EP3556479B1 - Device and method for delivery point sorting - Google Patents
Device and method for delivery point sorting Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3556479B1 EP3556479B1 EP18167747.7A EP18167747A EP3556479B1 EP 3556479 B1 EP3556479 B1 EP 3556479B1 EP 18167747 A EP18167747 A EP 18167747A EP 3556479 B1 EP3556479 B1 EP 3556479B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sorting
- feeders
- mail articles
- delivery point
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C1/00—Measures preceding sorting according to destination
- B07C1/02—Forming articles into a stream; Arranging articles in a stream, e.g. spacing, orientating
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
- B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
- B07C3/00—Sorting according to destination
- B07C3/02—Apparatus characterised by the means used for distribution
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a device and method for delivery point sorting.
- the present invention relates to a device and a method for the production of a delivery point sequence which corresponds to the sequence of the mailboxes on the route of a mail carrier. Delivery point sorting establishes such a sequence.
- a series of delivery point sorting methods for letters have been disclosed in the art which are based on the use of the RADIX method with two sorting passes using a feeder.
- This method involves sorting mail with a delivery point sequence (delivery address code on the mail articles) by performing a first sorting pass to mail articles and a second sort pass to mail articles, where mail articles are supplied to the first sorting assembly, which identifies a sequence digit/variable; the mail articles are then conveyed to the second sorting assembly which identifies a further sequence digit/variable, and the mail articles are sorted in delivery point sequence.
- the required number of sorting end points can be reduced, but at the same time, this increases the sorting period and/or correspondingly reduces the sorting throughput rate.
- Mail is typically received in distribution centers or warehouses from two sources. Local mail which is to be delivered within the local area or to other distribution centers and out-of-area mail received from other distribution centers are the two sources. Mail which is to be delivered locally needs to ultimately be sorted to delivery point sequence, also known as carrier walk sequence. As in, the mail is sorted and arranged in the same order which the mail carrier travels while delivering mail articles. Delivery Bar Code Sequenced (DBCS) machines, which require two or more passes of the mail through the same sequence, are capable of achieving delivery point sequence for letter mail.
- DBCS Delivery Bar Code Sequenced
- the mail is passed through a letter sorting machine two times.
- the first pass arranges the mail into groupings of addresses from the rather random order which the mail arrives.
- the number of output bins of the sorting machine determines the number of address sequences used.
- a sorting matrix will provide places to hold the mail in a sorted order.
- the sorting matrix has a grouping of slots; each slot represents an address (or addresses) on the carrier's route.
- a sorting matrix with a larger number of slots allows for a bigger mail carrier route (or more individual smaller mail carrier routes) to be processed at a time.
- each address's mail would be sorted into a separate individual bin.
- a letter sorting machine can process mail for more addresses then sorting bins by using grouping slots.
- a first address' mail would go into the first bin, the second address' mail into the second bin, and so on until the tenth address' mail goes into the tenth bin. Then an eleventh address' mail would be placed into the first bin, the twelfth into the second bin and so on until the twentieth address' mail goes into the tenth bin.
- the result would be bin 1 holding address' 1, 11, 21, 31 etc, bin 2 holding address' 2, 22, 32, etc.
- first sorting pass After a first sorting pass, mail is usually moved from the letter sorting machine and loaded onto carts for storage and readied for a second pass. The first-pass sorted mail, while maintaining its order, will then be loaded for a second pass. The mail sorted into the first bin will be loaded first for the second pass and so on. This sequence must be maintained.
- the mail from the first-pass' bin 1 is sorted with address 1 being sorted into bin 1, address 11 being sorted into bin 2, address 21 being sorted into bin 3, and so on until address 91 is sorted into bin 10.
- the mail from the first-pass' bin 2 is sorted with address 2 being sorted into bin 1, address 12 into bin 2, address 22 into bin 3, and so on until address 92 Is sorted into bin 10.
- bin 1 will contain the sequence of addresses 1-10
- bin 2 will contain the sequence of addresses 11-20
- bin 2 will contain the sequence of addresses 21-30, and so on. So at the conclusion of the second pass, the mail is in mail carrier route sequence.
- the number of sorting passes could be increased in order to reduce the number of endpoints; however this would reduce the throughput rate of the machines.
- US 2005247606 A1 shows a sorting system using multiple sorters operating as part of a single, multi-sorting machine unified system.
- The includes a plurality of input sections capable of operating in parallel, each including a feeder that takes in mail pieces one at a time and a scanner that scans each mail piece for destination indicia, a plurality of stackers each comprising at least one row of pockets, a control system that determines a destination pocket in the stacker for each mail piece based on a predetermined sort scheme and the destination indicia, and a routing system effective to route mail in accordance with the sort scheme from any input section to any pocket of a stacker.
- WO 2005075116 A1 shows a system for sorting postal articles includes a plurality of postal article feeders.
- a delay line receives postal articles from one of the feeders, and a delivery line receives postal articles from another of the feeders.
- Each one of a plurality of towers has a plurality of destination compartments arranged to receive the postal articles from the delay line and the delivery line. The destination compartments move laterally with respect to the towers.
- a plurality of trays receives the postal articles from the delivery and delay lines and delivers the postal articles to select destination compartments.
- WO 2016026655 A1 relates to a sorting device which comprises at least two main conveyor sections, each of which transports articles arranged one behind the other in a conveying direction, at least two feed devices, each of which feeds the articles to one of the main conveyor sections, at least two identification devices, each of which is arranged downstream of the feed devices in the conveying direction and determines a sorting destination for each article, a plurality of sorting outlets arranged at the end of each main conveyor section, which are each assigned to sorting destinations and into which the articles are transported as a function of their sorting destination, at least two connecting conveyor sections which branch off from the main conveyor sections at branching points and which each connect two main conveyor sections and by means of which articles can be fed from one main conveyor section to another main conveyor section, and at least one storage device in which articles can be temporarily stored.
- a device for a delivery point sorting including the features if claim 1 is provided.
- a significant reduction in the number of sorting end points is achieved with the three sorting passes. This reduces the space, footprint, and cost requirement needed for the sorting device. It allows for a relatively high filling level of the containers at the end of the sorting passes, and a relatively short final emptying process of the system after the feeder of the last item of mail. Since the number of not-full containers before the final emptying process of the system is lower corresponding to the reduction in the sorting end points. There is also the added advantage of compensating, or even over-compensating, the additional time requirement for the third sorting pass by using a second feeder.
- the delivery point sorting device further comprises a storage module (GCM or gap correction module) configured to store an item of mail for a specific time in a stationary state, where the storage module is arranged upstream of the merge module in a flow direction of the streams of mail articles.
- GCM gap correction module
- the converging apparatus is configured for simultaneous convergence of the streams of mail articles from the at least two feeders.
- the converging apparatus is configured for non-simultaneous convergence of the streams of mail articles.
- the merge module is an active merge module, i.e. it merges two streams at the same time.
- the delivery point sorting device further comprises at least two virtual machines, each with half of the number of said sorting endpoints.
- the merge module is a passive merge module, i.e. it handles only one stream at the same time.
- a significant reduction in the number of sorting end points is achieved with the three sorting passes. This reduces the area and cost requirement needed for the sorting device. It allows for a relatively high filling level of the containers at the end of the sorting passes, and a relatively short final emptying process of the system after the last item of mail is fed. Since the number of non-full containers before the final emptying process of the system is lower corresponding to the reduction in the sorting end points. There is also the added advantage of compensating the additional time requirement for the third sorting pass by using a second feeder.
- the method for delivery point sorting further comprises, storing or delaying the mail articles in a storage module for a specific time in a stationary state between passes, where said storage module is arranged upstream of a merge module in a flow direction of said streams of mail articles.
- the method for delivery point sorting further comprises simultaneously converging the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders.
- the method further comprises converging the stream of mail articles non-simultaneously.
- the method for delivery point sorting further comprises, after the first sorting pass, dividing a volume of the mail articles from the first sorting pass into respectively equal parts between the two feeders at each sorting end point.
- the method for delivery point sorting where after the second sorting pass, only one of the at least two feeders processes mail articles.
- the method for delivery point sorting comprises providing two virtual machines each with half of the sorting endpoints.
- the method further comprises preventing simultaneous converging of the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders, and using one of the at least two feeders during a first sorting pass to serve both virtual machines.
- the exemplary embodiments of the present application relate to a letter sorting system with four levels 101, 102, 103, 104 which are arranged one above the other with sorting end points, known as a stacker wall.
- An elevator 14 distributes the streams of mail articles from the two feeders 1, 2 among the four levels using divert modules 15.
- the elevator 14 is arranged downstream of the feeders 1, 2.
- a storage module 18 is used in the two partial streams upstream of the merge module 16, which storage module 18 can store an item of mail for a specific time in a stationary state (GCM or gap correction module).
- the present invention is configured with the use of virtual machines, which are subdivisions of the sorting device into two component-machines.
- the virtual machines are generally of the same size and are independent of one another.
- the device must not permit simultaneous convergence of the stream of mail articles if only one feeder is used in the first sorting pass; one feeder serves both virtual machines in this embodiment.
- Figs. 1 and 2 show an exemplary examples representing a general arrangement with a device for the simultaneous convergence of two streams of items of mail from the feeders for explaining features of the present invention.
- this configuration allows for, arrangements without the use of virtual machines to be implemented, in the same way as the arrangement with virtual machines in which just one feeder serves all four levels of the stacker wall in the first sorting pass:
- Fig. 1 shows the function of the convergence device is shown for simultaneous convergence; where the device has two feeders. Each of the two feeders feed mail articles into each of the four shown levels of the stacker wall.
- the crossing functionality 3 is shown in the crossing streams of feeders 1 and 2.
- Fig. 2 shows a convergence device not according to the present invention for simultaneous convergence in the first, second, and third sorting passes where the device has two feeders.
- the two lines from the feeders flow through the divert module, through the GCM, through the active merge module 16, finally into the stacker wall matrix.
- the crossing of the streams is realized in the convergence apparatus 13 having an elevator module 14 with divert module 15, and merge modules 16.
- the device for converging two streams of mail articles from the two feeders becomes necessary if the latter are to be loaded by the same conveyor device or devices at the sorting end points. This is the case generally in letter sorting machines such as in the Delivery Point Barcode Sorter (DBCS) but not generally in large-format letter sorting machines such as the Open Mail Handling System (OMS) with its two separate pocket rings.
- DBCS Delivery Point Barcode Sorter
- OMS Open Mail Handling System
- the converging device must permit simultaneous convergence of the stream of items of mail of the two streams of items of mail from the feeders.
- the volume of the items of mail from the first sorting pass must be divided into respectively equal parts between the two feeders in each sorting end point. Since this is generally not precisely possible owing to the container delivery unit to the feeders, when the volume of items of mail of one sorting end point are separated from the first sorting pass, generally one of the two feeders must wait for the other until it has finished its portion.
- the three-stage sorting process means that unless virtual machines are formed the use of two feeders can take place only in the first and second sorting passes, while in the third sorting pass only one of the two feeders can be appropriately used. This is due to the fact that the sequence of the items of mail of the volume of the items of mail to be separated from the second sorting pass must not be changed in specific regions at each sorting end point. Accordingly, different volume portions cannot be separated at the same time.
- the overall throughput rate over the entire delivery point sequencing process is as a result correspondingly reduced in the generally time-critical sorting passes after the first sorting pass, but is just as high as in a system with just one feeder and two sorting passes.
- the converging device When two (or more) virtual machines are formed, the converging device must permit no simultaneous convergence of the stream of items of mail precisely if only one feeder is used (only) in the first sorting pass, which feeder then serves both virtual machines.
- the overall throughput rate is therefore also reduced over the entire delivery point sequencing process, but the reduction relates to the generally not too time-critical first sorting pass, but is also precisely just as high here as in a system with just one feeder and two sorting passes.
- Figs. 3-6 show the further exemplary embodiment of a device according to the present invention, where a simultaneous convergence of the two streams of items of mail from the feeders is not necessary.
- Fig. 3 shows the function of the convergence device without simultaneous convergence in the case of two feeders.
- Fig. 4 shows the convergence device without simultaneous convergence necessary for the first, second, and third sorting passes in the case of two feeders.
- the two lines from the feeder flow through the divert module, through the passive merge module, finally into the stacker wall matrix.
- Fig. 5 shows the convergence device without simultaneous convergence during the first sorting pass in the case of two feeders.
- the two lines from the feeder flow through the divert module, through the passive merge module, finally into the stacker wall with the two virtual machines.
- Fig. 6 shows the convergence device without simultaneous convergence during the second and third sorting passes in the case of two feeders.
Landscapes
- Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a device and method for delivery point sorting. In particular, the present invention relates to a device and a method for the production of a delivery point sequence which corresponds to the sequence of the mailboxes on the route of a mail carrier. Delivery point sorting establishes such a sequence.
- A series of delivery point sorting methods for letters have been disclosed in the art which are based on the use of the RADIX method with two sorting passes using a feeder. This method involves sorting mail with a delivery point sequence (delivery address code on the mail articles) by performing a first sorting pass to mail articles and a second sort pass to mail articles, where mail articles are supplied to the first sorting assembly, which identifies a sequence digit/variable; the mail articles are then conveyed to the second sorting assembly which identifies a further sequence digit/variable, and the mail articles are sorted in delivery point sequence. By increasing the number of sorting passes, the required number of sorting end points can be reduced, but at the same time, this increases the sorting period and/or correspondingly reduces the sorting throughput rate.
- Mail is typically received in distribution centers or warehouses from two sources. Local mail which is to be delivered within the local area or to other distribution centers and out-of-area mail received from other distribution centers are the two sources. Mail which is to be delivered locally needs to ultimately be sorted to delivery point sequence, also known as carrier walk sequence. As in, the mail is sorted and arranged in the same order which the mail carrier travels while delivering mail articles. Delivery Bar Code Sequenced (DBCS) machines, which require two or more passes of the mail through the same sequence, are capable of achieving delivery point sequence for letter mail.
- A process exists today to sort mail into a mail carrier route sequence, known as delivery point sequence. The mail is passed through a letter sorting machine two times. The first pass arranges the mail into groupings of addresses from the rather random order which the mail arrives. The number of output bins of the sorting machine determines the number of address sequences used.
- Generally, a sorting matrix will provide places to hold the mail in a sorted order. The sorting matrix has a grouping of slots; each slot represents an address (or addresses) on the carrier's route. A sorting matrix with a larger number of slots allows for a bigger mail carrier route (or more individual smaller mail carrier routes) to be processed at a time. In a scenario where the letter sorting machine contains the same amount of sorting bins as addresses on the carrier's route, each address's mail would be sorted into a separate individual bin. A letter sorting machine can process mail for more addresses then sorting bins by using grouping slots.
- As an example, a first address' mail would go into the first bin, the second address' mail into the second bin, and so on until the tenth address' mail goes into the tenth bin. Then an eleventh address' mail would be placed into the first bin, the twelfth into the second bin and so on until the twentieth address' mail goes into the tenth bin. In this example, the result would be bin 1 holding address' 1, 11, 21, 31 etc,
bin 2 holding address' 2, 22, 32, etc. - After a first sorting pass, mail is usually moved from the letter sorting machine and loaded onto carts for storage and readied for a second pass. The first-pass sorted mail, while maintaining its order, will then be loaded for a second pass. The mail sorted into the first bin will be loaded first for the second pass and so on. This sequence must be maintained.
- During a second pass, the mail from the first-pass'
bin 1 is sorted withaddress 1 being sorted intobin 1, address 11 being sorted intobin 2,address 21 being sorted intobin 3, and so on until address 91 is sorted intobin 10. The mail from the first-pass'bin 2 is sorted withaddress 2 being sorted intobin 1, address 12 intobin 2,address 22 intobin 3, and so on until address 92 Is sorted intobin 10. After all of the first-pass' 10 bins are processed through the letter sorting machine for a second pass,bin 1 will contain the sequence of addresses 1-10,bin 2 will contain the sequence of addresses 11-20,bin 2 will contain the sequence of addresses 21-30, and so on. So at the conclusion of the second pass, the mail is in mail carrier route sequence. - The number of sorting passes could be increased in order to reduce the number of endpoints; however this would reduce the throughput rate of the machines.
-
US 2005247606 A1 shows a sorting system using multiple sorters operating as part of a single, multi-sorting machine unified system. The includes a plurality of input sections capable of operating in parallel, each including a feeder that takes in mail pieces one at a time and a scanner that scans each mail piece for destination indicia, a plurality of stackers each comprising at least one row of pockets, a control system that determines a destination pocket in the stacker for each mail piece based on a predetermined sort scheme and the destination indicia, and a routing system effective to route mail in accordance with the sort scheme from any input section to any pocket of a stacker. -
WO 2005075116 A1 shows a system for sorting postal articles includes a plurality of postal article feeders. A delay line receives postal articles from one of the feeders, and a delivery line receives postal articles from another of the feeders. Each one of a plurality of towers has a plurality of destination compartments arranged to receive the postal articles from the delay line and the delivery line. The destination compartments move laterally with respect to the towers. A plurality of trays receives the postal articles from the delivery and delay lines and delivers the postal articles to select destination compartments. -
WO 2016026655 A1 relates to a sorting device which comprises at least two main conveyor sections, each of which transports articles arranged one behind the other in a conveying direction, at least two feed devices, each of which feeds the articles to one of the main conveyor sections, at least two identification devices, each of which is arranged downstream of the feed devices in the conveying direction and determines a sorting destination for each article, a plurality of sorting outlets arranged at the end of each main conveyor section, which are each assigned to sorting destinations and into which the articles are transported as a function of their sorting destination, at least two connecting conveyor sections which branch off from the main conveyor sections at branching points and which each connect two main conveyor sections and by means of which articles can be fed from one main conveyor section to another main conveyor section, and at least one storage device in which articles can be temporarily stored. - It is therefore the object of the present invention to solve the problems known in the prior art. In particular, it is an object of the present invention to specify a device and method for efficient and dependable delivery point sorting.
- These objects are achieved by a device including the features of
claim 1 and method including the features of claim 7. Particular embodiments are the subject of the dependent claims. According to one aspect of the invention, three sorting passes and two feeders for reducing sorting end points are utilized without sacrificing throughput rate. Moreover, the features indicated in the claims are specified and explained in greater detail in the description, wherein further preferred embodiments of the invention are described. - According to the invention a device for a delivery point sorting including the features if
claim 1 is provided. - A significant reduction in the number of sorting end points is achieved with the three sorting passes. This reduces the space, footprint, and cost requirement needed for the sorting device. It allows for a relatively high filling level of the containers at the end of the sorting passes, and a relatively short final emptying process of the system after the feeder of the last item of mail. Since the number of not-full containers before the final emptying process of the system is lower corresponding to the reduction in the sorting end points. There is also the added advantage of compensating, or even over-compensating, the additional time requirement for the third sorting pass by using a second feeder.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the delivery point sorting device further comprises a storage module (GCM or gap correction module) configured to store an item of mail for a specific time in a stationary state, where the storage module is arranged upstream of the merge module in a flow direction of the streams of mail articles.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the converging apparatus is configured for simultaneous convergence of the streams of mail articles from the at least two feeders.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the converging apparatus is configured for non-simultaneous convergence of the streams of mail articles.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the merge module is an active merge module, i.e. it merges two streams at the same time.
- In accordance with the invention, the delivery point sorting device further comprises at least two virtual machines, each with half of the number of said sorting endpoints.
- When two virtual machines are used, the additional time requirement of using a third sorting pass is completely compensated if a device for the non-simultaneous converging of the two streams of items of mail from the two feeders is used and therefore only one feeder can be used (only) in the (rather non-time-critical) first sorting pass. This permits a simpler arrangement of the convergence.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the merge module is a passive merge module, i.e. it handles only one stream at the same time.
- According to the invention, there is also provided a method including the features of claim 7 for delivery point sorting.
- A significant reduction in the number of sorting end points is achieved with the three sorting passes. This reduces the area and cost requirement needed for the sorting device. It allows for a relatively high filling level of the containers at the end of the sorting passes, and a relatively short final emptying process of the system after the last item of mail is fed. Since the number of non-full containers before the final emptying process of the system is lower corresponding to the reduction in the sorting end points. There is also the added advantage of compensating the additional time requirement for the third sorting pass by using a second feeder.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the method for delivery point sorting further comprises, storing or delaying the mail articles in a storage module for a specific time in a stationary state between passes, where said storage module is arranged upstream of a merge module in a flow direction of said streams of mail articles.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the method for delivery point sorting further comprises simultaneously converging the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the method further comprises converging the stream of mail articles non-simultaneously.
- In accordance with an additional feature of the invention, the method for delivery point sorting further comprises, after the first sorting pass, dividing a volume of the mail articles from the first sorting pass into respectively equal parts between the two feeders at each sorting end point.
- In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the method for delivery point sorting, where after the second sorting pass, only one of the at least two feeders processes mail articles.
- In accordance with the invention, the method for delivery point sorting comprises providing two virtual machines each with half of the sorting endpoints.
- When two virtual machines are used, the additional time requirement of using a third sorting pass is completely compensated if a method for the non-simultaneous converging of the two streams of items of mail from the two feeders is used and therefore only one feeder can be used (only) in the (rather non-time-critical) first sorting pass. This permits a simpler arrangement of the convergence.
- In accordance with the invention, the method further comprises preventing simultaneous converging of the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders, and using one of the at least two feeders during a first sorting pass to serve both virtual machines.
-
-
Fig. 1 shows a functional diagram of an embodiment of the delivery point sorting device; -
Fig. 2 shows a functional diagram of an embodiment of the delivery point sorting device; -
Fig. 3 shows a functional diagram of a further embodiment of the delivery point sorting device; -
Fig. 4 shows a functional diagram of a further embodiment of the delivery point sorting device; -
Fig. 5 shows a functional diagram of a further embodiment of the delivery point sorting device; and -
Fig. 6 shows a functional diagram of a further embodiment of the delivery point sorting device. - The exemplary embodiments of the present application relate to a letter sorting system with four
101, 102, 103, 104 which are arranged one above the other with sorting end points, known as a stacker wall. Anlevels elevator 14 distributes the streams of mail articles from the two 1, 2 among the four levels using divertfeeders modules 15. Theelevator 14 is arranged downstream of the 1, 2.feeders - When two of the
elevators 14 are embodied one next to the other for in each case the two streams of items of mail from the 1, 2, the two streams can be merged for each level, known as afeeders merge module 16, with only a quarter of the average throughput rate. Such anarrangement 13 accordingly represents the necessary device for the simultaneous crossing of the streams of items of mail. - In order for the simultaneous convergence of the two respective partial streams, in each case a
storage module 18 is used in the two partial streams upstream of themerge module 16, whichstorage module 18 can store an item of mail for a specific time in a stationary state (GCM or gap correction module). - The present invention is configured with the use of virtual machines, which are subdivisions of the sorting device into two component-machines. The virtual machines are generally of the same size and are independent of one another. When virtual machines are used, the device must not permit simultaneous convergence of the stream of mail articles if only one feeder is used in the first sorting pass; one feeder serves both virtual machines in this embodiment.
-
Figs. 1 and 2 show an exemplary examples representing a general arrangement with a device for the simultaneous convergence of two streams of items of mail from the feeders for explaining features of the present invention. According to an example for explaining features of the present invention, this configuration allows for, arrangements without the use of virtual machines to be implemented, in the same way as the arrangement with virtual machines in which just one feeder serves all four levels of the stacker wall in the first sorting pass:
Fig. 1 shows the function of the convergence device is shown for simultaneous convergence; where the device has two feeders. Each of the two feeders feed mail articles into each of the four shown levels of the stacker wall. Thecrossing functionality 3 is shown in the crossing streams of 1 and 2.feeders -
Fig. 2 shows a convergence device not according to the present invention for simultaneous convergence in the first, second, and third sorting passes where the device has two feeders. The two lines from the feeders flow through the divert module, through the GCM, through theactive merge module 16, finally into the stacker wall matrix. The crossing of the streams is realized in theconvergence apparatus 13 having anelevator module 14 with divertmodule 15, and mergemodules 16. - The device for converging two streams of mail articles from the two feeders becomes necessary if the latter are to be loaded by the same conveyor device or devices at the sorting end points. This is the case generally in letter sorting machines such as in the Delivery Point Barcode Sorter (DBCS) but not generally in large-format letter sorting machines such as the Open Mail Handling System (OMS) with its two separate pocket rings.
- According to an example for explaining features of the present invention, without the formation of so-called virtual machines, which is the subdivision of the sorting device into two component-machines which are generally of the same size and are independent of one another, the converging device must permit simultaneous convergence of the stream of items of mail of the two streams of items of mail from the feeders. Also, in the sorting passes, after the first sorting pass the volume of the items of mail from the first sorting pass must be divided into respectively equal parts between the two feeders in each sorting end point. Since this is generally not precisely possible owing to the container delivery unit to the feeders, when the volume of items of mail of one sorting end point are separated from the first sorting pass, generally one of the two feeders must wait for the other until it has finished its portion. As a result, this brings about a reduction in the overall throughput rate. The three-stage sorting process means that unless virtual machines are formed the use of two feeders can take place only in the first and second sorting passes, while in the third sorting pass only one of the two feeders can be appropriately used. This is due to the fact that the sequence of the items of mail of the volume of the items of mail to be separated from the second sorting pass must not be changed in specific regions at each sorting end point. Accordingly, different volume portions cannot be separated at the same time. The overall throughput rate over the entire delivery point sequencing process is as a result correspondingly reduced in the generally time-critical sorting passes after the first sorting pass, but is just as high as in a system with just one feeder and two sorting passes.
- When two (or more) virtual machines are formed, the converging device must permit no simultaneous convergence of the stream of items of mail precisely if only one feeder is used (only) in the first sorting pass, which feeder then serves both virtual machines. Likewise, with such a configuration, the overall throughput rate is therefore also reduced over the entire delivery point sequencing process, but the reduction relates to the generally not too time-critical first sorting pass, but is also precisely just as high here as in a system with just one feeder and two sorting passes. In addition, there is no convergence-induced reduction in the throughput rate as occurs in the use of a convergence device for simultaneous convergence of the stream of items of mail.
-
Figs. 3-6 show the further exemplary embodiment of a device according to the present invention, where a simultaneous convergence of the two streams of items of mail from the feeders is not necessary. In this embodiment, it is only possible to implement arrangements which use two virtual machines, and in the first sorting process the four levels of the stacker wall are served by just one feeder:
Fig. 3 shows the function of the convergence device without simultaneous convergence in the case of two feeders.Fig. 4 shows the convergence device without simultaneous convergence necessary for the first, second, and third sorting passes in the case of two feeders. The two lines from the feeder flow through the divert module, through the passive merge module, finally into the stacker wall matrix.Fig. 5 shows the convergence device without simultaneous convergence during the first sorting pass in the case of two feeders. The two lines from the feeder flow through the divert module, through the passive merge module, finally into the stacker wall with the two virtual machines.Fig. 6 shows the convergence device without simultaneous convergence during the second and third sorting passes in the case of two feeders. -
- 1, 2
- feeder
- 3
- crossing functionality
- 10
- delivery point sorting device
- 13
- crossing arrangement, convergence apparatus, converging device
- 14
- elevator, elevator module
- 15
- divert module
- 16
- merge module
- 18
- storage module
- 19
- sorting endpoint
- 101, 102, 103, 104
- levels
- DBCS
- Delivery Point Barcode Sorter
- GCM
- Gap Correction Module
- OMS
- Open Mail handling System
Claims (12)
- A delivery point sorting device (10), the device comprising:two feeders (1, 2) for processing mail articles, said two feeders receiving the mail articles and forwarding the mail articles in streams of mail articles;a crossing arrangement (13) for streams of mail articles realized by a converging apparatus, said converging apparatus having elevator (14) modules with divert modules (15), and merge modules (16);said elevator modules (14) configured to distribute the mail articles to respective sorting endpoints (19);said divert modules (15) configured to process mail from said two feeders;said merge modules for converging the streams of mail articles from said two feeders;said sorting endpoints (19) disposed downstream of said merge modules for stacking the mail articles received from said merge modules;characterized byat least two virtual machines (21, 22), each with half of the number of said sorting endpoints;wherein the delivery point sorting device (10) is adapted to preventing simultaneous converging of the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders, and to use one of said at least two feeders during a first sorting pass to serve both virtual machines.
- The delivery point sorting device (10) according to claim 1, which further comprises a storage module (18) configured to store an item of mail for a specific time in a stationary state or to delay the item of mail, where said storage module (18) is arranged upstream of said merge modules in a flow direction of said streams of mail articles.
- The delivery point sorting device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said converging apparatus is configured for simultaneous convergence of the streams of mail articles from said two feeders.
- The delivery point sorting device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said converging apparatus is configured for non-simultaneous convergence of the streams of mail articles.
- The delivery point sorting device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said merge modules are active merge modules.
- The delivery point sorting device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said merge modules are passive merge modules.
- A method for delivery point sorting, the method comprising:providing a delivery point sorting device according to any one of the preceding claims,sorting items of mail through a plurality of sorting passes including a first sorting pass, a second sorting pass and a third sorting pass;in at least two of said sorting passes, processing mail articles through at least two feeders by receiving the mail articles by the at least two feeders and forwarding the mail articles in streams of mail articles;converging the streams of mail articles from the at least two feeders to at least one conveyor apparatus in each of said sorting passes;loading the mail articles at sorting endpoints by the at least one conveyor apparatus in each of said sorting passes; andsequentially passing the mail articles through the first sorting pass, subsequently through the second sorting pass, and subsequently through the third sorting pass;providing two virtual machines, each with half of the number of sorting endpoints;preventing simultaneous converging of the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders; andusing one of said at least two feeders during a first sorting pass to serve both virtual machines.
- The method for delivery point sorting according to claim 7, which further comprises storing or delaying the mail articles in a storage module (18) for a specific time in a stationary state between passes, where said storage module (18) is arranged upstream of a merge module in a flow direction of said streams of mail articles.
- The method for delivery point sorting according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the method further comprises simultaneously converging the stream of mail articles from the at least two feeders.
- The method for delivery point sorting according to any one of claims 7 to 9, wherein the method further comprises converging the stream of mail articles non-simultaneously.
- The method for delivery point sorting according to any one of claims 7 to 10, which comprises, after the first sorting pass, dividing a volume of the mail articles from the first sorting pass into respectively equal parts between the two feeders at each sorting end point.
- The method for delivery point sorting according to any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein after the second sorting pass only one of the at least two feeders processes mail articles.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18167747.7A EP3556479B1 (en) | 2018-04-17 | 2018-04-17 | Device and method for delivery point sorting |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18167747.7A EP3556479B1 (en) | 2018-04-17 | 2018-04-17 | Device and method for delivery point sorting |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3556479A1 EP3556479A1 (en) | 2019-10-23 |
| EP3556479B1 true EP3556479B1 (en) | 2024-07-31 |
Family
ID=62017232
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18167747.7A Active EP3556479B1 (en) | 2018-04-17 | 2018-04-17 | Device and method for delivery point sorting |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP3556479B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112893150B (en) * | 2019-11-19 | 2023-03-31 | 顺丰科技有限公司 | Article sorting method, article sorting device, control equipment and storage medium |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2016026655A1 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-02-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Sorting device for articles and method for sorting articles |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1917968A (en) * | 2004-02-09 | 2007-02-21 | 西门子公司 | System and method for sorting postal articles using flatbed sorter |
| US7728245B2 (en) * | 2004-05-10 | 2010-06-01 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Multi-machine mail sorting system |
-
2018
- 2018-04-17 EP EP18167747.7A patent/EP3556479B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2016026655A1 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-02-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Sorting device for articles and method for sorting articles |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP3556479A1 (en) | 2019-10-23 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US7728246B2 (en) | Delivery point sequencer and method of use | |
| US7170024B2 (en) | Delivery point sequencing mail sorting system with flat mail capability | |
| US7870945B2 (en) | Process for sorting objects | |
| US8965566B2 (en) | Device and method for sorting by means of a storage region and a sorting region | |
| US20100318216A1 (en) | Method of Sorting Mailpieces by Using a Process for Dynamically Allocating Sorting Outlets | |
| US10722920B2 (en) | Device and method for delivery point sorting | |
| US9205461B2 (en) | Method and system for delivery point multiplication | |
| US20100332020A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sorting articles by way of storage regions | |
| US20100198391A1 (en) | System and method for handling returned goods in an order-picking system | |
| US20110170990A1 (en) | Mail sorter system and method for moving trays of mail to dispatch in delivery order | |
| US7888616B2 (en) | Post processing system and method | |
| US5346072A (en) | Sorting installation for articles having different destinations | |
| US9314822B2 (en) | Sorting system and sorting method with two storage areas | |
| EP1678601B1 (en) | System and method for delivery point packaging | |
| US8369984B2 (en) | Facility and method for processing printed materials | |
| EP3556479B1 (en) | Device and method for delivery point sorting | |
| EP1715963B1 (en) | System and method for sorting postal articles using two feeders | |
| US12059711B2 (en) | System for sorting items to be sorted into target points, logically linked to their destination, in a matrix arrangement | |
| US20120118797A1 (en) | Sorting method and sorting configuration for sorting two types of articles to produce a single succession | |
| EP1385641B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sorting mail articles | |
| US8796576B2 (en) | Sorting system and method for flat items of mail | |
| US10065215B2 (en) | Sorting device for articles and method for sorting articles | |
| US7528339B2 (en) | Sequencing system and method of use | |
| JP2005089019A (en) | Sorting method and sorting system | |
| JP2006505381A (en) | Integrated network and method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20200420 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20210330 |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: KOERBER SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS GMBH |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20240305 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Free format text: CASE NUMBER: APP_33906/2024 Effective date: 20240606 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602018072375 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241202 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1707995 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241202 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241031 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241101 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241130 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241031 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241031 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241031 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241130 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20241101 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602018072375 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20250501 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250221 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20250422 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: H13 Free format text: ST27 STATUS EVENT CODE: U-0-0-H10-H13 (AS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL OFFICE) Effective date: 20251125 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20250417 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240731 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20250417 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20250430 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20250417 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20250430 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20250430 |