EP3814165B1 - Verfahren zur verwendung von luft und helium in niederdruckrohrtransportsystemen - Google Patents

Verfahren zur verwendung von luft und helium in niederdruckrohrtransportsystemen Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3814165B1
EP3814165B1 EP18924874.3A EP18924874A EP3814165B1 EP 3814165 B1 EP3814165 B1 EP 3814165B1 EP 18924874 A EP18924874 A EP 18924874A EP 3814165 B1 EP3814165 B1 EP 3814165B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tube
helium
air
power
capsule
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP18924874.3A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3814165A1 (de
EP3814165A4 (de
Inventor
Alexandre Neophytou
Michael Sarin
Alexandre Zisa
Spencer John Baldwin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hyperloop Transportation Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Hyperloop Transportation Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hyperloop Transportation Technologies Inc filed Critical Hyperloop Transportation Technologies Inc
Publication of EP3814165A1 publication Critical patent/EP3814165A1/de
Publication of EP3814165A4 publication Critical patent/EP3814165A4/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3814165B1 publication Critical patent/EP3814165B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61B—RAILWAY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT THEREFOR NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B61B13/00—Other railway systems
    • B61B13/10—Tunnel systems
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
    • E01B—PERMANENT WAY; PERMANENT-WAY TOOLS; MACHINES FOR MAKING RAILWAYS OF ALL KINDS
    • E01B25/00—Tracks for special kinds of railways
    • E01B25/30—Tracks for magnetic suspension or levitation vehicles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of tube transportation. More specifically, the present invention is related to a method of using air and helium in low-pressure tube transportation systems.
  • the Hyperloop is a system where a capsule is levitated in a tube at low-pressure (and in turn low air density). Levitation reduces, substantially, ground friction. Low air density reduces, substantially, air drag.
  • the white paper proposed an air-ski supported capsule riding inside of an evacuated tube, 100 Pascal (Pa) absolute, and propelled by linear induction motors.
  • An air compressor was placed at the nose of the capsule to provide air to the ski pads and to improve the speed capability of the capsule.
  • the inclusion of a large compressor improved the capsule speed but required a large battery array to power it during the Hyperloop journey. It additionally took valuable space from the passenger compartment and added significant complexity.
  • the compressor serves as an important component for improving the speed of the capsule, where such improvement is not due to the thrust provided to push the capsule down the tube but is due to the reduction in the effective frontal area of the capsule.
  • the compressor provided a second path to direct air from in front of the capsule to the rear of capsule, adding to the annular region between the capsule and tube.
  • the ratio of this annulus to total tube area, known as the bypass ratio, is a key predictor of choking.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a schematic of a vehicle (also referred to as pod or capsule) within a tube (Source: see paper to Chin et al. titled “Open-Source Conceptual Sizing Models for the Hyperloop Passenger Pod", dated 5-9 January 2015 ).
  • Drag is mainly the contribution of two components: pressure drag and friction drag.
  • Pressure drag is the pressure exerted as the vehicle moves forward and pushes the air.
  • the drag is proportional to density. Consequently, reducing density has a substantial effect on drag and in turn on propulsion power. This can be obtained with a low-pressure tube.
  • the drag is proportional to the square of the velocity. Thus, drag rises fast with increasing velocity.
  • FIG. 4 depicts a graph of drag versus vehicle speed which identifies the critical vehicle speed that demarcates the pressure equilibrium scenario depicted in FIG. 2 and the choked flow scenario depicted in FIG. 3 .
  • a maximum vehicle speed can be defined at which choking flow occurs. This maximum speed has been studied in the previously noted paper to Chin et al. (2015).
  • FIG. 5 extracted from the Chin et al. (2015) article, depicts a graph of the bypass area ratio (Bypass/Tube) versus the bypass air flow Mach number.
  • FIG. 5 demonstrates that, for a reasonable vehicle size (bypass area less than 50% of tube area), the maximum vehicle speed is about Mach 0.25. This corresponds to 300 km/h. This is clearly unacceptable for such a novel transportation system.
  • FIGS. 6(A)-(B) The drawback of the approach depicted in FIGS. 6(A)-(B) is that the installation of a compressor introduces significant cost, complexity in the design of the vehicle, and safety issues. Regarding safety, Uncontained Engine Failure (UERF) where the blade of the compressor can break and damage the vehicle itself, the tube, and other vehicles, and induce high constraints in the development of such a transport system.
  • UERF Uncontained Engine Failure
  • CFD Computational fluid dynamics
  • German patent publication, DE 2054063 A1 discloses a high-speed passenger and container mass transit system using helium.
  • the German patent publication much like the current tube-based transportation systems, fails to utilize a mixture of air and helium, where the composition of each gas in the mixture is dynamically determined to optimize drag.
  • the German patent publication much like the current tube-based transportation systems, fails to utilize a mixture of air and helium, where the composition of each gas is dynamically determined depending on the desired velocity of the capsule.
  • DE 22 13 210 A1 discloses a method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube, comprising the steps of pumping the tube to a pressure which is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated and identifying a predetermined power value.
  • the present invention provides a method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube, the tube being a part of tubular transportation system for transporting one or more passengers or one or more cargos via a capsule, the tube being arranged along at least one predetermined route, the method comprising: (a) pumping the tube to a pressure that is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated; (b) identifying a predetermined power value; (c) identifying a first percentage, x, of helium based on the predetermined power value identified in (b) and a leak rate associated with the tube; and (e) maintaining, within each tube in the plurality of substantially evacuated tubes, a gaseous composition a gaseous composition comprising a mixture of a first percentage, x, of helium and a second percentage, (100-x), of air.
  • the present invention provides a method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube, the tube being a part of tubular transportation system for transporting one or more passengers or one or more cargos via a capsule, the tube being arranged along at least one predetermined route, the method comprising: (a) pumping the tube to a pressure that is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated; (b) identifying a predetermined power value; (c) identifying a desired capsule speed; (d) identifying a first percentage, x, of helium based on the predetermined power value identified in (b) and the desired capsule speed identified in (c) and a leak rate associated with each tube; (e) maintaining, within each tube in the plurality of substantially evacuated tubes, a gaseous composition a gaseous composition comprising a mixture of a first percentage, x, of helium and a second percentage, (100-x), of air.
  • the present invention provides a method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube, the tube being a part of tubular transportation system for transporting one or more passengers or one or more cargos via a capsule, the tube being arranged along at least one predetermined route, the method comprising: (a) pumping the tube to a pressure that is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated; (b) for each of a plurality of bypass ratios and a plurality of leak ratios, storing, in memory, data representative of a first range of total powers, a second range of percentages of helium, and third range of tube pressures, each total power in the range of total powers representing a power value that is a function of a first power to pump each tube to the substantially evacuated state and a second power to overcome aerodynamic drag in each tube; (c) identifying a predetermined power value; (d) identifying a desired capsule speed; (e) identifying a first percentage, x, of helium based on data stored in (b)
  • the present invention overcomes the pitfalls associated with the prior art by using a mixture of air and helium (in various ratios to be described later) to modify the fluid properties such as speed of sound, which enables reaching high vehicle speed at acceptable propulsion power.
  • Advantages of using a mixture of air and helium include obtaining different fluid properties, such as, reduced density, higher speed of sound and higher free molecular path. These different fluid properties can substantially reduce the drag on the vehicle and the propulsion power needed.
  • the present invention discloses mixing different gases that are lighter than air, where these gases have smaller molecular diameter.
  • gases There are numerous gasses which meet the requirement of a gas molecule smaller than air.
  • the subject of this patent application is the use of helium, which has attractive properties that can be exploited in tube-based transportation systems. While, the air in the tube could be replaced completely by helium, this could be hard to achieve.
  • the present invention discloses using a mixture of air and helium in various ratios (which is discussed in detail later in this patent application), which still has interesting properties, while also providing an implementation at a lower cost (when compared to previously described prior art systems and when compared to equivalent systems that use just helium).
  • Table 1 demonstrates that the amount of helium to be injected in a 10 km tube is low, whether considering pure helium or a mixture of helium and air. At 100 Pa, the entire 10 km tube could be filled with pure helium at current cost of less than $300 ( ⁇ $14.00/kg He). However, it is not possible to maintain a 100% helium content in a large welded tube due to leakage of air from outside the tube. It is the intent of this art to define optimum percentages of helium and air which reduce drag in the tube.
  • the first advantage is the possibility of significantly reducing the density of the gas. Since drag is proportional to the density, a reduction of the density of the gas directly impacts the drag. Table 2 below shows the density at atmospheric pressure for usual gases, extracted from the website (Source: Engineering Toolbox website).
  • Table 2 depicts the distinguishing features of lightest weight gases, of which helium and hydrogen have the lowest densities.
  • Helium has a density seven times lower than air at atmospheric pressure. This ratio is the same in a tube pressure of 100 Pa, which means that drag can be expected to be reduced by a factor of about seven. This is a major advantage that goes to the root of high speed transportation: reducing drag by reducing density.
  • a high speed of sound allows a higher vehicle speed without choked flow.
  • Table 3 is a list of the speed of sound entries for various gases (Source: Engineering Toolbox Website): From Table 3, it is seen that the lightest weight gases stand out in terms of their speed of sound entry.
  • Helium and hydrogen have the highest speed of sound.
  • Helium has a speed of sound three times higher than air while hydrogen has a speed of sound four times higher than air.
  • it is preferred to use Helium in the tube since flammability issues would have to be addressed with hydrogen, which would require some design changes).
  • the Kantrowitz limit occurs when gas flowing around the capsule becomes choked, i.e., at a speed of Mach 1. Mach 1 for air is 331 m/s at standard temperatures. Smaller molecular gases have higher speed of sound which allow them to flow much faster before choking. The capsule will not be subject to choking flows until the preferred, and much higher Mach speed is reached.
  • the Knudsen number compares to the mean free path, ⁇ , of the molecules and the vehicle characteristic size L (length or diameter). Hence, molecular flow region can be attained by increasing the mean free path.
  • ⁇ kT ⁇ 2 ⁇ P d m 2
  • k the Botzmann constant
  • P the pressure
  • d the molecular diameter
  • Kn number can be derived not from just lowering the pressure, but rather from changing the diameter of the gas molecule, d m , in the denominator of the expanded free mean path (EQN. 5).
  • FIG. 11 depicts Table 5 which lists the density by mass figures for both air and helium at 100 Pa.
  • the reduction in density of over seven times (0.00116/0.00016) reduces drag in a similar ratio (i.e., seven times). This advantage holds true at differing pressures in the continuum range. (Note: Due to round off errors the bypass ratio is sometimes shown as 0.488 or 0.489)
  • the 2D simulations provide the Drag Coefficient at different pod velocities.
  • the estimated 3D drag is then obtained by multiplying the drag coefficient 1/2 ⁇ tube V pod 2 S pod where ⁇ tube is the tube operating density, V pod is the pod velocity, and S pod is the frontal surface area of the pod.
  • FIG. 12 depicts a graph showing the drag coefficient from 2D simulation for air and helium.
  • the drag coefficient increases substantially when the velocity goes above the Kantrowitz limit. It is noted that the Kantrowitz limit for helium is reached at a speed about three times higher than that of air, which is in line with what was expected. It is also noted that below the Kantrowitz limit, the drag coefficients of helium and for air are similar (about 3.5 at 375 km/h). This is because the drag coefficient formula is drag divided by density.
  • FIG. 13 investigates the effect of density by plotting the actual drag for a 3D capsule against the capsule velocity.
  • the graph below illustrates the behavior of the estimated Drag of the actual 3D pod for helium and air.
  • the 3D drag is estimated using 2D Drag Coefficients and multiplying it by 1/2 ⁇ tube V pod 2 S pod .
  • FIG. 14 depicts a graph illustrating power reduction based on using light-weighted gas, where the graph compares requirements to overcome aerodynamic drag with air versus helium (at 100 Pa).
  • the same power to offset aerodynamic drag can achieve speeds of over 900 kph in a helium-based system but can only achieve 425 kph in an air-based tube. Twice the speed is achieved for the same cost in aerodynamic power.
  • replacing air or part of air in the tube by light-weight gases provides at least the following advantages: lower density (and, hence, lower drag, implying lower propulsion power), higher speed of sound (and, hence, higher vehicle speed before occurrence of the choking phenomenon), and higher mean free path (and, hence, lower pump power to achieve molecular flow as molecular flow may avoid choke phenomenon and thus decrease propulsion power).
  • FIG. 15 depicts the results of CFD studies comparing maximum velocities at the K-limit attainable due to variations in the helium-air mixtures. Drag is a useful indicator to chart against velocity as there is no economic advantage to achieving higher speeds if the drag increases correspondingly.
  • the dashed vertical lines show the speed at the K limits, first, on the left, for pure air and lastly for pure helium.
  • the second vertical line, on the right, is for a 100% by volume helium filled tube and shows a maximum speed of exceeding 1,200 km/hr with an only nominal increase in drag. Comparing that to the air maximum speed line it is noted that the achievable speed has increased nearly three times from 425 km/hr to over 1,225 km/hr.
  • the operational cost is a function of power. Choosing an optimal speed with reference to cost can be qualitatively seen from the power versus gas mixture graph shown in FIG. 16 . For example, given a power potential of approximately 27 kW, a target velocity of 800 km/hr may be achieved using a gaseous mixture of 5% air + 95% helium.
  • FIG. 17 illustrates a comparison of Drag versus Velocity, at the Kantrowitz limit, graphs for four basic tube pressures from 1-1000 Pa along with percentages of helium in air.
  • the velocity at Kantrowitz Limit increases as the percentage of helium increases in the mixture, for all pressures.
  • the increase in velocity at the Kantrowitz limit has a relatively low dependence on pressure.
  • different graphs for various pressures are examined. These pressure comparisons are first made on the basis of drag and are most interesting for the lowest pressure regime, 1 Pa, where the low pressure and high helium percentage transforms the flow to laminar, thus increasing drag 80% in the 1-100% helium range.
  • the 1000 Pa tube is also seen to create very high drag despite all combinations of air and helium. This will certainly result in high propulsive power requirements leading to impractical capsule onboard energy storage systems.
  • Drag is one of the key consumers of power that must be overcome by the propulsion system, the others being acceleration and gravity. Once the vehicle is at operational speed and running on level terrain, drag is the major drain on power consumption for propulsion purposes. Thus, economic operation depends on minimizing drag at the highest operation speeds and obtainable vacuum levels. Notice above that aerodynamic drag is shown to be increasing at a low rate ( ⁇ 25%) with significant speed increases. Operation at higher speeds is achievable with only incremental drag increases. Current high-speed rail does not have this advantage and thus is constrained to lower speeds or much higher power requirements or both.
  • FIG. 18 illustrates a power versus velocity graph where the power requirements are reviewed for various pressures and various air-helium mixtures to identify optimal operational ranges. Aerodynamic power consumption graphs with varying helium percentages at pressures of 1, 10, 100 and 1000 Pascals are shown.
  • the present invention identifies that helium percentages in air ranging from 75%-99% are practical and effective for increasing capsule speeds from a base of 400 kph in pure air to as high as 1,150 kph in a mix of 99% He and 1 % air. Lower percentages of helium also provide improvements as shown, but due to the relative low cost of helium, do not provide optimum or most cost effective operating points. Helium percentages in the 75%-99% range are practical to control with current state-of-the-art mass flow controllers, sensors and control systems.
  • the present invention also shows optimum tube pressures which are economical to achieve, ranging from 10-100 Pa. Pressures below 10 Pa, such as 1-10 Pa, show promise in reducing drag, but move into the range of laminar flow and transition to a lower maximum speed at K limit. It is apparent, however, that even at these very low-pressure ranges below 1-10 Pa, helium shows an increase in attainable speeds and thus this operational environment will gain improvement from the addition of helium from the speed perspective. But, it is similarly interesting that the change in power requirements is very little compared to a pure air system. Thus, the range of power at 1 Pa with and without helium is only 0.5 to 2.5 kW.
  • a light-weighted gas system does not derive much incremental advantage at these pressure ranges (1-10Pa) in the drag/power regimes.
  • top speeds do enjoy a large incremental increase of 400 kph to 1,150 kph and thus it is expected that operations below 10 Pa will also include large percentages of helium similar to the ranges at 10 to 100 Pa.
  • FIG. 19 illustrates a drag versus velocity graph, just as FIG. 17 , but for a lower bypass ratio of 0.208.
  • FIG. 19 depicts a low bypass system of 0.208 (4 m tube diameter and 10 m 2 pod area) and its aerodynamic drag improvements due to use of light-weighted gas mixtures.
  • the advantages of larger bypass ratio can be clearly seen in any of the above pressure graphs as the attainable speeds are more than double with the .489 bypass vs .208.
  • Top speed will be a major advantage on long routes and thus larger bypass ratios preferred, but on short routes the speed advantage is diminished, and smaller ratios may be acceptable.
  • smaller bypass ratios may be relevant for low-speed cargo operations during off hours and enables the use of larger cargo capsules in the same tube.
  • top speeds are reduced with the smaller bypass ratio, the advantages over pure air systems are still attained.
  • FIG. 20 illustrates a power versus velocity graph, just as FIG. 18 , but for the lower bypass ratio of 0.208.
  • the power requirements may be reviewed for various pressures and various Air-helium mixtures to identify optimal operational ranges. Due the higher drag of the low ratio systems at same speeds, more power is required to attain the same speed. However, with the 0.208 bypass system, maximum speeds are still significantly increased over 100% air systems.
  • FIG. 21 illustrates a comparison of two non-limiting bypass ratio examples used in this disclosure, along with a sample calculation of how the bypass ratio is calculated in each instance. It should be noted that while this disclosure uses two bypass ratios, i.e., 0.489 bypass ratio for a capsule to transport humans and 0.208 bypass ratio for a cargo capsule, these ratios should in no way be used to limit the scope of the present invention, as the teaching of the present invention can be applied to other bypass ratios.
  • each orifice follows standard gas laws and chokes at pressures drops above approximately 0.53 ⁇ P and will be limited to flow at sonic speeds. The choking of each orifice maintains constant flow up to a tube pressure approximately 53,700 Pa. Tube pressures in the region of 1-1000 Pa essentially creates equal air leaks.
  • each of these orifices will contribute small amount of Air into the vacuum vessel which must continuously be pumped if base pressure is to be maintained.
  • This continuous leakage makes achieving 100% He content impossible unless a perfectly leak tight tube can be designed.
  • practical implementations of such tube-based transportation systems will suffer from the effects of these leaks, making reaching 100% helium not a practical solution.
  • FIG. 23 illustrates a table depicting volume loading at 50 slm/km by percentage of helium.
  • FIG. 24 illustrates a table depicting volume loading at 5 slm/km by percentage of helium.
  • This leak rate is directly related to methods and materials of construction of the tube, where with knowledge of such methods and materials, one can populate Table in FIGS. 23 or 24 with more accurate numbers.
  • the leak rate may be calculated using standard vacuum system practices and should be measured for each part of the route.
  • Such estimated data associated with different portions of the route is critical in estimating base tube pressures and percentages of helium that can be reasonably achieved within each portion of the route.
  • FIG. 25 depicts a graph of pump power (in kW) versus the percentage of helium for various pressures.
  • vacuum pumps are very sensitive to volumetric flow rates with power (kW), increasing in a geometric fashion at He-Air percentages beyond approximately 90%.
  • These pumping power curves show the diminishing returns of trying to maintain high percentages of helium with respect to pumping power (kW).
  • This deleterious effect is most pronounced at low tube pressures which is counter to the desire to operate at low pressure to reduce drag.
  • FIG. 25 shows the negative effects of high helium percentages versus necessary pump power to maintain those percentages. More is not better.
  • the present invention leverages this effect to achieve optimum performance within a tube-based transportation system.
  • the most economical operating percentages can be deduced when coupling this result with the power required to overcome aerodynamic drag.
  • the present invention discloses a system and method for identifying optimum He-Air ranges based on the economics of power usage, both for pumping the tube to vacuum, and also for overcoming drag at operational speeds. Ideally, 100% He results in the lowest drag and highest speeds due to its reduced molecular size (improved speed) and lower density (reduced drag). The calculations following show that not only is 100% helium not possible.
  • FIGS. 26A-C shows a summary of power requirements (kW) to balance aerodynamic drag at a pressures of 1000 Pa, 100 Pa and 10 Pa, respectively, for various capsule speeds versus percentages of helium and Air.
  • the highest speeds can only be attained with the highest percentages of helium.
  • capsule/propulsion power as shown in FIG. 25 , those helium rich environments come at the cost of much added pump power. These two interactions need to be combined to formulate the least power and best operating points.
  • FIG. 27 depicts such a combination by way of a graph of total power (in kW) (combining pumping power at a given leak rate and aerodynamic power) versus the percentage of helium for various velocities at 100 Pa.
  • FIGS. 28A-C depicts such a non-limiting example, where the same analysis as FIGS. 25-27 is performed for a leak of 5 slm/km.
  • FIG. 28A depicts a graph of pump power (in kW) versus the percentage of helium for various pressures for an air leak of 5 slm/km.
  • FIG 28B depicts a graph of the capsule power (in kW) at 100 Pa. Since capsule power is not dependent on leak rate this is the same as graph 26B previously shown.
  • FIG. 28C depicts a graph of total power (in kW) (combining pumping power and aerodynamic power) versus the percentage of helium for various velocities at 100 Pa for an air leak of 5 slm/km.
  • graphs depicted in FIGS. 25-27 relate to a bypass ratio of 0.489 but, similar, but smaller effects, may be obtained for bypass ratios lower than 0.489.
  • the basis of the method is to separate the various inputs, look at the effect of He-Air mixtures on those inputs, then to combine the inputs into a simple graph showing ideal operating conditions.
  • the graphs shown in FIG. 27 summarize results presented in FIGS. 25-26 by combining them to allow finding the optimum helium-Air percentages. These are done for expected velocities with pressure of 100 Pa and 0.489 bypass ratio, including as assumption of a 50 slm/km leak.
  • the graphs in FIG. 27 depicts fairly flat power requirements at 600, 700 and 800 km/h up to 90% He mixtures. Looking closely at the graph in FIG. 27 (and using the data behind the graph to identify more precisely), it is seen that 75%-85% helium in the tube appears acceptable. An operator would not want to operate at 75% He and 800 km/h, however, as there would be very little safety margin before reaching the K-limit and ensuing shock in the bypass area.
  • FIG. 29 illustrates see how these graphs depicted in FIGS. 25-27 may be combined to provide optimum operating points for power (cost) and helium-Air ratios.
  • FIG. 29 shows an optimum helium operating point at 600 kph based solely on power requirements--least cost per km for tube pressures of 100 Pa for this set of speeds. This could be considered the most economic (or eco mode) at that pressure and set of speeds.
  • the same optimization can be done at 700 kph requiring 80% of helium and 20 percentage of Air, with nearly 50% more power expended, but resulting in shorter transit times by 17% (based on increasing the speed from 600 km/h to 700 km/h).
  • helium concentrations in the high range are desirable but come at a higher cost with respect to power.
  • the present invention envisions maintaining, or creating, ideal helium-air ratios from both a safety and profit point of views.
  • power consumption has been used as an analog for profit, however, there are several operating power points which may be chosen depending on the motives of the operator. For example, minimum power does not occur at maximum speeds, and thus lengthens the trip time. Some operators (military, medical transport, etc.) may choose the 'optimum' power to attain maximum speeds. The methods as per the present invention identify what percentages of helium are required to achieve such maximum speeds.
  • the process of adding helium to the tube is certainly a very cost effective and simple method of improving tube-based transportation system performance.
  • Using helium to optimize improves both capital and operational economics.
  • identifying and operating in these optimum spots, and even varying the percentage of helium based on changing operations (passenger vs cargo) can be automated and implemented during daily operations.
  • the percentage of helium is a major determinant of maximum speed and least power along with bypass ratio, air leakage, and tube pressure.
  • the distribution and percentages of the light-weight gas within the length of the tube is an important consideration to maintain these advantages.
  • the ability to maintain that percentage of helium and homogeneity within the tube is important to achieving these advantages.
  • we also see that much higher percentages of the light-weight gas are sometimes desired or required.
  • Different portions of a route may be speed constrained due to curves, stations, elevations changes, etc., while other portions of the route will allow maximum speeds.
  • a homogeneous mixture must be attainable, but there several conditions under which the most helium rich mixture economically attainable is preferred, such as high-speed sections of the route. Methods of achieving both homogeneous and enriched He atmospheres are described below.
  • the present invention proposes additional components to create and to maintain a homogeneous mixture of gases and additionally how to improve some tube areas resulting in increased local percentages of light-weight gases.
  • the methods used to place the preferred gases into the tube is an area to optimize. Multiple methods are envisioned for filling the tube with these gases. Individual and/or combined methods such as injection through the tube wall, injection from the capsule, from valves placed onto the tube or tube attachments, from the capsule, or potentially from the vacuum pumping system all are viable methods.
  • Injecting the small diameter gas through various critical points in the capsule has some potential significant advantages to enrichen the helium content in localized areas around the capsule to reduce shock waves, turbulence, and possible capsule instability due to these factors. It can also be surmised that capsules in the tube behind a lead injecting capsule may benefit significantly by these same factors. Such a method of optimized capsule shell injection is another advantage of the present invention.
  • a gas separator can be coupled to the pumping system. It would separate air and re-inject the recuperated gas.
  • Novel methods of capturing the vacuum pump exhaust and separating out the smaller diameter gases through typical air separation units or other types of separation could be used to recycle the gas back into the tube and are also envisioned as part of the present invention.
  • Homogeneity can be ensured by the uniformly spaced reservoirs of gas, or gas tanks. Homogeneity can also be ensured by the motion of the vehicle, possibly creating vortices and/or turbulence in their wake that mix the gases.
  • FIG. 30 depicts a graph of the diffusion coefficients for various gas in air (source: Engineering Toolbox website).
  • FIG. 30 shows that light-weight gases, such as helium and hydrogen, have much higher diffusion coefficients in air than other gases.
  • helium has a diffusion coefficient almost four times higher than methane or water vapor with hydrogen being slightly superior. This makes helium and hydrogen the best candidates to obtain and maintain a homogeneous mixture within the tubes.
  • FIG. 31 depicts a first implementation that includes a set of helium tanks uniformly fitted along the tube length, where helium is injected with controlled valves that open or close to maintain the desired level of helium.
  • the pumping system is linked to a separator system that removes air and re-injects helium in the tank. For a system without losses, the helium that left the tube because of the pump is constantly refilled in the tank.
  • FIG. 32 depicts a second implementation that includes helium tanks embedded in the vehicles.
  • the tanks open helium release via command control.
  • the helium can be released in the wake of the vehicle, taking advantage of the vortices for good mixing.
  • the helium tank can be filled when vehicles are docked. Helium is collected by the separation system integrated in the Pumping System.
  • FIG. 33 depicts an approach that combines the approaches of FIGS. 31 and 32 .
  • the embodiment depicted in FIG. 31 involves injection of the gases or mixtures directly into the tube via ports connected to mass flow controllers and valves, supplied by gas lines or compressed gas bottles, to precisely control the amounts of each gas introduced.
  • the amount will be dependent on analysis of the gases within the tube and controlled by the Operations Control Center (OCC).
  • OOC Operations Control Center
  • the spacing of these injection points needs to be engineered. It may be that injecting He into the tube just in front of the moving capsule will aid the capsule aerodynamics. Injecting He, such that its percentage is very high as the capsule approaches the injection point could aid in reducing shock waves and in reducing drag.
  • FIG. 32 i.e., capsule body injection
  • This design would more precisely inject the gases to areas most susceptible to drag and shock around the capsule.
  • FIG. 33 combines the teachings of the embodiments depicted in FIG. 30 and FIG. 31 .
  • FIG. 34 depicts one embodiment of the present invention's method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube that is part of a tubular transportation system for transporting one or more passengers or one or more cargos via a capsule, where the tube is arranged along a predetermined route.
  • the method comprises the steps of: (a) pumping the tube to a pressure that is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated - step 3402; (b) identifying a predetermined power value - step 3404; (c) identifying a first percentage, x, of helium based on the predetermined power value identified in (b) and a leak rate associated with the tube - step 3406; (d) maintaining, within each tube in the plurality of substantially evacuated tubes, a gaseous composition a gaseous composition comprising a mixture of a first percentage, x, of helium and a second percentage, ( 100-x ), of air - step 3408.
  • FIG. 35 depicts another embodiment of the present invention's method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube that is part of a tubular transportation system for transporting one or more passengers or one or more cargos via a capsule, where the tube is arranged along a predetermined route.
  • the method comprises the steps of: (a) pumping the tube to a pressure that is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated - step 3502; (b) identifying a predetermined power value - step 3504; (c) identifying a desired capsule speed - step 3506; (d) identifying a first percentage, x, of helium based on the predetermined power value identified in (b), the desired capsule speed identified in (c) and a leak rate associated with each tube - step 3508; (e) maintaining, within each tube in the plurality of substantially evacuated tubes, a gaseous composition a gaseous composition comprising a mixture of a first percentage, x, of helium and a second percentage, ( 100-x ), of air - step 3510.
  • FIG. 36 depicts another embodiment of the present invention's method for maintaining a gaseous composition within a tube, the tube being a part of tubular transportation system for transporting one or more passengers or one or more cargos via a capsule, the tube being arranged along at least one predetermined route, wherein the method comprises: (a) pumping the tube to a pressure that is below atmospheric pressure until the tube is substantially evacuated - step 3602; (b) for each of a plurality of bypass ratios and a plurality of leak ratios, storing, in memory, data representative of a first range of total powers, a second range of percentages of helium, and third range of tube pressures, each total power in the range of total powers representing a power value that is a function of a first power to pump each tube to the substantially evacuated state and a second power to overcome aerodynamic drag in each tube - step 3604; (c) identifying a predetermined power value - step 3606; (d) identifying a desired capsule speed - step 3608; (e)
  • the feature of maintaining within each tube (in a plurality of substantially evacuated tubes) particular percentages of helium and air can be implemented in software process where a processor (or controller) executes instructions to control mechanisms, such as valves, to release specific percentages of helium or release specific percentages of helium and air.
  • a processor or controller
  • the feature of picking a percentage helium based on a predetermined power value and a leak rate associated with each tube can be implemented in software process where a processor (or controller) executes instructions stored in storage to identify such a percentage of helium.
  • the feature of picking a percentage helium based on a predetermined power value that is a function of both pump power and power to overcome drag and a leak rate associated with each tube can be implemented in software process where a processor (or controller) executes instructions stored in storage to identify such a percentage of helium.
  • the feature of picking a percentage helium based on a predetermined power value, a desired speed of the capsule, and a leak rate associated with each tube can be implemented in software process where a processor (or controller) executes instructions stored in storage to identify such a percentage of helium.
  • the above-described features and applications can be implemented as software processes that are specified as a set of instructions recorded on a computer readable storage medium (also referred to as computer readable medium).
  • a computer readable storage medium also referred to as computer readable medium.
  • processing unit(s) e.g., one or more processors, cores of processors, or other processing units
  • Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure may also include tangible and/or non-transitory computer-readable storage media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon.
  • Such non-transitory computer-readable storage media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer, including the functional design of any special purpose processor.
  • non-transitory computer-readable media can include flash memory, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions, data structures, or processor chip design.
  • the computer readable media does not include carrier waves and electronic signals passing wirelessly or over wired connections.
  • Computer-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions.
  • Computer-executable instructions also include program modules that are executed by computers in stand-alone or network environments.
  • program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, objects, and the functions inherent in the design of special-purpose processors, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
  • Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of the program code means for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps.
  • processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer.
  • a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both.
  • the essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing or executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data.
  • a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks.
  • mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks.
  • a computer need not have such devices.
  • a computer can be embedded in another device, e.g., a controller, a programmable logic controller, just to name a few.
  • the term "software” is meant to include firmware residing in read-only memory or applications stored in magnetic storage or flash storage, for example, a solid-state drive, which can be read into memory for processing by a processor.
  • multiple software technologies can be implemented as sub-parts of a larger program while remaining distinct software technologies.
  • multiple software technologies can also be implemented as separate programs.
  • any combination of separate programs that together implement a software technology described here is within the scope of the subject technology.
  • the software programs when installed to operate on one or more electronic systems, define one or more specific machine implementations that execute and perform the operations of the software programs.
  • a computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative or procedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment.
  • a computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system.
  • a program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code).
  • a computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
  • Some implementations include electronic components, for example microprocessors, storage and memory that store computer program instructions in a machine-readable or computer-readable medium (alternatively referred to as computer-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or machine-readable storage media).
  • computer-readable media include RAM, ROM, read-only compact discs (CD-ROM), recordable compact discs (CD-R), rewritable compact discs (CD-RW), read-only digital versatile discs (e.g., DVD-ROM, dual-layer DVD-ROM), a variety of recordable/rewritable DVDs (e.g., DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, etc.), flash memory (e.g., SD cards, mini-SD cards, micro-SD cards, etc.), magnetic or solid state hard drives, read-only and recordable Blu-Ray ® discs, ultra density optical discs, any other optical or magnetic media, and floppy disks.
  • CD-ROM compact discs
  • CD-R recordable compact discs
  • the computer-readable media can store a computer program that is executable by at least one processing unit and includes sets of instructions for performing various operations.
  • Examples of computer programs or computer code include machine code, for example is produced by a compiler, and files including higher-level code that are executed by a computer, an electronic component, or a microprocessor using an interpreter.
  • ASICs application specific integrated circuits
  • FPGAs field programmable gate arrays
  • integrated circuits execute instructions that are stored on the circuit itself.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)

Claims (30)

  1. Verfahren zum Aufrechterhalten einer gasförmigen Zusammensetzung in einer Röhre, wobei die Röhre ein Teil eines röhrenförmigen Transportsystems ist, das aus einer Vielzahl von Rohren hergestellt ist, um einen oder mehrere Passagiere oder ein Frachtgut oder mehrere Frachtgüter über eine Kapsel zu transportieren, wobei die Röhre entlang wenigstens einer vorbestimmten Route angeordnet ist, wobei das Verfahren aufweist:
    (a) Pumpen der Röhre auf einen Druck, der unter dem Luftdruck liegt, bis die Röhre im Wesentlichen luftentleert ist;
    (b) Identifizieren eines vorbestimmten Energiewerts;
    gekennzeichnet durch
    (c) Identifizieren eines ersten Prozentsatzes x an Helium basierend auf dem vorbestimmten in (b) identifizierten Energiewert und einer mit der Röhre verbundenen Leckrate; und
    (d) Aufrechterhalten in einer jeden Röhre in der Vielzahl von im Wesentlichen luftentleerten Röhren einer gasförmigen Zusammensetzung, die eine Mischung aus einem ersten Prozentsatz x an Helium und einem zweiten Prozentsatz (100 - x) an Luft aufweist.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der vorbestimmte Energiewert ein beliebiger von den folgenden ist: erschwingliche Energie, minimale Energie oder akzeptable Energie.
  3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin den Schritt des Auswählens des vorbestimmten Energiewerts als eine Funktion einer ersten Energie, um eine jede Röhre im Wesentlichen in den luftentleerten Zustand zu pumpen, und einer zweite Energie, um einen Luftwiderstand in einer jeden Röhre zu überwinden, aufweist.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Druck ausgewählt ist aus dem folgenden Bereich: 1 Pa bis 100 Pa.
  5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei 50% ≤ x ≤ 99%.
  6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung durch eine Wand, die mit der wenigstens einen Röhre verbunden ist.
  7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung in wenigstens eine Röhre über die Kapsel.
  8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung durch eine Wand, die mit der wenigstens einen Röhre verbunden ist, und des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung in wenigstens eine Röhre über die Kapsel.
  9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist das Erfassen der gasförmigen Zusammensetzung in einer jeden Röhre unter Verwendung eines Rezirkulationsmechanismus und Rezirkulieren von wenigstens einigen von diesen Gasen zurück in die gleiche Röhre.
  10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 9, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist den Schritt des Konzentrierens der Gase unter Verwendung von wenigstens einer Trenneinheit, die Teil des Rezirkulationsmechanismus ist, vor dem Rezirkulieren dieser zurück in die Röhre.
  11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist den Schritt des Aufrechterhaltens der erforderlichen Gaskonzentrationen über einen Abpump- und Rückfüllmechanismus.
  12. Verfahren zum Aufrechterhalten einer gasförmigen Zusammensetzung in einer Röhre, wobei die Röhre ein Teil eines röhrenförmigen Transportsystems ist, um einen oder mehrere Passagiere oder ein Frachtgut oder mehrere Frachtgüter über eine Kapsel zu transportieren, wobei die Röhre entlang wenigstens einer vorbestimmten Route angeordnet ist, wobei das Verfahren aufweist:
    (a) Pumpen der Röhre auf einen Druck, der unter dem Luftdruck liegt, bis die Röhre im Wesentlichen luftentleert ist;
    (b) Identifizieren eines vorbestimmten Energiewerts;
    gekennzeichnet durch
    (c) Identifizieren einer gewünschten Kapselgeschwindigkeit;
    (d) Identifizieren eines ersten Prozentsatzes x an Helium basierend auf dem vorbestimmten in (b) identifizierten Energiewert, der in (c) identifizierten gewünschten Kapselgeschwindigkeit und einer mit einer jeden Röhre verbundenen Leckrate;
    (e) Aufrechterhalten in einer jeden Röhre in der Vielzahl von im Wesentlichen luftentleerten Röhren einer gasförmigen Zusammensetzung, die eine Mischung aus einem ersten Prozentsatz x an Helium und einem zweiten Prozentsatz (100 - x) an Luft aufweist.
  13. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei der vorbestimmte Energiewert ein beliebiger von den folgenden ist: erschwingliche Energie, minimale Energie oder akzeptable Energie.
  14. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin den Schritt des Auswählens des vorbestimmten Energiewerts als eine Funktion einer ersten Energie, um eine jede Röhre in den im Wesentlichen luftentleerten Zustand zu pumpen, und einer zweiten Energie, um einen Luftwiderstand in einer jeden Röhre zu überwinden, aufweist.
  15. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei der Druck ausgewählt ist aus dem folgenden Bereich: 1 Pa bis 100 Pa.
  16. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei 50% ≤ x ≤ 99%.
  17. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung durch eine Wand, die mit der wenigstens einen Röhre verbunden ist.
  18. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung in wenigstens eine Röhre über die Kapsel.
  19. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung durch eine Wand, die mit der wenigstens einen Röhre verbunden ist, und des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung in wenigstens eine Röhre über die Kapsel.
  20. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: das Erfassen der gasförmigen Zusammensetzung in einer jeden Röhre unter Verwendung eines Rezirkulationsmechanismus und Rezirkulieren von wenigstens einigen von diesen Gasen zurück in die gleiche Röhre.
  21. Verfahren nach Anspruch 20, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Konzentrierens der Gase unter Verwendung von wenigstens einer Trenneinheit, die Teil des Rezirkulationsmechanismus ist, vor dem Rezirkulieren dieser zurück in die Röhre.
  22. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Aufrechterhaltens der erforderlichen Gaskonzentrationen über einen Abpump- und Rückfüllmechanismus.
  23. Verfahren zum Aufrechterhalten einer gasförmigen Zusammensetzung in einer Röhre, wobei die Röhre ein Teil eines röhrenförmigen Transportsystems ist, um einen oder mehrere Passagiere oder ein Frachtgut oder mehrere Frachtgüter über eine Kapsel zu transportieren, wobei die Röhre entlang wenigstens einer vorbestimmten Route angeordnet ist, wobei das Verfahren aufweist:
    (a) Pumpen der Röhre auf einen Druck, der unter dem Luftdruck liegt, bis die Röhre im Wesentlichen luftentleert ist;
    (b) Identifizieren eines vorbestimmten Energiewerts;
    gekennzeichnet durch
    (c) für ein jedes der Vielzahl von Umgehungsverhältnissen und einer Vielzahl von Leckverhältnissen, Speichern, in einem Speicher, von Daten, die für einen ersten Bereich der Gesamtenergien, einen zweiten Bereich der Prozentsätze an Helium und einen dritten Bereich von Röhrendrücke repräsentativ sind, wobei jede Gesamtenergie im Bereich der Gesamtenergien einen Energiewert darstellt, der eine Funktion ist einer ersten Energie, um eine jede Röhre in den im Wesentlichen luftentleerten Zustand zu pumpen, und einer zweiten Energie, um den Luftwiderstand in jede Röhre zu überwinden;
    (d) Identifizieren einer gewünschten Kapselgeschwindigkeit;
    (e) Identifizieren eines ersten Prozentsatzes x an Helium basierend auf Daten, die in (b) entsprechend dem vorbestimmten in (c) identifizierten Energiewert, der in (d) identifizierten gewünschten Kapselgeschwindigkeit und einer mit einer jeden Röhre verbundenen Leckrate, gespeichert sind; und
    (f) Aufrechterhalten in einer jeden Röhre in der Vielzahl der im Wesentlichen luftentleerten Röhren einer gasförmigen Zusammensetzung, die eine Mischung aus einem ersten Prozentsatz x an Helium und einem zweiten Prozentsatz (100 - x) an Luft aufweist.
  24. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei der vorbestimmte Energiewert ein beliebiger von den folgenden ist: erschwingliche Energie, minimale Energie oder akzeptable Energie.
  25. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin den Schritt des Auswählens des vorbestimmten Energiewerts als eine Funktion einer ersten Energie, um eine jede Röhre im Wesentlichen in einen luftentleerten Zustand zu pumpen, und einer zweiten Energie, um einen Luftwiderstand in einer jeden Röhre zu überwinden, aufweist.
  26. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei der Druck ausgewählt ist aus dem folgenden Bereich: 1 Pa bis 100 Pa.
  27. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei 50% ≤ x ≤ 99%.
  28. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung durch eine Wand, die mit der wenigstens einen Röhre verbunden ist.
  29. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung in wenigstens eine Röhre über die Kapsel.
  30. Verfahren nach Anspruch 23, wobei das Verfahren weiterhin aufweist: den Schritt des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung durch eine Wand, die mit der wenigstens einen Röhre verbunden ist, und des Einspritzens von entweder Helium oder einer Kombination aus Helium und Luft in die gasförmige Zusammensetzung in wenigstens eine Röhre über die Kapsel.
EP18924874.3A 2018-06-29 2018-06-29 Verfahren zur verwendung von luft und helium in niederdruckrohrtransportsystemen Active EP3814165B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2018/040357 WO2020005278A1 (en) 2018-06-29 2018-06-29 A method of using air and helium in low-pressure tube transportation systems

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3814165A1 EP3814165A1 (de) 2021-05-05
EP3814165A4 EP3814165A4 (de) 2022-03-16
EP3814165B1 true EP3814165B1 (de) 2022-12-14

Family

ID=68984922

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18924874.3A Active EP3814165B1 (de) 2018-06-29 2018-06-29 Verfahren zur verwendung von luft und helium in niederdruckrohrtransportsystemen

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3814165B1 (de)
CN (1) CN112654524A (de)
ES (1) ES2943659T3 (de)
WO (1) WO2020005278A1 (de)

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2213210A1 (de) * 1972-03-16 1973-10-04 Boes Christian Vakuum-helium-rohrschnellbahn
US5909710A (en) * 1997-08-15 1999-06-08 Cummins; Richard D. Air-levitated train
US5950543A (en) * 1997-10-10 1999-09-14 Et3.Com Inc. Evacuated tube transport
US8496412B2 (en) * 2006-12-15 2013-07-30 General Electric Company System and method for eliminating process gas leak in a solids delivery system
CN101746378A (zh) * 2008-12-16 2010-06-23 彭智祥 一种轻质气体管道
CN105730459B (zh) * 2010-12-16 2018-07-27 大卫·达尔林普尔 真空管运输系统
CN102602400A (zh) * 2012-03-19 2012-07-25 杜顺峰 一种电路控制磁力吸引的环形管道风力列车运行系统
US9228298B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2016-01-05 Daryl Oster Evacuated tube transport system with interchange capability
CA2911055C (en) * 2013-04-30 2021-03-16 Xavier Allaire Transportation system and displacement device therefor
CN104085399A (zh) * 2014-04-24 2014-10-08 张启文 低空轨道旋翼氦气球高速大型客货车
CN107179163B (zh) * 2017-06-05 2019-02-22 南京扬子动力工程有限责任公司 大型变压器密封元件的高速吸枪泄漏检测装置及检测方法
US10286928B1 (en) * 2018-06-29 2019-05-14 Hyperloop Transportation Technologies, Inc. Method of using air and helium in low-pressure tube transportation systems
WO2020005273A1 (en) * 2018-06-29 2020-01-02 Hyperloop Transportation Technologies, Inc. Tube transportation systems using a gaseous mixture of air and helium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2020005278A1 (en) 2020-01-02
EP3814165A1 (de) 2021-05-05
CN112654524A (zh) 2021-04-13
ES2943659T3 (es) 2023-06-15
EP3814165A4 (de) 2022-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10286928B1 (en) Method of using air and helium in low-pressure tube transportation systems
US11214282B2 (en) Method and an article of manufacture for determining optimum operating points for power/cost and helium-air ratios in a tubular transportation system
US11230300B2 (en) Method of using air and helium in low-pressure tube transportation systems
KR101922197B1 (ko) 수송 시스템
US10286927B1 (en) Tube transportation systems using a gaseous mixture of air and helium
CN105730459B (zh) 真空管运输系统
Prewitz et al. Hydrogen as the fuel of the future in aircrafts–challenges and opportunities
US11235787B2 (en) Tube transportation systems using a gaseous mixture of air and hydrogen
WO2020005273A1 (en) Tube transportation systems using a gaseous mixture of air and helium
EP3814165B1 (de) Verfahren zur verwendung von luft und helium in niederdruckrohrtransportsystemen
US11242072B2 (en) Method of using air and hydrogen in low pressure tube transportation
US20220153317A1 (en) Combined Pumping / Gas Source Unit Configured For Use in a Tubular Transportation System
US20220153318A1 (en) Injection System and Method for Injecting Helium and/or Hydrogen in Critical Aerodynamic Areas Around a Capsule in a Tube Transportation System
US20230399030A1 (en) A tube transport system for very high vehicle speeds, a specific tube assembly to achieve high vacuum, and method of operating a tube transport system
Nikitaev Implications of alternative in-situ propellants used in nuclear thermal propulsion engines
CN102040011A (zh) 以速度控制和地形选择调制重力
Kozeny et al. Real-time mathematical description of a fuel cell system with a passive hydrogen recirculation
Miller Hydrogen tube vehicle for supersonic transport: Analysis of the concept
Sarae et al. Sounding rocket experiment on chill-down process with liquid nitrogen in a complex channel
Paul et al. Proposed ITS Cargo Modules to Initiate a Chemical Industry on Mars
Behruzi et al. Active and passive sloshing mitigation in tanks
Alptekin et al. Demonstration of Advanced Mars ISRU CO2 Recovery System
GORMLEY et al. Pressurization assessment for large liquid boosters
Meier et al. Feasibility study of air bearing rocket sled slippers
Feldtkeller et al. Compliant Air Skates, An Experiment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210127

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20220210

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E01B 25/30 20060101ALI20220204BHEP

Ipc: B65G 53/04 20060101ALI20220204BHEP

Ipc: B61B 13/12 20060101ALI20220204BHEP

Ipc: B61B 13/10 20060101ALI20220204BHEP

Ipc: B61B 13/08 20060101ALI20220204BHEP

Ipc: B60L 13/10 20060101ALI20220204BHEP

Ipc: B60L 13/03 20060101AFI20220204BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20220720

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602018044378

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1537482

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602018044378

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: COHAUSZ & FLORACK PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAELTE P, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20221214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230314

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1537482

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20221214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2943659

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20230615

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230516

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230414

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230626

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230626

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230414

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602018044378

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230720

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230627

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230703

Year of fee payment: 6

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20230915

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230629

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230630