EP3428591B1 - Flame detector field of view verification via reverse infrared signaling - Google Patents

Flame detector field of view verification via reverse infrared signaling Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3428591B1
EP3428591B1 EP18183185.0A EP18183185A EP3428591B1 EP 3428591 B1 EP3428591 B1 EP 3428591B1 EP 18183185 A EP18183185 A EP 18183185A EP 3428591 B1 EP3428591 B1 EP 3428591B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
infrared test
flame detector
optical flame
test signal
digital infrared
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP18183185.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3428591A1 (en
Inventor
Michael J. Grady
Venus Dantas
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honeywell International Inc
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honeywell International Inc filed Critical Honeywell International Inc
Publication of EP3428591A1 publication Critical patent/EP3428591A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3428591B1 publication Critical patent/EP3428591B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B17/00Fire alarms; Alarms responsive to explosion
    • G08B17/12Actuation by presence of radiation or particles, e.g. of infrared radiation or of ions
    • G08B17/125Actuation by presence of radiation or particles, e.g. of infrared radiation or of ions by using a video camera to detect fire or smoke
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01JMEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/0014Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry for sensing the radiation from gases, flames
    • G01J5/0018Flames, plasma or welding
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01JMEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/0014Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry for sensing the radiation from gases, flames
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01JMEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/02Constructional details
    • G01J5/025Interfacing a pyrometer to an external device or network; User interface
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01JMEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/02Constructional details
    • G01J5/026Control of working procedures of a pyrometer, other than calibration; Bandwidth calculation; Gain control
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01JMEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
    • G01J5/00Radiation pyrometry, e.g. infrared or optical thermometry
    • G01J5/02Constructional details
    • G01J5/027Constructional details making use of sensor-related data, e.g. for identification of sensor parts or optical elements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/01Arrangements or apparatus for facilitating the optical investigation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N21/25Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
    • G01N21/31Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
    • G01N21/35Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/17Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
    • G01N2021/1765Method using an image detector and processing of image signal

Definitions

  • flame detectors may be incorporated into various environments, such as, for example, oil refineries, oil platforms/rigs, semiconductor fabrication plants, gas storage facilities, and/or power plants. These environments may require monitoring and an appropriate response to a fire or a potential fire situation.
  • Flame detectors may detect a presence of a flame by sensing various spectral bands which may be emitted from the flame. Responses to a detected flame may include activating an alarm, shutting off a fuel line (e.g., a natural gas line), and/or triggering a fire suppression system.
  • a fuel line e.g., a natural gas line
  • WO2012/045996 discloses a safety system providing a nodal system including a unit having a memory and an optical data receiver and a common control unit in combination with the unit. This includes a method of commissioning the system comprising the steps of activating the optical data receiver on the unit and transmitting an optical data signal to the unit thereby commissioning the unit.
  • WO2008/014592 discloses an infrared sensor security system comprising an infrared sensor located on a network as an IR transmitter and an IR receiver with a processor to control data packets to be transmitted by the EIR transmitter and receiver to provide bidirectional communication.
  • component or feature may,” “can,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “preferably,” “possibly,” “typically,” “optionally,” “for example,” “often,” or “might” (or other such language) be included or have a characteristic, that particular component or feature is not required to be included or to have the characteristic. Such component or feature may be optionally included in some embodiments, or it may be excluded.
  • Optical flame detectors may have an effective field of view (“FOV”), and fires within the FOV may be detected, while fires outside the FOV are not likely to be detected.
  • FOV effective field of view
  • a technician may align and aim the OFD to cover an intended area.
  • OFDs may be checked periodically in order to confirm reliable operation.
  • failure modes that might prevent proper operation of the OFD can include, but are not limited to: 1) a window of the OFD may become dirty or obscured; 2) the OFD may be bumped so that its aim is no longer correct; 3) additional equipment may be installed in the optical path (e.g., FOV), blocking infrared ("IR”) radiation and preventing flame detection.
  • FOV optical path
  • IR infrared
  • a conventional solution to testing the operation of an OFD may involve sending a technician out with a test lamp (e.g., test IR source).
  • the test lamp mimics a fire. That is, the test lamp must produce light approximately as intense as light produced by a fire.
  • the technician may activate the test lamp (e.g., aim the test lamp at the OFD) from several locations and watch for an indicator light on the OFD. This may confirm that the IR path is clear. This may require two people because a second person may be in a control room disabling a response to a flame report. Therefore, this solution may be laborious, slow, and inefficient because the test lamp may be big and heavy, and may only have a 4 meter range (i.e., the test lamp must be near the OFD).
  • test lamp may have a modest battery life. This may be short compared to a 50-60 meter range of the OFD. As a result, the use of a test lamp may not be capable of verifying the operation of the OFD at all distances within the operating range of the OFD. Thus, this solution may not be accurate in determining whether each location is within the FOV of the OFD.
  • the systems, methods, and/or devices of the disclosure may utilize reverse signaling to improve a signal to noise ratio by 1) Blocking out of band radiation at a portable infrared test receiver ("PTTR") with a near infrared region (“NIR”) optical filter; 2) Blocking optical signals which may be modulated at an incorrect frequency relative to a digital infrared test signal (“DITS").
  • the DITS may utilize digital encoding (e.g., Manchester encoding).
  • the DITS may modulate for a minority of an operation time of the OFD. That is, the DITS may be transmitted during a quiescent state of the OFD. This transmission of the DITS during the quiescent state may avoid creating a low frequency signal that might be in band for the OFD.
  • This feature may allow the PITR to receive DITSs from multiple OFDs. Interpreting each DITS in an environment with multiple OFDs may be facilitated by both the PITR and the quiescent state DITS transmission.
  • the present invention relates to a system and a method for verifying operation verification of an OFD.
  • the system and method incorporate/embed a digital infrared test signal source in the OFD.
  • This digital infrared test signal source transmits a signal train (digital signal packet, DITS) to a test receiver (PITR).
  • DITS may include information/data such as, at least one of a serial number of the optical flame detector, a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time (e.g., seconds) since a last reboot of the optical flame detector, a real time clock value of the optical flame detector, and current analog optical signal levels.
  • the test receiver may be optically passive (e.g., test receiver may not transmit any signals such as a signal train).
  • the test receiver can include a global positioning system ("GPS") and a logging capability (e.g., logging/storing data). This may make a verification procedure for OFD operation simpler. That is, a technician can simply walk to a potential flame source with the test receiver.
  • the test receiver may then report a number of DITS it detects from various OFDs (e.g., a digital infrared test signal source of each OFD). This report can be either immediate on a display/user interface of the test receiver and/or logged/stored into an internal memory of the test receiver.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an OFD 100.
  • the OFD 100 can include any suitable OFD configured to detect a fire/flame using optical detection techniques.
  • the OFD 100 serves to optically view a desired optical field for flames/fires, compose the transmitted DITS(s), and provide an alarm in the event that a flame/fire satisfying predetermined thresholds is detected.
  • the OFD 100 may include a FOV from about 100° to about 170° relative to at least one axis (e.g., x-axis, y-axis, z-axis).
  • the OFD 100 may detect flames at a distance ranging from about 0 meters to about 60 meters, relative to the position of the OFD 100.
  • the OFD 100 may detect hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon based fires or flames.
  • the operating temperature of the OFD 100 may be about -50°F to about 200°F.
  • the OFD 100 may include a housing 102 (e.g., which can be an explosion proof housing) which may include at least one of an ultraviolet ("UV") light sensor 104, a visible light sensor 106, an infrared (“IR”) sensor 108 (e.g., analog IR receiver), and a digital infrared test signal source 109.
  • a sensitivity for each of the sensors may be adjustable.
  • the housing 102 may include materials, such as, for example, aluminum and/or stainless steel.
  • the housing 102 may include a window 107 positioned to cover the UV light sensor 104, the visible light sensor 106, and/or the IR sensor 108, and digital infrared test signal source 109.
  • the window 107 may protect the sensors and the digital infrared test signal source 109.
  • the digital infrared test signal source 109 (e.g., an IR source/transmitter, etc.) emits/transmits a DITS recognizable by a test receiver.
  • the DITS may be transmitted at an angle ranging from about 100° to about 170° relative to at least one axis (e.g., x-axis, y-axis, z-axis). That is, a spread of the DITS shall be similar to that of a coverage area included in the FOV of OFD 100.
  • the digital infrared test signal source 109 may emit/transmit a DITS at a frequency ranging from about 30 kilohertz ("kHz") to about 60 kHz.
  • the DITS may include data, such as, at least one of a serial number of the optical flame detector, a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time since a last reboot of the optical flame detector, a real time clock value of the optical flame detector, and current analog optical signal levels.
  • a transmitting range of the digital infrared test signal source 109 may substantially match that of a reception range of the OFD, and can range from about 0 meters to about 60 meters. That is, the digital infrared test signal source 109 may transmit a DITS up to a distance of about 60 meters. The DITS is detected by a test receiver.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of PITR 113.
  • the PITR 113 tests/verifies that the OFD 100 is operating as intended (e.g., monitoring the intended coverage area).
  • the PITR 113 receives/processes the DITS.
  • the PITR 113 may receive electromagnetic radiation (in an NIR), wherein a wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation may be between about 700 nanometers and about 1200 nanometers.
  • the PITR 113 may be optically passive.
  • the PITR 113 may be a low power electronic device which may allow it to be non-incendive (e.g., incapable, under normal operating conditions, of causing ignition of a flammable gas-air, vapor-air, and/or dust-air mixture due to arcing or thermal means).
  • the PITR 113 may include a memory 115 and a user interface 116 (e.g., liquid crystal display ("LCD”)), and optionally, a positioning or location module 114 (e.g., a global positioning system (GPS) receiver and module, a time of flight (TOF) positioning system, a received signal strength (RSS) positioning system, etc.).
  • GPS global positioning system
  • TOF time of flight
  • RSS received signal strength
  • the PITR 113 may receive and/or process DITS from distances of up to about 60 meters. For example, the PITR 113 can receive and process DITS within the transmission range of the digital infrared test signal source 109. The PITR 113 may also calculate its location/position via the location module (e.g., via the location module 114). The PITR 113 may store the data included in the DITS within memory 115 and display this data on user interface 116. That is, memory 115 may store at least one of a serial number of the OFD 100, a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time since a last reboot of the OFD 100, a real time clock value of the OFD 100, and current analog optical signal levels. The PITR 113 can receive and store information received from each OFD 100 within range.
  • the DITS from more than one OFD may be received by the PITR 113 at a given location.
  • the PITR 113 may be aimed/positioned at different viewing angles at a given location in order to determine which sources (e.g., OFDs with a digital infrared test signal source) are capable of viewing the PITR 113 at the given location.
  • the PITR 113 may be within view of two or more sources.
  • the PITR 113 can be positioned to receive a DITS from a first source, and once the DITS information is received, repositioned/aimed to receive a DITS from a second source. This process can be repeated until each source within view is detected.
  • DITS may convey data for a minority of the time; contain little low-frequency components that might interfere with the flame detection; and facilitate multiple OFDs transmitting the DITS at the same time without interference without optical selection.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an OFD FOV verification system 118 ("system 118").
  • System 118 includes the OFD 100 and the PITR 113.
  • the OFD 100 may be positioned/installed on a structure 117 via a mount 119.
  • the FOV of the OFD 100 include sa target area 120 (e.g., a location). That is, the OFD 100 is installed/positioned to scan target area 120 for a flame.
  • the OFD 100 transmits a DITS, for example periodically or continuously.
  • the PITR 113 is positioned at the target area 120. That is, to verify that target area 120 is within the FOV, a technician/user may position himself/herself with the PITR 113 at the target area 120.
  • the target area 120 includes potential flame/fire sources, such as, for example, gas tanks, flammable materials, areas containing flammable materials, and the like.
  • the PITR 113 receives the DITS and may indicate on the user interface 116 that the FOV is correct. If the FOV for the OFD 100 is incorrect (e.g., target area 120 is not within the FOV), the PITR 113 may not receive the DITS and may indicate that the FOV is incorrect on user interface 116 or not provide any indication of any received DITS. If the FOV is incorrect, a technician may correct the FOV by repositioning the OFD 100 to bring the target area 120 within the FOV. That is, based on receiving/not receiving the DITS, an indication can be made as to whether target area 120 is within the FOV of the OFD 100. For example, a green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate if target area 120 is within the FOV of OFD 100. A red light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate if target area 120 is not within the FOV of the OFD 100.
  • a green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate if target area 120 is within the FOV of OFD 100.
  • window 107 may become cloudy or non-transparent (e.g., obstructed) which may not allow the sensors to detect a flame and not allow the PITR 113 to receive a DITS.
  • the FOV may be correct, but the PITR 113 may indicate that the FOV is incorrect.
  • a user/technician may need to examine the condition of window 107 after being notified that the FOV is incorrect, and may clean the window 107 as necessary, thereby allowing the sensors to detect a flame and allow PITR 113 to receive a DITS.
  • the DITS can be received, but the signal strength may be lower than expected and/or less than a threshold.
  • Such a result may provide an indication that the FOV is correct, but that the window 107 is partially obstructed. That is, based on receiving/not receiving the DITS, an indication can be made as to whether OFD 100 is operating correctly (e.g., transmitting a DITS that is actually received).
  • a green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate proper/correct operation, whereas, a red light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate improper/incorrect operation.
  • an object e.g., equipment
  • This object may obstruct a line of sight (e.g., a signal transmission path)/FOV between the OFD 100 and the target area 120/ PITR 113, and may cause the PITR 113 to indicate an incorrect FOV and may not allow OFD 100 to detect a flame.
  • a line of sight e.g., a signal transmission path
  • an indication can be made as to whether the line of sight between the PITR 113 and the OFD 100 is obstructed or unobstructed.
  • a technician/user may correct positioning of the OFD 100 or reposition the object to obtain the correct FOV.
  • a green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate an unobstructed line of sight/FOV between the OFD 100 and target area 120/ PITR 113, whereas, a red light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate an obstructed line of sight/FOV between the OFD 100 and target area 120/ PITR 113.
  • Benefits of systems, methods, and/or devices of the disclosure may include: 1) The test receiver may contain only low-power electronics which may allow it to be made non-incendive, 2) verification/testing may only require one person, 3) flame detection may not need to be interrupted for the test/verification, 4) the verification may be focused on the flame source instead of the flame detector, 5) the range of the IR source can be comparable to the range of the OFD, and 6) the facility owner may have a reliable record (e.g., data can be stored/reviewed in the receiver) confirming staff/technicians really did perform the verification/testing.
  • a reliable record e.g., data can be stored/reviewed in the receiver

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Fire Alarms (AREA)
  • Photometry And Measurement Of Optical Pulse Characteristics (AREA)

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • To prevent fires, the use of flame detectors may be incorporated into various environments, such as, for example, oil refineries, oil platforms/rigs, semiconductor fabrication plants, gas storage facilities, and/or power plants. These environments may require monitoring and an appropriate response to a fire or a potential fire situation. Flame detectors may detect a presence of a flame by sensing various spectral bands which may be emitted from the flame. Responses to a detected flame may include activating an alarm, shutting off a fuel line (e.g., a natural gas line), and/or triggering a fire suppression system.
  • WO2012/045996 , discloses a safety system providing a nodal system including a unit having a memory and an optical data receiver and a common control unit in combination with the unit. This includes a method of commissioning the system comprising the steps of activating the optical data receiver on the unit and transmitting an optical data signal to the unit thereby commissioning the unit.
  • WO2008/014592 discloses an infrared sensor security system comprising an infrared sensor located on a network as an IR transmitter and an IR receiver with a processor to control data packets to be transmitted by the EIR transmitter and receiver to provide bidirectional communication.
  • SUMMARY
  • The invention is set out in the appended claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
    • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an optical flame detector included in an optical flame detector operation verification system in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
    • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a portable infrared test receiver included in the optical flame detector operation verification system in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
    • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the optical flame detector operation verification system in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • It should be understood at the outset that although illustrative implementations of one or more embodiments are illustrated below, the disclosed systems and methods may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not yet in existence. The disclosure should in no way be limited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
  • The following brief definition of terms shall apply throughout the application:
  • The term "comprising" means including but not limited to, and should be interpreted in the manner it is typically used in the patent context;
  • The phrases "in one embodiment," "according to one embodiment," and the like generally mean that the particular feature, structure, or characteristic following the phrase may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, and may be included in more than one embodiment of the present invention (importantly, such phrases do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment);
  • If the specification describes something as "exemplary" or an "example," it should be understood that refers to a non-exclusive example;
  • The terms "about" or "approximately" or the like, when used with a number, may mean that specific number, or alternatively, a range in proximity to the specific number, as understood by persons of skill in the art field; and
  • If the specification states a component or feature "may," "can," "could," "should," "would," "preferably," "possibly," "typically," "optionally," "for example," "often," or "might" (or other such language) be included or have a characteristic, that particular component or feature is not required to be included or to have the characteristic. Such component or feature may be optionally included in some embodiments, or it may be excluded.
  • Optical flame detectors ("OFDs") may have an effective field of view ("FOV"), and fires within the FOV may be detected, while fires outside the FOV are not likely to be detected. During installation of an OFD, a technician may align and aim the OFD to cover an intended area.
  • OFDs may be checked periodically in order to confirm reliable operation. There are a number of failure modes that might prevent proper operation of the OFD. For example, failure modes that might prevent operation can include, but are not limited to: 1) a window of the OFD may become dirty or obscured; 2) the OFD may be bumped so that its aim is no longer correct; 3) additional equipment may be installed in the optical path (e.g., FOV), blocking infrared ("IR") radiation and preventing flame detection.
  • A conventional solution to testing the operation of an OFD may involve sending a technician out with a test lamp (e.g., test IR source). The test lamp mimics a fire. That is, the test lamp must produce light approximately as intense as light produced by a fire. The technician may activate the test lamp (e.g., aim the test lamp at the OFD) from several locations and watch for an indicator light on the OFD. This may confirm that the IR path is clear. This may require two people because a second person may be in a control room disabling a response to a flame report. Therefore, this solution may be laborious, slow, and inefficient because the test lamp may be big and heavy, and may only have a 4 meter range (i.e., the test lamp must be near the OFD). Also, the test lamp may have a modest battery life. This may be short compared to a 50-60 meter range of the OFD. As a result, the use of a test lamp may not be capable of verifying the operation of the OFD at all distances within the operating range of the OFD. Thus, this solution may not be accurate in determining whether each location is within the FOV of the OFD.
  • The systems, methods, and/or devices of the disclosure may utilize reverse signaling to improve a signal to noise ratio by 1) Blocking out of band radiation at a portable infrared test receiver ("PTTR") with a near infrared region ("NIR") optical filter; 2) Blocking optical signals which may be modulated at an incorrect frequency relative to a digital infrared test signal ("DITS"). The DITS may utilize digital encoding (e.g., Manchester encoding). The DITS may modulate for a minority of an operation time of the OFD. That is, the DITS may be transmitted during a quiescent state of the OFD. This transmission of the DITS during the quiescent state may avoid creating a low frequency signal that might be in band for the OFD. This feature may allow the PITR to receive DITSs from multiple OFDs. Interpreting each DITS in an environment with multiple OFDs may be facilitated by both the PITR and the quiescent state DITS transmission.
  • The present invention relates to a system and a method for verifying operation verification of an OFD. The system and method incorporate/embed a digital infrared test signal source in the OFD. This digital infrared test signal source transmits a signal train (digital signal packet, DITS) to a test receiver (PITR). The DITS may include information/data such as, at least one of a serial number of the optical flame detector, a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time (e.g., seconds) since a last reboot of the optical flame detector, a real time clock value of the optical flame detector, and current analog optical signal levels. The test receiver may be optically passive (e.g., test receiver may not transmit any signals such as a signal train). The test receiver can include a global positioning system ("GPS") and a logging capability (e.g., logging/storing data). This may make a verification procedure for OFD operation simpler. That is, a technician can simply walk to a potential flame source with the test receiver. The test receiver may then report a number of DITS it detects from various OFDs (e.g., a digital infrared test signal source of each OFD). This report can be either immediate on a display/user interface of the test receiver and/or logged/stored into an internal memory of the test receiver.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an OFD 100. The OFD 100 can include any suitable OFD configured to detect a fire/flame using optical detection techniques. In this regard, the OFD 100 serves to optically view a desired optical field for flames/fires, compose the transmitted DITS(s), and provide an alarm in the event that a flame/fire satisfying predetermined thresholds is detected. The OFD 100 may include a FOV from about 100° to about 170° relative to at least one axis (e.g., x-axis, y-axis, z-axis). The OFD 100 may detect flames at a distance ranging from about 0 meters to about 60 meters, relative to the position of the OFD 100. The OFD 100 may detect hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon based fires or flames. The operating temperature of the OFD 100 may be about -50°F to about 200°F.
  • The OFD 100 may include a housing 102 (e.g., which can be an explosion proof housing) which may include at least one of an ultraviolet ("UV") light sensor 104, a visible light sensor 106, an infrared ("IR") sensor 108 (e.g., analog IR receiver), and a digital infrared test signal source 109. A sensitivity for each of the sensors may be adjustable.
  • The housing 102 may include materials, such as, for example, aluminum and/or stainless steel. The housing 102 may include a window 107 positioned to cover the UV light sensor 104, the visible light sensor 106, and/or the IR sensor 108, and digital infrared test signal source 109. The window 107 may protect the sensors and the digital infrared test signal source 109.
  • The digital infrared test signal source 109 (e.g., an IR source/transmitter, etc.) emits/transmits a DITS recognizable by a test receiver. The DITS may be transmitted at an angle ranging from about 100° to about 170° relative to at least one axis (e.g., x-axis, y-axis, z-axis). That is, a spread of the DITS shall be similar to that of a coverage area included in the FOV of OFD 100. The digital infrared test signal source 109 may emit/transmit a DITS at a frequency ranging from about 30 kilohertz ("kHz") to about 60 kHz. The DITS may include data, such as, at least one of a serial number of the optical flame detector, a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time since a last reboot of the optical flame detector, a real time clock value of the optical flame detector, and current analog optical signal levels. A transmitting range of the digital infrared test signal source 109 may substantially match that of a reception range of the OFD, and can range from about 0 meters to about 60 meters. That is, the digital infrared test signal source 109 may transmit a DITS up to a distance of about 60 meters. The DITS is detected by a test receiver.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of PITR 113. The PITR 113 tests/verifies that the OFD 100 is operating as intended (e.g., monitoring the intended coverage area). The PITR 113 receives/processes the DITS. The PITR 113 may receive electromagnetic radiation (in an NIR), wherein a wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation may be between about 700 nanometers and about 1200 nanometers. The PITR 113 may be optically passive. In certain embodiments, the PITR 113 may be a low power electronic device which may allow it to be non-incendive (e.g., incapable, under normal operating conditions, of causing ignition of a flammable gas-air, vapor-air, and/or dust-air mixture due to arcing or thermal means). The PITR 113 may include a memory 115 and a user interface 116 (e.g., liquid crystal display ("LCD")), and optionally, a positioning or location module 114 (e.g., a global positioning system (GPS) receiver and module, a time of flight (TOF) positioning system, a received signal strength (RSS) positioning system, etc.). The PITR 113 may receive and/or process DITS from distances of up to about 60 meters. For example, the PITR 113 can receive and process DITS within the transmission range of the digital infrared test signal source 109. The PITR 113 may also calculate its location/position via the location module (e.g., via the location module 114). The PITR 113 may store the data included in the DITS within memory 115 and display this data on user interface 116. That is, memory 115 may store at least one of a serial number of the OFD 100, a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time since a last reboot of the OFD 100, a real time clock value of the OFD 100, and current analog optical signal levels. The PITR 113 can receive and store information received from each OFD 100 within range.
  • In some embodiments, the DITS from more than one OFD may be received by the PITR 113 at a given location. The PITR 113 may be aimed/positioned at different viewing angles at a given location in order to determine which sources (e.g., OFDs with a digital infrared test signal source) are capable of viewing the PITR 113 at the given location. For example, the PITR 113 may be within view of two or more sources. During testing, as described in more detail herein, the PITR 113 can be positioned to receive a DITS from a first source, and once the DITS information is received, repositioned/aimed to receive a DITS from a second source. This process can be repeated until each source within view is detected. This process may allow for an indication that a particular piece of equipment or location is actually within view of one or more of the OFDs. DITS may convey data for a minority of the time; contain little low-frequency components that might interfere with the flame detection; and facilitate multiple OFDs transmitting the DITS at the same time without interference without optical selection.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an OFD FOV verification system 118 ("system 118"). System 118 includes the OFD 100 and the PITR 113. The OFD 100 may be positioned/installed on a structure 117 via a mount 119. The FOV of the OFD 100 include sa target area 120 (e.g., a location). That is, the OFD 100 is installed/positioned to scan target area 120 for a flame. The OFD 100 transmits a DITS, for example periodically or continuously. The PITR 113 is positioned at the target area 120. That is, to verify that target area 120 is within the FOV, a technician/user may position himself/herself with the PITR 113 at the target area 120. The target area 120 includes potential flame/fire sources, such as, for example, gas tanks, flammable materials, areas containing flammable materials, and the like.
  • If the FOV for the OFD 100 is correct (e.g., the potential flame source/target area is within the FOV), the PITR 113 receives the DITS and may indicate on the user interface 116 that the FOV is correct. If the FOV for the OFD 100 is incorrect (e.g., target area 120 is not within the FOV), the PITR 113 may not receive the DITS and may indicate that the FOV is incorrect on user interface 116 or not provide any indication of any received DITS. If the FOV is incorrect, a technician may correct the FOV by repositioning the OFD 100 to bring the target area 120 within the FOV. That is, based on receiving/not receiving the DITS, an indication can be made as to whether target area 120 is within the FOV of the OFD 100. For example, a green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate if target area 120 is within the FOV of OFD 100. A red light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate if target area 120 is not within the FOV of the OFD 100.
  • In certain situations, window 107 (shown on FIG. 1) may become cloudy or non-transparent (e.g., obstructed) which may not allow the sensors to detect a flame and not allow the PITR 113 to receive a DITS. In this situation, the FOV may be correct, but the PITR 113 may indicate that the FOV is incorrect. A user/technician may need to examine the condition of window 107 after being notified that the FOV is incorrect, and may clean the window 107 as necessary, thereby allowing the sensors to detect a flame and allow PITR 113 to receive a DITS. In some instances, the DITS can be received, but the signal strength may be lower than expected and/or less than a threshold. Such a result may provide an indication that the FOV is correct, but that the window 107 is partially obstructed. That is, based on receiving/not receiving the DITS, an indication can be made as to whether OFD 100 is operating correctly (e.g., transmitting a DITS that is actually received). A green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate proper/correct operation, whereas, a red light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate improper/incorrect operation.
  • In other scenarios, an object (e.g., equipment) may be positioned between target area 120 and OFD 100. This object may obstruct a line of sight (e.g., a signal transmission path)/FOV between the OFD 100 and the target area 120/ PITR 113, and may cause the PITR 113 to indicate an incorrect FOV and may not allow OFD 100 to detect a flame. Based on receiving/not receiving the DITS, an indication can be made as to whether the line of sight between the PITR 113 and the OFD 100 is obstructed or unobstructed. A technician/user may correct positioning of the OFD 100 or reposition the object to obtain the correct FOV. A green light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate an unobstructed line of sight/FOV between the OFD 100 and target area 120/ PITR 113, whereas, a red light displayed in user interface 116 may indicate an obstructed line of sight/FOV between the OFD 100 and target area 120/ PITR 113.
  • Benefits of systems, methods, and/or devices of the disclosure may include: 1) The test receiver may contain only low-power electronics which may allow it to be made non-incendive, 2) verification/testing may only require one person, 3) flame detection may not need to be interrupted for the test/verification, 4) the verification may be focused on the flame source instead of the flame detector, 5) the range of the IR source can be comparable to the range of the OFD, and 6) the facility owner may have a reliable record (e.g., data can be stored/reviewed in the receiver) confirming staff/technicians really did perform the verification/testing.

Claims (10)

  1. A system (118) for verifying operation of an optical flame detector (100), the system (118) comprising:
    the optical flame detector (100), positioned in a manner to have a field of view which includes a location of potential fire, wherein the optical flame detector (100) comprises:
    a digital infrared test signal source (109), wherein the digital infrared test signal source (109) is configured to transmit a digital infrared test signal in the direction of the location of the potential fire with a spread similar to that of a coverage area included in the field of view of the optical flame detector (100); and
    at least one of an ultraviolet light sensor (104), a visible light sensor (106), and an infrared sensor (108); and
    a portable infrared test receiver (113), positioned at the location of the potential fire and configured to receive the digital infrared test signal, wherein upon receipt of the digital infrared test signal the portable infrared test receiver (113) is configured to indicate that a location of potential fire is within a field of view of the optical flame detector (100).
  2. The system (118) of claim 1, wherein the portable infrared test receiver (113) is configured to receive electromagnetic radiation, wherein a wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation is between 700 nanometers and 1200 nanometers.
  3. The system (118) of claim 2, wherein a transmitting range for the digital infrared test signal source (109) is 0 meters to 60 meters.
  4. The system (118) of claim 3, wherein the portable infrared test receiver (113) is positioned to receive signals at a distance from 0 meters to 60 meters.
  5. The system (118) of claim 4, wherein the digital infrared test signal comprises at least one of a serial number of the optical flame detector (100), a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time since a last reboot of the optical flame detector (100), a real time clock value of the optical flame detector (100), and current analog optical signal levels.
  6. A method of verifying operation of an optical flame detector (100), the method comprising:
    providing the optical flame detector (100), positioning it in a manner to have a field of view which includes a location of potential fire, wherein the optical flame detector (100) comprises:
    a digital infrared test signal source (109), wherein the digital infrared test signal source (109) is configured to transmit a digital infrared test signal in the direction of the location of the potential fire with a spread similar to that of a coverage area included in the field of view of the optical flame detector (100); and
    at least one of an ultraviolet light sensor (104), a visible light sensor (106), and an infrared sensor (108); and
    providing a portable infrared test receiver (113) positioned at the location of the potential fire, wherein the portable infrared test receiver (113) is configured to receive the digital infrared test signal, wherein upon receipt of the digital infrared test signal the portable infrared test receiver (113) indicates whether a location of potential fire is within a field of view of the optical flame detector (100).
  7. The method of claim 6, wherein the portable infrared test receiver (113) is configured to receive electromagnetic radiation, wherein a wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation is between 700 nanometers and 1200 nanometers.
  8. The method of claim 7, wherein a transmitting range for the digital infrared test signal source (109) is 0 meters to 60 meters.
  9. The method of claim 8, wherein the portable infrared test receiver (113) is positioned to receive signals at a distance from 0 meters to 60 meters.
  10. The method of claim 9, wherein the digital infrared test signal comprises at least one of a serial number of the optical flame detector (100), a user's mnemonic name, sensor sensitivity, time since a last reboot of the optical flame detector (100), a real time clock value of the optical flame detector (100), and current analog optical signal levels.
EP18183185.0A 2017-07-12 2018-07-12 Flame detector field of view verification via reverse infrared signaling Active EP3428591B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/648,093 US10181244B1 (en) 2017-07-12 2017-07-12 Flame detector field of view verification via reverse infrared signaling

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3428591A1 EP3428591A1 (en) 2019-01-16
EP3428591B1 true EP3428591B1 (en) 2024-03-13

Family

ID=62948024

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18183185.0A Active EP3428591B1 (en) 2017-07-12 2018-07-12 Flame detector field of view verification via reverse infrared signaling

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US10181244B1 (en)
EP (1) EP3428591B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2018255373B2 (en) * 2017-04-20 2023-11-09 Tyco Fire & Security Gmbh Smoke detector availability test
CN109118702B (en) * 2018-09-29 2021-07-20 歌尔光学科技有限公司 Fire detection method, device and equipment
US10739192B1 (en) 2019-04-02 2020-08-11 Honeywell International Inc. Ultraviolet flame sensor with dynamic excitation voltage generation
CN109941629A (en) * 2019-04-23 2019-06-28 北京理工大学 Initial fire detector in a kind of storage tank
US11403930B2 (en) 2020-12-22 2022-08-02 Honeywell International Inc. Methods, apparatuses, and systems for configuring a flame detection apparatus using flame detecting components

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6515285B1 (en) * 1995-10-24 2003-02-04 Lockheed-Martin Ir Imaging Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for compensating a radiation sensor for ambient temperature variations
US6388254B1 (en) * 1998-09-10 2002-05-14 Knox Company Handheld heat detection device
GB2426578A (en) 2005-05-27 2006-11-29 Thorn Security A flame detector having a pulsing optical test source that simulates the frequency of a flame
US7787776B2 (en) * 2006-08-03 2010-08-31 Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. Method and apparatus for using infrared sensors to transfer data within a security system
US7714734B1 (en) 2007-07-23 2010-05-11 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Extended smoke alarm system
GB2484459A (en) * 2010-10-04 2012-04-18 Thorn Security Commissioning detectors in a networked fire or intrusion detection system
US9355542B2 (en) * 2014-01-27 2016-05-31 Kidde Technologies, Inc. Apparatuses, systems and methods for self-testing optical fire detectors
US9679468B2 (en) * 2014-04-21 2017-06-13 Tyco Fire & Security Gmbh Device and apparatus for self-testing smoke detector baffle system
US9459142B1 (en) 2015-09-10 2016-10-04 General Monitors, Inc. Flame detectors and testing methods

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20190019389A1 (en) 2019-01-17
EP3428591A1 (en) 2019-01-16
US10181244B1 (en) 2019-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3428591B1 (en) Flame detector field of view verification via reverse infrared signaling
US9886833B2 (en) System and method of automated gunshot emergency response system
CN102005097B (en) Infrared laser perimeter protection method
AU2006313621A1 (en) Method and device for detecting forest fires
EP3405934B1 (en) Using bluetooth beacons to automatically update the location within a portable gas detector's logs
US7956329B2 (en) Flame detector and a method
KR101914554B1 (en) Control system using fire detection device based internet of small things
KR101842500B1 (en) Intelligent fire detecting system
KR102204055B1 (en) Artificial intelligent fire extinguishing system for commercial kitchen facilities
JP2013246552A (en) Fire alarm system, fire determination method of fire alarm system, and fire determination program of fire alarm system
US20200116557A1 (en) Optical flame detector
KR100567443B1 (en) Flame detector to detect angle of three hundred sixty in all-way detection
US12033483B2 (en) Flame detecting arrangement
EP3891711B1 (en) Method of optical alignment and verification of field of view integrity for a flame detector and system
EP3428590B1 (en) System and method to identify obscuration fault in a flame detector
JP2024532181A (en) Active Bidirectional Open Path Gas Detection System
KR20160093448A (en) Electronic fire detector by bluetooth ibeacon transmitter and receiving system
CN111973921B (en) Water cannon aiming device, fire water cannon and water cannon aiming method
KR100920062B1 (en) Detecting area display apparatus of fire detector
JP6399572B1 (en) Wireless communication device for fire and fire alarm system
US20170193805A1 (en) Remote authorization and control of a networked device using visual indication
CN108918423A (en) A kind of safety system for the detection of open laser gas
RU199982U1 (en) Gas and fire alarm device
KR102244881B1 (en) Platform service system for providing integrated information on gas meter reading and environment and safety
JP7379255B2 (en) Measuring equipment and disaster prevention system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180712

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20211117

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20231004

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: DANTAS, VENUS

Inventor name: GRADY, MICHAEL J.

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602018066492

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240614

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20240313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240613

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240613

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240614

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1666157

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20240313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240313