EP3474824B1 - Easy to swallow coatings and substrates coated therewith - Google Patents

Easy to swallow coatings and substrates coated therewith Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3474824B1
EP3474824B1 EP17837417.9A EP17837417A EP3474824B1 EP 3474824 B1 EP3474824 B1 EP 3474824B1 EP 17837417 A EP17837417 A EP 17837417A EP 3474824 B1 EP3474824 B1 EP 3474824B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
composition
water
guar gum
coefficient
weight
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17837417.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3474824A1 (en
EP3474824A4 (en
Inventor
Jeffrey R. Gimbel
Daniel TO
Jason Teckoe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BPSI Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
BPSI Holdings LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BPSI Holdings LLC filed Critical BPSI Holdings LLC
Publication of EP3474824A1 publication Critical patent/EP3474824A1/en
Publication of EP3474824A4 publication Critical patent/EP3474824A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3474824B1 publication Critical patent/EP3474824B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/28—Dragees; Coated pills or tablets, e.g. with film or compression coating
    • A61K9/2806—Coating materials
    • A61K9/2833—Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/284—Organic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyvinyl pyrrolidone
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/30—Macromolecular organic or inorganic compounds, e.g. inorganic polyphosphates
    • A61K47/36—Polysaccharides; Derivatives thereof, e.g. gums, starch, alginate, dextrin, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, inulin, agar or pectin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/06—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite
    • A61K47/26—Carbohydrates, e.g. sugar alcohols, amino sugars, nucleic acids, mono-, di- or oligo-saccharides; Derivatives thereof, e.g. polysorbates, sorbitan fatty acid esters or glycyrrhizin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/30—Macromolecular organic or inorganic compounds, e.g. inorganic polyphosphates
    • A61K47/36—Polysaccharides; Derivatives thereof, e.g. gums, starch, alginate, dextrin, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, inulin, agar or pectin
    • A61K47/38—Cellulose; Derivatives thereof
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/44—Oils, fats or waxes according to two or more groups of A61K47/02-A61K47/42; Natural or modified natural oils, fats or waxes, e.g. castor oil, polyethoxylated castor oil, montan wax, lignite, shellac, rosin, beeswax or lanolin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012—Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0053—Mouth and digestive tract, i.e. intraoral and peroral administration
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/10—Dispersions; Emulsions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/14—Particulate form, e.g. powders, Processes for size reducing of pure drugs or the resulting products, Pure drug nanoparticles
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/28—Dragees; Coated pills or tablets, e.g. with film or compression coating
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/28—Dragees; Coated pills or tablets, e.g. with film or compression coating
    • A61K9/2806—Coating materials
    • A61K9/282—Organic compounds, e.g. fats
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/28—Dragees; Coated pills or tablets, e.g. with film or compression coating
    • A61K9/2806—Coating materials
    • A61K9/2833—Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/2853—Organic macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, poloxamers, poly(lactide-co-glycolide)
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/28—Dragees; Coated pills or tablets, e.g. with film or compression coating
    • A61K9/2806—Coating materials
    • A61K9/2833—Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/286—Polysaccharides, e.g. gums; Cyclodextrin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/20—Pills, tablets, discs, rods
    • A61K9/28—Dragees; Coated pills or tablets, e.g. with film or compression coating
    • A61K9/2806—Coating materials
    • A61K9/2833—Organic macromolecular compounds
    • A61K9/286—Polysaccharides, e.g. gums; Cyclodextrin
    • A61K9/2866—Cellulose; Cellulose derivatives, e.g. hydroxypropyl methylcellulose

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to film coating formulations that, when coated onto orally ingestible substrates, allow such coated substrates to be much more slippery when wet and therefore more readily swallowed versus an uncoated tablet or tablets coated with prior art coatings.
  • the invention also relates to pharmaceutical and nutritional substrates having such film coatings and methods of preparing the same.
  • Film coatings for orally ingestible substrates are recognized for imparting many benefits to the resulting coated pharmaceutical and nutritional dosage forms. These benefits include imparting color for brand identification and reduction of medication errors as well as improving stability of the dosage forms by providing a barrier from water vapor and oxygen. It is also generally desirable that said coatings at least maintain the swallowability of dosage forms versus uncoated dosage forms, particularly for larger tablets and capsules. However, improvement in the swallowability of dosage forms is still an incompletely met need in the industry, especially for larger dosage forms and patient populations that have difficulties when swallowing (e.g. geriatric and pediatric populations).
  • US 2012/0082723 A1 discloses a coating composition for an orally-administered preparation which is easily administrable and has improved dissolution properties.
  • This coating composition comprises a first thickener, selected from a carboxyvinyl polymer and sodium alginate; a polyvalent metal compound; and a second thickener selected from xanthan gum, guar gum and sodium alginate (when sodium alginate is not the first thickener).
  • a coating composition comprising hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and guar gum with a viscosity of 1100 mPa.s is specifically disclosed. This coating composition is not in powder form.
  • film coating formulations comprising a water-soluble polymer and an amount of guar gum which is sufficient to reduce static friction or dynamic friction or both (as a slip aid) forms aqueous dispersions with processible viscosities and, when coated onto orally ingestible substrates, result in coated substrates with relatively low levels of static and dynamic friction when wet, i.e. after ingestion.
  • Use of the inventive film coatings results in coated substrates that are easier to swallow, by virtue of the relatively low levels of static and dynamic friction, when compared to coated substrates of the prior art.
  • the present invention also relates to fully-formulated film coating systems comprising a water-soluble polymer and guar gum.
  • the invention further relates to aqueous dispersions comprising a water-soluble polymer and guar gum, methods of preparing the same by dispersing the film coating materials (system) in ambient temperature water, orally ingestible substrates film coated with the coatings described herein, i.e. comprising a water-soluble polymer and guar gum, as well as methods of coating the substrates with the aqueous dispersions.
  • an aqueous dispersion according to claim 12 prepared by mixing a coating composition according to any of claims 1 to 11 in water which is optionally at ambient temperature. Still further aspects include orally-ingestible substrates according to claims 13-15 coated with said aqueous dispersion In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method according to claim 16, for reducing the coefficient of static and/or dynamic friction of an orally ingestible substrate.
  • coated ingestible substrates have an elegant appearance with relatively high gloss and are free from cracks, pick marks and other surface defects. This combination of properties for a coating system is clearly advantageous over the prior art and existing marketed products.
  • the water-soluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of cellulosic polymers, vinyl polymers or combinations thereof.
  • the cellulosic polymers are preferably water soluble polymers selected from the group consisting of hypromellose (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose.
  • Preferred grades of hypromellose are lower viscosity grades such as those with aqueous solution viscosities of 1, 3, 5, 6, 15 or 50 centipoise when dissolved at 2% weight/volume in water.
  • the water-soluble vinyl polymers may include polymers derived from vinyl monomers with varying substitution and molecular weights.
  • the water-soluble vinyl polymers may be homopolymers (i.e.
  • water-soluble vinyl polymers are selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer (e.g. Kollicoat IR) and vinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate copolymer 6:4 (e.g. Kollidon VA-64).
  • the water-soluble polymers are of sufficiently small particle size, preferably less than 250 microns, to facilitate dissolution into ambient water when forming the aqueous coating solutions. Two or more of these polymers may be used together.
  • the amount of water-soluble polymer included in the powder mixtures of the present invention is from about 5 to about 35% by weight. In some preferred embodiments, it ranges from about 10 to about 20%. When two or more water-soluble polymers are used together, the combined total of the polymers is from about 5 to about 35% by weight, preferably from about 10 to about 30%.
  • the guar gum When included in sufficient amounts, the guar gum imparts enhanced slip to the powder mixtures of the present invention when coated onto orally ingestible substrates as part of a film coating. While the tablets or other substrates having the film coatings of the present invention applied thereon have the expected physical properties of a film coated product in the dry state, tablets having the inventive film coatings demonstrate a significant reduction in static and/or dynamic friction values, when wet, as compared to tablets coated with prior art film coatings. Thus, after ingestion, such coated tablets demonstrate enhanced swallowability.
  • Guar gum may be any of the grades commonly used in pharmaceutical and nutritional products and the like, provided that it has a minimum viscosity of 700 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration for two hours when measured on a Brookfield RVT viscometer at 25°C and 20 rpm.
  • preferred higher viscosity guar gum grades have a minimum viscosity of about 180 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration and measured on a TA Instruments Rheometer ARG2 at 25°C and at a shear rate of 80/second.
  • the amount of guar gum included in the powder mixtures of the present invention is an amount which is sufficient to reduce at least one of the static friction, dynamic friction or both, when compared to oral substrates lacking the inventive coatings.
  • the improvements are in the range of at least about 10% and more preferably at least about 20%.
  • the amount of guar gum is an amount to provide oral substrates coated the inventive film coatings with at least one of a coefficient of static friction of less than 3 and/or a coefficient of dynamic friction of less than 1.5; as such values are indicative of enhanced slip/swallowability.
  • the amount of guar gum included in the dry powder composition in many aspects of the invention is preferably from 4 to 20%.
  • the friction of the coated tablets is reduced as the guar gum level is increased in the dry film coating formulation.
  • increasing the guar gum concentration above about 25% by weight can result in aqueous dispersions that are too viscous to be used productively to coat orally ingestible substrates in most cases.
  • the viscosity of the aqueous dispersions also depends on the concentration of the film coating formulation in water. Viscosity increases with increasing concentrations of the film coating in the aqueous dispersion. It is preferred that the concentration of film coatings in the aqueous dispersions be as high as possible while still being pumpable and sprayable to reduce the coating time required and increase productivity.
  • the viscosity of the aqueous dispersions will increase both as the guar gum concentration in the film coating and film coating concentration in the aqueous dispersion increase. Therefore, the film coating concentration in the aqueous dispersions must be determined based on the guar gum concentration in the film coating. If higher guar gum concentrations, i.e.
  • guar gum based upon the weight of the dry powder ingredients
  • lower concentrations of the film coating composition i.e. from about 5 to about 15%, in the aqueous dispersion are preferable such that the viscosity of the aqueous dispersion is less than about 450 mPa.s (centipoises (cP)).
  • cP centipoises
  • Aqueous dispersion viscosity is also dependent on the nature of the polymer used in the film coating formulation.
  • cellulosic polymers When used in film coating formulations at equivalent concentrations, cellulosic polymers often impart a higher solution viscosity than vinyl polymers do. Therefore, higher guar gum concentrations may be used in film coating formulations with vinyl polymers than with cellulosic polymers in many cases. Therefore, in certain embodiments, it will be preferred to use guar gum in combination with vinyl polymers such that the guar gum concentration may be maximized and, correspondingly, the friction of coated tablets be minimized, while still allowing the concentration of the film coating in aqueous dispersion to be sufficiently high, while maintaining processible viscosity, so that the coating process will be efficient.
  • both cellulosic polymers and vinyl polymers may be used in the same formulation, and it will be appreciated from the foregoing that the amount of guar gum should vary depending on the ratio of cellulosic to vinyl polymers to ensure that the viscosity of the resulting aqueous dispersion, i.e. containing the film coating composition, is less than about 450 centipoise.
  • Maltodextrin is optionally used to reduce viscosity of the aqueous dispersions and/or increase gloss of the coated orally ingestible tablets.
  • the maltodextrin may be any of the grades commonly used in pharmaceutical and nutritional products and the like. Maltodextrins having a dextrose equivalent (DE) of ⁇ 20 are preferred. Maltodextrins having a DE of 11-14 are particularly preferred.
  • DE dextrose equivalent
  • the dextrose equivalent value is a measure of the extent of starch-polymer hydrolysis and, correspondingly, the amount of reducing sugars present in a sugar product, relative to dextrose (a.k.a. glucose), expressed as a percentage on a dry basis.
  • a maltodextrin with a DE of 10 would have 10% of the reducing power of dextrose (which has a DE of 100).
  • the amount of maltodextrin, when included in the powder mixtures of the present invention is from about 0.1 to about 80% by weight.
  • the preferred amount of maltodextrin in the powder mixtures is about from 50 to about 80%.
  • the preferred amount of maltodextrin in the powder mixtures is from about 5 to about 60%.
  • a glidant is optionally used to help tablets flow over each other and so generate a smooth surface finish.
  • a preferred glidant is talc.
  • the amount of glidant, when present, will depend upon need, but can broadly range from 0.1 to about 30% in the powder mixtures. Preferably, the range is from about 10 to about 20%.
  • a plasticizer is optionally used to help to aid in film formation.
  • Preferred plasticizers are those that are known to plasticize water-soluble cellulosic polymers or vinyl polymers and may include polyethylene glycol, glycerin, triacetin, medium chain triglycerides and medium chain mono/diglycerides. Medium chain triglycerides are preferred.
  • the amount of plasticizer, when present, will depend upon need, but can broadly range from about 1 to about 10% by weight in the powder mixtures. Preferably, the range is from about 2.5 to about 10%.
  • Pigments are also optionally added and may be any food or pharmaceutically approved colors, opacifiers or dyes.
  • the pigments may be aluminum lakes, iron oxides, titanium dioxide, natural colors or pearlescent pigments (e.g. mica based pigments sold under the Candurin trade name). Examples of such pigments are listed in US Patent No. 4543570 .
  • the pigments may be used in the powder mixtures in a range (by weight) from about greater than 0 to about 40 % pigment, preferably, from about 4 to about 32 % and, more preferably, from about 7 to about 30 %. It will be understood, however, that the amount of pigment employed in the powder mixtures of the invention is an amount which is sufficient or effective to impart the required appearance of the outer coating to the surface of the substrate to be coated.
  • the powder mixtures may also include supplemental or auxiliary ingredients typically found in film coatings.
  • supplemental or auxiliary ingredients typically found in film coatings.
  • a non-limiting list of such adjuvants includes surfactants, suspension aids, sweeteners, flavorants, etc. and mixtures thereof.
  • the powder mixtures are prepared using standard dry blending or mixing techniques known to those of ordinary skill. For example, the ingredients are individually weighed, added to a suitable apparatus and blended for a sufficient time until a substantially uniform mixture of the ingredients is obtained. The time required to achieve such substantial uniformity will, of course, depend upon the batch size and apparatus used. Addition of liquid plasticizers such as the medium chain triglycerides and medium chain mono/diglycerides will occur such that no significant agglomeration or separation will occur. This can be accomplished by gradually adding the liquid to the dry ingredients while blending. A preblend may also be utilized, wherein the liquid plasticizers are first added to a portion of the dry ingredients and then the remaining dry material is added. The preblend may be prepared in bulk and used as needed to reduce the mixing time required for smaller batches. In all cases, when the liquid plasticizers are added to the dry ingredients, the components must be mixed for a time sufficient to ensure homogeneity.
  • liquid plasticizers such as the medium chain triglycerides and medium chain mono/
  • Suitable blending devices include diffusion blenders such as a cross flow, V-blender, or hub blender, available from Patterson-Kelly, or convection blenders, such as Ruberg or CVM blenders, available from Azo, Servolift and Readco, respectively, may be used. Blending of the aforementioned formulations may also be achieved by processing ingredients into a granular form to produce a non-dusting granular coating composition by methods including, but not limited to, wet massing, fluid bed granulation, spray granulation and dry compaction, roller compaction or slugging. Other manners of blending will be apparent to those of ordinary skill.
  • Some preferred dry film coating compositions in accordance with the present invention include: Ingredient % by weight Preferred About About Water-soluble polymer(s) 5-35 10-20 Guar gum 4-20 Maltodextrin 0-80 5-60 (pigmented formulations) 50-80 (unpigmented formulations) Glidant 0-30 10-20 Plasticizer 0-10 2.5-10 Pigments 0-40 4-32 Optional or aux. ingredients 0-20 ---
  • the preferred dry film coating compositions will include at least a water-soluble polymer and guar gum as described herein.
  • the additional ingredients, if included, will cause the amount of water-soluble polymer and guar gum to be reduced proportionally, but both components will still be within the ranges described herein, so that the total amount of all ingredients in the dry blend will be 100% by weight.
  • an aqueous dispersion having about 20% non-water ingredients can be formed by dispersing 100 parts of a blended powder mixture described hereinabove into 400 parts of ambient temperature water.
  • the water is weighed into a suitable vessel, i.e. one with a diameter approximately equal to the depth of the final suspension.
  • a low shear mixer preferably one having a mixing blade with a diameter about one third the diameter of the mixing vessel, is lowered into the water and turned on to create a vortex from the edge of the vessel down to about just above the mixing blade to prevent entrapment of air.
  • the 100 parts of dry film coating composition is added to the vortex at a rate where there is no excessive buildup of dry powder.
  • the speed and depth of the mixing blade is adjusted to avoid air being drawn into the suspension so as to avoid foaming.
  • the suspension is stirred at low speed, preferably 350 rpm or less, for a time sufficient to ensure that a homogenous mixture is formed. Using the above batch size as a guide, about 45 minutes mixing time is required.
  • the suspension is then ready for spraying onto pharmaceutical substrates and the like.
  • suitable aqueous dispersions will contain from about 5 to about 30% and preferably from about 10 to about 20% non-water ingredients therein.
  • orally-ingestible substrates coated with the inventive film coating formulations there are provided orally-ingestible substrates coated with the inventive film coating formulations.
  • the coated substrates have relatively low coefficients of static and dynamic friction as well as elegant appearance - i.e. relatively high gloss and logos free of particulate matter.
  • the methods include applying the film coating compositions as aqueous suspensions to the surfaces of orally ingestible substrates.
  • the film coating can be applied as part of a pan coating or spray coating process commonly used to coat such articles.
  • the amount of coating applied will depend upon several factors, including the nature and functionality of the film coating, the substrate to be coated and the apparatus employed to apply the coating, etc.
  • the substrates will be tablets and will be coated to a theoretical weight gain of from about 0.25 to about 5.0%.
  • the theoretical weight gain is from about 1.0 to about 4.5% and more preferably, the theoretical weight gain is from about 2.0 to about 4.0% by weight of said substrate.
  • the coating solutions of the present invention may also include auxiliary ingredients in addition to the powder mixture and the water.
  • auxiliary ingredients in addition to the powder mixture and the water.
  • theoretical weight gain and “weight gain” are used interchangeably with respect to indicating the amount of film coating applied to a substrate.
  • the practice of the industry is to weight a fixed quantity of substrates or tablets in coating pan, apply the film coating dispersion to the substrates until the desired weight gain for the entire batch is achieved, i.e. 0.5%.
  • the resulting substrates are individually accepted as having a weight gain of 0.5% without measuring each substrate.
  • Such measurements for determining the amount of film coating applied to a substrate is accepted as the theoretical weight gain for each substrate and the batch.
  • the coated, orally-ingestible substrates described above can also include a subcoat film coating between the orally-ingestible substrate and the inventive film coating.
  • the subcoat selected is preferably based on an edible film coating composition that is compatible with and adheres to both the orally-ingestible substrate and the inventive coating.
  • the subcoat is also applied to the substrate to provide from about a 0.25 to about a 5.0% weight gain to the orally-ingestible substrate.
  • the orally-ingestible substrates of the present invention will include a film coating which contains a water-soluble polymer and a sufficient amount of guar gum to reduce at least one of the static friction, dynamic friction or both, preferably by at least about 10 % when compared to oral substrates lacking the inventive coatings.
  • the methods include coating a substrate with an aqueous dispersion containing a water-soluble polymer and a slip enhancing amount of guar gum until the amount of film coating dried thereon is an amount sufficient to reduce at least one of the static friction, dynamic friction or both of the substrate.
  • the methods include applying a film coating dispersion containing water-soluble polymer and guar gum having a minimum viscosity of 700 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration for 2 hours as measured on a Brookfield RVT viscometer at 25° C, the guar gum being present in an amount sufficient to provide the orally ingestible substrate coated with said aqueous dispersion to a weight gain of at least about 0.25% by weight, with a reduction of the coefficient of static friction and/or the coefficient of dynamic friction of the coated orally ingestible substrate.
  • film coating is applied to the substrates until the coefficient of static friction for the substrate is less than about 3 and/or until the coefficient of dynamic friction is less than about 1.5.
  • aqueous dispersions containing from about 5 to about 30% non-aqueous content, i.e. the inventive film coating compositions are applied until a weight gain of at least about 0.25% is achieved.
  • the substrate weight gain caused by the application of the film coating dispersion is about 5% or less.
  • the dry film coating composition was prepared by adding all dry ingredients (maltodextrin, talc, hypromellose, guar gum, titanium dioxide and Blue#2 aluminum lake) into a laboratory blender and blending for 5 minutes until a homogenous mixture was produced. Medium chain triglycerides, the only liquid component, was then gradually added to the dry mixture, and the total mixture was blended for an additional 2 minutes after all liquid was introduced.
  • dry ingredients maltodextrin, talc, hypromellose, guar gum, titanium dioxide and Blue#2 aluminum lake
  • the dry film coating composition (100 parts) was dispersed into 400 parts of ambient temperature water to make an aqueous coating suspension having 20% w/w non-water ingredients.
  • the water was weighed into a vessel with a diameter approximately equal to the depth of the final dispersion.
  • a low shear mixer was lowered into the water and turned on to create a vortex from the edge of the vessel down to just above the mixing blade to prevent entrapment of air.
  • the 100 parts of dry film coating composition was added to the vortex at a rate where there was no excessive buildup of dry powder or foam.
  • the speed and depth of the mixing blade was adjusted to avoid air being drawn into the suspension so as to avoid foaming.
  • the suspension was stirred at low speed (350 rpm or less) for 45 minutes to form a homogeneous aqueous dispersion suitable for coating.
  • the viscosity of the resulting aqueous dispersion was 213 centipoise (cP) at a shear rate of 80/s.
  • a mixed batch of 50 grams of 10-mm round flat-faced placebo tablets and 950 grams of 10-mm bi-convex round placebos were coated with aqueous dispersion of Example 1 at a spray rate of 8 grams/min in a Labcoat I (O'Hara Technologies Inc., Canada) outfitted with a 12" fully perforated pan.
  • a theoretical coating weight gain of 3.0% was applied to the tablets.
  • the resulting coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • the wet slip behavior of each film coating system was characterized by determining the coefficients of static and dynamic friction on the flat-faced tablets.
  • Three tablets weighted with a 0.5 N normal force were dragged across a water saturated substrate (SAS) at 500 mm/min with an Instron testing system (5542, Instron, USA).
  • the static friction coefficient is the ratio between the force required to initiate tablet movement and the normal force.
  • the dynamic friction coefficient is the ratio between the average force during tablet movement and the normal force.
  • the dry film coating composition was prepared by adding all dry ingredients (maltodextrin, talc, hypromellose, and guar gum) into a laboratory blender and blending for 5 minutes until a homogenous mixture was produced. Medium chain triglycerides, the only liquid component, was then gradually added to the dry mixture, and the total mixture was blended for an additional 2 minutes after all liquid was introduced.
  • dry ingredients maltodextrin, talc, hypromellose, and guar gum
  • the dry film coating composition (40 parts) was dispersed into 360 parts of ambient temperature water to make an aqueous coating suspension having 10% w/w non-water ingredients according to the method described in Example 1.
  • the viscosity of the resulting aqueous dispersion was 23 cP at a shear rate of 80/s.
  • a mixed batch of 50 grams of 10-mm round flat-faced placebo tablets and 950 grams of 10-mm bi-convex round placebos were coated with aqueous dispersion of Example 2 at a spray rate of 8 grams/min in a Labcoat I (O'Hara Technologies Inc., Canada) outfitted with a 12" fully perforated pan.
  • a theoretical coating weight gain of 3.0% was applied to the tablets.
  • the resulting coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • the wet slip behavior of each film coating system was determined according to the method of Example 1.
  • Comparative Examples C and D both without guar gum
  • coefficients of static and dynamic friction greater than 3 and 1.5, respectively, which is indicative of relatively poor slip/swallowability.
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using polyvinyl alcohol as a water-soluble polymer by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
  • Example 5 6 7 Component Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Maltodextrin 36.5 32.5 27.5 Talc 15.0 15.0 15.0 Polyvinyl alcohol 15.0 15.0 15.0 Guar gum 6.0 10.0 15.0 Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 2.5 Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0 I 25.0 Totals 100 100 100 Performance Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 33 93 296 Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass Pass Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Pass Pass Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 2.32 2.22 2.06 Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 1.23 1.05 0.89
  • Examples 5-7 showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction decreased with increasing guar gum concentration.
  • a coating process performance of "pass” indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions.
  • a qualitative appearance of "pass” indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer as a water-soluble polymer by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
  • Example 8 9 10 11 Component Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Maltodextrin 36.5 32.5 27.5 22.5 Talc 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Guar gum 6.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0 25.0 Totals 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Performance Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 19 36 92 222 Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 2.18 2.05 1.93 1.83 Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 1.24 1.17 1.00 0.95
  • Examples 8-11 again showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction decreased with increasing guar gum concentration.
  • a coating process performance of "pass” indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions.
  • a qualitative appearance of "pass” indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer as a water-soluble polymer by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
  • Examples 12-15 once again showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction decreased with increasing guar gum concentration.
  • a coating process performance of "pass” indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions.
  • a qualitative appearance of "pass” indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose as water-soluble polymers by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
  • Example 16 17 Component Wt.% Wt.% Maltodextrin 36.5 36.5 Talc 15.0 15.0 Hydroxyethyl cellulose 15.0 Hydroxypropyl cellulose 15.0 Guar gum 6.0 6.0 Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0 Totals 100 100 Performance Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 251 332 Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 1.86 2.16 Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 0.80 1.06
  • Examples 16-17 showed that alternative water-soluble cellulosic polymers may be used successfully.
  • a coating process performance of "pass” indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions.
  • a qualitative appearance of "pass” indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • Examples 18-20 showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction were below the desired maxima of 3 and 1.5, respectively.
  • a coating process performance of "pass” indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions.
  • a qualitative appearance of "pass” indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
  • Comparative example E containing a low viscosity guar gum, resulted in a coated tablet that had low gloss and was tacky and, therefore, failed the appearance test.
  • the resulting coated tablets from comparative example E also had a coefficient of dynamic friction above the desired maximum of 1.5.
  • Example 21 Component Wt.% Wt.% Talc 30 25 Hypromellose, 6 cP grade 10 10 Polyvinyl alcohol 17.5 17.5 Guar gum 15 15 Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 Titanium dioxide 20 25 Blue #2 aluminum lake 5 5 Totals 100 100

Description

    1. Cross-Reference to Related Applications
  • This application claims the benefit of priority from US Provisional Application No. 62/370,944, filed August 4, 2016 .
    • 2. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to film coating formulations that, when coated onto orally ingestible substrates, allow such coated substrates to be much more slippery when wet and therefore more readily swallowed versus an uncoated tablet or tablets coated with prior art coatings. The invention also relates to pharmaceutical and nutritional substrates having such film coatings and methods of preparing the same.
    • 3. Description of the Prior Art
  • Film coatings for orally ingestible substrates are recognized for imparting many benefits to the resulting coated pharmaceutical and nutritional dosage forms. These benefits include imparting color for brand identification and reduction of medication errors as well as improving stability of the dosage forms by providing a barrier from water vapor and oxygen. It is also generally desirable that said coatings at least maintain the swallowability of dosage forms versus uncoated dosage forms, particularly for larger tablets and capsules. However, improvement in the swallowability of dosage forms is still an incompletely met need in the industry, especially for larger dosage forms and patient populations that have difficulties when swallowing (e.g. geriatric and pediatric populations).
  • US 2012/0082723 A1 discloses a coating composition for an orally-administered preparation which is easily administrable and has improved dissolution properties. This coating composition comprises a first thickener, selected from a carboxyvinyl polymer and sodium alginate; a polyvalent metal compound; and a second thickener selected from xanthan gum, guar gum and sodium alginate (when sodium alginate is not the first thickener). A coating composition comprising hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and guar gum with a viscosity of 1100 mPa.s is specifically disclosed. This coating composition is not in powder form.
    • 4. Summary of the Invention
  • It has been surprisingly found that film coating formulations comprising a water-soluble polymer and an amount of guar gum which is sufficient to reduce static friction or dynamic friction or both (as a slip aid) forms aqueous dispersions with processible viscosities and, when coated onto orally ingestible substrates, result in coated substrates with relatively low levels of static and dynamic friction when wet, i.e. after ingestion. Use of the inventive film coatings results in coated substrates that are easier to swallow, by virtue of the relatively low levels of static and dynamic friction, when compared to coated substrates of the prior art.
  • The present invention also relates to fully-formulated film coating systems comprising a water-soluble polymer and guar gum. The invention further relates to aqueous dispersions comprising a water-soluble polymer and guar gum, methods of preparing the same by dispersing the film coating materials (system) in ambient temperature water, orally ingestible substrates film coated with the coatings described herein, i.e. comprising a water-soluble polymer and guar gum, as well as methods of coating the substrates with the aqueous dispersions.
  • In one aspect of the invention, there is provided a film coating composition in powder from according to claim 1. Further features of the powder film coating composition are disclosed in claims 2 to 11 The friction of the coated tablets is reduced as the guar gum level is increased in the dry film coating formulation; however, increasing the guar gum concentration above about 25% by weight results in aqueous dispersions that are too viscous to be used productively to coat orally ingestible substrates in many cases.
  • In another aspect of the invention, there is provided an aqueous dispersion according to claim 12, prepared by mixing a coating composition according to any of claims 1 to 11 in water which is optionally at ambient temperature. Still further aspects include orally-ingestible substrates according to claims 13-15 coated with said aqueous dispersion In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method according to claim 16, for reducing the coefficient of static and/or dynamic friction of an orally ingestible substrate.
  • The coated ingestible substrates have an elegant appearance with relatively high gloss and are free from cracks, pick marks and other surface defects. This combination of properties for a coating system is clearly advantageous over the prior art and existing marketed products.
    • 5. Detailed Description of the Invention
  • For purposes of the present invention, the following terms are given further clarification as to their meanings:
    • "orally-ingestible substrate" shall be understood to mean any pharmaceutically acceptable dosage form, e.g. tablet, capsule, caplet, etc. or any other veterinary, nutritional or confectionary product intended to be swallowed;
    • "dry powder" shall be understood to mean powders which are relatively dry to the touch rather than powders which are essentially without liquid content;
    • "ambient temperature" shall be understood to mean temperatures generally in the range of from about 20°C (68°F) to about 30°C (86°F) +/-3°C;
    • "glycerin" is synonymous with "glycerol", and "glycerol esters" is synonymous with glycerides; and
    • "about" when used to modify any numerical value shall be understood to include values which may vary by about +/-10%.
  • The water-soluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of cellulosic polymers, vinyl polymers or combinations thereof. The cellulosic polymers are preferably water soluble polymers selected from the group consisting of hypromellose (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose. Preferred grades of hypromellose are lower viscosity grades such as those with aqueous solution viscosities of 1, 3, 5, 6, 15 or 50 centipoise when dissolved at 2% weight/volume in water. The water-soluble vinyl polymers may include polymers derived from vinyl monomers with varying substitution and molecular weights. The water-soluble vinyl polymers may be homopolymers (i.e. made from one type of vinyl monomer) or copolymers (i.e. made from one or more vinyl monomers and potentially other types of monomers). Preferred water-soluble vinyl polymers are selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer (e.g. Kollicoat IR) and vinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate copolymer 6:4 (e.g. Kollidon VA-64). Preferably, the water-soluble polymers are of sufficiently small particle size, preferably less than 250 microns, to facilitate dissolution into ambient water when forming the aqueous coating solutions. Two or more of these polymers may be used together.
  • In most embodiments, the amount of water-soluble polymer included in the powder mixtures of the present invention is from about 5 to about 35% by weight. In some preferred embodiments, it ranges from about 10 to about 20%. When two or more water-soluble polymers are used together, the combined total of the polymers is from about 5 to about 35% by weight, preferably from about 10 to about 30%.
  • When included in sufficient amounts, the guar gum imparts enhanced slip to the powder mixtures of the present invention when coated onto orally ingestible substrates as part of a film coating. While the tablets or other substrates having the film coatings of the present invention applied thereon have the expected physical properties of a film coated product in the dry state, tablets having the inventive film coatings demonstrate a significant reduction in static and/or dynamic friction values, when wet, as compared to tablets coated with prior art film coatings. Thus, after ingestion, such coated tablets demonstrate enhanced swallowability.
  • Guar gum may be any of the grades commonly used in pharmaceutical and nutritional products and the like, provided that it has a minimum viscosity of 700 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration for two hours when measured on a Brookfield RVT viscometer at 25°C and 20 rpm. Alternatively, preferred higher viscosity guar gum grades have a minimum viscosity of about 180 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration and measured on a TA Instruments Rheometer ARG2 at 25°C and at a shear rate of 80/second. In most embodiments, the amount of guar gum included in the powder mixtures of the present invention is an amount which is sufficient to reduce at least one of the static friction, dynamic friction or both, when compared to oral substrates lacking the inventive coatings. In some aspects of the invention, the improvements are in the range of at least about 10% and more preferably at least about 20%. In further embodiments, the amount of guar gum is an amount to provide oral substrates coated the inventive film coatings with at least one of a coefficient of static friction of less than 3 and/or a coefficient of dynamic friction of less than 1.5; as such values are indicative of enhanced slip/swallowability.
  • In view of the foregoing, the amount of guar gum included in the dry powder composition in many aspects of the invention is preferably from 4 to 20%. The friction of the coated tablets is reduced as the guar gum level is increased in the dry film coating formulation. However, increasing the guar gum concentration above about 25% by weight can result in aqueous dispersions that are too viscous to be used productively to coat orally ingestible substrates in most cases.
  • It will be appreciated that the viscosity of the aqueous dispersions also depends on the concentration of the film coating formulation in water. Viscosity increases with increasing concentrations of the film coating in the aqueous dispersion. It is preferred that the concentration of film coatings in the aqueous dispersions be as high as possible while still being pumpable and sprayable to reduce the coating time required and increase productivity. The viscosity of the aqueous dispersions will increase both as the guar gum concentration in the film coating and film coating concentration in the aqueous dispersion increase. Therefore, the film coating concentration in the aqueous dispersions must be determined based on the guar gum concentration in the film coating. If higher guar gum concentrations, i.e. amounts of more than 20% guar gum, based upon the weight of the dry powder ingredients, are used in the film coating dispersion, lower concentrations of the film coating composition, i.e. from about 5 to about 15%, in the aqueous dispersion are preferable such that the viscosity of the aqueous dispersion is less than about 450 mPa.s (centipoises (cP)). If lower guar gum concentrations, i.e. less than 10%, are used in the film coating composition, higher concentrations of the film coating, i.e. from about 15 to about 25%, in the aqueous dispersions are preferred to minimize coating time and maximize productivity.
  • Aqueous dispersion viscosity is also dependent on the nature of the polymer used in the film coating formulation. When used in film coating formulations at equivalent concentrations, cellulosic polymers often impart a higher solution viscosity than vinyl polymers do. Therefore, higher guar gum concentrations may be used in film coating formulations with vinyl polymers than with cellulosic polymers in many cases. Therefore, in certain embodiments, it will be preferred to use guar gum in combination with vinyl polymers such that the guar gum concentration may be maximized and, correspondingly, the friction of coated tablets be minimized, while still allowing the concentration of the film coating in aqueous dispersion to be sufficiently high, while maintaining processible viscosity, so that the coating process will be efficient. Both cellulosic polymers and vinyl polymers may be used in the same formulation, and it will be appreciated from the foregoing that the amount of guar gum should vary depending on the ratio of cellulosic to vinyl polymers to ensure that the viscosity of the resulting aqueous dispersion, i.e. containing the film coating composition, is less than about 450 centipoise.
  • Maltodextrin is optionally used to reduce viscosity of the aqueous dispersions and/or increase gloss of the coated orally ingestible tablets. The maltodextrin may be any of the grades commonly used in pharmaceutical and nutritional products and the like. Maltodextrins having a dextrose equivalent (DE) of < 20 are preferred. Maltodextrins having a DE of 11-14 are particularly preferred. The dextrose equivalent value is a measure of the extent of starch-polymer hydrolysis and, correspondingly, the amount of reducing sugars present in a sugar product, relative to dextrose (a.k.a. glucose), expressed as a percentage on a dry basis. For example, a maltodextrin with a DE of 10 would have 10% of the reducing power of dextrose (which has a DE of 100). In most embodiments, the amount of maltodextrin, when included in the powder mixtures of the present invention is from about 0.1 to about 80% by weight. For formulations without added colorants (i.e. clear formulations), the preferred amount of maltodextrin in the powder mixtures is about from 50 to about 80%. For formulations with added pigments, the preferred amount of maltodextrin in the powder mixtures is from about 5 to about 60%. A glidant is optionally used to help tablets flow over each other and so generate a smooth surface finish. A preferred glidant is talc. The amount of glidant, when present, will depend upon need, but can broadly range from 0.1 to about 30% in the powder mixtures. Preferably, the range is from about 10 to about 20%.
  • A plasticizer is optionally used to help to aid in film formation. Preferred plasticizers are those that are known to plasticize water-soluble cellulosic polymers or vinyl polymers and may include polyethylene glycol, glycerin, triacetin, medium chain triglycerides and medium chain mono/diglycerides. Medium chain triglycerides are preferred. The amount of plasticizer, when present, will depend upon need, but can broadly range from about 1 to about 10% by weight in the powder mixtures. Preferably, the range is from about 2.5 to about 10%.
  • Pigments are also optionally added and may be any food or pharmaceutically approved colors, opacifiers or dyes. For example, the pigments may be aluminum lakes, iron oxides, titanium dioxide, natural colors or pearlescent pigments (e.g. mica based pigments sold under the Candurin trade name). Examples of such pigments are listed in US Patent No. 4543570 .
  • When included, the pigments may be used in the powder mixtures in a range (by weight) from about greater than 0 to about 40 % pigment, preferably, from about 4 to about 32 % and, more preferably, from about 7 to about 30 %. It will be understood, however, that the amount of pigment employed in the powder mixtures of the invention is an amount which is sufficient or effective to impart the required appearance of the outer coating to the surface of the substrate to be coated.
  • Furthermore, the powder mixtures may also include supplemental or auxiliary ingredients typically found in film coatings. A non-limiting list of such adjuvants includes surfactants, suspension aids, sweeteners, flavorants, etc. and mixtures thereof.
  • The powder mixtures are prepared using standard dry blending or mixing techniques known to those of ordinary skill. For example, the ingredients are individually weighed, added to a suitable apparatus and blended for a sufficient time until a substantially uniform mixture of the ingredients is obtained. The time required to achieve such substantial uniformity will, of course, depend upon the batch size and apparatus used. Addition of liquid plasticizers such as the medium chain triglycerides and medium chain mono/diglycerides will occur such that no significant agglomeration or separation will occur. This can be accomplished by gradually adding the liquid to the dry ingredients while blending. A preblend may also be utilized, wherein the liquid plasticizers are first added to a portion of the dry ingredients and then the remaining dry material is added. The preblend may be prepared in bulk and used as needed to reduce the mixing time required for smaller batches. In all cases, when the liquid plasticizers are added to the dry ingredients, the components must be mixed for a time sufficient to ensure homogeneity.
  • As mentioned above, batch sizes will vary upon need. A non-limiting list of suitable blending devices include diffusion blenders such as a cross flow, V-blender, or hub blender, available from Patterson-Kelly, or convection blenders, such as Ruberg or CVM blenders, available from Azo, Servolift and Readco, respectively, may be used. Blending of the aforementioned formulations may also be achieved by processing ingredients into a granular form to produce a non-dusting granular coating composition by methods including, but not limited to, wet massing, fluid bed granulation, spray granulation and dry compaction, roller compaction or slugging. Other manners of blending will be apparent to those of ordinary skill.
  • Some preferred dry film coating compositions in accordance with the present invention include:
    Ingredient % by weight Preferred
    About About
    Water-soluble polymer(s) 5-35 10-20
    Guar gum 4-20
    Maltodextrin 0-80 5-60 (pigmented formulations) 50-80 (unpigmented formulations)
    Glidant 0-30 10-20
    Plasticizer 0-10 2.5-10
    Pigments 0-40 4-32
    Optional or aux. ingredients 0-20 ---
  • It will be understood from the foregoing table that the preferred dry film coating compositions will include at least a water-soluble polymer and guar gum as described herein. The additional ingredients, if included, will cause the amount of water-soluble polymer and guar gum to be reduced proportionally, but both components will still be within the ranges described herein, so that the total amount of all ingredients in the dry blend will be 100% by weight.
  • For purposes of illustration and not limitation, an aqueous dispersion having about 20% non-water ingredients can be formed by dispersing 100 parts of a blended powder mixture described hereinabove into 400 parts of ambient temperature water. The water is weighed into a suitable vessel, i.e. one with a diameter approximately equal to the depth of the final suspension. A low shear mixer, preferably one having a mixing blade with a diameter about one third the diameter of the mixing vessel, is lowered into the water and turned on to create a vortex from the edge of the vessel down to about just above the mixing blade to prevent entrapment of air. The 100 parts of dry film coating composition is added to the vortex at a rate where there is no excessive buildup of dry powder. The speed and depth of the mixing blade is adjusted to avoid air being drawn into the suspension so as to avoid foaming. The suspension is stirred at low speed, preferably 350 rpm or less, for a time sufficient to ensure that a homogenous mixture is formed. Using the above batch size as a guide, about 45 minutes mixing time is required. The suspension is then ready for spraying onto pharmaceutical substrates and the like. Those of ordinary skill will also realize that there are many ways of preparing a substantially homogenous mixture of the solids in water and that the scope of the invention is in no way dependent on the apparatus used. It is contemplated that suitable aqueous dispersions will contain from about 5 to about 30% and preferably from about 10 to about 20% non-water ingredients therein.
  • In still further embodiments of the invention, there are provided orally-ingestible substrates coated with the inventive film coating formulations. The coated substrates have relatively low coefficients of static and dynamic friction as well as elegant appearance - i.e. relatively high gloss and logos free of particulate matter.
  • As will be described in the examples below, the methods include applying the film coating compositions as aqueous suspensions to the surfaces of orally ingestible substrates. The film coating can be applied as part of a pan coating or spray coating process commonly used to coat such articles. The amount of coating applied will depend upon several factors, including the nature and functionality of the film coating, the substrate to be coated and the apparatus employed to apply the coating, etc. In some immediate release applications of the invention, the substrates will be tablets and will be coated to a theoretical weight gain of from about 0.25 to about 5.0%. Preferably, the theoretical weight gain is from about 1.0 to about 4.5% and more preferably, the theoretical weight gain is from about 2.0 to about 4.0% by weight of said substrate. As mentioned above, the coating solutions of the present invention may also include auxiliary ingredients in addition to the powder mixture and the water. For purposes of the present invention, it will be understood that "theoretical weight gain" and "weight gain" are used interchangeably with respect to indicating the amount of film coating applied to a substrate. The practice of the industry is to weight a fixed quantity of substrates or tablets in coating pan, apply the film coating dispersion to the substrates until the desired weight gain for the entire batch is achieved, i.e. 0.5%. The resulting substrates are individually accepted as having a weight gain of 0.5% without measuring each substrate. Such measurements for determining the amount of film coating applied to a substrate is accepted as the theoretical weight gain for each substrate and the batch.
  • The coated, orally-ingestible substrates described above can also include a subcoat film coating between the orally-ingestible substrate and the inventive film coating. The subcoat selected is preferably based on an edible film coating composition that is compatible with and adheres to both the orally-ingestible substrate and the inventive coating. Thus, the artisan may choose from a wide variety of pharmaceutical or food-acceptable coatings for use as subcoats in the present invention. The subcoat is also applied to the substrate to provide from about a 0.25 to about a 5.0% weight gain to the orally-ingestible substrate.
  • Regardless of the method employed or the specific materials included in the film coating compositions, the orally-ingestible substrates of the present invention will include a film coating which contains a water-soluble polymer and a sufficient amount of guar gum to reduce at least one of the static friction, dynamic friction or both, preferably by at least about 10 % when compared to oral substrates lacking the inventive coatings.
  • In another aspect of the invention, there are provided methods of reducing the coefficient of static and/or dynamic friction of an orally ingestible substrate, e.g. compressed tablet. The methods include coating a substrate with an aqueous dispersion containing a water-soluble polymer and a slip enhancing amount of guar gum until the amount of film coating dried thereon is an amount sufficient to reduce at least one of the static friction, dynamic friction or both of the substrate. Stated alternatively, the methods include applying a film coating dispersion containing water-soluble polymer and guar gum having a minimum viscosity of 700 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration for 2 hours as measured on a Brookfield RVT viscometer at 25° C, the guar gum being present in an amount sufficient to provide the orally ingestible substrate coated with said aqueous dispersion to a weight gain of at least about 0.25% by weight, with a reduction of the coefficient of static friction and/or the coefficient of dynamic friction of the coated orally ingestible substrate.
  • In preferred aspects, film coating is applied to the substrates until the coefficient of static friction for the substrate is less than about 3 and/or until the coefficient of dynamic friction is less than about 1.5. In many embodiments, aqueous dispersions containing from about 5 to about 30% non-aqueous content, i.e. the inventive film coating compositions, are applied until a weight gain of at least about 0.25% is achieved. Preferably, the substrate weight gain caused by the application of the film coating dispersion is about 5% or less.
    • 6. Examples
  • The following examples serve to provide further appreciation of the invention but are not meant in any way to restrict the effective scope of the invention. All ingredients are expressed as being by weight%. Unless otherwise specified, the guar gum used in the following examples produced a 1% aqueous solution with a viscosity equal to about 207 mPa.s (centipoises) at 25°C and at a shear rate of 80/sec as measured on a TA Instruments ARG2 rheometer. The viscosity in the following examples is expressed in centipoises (1cP = mPa.s).
    • Example 1
  • A preferred pigmented formulation for an inventive dry coating composition is the following:
    Component Weight%
    Maltodextrin (DE = 11-14) 36.5
    Talc 15.0
    Hypromellose, 5 cP grade 7.5
    Hypromellose, 15 cP grade 7.5
    Guar gum 6.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 20.0
    Blue#2 aluminum lake pigment 5.0
    100.0
    • Preparation of the Dry Film Coating Composition:
  • The dry film coating composition was prepared by adding all dry ingredients (maltodextrin, talc, hypromellose, guar gum, titanium dioxide and Blue#2 aluminum lake) into a laboratory blender and blending for 5 minutes until a homogenous mixture was produced. Medium chain triglycerides, the only liquid component, was then gradually added to the dry mixture, and the total mixture was blended for an additional 2 minutes after all liquid was introduced.
    • Preparation of the Aqueous Dispersion:
  • The dry film coating composition (100 parts) was dispersed into 400 parts of ambient temperature water to make an aqueous coating suspension having 20% w/w non-water ingredients. The water was weighed into a vessel with a diameter approximately equal to the depth of the final dispersion. A low shear mixer was lowered into the water and turned on to create a vortex from the edge of the vessel down to just above the mixing blade to prevent entrapment of air. The 100 parts of dry film coating composition was added to the vortex at a rate where there was no excessive buildup of dry powder or foam. The speed and depth of the mixing blade was adjusted to avoid air being drawn into the suspension so as to avoid foaming. The suspension was stirred at low speed (350 rpm or less) for 45 minutes to form a homogeneous aqueous dispersion suitable for coating. The viscosity of the resulting aqueous dispersion was 213 centipoise (cP) at a shear rate of 80/s.
    • Coating of Tablets:
  • A mixed batch of 50 grams of 10-mm round flat-faced placebo tablets and 950 grams of 10-mm bi-convex round placebos were coated with aqueous dispersion of Example 1 at a spray rate of 8 grams/min in a Labcoat I (O'Hara Technologies Inc., Canada) outfitted with a 12" fully perforated pan. A theoretical coating weight gain of 3.0% was applied to the tablets. The resulting coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Determination of Coefficients of Static and Dynamic Friction:
  • The wet slip behavior of each film coating system was characterized by determining the coefficients of static and dynamic friction on the flat-faced tablets. Three tablets weighted with a 0.5 N normal force were dragged across a water saturated substrate (SAS) at 500 mm/min with an Instron testing system (5542, Instron, USA). The static friction coefficient is the ratio between the force required to initiate tablet movement and the normal force. The dynamic friction coefficient is the ratio between the average force during tablet movement and the normal force. The average static and dynamic friction values (n=5) were 2.553 and 1.455, respectively.
    • Example 2
  • A preferred unpigmented (clear) formulation for an inventive dry coating composition is the following:
    Component Weight%
    Maltodextrin (DE = 11-14) 61.5
    Talc 15.0
    Hypromellose, 5 cP grade 7.5
    Hypromellose, 15 cP grade 7.5
    Guar gum 6.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5
    100.0
    • Preparation of the Dry Film Coating Composition:
  • The dry film coating composition was prepared by adding all dry ingredients (maltodextrin, talc, hypromellose, and guar gum) into a laboratory blender and blending for 5 minutes until a homogenous mixture was produced. Medium chain triglycerides, the only liquid component, was then gradually added to the dry mixture, and the total mixture was blended for an additional 2 minutes after all liquid was introduced.
    • Preparation of the Aqueous Dispersion:
  • The dry film coating composition (40 parts) was dispersed into 360 parts of ambient temperature water to make an aqueous coating suspension having 10% w/w non-water ingredients according to the method described in Example 1. The viscosity of the resulting aqueous dispersion was 23 cP at a shear rate of 80/s.
    • Coating of Tablets:
  • A mixed batch of 50 grams of 10-mm round flat-faced placebo tablets and 950 grams of 10-mm bi-convex round placebos were coated with aqueous dispersion of Example 2 at a spray rate of 8 grams/min in a Labcoat I (O'Hara Technologies Inc., Canada) outfitted with a 12" fully perforated pan. A theoretical coating weight gain of 3.0% was applied to the tablets. The resulting coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Determination of Coefficients of Static and Dynamic Friction:
  • The wet slip behavior of each film coating system was determined according to the method of Example 1. The average static and dynamic friction values (n=5) were 2.262 and 1.075, respectively.
    • Examples 3-4
  • Additional inventive, unpigmented formulations were prepared according to the following ratios:
    Example 3 Example 4
    Component Weight% Weight%
    Maltodextrin (DE = 5) 76.0 74.0
    Sodium carboxymethylcellulose 10.0 10.0
    Guar gum 4.0 6.0
    Glycerol monocaprylocaprate 10.0 10.0
    100.0 100.0
    • Comparative Example A-B
  • Comparative unpigmented formulations were prepared according to the following ratios:
    Comparative Comparative
    Example A Example B
    Component Weight% Weight%
    Maltodextrin (DE = 5) 79.0 78.0
    Sodium carboxymethylcellulose 10.0 10.0
    Guar gum 1.0 2.0
    Glycerol monocaprylocaprate 10.0 10.0
    100.0 100.0
  • The aqueous dispersion preparation and coating process were conducted in an analogous fashion to that described in Example 2. The average coefficients of static and dynamic friction for Examples 3-4 and Comparative Examples A-B are summarized in the following table.
    Example Guar Gum Level (wt. %) Coefficient of Static Friction Coefficient of Dynamic Friction
    Comparative Example A 1 3.172 1.937
    Comparative Example B 2 3.025 1.824
    Example 3 4 2.762 1.379
    Example 4 6 2.741 1.215
  • When guar gum is present at 4-6%, the coefficients of static and dynamic friction are less than 3 and 1.5, respectively, which is indicative of enhanced slip/swallowability. When guar gum levels are at the 1-2% level, the coefficients of static and dynamic friction are greater than 3 and 1.5, respectively, which is indicative of relatively poor slip/swallowability. The resulting coated tablets from Examples 3 & 4 were also smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Comparative Example C
  • The following prior art formulation was prepared for comparison:
    Component Weight%
    Hydroxypropyl cellulose 42.0
    Hypromellose, 6 cP grade 42.0
    Titanium dioxide 16.0
    100.0
  • 12 parts of this dry powder formulation were dispersed in 88 parts water according to the method described in Example 1. Coated tablets were prepared and frictional analyses were completed according to the methods described in Example 1 as well. The average static and dynamic friction values (n=5) were 3.454 and 1.769, respectively.
    • Comparative Example D
  • The following prior art formulation was prepared for comparison:
    Component Weight%
    Polyvinyl alcohol 45.52
    Talc 20.00
    Soya lecithin 2.00
    Xanthan gum 0.48
    Titanium dioxide 32.00
    100.00
  • 20 parts of this dry powder formulation were dispersed in 80 parts water according to the method described in Example 1. Coated tablets were prepared and frictional analyses were completed according to the methods described in Example 1 as well. The average coefficients of static and dynamic friction values (n=5) were 3.331 and 2.793, respectively.
  • Thus, the prior art formulations of Comparative Examples C and D (both without guar gum) have coefficients of static and dynamic friction greater than 3 and 1.5, respectively, which is indicative of relatively poor slip/swallowability.
    • Examples 5-7
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using polyvinyl alcohol as a water-soluble polymer by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
    Example 5 6 7
    Component Wt.% Wt.% Wt.%
    Maltodextrin 36.5 32.5 27.5
    Talc 15.0 15.0 15.0
    Polyvinyl alcohol 15.0 15.0 15.0
    Guar gum 6.0 10.0 15.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0 I 25.0
    Totals 100 100 100
    Performance
    Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 33 93 296
    Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass
    Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Pass
    Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 2.32 2.22 2.06
    Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 1.23 1.05 0.89
  • Examples 5-7 showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction decreased with increasing guar gum concentration. A coating process performance of "pass" indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions. A qualitative appearance of "pass" indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Examples 8-11
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer as a water-soluble polymer by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
    Example 8 9 10 11
    Component Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Wt.%
    Maltodextrin 36.5 32.5 27.5 22.5
    Talc 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
    Polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
    Guar gum 6.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
    Totals 100 100 100 100
    Performance
    Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 19 36 92 222
    Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass Pass
    Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Pass Pass
    Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 2.18 2.05 1.93 1.83
    Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 1.24 1.17 1.00 0.95
  • Examples 8-11 again showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction decreased with increasing guar gum concentration. A coating process performance of "pass" indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions. A qualitative appearance of "pass" indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Examples 12-15
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer as a water-soluble polymer by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
    Example 12 13 14 15
    Component Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Wt.%
    Maltodextrin 36.5 32.5 27.5 22.5
    Talc 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
    Vinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate copolymer (6:4) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
    Guar gum 6.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
    Totals 100 100 100 100
    Performance
    Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 19 38 150 354
    Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass Pass
    Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Pass Pass
    Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 2.11 2.09 1.97 1.89
    Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 1.20 1.13 1.04 1.00
  • Examples 12-15 once again showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction decreased with increasing guar gum concentration. A coating process performance of "pass" indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions. A qualitative appearance of "pass" indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Examples 16-17
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose as water-soluble polymers by methods similar to those described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
    Example 16 17
    Component Wt.% Wt.%
    Maltodextrin 36.5 36.5
    Talc 15.0 15.0
    Hydroxyethyl cellulose 15.0
    Hydroxypropyl cellulose 15.0
    Guar gum 6.0 6.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 25.0 25.0
    Totals 100 100
    Performance
    Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise 251 332
    Coating process performance Pass Pass
    Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass
    Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 1.86 2.16
    Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 0.80 1.06
  • Examples 16-17 showed that alternative water-soluble cellulosic polymers may be used successfully. A coating process performance of "pass" indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions. A qualitative appearance of "pass" indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects.
    • Examples 18-20 and Comparative Example E
  • Film coating compositions and aqueous dispersions comprising them were prepared using as described in Example 1. Aqueous dispersion and coated tablet properties were similarly assessed.
    Example 18 19 20 E
    Component Wt.% Wt.% Wt.% Wt.%
    Maltodextrin 63.5 12.0 9.5 61.5
    Talc 15.0 20.5 20.5 15.0
    Hypromellose, 5 cP grade 7.5
    Hypromellose, 6 cP grade 5.0 10.0 10.0
    Hypromellose, 15 cP grade 10.0 7.5
    Polyvinyl alcohol 15.0 17.5
    Guar gum 4.0 15.0 15.0
    Guar gum (viscosity of 1% aqueous solution = 56 cP at 25°C and at shear rate of 80/sec) 6.0
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 20.0 20.0
    Yellow #6 aluminum lake 5.0
    Blue #2 aluminum lake 5.0
    Totals 100 100 100 100
    Performance
    Viscosity of aqueous dispersion at 20% solids and shear rate of 80/s in centipoise * 348 339 354
    Coating process performance Pass Pass Pass Pass
    Qualitative appearance of coated tablets Pass Pass Pass Fail
    Coefficient of static friction (coated tablets) 2.08 2.38 2.35 2.61
    Coefficient of dynamic friction (coated tablets) 1.18 1.13 1.12 1.60
    ∗Viscosity at 8% solids and shear rate of 80/sec was 13.5 centipoise.
  • Examples 18-20 showed that the coefficients of static and dynamic friction were below the desired maxima of 3 and 1.5, respectively. A coating process performance of "pass" indicates that the aqueous dispersion was pumpable and that the coating was applied with no gun clogs, tablet sticking or process interruptions. A qualitative appearance of "pass" indicates that the coated tablets were smooth, non-tacky, glossy and free from cracks or other surface defects. Comparative example E, containing a low viscosity guar gum, resulted in a coated tablet that had low gloss and was tacky and, therefore, failed the appearance test. The resulting coated tablets from comparative example E also had a coefficient of dynamic friction above the desired maximum of 1.5.
    • Examples 21-22
  • Additional film coating compositions are prepared in accordance with the present invention.
    Example 21 22
    Component Wt.% Wt.%
    Talc 30 25
    Hypromellose, 6 cP grade 10 10
    Polyvinyl alcohol 17.5 17.5
    Guar gum 15 15
    Medium chain triglycerides 2.5 2.5
    Titanium dioxide 20 25
    Blue #2 aluminum lake 5 5
    Totals 100 100

Claims (16)

  1. A film coating composition in powder form, consisting of:
    a water-soluble polymer selected from the group consisting of cellulosic polymers, vinyl polymers, and mixtures thereof;
    guar gum in an amount of 4-25%, preferably 4-20%, by weight of the film coating composition,
    one or more of a glidant, a plasticizer, a pigment; and maltodextrin, wherein said guar gum has a minimum viscosity of 700 mPa.s (centipoises) when dissolved in water at a 1% w/w concentration for 2 hours as measured on a Brookfield RVT viscometer at 25° C.
  2. The film composition of claim 1, wherein said guar gum provides a substrate coated with an aqueous dispersion containing the film coating composition to a weight gain of at least 0.25% by weight with at least one of
    a) a coefficient of static friction of less than 3; or
    b) a coefficient of dynamic friction of less than 1.5.
  3. The composition of claim 1 wherein said cellulosic polymer is a water soluble cellulosic polymer selected from the group consisting of hypromellose (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, and said vinyl polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer (e.g. Kollicoat IR) and vinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate copolymer 6:4 (e.g. Kollidon VA-64).
  4. The composition of claim 3, wherein the polymer is hypromellose.
  5. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the water-soluble polymer is a vinyl polymer and the amount of guar gum is 6-20% by weight.
  6. The composition of claim 1 wherein the glidant is talc and the plasticizer comprises medium chain triglycerides.
  7. The composition of claim 1 wherein the maltodextrin is 0.1-80%, more preferably 5-60% by weight of the film coating composition.
  8. The composition of claim 8, wherein the maltodextrin has a DE of less than 20, preferably a DE of between 11 and 14.
  9. The composition of claim 1 wherein the water-soluble polymer is from 5 to 35% by weight, preferably 10 to 20% by weight of the dry powder composition.
  10. A composition according to claim 1, consisting of:
    10 to 20%/wt. water soluble polymer;
    4 to 20%/wt. guar gum;
    5 to 60%/wt. maltodextrin;
    10 to 20%/wt. glidant;
    2.5 to 10 %/wt. plasticizer; and
    4 to 32%/wt. pigments,
    the total not exceeding 100%/wt. of the composition.
  11. A composition according to claim 1, consisting of:
    10 to 20%/wt. water soluble polymer;
    4 to 20%/wt. guar gum;
    50 to 80%/wt. maltodextrin;
    10 to 20%/wt. glidant; and
    2.5 to 10 %/wt. plasticizer,
    the total not exceeding 100%/wt. of the composition.
  12. An aqueous dispersion prepared by mixing a composition according to any of claims 1-11 in water, said water optionally being at ambient temperature.
  13. An orally-ingestible substrate coated with an aqueous dispersion according to claim 12.
  14. The orally-ingestible substrate according to claim 13, wherein the coating is applied to a weight gain of from 0.25 to 5%, preferably from 1.0 to 4.5 and more preferably from 2.0 to 4.0.
  15. A coated orally-ingestible substrate according to claim 13, having an average coefficient of static friction of less than 3.0 and/or a coefficient of dynamic friction of less than 1.5.
  16. A method of reducing the coefficient of static and/or dynamic friction of an orally ingestible substrate, comprising:
    coating an orally ingestible substrate with an aqueous dispersion of a film coating composition in powder form according to claim 1 to a weight gain of at least 0.25% by weight,
    whereby at least one of the coefficient of static friction or the coefficient of dynamic friction of the coated orally ingestible substrate is reduced, the coefficient of static friction preferably being less than 3 and/or the coefficient of dynamic friction preferably being less than 1.5.
EP17837417.9A 2016-08-04 2017-07-26 Easy to swallow coatings and substrates coated therewith Active EP3474824B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662370944P 2016-08-04 2016-08-04
PCT/US2017/043923 WO2018026596A1 (en) 2016-08-04 2017-07-26 Easy to swallow coatings and substrates coated therewith

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3474824A1 EP3474824A1 (en) 2019-05-01
EP3474824A4 EP3474824A4 (en) 2019-07-31
EP3474824B1 true EP3474824B1 (en) 2022-02-16

Family

ID=61071910

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17837417.9A Active EP3474824B1 (en) 2016-08-04 2017-07-26 Easy to swallow coatings and substrates coated therewith

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US10232045B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3474824B1 (en)
JP (1) JP7041120B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102437953B1 (en)
CN (1) CN109562076B (en)
AU (1) AU2017307194B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112019002040A2 (en)
CA (1) CA3031671A1 (en)
CO (1) CO2019000756A2 (en)
MX (1) MX2019001238A (en)
RU (1) RU2753049C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2018026596A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3860849A4 (en) * 2018-10-05 2022-06-22 ISP Investments LLC Smooth high solids film coating composition comprising water soluble cellulose ether, process for preparing the same
CN113508165A (en) * 2019-03-04 2021-10-15 泽井制药株式会社 Film coating composition and solid preparation

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4543370A (en) 1979-11-29 1985-09-24 Colorcon, Inc. Dry edible film coating composition, method and coating form
DE3220434A1 (en) 1982-05-29 1983-12-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh, 7000 Stuttgart METHOD FOR MONITORING A MEASUREMENT
DE69121098T2 (en) * 1990-04-04 1997-01-23 Berwind Pharma Service AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING COATING COMPOSITIONS MALTODEXTRIN AND CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES
US5114720A (en) * 1990-12-27 1992-05-19 American Cyanamid Company Gelatin coated tablets and method for producing same
WO2001026633A1 (en) 1999-10-11 2001-04-19 Monsanto Company Tablets coated with locust bean gum, guar gum or carrageenan gum
AU2005251793B2 (en) * 2004-06-07 2010-07-15 Wyeth Sugar coatings and methods therefor
CN101490093B (en) * 2006-07-20 2012-07-18 罗迪亚公司 Method for making derivatized guar gum and derivatized guar gum made thereby
HUP0700826A3 (en) * 2007-12-20 2010-03-29 Richter Gedeon Nyrt Coated tablet containing drospirenone and process for producing the same
KR20100129740A (en) * 2008-02-19 2010-12-09 맥네일-피피씨, 인코포레이티드 Dip coated compositions containing a starch having a high amylose content
WO2010052727A1 (en) * 2008-11-04 2010-05-14 Ideal Cures Private Limited High performance film coating compositions
US20100124568A1 (en) 2008-11-20 2010-05-20 Med-Eez, Inc Pharmaceutical articles coated with lubricious coatings
DK2470165T3 (en) * 2009-08-28 2018-06-06 Hercules Llc FILM COATING COMPOSITION OF SOLID POWDER COMPOUNDS
CN102858373B (en) * 2010-03-31 2014-11-26 持田制药株式会社 Easily dosable solid preparation
CA2807319C (en) 2010-08-18 2018-08-14 Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. Tablet sleeve for improved performance
US9421171B2 (en) * 2011-02-14 2016-08-23 The Procter & Gamble Company Coated solid dosage forms
US20120220454A1 (en) * 2011-02-28 2012-08-30 Rhodia Operations Seed coatings, coating compositions and methods for use
CN102652738A (en) * 2011-03-03 2012-09-05 天津聚贤投资有限公司 Novel medicinal outer wrapper facilitating swallow
EP2714015B1 (en) * 2011-06-01 2017-03-15 FMC Corporation Controlled release solid dose forms
US20130064889A1 (en) * 2011-09-13 2013-03-14 Aptapharma, Inc. Tablet-in-tablet Palperidone Formulations and Methods for Production and Use Thereof
JP5976657B2 (en) * 2011-09-30 2016-08-24 持田製薬株式会社 Easy-to-use solid preparation
CN102430124B (en) * 2011-11-24 2013-03-20 清华大学 Pill coating with ultralow friction coefficient and preparation method thereof
CN104274409B (en) * 2013-07-10 2017-11-03 北京科信必成医药科技发展有限公司 A kind of medicine microspheres for being easy to swallow and preparation method thereof
ES2802156T3 (en) 2014-01-21 2021-01-15 Bpsi Holdings Llc Immediate release film coatings containing medium chain glycerides and substrates coated therewith
JP6294400B2 (en) * 2016-07-19 2018-03-14 持田製薬株式会社 Easy-to-use solid preparation

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2017307194A1 (en) 2019-01-24
JP2019523290A (en) 2019-08-22
EP3474824A1 (en) 2019-05-01
JP7041120B2 (en) 2022-03-23
RU2019105589A (en) 2020-09-04
RU2019105589A3 (en) 2020-09-04
RU2753049C2 (en) 2021-08-11
WO2018026596A1 (en) 2018-02-08
US20180036413A1 (en) 2018-02-08
MX2019001238A (en) 2019-04-25
US10232045B2 (en) 2019-03-19
CO2019000756A2 (en) 2019-02-08
KR102437953B1 (en) 2022-08-29
CA3031671A1 (en) 2018-02-08
EP3474824A4 (en) 2019-07-31
AU2017307194B2 (en) 2022-06-23
CN109562076B (en) 2022-01-28
CN109562076A (en) 2019-04-02
KR20190035745A (en) 2019-04-03
BR112019002040A2 (en) 2019-05-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2429505B1 (en) Enhanced moisture barrier immediate release film coating systems and substrates coated therewith
US9789067B2 (en) Immediate release film coatings containing medium chain glycerides and substrates coated therewith
WO2010132205A1 (en) Film coatings containing fine particle size detackifiers and substrates coated therewith
EP3474824B1 (en) Easy to swallow coatings and substrates coated therewith
WO2022150693A1 (en) High opacity coatings and substrates coated therewith
US10758489B2 (en) Acidifying coatings and disintegration-resistant substrates coated therewith

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190123

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602017053523

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: A61K0009340000

Ipc: A61K0009200000

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20190701

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: A61K 9/20 20060101AFI20190625BHEP

Ipc: A61K 9/28 20060101ALI20190625BHEP

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20201001

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210914

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: BPSI HOLDINGS, LLC

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017053523

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1468464

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20220216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1468464

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220616

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220516

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220516

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220517

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220617

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017053523

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20221117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220726

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220731

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220216

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220726

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230727

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230725

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230727

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170726