EP3574952A1 - Elektrodenanordnung, bleipaddel und neuromodulationssystem - Google Patents
Elektrodenanordnung, bleipaddel und neuromodulationssystem Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3574952A1 EP3574952A1 EP18175117.3A EP18175117A EP3574952A1 EP 3574952 A1 EP3574952 A1 EP 3574952A1 EP 18175117 A EP18175117 A EP 18175117A EP 3574952 A1 EP3574952 A1 EP 3574952A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- electrode
- electrodes
- section
- electrode section
- electrode array
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000004007 neuromodulation Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 43
- 210000000278 spinal cord Anatomy 0.000 description 28
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000003169 central nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 4
- 210000000273 spinal nerve root Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000003484 anatomy Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000002161 motor neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000763 evoking effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 208000020431 spinal cord injury Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000237970 Conus <genus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910003460 diamond Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005021 gait Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002529 medical grade silicone Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 210000000653 nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002569 neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000954 sacrococcygeal region Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001044 sensory neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/02—Details
- A61N1/04—Electrodes
- A61N1/05—Electrodes for implantation or insertion into the body, e.g. heart electrode
- A61N1/0551—Spinal or peripheral nerve electrodes
- A61N1/0553—Paddle shaped electrodes, e.g. for laminotomy
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation
- A61N1/3605—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system
- A61N1/3606—Implantable neurostimulators for stimulating central or peripheral nerve system adapted for a particular treatment
- A61N1/36062—Spinal stimulation
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an electrode array, a lead paddle and a neuromodulation system.
- Electrode arrays and lead paddles for neuromodulation, especially neurostimulation are for example known from US 8,108,051 B2 , US 2013/0096662 A1 , US 2012/0006793 A1 and EP 3 013 411 A1 .
- US 2008/0269854 A1 , US 2005/0113878A1 and EP2243510 B1 disclose a device for patient therapy with a specific kind of electrode array, i.e. a lead body suitable for patient implantation; a connection element carried by the lead body and positioned to electrically couple to a pulse generator suitable for patient implantation, and at least three electrical contacts carried by the lead body and positioned relative to the lead body to contact patient tissue and deliver electrical signals to a patient, wherein the spacings between the immediately neighboring contacts of said at least three electrical contacts are at least 8 millimeters.
- US 9,358,384 B2 discloses a flexible paddle electrode array which has transverse lines of reduced rigidity or stiffness at these flex or hinge lines, thereby allowing the flexible paddle electrode array to flex or deflect along its length at these hinge lines. Because of the living hinges, the staggered arrangement of the rows of the nonflexible and flexible electrodes, and the flex or hinge lines, the flexible paddle electrode array is able to flex along its length, but to be sufficiently rigid to maintain the nonflexible and flexible electrodes in adequate contact with patient tissue.
- an electrode array for neuromodulation comprising a first electrode section with more than two electrodes being arranged parallel and densely packed in the first electrode section, further comprising a second electrode section with more electrodes than in the first electrode section, the electrodes in the second electrode section being arranged symmetrically with respect to the longitudinal axis and transversal offset to each other.
- the invention is based on the basic idea that with the combination of the first and the second electrode section two different means for specifically evoking targeted pools of motor neurons are provided.
- a current steering possibility may be provided to enhance stimulation specificity.
- a so-called electrode belt can be established with the more than two electrodes being arranged parallel and densely packed in the first electrode section.
- the stimulation with an electrode belt allows a well-defined (current steering) stimulation at the sacral level and can potentially target any desired spinal segment located above (“belt array” strategy).
- the "standard" regular paddle design configuration in the second electrode section is provided with regularly spaced electrodes for targeting dorsal roots at their entry point in spinal segments.
- the electrode array may be configured and adapted for implantation into mammals, in particular human patients.
- the electrode array be arranged for Central Nervous System (CNS) Stimulation.
- the electrode can be designed for the stimulation of the spinal cord.
- CNS Stimulation can be done by Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) (or similarly subdural stimulation, hereinafter always to be understood as possible alternative to EES).
- EES Epidural Electrical Stimulation
- Epidural Electrical Stimulation is known to restore motor control in animal and human models and has more particularly been shown to restore locomotion after spinal cord injury by artificially activating the neural networks responsible for locomotion below the spinal cord lesion ( Capogrosso, M, et al., A Computational Model for Epidural Electrical Stimulation of Spinal Sensorimotor Circuits, Journal of Neuroscience 4 December 2013, 33 (49) 19326-19340 , Courtine et al., Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input, Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct; 12(10): 1333-1342 .
- EES does not directly stimulate motor-neurons but the afferent sensory neurons prior to entering into the spinal cord.
- the spinal networks responsible for locomotion are recruited indirectly via those afferents, restoring globally the locomotion movement by activating the required muscle synergies.
- the produced movement is functional; however, due to relatively poor selectivity (network activation instead of selective targeting of key muscles) the controllability is low, and the imprecisions hinder fluidity and full functionality in the potential space of the movement.
- neuromodulation and/or neurostimulation of the CNS may be used to enhance and/or restore the capabilities of the patient as regards movement, especially in a way that the existing ways of physiological signal transfer in the patient's body are supported such that the command signals for body movement or the like still are provided by the patient's nervous system and just supported and/or enhanced or translated by the CNS stimulation module.
- the first electrode section is arranged at a proximal end of the electrode array and/or the second electrode section is arranged at a distal end of the electrode array.
- the proximal end is especially the end of the electrode array, which is considering the implanted situation or the situation during implantation of the electrode array proximal than the second electrode section, which is then at the distal end or in a more distal position.
- the belt electrode strategy can be applied close the entry point or channel, where the electrode array and its carrier (e.g. a lead paddle) are positioned at and/or around the spinal cord. A more precise position can be provided with such a design and arrangement.
- the electrodes in the first electrode section can be identical. This helps to enhance the effects of the belt array strategy as outlined above. Also, the steering predictability is enhanced as identical electrodes with inter alia identical functionality are used. This increases the predictability of the stimulation capabilities of the electrodes of the first section.
- the electrodes in the second electrode section can be identical.
- the manufacturing is simplified and also the predictability of the stimulation result may be enhanced.
- electrodes are identical. By providing (only) identical electrodes, the manufacturing process may be simplified. Also, the stimulation behavior becomes more predictable as the electrodes are more comparable to each other when compared with an approach, where different forms of electrodes are used.
- the electrodes may have a rectangular stimulation area.
- the stimulation area shall be understood as the area, which is effectively participating in the stimulation, i.e. the area which can be effectively used to send out stimulation signals and/or receive stimulation signals or other signals.
- At least one electrode may have a length that is 2.0-4.0 times of the width. This relationship was found to be beneficial in trials as by this form stiffness in axial direction (i.e. along the longitudinal axis) of the electrode array and its carrier can be enhanced. Especially, the length may be 2.5-3.0 times of the width. An example value for the length could be chosen at around 2.6-2.7 times of the width.
- Example dimensions of an electrode, especially of an electrode with rectangular form, can be approx. 4.0-6.0 mm length and approx. 1.3-2.5 mm width.
- All electrodes may have the same orientation. Especially, it is possible that all electrodes have an orientation parallel to the longitudinal axis of the electrode array. In case that the electrodes have a form with a longer extension in one direction than the other, e.g. oval form, rectangular form or the like, and by arranging the electrodes all in the same direction, the stiffness and flexibility of the array of electrodes and its carrier can be influenced. If, for example, all electrodes have a form with a longer extension along their longitudinal axis and are oriented all in the same direction of the longitudinal axis, then the stiffness in the longitudinal direction is increased, while in radial direction still more flexibility and elasticity is offered. Such a design is especially beneficial for electrode arrays to be placed in the spinal channel for spinal cord stimulation.
- the electrode array may have a length that is of 8-14 times of the length of an electrode, especially approximately 12 times of the length of an electrode. For example, if the length is chosen in a range of 4.00-6.00 mm, then the length of the array may be for example within a range of 50-70 mm. A suitable width of the electrode may then be chosen in a range of 10-13 mm. With such dimensions, sufficient area and volume of the spinal cord may be stimulated. Several segments of the spine and the respective parts of the spinal cord may be covered and stimulated this way.
- the first electrode section and the second electrode section can be for example separated by a gap that is larger than the length of an electrode, especially wherein the length of the gap is chosen in a range of approx. 100-160% of the length of an electrode.
- a possible setup may be chosen such that the length of the gap is chosen in a range of approx. 100%.
- the electrode array can for example comprise a longitudinal axis in the direction of the longitudinal orientation of the electrodes, wherein the first electrode section is symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis and with respect to a radial axis in the first electrode section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. Symmetry in this section helps to increase the steering capabilities and the electrode belt stimulation strategy.
- the second electrode section is symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis and asymmetrical with respect to a radial axis in the second electrode section perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. Asymmetry is the second electrode section is helpful to achieve greater coverage of area/volume to be stimulated with the electrodes arranged in the second electrode section.
- the second electrode section may be in that asymmetrical, the pattern of the electrodes in this section may still be a regular one, i.e. that the distance of neighboring electrodes and the arrangement of neighboring electrodes always stays the same (or more or less the same) in the second electrode section.
- the first electrode section can comprise at least 3 columns, preferably at least four or five columns, aligned with the longitudinal axis and/or only one radial row along the radial axis. Three or more columns have found to be sufficient to establish successfully an electrode belt array strategy. Preferred setups comprise four or five columns. No further radial row has been found to be necessary.
- the second electrode section can comprise for example at least 3 columns aligned with the longitudinal axis and more than 5 radial rows, preferably more than 7 rows, especially at least 8 rows. With such an arrangement, more coverage in longitudinal direction than in radial direction can be provided. This is especially beneficial in spinal cord stimulation, where in the spinal channel it is desirable to stimulate the spinal cord over a substantial part of the spinal cord and over several segments. In other words, one can say the longer the electrode array, the better it is for spinal cord stimulation.
- the distance between electrodes of the first section can be for example less than the width of an electrode chosen in the range of approx. 50% to 95% of the width of an electrode, especially approx. 55-75% of the width of an electrode.
- a possible setup may be chosen such that the width of an electrode chosen in the range of approx. 55% of an electrode. By this, a dense packing of the electrode can be provided. Also, still the steering of the stimulation and the stimulation overlap can be managed very precisely.
- the electrodes in neighboring columns can be arranged to each other with a transversal offset.
- a transversal offset a good stimulation area coverage can be established.
- more coverage in for example the longitudinal direction with some coverage in radial direction can be provided with less electrodes.
- the distance between neighboring electrodes (or distance between neighboring contacts/electrodes or the distance to the neighboring contact/electrode) arranged in the same column can be for example chosen in the range of 135% to 155% of the length of an electrode, especially in the range of 140% to 150% of the length of an electrode.
- the distance between neighboring rows can be chosen in the range of 130% to 150% of the width of an electrode, especially in the range of 135% to 145% of the width of an electrode.
- the electrode array may comprise a number of electrodes chosen in the range of 8-32 electrodes, preferably 14-18 electrodes, most preferably 16 electrodes. It has been found that a number of electrodes chosen in the range of 10-20 electrodes allows sufficient precise stimulation and at the same time is good to handle in terms of complexity of the electronic system.
- the range of 14-18 electrodes has been found to be advantageous, as in this range steering and precise stimulation is possible.
- 16 electrodes appear to be the best compromise in steering capabilities, preciseness of the stimulation to be provided and also the area/volume to be stimulated and at the same time still manageable complexity of the necessary electronic system for the electrodes, by at the same time reducing side effect. The effects have been observed during trials (animal tests and clinical trials), which have not yet been published.
- the present invention relates to a lead paddle comprising at least one electrode array as defined above.
- the lead paddle may be a lead paddle of a neuromodulation system, especially of a neurostimulation system.
- the present invention relates to a neuromodulation system comprising at least one electrode array as defined above and/or at least one lead paddle as defined above.
- the neuromodulation system can be for example a neurostimulation system, especially a neurostimulation system for the stimulation of the spinal cord.
- the neurostimulation system may be a system to provide inter alia, but not limited to, EES. It can be a combined system that can provide EES and FES for example.
- Fig. 1 shows a view from above of a possible embodiment of an electrode array 5 according to the present invention for a lead paddle 10 and a neuromodulation system 100 according to the present invention.
- a longitudinal axis shall be understood as being aligned (i.e. identical or parallel to) the longitudinal direction L.
- a radial axis shall be understood as being aligned (i.e. identical or parallel to) the radial direction R.
- the lead paddle 10 comprises a lead paddle body 11 and comprises two guiding channels 12.
- the two guiding channels 12 are embedded in the lead paddle body 11.
- the lead paddle body 11 may be made of a medical grade material, such as a medical grade polymer.
- a medical grade silicone or the like may be used.
- the guiding channels 12 extend over more than half of the length of the length of the lead paddle 10.
- the guiding channels 12 extend over more than a half of 80% of the length of the lead paddle 10.
- the guiding channels 12 are arranged along the outer edge region 14 of the lead paddle 10.
- the guiding channels 12 are arranged parallel to the longitudinal edge 16 of the lead paddle 10.
- the lead paddle 10 comprises a plurality of electrodes 18 forming the electrode array 5.
- electrodes 18 are provided.
- the electrodes 18 are embedded in the body of the lead paddle 10.
- Each specific electrode 18 has a specific denotation, here En with n being chosen from 1 to 16.
- the shape of the electrodes 18 is rectangular.
- All electrodes 18 have the identical form. The shape of all electrodes is more or less identical. Here the electrodes 18 are all identical in their form.
- the electrodes 18 have a length I that is 2.0-4.0 times of the width w, especially 2.5-3.0 times of the width. Here they have a length that is approx. 2.6 times of the width to form an elongate shaped rectangular electrode form.
- one or more electrodes can be designed differently. In particular, they can be oval, round, square, diamond shape, trapezoidal or the like.
- the electrodes 18 form the electrode array 5 for neurostimulation.
- the electrode array 5 has a length that is of 8-14 times of the length of an electrode, here in the shown embodiment approximately 12 times of the length of an electrode 18.
- All electrodes 18 have the same orientation. In particular, all electrodes 18 have an orientation parallel to the longitudinal axis of the electrode array 5.
- the electrode array 5 comprises a first electrode section S1 with four electrodes 18.
- the electrodes 18, here the electrodes E5, E6, E15 and E16 of the first electrode section S1 are arranged parallel and densely packed in the first electrode section S1.
- the first electrode section S1 is arranged at the proximal end P of the lead paddle 10.
- the first electrode section S1 comprises here four columns C01, C02, C03, C04 aligned with the longitudinal axis and only one radial row R0 along the radial axis in this first electrode section S1.
- the distance between electrodes 18 of the first electrode section S1 is less than the width w of an electrode 18 chosen in the range of approx. 50% to 95% of the width of an electrode 18 and here chosen at approx. 55-75% of the width of an electrode 18.
- a second electrode section S2 is arranged at the distal end D, i.e. the section orientated to the tip end 17 of the lead paddle 10.
- the first electrode section S1 and the second electrode section S2 are separated by a gap G that is larger than the length l of an electrode 18.
- the length l2 of the gap G is chosen in a range of approx. 100-150% of the length of an electrode 18.
- Electrodes E1-E4, E7-E10 and E11-E14 are provided in the second electrode section S2 in the second electrode section S2 in the second electrode section S2 more electrodes 18 than in the first electrode section S1 are provided, i.e. electrodes E1-E4, E7-E10 and E11-E14.
- the electrodes 18 in the second electrode section S2 are arranged symmetrically with respect to the longitudinal direction L and with transversal offset to each other.
- the second electrode section S2 comprises at least three columns C1, C2, C3 aligned with the longitudinal axis and eight rows R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8.
- the distance between neighboring electrodes 18 arranged in the same column C1, C2, C3 is chosen in the range of 135% to 155% of the length of an electrode 18, here in the range of 140% to 150% of the length I of an electrode 18.
- the distance between neighboring rows R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8 is chosen in the range of 130% to 150% of the width w of an electrode 18, here in the range of 145% to 155% of the width w of an electrode 18.
- the arrangement of the electrodes 18 is also such that some electrodes are offset to each other.
- the electrodes 18 in neighboring columns C1 to C2 and C2 to C3 are arranged to each other with a transversal offset.
- the electrode array 5 comprises a longitudinal axis in the direction of the longitudinal orientation of the electrodes 18, wherein the first electrode section S1 is symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis and with respect to a radial axis in the first electrode section S1 perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and the second electrode section S2 is symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis and asymmetrical with respect to a radial axis in the second electrode section S2 perpendicular to the longitudinal axis.
- the electrodes 18 of the lead paddle 10 are connected to lead bodies 20.
- the lead bodies 20 are connected to a connection portion 20a on the upper side 10a of the lead paddle 10.
- connection portion 20a is on the opposite side of the contact side 10b of the lead paddle 10, that is configured and arranged to get in contact with the tissue to be stimulated, i.e. here the spinal cord of the patient.
- connection portion 20a is arranged centric with regard to the axial axis of the lead paddle 10. Moreover, the connection position 20a is positioned with an offset d to the edge of the proximal end 10c of the lead paddle 10.
- connection portion 20a of the lead bodies 20 is not directly arranged at the outer edge of the lead paddle 10, the deployment and positioning of the lead paddle 10 is enhanced.
- the offset d helps that by means of the lead bodies 20 the lead paddle 10 may be moved back and forth and also to the left and right and vice versa even after deployment in the spinal canal.
- the lead bodies are arranged on the upper side with an offset to the edge, the proximal edge of the lead paddle is free and especially a movement in the proximal direction is not obstructed by the lead bodies.
- the lead bodies 20 can be provided with anchoring sleeves 22.
- the anchoring sleeves 22 are attached to the outer side of the lead body 20.
- anchoring sleeves 22 are provided with pins 24 or so-called anchor bumps 24, which extend radially from the outer side of the anchoring sleeve 22.
- Fig. 2 shows a side view of the lead paddle and the electrode array according to Fig. 1 .
- the electrodes 18 protrude out of the surface of the contact side 10b.
- Fig. 3 shows cutaway drawing through the first section of the lead paddle and the electrode array according to Fig. 1 .
- connection portions 20a of the lead bodies 20 can be seen.
- the lead paddle body 11 and thus the lead paddle 10 comprises axial stiffness in the longitudinal direction L and radial flexibility in the radial direction R.
- the lead paddle 10 can be inserted into the spinal channel.
- axial stiffness is necessary to avoid bending in axial direction, whereas (slight) bending in the radial direction is wanted to adapt to the anatomical structures at the implantation site in the spinal channel.
- the first electrode section S1 and the second electrode section S2 provide two different means for specifically evoking targeted pools of motor neurons.
- Fig. 4 shows a schematical drawing of the spinal column 200 and the spinal cord 210 with the embodiment of the lead paddle 10 with the electrode array 5 as described above.
- Electrodes 18 in the first electrode section S1 By means of the increased density of electrodes 18 in the first electrode section S1, e.g. positioned in an application for spinal cord stimulation above the sacral level of the spinal cord 210 in spinal cord stimulation as shown in Fig. 4 , a current steering possibility may be provided to enhance stimulation specificity.
- a so-called electrode belt is established with the four electrodes 18 (i.e. electrodes E5, E6, E15, E16) being arranged parallel and densely packed in the first electrode section S1.
- Fig. 4 it can been seen that dorsal roots enter the spinal cord in their respective segment (i.e. C1 root enters at C1 spinal segment).
- C1 root enters at C1 spinal segment.
- the exit point of the vertebrate column for lumbo-sacral roots is located rather far apart of their respective entry point in the spinal cord.
- lumbar and sacral roots overlay each other like a "spaghetti bag" around the conus medullaris region.
- the stimulation with an electrode belt allows a well-defined (current steering) stimulation at the sacral level can potentially target any desired spinal segment located above (“belt array” strategy).
- the "standard" regular paddle design configuration in the second electrode section S2 is provided with regularly spaced electrodes for targeting dorsal roots at their entry point in spinal segments. This is based on the finding that a regularly spaced electrode array would work well in the cervical area to specifically address individual spinal segments, but that this specificity will deteriorate when sliding the array toward sacral region. Yet, it will still quite sufficient for upper lumbar segments.
- Fig. 5 shows the lead paddle 10 with the electrode array 5 according to Fig. 1 with further details.
- Fig. 5 shows in greater detail the dimensions and the lead paddle 10 with the electrode array 5 with example values for distances.
- the overall dimensions/size of one electrode 18 is approx. 2x5.5mm with 0.25mm.
- a minimum exposed electrode surface to tissue of at least 10 mm 2 was required and is reached with this setup, as the exposed electrode surface of an electrode 18 is approx. 11 mm 2 .
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Electrotherapy Devices (AREA)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP18175117.3A EP3574952B1 (de) | 2018-05-30 | 2018-05-30 | Elektrodenanordnung, bleipaddel und neuromodulationssystem |
US16/426,897 US11571565B2 (en) | 2018-05-30 | 2019-05-30 | Electrode array, a lead paddle and a neuromodulation system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP18175117.3A EP3574952B1 (de) | 2018-05-30 | 2018-05-30 | Elektrodenanordnung, bleipaddel und neuromodulationssystem |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3574952A1 true EP3574952A1 (de) | 2019-12-04 |
EP3574952B1 EP3574952B1 (de) | 2020-11-25 |
Family
ID=62492478
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP18175117.3A Active EP3574952B1 (de) | 2018-05-30 | 2018-05-30 | Elektrodenanordnung, bleipaddel und neuromodulationssystem |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11571565B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP3574952B1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160331561A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2016-11-17 | Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) | Bidirectional Limb Neuro-Prosthesis |
WO2023245081A1 (en) | 2022-06-15 | 2023-12-21 | University Of Pittsburgh - Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education | Treatment of spinal muscular atrophy |
WO2024226406A1 (en) | 2023-04-24 | 2024-10-31 | University Of Pittsburgh - Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education | Treatment of spinal muscular atrophy |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050113878A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-05-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method, system and device for treating various disorders of the pelvic floor by electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerves and the sacral nerves at different sites |
US20060253182A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-11-09 | Medtronic, Inc. | Transverse Tripole Neurostimulation Lead, System and Method |
US20080269854A1 (en) | 2007-04-26 | 2008-10-30 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable medical lead with multiple electrode configurations |
US20120006793A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-12 | John Swanson | Spinal cord stimulation paddle lead and method of making the same |
US8108051B2 (en) | 2002-04-25 | 2012-01-31 | Medtronic, Inc. | Surgical lead paddle |
US8560083B2 (en) * | 2008-03-06 | 2013-10-15 | Stryker Corporation | Foldable, implantable electrode assembly |
EP2243510B1 (de) | 2009-04-22 | 2014-04-09 | Nevro Corporation | Systeme zur selektiven Hochfrequenzrückenmarksmodulation zur Vermeidung von Schmerzen mit weniger Nebenwirkungen |
WO2014113612A1 (en) * | 2013-01-16 | 2014-07-24 | St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. | Flexible high-density mapping catheter tips and flexible ablation catheter tips with onboard high-density mapping electrodes |
US20150012067A1 (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2015-01-08 | Greatbatch Ltd. | System and method for improving nerve finding for peripheral nerve stimulation |
US20150119957A1 (en) * | 2013-10-30 | 2015-04-30 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Automatic anode and cathode fractional control and location to selectively avoid dorsal root stimulation |
EP3013411A1 (de) | 2013-06-27 | 2016-05-04 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Paddle-elektroden und elektrodenanordnungen zur dorsalhornstimulation und systeme mit den elektroden |
US9358384B2 (en) | 2014-09-05 | 2016-06-07 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Implantable lead with flexible paddle electrode array |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6236892B1 (en) * | 1999-10-07 | 2001-05-22 | Claudio A. Feler | Spinal cord stimulation lead |
US8612009B2 (en) * | 2006-01-26 | 2013-12-17 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Method of neurostimulation of distinct neural structures using single paddle lead to treat multiple pain locations and multi-column, multi-row paddle lead for such neurostimulation |
US20130006793A1 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2013-01-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Migrating Computing Environment Entitlement Contracts Based on Seller and Buyer Specified Criteria |
US9302113B2 (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2016-04-05 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Systems and methods for identifying anode placement based on cerebrospinal fluid thickness |
US10799701B2 (en) * | 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-13 | Nevro Corp. | Systems and methods for identifying and treating patients with high-frequency electrical signals |
US20190381313A1 (en) * | 2017-01-24 | 2019-12-19 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Accessing spinal network to enable respiratory function |
AU2019267947A1 (en) * | 2018-05-11 | 2020-11-12 | Synerfuse, Inc. | System, devices, and methods combining spinal stabilization and neuromodulation |
-
2018
- 2018-05-30 EP EP18175117.3A patent/EP3574952B1/de active Active
-
2019
- 2019-05-30 US US16/426,897 patent/US11571565B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8108051B2 (en) | 2002-04-25 | 2012-01-31 | Medtronic, Inc. | Surgical lead paddle |
US20050113878A1 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2005-05-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method, system and device for treating various disorders of the pelvic floor by electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerves and the sacral nerves at different sites |
US20060253182A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-11-09 | Medtronic, Inc. | Transverse Tripole Neurostimulation Lead, System and Method |
US20120006793A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-12 | John Swanson | Spinal cord stimulation paddle lead and method of making the same |
US20130096662A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2013-04-18 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Spinal Cord Stimulation Paddle Lead and Method of Making The Same |
US20080269854A1 (en) | 2007-04-26 | 2008-10-30 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable medical lead with multiple electrode configurations |
US8560083B2 (en) * | 2008-03-06 | 2013-10-15 | Stryker Corporation | Foldable, implantable electrode assembly |
EP2243510B1 (de) | 2009-04-22 | 2014-04-09 | Nevro Corporation | Systeme zur selektiven Hochfrequenzrückenmarksmodulation zur Vermeidung von Schmerzen mit weniger Nebenwirkungen |
WO2014113612A1 (en) * | 2013-01-16 | 2014-07-24 | St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. | Flexible high-density mapping catheter tips and flexible ablation catheter tips with onboard high-density mapping electrodes |
EP3013411A1 (de) | 2013-06-27 | 2016-05-04 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Paddle-elektroden und elektrodenanordnungen zur dorsalhornstimulation und systeme mit den elektroden |
US20150012067A1 (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2015-01-08 | Greatbatch Ltd. | System and method for improving nerve finding for peripheral nerve stimulation |
US20150119957A1 (en) * | 2013-10-30 | 2015-04-30 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Automatic anode and cathode fractional control and location to selectively avoid dorsal root stimulation |
US9358384B2 (en) | 2014-09-05 | 2016-06-07 | Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc. | Implantable lead with flexible paddle electrode array |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
CAPOGROSSO, M ET AL.: "A Computational Model for Epidural Electrical Stimulation of Spinal Sensorimotor Circuits", JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, vol. 33, no. 49, 4 December 2013 (2013-12-04), pages 19326 - 19340, XP055479489, DOI: doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1688-13.2013 |
COURTINE ET AL.: "Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input", NAT NEUROSCI., vol. 12, no. 10, October 2009 (2009-10-01), pages 1333 - 1342, XP055080636, DOI: doi:10.1038/nn.2401 |
MORAUD ET AL.: "Mechanisms Underlying the Neuromodulation of Spinal Circuits for Correcting Gait and Balance Deficits after Spinal Cord Injury", NEURON, vol. 89, no. 4, 17 February 2016 (2016-02-17), pages 814 - 828, XP029421586, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.009 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US11571565B2 (en) | 2023-02-07 |
EP3574952B1 (de) | 2020-11-25 |
US20190366077A1 (en) | 2019-12-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9962543B2 (en) | Method of neurostimulation of distinct neural structures using single paddle lead to treat multiple pain locations and multi-column, multi-row paddle lead for such neurostimulation | |
US9511222B2 (en) | System and method for post-stroke neural rehabilitation | |
US6587733B1 (en) | Percutaneous surgical lead body with directed stimulation | |
EP3359247B1 (de) | Implantierbare modulare elektrodengruppenanordnung | |
US7684873B2 (en) | Implantable medical lead including a directional electrode and fixation elements along an interior surface | |
AU2011282294B9 (en) | Minimally invasive lead system for vagus nerve stimulation | |
US11571565B2 (en) | Electrode array, a lead paddle and a neuromodulation system | |
US20020111661A1 (en) | Multiple electrode lead body for spinal cord stimulation | |
US9731115B2 (en) | System and method for muscle reconditioning and neural rehabilitation | |
US20060271137A1 (en) | Apparatus and system to stimulate a nerve | |
US8612009B2 (en) | Method of neurostimulation of distinct neural structures using single paddle lead to treat multiple pain locations and multi-column, multi-row paddle lead for such neurostimulation | |
US20180104472A1 (en) | Orientation marker for implantable leads and leads, systems, and methods utilizing the orientation marker | |
WO2011147873A1 (de) | Implantierbare sammelelektrode sowie neurostimulationssystem | |
US8135477B2 (en) | Neurostimulation utilizing a tree configuration | |
US11559258B2 (en) | Stimulation lead with electrodes configured for sensing and stimulation over a partial circumference | |
US11491326B2 (en) | Stimulation lead with electrodes configured for sensing and stimulation over a partial circumference | |
EP3558449B1 (de) | Entfaltbare elektrodenarrayleitungsanordnung für elektrische stimulation | |
US20230285754A1 (en) | Calibration for ecap sensing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20200506 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: A61N 1/05 20060101AFI20200527BHEP Ipc: A61N 1/36 20060101ALI20200527BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200622 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1337594 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ONWARD MEDICAL N.V., NL Free format text: FORMER OWNER: G-THERAPEUTICS BV, EINDHOVEN, NL Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ONWARD MEDICAL B.V., NL Free format text: FORMER OWNER: G-THERAPEUTICS BV, EINDHOVEN, NL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ONWARD MEDICAL N.V., NL Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GTX MEDICAL B.V., EINDHOVEN, NL Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ONWARD MEDICAL B.V., NL Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GTX MEDICAL B.V., EINDHOVEN, NL Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DTS PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAELTE SCHNEKENBUEHL U, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1337594 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201125 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20201125 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210325 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210225 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210226 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210325 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210225 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20210826 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210530 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602018010020 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ONWARD MEDICAL N.V., NL Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ONWARD MEDICAL B.V., EINDHOVEN, NL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20220310 AND 20220316 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210530 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210325 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230514 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20180530 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240522 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240517 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240516 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201125 |