | 2021-06-15 | 崔明 | New use of pharmaceutical composition comprising n-pentanoic acid, indolpropanic acid and sodium n-butyrate |
-
2021
- 2021-08-10 EP EP21785975.0A patent/EP4196613A1/en active Pending
- 2021-08-10 WO PCT/HU2021/050049 patent/WO2022034349A1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2022034349A1 (en) | 2022-02-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Galluzzi et al. | Prognostic impact of vitamin B6 metabolism in lung cancer | |
Norouzi et al. | Nisin, a potent bacteriocin and anti-bacterial peptide, attenuates expression of metastatic genes in colorectal cancer cell lines | |
Haugrud et al. | Dichloroacetate enhances apoptotic cell death via oxidative damage and attenuates lactate production in metformin-treated breast cancer cells | |
Huang et al. | Diallyl disulfide inhibits growth and metastatic potential of human triple‐negative breast cancer cells through inactivation of the β‐catenin signaling pathway | |
Jing et al. | Salvianolic acid B, a novel autophagy inducer, exerts antitumor activity as a single agent in colorectal cancer cells | |
Xu et al. | Disulfiram/copper markedly induced myeloma cell apoptosis through activation of JNK and intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways | |
Zheng et al. | IL‐17A promotes cell migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells via activation of PI 3K/AKT signalling pathway | |
Wu et al. | Characterization of site-specific glycosylation of secreted proteins associated with multi-drug resistance of gastric cancer | |
Li et al. | Areca nut contributes to oral malignancy through facilitating the conversion of cancer stem cells | |
Xie et al. | Progesterone inhibits the migration and invasion of A549 lung cancer cells through membrane progesterone receptor α-mediated mechanisms | |
Qu et al. | Role of the gut microbiota and its metabolites in tumorigenesis or development of colorectal cancer | |
Zhang et al. | Triptonide effectively inhibits triple-negative breast cancer metastasis through concurrent degradation of Twist1 and Notch1 oncoproteins | |
Xie et al. | Targeting ATAD3A-PINK1-mitophagy axis overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by redirecting PD-L1 to mitochondria | |
Liu et al. | Curcumin sensitizes response to cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia by regulating intestinal microbiota | |
Aggarwal et al. | Cinnamomum zeylanicum extract and its bioactive component cinnamaldehyde show anti-tumor effects via inhibition of multiple cellular pathways | |
EP4196613A1 (en) | Treatment and diagnosis of breast cancer | |
Zhang et al. | Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and suppresses the migration and invasion of colon cancer cells by regulating STAT3/CXCL8 pathway | |
WO2018229519A1 (en) | Methods for diagnosing breast cancer | |
Cherradi et al. | Improving the response to oxaliplatin by targeting chemotherapy-induced CLDN1 in resistant metastatic colorectal cancer cells | |
CN108697771A (en) | Treatment of cancer | |
Cheng et al. | Curzerene suppresses progression of human glioblastoma through inhibition of glutathione S‐transferase A4 | |
Yan et al. | ENPP2 inhibitor improves proliferation in AOM/DSS-induced colorectal cancer mice via remodeling the gut barrier function and gut microbiota composition | |
Chai et al. | CCL25/CCR9 interaction promotes the malignant behavior of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway | |
Liu et al. | Using dynamic cell communication improves treatment strategies of breast cancer | |
Wang et al. | ABBV-744 induces autophagy in gastric cancer cells by regulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR/p70S6k and MAPK signaling pathways |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20230310 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) |