EP4130303A1 - Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same - Google Patents

Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP4130303A1
EP4130303A1 EP21780703.1A EP21780703A EP4130303A1 EP 4130303 A1 EP4130303 A1 EP 4130303A1 EP 21780703 A EP21780703 A EP 21780703A EP 4130303 A1 EP4130303 A1 EP 4130303A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
less
cutting
steel
free
machinability
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP21780703.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Masayuki Kasai
Kazuaki Fukuoka
Kimihiro Nishimura
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Publication of EP4130303A1 publication Critical patent/EP4130303A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/13Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by hot working
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/0081Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for slabs; for billets
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/02Hardening articles or materials formed by forging or rolling, with no further heating beyond that required for the formation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/0221Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/0226Hot rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/06Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of rods or wires
    • C21D8/065Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of rods or wires of ferrous alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/0075Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for rods of limited length
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/22Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for drills; for milling cutters; for machine cutting tools
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/002Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing In, Mg, or other elements not provided for in one single group C22C38/001 - C22C38/60
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/008Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tin
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/08Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/12Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, vanadium, or niobium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/14Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/42Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/46Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with vanadium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/50Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/60Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a free-cutting steel, in particular a steel that is a substitute for a free-cutting steel containing sulfur and a small amount of lead as elements for improving machinability by cutting.
  • the present disclosure relates to a free-cutting steel having machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel, and a method of producing the same.
  • Low carbon sulfur-lead free-cutting steel as represented by JIS SUM24L contains a large amount of lead (Pb) and sulfur (S) as free-cutting elements and thus has excellent machinability by cutting.
  • lead In steel materials, lead is useful for reducing tool wear and improving chip treatability in cutting work. Hence, lead is regarded as an important element that significantly improves the machinability by cutting of materials, and is used in many steel products produced by cutting work. With the rise of environmental awareness in recent years, however, there is a growing movement to abolish or restrict the use of environmentally hazardous substances worldwide. Lead is one of such environmentally hazardous substances, and restriction on the use of lead is required.
  • JP H9-25539 A discloses a non-Pb-containing free-cutting non-heat-treated steel.
  • JP 2000-160284 A discloses a non-Pb-containing free-cutting steel.
  • JP H2-6824 B discloses a free-cutting steel containing Cr which can form a compound with S more easily than Mn to thereby cause a Mn-Cr-S-based inclusion to be present and ensure machinability by cutting.
  • the technique described in PTL 1 is intended for a non-heat-treated steel that contains 0.2 % or more of C and thus is hard, and the use of Nd which is a special element requires high production costs.
  • adding a large amount of S causes low hot ductility and induces cracking during continuous casting or hot rolling, which is problematic in terms of surface characteristics.
  • Cr and S are added while reducing the amount of Mn.
  • due to high Cr content of 3.5 % or more not only cost reduction is difficult but also a large amount of CrS forms, causing a production problem in that material smelting treatment in the steelmaking process is difficult.
  • a free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure will be described in detail below. First, the reasons for limiting the content of each component in the chemical composition of the free-cutting steel will be described below.
  • “%” with regard to components is mass% unless otherwise stated.
  • C is an important element that greatly influences the strength and the machinability by cutting of the steel. If the C content is 0.09 % or more, the steel hardens and the strength increases excessively, and as a result the machinability by cutting degrades. The C content is therefore less than 0.09 %.
  • the C content is preferably 0.07 % or less. From the viewpoint of ensuring the strength, the C content is preferably 0.01 % or more, and more preferably 0.03 % or more.
  • Mn is a sulfide forming element important for improvement in machinability by cutting. If the Mn content is less than 0.50 %, the amount of sulfide is small, and sufficient machinability by cutting cannot be obtained. The lower limit is therefore 0.50 %.
  • the Mn content is preferably 0.70 % or more. If the Mn content is more than 1.50 %, sulfides not only coarsen but also extend long, causing a decrease in machinability by cutting. In addition, the mechanical properties decrease.
  • the upper limit of the Mn content is therefore 1.50 %.
  • the Mn content is preferably 1.20 % or less.
  • S is a sulfide forming element effective in improving the machinability by cutting. If the S content is less than 0.250 %, fine sulfides are few, so that the machinability by cutting cannot be improved. If the S content is more than 0.600 %, sulfides coarsen excessively and the number of fine sulfides decreases, as a result of which the machinability by cutting decreases. Moreover, the hot workability and the ductility which is an important mechanical property decrease. The S content is therefore in a range of 0.250 % to 0.600 %. The S content is preferably 0.300 % or more. The S content is preferably 0.450 % or less.
  • O is an element that forms oxide and serves as a sulfide precipitation nucleus and also is effective in suppressing extension of sulfides during hot working such as rolling. This action can improve the machinability by cutting. If the O content is 0.0100 % or less, the sulfide extension suppressing effect is insufficient and extended sulfides remain, so that the foregoing effect cannot be expected. The O content is therefore more than 0.0100 %. If the O content is more than 0.0500 %, not only the sulfide extension suppressing effect is saturated but also the amount of hard oxide-based inclusions increases. Adding an excessive amount of O is also economically disadvantageous. The upper limit of the O content is therefore 0.0500 %.
  • Cr has an effect of forming sulfides and improving the machinability by cutting through lubricating action during cutting. Cr also suppresses extension of sulfides during hot working such as rolling, and thus can improve the machinability by cutting. If the Cr content is less than 0.50 %, the formation of sulfides is insufficient and extended sulfides tend to remain, so that the foregoing effect cannot be expected. If the Cr content is more than 1.50 %, not only the steel hardens but also sulfides coarsen. Moreover, the extension suppressing effect is saturated, and the machinability by cutting decreases. Besides, adding an excessive amount causes an increase in alloy costs, which is economically disadvantageous.
  • the Cr content is therefore 0.50 % to 1.50 %.
  • the Cr content is preferably 0.70 % or more.
  • the Cr content is preferably 1.30 % or less.
  • the free-cutting steel contains the above-described components with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, or contains the above-described components and further contains the below-described optional components.
  • the free-cutting steel preferably contains the above-described components or preferably contains the above-described components and further the below-described optional components, with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities.
  • a value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0.
  • a value 2 Mn + 2 Cr / S where [M] is the content (mass%) of the corresponding element in brackets.
  • the A value is an important index that influences refinement of Mn-Cr-S-based sulfide during hot working such as rolling, and limiting the A value can improve the machinability by cutting. If the A value is less than 6.0, sulfide of Mn-S alone forms, which tends to be coarse. Consequently, the machinability by cutting degrades. If the A value is more than 18.0, not only the sulfide refining effect is saturated but also the amount of the sulfide forming elements is excessively large relative to sulfur, causing sulfides to coarsen. The A value is therefore 6.0 to 18.0. The A value is preferably 6.5 or more. The A value is preferably 17.0 or less.
  • the free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure may optionally contain one or more selected from the group consisting of
  • Si is a deoxidizing element. Moreover, Si oxide acts as a sulfide formation nucleus to promote the formation of sulfides and refine the sulfides and thus improve the cutting tool life. Accordingly, Si may be contained in the steel in order to further extend the tool life. If the Si content is more than 0.50 %, the oxide increases in size and decreases in number. Such oxide is ineffective as a sulfide formation nucleus, and also hard oxide induces abrasive wear and leads to degradation in tool life. The Si content is therefore 0.50 % or less. The Si content is preferably 0.03 % or less. To achieve the foregoing action by Si, the Si content is preferably 0.001 % or more.
  • the P content is an element effective in suppressing the formation of built-up edges during cutting work to thus reduce finishing surface roughness.
  • the P content is preferably 0.01 % or more. If the P content is more than 0.10 %, the material hardens, so that the machinability by cutting decreases and the hot workability and the ductility decrease significantly.
  • the P content is therefore preferably 0.10 % or less.
  • the P content is more preferably 0.08 % or less.
  • Al is a deoxidizing element as with Si, and may be contained in the steel. Al forms Al 2 O 3 in the steel. This oxide is hard and causes degradation in cutting tool life due to abrasive wear. Hence, adding an excessive amount of Al needs to be avoided. From this viewpoint, the Al content is preferably 0.010 % or less. The Al content is more preferably 0.005 % or less. From the viewpoint of achieving the deoxidizing effect by Al, the Al content is preferably 0.001 % or more.
  • N forms nitride with Cr and the like.
  • an oxide film called belag forms on the tool surface.
  • Belag has an action of protecting the tool surface and thereby improving the tool life.
  • N may be contained in the steel.
  • the N content is preferably 0.0050 % or more. If the N content is more than 0.0150 %, not only the effect of belag is saturated but also the material hardens, as a result of which the tool life shortens.
  • the N content is therefore preferably 0.0150 % or less.
  • the N content is more preferably 0.0060 % or more.
  • the N content is more preferably 0.0120 % or less.
  • the free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure may optionally further contain one or more selected from the group consisting of
  • Ca, Se, Te, Bi, Sn, Sb, B, Cu, Ni, Ti, V, Zr, and Mg each have an action of improving the machinability by cutting, and accordingly may be added in the case where the machinability by cutting is considered important.
  • these elements in order to improve the machinability by cutting, if their respective contents are Ca: less than 0.0001 %, Se: less than 0.02 %, Te: less than 0.10 %, Bi: less than 0.02 %, Sn: less than 0.003 %, Sb: less than 0.003 %, B: less than 0.003 %, Cu: less than 0.05 %, Ni: less than 0.50 %, Ti: less than 0.003 %, V: less than 0.005 %, Zr: less than 0.005 %, and Mg: less than 0.0005 %, sufficient effect cannot be achieved.
  • their respective contents are preferably Ca: 0.0001 % or more, Se: 0.02 % or more, Te: 0.10 % or more, Bi: 0.02 % or more, Sn: 0.003 % or more, Sb: 0.003 % or more, B: 0.003 % or more, Cu: 0.05 % or more, Ni: 0.05 % or more, Ti: 0.003 % or more, V: 0.005 % or more, Zr: 0.005 % or more, and Mg: 0.0005 % or more.
  • their respective contents are preferably Ca: 0.0010 % or less, Se: 0.30 % or less, Te: 0.15 % or less, Bi: 0.20 % or less, Sn: 0.020 % or less, Sb: 0.025 % or less, B: 0.010 % or less, Cu: 0.50 % or less, Ni: 0.50 % or less, Ti: 0.100 % or less, V: 0.20 % or less, Zr: 0.050 % or less, and Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
  • Fine dispersion of sulfides in the microstructure of the free-cutting steel is advantageous in promoting the lubricating action between the tool and the work material during cutting work.
  • at least a predetermined amount of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter and at least a predetermined amount of sulfides of 1 ⁇ m to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter need to be dispersed in the steel microstructure.
  • Sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter are mainly effective for lubrication between the tool and the work material.
  • Sulfides of 1 ⁇ m to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter not only have the foregoing lubrication effect but also are effective for chip partibility.
  • the number of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter is at least 500 particles/mm 2
  • the number of sulfides of 1 ⁇ m to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter is at least 2000 particles/mm 2 .
  • a rectangular cast steel that has the above-described chemical composition and whose side length of a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is 250 mm or more is rolled at a heating temperature of 1120 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 60 % or more to obtain a billet, and the billet is hot worked at a heating temperature of 1050 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 75 % or more.
  • Rectangular cross section whose side length of cross section perpendicular to longitudinal direction is 250 mm
  • a molten steel adjusted to the chemical composition is cast to obtain a cast steel.
  • a cast steel a rectangular cast steel whose side length of a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is 250 mm or more is used.
  • the cast steel is produced as a cast steel having a rectangular cross section by continuous casting or ingot casting. If the side length of the rectangular cross section is less than 250 mm, sulfide particles increase in size in the solidification of the cast steel. Consequently, coarse sulfides remain even after the cast steel is subsequently rolled to obtain a billet, which is disadvantageous in terms of sulfide refinement after final hot working.
  • the side length of the cast steel in the cross section is therefore 250 mm or more.
  • the side length of the cast steel in the cross section is more preferably 300 mm or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the side length of the cast steel in the cross section, the side length is preferably 600 mm or less from the viewpoint of the rollability in the hot rolling following the casting.
  • Heating temperature of cast steel 1120 °C or more
  • the cast steel is hot rolled into a billet.
  • the heating temperature in the hot rolling needs to be 1120 °C or more. If the heating temperature is less than 1120 °C, coarse sulfides crystallized during cooling-solidification in the casting stage do not dissolve, and remain even in the billet. Consequently, the sulfides remain coarse even after the hot working, and the desired fine sulfide distribution state cannot be achieved. Accordingly, the heating temperature when hot rolling the cast steel into the billet is 1120 °C or more, and is preferably 1150 °C or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the heating temperature of the cast steel, the heating temperature is preferably 1300 °C or less and more preferably 1250 °C or less from the viewpoint of preventing scale loss.
  • the sulfide particles crystallized during the solidification are large in size, the sulfide particles need to be reduced in size to some extent in bloom rolling. If the area reduction rate in the hot rolling is low, the sulfide particles remain large in the billet. In such a case, it is difficult to refine the sulfide particles in heating/rolling when subsequently hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod. In view of this, the area reduction rate in the hot rolling of the cast steel into the billet is 60 % or more.
  • the area reduction rate (%) in the hot rolling can be calculated according to the following formula: 100 ⁇ S 0 ⁇ S 1 / S 0 where S0 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot rolling direction of the cast steel before the hot rolling, and S1 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot rolling direction of the billet produced as a result of the hot rolling.
  • Heating temperature 1050 °C or more
  • the heating temperature when hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod is an important factor. If the heating temperature is less than 1050 °C, the sulfides do not disperse finely, so that the lubricating action during cutting work is poor. This facilitates tool wear, and shortens the tool life.
  • the heating temperature of the billet is therefore 1050 °C or more.
  • the heating temperature of the billet is more preferably 1080 °C or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the heating temperature of the billet, the heating temperature is preferably 1250 °C or less from the viewpoint of suppressing a yield rate decrease caused by scale loss.
  • the area reduction rate when hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod is also an important factor for sulfide refinement. If the area reduction rate is less than 75 %, sulfide refinement is insufficient. Accordingly, the lower limit of the area reduction rate is 75 %. The area reduction rate is more preferably 80 % or more.
  • the area reduction rate in the hot working can be calculated according to the following formula: 100 ⁇ S 1 ⁇ S 2 / S 1 where S1 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot working direction of the billet before the hot working, and S2 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot working direction (stretching direction) of the steel bar or wire rod produced as a result of the hot working.
  • the sulfides can be refined and the machinability by cutting can be improved.
  • the obtained billet was heated at the corresponding heating temperature in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, and hot rolled into a steel bar having the corresponding diameter in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2.
  • Each of the obtained steel bars (disclosed steels and comparative steels) was subjected to the following test. Table 1 (mass%) No.
  • a test piece was collected from a cross section parallel to the rolling direction of the obtained steel bar, and the 1/4 position in the radial direction from the peripheral surface of the cross section was observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to investigate the equivalent circle diameter and number density of sulfide in the steel.
  • SEM scanning electron microscope
  • precipitate composition analysis was conducted by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX).
  • EDX energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry
  • the machinability by cutting was evaluated by an outer periphery turning test.
  • BNC-34C5 produced by Citizen Machinery Co., Ltd. was used as a cutting machine
  • Carbide EX35 Tool TNGG160404R-N produced by Hitachi Tool Engineering, Ltd. was used as a turning tip
  • DTGNR2020 produced by KYOCERA Corporation was used as a holder.
  • a 15-fold diluted emulsion of YUSHIROKEN FGE1010 produced by Yushiro Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. was used.
  • the cutting conditions were cutting rate: 120 m/min, feed rate: 0.05 mm/rev, cut depth: 2.0 mm, and machining length: 10 m.
  • the machinability by cutting was evaluated based on the flank wear Vb of the tool after the end of the cutting test over a length of 10 m. In the case where the flank wear Vb after the end of the cutting test was 200 ⁇ m or less, the machinability by cutting was evaluated as "good”. In the case where the flank wear was more than 200 ⁇ m, the machinability by cutting was evaluated as "poor".
  • Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 The test results of the disclosed steels and the comparative steels are shown in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. As is clear from Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, the disclosed steels had favorable machinability by cutting as compared with the comparative steels. Table 2-1 No. Steel sample No.
  • Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet) Linear rod rolling ( rolling billet into steel bar) Properties of machin steel bar (inclusion ability by cutting test distribution, result) Remarks Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (nm) Cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (nm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm 2 ) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm 2 ) Tool life (machinability by cutting) 1 1 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1273 2896 Good
  • Example 2 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1273 2896
  • ⁇ 2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter: confoming range (at least 500 part icles/mm 2 ).
  • ⁇ 3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 000 particles m/mm 2 ).
  • ⁇ 4 Tool life (machina bility by cutting) good: tool wear of 200 ⁇ m or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200 ⁇ m. No. Steel sample No.
  • Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet) Linear rod rolling (rolling billet into steel bar) Properties of steel bar (inclusion distribution, machinability by cutting test result) Remarks Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (mm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm 2 ) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm 2 ) Tool life (machinability by cutting) 12 12 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1611 3664 Good Example 13 13 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1611 3664 Good Example 13
  • Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet) Linear rod rolling (rolling billet into steel bar) Properties of steel bar (inclusion distribution, machinability by cutting test result) Remarks Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (mm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm 2 ) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm 2 ) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm 2 ) Tool life (machinability by cutting) 23 1 257 240 61680 1120 60 158 158 24964 1050 89 75 483 2034 Poor Comparative Example 24 1 230 230 52900 1180 52 160 160 25600 1080 25
  • ⁇ 2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 500 particles/mm).
  • ⁇ 3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 ⁇ m in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 2000 particles/mm 2 ).
  • ⁇ 4 Tool life (machinability by cutting) good: tool wear of 200 ⁇ m or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200 ⁇ m.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Metal Rolling (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is a free-cutting steel that, despites not containing Pb, has machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel. A free-cutting steel comprises: a chemical composition that contains, in mass%, C: less than 0.09 %, Mn: 0.50 % to 1.50 %, S: 0.250 % to 0.600 %, O: more than 0.010 % and 0.050 % or less, and Cr: 0.50 % to 1.50 %, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, and a steel microstructure in which at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter are distributed.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present disclosure relates to a free-cutting steel, in particular a steel that is a substitute for a free-cutting steel containing sulfur and a small amount of lead as elements for improving machinability by cutting. The present disclosure relates to a free-cutting steel having machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel, and a method of producing the same.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Low carbon sulfur-lead free-cutting steel as represented by JIS SUM24L contains a large amount of lead (Pb) and sulfur (S) as free-cutting elements and thus has excellent machinability by cutting.
  • In steel materials, lead is useful for reducing tool wear and improving chip treatability in cutting work. Hence, lead is regarded as an important element that significantly improves the machinability by cutting of materials, and is used in many steel products produced by cutting work. With the rise of environmental awareness in recent years, however, there is a growing movement to abolish or restrict the use of environmentally hazardous substances worldwide. Lead is one of such environmentally hazardous substances, and restriction on the use of lead is required.
  • In view of this, for example, JP H9-25539 A (PTL 1) discloses a non-Pb-containing free-cutting non-heat-treated steel. Likewise, JP 2000-160284 A (PTL 2) discloses a non-Pb-containing free-cutting steel. Moreover, JP H2-6824 B (PTL 3) discloses a free-cutting steel containing Cr which can form a compound with S more easily than Mn to thereby cause a Mn-Cr-S-based inclusion to be present and ensure machinability by cutting.
  • CITATION LIST Patent Literature
    • PTL 1: JP H9-25539 A
    • PTL 2: JP 2000-160284 A
    • PTL 3: JP H2-6824 B
    SUMMARY (Technical Problem)
  • The technique described in PTL 1 is intended for a non-heat-treated steel that contains 0.2 % or more of C and thus is hard, and the use of Nd which is a special element requires high production costs. With the technique described in PTL 2, adding a large amount of S causes low hot ductility and induces cracking during continuous casting or hot rolling, which is problematic in terms of surface characteristics. With the technique described in PTL 3, Cr and S are added while reducing the amount of Mn. However, due to high Cr content of 3.5 % or more, not only cost reduction is difficult but also a large amount of CrS forms, causing a production problem in that material smelting treatment in the steelmaking process is difficult.
  • It could therefore be helpful to provide a free-cutting steel that, despites not containing Pb, has machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel and does not need to contain Nd or a large amount of S or Cr as in PTL 1 to PTL 3, together with a method of producing the same.
  • (Solution to Problem)
  • Upon careful examination, we discovered the following:
    1. (i) Adding appropriate amounts of Mn, Cr, and S and optimizing the ratio 2(Mn + 2Cr)/S causes an appropriate amount of sulfide to have a Mn-Cr-S composite-based composition. The sulfides of the composite-based composition can be refined by hot working.
    2. (ii) When the sulfides are finer, the lubricating action is greater, and the formation of hard phase adhering to the tool surface, called a built-up edge, can be prevented. Thus, machinability by cutting including chip treatability and surface roughness can be significantly improved.
    3. (iii) It is conventionally known that machinability by cutting is improved with an increase in S content in steel. There is, however, an upper limit to the amount of S that can be added in steel, from the viewpoint of hot workability or mechanical property anisotropy. If sulfides in steel are fine, machinability by cutting including chip treatability and surface roughness is significantly improved. Hence, by finely distributing sulfides in steel, favorable machinability by cutting can be ensured within the upper limit of the S content imposed from the viewpoint of hot workability or mechanical property anisotropy.
  • The present disclosure is based on these discoveries. We thus provide:
    1. 1. A free-cutting steel comprising: a chemical composition that contains (consists of), in mass%, C: less than 0.09 %, Mn: 0.50 % to 1.50 %, S: 0.250 % to 0.600 %, O: more than 0.0100 % and 0.0500 % or less, and Cr: 0.50 % to 1.50 %, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, A value = 2 Mn + 2 Cr / S
      Figure imgb0001
      where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass% of elements Mn, Cr, and S; and a steel microstructure in which at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter are distributed.
    2. 2. The free-cutting steel according to 1., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of Si: 0.50 % or less, P: 0.10 % or less, Al: 0.010 % or less, and N: 0.0150 % or less.
    3. 3. The free-cutting steel according to 1. or 2., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010 % or less, Se: 0.30 % or less, Te: 0.15 % or less, Bi: 0.20 % or less, Sn: 0.020 % or less, Sb: 0.025 % or less, B: 0.010 % or less, Cu: 0.50 % or less, Ni: 0.50 % or less, Ti: 0.100 % or less, V: 0.20 % or less, Zr: 0.050 % or less, and Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
    4. 4. A method of producing a free-cutting steel, the method comprising: rolling a rectangular cast steel at a heating temperature of 1120 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 60 % or more to obtain a billet, the rectangular cast steel having a chemical composition that contains, in mass%, C: less than 0.09 %, Mn: 0.50 % to 1.50 %, S: 0.250 % to 0.600 %, O: more than 0.0100 % and 0.0500 % or less, and Cr: 0.50 % to 1.50 % with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, A value = 2 Mn + 2 Cr / S
      Figure imgb0002
      where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass% of elements Mn, Cr, and S, and a side length of a cross section of the rectangular cast steel perpendicular to a longitudinal direction being 250 mm or more; and hot working the billet at a heating temperature of 1050 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 75 % or more.
    5. 5. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to 4., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of Si: 0.50 % or less, P: 0.10 % or less, Al: 0.010 % or less, and N: 0.0150 % or less.
    6. 6. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to 4. or 5., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010 % or less, Se: 0.30 % or less, Te: 0.15 % or less, Bi: 0.20 % or less, Sn: 0.020 % or less, Sb: 0.025 % or less, B: 0.010 % or less, Cu: 0.50 % or less, Ni: 0.50 % or less, Ti: 0.100 % or less, V: 0.20 % or less, Zr: 0.050 % or less, and Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
    (Advantageous Effect)
  • It is thus possible to obtain a free-cutting steel having excellent machinability by cutting without adding lead.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • A free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure will be described in detail below. First, the reasons for limiting the content of each component in the chemical composition of the free-cutting steel will be described below. Herein, "%" with regard to components is mass% unless otherwise stated.
  • C: less than 0.09 %
  • C is an important element that greatly influences the strength and the machinability by cutting of the steel. If the C content is 0.09 % or more, the steel hardens and the strength increases excessively, and as a result the machinability by cutting degrades. The C content is therefore less than 0.09 %. The C content is preferably 0.07 % or less. From the viewpoint of ensuring the strength, the C content is preferably 0.01 % or more, and more preferably 0.03 % or more.
  • Mn: 0.50 % to 1.50 %
  • Mn is a sulfide forming element important for improvement in machinability by cutting. If the Mn content is less than 0.50 %, the amount of sulfide is small, and sufficient machinability by cutting cannot be obtained. The lower limit is therefore 0.50 %. The Mn content is preferably 0.70 % or more. If the Mn content is more than 1.50 %, sulfides not only coarsen but also extend long, causing a decrease in machinability by cutting. In addition, the mechanical properties decrease. The upper limit of the Mn content is therefore 1.50 %. The Mn content is preferably 1.20 % or less.
  • S: 0.250 % to 0.600 %
  • S is a sulfide forming element effective in improving the machinability by cutting. If the S content is less than 0.250 %, fine sulfides are few, so that the machinability by cutting cannot be improved. If the S content is more than 0.600 %, sulfides coarsen excessively and the number of fine sulfides decreases, as a result of which the machinability by cutting decreases. Moreover, the hot workability and the ductility which is an important mechanical property decrease. The S content is therefore in a range of 0.250 % to 0.600 %. The S content is preferably 0.300 % or more. The S content is preferably 0.450 % or less.
  • O: more than 0.0100 % and 0.0500 % or less
  • O is an element that forms oxide and serves as a sulfide precipitation nucleus and also is effective in suppressing extension of sulfides during hot working such as rolling. This action can improve the machinability by cutting. If the O content is 0.0100 % or less, the sulfide extension suppressing effect is insufficient and extended sulfides remain, so that the foregoing effect cannot be expected. The O content is therefore more than 0.0100 %. If the O content is more than 0.0500 %, not only the sulfide extension suppressing effect is saturated but also the amount of hard oxide-based inclusions increases. Adding an excessive amount of O is also economically disadvantageous. The upper limit of the O content is therefore 0.0500 %.
  • Cr: 0.50 % to 1.50 %
  • Cr has an effect of forming sulfides and improving the machinability by cutting through lubricating action during cutting. Cr also suppresses extension of sulfides during hot working such as rolling, and thus can improve the machinability by cutting. If the Cr content is less than 0.50 %, the formation of sulfides is insufficient and extended sulfides tend to remain, so that the foregoing effect cannot be expected. If the Cr content is more than 1.50 %, not only the steel hardens but also sulfides coarsen. Moreover, the extension suppressing effect is saturated, and the machinability by cutting decreases. Besides, adding an excessive amount causes an increase in alloy costs, which is economically disadvantageous. The Cr content is therefore 0.50 % to 1.50 %. The Cr content is preferably 0.70 % or more. The Cr content is preferably 1.30 % or less.
  • The free-cutting steel contains the above-described components with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, or contains the above-described components and further contains the below-described optional components. The free-cutting steel preferably contains the above-described components or preferably contains the above-described components and further the below-described optional components, with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities.
  • It is important that, in the above-described chemical composition, a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0. A value = 2 Mn + 2 Cr / S
    Figure imgb0003
    where [M] is the content (mass%) of the corresponding element in brackets.
  • The A value is an important index that influences refinement of Mn-Cr-S-based sulfide during hot working such as rolling, and limiting the A value can improve the machinability by cutting. If the A value is less than 6.0, sulfide of Mn-S alone forms, which tends to be coarse. Consequently, the machinability by cutting degrades. If the A value is more than 18.0, not only the sulfide refining effect is saturated but also the amount of the sulfide forming elements is excessively large relative to sulfur, causing sulfides to coarsen. The A value is therefore 6.0 to 18.0. The A value is preferably 6.5 or more. The A value is preferably 17.0 or less.
  • The optional components will be described below. In addition to the above-described basic components, the free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure may optionally contain one or more selected from the group consisting of
    • Si: 0.50 % or less,
    • P: 0.10 % or less,
    • Al: 0.010 % or less, and
    • N: 0.0150 % or less.
    Si: 0.50 % or less
  • Si is a deoxidizing element. Moreover, Si oxide acts as a sulfide formation nucleus to promote the formation of sulfides and refine the sulfides and thus improve the cutting tool life. Accordingly, Si may be contained in the steel in order to further extend the tool life. If the Si content is more than 0.50 %, the oxide increases in size and decreases in number. Such oxide is ineffective as a sulfide formation nucleus, and also hard oxide induces abrasive wear and leads to degradation in tool life. The Si content is therefore 0.50 % or less. The Si content is preferably 0.03 % or less. To achieve the foregoing action by Si, the Si content is preferably 0.001 % or more.
  • P: 0.10 % or less
  • P is an element effective in suppressing the formation of built-up edges during cutting work to thus reduce finishing surface roughness. From this viewpoint, the P content is preferably 0.01 % or more. If the P content is more than 0.10 %, the material hardens, so that the machinability by cutting decreases and the hot workability and the ductility decrease significantly. The P content is therefore preferably 0.10 % or less. The P content is more preferably 0.08 % or less.
  • Al: 0.010 % or less
  • Al is a deoxidizing element as with Si, and may be contained in the steel. Al forms Al2O3 in the steel. This oxide is hard and causes degradation in cutting tool life due to abrasive wear. Hence, adding an excessive amount of Al needs to be avoided. From this viewpoint, the Al content is preferably 0.010 % or less. The Al content is more preferably 0.005 % or less. From the viewpoint of achieving the deoxidizing effect by Al, the Al content is preferably 0.001 % or more.
  • N: 0.0150 % or less
  • N forms nitride with Cr and the like. As a result of the nitride decomposing due to temperature increase during cutting work, an oxide film called belag forms on the tool surface. Belag has an action of protecting the tool surface and thereby improving the tool life. Accordingly, N may be contained in the steel. To effectively achieve this action, the N content is preferably 0.0050 % or more. If the N content is more than 0.0150 %, not only the effect of belag is saturated but also the material hardens, as a result of which the tool life shortens. The N content is therefore preferably 0.0150 % or less. The N content is more preferably 0.0060 % or more. The N content is more preferably 0.0120 % or less.
  • The free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure may optionally further contain one or more selected from the group consisting of
    • Ca: 0.0010 % or less,
    • Se: 0.30 % or less,
    • Te: 0.15 % or less,
    • Bi: 0.20 % or less,
    • Sn: 0.020 % or less,
    • Sb: 0.025 % or less,
    • B: 0.010 % or less,
    • Cu: 0.50 % or less,
    • Ni: 0.50 % or less,
    • Ti: 0.100 % or less,
    • V: 0.20 % or less,
    • Zr: 0.050 % or less, and
    • Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
  • Ca, Se, Te, Bi, Sn, Sb, B, Cu, Ni, Ti, V, Zr, and Mg each have an action of improving the machinability by cutting, and accordingly may be added in the case where the machinability by cutting is considered important. In the case of adding these elements in order to improve the machinability by cutting, if their respective contents are Ca: less than 0.0001 %, Se: less than 0.02 %, Te: less than 0.10 %, Bi: less than 0.02 %, Sn: less than 0.003 %, Sb: less than 0.003 %, B: less than 0.003 %, Cu: less than 0.05 %, Ni: less than 0.50 %, Ti: less than 0.003 %, V: less than 0.005 %, Zr: less than 0.005 %, and Mg: less than 0.0005 %, sufficient effect cannot be achieved. Accordingly, their respective contents are preferably Ca: 0.0001 % or more, Se: 0.02 % or more, Te: 0.10 % or more, Bi: 0.02 % or more, Sn: 0.003 % or more, Sb: 0.003 % or more, B: 0.003 % or more, Cu: 0.05 % or more, Ni: 0.05 % or more, Ti: 0.003 % or more, V: 0.005 % or more, Zr: 0.005 % or more, and Mg: 0.0005 % or more.
  • If their respective contents are Ca: more than 0.0010 %, Se: more than 0.30 %, Te: more than 0.15 %, Bi: more than 0.20 %, Sn: more than 0.020 %, Sb: more than 0.025 %, B: more than 0.010 %, Cu: more than 0.50 %, Ni: more than 0.50 %, Ti: more than 0.100 %, V: more than 0.20 %, Zr: more than 0.050 %, and Mg: more than 0.0050 %, the effect is saturated, and also adding such amounts is economically disadvantageous. Accordingly, their respective contents are preferably Ca: 0.0010 % or less, Se: 0.30 % or less, Te: 0.15 % or less, Bi: 0.20 % or less, Sn: 0.020 % or less, Sb: 0.025 % or less, B: 0.010 % or less, Cu: 0.50 % or less, Ni: 0.50 % or less, Ti: 0.100 % or less, V: 0.20 % or less, Zr: 0.050 % or less, and Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
  • (Steel microstructure)
  • Distribution of at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter
  • Fine dispersion of sulfides in the microstructure of the free-cutting steel is advantageous in promoting the lubricating action between the tool and the work material during cutting work. To ensure the machinability by cutting of the free-cutting steel by such fine dispersion of sulfides, at least a predetermined amount of sulfides of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter and at least a predetermined amount of sulfides of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter need to be dispersed in the steel microstructure. Sulfides of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter are mainly effective for lubrication between the tool and the work material. Sulfides of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter not only have the foregoing lubrication effect but also are effective for chip partibility. Hence, the number of sulfides of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter is at least 500 particles/mm2, and the number of sulfides of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter is at least 2000 particles/mm2.
  • The conditions for producing the free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure will be described below.
  • A rectangular cast steel that has the above-described chemical composition and whose side length of a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is 250 mm or more is rolled at a heating temperature of 1120 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 60 % or more to obtain a billet, and the billet is hot worked at a heating temperature of 1050 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 75 % or more.
  • (Cast steel)
  • Rectangular cross section whose side length of cross section perpendicular to longitudinal direction is 250 mm
  • First, a molten steel adjusted to the chemical composition is cast to obtain a cast steel. As the cast steel, a rectangular cast steel whose side length of a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is 250 mm or more is used.
  • The cast steel is produced as a cast steel having a rectangular cross section by continuous casting or ingot casting. If the side length of the rectangular cross section is less than 250 mm, sulfide particles increase in size in the solidification of the cast steel. Consequently, coarse sulfides remain even after the cast steel is subsequently rolled to obtain a billet, which is disadvantageous in terms of sulfide refinement after final hot working. The side length of the cast steel in the cross section is therefore 250 mm or more. The side length of the cast steel in the cross section is more preferably 300 mm or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the side length of the cast steel in the cross section, the side length is preferably 600 mm or less from the viewpoint of the rollability in the hot rolling following the casting.
  • (Hot rolling of cast steel into billet)
  • Heating temperature of cast steel: 1120 °C or more
  • The cast steel is hot rolled into a billet. The heating temperature in the hot rolling needs to be 1120 °C or more. If the heating temperature is less than 1120 °C, coarse sulfides crystallized during cooling-solidification in the casting stage do not dissolve, and remain even in the billet. Consequently, the sulfides remain coarse even after the hot working, and the desired fine sulfide distribution state cannot be achieved. Accordingly, the heating temperature when hot rolling the cast steel into the billet is 1120 °C or more, and is preferably 1150 °C or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the heating temperature of the cast steel, the heating temperature is preferably 1300 °C or less and more preferably 1250 °C or less from the viewpoint of preventing scale loss.
  • Area reduction rate in hot rolling of cast steel into billet: 60 % or more
  • Since the sulfide particles crystallized during the solidification are large in size, the sulfide particles need to be reduced in size to some extent in bloom rolling. If the area reduction rate in the hot rolling is low, the sulfide particles remain large in the billet. In such a case, it is difficult to refine the sulfide particles in heating/rolling when subsequently hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod. In view of this, the area reduction rate in the hot rolling of the cast steel into the billet is 60 % or more.
  • The area reduction rate (%) in the hot rolling can be calculated according to the following formula: 100 × S 0 S 1 / S 0
    Figure imgb0004
    where S0 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot rolling direction of the cast steel before the hot rolling, and S1 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot rolling direction of the billet produced as a result of the hot rolling.
  • (Hot working of billet)
  • Heating temperature: 1050 °C or more
  • The heating temperature when hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod is an important factor. If the heating temperature is less than 1050 °C, the sulfides do not disperse finely, so that the lubricating action during cutting work is poor. This facilitates tool wear, and shortens the tool life. The heating temperature of the billet is therefore 1050 °C or more. The heating temperature of the billet is more preferably 1080 °C or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the heating temperature of the billet, the heating temperature is preferably 1250 °C or less from the viewpoint of suppressing a yield rate decrease caused by scale loss.
  • Area reduction rate in hot working: 75 % or more
  • The area reduction rate when hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod is also an important factor for sulfide refinement. If the area reduction rate is less than 75 %, sulfide refinement is insufficient. Accordingly, the lower limit of the area reduction rate is 75 %. The area reduction rate is more preferably 80 % or more. The area reduction rate in the hot working can be calculated according to the following formula: 100 × S 1 S 2 / S 1
    Figure imgb0005
    where S1 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot working direction of the billet before the hot working, and S2 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot working direction (stretching direction) of the steel bar or wire rod produced as a result of the hot working.
  • By limiting the size and the heating temperature of the bloom, the size and the heating temperature of the billet, and the area reduction rates to the respective appropriate ranges, the sulfides can be refined and the machinability by cutting can be improved.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The presently disclosed technique will be described in detail below by way of examples.
  • Steels having the chemical compositions listed in Table 1 were cast into rectangular cast steels having the dimensions listed in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 in a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, by a continuous casting machine. The obtained cast steels were rolled into steel bars under the production conditions listed in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. Disclosed steels (conforming steels) and comparative steels were subjected to the following test. In detail, the cast steels were each hot rolled at the corresponding heating temperature and area reduction rate in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, to obtain a square billet having the corresponding long side dimension and short side dimension in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. The obtained billet was heated at the corresponding heating temperature in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, and hot rolled into a steel bar having the corresponding diameter in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. Each of the obtained steel bars (disclosed steels and comparative steels) was subjected to the following test. Table 1
    (mass%)
    No. C Si Mn P S Cr Al Sb N O Others A value Category
    1 0.05 - 0.67 0.072 0.412 0.80 0.001 0.0010 0.0110 0.0295 - 11.0 Conforming Example
    2 0.06 0.05 0.55 0.036 0.450 0.55 0.003 0.0040 0.0095 0.0245 - 6.1 Conforming Example
    3 0.08 0.02 1.25 0.065 0.356 1.25 0.002 0.0040 0.0123 0.0159 - 17.6 Conforming Example
    4 0.03 0.09 0.75 0.051 0.255 0.86 0.001 - 0.0105 0.0163 - 160 Conforming Example
    5 0.04 0.01 0.83 0.049 0.523 0.98 0.001 - 0.0088 0.0204 - 8.8 Conforming Example
    6 0.08 - 1.44 0.007 0.375 0.99 0.002 0.0010 0.0090 0.0288 Ca:0.0005 15.6 Conforming Example
    7 0.05 - 0.86 0.055 0.406 1.23 0.002 - 0.0086 0.0369 Se:0.12 13.3 Conforming Example
    8 0.07 0.02 0.55 0.082 0.324 0.76 0.002 - 0.0120 0.0234 Te:0.15 10.4 Conforming Example
    9 0.06 0.06 1.45 0.091 0.554 1.16 0.002 - 0.0099 0.0254 Bi:0.05, Sn:0.010 11.5 Conforming Example
    10 0.04 0.01 0.92 0.081 0.543 1.15 0.001 0.0102 0.0060 0.0265 Sb:0.045 9.7 Conforming Example
    11 0.07 0.02 1.05 0.065 0.368 1.15 0.002 - 0.0063 0.0316 B:0.0035 15.1 Conforming Example
    12 0.07 0.02 0.78 0.078 0.435 0.97 0.001 - 0.0077 0.0203 C:025, Ni:0.15 10.3 Conforming Example
    13 0.06 0.03 1.44 0.075 0.366 1.11 0.001 - 0.0096 0.0314 Ti.0.056 17.0 Conforming Example
    14 0.05 - 0.76 0.068 0.370 0.54 0.003 0.0006 0.0089 0.0163 V:0.008, Zr:0.06 8.5 Conforming Example
    15 0.06 0.02 1.24 0.074 0.399 1.23 0.001 0.0006 0.0123 0.0234 Mg:0.0009 15.5 Conforming Example
    16 0.05 0.01 0.78 0.008 0.399 0.99 0.003 0.0068 0.0040 0.0132 - 11.4 Conforming Example
    17 0.09 0.01 0.85 0.055 0.403 0.95 0.003 0.0025 0.0088 0.0126 - 11.3 Comparative Example
    18 0.08 0.51 1.15 0.016 0.435 0.88 0.001 0.0025 0.0123 0.0168 - 11.4 Comparative Example
    19 0.08 0.02 0.45 0.045 0.352 0.56 0.002 0.0036 0.0098 0.0201 - 7.3 Comparative Example
    20 0.05 0.01 2.13 0.060 0.301 0.55 0.003 0.0056 0.0076 0.0176 - 19.6 Comparative Example
    21 0.09 - 0.84 0.120 0.406 0.25 0.001 0.0019 0.0089 0.0155 - 6.0 Comparative Example
    22 0.08 0.01 0.75 0.096 0.241 0.65 0.001 0.0019 0.0112 0.0201 - 14.3 Comparative Example
    23 0.07 0.02 0.53 0.012 0.611 1.09 0.002 0.0019 0.0098 0.0196 - 7.1 Comparative Example
    24 0.05 0.01 1.36 0.003 0.352 0.04 0.003 0.0019 0.0053 0.0162 - 8.1 Comparative Example
    25 0.07 0.02 0.94 0.065 0.463 1.59 0.001 0.0019 0.0123 0.0246 - 14.4 Comparative Example
    26 0.05 0.01 1.00 0.013 0.349 1.06 0.013 - 0.0062 0.0222 - 14.8 Comparative Example
    27 0.06 - 1.34 0.065 0.391 1.25 0.003 0.0068 0.0170 0.0116 - 16.4 Comparative Example
    28 0.05 0.53 0.63 0.023 0.406 0.95 0.001 0.0088 0.0123 0.0091 - 10.1 Comparative Example
    29 0.07 0.03 1.36 0.098 0.369 0.95 0.003 0.0088 0.0076 0.0523 - 15.1 Comparative Example
    30 0.08 0.02 0.68 0.023 0.531 0.57 0.001 0.0088 0.0116 0.0165 - 5.8 Comparative Example
    31 0.04 - 1.25 0.089 0.312 1.08 0.004 0.0088 0.0084 0.0203 - 18.4 Comparative Example
    )A value=2(Mn+2Cr)/S ratio: conforming range (6.0 to 18.0).
    "-" in composition table denotes less than 0.01 for Si, and less than 0.003 for Sb.
  • A test piece was collected from a cross section parallel to the rolling direction of the obtained steel bar, and the 1/4 position in the radial direction from the peripheral surface of the cross section was observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to investigate the equivalent circle diameter and number density of sulfide in the steel. Here, precipitate composition analysis was conducted by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX). The obtained SEM images of precipitates determined as sulfide by EDX were analyzed and binarized to calculate the equivalent circle diameter and the number density.
  • The machinability by cutting was evaluated by an outer periphery turning test. BNC-34C5 produced by Citizen Machinery Co., Ltd. was used as a cutting machine, Carbide EX35 Tool TNGG160404R-N produced by Hitachi Tool Engineering, Ltd. was used as a turning tip, and DTGNR2020 produced by KYOCERA Corporation was used as a holder. As a lubricant, a 15-fold diluted emulsion of YUSHIROKEN FGE1010 produced by Yushiro Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. was used. The cutting conditions were cutting rate: 120 m/min, feed rate: 0.05 mm/rev, cut depth: 2.0 mm, and machining length: 10 m.
  • The machinability by cutting was evaluated based on the flank wear Vb of the tool after the end of the cutting test over a length of 10 m. In the case where the flank wear Vb after the end of the cutting test was 200 µm or less, the machinability by cutting was evaluated as "good". In the case where the flank wear was more than 200 µm, the machinability by cutting was evaluated as "poor".
  • The test results of the disclosed steels and the comparative steels are shown in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. As is clear from Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, the disclosed steels had favorable machinability by cutting as compared with the comparative steels. Table 2-1
    No. Steel sample No. Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet) Linear rod rolling ( rolling billet into steel bar) Properties of machin steel bar (inclusion ability by cutting test distribution, result) Remarks
    Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (nm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (nm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Tool life (machinability by cutting)
    1 1 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1273 2896 Good Example
    2 2 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1011 2299 Good Example
    3 3 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1817 4134 Good Example
    4 4 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 810 2343 Good Example
    5 5 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1986 4518 Good Example
    6 6 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1746 3971 Good Example
    7 7 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1835 4174 Good Example
    8 8 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 913 2077 Good Example
    9 9 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 2843 6467 Good Example
    10 10 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 2380 5414 Good Example
    11 11 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1678 3817 Good Example
    1 Underlines indicate outside applicable range.
    2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter: confoming range (at least 500 part icles/mm2).
    3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 000 particles m/mm2).
    4 Tool life (machina bility by cutting) good: tool wear of 200µm or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200µm.
    No. Steel sample No. Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet) Linear rod rolling (rolling billet into steel bar) Properties of steel bar (inclusion distribution, machinability by cutting test result) Remarks
    Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (mm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Tool life (machinability by cutting)
    12 12 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1611 3664 Good Example
    13 13 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1823 4148 Good Example
    14 14 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 927 2108 Good Example
    15 15 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 2009 4571 Good Example
    16 1 420 350 147000 1180 83 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1444 3001 Good Example
    17 1 400 300 120000 1220 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 1564 3265 Good Example
    18 1 400 300 120000 1180 84 140 140 19600 1080 25 97 1654 3269 Good Example
    19 1 400 300 120000 1180 84 140 140 19600 1130 25 97 1312 2130 Good Example
    20 1 400 300 120000 1180 84 140 140 19600 1080 15 99 1273 3356 Good Example
    21 4 250 250 62500 1120 60 158 158 24964 1050 89 75 511 2021 Good Example
    22 16 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1124 2558 Good Example
    1 Underlines indicate outside applicable range.
    2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 500 particles/mm2).
    3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 2000 particles/mm2).
    4 Tool life (machinability by cutting) good: tool wear of 200µm or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200µm.
    Table 2-2
    No. Steel sample No. Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet) Linear rod rolling (rolling billet into steel bar) Properties of steel bar (inclusion distribution, machinability by cutting test result) Remarks
    Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (mm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Tool life (machinability by cutting)
    23 1 257 240 61680 1120 60 158 158 24964 1050 89 75 483 2034 Poor Comparative Example
    24 1 230 230 52900 1180 52 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 324 1804 Poor Comparative Example
    25 1 400 300 120000 1100 79 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 514 1589 Poor Comparative Example
    26 1 250 250 62500 1180 59 160 160 25600 1080 25 98 569 1756 Poor Comparative Example
    27 1 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1030 25 98 1023 1465 Poor Comparative Example
    28 1 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 95 22 468 1786 Poor Comparative Example
    29 17 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1131 2574 Poor Comparative Example
    30 18 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1292 2940 Poor Comparative Example
    31 19 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 456 1114 Poor Comparative Example
    32 20 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 356 1375 Poor Comparative Example
    33 21 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 756 2146 Poor Comparative Example
    1 Underlines indicate outside applicable range.
    2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 500 particles/mm).
    3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 2000 particles/mm2).
    4 Tool life (machinability by cutting) good: tool wear of 200µm or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200µm.
    Long side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Short side of cross section of cast steel (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm) Heating temperature (°C) Area reduction rate in cast steel rolling (%) Long side of cross section of billet (mm) Short side of cross section of billet (mm) Cross-sectional area (mm2) Heating temperature (°C) Steel bar diameter (mm) Area reduction rate in linear rod rolling (%) Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5µm in equivalent circle diameter (particles/mm2) Tool life (machinability by cutting)
    34 22 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 467 1805 Poor Comparative Example
    35 23 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 444 1769 Poor Comparative Example
    36 24 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 324 1657 Poor Comparative Example
    37 25 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1156 2146 Poor Comparative Example
    38 26 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1112 2529 Poor Comparative Example
    39 27 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1533 3487 Poor Comparative Example
    40 28 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1154 2179 Poor Comparative Example
    41 29 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 1232 2217 Poor Comparative Example
    42 30 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 430 1567 Poor Comparative Example
    43 31 400 300 120000 1180 79 160 160 25600 1080 30 97 398 1765 Poor Comparative Example
    *1 Underlines indicate outside applicable range.
    *2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 500 particles/mm2).
    *3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 2000 particles/mm2).
    *4 Tool life (machinability by cutting) good: tool wear of 200µm or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200µm.

Claims (6)

  1. A free-cutting steel comprising:
    a chemical composition that contains, in mass%,
    C: less than 0.09 %,
    Mn: 0.50 % to 1.50 %,
    S: 0.250 % to 0.600 %,
    O: more than 0.0100 % and 0.0500 % or less, and
    Cr: 0.50 % to 1.50 %,
    with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, A value = 2 Mn + 2 Cr / S
    Figure imgb0006
    where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass% of elements Mn, Cr, and S; and
    a steel microstructure in which at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 µm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 µm to 5 µm in equivalent circle diameter are distributed.
  2. The free-cutting steel according to claim 1, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of
    Si: 0.50 % or less,
    P: 0.10 % or less,
    Al: 0.010 % or less, and
    N: 0.0150 % or less.
  3. The free-cutting steel according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of
    Ca: 0.0010 % or less,
    Se: 0.30 % or less,
    Te: 0.15 % or less,
    Bi: 0.20 % or less,
    Sn: 0.020 % or less,
    Sb: 0.025 % or less,
    B: 0.010 % or less,
    Cu: 0.50 % or less,
    Ni: 0.50 % or less,
    Ti: 0.100 % or less,
    V: 0.20 % or less,
    Zr: 0.050 % or less, and
    Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
  4. A method of producing a free-cutting steel, the method comprising:
    rolling a rectangular cast steel at a heating temperature of 1120 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 60 % or more to obtain a billet, the rectangular cast steel having a chemical composition that contains, in mass%,
    C: less than 0.09 %,
    Mn: 0.50 % to 1.50 %,
    S: 0.250 % to 0.600 %,
    O: more than 0.010 % and 0.050 % or less, and
    Cr: 0.50 % to 1.50 %
    with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, A value = 2 Mn + 2 Cr / S
    Figure imgb0007
    where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass% of elements Mn, Cr, and S, and a side length of a cross section of the rectangular cast steel perpendicular to a longitudinal direction being 250 mm or more; and
    hot working the billet at a heating temperature of 1050 °C or more and an area reduction rate of 75 % or more.
  5. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to claim 4, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of
    Si: 0.50 % or less,
    P: 0.10 % or less,
    Al: 0.010 % or less, and
    N: 0.0150 % or less.
  6. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of
    Ca: 0.0010 % or less,
    Se: 0.30 % or less,
    Te: 0.15 % or less,
    Bi: 0.20 % or less,
    Sn: 0.020 % or less,
    Sb: 0.025 % or less,
    B: 0.010 % or less,
    Cu: 0.50 % or less,
    Ni: 0.50 % or less,
    Ti: 0.100 % or less,
    V: 0.20 % or less,
    Zr: 0.050 % or less, and
    Mg: 0.0050 % or less.
EP21780703.1A 2020-03-31 2021-03-31 Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same Pending EP4130303A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020063741 2020-03-31
PCT/JP2021/014049 WO2021201178A1 (en) 2020-03-31 2021-03-31 Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4130303A1 true EP4130303A1 (en) 2023-02-08

Family

ID=77929205

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21780703.1A Pending EP4130303A1 (en) 2020-03-31 2021-03-31 Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20230108640A1 (en)
EP (1) EP4130303A1 (en)
JP (1) JP7024922B1 (en)
KR (1) KR20220144864A (en)
CN (1) CN115362278B (en)
TW (1) TWI779544B (en)
WO (1) WO2021201178A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5763667A (en) 1980-10-02 1982-04-17 Seiko Epson Corp Free cutting steel
JPH026824A (en) 1988-06-27 1990-01-11 Mitsubishi Rayon Co Ltd Method and apparatus for filtration
JP3196579B2 (en) 1995-07-11 2001-08-06 住友金属工業株式会社 Free-cutting non-heat treated steel with excellent strength and toughness
JP3687370B2 (en) 1998-11-25 2005-08-24 住友金属工業株式会社 Free-cutting steel
JP2002249823A (en) * 2001-02-22 2002-09-06 Kawasaki Steel Corp Method for producing free cutting steel
DE60222460T2 (en) * 2001-11-30 2008-06-19 Ishida, Kiyohito, Sendai MACHINES STEEL
JP4295959B2 (en) * 2002-06-26 2009-07-15 Jfe条鋼株式会社 Sulfur and sulfur composite free-cutting steel with low surface flaws and excellent machinability
JP4264247B2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2009-05-13 新日本製鐵株式会社 Steel with excellent machinability and method for producing the same
EP1580287B1 (en) * 2002-11-15 2008-01-16 Nippon Steel Corporation Steel excellent in machinability and method for production thereof
JP4264329B2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2009-05-13 新日本製鐵株式会社 Steel with excellent machinability
JP3918787B2 (en) * 2003-08-01 2007-05-23 住友金属工業株式会社 Low carbon free cutting steel
JP4265776B2 (en) * 2004-02-18 2009-05-20 Jfe条鋼株式会社 Sulfur and sulfur composite free-cutting steel with excellent machinability
JP2005307243A (en) * 2004-04-19 2005-11-04 Daido Steel Co Ltd High-sulfur free-cutting steel
JP2006206967A (en) * 2005-01-28 2006-08-10 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Method for continuously casting free-cutting steel for machine structure
JP5092578B2 (en) * 2007-06-26 2012-12-05 住友金属工業株式会社 Low carbon sulfur free cutting steel
KR101091275B1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2011-12-07 주식회사 포스코 Eco-Friendly Pb-Free Free-Cutting Steel
RU2437739C1 (en) * 2010-03-29 2011-12-27 ЗАО "Омутнинский металлургический завод" Method of producing free-cutting steel am-14
CN103966531B (en) * 2014-04-29 2016-03-09 江苏省沙钢钢铁研究院有限公司 A kind of production method of low carbon high sulfur free-cutting steel of oxide morphology excellence

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115362278A (en) 2022-11-18
CN115362278B (en) 2024-02-27
WO2021201178A1 (en) 2021-10-07
JPWO2021201178A1 (en) 2021-10-07
US20230108640A1 (en) 2023-04-06
JP7024922B1 (en) 2022-02-24
TW202138583A (en) 2021-10-16
TWI779544B (en) 2022-10-01
KR20220144864A (en) 2022-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE602004007730T2 (en) Low-carbon free-cutting steel.
TWI707047B (en) Free-cutting s-containing martensitic stainless steel
JP2007107020A (en) Bn free-cutting steel excellent in tool life
JP2000219936A (en) Free-cutting steel
KR20090128559A (en) Low-carbon sulphur free-cutting steel
JP2000034538A (en) Steel for machine structure excellent in machinability
AU2006241390B2 (en) Free-cutting steel having excellent high temperature ductility
EP4130303A1 (en) Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same
JP4023196B2 (en) Machine structural steel with excellent machinability
JP5576895B2 (en) BN free-cutting steel with excellent tool life
JP2019183257A (en) Ferritic S free-cutting stainless steel
JP3912308B2 (en) Steel for machine structure
EP4317467A1 (en) Duplex stainless steel wire rod, and duplex stainless steel wire
EP4130302A1 (en) Free-cutting steel and method for manufacturing same
JP6927444B1 (en) Free-cutting steel and its manufacturing method
EP2789710B1 (en) Bismuth containing free-machining steel
TWI717990B (en) Free-cutting steel and its manufacturing method
JP4310800B2 (en) High sulfur free cutting steel
JP4222112B2 (en) High sulfur free cutting steel
US20040081575A1 (en) Corrosion resistant steel having good cold-workability and machinability
JP3898959B2 (en) Free-cutting steel
JP2021134420A (en) Steel for machine structure
JP2005307243A (en) High-sulfur free-cutting steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20221018

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)