EP3748065A1 - Process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof - Google Patents

Process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3748065A1
EP3748065A1 EP19178847.0A EP19178847A EP3748065A1 EP 3748065 A1 EP3748065 A1 EP 3748065A1 EP 19178847 A EP19178847 A EP 19178847A EP 3748065 A1 EP3748065 A1 EP 3748065A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bath
fabric
minutes
previous
amylase
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP19178847.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Jorge João ABREU FARIA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Aquitex Acabamentos Quimicos Texteis SA
Original Assignee
Aquitex Acabamentos Quimicos Texteis SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Aquitex Acabamentos Quimicos Texteis SA filed Critical Aquitex Acabamentos Quimicos Texteis SA
Publication of EP3748065A1 publication Critical patent/EP3748065A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06LDRY-CLEANING, WASHING OR BLEACHING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR MADE-UP FIBROUS GOODS; BLEACHING LEATHER OR FURS
    • D06L4/00Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs
    • D06L4/10Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs using agents which develop oxygen
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06LDRY-CLEANING, WASHING OR BLEACHING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR MADE-UP FIBROUS GOODS; BLEACHING LEATHER OR FURS
    • D06L4/00Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs
    • D06L4/10Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs using agents which develop oxygen
    • D06L4/12Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs using agents which develop oxygen combined with specific additives
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06LDRY-CLEANING, WASHING OR BLEACHING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR MADE-UP FIBROUS GOODS; BLEACHING LEATHER OR FURS
    • D06L4/00Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs
    • D06L4/40Bleaching fibres, filaments, threads, yarns, fabrics, feathers or made-up fibrous goods; Bleaching leather or furs using enzymes

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to the field of textile industry and chemistry, namely textile dyeing and a process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof.
  • the present disclosure describes a process for fabric bleaching using a novel enzyme blend combined with a specifically designed chemical system, which reduces the use of caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide in the conventional oxidative bleaching process, replacing the manipulation of these chemicals.
  • the Textile Industry is one of the biggest industries in the world with a current worth of nearly 1.5 trillion USD. Nevertheless, it is also one of the world's top polluting industries, partaking a heavy environmental impact in terms of resource consumption, effluents contamination and textile elimination.
  • Water is a finite resource that is quickly becoming scarce and is used at every step of the process both to convey the chemicals used during that step and to wash them out before beginning the next step.
  • the water becomes full of chemical additives and is then expelled as wastewater; which in turn pollutes the environment.
  • the liquid effluents of the TI have usually a high Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), high conductivity and colouring.
  • Naturally occurring fibres such as cotton
  • colouring materials even after scouring processes and the cause of this colour may be the naturally occurring pigments present in the fibre structure.
  • This colour can come from different contaminations occurring during the processing of natural fibres like for example, oils and greases coming from the processing equipment.
  • the bleaching process aims to eliminate all coloured contaminants that are on the fibres, as well as the remaining of other contaminants that have resisted to previous pre-treating processes (desizing, scouring, etc.) such as bark remnants of the cotton plant.
  • Chlorine is known to be extremely toxic to the environment and to consumers, while sodium hypochlorite is very hazardous to human health due to the etching effect that may cause skin and lungs damage. In its compound form, sodium hypochlorite is also very toxic to aquatic organisms and bacteria.
  • Enzymes are protein catalysts produced by living cells that catalyse specific reactions.
  • the use of enzymes in textile processes has gained increased interest due to the fact that enzymes are non-toxic, biodegradable and environmentally friendly.
  • Document WO0200823386 relates to novel compositions for biobleaching coupled with stone washing of indigo dyed denims comprising a blend of glucose oxidase, catalases and cellulases in the ratio of 1.0:10.0:1.0 along with sugar base, peroxide source and optional adjuvants, wherein the process is carried out at optimized conditions of neutral pH (6.5 - 7.0) and a temperature of 55 °C.
  • Document CN103266495 discloses a method for pre-treating a cotton-polyester blended fabric with a biological enzyme.
  • the method comprises the steps of scouring and bleaching, washing and drying and is characterized in that the scouring and bleaching step comprises the sub-step of adding the cotton-polyester blended fabric to a scouring and bleaching solution to be scoured and bleached, wherein the mass ratio of the cotton-polyester blended fabric to the scouring and bleaching solution is (1:10)-(1:20); the temperature is controlled to be 50-60 °C; the treatment time is 30-90 minutes; and the scouring and bleaching solution comprises the following components by weight percent: 2.5-3.5% of compound biological enzyme, 5-10% of hydrogen peroxide, 1-2% of tetra acetyl ethylene diamine, 0.1-0.3% of sodium cocoamphoacetate, 0.1-0.3% of ferrous sulfate and the balance of water.
  • the method has the advantages of desizing and bleaching in one bath, mild treatment
  • the process of the present disclosure is a simplified treatment that results in a fabric that retains the characteristics of cotton and shows a better handle and hydrophilicity and a cleaner and smoother surface than the conventionally bleached cotton.
  • the process of the present disclosure decreases the chemical load used, namely it eliminates the use of NaOH and includes more sustainable versions of the auxiliary chemicals used.
  • An aspect of the present disclosure relates to process for fabric bleaching comprising the following steps:
  • the process may further comprise the following steps:
  • the process may further comprise the following steps:
  • the process may further comprise the following steps:
  • the process may further comprise the following steps: adding a catalase solution to the third bath maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the catalase reaction.
  • the first temperature of the bath is from 40 - 70 °C, preferably 60 °C.
  • the pH of the first bath is from pH 5.5- 8.
  • the duration of the enzymatic reaction is at least 30 minutes, preferably from 30 minutes to 1 hour, more preferably 45 minutes.
  • the second temperature of the first bath is from 75-90 °C, preferably 80 °C.
  • the duration of the peroxidation reaction is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
  • the temperature of the second bath is from 60-90 °C, preferably 70 °C.
  • the duration of the washing is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
  • the temperature of the third bath is from 25-60 °C, preferably 40 °C.
  • the duration of the washing with sequestering and dispersing agent is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-15 minutes.
  • the duration of the catalase reaction is at least 10 minutes, preferably from 10-30 minutes.
  • the blend of enzymes is:
  • the blend of enzymes further comprises oxidoreductase.
  • the liquor ratio between fabric: water is from 1:5 -1:40; preferably 1:10 -1:20.
  • the wetting agent concentration is from 0,5 - 5 % (wt/wt), preferably 1 - 2 %(wt/wt).
  • the enzyme blend concentration is from 0,5 - 5 % (wt/wt), preferably 1 - 2 %(wt/wt).
  • the peroxide donor concentration is from 5 - 50 g/l, preferably 10 - 15 g/l.
  • the bleaching activator concentration is from 0.5 - 5 g/l, preferably 1 - 3 g/l.
  • the sequestering and dispersing agent concentration is from 0.5 - 3 g/l, preferably 0.5 -1 g/l.
  • the catalase concentration is from 0.2 - 2 g/l.
  • the peroxide donor is sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate or a mixture thereof.
  • the wetting agent is ethoxylated isotridecanol.
  • the bleaching activator is a manganese salt
  • the sequestering and dispersing agent is 3-hydroxy-3-carboxy-1,5-pentanedioic acid.
  • Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a bleached fabric obtainable by the process described in the present disclosure wherein the weight loss is inferior to the standard process, being less than 4.5%.
  • the fabric is a natural yarn fabric, preferably a cotton fabric.
  • Another aspect of the present disclosure also relates to an article comprising the fabric described in the present disclosure.
  • the process of the present disclosure is an alternative pre-treatment process that accomplishes fabric whitening using less water, less energy and less harsh chemicals. It minimizes environmental impact of one of the more universal cotton processing steps, the oxidative bleaching,
  • the process of the present disclosure is a simplified treatment that results in a fabric that retains the characteristics of cotton and shows a better handle and hydrophilicity and a cleaner and smoother surface than the conventionally bleached cotton.
  • the present disclosure is used to bleach all 100% cotton articles used as starting material for the Textile Industry.
  • process of the present disclosure may comprise the following steps:
  • the bleaching process is reduced from 148 min with the conventional procedure to 135 min with the process of the present disclosure, meaning a reduction of approximately 9% in process time.
  • Table 1 Comparison between 100% cotton knitted fabric bleached according to the conventional method and to the process of the present disclosure Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2 HANDLE Slightly harsh handle Softer and smoother handle WHITE LEVEL (WI-BERG) 74.97 67.73 WEIGHT LOSS (%) 5.1% 4.5%
  • Table 2 Results of effluent analysis after conventional bleaching and process of the present disclosure by exhaustion.
  • the overall difference of colour can be calculated by spectrophotometric reading and it is expressed by the DE value, obtained based on the comparison between samples that went through the conventional bleaching and samples treated by process of the present disclosure.
  • Standard values for colour tolerance accepted amongst the industry players are usually ⁇ 0.5.
  • the spectrophotometric analysis of the dyed samples shows DE values between 0.52 and 0.84, which can be attributed to the slight differences in whiteness level obtained in the samples post-bleaching.
  • This means the colour yield of samples subjected to the process of the present disclosure is not exactly the same but it is close enough to the conventionally bleached samples and, therefore, it is expected to be easy to adjust the dyeing recipes. In some cases, this colour difference will possibly mean the need to use less dyestuff.
  • the process of the present disclosure is a perfectly viable option to replace the conventional bleaching process as the final article is softer, smoother, with cleaner surface, better hydrophilicity and lower weigh loss. Even though there seems to be some variation in the colour yield, dyeing recipes are expected to be easily adjusted. When assessing the variation of colour yield against all the benefits and advantages of the process of the present disclosure, it can be deemed a manageable adaptation.
  • the process of the present disclosure allows meaningful savings in terms of water, energy and time consumption and originates less polluted effluents.

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to the field of textile industry and chemistry, namely textile dyeing.The present disclosure describes a process for fabric bleaching using a novel enzyme blend combined with a specifically designed chemical system, which reduces the use of caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide in the conventional oxidative bleaching process, replacing the manipulation of these chemicals.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present disclosure relates to the field of textile industry and chemistry, namely textile dyeing and a process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof.
  • The present disclosure describes a process for fabric bleaching using a novel enzyme blend combined with a specifically designed chemical system, which reduces the use of caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide in the conventional oxidative bleaching process, replacing the manipulation of these chemicals.
  • BACKGROUND
  • The Textile Industry (TI) is one of the biggest industries in the world with a current worth of nearly 1.5 trillion USD. Nevertheless, it is also one of the world's top polluting industries, partaking a heavy environmental impact in terms of resource consumption, effluents contamination and textile elimination.
  • It has long been known that the TI processes are characterized, not only by the large volume of water required, but also by the high temperatures and the variety of chemicals used. There is a long sequence of wet processing stages requiring inputs of water, chemical and energy, generating waste at each stage.
  • Water is a finite resource that is quickly becoming scarce and is used at every step of the process both to convey the chemicals used during that step and to wash them out before beginning the next step. The water becomes full of chemical additives and is then expelled as wastewater; which in turn pollutes the environment. The liquid effluents of the TI have usually a high Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), high conductivity and colouring.
  • Along with the direct contamination and consumption of water, this industry's processes are usually carried out at high temperatures, also representing a very high energy consumption level. Most energy used in the TI is still obtained from coal and fossil fuels, meaning this energy use is an important source of greenhouse gases emission.
  • The minimization of the above-mentioned issues means all processing steps need to be optimized in such a way that their environmental impact is reduced and they become more sustainable, resulting in reduced effluents charge and energy and water consumption. There are different variables that can be addressed for the optimization of textile processes, such as process temperature, water requirement and chemical system used. It is mandatory to find alternative processes that work at a lower temperature, require less water or where harsh chemicals can be replaced for eco-friendly and more sustainable and safe products.
  • Focusing on the particular case of cotton, it remains one of the more prominent textile fibres and it has regained importance due to the heavy environmental impact of synthetic fibres. Among the different steps of cotton pre-treatment (before dyeing) we can have desizing, mercerizing, alkaline scouring and bleaching, some of them requiring severe chemical treatment and the need to perform multiple washing steps between them.
  • Naturally occurring fibres, such as cotton, still contain colouring materials even after scouring processes and the cause of this colour may be the naturally occurring pigments present in the fibre structure. This colour can come from different contaminations occurring during the processing of natural fibres like for example, oils and greases coming from the processing equipment.
  • The bleaching process aims to eliminate all coloured contaminants that are on the fibres, as well as the remaining of other contaminants that have resisted to previous pre-treating processes (desizing, scouring, etc.) such as bark remnants of the cotton plant.
  • Nowadays, the major process used for cotton whitening is the oxidative bleaching with hydrogen peroxide.
  • Considering a typical oxidative bleaching process by exhaustion, it usually consists in the steps depicted in figure 1.
  • The conventional bleaching of cotton gives an article with a white level adequate to the subsequent dyeing steps and free of additional contaminants. Nevertheless, it is important to have in mind that this step is performed at a very high temperature, requiring a considerable amount of time and high energy to reach. It also includes several water baths that represent a big water consumption, with the disposed water becoming contaminated with harsh chemicals, such as NaOH.
  • This chemical is used in substantial quantities in the bleaching process and it is an important contributor to the pollution load in bleaching effluents. A high concentration of NaOH in water will result in toxic effects for the wildlife. Likewise, highly concentrated solutions of NaOH (which is the case of the solutions used for textile bleaching) are also corrosive and irritating to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes, increasing the risk of harmful accidents among textile workers.
  • On the perspective of textile workers safety, it is also important noting that fifty-percent-concentration hydrogen peroxide solutions can also represent major safety hazards, such as skin burns; eye injuries; potential for rapid pressurization within tanks, pipes, pumps, and/ or storage vessels, etc. Therefore, being able to replace the handling of this chemical would also be advantageous.
  • There are other traditional bleaching processes that can be applied, nonetheless they are even more damaging than the oxidative bleaching with hydrogen peroxide. Chlorine is known to be extremely toxic to the environment and to consumers, while sodium hypochlorite is very hazardous to human health due to the etching effect that may cause skin and lungs damage. In its compound form, sodium hypochlorite is also very toxic to aquatic organisms and bacteria.
  • The TI has been exploring the potential of enzymes for several years. Enzymes are protein catalysts produced by living cells that catalyse specific reactions. The use of enzymes in textile processes has gained increased interest due to the fact that enzymes are non-toxic, biodegradable and environmentally friendly.
  • Many processes, such as desizing, scouring, anti-pilling, can be accomplished with the help of these products. Nevertheless, an industrially viable enzyme has still not been developed that is capable of directly bleaching cotton fabric. Also, it has not been possible to include enzymes in the conventional bleaching processes as they are usually not stable to the severe pH, temperature and oxidative conditions of these processes.
  • Document WO0200823386 relates to novel compositions for biobleaching coupled with stone washing of indigo dyed denims comprising a blend of glucose oxidase, catalases and cellulases in the ratio of 1.0:10.0:1.0 along with sugar base, peroxide source and optional adjuvants, wherein the process is carried out at optimized conditions of neutral pH (6.5 - 7.0) and a temperature of 55 °C.
  • Document CN103266495 discloses a method for pre-treating a cotton-polyester blended fabric with a biological enzyme. The method comprises the steps of scouring and bleaching, washing and drying and is characterized in that the scouring and bleaching step comprises the sub-step of adding the cotton-polyester blended fabric to a scouring and bleaching solution to be scoured and bleached, wherein the mass ratio of the cotton-polyester blended fabric to the scouring and bleaching solution is (1:10)-(1:20); the temperature is controlled to be 50-60 °C; the treatment time is 30-90 minutes; and the scouring and bleaching solution comprises the following components by weight percent: 2.5-3.5% of compound biological enzyme, 5-10% of hydrogen peroxide, 1-2% of tetra acetyl ethylene diamine, 0.1-0.3% of sodium cocoamphoacetate, 0.1-0.3% of ferrous sulfate and the balance of water. The method has the advantages of desizing and bleaching in one bath, mild treatment conditions, small damage to the fabric and short treatment time.
  • These facts are disclosed in order to illustrate the technical problem addressed by the present disclosure.
  • GENERAL DESCRIPTION
  • In order to optimize and minimize the environmental impact of one of the more universal cotton processing steps, the oxidative bleaching, we have come up with an alternative pre-treatment process that accomplishes fabric whitening using less water, less energy and less harsh chemicals.
  • The process of the present disclosure is a simplified treatment that results in a fabric that retains the characteristics of cotton and shows a better handle and hydrophilicity and a cleaner and smoother surface than the conventionally bleached cotton.
  • It was developed a bleaching process to spare some resources and increase the quality of the treated fabric, water and energy consumption.
  • Additionally, the process of the present disclosure decreases the chemical load used, namely it eliminates the use of NaOH and includes more sustainable versions of the auxiliary chemicals used.
  • The chemical intervenients were as follows:
    • Wetting agent - It is based on ethoxylated alcohols of natural origin. It does not contain silicone and complies with GOTS 5.0:2017 standards.
    • Enzyme blend - It is a specific enzyme blend, specially developed for the process of the present invention that allows to obtain a final article with good hydrophilicity and a soft touch. It is a blend containing, at least 3, of the following enzymes: alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase, lipase.
    • Peroxide donor - It is a solid compound that, boosted by a combination of products, acts as a peroxide donor. The peroxide donor may be selected from the following list: sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate or a mixture thereof.
    • Bleaching activator - It is a combination of salts that works as a specific activator for bleaching at lower temperatures.
    • Sequestering and dispersing agent - It is a biodegradable sequestering and dispersing agent, based on a mixture of hydrocarboxylic acids. It is free from APEOs and GOTS 5.0 :2017 approved.
    • Catalase - It is a commonly used enzyme for elimination of the residual hydrogen peroxide after bleaching.
  • An aspect of the present disclosure relates to process for fabric bleaching comprising the following steps:
    • preparing a water bath with a wetting agent and the fabric,
    • wherein the bath is warmed to a first temperature up to a maximum of 70 °C,
    • and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8;
    • adding an enzyme blend to the bath, wherein the enzyme blend comprises at least 3 of the following enzymes: alpha-amylase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase, endoglucanase, lipase;
    • maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the enzymatic reaction;
    • adding a peroxide donor and a bleaching activator to the bath;
    • warming the bath to a second temperature of a minimum of 75 °C for the peroxidation reaction.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following steps:
    • discharging the water bath;
    • removing chemical residues from the fabric.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following steps:
    • submitting the fabric to a second bath at a minimum of 60 °C to improve the residue removal;
    • discharging the bath water.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following steps:
    • preparing a further water bath with a sequestering and dispersing agents, and the fabric,
    • wherein the bath is warmed to a temperature up to a maximum of 60 °C,
    • and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8;
    • maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the reaction of the component.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following steps:
    adding a catalase solution to the third bath maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the catalase reaction.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the first temperature of the bath is from 40 - 70 °C, preferably 60 °C.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the pH of the first bath is from pH 5.5- 8.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the enzymatic reaction is at least 30 minutes, preferably from 30 minutes to 1 hour, more preferably 45 minutes.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the second temperature of the first bath is from 75-90 °C, preferably 80 °C.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the peroxidation reaction is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the temperature of the second bath is from 60-90 °C, preferably 70 °C.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the washing is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the temperature of the third bath is from 25-60 °C, preferably 40 °C.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the washing with sequestering and dispersing agent is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-15 minutes.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the catalase reaction is at least 10 minutes, preferably from 10-30 minutes.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the blend of enzymes is:
    • alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, cellulase;
    • alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, pectate lyase;
    • alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, lipase;
    • endoglucanase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase;
    • endoglucanase, beta-amylase, cellulase;
    • endoglucanase, beta-amylase, lipase;
    • beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase;
    • beta-amylase, pectate lyase, lipase;
    • beta-amylase, cellulase, lipase;
    • pectate lyase, cellulase, lipase.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the blend of enzymes further comprises oxidoreductase.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the liquor ratio between fabric: water is from 1:5 -1:40; preferably 1:10 -1:20.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the wetting agent concentration is from 0,5 - 5 % (wt/wt), preferably 1 - 2 %(wt/wt).
  • In an embodiment for better results, the enzyme blend concentration is from 0,5 - 5 % (wt/wt), preferably 1 - 2 %(wt/wt).
  • In an embodiment for better results, the peroxide donor concentration is from 5 - 50 g/l, preferably 10 - 15 g/l.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the bleaching activator concentration is from 0.5 - 5 g/l, preferably 1 - 3 g/l.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the sequestering and dispersing agent concentration is from 0.5 - 3 g/l, preferably 0.5 -1 g/l.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the catalase concentration is from 0.2 - 2 g/l.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the peroxide donor is sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate or a mixture thereof.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the wetting agent is ethoxylated isotridecanol.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the bleaching activator is a manganese salt
  • In an embodiment for better results, the sequestering and dispersing agent is 3-hydroxy-3-carboxy-1,5-pentanedioic acid.
  • Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a bleached fabric obtainable by the process described in the present disclosure wherein the weight loss is inferior to the standard process, being less than 4.5%.
  • In an embodiment for better results, the fabric is a natural yarn fabric, preferably a cotton fabric.
  • Another aspect of the present disclosure also relates to an article comprising the fabric described in the present disclosure.
  • Among the advantages of the process of the present invention, are the significant savings in terms of resources consumption, namely:
    • In an embodiment for better results, the maximum temperature attained was 80°C, sparing the need to heat the system an additional 20 °C.
    • By accomplishing the process to be performed at the optimum temperature for each phase, what means using different temperatures, all below 100 °C, there is no need to maintain the system at 100 °C during the entire process.
    • The process of the present invention allows to obtain a white article with three water baths. Comparing to the example shown in figure 1, it is possible to save two water baths, considering the middle washing and the anti-pilling treatment baths. If we consider the bleaching of 1 ton of cotton fabric in liquor ratio of 1:10, the fact that two baths are eliminated means a 20 000-liter saving in water consumption, i.e. 20 I water per 1 kg of cotton
    • The chemical system used has been conceived to present more sustainable products and to avoid the need for harsh chemicals like caustic soda, thus diminishing the effluent charge in polluting species.
    • The process of the present invention is also advantageous in terms of productivity as the total time of process can be decreased.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The following figures provide preferred embodiments for illustrating the invention and should not be seen as limiting the scope of invention.
    • Figure 1 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of a common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton.
    • Figure 2 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the process of the present subject matter.
    • Figure 3 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the process of the present subject matter: Hydrophilicity: a) Spread of the drop in a fabric treated with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton; b) Spread of the drop in a fabric treated with the process of the present subject matter, the drop is wider and more regular, meaning the fabric has higher hydrophilicity.
    • Figure 4 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the process of the present subject matter: a) Noticeable protuberant fibres in the fabric treated with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton; b) Cleaner and smoother surface of the fabric treated with the process of the present subject matter.
    • Figure 5 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the possible processes of the present invention: Colour yield for a Light Pink dyeing. Comparison of same dyeing in a fabric treated with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton (A) and a fabric treated with the process of the present subject matter (B); spectrophotometric reading of both samples (C) and result for colour difference (DE).
    • Figure 6 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the possible processes of the present invention: for a Salmon dyeing. Comparison of same dyeing in a fabric treated with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton (A) and a fabric treated with the process of the present subject matter (B); spectrophotometric reading of both samples (C) and result for colour difference (DE).
    • Figure 7 : Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the possible processes of the present invention: Brown dyeing. Comparison of same dyeing in a fabric treated with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton (A) and a fabric treated with the process of the present subject matter (B); spectrophotometric reading of both samples (C) and result for colour difference (DE).
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The process of the present disclosure is an alternative pre-treatment process that accomplishes fabric whitening using less water, less energy and less harsh chemicals. It minimizes environmental impact of one of the more universal cotton processing steps, the oxidative bleaching,
  • The process of the present disclosure is a simplified treatment that results in a fabric that retains the characteristics of cotton and shows a better handle and hydrophilicity and a cleaner and smoother surface than the conventionally bleached cotton.
  • In an embodiment, the present disclosure is used to bleach all 100% cotton articles used as starting material for the Textile Industry.
  • In an embodiment the conventional process described in figure 1 consists in the following steps:
    • first water bath adding a detergent, a stabilizer and sequestering agent, an anti-creasing agent, 3 g/l of NaOH at 50% and 3 g/l of H2O2 200 vol;
    • temperature increase up to 100 °C, the fabric being treated for at least 30 minutes; water discharge;
    • water washing with addition of a sequestering agent, at a temperature of 70°C, for 10 minutes;
    • water discharge;
    • new washing step with water at 60°C for 10 minutes;
    • water discharge;
    • new water bath at 40°C with addition of acetic acid for neutralization;
    • run for 5 minutes and check pH, if necessary, adjust to the interval of 6.5 - 7;
    • add a catalase solution (enzyme that will degrade the hydrogen peroxide to avoid its interference in dyeing) and run for additional 15 minutes;
    • water discharge;
    If an anti-pilling treatment is required (for a cleaner surface and to reduce the tendency of fabric to pill) an additional water bath in necessary. It is usually run at 50 - 60 °C, pH 5 - 8, 30 - 90 minutes, depending on the cellulase-based product (neutral or acid cellulase) used. For inactivation of the enzyme it is then mandatory to increase the temperature up to 80 °C for 10 minutes or add Na2CO3 for pH increase.
  • In an embodiment, the process of the present disclosure may comprise the following steps:
    • Obtaining a bath with the fabric to bleach comprising water in a liquor ratio from 1:5 and 1:40, 0.5 - 5 % of a wetting agent and set the temperature to 40 - 70°C;
    • When temperature is close to the set point, check pH is in the interval 5.5 - 8, add an enzyme blend 0.5 - 5% and run the process for 30- 60 min;
    • add 5 - 50 g/l of a peroxide donor and 0.5 - 5 g/l of a bleaching activator;
    • set the temperature to 75 - 90 °C and run the process for 5 -20 minutes;
    • discharge the water;
    • water wash at 60 - 90 °C for 5 - 20 minutes;
    • discharge the water;
    • new water bath at 25 - 60 °C with addition of 0.5 - 3 g/l of a sequestering and dispersing agent;
    • Run for 5 -15 min and check that pH is 5 - 8;
    • add a catalase solution and run for 10 - 30 minutes;
    • discharge the water.
  • In an embodiment, considering an initial water temperature of 30 °C, a machine with a heating and cooling rate of 4°C/min, a machine that takes 5 minutes to fill in and 5 minutes to drain the water and the optimized process conditions, the bleaching process is reduced from 148 min with the conventional procedure to 135 min with the process of the present disclosure, meaning a reduction of approximately 9% in process time. Table 1: Comparison between 100% cotton knitted fabric bleached according to the conventional method and to the process of the present disclosure
    Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2
    HANDLE Slightly harsh handle Softer and smoother handle
    WHITE LEVEL (WI-BERG) 74.97 67.73
    WEIGHT LOSS (%) 5.1% 4.5%
    Table 2: Results of effluent analysis after conventional bleaching and process of the present disclosure by exhaustion.
    Effluent parameters Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2
    Total nitrogen (mg/L N) 75 70
    Biochemical oxygen demand (5 days) (g/L O2) 1.5 0.79
    Chemical Oxygen Demand (g/L O2) 4.2 3.3
    Total phosphorus (mg/L P) 26 8.4
    pH final 11.7 9.9
    Total suspended solids (g/L) 57 22
    Table 3: Results of effluent analysis after conventional bleaching and process of the present disclosure by continuous application (pad-steam).
    Effluent parameters Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2
    Total nitrogen (mg/L N) 40 30
    Biochemical oxygen demand (5 days) (g/L O2) 15 1.5
    Chemical Oxygen Demand (g/L O2) 21 13
    Total phosphorus (mg/L P) 25 2.9
    pH final 11.7 10.9
    Total suspended solids (g/L) 0.2 0.4
  • In addition to the decrease of environmental impact due to resource savings, which has already been described, the effluents generated by process of the present disclosure show decreased values for practically all parameters of effluent analysis, namely on BOD and COD, as shown in Tables 2 and 3.
  • The overall difference of colour can be calculated by spectrophotometric reading and it is expressed by the DE value, obtained based on the comparison between samples that went through the conventional bleaching and samples treated by process of the present disclosure. Standard values for colour tolerance accepted amongst the industry players are usually ≤ 0.5.
  • The spectrophotometric analysis of the dyed samples shows DE values between 0.52 and 0.84, which can be attributed to the slight differences in whiteness level obtained in the samples post-bleaching. This means the colour yield of samples subjected to the process of the present disclosure is not exactly the same but it is close enough to the conventionally bleached samples and, therefore, it is expected to be easy to adjust the dyeing recipes. In some cases, this colour difference will possibly mean the need to use less dyestuff.
  • In conclusion, in terms of final article characteristics, the process of the present disclosure is a perfectly viable option to replace the conventional bleaching process as the final article is softer, smoother, with cleaner surface, better hydrophilicity and lower weigh loss. Even though there seems to be some variation in the colour yield, dyeing recipes are expected to be easily adjusted. When assessing the variation of colour yield against all the benefits and advantages of the process of the present disclosure, it can be deemed a manageable adaptation.
  • Moreover, on an environmental perspective, the process of the present disclosure allows meaningful savings in terms of water, energy and time consumption and originates less polluted effluents.
  • The term "comprising" whenever used in this document is intended to indicate the presence of stated features, integers, steps, components, but not to preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components or groups thereof.
  • It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that unless otherwise indicated herein, the particular sequence of steps described is illustrative only and can be varied without departing from the disclosure. Thus, unless otherwise stated the steps described are so unordered meaning that, when possible, the steps can be performed in any convenient or desirable order.
  • Furthermore, it is to be understood that the disclosure encompasses all variations, combinations, and permutations in which one or more limitations, elements, clauses, descriptive terms, etc., from one or more of the claims or from relevant portions of the description is introduced into another claim. For example, any claim that is dependent on another claim can be modified to include one or more limitations found in any other claim that is dependent on the same base claim.
  • Furthermore, where the claims recite a composition, it is to be understood that methods of using the composition for any of the purposes disclosed herein are included, and methods of making the composition according to any of the methods of making disclosed herein or other methods known in the art are included, unless otherwise indicated or unless it would be evident to one of ordinary skill in the art that a contradiction or inconsistency would arise.
  • Where ranges are given, endpoints are included. Furthermore, it is to be understood that unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the context and/or the understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art, values that are expressed as ranges can assume any specific value within the stated ranges in different embodiments of the invention, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is also to be understood that unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the context and/or the understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art, values expressed as ranges can assume any subrange within the given range, wherein the endpoints of the subrange are expressed to the same degree of accuracy as the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range.
  • The disclosure should not be seen in any way restricted to the embodiments described and a person with ordinary skill in the art will foresee many possibilities to modifications thereof.
  • The above described embodiments are combinable.
  • The following claims further set out particular embodiments of the disclosure.

Claims (15)

  1. A process for fabric bleaching comprising the following steps:
    preparing a water bath with a wetting agent and the fabric; wherein the bath is warmed to a first temperature up to a maximum of 70 °C and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8;
    adding an enzyme blend to the bath, wherein the enzyme blend comprises at least 3 of the following enzymes: alpha-amylase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase, endoglucanase, lipase;
    maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the enzymatic reaction;
    adding a peroxide donor and a bleaching activator to the bath;
    warming the bath to a second temperature of a minimum of 75 °C for the peroxidation reaction.
  2. The process according to the previous claim further comprising the following steps:
    discharging the first water bath;
    removing chemical residues from the fabric;
    optionally submitting the fabric to a second water bath of a minimum of 60 °C to improve the residue removal;
    optionally discharging the bath water;
    optionally preparing a further water bath, with a sequestering and dispersing agent, and the fabric, wherein the bath is warmed to a temperature up to a maximum of 60 °C, preferably 40 °C - 50 °C, and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8, maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the reaction time;
    optionally adding a catalase solution to the third bath, maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the catalase reaction.
  3. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the first temperature of the first bath is from 40 to 70 °C, preferably 60 °C and the pH of the first bath is from pH 5.5 to 8, preferably 6.0 - 6.5; and wherein the second temperature of the first bath is from 75 to 90 °C, preferably 80 °C and wherein the temperature of the second bath is from 60 to 90 °C, preferably 70 °C and wherein the temperature of the third bath is from 25 to 60 °C, preferably 40 °C.
  4. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the enzymatic reaction is of at least 30 minutes, preferably from 30 minutes to 1 hour, more preferably 45 minutes.
  5. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the peroxidation reaction is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5 to 20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
  6. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the washing is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5 to 20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
  7. Theprocess according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the washing with the sequestering and dispersing is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5 to 15 minutes.
  8. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the catalase reaction is at least 10 minutes, preferably from 10 to 30 minutes.
  9. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the blend of enzymes is:
    alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, cellulase;
    alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, pectate lyase;
    alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, lipase;
    endoglucanase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase;
    endoglucanase, beta-amylase, cellulase;
    endoglucanase, beta-amylase, lipase;
    beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase;
    beta-amylase, pectate lyase, lipase;
    beta-amylase, cellulase, lipase;
    pectate lyase, cellulase, lipase.
    optionally comprising oxidoreductase.
  10. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the liquor ratio between fabric: water is from 1:5 to 1:40; preferably from 1:10 to 1:20.
  11. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the wetting agent concentration is from 0.5 to 5 % (wt/wt), preferably from 1 to 2 % (wt/wt), the peroxide donor concentration is from 5 to 50 g/l, preferably from 10 to 15 g/l, the bleaching activator concentration is from 0.5 to 5 g/l, preferably from 1 to 3 g/l and/or the sequestering and dispersing agent concentrations are from 0.5 to 3 g/l, preferably from 0.5 to 1 g/l.
  12. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the enzyme blend concentration is from 0.5 to 5 % (wt/wt), preferably from 1 to 2 % (wt/wt) and/or the catalase concentration is from 0.2 to 2 g/l, preferably from 0.5 to 1.
  13. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the peroxide donor is sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate or a mixture thereof, the wetting agent is ethoxylated isotridecanol, the bleaching activator is a manganese salt, the sequestering and the dispersing agent is 3-hydroxy-3-carboxy-1,5-pentanedioic acid.
  14. A bleached fabric obtainable by the process described in any of the previous claims wherein the weight loss is less than 4.5%.
  15. An article comprising the fabric described in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the fabric is a natural yarn fabric, preferably a cotton fabric, most preferably a 100% cotton fabric.
EP19178847.0A 2019-06-03 2019-06-06 Process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof Pending EP3748065A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PT11556019 2019-06-03

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3748065A1 true EP3748065A1 (en) 2020-12-09

Family

ID=66793786

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19178847.0A Pending EP3748065A1 (en) 2019-06-03 2019-06-06 Process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3748065A1 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003002810A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-09 Novozymes North America, Inc. Single-bath preparation of cellulosic materials
WO2007093677A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-08-23 Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus A process for pretreatment of cellulose-based textile materials
WO2008023386A2 (en) 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Advanced Enzyme Technologies Limited Novel compositions for biobleaching coupled with stone washing of indigo dyed denims and process thereof
US20120015860A1 (en) * 2009-03-24 2012-01-19 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Gentle bleaching agent
CN103266495A (en) 2013-05-25 2013-08-28 上海秋橙新材料科技有限公司 Method for pre-treating cotton-polyester blended fabric with biological enzyme

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003002810A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-09 Novozymes North America, Inc. Single-bath preparation of cellulosic materials
WO2007093677A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-08-23 Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus A process for pretreatment of cellulose-based textile materials
WO2008023386A2 (en) 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Advanced Enzyme Technologies Limited Novel compositions for biobleaching coupled with stone washing of indigo dyed denims and process thereof
US20120015860A1 (en) * 2009-03-24 2012-01-19 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Gentle bleaching agent
CN103266495A (en) 2013-05-25 2013-08-28 上海秋橙新材料科技有限公司 Method for pre-treating cotton-polyester blended fabric with biological enzyme

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1637596B1 (en) Alkaline bacillus amylase
CN1177966C (en) Single-bath bioscouring and dyeing of textiles
Buschle-Diller et al. Enzymatic bleaching of cotton fabric with glucose oxidase
CN101418513B (en) One dosage form solid additive for cotton knitted fabric one bath boiling and bleaching process at low temperature
Eren et al. Enzymatic one-bath desizing—bleaching—dyeing process for cotton fabrics
CN102080331B (en) Process for pre-treating fabrics by bio-enzymatic method
EP0580707A1 (en) Removal of excess dye from new textiles.
CN101517156A (en) Novel pectate lyase and method of use for bio-scouring
CN102587111A (en) Low-temperature scouring and bleaching one-bath-process pretreatment process of cotton knitted fabrics
CN102154810A (en) Method for pretreating cotton fabrics by adopting glucoamylase/glucose oxidase, pectinase and CBD (cellulose-binding domain)-lignin peroxidase
Tzanov et al. Dyeing in catalase‐treated bleaching baths
CN107675510A (en) A kind of ultra-short Time Cold Pad-Batch Pretreatment auxiliary agent of bafta and preparation method thereof
Imran et al. Sustainable and economical one-step desizing, scouring and bleaching method for industrial scale pretreatment of woven fabrics
Preša et al. Low water and energy saving process for cotton pretreatment
CN106638053A (en) One-bath dyeing technology for polyester-cotton blended fabric by natural vegetable dye
Mojsov Biotechnological applications of pectinases in textile processing and bioscouring of cotton fibers
EP3748065A1 (en) Process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof
CN107142734A (en) A kind of pretreating reagent and its method for cotton cheese dyeing pre-treatment
KR101321526B1 (en) Process Of Dyeing Cotton Textiles Using Enzyme
Mojsov Enzyme applications in textile preparatory process: A review
Ali et al. Integrated preparatory method for cotton towel by using enzymes
KR101061436B1 (en) Towel Dyeing Pretreatment Method
Tavčer Biotechnology in textiles–an opportunity of saving water
CN111073865A (en) Enzyme preparation for pretreatment of aramid fiber and preparation process thereof
JP5604768B1 (en) Fiber scouring method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20210607

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230529

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED