EP3396802B1 - Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor - Google Patents

Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3396802B1
EP3396802B1 EP17168236.2A EP17168236A EP3396802B1 EP 3396802 B1 EP3396802 B1 EP 3396802B1 EP 17168236 A EP17168236 A EP 17168236A EP 3396802 B1 EP3396802 B1 EP 3396802B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
electric
grid
data values
current
time window
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17168236.2A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3396802A1 (de
Inventor
Enrico RAGAINI
Daniele Angelosante
Lorenzo Fagiano
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ABB SpA
Original Assignee
ABB SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ABB SpA filed Critical ABB SpA
Priority to DK17168236.2T priority Critical patent/DK3396802T3/da
Priority to ES17168236T priority patent/ES2908116T3/es
Priority to EP17168236.2A priority patent/EP3396802B1/de
Priority to RU2018114569A priority patent/RU2765380C2/ru
Priority to US15/961,180 priority patent/US11451042B2/en
Priority to KR1020180048083A priority patent/KR102514161B1/ko
Priority to CN201810384399.6A priority patent/CN108805399B/zh
Publication of EP3396802A1 publication Critical patent/EP3396802A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3396802B1 publication Critical patent/EP3396802B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/25—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof using digital measurement techniques
    • G01R19/2513—Arrangements for monitoring electric power systems, e.g. power lines or loads; Logging
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H1/00—Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements
    • H02H1/0092—Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements concerning the data processing means, e.g. expert systems, neural networks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/165—Indicating that current or voltage is either above or below a predetermined value or within or outside a predetermined range of values
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/165—Indicating that current or voltage is either above or below a predetermined value or within or outside a predetermined range of values
    • G01R19/16528—Indicating that current or voltage is either above or below a predetermined value or within or outside a predetermined range of values using digital techniques or performing arithmetic operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/165—Indicating that current or voltage is either above or below a predetermined value or within or outside a predetermined range of values
    • G01R19/16566—Circuits and arrangements for comparing voltage or current with one or several thresholds and for indicating the result not covered by subgroups G01R19/16504, G01R19/16528, G01R19/16533
    • G01R19/1659—Circuits and arrangements for comparing voltage or current with one or several thresholds and for indicating the result not covered by subgroups G01R19/16504, G01R19/16528, G01R19/16533 to indicate that the value is within or outside a predetermined range of values (window)
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/25—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof using digital measurement techniques
    • G01R19/2506—Arrangements for conditioning or analysing measured signals, e.g. for indicating peak values ; Details concerning sampling, digitizing or waveform capturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
    • G01R19/25—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof using digital measurement techniques
    • G01R19/2516—Modular arrangements for computer based systems; using personal computers (PC's), e.g. "virtual instruments"
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G01R31/081—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors
    • G01R31/086—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors in power transmission or distribution networks, i.e. with interconnected conductors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H1/00—Details of emergency protective circuit arrangements
    • H02H1/04—Arrangements for preventing response to transient abnormal conditions, e.g. to lightning or to short duration over voltage or oscillations; Damping the influence of dc component by short circuits in ac networks
    • H02H1/043—Arrangements for preventing response to transient abnormal conditions, e.g. to lightning or to short duration over voltage or oscillations; Damping the influence of dc component by short circuits in ac networks to inrush currents
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/08—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to excess current
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/08—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to excess current
    • H02H3/083—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to excess current for three-phase systems
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/26—Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of electric power distribution grids.
  • the present invention relates to a method for identifying a fault event in an electric power distribution grid sector.
  • An electronic protection device is normally mounted on-board or operatively associated with a switching device (e.g. a circuit breaker) capable of electrically connecting or disconnecting a grid sector with or from the main grid.
  • a switching device e.g. a circuit breaker
  • an electronic protection device is adapted to receive detection signals indicative of electric quantities of the grid sector, process the detection data so received and, when necessary (e.g. in the event of failures or overloads), generate suitable control signals to prompt the intervention of the switching device operatively associated therewith.
  • Electronic protection devices currently available in the state of the art show some limits in managing operation of grid sectors including a large numbers of electric loads, particularly when said electric loads are designed in such a way to absorb high currents during specific transitional periods of their operating life (e.g. during the start-up phase when said electric loads are electric rotating machines).
  • these devices are configured to cause the intervention of the associated switching device if the values of current absorbed at a given electric node of the grid sector overcome a predefined threshold regardless of the actual causes at the origin of the detected abnormal current absorption.
  • a detected current absorption peak is not necessarily caused by an electric fault but it may be merely due to a transitional operating condition of an electric load of the grid sector (for example the start-up of an electric rotating machine).
  • the present invention provides a method for identifying a fault event in an electric power distribution grid sector, according to the following claim 1 and the related dependent claims.
  • the present invention relates to a computer program, according to the following claim 11.
  • the present invention relates to a computerised device, according to the following claim 12.
  • the present invention relates to a method 1 for identifying a fault event in an electric power distribution grid sector 100.
  • the grid sector 100 may be a smart grid, a micro-grid or, more in general, any portion of an electric power distribution grid.
  • the grid sector 100 may be an electric power distribution network for industrial, commercial or residential buildings or plants.
  • the grid sector 100 may operate at low or medium voltage levels.
  • the term "low voltage” relates to operational voltages up to 1.2 kV AC and 1.5 kV DC whereas the term “medium voltage” relates to operational voltages higher than 1.2 kV AC and 1.5 kV DC up to several tens of kV, e.g. up to 72 kV AC and 100 kV DC.
  • the grid sector 100 comprises an electric coupling node PoC (Point of Coupling), at which it is electrically connectable with or disconnectable from main grid 200, which may be, for example, an electric power utility grid.
  • PoC Point of Coupling
  • the grid sector 100 may have electric lines with one or more of electric phases, e.g. with three electric phases.
  • the grid sector 100 comprises a first switching device S 1 , the operation of which can be selectively controlled by means of suitable control signals C1.
  • the switching device S 1 When the switching device S 1 is in a closed (ON) state or in an open (OFF) state, the grid sector 100 is electrically connected to or disconnected from the main grid 200, respectively.
  • the switching device S 1 may be of known type (e.g. a circuit breaker, a disconnector, a contactor, or the like) and will not here further described for the sake of brevity.
  • the overall grid current I G absorbed by the grid sector 100 i.e. of the electric loads thereof
  • suitable detection means 301 can be detected at the electric coupling node PoC by suitable detection means 301.
  • the grid sector 100 comprises one or more electric loads L 1 , ..., L M , each of which consumes a corresponding amount of electric power provided by the electric power source 200.
  • the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M may be of any type, according to the needs.
  • the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M are formed by corresponding electric rotating machines, e.g. by corresponding three-phase induction motors.
  • the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M may be of known type and will not here further described for the sake of brevity.
  • the grid sector 100 comprises one or more second switching devices S 2 for electrically disconnecting or connecting one or more electric loads L 1 , ..., L M from or with the remaining portions of the grid sector.
  • each switching device S 2 can be controlled in a known manner by means of suitable control signals C2.
  • the switching devices S 2 may be of known type (e.g. circuit breakers, disconnectors, contactors, I-O interfaces, switches, switch-disconnectors or the like) and will not here further described for the sake of brevity.
  • the method 1, according to the invention is directed to allow identification of a fault event in the grid sector 100.
  • the method 1 is directed to determine whether a detected anomalous variation of the grid current I G is due to the occurrence of a characteristic transitional operating period of an electric load L 1 , ..., L M or is due to an electric fault.
  • the method 1 is particularly suitable for the identification of a fault event in a grid sector 100 including electric rotating machines as electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the method 1 allows determining whether a detected anomalous variation of the grid current I G is due to the start-up of an electric rotating machine L 1 , ..., L M or is due to an electric fault.
  • the method 1 will be described with particular reference of this implementation for the sake of clarity, without intending to limit the scope of the invention.
  • the method 1 may be implemented in a grid sector 100 including different types of electric loads and may be referred to different characteristic transitional operating periods for said electric loads, depending on the actual nature of these latter.
  • the method 1, according to the invention comprises a step (a) of acquiring, for each electric phase, first data values i k (n) indicative of the grid current I G flowing at the coupling node PoC.
  • the first data values i k (n) are acquired at subsequent sampling instants n, each of which is a multiple of a given sampling period Ts.
  • the grid current I G may be detected by first sensor means 301 arranged at the coupling node PoC and providing the first detection signals D1 indicative of the grid current I G .
  • the sensor means 301 may be of known type (e.g. current transformers, Rogowski coils, Hall sensors or the like) and will not here further described for the sake of brevity.
  • additional data values v k (n) indicative of a grid voltage V G at the coupling node PoC may be acquired, for each electric phase, at the same sampling instants n or at time intervals including a plurality of sampling instants n.
  • the grid voltage V G may be detected by suitable further sensor means (not shown), which may be of known type (e.g. voltage transformers, shunt resistors, or the like) and will not here further described for the sake of brevity.
  • suitable further sensor means e.g. voltage transformers, shunt resistors, or the like
  • the acquired first data values i k (n) are subdivided in a sequence of time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R , which are defined so as to include a same number of sampling instants n, thereby having a same time width.
  • each time window TW 1 , ..., TW R may be arranged according to the needs.
  • each time window TW 1 , ..., TW R has a time width equal to the grid period of the grid sector 100 (e.g. equal to 0.02 s when the grid sector has a grid frequency of 50 Hz).
  • the above mentioned sequence of time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R includes an initial time window TW 1 and one or more subsequent time windows TW 2 , ..., TW R , which follow the initial time window TW 1 .
  • the time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R are defined so as to start at corresponding start instants t 1 , t 2 , ..., t R , which may be arranged according to the needs.
  • the start instants t 1 , t 2 , ..., t R of the time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R are equally spaced in time.
  • Such an example corresponds to a theoretical case (represented in the cited figures for the sake of clarity only) in which the starting instants t 1 , t 2 , ..., t R of the time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R are spaced by time intervals equal to the time width (e.g. 200 sampling instants n) of the time windows.
  • each time window TW 1 , ..., TW R will be partially overlapped with a number of subsequent time windows.
  • TW R the whole sequence of time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R may be seen as a sequence of subsequent pairs of consecutive time windows TW - , TW + , each pair being formed by a given time window TW + and by a previous time window TW - preceding the time window TW + .
  • the sequence of time windows TW 1 , TW 2 ,..., TW R can be defined by shifting in time the pairs of time windows TW - , TW + .
  • the time window TW - may be the initial time window W 1 or a time window included in the subsequent time windows TW 2 ,..., TW R whereas the time window TW + may be a time window included in the subsequent time windows TW 2 ,..., TW R .
  • the method 1 Upon the acquisition of the first data values i k (n), the method 1 processes first data values i k (n) acquired at one or more subsequent pairs of consecutive time windows TW - , TW + to check whether the grid current I G is subject to anomalous variations from a time window to another.
  • the method 1 comprises a step (b) of processing first data values i k + [n] acquired at first sampling instants at least partially included in a time window TW + and first data values i k - [n] acquired at second sampling instants, which precedes said first sampling instants and are at least partially included in a previous time window TW - preceding the time window TW + .
  • the above-mentioned data values i k - [n], i k + [n] are processed to check whether the grid current I G , at the time window TW + , is subject to an anomalous variation with respect to the previous time window TW - .
  • first data values i k (n) at least partially acquired at the time window TW + and first data values i k - [n] at least partially acquired at a previous time window TW - are processed to check whether the grid current I G is subject to an anomalous variation with respect to the previous time window TW - .
  • first data values i k (n) acquired at first sampling instants n at least partially included in the time window TW + and first data values i k (n) acquired at second sampling instants n, which precede said first sampling instants and are at least partially included in the preceding time window TW - are processed to calculate a statistical quantity CH[n] indicative of the variation of the grid current I G at the time window TW + with respect to the previous time window TW - .
  • Such a statistical quantity is then compared with a threshold value to determine whether, at the time window TW + , there is an anomalous variation of the detected grid current I G .
  • the step (b) of the method 1 comprises a sequence of sub-steps that is executed for one or more generic sampling instants n included in a generic time window TW + .
  • the step (b) of the method 1 comprises the following sub-steps for each electric phase of the grid sector 100:
  • the phase current variation value CH k [n] is an index of variation of the grid current I G and it can be calculated as a sum of absolute values (as above indicated), or as a sum of squared differences, or as a weighted average with different values of weights, or as another function of sampled values.
  • the choice of the method for calculating CH k [n] may depends on the actual type of the grid sector 100 (e.g. nominal absorbed power, type of the electric loads, etc.).
  • the step (b) of the method 1 preferably comprises a further sub-step of processing the phase current variation values CH k [n], calculated for each electric phase, to calculate an overall current variation value CH[n] indicative of an overall variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G with respect to the previous time window TW - .
  • the step (b) of the method 1 comprises a further sub-step of comparing the overall current variation value CH[n], so calculated at the generic instant n, with a first threshold value TH1.
  • the first threshold value TH1 and the first number N1 may be set according to the actual nature of the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the step (b) of the method 1 comprises a further sub-step of checking whether the overall current variation value CH[n] exceeds the first threshold value TH1 for at least the first number N1 of consecutive sampling instants n included in the time window TW + .
  • the calculated phase current variation values CH k [n] are subject to a sudden increase at the event instant n event , when the grid current I G starts showing an anomalous trend.
  • the overall current variation value CH[n] thus represents a reliable index to check whether the grid current I G is subject to an anomalous variation with respect to a normal background condition.
  • the method 1 comprises the step (c) of repeating the above-described step (b) for subsequent sampling instants n, which may still be included in the time window TW + or in a further time window of the subsequent time windows TW 1 , ..., TW R .
  • a subsequent pair of time windows TW - , TW + will be taken into consideration for processing the acquired first values i k (n) for each electric phase.
  • the method 1 comprises the step (d) of processing, for each electric phase of the grid sector 100, one or more first data values i k e [n] acquired at sampling instants n following the event instant n event to calculate second data values i k clean [n] indicative of the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G (starting from said event instant n event ).
  • the method 1 provides for calculating the isolated current variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G caused by the anomalous event (not yet identified) occurred at the event instant n event .
  • FIG 8 it is shown an example of the behaviour of the isolated current variation ⁇ I G at sampling instants n following the event instant n event for an electric phase of the grid current I G detected at a coupling node PoC in a grid sector 100 including electric rotating machines as electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the isolated current variation ⁇ I G has the waveform of a typical in-rush current of an electric rotating machine.
  • the isolated current variation ⁇ I G may thus be indicative that the above-mentioned anomalous event consists in the start-up (transitional operating period) of an electric rotating machine of the grid sector 100.
  • the method (d) provides for calculating the isolated current variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G by suitably "cleaning" one or more first data values i k e [n] acquired at sampling instants n following the event instant n event .
  • Such a "cleaning" process of the first data values i k e [n], acquired at sampling instants n of a time window following the event instant n event conveniently consists in subtracting one or more corresponding first reference data values i k r [n] from said first data values.
  • the reference data values i k r [n] which are preferably formed by one or more first data values acquired at sampling instants n preceding the event instant n event , are indicative of a normal behaviour of the grid current I G occurring before the event instant n event . They are thus indicative of a background condition of the grid current I G before the occurrence of the above-mentioned anomalous event.
  • the step (d) of the method 1 comprises the sub-step of selecting, for each electric phase, a first data set i k e [n] of first data values i k (n) acquired at one or more sampling instants following the event instant n event .
  • the step (d) of the method 1 comprises the step of selecting, for each electric phase of the grid sector 100, a second data set i k r [n] of first reference data values indicative of a normal behaviour of said grid current I G .
  • the reference data values i k r [n] conveniently comprise first data values i k (n) acquired at sampling instants n preceding said event instant n event .
  • the first reference data values i k r [n] coincide with first data values included in the last time window TW - preceding the event instant n event as they truly represent the current background (see Figure 7 ).
  • the second data set i k r [n] of first reference data values substantially can be created by repetition of the second vector i k - [n] calculated at the step (b) of the method 1.
  • the step (c) of the method 1 comprises the step of processing the first and second data sets i k e [n], i k r [n] to calculate a third data set i k clean [n] of second data values indicative of the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G (starting from said event instant n event ).
  • n is a generic sampling instant of a time window following the event instant n event
  • k is an electric phase index
  • P is the number of first data values i k (n) included in each time window
  • i k - [n] is the second vector calculated at the step (b) of the method 1.
  • each element of the third data set i k clean [n] of second data values is calculated as a difference between corresponding first data values i k (n) included in a time window following the event instant n event and in the last time window TW - preceding the event instant n event , respectively.
  • the method 1 comprises the step (e) of processing said second data values to check whether the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G is due to a characteristic transitional operating period of an electric load L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the step (e) is directed to check whether the second data values i k clean [n] match with second reference values indicative of the current absorbed by an electric load L 1 , ..., L M during a specific transitional operating period of said electric load.
  • a matching between the second data values i k clean [n] and the second reference values related to an electric load L 1 , ..., L M will indicate that the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G is due to the occurrence of such a characteristic transitional operating period for said electric load and not to an electric fault.
  • an anomalous variation of the grid current I G may be due to the high current (in-rush current) absorbed at the start-up of an electric rotating machine or to an electric fault.
  • a matching between the second data values i k clean [n] and the second reference values describing the electric current absorbed by a specific electric rotating machine at the start-up phase (transitional operating period) will indicate that the identified anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G is due to the start-up of said electric rotating machine.
  • the identified anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G is due an electric fault.
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of processing the second data values i k clean [n] calculated for each electric phase, at a sampling instant n subsequent to the event instant n event , to calculate third data values I clean [n] indicative of the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G (starting from said event instant n event ).
  • the data processing carried out in this sub-step of the step (e) actually depends on the actual nature of the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the third data values I clean [n] may be calculated by calculating the well-known Clark transformation of the second data values i k clean [n] calculated for each electric phase and for a sampling instant n.
  • the third data values I clean [n] may be indicative of the q-d waveform of the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G .
  • the third data values may be calculated by calculating an estimate of impedances for each electric phase.
  • the data values I clean [n] may then be indicative of the equivalent impedance seen by the circuit at sampling instant n.
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of selecting, for each electric load L 1 , ..., L M , second reference data values I m [n] indicative, at a sampling instant n subsequent to the event instant n event , of a predicted current absorbed by said m th electric load during a characteristic transitional operating period of said electric load.
  • a corresponding set of second reference data values I m [n] is selected for each electric rotating machine.
  • Each set of second reference data values I m [n] describes the predicted behaviour for the current (in-rush current) absorbed by the corresponding electric rotating machine during the start-up phase (characteristic transitional period) of this latter.
  • the second reference data values I m [n] may be indicative of the q-d waveform for the predicted current (in-rush current) absorbed by the corresponding electric rotating machine.
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of processing, for each electric load L 1 , ..., L M , the corresponding third data values I clean [n] and the corresponding second reference data values I m [n] to calculate a corresponding error value E m [n] indicative of a difference, at an instant n subsequent to the event instant n event , between the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of said grid current I G and the predicted current absorbed by said electric load during said characteristic transitional operating period.
  • a corresponding error value E[n] is calculated, which is indicative of the difference, at an instant n subsequent to the event instant n event , between the anomalous variation ⁇ I G ( figure 8 ) of the grid current I G and the predicted current absorbed by said electric rotating machine during a start-up phase of this latter.
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of selecting a minimum error value E ⁇ [n] among the error values E[n] calculated for all the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of comparing said minimum error value E ⁇ [n] with a second threshold value TH2.
  • the second threshold value TH2 may be set according to the actual nature of the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of repeating the above-described sub-steps for a second number N2 of sampling instants n following the event instant n event .
  • the second number N2 of sampling instants can be conveniently selected depending on the response time desired for determining whether there is an electric fault in the grid sector 100.
  • the step (e) of the method 1 comprises a sub-step of checking whether the minimum error value E ⁇ [n] exceeds the second threshold value TH2 for at least the second number N2 of sampling instants n.
  • the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G is determined as due to the occurrence a transitional operating period of the electric load L 1 , ..., L M , which corresponds to the selected minimum error value E ⁇ [n].
  • the grid sector 100 includes electric rotating machines as electric loads L 1 , ..., L M , for each electric rotating machine, if the minimum error value E ⁇ [n] does not exceed the second threshold value TH2 for at least the second number N2 of sampling instants n, the anomalous variation ⁇ I G ( figure 8 ) of the grid current I G is determined as due to the occurrence a start-up of the electric rotating machine L 1 , ..., L M for which to the selected minimum error value E ⁇ [n] has been calculated.
  • Figure 9 refers to the operation of an exemplary grid sector including two electric rotating machines L 1 , L 2 as electric loads.
  • the behaviour of the error values E 1 [n], E 2 [n] calculated for two electric rotating machines A, B is schematically shown.
  • the error value E 1 [n] can be selected as minimum error value E ⁇ [n].
  • the anomalous variation ⁇ I G ( figure 8 ) of the grid current I G is determined as due to an electric fault.
  • the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of the grid current I G may be caused by to the occurrence transitional operating periods for a plurality of the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • this situation may occur when a plurality of electric rotating machines are activated at a same time.
  • this particular condition is considered as equivalent to an electric fault as it will be almost impossible to find a matching between the second data values i k clean [n] and the specific second reference values I m [n] related to each electric load L 1 , ..., L M .
  • This approach does not provide any real disadvantage as the above-mentioned particular condition is not frequent in the real operating life of an electric power distribution grid.
  • suitable control strategies e.g. load shedding strategies
  • suitable control strategies e.g. load shedding strategies
  • some electric loads of the grid sector may be disconnected or regulated so as to compensate the anomalous variation ⁇ I G of grid current I G adsorbed by the grid sector 100 as a consequence of the occurrence of a transitional operating period of an electric load as it is possible to be confident that the grid current I G will decrease soon.
  • suitable control signals C1 may be generated to prompt the switching device S 1 to disconnect the grid sector 100 from the electric power source 200.
  • the second reference data values may be calculated on the base of first data samples indicative i k (n) of the grid current I G and, possibly, on the base of further data samples v k (n) indicative of the grid voltage V G , when available.
  • the second reference data values I m [n] are calculated by simulating the behaviour of each electric load L 1 , ..., L M using a time-discrete model describing the operation of said electric load during the corresponding characteristic transitional operating period.
  • the function Y() which expresses the above mentioned time-discrete model, may be of known type and is conveniently calculated depending on the actual nature of the electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the function Y() may be calculated according to the well-known modelling techniques described in the following scientific papers:
  • the above-mentioned time-discrete model is calculated by carrying out a modelling procedure for each electric load L 1 , ..., L M of the grid sector 100.
  • such a modelling procedure comprises the following steps:
  • the above-described set-up procedure may include the following steps:
  • the above-described modelling procedure is conveniently carried out during a commissioning phase of the grid sector 100. However, it may be conveniently carried out during a maintenance procedure to update the above-mentioned time-discrete model for each electric load L 1 , ..., L M during the operating life of this latter.
  • the method, according to the invention is characterised by a high flexibility in use and it can be easily adapted to different typologies of electric loads having specific transitional periods.
  • the method 1 is particularly suitable for the identification of a fault event in a grid sector 100 including electric rotating machines as electric loads L 1 , ..., L M .
  • the method 1 can be easily adapted to the implementation in grid sectors having groups of electric rotating machine L 1 , ..., L M as electric loads.
  • the method 1, according to the invention, is particularly suitable for being implemented by a computerised device 300.
  • the present invention relates to a computer program 350 comprising software instructions to carry out the method, according to the invention.
  • the computer program 350 is stored or storable in a storage medium, e.g. in a memory of the computerised device 300 ( figure 1 ).
  • the present invention further relates to a computerised device 300 comprising computerised resources (e.g. one or more microprocessors) configured to execute software instructions to carry out the method, according to the invention.
  • computerised resources e.g. one or more microprocessors
  • the sensor means 301 may arranged to provide the first detection signals D1 to the computerised device 300 configured to carry out the sampling of said detection signals and implement the method 1.
  • the computerised device 300 may be an electronic protection device (electronic protection relay) for an electric power distribution grid, which, as an example, may be installed on board the switching device S 1 or operatively associated to the switching device S 1 .
  • the computerised device 300 may be also a controller for an electric power distribution grid installed on the field or positioned at a remote location with respect to the grid sector 100.
  • the method is quite effective in identifying an electric fault in a grid sector 100 of an electric power distribution grid.
  • the method 1 allows determining whether an anomalous variation of the grid current I G is due to an electric fault or due to a transitional operating period of an electric load. In this last case, the method 1 allows identifying which electric load is subject to a transitional operating period, thereby providing relevant information for the implementation of suitable control strategies for managing the electric loads of the grid sector 100 without disconnecting this latter.
  • the above-described capabilities of the method 1 ensures a robust and reliable control of the operation of the grid sector and, at the same time, allows avoiding or reducing unnecessary disconnection interventions of the electric loads.
  • the method is particularly adapted to be implemented using the hardware and software resources that are already installed on the field to manage the operational of the electric power distribution grid.
  • the method is particularly adapted for being implemented in digitally enabled power distribution networks (smart grids, micro-grids and the like).
  • the method, according to the invention is of relatively easy and cost-effective practical implementation on the field.
  • the method is well scalable for various type of electrical grids (industrial, commercial, and residential) and electrical load types, e.g. rotating machines, such as induction machines, synchronous machines, direct current machines, or other type of electrical loads, such as cooling and heating equipment, furnaces, to name a few.
  • rotating machines such as induction machines, synchronous machines, direct current machines, or other type of electrical loads, such as cooling and heating equipment, furnaces, to name a few.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Remote Monitoring And Control Of Power-Distribution Networks (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Tests Of Circuit Breakers, Generators, And Electric Motors (AREA)

Claims (14)

  1. Verfahren (1) zum Identifizieren eines Störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen Energieverteilungsnetzsektor (100), wobei der Netzsektor eine oder mehrere elektrische Lasten (L1, ..., LM) enthält und einen Kopplungsknoten (PoC) mit einem Hauptnetz (200) aufweist, an dem ein Netzstrom (IG) des Netzsektors detektierbar ist, wobei das Verfahren durch die folgenden Schritte gekennzeichnet ist:
    a) Erfassen von ersten Datenwerten (ik[n]) die kennzeichnend für den Netzstrom (IG), sind, für jede elektrische Phase, wobei die ersten Datenwerte zu aufeinander folgenden Abtastzeitpunkten (n) erfasst werden, die in eine Folge von Zeitfenstern (TW1, ..., TWR) unterteilt sind;
    b) Verarbeiten von ersten, für jede elektrische Phase erfassten Datenwerten (ik +[n]) zu ersten Abtastzeitpunkten (n), die zumindest teilweise in einem Zeitfenster (TW+) enthalten sind, und von ersten, für jede elektrische Phase erfassten Datenwerten (ik - [n]) zu zweiten Abtastzeitpunkten (n), die den ersten Abtastzeitpunkten vorausgehen und zumindest teilweise in einem dem Zeitfenster (TW+) vorausgehenden vorherigen Zeitfenster (TW-) enthalten sind, um zu prüfen, ob der Netzstrom (IG), in dem Zeitfenster (TW+), einer anomalen Abweichung (ΔIG) in Bezug auf das vorherige Zeitfenster (TW-) unterliegt,
    wobei eine statistische Anzahl (CH[n]), die kennzeichnend für eine Abweichung des Netzstroms (IG) in dem Zeitfenster (TW+) in Bezug auf das vorherige Zeitfenster (TW-) ist, basierend auf ersten Datenwerten (ik +[n], ik -[n]) die zu den ersten und zweiten Abtastzeitpunkten erfasst wurden, berechnet wird, wobei die statistische Anzahl mit einem Schwellenwert (TH1) verglichen wird, um zu bestimmen, ob es die anomale Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) in dem Zeitfenster (TW+) gibt;
    c) wenn bestimmt wird, dass der Netzstrom (IG) keiner anomalen Abweichung (ΔIG) in Bezug auf das vorherige Zeitfenster (TW-), unterliegt, Wiederholen des Schritts (b) für nachfolgende Abtastzeitpunkte;
    d) wenn bestimmt wird, dass der Netzstrom (IG), ausgehend von einem Ereigniszeitpunkt (nevent) des Zeitfensters (TW+), einer anomalen Abweichung (ΔIG) in Bezug auf das vorherige Zeitfenster (TW-) unterliegt, Verarbeiten eines oder mehrerer erfasster erster Datenwerte (ik e[n]) für jede elektrische Phase zu Abtastzeitpunkten, die auf den Ereigniszeitpunkt (nevent) folgen, um für jede elektrische Phase zweite Datenwerte (ik clean[n]) zu berechnen, die kennzeichnend für die anomale Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) sind;
    e) Verarbeiten der für jede elektrische Phase berechneten zweiten Datenwerte (ik clean[n]), um zu prüfen, ob die anomale Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) auf eine charakteristische Übergangsbetriebsperiode einer elektrischen Last (L1, ..., LM) des Netzsektors zurückzuführen ist;
    wobei ein Übereinstimmen zwischen den zweiten Datenwerten (ik clean[n]) und zweiten Referenzwerten (Im[n]) die sich auf die elektrische Last beziehen, angibt, dass die anomale Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) auf das Vorkommen einer charakteristischen Übergangsbetriebsperiode für die elektrische Last und nicht auf eine elektrische Störung zurückzuführen ist;
    wobei ein Nichtübereinstimmen zwischen den zweiten Datenwerten (ik clean[n]) und den zweiten Referenzwerten, die sich auf jede elektrische Last (L1, ..., LM) beziehen, angibt, dass die anomale Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) auf das Vorkommen einer elektrischen Störung zurückzuführen ist; wobei für jede elektrische Last L1, ..., LM, die zweiten Referenzwerte (Im[n]) ein vorhergesagtes Verhalten für den von der elektrischen Last aufgenommenen Strom beschreiben, wenn die elektrische Last einer charakteristischen Übergangsbetriebsperiode unterliegt.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Schritt b) die folgenden Teilschritte umfasst:
    - für jede elektrische Phase (k) des Netzsektors, Ausführen der folgenden Schritte:
    - Auswählen eines ersten Vektors (ik +[n]) von ersten Datenwerten (ik(n)), die zu den ersten Abtastzeitpunkten (n) erfasst wurden;
    - Auswählen eines zweiten Vektors (ik -[n]) von ersten Datenwerten (ik(n)), die zu den zweiten Abtastzeitpunkten (n) erfasst wurden;
    - Verarbeiten des ersten und zweiten Vektors (ik +[n]), (ik -[n]), um einen Phasenstromabweichungswert (CHk[n]) zu berechnen, der kennzeichnend für eine Abweichung eines Phasenstroms des Netzstroms (IG) in Bezug auf das vorherige Zeitfenster (TW-) ist;
    - Verarbeiten der für jede elektrische Phase berechneten Phasenstromabweichungswerte (CHk[n]), um einen Gesamtstromabweichungswert (CH[n]) zu berechnen, der kennzeichnend für eine Gesamtabweichung des Netzstroms (IG) in Bezug auf das vorherige Zeitfenster (TW-) ist;
    - Vergleich des Gesamtstromabweichungswertes (CH[n]) mit einem ersten Schwellenwert (TH1);
    - Wiederholen der vorherigen Schritte für eine erste Anzahl (N1) von Abtastzeitpunkten (n), die in dem Zeitfenster (TW+) enthalten sind;
    - Prüfen, ob der Gesamtstromabweichungswert (CH[n]) den ersten Schwellenwert (TH1) für die erste vordefinierte Anzahl (N1) von Abtastzeitpunkten (n) überschreitet.
  3. Verfahren nach einem oder mehreren der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Schritt d) die folgenden Unterschritte umfasst:
    für jede elektrische Phase,
    Auswählen eines ersten Datensatzes (ik e[n]) von ersten Datenwerten (ik(n)), die zu Abtastzeitpunkten erfasst werden, die auf den Ereigniszeitpunkt (nevent) folgen;
    Auswählen eines zweiten Datensatzes (ik r[n]) von ersten Referenzdatenwerten, die kennzeichnend für einen Hintergrundzustand des Netzstroms (IG) sind;
    Verarbeiten des ersten und zweiten Datensatzes (ik e[n]), (ik r[n]) von Datenwerten, um einen dritten Datensatz (ik clean[n]) der zweiten Datenwerte zu berechnen.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Referenzdatenwerte (ik r[n]) erste Datenwerte (ik(n)) sind, die zu einem oder mehreren Abtastzeitpunkten (n) erfasst werden, die dem Ereigniszeitpunkt (nevent) vorhergehen.
  5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Referenzdatenwerte (ik r[n]) erste Datenwerte (ik -[n]) sind, die im letzten Zeitfenster (TW-) erfasst wurden, das dem Ereigniszeitpunkt (nevent) vorhergeht.
  6. Verfahren nach einem oder mehreren der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Schritt e) die folgenden Unterschritte umfasst:
    Verarbeiten der für jede elektrische Phase berechneten zweiten Datenwerte (ik clean[n]), um dritte Datenwerte (Iclean[n]) zu berechnen, die kennzeichnend für die anomale Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) sind;
    für jede elektrische Last (L1, ..., LM), Auswählen der zweiten Referenzdatenwerte (Im[n]), die kennzeichnend für einen vorhergesagten Strom sind, der von der elektrischen Last während einer charakteristischen Übergangsbetriebsperiode der elektrischen Last aufgenommen wird;
    für jede elektrische Last (L1, ..., LM), Verarbeiten der dritten Datenwerte (Iclean[n]) und der zweiten Referenzdatenwerte (Im[n]), um einen Fehlerwert (Em[n]) zu berechnen, der kennzeichnend für eine Differenz zwischen der anomalen Abweichung (ΔIG) des Netzstroms (IG) und dem vorhergesagten Strom ist, der von der elektrischen Last während der charakteristischen Übergangsbetriebsperiode aufgenommen wird;
    Auswählen eines minimalen Fehlerwertes (E∗[n]) unter den für die elektrischen Lasten (L1, ..., LM) berechneten Fehlerwerten (Em[n]);
    Vergleich des minimalen Fehlerwertes (E∗[n]) mit einem zweiten Schwellenwert (TH2); Wiederholen der vorherigen Schritte für eine zweite Anzahl (N2) von Abtastzeitpunkten (n) nach dem Ereigniszeitpunkt (nevent);
    Prüfen, ob der Mindestfehlerwert (E∗[n]) den zweiten Schwellenwert (TH2) für die zweite Anzahl (N2) von Abtastzeitpunkten überschreitet.
  7. Verfahren nach einem oder mehreren der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die zweiten Referenzdatenwerte (Im[n]) durch Simulieren des Verhaltens jeder elektrischen Last(L1, ..., LM) unter Verwendung eines zeitdiskreten Modells (Y()) berechnet werden, das den Betrieb der elektrischen Last während der charakteristischen Übergangsbetriebsperiode beschreibt.
  8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das zeitdiskrete Modell (Y()) durch Durchführen eines Modellierungsvorgangs berechnet wird, der die folgenden Schritte umfasst:
    Aktivieren einer elektrischen Last (Lm) des Netzsektors;
    Deaktivieren der verbleibenden elektrischen Lasten des Netzsektors;
    Erfassen von Detektionsdaten, die kennzeichnend sind für die Betriebsspannung und den Strom der elektrischen Last während der charakteristischen Übergangsbetriebsperiode der elektrischen Last;
    Verarbeiten der Detektionsdaten, um einen oder mehrere tatsächliche elektrische und/oder mechanische Parameter (pest) der elektrischen Last zu schätzen, die in dem zeitdiskreten Modell (Y()) verwendet werden sollen.
  9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die tatsächlichen elektrischen und mechanischen Parameter (pest) der elektrischen Last (Lm) durch Lösen eines NLS-Problems basierend auf einer oder mehreren für die elektrische Last bereitgestellten Installationsbeschränkungen geschätzt werden.
  10. Verfahren nach einem oder mehreren der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die elektrischen Lasten (L1, ..., LM) durch elektrische rotierende Maschinen oder Gruppen von elektrischen rotierenden Maschinen gebildet werden, wobei die charakteristische Übergangsbetriebsperiode der elektrischen Lasten eine Anlaufphase der elektrischen rotierenden Maschinen oder Gruppen von elektrischen rotierenden Maschinen ist.
  11. Computerprogramm (350), das in einem Speichermedium gespeichert oder speicherbar ist, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass es Software-Anweisungen umfasst, um ein Verfahren (1) nach einem oder mehreren der vorhergehenden Ansprüche zu implementieren.
  12. Computergestützte Vorrichtung (300), dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie Datenverarbeitungsressourcen umfasst, die dazu ausgelegt sind, Softwareanweisungen auszuführen, um ein Verfahren (1) nach einem oder mehreren der Ansprüche 1 bis 10 zu implementieren.
  13. Computergestützte Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 12, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie eine elektronische Schutzvorrichtung für ein elektrisches Energieverteilungsnetz ist.
  14. Computergestützte Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 12, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass sie eine Steuerung für ein elektrisches Energieverteilungsnetz ist.
EP17168236.2A 2017-04-26 2017-04-26 Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor Active EP3396802B1 (de)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK17168236.2T DK3396802T3 (da) 2017-04-26 2017-04-26 Fremgangsmåde til identificering af en fejlhændelse i en sektor af et strømfordelingsnet
ES17168236T ES2908116T3 (es) 2017-04-26 2017-04-26 Un método para identificar un evento de falla en un sector de la red de distribución de energía eléctrica
EP17168236.2A EP3396802B1 (de) 2017-04-26 2017-04-26 Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor
RU2018114569A RU2765380C2 (ru) 2017-04-26 2018-04-20 Способ идентификации события отказа в секторе электрической распределительной сети
US15/961,180 US11451042B2 (en) 2017-04-26 2018-04-24 Method for identifying a fault event in an electric power distribution grid sector
KR1020180048083A KR102514161B1 (ko) 2017-04-26 2018-04-25 배전 그리드 섹터에서 고장 이벤트를 식별하는 방법
CN201810384399.6A CN108805399B (zh) 2017-04-26 2018-04-26 用于识别配电网区段中的故障事件的方法

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP17168236.2A EP3396802B1 (de) 2017-04-26 2017-04-26 Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3396802A1 EP3396802A1 (de) 2018-10-31
EP3396802B1 true EP3396802B1 (de) 2021-12-29

Family

ID=58632895

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17168236.2A Active EP3396802B1 (de) 2017-04-26 2017-04-26 Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US11451042B2 (de)
EP (1) EP3396802B1 (de)
KR (1) KR102514161B1 (de)
CN (1) CN108805399B (de)
DK (1) DK3396802T3 (de)
ES (1) ES2908116T3 (de)
RU (1) RU2765380C2 (de)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3772789B1 (de) * 2019-08-05 2022-04-20 ABB Schweiz AG Elektronische schutzvorrichtung für elektrische energieverteilungsnetze
MX2022005004A (es) * 2019-10-28 2022-05-16 Enphase Energy Inc Metodo y aparato para control terciario de microrejillas con proteccion de sobrecorriente integrada.
CN115296592B (zh) * 2022-10-08 2023-02-03 东营金丰正阳科技发展有限公司 一种防止过压故障的潜油电泵控制柜
CN117094475B (zh) * 2023-10-18 2024-01-30 合肥工业大学 一种电力配电网故障分析系统
CN117648587B (zh) * 2024-01-29 2024-04-02 深圳市爱宝科技有限公司 一种电机堵转高灵敏度检测方法
CN117875794A (zh) * 2024-03-11 2024-04-12 深圳市福山自动化科技有限公司 一种能源电力数据质量评估方法

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU877683A1 (ru) * 1979-03-27 1981-10-30 Павлодарский Химический Завод Реагирующий орган дл токовой защиты
GB2195845B (en) * 1986-09-30 1991-03-27 Electricity Council Remote protection of three phase distribution transformers
US5537327A (en) * 1993-10-22 1996-07-16 New York State Electric & Gas Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting high-impedance faults in electrical power systems
IES80796B2 (en) * 1997-08-28 1999-02-24 Electricity Supply Board Fault detection apparatus and method of detecting faults in an electrical distribution network
RU2280292C1 (ru) * 2004-12-15 2006-07-20 Фгуп "Нии Сиис" Способ защиты нагрузки от аномальных напряжений в сети
US7391218B2 (en) * 2005-03-11 2008-06-24 Honeywell International Inc. Method and apparatus for generalized arc fault detection
MX2008011505A (es) * 2006-03-08 2009-02-25 Aclara Power Line Systems Inc Sistema inteligente detector de falla y metodo.
US8260579B2 (en) * 2009-07-01 2012-09-04 Schneider Electric USA, Inc. Automatic identification of multiple power grids using data synchronization
US8340931B2 (en) * 2009-10-05 2012-12-25 Mehta Tech, Inc. Power grid with comparison of differences in remote phasor changes
US8336352B2 (en) * 2010-01-25 2012-12-25 Aclara Power-Line Systems, Inc. Transient detector and fault classifier for a power distribution system
US8339084B2 (en) * 2010-03-12 2012-12-25 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Systems and methods for monitoring current in an electric motor
US10324132B2 (en) * 2010-06-07 2019-06-18 Abb Inc. Systems and methods for power line event zone identification
WO2012049294A1 (en) * 2010-10-14 2012-04-19 Abb Research Ltd Fault direction parameter indicator device using only current and related methods
RU2609665C2 (ru) * 2012-03-15 2017-02-02 АББ С.п.А. Способ управления профилем нагрузки электрической сети низкого или среднего напряжения и связанная с ним система управления
CN103675415B (zh) * 2012-08-31 2017-03-01 西门子公司 励磁涌流检测方法、励磁涌流制动方法及其装置
US9411389B2 (en) * 2012-10-09 2016-08-09 Nec Corporation Distributed generation control for microgrid during islanding
FR3010531B1 (fr) * 2013-09-12 2015-10-02 Schneider Electric Ind Sas Procede de determination d'une cause de perte de tension en aval d'un disjoncteur, appareil auxiliaire pour disjoncteur, systeme electrique comportant un disjoncteur et un tel appareil auxiliaire
US9891289B2 (en) * 2014-06-03 2018-02-13 Cooper Technologies Company Power transformer inrush current detector
CN104297629B (zh) * 2014-08-19 2017-09-12 中国科学院电工研究所 含分布式电源的配电网的区段故障检测与定位方法
US9152737B1 (en) * 2014-11-26 2015-10-06 Sense Labs, Inc. Providing notifications to a user
EP3254370A4 (de) * 2015-02-06 2018-08-15 United Technologies Corporation Netzangeschlossener nahtloser übergang im netzinselmodus
US9798342B2 (en) * 2015-02-23 2017-10-24 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Detection and correction of fault induced delayed voltage recovery
CN105140894B (zh) * 2015-08-07 2018-09-25 许继电气股份有限公司 一种基于相位差原理的配电网差动保护方法
EP3549221B1 (de) * 2016-11-30 2021-02-17 MARICI Holdings The Netherlands B.V. Verfahren zur steuerung einer leckstromschutzvorrichtung in einer fotovoltaikvorrichtung

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108805399B (zh) 2023-09-19
KR102514161B1 (ko) 2023-03-24
DK3396802T3 (da) 2022-03-14
US11451042B2 (en) 2022-09-20
ES2908116T3 (es) 2022-04-27
RU2765380C2 (ru) 2022-01-28
US20180316176A1 (en) 2018-11-01
KR20180120112A (ko) 2018-11-05
RU2018114569A3 (de) 2021-09-03
CN108805399A (zh) 2018-11-13
RU2018114569A (ru) 2019-10-21
EP3396802A1 (de) 2018-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3396802B1 (de) Verfahren zur identifizierung eines störungsereignisses in einem elektrischen verteilungsnetzsektor
US20110153236A1 (en) Electrical anomaly detection method and system
AU2020348655B2 (en) Fast close open
US10247767B2 (en) Fault detection and direction determination
US9742181B2 (en) Method and control system for handling a reclosing operation in a power system
KR100920946B1 (ko) 부하 기기의 영향을 고려한 배전 선로의 고장 검출 및위치를 판단하는 장치 및 방법
Kamble et al. Voltage sag characterization in a distribution systems: A case study
US10295598B2 (en) Method for determining the operating status of a spring charging motor for a LV or MV switching apparatus and a diagnostic system implementing said method
US20210091558A1 (en) Sectionalizing sequence order
CN108345706B (zh) 一种电源快切的仿真方法及模型
Stanek Analysis of circuit breaker controlled switching operations-from manual to automatic
KR20120136952A (ko) 고저항 지락고장 검출 시스템 및 그 방법
EP4080725B1 (de) Verfahren zur schätzung der betriebsbedingungen einer schaltvorrichtung
JP2011244593A (ja) 事故様相判定装置
CN100550556C (zh) 电压互感器的似真性检验的方法和设备以及电气开关设施
Hanzelka et al. Voltage dips and short supply interruptions
US20230089477A1 (en) Wire down detection system and method
MOKHTAR et al. OPERATION EFFECT TO VOLTAGE SAG IMMUNITY LEVELS OF AC CONTACTORS AT PETROCHEMICAL PLANT IN PAHANG, MALAYSIA
Chagas et al. A Method Based on Linear Prediction for Inrush Current Detection
CN116559586A (zh) 一种电网故障检测方法及检测装置
CN116316397A (zh) 具有改进选择性的电气保护系统和方法
Taberer et al. Real-world troubleshooting with microprocessor-based recloser controls
Stanek Operations–from Manual to Automatic
Leão et al. Testing the Influence of the Quality of the Supply Voltage on the Performance of a Numerical Relay

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190401

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200407

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H02H 1/04 20060101AFI20210719BHEP

Ipc: H02H 3/08 20060101ALI20210719BHEP

Ipc: H02H 7/26 20060101ALI20210719BHEP

Ipc: H02H 1/00 20060101ALN20210719BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210806

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1459394

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017051460

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20220308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2908116

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20220427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220329

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20211229

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20220400591

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20220418

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1459394

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20211229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220329

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220429

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220429

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017051460

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220426

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220426

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230426

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230424

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230627

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20230421

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230419

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170426

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211229