EP3403148A1 - Controlling method, control system, and plant - Google Patents
Controlling method, control system, and plantInfo
- Publication number
- EP3403148A1 EP3403148A1 EP17715643.7A EP17715643A EP3403148A1 EP 3403148 A1 EP3403148 A1 EP 3403148A1 EP 17715643 A EP17715643 A EP 17715643A EP 3403148 A1 EP3403148 A1 EP 3403148A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- control
- quality criterion
- riti
- seti
- plant
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/047—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators the criterion being a time optimal performance criterion
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for control, a control system and a system.
- a further object of the invention is to provide an improved control system and an improved system with which the method according to the invention can be carried out.
- the inventive method for controlling uses a STEU ⁇ ervorschrift.
- the course of the control is at least partially observed and, depending on this course, at least one quality criterion characterizing the quality of the control method is determined, ie determined.
- an adaptation of the tax law is carried out in the inventive method.
- the course of the control is detected by detecting the profile in discrete and, in particular, successive time intervals or continuously. Under the phrase "based on the waveform of the control" is preferably "at least from the control at run time and / or from the controller to the previous, in particular successive points in time or time periods from ⁇ pending" understood.
- Suitably method automated ⁇ Siert to the invention is, for example computer-implemented and / or software-based, run.
- the quality criterion (s) are evaluated at runtime and, depending on the quality criterion (s), in particular if at least one quality criterion changes by a threshold value and / or with a threshold rate, the tax code is changed. Consequently, it is not mandatory, Bedin ⁇ conditions or environmental changes, which can lead to a change in the quality criteria previously explicitly set.
- the inventive method thus allows a gegenü ⁇ over the prior art particularly flexible and robust control.
- the quality criteria are not fixed in advance fixed, but are either determined at run time of the controller itself or flexibly adjusted over the life of the device used for carrying out the method according to the invention.
- the tax law is executed with a control unit.
- the control unit is an integrated (ger .: "EMBED Dedicated control units are provided regularly via a memory element which is expediently used in the method according to the invention for storing at least part of the course of the control.
- the course of the control is monitored with an adaptation unit and the determination of the quality criterion as well as the adaptation of the control specification are carried out by means of the adaptation unit.
- the tax law is executed with a control unit, which, although signal-connected with this, is functionally separated from the adaptation unit.
- Insbesonde ⁇ re controller and adaptation unit can each be ⁇ least a dedicated processor or with each horrin- least a dedicated processor core to be formed. In this way, on the one hand control and observation of the control and the determination of the quality criterion can be carried out completely parallel to each other. It is advantageously ensured in this way that the operation of the adaptation unit does not disturb the operation of the control unit due to an otherwise shared use of resources.
- control is expediently formed with a control, in particular with a PID control.
- PID controllers can be obtained by means of the method according to the invention a dynamic control with egg ⁇ ner high stability.
- quantity to be controlled or regulated in particular a control variable, or with a measure for a deviation, for example an overshoot, during a setting phase or a measure of an oscillation (in particular amplitude and / or frequency). be formed during a setting phase of the controlled or regulated variable size.
- a semantic model is used for the at least one quality criterion and / or the adaptation.
- the semantic model an ontology and / or ⁇ least a representation library.
- Semantic Mo ⁇ delle provide in known manner the possibility to combine knowledge of a plurality of different areas in a consistent manner with each other, which is obtained during a simulation or about knowledge, from a BOM or from a working plan of a means of controlling product to be manufactured or from a maintenance report of the plant.
- the course of the control in the time domain is detected.
- the at least one criterion preferably the at least one criterion rinsekrite- determined in the time domain and / or there is the ANPAS ⁇ solution of the control rule in the time domain.
- the inventive method for controlling a manufacturing plant is performed.
- control procedure is suitably carried out by means of a control unit, is subjected min ⁇ least herange- a state of the control unit for the quality criterion and / or as an input quantity for the control rule.
- the method according to the invention is preferably carried out for the control ⁇ tion of a system, wherein at least one state of the system for the quality criterion and / or used as an input to the tax rule.
- a context model of the control method which includes a semantic model, in particular having at least one ontology and / or at least one representation library.
- the at least one quality criterion is formed on the basis of the context model of the control method.
- the control method can be based on the
- the inventive method is preferably carried out for Steue ⁇ tion of a plant, wherein a context model to the ⁇ position is used, which comprises a semantic model, in ⁇ sbesondere comprising at least an ontology and / or ⁇ least a representation of library.
- specifications for output variables of the controller and / or specifications of the input variables of the controller can also be used according to the invention, for example sensor readings and / or specifications of rules which influence control signals and / or sensor signals and / or Specifications of state transitions, which in particular specify which states and conditions in the form of measured values entail which state transitions.
- these specifications are derived from a model for the control method, in particular a semantic model of the control method, which preferably has one or more a plurality of ontologies and / or one or more representation ⁇ onsbibken comprises.
- the control system according to the invention has at least one control unit, designed for control by means of a control prediction , and at least one adaptation unit.
- the min ⁇ least an adaptation unit is arranged to observe the course of the control, at least partially, and to determine a quality of the control method of characterizing quality criterion.
- the adaptation unit is designed to adapt the tax rule depending on the quality criterion.
- he ⁇ inventive control system is designed to carry out the inventive method as described above.
- control unit is an integrated (English: "EmbeddecT) Steuerein ⁇ unit.
- integrated control units regularly have a memory element which can conveniently save the course of the control, so that this stored history of the adaptation unit can be easily made available by means of signal connection or signal ⁇ transmission.
- control unit and adaptation unit are each formed with at least one own processor or each with at least one own processor core.
- adaptation unit does not block any resources intended for control.
- observation of control and the determination of the quality criterion and the adaptation of STEU ervorschrift ⁇ all times are possible at run time and are not interrupted as in the case of utilization of the computing capacity of the control unit. It is expedient in the control system according to the invention
- Control a scheme, in particular a PID control.
- the control unit of the control system according to the invention comprises a PID controller.
- the inventive system is in particular a manufacturing plant ⁇ .
- the system according to the invention has a control system as described above.
- zei ⁇ gene a structure of a control system according to the invention with a control unit and a monitoring and adjusting unit for executing a fiction, modern ⁇ method for controlling schematically gem in a schematic diagram, a signal flow of the observation and adaptation ⁇ unit.
- Fig. 1 schematically in a schematic diagram, a part of the signal flow of the control unit acc.
- Fig. 1 shows schematically in a signal flow diagram, a context model of the control unit acc. Fig. 1 and 3 of the control system according to the invention.
- Fig. 1 schematically in a section of a schematic diagram and
- FIG. 5 shows a context model of a method according to the invention for controlling by means of the control system according to the invention.
- Fig. 1 and Fig. 4 schematically in a section of a schematic diagram.
- COS is an embedded, that is, integrated control system comprises COS and as shown in FIG. 1, a control unit COU in the form of a decorated to Steue ⁇ tion microprocessor.
- the STEU ⁇ ersystem COS comprises a monitoring and adjusting unit OAU, whose function is described in more detail below.
- the Monitoring and adjustment unit OAU is realized with a ent ⁇ speaking, furnished ie programmed microprocessor.
- the control unit COU and the observation and adaptation unit OAU can each be realized as one or more cores of a single processor in further, not specifically illustrated exemplary embodiments.
- control unit COU is a control algorithm, ie a tax law implemented, by means of which the control ⁇ unit COU forms a software-based PID controller.
- the control unit COU will be described below.
- the observation and adaptation unit OAU is designed to observe and adapt the control method executed by the control unit COU.
- the observation and ANPAS ⁇ sungsech OAU is closer detail in Fig. 2:
- the observation and adaptation unit OAU receives via an input interface a time-synchronous data flow SYR from the current tax law of the control method of the control unit COU.
- This data flow SYR is formed with each ak ⁇ TULLE captured images PIIW of the control method.
- the currently acquired images PIIW comprise the current input variables and outputs of the control unit COU and are kept available in their time sequence as a history of images BPIO, BPH in a main memory WOME of the observation and adaptation unit OAU. In this one Hi ⁇ storie of images BPIO, BPH attacks
- the data stream evaluator DASE also contains evaluation data ESDB in the work memory WOME of the observation and adaptation unit OAU.
- the adaptation of the control method of the control unit COU is carried out by the data stream evaluator DASE in such a way that the data stream evaluator DASE commits a desired target image POIB of the control method based on the quality criteria described in more detail below and subsequently transmits the target image PIOB to the control unit COU by means of a time-synchronous data flow SYR.
- the control unit COU over ⁇ takes the target image PIOB as the current tax law. With ⁇ tels the adoption of the target image PIOB as the current tax ⁇ regulation, the control method is adjusted accordingly.
- the control method of the control unit COU is a control method known per se in the form of a software-based PID control of a system as shown in FIG.
- the plant is in the embodiment shown a Vietnamesesanalage (in another, not specifically shown, beauspie ⁇ len, the control method can be embodied as a control method for other systems or processes).
- the Steuerver ⁇ drive satisfies the control model described below:
- the control unit COU are according to their currently implemented control rule a time-dependent control signal u (t) from which actuators ACTU, the w ⁇ let in the embodiment shown, manufacturing equipment, and according to a time-dependent function F (t) to act. Acting the actuators according to the function u F (t)
- the state x (t) does not depend solely on the function u F (t), but additional disturbing influences and stochastic influences NOI are to be taken into account, which uncontrollably influence the state x (t) of the production plant.
- Sensors SENS detect the state x (t) of the system as measured values y (t).
- the sensors are signal-connected to a state estimator x est (t) which, together with the control unit COU, is part of a control unit CONB.
- a state estimator x est (t) an estimation function is implemented which estimates from the measured values y (t) a state of the system which itself is not directly accessible to a measurement. This state is transmitted to the control unit COU together with the measured values y (t) itself.
- the control unit also holds it COU ⁇ system deviation are compared reference values y ref (t) for the measuring values y (t), wel ⁇ che with these reference values y ref (t) for determining a re.
- control unit COU determines new control signals u (t) as a function of these measured values y (t) and the reference values y ref (t) and the states of the system estimated by the state estimator x est (t).
- the state estimator x est (t) is part of the control method itself in the exemplary embodiment shown and is not part of the observation and adaptation unit OAU.
- the above-explained control model thus describes the following variables:
- control model describes the control unit COU and the input and output variables which are transmitted to or provided by the control unit COU, here in particular the measured values y (t) and the control signals u (t).
- control model describes variables which describe the time ⁇ behavior of the system, here are not directly measurable states of the system.
- Such quantities are, on the one hand, quality criteria (English: “Key performance indicators”, KPIs), which determine a desired quality of the tax rule. Furthermore, warning signals can be provided which occur during the run-time-synchronous evaluation of input and output variables and / or states of the system and suitably characterize deviations from desired states and / or injured quality criteria.
- causal relationships of variables of the control model and such warning signals for example from a semantic model, can be used.
- dependencies between different components of the control model can be used. Such dependencies are expediently derived from explicit knowledge of the production process carried out with the installation and / or explicit knowledge of the structure of the installation and / or a hierarchy of its components and / or a correlation analysis of various components of the control model.
- control model and the context model (which may, for example, include the control model) can now be used to optimize and adapt the control process.
- such a context model is a semantic ⁇ MOORISH model, especially in the manner of a
- the context model can be easily analyzed and used to adapt and / or optimize the tax procedure.
- the context model expediently includes as much knowledge about the control process as possible and represents this knowledge in a manner known per se by means of objects, relations and procedures.
- the knowledge comes from the control process itself and also useful simulations the control method and / or a controlled means of Steuerverfah ⁇ Rens system and / or the specification of a controlled means of the control process plant gefer ⁇ saturated product and / or service protocols the system and / or specifications of environmental conditions and / or quality tests such as a finished product or the plant.
- the context model illustrated in FIG. 4 comprises a semantic description CONS of the control method in the form of a control model and a semantic description SYSD of the control unit COU.
- the semantic description CONS has a sub-class, which forms a continuous state Be ⁇ scription of the control method.
- the relation "has sub-class" is always labeled in ⁇ distinguished in Fig. 4 with arrows HAS.
- the control method dissected into the sub-classes with non-linear components of the control method and NONL with linear components LINE the control method.
- Both the nonlinear components of the control method NONL and the linear components LINE of the control method influence a description of the control unit COU in the time domain TIDD (marked as "defined” by means of the arrows DEF in FIG in the time domain TIDD of the semantic description of the control unit COU SYSD from itself.
- the description of the control unit COU in the time domain TIDD has a subclass an answer STERD on describing the Ant ⁇ word of the control unit COU to a control step of STEU ⁇ ervons.
- the answer STERD in each case forms ei ⁇ NEN part (the relation "is part of" is marked with arrows PAO) of quality criteria, which as a
- quality criteria form evaluation criteria for the quality of the operation of the control unit COU.
- quality criteria can be used in further, not specifically illustrated exemplary embodiments: the variability of the control method, in particular one
- a detailed analysis for example, failure analysis, or an analysis for a possible optimization of the control method, requires further information about Kausalbe ⁇ relationships of sizes of the control method and preferably also sizes the system. Such information about causal relationships are obtained in the illustrated embodiment from the semantic description CONS of the control method:
- the control method comprises a control algorithm CONP which defines control functions CONF and control variables CONV (the relation "defined” is marked with arrows DEF.)
- the control variables CONV are part of the control functions CONF (the relation "has subclass on "is marked with arrows HAS).
- the control functions CONF comprise, on the one hand, sequences SEQ and estimation functions ESOB for estimating conditions of the system and feedback functions FEBA.
- the control variables CONV include, for example, temporary or internal variables TEINT, for example a time dynamic of the Control device COU, in particular the value of an integrie ⁇ generating part of the PID controller, or the temporal dynamics of the system, which is approximately determined by an estimator or a sensor.
- TEINT temporary or internal variables
- control variables CONV include input INPU and output variables OUPU, approximately output for controlling the actuators ACTU or obtained from the sensors SENS.
- the way in which the control functions CONF correlate different control variables CONV defines implicit relationships between the control variables CONV. Such relationships and dependencies become transparently visible in the context model and usable for observation and adaptation according to the invention.
- control variables CONV form input variables (the relations "input quantity f" are marked with arrows INF) for quality criteria CONK, which are already explained with reference to FIG. 4 as the rise time RITI, the overshoot OSHSO and as a decay time SETI.
- these specifications are obtained from a model for the control method, in particular a semantic model of the control process, comprising preferably one or more ontologies and / or one or more repre ⁇ onsBibliotheken.
- the system of the invention is a Vietnamesesanalage explained here in exporting approximately ⁇ for example, and has a ⁇ OF INVENTION dung control system according as described above on.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201662312538P | 2016-03-24 | 2016-03-24 | |
PCT/EP2017/056969 WO2017162815A1 (en) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-03-23 | Controlling method, control system, and plant |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3403148A1 true EP3403148A1 (en) | 2018-11-21 |
Family
ID=58489294
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17715643.7A Pending EP3403148A1 (en) | 2016-03-24 | 2017-03-23 | Controlling method, control system, and plant |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11188037B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3403148A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN108885438A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2017162815A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (92)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5351195A (en) * | 1989-07-24 | 1994-09-27 | The George Group | Method for improving manufacturing processes |
US5056331A (en) * | 1990-08-14 | 1991-10-15 | Lotz Paul B | Enclosure for electronic equipment |
US5284164A (en) * | 1991-11-07 | 1994-02-08 | Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation | Method for improving the quality of products produced in the cigarette manufacturing process |
US5526293A (en) * | 1993-12-17 | 1996-06-11 | Texas Instruments Inc. | System and method for controlling semiconductor wafer processing |
JP3085095B2 (en) * | 1994-07-25 | 2000-09-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Plant monitoring device and monitoring method |
US5715181A (en) * | 1995-04-03 | 1998-02-03 | Horst; Robert L. | Isogrammetric analysis method for high-yield processes |
US5657641A (en) * | 1995-09-13 | 1997-08-19 | Kooltronic, Inc. | Panel mounted cooling system |
US5942017A (en) * | 1998-03-23 | 1999-08-24 | Van Winkle, Sr.; Frank A. | Electronic equipment air conditioner and purifier |
AU2208500A (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 2000-07-24 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Process control using multiple detections |
SE515570C2 (en) * | 1999-10-05 | 2001-09-03 | Abb Ab | A computer-based process and system for regulating an industrial process |
US6631305B2 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2003-10-07 | General Electric Company | Capability analysis of assembly line production |
JP4693225B2 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2011-06-01 | 株式会社東芝 | Manufacturing line automatic quality control method and apparatus, storage medium, and automatic quality control program |
JP2002149222A (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2002-05-24 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Managing quality method and system for production line for product |
JP2002297217A (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-11 | Japan Institute Of Plant Maintenance | Quality management method in manufacture task, quality management supporting system and trend management program |
US6915172B2 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2005-07-05 | General Electric | Method, system and storage medium for enhancing process control |
BR0214803A (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2004-09-14 | Nat University Singapore | High performance variable air volume (vav) system with zonal ventilation control |
DE10206902A1 (en) | 2002-02-19 | 2003-09-11 | Siemens Ag | Engineering process and engineering system for industrial automation systems |
US6796896B2 (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2004-09-28 | Peter J. Laiti | Environmental control unit, and air handling systems and methods using same |
US6823287B2 (en) * | 2002-12-17 | 2004-11-23 | Caterpillar Inc | Method for predicting the quality of a product |
US8521708B2 (en) * | 2003-01-22 | 2013-08-27 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | System and method for developing and processing building system control solutions |
US6938026B2 (en) * | 2003-07-21 | 2005-08-30 | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for implementing quality control rules formulated in accordance with a quality control rule grammar |
US6974489B2 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2005-12-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for protecting electronic devices against particulate infiltration, excessive heat build-up, and for implementing EMC shielding |
JP3705296B1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-10-12 | オムロン株式会社 | Quality control apparatus and control method therefor, quality control program, and recording medium recording the program |
TWI267012B (en) * | 2004-06-03 | 2006-11-21 | Univ Nat Cheng Kung | Quality prognostics system and method for manufacturing processes |
US7398179B2 (en) * | 2004-08-25 | 2008-07-08 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Part measurement prioritization system and method |
JP4239932B2 (en) * | 2004-08-27 | 2009-03-18 | 株式会社日立製作所 | production management system |
US7176475B2 (en) * | 2004-11-16 | 2007-02-13 | Omron Corporation | Adjusting apparatus, production processing system, and method of controlling adjusting apparatus |
TWI257538B (en) * | 2004-11-26 | 2006-07-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | On-line quality control information system and method |
US8424885B2 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2013-04-23 | Elliptical Mobile Solutions, LLC | Method and apparatus for an environmentally-protected electronic equipment enclosure |
US9677777B2 (en) * | 2005-05-06 | 2017-06-13 | HVAC MFG, Inc. | HVAC system and zone control unit |
US20160281348A9 (en) * | 2005-05-06 | 2016-09-29 | Best Technologies, Inc. | Modular building utilities systems and methods |
US7526463B2 (en) * | 2005-05-13 | 2009-04-28 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Neural network using spatially dependent data for controlling a web-based process |
US8140296B2 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2012-03-20 | Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generalized performance evaluation of equipment using achievable performance derived from statistics and real-time data |
US7421911B2 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2008-09-09 | Desrochers Eric M | Duct probe assembly system for multipoint air sampling |
US8236240B2 (en) * | 2006-02-25 | 2012-08-07 | James Arthur Childers | Method and system for conducting vapor phase decontamination of sealable entities and their contents |
US7571149B1 (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2009-08-04 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Inferential evaluation and control for matching requirements to system capabilities |
US8720217B2 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2014-05-13 | Mag Aerospace Industries, Inc. | Galley cooling heat sink through water system |
US20080243927A1 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-10-02 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and a system for maintaining an integrity of a product |
US8422218B2 (en) * | 2007-04-16 | 2013-04-16 | Stephen Samuel Fried | Liquid cooled condensers for loop heat pipe like enclosure cooling |
US20080278912A1 (en) * | 2007-05-09 | 2008-11-13 | Dean Zavadsky | Thermal management systems and methods for electronic components in a sealed enclosure |
US20090086428A1 (en) * | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Docking station with hybrid air and liquid cooling of an electronics rack |
US8650022B2 (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2014-02-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and an apparatus for automatic semantic annotation of a process model |
DE102008021557B4 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2011-07-28 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Method for monitoring a predicted product quality distribution |
US9781865B2 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2017-10-03 | Jason Todd Roth | System and method of cooling and ventilating for an electronics cabinet |
US8423952B2 (en) * | 2008-09-29 | 2013-04-16 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and an apparatus for automatic extraction of process goals |
US7872864B2 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2011-01-18 | Intel Corporation | Dual chamber sealed portable computer |
US8594828B2 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2013-11-26 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | System and method for optimizing a paper manufacturing process |
US20100141105A1 (en) * | 2008-12-04 | 2010-06-10 | Thermocabinet, Llc | Thermal Management Cabinet for Electronic Equipment |
DE102009006887B3 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-07-15 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale | Method and system for semiconductor process control and monitoring using a data quality measure |
JP5200970B2 (en) * | 2009-02-04 | 2013-06-05 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Quality control system, quality control device and quality control program |
US8381173B2 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2013-02-19 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Platform-independent method and system for deploying control logic programming |
GB2464354B (en) * | 2009-03-13 | 2011-06-08 | 4Energy Ltd | Equipment enclosure |
US20120136470A1 (en) * | 2009-05-22 | 2012-05-31 | Aurora Control Technologies, Inc. | Process for improving the production of photovoltaic products |
US20120253869A1 (en) * | 2009-12-14 | 2012-10-04 | Rebecca Ansley | System and Method for Process Improvement and Associated Products and Services |
EP2619732A4 (en) * | 2010-09-24 | 2014-04-09 | Nulogy Corp | Method, system and apparatus for automatic quality control using a plurality of computers |
US20120118327A1 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2012-05-17 | Rouben Mazmanyan | Dust Removal System for Electronic Devices |
DE102010044039A1 (en) * | 2010-11-17 | 2012-05-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for quality analysis of system models |
US8849438B2 (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2014-09-30 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Factory level process and final product performance control system |
DE102011006786B4 (en) * | 2011-04-05 | 2013-04-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Product sensor, product with product sensor, system and method for communication between product sensor and system |
US8959941B2 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2015-02-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data center cooling with an air-side economizer and liquid-cooled electronics rack(s) |
US8649884B2 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2014-02-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Integrated linear/non-linear hybrid process controller |
US9110452B2 (en) * | 2011-09-19 | 2015-08-18 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Inferential process modeling, quality prediction and fault detection using multi-stage data segregation |
US8793106B2 (en) * | 2011-09-23 | 2014-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Continuous prediction of expected chip performance throughout the production lifecycle |
WO2013071979A1 (en) * | 2011-11-18 | 2013-05-23 | Abb Technology Ag | Method and arrangement for configuring a system for monitoring the performance of a control loop of an industrial plant |
DE102012207437B3 (en) * | 2012-05-04 | 2013-05-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for operating memory-programmable control, involves executing one or multiple programs in predetermined memory based on cycles with predetermined cycle time |
US20140032555A1 (en) * | 2012-06-07 | 2014-01-30 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method to classify telemetry from automation systems |
GB2502972B (en) * | 2012-06-11 | 2014-07-16 | Bioquell Uk Ltd | Aseptic processing workstation |
US20140156051A1 (en) * | 2012-12-05 | 2014-06-05 | Laboratoires Bodycad Inc. | Quality control of an object during machining thereof |
US20140279677A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Ontology-driven construction of semantic business intelligence models |
US9459022B2 (en) * | 2013-09-18 | 2016-10-04 | Supplier Support International, Inc. | Multi-component system for treating enclosed environments |
CN103716584A (en) | 2013-11-30 | 2014-04-09 | 南京大学 | Context sensing-based intelligent mobile terminal field monitoring method |
US9182758B1 (en) * | 2014-02-28 | 2015-11-10 | Michael H S Dunlop | Computer-implemented system and method for capability zone-based manufacturing quality control |
US9726578B2 (en) * | 2014-06-23 | 2017-08-08 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for particle collection and analysis |
US9946244B2 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2018-04-17 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Intelligent programmable logic controller |
ES2779313T3 (en) * | 2014-09-25 | 2020-08-14 | Siemens Ag | Method and system for providing data analytics results |
CN107077117B (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2019-10-01 | 西门子公司 | The selection of automatic compression algorithm and parameter regulation based on Context Knowledge |
EP3045992B1 (en) * | 2015-01-14 | 2020-10-14 | Hexagon Technology Center GmbH | Compensating for errors occurring in a production process |
DE102015205173A1 (en) * | 2015-03-23 | 2016-09-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for producing a composite product as well as production module and production control |
US10345764B2 (en) * | 2015-04-27 | 2019-07-09 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Integrated modeling and monitoring of formation and well performance |
EP3295386A4 (en) * | 2015-05-11 | 2019-01-16 | Olsher, Daniel Joseph | Universal task independent simulation and control platform for generating controlled actions using nuanced artificial intelligence |
CN104932464B (en) * | 2015-05-19 | 2017-05-31 | 重庆大学 | A kind of dynamic batching Control System Design method |
US20170011301A1 (en) * | 2015-07-09 | 2017-01-12 | General Electric Company | Capturing, encoding, and executing knowledge from subject matter experts |
US10409254B2 (en) * | 2015-07-16 | 2019-09-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Knowledge-based programmable logic controller with flexible in-field knowledge management and analytics |
US20170060972A1 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2017-03-02 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for processing process data |
CN105243080B (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2018-10-26 | 湖北工业大学 | The adaptive adaption system of resource perception based on ESB frameworks |
DE102015218744A1 (en) * | 2015-09-29 | 2017-03-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for modeling a technical system |
US20170136702A1 (en) * | 2015-11-12 | 2017-05-18 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Additive manufacturing quality control systems |
WO2017144470A1 (en) * | 2016-02-26 | 2017-08-31 | Automation & Robotics Sa | Method for "real time" in-line quality audit of a digital ophthalmic lens manufacturing process |
KR101823420B1 (en) * | 2016-08-30 | 2018-01-30 | 에스케이 주식회사 | Fine Fluctuation Detection Method and System for Metrology/Equipment Processing Data |
US20180137424A1 (en) * | 2016-11-17 | 2018-05-17 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for identifying gaps in predictive model ontology |
EP3339801B1 (en) * | 2016-12-20 | 2021-11-24 | Hexagon Technology Center GmbH | Self-monitoring manufacturing system, production monitoring unit and use of production monitoring unit |
EP3392725B1 (en) * | 2017-04-21 | 2022-10-19 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Suggestion and or creation of agents in an industrial automation system |
-
2017
- 2017-03-23 US US16/083,143 patent/US11188037B2/en active Active
- 2017-03-23 CN CN201780019100.0A patent/CN108885438A/en active Pending
- 2017-03-23 WO PCT/EP2017/056969 patent/WO2017162815A1/en active Application Filing
- 2017-03-23 EP EP17715643.7A patent/EP3403148A1/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20190113892A1 (en) | 2019-04-18 |
CN108885438A (en) | 2018-11-23 |
WO2017162815A1 (en) | 2017-09-28 |
US11188037B2 (en) | 2021-11-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3662418B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for machine learning in a computational unit | |
DE102016008987B4 (en) | Machine learning method and machine learning apparatus for learning failure conditions, and failure prediction apparatus and failure prediction system including the machine learning apparatus | |
EP3529669B1 (en) | Method and control device for controlling a technical system | |
EP3279756B1 (en) | Diagnostic device and method for monitoring the operation of a technical plant | |
DE102016015332A1 (en) | A preventive maintenance management system and method for creating a maintenance plan of a machine and cell controller | |
EP3077878B1 (en) | Computer-implemented method and system for automatic monitoring and status detection of entire process stages in a process unit | |
EP3794416A1 (en) | Controller for controlling a technical system, and method for configuring the controller | |
WO2020052899A1 (en) | Method for improving the measuring performance of automation field devices | |
EP2370867A1 (en) | Method for transferring parameter data during uploading and/or downloading of parameter settings between field devices and/or a control center | |
WO2022063702A1 (en) | Quality control for products produced in series | |
EP2588925B1 (en) | Method and device for determining model parameters for controlling a steam power plant block, control unit for a steam generator and computer program product | |
EP1528447B1 (en) | Diagnostic method and device for monitoring the functioning of a control loop | |
EP3403148A1 (en) | Controlling method, control system, and plant | |
DE102018125909A1 (en) | Determination method for determining a process variable | |
EP4036663A1 (en) | Control system for controlling a technical system and method for configuring the control device | |
DE102018128315A1 (en) | Method, device, computer program and computer program product for checking a first adaptive system model | |
EP3904972B1 (en) | Method and control device for controlling a technical system | |
DE102017216749A1 (en) | Method for providing a control signal | |
EP3349078A1 (en) | Diagnosis device and method for monitoring and/or optimizing a control device | |
EP2420908A1 (en) | Automation arrangement and method for operating and forecasting the operating time | |
EP4230965A1 (en) | Control of a sensor system | |
EP3588223A1 (en) | Method and system for providing an analysis function | |
EP3056951A1 (en) | Operating method for load management of a system and corresponding fuel agent | |
EP4416558A1 (en) | Method and assembly for monitoring or controlling a machine | |
WO2022253541A1 (en) | Method and configuration system for configuring a machine controller |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20180816 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20210517 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |