EP3734998B1 - Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3734998B1 EP3734998B1 EP20180704.7A EP20180704A EP3734998B1 EP 3734998 B1 EP3734998 B1 EP 3734998B1 EP 20180704 A EP20180704 A EP 20180704A EP 3734998 B1 EP3734998 B1 EP 3734998B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- decorrelation
- control parameter
- filter length
- audio
- length
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 34
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 title description 3
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 17
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- AQHHHDLHHXJYJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N propranolol Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(OCC(O)CNC(C)C)=CC=CC2=C1 AQHHHDLHHXJYJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 125000000205 L-threonino group Chemical group [H]OC(=O)[C@@]([H])(N([H])[*])[C@](C([H])([H])[H])([H])O[H] 0.000 description 2
- 101100026203 Neurospora crassa (strain ATCC 24698 / 74-OR23-1A / CBS 708.71 / DSM 1257 / FGSC 987) neg-1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000005314 correlation function Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001025261 Neoraja caerulea Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZYXYTGQFPZEUFX-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzpyrimoxan Chemical compound O1C(OCCC1)C=1C(=NC=NC=1)OCC1=CC=C(C=C1)C(F)(F)F ZYXYTGQFPZEUFX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002789 length control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012805 post-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000013707 sensory perception of sound Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S5/00—Pseudo-stereo systems, e.g. in which additional channel signals are derived from monophonic signals by means of phase shifting, time delay or reverberation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L19/00—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis
- G10L19/04—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis using predictive techniques
- G10L19/16—Vocoder architecture
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L19/00—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis
- G10L19/04—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis using predictive techniques
- G10L19/26—Pre-filtering or post-filtering
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S3/00—Systems employing more than two channels, e.g. quadraphonic
- H04S3/008—Systems employing more than two channels, e.g. quadraphonic in which the audio signals are in digital form, i.e. employing more than two discrete digital channels
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L19/00—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis
- G10L19/008—Multichannel audio signal coding or decoding using interchannel correlation to reduce redundancy, e.g. joint-stereo, intensity-coding or matrixing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00
- G10L25/78—Detection of presence or absence of voice signals
- G10L25/81—Detection of presence or absence of voice signals for discriminating voice from music
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S2400/00—Details of stereophonic systems covered by H04S but not provided for in its groups
- H04S2400/01—Multi-channel, i.e. more than two input channels, sound reproduction with two speakers wherein the multi-channel information is substantially preserved
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S2420/00—Techniques used stereophonic systems covered by H04S but not provided for in its groups
- H04S2420/03—Application of parametric coding in stereophonic audio systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S2420/00—Techniques used stereophonic systems covered by H04S but not provided for in its groups
- H04S2420/07—Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing
Definitions
- the control parameter may be obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain.
- a transmitted control parameter may for example be based on an estimated performance of the parametric description of the spatial properties, i.e. the stereo image in case of two-channel input. That is, the control parameter may be a performance measure.
- the performance measure may be obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain.
- the amount of feedback, ⁇ [ a ] may also be adapted in similar way as the delay parameter d[a].
- the length of the generated ambiance is a combination of both these parameters and thus both may need to be adapted in order to achieve a suitable ambience length.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Stereophonic System (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
- Filters That Use Time-Delay Elements (AREA)
Description
- The present application relates to spatial audio coding and rendering.
- Spatial or 3D audio is a generic formulation, which denotes various kinds of multi-channel audio signals. Depending on the capturing and rendering methods, the audio scene is represented by a spatial audio format. Typical spatial audio formats defined by the capturing method (microphones) are for example denoted as stereo, binaural, ambisonics, etc. Spatial audio rendering systems (headphones or loudspeakers) are able to render spatial audio scenes with stereo (left and right channels 2.0) or more advanced multichannel audio signals (2.1, 5.1, 7.1, etc.).
- Recent technologies for the transmission and manipulation of such audio signals allow the end user to have an enhanced audio experience with higher spatial quality often resulting in a better intelligibility as well as an augmented reality. Spatial audio coding techniques, such as MPEG Surround or MPEG-H 3D Audio, generate a compact representation of spatial audio signals which is compatible with data rate constraint applications such as streaming over the internet for example. The transmission of spatial audio signals is however limited when the data rate constraint is strong and therefore post-processing of the decoded audio channels is also used to enhanced the spatial audio playback. Commonly used techniques are for example able to blindly up-mix decoded mono or stereo signals into multi-channel audio (5.1 channels or more).
- In order to efficiently render spatial audio scenes, the spatial audio coding and processing technologies make use of the spatial characteristics of the multi-channel audio signal. In particular, the time and level differences between the channels of the spatial audio capture are used to approximate the inter-aural cues, which characterize our perception of directional sounds in space. Since the inter-channel time and level differences are only an approximation of what the auditory system is able to detect (i.e. the inter-aural time and level differences at the ear entrances), it is of high importance that the inter-channel time difference is relevant from a perceptual aspect. The inter-channel time and level differences (ICTD and ICLD) are commonly used to model the directional components of multi-channel audio signals while the inter-channel cross-correlation (ICC) - that models the inter-aural cross-correlation (IACC) - is used to characterize the width of the audio image. Especially for lower frequencies the stereo image may also be modeled with inter-channel phase differences (ICPD).
- It should be noted that the binaural cues relevant for spatial auditory perception are called inter-aural level difference (ILD), inter-aural time difference (ITD) and inter-aural coherence or correlation (IC or IACC). When considering general multichannel signals, the corresponding cues related to the channels are inter-channel level difference (ICLD), inter-channel time difference (ICTD) and inter-channel coherence or correlation (ICC). Since the spatial audio processing mostly operates on the captured audio channels, the "C" is sometimes left out and the terms ITD, ILD and IC are often used also when referring to audio channels.
Figure 1 gives an illustration of these parameters. Infigure 1 a spatial audio playback with a 5.1 surround system (5 discrete + 1 low frequency effect) is shown. Inter-Channel parameters such as ICTD, ICLD and ICC are extracted from the audio channels in order to approximate the ITD, ILD and IACC, which models human perception of sound in space. - In
figure 2 , a typical setup employing the parametric spatial audio analysis is shown.Figure 2 illustrates a basic block diagram of a parametric stereo coder. A stereo signal pair is input to thestereo encoder 201. Theparameter extraction 202 aids the down-mix process, where adownmixer 204 prepares a single channel representation of the two input channels to be encoded with amono encoder 206. The extracted parameters are encoded by aparameter encoder 208. That is, the stereo channels are down-mixed into amono signal 207 that is encoded and transmitted to thedecoder 203 together with encodedparameters 205 describing the spatial image. Usually some of the stereo parameters are represented in spectral sub-bands on a perceptual frequency scale such as the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) scale. The decoder performs stereo synthesis based on the decoded mono signal and the transmitted parameters. That is, the decoder reconstructs the single channel using amono decoder 210 and synthesizes the stereo channels using the parametric representation. The decoded mono signal and received encoded parameters are input to aparametric synthesis unit 212 or process that decodes the parameters, synthesizes the stereo channels using the decoded parameters, and outputs a synthesized stereo signal pair. - Since the encoded parameters are used to render spatial audio for the human auditory system, it is important that the inter-channel parameters are extracted and encoded with perceptual considerations for maximized perceived quality.
- Since the side channel may not be explicitly coded, the side channel can be approximated by decorrelation of the mid channel. The decorrelation technique is typically a filtering method used to generate an output signal that is incoherent with the input signal from a fine-structure point of view. The spectral and temporal envelopes of the decorrelated signal shall ideally remain. Decorrelation filters are typically all-pass filters with phase modifications of the input signal.
-
US 2016/0005406 A1 discloses an audio signal processing method for determining decorrelation filter parameters for a decorrelator. The method involves calculating combined frequency coefficients of a composite coupling channel based on frequency coefficients of two or more channels, and computing cross-correlation coefficients between frequency coefficients of a first channel and the combined frequency coefficients. The method comprises averaging the cross-correlation coefficients and determining a variance of the cross-correlation coefficients. - The essence of embodiments is an adaptive control of the character of a decorrelator for representation of non-coherent signal components utilized in a multi-channel audio decoder. The adaptation is based on a transmitted performance measure and how it varies over time. Different aspects of the decorrelator may be adaptively controlled using the same basic method in order to match the character of the input signal. One of the most important aspects of decorrelation character is the choice of decorrelator filter length, which is described in the detailed description. Other aspects of the decorrelator may be adaptively controlled in a similar way, such as the control of the strength of the decorrelated component or other aspects that may need to be adaptively controlled to match the character of the input signal.
- The invention is defined by a method according to
claim 1 and an apparatus according to claim 7. - Provided is a method for adaptation of a decorrelation filter length. The method comprises receiving or obtaining a control parameter, and estimating mean and variation of the control parameter. Ratio of the variation and mean of the control parameter is calculated, and an optimum or targeted decorrelation filter length is calculated based on the current ratio. The optimum or targeted decorrelation filter length is then applied or provided to a decorrelator. According to a first aspect there is presented an audio signal processing method for adaptively adjusting a decorrelator. The method comprises obtaining a control parameter and estimating mean and variation of the control parameter. Ratio of the variation and mean of the control parameter is calculated, and a targeted decorrelation filter length is calculated based on the said ratio.
- The control parameter may be obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain.
- The control parameter is received from an encoder, such as a parametric stereo encoder, or obtained from information already available at a decoder or by a combination of available and transmitted information (i.e. information received by the decoder).
- The adaptation of a decorrelation filter length may be done in at least two sub-bands so that each frequency band can have an optimal decorrelation filter length. This means that shorter or longer filters than the targeted length may be used for certain frequency sub-bands or coefficients.
- The method is performed by a parametric stereo decoder or a stereo audio codec. According to a second aspect there is provided an apparatus for adaptively adjusting a decorrelator of an audio decoder. The apparatus comprises means adapted to obtain a control parameter and to estimate mean and variation of the control parameter. The apparatus is adapted to calculate ratio of the variation and mean of the control parameter, and to calculate a targeted decorrelation filter length based on the said ratio.
- For a more complete understanding of example embodiments of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
-
Figure 1 illustrates spatial audio playback with a 5.1 surround system. -
Figure 2 illustrates a basic block diagram of a parametric stereo coder. -
Figure 3 illustrates width of the auditory object as a function of the IACC. -
Figure 4 shows an example of an audio signal. -
Figure 5 is a block diagram describing the method according to an embodiment. -
Figure 6 is a block diagram describing the method according to an alternative embodiment. -
Figure 7 shows an example of an apparatus. -
Figure 8 shows a device comprising a decorrelation filter length calculator. - An example embodiment of the present invention and its potential advantages are understood by referring to
Figures 1 through 8 of the drawings. - Existing solutions for representation of non-coherent signal components are based on time-invariant decorrelation filters and the amount of non-coherent components in the decoded multi-channel audio is controlled by the mixing of decorrelated and non-decorrelated signal components.
- An issue of such time-invariant decorrelation filters is that the decorrelated signal will not be adapted to properties of the input signals which are affected by variations in the auditory scene. For example, the ambience in a recording of a single speech source in a low reverb environment would be represented by decorrelated signal components from the same filter as for a recording of a symphony orchestra in a big concert hall with significantly longer reverberation. Even if the amount of decorrelated components is controlled over time the reverberation length and other properties of the decorrelation is not controlled. This may cause the ambience for the low reverb recording sound too spacious while the auditory scene for the high reverb recording is perceived to be too narrow. A short reverberation length, which is desirable for low reverb recordings, often results in metallic and unnatural ambiance for recordings of more spacious recordings.
- The proposed solution improves the control of non-coherent audio signals by taking into account how the non-coherent audio varies over time and uses that information to adaptively control the character of the decorrelation, e.g. the reverberation length, in the representation of non-coherent components in a decoded and rendered multi-channel audio signal.
- The adaptation can be based on signal properties of the input signals in the encoder and controlled by transmission of one or several control parameters to the decoder. Alternatively, it can be controlled without transmission of an explicit control parameter but from information already available at the decoder or by a combination of available and transmitted information (i.e. information received by the decoder from the encoder).
- A transmitted control parameter may for example be based on an estimated performance of the parametric description of the spatial properties, i.e. the stereo image in case of two-channel input. That is, the control parameter may be a performance measure. The performance measure may be obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain.
- The solution provides a better control of reverberation in decoded rendered audio signals which improves the perceived quality for a variety of signal types, such as clean speech signals with low reverberation or spacious music signals with large reverberation and a wide audio scene.
- The essence of embodiments is an adaptive control of a decorrelation filter length for representation of non-coherent signal components utilized in a multi-channel audio decoder. The adaptation is based on a transmitted performance measure and how it varies over time. In addition, the strength of the decorrelated component may be controlled based on the same control parameter as the decorrelation length.
- The proposed solution may operate on frames or samples in the time domain on frequency bands in a filterbank or transform domain, e.g. utilizing Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), for processing on frequency coefficients of frequency bands. Operations performed in one domain may be equally performed in another domain and the given embodiments are not limited to the exemplified domain.
- In one embodiment, the proposed solution is utilized for a stereo audio codec with a coded down-mix channel and a parametric description of the spatial properties, i.e. as illustrated in
figure 2 . The parametric analysis may extract one or more parameters describing non-coherent components between the channels which can be used to adaptively adjust the perceived amount of non-coherent components in the synthesized stereo audio. As illustrated infigure 3 , the IACC, i.e. the coherence between the channels, will affect the perceived width of a spatial auditory object or scene. When the IACC decreases, the source width increases until the sound is perceived as two distinct uncorrelated audio sources. In order to be able to represent wide ambience in a stereo recording, non-coherent components between the channels have to be synthesized at the decoder. - A down-mix channel of two input channels X and Y may be obtained from
- The side channel S may not be explicitly encoded but parametrically modelled for example by using a prediction filter where Ŝ is predicted from the decoded mid channel M̂ and used at the decoder for spatial synthesis. In this case prediction parameters, e.g. prediction filter coefficients, may be encoded and transmitted to the decoder.
- Another way to model the side channel is to approximate it by decorrelation of the mid channel. The decorrelation technique is typically a filtering method used to generate an output signal that is incoherent with the input signal from a fine-structure point of view. The spectral and temporal envelopes of the decorrelated signal shall ideally remain. Decorrelation filters are typically all-pass filters with phase modifications of the input signal.
- In this embodiment, the proposed solution is used to adaptively adjust a decorrelator used for spatial synthesis in a parametric stereo decoder.
- Spatial rendering (up-mix) of the encoded mono channel M̂ is obtained by
-
-
-
-
- The coherence between channels can be estimated through the inter-channel cross correlation (ICC). A conventional ICC estimation relies on the cross-correlation function (CCF) rxy which is a measure of similarity between two waveforms x[n] and y[n], and is generally defined in the time domain as
-
- Additional parameters may be used in the description of the stereo image. These can for example reflect phase or time differences between the channels.
- A decorrelation filter may be defined by its impulse response hd (n) or transfer function Hd (k) in the DFT domain where n and k are the sample and frequency index, respectively. In the DFT domain a decorrelated signal Md is obtained by
- In one embodiment a reverberator based on A serially connected all-pass filters is obtained as
- Multi-channel audio, or in this example two-channel audio, has naturally a varying amount of coherence between the channels depending on the signal characteristics. For a single speaker recorded in a well-damped environment there will be a low amount of reflections and reverberation which will result in high coherence between the channels. As the reverberation increases the coherence will generally decrease. This means that for clean speech signals with low amount of noise and ambience the length of the decorrelation filter should probably be shorter than for a single speaker in a reverberant environment. The length of the decorrelator filter is one important parameter that controls the character of the generated decorrelated signal. Embodiments of the invention may also be used to adaptively control other parameters in order to match the character of the decorrelated signal to that of the input signal, such as parameters related to the level control of the decorrelated signal. By utilizing a reverberator for rendering of non-coherent signal components the amount of delay may be controlled in order to adapt to different spatial characteristics of the encoded audio. More generally one can control the length of the impulse response of a decorrelation filter. As mentioned above controlling the filter length can be equivalent to controlling the delay of a reverberator without feedback.
-
- A transmitted control parameter may for example be based on an estimated performance of the parametric description of the spatial properties, i.e. the stereo image in case of two-channel input. The performance measure r may for example be obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain. The decorrelation filter length d may then be controlled based on this performance measure, i.e. c 1 is the performance measure r . One example of a suitable control function f 1(·) is given by
- θ 1 is a tuning parameter that may for example be set to θ 1 = 7.0. There is a relation between θ 1 and the dynamics of g(r) and in another embodiment it may for example be θ 1 = 0.22. The sub-function g(r) may be defined as the ratio between the change of r and the average r over time. This ratio will go higher for sounds that have a lot of variation in the performance measure compared to its mean value, which is typically the case for sparse sounds with little background noise or reverberation. For more dense sounds, like music or speech with background noise this ratio will be lower and therefor works like a sound classifier, classifying the character of the non-coherent components of the original input signal. The ratio can be calculated as
-
- For the first frame rmean [i - 1] may be initialized to 0. The smoothing factors αpos and αneg may be chosen such that upward and downward changes of r are followed differently. In one example αpos = 0.005 and αneg = 0.5 which means that the mean estimation follows to a larger extent the minima of the mean performance measure over time. In another embodiment, the positive and negative smoothing factors are equal, e.g. αpos = αneg = 0.1.
-
-
-
-
- The smoothing factors βpos and βneg may be chosen such that upward and downward changes of rc are followed differently. In one example βpos = 0.5 and βneg = 0.05 which means that the mean estimation follows to a larger extent the maxima of the change in the performance measure over time. In another embodiment, the positive and negative smoothing factors are equal, e.g. βpos = βneg = 0.1.
- Generally for all given examples the transition between the two smoothing factors may be made for any threshold that the update value of the current frame is compared to. I.e., in the given example of equation 25 rc [i] > θthres.
-
-
-
-
- where b = b 0, ... b N-1 is an index for N frequency sub-bands. The smoothing factors control the amount of smoothing when the threshold θhigh, e.g. set to 0.6, is exceeded, respectively not exceeded and can be equal for positive and negative updates or different, e.g. κpos_high = 0.03, κneg_high = 0.05, κpos_low = 0.1, κneg_low = 0.001.
- It may be noted that additional smoothing or limitation of change in the obtained decorrelation filter length between samples or frames is possible in order to avoid artifacts. In addition, the set of filter lengths utilized for decorrelation may be limited in order to reduce the number of different colorations obtained when mixing signals. For example, there might be two different lengths where the first one is relatively short and the second one is longer.
- In one embodiment, a set of two available filters of different lengths d 1 and d 2 are used. A targeted filter length d may for example be obtained as
- In this case, the decorrelation filter strength s controlling the amount of decorrelated signal D in the synthesized channels X̂ and Ŷ may be controlled by the same control parameters, in this case with one control parameter, the performance measure c 1 ≡ r.
- In another embodiment, the adaptation of the decorrelation filter length is done in several, i.e. at least two, sub-bands so that each frequency band can have the optimal decorrelation filter length.
- In an embodiment where the reverberator uses a set of filters with feedback, as depicted in
equation 15, the amount of feedback, ψ[a], may also be adapted in similar way as the delay parameter d[a]. In such embodiment the length of the generated ambiance is a combination of both these parameters and thus both may need to be adapted in order to achieve a suitable ambiance length. -
- In yet another embodiment, the decorrelation filter length and decorrelation signal strength are controlled by an analysis of the decoded audio signals.
- The reverberation length may additionally be specially controlled for transients, i.e. sudden energy increases, or for other signals with special characteristics.
- As the filter changes over time there should be some handling of changes over frames or samples. This may for example be interpolation or window functions with overlapping frames. The interpolation can be made between previous filters of their respectively controlled length to the currently targeted filter length over several samples or frames. The interpolation may be obtained by successively decrease the gain of previous filters while increasing the gain of the current filter of currently targeted length over samples or frames. In another embodiment, the targeted filter length controls the filter gain of each available filter such that there is a mixture of available filters of different lengths when the targeted filter length is not available. In the case of two available filters h 1 and h 2 of length d 1 and d 2 respectively, their gains s 1 and s 2 may be obtained as
- The filter gains may also be depending on each other, e.g. in order to obtain equal energy of the filtered signal, i.e. s 2 = f(s 1) in case h 1 is the reference filter which gain is controlled by c 1. For example the filter gain s 1 may be obtained as
-
-
-
-
-
Figure 4 shows an example of a signal where the first half contains clean speech and the second half classical music. The performance measure mean is relatively high for the second half containing music. The performance measure variation is also higher for the second half but the ratio between them is considerably lower. A signal where the performance measure variation is much higher than the performance measure mean is considered to be a signal with continuous high amounts of diffuse components and therefore the length of the decorrelation filter should be lower for the first half of this example than the second. It is to be noted that the signals in the graphs have all been smoothed and partly restricted for a more controlled behavior. In this case the targeted decorrelation filter length is expressed in a discrete number of frames but in other embodiments the filter length may vary continuously. -
Figures 5 and6 illustrate an example method for adjusting a decorrelator. The method comprises obtaining a control parameter, and calculating mean and variation of the control parameter. Ratio of the variation and mean of the control parameter is calculated, and a decorrelation parameter is calculated based on the ratio. The decorrelation parameter is then provided to a decorrelator. -
Figure 5 describes steps involved in the adaptation of the decorrelation filter length. Themethod 500 starts with receiving 501 a performance measure parameter, i.e. a control parameter. The performance measure is calculated in an audio encoder and transmitted to an audio decoder. Alternatively, the control parameter is obtained from information already available at a decoder or by a combination of available and transmitted information. First a mean and a variation of the performance measure is calculated as shown inblocks -
Figure 6 describes another embodiment of the adaptation of the decorrelation filter length. Themethod 600 starts with receiving 601 a performance measure parameter, i.e. a control parameter. The performance measure is calculated in an audio encoder and transmitted to an audio decoder. Alternatively, the control parameter is obtained from information already available at a decoder or by a combination of available and transmitted information. First a mean and a variation of the performance measure is calculated as shown inblocks - The methods may be performed by a parametric stereo decoder or a stereo audio codec.
-
Figure 7 shows an example of an apparatus performing the method illustrated inFigures 5 and6 . Theapparatus 700 comprises aprocessor 710, e.g. a central processing unit (CPU), and acomputer program product 720 in the form of a memory for storing the instructions,e.g. computer program 730 that, when retrieved from the memory and executed by theprocessor 710 causes theapparatus 700 to perform processes connected with embodiments of adaptively adjusting a decorrelator Theprocessor 710 is communicatively coupled to thememory 720. The apparatus may further comprise an input node for receiving input parameters, i.e., the performance measure, and an output node for outputting processed parameters such as a decorrelation filter length. The input node and the output node are both communicatively coupled to theprocessor 710. - The
apparatus 700 is comprised in an audio decoder, such as the parametric stereo decoder shown in a lower part offigure 2 . It may be comprised in a stereo audio codec.Figure 8 shows adevice 800 comprising a decorrelationfilter length calculator 802. The device is a decoder, e.g., a speech or audio decoder. Aninput signal 804 is an encoded mono signal with encoded parameters describing the spatial image. The input parameters may comprise the control parameter, such as the performance measure. Theoutput signal 806 is a synthesized stereo or multichannel signal, i.e. a reconstructed audio signal. The device may further comprise a receiver (not shown) for receiving the input signal from an audio encoder. The device may further comprise a mono decoder and a parametric synthesis unit as shown infigure 2 . - In an embodiment, the
decorrelation length calculator 802 comprises an obtaining unit for receiving or obtaining a performance measure parameter, i.e. a control parameter. It further comprises a first calculation unit for calculating a mean and a variation of the performance measure, a second calculation unit for calculating the ratio of the variation and the mean of the performance measure, and a third calculation unit for calculating targeted decorrelation filter length. It may further comprise a providing unit for providing the targeted decorrelation filter length to a decorrelation unit. - By way of example, the software or
computer program 730 may be realized as a computer program product, which is normally carried or stored on a computer-readable medium, preferably non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable medium may include one or more removable or non-removable memory devices including, but not limited to a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Versatile Disc (DVD), a Blue-ray disc, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) memory, a Hard Disk Drive (HDD) storage device, a flash memory, a magnetic tape, or any other conventional memory device. - Embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in software, hardware, application logic or a combination of software, hardware and application logic. The software, application logic and/or hardware may reside on a memory, a microprocessor or a central processing unit. If desired, part of the software, application logic and/or hardware may reside on a host device or on a memory, a microprocessor or a central processing unit of the host. In an example embodiment, the application logic, software or an instruction set is maintained on any one of various conventional computer-readable media.
-
- ILD/ICLD
- Inter-channel Level Difference
- IPD/ICPD
- Inter-channel Phase Difference
- ITD/ICTD
- Inter-channel Time difference
- IACC
- Inter-Aural Cross Correlation
- ICC
- Inter-Channel correlation
- DFT
- Discrete Fourier Transform
- CCF
- Cross Correlation Function
Claims (14)
- An audio signal processing method (500, 600) performed by an audio decoder for adaptively adjusting a decorrelator, the method comprising:obtaining (501, 601) a control parameter;estimating (502, 602) a mean of the control parameter;estimating (504, 604) a variation of the control parameter;calculating (506, 606) a ratio of said variation and mean of the control parameter; andcalculating (508, 608) a targeted decorrelation filter length based on said ratio.
- The method according to claim 1, further comprising calculating a decorrelation signal strength based on the calculated targeted decorrelation filter length.
- The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the control parameter is obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain.
- The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the targeted decorrelation filter length is calculated based on two different filter lengths.
- The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein adaptation of a decorrelation filter length is done in at least two sub-bands, each frequency band having an adapted decorrelation filter length.
- The method according to any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein at least one of the decorrelation filter length and the decorrelation signal strength are controlled as functions of two or more different control parameters.
- An apparatus (700, 802) for adaptively adjusting a decorrelator of an audio decoder, the apparatus comprising means adapted to:obtain a control parameter;estimate a mean of the control parameter;estimate a variation of the control parameter;calculate a ratio of said variation and mean of the control parameter; andcalculate a targeted decorrelation filter length based on said ratio.
- The apparatus according to claim 7, further configured to calculate a decorrelation signal strength based on the calculated targeted decorrelation filter length.
- The apparatus according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the control parameter is obtained from estimated reverberation length, correlation measures, estimation of spatial width or prediction gain.
- The apparatus according to any one of claims 7 to 9, further configured to calculate the targeted decorrelation filter length based on two different filter lengths.
- The apparatus according to any one of claims 7 to 10, further configured to perform adaptation of a decorrelation filter length in at least two sub-bands, each frequency band having an adapted decorrelation filter length.
- The apparatus according to any one of claims 8 to 11, further configured to control at least one of the decorrelation filter length and the decorrelation signal strength as functions of two or more different control parameters.
- A stereo or multi-channel audio codec comprising the apparatus of claim 7.
- A parametric stereo decoder comprising the apparatus of claim 7.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP22203950.5A EP4149122A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201662425861P | 2016-11-23 | 2016-11-23 | |
US201662430569P | 2016-12-06 | 2016-12-06 | |
PCT/EP2017/080219 WO2018096036A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
EP17803944.2A EP3545693B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17803944.2A Division EP3545693B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP22203950.5A Division EP4149122A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3734998A1 EP3734998A1 (en) | 2020-11-04 |
EP3734998B1 true EP3734998B1 (en) | 2022-11-02 |
Family
ID=60450667
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17803944.2A Active EP3545693B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
EP20180704.7A Active EP3734998B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
EP22203950.5A Pending EP4149122A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17803944.2A Active EP3545693B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP22203950.5A Pending EP4149122A1 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2017-11-23 | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US10950247B2 (en) |
EP (3) | EP3545693B1 (en) |
JP (3) | JP6843992B2 (en) |
KR (2) | KR102349931B1 (en) |
CN (2) | CN112397076A (en) |
ES (1) | ES2808096T3 (en) |
IL (1) | IL266580B (en) |
MX (1) | MX2019005805A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2018096036A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
MX2019005805A (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2019-08-12 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters. |
WO2020044244A1 (en) | 2018-08-29 | 2020-03-05 | Audible Reality Inc. | System for and method of controlling a three-dimensional audio engine |
US11586411B2 (en) * | 2018-08-30 | 2023-02-21 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Spatial characteristics of multi-channel source audio |
US20200402523A1 (en) * | 2019-06-24 | 2020-12-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Psychoacoustic audio coding of ambisonic audio data |
CN112653985B (en) * | 2019-10-10 | 2022-09-27 | 高迪奥实验室公司 | Method and apparatus for processing audio signal using 2-channel stereo speaker |
KR20230054597A (en) | 2021-10-16 | 2023-04-25 | 김은일 | Sheathing solar energy system and construction method thereof |
GB2623999A (en) * | 2022-11-03 | 2024-05-08 | The Univ Of Derby | Speaker system and calibration method |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5956674A (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 1999-09-21 | Digital Theater Systems, Inc. | Multi-channel predictive subband audio coder using psychoacoustic adaptive bit allocation in frequency, time and over the multiple channels |
KR100825214B1 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2008-04-25 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Asymmetric multichannel filter |
SE0301273D0 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2003-04-30 | Coding Technologies Sweden Ab | Advanced processing based on a complex exponential-modulated filter bank and adaptive time signaling methods |
EP1914722B1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2009-04-29 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Multichannel audio decoding |
TWI393121B (en) | 2004-08-25 | 2013-04-11 | Dolby Lab Licensing Corp | Method and apparatus for processing a set of n audio signals, and computer program associated therewith |
JP2007065497A (en) | 2005-09-01 | 2007-03-15 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Signal processing apparatus |
EP1879181B1 (en) * | 2006-07-11 | 2014-05-21 | Nuance Communications, Inc. | Method for compensation audio signal components in a vehicle communication system and system therefor |
JP4928918B2 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2012-05-09 | 株式会社東芝 | Signal processing apparatus using adaptive filter |
WO2008096313A1 (en) * | 2007-02-06 | 2008-08-14 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Low complexity parametric stereo decoder |
CN101521010B (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2011-10-05 | 华为技术有限公司 | Coding and decoding method for voice frequency signals and coding and decoding device |
WO2011072729A1 (en) * | 2009-12-16 | 2011-06-23 | Nokia Corporation | Multi-channel audio processing |
EP2593937B1 (en) * | 2010-07-16 | 2015-11-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Audio encoder and decoder and methods for encoding and decoding an audio signal |
JP5730555B2 (en) | 2010-12-06 | 2015-06-10 | 富士通テン株式会社 | Sound field control device |
GB201109731D0 (en) * | 2011-06-10 | 2011-07-27 | System Ltd X | Method and system for analysing audio tracks |
AU2012358317B2 (en) | 2011-12-21 | 2017-12-14 | Indiana University Research And Technology Corporation | Anti-cancer compounds targeting Ral GTPases and methods of using the same |
JP2013156109A (en) * | 2012-01-30 | 2013-08-15 | Hitachi Ltd | Distance measurement device |
RU2630370C9 (en) * | 2013-02-14 | 2017-09-26 | Долби Лабораторис Лайсэнзин Корпорейшн | Methods of management of the interchannel coherence of sound signals that are exposed to the increasing mixing |
TWI618050B (en) * | 2013-02-14 | 2018-03-11 | 杜比實驗室特許公司 | Method and apparatus for signal decorrelation in an audio processing system |
US10839302B2 (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2020-11-17 | The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York | Approximate value iteration with complex returns by bounding |
MX2019005805A (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2019-08-12 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters. |
-
2017
- 2017-11-23 MX MX2019005805A patent/MX2019005805A/en unknown
- 2017-11-23 KR KR1020217000273A patent/KR102349931B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2017-11-23 EP EP17803944.2A patent/EP3545693B1/en active Active
- 2017-11-23 CN CN202011398462.5A patent/CN112397076A/en active Pending
- 2017-11-23 US US16/463,619 patent/US10950247B2/en active Active
- 2017-11-23 JP JP2019527437A patent/JP6843992B2/en active Active
- 2017-11-23 ES ES17803944T patent/ES2808096T3/en active Active
- 2017-11-23 CN CN201780072339.4A patent/CN110024421B/en active Active
- 2017-11-23 WO PCT/EP2017/080219 patent/WO2018096036A1/en unknown
- 2017-11-23 KR KR1020197017588A patent/KR102201308B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2017-11-23 EP EP20180704.7A patent/EP3734998B1/en active Active
- 2017-11-23 EP EP22203950.5A patent/EP4149122A1/en active Pending
-
2019
- 2019-05-12 IL IL266580A patent/IL266580B/en unknown
-
2021
- 2021-02-24 JP JP2021027961A patent/JP7201721B2/en active Active
- 2021-03-15 US US17/201,030 patent/US11501785B2/en active Active
-
2022
- 2022-11-14 US US17/986,830 patent/US11942098B2/en active Active
- 2022-12-22 JP JP2022205672A patent/JP2023052042A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR102201308B1 (en) | 2021-01-11 |
EP3545693B1 (en) | 2020-06-24 |
CN112397076A (en) | 2021-02-23 |
US20200184981A1 (en) | 2020-06-11 |
WO2018096036A1 (en) | 2018-05-31 |
JP2020502562A (en) | 2020-01-23 |
US11501785B2 (en) | 2022-11-15 |
KR20190085988A (en) | 2019-07-19 |
JP6843992B2 (en) | 2021-03-17 |
EP4149122A1 (en) | 2023-03-15 |
JP7201721B2 (en) | 2023-01-10 |
MX2019005805A (en) | 2019-08-12 |
US10950247B2 (en) | 2021-03-16 |
KR102349931B1 (en) | 2022-01-11 |
US11942098B2 (en) | 2024-03-26 |
CN110024421B (en) | 2020-12-25 |
JP2021101242A (en) | 2021-07-08 |
EP3734998A1 (en) | 2020-11-04 |
KR20210006007A (en) | 2021-01-15 |
IL266580B (en) | 2021-10-31 |
CN110024421A (en) | 2019-07-16 |
ES2808096T3 (en) | 2021-02-25 |
IL266580A (en) | 2019-07-31 |
EP3545693A1 (en) | 2019-10-02 |
US20210201922A1 (en) | 2021-07-01 |
JP2023052042A (en) | 2023-04-11 |
US20230071136A1 (en) | 2023-03-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11942098B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for adaptive control of decorrelation filters | |
US10573328B2 (en) | Determining the inter-channel time difference of a multi-channel audio signal | |
US9449603B2 (en) | Multi-channel audio encoder and method for encoding a multi-channel audio signal | |
US10002614B2 (en) | Determining the inter-channel time difference of a multi-channel audio signal | |
US11869518B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for increasing stability of an inter-channel time difference parameter |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 3545693 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20210503 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G10L 25/81 20130101ALN20220404BHEP Ipc: G10L 19/008 20130101ALN20220404BHEP Ipc: H04S 5/00 20060101AFI20220404BHEP |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G10L 25/81 20130101ALN20220413BHEP Ipc: G10L 19/008 20130101ALN20220413BHEP Ipc: H04S 5/00 20060101AFI20220413BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20220527 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 3545693 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1529644 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20221115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602017063441 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1529644 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20221102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230302 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230202 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230302 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230203 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230517 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221130 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602017063441 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221123 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20230803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20231126 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231127 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20231127 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231127 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231129 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20231127 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20171123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221102 |