EP3848772A2 - Reconfigurable series-shunt ldo - Google Patents

Reconfigurable series-shunt ldo Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3848772A2
EP3848772A2 EP20203119.1A EP20203119A EP3848772A2 EP 3848772 A2 EP3848772 A2 EP 3848772A2 EP 20203119 A EP20203119 A EP 20203119A EP 3848772 A2 EP3848772 A2 EP 3848772A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
circuitry
reverse isolation
output node
low
dropout regulator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP20203119.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3848772A3 (en
EP3848772B1 (en
Inventor
Po-Jung CHANG
Yan-Jiun CHEN
Chih-Hong Lou
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MediaTek Inc
Original Assignee
MediaTek Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MediaTek Inc filed Critical MediaTek Inc
Publication of EP3848772A2 publication Critical patent/EP3848772A2/en
Publication of EP3848772A3 publication Critical patent/EP3848772A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3848772B1 publication Critical patent/EP3848772B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/46Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc
    • G05F1/56Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices
    • G05F1/565Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices sensing a condition of the system or its load in addition to means responsive to deviations in the output of the system, e.g. current, voltage, power factor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/46Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc
    • G05F1/56Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices
    • G05F1/575Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices characterised by the feedback circuit
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/46Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc
    • G05F1/56Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices
    • G05F1/561Voltage to current converters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/46Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc
    • G05F1/56Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices
    • G05F1/562Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series with the load as final control devices with a threshold detection shunting the control path of the final control device
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/46Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc
    • G05F1/613Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in parallel with the load as final control devices
    • G05F1/614Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in parallel with the load as final control devices including two stages of regulation, at least one of which is output level responsive
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/46Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc
    • G05F1/618Regulating voltage or current wherein the variable actually regulated by the final control device is dc using semiconductor devices in series and in parallel with the load as final control devices

Definitions

  • This application relates generally to low-dropout regulators (LDOs).
  • a regulator converts an unstable power supply voltage into a stable power supply voltage.
  • a low dropout regulator (LDO) has a low input-to-output voltage difference between an input terminal where an unstable power supply voltage is inputted and an output terminal where a stable power supply voltage is outputted.
  • Dropout voltage refers to the input-to-output voltage difference, whereby the regulator ceases to regulate against further reductions in input voltage.
  • the dropout voltage should be as low as possible, to allow the input voltage to be relatively low, while still maintaining regulation.
  • LDOs Low-dropout regulators
  • PSRR power-supply rejection ratio
  • Some embodiments relate to a low-dropout regulator comprising a core circuitry providing an output voltage to an output node; and a reverse isolation circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry in response to ripples at the output node.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry is configured with bandwidth higher than that of the core circuitry such that the reverse isolation circuitry responds to the ripples at the output node faster than the core circuitry.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry is configured such that a current flowing through the core circuitry is constant regardless the ripples at the output node or an alternating current (AC) component of the current flowing through the core circuitry is smaller than an AC component required to respond to the ripples at the output node.
  • AC alternating current
  • the reverse isolation circuitry adjusts the current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry based on the magnitude of the ripples at the output node.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • the transistor of the reverse isolation circuitry is a plurality of transistors connected in parallel.
  • the core circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • the transistor of the core circuitry is a pass transistor receiving a power supply voltage to generate the output voltage at the output node.
  • the core circuitry comprises a direct current (DC) circuitry coupled to the output node and comprising a power transistor configured to provide the output voltage at the output node, and a power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a high PSRR
  • DC direct current
  • PSRR power-supply rejection ratio
  • the PSRR circuitry comprises an operational amplifier configured to provide a gate voltage based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node, and a capacitor coupled to the gate voltage.
  • Some embodiments relate to a low-dropout regulator comprising a core circuitry providing an output voltage to an output node; and a reverse isolation circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to adjust a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry in response to ripples at the output node.
  • the current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry is adjusted at least in part to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry comprises a plurality of transistors connected in parallel, and one or more of the plurality of transistors are turned on depending on a tradeoff between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • the core circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • the transistor of the core circuitry is a pass transistor receiving a power supply voltage to generate the output voltage at the output node.
  • the core circuitry comprises a direct current (DC) circuitry coupled to the output node and comprising a power transistor configured to provide the output voltage at the output node, and a power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a high PSRR
  • DC direct current
  • PSRR power-supply rejection ratio
  • the PSRR circuitry comprises an operational amplifier configured to provide a gate voltage based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node, and a capacitor coupled to the gate voltage.
  • the core circuitry comprises a decrease gain circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to reduce a gain of the DC circuitry.
  • Some embodiments relate to a low-dropout regulator comprising a core circuitry configured to provide an output voltage to an output node; and a reverse isolation circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry.
  • the current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry is configurable and/or reconfigurable.
  • LDOs low-dropout regulators
  • PSRR power-supply rejection ratio
  • PSRR power-supply rejection ratio
  • conventional LDOs are designed to trade off between PSRR performance and reverse isolation performance.
  • One type of conventional LDO may sacrifice reverse isolation performance for high PSRR.
  • another type of conventional LDO may trade off PSRR performance for good reverse isolation.
  • a conventional LDO with good reverse isolation may consume more power than a conventional LDO with high PSRR.
  • LDOs that can have high PSRR (e.g., at least 30 dB in 2 MHz bandwidth) and good reverse isolation (e.g., at least 10 dB) at the same time.
  • the LDOs may be configurable and/or reconfigurable for a desirable reverse isolation performance.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
  • a system may include one or more low dropout regulators (LDOs) configured to provide stable power supply voltages to respective loading circuits.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a system 100 with multiple LDOs, according to some embodiments.
  • the system 100 may receive a power supply V IN from one or more power supplies including, for example, one or more batteries.
  • the system 100 may include one or more LDOs, each of which may receive an input power supply V IN and provide an output power supply V OUT to a respective loading circuit. While the voltage difference between the input power supply V IN and output power supply voltage V OUT may be low, the output power supply V OUT may be a more stable voltage compared to the input power supply V IN .
  • the example illustrated in FIG. 1 shows two LDOs 112 and 114 providing power supplies V OUT1 and V OUT2 to an analog circuit 114 and a digital circuit 124, respectively.
  • the system 100 may include one or more analog circuit LDO branches 102 and one or more digital circuit LDO branches 104. Although the illustrated example shows that the LDO branches 102 and 104 share the power supply V IN , it should be appreciated that an LDO branch may access a separate input power supply.
  • An analog circuit LDO branch 102 may include the LDO 112 providing power to the analog circuit 114.
  • Examples of the analog circuit 114 may include a CMOS image sensor and/or a gimbal, which are provided for illustration purposes and should not limit the scope of an analog circuit.
  • a digital circuit LDO branch 104 may include the LDO 122 providing power to the digital circuit 124.
  • Examples of the digital circuit 124 may include an electronic speed controller and/or a processor, which are provided for illustration purposes and should not limit the scope of a digital circuit.
  • the power supply V IN may ideally be a direct current (DC) power supply.
  • the power supply V IN may include a DC component overlaid with ripples, which may be one of the reasons that the power supply V IN is less stable and/or noisy.
  • the ripples may be a composite waveform including harmonics of a fundamental frequency, which may be the line frequency of the original alternating current (AC) source that is used to produce the power supply V IN .
  • the ripples may be due to incomplete suppression of the alternating waveform after rectification of the AC source.
  • the magnitudes of the ripples may depend on the harmonics the ripples may be associated with.
  • the ripples may be caused by circuits including, for example, switched-mode power supplies, capacitor input rectifiers, and active rectifiers.
  • an LDO may be configured to attenuate ripples from a power supply and provide a less noisy power to a loading circuit.
  • the LDO 112 may receive from the power supply V IN a DC component 116D overlaid with an AC component 116A.
  • the LDO 112 may be configured to provide the DC component 116D to the analog circuit 114.
  • the LDO 112 may be configured to reduce the AC component 116A such that the analog circuit 114 receives an AC component 118A that has a magnitude smaller than the AC component 116A.
  • the PSRR of the LDO 112 may specify a ratio between the AC power element 116A at the input of the LDO 112 and the AC power element 118A at the output of the LDO 112. The higher PSRR the LDO 112 has, the lower noise the analog circuit 114 would be subject to.
  • an LDO may be configured to reduce crosstalk caused by ripples and provide good reverse isolation.
  • the analog circuit 124 may be affected by ripples caused by another circuit such as the digital circuit LDO branch 102 through a common ground and/or a common power supply.
  • the digital circuit 124 may pass the ripples to the output of the LDO 122 as an AC component 126A.
  • the LDO 122 may pass the AC component 126A to its input as an AC component 128A, which may be passed to and affect the analog circuit 114.
  • Reverse isolation may mitigate the current a common ground and/or a common power supply caused by digital circuit and/or mixed-signal circuit's operation.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of such an LDO 200, which may convert an input power supply Vin to an output power supply V OUT at an output node 208.
  • the output power supply V OUT may be provided to a loading circuit (not shown).
  • the output power supply V OUT may include a DC component 216D overlaid with an AC component 216A that may have a magnitude ⁇ .
  • the AC component 216A may correspond to ripples at least in part caused by adjacent circuits through a common ground and/or a common power supply.
  • the LDO 200 may include a core circuitry 202 having a current I1 flowing therethrough, and a reverse isolation circuitry 204 having a current 12 flowing therethrough.
  • the core circuitry 202 may be configured to provide the output power supply V OUT at the output node 208.
  • the core circuitry 202 may be configured to operate with a bandwidth lower than that of the reverse isolation circuitry 204 such that the core circuitry 202 provides DC and low frequency functions.
  • the core circuitry 202 may be configured to attenuate ripples from the power supply Vin such that the LDO 200 has high PSRR.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured to respond to the ripples at the output node 208.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured to operate with high bandwidth (e.g., in the range of 40 MHz to 160 MHz) such that the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may respond to the ripples at the output node 208 faster than the core circuitry 202.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured to sense a transient waveform of the output power supply V OUT at the output node 208 and adjust the current I2 flowing therethrough in response to the AC component 216A of the output power supply V OUT such that the current I1 flowing through the core circuitry 202 is constant regardless the ripples at the output node 208.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 204 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 202. For example, under a first operation condition that may correspond to a first input power supply and/or a first loading circuit coupled to the LDO 200, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured such that the LDO 200 has a reverse isolation performance of 10 dB. Under a second operation condition that may correspond to a second input power supply and/or a second loading circuit coupled to the LDO 200, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be reconfigured such that the LDO 200 has a reverse isolation performance of 20 dB. Under a third operation condition that may correspond to a third input power supply and/or a third loading circuit coupled to the LDO 200, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be reconfigured such that the LDO 200 has a reverse isolation performance of 15 dB.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to adjust the current I2 flowing therethrough in response to the AC component 216A at the output node 208 to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 204 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 202.
  • the current 12 flowing through the core circuitry may be configured to be smaller than an AC component required to fully compensate the ripples at the output node 208.
  • the current I1 flowing through the core circuitry 202 may include a leakage current such as an AC component generated by the core circuitry 202 in response to the ripples at the output node 208 that are not compensated by the current 12.
  • FIG. 3 depicts a schematic diagram of an LDO 300, according to some embodiments.
  • the LDO 300 may include a core circuitry 302 configured to provide an output voltage V OUT at an output node 308, and a reverse isolation circuitry 304 coupled to the output node 308.
  • the core circuitry 302 may include a PSRR circuitry 312, a DC circuitry 320, and a decrease gain circuitry 314.
  • the PSRR circuitry 312 may be configured to provide high PSRR.
  • the PSRR circuitry 312 may include a p-type pass transistor MP1, a feedback circuitry 316, an operational amplifier 318, and a compensation circuitry 326.
  • the p-type pass transistor MP1 may be coupled between the output node 308 and a current source 324.
  • the drain-to-source resistance of the p-type pass transistor MP1 may be controlled by a gate voltage V G such that a stable output voltage V OUT is generated at the output node 308.
  • the feedback circuitry 316 may include two resistors R1 and R2 connected in series between the output node 308 and a ground. It should be appreciated that a ground need not be connected to earth ground, but may carry reference potentials, which may include earth ground, DC voltages or other suitable reference potentials.
  • the feedback circuitry 316 may generate a feedback voltage V FB , which may be a divided voltage of the output voltage V OUT by the resistors R1 and R2.
  • the operational amplifier 318 may compare the feedback voltage V FB with a reference voltage V REF , and generate the gate voltage V G that may vary depending upon the voltage difference between the reference voltage V REF and the feedback voltage V FB .
  • the compensation circuitry 326 may be coupled to the gate of the p-type pass transistor MP1 to provide desired filtering to the gate voltage V G and enhance the stability of the output voltage V OUT .
  • the compensation circuitry 326 may include a capacitor C1 and a resistor R3 connected in series between the gate of the p-type pass transistor MP1 and a ground.
  • the DC circuitry 320 may be configured to provide a stable output voltage at the output node 308.
  • the DC circuitry 320 may be coupled to the output node 308.
  • the DC circuitry 320 may include a p-type power transistor MP2 between a power supply V IN and the output node 308.
  • the p-type power transistor MP2 may be configured to provide the output voltage V OUT at the output node 308.
  • the DC circuitry 320 may include a current source 322 and an n-type transistor MN3 connected in series with the current source 322.
  • the n-type transistor MN3 may be coupled between the output node 308 and the current source 324.
  • a control voltage V C at the gate of the p-type power transistor MP2 may be determined by the current source 322 and a gate-to-source voltage of the p-type power transistor MP2.
  • the gate of the transistor MN3 may receive a biasing voltage V BIASN , which may determine a voltage at node 328 that prevents the p-type pass transistor MP1 and current source 324 from entering triode region.
  • a capacitor C2 may be coupled between the power supply V IN and the gate of the p-type power transistor MP2 and configured to enhance the stability of the output voltage V OUT .
  • the capacitor C2 may have a capacitance in the range of 0.1 pF to 5 pF, in the range of 1 PF to 2 PF, or any suitable number in between, which may be significantly smaller than that of capacitors in conventional LDOs.
  • the decrease gain circuitry 314 may be configured to reduce a gain of the DC circuitry 320.
  • the decrease gain circuitry 314 may be coupled to the output node 308.
  • the decrease gain circuitry 314 may include an n-type transistor MN4 coupled between the output node 308 and the current source 324. The gate of the n-type transistor MN4 may receive the biasing voltage VBIASN .
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 304 may be configured to provide a current flowing therethrough in response to ripples at the output node 308.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a p-type transistor MP5 and an n-type transistor MN6 connected in series and coupled between the output node 308 and the ground.
  • the p-type transistor MP5 may receive the gate voltage V G generated by the operational amplifier 318.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a capacitor C3 and a resistor R4 connected in series and coupled between the drain of the n-type transistor MN6 and the ground.
  • the capacitor C3 and resistor R4 may be configured to enhance the gain of the reverse isolation circuitry 304.
  • the gate of the n-type transistor MN6 may be coupled to a node dividing the capacitor C3 and a resistor R4.
  • the transistors MP5 and MN6 may generate a reverse isolation control voltage V R based at least in part on the gate voltage V G generated by the operational amplifier 318.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 coupled between the output node 308 and the ground.
  • the gate of the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 may receive the reverse isolation control voltage V R .
  • the reconfigurable transistor MN7 may be adjusted based at least in part on the reverse isolation control voltage V R to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 304 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 302.
  • the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 may include a plurality of n-type transistors connected in parallel. The number of n-type transistors being turned on may be configured based at least in part on the reverse isolation control voltage V R to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 304 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 302.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a capacitor C4 and a resistor R5 connected in series and coupled between the gate of the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 and the ground.
  • the capacitor C4 and resistor R5 may be configured to enhance the stability of the output voltage V OUT .
  • FIG. 4 depicts a schematic diagram of an LDO 400, according to some embodiments.
  • the LDO 400 may include a core circuitry 402 configured to provide an output voltage V OUT at an output node 408, and a reverse isolation circuitry 404 coupled to the output node 408.
  • the core circuitry 402 may include a PSRR circuitry 412 and a DC circuitry 420.
  • the DC circuitry 420 may be configured similar to the DC circuitry 320 of FIG. 3 .
  • the PSRR circuitry 412 may be configured to provide high PSRR.
  • the PSRR circuitry 412 may include a p-type pass transistor MP41 and a feedback circuitry 416.
  • the p-type pass transistor MP41 may be coupled between the output node 408 and a resistor R.
  • the drain-to-source resistance of the p-type pass transistor MP41 may be controlled by a gate voltage V 4G such that a stable output voltage V OUT is generated at the output node 408.
  • a capacitor C41 may be coupled to the gate of the pass transistor MP41.
  • the capacitor C41 may be configured for functionalities similar to the capacitor C1 of FIG. 3 .
  • the feedback circuitry 416 may include a p-type transistor MP44 coupled between the output node 408 and a current source 424.
  • the p-type transistor MP44 may receive a gate voltage V CORE such that the p-type transistor MP44 is turned on when a difference between the gate voltage V CORE and the output voltage V OUT is bigger than the threshold voltage of the p-type transistor MP44.
  • the gate voltage V CORE of the p-type transistor MP44 may be configured to determine a DC component of the output voltage V OUT .
  • the feedback circuitry 416 may include a gain stage that may include an n-type transistor MN43 coupled between a current source 422 and the ground.
  • the gate of the n-type transistor MN43 may be coupled to the drain of the p-type transistor MP44 such that the drain of the n-type transistor MN43 may generate the gate voltage V 4G based at least in part on the difference between the gate voltage V CORE and the output voltage V OUT .
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 404 may include a reconfigurable p-type transistor MP46 coupled between the output node 408 and the ground.
  • the reconfigurable p-type transistor MP46 may be adjusted based at least in part on the gate voltage V 4G to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 404 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 402.
  • the reconfigurable transistor p-type MP46 may include a plurality of p-type transistors connected in parallel. The number of p-type transistors being turned on may be configured based at least in part on the gate voltage V 4G to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 404 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 402.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a schematic diagram of an LDO 500, according to some embodiments.
  • the LDO 500 may include the core circuitry 402 and a reverse isolation circuitry 504.
  • the core circuitry 402 is configured to generate an output voltage V OUT at an output node 508.
  • the reverse isolation circuitry 504 may include a reconfigurable p-type transistor MP51 coupled between the output node 508 and a resistor R51, a reconfigurable n-type transistor MN52 coupled between the output node 508 and the ground, and a capacitor C51 coupled between the output node 508 and the gate of the reconfigurable transistor MN52.
  • the gate of the reconfigurable p-type transistor MP51 may receive the gate voltage V 4G generated by the feedback circuitry 416 and applied to the gate of the p-type pass transistor MP41.
  • the reconfigurable p-type transistors MP51 and the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN52 may be adjusted based at least in part on the gate voltage V 4G to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 504 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 402.
  • an LDO may include any suitable core circuitry including, for example, one of the core circuitry 302 and core circuitry 402.
  • An LDO may also include any suitable reverse isolation circuitry including, for example, one of the reverse isolation circuitry 308, reverse isolation circuitry 408, and reverse isolation circuitry 508.
  • FIGs. 3-5 show transistors being implemented in particular types (e.g., n-type or p-type), it should be appreciated that the transistors may be implemented differently.
  • the n-type transistors in the examples may be implemented as p-type transistors while the p-type transistors in the examples may be implemented as n-type transistors.
  • FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram illustrating an RF spur measurement result of a conventional LDO.
  • FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram of illustrating an RF spur measurement result of an LDO, according to some embodiments. It can be clearly seen in FIGs. 6A and 6B that, for example, the ripples (e.g., the unwanted signals labeled "2"-"5") are better suppressed by an LDO in accordance with some embodiments compared with a conventional LDO.
  • the ripples e.g., the unwanted signals labeled "2"-"5"
  • FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram illustrating reverse isolation performance of a conventional LDO.
  • FIG. 7B is a schematic diagram of illustrating reverse isolation performance of an LDO, according to some embodiments. It can be clearly seen in FIGs. 7A and 7B that, for example, at 80 MHz, an LDO in accordance with some embodiments has a reverse isolation performance of about 22 dB while a conventional LDO has a much worse reverse isolation performance of about 114 mdB.
  • the terms “approximately”, “substantially,” and “about” may be used to mean within ⁇ 20% of a target value in some embodiments, within ⁇ 10% of a target value in some embodiments, within ⁇ 5% of a target value in some embodiments, and yet within ⁇ 2% of a target value in some embodiments.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Continuous-Control Power Sources That Use Transistors (AREA)

Abstract

A low-dropout regulator (LDO) capable of providing high power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) and good reverse isolation. The LDO may include a core circuitry and a reverse isolation circuitry. The core circuitry may include a PSRR circuitry coupled to an output node and configured to provide high PSRR at the output node. The reverse isolation circuitry may be configured to provide good reverse isolation at the output node by, for example, providing current in response to ripples at the output node. The reverse isolation circuitry may be configured with bandwidth higher than that of the core circuitry such that it can provide fast transient response. The reverse isolation circuitry may be configurable and/or reconfigurable for a desirable reverse isolation performance. The reverse isolation circuitry may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 62/958,770, filed January 9, 2020 and titled "RECONFIGURABLE SERIES-SHUNT LDO," which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This application relates generally to low-dropout regulators (LDOs).
  • BACKGROUND
  • A regulator converts an unstable power supply voltage into a stable power supply voltage. A low dropout regulator (LDO) has a low input-to-output voltage difference between an input terminal where an unstable power supply voltage is inputted and an output terminal where a stable power supply voltage is outputted. "Dropout voltage" refers to the input-to-output voltage difference, whereby the regulator ceases to regulate against further reductions in input voltage. Ideally, the dropout voltage should be as low as possible, to allow the input voltage to be relatively low, while still maintaining regulation.
  • SUMMARY
  • Low-dropout regulators (LDOs) with high power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) and good reverse isolation are provided.
  • Some embodiments relate to a low-dropout regulator comprising a core circuitry providing an output voltage to an output node; and a reverse isolation circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry in response to ripples at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry is configured with bandwidth higher than that of the core circuitry such that the reverse isolation circuitry responds to the ripples at the output node faster than the core circuitry.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry is configured such that a current flowing through the core circuitry is constant regardless the ripples at the output node or an alternating current (AC) component of the current flowing through the core circuitry is smaller than an AC component required to respond to the ripples at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry adjusts the current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry based on the magnitude of the ripples at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the transistor of the reverse isolation circuitry is a plurality of transistors connected in parallel.
  • In some embodiments, the core circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the transistor of the core circuitry is a pass transistor receiving a power supply voltage to generate the output voltage at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the core circuitry comprises a direct current (DC) circuitry coupled to the output node and comprising a power transistor configured to provide the output voltage at the output node, and a power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a high PSRR
  • In some embodiments, the PSRR circuitry comprises an operational amplifier configured to provide a gate voltage based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node, and a capacitor coupled to the gate voltage.
  • Some embodiments relate to a low-dropout regulator comprising a core circuitry providing an output voltage to an output node; and a reverse isolation circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to adjust a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry in response to ripples at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry is adjusted at least in part to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry comprises a plurality of transistors connected in parallel, and one or more of the plurality of transistors are turned on depending on a tradeoff between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the core circuitry comprises a transistor coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the transistor of the core circuitry is a pass transistor receiving a power supply voltage to generate the output voltage at the output node.
  • In some embodiments, the core circuitry comprises a direct current (DC) circuitry coupled to the output node and comprising a power transistor configured to provide the output voltage at the output node, and a power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a high PSRR
  • In some embodiments, the PSRR circuitry comprises an operational amplifier configured to provide a gate voltage based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node, and a capacitor coupled to the gate voltage.
  • In some embodiments, the core circuitry comprises a decrease gain circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to reduce a gain of the DC circuitry.
  • Some embodiments relate to a low-dropout regulator comprising a core circuitry configured to provide an output voltage to an output node; and a reverse isolation circuitry coupled to the output node and configured to provide a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry. The current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry is configurable and/or reconfigurable.
  • These techniques may be used alone or in any suitable combination. The foregoing summary is provided by way of illustration and is not intended to be limiting.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
    • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system with low dropout regulators (LDOs), according to some embodiments.
    • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a low dropout regulator, according to some embodiments.
    • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an LDO, according to some embodiments.
    • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an LDO, according to some embodiments.
    • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an LDO, according to some embodiments.
    • FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram illustrating an RF spur measurement result of a conventional LDO.
    • FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram of illustrating an RF spur measurement result of an LDO, according to some embodiments.
    • FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram illustrating reverse isolation performance of a conventional LDO.
    • FIG. 7B is a schematic diagram illustrating reverse isolation performance of an LDO, according to some embodiments.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Described herein are low-dropout regulators (LDOs) with high power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) and good reverse isolation. The inventors have recognized and appreciated that conventional LDOs are designed to trade off between PSRR performance and reverse isolation performance. One type of conventional LDO may sacrifice reverse isolation performance for high PSRR. Alternatively, another type of conventional LDO may trade off PSRR performance for good reverse isolation. Further, a conventional LDO with good reverse isolation may consume more power than a conventional LDO with high PSRR.
  • The inventors have developed LDOs that can have high PSRR (e.g., at least 30 dB in 2 MHz bandwidth) and good reverse isolation (e.g., at least 10 dB) at the same time. In some embodiments, the LDOs may be configurable and/or reconfigurable for a desirable reverse isolation performance. In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
  • A system may include one or more low dropout regulators (LDOs) configured to provide stable power supply voltages to respective loading circuits. FIG. 1 depicts a system 100 with multiple LDOs, according to some embodiments. The system 100 may receive a power supply VIN from one or more power supplies including, for example, one or more batteries. The system 100 may include one or more LDOs, each of which may receive an input power supply VIN and provide an output power supply VOUT to a respective loading circuit. While the voltage difference between the input power supply VIN and output power supply voltage VOUT may be low, the output power supply VOUT may be a more stable voltage compared to the input power supply VIN. The example illustrated in FIG. 1 shows two LDOs 112 and 114 providing power supplies VOUT1 and VOUT2 to an analog circuit 114 and a digital circuit 124, respectively.
  • The system 100 may include one or more analog circuit LDO branches 102 and one or more digital circuit LDO branches 104. Although the illustrated example shows that the LDO branches 102 and 104 share the power supply VIN, it should be appreciated that an LDO branch may access a separate input power supply.
  • An analog circuit LDO branch 102 may include the LDO 112 providing power to the analog circuit 114. Examples of the analog circuit 114 may include a CMOS image sensor and/or a gimbal, which are provided for illustration purposes and should not limit the scope of an analog circuit. Similarly, a digital circuit LDO branch 104 may include the LDO 122 providing power to the digital circuit 124. Examples of the digital circuit 124 may include an electronic speed controller and/or a processor, which are provided for illustration purposes and should not limit the scope of a digital circuit. Although the illustrated example shows analog circuit 114 and digital circuit 124, it should be appreciated that an LDO may provide power to a mixed-signal circuit.
  • In some embodiments, the power supply VIN may ideally be a direct current (DC) power supply. However, in reality, the power supply VIN may include a DC component overlaid with ripples, which may be one of the reasons that the power supply VIN is less stable and/or noisy. The ripples may be a composite waveform including harmonics of a fundamental frequency, which may be the line frequency of the original alternating current (AC) source that is used to produce the power supply VIN. The ripples may be due to incomplete suppression of the alternating waveform after rectification of the AC source. The magnitudes of the ripples may depend on the harmonics the ripples may be associated with. The ripples may be caused by circuits including, for example, switched-mode power supplies, capacitor input rectifiers, and active rectifiers.
  • In some embodiments, an LDO may be configured to attenuate ripples from a power supply and provide a less noisy power to a loading circuit. In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the LDO 112 may receive from the power supply VIN a DC component 116D overlaid with an AC component 116A. The LDO 112 may be configured to provide the DC component 116D to the analog circuit 114. The LDO 112 may be configured to reduce the AC component 116A such that the analog circuit 114 receives an AC component 118A that has a magnitude smaller than the AC component 116A. The PSRR of the LDO 112 may specify a ratio between the AC power element 116A at the input of the LDO 112 and the AC power element 118A at the output of the LDO 112. The higher PSRR the LDO 112 has, the lower noise the analog circuit 114 would be subject to.
  • In some embodiments, an LDO may be configured to reduce crosstalk caused by ripples and provide good reverse isolation. In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the analog circuit 124 may be affected by ripples caused by another circuit such as the digital circuit LDO branch 102 through a common ground and/or a common power supply. The digital circuit 124 may pass the ripples to the output of the LDO 122 as an AC component 126A. The LDO 122 may pass the AC component 126A to its input as an AC component 128A, which may be passed to and affect the analog circuit 114. Reverse isolation may mitigate the current a common ground and/or a common power supply caused by digital circuit and/or mixed-signal circuit's operation. The better reverse isolation an LDO has, the lower noise of digital circuit and/or mixed-signal circuit may inject to a common ground and/or a common power supply. It should be appreciated that the illustration of the AC components herein are simplified and not drawn to scale, and provided only for illustration purpose.
  • LDOs may be configured to have high PSRR and good reverse isolation, according to some embodiments. FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of such an LDO 200, which may convert an input power supply Vin to an output power supply VOUT at an output node 208. The output power supply VOUT may be provided to a loading circuit (not shown). The output power supply VOUT may include a DC component 216D overlaid with an AC component 216A that may have a magnitude Δ. The AC component 216A may correspond to ripples at least in part caused by adjacent circuits through a common ground and/or a common power supply.
  • The LDO 200 may include a core circuitry 202 having a current I1 flowing therethrough, and a reverse isolation circuitry 204 having a current 12 flowing therethrough. In some embodiments, the core circuitry 202 may be configured to provide the output power supply VOUT at the output node 208. In some embodiments, the core circuitry 202 may be configured to operate with a bandwidth lower than that of the reverse isolation circuitry 204 such that the core circuitry 202 provides DC and low frequency functions. In some embodiments, the core circuitry 202 may be configured to attenuate ripples from the power supply Vin such that the LDO 200 has high PSRR.
  • The reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured to respond to the ripples at the output node 208. In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured to operate with high bandwidth (e.g., in the range of 40 MHz to 160 MHz) such that the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may respond to the ripples at the output node 208 faster than the core circuitry 202. In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured to sense a transient waveform of the output power supply VOUT at the output node 208 and adjust the current I2 flowing therethrough in response to the AC component 216A of the output power supply VOUT such that the current I1 flowing through the core circuitry 202 is constant regardless the ripples at the output node 208.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 204 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 202. For example, under a first operation condition that may correspond to a first input power supply and/or a first loading circuit coupled to the LDO 200, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configured such that the LDO 200 has a reverse isolation performance of 10 dB. Under a second operation condition that may correspond to a second input power supply and/or a second loading circuit coupled to the LDO 200, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be reconfigured such that the LDO 200 has a reverse isolation performance of 20 dB. Under a third operation condition that may correspond to a third input power supply and/or a third loading circuit coupled to the LDO 200, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be reconfigured such that the LDO 200 has a reverse isolation performance of 15 dB.
  • In some embodiments, the reverse isolation circuitry 204 may be configurable and/or reconfigurable to adjust the current I2 flowing therethrough in response to the AC component 216A at the output node 208 to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 204 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 202. For example, the current 12 flowing through the core circuitry may be configured to be smaller than an AC component required to fully compensate the ripples at the output node 208. The current I1 flowing through the core circuitry 202 may include a leakage current such as an AC component generated by the core circuitry 202 in response to the ripples at the output node 208 that are not compensated by the current 12.
  • The LDO 200 with high PSRR and good reverse isolation may be implemented in various configurations. FIG. 3 depicts a schematic diagram of an LDO 300, according to some embodiments. The LDO 300 may include a core circuitry 302 configured to provide an output voltage VOUT at an output node 308, and a reverse isolation circuitry 304 coupled to the output node 308.
  • The core circuitry 302 may include a PSRR circuitry 312, a DC circuitry 320, and a decrease gain circuitry 314. The PSRR circuitry 312 may be configured to provide high PSRR. The PSRR circuitry 312 may include a p-type pass transistor MP1, a feedback circuitry 316, an operational amplifier 318, and a compensation circuitry 326. The p-type pass transistor MP1 may be coupled between the output node 308 and a current source 324. The drain-to-source resistance of the p-type pass transistor MP1 may be controlled by a gate voltage VG such that a stable output voltage VOUT is generated at the output node 308.
  • The feedback circuitry 316 may include two resistors R1 and R2 connected in series between the output node 308 and a ground. It should be appreciated that a ground need not be connected to earth ground, but may carry reference potentials, which may include earth ground, DC voltages or other suitable reference potentials. The feedback circuitry 316 may generate a feedback voltage VFB, which may be a divided voltage of the output voltage VOUT by the resistors R1 and R2. The operational amplifier 318 may compare the feedback voltage VFB with a reference voltage VREF, and generate the gate voltage VG that may vary depending upon the voltage difference between the reference voltage VREF and the feedback voltage VFB.
  • The compensation circuitry 326 may be coupled to the gate of the p-type pass transistor MP1 to provide desired filtering to the gate voltage VG and enhance the stability of the output voltage VOUT. The compensation circuitry 326 may include a capacitor C1 and a resistor R3 connected in series between the gate of the p-type pass transistor MP1 and a ground.
  • The DC circuitry 320 may be configured to provide a stable output voltage at the output node 308. The DC circuitry 320 may be coupled to the output node 308. The DC circuitry 320 may include a p-type power transistor MP2 between a power supply VIN and the output node 308. The p-type power transistor MP2 may be configured to provide the output voltage VOUT at the output node 308. The DC circuitry 320 may include a current source 322 and an n-type transistor MN3 connected in series with the current source 322. The n-type transistor MN3 may be coupled between the output node 308 and the current source 324. A control voltage VC at the gate of the p-type power transistor MP2 may be determined by the current source 322 and a gate-to-source voltage of the p-type power transistor MP2. The gate of the transistor MN3 may receive a biasing voltage VBIASN, which may determine a voltage at node 328 that prevents the p-type pass transistor MP1 and current source 324 from entering triode region. A capacitor C2 may be coupled between the power supply VIN and the gate of the p-type power transistor MP2 and configured to enhance the stability of the output voltage VOUT. In some embodiments, the capacitor C2 may have a capacitance in the range of 0.1 pF to 5 pF, in the range of 1 PF to 2 PF, or any suitable number in between, which may be significantly smaller than that of capacitors in conventional LDOs.
  • The decrease gain circuitry 314 may be configured to reduce a gain of the DC circuitry 320. The decrease gain circuitry 314 may be coupled to the output node 308. The decrease gain circuitry 314 may include an n-type transistor MN4 coupled between the output node 308 and the current source 324. The gate of the n-type transistor MN4 may receive the biasing voltage VBIASN .
  • The reverse isolation circuitry 304 may be configured to provide a current flowing therethrough in response to ripples at the output node 308. The reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a p-type transistor MP5 and an n-type transistor MN6 connected in series and coupled between the output node 308 and the ground. The p-type transistor MP5 may receive the gate voltage VG generated by the operational amplifier 318. The reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a capacitor C3 and a resistor R4 connected in series and coupled between the drain of the n-type transistor MN6 and the ground. The capacitor C3 and resistor R4 may be configured to enhance the gain of the reverse isolation circuitry 304. The gate of the n-type transistor MN6 may be coupled to a node dividing the capacitor C3 and a resistor R4. The transistors MP5 and MN6 may generate a reverse isolation control voltage VR based at least in part on the gate voltage VG generated by the operational amplifier 318.
  • The reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 coupled between the output node 308 and the ground. The gate of the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 may receive the reverse isolation control voltage VR. The reconfigurable transistor MN7 may be adjusted based at least in part on the reverse isolation control voltage VR to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 304 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 302. In some embodiments, the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 may include a plurality of n-type transistors connected in parallel. The number of n-type transistors being turned on may be configured based at least in part on the reverse isolation control voltage VR to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 304 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 302.
  • The reverse isolation circuitry 304 may include a capacitor C4 and a resistor R5 connected in series and coupled between the gate of the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN7 and the ground. The capacitor C4 and resistor R5 may be configured to enhance the stability of the output voltage VOUT.
  • FIG. 4 depicts a schematic diagram of an LDO 400, according to some embodiments. The LDO 400 may include a core circuitry 402 configured to provide an output voltage VOUT at an output node 408, and a reverse isolation circuitry 404 coupled to the output node 408. The core circuitry 402 may include a PSRR circuitry 412 and a DC circuitry 420. The DC circuitry 420 may be configured similar to the DC circuitry 320 of FIG. 3.
  • The PSRR circuitry 412 may be configured to provide high PSRR. The PSRR circuitry 412 may include a p-type pass transistor MP41 and a feedback circuitry 416. The p-type pass transistor MP41 may be coupled between the output node 408 and a resistor R. The drain-to-source resistance of the p-type pass transistor MP41 may be controlled by a gate voltage V4G such that a stable output voltage VOUT is generated at the output node 408. A capacitor C41 may be coupled to the gate of the pass transistor MP41. The capacitor C41 may be configured for functionalities similar to the capacitor C1 of FIG. 3.
  • The feedback circuitry 416 may include a p-type transistor MP44 coupled between the output node 408 and a current source 424. The p-type transistor MP44 may receive a gate voltage VCORE such that the p-type transistor MP44 is turned on when a difference between the gate voltage VCORE and the output voltage VOUT is bigger than the threshold voltage of the p-type transistor MP44. The gate voltage VCORE of the p-type transistor MP44 may be configured to determine a DC component of the output voltage VOUT. The feedback circuitry 416 may include a gain stage that may include an n-type transistor MN43 coupled between a current source 422 and the ground. The gate of the n-type transistor MN43 may be coupled to the drain of the p-type transistor MP44 such that the drain of the n-type transistor MN43 may generate the gate voltage V4G based at least in part on the difference between the gate voltage VCORE and the output voltage VOUT.
  • The reverse isolation circuitry 404 may include a reconfigurable p-type transistor MP46 coupled between the output node 408 and the ground. The reconfigurable p-type transistor MP46 may be adjusted based at least in part on the gate voltage V4G to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 404 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 402. In some embodiments, the reconfigurable transistor p-type MP46 may include a plurality of p-type transistors connected in parallel. The number of p-type transistors being turned on may be configured based at least in part on the gate voltage V4G to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 404 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 402.
  • FIG. 5 depicts a schematic diagram of an LDO 500, according to some embodiments. The LDO 500 may include the core circuitry 402 and a reverse isolation circuitry 504. In the illustrated example, the core circuitry 402 is configured to generate an output voltage VOUT at an output node 508.
  • The reverse isolation circuitry 504 may include a reconfigurable p-type transistor MP51 coupled between the output node 508 and a resistor R51, a reconfigurable n-type transistor MN52 coupled between the output node 508 and the ground, and a capacitor C51 coupled between the output node 508 and the gate of the reconfigurable transistor MN52. The gate of the reconfigurable p-type transistor MP51 may receive the gate voltage V4G generated by the feedback circuitry 416 and applied to the gate of the p-type pass transistor MP41. The reconfigurable p-type transistors MP51 and the reconfigurable n-type transistor MN52 may be adjusted based at least in part on the gate voltage V4G to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry 504 and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry 402.
  • Although the LDO illustrated in FIG. 5 include the core circuitry 402 and the reverse isolation circuitry 504, it should be appreciated that an LDO may include any suitable core circuitry including, for example, one of the core circuitry 302 and core circuitry 402. An LDO may also include any suitable reverse isolation circuitry including, for example, one of the reverse isolation circuitry 308, reverse isolation circuitry 408, and reverse isolation circuitry 508.
  • Although the illustrated examples of FIGs. 3-5 show transistors being implemented in particular types (e.g., n-type or p-type), it should be appreciated that the transistors may be implemented differently. For example, the n-type transistors in the examples may be implemented as p-type transistors while the p-type transistors in the examples may be implemented as n-type transistors.
  • LDOs in accordance with some embodiments have better reverse isolation performance than conventional LDOs. FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram illustrating an RF spur measurement result of a conventional LDO. FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram of illustrating an RF spur measurement result of an LDO, according to some embodiments. It can be clearly seen in FIGs. 6A and 6B that, for example, the ripples (e.g., the unwanted signals labeled "2"-"5") are better suppressed by an LDO in accordance with some embodiments compared with a conventional LDO.
  • LDOs in accordance with some embodiments have better reverse isolation performance than conventional LDOs. FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram illustrating reverse isolation performance of a conventional LDO. FIG. 7B is a schematic diagram of illustrating reverse isolation performance of an LDO, according to some embodiments. It can be clearly seen in FIGs. 7A and 7B that, for example, at 80 MHz, an LDO in accordance with some embodiments has a reverse isolation performance of about 22 dB while a conventional LDO has a much worse reverse isolation performance of about 114 mdB.
  • Various aspects of the apparatus and techniques described herein may be used alone, in combination, or in a variety of arrangements not specially discussed in the embodiments described in the foregoing description and is therefore not limited in its application to the details and arrangement of components set forth in the foregoing description or illustrated in the drawings. For example, aspects described in one embodiment may be combined in any manner with aspects described in other embodiments.
  • The terms "approximately", "substantially," and "about" may be used to mean within ±20% of a target value in some embodiments, within ±10% of a target value in some embodiments, within ±5% of a target value in some embodiments, and yet within ±2% of a target value in some embodiments.
  • Use of ordinal terms such as "first," "second," "third," etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
  • Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of "including," "comprising," or "having," "containing," "involving," and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.

Claims (15)

  1. A low-dropout regulator comprising:
    a core circuitry (202, 302, 402) providing an output voltage to an output node; and
    a reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) coupled to the output node and configured to provide a current flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry (12) in response to ripples at the output node.
  2. The low-dropout regulator of claim 1, wherein
    the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) is configured with bandwidth higher than that of the core circuitry (202, 302, 402) such that the reverse isolation circuitry responds to the ripples at the output node faster than the core circuitry.
  3. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) is configured such that a current (I1) flowing through the core circuitry (202, 302, 402) is constant regardless the ripples at the output node or an alternating current (AC) component of the current (I1) flowing through the core circuitry (202, 302, 402) is smaller than an AC component required to respond to the ripples at the output node.
  4. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) adjusts the current (12) flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry based on the magnitude of the ripples at the output node.
  5. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) comprises
    a transistor (MP5, MP46, MP51) coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage (VG, V4G) generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  6. The low-dropout regulator of claim 5, wherein
    the transistor (MN7, MP46) of the reverse isolation circuitry is a plurality of transistors connected in parallel.
  7. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein the core circuitry comprises
    a transistor (MP1, MP41) coupled to the output node and having a gate node controlled by a gate voltage (VG, V4G) generated based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node.
  8. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the transistor of the core circuitry is a pass transistor receiving a power supply voltage to generate the output voltage at the output node.
  9. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein the core circuitry comprises
    a direct current (DC) circuitry (320, 420) coupled to the output node and comprising a power transistor (MP2, MP42) configured to provide the output voltage at the output node, and
    a power-supply rejection ratio (PSRR) circuitry (312, 412) coupled to the output node and configured to provide a high PSRR
  10. The low-dropout regulator of claim 9, wherein the PSRR circuitry comprises
    an operational amplifier (318) configured to provide a gate voltage based at least in part on the output voltage at the output node, and
    a capacitor (C1) coupled to the gate voltage.
  11. The low-dropout regulator of claim 10, wherein the core circuitry comprises
    a decrease gain circuitry (314) coupled to the output node and configured to reduce a gain of the DC circuitry.
  12. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) is configured to adjust the current (12) flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry in response to ripples at the output node.
  13. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the current (12) flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry is adjusted at least in part to trade off between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry (202, 302, 402).
  14. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the current (12) flowing through the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) is configurable and/or reconfigurable.
  15. The low-dropout regulator of any preceding claim, wherein
    the reverse isolation circuitry (204, 304, 404, 504) comprises a plurality of transistors (MN7, MP46) connected in parallel, and
    one or more of the plurality of transistors are turned on depending on a tradeoff between power consumed by the reverse isolation circuitry and a leakage current flowing through the core circuitry.
EP20203119.1A 2020-01-09 2020-10-21 Reconfigurable series-shunt ldo Active EP3848772B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202062958770P 2020-01-09 2020-01-09
US17/065,445 US11526186B2 (en) 2020-01-09 2020-10-07 Reconfigurable series-shunt LDO

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3848772A2 true EP3848772A2 (en) 2021-07-14
EP3848772A3 EP3848772A3 (en) 2021-08-25
EP3848772B1 EP3848772B1 (en) 2024-07-10

Family

ID=73005449

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20203119.1A Active EP3848772B1 (en) 2020-01-09 2020-10-21 Reconfigurable series-shunt ldo

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US11526186B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3848772B1 (en)
CN (1) CN113110665B (en)
TW (1) TWI751826B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11280847B1 (en) * 2020-10-30 2022-03-22 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. Circuit, semiconductor device and method for parameter PSRR measurement
CN114460994B (en) * 2020-11-09 2024-09-27 扬智科技股份有限公司 Voltage Regulator
US11687104B2 (en) * 2021-03-25 2023-06-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Power supply rejection enhancer

Family Cites Families (65)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6603292B1 (en) * 2001-04-11 2003-08-05 National Semiconductor Corporation LDO regulator having an adaptive zero frequency circuit
DE60225124T2 (en) 2002-07-05 2009-02-19 Dialog Semiconductor Gmbh Control device with low loss voltage, with a large load range and fast inner control loop
US7119999B2 (en) * 2004-03-20 2006-10-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated Pre-regulator with reverse current blocking
US7091710B2 (en) * 2004-05-03 2006-08-15 System General Corp. Low dropout voltage regulator providing adaptive compensation
US7253589B1 (en) * 2004-07-09 2007-08-07 National Semiconductor Corporation Dual-source CMOS battery charger
US7274114B1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2007-09-25 National Semiconductor Corporation Integrated tracking voltage regulation and control for PMUIC to prevent latch-up or excessive leakage current
US7274176B2 (en) * 2004-11-29 2007-09-25 Stmicroelectronics Kk Regulator circuit having a low quiescent current and leakage current protection
CN1862438A (en) 2005-05-14 2006-11-15 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Linear voltage-stabilized source
JP4758731B2 (en) * 2005-11-11 2011-08-31 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 Constant voltage power circuit
TWI346438B (en) 2006-05-02 2011-08-01 Mediatek Inc Power supply
US8089822B1 (en) * 2007-02-12 2012-01-03 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation On-chip power-measurement circuit using a low drop-out regulator
US7755338B2 (en) * 2007-07-12 2010-07-13 Qimonda North America Corp. Voltage regulator pole shifting method and apparatus
EP2048567B1 (en) * 2007-08-17 2014-05-07 Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC EMC protection circuit
JP5146009B2 (en) * 2008-02-28 2013-02-20 富士通セミコンダクター株式会社 Power supply device and power supply method
US8378652B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2013-02-19 Texas Instruments Incorporated Load transient response time of LDOs with NMOS outputs with a voltage controlled current source
US8564256B2 (en) * 2009-11-18 2013-10-22 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. Circuit devices and methods of providing a regulated power supply
EP2354881A1 (en) * 2010-02-05 2011-08-10 Dialog Semiconductor GmbH Domino voltage regulator (DVR)
US8169203B1 (en) * 2010-11-19 2012-05-01 Nxp B.V. Low dropout regulator
US8648580B2 (en) * 2010-12-08 2014-02-11 Mediatek Singapore Pte. Ltd. Regulator with high PSRR
US8779731B2 (en) * 2011-01-10 2014-07-15 Eta Semiconductor Inc. Synthetic ripple hysteretic powder converter
US8878513B2 (en) * 2011-02-16 2014-11-04 Mediatek Singapore Pte. Ltd. Regulator providing multiple output voltages with different voltage levels
KR20120098025A (en) 2011-02-28 2012-09-05 에스케이하이닉스 주식회사 Hybrid voltage regulator
US9235222B2 (en) * 2012-05-17 2016-01-12 Rf Micro Devices, Inc. Hybrid regulator with composite feedback
US9104222B2 (en) * 2012-08-24 2015-08-11 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Low dropout voltage regulator with a floating voltage reference
US9170590B2 (en) * 2012-10-31 2015-10-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for load adaptive LDO bias and compensation
CN103809638B (en) 2012-11-14 2016-08-03 安凯(广州)微电子技术有限公司 A kind of high PSRR and the low pressure difference linear voltage regulator of low noise
US8917070B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-12-23 Vidatronic, Inc. LDO and load switch supporting a wide range of load capacitance
US8994399B2 (en) * 2013-04-29 2015-03-31 Broadcom Corporation Transmission line driver with output swing control
US9577508B2 (en) * 2013-05-15 2017-02-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated NMOS LDO PSRR improvement using power supply noise cancellation
US9582017B2 (en) * 2013-07-02 2017-02-28 Stmicroelectronics Design And Application S.R.O. Method of preventing inversion of output current flow in a voltage regulator and related voltage regulator
US9671803B2 (en) * 2013-10-25 2017-06-06 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Low drop out supply asymmetric dynamic biasing
KR102231317B1 (en) * 2013-12-16 2021-03-24 삼성전자주식회사 Voltage regulator and power delivering device therewith
WO2015100345A2 (en) * 2013-12-23 2015-07-02 Ess Technology, Inc. Voltage regulator using both shunt and series regulation
WO2015103768A1 (en) 2014-01-10 2015-07-16 Silicon Image, Inc. Linear regulator with improved power supply ripple rejection
US9454167B2 (en) 2014-01-21 2016-09-27 Vivid Engineering, Inc. Scalable voltage regulator to increase stability and minimize output voltage fluctuations
US9454168B2 (en) 2014-06-16 2016-09-27 Linear Technology Corporation LDO regulator powered by its regulated output voltage for high PSRR
CN105446403A (en) * 2014-08-14 2016-03-30 登丰微电子股份有限公司 Low dropout linear voltage regulator
US9436196B2 (en) * 2014-08-20 2016-09-06 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Voltage regulator and method
TWI580152B (en) * 2014-11-08 2017-04-21 立錡科技股份有限公司 High efficiency charging system and charging circuit therein
US20160204702A1 (en) * 2015-01-08 2016-07-14 Broadcom Corporation Low Output Ripple Adaptive Switching Voltage Regulator
US9552006B1 (en) * 2015-03-09 2017-01-24 Inphi Corporation Wideband low dropout voltage regulator with power supply rejection boost
DE102015218656B4 (en) 2015-09-28 2021-03-25 Dialog Semiconductor (Uk) Limited Linear regulator with improved supply voltage penetration
CN106610684B (en) * 2015-10-23 2018-08-03 恩智浦有限公司 Low-dropout regulator and its load current tracking compensation technique
KR102395603B1 (en) * 2016-01-11 2022-05-09 삼성전자주식회사 Voltage regulator for suppressing overshoot and undershoot, and devices including the same
US9785165B2 (en) * 2016-02-03 2017-10-10 Stmicroelectronics Design And Application S.R.O. Voltage regulator with improved line regulation transient response
US9740225B1 (en) 2016-02-24 2017-08-22 Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Low dropout regulator with replica feedback frequency compensation
US20170364111A1 (en) * 2016-06-21 2017-12-21 Infineon Technologies Ag Linear voltage regulator
US10014772B2 (en) * 2016-08-03 2018-07-03 Nxp B.V. Voltage regulator
DE102017205957B4 (en) * 2017-04-07 2022-12-29 Dialog Semiconductor (Uk) Limited CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR QUICK CURRENT CONTROL IN VOLTAGE REGULATORS
CN108733119B (en) * 2017-04-25 2022-11-04 恩智浦有限公司 Low dropout regulator and starting method thereof
US11133663B2 (en) * 2017-12-20 2021-09-28 Apple Inc. Reverse current protection circuit
US10579084B2 (en) * 2018-01-30 2020-03-03 Mediatek Inc. Voltage regulator apparatus offering low dropout and high power supply rejection
US10915121B2 (en) * 2018-02-19 2021-02-09 Texas Instruments Incorporated Low dropout regulator (LDO) with frequency-dependent resistance device for pole tracking compensation
US10866606B2 (en) * 2018-03-28 2020-12-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatuses for multiple-mode low drop out regulators
JP7062494B2 (en) * 2018-04-02 2022-05-06 ローム株式会社 Series regulator
US11112812B2 (en) * 2018-06-19 2021-09-07 Stmicroelectronics Sa Low-dropout voltage regulation device having compensation circuit to compensate for voltage overshoots and undershoots when changing between activity mode and standby mode
US20200064875A1 (en) * 2018-08-24 2020-02-27 Synaptics Incorporated In-rush current protection for linear regulators
US10775819B2 (en) * 2019-01-16 2020-09-15 Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited Multi-loop voltage regulator with load tracking compensation
US10845831B2 (en) * 2019-06-24 2020-11-24 Intel Corporation Techniques in hybrid regulators of high power supply rejection ratio and conversion efficiency
US10990117B2 (en) * 2019-09-05 2021-04-27 Qualcomm Incorporated P-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (PMOS) low drop-out (LDO) regulator
CN113970947A (en) * 2020-07-24 2022-01-25 武汉杰开科技有限公司 Low dropout regulator and electronic equipment
US11611316B2 (en) * 2020-10-29 2023-03-21 Psemi Corporation Load regulation for LDO with low loop gain
EP3992748A1 (en) * 2020-11-03 2022-05-04 pSemi Corporation Ldo with self-calibrating compensation of resonance effects
CN112558677B (en) * 2020-12-09 2022-06-24 思瑞浦微电子科技(苏州)股份有限公司 Low dropout regulator based on reverse current protection
CN113110694B (en) * 2021-04-30 2022-03-25 南京邮电大学 Low dropout regulator circuit with current surge suppression

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3848772A3 (en) 2021-08-25
TWI751826B (en) 2022-01-01
TW202127784A (en) 2021-07-16
EP3848772B1 (en) 2024-07-10
US11526186B2 (en) 2022-12-13
CN113110665A (en) 2021-07-13
US20210216092A1 (en) 2021-07-15
CN113110665B (en) 2022-04-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3848772A2 (en) Reconfigurable series-shunt ldo
US7397226B1 (en) Low noise, low power, fast startup, and low drop-out voltage regulator
US7362081B1 (en) Low-dropout regulator
EP3408724B1 (en) Low dropout voltage regulator with improved power supply rejection and corresponding method
US9577508B2 (en) NMOS LDO PSRR improvement using power supply noise cancellation
US9552004B1 (en) Linear voltage regulator
JP6540976B2 (en) Low dropout voltage regulator device
US11782468B2 (en) Current-mode feedforward ripple cancellation
US20200125126A1 (en) Voltage regulator circuit with high power supply rejection ratio
EP1865397A1 (en) Low drop-out voltage regulator
US20180239380A1 (en) Voltage Regulator with Improved Driver Stage
US10331152B2 (en) Quiescent current control in voltage regulators
CN108334149B (en) Low quiescent current high PSRR low dropout linear regulator circuit
US20230236615A1 (en) Low-dropout regulator having bidirectional current adjustment
US20170060166A1 (en) System and Method for a Linear Voltage Regulator
US10379555B2 (en) N-channel input pair voltage regulator with soft start and current limitation circuitry
CN113448372A (en) Compensation of low dropout voltage regulator
US10545521B2 (en) Linear regulator with improved power supply rejection ratio
CN105992981A (en) Low dropout voltage regulator circuits
US20070200536A1 (en) Shunt regulator
US20100327830A1 (en) Low voltage drop out regulator
US8253479B2 (en) Output driver circuits for voltage regulators
CN111373655B (en) Transconductor system
CN112527038A (en) Regulator circuit, semiconductor device, and electronic apparatus
US20170060153A1 (en) Bulk current regulation loop

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G05F 1/565 20060101AFI20210720BHEP

Ipc: G05F 1/575 20060101ALI20210720BHEP

Ipc: G05F 1/614 20060101ALI20210720BHEP

Ipc: G05F 1/618 20060101ALI20210720BHEP

Ipc: G05F 1/56 20060101ALI20210720BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20220225

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20221216

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230607

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20240207

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LOU, CHIH-HONG

Inventor name: CHEN, YAN-JIUN

Inventor name: CHANG, PO-JUNG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602020033662

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240806

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240911

Year of fee payment: 5