EP3792414A1 - Rattensperre mit glatten und gezahnten klappen - Google Patents

Rattensperre mit glatten und gezahnten klappen Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3792414A1
EP3792414A1 EP20178963.3A EP20178963A EP3792414A1 EP 3792414 A1 EP3792414 A1 EP 3792414A1 EP 20178963 A EP20178963 A EP 20178963A EP 3792414 A1 EP3792414 A1 EP 3792414A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
shutter
barrier
angular position
sewage pipe
edge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP20178963.3A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Flemming Lykke Sørensen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nordisk Innovation ApS
Original Assignee
Nordisk Innovation ApS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nordisk Innovation ApS filed Critical Nordisk Innovation ApS
Publication of EP3792414A1 publication Critical patent/EP3792414A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E03—WATER SUPPLY; SEWERAGE
    • E03F—SEWERS; CESSPOOLS
    • E03F7/00—Other installations or implements for operating sewer systems, e.g. for preventing or indicating stoppage; Emptying cesspools
    • E03F7/06—Devices for restraining rats or other animals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a rat barrier for installation in a sewage pipe, and more particularly a rat barrier with pivotally arranged shutters, use of such barrier and a pipe with such barrier.
  • Barriers suitable for installation at least partly in a sewage pipe and for preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction of the sewage pipe are known in the art.
  • EP 2 113 615 relates to a barrier for preventing rats or other rodents from entering a sewage pipe.
  • the barrier comprises a support element that is mountable within the pipe, and a first shutter pivotally suspended within the support element for rotation about a horizontal axis and having a centre of gravity lying under the axis.
  • the shutter is pivotable between a first angular position in which the first shutter is forming an acute angle with the direction of flow and at least substantially barring the aperture of the barrier, and a second angular position in which the first shutter is forming a second relatively smaller angle with the direction of flow thus keeping the aperture of the barrier at least partly open.
  • a second shutter is placed upstream of a first shutter and is pivotally suspended about a second axis and having a centre of gravity located under the second axis.
  • the first shutter can be suspended within the support element in two different orientations such that the direction in which the barrier blocks rodent from passing may be changed according to the needs without changing the orientation of the support element.
  • An improved barrier suitable for installation at least partly in a sewage pipe and for preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction of the sewage pipe would be advantageous, and in particular a more efficient and reliable barrier would be advantageous.
  • the above described object and several other objects are intended to be obtained in a first aspect of the invention by providing a barrier suitable for installation at least partly in a sewage pipe and for allowing a sewage flow within the sewage pipe to pass the barrier in a first direction of the sewage pipe, such as the first direction being a downstream direction, and for preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in a second direction being opposite to the first direction upon installation of the barrier in the sewage pipe, such as the second direction being an upstream direction, said barrier comprising
  • the invention may be particularly, but not exclusively, advantageous for obtaining a barrier, which may be effective in preventing rats from passing the barrier in at least one direction, since an edge of the second shutter is less smooth than a corresponding edge of the first shutter, whereby the second shutter may therefore exert a greater sensory stimulus to a rat or other rodent which tries to pass the barrier.
  • a rat or other rodent trying to pass the barrier from the side facing the second shutter will have to be in physical contact with the edge of the second shutter, which second edge is less smooth than a corresponding edge of the first shutter, and which may therefore exert a greater sensory stimulus to the rat or other rodent, which may therefore give up and not pass the barrier.
  • the invention may be particularly, but not exclusively, advantageous for obtaining a barrier, which may be more reliable, such as not being blocked by organic solid matter and other solid matter in, e.g., a sewage flow, since an edge of the first shutter is smoother than a corresponding edge of the second shutter, whereby the first shutter may therefore be less likely to attract organic solid matter and other solid matter in, e.g., a sewage flow, since such solid matter is less likely to get attached to, such as stick to, the smoother edge.
  • the invention may be particularly, but not exclusively, advantageous for obtaining a barrier, which may be more reliable, such as not being blocked by organic solid matter and other solid matter in, e.g., a sewage flow, since an edge of the first shutter is smoother than a corresponding edge of the second shutter, which has the very surprising effect, that the second shutter may be less likely to attract organic solid matter and other solid matter in, e.g., a sewage flow.
  • a more reliable and efficient barrier may be achieved by having shutters with different degrees of smoothness, so as to enable both effective blocking of rats and other rodent, and enabling a reduction of risk of blocking of the barrier with solid organic waste and other solid material, and it may in particular be seen as an insight of the present inventor that a contamination of the second shutter may be reduced by changing the first shutter.
  • a 'barrier' may be understood as is common in the art and described in, e.g., European patent application EP 1 826 326 A1 and/or EP 2 113 615 B1 .
  • the barrier may be positioned at least partially within a sewage pipe, such as partially within a sewage pipe and partially outside of a sewage pipe, such as partially in a well adjacent the sewage pipe, such as a completely inside a sewage pipe.
  • the barrier may be located in a downstream sewage pipe to let rodents escape from a well and further away from housings.
  • the barrier may also be used in an upstream sewage pipe so as to allow rats or other rodents to escape into a well and away from the upstream sewage pipe leading to, e.g. a housing.
  • the barrier may be installed as described in, e.g., European patent application EP 1 826 326 A1 which is hereby incorporated in their entirety.
  • a pipe may in general be understood to be any pipe, and in particular a sewage pipe, such as pipes for leading a sewage flow, such as any one of domestic sanitary, commercial, industrial, agricultural sewage flow and surface runoff.
  • a sewage flow may pass the barrier, such as the barrier being arranged so that the flow resistance of the barrier in the first direction is small enough so as to allow a sewage flow to pass. It may be understood that in an embodiment, a flow resistance of the barrier in the first direction is smaller than a flow resistance in the second direction.
  • the barrier may prevent rodent from passing the barrier in at least one direction, such as the second direction, such as an upstream direction. It may further be understood, that the barrier may not block rats or rodent from passing the barrier in the opposite direction, such as in the first direction, such as a downstream direction.
  • the barrier may be installed in a pipe so as to allow a flow of liquid in a first direction, such as a downstream direction, and so as to block rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in a second direction, such as an upstream direction. It may be understood, that the barrier may not necessarily block passage of rats or other rodents in a downstream direction.
  • 'first direction' may be understood a direction of flow of sewage in the sewage pipe, such as a downstream direction. While a pipe in itself may be symmetrical and as such not have any specific flow direction, it is in general understood, that a pipe, such as a sewage pipe, has a primary direction of flow, such as a direction of flow. The direction of flow may be the direction in which liquid typically flow through the pipe, such as due to gravity and/or pressure differences.
  • 'first direction' is understood at direction being parallel with a longitudinal direction of the sewage pipe in a direction being similar to a direction in which flow of sewage is allowed by the barrier, such as a downstream direction.
  • 'second direction' may be understood a direction in which rats or rodent are blocked.
  • the second direction may be the upstream direction.
  • 'second direction' is understood at direction being parallel with a longitudinal direction of the sewage pipe in a direction being similar to a direction in which rats or other rodents are being prevented from passing the barrier, where the second direction is opposite to the first direction, such as the second direction being an upstream direction.
  • upstream direction' of a pipe may be understood a direction opposite the flow direction in the pipe.
  • 'downstream direction' of a pipe may be understood a direction of flow of liquid in the pipe.
  • a support structure' may be understood a structural part of the barrier in from which the shutters may be pivotally suspended.
  • the support structure may comprise a part of the barrier not including the shutters or the entire barrier not including the shutters. It may be understood that the support structure may be structurally fixed to the sewage pipe, such as fixed via other structural elements in the barrier, such as fixed in an upper portion of the sewage pipe (with respect to gravity).
  • At least one hinge' may be understood at least a one hinge, such as a first hinge, such as a first hinge and a second hinge.
  • a 'shutter' may be understood as is common in the art, such as described in, e.g., European patent application EP 1 826 326 A1 and/or EP 2 113 615 B1 .
  • a shutter may thus denote a structural element, such as a plate or a net or a set of bars, which may be pivotally suspended so as to facilitate barring an aperture in a first angular position and not barring the aperture in a second angular position.
  • first shutter' and 'second shutter' may be understood shutters which are placed relative to each other, so that in case the barrier is installed in a pipe so as to allow a flow of liquid in a first direction, such as a downstream direction, and so as to block rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in a second direction, such as an upstream direction, the first shutter is placed upstream relative to the second shutter.
  • the first shutter is the first shutter, which the water passes when flowing through the pipe, pass the barrier in a downstream direction, and a rat or other rodent trying to pass the barrier in an upstream direction will first face the second shutter.
  • the first shutter and the second shutter may be arranged pivotably around each of their axes of rotation. They may be arranged so as to enable each of them to pivot independently from each other, although they may touch each other for certain combinations of angular values.
  • each shutter is linked to the support structure, and may each pivot around an axis of rotation, such as a hinge in the support structure.
  • the axis of rotation of the first shutter may or may not be identical to an axis of rotation of the second shutter.
  • the first and second shutters have spatially separated axes of rotation.
  • first shutter and the second shutter are at different positions, and that these positions spaced apart along the first direction, such as along a direction parallel with the flow, such as the first shutter is placed at a first position with respect to the first direction, and the second shutter is placed at another position with respect to the first direction, such as further downstream.
  • position of the first shutter or the second shutter the position may be defined by the position of the centre of gravity of the respective shutter.
  • An advantage of having the shutters spaced apart may be, that a rat or rodent trying to open the second shutter (where the second shutter may be the shutter the rat or rodent is facing when trying to pass the barrier in an upstream direction) by rotating it from the first angular position towards the second angular position, then the rat or rodent may have difficulties in handling the partially opened second shutter when it furthermore has to open the first shutter which is placed a little further upstream.
  • the distance between the first shutter and the second shutter in the flow direction may be a distance arranged so as to be large enough that a rat or rodent cannot reach pass the second shutter and get hold of the first shutter and small enough that the rat or rodent cannot get pass, such as completely pass the second shutter, before having to open the first shutter.
  • Said distance may be within 1-7 cm, such as 2-6 cm, such as 3-5 cm, such as substantially 4 cm, such as 4 cm. Said distance may advantageously be at least 30 mm. Said distance may advantageously be at most 50 mm. Said distance may be within 30-50 mm, such as 35 mm.
  • a 'profile' may be understood as is common in the art, so as referring to an outline or contour. It may in the present context be understood, that shutters are generally flat, and that 'profile' refers to a profile of the edges of the generally flat shutters, such as the profile as observed in a direction orthogonal to a plane of the shutter.
  • an edge' may be understood at least a part of an edge, such as at least a part of the edge of the first shutter or second shutter which - when the barrier is installed in a sewage pipe - would be accessible, such as immediately accessible, to rats or other rodents trying to pass the barrier and facing the shutter.
  • a profile of at least a part of an edge of the first shutter is smoother than a profile of a corresponding part of an edge of the second shutter' may be understood that a profile of at least a part of an edge, such as at least a part of the edge of the first shutter which - when the barrier is installed in a sewage pipe - would be accessible, such as immediately accessible, to rats or other rodents trying to pass the barrier and facing the shutter, is smoother than a profile of a corresponding part of an edge of the second shutter.
  • topographical features on the edge of the first shutter such as topographical features on the edge as observed from a direction away from the shutter where said direction is orthogonal to a plane of the shutter, may be larger and/or less smoothly than corresponding topographical features on the edge of the second shutter.
  • degree of smoothness it may be understood, to be smoothness on a length scale (such as 1 mm or 1 cm), which may be sensed by a rat or other rodent.
  • an edge may be less smooth by comprising pointy features, such as having any one of a saw-toothed profile, a toothed profile, a serrated profile and/or notched profile.
  • edges may differ in smoothness due to differences in quantitative measures, e.g., by differing in any one of amplitude (such as maximum height differences between maximum and minimum points of the profile), frequency and/or phase of teeth.
  • smoothness is to be understood to refer to a smoothness, which may be sensed by a rat or rodent upon touching said edge.
  • the smoothness of a shutter may in a specific embodiment be quantified by the maximum distance between a line circumscribing the shutter and the largest distance between said line, such as 1 cm of said line being furthest from an axis of the pivotal mounting of said shutter, and the shutter.
  • said distance is approximately 0 mm for the first (smooth) shutter 101 (because the circumscribed line is in contact with the shutter at the bottom part as depicted in Fig.
  • the second shutter (102) (corresponding to the height of the teeths at the bottom portion of the shutter in the figure, because the circumscribed line only touches the top parts of the teeths, and the distance is thus the distance from top to to bottom of teeths).
  • the size of the shutters is presumed similar to the size given in Fig. 9B .
  • a part of the edge of the shutter which is immediately accessible to rats or other rodents trying to pass the barrier' may be understood a part of the edge which the rat may be most likely to touch upon, such as a part of the edge which the rat or rodent may reach, when being in front of the shutter, when the barrier is installed in a sewage pipe.
  • the barrier may be installed in a sewage pipe as described in any one of EP 1 826 326 A2 or EP 2 113 615 A1 , which are both hereby incorporated by reference in entirety. It is furthermore noted, that said first shutter and second shutter may be capable of being positioned either in a first orientation in the barrier or in another orientation in the barrier, depending on the possible entering of the rodent, as described in EP 2 113 615 A1 , cf., e.g., claim 1, which is hereby incorporated by reference in entirety.
  • the barrier according to the present invention may have a mounting mechanism comprising two wings, which each have a shape conforming to the sewage pipe interior, preferably the two wings has the shape of a part of the circumference of a circular pipe.
  • the mounting mechanism may be expanded to establish a mounting of the barrier in the sewage pipe.
  • the barrier may accordingly be mounted in standard circular pipes with various diameters because the barrier is insertable, at least partly, in such standard pipes. Additionally, the barrier is easy to replace and/or temporally remove for service and maintentence.
  • a barrier wherein the barrier may be installed in a sewage pipe so that
  • a barrier wherein the barrier may be installed in a sewage pipe so that each shutter within the group of shutters comprising the first shutter and the second shutter are pivotal between
  • the barrier may be installed in a sewage pipe so that' may be understood that the claimed subject-matter is not confined to a barrier being installed in a sewage.
  • a first angular position (v) in which the shutter is forming a first relatively larger angle with a direction of flow of sewage in the sewage pipe' may be understood an angular position of the shutter, such as an angular position being defined by the angle the shutter makes with a direction of flow, such as an angle between
  • an aperture of the barrier' may be understood barring an aperture of the barrier, such as enabling barrier access through a pipe in which the barrier is installed so as to enable preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction, such as an upstream direction.
  • a second angular position (w) in which the shutter is forming a second relatively smaller angle with the direction of flow of sewage in the sewage pipe such as the first angular position and the second angular position being separated by less than 180 degrees
  • an angular position of the shutter such as an angular position being defined by the angle the shutter makes with a direction of flow, such as an angle between
  • the aperture of the barrier at least partly open' may be understood as enabling a liquid flow, such as a flow of sewage, through a pipe in which the barrier is installed in at least one direction, such as a downstream direction, such as enabling a flow of sewage in a sewage pipe to pass the barrier.
  • a barrier wherein the barrier is arranged so as to prevent each of the first shutter and the second shutter from pivoting beyond the first angular position (v) in a rotational direction away from the second angular position (w), such as preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction, such as said at least one direction being a direction opposite a direction of flow of sewage in the sewage pipe.
  • each of the first shutter and the second shutter may not be able to rotate further in a direction away from the second angular position than the first angular position.
  • This may be beneficial for preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction, since they will have to open the shutters by rotating them towards themselves, since they cannot push them the other way (away from themselves).
  • the barrier may be configured to prevent the shutter from pivoting in an upstream direction (from the first angular position). This is relevant for preventing the rodent from passing the barrier in an upstream direction.
  • a barrier wherein the first shutter is placed relative to the second shutter, so that when the first shutter is in the first angular position and rotating towards the second position, then a point on the first shutter below a rotational axis of the first shutter will move in a direction substantially towards the second shutter, such as towards the second shutter.
  • the first shutter By 'wherein the first shutter is placed relative to the second shutter, so that when the first shutter is in the first angular position and rotating towards the second position, then a point on the first shutter below a rotational axis of the first shutter will move in a direction substantially towards the second shutter, such as towards the second shutter' may be understood that when the barrier is installed in, e.g., a sewage pipe, then the first shutter may be arranged so that when it is in the first angular position, such as substantially blocking the aperture of the barrier and pipe, then a lower portion of the first shutter may pivot towards the second shutter when the shutter pivots from a first angular position towards the second angular position. It may in general be understood, that the direction of rotation from the first angular position to the second angular position is similar for each of the first shutter and the second shutter.
  • 'Rotational direction' may be understood as is known in the art, such as a direction of an angular rotation, such as clockwise or counterclockwise, as opposed to a translational (rectilinear) movement.
  • a barrier wherein an angular position of each of the first shutter and the second shutter, such as when the barrier is installed in the sewage pipe, may be changed subject to influence of the flow of water, such as a flow of water in a first direction, such as the first direction being a downstream direction, from the first angular position (v) to the second angular position (w).
  • the shutters are arranged in a manner so that they only may pivot in a direction caused by the force of a flow i.e. that the flow induces a force which causes the shutter, at least initially, to be be pivotally displaced. Notice that the barrier according to the present invention may therefore not be suitable for controlling the flow of sewage water itself.
  • 'shutter' may be understood a shutter having an spatial extension sufficient to not allowing a vermin, preferably a rat, to pass the barrier according to the present invention when the shutter is in the substantially vertical position in the corresponding sewage pipe i.e. in a closed position.
  • the shutter may have a spatial extension - in said closed position - that allows water to pass the barrier.
  • the shutter may have a wholly or partly circular shape allowing water to flow between the shutter and the sewage pipe i.e. at the periphery of the shutter when the shutter is in a said closed position. This is important in order not to obstructing the sewage water flow also at a relatively low flow of sewage water.
  • the term 'rat or similar animals' may be understood to include at least the two main rat species known to live in populated areas; i.e. black rat ( Rattus rattus ) and brown rat ( Rattus norvegicus ), but the barrier according to the present invention may be applied for other rats species, and/or similar sized animals (e.g. other rodents) inhabiting sewage pipes and systems.
  • An advantage of this embodiment may be that it enables a flow of liquid to open the barrier for itself, so as dispensing with a need for actively opening the barrier for allowing a flow of liquid to pass the barrier.
  • a barrier wherein a profile of at least a part of an edge of the first shutter is smoother than a profile of a corresponding part of an edge of the second shutter, so that
  • a force applied to a rat or other rodent via said part of an edge of the first shutter or the second shutter' may be understood a force applied to the rat via said part of an edge of the first shutter or the second shutter, such as said force being a contact force, such as said force being a contact force applied to said rat or other rodent in case said rat of rodent is trying to pass the barrier in the direction in which the barrier is preventing a rat or rodent from passing when said barrier is installed in a pipe.
  • a greater sensory stimulus to a rat or other rodent' may be understood that a rat or another rodent, such as a rat or other rodent trying to pass the barrier in the direction in which the barrier is preventing a rat or other rodent from passing when said barrier is installed in a pipe.
  • the sensory stimulus may be understood to be as stimulus which is sensed by the rat or other rodent upon touching said part of an edge, such as applying a force to said part of an edge.
  • the sensory stimulus may be understood as an unpleasant sensory stimulus, such as pain, such as an unpleasant sensory experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.
  • Said sensory stimulus may motivate the rat or other rodent to withdraw from its attempt to pass the barrier, so as to avoid the sensory stimulus, such as to avoid damaging a body part.
  • the sensory stimulus may resolve promptly once the rat or other rodent withdraws from its attempt to pass the barrier.
  • solid matter' may be understood matter in a flow of liquid in a pipe, such as for example solid organic waste and/or paper.
  • a flow of liquid in the sewage pipe being carried by the flow so as to touch said part of an edge of the first shutter and the second shutter' may be understood that solid material in a liquid in a pipe is carried by the liquid and may be carried by the liquid to the barrier so as to touch the barrier, such as said part on an edge of the respective shutters.
  • said part of an edge' may be understood that when solid matter, such as soft solid matter, such a soft organic solid matter, touches upon said part of an edge of the respective shutters, then said solid matter is more likely to get attached to, such as stick to, such as get caught by, a shutter where said part of an edge is less smooth, compared to a shutter where said part of an edge is smoother. This may be due to the solid matter better being able to getting caught by a less smooth edge.
  • a barrier wherein said part of an edge of the second shutter has a profile being any one of
  • 'pointy' may be understood a profile having pointy features, which may be felt by a rat or other rodent, such as felt as unpleasant.
  • a smooth profile may be understood that a circumscribed line around said part substantially corresponds, such as corresponds to a profile of said part.
  • a smooth profile is understood to be a profile wherein any topographical features, if any, in the profile are either large compared to a rat or other rodent (so that said topographical features are substantially seen as a flat profile by the rat or other rodent) or small enough that the they are negligible compared to a size of a rodent (so that the rat or rodent may neglect them).
  • a barrier wherein said part of an edge (416) of the second shutter (102) has a profile being
  • a barrier wherein the first shutter is arranged so as to guide solid matter in a flow of liquid in the sewage pipe in a direction from the first shutter to the second shutter, around the second shutter upon installation in a sewage pipe.
  • An advantage of this may be that the second shutter is less likely to get dirty by contact with the solid matter.
  • this may be seen as an advantage when at least a part of an edge of the first shutter is smoother than a corresponding part of an edge of the second shutter, since the less smooth edge of the second shutter would then be relatively more likely to attract the solid matter, unless the - relatively smooth - first shutter is arranged for guiding the solid matter around the second shutter.
  • a barrier wherein an area of a portion of the first shutter which may be in direct contact with a liquid flow during normal use is equal to or larger than an area of a portion of the second shutter which may be in direct contact with a liquid flow during normal use and/or wherein a circumscription around a portion of the first shutter which may be in direct contact with a liquid flow during normal use is equal to or larger than a circumscription around a portion of the second shutter which may be in direct contact with a liquid flow during normal use.
  • the level of liquid in a pipe such as a sewage pipe, may typically be below a certain level, then typically only a portion of the barrier and shutters may be in contact with a liquid flow during normal use.
  • an area of a portion of the first shutter which may be in direct contact with a liquid flow during normal use may be understood an area of the portion of the respective shutters which may be in contact with a liquid flow during normal use, such as a portion which is below said level.
  • An advantage of having said relation between said areas and/or said relation between said circumscriptions may be that these features may each alone or in combination be ways of achieving that the first shutter is arranged so as to guide solid matter in a flow of liquid in the sewage pipe in a direction from the first shutter to the second shutter, around the second shutter upon installation in a sewage pipe.
  • a barrier wherein at least a portion on a lower part, such as a lower half part, such as a lower third part, such as a lower fourth part, such a lower fifth part, of the first shutter is bent in a direction corresponding to a direction of rotation from the first angular position to the second angular position, so as to reduce a damming of liquid in front of the barrier on the side facing the first shutter when the barrier is placed in a sewage pipe and a flow of liquid is passing in a direction from the first shutter to the second shutter.
  • a lower part such as a lower half part, such as a lower third part, such as a lower fourth part, such a lower fifth part
  • the said lower part of the first shutter is to be considered relative to an preferred mounting of the barrier where the support structure is oriented in upper part of the sewage pipe to enable better flow of liquid in the pipe, at least when the pipe is only partly filled with liquid flowing in the lower part of the pipe.
  • the upper part of the shutter may considered the part closest to the supporting structure.
  • An advantage of this may be that a flow resistance through the barrier is smaller. Another advantage may be that the lower liquid level entails less contamination of the barrier, since floating solid matter in the liquid cannot contaminate relatively highly positioned parts of the barrier.
  • a barrier wherein at least a portion on a lower part, such as a lower half part, such as a lower third part, such as a lower fourth part, such a lower fifth part, of the second shutter is bent in a direction corresponding to a direction of rotation from the first angular position to the second angular position, so as to reduce a damming of liquid in front of the barrier on the side facing the first shutter when the barrier is placed in a sewage pipe and a flow of liquid is passing in a direction from the first shutter to the second shutter.
  • a lower part such as a lower half part, such as a lower third part, such as a lower fourth part, such a lower fifth part
  • the said lower part of the second shutter is to be considered relative to an preferred mounting of the barrier where the support structure is oriented in upper part of the sewage pipe, at least when the pipe is only partly filled with liquid flowing in the lower part of the pipe.
  • the upper part of the shutter may considered the part closest to the supporting structure.
  • An advantage of this may be that a flow resistance through the barrier is smaller. Another advantage may be that the lower liquid level entails less contamination of the barrier, since floating solid matter in the liquid cannot contaminate relatively highly positioned parts of the barrier.
  • An advantage of this may be that a flow of water in a direction from the first shutter towards the second shutter may relatively easily be opened by water, and when the shutters are placed relatively close to each other may then aid in opening the second shutter by directly touching upon the second shutter.
  • a position of the first shutter and/or the second shutter' may be understood a position in the barrier, such as a position with respect to the sides, such as top and bottom, of the pipe, once installed in the pipe.
  • an angle of the first angular position (v) of the first shutter and/or an angle of the first angular position (v) of the second shutter' may be understood the angular value which the respective shutters have when installed in the barrier and being in the first angular position.
  • An advantage of changing said position and/or angle may be that this enables changing a vertical distance from the sides of the pipe, such as the top and bottom of the pipe, to a bottom of the respective shutter, once the barrier is installed in the pipe.
  • An advantage of this may in turn be that the barrier may be adapted to slightly varying inner pipe diameters.
  • a barrier wherein the first angular position (v) may be adjusted, such as the barrier comprises means for enabling that the first angular position (v) may be adjusted.
  • a barrier wherein an angle of the first angular position of the first shutter and/or an angle of the first angular position (v) of the second shutter may be adjusted, such as the barrier comprises means for enabling that the first angular position (v) may be adjusted, wherein a vertical distance from a top of the sewage pipe to a bottom of the first shutter in the first angular position (v), respectively, the second shutter in the first angular position (v) when the barrier is installed in the sewage pipe depends on said angle .
  • An advantage of this may be that different angles are appropriate for different flow rates, so adjusting the angle may be beneficial for optimizing the barrier with respect to an expected flow rate.
  • a system comprising a pipe, such as a sewage pipe (206, 208), said pipe comprising barrier as defined in the first aspect, such as the barrier being arranged for preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier, such as preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction, such as at least in an upstream direction, such as allowing a flow of liquid in at least one direction, such as allowing a flow of liquid in at least a downstream direction.
  • 'pipe' may be understood any pipe, such as any one of a sewage pipe, such as pipes for leading a sewage flow, such as any one of domestic sanitary, commercial, industrial, agricultural sewage flow and surface runoff.
  • a barrier according to the first aspect for preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier, such as preventing rats or other rodents from passing the barrier in at least one direction in a pipe, such as a sewage pipe.
  • a method for preventing rats or other rodents from passing through a pipe such as a sewage pipe, such as preventing rats or other rodents from passing through a pipe in at least one direction in the pipe, such as at least in an upstream direction, said method comprising installing (such as installing as described in, e.g., any one of European patent applications EP 1 826 326 A1 are EP 2 113 615 B1 which are each hereby incorporated in entirety) a barrier according to the first aspect in the pipe.
  • the first, second, third and fourth aspect of the present invention may each be combined with any of the other aspects.
  • the first, second and third alternative aspect may each be combined with any of the other aspects.
  • FIG. 1 display an exploded view drawing of a barrier 100, in particular a barrier for rats, where the rodent may pass in a downstream flow direction (as indicated by arrow 112), but not in an upstream flow direction when the barrier is installed in the pipe.
  • the shutters 101, 102 are mounted on a support element 104 and arranged in a manner so that they only may pivot in a downstream direction, such as pivot subject to influence of a force of a downstream flow.
  • FIG. 1 furthermore shows that a profile, such as a second profile, of a part of an edge 416 of the second shutter 102 is toothed, and that a profile, such as a first profile, of a part of an edge 414 of the first shutter 101 is smooth.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exploded view drawing of a barrier (100) suitable for installation at least partly in a sewage pipe (206, 208) and for allowing a sewage flow within the sewage pipe to pass the barrier in a first direction (212) of the sewage pipe, such as the first direction being a downstream direction, and for preventing rats (210) or other rodents from passing the barrier in a second direction being opposite to the first direction upon installation of the barrier in the sewage pipe, such as the second direction being an upstream direction, said barrier comprising
  • FIG. 1 shows an exploded view drawing of a barrier 100 suitable for installation at least partly in a sewage pipe 206, 208 and for preventing rats 210 or other rodent from passing the barrier in at least one direction of the sewage pipe, such as at least in a second direction being and upstream direction, said barrier comprising
  • the first shutter 101 and the second shutter 102 are arranged pivotably around each of their axes of rotation, and besides that they might touch each other when pivoting, they may pivot independently from each other.
  • support structure 104 is shown in FIG. 1 as the plate immediately above the shutters, but it may in general be understood to be at least a portion of the barrier 100, besides the respective shutters 101, 102, on which the shutters are or may be mounted.
  • an angular position of each of the first shutter and the second shutter may be changed subject to influence of the flow of water, such as a flow of water in a first direction, such as the first direction being a downstream direction, from the first angular position (v) to the second angular position (w),
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a barrier 100 installed in a sewage pipe with sewage pipe top 206 and sewage pipe bottom 208.
  • the figure shows each of the first shutter 101 and second shutter 102 being in a first angular position (v) in which the shutter is forming a first relatively larger angle with a direction 212 of flow of sewage in the sewage pipe (note that dotted line 213 has been drawn so as to clearly indicate the direction of flow at the positions of the first and second shutters) and at least substantially barring, such as barring, an aperture of the barrier, such as barring the aperture so that a rat 210 cannot pass the barrier in an upstream direction, such as a second direction, such as a direction opposite the flow direction 212.
  • the rat 210 attempting to pass the barrier 100 is likely to come into physical contact with at least a part of an edge of the second shutter 102, such as a part of the edge being a lower part of the edge with respect to gravity when the barrier is installed in a sewage pipe.
  • FIG. 3 is similar to FIG. 2 except that it shows the second shutter 102 being in the second angular position (w) in which the shutter is forming a second relatively smaller angle with the direction of flow 212 in the sewage pipe keeping the aperture of the barrier at least partly open.
  • the first shutter 101 is left in the first angular position, but in case both the first shutter 101 and the second shutter 102 are in the second angular position, the aperture of the barrier is at least partly open (with respect to both shutters), so as to enable a flow of liquid to pass the barrier.
  • the figure furthermore shows a distance d b from a bottom 208 of the sewage pipe to a bottom of the first shutter 101.
  • the figure furthermore shows a distance Dt from a top 206 of the sewage pipe to a bottom of the first shutter 101.
  • FIG. 4 shows end views of a support element 104 and first 101 and second 102 shutters.
  • FIG. 4(a) shows an end view as seen from a direction facing the second shutter 102. It is noted that the first shutter 101 is also visible behind the second shutter 102. It can be seen that at least a profile, such as a second profile, of a part of an edge 416 of the second shutter 102 is toothed, and that at least a profile, such as a first profile, of a part of an edge 414 of the first shutter 101 is smooth.
  • FIG. 4(b) shows an end view as seen from a direction facing the first shutter 101.
  • a first profile of at least a part of an edge 414 of the first shutter 101 is smoother than a second profile of a corresponding part of an edge 416 of the second shutter 102, so that
  • FIG. 5 shows a top- and side view of a support element and 1 st and 2 nd shutters.
  • FIG. 5(a) shows top view of the support element 104 and the first shutter 101 and the second shutter 102.
  • the figure furthermore shows a first hole 518 in the support element 104, which hole is immediately above the first shutter 101, and a second hole 520 in the support element 104, which hole is immediately above the second shutter 102.
  • FIG. 5(b) shows a side view of the support element 104, first shutter 101 and second shutter 102.
  • FIGS. 6-8 shows side views of the support element 104, first shutter 101 and second shutter 102.
  • FIG. 6 shows a side view of the support element 104, first shutter 101 and second shutter 102, where a second screw 624 is mounted in the second hole 520, but where the screw has not gone very far into the hole 520 as indicated by the large gap 628 between support element 104 and the head of the screw 624. Thus, a lower portion of the screw 624 does not touch the second shutter 102, which is left unaffected.
  • FIG. 7 shows a side view corresponding to FIG. 6 , but where the second screw 624 is mounted in the second hole 520 and has gone further into the hole 520 as indicated by the large gap 729 (compared to the gap 628 in FIG. 7 ) between support element 104 and the head of the screw 624.
  • a lower portion of the screw 624 does touch the second shutter 102, which cannot rotate as far clockwise as in FIG. 6 , so that the angle first angular position (v) of the second shutter 102 of FIG. 7 is adjusted compared to the first angular position (v) of the first shutter of FIG. 6 .
  • FIG. 7 An effect of the adjusted angular position of the first angular position of the second shutter 102 is also indicated in FIG. 7 , where it can be seen that there is a difference D t1 -D t2 in vertical distance, cf., FIG. 3 , between a top of a pipe in which the barrier is installed and a lower portion of the second shutter 102 in
  • a first angular position (v) of the second shutter 102 may be adjusted, wherein a vertical distance (Dt) from a top of the sewage pipe 206 to a bottom of the second shutter 102 in the first angular position (v) when the barrier 100 is installed in the sewage depends on said angle of the first angular position.
  • FIG. 7 shows a side view corresponding to FIG. 7 , but where a first screw 822 is mounted in the first hole 518, but where the screw has not gone very far into the hole 518 as indicated by the large gap 826 between support element 104 and the head of the screw 822. Thus, a lower portion of the screw 822 does not touch the first shutter 101, which is left unaffected.
  • FIG. 6 shows that a portion on a lower part of the first shutter 101 is bent in a direction corresponding to a direction of rotation from the first angular position (v) to the second angular position (w), cf. the angle (g), and that a portion on a lower part of the second shutter 102 is bent in the same direction, cf. the second angle (h), and that a first angle (g) which the lower portion of the first shutter 101 makes with horizontal when the first shutter is in the first angular position (v) is smaller than the second angle (h) which a lower portion of the second shutter 102 makes with horizontal when the second shutter is in the first angular position (v).
  • first and/or the second shutter may be bowed instead of bent as shown in Figure 6 .
  • the first and/or the second shutter may have a bowed shape, possibly including a bent structure so that the first and/or the second shutter may have a plurality of bowed sections.
  • FIG. 9A shows a top- and side view of a support element and 1 st and 2 nd shutters, corresponding to FIG. 5 , but with a first screw 822 mounted in the first hole 518 and a second screw 624 mounted in the second hole so as to adjust an angle of the first angular position of each of the first and second shutters.
  • FIG. 9B shows an end- and side view of the exemplary barrier of FIG. 1 , and indicates exemplary dimensions of the barrier.
  • FIGS. 10-17 show comparative photographs of various two tested barriers, which may be referred to as a barrier 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention, and a reference barrier 1100.
  • the barrier 100 is a barrier as described in the FIGS. 1-9 .
  • the reference barrier 1100 is similar to the barrier 100, except that the edges of both shutters are similar (both edges are toothed).
  • the experiment was carried out by placing each barrier in a pipe adjacent to each their well in a test setup, where 4-6 litres of water is flushed through the barrier approximately once every 60 seconds.
  • the water flows through the barrier and into a container which holds approximately 20 litres of water, and where a pump is arranged for pumping the 4-6 litres of water from the container and to the other side of the barrier so as to simulate a flush in a sewage pipe.
  • a pump is arranged for pumping the 4-6 litres of water from the container and to the other side of the barrier so as to simulate a flush in a sewage pipe.
  • To mimic the content of a sewage flow there is added approximately 15 pieces of leather (each piece being 5 cm x 10 cm) and pieces (cubes of 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 sq. cm) of vegetables (carrots and Brussels sprouts) are added throughout the experiment.
  • the pipe is 110 mm in outer diameter.
  • Both barrier 100 and reference barrier 1100 are mounted in the test setup for 14 days
  • FIGS. 10 , 12 , 14 , and 16 show the barrier 100 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 11 , 13 , 15 , 17 show the reference barrier 1100.
  • the figures shows that both shutters, including the identical second shutters, have become dirtier during the experiment.
  • the fact that the reference barrier 1100 attracts more dirt is a clear indication, that the barrier 100 is less prone to being blocked by dirty when installed in a sewage pipe.
  • a front side of a shutter is referred to as a side, facing the flow direction, and a backside of a shutter is a side facing away from the flow direction.
  • FIGS. 10-11 show the barriers from below with both shutters in the second angular position (barriers open).
  • the figure clearly shows that the front sides and edges 414, 416 of both shutters 101, 102 in the barrier 100 is clear than the front sides and edges 1114, 1116 of both shutters 1101, 1102 in the reference barrier 1100.
  • FIG. 11 shows that contamination 1130 is clearly present on a front side of the first shutter 1101 and that some solid material 1131, 1132 has stuck, respectively, to the edges 1114, 1116 of the shutters 1101, 1102 of the reference barrier 1100.
  • FIG. 12-13 shows a similar result, where contamination 1334 is clearly visible on the front side of the second shutter 1102 of the reference barrier 1100, while the corresponding surface of the first shutter 101 in the barrier 100 is substantially clean. This may be seen as highly surprising, given that the second shutter 102 in the barrier 100 is identical to the second shutter 1102 in the reference barrier 1100.
  • FIG. 14-15 shows a similar result, where contamination 1536 is clearly visible on the backside of first shutter 1101 of the reference barrier 1100, while the corresponding surface of the first shutter 101 in the barrier 100 is substantially clean.
  • FIG. 16-17 shows a similar result, where contamination 1740 is clearly visible on the backside of second shutter 1102 of the reference barrier 1100, while the corresponding surface of the second shutter 102 in the barrier 100 is substantially clean.
  • the visible matter 1638 is not solid matter, but is merely coloured foam, which - as opposed to contamination 1740 on the reference barrier - may for, example, easily be wiped off with a finger.
  • a barrier (100) for installation at least partly in a sewage pipe (206, 208) and for preventing rats (210) or other rodent from passing the barrier in at least one direction of the sewage pipe, wherein the barrier comprises a support structure (104), a first shutter (101) and a second shutter (102) mounted on the support structure wherein a profile of at least a part of an edge of the first shutter is smoother than a profile of a corresponding part of an edge of the second shutter, such as a profile, such as a second profile, of a part of an edge (416) of the second shutter (102) is toothed, and that a profile, such as a first profile, of a part of an edge (414) of the first shutter (101) is smooth.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
EP20178963.3A 2014-04-16 2015-04-15 Rattensperre mit glatten und gezahnten klappen Withdrawn EP3792414A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA201470222 2014-04-16
EP15163734.5A EP2933392B1 (de) 2014-04-16 2015-04-15 Rattensperre mit glatter und gezahnter klappe

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15163734.5A Division EP2933392B1 (de) 2014-04-16 2015-04-15 Rattensperre mit glatter und gezahnter klappe

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3792414A1 true EP3792414A1 (de) 2021-03-17

Family

ID=52987943

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20178963.3A Withdrawn EP3792414A1 (de) 2014-04-16 2015-04-15 Rattensperre mit glatten und gezahnten klappen
EP15163734.5A Active EP2933392B1 (de) 2014-04-16 2015-04-15 Rattensperre mit glatter und gezahnter klappe

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15163734.5A Active EP2933392B1 (de) 2014-04-16 2015-04-15 Rattensperre mit glatter und gezahnter klappe

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (2) EP3792414A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4086399A1 (de) * 2021-05-03 2022-11-09 Nordisk Innovation ApS Barriere zur installation in einem abwassersystem mit begrenztem raum

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2537093B (en) * 2015-02-23 2018-01-03 Mcalpine & Co Ltd Improved anti-vermin barrier
BR112020006685A2 (pt) * 2017-10-03 2020-09-24 Sewatech Aps barreira adequada para ser montada em um sistema de encanamento

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE485120C (de) * 1929-10-26 Ernst Doering Doppelklappensperre fuer Kanalrohre
DE699005C (de) * 1938-10-28 1940-11-21 Henry Nowak In ein Kanalstueck einzusetzende Rattensperre
DE1658199A1 (de) * 1967-02-20 1970-06-11 Hering Annaliese Vorrichtung zum Absperren von Kanalisationsleitungen gegen das Eindringen von Ratten od.dgl.
EP1826326A2 (de) 2006-02-27 2007-08-29 Nordisk Innovation ApS Schranke zur Vermeidung des Eindringens von Ratten und anderer Schädlinge in ein Abwasserrohrssystem
EP2113615A1 (de) 2008-03-05 2009-11-04 Nordisk Innovation ApS Zwei-Wege-Sperre gegen das Eindringen von Ratten oder anderem Ungeziefer in ein Abwasserrohrsystem
EP2385179A1 (de) * 2010-05-05 2011-11-09 Nal Products Aps Nagetierschutz

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE485120C (de) * 1929-10-26 Ernst Doering Doppelklappensperre fuer Kanalrohre
DE699005C (de) * 1938-10-28 1940-11-21 Henry Nowak In ein Kanalstueck einzusetzende Rattensperre
DE1658199A1 (de) * 1967-02-20 1970-06-11 Hering Annaliese Vorrichtung zum Absperren von Kanalisationsleitungen gegen das Eindringen von Ratten od.dgl.
EP1826326A2 (de) 2006-02-27 2007-08-29 Nordisk Innovation ApS Schranke zur Vermeidung des Eindringens von Ratten und anderer Schädlinge in ein Abwasserrohrssystem
EP2113615A1 (de) 2008-03-05 2009-11-04 Nordisk Innovation ApS Zwei-Wege-Sperre gegen das Eindringen von Ratten oder anderem Ungeziefer in ein Abwasserrohrsystem
EP2113615B1 (de) 2008-03-05 2011-05-04 Nordisk Innovation ApS Zwei-Wege-Sperre gegen das Eindringen von Ratten oder anderem Ungeziefer in ein Abwasserrohrsystem
EP2385179A1 (de) * 2010-05-05 2011-11-09 Nal Products Aps Nagetierschutz

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4086399A1 (de) * 2021-05-03 2022-11-09 Nordisk Innovation ApS Barriere zur installation in einem abwassersystem mit begrenztem raum

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2933392B1 (de) 2020-06-10
EP2933392A1 (de) 2015-10-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2933392B1 (de) Rattensperre mit glatter und gezahnter klappe
US10837177B2 (en) Check valve for downspouts
US7988544B2 (en) Bird/animal restricting vent for fluid/air discharge conduits
ES2573413T3 (es) Sistema de superestructura para un desagüe situado en la zona de suelo
KR101473445B1 (ko) 실링장치를 구비한 하천용 수문
EP3613909B1 (de) Verbesserte barriere gegen schädlinge
EP3282839A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur halterung eines köders
US10648165B1 (en) Storm water gate with sensors
US20140373430A1 (en) Pest electrocution device
US10676913B2 (en) Drain pipe gate
US20040256298A1 (en) Sewer grate with insect block
US10827743B2 (en) Mosquito breeding prevention device and system
US10731407B1 (en) Bowed barrier system for a passageway
US11421420B2 (en) Gutter downspout extension ground support
GB2491633A (en) Apparatus to prevent the free movement of rats inside sewer /drainage pipes
DK2868823T3 (en) Pest barrier and method of operation of the pest barrier
US10172321B1 (en) Portable pet ramp
US20180313120A1 (en) Bathroom-Stall Door Stop
EP2800838B1 (de) Rattensperre
EP4086399A1 (de) Barriere zur installation in einem abwassersystem mit begrenztem raum
KR20110103705A (ko) 배수안내장치
BR112019011114A2 (pt) vedação com barreira resistente a ratos
GB2480656A (en) Pest control device
DE202015102075U1 (de) Auffangvorrichtung für eine sanitäre Einrichtung
KR20160003793U (ko) 배수관용 악취차단 및 역류방지 장치

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 2933392

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20210918