EP3433775A1 - Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un coût attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu - Google Patents
Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un coût attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individuInfo
- Publication number
- EP3433775A1 EP3433775A1 EP17711688.6A EP17711688A EP3433775A1 EP 3433775 A1 EP3433775 A1 EP 3433775A1 EP 17711688 A EP17711688 A EP 17711688A EP 3433775 A1 EP3433775 A1 EP 3433775A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- task
- execution
- individual
- primary
- data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
- G09B19/003—Repetitive work cycles; Sequence of movements
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1126—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/168—Evaluating attention deficit, hyperactivity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
- G09B19/003—Repetitive work cycles; Sequence of movements
- G09B19/0038—Sports
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/20—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of performance estimation associated with the execution of one or more tasks by an individual,
- the invention relates to a method comprising a dual-task protocol used to estimate resources or attentional costs necessary for their execution or to determine the strategies of sharing of attention developed by an individual (prioritization / sequentialization of tasks).
- a dual task situation is defined by the simultaneous completion of two tasks, a so-called "primary” task, and an added “secondary” task.
- the primary and secondary tasks may consist of a proprioceptive task, or a motor task, or a perceptual task, or a postural task, or a locomotor task, or a spatial orientation task or a functional task, or a cognitive task, or a visual-motor tracking task, or a visual-manual pointing task, or a pedaling task, etc.
- the invention advantageously has many applications, especially in the specialties associated with the evaluation, diagnosis, monitoring, learning, rehabilitation, training, or improvement of perceptual, postural, locomotive, motor, spatial orientation or functional,
- Context The performance of a primary task - such as maintaining upright balance or walking control - is, in general, mobilizing / consuming attentional resources in individuals.
- the mobilization / consumption of the attentional resources associated with the execution of the same task may also depend on a certain number of factors relating, among others, to the individual who performs this task (example: his age, his diverence, his state of health, his level of expertise, his sensorimotor and cognitive abilities, his emotional and emotional state, his level of alertness and concentration, his state of physical and psychological fatigue ...), the task he must perform (example: nature and complexity of the task %), the physical environment in which this task is performed (example: availability and accuracy of sensory information, inter-sensory conflict situations %), or, the voluntary attention paid to the task (example: priority instruction).
- US 8,764,532 discloses a system based on the dual task principle for predicting the risk of falls in an individual.
- the system includes:
- a measurement unit for acquiring data relating in particular to the patient's posture, to a reaction time of the patient in response to a stimulus, etc.
- a treatment unit for predicting a risk of falling or concussion from the data measured by the unit of measure.
- This system uses an interactive game and / or virtual reality scenario and / or an immersive graphic environment controlled by the movement of a subject to assess the probability that the subject will fall. and / or if he has suffered a concussion.
- An object of the invention is to propose a method based on the exploitation of the dual task paradigm allowing an individual to evaluate the resources or attentional costs necessary to perform a perceptual, postural, locomotor, motor, spatial or functional orientation or to determine the attention-sharing strategies developed by an individual.
- Another object of the invention is to allow evaluation of cognitive abilities through the performance of a certain number of tasks (reaction time, mental calculation task, spatial memory task, etc.).
- the present invention makes it possible to assist an individual, for example and in a nonlimiting manner:
- the invention proposes a method for estimating a request or an attentional cost associated with the execution of an attention-sharing task or strategy developed by an individual, said method being implemented in a mobile terminal and based on the exploitation of the multi-task paradigm, remarkable in that it comprises the following steps:
- the use of the primary task allows a quantification of the postural, motor, locomotor capacities.
- the use of the secondary task allows a quantification of cognitive abilities. Using a dual task protocol allows:
- the secondary task consists in the execution of an action in response to at least one visual and / or sound and / or tactile stimulus, the instant of emission of each stimulus during step c) depending on a position in the actual movement corresponding to the execution of the primary task;
- the third performance evaluation step c) comprises a sub-step consisting of:
- the third performance evaluation step c) comprises a sub-step consisting of:
- the third performance evaluation step c) comprises a sub-step consisting of:
- the first performance evaluation step a) comprises a sub-step of setting a difficulty level of the primary task according to a determined score associated with the execution of the primary task;
- the second performance evaluation step comprises a substep of comparing the second data collected with a response model to determine a score associated with the execution of the secondary task
- the second performance evaluation step b) comprises a sub-step of setting a difficulty level of the secondary task according to the determined score associated with the execution of the secondary task;
- the first performance evaluation step a) comprises a substep of comparing each first measured data with at least one theoretical data, so as to obtain a plurality of correspondence differences representative of variations over time between the actual movement of the individual and a desired movement that the individual should have achieved;
- the mobile terminal comprises three sensors consisting of a magnetometer, an accelerometer and a gyroscope, the substep of measuring a plurality of first data consisting in measuring:
- At least one linear acceleration with the accelerometer and preferably three linear accelerations along three orthogonal axes,
- At least one angular velocity with the gyroscope and preferably three angular velocities along the three orthogonal axes, at least one magnetic field with the magnetometer, and preferably three magnetic fields along the three orthogonal axes;
- the substep of determining an actual motion comprises estimating an orientation vector of the mobile terminal from the first data from measurements of the accelerometer, the magnetometer and the gyroscope;
- the method comprises, prior to the substep of determining an effective movement, a sub-step of filtering the first measured data using a Kalman filter so as to eliminate disturbances due to noise and measurement errors;
- the substep of filtering the first data comprises:
- the invention also relates to a computer program product comprising program code recorded on a computer readable data medium for executing the method according to any one of the preceding claims when the computer program is applied to a computer to be executed.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary method of the invention. assessment of a request or attentional cost required to perform a task or attention-sharing strategies developed by an individual.
- the method according to the invention is dedicated to the estimation of the attentional resources required for the execution of a primary task or to the determination of the strategies of sharing of attention developed by an individual (prioritization / sequentialization of the tasks).
- This process is based on exploiting the dual task paradigm of independently and simultaneously executing primary and secondary tasks on an individual.
- the primary and secondary tasks may consist of a proprioceptive task, or a motor task, or a perceptual task, or a postural task, or a locomotor task, or a locomotor task, or a spatial orientation task or a functional task, or a cognitive task, or a visual-motor tracking task, or a visual-manual pointing task, or a pedaling task, etc.
- the primary task is for example:
- TAG Timed Up and Go
- the secondary task is for example:
- This method can be implemented in the form of a downloadable application that can be implemented in a mobile terminal, including:
- display means such as a display screen
- keyboard possibly digital in the case of a terminal including a touch screen
- processing means such as a processor
- measurement means such as sensors, and in particular an accelerometer and / or a magnetometer and / or a gyroscope,
- - Touch and / or visual and / or audible alarm means such as a vibrator and / or the display screen and / or a loudspeaker.
- the terminal further comprises connection means (wired or non-wired) for connecting it to one (or more) sensor (s) and / or external actuator (s) possibly required (s) to the acquisition of certain data that can not be acquired by means of a sensor (s) and / or actuator (s) integrated into the terminal.
- the mobile terminal also comprises storage means such as a memory for the storage of tests or predefined exercises to be performed by the individual. It may also include means for transmitting / receiving signals such as an antenna for communicating with other fixed or mobile terminals in order to exchange information with third parties.
- storage means such as a memory for the storage of tests or predefined exercises to be performed by the individual. It may also include means for transmitting / receiving signals such as an antenna for communicating with other fixed or mobile terminals in order to exchange information with third parties.
- the various means for the implementation of the method are embedded in a single device such as a mobile terminal facilitates the implementation of the method for the individual. It allows in particular its use outside a laboratory or a hospital environment. Indeed, the only operation to be performed for the individual is to bring the mobile terminal. Thus, the implementation of the method can be performed in complete autonomy without the presence of a third party (doctor, experimenter, researcher, coach, etc.) thanks to its ease of use,
- the mobile terminal is for example a mobile phone including Smartphone type, a personal assistant (or "PDA", abbreviation of the expression Anglo-Saxon “Personal Digital Assistant”), or any type of mobile terminal known to those skilled in the art, such as a connected watch type Apple Watch®.
- PDA personal assistant
- Apple Watch® any type of mobile terminal known to those skilled in the art, such as a connected watch type Apple Watch®.
- an integrated solution is proposed to evaluate the resources or attentional costs necessary to perform a perceptual, postural, locomotor, motor, spatial or functional orientation task or to determine the strategies for sharing the attention. developed by an individual, from the evaluation of the performances obtained during the execution of two primary and secondary tasks carried out alone and separately, or simultaneously.
- This evaluation is useful for example, to allow a quantification of the allocation / mobilization of the attentional resources necessary to the execution of a primary task, to allow an evaluation of the capacity of the individual to move or to switch his attention on two competing tasks , and / or to predict and prevent a risk of falling.
- the mobile terminal can be attached to a region of the individual to perform a particular measurement for a task.
- the region in which the mobile terminal is attached depends on the type of primary and secondary tasks that the individual must perform.
- the mobile terminal executes different phases 10, 20, 30:
- the method comprises a phase of estimating the attentional resources solicited to perform the primary task or attention-sharing strategies developed by an individual.
- a representative score of the solicited attention resources or interference or prioritization / sequentialization of the tasks can be calculated. This score can be used to update a difficulty level of the test or exercise and / or add or remove an exercise.
- This score can also be sent to a third party to enable him to follow changes in the attention resources solicited in an individual, for example in the context of a reeducation to learn (or relearn) an individual to automate a postural task, motor or locomotor.
- the quantification associated with the exercise performed makes it possible to evaluate the progress of an individual in the execution of the exercise in terms of performance and degree automation. This quantification also makes it possible to update the difficulty levels of the exercises.
- the first performance evaluation phase comprises the steps of:
- Determining an effective movement of the individual with means for processing the mobile terminal the actual movement being determined from the first data measured during the execution of the primary task.
- movement means the sequence of positions occupied by a point (or a set of points) of one (or more) body segment (s) of the individual (trunk). , thigh, leg, foot, etc.) in space over time.
- a “movement” may consist for example of a displacement in a particular kinematic or conversely in the absence of displacement.
- a "motion” is represented by a set of vectors (for example “velocity vector” or "orientation vector”) which each define the displacement of a point with respect to a fixed repository of space and a determined moment.
- the step of issuing 1 10 of a first information makes it possible to provide the individual with information on the primary task to be performed.
- This first information can be displayed on the screen of the mobile terminal or be transmitted via a speaker of the terminal.
- the information relating to its execution can be issued to the individual as and when the task is executed.
- information that tells the individual to turn around to return to his or her initial position and to be seated can, for example, be emitted during the walk of the individual.
- This information can be sent in visual, sound or tactile form (via the vibrator of the mobile terminal).
- the evaluation phase of the first performance comprises the measurement 120 by sensors of the mobile terminal, a plurality of first data representing the movement or the absence of movement given in reference.
- the measurement step 120 of the first data is performed during the execution of the primary task.
- the first data can be measured using handheld sensors.
- the mobile terminal includes a 3D accelerometer, a 3D magnetometer, and a gyroscope:
- three of the first measured data can correspond to linear accelerations along three orthogonal axes
- three of the first measured data can correspond to angular velocities along the same three orthogonal axes
- three of the first measured data can correspond to magnetic fields along the same three orthogonal axes.
- first data measured by the different sensors can then be merged to determine the actual movement of the individual.
- the use of groups of first data each composed of measurements from an accelerometer, a magnetometer and a gyroscope improves the accuracy in the estimation of the actual movement made by the individual. 2.13. Filtering the first measured data
- the method may also include an optional step of filtering the groups of first data measured from the sensors of the mobile terminal. This eliminates disturbances due to noise and measurement errors.
- the filtering of groups of first data can be implemented using a Kalman type filter.
- This type of filter is particularly suitable for estimating parameters of a system evolving over time from noisy measurements, which is the case in the context of the present invention since the different groups of first data are representative signals. of a movement made by the individual.
- each group of first data carries information on:
- the processor of the mobile terminal processes the groups of first measured data to extract the information relating to the position, and / or the orientation and / or the speed of movement of the mobile terminal at different times of measurement over a period of time. .
- the actual motion thus determined may constitute a reference in the execution of the primary task.
- the first performances consist in this determined actual movement.
- the actual movement determined can be compared to a theoretical movement that the individual should "ideally” achieve, as described in the French patent application dated November 20, 2014 and filed under the number 1461233.
- the method may comprise an additional step of calculating a score relating to the execution of the primary task, in particular as a function of the difference (or differences) between the actual and theoretical movements.
- the calculated score is the first evaluated performance.
- the second performance evaluation phase comprises the steps of:
- - Emit 210 a second visual and / or sound and / or tactile information on the terminal, said information including instructions relating to a secondary task to be performed,
- the transmission step 210 of a second piece of information makes it possible to provide the individual with information on the secondary task to be performed.
- This second information can be displayed on the screen of the mobile terminal or be transmitted via a speaker of the terminal.
- the secondary task may, in some applications, consist of an action to be performed in response to a stimulus - for example visual (flashing light on the display screen of the mobile terminal) or audible (beep sound on the speaker of the terminal mobile) or touch (activating a vibrator on the mobile terminal), etc.
- a stimulus for example visual (flashing light on the display screen of the mobile terminal) or audible (beep sound on the speaker of the terminal mobile) or touch (activating a vibrator on the mobile terminal), etc.
- the collection step 220 of the second data is performed during the execution of the secondary task.
- These second data may include:
- a spatial displacement (or orientation) of the mobile terminal in response to a stimulus an actuation of a pushbutton of the (or connected to) the terminal, etc.
- These second data can be collected by using different sensors of the terminal as described above with reference to the evaluation phase of the first performances.
- the time of transmission of the second information may depend on the execution cycle of the primary task.
- the terminal will have detected via its microphone the succession of responses. provided by the individual and will be able to compare them to the solution of this exercise.
- the level of difficulty of the secondary task can be adapted according to the score obtained by the individual following his execution. This makes it possible to normalize the level of difficulty of the secondary task according to the capabilities of the individual.
- the difficulty level of the secondary task can be reduced (count down from 5 to 5 from 100, etc.).
- the score of the individual is maximal, the level of difficulty of the secondary task can be increased.
- the difficulty level of this secondary task be high enough to be able to detect an influence of this secondary task on the execution of the primary task. This makes it possible to obtain a level of interference between the primary and secondary tasks which has an impact on the behavioral performance of the individual and makes measurable the attentional cost of the primary task.
- the third performance evaluation phase comprises the steps of: Emitting 310 a third visual and / or sound and / or tactile information on the terminal, said information including instructions relating to the simultaneous execution of the primary task and the second secondary task,
- the third information includes an instruction associated with the simultaneous execution of the primary and secondary tasks. According to this instruction (that is, priority to the primary task, priority to the secondary task, no priority), the method allows:
- the instruction may consist in inviting the individual to perform the primary task as a priority (and if possible with the same level of performance as when the primary task was performed alone), the concurrent secondary task to be performed as best as possible.
- the method makes it possible to determine the request or the attentional cost associated with the execution of the primary task. Indeed, when the attentional capacities of the central nervous system are exceeded, by the competition between the primary and secondary tasks, the performance in the secondary task decreases. This drop in performance in the secondary task reflects the attentional cost necessary to complete the primary task.
- the instruction may consist in asking the individual to perform the secondary task as a priority (and if possible with the same level of performance as when the secondary task was performed alone).
- the method makes it possible to determine the effects (beneficial or negative) of a secondary task on the control mechanisms involved in the execution of the primary task.
- the instruction may finally consist in asking him to simultaneously perform the primary and secondary tasks without asking him to maintain the level of performance of one or other of the primary and secondary tasks (ie without priority set to the primary or secondary task).
- a degradation of the two tasks or a degradation of only one or the other primary and secondary tasks. This degradation is representative of the priority given by the individual to one or other of the primary and secondary tasks.
- the method then makes it possible to identify the strategies for sharing the attention developed by the individual.
- the instant of emission of the stimulus may be dependent on the primary task.
- the tasks to be performed consist of:
- a sound stimulus such as a "beep” (task of reaction time to an auditory stimulus)
- each sound stimulus can be emitted when the individual is in single support (i.e. on a foot) during his walking cycle.
- each stimulus may be emitted each time the two feet of the individual rest on the ground during his walking cycle.
- the method may comprise the following sub-steps to take account of the primary task in the presentation of the secondary task:
- the third data measured during the simultaneous execution of the primary and secondary tasks are compared with the first and second data obtained during the separate execution of said primary and secondary tasks.
- these scores can be compared to each other.
- statistics on data distributions may be added.
- This estimation step 40 has many advantages. Indeed, it allows for example:
- the "Time Up and Go” (TUG) is a functional mobility test used in the assessment and monitoring of rehabilitation of the elderly and patients with neurological, orthopedic or traumatological, in particular, for this relatively easy and rapid test , the person is asked to get up from an armchair, to walk, to turn around and to come back to sit, that is, to perform various postural and locomotor tasks that are common in life daily.
- the solution proposed in the present application offers the possibility of presenting a secondary task - such as a cognitive task (triggering an auditory stimulus for a reaction time task for example) - according to the postural and locomotor tasks (sitting, standing, walking, etc.) associated with performing the TUG test, which advantageously makes it possible to determine the attentional cost associated with performing each of these postural and locomotor tasks.
- a secondary task such as a cognitive task (triggering an auditory stimulus for a reaction time task for example)
- postural and locomotor tasks tilt, standing, walking, etc.
- this support phase corresponding to the entire period when the foot is in contact with the ground (this support phase starts with a heel strike and ends with the takeoff of the hallux), and
- this oscillating phase begins by taking off the hallux and ending with the attack of the heel.
- the support phase occupies 60% of the walking cycle and the oscillating phase 40%.
- the first period is a double support phase during which the weight of the body will be referred to a lower limb; it lasts 10% of the cycle;
- the second period is the single support phase lasting 40% of the cycle; iii) the third period is a new phase of double support for 10%; iv) the fourth period is an oscillating phase without contact with the ground during 40%.
- a complete cycle comprises two phases of double support, a monopodal support phase and an oscillating phase.
- the solution proposed in the present application offers the possibility of presenting a secondary task - such as a cognitive task (triggering an auditory stimulus for a reaction time task for example) - depending on the phases of walking (for example initiation of walking, simple support, double support, etc.), which advantageously makes it possible to determine the attentional cost associated with the realization of each of these phases.
- a cognitive task triggering an auditory stimulus for a reaction time task for example
- phases of walking for example initiation of walking, simple support, double support, etc.
- the difficulty of the secondary task (and / or the primary task) can be modified online depending on data collected on the primary task or the secondary task.
- Dual task training finds its place, especially in individuals in the initial phase of dementia. By simultaneously seeking the sensorimotor and cognitive functions of these people, this care makes it possible to improve their autonomy and quality of life, in particular their ability to perform the activities of daily life as much as possible and prevent the risk of falling.
- the present invention makes it possible to issue the instruction. It also makes it possible to determine whether the individual has managed to comply with the instructions by analyzing the data acquired with the sensors.
- the present invention is not limited strictly to the implementation of two tasks to estimate a request or an attentional cost or an attention-sharing strategy developed by an individual.
- the method according to the invention can be implemented with more than two tasks (for example, three, four, five tasks, etc.) performed separately and simultaneously.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
- Psychology (AREA)
- Psychiatry (AREA)
- Social Psychology (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1652541A FR3049371A1 (fr) | 2016-03-24 | 2016-03-24 | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un cout attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu |
PCT/EP2017/056921 WO2017162789A1 (fr) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-03-23 | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un coût attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3433775A1 true EP3433775A1 (fr) | 2019-01-30 |
Family
ID=56322071
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17711688.6A Withdrawn EP3433775A1 (fr) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-03-23 | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un coût attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11355029B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP3433775A1 (fr) |
FR (1) | FR3049371A1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2017162789A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3049371A1 (fr) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-09-29 | Univ Grenoble Alpes | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un cout attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu |
EP3744408A4 (fr) * | 2018-01-24 | 2021-01-20 | Fujitsu Limited | Programme de génération d'écran, procédé de génération d'écran et dispositif de traitement d'informations |
US10492023B1 (en) * | 2018-03-28 | 2019-11-26 | Michael Gurin | Dynamic resource location coordination control system |
CN117805658B (zh) * | 2024-02-29 | 2024-05-10 | 东北大学 | 一种数据驱动的电动汽车电池剩余寿命预测方法 |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3390115A (en) | 1964-12-29 | 1968-06-25 | Eastman Kodak Co | Polyvinyl chloride adhesive compositions |
US4028819A (en) * | 1974-07-12 | 1977-06-14 | Walker Norman K | Method for measuring tasks and means for generating coordinated audio-visual stimuli and error indicia for said secondary tasks |
EP2441386A1 (fr) * | 2008-10-14 | 2012-04-18 | Ohio University | Évaluation cognitive et linguistique utilisant le suivi des yeux |
AU2010223842A1 (en) * | 2009-03-11 | 2011-09-29 | University Of Wollongong | Method and apparatus |
US9585589B2 (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2017-03-07 | Cerner Innovation, Inc. | Computerized systems and methods for stability-theoretic prediction and prevention of sudden cardiac death |
US8764532B1 (en) | 2012-11-07 | 2014-07-01 | Bertec Corporation | System and method for fall and/or concussion prediction |
US9842511B2 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2017-12-12 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Method and apparatus for facilitating attention to a task |
US9053516B2 (en) * | 2013-07-15 | 2015-06-09 | Jeffrey Stempora | Risk assessment using portable devices |
US20150038803A1 (en) * | 2013-08-02 | 2015-02-05 | Motion Intelligence LLC | System and Method for Evaluating Concussion Injuries |
US10692603B2 (en) * | 2014-05-13 | 2020-06-23 | The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona | Method and system to identify frailty using body movement |
EP3267891A4 (fr) * | 2015-03-12 | 2018-11-14 | Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. | Systèmes et procédés implémentés par un processeur destinés à mesurer les capacités cognitives |
US20170270818A1 (en) * | 2016-03-21 | 2017-09-21 | Barry James French | Simulation creates a novel Dual Task Paradigm ("Divided Attention") with enhanced fidelity with dynamic environments for injury reduction, performance enhancement, and rehabilitation |
FR3049371A1 (fr) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-09-29 | Univ Grenoble Alpes | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un cout attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu |
-
2016
- 2016-03-24 FR FR1652541A patent/FR3049371A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
-
2017
- 2017-03-23 EP EP17711688.6A patent/EP3433775A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
- 2017-03-23 US US16/088,005 patent/US11355029B2/en active Active
- 2017-03-23 WO PCT/EP2017/056921 patent/WO2017162789A1/fr active Application Filing
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR3049371A1 (fr) | 2017-09-29 |
US11355029B2 (en) | 2022-06-07 |
US20190172367A1 (en) | 2019-06-06 |
WO2017162789A1 (fr) | 2017-09-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Schrack et al. | Assessing daily physical activity in older adults: unraveling the complexity of monitors, measures, and methods | |
Dobkin | Wearable motion sensors to continuously measure real-world physical activities | |
US10376739B2 (en) | Balance testing and training system and method | |
Geraedts et al. | Adherence to and effectiveness of an individually tailored home-based exercise program for frail older adults, driven by mobility monitoring: design of a prospective cohort study | |
Sprint et al. | Toward automating clinical assessments: a survey of the timed up and go | |
Borzì et al. | Real-time detection of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease using multi-head convolutional neural networks and a single inertial sensor | |
EP3433775A1 (fr) | Procede et systeme pour l'estimation d'une demande ou d'un coût attentionnel associe a l'execution d'une tache ou des strategies de partage de l'attention developpees par un individu | |
Zoetewei et al. | Protocol for the DeFOG trial: a randomized controlled trial on the effects of smartphone-based, on-demand cueing for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease | |
JP2018068910A (ja) | 疾病予測方法 | |
Szabo et al. | The Role and Importance of Using Sensor-Based Devices in Medical Rehabilitation: A Literature Review on the New Therapeutic Approaches | |
McManus et al. | Impact of exercise intervention in Parkinson’s disease can be quantified using inertial sensor data and clinical tests | |
Dissanayake et al. | CompRate: Power efficient heart rate and heart rate variability monitoring on smart wearables | |
Amira et al. | Stress level classification using heart rate variability | |
Sprint et al. | Designing wearable sensor-based analytics for quantitative mobility assessment | |
Saikia et al. | A Systematic review on Application based Parkinson’s disease Detection Systems | |
Immonen | Risk factors for falls and technologies for fall risk assessment in older adults | |
de Oliveira Brauner et al. | The 180° turn phase of the timed up and go test better predicts history of falls in the oldest-old when compared with the full test: a case-control study | |
Foppen | Smart insoles: Prevention of falls in older people through instant risk analysis and signalling | |
Wongsirikul | Field-based usability study of physical activity monitoring and sharing system for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury | |
Mechanick et al. | Wearable technologies in lifestyle medicine | |
Pistoia et al. | Integrated ICT system for the implementation of rehabilitation therapy for Alzheimer’s patients and for the improvement of quality and efficiency in managing their health: the rehab-dem project | |
Bächlin et al. | Experiences in developing a wearable gait assistant for parkinson’s disease patients | |
Mannini et al. | A smartphone-centered wearable sensor network for fall risk assessment in the elderly | |
Bohlke et al. | Technologies to Prevent Falls and Their Consequences | |
Mykkänen | Wearable motion sensors in measuring the activity of a rehabilitation patient |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20181023 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G06F 19/00 20180101AFI20170929BHEP Ipc: A61B 5/11 20060101ALI20170929BHEP Ipc: G09B 7/00 20060101ALI20170929BHEP Ipc: A61B 5/00 20060101ALI20170929BHEP Ipc: G09B 19/00 20060101ALI20170929BHEP |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20190715 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20200128 |