EP3451276A1 - Health state evaluation system, health state evaluation device, and health state evaluation method - Google Patents

Health state evaluation system, health state evaluation device, and health state evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3451276A1
EP3451276A1 EP16900520.4A EP16900520A EP3451276A1 EP 3451276 A1 EP3451276 A1 EP 3451276A1 EP 16900520 A EP16900520 A EP 16900520A EP 3451276 A1 EP3451276 A1 EP 3451276A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
habit
variables
health state
variable
subject
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP16900520.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3451276A4 (en
Inventor
Masato Miyake
Gerard Lipowski
Naoto Kagiyama
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Quintessensia LLC
Original Assignee
Quintessensia LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Quintessensia LLC filed Critical Quintessensia LLC
Publication of EP3451276A4 publication Critical patent/EP3451276A4/en
Publication of EP3451276A1 publication Critical patent/EP3451276A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H20/00ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
    • G16H20/60ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to nutrition control, e.g. diets
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/30ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1118Determining activity level
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/20Education
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/22Social work or social welfare, e.g. community support activities or counselling services
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H20/00ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
    • G16H20/30ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H40/00ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
    • G16H40/60ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the operation of medical equipment or devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/20ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/70ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a health state evaluation system, a health state evaluation device, and a health state evaluation method. Specifically, the present invention relates to a health state evaluation system, a health state evaluation device, and a health state evaluation method for evaluating the health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data, of a large number of persons, obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values.
  • Dx health checkup values
  • Non-Patent Document 1 ranking for each of blood values or ranking by a principal component analysis for each of organs has been performed.
  • the ranking of the health state requires professional interpretation, and therefore is not suitable for a layperson to use for improvement of his/her health state.
  • an object of the present invention is to provide a health state evaluation system which allows a layperson to know his/her rank in order to improve his/her health state.
  • a health state evaluation system configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values.
  • Dx health checkup values
  • principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3).
  • This system includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx); a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section.
  • the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance.
  • Ax is a weight coefficient of each Dx, which is derived through the principal component analysis
  • energy intake habit variable C 1 ⁇ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
  • D1,n1 includes one or some of minimal blood pressure, AST, ALT, and blood glucose
  • n1 is a natural number, ⁇ 1 to n1)
  • nutrition balance habit variable C 2 ⁇ A 2 , n 2 * D 2 , n 2 + ⁇ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
  • D2,n2 includes one or some of LDL, HDL, ⁇ GTP, and neutral fats
  • n2 and n1 are natural numbers, ⁇ 1 to n2, ⁇ 1 to n1)
  • exercise habit variable C 3 A 3 intrinsic coefficient of maximal blood pressure * D 3 maximal blood pressure + ⁇ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1 (n1 is a natural number, ⁇ 1 to n1).
  • the inventors have found that the principal component variables with top three largest variances correspond to the exercise habit variable (C1), the energy intake habit variable (C2), and the nutrition balance habit variable (C3), and are applicable as indices for lifestyle improvement.
  • the subject can know the exercise habit variable (C1), the energy intake habit variable (C2), and the nutrition balance habit variable (C3).
  • Dx the health checkup values
  • C1 the exercise habit variable
  • C2 the energy intake habit variable
  • C3 the nutrition balance habit variable
  • the result display section displays, together with the habit variables (C1) to (C3), the number of examinees and a prevalence for each variable.
  • the result display section plots markers as a result of the subject on a graph of the prevalence at positions corresponding to values of the habit variables (C1) to (C3), thereby displaying the prevalence.
  • the result display section is represented as three types of two-dimensional graphs obtained by extracting two components from any of the habit variables (C1) to (C3), and/or a three-dimensional graph having the three variables as components thereof.
  • the result display section displays, on the graph, a plurality of measurement processes in time sequence.
  • the result display section identifies and displays the values of the habit variables (C1) to (C3) in a plurality of stages.
  • a health state evaluation device configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values.
  • Dx health checkup values
  • principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3).
  • This device includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx); a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section.
  • the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance.
  • Ax, A1 to A3, C1 to C3, D1 to D3, n1, and n2 are identical to those described above.
  • a health state evaluation method is configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values.
  • Dx health checkup values
  • principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3).
  • This method includes: inputting the health checkup values (Dx); calculating the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis, and on the inputted variables; storing, in a storage section, the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and displaying, as a graph, a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section.
  • the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance.
  • Ax, A1 to A3, C1 to C3, D1 to D3, n1, and n2 are identical to those described above.
  • a health state evaluation system configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values.
  • Dx health checkup values
  • a nutrition balance habit variable (C2) and an exercise habit variable (C3) are obtained among principal component variables with top three largest variances.
  • This system includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx); a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C2, C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C2, C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C2, C3) among the habit variables (C2, C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section.
  • the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C2, C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance.
  • D1,n1 includes one or some of minimal blood pressure, AST, ALT, and blood glucose
  • n1 is a natural number, ⁇ 1 to n1)
  • D2,n2 includes one or some of LDL, HDL, ⁇ GTP, and neutral fats
  • n2 is a natural number, ⁇ 1 to n2)
  • exercise habit variable C 3 A 3 intrinsic coefficient of maximal blood pressure * D 3 maximal blood pressure + ⁇ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1 (n1 is a natural number, ⁇ 1 to n1).
  • a layperson is allowable to know his/her rank which is useful for health state improvement.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a health state evaluation system (device) 1 according to the present invention.
  • a PC 10 includes: a computation section 11 which performs computation processing and creates a display image; a temporary storage section 12; a storage section 13; an input/output IF 14; a communication IF 18; and an internal bus 17 including a data bus and an address bus for connecting these components.
  • An input section 15 such as a keyboard and a mouse used as a data input section, and a display section 16 such as a display and a printer used as a result display section, are connected to the input/output IF 14.
  • the communication IF 18 is connected to an external storage 21 and other PCs (not shown) via a network 20 established by ICP/IP or the like.
  • the PC 10 is used for data input, principal component analysis by arithmetic processing, and data display.
  • Habit variables (C1 to C3) obtained in advance from a large number of persons are stored in the storage section 13 in the PC 10, and are stored as a storage section in the external storage 21.
  • the display section 16 is caused to display graphs and input/output screens described later.
  • AST is an enzyme found primarily in the liver. If tissues are impaired, the AST level in blood increases. An extremely high AST level is a sign of various types of liver damage.
  • ALT is an enzyme found primarily in the liver. If tissues are impaired, the ALT level in blood increases. An extremely high ALT level is a sign of various types of liver damage.
  • ⁇ -GT 80 IU/l or lower (male), 30 IU/l or lower (female):
  • ⁇ -GT is an enzyme spreading in the liver, etc., and increases due to cholestasis, alcohol, drugs, etc. If cholestasis is caused by hepatitis, obstructive jaundice, gallstone, or the like, the measured value increases. In particular, ⁇ -GT sensitively reacts with alcohol, and sometimes increases due to drugs such as analgesic.
  • LDL LDL is calculated by subtracting HDL from total cholesterol.
  • HDL 40-70 mg/dl (male), 45-75 mg/dl (female): HDL (High Density Lipoprotein) cholesterol delivers cholesterol that may cause arteriosclerosis from peripheral arteries to the liver, and therefore is also called "good cholesterol". HDL cholesterol not higher than 40 mg/dl is highly likely to cause arteriosclerosis. Although HDL cholesterol cannot be increased directly through food intake, body fat reduction and moderate exercise are effective.
  • Neutral fats 30-149 mg/dl: neutral fats are used as an energy source. However, excessive neutral fats are accumulated under the skin and/or in the liver, and cause obesity and/or fatty liver disease. In addition, excessive neutral fats accelerate arteriosclerosis.
  • Blood glucose level (fasting blood glucose level), 70-109 mg/dl A blood glucose test is a test for measuring glucose concentration in blood. Glucose is used and metabolized as an energy source in a living body. The blood glucose level varies with diet, etc., but the variable range is within a fixed range. Diencephalon, autonomic nerve, and hormones such as insulin are deeply involved in control of the blood glucose level. Generally, diagnosis of glucose metabolism is performed with a fasting blood glucose level in the morning. Although it is difficult to perform accurate diagnosis with a casual blood glucose level (or after-meal blood glucose level) other than a fasting blood glucose level, blood glucose levels of normal persons hardly exceed 140 mg/dl even after meals.
  • Maximal blood pressure is a pressure when the muscle of the heart is contracted maximally so that the heart pumps blood, and is also called “systolic blood pressure”.
  • Minimal blood pressure is a pressure when the muscle of the heart is expanded maximally, and is also called “diastolic blood pressure”.
  • FIG. 2 a description will be given of a relationship between each of the above-described 9 health checkup values (Dx), and a mutual relationship of habit variables (components 1 to 3; hereinafter referred to as "C1 to C3") which are 3 principal component valuables analyzed by using data of about 5,000 persons (4,717 subjects, the same applies hereinafter).
  • the 9 health checkup values (Dx) are selected through trial and error so that variances of C1 to C3 become great.
  • FIGS. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) are graphs showing scattergrams of principle component load amounts regarding the relationship between C1 and C2, the relationship between C2 and C3, and the relationship between C1 and C3, respectively.
  • plotted points represent coefficients of the health checkup values (Dx) regarding C1 to C3.
  • blood-related components are separated into three groups G1 to G3.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates graphs each showing the percentages of diseases of persons in higher ranks regarding the values of the habit variable (C1 to C3) (i.e., those having life habits in red (Pcx) zones shown in FIG. 6(d) ).
  • G2 and G3 are on the C2 and C3 axes, respectively, but G1 is neither on the C2 axis nor on the C3 axis.
  • G3 is approximately zero, and each of G1 and G2 is neither on the C1 axis nor on the C2 axis.
  • G2 is approximately zero, G3 has values on the C3 axis, and G1 is neither on the C1 axis nor on the C3 axis.
  • C1 is correlated with G1 but is independent from G2 and G3
  • C2 is correlated with G1 and G2
  • C3 is correlated with G1 and G3.
  • the group G1 composing C1 includes blood glucose that can be controlled by the energy intake amount. Other elements in G1 are considered to be in the same group because they vary in association with blood glucose. Therefore, C1 is a parameter necessary for calculation of an energy intake habit score.
  • the group G2 composing C2 includes neutral fats that can be controlled by nutrition balance. HDL and the like in the same group G2 vary in association with neutral fats. Since the group G1 also depends on C2, the elements in G1 as well as G2 are used as parameters for score calculation.
  • the group G3 composing C3 includes only systolic blood pressure, which is a factor that can be controlled by exercise. For calculation of an exercise habit score, G1 that depends on C3 is also used.
  • the 3 habit variables (C1 to C3) of 4,717 persons were obtained based on anonymized individual blood-related component matrices of 4,717 persons obtained using, as elements, blood pressure (during systole), blood pressure (during diastole), ALT, AST, ⁇ -GT, LDL, HLD, neutral fats, and blood glucose, and on inner products of eigenvectors of the respective principal components.
  • frequency distributions of the 3 habit variables (C1 to C3) of 4,717 persons were created, and the percentage of sick persons included in each score rank was obtained.
  • the distributions of the habit variables (C1 to C3) and the graphs of prevalence Da, Db, and Dc may be integrated with each other, respectively, for convenience.
  • the state of a subject may be indicated by signs Sa, Sb, and Sc on the prevalence graphs Da, Db, and Dc, respectively.
  • the prevalence at each sign may be represented as a numerical value.
  • zone graphs may be used as shown in FIG. 6 .
  • blue shows a zone indicated by a sign Pax
  • yellow shows a zone indicated by a sign Pbx
  • Each life habit is appropriate in order of blue > yellow > red. Attention is paid to the most inappropriate habit among the three life habits C1 to C3.
  • Blue zone although the risk of lifestyle-related diseases is low, attention needs to be paid to anemia and hypotension .
  • Yellow zone the risk of lifestyle-related diseases is likely to increase with aging.
  • Red zone 80% of persons having the life habit in this zone suffer from lifestyle-related diseases. Appropriate lifestyle improvement is needed under guidance of a specialist such as a nutritionist.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 show examples of application to subjects.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 each show habit variable values Sa1, Sb1, and Sc1 of subjects before lifestyle guidance, and habit variable values Sa2, Sb2, and Sc2 of the subjects after lifestyle guidance.
  • a sign Sb indicates a habit variable value that has not been changed.
  • each subject commented that the graph allows the subject to easily comprehend the result of the guidance, and therefore serves as a source of motivation for lifestyle improvement.
  • Score calculation based on less data since the 9 blood-related components were separated into 3 groups, one blood-related component data was arbitrarily selected from each group to be used for score calculation.
  • maximal blood pressure (during systole), minimal blood pressure (during diastole), and blood lipid (neutral fats) are parameters that belong to different groups G1 to G3, respectively.
  • the eigenvalues of the above 3 parameters were used to obtain new eigenvectors regarding the energy intake habit, the nutrition balance habit, and the exercise habit.
  • scores of 4,717 individuals were newly obtained to create frequency distribution diagrams.
  • the respective habit variables (C1 to C3) are assigned to different graphs.
  • the respective habit variables (C1 to C3) may be assigned to different axes of a three-dimensional graph, and the state of each subject may be represented by three-dimensional coordinates with signs Ma, Mb, etc.
  • the zone graphs shown in FIG. 6 are applied to the three-dimensional coordinates, the zone graphs allow the subject to easily comprehend his/her state, and therefore are convenient as indices for lifestyle improvement.
  • the 3 habit variables (C1 to C3) are used.
  • the energy intake habit variable C1 includes only the elements in G1
  • the nutrition balance habit variable C2 and the exercise habit variable C3 include the elements in G1 and G2 and the elements in G1 and G3, respectively. Therefore, it is conceivable that diagnosis regarding G1 has already been incorporated in each of the nutrition balance habit variable C2 and the exercise habit variable C3, and therefore, only C2 and C3 may be used as indices for lifestyle improvement.
  • general formulae as in claim 11 are adopted.
  • graphs for diagnosis two graphs or a two-dimensional plane graph are/is used.
  • the configuration in practicing the present invention can use the elements described in claims 1 to 10, and the elements are disclosed in the present specification. However, it is needless to say that using 3 elements as indices for lifestyle improvement is advantageous from the viewpoint of the number of improvement points.
  • the gist of the present invention resides in that the health checkup values (Dx) in the group G1 are used as the energy intake habit variable C1, the health checkup values (Dx) in the groups G1 and G2 are used as the nutrition balance habit variable C2, and the health checkup values (Dx) in the groups G1 and G3 are used as the exercise habit variable C3.
  • the present invention can be used as a health state evaluation system, a health state evaluation device, and a health state evaluation method in which the health state of a subject is evaluated by a method of scoring the health state based on his/her life habits.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is a health state evaluation system which allows a layperson to know his/her rank in order to improve his/her health state. Through a principal component analysis using, as explanatory variables, health checkup values Dx which are principally blood values, three principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an exercise habit variable C1, an energy intake habit variable C2, and a nutrition balance habit variable C3. The system includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values Dx; a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables C1 to C3, based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, obtained by the computation section in advance. The habit variables C1 to C3 include elements in 3 groups. The health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to 3 principal component variables C1 to C3, the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a health state evaluation system, a health state evaluation device, and a health state evaluation method. Specifically, the present invention relates to a health state evaluation system, a health state evaluation device, and a health state evaluation method for evaluating the health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data, of a large number of persons, obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Conventionally, an example of such a system has been disclosed in Non-Patent Document 1. According to this document, ranking for each of blood values or ranking by a principal component analysis for each of organs has been performed. The ranking of the health state requires professional interpretation, and therefore is not suitable for a layperson to use for improvement of his/her health state.
  • CITATION LIST [NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS]
  • [NON-PATENT DOCUMENT 1] Japan Society of Ningen Dock/National Federation of Health Insurance Societies, "Reference Range for basic tests of new medical checkup, MEGA Study of 1.5 million subjects by the Japan Society of Ningen Dock and the National Federation of Health Insurance Societies", [online], April 2014, the Internet <URL:http://www.ningen-dock.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/%E3%83%97%E3%83%AC%E3%82%B9%E3%83%AA%E3%83%A A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B9%E7%94%A8PDF%EF%BC%88140409%E5%B7%AE%E3%8 1%97%E6%9B%BF%E3%81%88%EF%BC%89.pdf>
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
  • In view of the conventional circumstances described above, an object of the present invention is to provide a health state evaluation system which allows a layperson to know his/her rank in order to improve his/her health state.
  • SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEMS
  • In order to attain the above object, a health state evaluation system according to the present invention is configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values. Through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3). This system includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx); a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section. The health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance.
  • In this system, Ax is a weight coefficient of each Dx, which is derived through the principal component analysis, energy intake habit variable C 1 = Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0001
    (D1,n1 includes one or some of minimal blood pressure, AST, ALT, and blood glucose; n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1), nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = Σ A 2 , n 2 * D 2 , n 2 + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0002
    (D2,n2 includes one or some of LDL, HDL, γGTP, and neutral fats; n2 and n1 are natural numbers, ∑ 1 to n2, ∑ 1 to n1), and exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 intrinsic coefficient of maximal blood pressure * D 3 maximal blood pressure + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0003
    (n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1).
  • With the above configuration, the inventors have found that the principal component variables with top three largest variances correspond to the exercise habit variable (C1), the energy intake habit variable (C2), and the nutrition balance habit variable (C3), and are applicable as indices for lifestyle improvement.
  • Therefore, by only using the health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values, the subject can know the exercise habit variable (C1), the energy intake habit variable (C2), and the nutrition balance habit variable (C3). Thus, even a layperson can easily attempt to improve his/her health state.
  • Preferably, the result display section displays, together with the habit variables (C1) to (C3), the number of examinees and a prevalence for each variable.
  • In the above case, preferably, the result display section plots markers as a result of the subject on a graph of the prevalence at positions corresponding to values of the habit variables (C1) to (C3), thereby displaying the prevalence.
  • Preferably, the result display section is represented as three types of two-dimensional graphs obtained by extracting two components from any of the habit variables (C1) to (C3), and/or a three-dimensional graph having the three variables as components thereof.
  • Preferably, the result display section displays, on the graph, a plurality of measurement processes in time sequence.
  • Preferably, the result display section identifies and displays the values of the habit variables (C1) to (C3) in a plurality of stages.
  • Preferably, the energy intake habit variable C1, the nutrition balance habit variable C2, and the exercise habit variable C3 are represented by formulae as follows: the energy intake habit variable C 1 = A 1 * D 1 minimal blood pressure ;
    Figure imgb0004
    the nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = A 2 * D 2 neutral fats + A 1 * D 1 minimal blood pressure ;
    Figure imgb0005
    the exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 * D 3 maximal blood pressure + A 1 * D 1 minimal blood pressure .
    Figure imgb0006
  • Preferably, the energy intake habit variable C1, the nutrition balance habit variable C2, and the exercise habit variable C3 are represented by formulae as follows: the energy intake habit variable C 1 = A 11 * D 11 minimal blood pressure + A 12 * D 12 AST + A 13 * D 13 ALT + A 14 * D 14 blood glucose ;
    Figure imgb0007
    the nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = A 21 * D 21 neutral fats + A 22 * D 22 LDL + A 23 * D 23 HDL + A 24 * D 24 γGTP + A 11 * D 11 minimal blood pressure + A 12 * D 12 AST + A 13 * D 13 ALT + A 14 * D 14 blood glucose ;
    Figure imgb0008
    and the exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 * D 3 maximal blood pressure + { A 11 * D 11 maximal blood pressure + A 12 * D 12 AST + A 13 * D 13 ALT + A 14 * D 14 ( blood glucose ) } .
    Figure imgb0009
  • In order to attain the above object, a health state evaluation device according to the present invention is configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values. Through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3). This device includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx); a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section. The health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance. In this device, Ax, A1 to A3, C1 to C3, D1 to D3, n1, and n2 are identical to those described above.
  • In order to attain the above object, a health state evaluation method according to the present invention is configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values. Through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3). This method includes: inputting the health checkup values (Dx); calculating the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis, and on the inputted variables; storing, in a storage section, the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and displaying, as a graph, a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section. The health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance. In this method, Ax, A1 to A3, C1 to C3, D1 to D3, n1, and n2 are identical to those described above.
  • In order to attain the above object, a health state evaluation system according to the present invention is configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values. Through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, a nutrition balance habit variable (C2) and an exercise habit variable (C3) are obtained among principal component variables with top three largest variances. This system includes: a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx); a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C2, C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis; a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C2, C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C2, C3) among the habit variables (C2, C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section. The health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C2, C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance.
  • In this system, Ax is a weight coefficient of each Dx, which is derived through the principal component analysis, nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = Σ A 2 , n 2 * D 2 , n 2 + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0010
    (D1,n1 includes one or some of minimal blood pressure, AST, ALT, and blood glucose; n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1)
    (D2,n2 includes one or some of LDL, HDL, γGTP, and neutral fats; n2 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n2), and exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 intrinsic coefficient of maximal blood pressure * D 3 maximal blood pressure + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0011
    (n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1).
  • ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION
  • According to the features of the health state evaluation system, the health state evaluation device, and the health state evaluation method of the present invention, a layperson is allowable to know his/her rank which is useful for health state improvement.
  • Other objects, configurations, and effects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of embodiments of the present invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • [FIG. 1] FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a health state evaluation system (device) according to the present invention.
    • [FIG. 2] FIG. 2 illustrates graphs each showing a relationship between health checkup values (Dx) and a mutual relationship of habit variables (components 1 to 3, C1 to C3) as three principal component valuables, in which (a) shows the relationship with C1 and C2, (b) shows the relationship with C2 and C3, and (c) shows the relationship with C1 and C3.
    • [FIG. 3] FIG. 3 illustrates graphs each showing percentages of diseases of persons in higher ranks regarding the values of the habit variables (i.e., those having life habits in red (Pcx) zones).
    • [FIG. 4] FIG. 4 illustrates graphs each showing a relationship between the habit variable (C1 to C3) and a prevalence, in which an upper stage shows a distribution of the habit variable (C1 to C3), a lower stage shows a prevalence regarding the habit variable (C1 to C3), and (a), (b), and (c) correspond to energy intake C1, nutrition balance C2, and an amount of exercise C3, respectively.
    • [FIG. 5] FIG. 5 illustrates graphs showing a display example of this system, each graph showing the health state of a subject by integrating each habit variable (C1 to C3) with the prevalence, in which (a), (b), and (c) correspond to energy intake C1, nutrition balance C2, and an amount of exercise C3, respectively.
    • [FIG. 6] FIG. 6 illustrates zone graphs showing another display example of this system, in which (a), (b), and (c) correspond to energy intake C1, nutrition balance C2, and an amount of exercise C3, respectively.
    • [FIG. 7] FIG. 7 illustrates subject monitoring states by using graphs of the habit variables (C1 to C3) of this system.
    • [FIG. 8] FIG. 8 illustrates other subject monitoring states by using graphs of the habit variables (C1 to C3) of this system.
    • [FIG. 9] FIG. 9 illustrates graphs each showing a relationship between the habit variable (C1 to C3) and a prevalence, obtained through evaluation of the present invention using only three health checkup values (Dx).
    • [FIG. 10] FIG. 10 is a graph showing the health state of a subject by assigning the habit variables (C1 to C3) to different axes of a three-dimensional graph.
    DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • Next, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings as appropriate.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a health state evaluation system (device) 1 according to the present invention. A PC 10 includes: a computation section 11 which performs computation processing and creates a display image; a temporary storage section 12; a storage section 13; an input/output IF 14; a communication IF 18; and an internal bus 17 including a data bus and an address bus for connecting these components. An input section 15 such as a keyboard and a mouse used as a data input section, and a display section 16 such as a display and a printer used as a result display section, are connected to the input/output IF 14. The communication IF 18 is connected to an external storage 21 and other PCs (not shown) via a network 20 established by ICP/IP or the like.
  • The PC 10 is used for data input, principal component analysis by arithmetic processing, and data display. Habit variables (C1 to C3) obtained in advance from a large number of persons are stored in the storage section 13 in the PC 10, and are stored as a storage section in the external storage 21. As for display of arithmetic results, the display section 16 is caused to display graphs and input/output screens described later.
  • As for health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values, there are 9 numerical values displayed on an input screen shown in FIG. 6(d), and the adequate values and details of the respective values are as follows.
  • AST, 10-40 IU/l: AST is an enzyme found primarily in the liver. If tissues are impaired, the AST level in blood increases. An extremely high AST level is a sign of various types of liver damage.
  • AST, 5-45 IU/l: ALT is an enzyme found primarily in the liver. If tissues are impaired, the ALT level in blood increases. An extremely high ALT level is a sign of various types of liver damage.
  • γ-GT, 80 IU/l or lower (male), 30 IU/l or lower (female): γ-GT is an enzyme spreading in the liver, etc., and increases due to cholestasis, alcohol, drugs, etc. If cholestasis is caused by hepatitis, obstructive jaundice, gallstone, or the like, the measured value increases. In particular, γ-GT sensitively reacts with alcohol, and sometimes increases due to drugs such as analgesic.
  • LDL: LDL is calculated by subtracting HDL from total cholesterol.
  • HDL, 40-70 mg/dl (male), 45-75 mg/dl (female): HDL (High Density Lipoprotein) cholesterol delivers cholesterol that may cause arteriosclerosis from peripheral arteries to the liver, and therefore is also called "good cholesterol". HDL cholesterol not higher than 40 mg/dl is highly likely to cause arteriosclerosis. Although HDL cholesterol cannot be increased directly through food intake, body fat reduction and moderate exercise are effective.
  • Neutral fats, 30-149 mg/dl: neutral fats are used as an energy source. However, excessive neutral fats are accumulated under the skin and/or in the liver, and cause obesity and/or fatty liver disease. In addition, excessive neutral fats accelerate arteriosclerosis.
  • Blood glucose level (fasting blood glucose level), 70-109 mg/dl: A blood glucose test is a test for measuring glucose concentration in blood. Glucose is used and metabolized as an energy source in a living body. The blood glucose level varies with diet, etc., but the variable range is within a fixed range. Diencephalon, autonomic nerve, and hormones such as insulin are deeply involved in control of the blood glucose level. Generally, diagnosis of glucose metabolism is performed with a fasting blood glucose level in the morning. Although it is difficult to perform accurate diagnosis with a casual blood glucose level (or after-meal blood glucose level) other than a fasting blood glucose level, blood glucose levels of normal persons hardly exceed 140 mg/dl even after meals.
  • Maximal blood pressure: "maximal blood pressure" is a pressure when the muscle of the heart is contracted maximally so that the heart pumps blood, and is also called "systolic blood pressure".
  • Minimal blood pressure: "minimal blood pressure" is a pressure when the muscle of the heart is expanded maximally, and is also called "diastolic blood pressure".
  • Adequate values of blood pressure are shown in the following Table 1. [Table 1]
    List of blood pressure normal values Maximal blood pressure Minimal blood pressure When measured at home
    Optimal blood pressure up to 119 up to 79 Lower than 125/80
    Normal blood pressure 120∼ 80∼84
    High normal blood pressure 130∼ 85∼89
    High blood pressure (stage I) 140∼ 90∼99 135/85 or higher
    High blood pressure (stage II) 160∼ 100∼109
    High blood pressure (stage III) 180 or higher 110 or higher
    unit: mmHg
  • With reference to FIG. 2, a description will be given of a relationship between each of the above-described 9 health checkup values (Dx), and a mutual relationship of habit variables (components 1 to 3; hereinafter referred to as "C1 to C3") which are 3 principal component valuables analyzed by using data of about 5,000 persons (4,717 subjects, the same applies hereinafter). The 9 health checkup values (Dx) are selected through trial and error so that variances of C1 to C3 become great. FIGS. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) are graphs showing scattergrams of principle component load amounts regarding the relationship between C1 and C2, the relationship between C2 and C3, and the relationship between C1 and C3, respectively. In each graph, plotted points represent coefficients of the health checkup values (Dx) regarding C1 to C3. In each of the scattergrams, blood-related components are separated into three groups G1 to G3. In addition, FIG. 3 illustrates graphs each showing the percentages of diseases of persons in higher ranks regarding the values of the habit variable (C1 to C3) (i.e., those having life habits in red (Pcx) zones shown in FIG. 6(d)).
  • The aforementioned facts will be analyzed hereinafter. In the graph having C2 and C3 axes shown in FIG. 2(b), G2 and G3 are on the C2 and C3 axes, respectively, but G1 is neither on the C2 axis nor on the C3 axis. In the graph having C1 and C2 axes shown in FIG. 2(a), G3 is approximately zero, and each of G1 and G2 is neither on the C1 axis nor on the C2 axis. In the graph having C1 and C3 axes shown in FIG. 2(c), G2 is approximately zero, G3 has values on the C3 axis, and G1 is neither on the C1 axis nor on the C3 axis. Thus, C1 is correlated with G1 but is independent from G2 and G3, C2 is correlated with G1 and G2, and C3 is correlated with G1 and G3.
  • Meanwhile, consideration is given on the relationship between C1 to C3 and life habits, from the viewpoint of biological chemistry. The group G1 composing C1 includes blood glucose that can be controlled by the energy intake amount. Other elements in G1 are considered to be in the same group because they vary in association with blood glucose. Therefore, C1 is a parameter necessary for calculation of an energy intake habit score.
  • The group G2 composing C2 includes neutral fats that can be controlled by nutrition balance. HDL and the like in the same group G2 vary in association with neutral fats. Since the group G1 also depends on C2, the elements in G1 as well as G2 are used as parameters for score calculation. The group G3 composing C3 includes only systolic blood pressure, which is a factor that can be controlled by exercise. For calculation of an exercise habit score, G1 that depends on C3 is also used. These findings reveal that the elements in G1 should be used for C1 that reflects energy intake, the elements of G2 and G1 should be used for C2 that reflects nutrition balance, and the elements of G3 and G1 should be used for C3 that reflects exercise. Furthermore, the above findings reveal that the respective habit variables (C1 to C3) are represented as in claim 8, the health checkup values Dx may be the values regarding three components as in claim 7 described later, and general formulae are expressed as in claim 1.
  • Here, verification was performed on the relationship between prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases and each of the energy intake habit score C1, the nutrition balance habit score C2, and the exercise habit score C3. The 3 habit variables (C1 to C3) of 4,717 persons were obtained based on anonymized individual blood-related component matrices of 4,717 persons obtained using, as elements, blood pressure (during systole), blood pressure (during diastole), ALT, AST, γ-GT, LDL, HLD, neutral fats, and blood glucose, and on inner products of eigenvectors of the respective principal components. Next, frequency distributions of the 3 habit variables (C1 to C3) of 4,717 persons were created, and the percentage of sick persons included in each score rank was obtained. As the result, graphs shown in FIG. 4 were obtained, each showing the relationship between the habit variable (C1 to C3) and the prevalence. Since a positive correlation was observed between the score and the prevalence for each of the 3 habit variables (C1 to C3), it was confirmed that these scores were useful for guidance of lifestyle improvement.
  • In practical use, as shown in FIG. 5, the distributions of the habit variables (C1 to C3) and the graphs of prevalence Da, Db, and Dc may be integrated with each other, respectively, for convenience. In this case, the state of a subject may be indicated by signs Sa, Sb, and Sc on the prevalence graphs Da, Db, and Dc, respectively. Preferably, the prevalence at each sign may be represented as a numerical value.
  • In practical use, zone graphs may be used as shown in FIG. 6.
  • As shown in FIG. 6, blue shows a zone indicated by a sign Pax, yellow shows a zone indicated by a sign Pbx, and red shows a zone indicated by a sign Pcx (x = 1 to 3). Each life habit is appropriate in order of blue > yellow > red. Attention is paid to the most inappropriate habit among the three life habits C1 to C3.
  • Blue zone: although the risk of lifestyle-related diseases is low, attention needs to be paid to anemia and hypotension .
  • Yellow zone: the risk of lifestyle-related diseases is likely to increase with aging.
  • Red zone: 80% of persons having the life habit in this zone suffer from lifestyle-related diseases. Appropriate lifestyle improvement is needed under guidance of a specialist such as a nutritionist.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 show examples of application to subjects. FIGS. 7 and 8 each show habit variable values Sa1, Sb1, and Sc1 of subjects before lifestyle guidance, and habit variable values Sa2, Sb2, and Sc2 of the subjects after lifestyle guidance. A sign Sb indicates a habit variable value that has not been changed. As the result of the lifestyle guidance, each subject commented that the graph allows the subject to easily comprehend the result of the guidance, and therefore serves as a source of motivation for lifestyle improvement.
  • Score calculation based on less data: since the 9 blood-related components were separated into 3 groups, one blood-related component data was arbitrarily selected from each group to be used for score calculation.
  • Incidentally, maximal blood pressure (during systole), minimal blood pressure (during diastole), and blood lipid (neutral fats) are parameters that belong to different groups G1 to G3, respectively. Among the previously obtained load amount eigenvalues of the 9 blood-related components, the eigenvalues of the above 3 parameters were used to obtain new eigenvectors regarding the energy intake habit, the nutrition balance habit, and the exercise habit. Based on the anonymized individual blood-related component matrixes [maximal blood pressure (during systole), minimal blood pressure (during diastole), and blood lipid] of 4,717 persons and on inner products of the eigenvectors, scores of 4,717 individuals were newly obtained to create frequency distribution diagrams. In addition, prevalence in each rank was calculated and graphed as shown in FIG. 9. A positive correlation was observed between the prevalence (%) and each life habit score calculated based on the 3 parameters including maximal blood pressure (during systole), minimal blood pressure (during diastole), and blood lipid. This fact revealed that the 3 blood-related component data provide the scores that are useful for lifestyle guidance. In this case, data that requires collection of blood is only blood lipid, and thus significant reduction in the test cost can be expected. Elements other than the three elements may be selected according to the aforementioned general formulae.
  • Lastly, other possible embodiments of the present invention will be described. The same members and elements as those of the above embodiment are denoted by the same reference signs. In addition, the respective embodiments can be mutually combined and executed.
  • In the above-described embodiment, the respective habit variables (C1 to C3) are assigned to different graphs. However, as shown in FIG. 10, the respective habit variables (C1 to C3) may be assigned to different axes of a three-dimensional graph, and the state of each subject may be represented by three-dimensional coordinates with signs Ma, Mb, etc. At this time, if the zone graphs shown in FIG. 6 are applied to the three-dimensional coordinates, the zone graphs allow the subject to easily comprehend his/her state, and therefore are convenient as indices for lifestyle improvement.
  • In the above-described embodiment, the 3 habit variables (C1 to C3) are used. However, while the energy intake habit variable C1 includes only the elements in G1, the nutrition balance habit variable C2 and the exercise habit variable C3 include the elements in G1 and G2 and the elements in G1 and G3, respectively. Therefore, it is conceivable that diagnosis regarding G1 has already been incorporated in each of the nutrition balance habit variable C2 and the exercise habit variable C3, and therefore, only C2 and C3 may be used as indices for lifestyle improvement. In this case, general formulae as in claim 11 are adopted. In this case, as for graphs for diagnosis, two graphs or a two-dimensional plane graph are/is used. The configuration in practicing the present invention can use the elements described in claims 1 to 10, and the elements are disclosed in the present specification. However, it is needless to say that using 3 elements as indices for lifestyle improvement is advantageous from the viewpoint of the number of improvement points.
  • The gist of the present invention resides in that the health checkup values (Dx) in the group G1 are used as the energy intake habit variable C1, the health checkup values (Dx) in the groups G1 and G2 are used as the nutrition balance habit variable C2, and the health checkup values (Dx) in the groups G1 and G3 are used as the exercise habit variable C3.
  • Although the principal component analysis is used for obtaining the habit variables C1 to C3 and the coefficients of the above-described general formulae, another mathematical technique may be used. A method using the other mathematical technique is also within the scope of the present invention.
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
  • The present invention can be used as a health state evaluation system, a health state evaluation device, and a health state evaluation method in which the health state of a subject is evaluated by a method of scoring the health state based on his/her life habits.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE REFERENCE CHARACTERS
  • 1
    health state evaluation system (device)
    10
    PC (Personal Computer)
    11
    computation section
    12
    temporary storage section
    13
    storage section
    14
    input/output IF (interface)
    17
    internal bus
    18
    communication IF (interface)
    20
    network
    21
    external storage

Claims (11)

  1. A health state evaluation system configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values, wherein
    through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3),
    the health state evaluation system comprising:
    a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx);
    a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis;
    a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and
    a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section, wherein
    the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance,
    where
    Ax is a weight coefficient of each Dx, which is derived through the principal component analysis, energy intake habit variable C 1 = Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0012
    (D1,n1 includes one or more of minimal blood pressure, AST, ALT, and blood glucose; n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1), nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = Σ A 2 , n 2 * D 2 , n 2 + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0013
    (D2,n2 includes one or more of LDL, HDL, γGTP, and neutral fats; n2 and n1 are natural numbers, ∑ 1 to n2, ∑ 1 to n1), and exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 intrinsic coefficient of maximal blood pressure * D 3 maximal blood pressure + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0014
    (n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1).
  2. The health state evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the result display section displays, together with the habit variables (C1) to (C3), the number of examinees and a prevalence for each variable.
  3. The health state evaluation system according to claim 2, wherein the result display section plots markers as a result of the subject on a graph of the prevalence at positions corresponding to values of the habit variables (C1) to (C3), thereby displaying the prevalence.
  4. The health state evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the result display section is represented as three types of two-dimensional graphs obtained by extracting two components from any of the habit variables (C1) to (C3), and/or a three-dimensional graph having the three variables as components thereof.
  5. The health state evaluation system according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the result display section displays, on the graph, a plurality of measurement processes in time sequence.
  6. The health state evaluation system according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the result display section identifies and displays the values of the habit variables (C1) to (C3) in a plurality of stages.
  7. The health state evaluation system according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the energy intake habit variable C1, the nutrition balance habit variable C2, and the exercise habit variable C3 are represented by formulae as follows: the energy intake habit variable C 1 = A 1 * D 1 minimal blood pressure ;
    Figure imgb0015
    the nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = A 2 * D 2 neutral fats + A 1 * D 1 minimal blood pressure ;
    Figure imgb0016
    the exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 * D 3 maximal blood pressure + A 1 * D 1 minimal blood pressure .
    Figure imgb0017
  8. The health state evaluation system according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the energy intake habit variable C1, the nutrition balance habit variable C2, and the exercise habit variable C3 are represented by formulae as follows: the energy intake habit variable C 1 = A 11 * D 11 minimal blood pressure + A 12 * D 12 AST + A 13 * D 13 ALT + A 14 * D 14 blood glucose ;
    Figure imgb0018
    the nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = A 21 * D 21 neutral fats + A 22 * D 22 LDL + A 23 * D 23 HDL + A 24 * D 24 γGTP + A 11 * D 11 minimal blood pressure + A 12 * D 12 AST + A 13 * D 13 ALT + A 14 * D 14 blood glucose ;
    Figure imgb0019
    the exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 * D 3 maximal blood pressure + { A 11 * D 11 maximal blood pressure + A 12 * D 12 AST + A 13 * D 13 ALT + A 14 * D 14 ( blood glucose ) } .
    Figure imgb0020
  9. A health state evaluation device configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values, wherein
    through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3),
    the health state evaluation device comprising:
    a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx);
    a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis;
    a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and
    a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section, wherein
    the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance,
    where
    Ax, A1 to A3, C1 to C3, D1 to D3, n1, and n2 are identical to those of claim 1.
  10. A health state evaluation method for evaluating a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values, wherein
    through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, principal component variables with top three largest variances are obtained, the variables including an energy intake habit variable (C1), a nutrition balance habit variable (C2), and an exercise habit variable (C3),
    the health state evaluation method comprising:
    inputting the health checkup values (Dx);
    calculating the respective habit variables (C1 to C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis, and on the inputted variables;
    storing, in a storage section, the habit variables (C1 to C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and
    displaying, as a graph, a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C1 to C3) among the habit variables (C1 to C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section, wherein
    the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C1 to C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance,
    where
    Ax, A1 to A3, C1 to C3, D1 to D3, n1, and n2 are identical to those of claim 1.
  11. A health state evaluation system configured to evaluate a health state of a subject by obtaining a rank of the subject among data of a large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance by using health checkup values (Dx) which are principally blood values, wherein
    through a principal component analysis using the health checkup values (Dx) as explanatory variables, a nutrition balance habit variable (C2) and an exercise habit variable (C3) are obtained among principal component variables with top three largest variances,
    the health state evaluation system comprising:
    a data input section configured to input the health checkup values (Dx);
    a computation section configured to calculate the respective habit variables (C2, C3), based on coefficients and formulae derived through the principal component analysis;
    a storage section configured to store therein the habit variables (C2, C3) which have been obtained from a large number of persons in advance; and
    a result display section configured to display a rank of the subject regarding each of the habit variables (C2, C3) among the habit variables (C2, C3) of the large number of persons, the rank having been obtained by the computation section, wherein
    the health state of the subject is evaluated by obtaining, according to the habit variables (C2, C3), the rank of the subject among the data of the large number of persons, the data having been obtained in advance,
    where
    Ax is a weight coefficient of each Dx, which is derived through the principal component analysis, nutrition balance habit variable C 2 = Σ A 2 , n 2 * D 2 , n 2 + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0021
    (D1,n1 includes one or more of minimal blood pressure, AST, ALT, and blood glucose; n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1)
    (D2,n2 includes one or more of LDL, HDL, γGTP, and neutral fats; n2 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n2), and exercise habit variable C 3 = A 3 intrinsic coefficient of maximal blood pressure * D 3 maximal blood pressure + Σ A 1 , n 1 * D 1 , n 1
    Figure imgb0022
    (n1 is a natural number, ∑ 1 to n1).
EP16900520.4A 2016-04-28 2016-06-13 Health state evaluation system, health state evaluation device, and health state evaluation method Withdrawn EP3451276A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016092035 2016-04-28
PCT/JP2016/067547 WO2017187650A1 (en) 2016-04-28 2016-06-13 Health state evaluation system, health state evaluation device, and health state evaluation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3451276A4 EP3451276A4 (en) 2019-03-06
EP3451276A1 true EP3451276A1 (en) 2019-03-06

Family

ID=60160358

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16900520.4A Withdrawn EP3451276A1 (en) 2016-04-28 2016-06-13 Health state evaluation system, health state evaluation device, and health state evaluation method

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3451276A1 (en)
KR (1) KR102039346B1 (en)
CN (1) CN109196592A (en)
AU (1) AU2016404369A1 (en)
BR (1) BR112018071923A2 (en)
IL (1) IL262624B (en)
RU (1) RU2708368C1 (en)
SG (1) SG11201809480XA (en)
WO (1) WO2017187650A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110164554A (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-08-23 深圳市中幼国际教育科技有限公司 A kind of child's health data platform
CN109659001B (en) * 2018-12-18 2023-08-04 延安大学 Cancer prevention supervision system and method
CN110491510A (en) * 2019-07-22 2019-11-22 缤刻普达(北京)科技有限责任公司 Body measuring device, method and health control comments generating means
CN115148333B (en) * 2022-06-30 2023-02-07 国家体育总局运动医学研究所 Intelligent medical treatment and nutrition guarantee system based on remote audio and video interaction technology

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5960403A (en) * 1992-11-17 1999-09-28 Health Hero Network Health management process control system
US20020169634A1 (en) * 2000-12-26 2002-11-14 Kenzo Nishi Healthcare system, healthcare apparatus, server and healthcare method
KR20090000117A (en) * 2007-01-04 2009-01-07 박래웅 Personalized wellbeing index metric system for u-healthcare services
JP2010061389A (en) * 2008-09-03 2010-03-18 Tokyo Women's Medical College Interactive interface for medical diagnostic support
CA2680952A1 (en) * 2008-10-01 2010-04-01 Loyaltyone Us, Inc. System and method for providing a health management program
JP5185785B2 (en) * 2008-11-19 2013-04-17 オムロンヘルスケア株式会社 Health condition judgment device
JP4712100B2 (en) * 2009-03-13 2011-06-29 シャープ株式会社 Operating method of health condition judging device
US20120191469A1 (en) * 2011-01-21 2012-07-26 Life Time Fitness, Inc. System and process for evaluating and promoting health, wellness, and fitness in individuals
KR20130040494A (en) * 2011-10-14 2013-04-24 아주대학교산학협력단 Wellbeing index framework based on xml and wellbeing index calculating method
US9824446B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-11-21 Stephanie Littell Evaluating electromagnetic imagery by comparing to other individuals' imagery
CN104392110A (en) * 2014-11-04 2015-03-04 宝鸡数字人信息科技有限公司 Method and system for visually monitoring, analyzing and evaluating physiological data of human body
JP2016091338A (en) * 2014-11-06 2016-05-23 クインテセンシア合同会社 Health condition evaluation system
CN104484575A (en) * 2014-12-30 2015-04-01 天津迈沃医药技术有限公司 PCA (Principal Component Analysis)-based personalized health improvement method
WO2016143049A1 (en) * 2015-03-09 2016-09-15 株式会社FiNC Health management server, health management server control method, and health management program
CN105354414A (en) * 2015-10-21 2016-02-24 西安交通大学 Hierarchical analysis-based human body health condition assessment method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
RU2708368C1 (en) 2019-12-05
EP3451276A4 (en) 2019-03-06
IL262624A (en) 2018-11-29
KR102039346B1 (en) 2019-11-01
KR20190003595A (en) 2019-01-09
BR112018071923A2 (en) 2019-02-05
IL262624B (en) 2019-05-30
CN109196592A (en) 2019-01-11
SG11201809480XA (en) 2018-11-29
AU2016404369A1 (en) 2018-12-13
WO2017187650A1 (en) 2017-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
IL262624A (en) Health state evaluation system, health state evaluation device, and health state evaluation method
Warshaw et al. Teledermatology for diagnosis and management of skin conditions: a systematic review
Franssen et al. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria
Eckel et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Bartali et al. Serum micronutrient concentrations and decline in physical function among older persons
Church et al. Effects of different doses of physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness among sedentary, overweight or obese postmenopausal women with elevated blood pressure: a randomized controlled trial
Wang et al. Alcohol consumption, weight gain, and risk of becoming overweight in middle-aged and older women
Brown et al. Utility values and age-related macular degeneration
Dvorak et al. Development and implementation of a standardized precompetition medical assessment of international elite football players-2006 FIFA World Cup Germany
US20140243683A1 (en) System and method for health evaluation
Talarico et al. Static and dynamic single leg postural control performance during dual-task paradigms
Neal-Barnett et al. Ethnic differences in trichotillomania: Phenomenology, interference, impairment, and treatment efficacy
Su et al. In vivo high-definition optical coherence tomography: a bedside diagnostic aid for morphea
JP6069598B1 (en) Health condition evaluation system, health condition evaluation apparatus, and health condition evaluation method
Hackett et al. Effect of training phase on physical and physiological parameters of male powerlifters
JP2007105164A (en) Medical diagnostic imaging support apparatus
JP2016091338A (en) Health condition evaluation system
Middleton et al. Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts
TW201202991A (en) System and method thereof for generating recipes according to personal physical data
CN114023419A (en) Recipe recommendation method and device and nonvolatile storage medium
Simons et al. Health literature hybrid AI for health improvement; a design analysis for diabetes & hypertension
Herliani et al. Patients’ needs on nutritional counseling and risk factor management among myocardial infarction patients in cardiac rehabilitation
Parsakhoo et al. Monitoring physical health of the staff in forest management plans of Golestan province
Nwogueze et al. Cognitive Behaviour of Health Workers on Physical Activity and Sedentary Lifestyle during COVID-19 Pandemic in Abraka Community, Ethiope East Local Government Area, Nigeria
Chinnaiyan et al. Feasibility of establishing a comprehensive yoga program and its dose-effect relationship on cardiovascular risk factors and wellness parameters: a pilot study

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20181127

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20190125

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LIPOWSKI, GERARD

Inventor name: MIYAKE, MASATO

Inventor name: KAGIYAMA, NAOTO

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: KAGIYAMA, NAOTO

Inventor name: MIYAKE, MASATO

Inventor name: LIPOWSKI, GERARD

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20191203

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20201123