EP3577811A1 - Erweitertes verfahren zur messung der kanalqualitätsanzeige (cqi) für urllc - Google Patents

Erweitertes verfahren zur messung der kanalqualitätsanzeige (cqi) für urllc

Info

Publication number
EP3577811A1
EP3577811A1 EP18748717.8A EP18748717A EP3577811A1 EP 3577811 A1 EP3577811 A1 EP 3577811A1 EP 18748717 A EP18748717 A EP 18748717A EP 3577811 A1 EP3577811 A1 EP 3577811A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
value
channel quality
configuration
quality measurements
user equipment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP18748717.8A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3577811A4 (de
Inventor
Guillermo POCOVI
Klaus Pedersen
Jens Steiner
Beatriz SORET
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nokia Technologies Oy
Original Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Technologies Oy filed Critical Nokia Technologies Oy
Publication of EP3577811A1 publication Critical patent/EP3577811A1/de
Publication of EP3577811A4 publication Critical patent/EP3577811A4/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • H04L5/0057Physical resource allocation for CQI
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0026Transmission of channel quality indication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/02Channels characterised by the type of signal
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/1607Details of the supervisory signal
    • H04L1/1671Details of the supervisory signal the supervisory signal being transmitted together with control information
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/12Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
    • H04L1/16Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
    • H04L1/18Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
    • H04L1/1867Arrangements specially adapted for the transmitter end

Definitions

  • An additional example of an embodiment includes a computer program, comprising code for performing the method of the previous paragraph, when the computer program is run on a processor.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a non-limiting example message for configuring Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reporting according to an example embodiment
  • the feedback module may be implemented as feedback module 140-2, which is implemented as computer program code 123 and is executed by the one or more processors 120.
  • the one or more memories 125 and the computer program code 123 may be configured to, with the one or more processors 120, cause the user equipment 1 10 to perform one or more of the operations as described herein.
  • the UE 1 10 communicates with eNB 170 via a wireless link 11 1.
  • the one or more buses 157 may be address, data, or control buses, and may include any interconnection mechanism, such as a series of lines on a motherboard or integrated circuit, fiber optics or other optical communication equipment, wireless channels, and the like.
  • the one or more transceivers 160 may be implemented as a remote radio head (RRH) 195, with the other elements of the eNB 170 being physically in a different location from the RRH, and the one or more buses 157 could be implemented in part as fiber optic cable to connect the other elements of the eNB 170 to the RRH 195.
  • RRH remote radio head
  • each cell can correspond to a single carrier and an eNB may use multiple carriers. So, if there are three 120 degree cells per carrier and two carriers, then the eNB has a total of 6 cells.
  • the wireless network 100 may include one or more network control elements (NCE) 190 that may include MME (Mobility Management Entity) and/or SGW (Serving Gateway) functionality, and which provides connectivity with a further network, such as a telephone network and/or a data communications network (e.g., the Internet).
  • the eNB 170 is coupled via a link 131 to the NCE 190.
  • the link 131 may be implemented as, e.g., an S I interface.
  • the NCE 190 includes one or more processors 175, one or more memories 171 , and one or more network interfaces (N/W I/F(s)) 180, interconnected through one or more buses 185.
  • the one or more memories 171 include computer program code 173.
  • the one or more memories 171 and the computer program code 173 are configured to, with the one or more processors 175, cause the NCE 190 to perform one or more operations.
  • the wireless network 100 may implement network virtualization, which is the process of combining hardware and software network resources and network functionality into a single, software-based administrative entity, a virtual network.
  • Network virtualization involves platform virtualization, often combined with resource virtualization.
  • Network virtualization is categorized as either external, combining many networks, or parts of networks, into a virtual unit, or internal, providing network- like functionality to software containers on a single system. Note that the virtualized entities that result from the network virtualization are still implemented, at some level, using hardware such as processors 152 or 175 and memories 155 and 171 , and also such virtualized entities create technical effects.
  • the computer readable memories 125, 155, and 171 may be of any type suitable to the local technical environment and may be implemented using any suitable data storage technology, such as semiconductor based memory devices, flash memory, magnetic memory devices and systems, optical memory devices and systems, fixed memory and removable memory.
  • the computer readable memories 125, 155, and 171 may be means for performing storage functions.
  • the processors 120, 152, and 175 may be of any type suitable to the local technical environment, and may include one or more of general purpose computers, special purpose computers, microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs) and processors based on a multi-core processor architecture, as non- limiting examples.
  • the processors 120, 152, and 175 may be means for performing functions, such as controlling the UE 1 10, eNB 170, and other functions as described herein.
  • An eNB configures a UE to measure downlink experienced channel quality on a grid of N time-domain resources and M frequency domain resources.
  • the eNB also configures the UE to report a CQI value that at maximum will result in BLEP of X% if the eNB transmits with MCS corresponding to the index of CQI.
  • the configuration in this step is performed by the network (e.g. eNB) and the number of measurement samples is based on the grid of resources.
  • the channel quality can, for example, be measured as the experienced SINR by the UE.
  • the UE sorts the K measurement samples of its experienced channel quality, and uses these measurement samples to build an empirical sample distribution of the experienced channel quality.
  • SINR experienced channel quality
  • the UE may utilize a look-up table, such as an internal look-up table, to determine the highest supported MCS for an SINR value of SINR outage that it can decode with a BLEP no higher than X%.
  • this look-up table comprises BLEP versus SINR for the supported MCSs (or at least MCSs that can be reported as part of the CQI).
  • a non-limiting example lookup table is shown in FIG. 3 A, where the example look-up table includes three columns, namely, a column for BLEP values; a column for ranges of SINR values; and a column for different MCSs.
  • Another non-limiting example is a look-up table that includes a set of curves for the BLEP versus SINR, where each curve corresponds to a supported MCS that may be signaled back to the eNB as part of the CQI report.
  • An example is shown in FIG. 3B which illustrates a graph of BLEP versus SINR values for a set of curves corresponding to different MCSs.
  • the lookup tables in FIGS. 3 A and 3B are merely examples, and not intended to be limiting.
  • mapping the SINR to CQI may be performed prior to determining the empirical X%-ile of the quantized values.
  • Q may be configured by the eNB as part of step 1 above. This may be particularly useful for cases where the number of K samples is insufficient to reliably determine the SINR value at the X% outage.
  • the eNB (e.g. eNB 170) transmits an RRC configuration to the UE (e.g. UE 1 10) which includes at least one BLEP constraint and an indication of resources to be measured.
  • the indication of resources is denoted N and M corresponding to N time-domain resources and M frequency domain resources to be measured, respectively.
  • the UE performed channel measures over the time duration, N, and frequency resolution, M, to collect a number, K, of measurements. The UE only keeps the lowest Q ⁇ , Qi ,.
  • the UE transmits a set of the estimated MCSs to the eNB, namely, ⁇ MCS ⁇ , MCSi ,. .. , GSj ⁇ .
  • the UE may be configured to repeat steps 504-506 if the UE is configured for periodic CQI reporting.
  • this figure shows a non-limiting example message 700 for configuring Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) reporting according to an example embodiment.
  • the message 700 may be transmitted used by the eNB to configure the UE for CQI reporting.
  • the message 700 in this example is a periodic CQI reporting message as defined in LTE Release 8 (i.e. 3GPPP 36.331 , "Radio resource control"), where the CQI is configured as part of the RRC configuration process (RRC Connection Setup or RRC Connection Reconfiguration).
  • the underlined portion of the message 700 shows the additional information that may be used for configuring the UE for the CQI reporting.
  • the UE sends a CQI report from the UE to eNB.
  • This CQI may be included as part of the UE channel state information (CSI) report.
  • the CSI report is sent to the eNB in the LTE PUCCH.
  • Different formats are defined to support normal or extended cyclic prefix, multiplexing or not with 1 or 2 - bit HARQ-ACK, etc. (see, e.g. 3GPP 36.213).
  • New formats for supporting enhanced CQI may be defined.
  • the maximum length for the CSI report is 21 bits, corresponding to format 3 for TDD with up to 5 CCs.
  • Format 4 and 5 have been defined with a larger message.
  • the support of enhanced CQI for URLLC requires a larger message size, and therefore a new format, since multiple CQI values may be reported in a single message.
  • the processes described above may be applied for both periodic and aperiodic CQI feedback report.
  • the delay between the CQI request and CQI report can be reduced if the UE continuously monitors and collects channel quality measurements.
  • the UE may determine the CQI based on the N most recent measurements.
  • the recording window length N is configured to be large enough to provide a relatively good level of accuracy to the percentiles of interest. This is especially relevant for URLLC use cases, where information up to the 10 -5 percentile can be required.
  • the recording window length can also be adjusted in accordance to the channel properties, e.g. coherence, variance, stationarity, etc.
  • coherence e.g. coherence
  • variance e.g., stationarity
  • One challenge with this option is that many individual values are needed to have reliable measures of low percentiles, and sorting as such is an expensive operation. These issues may be addressed by using tree structures, and every time new individual values are available, they can be inserted, after removing any obsolete values. Pointers to all the individual values may be kept in a ring buffer to have pointers to obsolete values.
  • a "biased" IIR filter is applied to each of the channel quality measurements y(t) as follows: l - f up ) ⁇ E b (t - 1) + f up ⁇ y(t) if (t) ⁇ E b t
  • the method may include generating, by the user equipment, a channel quality distribution based on the channel quality measurements.
  • the at least one processing value may include an indication of a position, and wherein estimating the MCS value comprises: determining an order of the channel quality measurements; and estimating the MCS value for the channel quality measurement corresponding to the measurement position index.
  • the channel quality measurements are ordered from lowest to highest channel quality.
  • the configuration may include a number of time domain resources and an indication of the frequency domain partition.
  • the set may include two or more processing values, and the transmitting may include transmitting an indication of the estimated MCS value for each of the two or more processing values.
  • the configuration may be a radio resource control (RRC) configuration and performing the measurements may include at least one of: performing periodic channel quality measurements based on the RRC configuration; and performing aperiodic channel quality measurements based on the RRC configuration.
  • RRC radio resource control
  • an apparatus may include at least one processor; and at least one non-transitory memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to perform: performing, by a user equipment of a wireless network, a number of channel quality measurements according to a configuration received by the network, wherein the configuration is indicative of the number of channel quality measurements to be performed and comprises a set comprising at least one processing value, the at least one value comprising either an average block-error probability (BLEP) value or a measurement position index; estimating a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) value for each processing value in the set based on the channel quality measurements; and transmitting, from the user equipment to a base station of the wireless network, an indication of the estimated MCS value.
  • BLEP average block-error probability
  • MCS modulation and coding scheme
  • the at least one memory and the computer program code may be configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to perform: generating, by the user equipment, a channel quality distribution based on the channel quality measurements.
  • the at least one processing value may include an indication of a position, and wherein estimating the MCS value comprises: determining an order of the channel quality measurements; and estimating the MCS value for the channel quality measurement corresponding to the measurement position index.
  • the channel quality measurements are ordered from lowest to highest channel quality.
  • the configuration may include a number of time domain resources and an indication of the frequency domain partition.
  • the set may include two or more processing values, and the transmitting may include transmitting an indication of the estimated MCS value for each of the two or more processing values.
  • the configuration may be a radio resource control (RRC) configuration and performing the measurements may include at least one of: performing periodic channel quality measurements based on the RRC configuration; and performing aperiodic channel quality measurements based on the RRC configuration.
  • RRC radio resource control
  • FIG. 9 is a logic flow diagram for enhanced Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) measurement procedure for URLLC.
  • CQI Channel Quality Indicator
  • This figure further illustrates the operation of an exemplary method or methods, a result of execution of computer program instructions embodied on a computer readable memory, functions performed by logic implemented in hardware, and/or interconnected means for performing functions in accordance with exemplary embodiments.
  • the an adaptation module 150-1 and/or 150-2 may include multiples ones of the blocks in FIG. 9, where each included block is an interconnected means for performing the function in the block.
  • the blocks in FIG. 9 are assumed to be performed by a base station such as eNB 170, e.g., under control of the adaptation module 150-1 and/or 150- 2 at least in part.
  • a method comprising: determining, by a base station of a wireless network, a configuration for a number of channel quality measurements to be performed by a user equipment for determining a modulation and coding scheme (MCS), configuration is indicative of the number of channel quality measurements to be performed and comprises a set comprising at least one processing value, the at least one value comprising either an average block-error probability (BLEP) value or a measurement position as indicated by block 900; transmitting, from the base station to the user equipment, the configuration as indicated by block 902; and receiving, from the user equipment, an indication of the estimated MCS value for each processing value in the set as indicated by block 904.
  • MCS modulation and coding scheme
  • the configuration may include a number of time domain resources and an indication of the frequency domain partition.
  • the configuration may be a radio resource control (R C) configuration and indicates whether the channel quality measurements are either periodic or aperiodic.
  • R C radio resource control
  • an apparatus may comprise: at least one processor; and at least one non-transitory memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to perform: determining, by a base station of a wireless network, a configuration for a number of channel quality measurements to be performed by a user equipment for determining a modulation and coding scheme (MCS), wherein the configuration comprises at least an indication of the number of channel quality measurements to be performed and a set comprising at least one processing value; transmitting, from the base station to the user equipment, the configuration; and receiving, from the user equipment, an indication of the estimated MCS value for each processing value in the set.
  • MCS modulation and coding scheme
  • the set may include one or more average block-error probability (BLEP) values.
  • BLEP block-error probability
  • the set may comprise one or more measurement position indexes.
  • the configuration may be a radio resource control (RRC) configuration and indicates whether the channel quality measurements are either periodic or aperiodic.
  • RRC radio resource control
  • the selecting the estimated MCS value may be based on a latency requirement of the wireless network.
  • a base station may comprise an apparatus according to any one of paragraphs [0088]- [0094].
  • an apparatus may comprise: means for determining, by a base station of a wireless network, a configuration for a number of channel quality measurements to be performed by a user equipment for determining a modulation and coding scheme (MCS), wherein the configuration comprises at least an indication of the number of channel quality measurements to be performed and a set comprising at least one processing value; means for transmitting, from the base station to the user equipment, the configuration; and means for receiving, from the user equipment, an indication of the estimated MCS value for each processing value in the set.
  • MCS modulation and coding scheme
  • a communication system may include an apparatus in accordance with any one of the paragraphs [0069]-[0077] and an apparatus in accordance with any one of paragraphs [0088]- [0094].
  • a computer program may include program code for executing the method according to any of paragraphs [0060]-[0068] or [0081]-[0087].
  • the computer program may be a computer program product comprising a computer-readable medium bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer.
  • a technical effect of one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein is to address the challenges of LA for URLLC traffic, where the sporadic transmission of small packets leads to rapidly changing interference difficult to be tracked at the eNB side.
  • the multiple CQI indexes (each with a different associated BLEP constraint) reported to the eNB allow to perform spectral-efficient link adaptation, as the BLEP can be flexibly adjusted in accordance to the latency and reliability constraint of each individual URLLC packet.
  • Another technical effect of one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein is to help meet URLLC requirements in challenging environments with rapid interference fluctuations.
  • Embodiments herein may be implemented in software (executed by one or more processors), hardware (e.g., an application specific integrated circuit), or a combination of software and hardware.
  • the software e.g., application logic, an instruction set
  • a "computer-readable medium” may be any media or means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate or transport the instructions for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer, with one example of a computer described and depicted, e.g., in FIG. 1.
  • a computer-readable medium may comprise a computer-readable storage medium (e.g., memories 125, 155, 171 or other device) that may be any media or means that can contain, store, and/or transport the instructions for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer.
  • a computer-readable storage medium does not comprise propagating signals.
  • the different functions discussed herein may be performed in a different order and/or concurrently with each other. Furthermore, if desired, one or more of the above- described functions may be optional or may be combined.
  • eNB or eNodeB evolved Node B (e.g., an LTE base station)
  • UE user equipment e.g., a wireless, typically mobile device

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
EP18748717.8A 2017-02-03 2018-01-17 Erweitertes verfahren zur messung der kanalqualitätsanzeige (cqi) für urllc Withdrawn EP3577811A4 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201762454180P 2017-02-03 2017-02-03
PCT/FI2018/050030 WO2018142020A1 (en) 2017-02-03 2018-01-17 Enchanced channel quality indicator (cqi) measurement procedure for urllc

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3577811A1 true EP3577811A1 (de) 2019-12-11
EP3577811A4 EP3577811A4 (de) 2021-01-06

Family

ID=63039371

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18748717.8A Withdrawn EP3577811A4 (de) 2017-02-03 2018-01-17 Erweitertes verfahren zur messung der kanalqualitätsanzeige (cqi) für urllc

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3577811A4 (de)
JP (1) JP6811333B2 (de)
WO (1) WO2018142020A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019201421A1 (en) 2018-04-16 2019-10-24 Nokia Technologies Oy Interference pre-cancellation for multi-user ultra low latency communications in wireless networks
CN113039732A (zh) * 2018-09-06 2021-06-25 诺基亚通信公司 Acqi解码置信度检测
CN110648518B (zh) * 2019-09-23 2021-04-20 湖南长城信息金融设备有限责任公司 用于无人机和遥控器的数据传输方法及其相应的装置
US11997674B2 (en) * 2020-05-21 2024-05-28 Qualcomm Incorporated Frequency-related parameters for control signaling
WO2024072272A1 (en) * 2022-09-30 2024-04-04 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Link adaptation for re-transmission of a transport block based on a target block error probability (blep)

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8948799B1 (en) * 2007-11-30 2015-02-03 Microsoft Corporation Channel quality indicator apparatus and method
WO2009075617A1 (en) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) A method of selecting a modulation and coding scheme based on adjusted channel quality values
US9198070B2 (en) 2012-05-14 2015-11-24 Google Technology Holdings LLC Radio link monitoring in a wireless communication device
US20160204841A1 (en) * 2013-10-21 2016-07-14 Lg Electronics Inc. Feedback information reporting method and apparatus in wireless communication system
US9667362B2 (en) * 2014-09-19 2017-05-30 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for selecting channel quality indicator in communication system
WO2016119209A1 (en) * 2015-01-30 2016-08-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Ue feedback for point-to-multipoint transmissions
ES2664170T3 (es) * 2015-06-29 2018-04-18 Telefonica, S.A. Procedimiento, sistema y dispositivo de detección de errores en redes de comunicación inalámbrica de OFDM

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6811333B2 (ja) 2021-01-13
WO2018142020A1 (en) 2018-08-09
EP3577811A4 (de) 2021-01-06
JP2020506622A (ja) 2020-02-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11026239B2 (en) Method and user equipment for predicting available throughput for uplink data
CN112689969B (zh) 生成csi报告的方法和装置
US20220295328A1 (en) Methods and apparatuses for channel state information transmission
US11729770B2 (en) Configuring the transmission of periodic feedback information on a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH)
US10447455B2 (en) Enabling higher-order modulation in a cellular network
US9119216B2 (en) Method and network entity for resource allocation in mobile radio communication networks
US9432159B2 (en) Method, apparatus and computer program for providing sounding reference signals for coordinated multipoint transmissions
CN103945449B (zh) Csi测量方法和装置
US10530456B2 (en) Methods of radio front-end beam management for 5G terminals
EP3314794B1 (de) Verfahren und basisstation zur auswahl eines transportformats
EP3577811A1 (de) Erweitertes verfahren zur messung der kanalqualitätsanzeige (cqi) für urllc
WO2022254086A1 (en) Apparatus for csi prediction control
US9554379B2 (en) Method and network node for link adaptation in a wireless communications network
US20230239869A1 (en) Method for transmitting and receiving uplink control information, terminal and base station
CN116325623A (zh) 用于多trp urllc方案的csi反馈
KR102231454B1 (ko) 적응적 변조 및 코딩 방법 및 기지국
CN108464046B (zh) 用于自适应下行链路调度和链路适配的装置、系统和方法
WO2022223115A1 (en) Dynamic pucch format configuration using machine learning
WO2023186489A1 (en) Optimized cqi feedback for code block group based transmissions for extended reality use cases
WO2023025398A1 (en) Selective learning for ue reported values

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190902

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: PEDERSEN, KLAUS

Inventor name: POCOVI, GUILLERMO

Inventor name: SORET, BEATRIZ

Inventor name: STEINER, JENS

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20201208

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 72/08 20090101ALI20201202BHEP

Ipc: H04L 5/00 20060101ALI20201202BHEP

Ipc: H04W 72/12 20090101ALI20201202BHEP

Ipc: H04L 5/02 20060101ALI20201202BHEP

Ipc: H04L 1/00 20060101AFI20201202BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20220408

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20220819