EP3887847A1 - Système et procédé permettant de localiser un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote - Google Patents

Système et procédé permettant de localiser un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote

Info

Publication number
EP3887847A1
EP3887847A1 EP19880407.2A EP19880407A EP3887847A1 EP 3887847 A1 EP3887847 A1 EP 3887847A1 EP 19880407 A EP19880407 A EP 19880407A EP 3887847 A1 EP3887847 A1 EP 3887847A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
subsea
unmanned vehicle
reference unit
acoustic
location
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP19880407.2A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3887847A4 (fr
Inventor
Arnaud Croux
Yohann ROIRON
Arnaud Jarrot
Denis BIRYUKOV
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
OneSubsea IP UK Ltd
Original Assignee
OneSubsea IP UK Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by OneSubsea IP UK Ltd filed Critical OneSubsea IP UK Ltd
Publication of EP3887847A1 publication Critical patent/EP3887847A1/fr
Publication of EP3887847A4 publication Critical patent/EP3887847A4/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/04—Control of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/06—Rate of change of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/0692—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for under-water vehicles
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S5/00—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
    • G01S5/18—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using ultrasonic, sonic, or infrasonic waves
    • G01S5/28—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using ultrasonic, sonic, or infrasonic waves by co-ordinating position lines of different shape, e.g. hyperbolic, circular, elliptical or radial
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
    • B63G8/00—Underwater vessels, e.g. submarines; Equipment specially adapted therefor
    • B63G8/001—Underwater vessels adapted for special purposes, e.g. unmanned underwater vessels; Equipment specially adapted therefor, e.g. docking stations
    • B63G2008/002—Underwater vessels adapted for special purposes, e.g. unmanned underwater vessels; Equipment specially adapted therefor, e.g. docking stations unmanned
    • B63G2008/005—Underwater vessels adapted for special purposes, e.g. unmanned underwater vessels; Equipment specially adapted therefor, e.g. docking stations unmanned remotely controlled

Definitions

  • This application relates to localizing a subsea unmanned vehicle, and, more particularly, to a system and method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • IMR offshore infrastructure Inspection, Maintenance and Repair
  • BOP blow out preventer“BOP” and riser monitoring
  • IMR oil and gas industry
  • BOP blow out preventer“BOP” and riser monitoring
  • IMR include pipe inspection, manifold and subsea trees inspection and repair.
  • Other fields such as oceanographic surveys, underwater fiber optics telecom cables or offshore wind turbines inspections may also benefit from this technology.
  • the floating infrastructure may be of different type such as, but not limited to, a ship, a floating rig, a floating production storage and offloading (“FPSO”), an unmanned surface autonomous vehicle.
  • the floating infrastructure can be used to launch the at least one underwater vehicle and/or control the operations and recover the at least one underwater vehicle.
  • ROVs Remote Operated Vehicles
  • the ROVs may be highly maneuverable with, for example, up to 6 degrees of freedom.
  • ROVs typically are tethered in order to receive power and high-bandwidth telemetry.
  • deployment of the tether can be expensive and complex due to the associated ship infrastructure and due to the management of the entanglement risks.
  • the ROV operators usually deploy multiple ROVs to manage the tether risks.
  • Un-tethered vehicles have mainly been developed for long range missions with“torpedo-shape” vehicle, usually called Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (“AUV”).
  • AUV Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
  • the AUVs have a limited number of degrees of freedom, which results in the AUVs not being able to hover.
  • a subsea unmanned vehicular localization system may include a subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • the subsea unmanned vehicle may include at least three receiver elements.
  • the subsea unmanned vehicle may also include a multi-channel data acquisition tool.
  • the multi-channel data acquisition tool may be configured to synchronize one or more signals associated with a plurality of channels.
  • the subsea unmanned vehicle may also include a processing module.
  • the processing module may be configured to estimate a location of the subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • the at least three receiver elements may be configured to receive one or more acoustic signals transmitted via an acoustic transmitter located on a stationary reference unit.
  • the at least three receiver elements may be configured to receive one or more acoustic signals transmitted via an acoustic transmitter located on a moving reference unit.
  • the subsea unmanned vehicle may be configured to transmit the estimated location of the subsea unmanned vehicle to a reference unit via a communication link.
  • the estimated location may be transmitted via a communication link using one or more existing telemetry infrastructures.
  • the subsea unmanned vehicle may include a navigation system.
  • a method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include receiving one or more acoustic signals on a subsea unmanned vehicle from an acoustic transmitter located on a reference unit.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include estimating a location of the subsea unmanned vehicle using the received one or more acoustic signals.
  • the estimated location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may be used to adapt one or more behaviors of the subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • One or more obstructions in a path of the one or more acoustic signals, transmitted, via an acoustic transmitter located on the reference unit, to the subsea unmanned vehicle may be detected and accounted for.
  • Estimating the location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may include calculating one or more broad angles using the one or more acoustic signals.
  • Estimating the location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may include calculating a depth of the subsea unmanned vehicular system using the one or more calculated broad angles.
  • the one or more calculated broad angles may be defined by the direction of the subsea unmanned vehicle relative to the reference unit.
  • Estimating the location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may include calculating a time of travel between the time the one or more acoustic signals are sent from the acoustic transmitter located on the reference unit and the time the one or more acoustic signals are received by the subsea unmanned vehicular system.
  • the estimated location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may be transmitted to the reference unit via a communication link.
  • the subsea unmanned vehicle and reference unit may both include a clock. Each of the clocks may be configured to be synchronized with one another.
  • a method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include receiving, via an acoustic transmitter located on a reference unit, one or more acoustic signals on a subsea unmanned vehicular system.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include calculating one or more broad angles using the one or more acoustic signals.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include calculating a sound velocity profile using the one or more acoustic signals.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include estimating a location of the subsea unmanned vehicular system using the calculated broad angles and calculated sound velocity profile.
  • One or more behaviors of the subsea unmanned vehicular system may be altered using the calculated sound velocity profile.
  • the estimated location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may be used to adapt one or more behaviors of the subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • One or more obstructions in a path of the one or more acoustic signals, transmitted, via an acoustic transmitter located on the reference unit, to the subsea unmanned vehicle may be detected and accounted for.
  • the estimated location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may be transmitted to the reference unit via a communication link.
  • the estimated location may be transmitted via a communication link using one or more existing telemetry infrastructures.
  • the reference unit may be a ship.
  • the reference unit may be a piece of subsea equipment.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram depicting an embodiment of a system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 2 is diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
  • FIG 3. is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization method in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 1 1 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 12 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram a of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 17 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 19 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 20 is a diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 21 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 22 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure
  • FIG. 23 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • FIG. 24 is a block diagram of a subsea unmanned vehicle localization system in accordance with the present disclosure.
  • first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms may be used to distinguish one element from another.
  • a first object or step could be termed a second object or step, and, similarly, a second object or step could be termed a first object or step, without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
  • the first object or step, and the second object or step are both objects or steps, respectively, but they are not to be considered a same object or step.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be located within a subsea unmanned vehicle (e.g., subsea unmanned vehicle 302). Further, subsea unmanned vehicle localization process may reside on and may be executed by computer 12, which may be connected to network 14 (e.g., the Internet or a local area network). Examples of computer 12 may include, but are not limited to: a personal computer, a server computer, a series of server computers, a mini computer, and a mainframe computer.
  • Computer 12 may be a web server (or a series of servers) running a network operating system, examples of which may include but are not limited to: ANDROIDTM, iOSTM, Microsoft® Windows® Server; Novell® NetWare®; or Red Hat® Linux®, for example.
  • a network operating system examples of which may include but are not limited to: ANDROIDTM, iOSTM, Microsoft® Windows® Server; Novell® NetWare®; or Red Hat® Linux®, for example.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may reside on and be executed, in whole or in part, by a client electronic device, such as a personal computer, notebook computer, personal digital assistant, or the like.
  • Storage device 16 may include various types of memory systems. For example, but not limited to, storage device 16 may include: a hard disk drive; a solid state drive, a tape drive; an optical drive; a RAD array; a random access memory (RAM); a read-only memory (ROM). Storage device 16 may include various types of files and file types.
  • Computer 12 may execute a web server application, examples of which may include but are not limited to: Microsoft IIS, Novell WebserverTM, or Apache® Webserver, that allows for HTTP (e.g., HyperText Transfer Protocol) access to computer 12 via network 14
  • Webserver is a trademark of Novell Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both
  • Apache is a registered trademark of Apache Software Foundation in the United States, other countries, or both
  • Network 14 may be connected to one or more secondary networks (e.g., network 18), examples of which may include but are not limited to: a local area network; a wide area network; or an intranet, for example.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be a stand-alone application, or may be an applet / application / script that may interact with and/or be executed within application 20.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be a client-side process (not shown) that may reside on a client electronic device (described below) and may interact with a client application (e.g., one or more of client applications 22, 24, 26, 28).
  • client application e.g., one or more of client applications 22, 24, 26, 28
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be a hybrid server-side / client-side process that may interact with application 20 and a client application (e.g., one or more of client applications 22, 24, 26, 28).
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may reside, in whole, or in part, on computer 12 and/or one or more client electronic devices.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 and/or application 20 may be independent web applications accessible via the Internet.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 and/or application 20 may be executable applications within a web page or web site accessible via the Internet.
  • the instruction sets and subroutines of application 20, which may be stored on storage device 16 coupled to computer 12 may be executed by one or more processors (not shown) and one or more memory modules (not shown) incorporated into computer 12.
  • Storage devices 30, 32, 34, 36 may include but are not limited to: hard disk drives; solid state drives, tape drives; optical drives; RAID arrays; random access memories (RAM); read only memories (ROM), compact flash (CF) storage devices, secure digital (SD) storage devices, and memory stick storage devices.
  • client electronic devices 38, 40, 42, 44 may include, but are not limited to, personal computer 38, laptop computer 40, mobile computing device 42 (such as a smart phone, netbook, or the like), notebook computer 44, for example.
  • client applications 22, 24, 26, 28, users 46, 48, 50, 52 may access application 20 and may allow users to e.g., utilize subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • Users 46, 48, 50, 52 may access application 20 directly through the device on which the client application (e.g., client applications 22, 24, 26, 28) is executed, namely client electronic devices 38, 40, 42, 44, for example. Users 46, 48, 50, 52 may access application 20 directly through network 14 or through secondary network 18. Further, computer 12 (e.g., the computer that executes application 20) may be connected to network 14 through secondary network 18, as illustrated with phantom link line 54.
  • client application e.g., client applications 22, 24, 26, 28
  • client electronic devices 38, 40, 42, 44 for example.
  • Users 46, 48, 50, 52 may access application 20 directly through network 14 or through secondary network 18.
  • computer 12 e.g., the computer that executes application 20
  • the various client electronic devices may be directly or indirectly coupled to network 14 (or network 18).
  • personal computer 38 is shown directly coupled to network 14 via a hardwired network connection.
  • notebook computer 44 is shown directly coupled to network 18 via a hardwired network connection.
  • Laptop computer 40 is shown wirelessly coupled to network 14 via wireless communication channel 56 established between laptop computer 40 and wireless access point (e.g., WAP) 58, which is shown directly coupled to network 14.
  • WAP 58 may be, for example, an IEEE 802.1 la, 802.1 lb, 802.1 lg, Wi-Fi, and/or Bluetooth device that is capable of establishing wireless communication channel 56 between laptop computer 40 and WAP 58.
  • Mobile computing device 42 is shown wirelessly coupled to network 14 via wireless communication channel 60 established between mobile computing device 42 and cellular network / bridge 62, which is shown directly coupled to network 14.
  • IEEE 802.1 lx specifications may use Ethernet protocol and carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (e.g., CSMA/CA) for path sharing.
  • the various 802.1 lx specifications may use phase-shift keying (e.g., PSK) modulation or complementary code keying (e.g., CCK) modulation, for example.
  • PSK phase-shift keying
  • CCK complementary code keying
  • Bluetooth is a telecommunications industry specification that allows e.g., mobile phones, computers, and personal digital assistants to be interconnected using a short-range wireless connection.
  • Client electronic devices 38, 40, 42, 44 may each execute an operating system, examples of which may include but are not limited to Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Windows CE®, Red Hat Linux, or other suitable operating system.
  • Microsoft Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both).
  • the term“localization” refers to the positioning of an object in a local reference.
  • the local reference may be associated with a reference unit.
  • the term positioning refers to global positioning using an earth based referential.
  • the terms“position” and“location” used in this disclosure are intended to be synonymous.
  • a mission of the underwater vehicle refers to a set of actions of the vehicle to achieve some objectives.
  • a typical mission may include, for example and not to be construed as a limitation, a dive, some inspection of subsea equipment and a surface.
  • a mission may be, for example and not to be construed as a limitation, a set of actions.
  • the present disclosure utilizes acoustic signals for illustration purposes and, therefore, the present disclosure should not be understood to be limited only to the use of acoustic signals.
  • SMS Short BaseLine
  • USBL USBL
  • a relative location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may be obtained with a combination of a measured distance from the ship to the subsea unmanned vehicle and the estimation of broad angles between the ship and the subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • the distance may be estimated using a two-way travel time.
  • the broad angles may be estimated by exploiting one or more delays of arrival of one or more acoustic waves in between one or more elements of the array.
  • SBL and Long Base Line may rely on the one or more delays of time of arrival of the one or more acoustic waves sent from the underwater vehicle.
  • the estimation may be impacted by one or more of noise and reflections.
  • the estimation may be intrinsically limited by a bandwidth of the a signal.
  • a Gabor limit may provide a lowest error bound on a timing estimate for a given bandwidth, as illustrated in Equation 1 below with regards to a lower bound of a timing error:
  • SBL and LBL may poses great calibration challenges due to calculating broad angles being sensitive to errors on a location of the array elements.
  • the USBL may rely on a phase shift on the elements of the array of one of the one or more acoustic signals sent from a subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • the distance between one or more sensors may be lower than half a wavelength.
  • the phase shifts may depend on a frequency. Therefore, the signal may need to be decomposed using a Fourier Transform, especially for wideband signals.
  • the noted techniques may be sensitive to multipath, which may lead to some complexity. Specifically, multipath may occur where an acoustic signal takes one or more paths from an acoustic transmitter to an acoustic receiver and the path includes one or more impedances.
  • the path may include impedances such as between one or more of water and air, water and seabed, and water and a metallic structure.
  • an acoustic receiver may acquire multiple version of an acoustic signal with one or more of different time delays, different amplitudes and different doppler characteristics.
  • the array of receiver elements of SBL and USBL may be highly integrated on the ship, which may pose challenges such as, for example, the needing to correct calculated broad angles estimate using the orientation of the ship. For example, for two kilometers apart of the ship and the subsea unmanned vehicle, a location estimate within 10 meters of accuracy may require a broad angle estimate within 0.1 degree of accuracy. As a result, a motion composition of the boat is critical. Therefore, expensive INS may be coupled to the positioning system. Further, acoustic noise on the ship may be high (e.g., propellers, AC, operations on the boat, etc.), and is often higher than the acoustic noise around the underwater vehicle.
  • acoustic noise on the ship may be high (e.g., propellers, AC, operations on the boat, etc.), and is often higher than the acoustic noise around the underwater vehicle.
  • USBL and SBL may be used on ships that have been designed to support such technology. For example, hulls may be used that are calibrated for particular array design. As a result, SBL and USBL may not be able to be used on a“ship of opportunity.” Additionally, the estimated location of a subsea unmanned vehicle typically requires an active acoustic transmitter on the subsea unmanned vehicle. Further, an array of transducers typically is based on a reference unit itself rather than on a subsea unmanned vehicle. An example of SBL and USBL is illustrated in FIG. 2 where SBL is denoted as 202 and USBL is denoted at 204.
  • a subsea unmanned vehicular localization system is provided, as illustrated in FIG. 3.
  • the system may include subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may include receiver array 304.
  • Receiver array 304 may include at least three receiver elements.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may also include a multi-channel data acquisition tool.
  • the multi-channel data acquisition tool may be configured to synchronize one or more signals associated with a plurality of channels.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may also include a processing module.
  • the processing module may be configured to estimate a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be configured to receive one or more acoustic signals 310 from an acoustic transmitter 308 located on a reference unit 306 through an acoustic propagation path.
  • Reference unit 306 is denoted as a ship in FIG. 2, which is for illustration purposes and is not to be construed as to limit reference unit 306 only to a ship.
  • a plurality of instruments may provide an estimate of the location.
  • the plurality of instruments may use a wide range of physics principles. However, each of the plurality of instruments have benefits and limitations. Therefore, a successful location estimate lies in the combination of the right instruments for each scenario.
  • the plurality of instruments may include a plurality of positioning instruments, which may include a pressure gauge onboard the subsea unmanned vehicle, which may provide an image of depth when a water density profile is known.
  • a pressure sensor may be used to provide a measure of depth, giving important information for estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • a lock may be used with the pressure sensor 402, as illustrated in FIG. 4. Further, FIG. 4 illustrates travel time of two-way 404 and one-way 406 propagation of one or more acoustic signals 310.
  • a Doppler Velocity Log may also be included, which may provide a local altitude of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the DVL may provide a velocity of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relative to a seafloor.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 must be relatively close in proximity to a seabed.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be less than 50 meters from the seabed.
  • An Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) may also be included.
  • the IMU may be made of one or more of the following: one or more accelerometers (motion sensors), one or more gyroscopes (rotation sensors), and one or more magnetometers (magnetic sensors).
  • the IMU may provide direct measurement of an orientation of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. For example, yaw, pitch, and roll measurements may be provided.
  • the location may be calculated using dead reckoning, which may include double integration of the acceleration. However, drift may occur. Further, displacement due to water current may not be able to be accurately estimated by the IMU.
  • Simultaneous Localization And Mapping may be include.
  • SLAM may be based on feature recognition. As a result, SLAM may provide a location relative to one or more features of an environment.
  • one or more acoustic baselines may provide a location estimate relative to a location of one or more acoustic transmitters 308.
  • the one or more acoustic baselines may include one or more of SBL, Ultra Short BaseLine (USBL), or LBL.
  • SBL may include deploying multiple receiver elements on a surface of one or more infrastructures such as, for example, a boat including an inter-element distance of a few meters.
  • USBL an array of receiver elements may be deployed on a surface infrastructure, such as, for example and not to be construed as a limitation, a boat, with an inter-element distance of less than 10 centimeters.
  • LBL may include deploying multiple acoustic transmitters. The multiple acoustic transmitters may be deployed far apart from one another. For example, the multiple acoustic transmitters may be deployed at least 100 meters apart from one another.
  • a sensor fusion may be used.
  • the sensor fusion may include a combination of measurements to compute the most likely location estimate of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • sensor fusion may be done on a vehicle using a Bayesian filter.
  • the Bayesian filter may be a Kalman filter, an extended Kalman filter, or particle filter.
  • the filter may often be designed to operate based on IMU data by default. Other measurements may aid in order to compensate for the drift.
  • the filter and the IMU together are denoted as Inertial Navigation System (INS).
  • INS Inertial Navigation System
  • the configuration of subsea unmanned vehicular localization system 10 may be denoted as utilizing inverted Short BaseLine (“iSBL”).
  • iSBL may use one or more passive acoustic array receivers on subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the one or more passive acoustic array receivers may be onboard subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the one or more passive acoustic array receivers may not need to transmit one or more acoustic signals to reference unit 306 (i.e., a ship).
  • reference unit 306 i.e., a ship.
  • “inverted” refers to the one or more passive acoustic array receivers being located on subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may meet one or more technological requirements.
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may need to meet one or more sufficient sensitivity requirement for a required bandwidth.
  • the sufficient sensitivity may be in the range of 20kHz and 80kHz. In this example, flatness of the a response may not be a major constraint.
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may need to meet sufficient dynamics to cover all operating envelope. This may be in terms of signal amplitude.
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may need to meet sufficient Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) ratio requirements. For example, for each of the at least three receiver elements, self-noise may be low compared to the lowest expected signal on a required bandwidth.
  • SNR Signal to Noise Ratio
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may need to meet a specific beam pattern.
  • the beam pattern may be driven by a cone of an expected location of reference unit 306 relative to subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may have a form factor which satisfies one or more mechanical constraints. Further, each of the at least three receiver elements may meet a required depth capability.
  • one or more omnidirectional hydrophones or transducers may be included.
  • one or more directive hydrophones or transducers may be included, or a combination thereof.
  • one or more baffled hydrophones or transducers may be included, or a combination thereof, may help to avoid noise and multi-path from the directions where the reference unit is not expected.
  • a computing solution meeting the needs of computation power and memory may potentially be used.
  • some applications may require a dedicated computing device for subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • other applications may use existing processing capability available on the subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • one or more Graphical Processing Units (GPUs), one or more Central Processing Units (CPUs), one or more Digital Signal Processing (DSP) processors, and one or more Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) may provide interesting benefits to the subsea unmanned vehicle.
  • multi-processor architecture may be useful to adapt power consumption depending on the computation need.
  • each of the at least three receiver elements may generate one or more electrical signals.
  • one or more hydrophones present i.e., hydrophone 1 502, hydrophone 2 504...hydrophone N 506 may each generate one or more electrical signals.
  • the electrical signals may be amplified.
  • one or more of the hydrophones present may be pre-amplified 508.
  • each of the one or more electric signals may be an image of an acoustic pressure field perceived by each of the at least three receiver elements.
  • the one or more electric signals may then be passed 510 as analog signals to be digitized using a typical Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) solution 512. Further, one or more of the now digitized signals may be streamed 514 to a computing unit 516 which may be used for signal processing and estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • ADC Analog to Digital Converter
  • a computing unit 516 which may be used for signal processing and estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • a decentralized acquisition module may be used.
  • one or more hydrophones present i.e., hydrophone 1 602, hydrophone 2 604...hydrophone N 606 may each generate one or more electrical signals.
  • Acquisition module 608 may be used on each of the one or more electrical signals.
  • the one or more electrical signals may be digitized and passed 610 to a network hub 612 generated by each of the present hydrophones.
  • pre-amplification and digitization of the one or more electrical signals generated by each of the at least three receiver elements may be done in situ (i.e., as close as possible to the each of the at least three receiver elements).
  • one or more analog signals may be less polluted by background electro-magnetic noise.
  • the digital signals may then be streamed on network hub 612 in order to allow for a computing unit to process the one or more signals.
  • the digital signals may then be passed 614 to computer 616, which is used for estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the digital signals may be properly synchronized using one or more relevant techniques, including: (1) Network Timing Protocol (NTP), which may shares an absolute in a network of nodes; (2) correcting one or more local clocks using Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO); and (3) encoding each clock in a data stream, which may enable numerical resampling by a computing unit.
  • NTP Network Timing Protocol
  • VCO Voltage Controlled Oscillator
  • a centralized clock may be included in network hub 612.
  • one or more of the hydrophones may be a clock master.
  • Clock synchronization may be achieved by distributing an identical clock signal among network of network hub 612.
  • clock synchronization may be achieved by sharing a network time information such as NTP and applying a time correction in one or more of units that need to be time-synchronized.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 and reference unit 306 may both include a clock where the clock of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 and the clock of reference unit 306 are configured to be synchronized with one another.
  • the at least three receiver elements may be configured to receive one or more acoustic signals 310 transmitted via acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306, where reference unit 306 may be stationary.
  • the one or more acoustic signals 310 may be a broadband acoustic signal.
  • reference unit 306 may be a ship.
  • reference unit 306 may be a piece of subsea equipment (i.e., a Christmas Tree).
  • the at least three receiver elements may be configured to receive one or more acoustic signals 310 transmitted via an acoustic transmitter located on reference unit 306, where reference unit 306 may be moving.
  • reference unit 306 may be a moving vehicle such as a ship.
  • reference unit 302 may have a known initial location.
  • reference unit 302 may be a surface vessel equipped with a global positioning system (GPS).
  • GPS global positioning system
  • acoustic transmitter 308 may be deployed below the ship itself.
  • acoustic transmitter 308 may be a piece of underwater equipment.
  • acoustic transmitter 308 may be attached to an underwater structure, in which a location of the underwater structure has been measured.
  • a global location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be estimated using localization of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relative to reference unit 306.
  • an initial location of reference unit 302 may not be known. Because a global location is unknown, only a relative location of the subsea unmanned vehicle may be computed.
  • acoustic transmitter 308 may be attached to a Christmas Tree in a subsea production oilfield where subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be equipped to estimate a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 as described in accordance with the above embodiments.
  • acoustic transmitter 308 may be configured to transmit one or more acoustic signals 310 underwater.
  • an acoustic modem may be used as acoustic transmitter 308.
  • An alternative solution is to use a fit for purpose acoustic transmitter, which may transmit acoustic signals with a specific beam pattern. Therefore, the acoustic transmitter must be configured to provide a high enough bandwidth and able to systematically transmit a“known” portion. As a result, using a higher bandwidth, one or more delays can be better estimated using the Gabor limit as illustrated above in equation 1. Further, better localization results may be provided.
  • localizing subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relative to reference unit 306 may be defined in a referential centered on reference unit 306, north oriented.
  • the parameters of the localization may be defined in spherical coordinates by one or more of: (1) a distance between subsea unmanned vehicle 302 and reference unit 306; and (2) one or more broad angles, as illustrated in FIG. 7. (i.e., azimuth and elevation).
  • one-way acoustic propagation may be sufficient to estimate the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the computation of the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relatively with reference unit 306 may be done by detecting one or more acoustic signals 310 transmitted by acoustic transmitter 308.
  • the localization may be calculated by combining one or more of one or more estimated localization angles and a distance between reference unit 306 and subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • one or more localization angles may be estimated from the one or more acoustic signals 310 received by receiver array 304.
  • the technique to detect an incoming acoustic signal may include either: (1) a frame detection algorithm, which may be based on one or more one or more correlation computations; and (2) assuming that acoustic transmitter 308 is time-synchronized with receiver array 304 where scheduling of an acoustic signal transmission may be shared or agreed by reference unit 306 and receiver array 304. Further, a distance between reference unit 306 and subsea underwater vehicle 302 may be estimated by calculating the time of acoustic propagation of the one or more acoustic signals 310 transmitted from reference unit 306 to subsea unmanned vehicle 302, assuming one or more clocks are synchronized. For example, an atomic clock may be a suitable solution.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be configured to transmit the estimated location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 to reference unit 306 via a communication link.
  • receiver array 304 may include at least three receiver elements.
  • the at least three receiver elements may be hydrophones.
  • the hydrophones may be located anywhere on subsea unmanned vehicle 302 where one or more acoustic signals 310 transmitted by acoustic transmitter 308 on reference unit 306 can be received.
  • the location may be estimated by combining one or more of time of arrivals of the received one or more acoustic packets, which contain the one or more acoustic signals 310, on each of the at least three receiver elements of receiver array 304 from the one or more signals transmitted by acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306.
  • the one or more acoustic packets may include one or more acoustic signals transmitted by acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306.
  • Equation 2 below shows angular measured error dq depending on an acoustic wave celerity c, time of arrival St error and sensor array baseline d.
  • USBL are designed to be low footprint and to be contained in a single mechanical part.
  • the inter element distance may be of the order of few centimeters.
  • the algorithms based on time delay estimations may not be good enough.
  • Other algorithms based on phase drift can replace or complement the time delay algorithms.
  • those techniques have limitations, including one or more of: (1) higher sensitivity to multi-path; (2) if phase drift is higher than PI, then there may be one or more phase ambiguities, which may occur when acoustic propagation covers more than half a wavelength between two array elements; (3) may not be optimal for broadband signals; and (4) there may be higher complexity due to frequency decomposition.
  • using an array having one or more inter-element distances of the order of one meter may lead to better precision by using one or more time delay estimations.
  • the at least three receiver elements may be hydrophones.
  • the hydrophones may be attached individually to subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 is a support structure itself, which provides more flexibility on sensor integration of the at least three receiver elements.
  • An example of configuration is illustrated in FIG. 9.
  • six hydrophones 902 may be attached to a top portion of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Cables and the processing module may be located inside subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Alternatively, the cables and the processing module may be located outside of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may include receiving 1002 one or more acoustic signals 310 on subsea unmanned vehicle 302 from an acoustic transmitter located on a reference unit.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include estimating 1004 a location of the subsea unmanned vehicle using the received one or more acoustic signals 310.
  • estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may include calculating one or more broad angles using the one or more acoustic signals 310.
  • estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may include calculating a depth of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 using the one or more calculated broad angles.
  • one or more broad angles may be calculated for use in estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the one or more broad angles may be defined by a direction of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relative to reference unit 306. For example, this may be understood as a line of sight.
  • the one or more broad angles may be characterized by one or more of azimuth and elevation, as illustrated by“az” and“el” in FIG. 7. Further, there may be a bijection relationship between the line of sight direction with an acoustic direction of arrival of the one or more acoustic signals 310. This relationship must also be known.
  • the line of sight and acoustic arrival direction of the one or more acoustic signals 310 may be considered equal. However, the two directions may differ due to wave diffraction because of sound velocity gradient. If so, a correction may be applied using one or more calibration methods, as discussed in greater detail below.
  • the above scenario may be valid in an open-water scenario where channels may not be very“horizontal.”
  • a wave-guide such as a SOFAR channel may be created and the relationship between line of sight and acoustic arrival directions of the one or more acoustic signals 310 may be too complex and may not be bij ective.
  • the above conditions may not be true.
  • a first acoustic signal received from the one or more acoustic signals 310 arrival may be from propagation in the metallic pipe rather than the propagation in open-water field, which may bias the results.
  • one or more broad angles may be calculated by measuring one or more times of arrival of one or more acoustic packets on each of the array elements.
  • estimating a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may comprise calculating a time of travel between the time the one or more acoustic signals 310 are transmitted from acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306 and the time the one or more acoustic signals 310 are received by subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the one or more times of arrival may be estimated on each of the at least three receiver elements.
  • the one or more broad angles may be estimated.
  • the estimated time of arrival of the one or more acoustic signals 310 does not need to be an absolute time. Further, a fixed offset on the estimated times of arrival of the one or more acoustic signals 310 may not preclude calculating the one or more broad angles.
  • the estimated time of arrival may refer to the first acoustic arrival. In case of multipath, the following arrivals may be rejected using signal processing techniques.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates this embodiment of the present disclosure where a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be estimated in multiple steps.
  • acoustic to digital 1102 is the acquisition step aiming at providing data that can be processed by a digital computer.
  • This may include one or more of multichannel synchronous acquisition, scaling, and conversion to float, while providing all data in buffers in real time.
  • a centralized acquisition module as depicted in FIG. 5, may be used.
  • the module may include an acquisition of six channels at 192kHz, 24bits, performed on a unique board for synchronization purposes and sent by a TCP stream to an embedded computing unit.
  • feature search 1104 works to look for a piece of a signal that can be recognized on all channels. The length of this piece of signal may vary depending on the application and the expected signal.
  • This example may further include looking for a known preamble of one or acoustic packets from the one or more acoustic signals 310 as a feature using a match filter, with a length of few milliseconds.
  • the concept of preamble for a telemetry is illustrated in FIG. 12 and will be described in more detail below.
  • “P” denotes the one or more preambles.
  • other techniques may be used including one or more of SNR increase detection, self-correlation of a channel, and intercorrelation of multiple channel. Additionally, under high doppler condition, cross-correlation with a preamble may be weak. A solution may be to run multiple cross correlations in parallel on a set of reference signals.
  • This set of reference signals may be obtained by applying one or more expected clock drifts on an initial preamble. For example, instead of running a simple cross-correlation on a preamble P, subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may run five cross-correlation on the transformed preambles of P by clock drifts of -1000 ppm, -500 ppm, 0 ppm, +500 ppm and +1000 ppm. As a result, if the Doppler generate a clock drift of -600ppm, the second cross-correlation may show a high coefficient and the packet may be detected. When a signal of interest has been found, time delay estimation 1 106 may provide the information required for calculating one or more broad angles.
  • It may include measuring relative times of arrival of the one or more acoustic signals 310 on each of the at least three receiver elements.
  • the times may be relative because they may all be offset by a same fixed value.
  • This step may require excellent synchronization between multiple channels, which may include two examples of implementation.
  • processing data might be based on a match-filter between reference signals the multiple channels.
  • several design options may be selected, including one or more of the following: (1) a maximal value of the match-filter output may provide the time of arrival; (2) a first high peak of the match- filter output may be preferred to select to make sure a direct path arrival is selected instead of one or more reflected paths; and (3) up sampling may help to increase temporal resolution of the time estimation.
  • one or more theoretical delays of all channels may be computed. If the theoretical delays are applied to the multiple channels, all channels should match. As a result, an energy function may be defined as a cross product of the delayed channels, where the delays may be a function of a search space of direction of arrival. Moreover, as a signal may be altered on the multiple channels due to baffling, local multipath, a confidence index may be added to delay estimation per channel. This may occur, for example, using a match filter amplitude to avoid outliers.
  • one or more broad angles may be calculated 1108. The broad angles computation aims at inverting the problem known as source localization. Because the problem is non-linear, a numerical optimization may be preferred.
  • spherical wave propagation may be considered. Acoustic channel studies have shown that this is valid for channels that are not too horizontal. Second, approximation of a plane wave may be assumed, meaning an incoming direction is independent from the location of a sensor. Third, an improved version of the plane wave may be considered by considering one or more correction factors related to a timing offset due to the spherical propagation. This may be necessary in case a ratio of inter-element spacing over a reference unit to a subsea unmanned vehicle is not small. Broad angles calculation 1 108 may take as input the relative time delays per channel and output the computed one or more broad angles, an image of the position of reference unit 306.
  • broad angles calculation 1 108 may include a confidence index if available.
  • position computation 1 110 may include correcting the computed one or more broad angles (azimuth and elevation) with respect to an orientation of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 (yaw, pitch and roll) to obtain a local estimation of reference unit’s 306 direction. The distance may then be computed.
  • Position calculation 1110 may also integrate a Bayesian filter, which may be similar to a particle filter, to avoid bad measurements and add a confidence index to the value, by using the fact that a position function is continuous in time.
  • a location estimated by position calculation 1 110 may suffer from one or more of the following imperfections. First, an update rate of the location estimate might be low. For example, the update rate may be a few minutes.
  • This resolution may be too low for one or more algorithms onboard subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the autonomy behavior may require a better time resolution than few minutes.
  • one or more location updates may be erroneous due to one or more of noise, doppler, and failure of the system (i.e., hardware or software). The errors may have a disastrous impact on one or more external algorithms, such as, for example, autonomy software.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may include navigation system 1306, as illustrated in FIG. 13. Further, the location calculated in position calculation 1110 may be provided as feedback to navigation system 1306 in feedback to navigation system step 1112. Further, for greater performance, an output from subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be coupled with navigation system 1306, which is a more comprehensive software that may utilize one or more heterogeneous and asynchronous input sources.
  • the objective of navigation system 1306 is to maximize the certainty of the location estimate.
  • navigation system 1306 may take inputs such as, for example, IMU, pressure measurement, DVL.
  • the calculated one or more broad angles may be estimates.
  • the estimates may be associated with a certainty factor, given by subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • a certainty factor may be an image of a variance of the estimation of a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the one or more calculated broad angles may be defined by the direction of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relative to reference unit 306. [0089] In one embodiment, if one or more obstructions are in a path of the one or more acoustic signals 310, transmitted, via acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306, to subsea unmanned vehicle 302, the one or more obstructions may be detected and accounted for.
  • reference unit 306 may be stationary, as illustrated in FIG. 13.
  • a global location of reference unit 306 may be known by subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • Acoustic transmitter 308 may be located on reference unit 306.
  • Acoustic transmitter 308 may take one or more of the following forms: (1) a boat; (2) an underwater structure; and (3) another underwater vehicle.
  • Acoustic transmitter 308 may be a“fit for purpose” acoustic transmitter where the one or more acoustic packets may be sent when a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 needs to be updated.
  • acoustic transmitter 308 may also be an acoustic modem that transmits one or more acoustic packets containing information during a mission.
  • the one or more acoustic signals 310 may be directed to Rx array 1302.
  • One or more images of the one or more acoustic signals 10 received by each of the at least three receiver elements may be generated by Rx array 1302 and may in turn be used to estimate one or more broad angles 1304.
  • the estimated one or more broad angles may be directed to navigation system 1306.
  • Navigation system 1306 may take into account one or more of IMU, DVL, and one or more pressures.
  • a relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be estimated.
  • the estimation may include one or more uncertainties.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may output the calculated one or more broad angles between subsea unmanned vehicle 302 and reference unit 306.
  • a global location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be computed by using an instantaneous approach, as illustrated in FIG. 14.
  • Relative Position Calculation 1402 may calculate a relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Further, the calculated one or more broad angles (elevation and azimuth) may first be corrected by an orientation of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. For example, this may include one or more of a yaw, pitch and roll. Further, a measurement reflecting a distance between reference unit 306 and subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be included in Equation 2, as shown below, to calculate the relative position/location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 where the term“dist” represent“distance”:
  • the convention P , Q is used to define the absolute location n.
  • P gives the location of the reference point on a structure and Q defines an orientation.
  • the orientation may be specified by one or more of yaw, pitch and roll.
  • the absolute location may be calculated by applying a coordinate change in coordinate update 1404.
  • Coordinate update may depend on the coordinate system reference of use.
  • WSS84 World Geodetic System
  • P may be defined by longitude[°], latitude[°] and altitude[m].
  • Coordinate update 1404 may require one or more mathematical transformations.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may use this coordinate system in navigation system 1306.
  • Coordinate update 1404 is a sum of the relative location with an absolute location of reference unit 306.
  • An instantaneous location may be valid if all measurements are taken at the same time. Further, each measurement is valid at the time of measurement only, which poses one or more of the following challenges. First, one issue occurs if the measurements are not taken at the same time. For example, this may occur if the output of subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 is not synchronized with the IMU measurement. Second, one or more users may need an estimated location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 at a different time than the exact measurement time.
  • the one or more users may be the autonomy software of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • there may be an issue of noise in one or more of the measurements which raises an issue of trustworthiness as to whether a most recent location estimate or one or more previous measurements should be trusted.
  • a Navigation System algorithm based on a Bayesian approach, such as Kalman filtering may be used.
  • navigation system 1306 may include one or more of a notion of time and a notion of distributions (i.e., Probability Density Functions (PDF)) of one or more variables.
  • PDF Probability Density Functions
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may leverage a high-level control of one or more movements of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • One or more movements of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be coordinated in order to enhance subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • the one or more coordinated movements may be used to calibrate one or more locations and timing offsets of the at least three receiver elements.
  • FIG. 15 illustrates a signal flow path with a moving reference unit having no transmission of a location of reference unit 306 to subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • an initial location of reference unit 306 is unknown.
  • One or more acoustic signals 310 may be directed to Rx array 1302.
  • One or more images of the one or more acoustic signals 310 received by each of the at least three receiver elements may be generated by Rx array 1302 and may in turn be used to estimate one or more broad angles 1304. The estimated one or more broad angles may be directed to navigation system 1306.
  • Navigation system 1306 may take into account one or more of IMU, DVL, and one or more pressures.
  • acoustic telemetry i.e. acoustic transmitter 308
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may only compute a location relative to reference unit 306.
  • a model of reference unit 306 may be considered. This may include taking one of several options. First, in a stationary approach, it may be assumed that reference unit 306 does not move fast compared to the update rate of subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10. This may apply well to one or more fixed structures such as a subsea infrastructure (e.g., a manifold).
  • a priori model approach may be used where behavior of reference unit 306 may follow a model that can be loaded on subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the model may specify the route of reference unit 306 over time.
  • a machine learning approach may be used where subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may learn on the fly how a relative location is related to an absolute measurement data given by the IMU and DVL. This may lead to a relationship between the absolute measurement data such as IMU and DVL with the relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Further, if an uplink telemetry exists from subsea unmanned vehicle 302 to reference unit 306, then the relative location may be communicated to reference unit 306.
  • reference unit 306 may use this relative location to make one or more decisions. For example, reference unit 306 may elect to follow subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Based on one or more updated relative location estimates, reference unit 306 may adapt one or more of it its navigation modes to follow subsea unmanned vehicle 302. [0093] In some embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure, the estimated location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be used to adapt one or more behaviors of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • an embodiment of subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 is shown.
  • an initial location of reference unit 306 is known by subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • acoustic telemetry may be included.
  • telemetry modem 1604 may be included.
  • Acoustic telemetry 1604 may be used to transmit information in between reference unit 306 and subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • the acoustic telemetry may be used to transmit an absolute location of reference unit 306. If reference unit 306 is a floating platform such as, for example, a ship, then a radio GNSS may be reliable enough to obtain the absolute location of reference unit 306.
  • reference unit 306 is another underwater vehicle, then the absolute location may come from another navigation system.
  • the transmitted absolute location of reference unit 306 it is possible to derive the absolute location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 from the relative location of the subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • both the absolute location of the ship and the relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may suffer from one or more errors related to noise, bias, low update rate, and latency in the communication link. Therefore, optimal processing or algorithm may involve one or more of asynchronous and heterogeneous measurements that consider both a belief that propagation of the one or more acoustic signals 310 and one or more time dynamics aspects.
  • navigation system 1306 may be included having both models of reference unit 306 and subsea unmanned vehicle 302. This approach may be based on a Bayesian approach such as, for example, a Kalman filter. Further, as FIG. 16 illustrates, one or more acoustic signals 310 may be directed to one or more of Rx array 1302. One or more images of the one or more acoustic signals 10 received by each of the at least three receiver elements may be generated by Rx array 1302 and may in turn be used to estimate one or more broad angles 1304. The estimated one or more broad angles may be directed to navigation system 1306. Navigation system 1306 may take into account one or more of IMU, DVL, and one or more pressures.
  • the estimated one or more broad angles may be directed to navigation system 1306 along with the one or more acoustic signals 310 that may be passed to telemetry modem 1604.
  • the absolute location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be estimated.
  • the estimation may include one or more uncertainties.
  • reference unit 306 may be a floating structure where the location of acoustic transmitter 308 is expected to oscillate due to waves and heaves. Further, depending on the specific GPS technology, accuracy from 1 to 10 meters may be expected.
  • an INS may be implemented on reference unit 306 to filter the noise of the GPS and to achieve better accuracy with the aid of the IMU.
  • an exact location of acoustic transmitter 308 may be encoded systemically in one or more acoustic telemetry packets containing the one or more acoustic signals 310 that are transmitted from reference unit 306 to subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • a confidence index of the location may be associated with location of acoustic transmitter 308.
  • the confidence index may include a variance of one or more parameters of one or more locations of acoustic transmitter 308. For example, if a location of acoustic transmitter 308 is transmitted every minute, with a wave amplitude of 3 meters and a wave periodicity of 10 seconds, the standard deviation of the altitude of acoustic transmitter 308 location may be in the range of few meters.
  • This confidence index may be used by navigation system 1306 of subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • a location of acoustic transmitter 308 may be low-pass filtered in order to remove high frequency components.
  • the high frequency components may be removed due to the low telemetry rate associated with the high frequency components.
  • a relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 with reference unit 306 may be calculated by subsea unmanned vehicle 302, regardless of whether or not there is telemetry or if existing telemetry is not working properly. Therefore, one or more behaviors of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be adapted. Advantages of this configuration include the following examples. First, autonomy behavior of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be related to the relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 with reference unit 306. As mentioned above, an example of autonomy behavior includes“follow me” behavior where subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may follow reference unit 306. The “follow-me” behavior may be implemented with one or more specificities.
  • the one or more specificities may include one or more of a required space offset, a required depth, and a required altitude or a maximal/minimal speed.
  • a more complex example includes searching for a specific underwater feature such as, for example, one or more of a pipe, an equipment, a leak, etc., while remaining in a defined space relative to reference unit 306.
  • telemetry performance may depend significantly on the relative location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 with reference unit 306. Therefore, signal amplitude may be related to distance, via one or more of spreading and absorption losses. To guarantee a minimum SNR, subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may want to remain at a certain distance from reference unit 306.
  • the required distance may also depend on other factors including one or more of noise level and one or more absorption parameters.
  • a signal amplitude may also be related to the one or more broad angles due to directivity of one or more transducers. As a result, to maintain a sufficient SNR, subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may have to remain in one or more of in a cone and a more sophisticated space. Additionally, the signal amplitude may also depend on ray bending due to a sound velocity gradient on a water column. The sound velocity gradient may generate some acoustic diffraction, which may result in non-uniform energy propagation. One or more spaces may be characterized by a lower signal amplitude than expected due to the acoustic propagation escaping from the one or more spaces.
  • Other spaces may be characterized by an increased amplitude due to a focusing effect.
  • An example of this advantage lies in its usefulness in a case of communication loss. For example, if the acoustic telemetry is lost for any portion of time, subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be able to resolve the problem based on input to subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • Another advantage may include telemetry adaptation. For example, one or more parameters of the telemetry may be optimized depending on the relative location.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may choose to use a safer telemetry mode.
  • safer modes may include, depending on the configurations, one or more of using lower frequency, decreasing the bandwidth, increasing a redundancy rate of the modem for more reliable Forward-Error Correction, increasing transmitted power, focusing more the beam pattern, and changing modulation.
  • a third advantage may include optimization of input to subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • input to subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 performance may be optimized based on the relative location as described above.
  • the accuracy of input to subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be expected to degrade and the accuracy may be measured using a confidence index.
  • the estimated location of the subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be transmitted to reference unit 306 via a communication link using one or more existing telemetry infrastructures.
  • acoustic channel usage during a typical un-tethered AUV mission, driven from a ship may include one or more challenges, as described below.
  • the acoustic channel must be shared between acoustic positioning and acoustic telemetry. Due to frequency band constraints and due to the lack of underwater communication standards, there have not been other solutions than to use time multiplexing to share the available bandwidth.
  • existing USBL ping technology may be made of an acoustic request from the ship to a subsea unmanned vehicle, followed by a reply from a transponder on the subsea unmanned vehicle to the ship.
  • the USBL device on the ship computes the location of the unmanned vehicle. Due to the long propagating time in the water, few seconds must be dedicated to each USBL ping. In this example, 30% of the time may be allocated to USBL pinging.
  • most acoustic telemetry systems use wide band acoustic signals, making them suitable for location estimation. Therefore, leveraging existing telemetry infrastructure to provide one or more acoustic signals used by subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 onboard subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • a solution to the above challenges is presented that highlights the concept of removing allocating time for USBL and to only use acoustic downlink telemetry packets calculating the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 relative to a transmitting modem, as illustrated in FIG. 18.
  • more bandwidth may be left for telemetry purpose and the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be calculated more often, leading to higher system performance.
  • acoustic telemetry systems may be half duplex communications, meaning the communication can occur in both directions but never in the same time.
  • one or more telemetry packets to subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be used to estimate the relative location from acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306 relative to subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • a location update is calculated by subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10
  • one or more telemetry packets may include a preamble section.
  • the preamble section may be used for acoustic packet detection and synchronization by the receiver array 304.
  • the preamble section may prepended to ensure acoustic transmitter 308 and receiver array 304 are able to synchronize. This concept is illustrated in FIG. 19.
  • a multi-preamble architecture is shown where one or more preambles may be associated with a telemetry mode or a specific acoustic transmitter type, where a correlation with a first preamble 1902 and up to preamble N 1904 are directed to a preamble search 1906.
  • a location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be estimated (referred to as“compute” in FIG. 19) 1908 using preamble where preamble i may consists of a short duration signal in an asynchronous system.
  • the short duration signal may be used to synchronize acoustic transmitter 308 and subsea unmanned vehicle 302 using receiver array 304.
  • preamble i may be a“known” signal which may be transmitted by acoustic transmitter 308 to at least one of the three receiver elements located on receiver array 304. Preamble i may be used to estimate one or more of time, frequency and channel relatively between acoustic transmitter 308 and receiver array 304. Further, preamble search 1906 may be done on one or more of the at least three receiver arrays.
  • identical preambles may be used for both the uplink and the downlink packets.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may detect one or more packets transmitted by subsea unmanned vehicle 302 to reference unit 306.
  • an acoustic channel might be shared among all agents.
  • the acoustic agent may be understood as an active acoustic device. For example, this may include one or more of an underwater vehicle, a simple acoustic transmitter, and a ship. In this context, it is important that subsea unmanned vehicle 302 only focuses on the packets transmitted by reference unit 306.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may include the ability to differentiate one or more acoustic packets received from acoustic transmitter 308 located on reference unit 306. For example, one or more of the following techniques may be included singularly or in combination.
  • a network solution may be provided if the acoustic channel is shared using a common network scheme, such as Time-Division Multiplexing Access (TDMA), then the TDMA information may be used by subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 to only process acoustic streams on relevant time slots.
  • TDMA Time-Division Multiplexing Access
  • an outlier rejection technique may be applied if reference unit 306 can be assumed to be located in a cone, and that no other acoustic agent is located in that cone.
  • a feature recognition may be applied if one or more signal properties are assigned to reference unit 306.
  • integration with telemetry systems may focus only on one or more signals emitted by reference unit 306.
  • integration with telemetry systems may require integration with a networking layer.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be agnostic of one or more telemetry systems. For example, this may be done by identifying automatically a signal of interest, based on feature detection, as described above.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may include signal processing in order to extract one or more preambles from existing telemetry infrastructure. On one or more telemetry packets, the preamble may comprise the first few milliseconds of the one or more telemetry packets. The identified one or more preambles may then be used to compute one or more location updates. One or more of the following features may be used to extract the one or more preambles.
  • SNR may be used if subsea unmanned vehicle 302 is not too far off in terms of distance from reference unit 306 where the one or more acoustic packets received by receiver array 304 may include very good SNR.
  • the one or more preambles may be repeated. Further, the one or more preambles are unique for a telemetry mode. Signal processing may be implemented so that subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may recognize one or more signals that repeat over time.
  • An additional feature may be based on packet frequency rate. In this feature, depending on the networking layer, the one or more telemetry packets may be transmitted at a fixed frequency. This frequency of“pinging” may be used to isolate the one or more preambles.
  • a preamble may be configured to be received every 10 seconds. This information may be used to select one or more correct preambles. Further, a direction of arrival feature may be used there is relative to subsea unmanned vehicle 302. If the location information is available, the information may be used for preamble extraction. For example, subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be constrained in a cone of +/- 45 degree below reference unit 306 (i.e. a ship in this example). In extracting one or more, as described above, this feature may be used to process the one or more acoustic signals 310 accordingly. Further, a frequency content feature may be used.
  • the one or more preambles may be located in one or more defined frequency bands.
  • the one or more frequency bands may be specified by a telemetry system provider.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may include this feature in order focus only on one or more relevant frequency bands. As result, any out-of-the- band signal may be rejected. For example, assuming one of the one or more signals of interest is located in between a range of 20 kHz and 80 kHz, a digital pass-band filter may be implemented as a first stage of subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10. Additionally, a timing feature may be included.
  • the timing information of the one or more timings may be used to extract the one or more preambles.
  • a combination of the previous features may be used to extract the one or more preambles of interest for subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • an identification phase may be added at the early stage of the mission.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may not be too far away from reference unit 306 and a relative velocity may be low to ensure good reception quality.
  • one or more telemetry systems may transmit one or more acoustic packets. It may then be possible to extract a first few millisecond of the one or more acoustic signals 310, which may comprise the one or more preambles for the remainder of the mission.
  • a first step of processing one or more acoustic signals 310 may include detecting the one or more preambles. This step may be performed in parallel on one or a plurality of the one or more preambles. Given sufficient orthogonality on the one or more preambles, there may be a very low risk of mis-detection of the transmitted one or more preambles. Highly efficient computation architecture exists to perform such parallel tasks.
  • Each of the one or more preambles may be associated with an acoustic transmitter (i.e., acoustic transmitter 308) located on a reference unit (i.e., reference unit 306).
  • Each of the one or more preambles may be associated to one or more telemetry modes using one or more modems.
  • the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be estimated based on the detected one or more preambles.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may be run with multiple acoustic transmitter types, which may significantly increase the location performance, as a diversity of acoustic packets going from reference unit 306 to subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be leveraged for location purpose.
  • An example is illustrated in FIG. 20, where two telemetry systems may be used, using a Time-Division Multiplexing channel sharing solution.
  • the time-Division Multiplexing channel sharing solution may include one or more of the following.
  • Telemetry Scheme 1 may be used, which may include, for example, working from a range from 20 kHz to 40 kHz. In this example, one acoustic packet may be provided every minute. Further, since TS1 works at rather low frequency, it is efficient for long range communication.
  • Telemetry Scheme 2 (TS2) may be used. TS2 may include working in a range from 30 kHz to 80 kHz. In this example, three acoustic packets may be provided every minute. This telemetry scheme may work at higher frequency, which may results in a greater signal bandwidth and provide better timing resolution. Further, providing three times more packet per cycle in the TS2 scheme as compared to the TS1 scheme may allow for subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 to provide an update rate that is three times higher.
  • subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10 may combine the TS1 scheme and the TS2 scheme, as described above. The combination may result in the best use of acoustic energy transmitted from reference unit 306 to subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • FIG. 21 illustrates how one or more broad angles may have a direct effect on one or more times of arrival of one or more acoustic signals.
  • three receiver elements, 2102, 2104, and 2106 may be configured to receive one or more signals from three different angles of -45°, 0°, and +45°, respectively, due to one or more wave fronts transmitted by an acoustic transmitter.
  • one or more time delays between the time when the one or more acoustic signals are transmitted by the acoustic transmitter to the time when the three receiver elements, 2102, 2104, and 2106 may occur.
  • the one or more time delays may be due to inducements of each of the three receiver elements by one or more broad angles from the one or more wave fronts.
  • roll and depression of the three different angles 2108 of the one or more signals received by the three receiver elements, 2102, 2104, and 2106 may be taken into account by direct problem 2112 with one or more positions 2110 of the three receiver elements, which may be comprised of one or more hydrophones.
  • direct problem 2112 may consider acoustic propagation assuming one or more plane waves in order to generate one or more relative times of arrival 2114 of one or more acoustic signals on each of the three receiver elements (i.e. hydrophones).
  • FIG. 22 an example of unmanned vehicle localization process 10 is illustrated in FIG. 22.
  • One or more locations of one or more of the at least three receiver elements, which may be comprised of one or more hydrophones, 2202 may be taken with one or more relative times of arrival 2204 of the one or more acoustic signals 310 on each of the one or more hydrophones to be processed through inverse problem processing 2206.
  • Inverse problem processing 2206 may use, for example, one or more of a Gauss-Newton method, a gradient descent method, and a Bayesian method.
  • One or more angles may then be provided 2208.
  • the one or more angles may include one or more of roll and depression.
  • a Bayesian approach may be used to better estimate the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302, as illustrated in FIG. 23.
  • a location of a PDF of the one or more hydrophones 2302, relative times of arrival of the one or more acoustic signals 310 on each hydrophone 2304, and vehicle location PDF 2306 of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be directed to inverse problem processing 2308.
  • Inverse problem processing 2308 may use a Bayesian approach.
  • the Bayesian approach may include a Monte-Carlo Markov Chain. As a result, the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 and each of the one or more hydrophones may be better estimated 2310.
  • a method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include receiving, via an acoustic transmitter located on a reference unit, one or more acoustic signals on a subsea unmanned vehicular system.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include calculating one or more broad angles using the one or more acoustic signals.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include calculating a sound velocity profile using the one or more acoustic signals.
  • the method for localizing a subsea unmanned vehicular system may include estimating the location of the subsea unmanned vehicular system using the calculated broad angles and calculated sound velocity profile.
  • the sound velocity profile may also be measured directly using a probe measuring the time of flight between two known positions.
  • one or more“in situ” calibration methods may be used.
  • the one or more“in situ” calibration methods may use one or more onboard instrumentations on subsea unmanned vehicle 302 to improve the estimated location of subsea unmanned vehicle with very limited overhead.
  • a sound velocity profile may be calculated
  • the estimated location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 based on acoustic devices e.g., USBL, LBL, SBL, or the inverted equivalent
  • acoustic devices e.g., USBL, LBL, SBL, or the inverted equivalent
  • the calibration method may be configured to measure the acoustic velocity gradient and compute a correction on an estimated angle of arrival based on the an acoustic propagation model.
  • the acoustic propagation model may be based on one or more of Ray Tracing algorithms and one or more look-up tables to apply a correction.
  • a sound velocity profile may be measured during the mission and a profile can be built while running the mission. As a result, any corrections due to ray bending may be calculated and applied during the mission, with limited overhead time.
  • a CTD instrument may be used to obtain the sound velocity profile versus depth, which may be used to correct for the effects of ray bending.
  • the sound velocity profile may be inferred from one or more measurements performed by the CTD instrument.
  • a sound velocity probe may be used for direct measurement of the sound velocity profile.
  • the sound velocity profile may change over time, one of the following features may be included.
  • the sound velocity may be assumed to be constant.
  • the user may have information indicating that a new sound velocity profile should be measured by subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • a control signal may be sent to subsea unmanned vehicle 302 to trigger one or more new measurements.
  • the mission may be autonomously adapted to ensure the sound velocity profile measurement is updated at one or more relevant times. If needed, an underwater path the one or more acoustic signals 310 travel along may be adapted to take one or more new measurements.
  • the one or more relevant times may be based on an autonomy management of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Further, the one or more relevant times may be at a fixed frequency that depends on the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Additionally, the one or more relevant times may be triggered by one or more external sensors that indicate that one or more conditions have changed.
  • the estimated location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 based on one or more acoustic devices may be off due to an error on the location of the array elements.
  • acoustic devices USBL, LBL, SBL, or the inverted equivalent
  • USBL acoustic device
  • calibration methods which are part of the manufacturing process of the device are used.
  • the required accuracy is high, which is expensive and, further, the USBL device must be designed in such a way that the calibration results remain valid over time, involving high costs.
  • known SBL and LBL systems often involve the use of an external active acoustic device to measure the location of the array elements.
  • receiver array 304 may be calibrated by leveraging on one or more redundant array elements and by using specific behavior of subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • receiver array 304 may include at least three receiver elements for estimating the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Additional array elements may be used to reduce an estimation error and to better estimate a location of each of the at least three receiver elements.
  • a re-calibration may be performed, as illustrated below in using Equation 4:
  • Equation 4 X defines the location of the array elements, t t refers to a relative time of arrival on each of the at least three receiver elements i, t t refers to an expected time of arrival for one or more given broad angles (azimuth and elevation) and each of the at least three receiver elements locations. If the broad angles are not known, they may and must be found in the resolution of Equation 4. In one example, one or more element locations may be constrained around an initial estimate. Therefore, an additional term be added, as illustrated in Equation 5 below:
  • one or more estimations of the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be calculated. Specifically, argmin x (f(x)) finds x which gives a minimal value of f(x). X represents the positions of the at least three receiver elements located on receiver array 304. Xo represents an initial estimate of the at least three receiver elements located on receiver array 304.
  • one measurement may not be enough to resolve Equation 5.
  • controlling one or more behaviors of underwater movement while accumulating measurements for subsea unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • Equation 5 may be completed with one or more the additional terms coming from one or more new measurements, giving rise to equation 6, as illustrated below: argmin
  • l refers to a regularization parameter.
  • l may refer to a Thikhonov regularization parameter t; refers to the one or more new measurements taken, which include one or more estimated times of arrival of the one or more acoustic signals 310.
  • one or more locations of subsea unmanned vehicle may cover a wide range of angular movements.
  • one or more of the calibration methods may use one or more specific navigation patterns combined with an ability to localize subsea unmanned vehicle 302. It may be assumed that subsea unmanned vehicle 302 is equipped with an INS.
  • An INS may be made of an EVTU, a DVL and a Kalman filter, which may each provide a good estimation of the location of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 on a short period of time.
  • an INS localization estimate on one or more short periods may be used to feed a calibration process for unmanned vehicle localization process 10.
  • only the initial broad angles may be unknown. Further, some of the initial broad angles may be derived from the INS data.
  • FIG. 24 provides an illustration of the calibration step 2402.
  • the calibration results may be used to determine a location of one or more of the at least three receiver elements, which may be comprised of one or more hydrophones.
  • the locations of the one or more hydrophones 2404 may be taken with one or more relative times of arrival 2406 of one or more acoustic signals 310 on each of the one or more hydrophones to be processed through inverse problem processing 2408.
  • Inverse problem processing 2408 may use, for example, a Gauss-Newton method.
  • One or more angles may then be provided 2410.
  • the one or more angles may include one or more of roll and depression.
  • calibration step 2402 may be done prior to a mission. However, calibration step 2402 may also be done at a beginning of a mission.
  • a calibration method may be implemented. The calibration may be done before each new deployment of subsea unmanned vehicle by including one or more of the following steps. First, subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be deployed. Next, a dive at distance in open-water from acoustic transmitter 308, which may be located at a surface, may be conducted. Sound speed velocity may be recorded during the dive. The sound speed velocity may be used to create a sound speed velocity profile with respect to one or more of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 and reference unit 306 One or more calibration behaviors may be performed on subsea unmanned vehicle 302.
  • Subsea unmanned vehicle 302 perform a predefined set or rotations and translations and may further estimate a time of arrival of one or more surface pings on each of the at least three receiver elements. Further, local calibration on subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be performed based on the received time of arrival of the one or more surface pings on each of the at least three receiver elements. Bending of one or more rays may be estimated using the measured sounds velocity profile on either reference unit 306 or subsea unmanned vehicle 302. Further, a global calibration may be performed by compensating for an ending of one or more rays.
  • the above discussed calibration method may be expanded to a clock offset calibration per sensor.
  • one or more time offsets may occur among one or more data streams coming from at least three receiver elements.
  • the time offset variable may be added into Equation 5.
  • one or more behaviors of subsea unmanned vehicle 302 may be altered using a calculated sound velocity profile.
  • each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
  • the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention porte, selon des modes de réalisation, sur un système et sur un procédé de localisation de véhicule sous-marin sans pilote. Des modes de réalisation peuvent comprendre un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote comprenant au moins trois éléments récepteurs. Un outil d'acquisition de données multicanal peut également être inclus dans un ou plusieurs modes de réalisation. L'outil d'acquisition de données multicanal peut être configuré pour synchroniser un ou plusieurs signaux associés à une pluralité de canaux. Un ou plusieurs modes de réalisation peuvent également comprendre un module de traitement. Le module de traitement peut être configuré pour estimer une position du véhicule sous-marin sans pilote.
EP19880407.2A 2018-11-01 2019-11-01 Système et procédé permettant de localiser un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote Pending EP3887847A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201862754508P 2018-11-01 2018-11-01
PCT/US2019/059395 WO2020092903A1 (fr) 2018-11-01 2019-11-01 Système et procédé permettant de localiser un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3887847A1 true EP3887847A1 (fr) 2021-10-06
EP3887847A4 EP3887847A4 (fr) 2022-08-17

Family

ID=70462172

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19880407.2A Pending EP3887847A4 (fr) 2018-11-01 2019-11-01 Système et procédé permettant de localiser un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3887847A4 (fr)
BR (1) BR112021008529A2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2020092903A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE545302C2 (en) * 2021-06-23 2023-06-20 Saab Ab Time alignment of sampled radio frequency in a multi-channel receiver system

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4664624B2 (ja) 2004-06-28 2011-04-06 富士通株式会社 状況監視プログラム及び状況監視システム
JP3981962B2 (ja) 2005-12-09 2007-09-26 独立行政法人海洋研究開発機構 水中移動体の角度計測装置及び水中移動体の角度計測方法
ITMI20080602A1 (it) * 2008-04-07 2009-10-08 Eni Spa Metodo e sistema di estinzione di un pozzo sottomarino per l'estrazione di idrocarburi in condizione di rilascio incontrollato di fluidi
FR2930649B1 (fr) * 2008-04-24 2016-01-22 Ixsea Systeme de positionnement acoustique sous-marin
CN103620442B (zh) * 2010-10-25 2016-01-20 洛克希德马丁公司 判断水下航行器相对于水下结构的位置和方向
JP6207817B2 (ja) 2012-08-10 2017-10-04 国立大学法人東京海洋大学 水中位置関係情報取得システム
US9511829B2 (en) * 2012-09-19 2016-12-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and systems for tracking a toolstring at subsea depths
US20160050030A1 (en) * 2012-11-29 2016-02-18 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois System and method for communication with time distortion
WO2015125014A2 (fr) * 2014-02-19 2015-08-27 Cgg Services Sa Procédé et véhicule sous-marin autonome pouvant garder un agencement planifié
US10578441B2 (en) * 2016-03-31 2020-03-03 Cameron International Corporation Subsea navigation systems and methods

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BR112021008529A2 (pt) 2021-08-03
EP3887847A4 (fr) 2022-08-17
WO2020092903A1 (fr) 2020-05-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6511108B2 (ja) 合成開口ソナーのためのシステムおよび方法
US7362653B2 (en) Underwater geopositioning methods and apparatus
Kebkal et al. AUV acoustic positioning methods
Eustice et al. Synchronous‐clock, one‐way‐travel‐time acoustic navigation for underwater vehicles
JP6691476B2 (ja) 自律型無人潜水機をナビゲートするためのシステムおよび方法
US8995229B2 (en) Determining a position of a submersible vehicle within a body of water
EP3384362B1 (fr) Système de navigation pour véhicule autonome basé sur l'intercorrelation d'images cohérentes
US8908475B2 (en) Acoustic positioning system and method
Chen et al. Review of AUV underwater terrain matching navigation
CN106767793A (zh) 一种基于sins/usbl紧组合的auv水下导航定位方法
CN1547039A (zh) 无高稳定频标的水下gps定位导航方法及其系统
KR100906362B1 (ko) 2개의 기준점에 대한 거리정보와 저정밀도 관성센서를 이용한 무인잠수정 선단의 의사 lbl 수중항법시스템
Abreu et al. Widely scalable mobile underwater sonar technology: An overview of the H2020 WiMUST project
WO2014195610A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de métrologie pour la calibration de la géométrie d'un réseau de balises acoustiques sous-marines
RU2563332C2 (ru) Способ навигации автономного необитаемого подводного аппарата
Webster et al. Advances in decentralized single-beacon acoustic navigation for underwater vehicles: Theory and simulation
Aparicio et al. Characterization of an underwater positioning system based on GPS surface nodes and encoded acoustic signals
EP3887847A1 (fr) Système et procédé permettant de localiser un véhicule sous-marin sans pilote
Bingham et al. Integrating precision relative positioning into JASON/MEDEA ROV operations
Somers Doppler-based localization for mobile autonomous underwater vehicles
Mirza et al. Energy efficient signaling strategies for tracking mobile underwater vehicles
Dikarev et al. Position Estimation of Autonomous Underwater Sensors Using the Virtual Long Baseline Method
Devassykutty et al. Evaluation of high precision localization approach for a fleet of unmanned deep ocean vehicles
Watanabe et al. Conceptual design of navigation of an AUV for Monitoring CCS site at deep sea bottom
Garin et al. Sea experimentation of single beacon simultaneous localization and communication for AUV navigation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210503

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20220715

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G01S 5/28 20060101ALI20220711BHEP

Ipc: G05D 1/06 20060101ALI20220711BHEP

Ipc: B63G 8/00 20060101ALI20220711BHEP

Ipc: G05D 1/02 20200101ALI20220711BHEP

Ipc: G01S 11/14 20060101ALI20220711BHEP

Ipc: G01S 5/18 20060101AFI20220711BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20230414