EP3806126A1 - Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay - Google Patents

Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3806126A1
EP3806126A1 EP19201657.4A EP19201657A EP3806126A1 EP 3806126 A1 EP3806126 A1 EP 3806126A1 EP 19201657 A EP19201657 A EP 19201657A EP 3806126 A1 EP3806126 A1 EP 3806126A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
assembly
relay
armature
inductance
coil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19201657.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3806126B1 (en
Inventor
Matthias Kroeker
Christian Lindner
Harry Koch
Peter Sandeck
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TE Connectivity Germany GmbH
Original Assignee
TE Connectivity Germany GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TE Connectivity Germany GmbH filed Critical TE Connectivity Germany GmbH
Priority to EP19201657.4A priority Critical patent/EP3806126B1/en
Priority to DE102020126215.9A priority patent/DE102020126215A1/en
Publication of EP3806126A1 publication Critical patent/EP3806126A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3806126B1 publication Critical patent/EP3806126B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H47/00Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
    • H01H47/002Monitoring or fail-safe circuits
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H1/00Contacts
    • H01H1/12Contacts characterised by the manner in which co-operating contacts engage
    • H01H1/14Contacts characterised by the manner in which co-operating contacts engage by abutting
    • H01H1/20Bridging contacts
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H47/00Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
    • H01H2047/008Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current with a drop in current upon closure of armature or change of inductance
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H47/00Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
    • H01H47/22Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for supplying energising current for relay coil
    • H01H47/32Energising current supplied by semiconductor device
    • H01H47/325Energising current supplied by semiconductor device by switching regulator

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an assembly for and a method of monitoring the status of a relay having an armature and a coil for moving the armature.
  • Relays are often used for switching currents with a contact bridge that is movable relative to stationary or fixed contacts. Under faulty conditions the contact bridge can be welded to the stationary contacts for example due to an overcurrent. As this is a dangerous configuration, it is necessary to be able to monitor the switching state and/or detect such a welding. Current solutions for doing this are, however, very bulky.
  • an assembly for monitoring the status of a relay having an armature and a coil for moving the armature wherein the assembly comprises an inductance measurement device adapted for measuring the inductance of the coil.
  • the object is also achieved by a method of monitoring the status of a relay having an armature and a coil for moving the armature, wherein an inductance of the coil is measured.
  • the inductance measurement device can comprise a current measurement device to allow a simple implementation.
  • the circuit can discriminate the inductance difference between partially closed armature and fully open armature.
  • the assembly can comprise an oscillator adapted for creating an alternating current. This can allow a quick measurement.
  • the inventive solution can be part of a relay assembly comprising a relay and an assembly according to the invention.
  • the relay and the assembly can have a common ground.
  • the assembly can be connected to a control circuit of the relay. This can keep the configuration simple and compact.
  • the assembly can be adapted to be connected to the control circuit of the relay. It can be added to existing relays.
  • control circuit and the assembly are arranged on the same PCB. This keeps the overall device simple and compact.
  • PCB can comprise additional elements for performing the measurement.
  • the assembly can be connected to the relay via a capacitor.
  • Relays are often operated with a direct current (DC) or a current that is similar to a direct current.
  • the capacitor can thus achieve a good decoupling.
  • the assembly can be arranged within a housing of the relay. This keeps the configuration compact.
  • a connector of the relay assembly can comprise at least one pin for a signal of the assembly.
  • signals indicative of a measurement can be transmitted.
  • the signal could indicate a position or a status of the contact bridge or whether a fault condition exists.
  • the pin can be used to output current or voltage that has to be processed in additional elements.
  • the assembly can be arranged outside a housing of the relay.
  • the assembly can then be added to existing relays without big modifications.
  • the assembly can, for example, be at least partially located in a control circuit, e.g. an engine control unit.
  • the armature can be at least partially located in the coil.
  • the armature is located entirely or almost entirely within the coil.
  • the armature can be located in a space defined by the outlines of the coil and/or a housing of the coil.
  • the inductance can be measured at at least one frequency with an alternating current.
  • the frequency can be selected such that a certain difference in the inductance values exists between a normal and a fault state.
  • the method can comprise a step of detecting a fault state of the armature.
  • a fault state can in particular be a state in which the switching has not taken place although a corresponding control signal is applied.
  • the detection of the fault state can be made by comparing the measured inductance to a predefined value. If the measured inductance is below or above a certain threshold value, a fault state can be diagnosed.
  • the predefined value can depend on the inductance value of a normal state and can, for example, be 20% higher or lower than such a normal state value.
  • the inductance can be measured at at least two frequencies.
  • the assembly or the method can be such that the status is only monitored in a non-energized state of the relay.
  • the application also covers a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the inventive method.
  • the application covers a computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the inventive method.
  • Figs. 1 and 2 the operation of a relay 100 is depicted.
  • Fig. 1 can be seen as an energized state 401 of a coil 220 that results in a closed state 411 of a load circuit 255.
  • a current runs through the coil 220, which generates a magnetic field that pulls an armature 210 inwards.
  • the armature 210 is coupled to a contact bridge 240 via a transfer rod 246 and an attachment assembly 247.
  • a contact bridge 240 is thus pushed onto two fixed contacts 250 of a load circuit 255 and closes the load circuit 255.
  • a non-energized state 402 of the coil 220 resulting in an open state 412 of the load circuit 255 is shown.
  • the armature 210 is pushed outwards by a spring 245.
  • the contact bridge 240 is thus pulled away from the fixed contacts 250 so that the load circuit 255 is open.
  • Fig. 1 can also be seen as showing such a fault state 406 in which the load circuit 255 is closed or almost closed although the coil 220 is in a non-energized state 402.
  • the relay assembly 300 can comprise an assembly 100 that comprises an inductance measurement device 10 adapted for measuring the inductance of the coil 220. Details of such embodiments are shown in Figs. 3 and 4 .
  • the inductance of the coil 220 depends on the position of the armature 210 in the coil 220. In case of a fault condition, in which the contact bridge 240 is welded to at least one fixed contact 250, the armature 210 cannot move back although the coil 220 is not energized. In the embodiment of Fig. 3 , two coils 220 are present, wherein one of the coils 220 can be activated selectively by a transistor 56.
  • the assembly 100 can more generally be adapted to detect or measure the position of the armature 210. Such a position measurement can, for example, be used to detect further fault conditions. For example, the movement profile of the armature 210 can be analyzed to check whether the friction is increased. Further, the assembly 100 could be used to detect the tear and wear of contact elements 241 located on the contact bridge 240 and the fixed contacts 250. Such contact elements 241 are used up during the lifetime of the relay 200. The lack of enough material in the contact elements 241 can cause dangerous situations. The assembly 100 can be adapted to detect such conditions, for example by detecting an increased movement span of the armature 210.
  • the assembly comprises an oscillator 20 adapted for creating an alternating current.
  • the frequency of the alternating current can be constant or variable.
  • the alternating current is used for measuring the inductance in the coil 220.
  • the inductance measurement device 10 comprises a current measurement device 15 that measures the current resulting in the circuit.
  • the current in the circuit depends on the inductance of the coil 220.
  • the inductance measurement device 10 is adapted to calculate the maximum current measured with the current measurement device 15.
  • the relay 200 and the assembly 100 have a common ground 40 in order to simplify the electrical layout and in order to keep the number of pins 60 that are necessary for contacting the relay assembly 300 low.
  • three pins 60 are necessary, which is only one pin more than a relay 200 without an assembly 100.
  • a schematically shown connector 62 having the pins in a housing 64 can thus be similar in size to a connector with only two pins 60.
  • the assembly 100 is connected to a control circuit 215 of the relay 200, which is shown only schematically.
  • the assembly 100 can be arranged on the same PCB as the control circuit 215.
  • a capacitor 50 can be used to decouple a control signal for the switching of the relay 200, which is a direct current, or a signal similar to a direct current, from the alternating current used in the assembly 100.
  • the assembly 100 is arranged within a housing 230 of the relay 200.
  • the assembly 100 can be arranged outside a housing 230 of the relay 200, for example in an external control circuit or an engine control unit. In such a configuration, it could suffice to use only two pins 60 in the connector 62, as the necessary contacts to the circuit of the coil 220 can be made outside of the housing 230.
  • the armature 210 is at least partially located in the coil 220 and/or in the housing 230 of the coil 220.
  • an inductance of the coil 220 is measured.
  • the method can be adapted to detect a fault state of the armature 210 by comparing the measured inductance to a predefined value.
  • the inductance can be measured at at least two frequencies.
  • the method is only used and the status is only monitored in a non-energized state of the relay. It is then not necessary to compensate effects due to the operation of the relay 200.
  • a graph showing the different inductive behavior of a relay 200 in an open position 412 and a fault state 406 is shown.
  • the graph shows an inductance signal in arbitrary units on the ordinate over the frequency of the alternating current used for the measurement on the abscissa. It can be seen that at certain frequencies, a distinct difference between the two conditions exists. The measurement should be made at such a frequency. The frequency at which such a difference exists of course depends on the specific case.

Landscapes

  • Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an assembly (100) for monitoring the status of a relay (200) having an armature (210) and a coil (220) for moving the armature (210), wherein the assembly (100) comprises an inductance measurement device adapted for measuring the inductance of the coil (220), and a method of monitoring the status of a relay (200) having an armature (210) and a coil (220) for moving the armature (210), wherein an inductance of the coil (220) is measured.

Description

  • The invention relates to an assembly for and a method of monitoring the status of a relay having an armature and a coil for moving the armature.
  • Relays are often used for switching currents with a contact bridge that is movable relative to stationary or fixed contacts. Under faulty conditions the contact bridge can be welded to the stationary contacts for example due to an overcurrent. As this is a dangerous configuration, it is necessary to be able to monitor the switching state and/or detect such a welding. Current solutions for doing this are, however, very bulky.
  • It is the object of the invention to provide a solution that is more compact.
  • This object is achieved by an assembly for monitoring the status of a relay having an armature and a coil for moving the armature, wherein the assembly comprises an inductance measurement device adapted for measuring the inductance of the coil.
  • The object is also achieved by a method of monitoring the status of a relay having an armature and a coil for moving the armature, wherein an inductance of the coil is measured.
  • This solution does not require additional measurement devices so that a more compact configuration can be achieved.
  • The solution according to the invention can further be improved by the following further developments and advantageous embodiments, which are independent of each other and can be combined arbitrarily, as desired.
  • The inductance measurement device can comprise a current measurement device to allow a simple implementation.
  • The circuit can discriminate the inductance difference between partially closed armature and fully open armature.
  • In an advantageous embodiment, the assembly can comprise an oscillator adapted for creating an alternating current. This can allow a quick measurement.
  • The inventive solution can be part of a relay assembly comprising a relay and an assembly according to the invention.
  • In order to simplify the electrical layout and to save space, the relay and the assembly can have a common ground.
  • The assembly can be connected to a control circuit of the relay. This can keep the configuration simple and compact. The assembly can be adapted to be connected to the control circuit of the relay. It can be added to existing relays.
  • In a further embodiment, the control circuit and the assembly are arranged on the same PCB. This keeps the overall device simple and compact. Such a PCB can comprise additional elements for performing the measurement.
  • To achieve a good decoupling, in particular during the operation of the relay, the assembly can be connected to the relay via a capacitor. Relays are often operated with a direct current (DC) or a current that is similar to a direct current. The capacitor can thus achieve a good decoupling.
  • In an advantageous embodiment, the assembly can be arranged within a housing of the relay. This keeps the configuration compact.
  • In order to be able to process the results of a measurement, a connector of the relay assembly can comprise at least one pin for a signal of the assembly. Through this pin, signals indicative of a measurement can be transmitted. For example, the signal could indicate a position or a status of the contact bridge or whether a fault condition exists. In easier embodiments, the pin can be used to output current or voltage that has to be processed in additional elements.
  • In a further embodiment, the assembly can be arranged outside a housing of the relay. The assembly can then be added to existing relays without big modifications. The assembly can, for example, be at least partially located in a control circuit, e.g. an engine control unit.
  • In a space-saving configuration, the armature can be at least partially located in the coil. Preferably, the armature is located entirely or almost entirely within the coil. For example, the armature can be located in a space defined by the outlines of the coil and/or a housing of the coil.
  • In an advantageous development of the method, the inductance can be measured at at least one frequency with an alternating current. The frequency can be selected such that a certain difference in the inductance values exists between a normal and a fault state.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the method can comprise a step of detecting a fault state of the armature. Such a fault state can in particular be a state in which the switching has not taken place although a corresponding control signal is applied.
  • The detection of the fault state can be made by comparing the measured inductance to a predefined value. If the measured inductance is below or above a certain threshold value, a fault state can be diagnosed. The predefined value can depend on the inductance value of a normal state and can, for example, be 20% higher or lower than such a normal state value.
  • To improve the accuracy, the inductance can be measured at at least two frequencies.
  • In order to not intervene with the operation of the relay, the assembly or the method can be such that the status is only monitored in a non-energized state of the relay.
  • The application also covers a computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the inventive method.
  • Further, the application covers a computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the inventive method.
  • The invention will now be described in greater detail and in an exemplary manner using advantageous embodiments and with reference to the drawings. The described embodiments are only possible configurations in which, however, the individual features as described above can be provided independently of one another or can be omitted.
  • In the figures:
  • Fig. 1
    shows a schematic cross-sectional view through a relay in a first state;
    Fig. 2
    shows a schematic cross-sectional view through a relay in a second state;
    Fig. 3
    shows an electrical lay out of a first embodiment of a relay assembly;
    Fig. 4
    shows an electrical lay out of a second embodiment of a relay assembly;
    Fig. 5
    shows a graph depicting the difference in the inductance between an open state and a fault state.
  • In Figs. 1 and 2, the operation of a relay 100 is depicted. Fig. 1 can be seen as an energized state 401 of a coil 220 that results in a closed state 411 of a load circuit 255. A current runs through the coil 220, which generates a magnetic field that pulls an armature 210 inwards. The armature 210 is coupled to a contact bridge 240 via a transfer rod 246 and an attachment assembly 247. A contact bridge 240 is thus pushed onto two fixed contacts 250 of a load circuit 255 and closes the load circuit 255.
  • In Fig. 2, a non-energized state 402 of the coil 220 resulting in an open state 412 of the load circuit 255 is shown. When no current flows through the coil 220, the armature 210 is pushed outwards by a spring 245. The contact bridge 240 is thus pulled away from the fixed contacts 250 so that the load circuit 255 is open.
  • Under certain circumstances, for example too high load currents, the contact bridge 240 can be welded to at least one of the fixed contacts 250. This is a dangerous fault condition that should be detected so that the operation of the relay 200 can be discontinued. Fig. 1 can also be seen as showing such a fault state 406 in which the load circuit 255 is closed or almost closed although the coil 220 is in a non-energized state 402.
  • To monitor the position and/or status of the contact bridge 240 and/or the armature 210, the relay assembly 300 can comprise an assembly 100 that comprises an inductance measurement device 10 adapted for measuring the inductance of the coil 220. Details of such embodiments are shown in Figs. 3 and 4.
  • The inductance of the coil 220 depends on the position of the armature 210 in the coil 220. In case of a fault condition, in which the contact bridge 240 is welded to at least one fixed contact 250, the armature 210 cannot move back although the coil 220 is not energized. In the embodiment of Fig. 3, two coils 220 are present, wherein one of the coils 220 can be activated selectively by a transistor 56.
  • The assembly 100 can more generally be adapted to detect or measure the position of the armature 210. Such a position measurement can, for example, be used to detect further fault conditions. For example, the movement profile of the armature 210 can be analyzed to check whether the friction is increased. Further, the assembly 100 could be used to detect the tear and wear of contact elements 241 located on the contact bridge 240 and the fixed contacts 250. Such contact elements 241 are used up during the lifetime of the relay 200. The lack of enough material in the contact elements 241 can cause dangerous situations. The assembly 100 can be adapted to detect such conditions, for example by detecting an increased movement span of the armature 210.
  • The assembly comprises an oscillator 20 adapted for creating an alternating current. The frequency of the alternating current can be constant or variable. The alternating current is used for measuring the inductance in the coil 220.
  • In particular, the inductance measurement device 10 comprises a current measurement device 15 that measures the current resulting in the circuit. The current in the circuit depends on the inductance of the coil 220.
  • In the present example, the inductance measurement device 10 is adapted to calculate the maximum current measured with the current measurement device 15.
  • The relay 200 and the assembly 100 have a common ground 40 in order to simplify the electrical layout and in order to keep the number of pins 60 that are necessary for contacting the relay assembly 300 low. In the depicted examples, three pins 60 are necessary, which is only one pin more than a relay 200 without an assembly 100. A schematically shown connector 62 having the pins in a housing 64 can thus be similar in size to a connector with only two pins 60.
  • The assembly 100 is connected to a control circuit 215 of the relay 200, which is shown only schematically. For example, the assembly 100 can be arranged on the same PCB as the control circuit 215.
  • A capacitor 50 can be used to decouple a control signal for the switching of the relay 200, which is a direct current, or a signal similar to a direct current, from the alternating current used in the assembly 100.
  • In a space-saving configuration, the assembly 100 is arranged within a housing 230 of the relay 200.
  • In another embodiment, the assembly 100 can be arranged outside a housing 230 of the relay 200, for example in an external control circuit or an engine control unit. In such a configuration, it could suffice to use only two pins 60 in the connector 62, as the necessary contacts to the circuit of the coil 220 can be made outside of the housing 230.
  • In the depicted embodiment, the armature 210 is at least partially located in the coil 220 and/or in the housing 230 of the coil 220.
  • In the inventive method of monitoring the status of the relay 200 having an armature 210 and a coil 220 for moving the armature 210, an inductance of the coil 220 is measured.
  • The method can be adapted to detect a fault state of the armature 210 by comparing the measured inductance to a predefined value.
  • To improve the reliability, the inductance can be measured at at least two frequencies.
  • Preferably, the method is only used and the status is only monitored in a non-energized state of the relay. It is then not necessary to compensate effects due to the operation of the relay 200.
  • In Fig. 5, a graph showing the different inductive behavior of a relay 200 in an open position 412 and a fault state 406 is shown. The graph shows an inductance signal in arbitrary units on the ordinate over the frequency of the alternating current used for the measurement on the abscissa. It can be seen that at certain frequencies, a distinct difference between the two conditions exists. The measurement should be made at such a frequency. The frequency at which such a difference exists of course depends on the specific case.
  • REFERENCE NUMERALS
  • 10
    inductance measurement device
    15
    current measurement device
    20
    oscillator
    40
    ground
    50
    capacitor
    55
    resistor
    56
    transistor
    60
    pin
    62
    connector
    64
    connector housing
    100
    assembly
    200
    relay
    210
    armature
    215
    control circuit
    220
    coil
    230
    housing
    240
    contact bridge
    241
    contact element
    245
    spring
    246
    transfer rod
    247
    attachment assembly
    250
    fixed contact
    255
    load circuit
    260
    PCB
    300
    relay assembly
    401
    energized state
    402
    non-energized state
    406
    fault state
    411
    closed state
    412
    open state

Claims (15)

  1. Assembly (100) for monitoring the status of a relay (200) having an armature (210) and a coil (220) for moving the armature (210), wherein the assembly (100) comprises an inductance measurement device adapted for measuring the inductance of the coil (220).
  2. Assembly (100) according to claim 1, wherein the inductance measurement device (10) comprises a current measurement device (15).
  3. Assembly according to claim 2, wherein the inductance measurement device (10) is adapted to calculate the maximum current measured with the current measurement device (15).
  4. Assembly (100) according to one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the assembly (100) comprises an oscillator (20) adapted for creating an alternating current.
  5. Relay assembly (300) comprising a relay (200) and an assembly (100) according to one of claims 1 to 4.
  6. Relay assembly (300) according to claim 5, wherein the relay (200) and the assembly (100) have a common ground (40).
  7. Relay assembly (300) according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the assembly (100) is connected to a control circuit (215) of the relay (200).
  8. Relay assembly (300) according to one of claims 5 to 7, wherein the assembly (100) is connected to the relay (200) via a capacitor (50).
  9. Relay assembly (300) according to one of claims 5 to 8, wherein the assembly (100) is arranged within a housing (230) of the relay (200).
  10. Method of monitoring the status of a relay (200) having an armature (210) and a coil (220) for moving the armature (210), wherein an inductance of the coil (220) is measured.
  11. Method according to claim 10, wherein the inductance is measured at at least one frequency with an alternating current.
  12. Method according to one of claims 10 or 11, wherein a fault state of the armature (210) is detected.
  13. Method according to one of claims 10 to 12, wherein the status is only monitored in a non-energized state of the relay (200).
  14. A computer program comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of one of claims 10 to 13.
  15. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of one of claims 10 to 13.
EP19201657.4A 2019-10-07 2019-10-07 Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay Active EP3806126B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19201657.4A EP3806126B1 (en) 2019-10-07 2019-10-07 Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay
DE102020126215.9A DE102020126215A1 (en) 2019-10-07 2020-10-07 Arrangement and method for monitoring the status of a relay

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19201657.4A EP3806126B1 (en) 2019-10-07 2019-10-07 Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3806126A1 true EP3806126A1 (en) 2021-04-14
EP3806126B1 EP3806126B1 (en) 2023-11-01

Family

ID=68159030

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19201657.4A Active EP3806126B1 (en) 2019-10-07 2019-10-07 Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3806126B1 (en)
DE (1) DE102020126215A1 (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0400389A2 (en) * 1989-06-02 1990-12-05 Motorola, Inc. Solenoid closure detection
GB2275541A (en) * 1993-02-25 1994-08-31 Westinghouse Electric Corp Electromagnetic contactor
US5668693A (en) * 1996-06-25 1997-09-16 Eaton Corporation Method of monitoring a contactor
EP2884233A2 (en) * 2013-12-16 2015-06-17 Eaton Electrical IP GmbH & Co. KG Measuring of parameters in an electromagnetic drive of a switching device
DE102014111335B3 (en) * 2014-08-08 2015-11-19 Lisa Dräxlmaier GmbH Monitoring a switch
WO2019106488A1 (en) * 2017-11-29 2019-06-06 BSH Hausgeräte GmbH Domestic appliance device

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0400389A2 (en) * 1989-06-02 1990-12-05 Motorola, Inc. Solenoid closure detection
GB2275541A (en) * 1993-02-25 1994-08-31 Westinghouse Electric Corp Electromagnetic contactor
US5668693A (en) * 1996-06-25 1997-09-16 Eaton Corporation Method of monitoring a contactor
EP2884233A2 (en) * 2013-12-16 2015-06-17 Eaton Electrical IP GmbH & Co. KG Measuring of parameters in an electromagnetic drive of a switching device
DE102014111335B3 (en) * 2014-08-08 2015-11-19 Lisa Dräxlmaier GmbH Monitoring a switch
WO2019106488A1 (en) * 2017-11-29 2019-06-06 BSH Hausgeräte GmbH Domestic appliance device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3806126B1 (en) 2023-11-01
DE102020126215A1 (en) 2021-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2826053B1 (en) Relay including processor providing control and/or monitoring
US11948757B2 (en) Contactor with contact carrier location sensing
US10840698B2 (en) Leakage current detection and protection device for power cord
US20200028349A1 (en) System and method for detecting arc faults
CN102822930B (en) Device for monitoring an electrical circuit, circuit arrangement for supplying a load and method for operating the circuit arrangement
US20160315461A1 (en) Insulation monitoring device having voltage monitoring and underlying method
CN109256288B (en) Electrical switching device and method for detecting relative wear
US10109994B2 (en) Multiple current sensor system
CN110488182A (en) Method, system, device and storage medium for on-line detection and monitoring of relays
CN103649687A (en) Electromagnetic actuators and monitoring thereof
JP2004198308A (en) Failure diagnosis method and failure diagnosis system
US5204633A (en) Electromagnetic contactor with closure fault indicator
CN104569713A (en) Method for identifying short-line fault or line interruption for switched inductive load
KR102364572B1 (en) System and method for diagnosing relay fault
US9048049B2 (en) Electromagnetic opening/closing device
EP3806126B1 (en) Assembly for and method of monitoring the status of a relay
CN113939888B (en) Methods for Predicting Primary Relay Failures
US20180364313A1 (en) Power Contactor and Method for Checking the Function of a Power Contactor
US8547106B2 (en) Methods and systems involving monitoring circuit connectivity
CN101788626A (en) A Method to Distinguish Displacement Transducer LVDT Disconnection Mode
US20120182655A1 (en) Methods and Systems Involving Monitoring Circuit Connectivity
RU2759588C1 (en) Method for continuous monitoring of the serviceability of the winding of an electromagnetic mechanism, the integrity of the control circuits of such a winding and a device for its implementation (options)
KR20210029057A (en) Terminal block with CT / VT protection device for switch gear based on IoT technology
KR20190037656A (en) Apparatus and method for diagnosis relay welding
KR20230055043A (en) Detection method and apparatus for current transformer secondary open with arcing current

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20211008

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20220707

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230630

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602019040477

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1628208

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240301

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240202

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240201

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240201

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602019040477

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20240802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20241007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20241007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20241007

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20241031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20241031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20241031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20241031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20241007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250902

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20191007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20191007