EP4126040A1 - Lipophilic enantiomers of desacetylglucosamine muramyl dipeptide with anti-inflammatory and growth promoting activity - Google Patents

Abstract

Compositions of matter and methods to reduce inflammation in vertebrates and to promote growth and feed conversion in animals by administering an effective amount of a composition containing a mirror image molecule (enantiomer) of a lipophilic muramyl dipeptide (MDP) derivative that does not contain the N-acetylglucosamine moiety of MDP (i.e., a desmuramyl dipeptide).

Description

Lipophilic Enantiomers of Desacetylglueosamine Muramyl Dipeptide with Anti-Inflammatory and Growth Promoting Activity

CROSS REFERENCE TO PRIORITY APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit ofU.S. Provisional Application Serial No.

63/000,364. filed March 26, 2020, titled “Lipophilic Enantiomers of Desacetylglueosamine Muramyl Dipeptide with Anti-Inflammatory and Gr owth Promoting Activity,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

FIELD

The field of the present invention relates to lipophilic muramyl dipeptide enantiomer compositions and methods for reducing inflammation, promoting growth and enhancing feed conversion in animals including humans.

BACKGROUND

Muramyl dipeptide (MDP) is the minimal structure that is preserved in ail bacterial pepiidog!ycans (PGN). It consists ofN-aeetyl muramic acid (ether of N-acetylglueosamine and D-lactie acid) linked with peptide bonds to L-alanine and D-y-glutamate or D-isoglutamine (MacDonald 2005).

PGN has long been known to promote an inflammatory response. The MDP subcomponent of PGN was found to be the minimal chemical structure required to elicit inflammation. MDP is also required for the adjuvant activity of Freund’s complete adjuvant, an emulsion of a mycobacterial extract (MacDonald 2005). As an adjuvant , MDP promotes a strong immune reaction that is used to boost the effectiveness of vaccines when injected together with vaccine antigens.

While stimulating extraintestinai inflammation, MDP has anti-inflammatory effects in the intestinal tract, and protects mice from experimentally induced colitis (Watanabe 2008; Watanabe 2014).

The intestinal anti-inflammatory properties of MDP provide opportunities for therapeutic applications (Strober 2013). However, MDP is hydrophilic and rapidly remove via kidney excretion from circulation, finis requiring high-dosed and repeated administration in order to mediate nonspecific resistance to infection or adjuvant activity (Fogler 1985).

These unfavorable pharmacokinetics and serious side effects prompted many chemical modifications ofMDP to correct for these shortcomings. Most successful among those were lipid modifications ofMDP that increase both potency and half-life ofMDP (Paranf 1980; Mafsumoto 1983; Fogler 1985).

Covalent lipid MDP conjugates thus have demonstrated several advantages including improved oral bioavailahility, enhanced tumor targeting and therapeutic potency, reduced toxicity, and enhanced drag loading into delivery carriers such as liposomes (F idler 1987; Irby 2017).

Surprisingly, the complete muramyi dipeptide molecule is not required for biological activity with lipophilic conjugated MDP. Even the L-alnnine-D-isoglutamine dipeptide MDP moiety without N-acetyl muramic acid retains immunomodulating activity ofMDP, when covalently conjugated to lipophilic moieties. For instance, Gobec (2016) successfully replaces N-acetyl muramyi with acyl moieties in acyl-glycine-L-alanine-D-giutamate MDP analogs. Penney (1999) removes the muramyi moiety altogether in octadecyl L-alamne-D-isogiuiamine that still retains strong immunomodulating activity.

Furthermore, both Penney (1999) and Gobec (2016) demonstrate that D-isogiuf amine can be replaced in the lipophilic desmuramyl dipeptides with D-giuiamiiie or D-glutamate without loss of function.

Enhanced growth in animals is measured either by growth in mass per unit of time or by growth in mass per unit of nutrition; the latter is sometimes referred to as feed conversion. Promotion of growth by either measure is economically useful in the production of animal protein for consumption by humans and other animals because it reduces the amount of time or feed required to obtain equal gains in body mass.

Antibiotics fed at subinhibitory doses have been used for a long time as growth promoters to enhance growth in agricultural production animals. They presumably work by releasing components from intestinal bacteria (postbiotics). including MDP, which suppress inflammation within the intestinal tract. This mechanism most likely has evolved to protect animals from damaging responses to the trillions of gut-dwelling bacteria. Due to the widespread induction of antibiotic resistance in bacteria by use of antibiotics as growth promoters, replacement of antibiotics as growth promoters is highly desirable. Nalle and Kaitenboeck teach that lo w-dose oral administration of potent lipophilic MDP analogs improves growth rates and feed conversion in animals (Nalle 2017), presumably due to reduction of asymptomatic intestinal inflammation, and thus of the whole-body systemic inflammatory status.

Production of the N-acetyl muramie acid MDP intermediate by multi-step chemical synthesis is difficult, rendering lipophilic MDP analogs too expensive for use as growth promoters in livestock. This makes imniunomodulating lipophilic desmuramyl dipeptides prime candidates for non-antibiotic growth promotion in animals.

Sidweil (1995) and Penney (1999) show that octadecyl D-alanine-L-glutamine, a stereochemical mirror image molecule (enantiomer) of the lipophilic octadecyl L-alanine-D- giutamine desmuramyl dipeptide, is an even stronger immunomodulator than octadecyl i.- akmine-D-glutamme .

While counterintuitive, Zhou (2002) shows that enantiomeric mirror image D-peptides of natural receptor-binding L-peptides bind their cognate receptor as strongly, or even more strongly, than the natural peptides. Additionally, such D-pe iide enantiomers are biologically highly active because they are much more stable than their L-eounterparts, being resistant to degr adation due to the absence of naturally degrading enzymes.

The binding of enantiomeric peptides to the cognate receptor, as well as the increased stability of such natur ally not occurring peptides, explains the strong biological effect of octadecyl D-alanine-L-glutamine desmuramyl dipeptide (BCH-527). This dipeptide also avoids the complicated synthesis of the anisotropic cyclic car bohydrate moiety of N-acetyl muramie acid an thus is a prime cost effective MDP analog candidate for use as growth promoter in animals.

As a lipophilic desmuramyl MDP enantiomer, octadecyl D-alanine-L-glutamine desmuramyl dipeptide has two shortcomings: i) it lacks the lactic acid moiety of N-acetyl muramie acid that links the N-acetylglucosamine moiety of muramie acid to the dipeptide (Jeanloz 1970), thus may forfeit some binding strength to its cognate receptor; ii) it contains the high-melting octadecyl aliphatic lipid that is suboptimal for cell membrane insertion (cellular targeting), intra-membrane transport, and intracellular release (Spec-tor 1985; van Meer 2008), and thus disfavors the intracellular esterase cleavage of the ester bond (Hatfield 2016) between dipeptide and lipid that intracellularly releases the active dipeptide component of octadecy! D- alanine-L-giutamine.

Accordingly, there is a need for compounds that maximize the immunomodulatory activity of lipophilic desmuramyl MDP enantiomers.

SUMMARY

Described herein is an oligopeptide analog of MDP (also referred to herein as an oligopeptide or a compound) comprising an L-lactate-D-alanine-L-glutamine moiety. In some cases, the analog does not contain the N-aeetylglueosamme moiety of MDP. The oligopeptides described herein can have the following formula: or a pharmaceutically acceptable acid or salt thereof, wherein R^! is substituted or imsnbstituted alkyl or substituted or unsubstituted aryl: R², R\ R⁴, and R³ are each independently selected from H, substituted or imsnbstituted alkyl and substituted or unsubstituted aryl: and X is O or NR^®, wherein R⁶ is hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl, or substituted or unsubstituted aryl. Optionally, X is O. Optionally, R^{ is Ci-Cis linear alkyl or an ammo acid. In some cases, the oligopeptide has one of the following structures:

In some cases the oligopeptide has one of the following structures:

wherein R⁷ is substituted or uiisubstituted alkyl or substituted or unsubstituted ;nyl: and Y is O or NR⁸, wherein R⁸ is hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted aikyl, or substituted or uiisubstituted aryl. Optionally, the oligopeptide is L-lactate-D-alanine-L-glutamine-hexadecyl ester

Also described herein are compositions comprising a compound as described herein. Optionally, the composition is a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one oligopeptide described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable earner. In some cases, the composition comprises at least one oligopeptide as described herein and animal feed. The at least one oligopeptide can be present in the composition in an amount of from about 0.01 mg/hg to 5 nig/kg. Optionally, the composition further comprises an additive used in an animal diet (e.g., an enzyme, a probiotic, a prebiotie, an antioxidant, an antibiotic growth promoter, a coloring agent, or a combination thereof).

Further described herein are methods for reducing intestinal inflammation in a human comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition as described herein to a human having intestinal inflammation, wherein the administration reduces the intestinal inflammation. The methods can further comprise selecting a human having a disease or condition associated with intestinal inflammation (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or a bacterial infection). Methods for promoting growth in animal are also provided herein wherein the methods comprise administering the compounds or compositions as described herein, wherein the administration enhances the growth of the animal. Also provided herein are methods for enhancing feed conversion in an animal, wherein the methods comprise administering the compounds or compositions as described herein, wherein the administration enhances the feed conversion in the animal.

The details of one or more embodiments are forth in the drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 is a schematic depicting the synthesis of L-lactate-D-alanine-L-glutamine paimityl ester (Lactate-DiPeptide-Palmityl ester, LDPP).

Figure 2 contains bar graphs showing the evaluation of the growth promotion effect of L-lactate-D-alanine-L-glutamine paimityl ester (LDPP) in broiler chickens. (A) The experimental diets were fed from start on day 21 through termination on day 44 (24 days constant time). (B) Body weight gain per chicken on constant time. Data shown are means ± 95% confidence interval (95% Cl). (C) Total feed consumed per chicken on constant time, means ± 95% Cl. (D) Fee conversion rate as determined by dividing total consumed feed by total weight gains of all chickens on constant time of each group. Error bars indicate 25-75 percentiles of calculated feed conversions of individual pens. (E) Modeling of time on feed required for weight gain identical to the untreated controls (1,653 g constant weight gain). (F) Body weight gain per chicken on constant weight gain, means ± 95% Cl. (G) Total feed consumed per chicken on constant weight gain, means ± 95% CL (H) Feed conversion rate for constant weight gain of each treatment group. Morbidity and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. Relevant differences between treatment groups are indicated by dashed brackets and the corresponding p value.

Figure 3 contains bar graphs showing the evaluation of the growth promotion effect of L-iaciate-D-aianine-L-glutamine paimityl ester (LDPP) in nursery pigs. (A) The experimental diets were fed from start on day 0 through termination on day 42 (42 days constant time). (B) Body weight gain per pig on constant time. Data shown are means ± 95% confidence interval (95% Cl). (C) Total feed consumed per pig on constant time, means ± 95% Cl. (D) Feed conversion rate as determined by dividing total consumed feed by total weight gains of all pigs on constant time of each group. Error bar s indicate 25-75 percentiles of calculated feed conversions of individual pens. (E) Modeling of time on feed required for weight gain identical to the untreated controls (22.076 kg constant weight gain). (F) Body weight gain per pig on constant weight gain, means ± 95% Cl. (G) Total feed consumed per pig on constant weight gain, means ± 95% CL (H) Feed conversion rate for constant weight gain of each treatment group. Morbidity and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. Significant differences between treatment groups are indicated by bold p values. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Provided herein are compositions containing a lipophilic enantiomer of desacetylglucosamine muramyl dipeptide (MDP) (e.g., L-lactate-D-alanine-L-giutamme- hexadecyl ester). This compound improves i) binding strength to the cognate intracellular receptor(s) by enlarging the dipeptide via the additional mirror 1-lactate moiety; and ii) maximizes intracellular targeting and active dipeptide release via the increased membrane fluidity provided by the lower-melting hexadecyl (paimityl) aliphatic lipid.

When administered to humans or animals, the compositions containing the lipophilic enantiomer of MDP reduce inflammation, promote growth and improve feed conversion. Therefore, methods for reducing inflammation in humans and animals, an methods for promoting growth and enhancing feed conversion in animals are provided. In accordance with the methods , the lipophilic enantiomer of MDP is combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable acid or addition salt thereof, a pharmaceutical carrier or animal feed, which is then administered to the animal or human in a sufficient amount to achieve the desired reduction in inflammation, promotion of growth or improvement of feed conversion.

I. Compounds

Described herein are oligopeptide analogs of desacetylglucosamine miiramyl dipeptide (MDP). The analogs can include an L-laetate-D-alaniue-L-g!utamme moiety bonded to an organic lipid molecule, and any pharmaceutically acceptable acid or salt thereof. In some cases, the analog does not contain the N-acetylglueosamine moiety of MDP.

In some cases, the compounds described herein includes Formula I: , wherein;

In Formula I. R¹ is substituted or iinsubstituted alkyl or substituted or misubstituted aryl. Optionally, R¹ is a Ci-Cis linear alkyl. Optionally, R¹ is an amino acid, such as a lysine group (D-ly ine or L-lysine). Also in Formula I. R², R³, R⁴, and R^:' are each independently selected from H, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl and substituted or unsubstituted aryl.

Additionally in Formula I, X is O or NR⁶, wherein R⁶ is hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl or substituted or unsubstituted aryl.

Optionally, the compounds of Formula I can include compounds according to Structure I-A;

Structure I-A

In Structure I-A, R¹ is defined as above for Formula I

Optionally, the compounds of Formula I can include compounds according to Structure I-B.

Structure I-B

In Structure I-B, R¹ is defined as above for Formula I.

Optionally, the compounds of Formula I can include compounds according to Structure I-C or Structure I-D:

Structure I-C Structure I-D In Structure I-C and Structure I-D, R⁷ is substituted or uusubstituted alkyl or substituted or unsubstituted aiyi. Also io Structure I-C and Structure I-D, Y is O or NR⁸, wherein R⁸ is hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl, or substituted or unsubstituted aryl.

The alky! can be a straight-chain alkyl or a branched-ehain alkyi. In some cases, the straight-chain alkyi can be a Ci-Cie alkyl (e.g., a C2-C17 alkyl or a C3 - Cis alkyl). Examples of suitable alkyi groups include methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyL decyl, undecyl, dcdecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl. hexadecyl, heptadecyl, or octadecyl. In some cases the oligopeptide is L-lacta†e-D-alamne-L-glutamine-hexadecyl ester, also referred to herein as L-lactate-D-alanme-L-ghitamine painiityl ester (Lactate-DiPeptide-Palmityl ester. LDPP) or as hexadecyl (2S)-5-amino-2-[[(2R)-2-[[(2S)-2- hydroxypropanoyl]amino]propanoyl]amino]-5-oxo-pentanoate.

Optionally the aryl group includes a phenyl group. Optionally, the aryl group can include additional fused rings, for example, naphthalene, anthracene, and pyrene. The and and heteroaryl groups can be attached at any position on the ring, unless otherwise noted.

The alkyl and aryl groups used herein can be substituted or unsubstituted. As used herein, the term substituted includes the addition of a functional group to a position attached to the main chain of the alkyl or aryl group, e.g , the replacement of a hydrogen by one of these molecules. Examples of substitution groups include, but are not limited to, hydroxy, halogen (e.g., F, Br, Cl, or I), and carboxyl groups. Conversely, as used herein, the term misubstituted indicates the alkyl or aryl group has a full complement of hydrogens i .e., commensurate with its saturation level, with no substitutions, e.g., linear hexadecyl (-(CEE/is-CH:,).

II. Methods of Making the Compounds

The compounds described herein can be prepared in a var iety of ways. The compounds can be synthesized using various synthetic methods. At least some of these methods are known in the art of synthetic organic chemistry. The compounds described herein can be prepared from readily available starting materials. Optimum reaction conditions may vary with the particular reactants or solvents used, hut such conditions can be determined by one skilled in the art.

Variations on Formula I an the compounds described herein include the addition, subtraction, or movement of the various constituents as described for each compound. Similarly, when one or more chiral centers are present in a molecule, all possible chiral variants are included. Additionally, compound synthesis can involve the protection and deprotection of various chemical groups. The use of protection and deprotection, and the selection of appropriate protecting groups can be determined by one skilled in the art. The chemistry of protecting groups can be found for example, in Writs, Greene^’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 5th. Ed., Wiley & Sons, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Reactions to produce the compounds described herein can be carried out in solvents, which can be selected by one of ordinary skill in the art of organic synthesis. Solvents can be substantially nonreactive with the starting materials (reactants), the intermediates, or products under the conditions at which the reactions are carried out, i.e., temperature and pressure. Reactions can be earned out in one solvent or a mixture of more than one solvent. Product or intermediate formation can be monitored according to any suitable method known in the art. For example, product formation can be monitored by spectroscopic means, such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (e.g., ⁵H-NMR or ⁱ³C-NMR), infrared spectroscopy (IR), spectrophotometry (e.g., UV-visible), or mass spectrometry (MS), or by chromatography such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or thin layer chromatography (TLC).

Exemplary methods for synthesizing compounds as described herein are provided in Example 1 below, depicting the synthesis of LDPP by way of example.

III. Formulations

Also described herein are compositions including a compound of Formula I as described herein (e.g., at least one oligopeptide analog of MDP) and a carrier. Optionally, the composition includes L-laciate-D-alanine-L-glutamine pa miyl ester (LDPP) and a earner. hi some cases, the composition includes a compound of Formula I as described herein, such as, for example, LDPP, and animal feed. Any suitable animal feed can be used, including animal feed that includes one or more of maize, sorghum wheat, bar ley , oats, soybean meal, fish meal, and/or whey. Optionally, the compound of Formula I can be included in the composition in an amount of from about 0.01 mg/kg to 5 mg/^'kg (e.g., 0.05 mg/kg to 4.5 mg kg, 0.1 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg to 3.5 mg/^'kg, or 0.2 mg/kg to 3 mg/kg). In some examples, the compound of Formula I, such as LDPP, can be included in a composition including animal feed in an amount of 0.01 mg/kg, 0.05 mg/kg, 0.1 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg. 0.2 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg. 0.35 mg/kg. 0.4 mg/kg, 0.45 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg. 0.55 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg, 0.65 mg/kg, 0.7 mg/kg, 0.75 mg/kg, 0.8 mg/kg, 0.85 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg, 0.95 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/^'kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2.0 mgkg, 2.5 mg/kg. 3.0 mg/kg, 3.5 mgkg, 4.0 lng/kg. 4.5 mg/kg, or 5.0 mg/kg. The animal feed composition can further include additives used in animal diets, including enzymes probiotics, prebiotics, antioxidants, antibiotic growth promoters, and coloring agents.

The compositions described herein may be suitable for oral, parenteral, inhalation spray, topical, rectal, nasal buccal vaginal, or implanted reservoir administration. The term parenteral as used herein includes subcutaneous, intradermal, intravenous, intramuscular, intra-articular, intra-synovial, intrasiemal, intrathecal, intrahepatic, intralesional and intracranial injection or infusion techniques. Optionally, the compositions described herein can administered orally, topically, intranasally, intravenously, subcutaneously, iiitradermally, transdermally, intramucosally, intramuscularly, by inhalation spray, rectally, nasally, sublingually, buccally. vagmaily or via an implanted reservoir.

The compounds described herein or derivatives thereof can be provided in a pharmaceutical composition. In some cases, the compositions are pharmaceutical compositions that include a compound of Formula I and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier . Depending on the intended mode of administration, the pharmaceutical composition can be in the form of solid, semi-solid or liquid dosage forms, such as, for example, tablets, suppositories, pills, capsules, powders, liquids, or suspensions, preferably in unit dosage form suitable for single administration of a precise dosage. The compositions will include a therapeutically effective amount of the compound described herein or derivatives thereof in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable earner and, in addition, may include other medicinal agents, pharmaceutical agents, carriers, or diluents. By pharmaceutically acceptable is meant a material that is not biologically or otherwise undesirable, which can be administered to an individual along with the selected compound without causing unacceptable biological effects or interacting in a deleterious maimer with the other components of the pharmaceutical composition in which it is contained.

The compositions can include one or more of the compounds described herein and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. As used herein, the term carrier encompasses any excipient diluent, filler, salt, buffer, stabilizer, solubilizer, lipid, stabilizer, or other material well known in the art for use in pharmaceutical formulations. The choice of a carrier for use in a composition will depend upon the intended route of administration for the composition. The preparation of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and formulations containing these materials is described in, e.g., Remington: The Science end Practice of Pharmacy, Adeboye Adejare ed., 23rd Ed., Academic Press (2021). Examples of physiologically acceptable carriers include buffers, such as phosphate buffers, citrate buffer; and buffers with other organic acids; antioxidants including ascorbic acid; low molecular weight (less than about 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins; hydr ophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, asparagine, arginine or lysine; monosaccharides, disaccharides an other carbohydrates, including glucose, mannose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugar alcohols, such as mannitol or sorbitol; salt forming counterions, such as sodium: and^'or nonionic surfactants, such as TWEEN® (IQ. Inc.; Bridgewater, New Jersey), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and PLE'RGNICS™ (BASF; Florham Park, NJ).

Compositions containing the compound described herein or derivatives thereof suitable for parenteral injection may comprise physiologically acceptable sterile aqueous or nonaqueous solutions, dispersions, suspensions or emulsions, and sterile powders for reconstitution into sterile injectable solutions or dispersions. Examples of suitable aqueous and nonaqueous carriers, diluents, solvents or vehicles include water, ethanol, polyols (propyleneglycol, polyethyienegiycoL glycerol, and the like), suitable mixtures thereof, vegetable oils (such as olive oil) and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of a coating such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersions and by the use of surfactants.

These compositions may also contain adjuvants, such as preserving, wetting, emulsifying, and dispensing agents. Prevention of the action of microorganisms can be promoted by various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, parabens. chlorobiitanol, phenol, sorbic acid, and the like. Isotonic agents for example, sugars, sodium chloride, and the like may also be included. Prolonged absorption of the injectable pharmaceutical form can be brought about by the use of agents delaying absorption, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

Solid dosage forms for oral administration of the compounds described herein or derivatives thereof include capsules, tablets, pills, powders, and granules hi such solid dosage forms, the compounds described herein or derivatives thereof is admixed with at least one inert customary excipient (or carrier) such as sodium citrate or dicalcium phosphate, or (a) fillers or extenders, as for example, starches, lactose sucrose, glucose, mannitol, and silicic acid (b) binders, as for example, earboxymethylceliulose, alginate, gelatin, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sucrose, and acacia, (c) humeetants, as for example, glycerol, (d) disintegrating agents as for example, agar-agar, calcium carbonate, potato or tapioca starch, alginie acid, certain complex silicates, and sodium carbonate, (e) solution retarders, as for example, paraffin, (f) absorption accelerators, as for example, quaternary ammonium compounds, (g) wetting agents, as for example, cetyl alcohol, and glycerol monostearate, (h) adsorbents as for example, kaolin and bentonite, and (i) lubricants as for example, talc, calcium stearate magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, sodium !aury! sulfate, or mixtures thereof. In the case of capsules tablets, and pills, the dosage forms may also comprise buffering agents.

Solid compositions of a similar type may also be employed as fillers in soft and hard- filled gelatin capsules using such excipients as lactose or milk sugar as well as high molecular weight polyethyleneglycols, and the like.

Solid dosage forms such as tablets, dragees, capsules, pills, and granules can be prepared with coatings and shells, such as enteric coatings and others known in the art. They may contain opacifying agents and can also be of such composition that they release the active compound or compounds in a certain part of the intestinal tract in a delayed manner. Examples of embedding compositions that can be used are polymeric substances and waxes. The active compounds can also be in micro-encapsulated form, if appropriate, with one or more of the above-men tioned excipient .

Liquid dosage forms for oral or intravenous administration of the compounds described herein or derivatives thereof include pharmaceutically acceptable emulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups, and elixirs in addition to the active compounds, the liquid dosage forms may contain inert diluents commonly use in the art, such as water or other solvents, solubilizing agents, and emulsifiers, as for example, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl carbonate, ethyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, propyleneglycol, 1 ,3-butyleneglycol, dimethyifomiamide, oils, in particular, cottonseed oil, groundnut oil, com germ oil, olive oil, castor oil, sesame oil, glycerol, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol, polyethylenegiyeols, and fatty acid esters of sorbitan, or mixtures of these substances, and the like.

Besides such inert diluents, the composition can also include additional agents, such as wetting, emulsifying, suspending, sweetening, flavoring, or perfuming agents. Suspensions, in addition to the active compounds, may contain additional agents, as for example, ethoxyiated isosteaiyl alcohols, polyoxyethylene sorbitol and sorbitan esters, mierocrystaliine cellulose, aluminum metahydroxide, bentonite, agar-agar and tragacanth, or mixtures of these substances, and the like.

As described above, the one or more compounds described herein can be provided with a nebulizer, which is an instrument that generates very fine liquid particles of substantially uniform size in a gas. The liquid containing the one or more compounds described herein can be dispersed as droplets about 5 mm or less in diameter in the form of a mist. The small droplets can be earned by a current of ah or oxygen through an outlet tube of the nebulizer. The resulting mist can penetrate into the respiratory tact of the patient.

Additional inhalants useful for delivery of the compounds described herein include intra-oral sprays, mists, metered dose inhalers, and dry powder generators (See Gonda, J. Pharm. Sci. 89:940-945, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, at least, for inhalation delivery methods taught therein). For example, a powder composition containing the one or more compounds as described herein, with or without a lubricant, earner, or propellant, can be administered to a patient. The delivery of the one or more compounds in powder form can be carried out with a conventional device for administering a powder pharmaceutical composition by inhalation.

Compositions of the compounds described herein or derivatives thereof for rectal administrations are optionally suppositories, which can be prepared by mixing the compounds with suitable non-irritating excipients or carriers, such as cocoa butter, polyethyleneglycol or a suppository wax, which are solid at ordinary temperatures but liquid at body temperature and, therefore, melt in the rectum or vaginal cavity an release the active component.

Dosage forms for topical administration of the compounds described herein or derivatives thereof include ointments, powders, sprays, and inhalants. The compounds describe herein or derivatives thereof are admixed under sterile conditions with a physiologically acceptable carrier and any preservatives buffers, or propellants as may be required. Ophthalmic formulations, ointments, powders, and solutions are also contemplate as being within the scope of the compositions.

As noted above, the compositions can include one or more of the compounds described herein or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof As use herein, the term pharmaceutically acceptable salt refers to those salts of the compound described herein or derivatives thereof that are, within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contact with the tissues of subjects without undue toxicity, irritation, allergic response, and the like, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio, and effective for their intended use, as well as the zwitterionic forms, where possible, of the compounds described herein. The term salts refers to the relatively non-toxic, inorganic and organic acid addition salts of the compounds described herein. These salts can be prepared in situ during the isolation and purification of the compounds or by separately reacting the purified compound in its free base form with a suitable organic or inorganic acid and isolating the salt thus formed. Representative salts include the hydrobromide, hydrochloride, sulfate, bisulfate, nitrate, acetate, oxalate, valerate, oleate. palmitate, stearate, laurate, borate, benzoate, lactate, phosphate, tosylate, citrate, maleate, fumaraie, succinate, tartrate, iiaphthyiate mesylate, glucoheptonate, lactobionate, methane sulphonate, and laurylsulphonate salts, and the like. These may include cations based on the alkali and alkaline earth metals, such as sodium, lithium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and the like, as well as non-toxic ammonium, quaternary ammonium, and amine cations including, but not limited to ammonium, tetrametkyiammommii, teiraetliylammoiiium, methylamine, dimetliylamine, trimeihylamine, triethylamine, eihylamme, and the like. (See S.M. Barge et ah, J. Phami. Sci. (1977) 66, 1, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, at least, for compositions taught therein.

Administration of the compounds and compositions described herein or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof can be earned out using therapeutically effective amounts of the compounds and compositions described herein or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof as describe herein for periods of time effective to treat a disorder. The effective amount of the compounds and compositions described herein or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof as describe herein may be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art and includes exemplary administrations for an animal or human at a dose that delivers the active compound to the subject in an amount between about 0.01 x (BW/20)¹'⁴ pg and 10,000 x BW/20)³⁴ pg per day, wherein BW is the body weight of the subject in grams. This amount may be administered in a single dose or in the form of individual divided doses, such as from 1 to 4 times per day. Those of skill in the art will understand that the specific dose level and frequency of dosage for any particular subject may be varied and will depend upon a variety of factors, including the activity of the specific compound employed, the metabolic stability and length of action of that compound, the species, age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the subject, the mode and time of administration, rate of excretion, drag combination, and severity of the particular condition.

The precise dose to be employed in the formulation will also depend on the route of administration, an the seriousness of the disease or disorder, and should be decided according to the judgment of the practitioner and each subject’s circumstances. Effective doses can be extrapolated from dose-response curves derived from in vitro or animal model test systems. Further, depending on the route of administration, one of skill in the art would know how to determine doses that result in a plasma concentration for a desired level of response in the cells, tissues and/or organs of a subject.

IV. Methods of Use

Provided herein are methods that include administering to a subject an effective amount of one or more of the compounds or pharmaceutical compositions described herein, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The expression "effective amount,” when used to describe an amount of compound in a method, refers to the amount of a compound that achieves the desir ed pharmacological effect or other effect, for example, an amount that results in enhanced growth or feed conversion.

Methods for promoting growth in an animal are provided herein, along with methods for enhancing feed conversion in an animal. The methods comprise administering a compound or composition as described herein to the animal The administration can enhance the growth of the animal and/or enhance the feed conversion of the animal as compar ed to a control (an animal not administered a compound or composition as described herein).

The compounds and compositions described herein or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof are useful for tr eating and/or preventing a disease or condition associated with intestinal inflammation. As such, provided herein are methods for reducing intestinal inflammation in a human comprising administering a composition as described herein (e.g. , a pharmaceutical composition as described herein) to a human having intestinal inflammation, wherein the administration reduces the intestinal inflammation. Optionally, the human has or is at risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or a bacterial infection (such as Clostridium difficile infection). The methods can bather include selecting a human having a disease or condition associated with intestinal inflammation (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn’s disease ulcerative colitis, or a bacterial infection).

The methods described herein are useful for treating the diseases and conditions described herein in humans including without limitation, pediatric and geriatric populations and in animals, e.g., veterinary application.

V. Kits

Also provided herein are kits for promoting growth in an animal are provided herein, along witli methods for enhancing feed conversion in an animal. A kit ca include any of the compounds or compositions described herein. For example, a kit can include a compound of Formula I. A kit can further include one or more additional agents, such as animal feed and/or animal feed supplements. A kit can include an oral formulation of any of the compounds or compositions described herein. A kit can additionally include directions for use of the kit (e.g., instructions for treating a subject), a container, a means for administering the compounds or compositions, and/or a carrier.

Also provided herein are kits for treating or preventing a disease or condition associated with intestinal inflammation in a subject. A kit can include any of the compounds or compositions described herein . For example, a kit can include a eompomid of Formula I. A kit can further include one or more additional agents, such as anti-inflammatory agents. A kit can include an oral formulation of any of the compounds or compositions described herein. A kit can additionally include directions for use of the kit (e.g., instructions for treating a subject), a container a means for administering the compounds or compositions, and/or a earner.

As used herein the terms treatment, treat, or treating refer to a metho of reducing one or more symptoms of a disease or condition. Thus in the disclosed method treatment can refer to a 10%. 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% reduction in the severity of one or more symptoms of the disease or condition. For example, a method for treating a disease is considered to he a treatment if there is a 10% reduction in one or more symptoms or signs of the disease in a subject as compared to a control. As used herein, control refers to the untreated condition. Thus the reduction can be a 10%. 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%_s or any percent reduction in between 10% and 100% as compared to native or control levels. It is understood that treatment does not necessarily refer to a cure or complete ablation of the disease, condition, or symptoms of the disease or condition.

As used herein, the terms prevent, preventing, and prevention of a disease or disorder refer to an action, for example, administration of a composition or therapeutic agent, that occurs before or at about the same time a subject begins to show one or more symptoms of the disease or disorder , which inhibits or delays onset or severity of one or more symptoms of the disease or disorder.

As used herein, references to decreasing, reducing, or inhibiting include a change of 10%, 20%. 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or greater as compared to a control level. Such terms can include, but do not necessarily include, complete elimination.

As used throughout, by subject is meant an individual . Preferably, the subject is a mammal such as a primate, and, more preferably, a human. Non-humau primates are subjects as well. The term subject includes domesticated animals, such as cats, dogs, etc., livestock (for example, cattle, horses, pigs, sheep, goats, etc.}, fanned birds (chickens, turkeys, pigeons, geese, etc.), and laboratory animals (for example, ferret, chinchilla, mouse, rabbit, rat, gerbil, guinea pig, etc.). Thus, veterinary uses and medical formulations are contemplated herein. Non-human subjects are also referred to as animals in this disclosure.

Throughout this application, various publications are referenced. The disclosures of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application.

The following examples will serve to further illustrate the present invention without, at the same time, however, constituting any limitation thereof. On the contrary, it is to be clearly understood that resort may be had to various embodiments, modifications and equivalents thereof which, after reading the description herein; may suggest themselves to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Synthesis of L-lactaie-D-alanme-L-glulamme palmityl ester (LDPP)

L-iaciate-D-aiamne-L-glutamine palmityl ester (LDPP) was synthesized according to the method detailed below, and depicted in Figure 1.

The hexadecyl ester of tert-butyloxycarbonyl (BGC) L-glutamine was prepared in step a by esterification reaction of BOC-glutamine (1) with 1-hexadecanol (2) in tetrahydrofuran, in the presence of dicyclohexyl earbodiimide, to yield hexadecyl BQC-L-glutamme (3 . The BOC protecting group was removed in step b by treatment of intermediate (3) dissolved in methylene chloride with hydrogen chloride gas to yield the hydrochloride salt of hexadecyl L-gkitamine (4). Intermediate (4) was dissolved in N,N-dimeihylformamide, N,N-diisoprOpyletliylamine was added followed by BOC D-alanine (5) and the coupling agent benzotriazole- 1 - yloxytris(pyrrolidmo)phosplionium hexafluorophosphate (PyBOP), to yield in step c the BOC- proteeted hexadecyl dipeptide 6. Intermediate 6 was purified by column chromatography and the BOC group was remove in step d by treatment of the product with hydrogen chloride gas to yield hexadecyl dipeptide 2- To intermediate (7) dissolved in N,N-dimethyiformamide in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine and 2-( lif-benzotriazol- 1 -yl)-l ,1.3,3- tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (Hexafluorophosphate Benzotriazole Tetramethyl Uronium, HBTU), lithhim L-lactate (8) was added, and step e yielded the final product L-iaciate- D-aianine-L-glutamine hexadecyl ester (9). The white L-lactate-D-alanine-L-glutanime palmityl ester with a MW of 513.72 g/rnol was greater than 98% pure, as determined by ⁱH-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance analysis.

Example 2: Impact of LDPP on Growth Rate and Fee Conversion in Chickens

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate if supplementation of feed with L- lactate-D-alarmie-L-gluiainme palmityl ester (LDPP) at 0.2 mg/kg feed increases the growth rate and/or improves the feed conversion in broiler chickens, i.e., if it promotes growt by making broiler chickens grow faster and or require less feed for the same amount of gain in body weight. A secondary objective was to compare the effect of LDPP to that of bacitracin, an industry- standard growth promoting antibiotic.

Experimental Design

Freshly hatched female Ross 708 broiler chickens were housed for as single flock for 21 days on a floor pen with used bedding. All chickens received crumbled untreated standard Aviagen 708 starter and grower feeds dur ing this time, with 80% recommended crude protein and without anti-eoceidial supplement. After 3 weeks the chickens were grouped into 38 replicate floor pens of 25 chickens with fresh bedding. Chickens were fed for 24 days from day 21 through termination on day 44 standard crumbled finisher Aviagen 708 finisher feed with 100% protein and 0.0125% arnprohum anti-eoccidial inclusion. Fee and water were available ad libitum throughout the trial. Thirteen pens each were assigned to untreated controls (feed without supplement) and LDPP-treaiment (0.2 mg LDPP/kg feed), and 12 pens were assigned to bacitracin treatment (50 nig bacitraein/^'kg feed). The experimental unit was the pen rather than individual chickens. Pen weights of chickens were determined on day 21 and 44. Finisher feed uptake was be recorded, and on day 44 residual feed was determined, and the experiment was terminated.

Statistical Analyses

For constant time analyses of the complete 24-day duration of the feeding experiment the overall (true) feed conversion for each treatment group was determined by dividing total consumed feed by total weight gains of all pens of each treatment group.

For constant body weight gain analyses, the time on feed of the bacitracin and LDPP treated groups was modeled to match the weight gain of the untreated control group. Based on the closely matching body weights and weight gains of standard female Ross 70S broilers, body weight gains per chicken on the last day 44 of the experiment were calculated as the 0.04781 fraction of pen body weight gain day 21 -44/ surviving chickens per pen . The mean body weight gain of each treatment group was adjusted to the control mean by iteratively subtracting the same fractions of the calculated day 44 body weight gain of ail pens of a treatment until a single fractional day was found that produced a weight ga i matching with the control group.

Similarly, feed consumption per chicken on day 44 was calculated as the 0.05867 fraction of pen feed uptake day 21-44/survivmg chickens per pen. Mean feed uptake per treatment group was then calculated by subtracting the previously found fractional daily feed uptake from each pen.

Body weight gain and feed consumption data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey Honest True Difference correction for multiple comparisons. Group differences in feed conversion rates were evaluated from pen FCR data by non-parameiric Maim Whitney U test. Results and Conclusions

LDPP, supplemented at 0.2 mg/^'kg feed significantly improves the growth rate of broiler chickens by increasing the weight gain of LDPP-treated chickens by 4.4% to 1,725 g as compared to the 1 ,653 g weight gain of untreated control chickens. This resulted in highly significant, nearly a day more rapid growth of the LDPP-treated chickens as compared to the controls (23.13 vs 24 days). The feed conversion rate of LDPP-treated versus untreated chickens is improved at constant time from 1.818 to 1.805, and more strongly by 1.7% to 1.787 at constant body weight gam. The growth promoting effect ofLDPP is significantly stronger than that of bacitracin, an industry-standard growth promoting antibiotic, which showed a significantly higher feed conversion rate of 1.827 at constant body weight gain. The results are shown in Figure 2.

Example 3: Impact of LDPP on Growth Rate and Feed Conversion in Pigs

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate if supplementation of feed with L- lactate-D-alanine-L-glutamme palmityl ester (LDPP) at 0.2 mg/kg feed increases the growth rate and/or improves the feed conversion in freshly weaned nursery pigs.

Experimental Design

Male pigs (barrows) were used in this study. Pigs were weane at approximately 3 weeks of age transferred to the nursery, and randomly allotted to 24 nursery pens with 4 pigs per pen. One of 2 dietary treatments, untreated controls (feed without supplement) or LDPP- ireaimeni (0.2 mg LDPP/kg feed), was assigned to each pen, such that 12 pens of 4 pigs were used to evaluate the effect of each diet. Premixes of the treatment compounds were added at 0.1% to mixed diets, which were then pelleted. Phase 1 diet was fed at 6 lb/pig from day 0 to approximately day 8 post-weaning. On day 8 post-weaning, pigs were switched to 12 Ib/pig Phase 2 diet which expired approximately on day 18. Once the Phase 2 diet had been consumed, pigs were switched to Phase 3 diet and maintained until termination of the study on day 42. No antibiotics were added to any diet. Diets were formulated to meet or exceed all the nutrient requirements based on the 2012 NRC specifications. Pigs received diets and water ad libitum. Pigs were weighed individually on days 0 and 42 of the experiment. Feed intake per pen was monitored for the weigh period. Although individual pig weights were obtained, the pen was the experimental unit. On day 42, the study was terminated and untreated pigs were retained in the food chain while the treatment pigs were euthanized.

Statistical Analyses

Pen data were converted into individual pig data by dividing by the number of pigs.

For three pens in which pigs were euthanized, a time-fractional pig number was used. Body weight gain and calculated feed consumption data were analyzed by pairwise T-test. The overall (true) feed conversion for each treatment was determined by dividing total consumed feed by total weight gains of all pens of each treatment. Treatment differences in feed conversion were statistically evaluated by non-parameiric Maun Whitney U test of pen feed conversion data. For constant body weight gain analyses, the time on feed of the LDPP treated group was modeled to match the weight gain of the untreated control group. Daily body weights and weight gains were modeled by linear interpolation between weights on days 0 and 42. The mean body weight gain of the LDPP treatment group was adjusted to the control mean by subtracting the calculated day 42 and 41 body weight gains, and then iteratively subtracting the same fractions of the calculated day 40 body weight gain of all pens of the LDPP treatment until a single fractional day was found that produced a weight gam matching with the control group. From interpolated daily body weight data, daily feed consumption was first calculated as 5% of body weight. The sum of these daily feed uptakes was then divided by the actual weighed feed uptake of each pen, and daily feed uptakes were multiplied by this fr action to arrive at the precise weighed feed uptake per pen. These calculated daily feed uptakes were used to calculate feed uptake by changed times on feed for the LDPP treatment group. Mean feed uptake of the LDPP treatment group was then calculated by subtracting for each pen the previously found day 42 and 41 and the fractional day 40 teed uptake.

Body weight gain and feed consumption data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student’s T-test. Differences in feed conversion rates were evaluated from pen FCR data by lion-parametric Mann Whitney U test.

Results and Conclusions

LDPP, supplemented at 0.2 mg/kg feed, significantly improves the growth rate of nursery pigs by increasing the weight gain of LDPP-treated pigs by 7.9 % to 23.826 kg as compared to the 22.076 kg weight gain of untreated nursery pigs. This resulted in highly significant, 2.1 days more rapid growth of the LDPP-treated pigs as compared to the controls (39.921 vs 42 days). The feed conversion rate of LDPP-treated versus untreated pigs is improved by 3.8% at constant time from 1.479 to 1.423, and more strongly by 5.5% to 1.396 at constant body weight gain. The results are shown in Figure 3.

All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

REFERENCES

1. MacDonald, C., N. Xnohara, G. Nunez. 2005. Peptidogiyean signaling in innate immunity and inflammatory disease. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 20177-20180.

2. atanabe, T., N. Asano, P. J. Murray, K. Ozato, P. Tailor, I. J. Fuss, A. Kitani, W. Strober. 2008. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 118: 545-559. 3. Watanabe, T., N. Asano, G. Meng, K. Yamashita, Y. Arai, T. Sakurai, I. 3. Fuss, A.

Kitani, T. Shomosegawa, T. Chiba, W. Strober. 2014. Mucosal Immunology 7: 1312- 1325.

4. Strober. W. 2013. Use of muramyi dipeptide (MDP) for treating inflammation. US Patent US 8,603,978 B2.

5. Paranf M. A.. F. M. Audibert, L. A. Chedid, M. R. Level, P. L. Lefrancier, J. P. Choay,

E. Lederer. 1980. Infection and Immunity 27: 826-831.

6. Matsnmoto, K., T. Otani. T. Line, Y. Osada, H. Ogawa, I. Azuma. 1983. Stimulation of nonspecific resistance to infection induced by mnramyl dipeptide analogs substituted in the g-earboxyl group and evaluation of A^¾-muramyl dipeptide-A^-stearoyl!ysine. Infection and Immunity 39: 1029-1040.

7. Fogler, W. E., R. Wade, D. E. Bmdmsh, 1. 1. Fidler. 1985. Distribution and fate of tree and liposome-encapsulated [3H]nor-muramyl dipeptide and [3H]muramyl tripeptide pliosphaiidylethimolamme in mice. Journal of Immunology 135: 1372-1377.

8. Fidler, 1. 1., W. E. Fogler, A. F. Brownbill, G. Schumann. 1987. Systemic activation of tumoricidal properties in mouse macrophages and inhibition of melanoma nietastases by then oral administration of MTP-PE, a lipophilic mm a yi dipeptide. Journal of Immunology 138: 4509-4514.

9. Irby, D., C. Du, F. Li. 2017. Lipid-drug conjugate for enhancing drug delivery. Molecular Pharmaceutics 14: 1325-1338.

10. Gobec, M., I. Mlinarie-Rascan, M. Solhier Dolenc. Z. Jakopin. 2016. Structural requirements of acylated Gly-L-Ala-D-Glu analogs for activation of the innate immune receptor NOD2. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 116: 1-12.

11. Penney, €., Z. Boulos. 1999. Novel lipophilic oligopeptides with inimunomodulating activity'. European Patent EP 0635 026 B l.

12. Nalle, H. D., B. Kaltenboeck. 2017. Methods to promote growth and improve feed conversion in animals. Patent Application PCT/US2017/038790.

13. Sidweil, R. W., D. F. Smee, 3. H. Huffman, K. W. Bailey, R. P Warren, R A. Burger. C. L. Penney. 1995. Antiviral activity of an immunomodulatory lipophilic desmu amyl dipeptide analog. Antiviral Research 26: 145-159. 14. Zhou, N., Z. Luo. J. Luo, X. Fan, M. Cayabyab, M. Hiraoka, D. Liu, X. Han, J.

Pesavento, C.-Z. Dong, Y. Wang, J. An, H. Kaji, J. G. Sodroski, Z. Huang. 2002. Exploring the stereochemistry of €XCR4-peptide recognition and inhibiting HIV-1 entry with D-peptides derived from diemokines. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 17476-17485.

15. Jeanloz, R. W., A. Veyrieres. 1970. Amino sugars. LV. Absolute configuration of the carboxyethyl (lactyl) side chain of muramic acid[2-amino-3-0-(D- 1 -carboxyethyl)-2- deoxy-D-glucose]. Biochemistry 9: 4153-4159.

16. van Mee , G., D. R. Voelker, G. W. Feigenson. 2008. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 9: 112- 124.

17. Spector, A. A., M. A. Yorek. 1985. Membrane lipid composition and cellular function. Journal of Lipid Research 26: 1015-1035.

18. Hatfield, J. M., R. A. Umaiis, I. L. Hyatt, C. E. Edwards, M. WierdL L. Tsurfcan, M. R. Taylor, P. M. Potter. 2016. Carboxylesierases : general detoxifying enzymes. Chemico- Biological Interactions 259: 327-331.

While one or more example embodiments have been described with reference to the figures, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein w ithout departing from the spirit and scope of the inventi ve concept as defined by the following claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. An oligopeptide of the following formula: or a pharmaceutically acceptable acid or salt thereof wherein:

R^J is substituted or imsuhstituted alkyl or substituted or misubstituted aryl;

R², R³, R⁴, and R³ are each independently selected from H, substituted or imsuhstituted alkyl and substituted or misubstituted aryl: aud

X is O or NR⁶, wherein R⁶ is hydrogen, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl, or substituted or imsuhstituted aryl.

2. The oligopeptide of claim 1, wherein X is O.

3. The oligopeptide of claim 1, wherein ⁵ is Ci-Cis linear alkyl or an amino acid.

4. The oligopeptide of claim 1, wherein the oligopeptide has the following structure:

5 The oligopeptide of claim 1, wherein the oligopeptide has the following structure: wherein R⁷ is substituted or uusubstituted alkyl or substituted or unsubstituted aryl: and

Y is O or NR⁸, wherein R⁸ is hydrogen, substituted or uusubstituted alkyl, or substituted or uusubstituted aryl.

6. The oligopeptide of claim 1 , wherein the oligopeptide is --lactate-D-aiamne-L-glutamine- hexadecyl ester.

7. A pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one oligopeptide of any of claims 1-6 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

8. A composition comprising at least one oligopeptide of any of claims 1-6 and animal feed.

9. The composition of claim 8, wherein the at least one oligopeptide is present in the composition in an amount of from about 0.01 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg.

10. The composition of claim 8 or 9, wherein the composition further comprises an additive used in an animal diet.

11. The composition of claim 10, wherein the additive comprises an enzyme, a probiotic, a prebiotic, an antioxidant, an antibiotic growth promoter, a coloring agent, or a combination thereof.

12. A method for reducing intestinal inflammation in a human, comprising: administering the pharmaceutical composition of claim 7 to a human having intestinal inflammation, wherein the administration reduces the intestinal inflammation.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising selecting a human having a disease or condition associate with intestinal inflammation.

14. The method of claim 13. wherein the disease or condition associated with intestinal inflammation comprises inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or a bacterial infection.

15. A method for promoting growth in an animal, comprising: administering the oligopeptide of any of claims 1-6 to an animal, wherein the administration enhances the growth of the animal.

16. A method for promoting growth in an animal, comprising: administering the composition of any of claims 8-11 to an animal wherein the administration enhances the growth of the animal.

17. A method for enhancing feed conversion hi an animal, comprising: administering the oligopeptide of any of claims 1-6 to an animal, wherein the administration enhances the feed conversion of the animal.

18. A method for enhancing feed conversion hi an animal, comprising: administering the c omposition of any of claims 8-11 to an animal, wherein the administration enhances the feed conversion in the animal