EP3394783B1 - Identification de logiciels malveillants - Google Patents

Identification de logiciels malveillants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3394783B1
EP3394783B1 EP16809439.9A EP16809439A EP3394783B1 EP 3394783 B1 EP3394783 B1 EP 3394783B1 EP 16809439 A EP16809439 A EP 16809439A EP 3394783 B1 EP3394783 B1 EP 3394783B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cfd
malicious
network
traffic
malware
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16809439.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3394783A1 (fr
Inventor
Fadi El-Moussa
George KALLOS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
British Telecommunications PLC
Original Assignee
British Telecommunications PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by British Telecommunications PLC filed Critical British Telecommunications PLC
Publication of EP3394783A1 publication Critical patent/EP3394783A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3394783B1 publication Critical patent/EP3394783B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
    • G06F21/562—Static detection
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/552—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures involving long-term monitoring or reporting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/554—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures involving event detection and direct action
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
    • G06F21/562—Static detection
    • G06F21/563—Static detection by source code analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
    • G06F21/562—Static detection
    • G06F21/564—Static detection by virus signature recognition
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
    • G06F21/566—Dynamic detection, i.e. detection performed at run-time, e.g. emulation, suspicious activities
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
    • G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
    • G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
    • G06F21/568—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements eliminating virus, restoring damaged files
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1408—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic by monitoring network traffic
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1408—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic by monitoring network traffic
    • H04L63/1416—Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1441—Countermeasures against malicious traffic
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1441—Countermeasures against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/145—Countermeasures against malicious traffic the attack involving the propagation of malware through the network, e.g. viruses, trojans or worms
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/03—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/50, monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms
    • G06F2221/033—Test or assess software

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the detection of malicious software in a computer system.
  • the invention relates to improved malicious software detection.
  • Malicious software also known as computer contaminants or malware, is software that is intended to do direct or indirect harm in relation to one or more computer systems. Such harm can manifest as the disruption or prevention of the operation of all or part of a computer system, accessing private, sensitive, secure and/or secret data, software and/or resources of computing facilities, or the performance of illicit, illegal or fraudulent acts.
  • Malware includes, inter alia, computer viruses, worms, botnets, trojans, spyware, adware, rootkits, keyloggers, dialers, malicious browser extensions or plugins and rogue security software.
  • Malware proliferation can occur in a number of ways. Malware can be communicated as part of an email such as an attachment or embedding. Alternatively malware can be disguised as, or embedded, appended or otherwise communicated with or within, genuine software. Some malware is able to propagate via storage devices such as removable, mobile or portable storage including memory cards, disk drives, memory sticks and the like, or via shared or network attached storage. Malware can also be communicated over computer network connections such as the internet via websites or other network facilities or resources. Malware can propagate by exploiting vulnerabilities in computer systems such as vulnerabilities in software or hardware components including software applications, browsers, operating systems, device drivers or networking, interface or storage hardware.
  • a vulnerability is a weakness in a computer system, such as a computer, operating system, network of connected computers or one or more software components such as applications. Such weaknesses can manifest as defects, errors or bugs in software code that present an exploitable security weakness.
  • An example of such a weakness is a buffer-overrun vulnerability, in which, in one form, an interface designed to store data in an area of memory allows a caller to supply more data than will fit in the area of memory. The extra data can overwrite executable code stored in the memory and thus such a weakness can permit the storage of malicious executable code within an executable area of memory.
  • An example of such malicious executable code is known as 'shellcode' which can be used to exploit a vulnerability by, for example, the execution, installation and/or reconfiguration of resources in a computer system.
  • Such weaknesses once exploited, can bootstrap a process of greater exploitation of a target system.
  • Malware propagated by, or communicating over, a network connection, such as the internet, by exploitation of a vulnerability in a target system can be particularly challenging to detect.
  • Many systems monitor files stored or received in a file system with reference to a dictionary of malware "signatures".
  • a signature can be a pattern of data associated with known malware.
  • Such an approach requires the receipt of known malware and is susceptible to subtle changes in malware which may render the malware undetectable in view of the stored signatures.
  • Other systems monitor behaviour of software to identify suspicious behaviour in order to detect potential malware. Such systems therefore detect malware infection after-the-event and are susceptible to changes in malware and malware devised specifically to minimise suspicious behaviour such as malware designed to behave like genuine software.
  • An alternative approach to the detection of malware is to detect network traffic associated with malware propagated by, or communicating over, a network connection.
  • Such network traffic can be considered malicious network traffic occurring as part of network communications received by, or occurring between, computer systems, such as traffic attributable to malware software installed, being installed or being communicated for installation on a computer system.
  • Traditional malicious traffic detection mechanisms depend on techniques including network traffic interception and analysis or network connection summarisation which can determine key characteristics of a network connection such as source and destination addresses, source and destination ports and a protocol (known as a traffic characterising 5-tuple).
  • Such facilities are provided by technologies such as NetFlow (Cisco) or Yet Another Flowmeter (YAF).
  • Document XP055254814 discloses a fractal-based algorithm for anomaly pattern discovery on time series stream.
  • DPI deep packet inspection
  • DPI is inefficient since it involves a considerable processing overhead and challenges exist maintaining a DPI process that can keep up with ever greater network throughput. Additionally, DPI is ineffective where malicious network traffic is encrypted.
  • the paper " Detecting Encrypted Botnet Traffic" (Zhang et al, Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2013 ) acknowledges how detection systems such as BotHunter suffer significantly in the presence of encrypted traffic with detection rates reduced by almost 50%.
  • Zhang et al describes an approach using BotHunter to detect encrypted malicious traffic. The approach of Zhang et al operates on the premise that the presence of at least one high entropy flow along with other features that BotHunter detects is a reliable detector of encrypted malicious traffic.
  • entropy is a measure of a degree of indeterminacy of a random variable
  • Entropy R.L. Dobrushin V.V. Prelov, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, 2002, ISBN 1402006098 .
  • the theoretical basis for entropy calculation and the entropy of an information source is defined in detail in " A Mathematical Theory of Communication” (C. E. Shannon, The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379-423, 623-656, July, October, 1948 ) and derives from a measure of entropy as defined in statistical mechanics.
  • Zhang describes estimating a measure of entropy for packets in a network communication. Estimates of entropy for a communication exceeding a threshold are identified as 'high entropy' and an identification of a high entropy flow contributes to a detection of encrypted malicious traffic.
  • Zhang is premised on the detection of high entropy flows as an indicator of malicious network traffic. Encrypted network traffic also arises as part of non-malicious applications such as traffic from genuine and/or authorised software applications being encrypted for security purposes. It is therefore problematic to detect and respond to high entropy flows where non-malicious traffic may be falsely identified as potentially malicious.
  • the paper " Detecting Subverted Cryptographic Protocols by Entropy Checking" (J. Olivain and J. Goubault-Larrecq, 2006 ) describes an approach to detecting attacks based on computing entropy for a flow.
  • the approach of Olivain et al is directed to the detection of unscrambled traffic over cryptographic protocols as a way of detecting potentially malicious traffic.
  • Olivain et al observe how a measure of entropy for encrypted network traffic will tend towards the entropy of a random source such that, where network traffic consists of characters as bytes from an alphabet of 256 bytes, the entropy of encrypted network traffic tends towards 8 bits per byte.
  • Olivain et al propose an approach to malicious traffic detection based on ranges of acceptable measures of entropy tending towards the entropy of a random source such that traffic that does not tend consistently in this way is identified as being unscrambled and malicious. Olivain et al acknowledge the considerable drawback of their technique that it can be countered by malicious traffic that is itself encrypted. This is because encrypted malicious traffic will also exhibit entropy tending towards the entropy of a random source and so becomes indistinguishable from non-malicious encrypted traffic.
  • Bestuzhev highlights how malware can be communicated in encrypted form causing existing automatic malware detection systems to function incorrectly (Bestuzhev, 2010, www.securelist.com/en/blog/208193235/Steganography_or_encryption_in_bankers, retrieved February 2014). Such encrypted malware would also fail to be detected by the approach of Olivain et al which relies on the communication of unscrambled (e.g. unencrypted) traffic for detection.
  • Patent publication WO2015/128613A1 discloses a method for identifying malicious encrypted network traffic communicated via a computer network, the method comprising: evaluating an estimated measure of Shannon entropy for a portion of network traffic over a monitored network connection; comparing the estimated measure of entropy with a reference measure of Shannon entropy for a corresponding portion of network traffic of a malicious encrypted network connection so as to determine if malicious encrypted network traffic is communicated over the monitored network connection.
  • the approach of WO2015/128613A1 is effective for encrypted network traffic, it is restricted to substantially the portion of a network traffic that is not encrypted since an estimate of a Shannon entropy measure for encrypted traffic will tend towards entropy of a random source. It would be beneficial to be able to characterise both unencrypted and encrypted network traffic for malicious traffic detection.
  • the present invention accordingly provides, in a first aspect, a computer implemented method to identify a derivative of one or more malicious software components in a computer system comprising: evaluating a measure of a correlation fractal dimension (CFD) for at least a portion of a monitored software component in the computer system, the CFD including a plurality of CFD values varying with a resolution of fractal dimension; and comparing the plurality of CFD values with a reference measure of CFD for each of the malicious software components, each reference measure of CFD including a plurality of CFD values varying with a resolution of fractal dimension, so as to identify one or more of the plurality of malicious software components from which the monitored software component is derived.
  • CFD correlation fractal dimension
  • each of the identified malicious software component is identified based on a similarity of at least a portion of the plurality of CFD values of the monitored software component and the identified software component.
  • the similarity is a degree of similarity of CFD values.
  • the plurality of CFD values of each of the monitored software component and the malicious software components are ranges of CFD values modelled as a plot of CFD values against a function of resolution of fractal dimension having one or more slopes therein, and the similarity is a degree of similarity of the slopes of the monitored software component and the identified malicious software components.
  • the present invention accordingly provides, in a second aspect, a computer system to identify a derivative of one or more malicious software components in a computer system comprising a memory and a processor wherein the processor is configured to perform the steps of: evaluating a measure of a correlation fractal dimension (CFD) for at least a portion of a monitored software component in the computer system, the CFD including a plurality of CFD values varying with a resolution of fractal dimension; and comparing the plurality of CFD values with a reference measure of CFD for each of the malicious software components, each reference measure of CFD including a plurality of CFD values varying with a resolution of fractal dimension, so as to identify one or more of the plurality of malicious software components from which the monitored software component is derived.
  • CFD correlation fractal dimension
  • the present invention accordingly provides, in a third aspect, a computer program element comprising computer program code to, when loaded into a computer system and executed thereon, cause the computer to perform the steps of the method set out above.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer system suitable for the operation of embodiments of the present invention.
  • a central processor unit (CPU) 102 is communicatively connected to a storage 104 and an input/output (I/O) interface 106 via a data bus 108.
  • the storage 104 can be any read/write storage device such as a random access memory (RAM) or a non-volatile storage device.
  • RAM random access memory
  • An example of a non-volatile storage device includes a disk or tape storage device.
  • the I/O interface 106 is an interface to devices for the input or output of data, or for both input and output of data. Examples of I/O devices connectable to I/O interface 106 include a keyboard, a mouse, a display (such as a monitor) and a network connection.
  • FIG. 2a is a component diagram of a malicious network traffic detector 200 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the detector 200 is a software, hardware or firmware component for monitoring network traffic communicated via a computer network 202 and for generating a malicious traffic event 210 on detection of malicious traffic.
  • the network 202 is a wired or wireless network suitable for the communication of information such as data as network traffic between or within computer systems.
  • Such computer systems can include network connected devices having means to transmit and/or receive data via such a computer network 202 such as, inter alia, pervasive devices, smartphones, embedded logic in devices, appliances, vehicles or other articles, networks of computer systems, mainframe, mini, desktop, portable or cloud-based computer systems, virtualised or emulated systems and the like.
  • Network traffic is communicated via the network connection 202 between network endpoints such as computer systems.
  • Each communication between endpoints is part of a network connection, such as a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) connection in the Internet Protocol Suite.
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • a network connection can be characterised by an address of a source network endpoint, an address of a destination network endpoint, source and destination ports for the communication and a type of communication protocol employed.
  • the detector 200 can be implemented in a network appliance such as a router, switch, firewall, network attached storage, multiplexor, transceiver or the like.
  • the detector 200 can be a standalone device operable with the network 202.
  • the detector 200 can be provided as a software, hardware or firmware component of a network connected computer system such as a computer system for protection from malicious network traffic and/or malware.
  • the detector 200 can be implemented as part of an intrusion detection system, firewall, operating system, virus detection system, malware detection system or the like.
  • the detector includes a correlation fractal dimension (CFD) evaluator 204 and a CFD comparator 206 as software, hardware or firmware components.
  • the CFD evaluator 204 is operable to evaluate a measure of CFD for a portion of network traffic communicated over a network connection via the computer network 202.
  • the measure of CFD is evaluated as a measure of a probability that two points in a data stream of information communicated via the network connection 202 will be within a certain distance of each other.
  • the portion of network traffic for CFD evaluation is selected as a continuous subset of the network traffic as a window of network traffic substantially corresponding to an application protocol connection setup. That is, the portion of network traffic substantially corresponds to a portion of the network traffic involved in the formation of a connection for an application network protocol between two application endpoints communicating via the network 202, as will be described in detail below.
  • a fractal dimension is a mathematical or numerical description of the self-similarity of a structure.
  • the evaluation of a fractal dimension for a given set of data items is described in " Fast Feature Selection Using Fractal Dimension” (Traina et al, 2000 ) which describes a fractal dimension algorithm.
  • Such an algorithm can be applied to a time series stream as described in " Fractal-Based Algorithm for Anomaly Pattern Discovery on Time Series Stream” (Li et al, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, Volume 6, Number 3, March 2011 ).
  • Embodiments of the present invention apply a CFD to computer network traffic and, in particular, to the identification of malicious network traffic.
  • a CFD, D2 is evaluated using the formula: D 2 ⁇ ⁇ log ⁇ i p r , i 2 ⁇ log r , r ⁇ r min r max
  • P r,i is the occupancy with which data points fall in an i th cell in a matrix of data points having a resolution r .
  • the resolution is the cell size (also known as the 'radius' of a cell).
  • the cells for evaluation of a measure of CFD are selected to cover a full range of normalised values of network traffic data units in the portion of network traffic, such as normalised byte values, such that a count of a number of bytes (data points) occurring in each cell is determined as an occupancy measure for each cell from which the CFD is evaluated using the above formula.
  • the evaluation is performed based on occupancy measures for a plurality of resolutions and the fractal dimension is evaluated based on a derivative of a function of the occupancy measures with respect to a function of the radius.
  • Figure 2b is a flowchart of an exemplary method of the CFD evaluator 204 of Figure 2a in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2c is a schematic illustration of processing of a sequence of bytes of network traffic 220 to evaluate a measure of CFD in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the CFD evaluator 204 receives bytes of network traffic in a network traffic window as a byte matrix.
  • the network traffic window is a portion of network traffic for evaluation of the CFD measure. The determination and selection of an appropriate portion of network traffic for CFD evaluation will be described in detail later.
  • Figure 2c illustrates a example sequence of bytes 220 from network traffic, such as known malware network traffic or network traffic for a network communication for identification of malware.
  • the example sequence 220 of bytes in Figure 2c is sixteen bytes long though other window sizes could alternatively be used.
  • Each byte in the sequence 220 is illustrated by its value ranging from 0 to 255.
  • the CFD evaluator 204 converts each byte to a normalised byte identifier to generate a matrix of data points 222.
  • each byte value is normalised in the range [0..1] such that a value of each byte is identified by a unique numeric identifier in the range.
  • the matrix of data points 222 contains a single entry for each byte and constitutes the base data structure for the evaluation of a measure of CFD in this example.
  • Figure 2c includes a conceptual depiction of the normalised range [0..1] divided into cells as a cell matrix 224.
  • the normalised range in Figure 2c is subdivided into cells at each of three different resolutions though different numbers of resolutions (at least 2) can be employed.
  • r 0.5 there are two cells including a cell for normalised values up to 0.5 and a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.5 (depicted at 226).
  • r 0.25 there are four cells including: a cell for normalised values up to 0.25; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.25 and less than 0.5; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.5 and less than 0.75; and a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.75 (depicted at 228).
  • r 0.125 there are eight cells including: a cell for normalised values up to 0.125; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.125 and less than 0.25; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.25 and less than 0.375; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.375 and less than 0.5; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.5 and less than 0.625; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.625 and less than 0.75; a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.75 and less than 0.875; and a cell for normalised values greater than or equal to 0.875 (depicted at 230).
  • Each of these sets of cells constitutes a resolution or a particular radius (size) of the cells or grid.
  • the multi-resolution cell occupancy determination at step 236 involves counting the cell occupancy for each resolution by mapping the normalised byte values 222 into the cells 224, as depicted by arrows in Figure 2c .
  • Figure 2d illustrates a plot 250 of the values of Log( S(r) ) with respect to Log( r ) for the exemplary data of Figure 2c in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the slope or gradient of the plot 250 constitutes a measure of CFD for the data stream 220 and such slope can be evaluated as a generalisation, an average, mean or mode gradient or a point linear gradient at a selected point across the range of the plot. Alternatively the slope may be evaluated algorithmically by differentiation.
  • the method of Figure 2b evaluates a measure of CFD for a portion of network data 220.
  • Figure 2d further depicts, by way of example only, further slopes corresponding to plots of values of Log(S(r)) with respect to Log(r) for other sequences of bytes for the purpose of illustrating an exemplary mode of operation of the CFD comparator 206 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Slope 252 can be seen to have little commonality with slope 250 while slopes 254 and 256 have greater commonality.
  • the commonality can be determined from a similarity of the slopes - such as a similarity of the gradient of the lines at one, more or a range of values in the plot.
  • a degree of similarity of CFD values can be defined for use by the CFD comparator 206 such as a range, point and deviation or other similarity measure.
  • the method of the CFD evaluator 204 described above is applicable to a determination of a CFD measure for a window of network traffic.
  • Such CFD measure could apply to known malware network traffic as a reference measure of CFD 209 or alternatively to network traffic for comparison with known malware network traffic, such comparison being achieved based on the CFD measure.
  • the CFD comparator 206 is operable to receive an evaluated measure of CFD from the CFD evaluator 204 for comparison with a reference measure of CFD 209 in a data store 208.
  • the data store is any suitable data storage mechanism for the storage of the reference measure of CFD 209, such as a data structure, memory area, file, database or the like. While the store 208 is illustrated as being external to the detector 200 it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the store could alternatively constitute part of the detector 200.
  • the reference measure of CFD 209 is a measure of CFD for a portion of network traffic of a known malicious encrypted network connection.
  • the reference measure of CFD 209 is predetermined by a suitable mechanism such as through observation of malicious network traffic. For example, malicious network traffic such as network traffic occurring between two malicious software applications communicating via the computer network 202 is monitored to observe a portion of the network traffic and a measure of CFD of the observed portion is evaluated and stored as the reference measure of CFD 209.
  • the reference measure of CFD 209 is preferably evaluated using the same technique as is employed by the CFD evaluator 204 described above.
  • the comparator 206 is operable to compare a measure of CFD from the evaluator 204 with the reference measure of CFD 209 for malicious encrypted traffic. In response to a determination, by the comparator 206, that the measure of CFD for traffic communicated via the computer network 202 is sufficiently similar to the reference measure of CFD 209, the comparator 206 outputs a positive identification of malicious traffic on the computer network 202.
  • the sufficiency of the similarity in the CFD measures can be achieved on the basis of a comparison algorithm including a comparison allowing for a degree of deviation based on a predetermined level of acceptable deviation.
  • the reference measure of CFD 209 can define a midpoint in a linear range of CFD measures deviating by a predetermined extent above and below the midpoint.
  • the reference measure of CFD 209 can be a range of reference CFD measures.
  • a malicious traffic event 210 is generated to indicate that malicious traffic is identified on the computer network 202.
  • the malicious traffic event 210 can further include, refer to, or correlate with information identifying any or all of: the network 202; a network connection occurring on the network 202; a protocol of a network connection occurring on the network 202; one or more of the endpoints, such as an address of systems, resources, appliances or entities, engaged in a network connection occurring on the network 202; other characterising information for a network connection such as ports or session identifiers, and the like.
  • the malicious traffic event 210 can be a consumable event for receipt by one or more components operable to receive the event and act upon the event.
  • the malicious traffic event 210 can trigger a communication to one or both endpoints of a malicious network connection for the purposes of informing the endpoint(s) that malicious communication is in progress.
  • the malicious traffic event 210 can trigger a proactive termination of an identified malicious network connection, or an increase in a standard or level of network or system security employed by an endpoint of the malicious network connection.
  • the malicious traffic event 210 can trigger a virus, malware, or other malicious software or configuration scan of a computer system, or a shutdown, closure or disconnection of a computer system, or any other suitable protective or remedial measures as will be apparent to those skilled in the art and which may depend on the nature, configuration and purpose of a computer system.
  • the malicious traffic event 210 suitable for triggering a protective component to protect an endpoint of the network connection from the malicious network traffic.
  • the protective component can be a software, hardware or firmware component operable to undertake one or more of, inter alia: terminating the network connection; initiate a scan for malware installed at an endpoint computer system; and adapt a level of security of an endpoint computer system or network connection.
  • FIG 3 is a flowchart of a method of the malicious network traffic detector 200 of Figure 2a in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the CFD evaluator 204 evaluates a measure of CFD for a portion of network traffic.
  • the portion of network traffic is selected to correspond to a connection setup portion of traffic for an application protocol employed by a network connection on the network 202.
  • the CFD comparator 206 compares the evaluated measure of CFD with a reference measure of CFD 209.
  • detector 200 determines if malicious traffic is detected based on the comparison undertaken at step 304. Where malicious traffic is detected, protective and/or remedial measures are taken at step 308 in order to protect against the malicious network traffic and/or remediate malicious software operating at one or both of the communication endpoints.
  • a measure of CFD for a portion of network traffic occurring over a network connection is suitable for characterising the network traffic for the purpose of comparing with reference measures of CFD for known malicious encrypted network traffic in order to identify malicious traffic.
  • the portion of network traffic is selected as a continuous subset of the network traffic substantially corresponding to an application protocol connection setup. That is, the portion of network traffic substantially corresponds to a subset of the network traffic involved in the establishment of a connection for an application network protocol between two application endpoints. In an embodiment, the portion of network traffic corresponds directly to application protocol connection setup traffic.
  • Application protocols include protocols occurring at the application layer of the Internet Protocol Suite as defined by RFC1122 (RFC 1122, Robert Braden, Internet Engineering Task Force, 1989 , available at tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122). Equivalently, application protocols include protocols occurring at the application, presentation or session layer of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model of network protocols.
  • OSI Open Systems Interconnection
  • connection setup will substantially correspond to a portion of a communication that is consistently required for the setup of communications using the application protocol.
  • connection setup excludes substantive traffic being traffic for which a network connection is created (i.e. the payload, freight or cargo of a network communication taken as a whole).
  • substantive traffic is encrypted, the highly variable nature of the encrypted substantive traffic resulting from the encryption will still produce a useful measure of CFD.
  • a connection setup portion of traffic is used for the evaluation of a measure of CFD, the connection setup portion consisting of unencrypted and, potentially, encrypted data.
  • an application protocol for the transmission of multimedia data such as the H.323 protocol ( Packet-Based Multimedia Communications System, the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), 2009 and Amendment 1 dated 03/2013, available from www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.323) includes a connection setup portion and a substantive portion.
  • the substantive portion of an H.323 communication is that portion including multimedia data communicated via an RTP communication channel (Real-time Transport Protocol) - and being the substantive traffic for which a connection is created.
  • the connection setup portion of an H.323 communication is that portion of network traffic required to establish the network connection in order that the multimedia data can be communicated in a desired manner.
  • the connection setup portion of a communication will include: a H.225/Q931 call setup (ITU, 2009 and Amendment 1 dated 03/2013, available from www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.225.0); a H.245 negotiation (ITU, 2011, available from www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.245); and a H.245 voice path setup for an RTP communication channel.
  • substantive voice data is transmitted over the established RTP channel.
  • Such substantive data can be encrypted involving further connection setup steps, such as in accordance with the H.235 security standard (H.235.0 to H.235.7, ITU, 2005 and 2014, available from www.itu.int).
  • FIG 4 is an exemplary illustration of the connection setup and communication of encrypted data between a client 402 and a server 404.
  • the steps indicated at 406 generally relate to the internet's TCP setup including a 'SYN', 'SYN/ACK' and 'ACK' messages. These messages relate to the TCP protocol at the transport layer and serve to establish a TCP connection with segment sequence number synchronisation. Following these steps a TCP connection is created between the client 402 and server 404 indicated by the broken line 408. Subsequently, the steps indicated at 410 generally relate to the creation of a potentially encrypted connection, such as an encrypted connection using the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol.
  • SSL Secure Sockets Layer
  • TLS Transport Layer Security
  • the SSL and TLS protocols are cryptographic protocols at the application layer of the Internet Protocol Suite that use asymmetric cryptography to securely establish a symmetric session key for encrypting data communicated between endpoints.
  • a secure SSL or TLS session is provided between the client 402 and server 404, as indicated by the broken line 412.
  • an application protocol for exchanging data between software applications executing at each of the client 402 and server 404 is established.
  • Such an application protocol can be a standardised or application specific protocol and can include an initial set of messages for establishing an application protocol connection, referred to in Figure 4 as an application handshake.
  • applications protocols include internet protocols such as, inter alia: FTP (file transfer protocol); Telnet; SSH (secure shell); SMTP (simple mail transfer protocol); IMAP (internet message access protocol); POP (post office protocol); SNMP (simple network management protocol); HTTP (hypertext transfer protocol); and CMIP (common management information protocol).
  • applications protocols can include service or application specific protocols such as, inter alia: AFP (Apple filing protocol, formerly AppleTalk); JNDI (Java naming and directory interface); SOAP (simple object access protocol); RDP (remote desktop protocol); NFS (network file system); X Window System; Java remote method protocol; and very many others.
  • bespoke application protocols can operate at the application layer such as, inter alia: database access protocols such as Oracle Net; messaging protocols such as Apple iMessage or Google Wave Federation Protocol; voice or media protocols such as the proprietary Skype protocol; cryptocurrency protocols such as BitCoin protocol; and very many others.
  • a handshake phase of an application protocol can include negotiation, configuration, authentication, further or alternative cryptographic setup, authorisation and/or access control, information exchange, parameter configuration, sequencing and the like.
  • an application protocol handshake takes place as indicated by the hatched area 414.
  • the application handshake may be encrypted using the session key established for the SSL / TLS session 408.
  • application protocols could alternatively manage their own cryptographic communications mechanism instead of, or in addition to, an SSL / TLS session 408.
  • the nature and extent of the application handshake 414 will vary depending on the type of application protocol employed and can be protocol specific. Where the protocol specification is public, the nature and extent of the application handshake 414 will be well known.
  • an application communications session is established and application data is exchanged between the client 402 and server 404 as indicated generally at 416 "AC" (application communication) in Figure 4 .
  • the application data exchanged at 416 may be encrypted.
  • the communicating application has a vulnerability, such as a susceptibility to buffer overflow attack, a programming error, format string vulnerabilities, security lapses or misconfigurations and the like, then the vulnerability is susceptible to exploitation. Exploitation can involve the ultimate execution of arbitrary code by an unauthorised entity such as by way of system access via shellcode or the like. Such exploitation can ultimately lead to the installation of malware on the exploited computer system and, as previously described, when such exploitation takes place over an encrypted network connection such as that illustrated in Figure 4 , the difficulty in identifying such an exploitation increases considerably.
  • embodiments of the present invention evaluate a measure of CFD for a portion of network traffic occurring over a network connection.
  • the portion is selected such that the portion is suitable for characterising the network traffic for the purpose of comparing with reference measures of CFD for known malicious encrypted network traffic in order to detect malicious encrypted traffic.
  • Monitoring a trend in network traffic such as is proposed by Olivain et al, is not effective where the network traffic may be encrypted. For example, estimates of Shannon entropy measures for encrypted network traffic will tend towards entropy of a random sample.
  • embodiments of the present invention evaluate a measure of CFD of a specifically chosen portion of a network communication consisting of the application protocol connection setup.
  • Figure 4 illustrates such a portion as "CS" 418 (connection setup).
  • portion 418 constitutes a window of network traffic occurring in all the network traffic for the network connection.
  • the connection setup portion of Figure 4 is defined to include the TLS / SSL negotiation traffic and the application handshake 414. Notably, the application handshake of Figure 4 may be encrypted.
  • the TCP connection setup 406 is excluded since this is not an application layer protocol of the Internet Protocol Suite.
  • the TCP connection setup 406 will be largely consistent for all connections save for connection characterising information such as addresses and ports, and so the value of the TCP connection setup 406 for the evaluation of CFD is low.
  • the TCP connection setup 406 is included in the CFD evaluation since the effect of including the TCP connection setup 406 may, in some embodiments, be considered consistent across all network connections and accordingly becomes self-cancelling for comparison purposes. In some embodiments, however, the TCP and other, similar or alternative lower layer protocols such as transport, internet and link layer protocols, are excluded from the portion of network traffic for the evaluation of CFD. Preferably, the identification of a lower layer protocol connection setup, such as the TCP connection setup 406, is used to determine the commencement of an application setup portion of network traffic.
  • the definition of a portion of network traffic over a network connection for use in evaluating CFD is predetermined and protocol specific.
  • a definition of an application protocol can be used to determine the number and/or size of network segments, packets, messages or the like that suitably constitute the required portion for the protocol.
  • the portion is a continuous and unbroken portion of network traffic relating to the connection setup characteristics in order that malicious traffic can be identified efficiently and ahead-of-time in order that appropriate remediation and/or protection measures can be employed without necessarily acquiescing to malicious communication.
  • the portion is not disconnected or comprised of selected fields or multiple portions of network traffic - such an approach introduces inefficiencies in both the identification of relevant parts of network traffic and also in the evaluation of a CFD measure. Further, such an approach cannot ensure the efficient and effective application of the CFD evaluation mechanism for streamed network traffic.
  • the portion of network traffic used by the CFD evaluator 204 for the evaluation of a CFD measure is consistent with a portion of network traffic used to evaluate the reference measure of CFD 209. That is to say that a portion definition for a protocol of network traffic in a network connection over the network 202 applies equally to the CFD evaluator 204 and the mechanism used to determine the reference measure of CFD 209, which can also be a process of CFD evaluation consistent with that of the evaluator 204. If the portions are not consistent then the opportunity to identify malicious traffic corresponding to the reference measure of CFD 209 are reduced and can be eliminated.
  • the portion of network traffic for evaluation of a CFD measure is determined to be a continuous subset of traffic occurring over the network connection subsequent to a TCP handshake portion and up to a point in a flow of network traffic on the network connection where the traffic is substantially all encrypted.
  • Such a portion can correspond substantially to an application protocol connection setup portion for some protocols.
  • FIG. 5 is a component diagram of a malicious network traffic detector 500 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Many of the features of Figure 5 are consistent with those of Figure 2a and these will not be repeated.
  • the detector 500 of Figure 5 further includes a monitor 520 and analyser 522 as software, hardware or firmware components.
  • the monitor 520 is operable to monitor network traffic occurring over the network 502 to identify network connections.
  • the monitor 520 is operable to identify the commencement of new network connections by identifying known connection setup characteristics of protocols used for communication via the network 502.
  • the monitor 520 can be operable as a network component adapted to a promiscuous mode of operation in which all network traffic passing via the network 502 is accessible to the monitor 520 as a type of network sniffer.
  • the monitor 520 is adapted to operate in a raw socket mode of operation.
  • the monitor 520 can be implemented using the libpcap library or similar.
  • the monitor 520 identifies new network connections.
  • the monitor 520 can identify the commencement of a TCP connection by identifying the TCP connection setup including 'SYN', 'SYN/ACK', 'ACK' segments. In this way, new network connections created over the network 502 are detected by the monitor 520.
  • the analyser 522 is operable to analyse a new network connection identified by the monitor 520 to identify characteristics of the network connection to determine an application protocol of the network connection.
  • the determination of an application protocol is made with reference to a protocol information store 524 storing one or more characteristics of application protocols as one or more criteria.
  • the criteria, when satisfied, are suitable for identifying a protocol of a network connection.
  • an application protocol for a network connection is determined based on an identification of port numbers for the network connection since port numbers are generally application specific.
  • Internet Protocol Suite ports numbered from 0 to 1023 are designated well-known ports for most widely-used network services.
  • Ports 1024 to 49151 are registered ports assigned by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) for specific services.
  • further characteristics of the network connection observable by the analyser 522 can be used to determine the application protocol. For example, unencrypted connection setup information or protocol-specific information, data or headers disclosed as part of the network connection.
  • Each protocol in the protocol information store 524 has associated one or more portions in the traffic portion definitions store 526.
  • the traffic portion definitions 526 include a definition of a portion of network traffic for the evaluation of a CFD measure by the CFD evaluator 504. As described above, each traffic portion definition 526 identifies a continuous subset of network traffic as a window of network traffic corresponding to an application protocol connection setup portion of network traffic.
  • the traffic portion definitions 526 are predefined and can be based on definitions of application protocols or observation of application protocols in use.
  • a portion definition 526 includes a definition of an amount of traffic following a TCP connection setup, such as a number of segments, packets, messages or bytes, commencing at a reference starting point in network traffic.
  • each portion is a subset of network traffic subsequent to a transport protocol handshake and up to a predetermined endpoint.
  • a portion definition 526 includes a definition of a starting point, such as a starting byte or segment, in a sequence of network traffic, and a definition of an ending point such as an ending byte or segment or a number of bytes or segments.
  • each traffic portion definition in the store 926 is protocol specific such that a definition of a portion of traffic is specific to a particular protocol in the protocol information store 924.
  • the portion is defined to be a continuous, unbroken subset of network traffic defined as some window of network traffic communicated for a network connection. While the protocol information store 524 and traffic portion definitions 526 are illustrated as different and separate data stores, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the protocol information and traffic portion definitions can alternatively be stored in a common data store.
  • the CFD evaluator 504 is adapted to retrieve one or more definitions of a portion of network traffic from the traffic portion definitions 526 based on the protocol for the network traffic determined by the analyser 522.
  • the evaluator 504 is further adapted to evaluate a measure of CFD for the network connection as a measure of CFD of each portion of traffic for the connection according to the retrieved traffic portion definitions 526.
  • the measure of CFD is evaluated as described above. Where multiple traffic portion definitions 526 are retrieved for a protocol, such portion definitions will constitute windows of network traffic that may overlap or occur adjacent in the flow of network traffic.
  • the evaluation of a measure of CFD for each of the retrieved traffic portion definition 526 may involve multiple evaluations covering the same network traffic to differing extents: such that evaluations occur for all windows of the traffic constituting each of the retrieved traffic portion definitions 526. In an embodiment this is efficiently achieved by receiving, intercepting, sniffing, recording or otherwise accessing network traffic in a window of network traffic for a connection covering the windows of all retrieved traffic portion definitions 926. Subsequently, individual traffic portion definitions 926 can be applied to the network traffic so accessed in order to undertake CFD evaluations for each portion individually. In such embodiments it is necessary to access the network traffic only once from the network, attending to the evaluation of multiple measures of CFD subsequently.
  • the CFD comparator 506 is adapted to receive a measure of CFD for the network connection from the evaluator 504 and compare the measure of CFD with CFD measures recorded in a dictionary data store 508.
  • the dictionary data store 508 stores a dictionary of one or more CFD measures, each being associated with a type of malicious communication such as malware or an exploit.
  • the CFD measures in the dictionary 508 are predetermined and preferably based on evaluated measures of CFD for known malicious encrypted network traffic. Notably, the CFD measures in the dictionary 508 are evaluated based on a portion of network traffic for a particular application protocol that is consistent with the portion used by the CFD evaluator 504 for a new network connection.
  • the CFD measures in the dictionary 508 are most preferably evaluated based on the traffic portion definitions 526 for known malicious encrypted traffic. As described above with respect to the reference measure of CFD of Figure 2a , the CFD measures in the dictionary 508 can be determinate measures, ranges of measures, or measures from which some degree of deviation is permitted to identify similarity of measures.
  • Known malicious encrypted network traffic includes network traffic known to contain malicious encrypted payload, such as network traffic delivering encrypted malware. Further, known malicious encrypted network traffic includes encrypted network traffic known to relate to communications from a malicious endpoint of a network connection, such as network traffic arising from or occurring between installed malware components.
  • known malicious encrypted network traffic includes encrypted network traffic relating to communications between a malicious entity, such as a malicious software application, and a genuine (non-malicious) software application, where the genuine software application is susceptible to a vulnerability and the malicious software application is communicating with the genuine software application to exploit such vulnerability.
  • a malicious entity such as a malicious software application
  • genuine software application is susceptible to a vulnerability
  • the malicious software application is communicating with the genuine software application to exploit such vulnerability.
  • Other types, forms and categories of malicious encrypted network traffic will be known to those skilled in the art and any or all of these types of malicious encrypted network traffic are suitable as a basis for defining CFD measures associated with a portion of network traffic of a malicious network connection.
  • malicious network traffic can include encrypted and unencrypted portions. It will, therefore, be clear to those skilled in the art that a CFD measure associated with a portion of network traffic of a malicious network connection can include at least part of the portion being unencrypted. This is because the malicious network connection may be primarily encrypted in terms of the substantive payload of the network connection (e.g. the encrypted malware, or malware communication, communicated via the network connection).
  • the dictionary data store 508 can include records for different malware or exploits, X and Y, providing ranges of CFD measure indicative of such malware, of such as: Malware or Exploit Portion Measure of CFD X Portion n a to b Y Portion m c to d ... ... notably, the 'portion' is protocol specific and accordingly implies a particular protocol. Where malware communicates over, or exploits, potentially multiple application protocols, then multiple malware entries can occur in the dictionary 508 including entries for different portions, constituting different protocols. Alternative formulations of the dictionary 508 will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • Figure 6a illustrates an exemplary data schema 648 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the data schema 648 includes data structure definitions and relationships suitable for storing data for the operation of the embodiment of Figure 5 .
  • a protocol data structure 650 includes a unique protocol identifier and has a one-to-one association with a protocol criterion 652.
  • the criterion 652 can include a port number.
  • the protocol 650 can be associated with one or more criteria that uniquely define a particular application network protocol.
  • the protocol 650 is further associated with any number of portion definitions 654, each portion having a unique identifier. Each portion is defined by association with a window 660 having a window definition.
  • a window can be defined by a byte offset of a starting point and an ending point in a network connection data stream.
  • Other suitable mechanisms for defining windows in a network connection data stream will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • the portion 654 further has a one-to-one association with a CFD data structure 656.
  • the CFD data structure 656 includes a CFD range, such as a low CFD measure to a high CFD measure.
  • Other suitable mechanisms for recording one or more or a range of CFD measures for a portion 654 can alternatively be employed.
  • a midpoint CFD measure can be recorded in the CFD data structure 656, and a definition of a configurable or predetermined similarity criterion (such as a maximum distance from the midpoint CFD) can be employed to determine similar measures of CFD with reference to the CFD data structure 656.
  • the CFD data structure 656 has a one-to-one association with a malware record 658.
  • the malware record relates to a particular piece of malware or a particular exploit having a unique identifier.
  • the data schema 648 is implemented using relational data storage means, such as a relational database.
  • the protocol information store 524 can have a table definition as: Protocol ID (primary key) Criterion (foreign key) ... ...
  • the traffic portion definitions store 526 can have a table definition as: Portion ID (primary key) Protocol ID (foreign key) Window ... ... ...
  • a schema such as is illustrated in Figure 6a provides a per-protocol, per-malware definition of a portion of network traffic. It will be appreciated that such an arrangement can provide for potentially multiple portions defined for each protocol as most suitable portions for identifying the presence of malicious encrypted communication attributable to multiple malwares and/or exploits.
  • FIG. 6b is a flowchart of a method of the malicious encrypted traffic detector 500 of Figure 5 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the monitor 520 monitors network traffic over the network 502 to detect a new network connection. Such detection can be made by identifying network connection setup messages such as TCP 'SYN', 'SYN/ACK', 'ACK' segments.
  • the analyser 522 identifies characteristics of the network connection to determine a protocol of the network connection.
  • a definition of a portion of the network traffic is retrieved based on the protocol identified at step 604. It will be appreciated that multiple portion definitions may alternatively be retrieved, in which case subsequent steps are repeated for each portion.
  • a measure of CFD is evaluated for a portion of network traffic in the network connection based on the portion definition (or definitions) retrieved at step 606.
  • the evaluated measure of CFD is compared with the measures of CFD in the dictionary data store 508 to determine if malicious encrypted traffic is detected at step 612. Where malicious encrypted traffic is detected at step 612, the method proceeds to step 614 to instigate protective and/or remedial measures to protect one or more computer systems from negative effects of the malicious network traffic and/or malicious software associated with the malicious network traffic.
  • connection setup negotiation utilises the distinctive nature of application protocol connection setup characteristics as a basis for evaluating a measure of CFD of a network connection as a distinguishing feature for the network connection.
  • Connection setup negotiation, protocol selection, parameter selection, encryption options including cypher or algorithm selection and parameters, key exchanges and the like all constitute characterising features of the connection setup portion of an application protocol. Notably, such features will be consistent between communications such that malicious software will largely employ similar or identical characteristics in application protocol setup.
  • malware There can be constraints on malware that require consistent communication setup - such as a need for an approach to communication setup that is be compatible between a local and remote system and therefore cannot change dramatically.
  • malware at a server seeking to communicate with installed malware at a client will employ a network connection having connection setup characteristics known to be compatible with, or expected by, the installed malware at the client.
  • connection setup characteristics known to be compatible with, or expected by, the installed malware at the client.
  • exploitation of certain system vulnerabilities can require certain communication configuration, including application protocol setup. Accordingly the constraints on malware to the variability of connection setup characteristics results in the connection setup process for an application protocol as a good distinguishing characteristic for malicious encrypted communication.
  • the types of encrypted communication that are suitable for detection by embodiments of the present invention include, inter alia, communication between systems infected with malware, such as malware-to-malware communication. Further, communication can include communication from a malware server to a client computer system for the purpose of exploitation and installation / transfer of malware (such as infection). These types of communication are considered below with respect to Figures 7 , 8a and 8b .
  • FIG. 7 is a depiction of a propagation tree of self-propagating malware.
  • a source of malware is illustrated as a network connected computer system depicted by a circle.
  • Each network connected computer system infected by the malware that have also infected other systems is depicted by a rectangle.
  • Each network connected computer system infected by the malware that have not infected other systems is depicted by a triangle. It can be seen, from Figure 7 , that self-propagating malware can rapidly lead to large numbers of infected systems spanning a wide network reach. Where the mode of propagation is by transfer of encrypted malware in a network communication, each propagation (each arrow in Figure 7 ) can correspond to a network connection between an infecting and a target system, across which encrypted malware may be communicated. These network connections are monitored by embodiments of the present invention to detect malicious encrypted network traffic to prevent, protect against or remediate malware infections.
  • Figure 8a is a portion of the propagation tree of self-propagating malware of Figure 7 with additional network communications indicated.
  • the broken lines in Figure 8a indicate possible network connections between infected systems and a source of malware, such as a malware mothership (indicated by the circle).
  • Each of these network connections can be used to share information about infected systems, to communicate data extracted, stolen or otherwise accessed from infected systems, to instruct or control infected systems etc.
  • each of these communications can be undertaken in encrypted form by using encrypted application protocols and these communications can be monitored by embodiments of the present invention to detect malicious encrypted network traffic to prevent, protect against or remediate malware infections.
  • Figure 8b is a portion of the propagation tree of self-propagating malware of Figure 7 with additional network communications indicated.
  • the broken lines in Figure 8b indicate possible network connections between infected systems.
  • Malware may operate with infected systems communicating with each other to distribute the range of addresses between which the malware communicates to a set of unpredictable and disparate addresses as a means to avoid detection. Thus, only a small set of malware infected systems may communicate directly with a malware source.
  • Each network connection in Figure 8b can be used to share information about infected systems, to communicate data extracted, stolen or otherwise accessed from infected systems, to instruct or control infected systems etc. Accordingly, each of these communications can be undertaken in encrypted form by using encrypted application protocols and these communications can be monitored by embodiments of the present invention to detect malicious encrypted network traffic to prevent, protect against or remediate malware infections.
  • the portion of network traffic for which an measure of CFD is evaluated is selected from a plurality of possible windows of network traffic based on a degree of consistency of similarity of measures of CFD for known malicious encrypted traffic. That is to say, in certain embodiments, a portion for CFD evaluation is continuous subset of known malicious traffic occurring within a particular window that exhibits consistently similar measures of CFD such that the portion constitutes an effective basis for characterising the malicious traffic. Accordingly, the portion constitutes an effective basis for detecting the malicious traffic.
  • FIG. 9 is a component diagram of a malicious network traffic detector 900 adapted to determine traffic portion definitions 926 for malware 948 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the detector 900 is a software, hardware or firmware component operable with a computer network 902 and can constitute all of, part of, or an adapted type of detector such as those described above with respect to Figures 2a and 5 .
  • Communication endpoints 932a and 932b are network connected devices such as computer systems, pervasive devices, network appliances and the like.
  • the communication endpoints 932a and 932b can be software components such as virtualised computer systems operating within a computer system, such as virtual machines, emulated machines or applications executing within a computer system.
  • At least communication endpoint 932b includes malware 948 as a malicious component such as a malicious software component adapted to communicate with endpoint 932a using network connections that may be encrypted.
  • the malware 948 and network 902 operate in a fashion that is observable by the malicious network traffic detector 900.
  • the malware 948 is observed in operation multiple times to establish and communicate via multiple network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • the malware 948 can be executed repeatedly, or multiple instances of the malware can be executed.
  • the communication by malware 948 by way of the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n can be for, inter alia: exchanging data with malware also installed at endpoint 932a; identifying, testing or exploiting a vulnerability at endpoint 932a; communicating encrypted malware or shellcode (such as polymorphic shellcode) to endpoint 932a; receiving information such as data from endpoint 932a; or other reasons as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • encrypted malware or shellcode such as polymorphic shellcode
  • the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n can be loopback network connections between software components executing on a single computing device.
  • the network 902 can be a virtual network in the sense that networking protocols are operable to constitute the network 902 though communications for the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n do not leave a computing device to travel on physical network media or wirelessly external to the computing device.
  • the detector 900 includes an analyser 922, CFD evaluator 904 and protocol information store 924 substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Figure 5 .
  • the detector 900 further includes a network traffic recorder 950 for recording network traffic 960 communicated over a network connection 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n , the recording being undertaken in accordance with network traffic window definitions 956 for an application protocol for a network connection determined by the analyser 922.
  • the network traffic window definitions 956 define windows of network traffic as candidate portions of network traffic for recording by the recorder 950.
  • the candidate portions are used to select a portion as a traffic portion definition 926 for detection of malware according to, for example, the embodiments described hereinbefore with reference to Figure 5 .
  • Each network traffic window definition 956 is specific to a network protocol.
  • one or more network traffic window definitions 956 can also be specific to, or defined in view of, a particular malware 948, such as in view of known, observed or understood characteristics of a particular malware including application protocol connection setup characteristics and/or vulnerability exploitation characteristics.
  • Figure 10 depicts an exemplary set 1008 of traffic window definitions for an application protocol for an exemplary network connection 1000 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Data communicated via the network connection 1000 of Figure 10 is generally divided into three parts, each having an estimated size indicated in Figure 10 (purely illustratively) and including: a transport protocol handshake part, estimated to constitute generally the portion 1002; an application protocol connection setup part, estimated to constitute generally the portion 1004; and a substantive encrypted data payload part, estimated to constitute generally the portion 1006.
  • the exact size, length or extent of each part of the exemplary network connection of Figure 10 may not be known for a number of reasons.
  • the exact nature of the transport handshake 1002 may not be known since the handshake may range from a minimal number of message or segment exchanges between communicating endpoints and a most protracted number.
  • the exact nature and extent of the application protocol connection setup 1004 may also be unknown since part of the connection setup may be encrypted and the exact nature of the application protocol may not be known, and/or the extent of connection setup could range from minimal to protracted.
  • the application protocol setup may constitute part or all of the exploitation process of the malware 948 in exploiting a vulnerability at a target system 932a, and accordingly the nature of such connection setup may be atypical. Consequently, the starting point, ending point and extent of the application protocol connection setup 1004 may not be precisely known.
  • a plurality of window definitions 1008 are predetermined such that each window defines a different subset of network traffic for a network connection with the intention that all windows seek to cover at least part of the application protocol connection setup part 1004 of network traffic for a network connection.
  • Each window can be defined by way of a start point 1010 and an end point 1012, each of the start and end points indicating a location in network traffic for a network connection such as a byte, message, segment or packet offset in network traffic, Alternatively, a start point 1010 and an extent, length or size 1014 can define a window.
  • the windows 1008 are generally defined to span different continuous subsets of network traffic, covering at least a portion of the estimated location of an application protocol connection setup 1004, in order to provide a useful basis for identifying a most promising window as a portion of network traffic for a protocol and/or malware for identifying encrypted network traffic by the malicious encrypted traffic detector 900.
  • a primary window is defined, from which the plurality of windows 1008 are derived.
  • Such a primary window is defined to have a size and position based on a predetermined estimate of a size of an application protocol connection setup, and wherein each of the windows in the plurality of windows 1008 has a size in a range of sizes from a first predetermined delta size below the primary windows size to a second predetermined delta size above the primary window size.
  • the network traffic recorder 950 records a subset of network traffic 960 received over a network connection for each applicable window defined in the traffic window definitions 956. Applicable windows are windows associated with a protocol for the network connection. Thus, in use, the recorder 950 records a plurality of subsets of network traffic 960 for each of the malware network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n . Each subset of network traffic 960 recorded for a network connection is associated with a particular traffic window definition.
  • the network traffic recorder 950 accesses network traffic for a network connection 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n only once and copies subsets of the accessed network traffic in accordance with the applicable traffic window definitions 956 to generate the plurality of subsets of network traffic 960.
  • the network traffic recorder 950 can record network traffic from an earliest point in all applicable window definitions to a latest point in all applicable window definitions such that, subsequently, the particular window definitions can be used to extract subsets of the recorded traffic to store network traffic subsets 960 for each window definition.
  • the CFD evaluator 904 of Figure 9 is adapted to evaluate, for each of the subsets of network traffic 960 recorded for each of the connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n , a measure of CFD ("H") 954.
  • Figure 10 is an exemplary illustration of measures of CFD evaluated for a plurality of traffic window definitions 956 for a plurality of network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • Figure 10 illustrates CFD measures for three exemplary network connections A, B and C of malware communicating encrypted network traffic.
  • Each connection has a distribution of evaluated CFD measures (H) for a set of windows, each window being identified by window identifiers ("window id" in a range 1 to 8 in the present example.)
  • the windows for each connection are the same such that the CFD measures for discrete windows of network traffic between connections can be compared.
  • the detector further includes a window selector 958 as a software, hardware or firmware component for identifying a window as a network traffic portion definition for storage in a traffic portion definitions store 926.
  • the traffic portion definitions store 926 is substantially as hereinbefore described with respect to Figure 5 .
  • a window is identified from a set of applicable windows for the malware 948, i.e. windows associated with a protocol for the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n and for which measures of CFD H are evaluated by the CFD evaluators 904.
  • a window is identified by the window selector 958 as a window for which a measure of CFD across a plurality of network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n is most similar or consistent.
  • the window selector 958 evaluates a measure of similarity of CFD measures for each window across a plurality of network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n to identify a window with most consistently similar measures of CFD.
  • windows can be ranked by the measure of similarity to identify a most consistently similar window.
  • Techniques for measuring similarity between CFD measures will be apparent to those skilled in the art and can include, for example, similarity functions or inverse distance metrics, such as similarity measures based on Euclidean distance. Clustering algorithms could also be employed to gauge the similarity of a plurality of CFD measures.
  • Models or graphs plotting the enumerator and the denominator of the CFD evaluation formula can be used to provide slopes, lines, or representations thereof, the linear gradient of which constitutes a CFD measure.
  • a comparison between CFD measures can be achieved by a comparison of such models or plots such as by evaluating and comparing gradients or by comparing plots, slopes or lines using a suitable comparison technique to identify similarity or a degree of similarity.
  • a suitable comparison technique to identify similarity or a degree of similarity.
  • consistency or deviation of the degree of similarity between CFD measures for a window becomes pertinent.
  • embodiments of the invention can employ clustering algorithms such as, inter alia, k-means algorithms, distribution-based clustering algorithms and/or density-based clustering algorithms to identify clusters of CFD measures among all CFD measures for a window.
  • clustering algorithms can be adapted to identify windows having most tightly clustered CFD measures as windows having most consistently similar CFD measures. For example, CFD measures for a window that can all be clustered into a single cluster constitute similar CFD measures.
  • Windows having such similar CFD measures can be me measured for a degree or consistency of similarity between the CFD measures.
  • One technique for achieving this involves measuring the variability or deviation of the CFD measures in the cluster. For example, a maximum, average or most frequent deviation from a central, average, mean or median CFD measure can be used as a measure of the degree or consistency of similarity of all CFD measures in a cluster for a window.
  • Other suitable techniques for measuring and comparing relative degrees of similarity and consistency of CFD measures for a window will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
  • the window selector 958 identifies a window determined to have a greatest degree of consistent similarity of CFD measures across multiple malware network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • Figure 11 a graphical depiction of similarity measures, S 1008, for each window across all network connections is shown. It can be seen that a most consistently similar window 1110 is identified by the window selector 958 and used to generate a new traffic portion definition 926. In practice, such an identified window may be consistently similar for both malicious encrypted network traffic and also for genuine or non-malicious network traffic. For example, a window may be identified by the window selector 958 that is always identical for all network connections (whether malicious or not) for a particular application protocol.
  • the window selector 958 further undertakes a process of elimination of windows identified by the window selector 958 to exclude from the identification windows having CFD measures for known malicious encrypted traffic that are similar, by some predetermined degree of similarity or clustering, to CFD measures for known non-malicious traffic.
  • the process of elimination is based on non-malicious traffic relating to communications using the same application protocol as that for the known malicious network traffic.
  • the identification of a portion as a window can be based on a determination that evaluations of CFD measures of the window are inconsistent between malicious encrypted network traffic and non-malicious network traffic such that a window for which CFD measures are substantially similar for malicious and non-malicious traffic are eliminated from selection as a portion for malicious encrypted network traffic detection.
  • a traffic portion definition 926 is generated for use by the methods and apparatus hereinbefore described to detect malicious encrypted network traffic on a network. Additionally, the process of identifying a window for a traffic portion definition 926 by the window selector 958 further includes the identification of typical CFD values for encrypted network traffic occurring in the window. Accordingly, the portion identification by the window selector 958 is suitable also for defining records in the dictionary data store 508 as reference measures or reference ranges of CFD as described with respect to Figure 5 . In particular, reference CFD measures in the dictionary data store 508 can be defined for an application protocol and malware 948 based on the CFD measures, or range of CFD measures, for the identified window.
  • the window selector 958 further stores, in a dictionary 508, a reference measure of CFD in association with an identifier of the malicious software component 948, the reference measure being derived from the evaluated measures of CFD for the identified window for each of the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • the relative degree of similarity of all CFD measures for a window is further informative of the degree of similarity, or margin of error, that is permitted when employing a traffic portion definition 926 in the identification of malicious traffic. That is to say the extent to which CFD measures for a window across a plurality of network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n are consistently similar when defining traffic portion definitions 926 informs a determination of an extent to which a CFD measure for a connection setup portion of a network connection must be similar to the traffic portion CFD measure to conclude that the connection is malicious.
  • the window selector 958 evaluates CFD measures for a window of network traffic for known malware 948 as having a high degree of similarity
  • the subsequent use of the window as a traffic portion definition 926 to detect malicious traffic in a production environment will require a correspondingly high degree of similarity with the reference measure of CFD in the dictionary.
  • FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method of the detector of Figure 9 for defining traffic portion definitions 926 for malware 948 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • traffic window definitions 956 are defined as subsets of network traffic.
  • the analyser 922 identifies characteristics of the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n established by the malware 948 with reference to a protocol information store 924 to determine a protocol of the network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • the recorder 950 records a subset 960 of network traffic corresponding to each window applicable to the determined protocol for each network connection 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • the CFD evaluator 904 evaluates a measure of CFD 954 for each recorded set of network traffic.
  • the window selector 958 identifies a portion of malicious network traffic as a window corresponding substantially to a connection setup portion of a malicious network connection using an application protocol for characterising the malicious network connection. The portion is stored in the traffic portion definitions 926.
  • a reference measure (or range of measures) of CFD for the portion of malicious network traffic for the malware 948 is added to the dictionary 508 based on the evaluated measures of CFD for the identified window across the plurality of network connections 930 1 , 930 2 , 930 n .
  • Figure 13 is a component diagram of the malicious network traffic detector 900 of Figure 9 configured to identify malicious network traffic communicated via a computer network 902 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the detector 900 of Figure 13 further includes a monitor 920 and dictionary data store 908 substantially as hereinbefore described with respect to Figure 5 .
  • traffic portion definitions 926 and a dictionary 908 are generated in order that monitored network traffic communicated via the network 902 can be assessed for malicious encrypted network traffic by comparison of measures of CFD with reference measures stored in the dictionary 908.
  • a malicious traffic event 910 is generated for triggering or instigating remedial, preventative, communicative or protective measures, examples of which are further described below.
  • FIG. 14 is a component diagram of a malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 configured to identify and inhibit malicious network traffic communicated via a computer network 1402 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a network connection 1410 is initiated via the computer network 1402 for communication of malicious network traffic including network messages 1412 such as packets, segments or the like between a malicious endpoint 1422 and a target endpoint 1420.
  • the malicious endpoint 1422 is a computer system executing malicious software such as malware for the exploitation of vulnerabilities in other computer systems such as the target endpoint 1420.
  • the malicious endpoint 1422 may itself have a target of malicious activity such as vulnerability exploitation, leading to its status as a malicious endpoint 1422.
  • a malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 is a network connected software, hardware or firmware component operable to intercept, sniff or otherwise access messages 1412 communicated via the computer network 1402.
  • the malicious encrypted traffic inhibitor 1401 includes a malicious network traffic detector 1400 such as has been hereinbefore described in numerous embodiments including, inter alia, with respect to Figures 2a , 5 and 9 .
  • the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 includes a connection characteristic extractor 1462, an encrypted payload data extractor 1464 and a message generator 1466 as software, hardware or firmware components provided as part of, in association with or accessible to the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401.
  • connection characteristic extractor 1462 is operable in response to the malicious network traffic detector 1400 to extract connection characteristics from network traffic for the network connection 1410.
  • the connection characteristics include information suitable for communicating with the malicious endpoint 1422 of the network connection 1410.
  • the network connection includes an application network protocol operating via a transport protocol such as the transmission control protocol (TCP).
  • TCP communications are conducted as a series of segments having a header portion and a payload (body) portion. Connection characteristics are maintained in the header portion of TCP segments and include address information for source and destination endpoints for a segment.
  • TCP operates as a sequenced protocol such that each byte in each segment for a network connection is numbered in sequence.
  • TCP messages received at a receiving endpoint can be aggregated in a correct order and absent, missing or delayed messages can be identified for resend.
  • SEQ sequence number field
  • each TCP segment includes an acknowledgment (ACK) field indicating the sequence number of the next byte expected from a remote endpoint.
  • ACK acknowledgment
  • the SEQ and ACK fields in conjunction with the process of synchronisation at TCP handshake described hereinbefore, serve to provide proper sequencing of bytes and messages communicated via a TCP network connection. Accordingly, such fields along with network address information constitute connection characteristics for the network connection 1410.
  • connection characteristics are suitable for communicating with the malicious endpoint 1422 since they provide address information for the endpoint along with up-to-date sequence information.
  • the malicious network traffic inhibitor 140 by way of the connection characteristics extracted from messages accessed thereby, has information required to partake in the network connection 1410 that is otherwise established between the malicious endpoint 1422 and the target endpoint 1420.
  • TCP/IP hijacking is a form of attack or exploitation normally undertaken with malicious intent.
  • embodiments of the present invention employ a similar technique as a mechanism for inhibiting the distribution, operation or network communication of malicious software engaged in communicating encrypted network traffic.
  • the encrypted payload data extractor 1464 is operable in response to the malicious network traffic detector 1400 to extract at least a sample or subset of encrypted payload data from network traffic for the network connection 1410.
  • such encrypted payload can be carried in a payload or data section of one or more messages 1412, such as one or more TCP segments.
  • the encrypted payload may be discerned based on an estimated measure of Shannon entropy of the payload data on the basis that an estimate measure of entropy for encrypted data will tend towards entropy of a random sample (tending towards maximum indeterminacy) - see for example WO2015/128613A1 for an evaluation of Shannon entropy of network traffic.
  • a sizeable or complete sample of encrypted malicious payload is extracted, being of a size suitable for transmission as part of one or more network message such as a TCP segment.
  • complete encrypted data payload information is extracted in binary form. It is not necessary to decrypt the encrypted network traffic payload since its purpose is to constitute all or part of a payload for a new message generated by the message generator 1466 and communicated to the malicious endpoint 1422.
  • the encrypted payload when communicated to the malicious endpoint 1422, will be recognisable to the malicious endpoint 1422 at least insofar as it is encrypted using an encryption scheme, mechanism, key or process recognisable to the malicious endpoint 1422 since it originated as part of the existing communication between the malicious endpoint 1422 and the target endpoint 1420.
  • the encrypted payload data extractor 1464 extracts encrypted payload originating from the target endpoint 1420. This is particularly beneficial if it is likely or known that an asymmetric encryption scheme is used in the communication between the malicious endpoint 1422 and the target endpoint 1420. Where a symmetric encryption scheme is employed for the malicious encrypted network traffic, encrypted payload from either the malicious endpoint 1422 or target endpoint 1420 is suitable.
  • FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram of a TCP network connection between a malicious endpoint 1422 and a target endpoint 1420 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 (MNTI) is operable to access TCP segments communicated via the TCP network connection.
  • An initial message 1502 transmitted by the target endpoint 1420 includes a TCP header having: source (SRC) and destination (DST) addresses; a sequence number field (SEQ); an acknowledgement field (ACK); and a length (LEN).
  • a second message 1504 transmitted by the malicious endpoint 1422 includes a similar header and a more substantial payload (hatched) including encrypted malicious data, such as malware software, an encrypted shellcode and exploitation code, or other malicious encrypted data.
  • a connection characteristic extractor of the malicious encrypted traffic inhibitor 1401 is adapted to retrieve connection characteristics 1506 from a header of the message 1504 received from the malicious endpoint 1422. Further, the encrypted payload data extractor is adapted to retrieve a sample of the encrypted payload 1508 from the payload of the message 1504 received from the malicious endpoint 1422.
  • the malicious encrypted traffic inhibitor 1401 has information required to generate messages for transmission to the malicious endpoint 1422 that would appear to plausibly relate to the network connection between the malicious endpoint 1422 and the target endpoint 1420. That is to say that such messages can include at least relevant and appropriate address, sequence (SEQ) and acknowledgement (ACK) information and can further include payload data being encrypted using an encryption scheme recognisable as relating to the network connection.
  • the message generator 1466 is operable in response to the malicious network traffic detector 1400 to generate a plurality of network messages for transmission to the malicious endpoint 1422.
  • the generated network messages include characteristics based on or derived from the connection characteristics extracted by the connection characteristic extractor 1462, and further including payload data as encrypted malicious network traffic payload data based on or derived from data extracted by the encrypted payload data extractor 1464. Accordingly, the messages generated by the message generator 1466 will appear, to the malicious endpoint 1422, to plausibly relate to the network connection for communicating malicious encrypted network traffic.
  • the message generator 1466 generates sufficient messages that, when the messages are transmitted to the malicious endpoint 1422, the malicious endpoint 1422 becomes substantially consumed by the need to process the messages in view of the messages being plausibly related to the network connection and each requiring receipt, decryption and potentially a response.
  • a balance can be struck by a number (quantity) of messages for transmission to the malicious endpoint 1422 and a size (length) of each message, determined by the size of the encrypted payload.
  • Figure 16 is a schematic diagram of a TCP network connection between a malicious endpoint 1422 and the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the messages illustrated in Figure 16 occur subsequent to the messages and occurrences of Figure 15 .
  • the message generator 1466 of the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 generates a plurality of messages1602 each including appropriate SRC and DST address information for the network connection between the malicious endpoint 1422 and the target endpoint 1420. Further, each message includes accurate and up-to-date SEQ and ACK fields.
  • Each message includes a payload part having encrypted payload data being based on, or copied from, data extracted by the encrypted payload data extractor 1464.
  • the malicious endpoint 1422 receives a considerable number of TCP segments being plausibly related to the network connection established with the target endpoint 1420.
  • Each segment includes appropriate address and sequencing information and each payload is encrypted with a recognisable encryption algorithm and using a known key.
  • the malicious endpoint 1422 sets about receiving, logging, interpreting and decrypting these many messages in a process that occupies the malicious endpoint 1422 so as to distract the malicious endpoint 1422 by consumption of resources of the malicious endpoint 1422.
  • the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 can communicate with or notify the target endpoint 1420 of the malicious encrypted network traffic and/or cease, prevent or trigger a process of protecting against further traffic.
  • the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 serves to inhibit the ability of the malicious endpoint 1422 to generate and communicate malicious network traffic via the network connection, at least until the messages generated by the message generator 1466 cease to be transmitted.
  • denial-of-service methods such as SYN flooding, 'the ping of death', 'teardrop', 'ping flooding', amplification attacks and distributed versions of any of these (distributed denial-of-service attacks) are well established and methods for protecting against such attacks are increasingly prevalent (for example, Linux operating systems employ 'syncookies' to prevent SYN flood attacks).
  • methods of the present invention employ messages based on real network traffic to increase the plausibility of communications received by the malicious endpoint 1422 so much so that the messages cannot be readily questioned until the scale of resource consumption is so great that the resource consumption itself becomes an indicator that a denial-of-service type effect is being realised at the malicious endpoint 1422.
  • malicious systems such as malicious endpoint 1422 are typically developed to aggressively communicate with as many other systems as possible to maximise the propagation and effect of distributed and executing malware. Accordingly the propensity for such malicious systems to fall foul of high volume messages of the sort described hereinabove, with the consequence that the malicious systems cease to be effective in their distribution of, or communication with, malware, renders the approach of embodiments of the present invention particularly advantageous.
  • Figure 17 is a flowchart of a method of the malicious network traffic inhibitor 1401 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the method of Figure 17 is applicable also by way of extension to the embodiments described hereinbefore with respect to Figures 6b and 12 and the arrangements of Figures 2a , 5 , 9 and 14 .
  • the connection characteristic extractor 1462 extracts connection characteristics from malicious network traffic, such as messages, packets, segments or the like, communicated via a computer network.
  • the encrypted payload data extractor 1464 extracts at least a sample of encrypted payload from malicious encrypted network traffic, such as messages, packets, segments or the like, communicated via a computer network.
  • the message generator 1466 generates a plurality of messages for transmission to a malicious endpoint 1422, each of the messages being characterised by the extracted connection characteristics and including a payload derived from the extracted sample of encrypted payload data so as to overwhelm the malicious endpoint 1422 with messages plausibly relating to the malicious network connection in order that the malicious endpoint 1422 substantially ceases to engage in malicious network communication with the target endpoint 1420.
  • methods and techniques in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are operable to model malicious network traffic based on an evaluated measure of CFD and to identify potential network traffic based on a comparison of a measure of CFD with a reference measure for known malicious traffic.
  • potential or actual malicious network traffic is identified it is advantageous to apply the techniques described above for characterising malicious traffic based on CFD to the software engaged in the malicious network communication, such as by evaluating a measure of CFD for some portion or all of the software application to characterise the software application for subsequent detection of potentially malicious software entering, being received at, installed on or otherwise stored in a computer system.
  • a software application can be embodied as an executable, loadable or linkable set of software instructions such as machine code, an intermediate representation of code (e.g.
  • bytecode or interpretable code, such as an executable file, a dynamic link library, a static library, a service routine or the like. Additionally or alternatively an application, library, service, task or process can be executing, loaded or prepared for execution in a memory of a computer system.
  • FIG. 18 illustrates a component diagram of a malicious software detector 1804 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the malicious software detector 1804 is a software, hardware, firmware or combination component responsive to receipt of a malicious traffic event 1802 such as may be generated by a malicious network traffic detector 1800 substantially as hereinbefore described.
  • the malicious software detector 1804 includes a software identifier 1806 for identifying a software component such as a software application, applet, process, service, library, or the like associated with malicious network traffic for which the malicious traffic event 1802 is received.
  • the software identifier 1806 can be a software component executing with an operating system of a computer system and accessing one or both of a memory or file system 1812 for the computer system to identify the software.
  • the software identifier 1806 may parse a process or task log of a computer system to identify software engaged in malicious network communication.
  • the software identifier 1806 may identify software based on network characteristics of malicious network traffic for which the event 1802 was received such as a port and/or address identifier such as by way of a mapping of network ports, connections or addresses to applications, services or processes which may communicate, listen, wait or engage in communications corresponding to the malicious network traffic.
  • the malicious software detector further includes a CFD evaluator 1808 for evaluating a measure of CFD for a sequence of data substantially as hereinbefore described. Previously the evaluation of CFD has been described with respect to a portion of network traffic. In relation to the CFD evaluator 1808 of Figure 18 a CFD measure is evaluated for a portion of software such as a portion of executable code, object code, byte code, source code, process code, code in execution or code loaded into a memory for execution and the like.
  • While the CFD evaluator 1808 of Figure 18 is operable on different data to that previously described the nature of operation of the CFD evaluator 1808 is substantially the same as previously described in that the CFD evaluator 1808 operates on a portion of data such as a sequence of bytes occurring in or for a piece of software identified by the software identifier 1806.
  • the particular portion of software for evaluation of a CFD can be determined based on a fixed portion, an apportionment of the whole software into discrete sub-portions, or an iterative algorithm for identifying a most promising portion of the software for characterising the software based on a CFD value.
  • the CFD evaluator 1808 is operable both to evaluate a CFD measure for software known or determined to be involved in malicious network traffic and to check if new software may be involved in malicious network traffic.
  • the CFD evaluator 1808 stores the evaluated CFD measure as a reference measure of CFD 1816 in a data store 1814 for future retrieval and comparison with measures of CFD for other software.
  • the malicious software detector 1804 is triggered 1822 to check if new software may be involved in malicious network traffic when new software 1820 is received, stored or executes in or from a memory or file system 1812 of the computer system.
  • the CFD evaluator 1808 evaluates a measure of CFD for the new software and the CFD comparator 1808 operates to check if the new software may be involved in malicious network traffic by retrieving the reference measure of CFD 1816 from the store 1814 and comparing with the CFD measure evaluated for the new software. Where the comparison determines a degree of similarity between the CFD measures the malicious software detector 1804 generates a malicious software event 1824.
  • the malicious software event 1824 may prompt, trigger or lead to protective or remedial action in respect of the new software such as action that may take place on identification of malicious software in a computer system.
  • action may include: quarantine of the software; deletion of the software; informing a user of the software; restricting the operation of the software; preventing execution of the software; restricting resources available to the software; elevating a security level of operation of a computer system; and the like.
  • FIG 19 is a flowchart of a method of the malicious software detector 1804 of Figure 18 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Initially at step 1902 the method determines if a malicious traffic event is received. Where a malicious traffic event is received the software identifier 1806 identifies software involved in the malicious traffic in a memory or file system operating with the computer system at step 1904. At step 1906 the CFD evaluator 1808 evaluates a measure of CFD for the identified software and the measure of CFD is stored as a reference measure of CFD 1816 at step 1908.
  • Step 1910 is performed following step 1908 or in the event no malicious software event was received at step 1902.
  • the method determines if new software has been installed, received, executed or otherwise accessed at the computer system. For example, the method may receive a trigger 1822 of new software stored in a memory or file system 1812.
  • the software identifier 1806 identifies the new software at step 1912.
  • the CFD evaluator evaluates a measure of CFD for the new software and at step 1916 the CFD comparator 1810 compares the evaluated CFD for the new software with the reference measure of CFD to determine a degree of similarity of the CFD values.
  • step 1918 the method determines if there is sufficient similarity between the CFD values and, on positive determination, the malicious software detector 1804 undertakes a responsive action at step 1920 such as performing protective, remedial and/or flagging actions in response to the identification of similar CFD.
  • the method returns to step 1902 for iteration.
  • Identification of software involved in malicious network communication may constitute identification of malicious software or malware. Where the nature, effect, modus operandi and/or consequence of such malware is already known then an appropriate protection and/or remediation mechanism may also be known and can be employed in response to the detection of the malware. Some malware seeks to increase its resilience to protective and/or remediation measures by combining multiple malware components within the software.
  • a software component can consist of multiple malware components or can be derived from multiple malwares such that the software component constitutes a combination risk or exposure to any infected computer system.
  • a malicious software component can include a malicious software originating from multiple families of malware having multiple and potentially disparate effects. The identification of such malware may not comprehensively identify all malware types included in the malicious software and protective or remediation measures may not be comprehensive to fully protect against or remediate all families, types or varieties of malware included in the software component.
  • FIG. 20 is a component diagram of the malware derivative identifier 2000 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the malware derivative identifier 2000 is a software, hardware, firmware or combination component for identifying known malware software that a new identified malware software component may be derived from or may include portions of. That is to say that the malware derivative identifier 2000 is adapted to identify portions, behaviour, aspects or elements of known malware that may exist in a newly identified malware component.
  • the identifier 2000 can receive an identification of software found to be involved in malicious network communication from the malicious software detector 1804. Alternatively the function of the identifier 2000 can operate with, as part of or integral to the malicious software detector 1804.
  • the identifier 2000 further accesses a data store 2010 containing a plurality of reference measures of CFD 2002 each reference measure for known malware components.
  • the reference measures 2002 include multiple CFD measures for each of multiple known malware components.
  • each CFD measure for the known malware and for newly identified malware can constitutes a series of different measures of CFD varying in accordance with the resolution or radius employed for fractal dimension evaluation so as to produce, when plotted, a slope of potentially varying gradient with respect to resolution.
  • the identifier 2000 includes a CFD receiver 2004 for obtaining (either by evaluating or by receiving from the detector 1804 or a CFD evaluator) a CFD value as a representation of CFD slope for the newly identified malware software component.
  • the identifier further includes a CFD comparator for comparing the CFD slope for the new malware with the CFD slopes for multiple known malware components with reference to the reference measures of CFD 2002 constituting reference CFD slopes for each known malware.
  • the CFD comparator can divide the CFD slope for the new malware into portions of discrete linear gradient for comparison with multiple malware CFD slopes to identify, for each portion at each resolution or range or resolutions of CFD evaluation, known malware having a similar gradient as a CFD value.
  • the malware reactor 2008 is adapted to implement reactive measures for each known malware component identified to have a CFD value for a portion of CFD slope that is at least partly similar to the CFD slope of the newly identified malware. In this way the computer system can protect against the newly identified malware even where the malware is derived from, based on or implements potentially multiple known malwares or derivatives thereof.
  • Figure 21 is an exemplary flowchart of a method of the malware derivative identifier 2000 of Figure 20 in an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the CFD receiver 2004 obtains CFD values for the new identified malware, the CFD values corresponding to potentially multiple gradients in the CFD slope for the new malware.
  • the CFD comparator 2006 compares the CFD values (slope) of the new malware with each set of reference CFD values (slope) for each known malware in the reference measures of CFD 2002.
  • the CFD comparator 2006 identifies one or more portions of the CFD slope for the new malware exhibiting sufficient similarity to CFD slopes of known malware. Notably, this might include exhibiting sufficient similarity to portions of CFD slopes of known malware.
  • a degree of sufficient similarity can be predefined and can include a similarity of linear gradient at one or more ranges of resolution such that a minimum range of resolutions is required across which sufficient similarity of linear gradient is observed so as to avoid point-similarity between slopes (i.e. to ensure the extent of similarity is beyond de minimis).
  • the degree of similarity can be only a similarity of gradient, or a similarity of slope including the particular location of the slope in a CFD graph so as to require also a similarity of magnitude of plotted values also (i.e. constituting a literal similarity of slope).
  • the identifier 2000 identifies all known malwares for which sufficient similarity is observed and at step 2158 the malware reactor 2008 implements protective and/or remedial measures for all identified malwares.
  • Figure 22 depicts the comparison of an illustrative CFD slope for a new malware with a CFD slope for each of a plurality of known malware in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the new malware CFD slope 2100 is depicted by a broken line in each graph and a known malware CFD slope is depicted by an unbroken line in each graph.
  • similarity of CFD slopes is identified where both gradient and magnitude of plotted values match such that similarity occurs when slopes generally overlap or track each other within a predetermined margin.
  • the new malware CFD slope 2100 has gradient similarity to, and generally tracks, Malware A CFD slope 2102 for a portion 2190 and such extent of similarity may be considered sufficient for identifying the new malware as potentially including or being derived from Malware A.
  • Malware B it can be seen that there is no gradient similarity or tracking between the new malware CFD slope 2100 and the Malware B CFD slope 2104.
  • Malware C it can be seen that there is no gradient similarity or tracking between the new malware CFD slope 2100 and the Malware C CFD slope 2106.
  • the new malware CFD slope 2100 has gradient similarity to, and generally tracks, Malware D CFD slope 2108 for a considerable portion 2192 and such extent of similarity may be considered sufficient for identifying the new malware as potentially including or being derived from Malware D.
  • Malware E it can be seen that the new malware CFD slope 2100 has gradient similarity to, and generally tracks, Malware E CFD slope 2110 for a small portion 2192. Depending on a predetermined threshold level of similarity required, it may be that such extent of similarity to the CFD slope of Malware E is insufficient for identifying the new malware as potentially including or being derived from Malware E.
  • the new malware considered with respect to Figure 22 may be similar to, derived from or include software of known Malware A and Malware D and remedial and/or protective measures for these known malwares can be implemented.
  • a software-controlled programmable processing device such as a microprocessor, digital signal processor or other processing device, data processing apparatus or system
  • a computer program for configuring a programmable device, apparatus or system to implement the foregoing described methods is envisaged as an aspect of the present invention.
  • the computer program may be embodied as source code or undergo compilation for implementation on a processing device, apparatus or system or may be embodied as object code, for example.
  • the computer program is stored on a carrier medium in machine or device readable form, for example in solid-state memory, magnetic memory such as disk or tape, optically or magneto-optically readable memory such as compact disk or digital versatile disk etc., and the processing device utilises the program or a part thereof to configure it for operation.
  • the computer program may be supplied from a remote source embodied in a communications medium such as an electronic signal, radio frequency carrier wave or optical carrier wave.
  • a communications medium such as an electronic signal, radio frequency carrier wave or optical carrier wave.
  • carrier media are also envisaged as aspects of the present invention.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Claims (5)

  1. Procédé, mis en œuvre par ordinateur, d'identification d'un ou de plusieurs d'une pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants desquels est dérivé un composant logiciel surveillé dans un système ordinateur ; le procédé comprenant :
    l'évaluation d'une mesure d'une dimension fractale de corrélation, notée CFD, pour au moins une partie du composant logiciel surveillé dans le système ordinateur, la CFD comportant une pluralité de valeurs de CFD variant en fonction d'une résolution de dimension fractale ; et
    la comparaison de la mesure évaluée de la CFD pour l'au moins une partie du composant logiciel surveillé à une mesure de référence de CFD pour chacun des un ou plusieurs composants logiciels malveillants, chaque mesure de référence de CFD comportant une pluralité de valeurs de CFD variant en fonction d'une résolution de dimension fractale, de manière à identifier un ou plusieurs de la pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants desquels est dérivé le composant logiciel surveillé,
    chacun des un ou plusieurs de la pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants identifiés étant identifié sur la base d'une similitude d'au moins une partie de la pluralité de valeurs de CFD du composant logiciel surveillé et des un ou plusieurs de la pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants identifiés.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la similitude est un degré de similitude de valeurs de CFD.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la pluralité de valeurs de CFD de chacun du composant logiciel surveillé et des composants logiciels malveillants consistent en des plages de valeurs de CFD modélisées sous forme d'une représentation graphique de valeurs de CFD par rapport à une fonction de résolution de dimension fractale contenant une ou plusieurs pentes, et la similitude consiste en un degré de similitude des pentes du composant logiciel surveillé et des composants logiciels malveillants identifiés.
  4. Système ordinateur configuré pour identifier un ou plusieurs d'une pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants desquels est dérivé un composant logiciel surveillé dans le système ordinateur est dérivé ; le système ordinateur comprenant une mémoire et un processeur, le processeur étant configuré pour réaliser les étapes suivantes :
    l'évaluation d'une mesure d'une dimension fractale de corrélation, notée CFD, pour au moins une partie du composant logiciel surveillé dans le système ordinateur, la CFD comportant une pluralité de valeurs de CFD variant en fonction d'une résolution de dimension fractale ; et
    la comparaison de la mesure évaluée de la CFD pour l'au moins une partie du composant logiciel surveillé à une mesure de référence de CFD pour chacun des un ou plusieurs composants logiciels malveillants, chaque mesure de référence de CFD comportant une pluralité de valeurs de CFD variant en fonction d'une résolution de dimension fractale, de manière à identifier un ou plusieurs de la pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants desquels est dérivé le composant logiciel surveillé,
    chacun des un ou plusieurs de la pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants identifiés étant identifié sur la base d'une similitude d'au moins une partie de la pluralité de valeurs de CFD du composant logiciel surveillé et des un ou plusieurs de la pluralité de composants logiciels malveillants identifiés.
  5. Programme d'ordinateur comprenant des instructions qui, lorsque le programme est exécuté par un système ordinateur, amènent le système ordinateur à réaliser les étapes d'un procédé ainsi que revendiqué dans l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3.
EP16809439.9A 2015-12-24 2016-12-15 Identification de logiciels malveillants Active EP3394783B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15202738 2015-12-24
PCT/EP2016/081188 WO2017108576A1 (fr) 2015-12-24 2016-12-15 Identifiant de logiciel malveillant

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3394783A1 EP3394783A1 (fr) 2018-10-31
EP3394783B1 true EP3394783B1 (fr) 2020-09-30

Family

ID=55068865

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16809439.9A Active EP3394783B1 (fr) 2015-12-24 2016-12-15 Identification de logiciels malveillants

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US10891377B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3394783B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2017108576A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10419454B2 (en) 2014-02-28 2019-09-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Malicious encrypted traffic inhibitor
WO2015128609A1 (fr) 2014-02-28 2015-09-03 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Profilage d'identification d'un trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
WO2015128613A1 (fr) 2014-02-28 2015-09-03 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
WO2016146609A1 (fr) 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Profils appris pour une identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
WO2016146610A1 (fr) 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant au moyen d'une transformation de fourier
WO2017109135A1 (fr) 2015-12-24 2017-06-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification d'un trafic réseau malveillant
WO2017108575A1 (fr) 2015-12-24 2017-06-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de logiciels malveillants
WO2017167545A1 (fr) 2016-03-30 2017-10-05 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de menace relative au trafic de réseau
EP3437290B1 (fr) 2016-03-30 2020-08-26 British Telecommunications public limited company Detection des menaces de sécurité informatique
US10771483B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2020-09-08 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identifying an attacked computing device
US10476673B2 (en) 2017-03-22 2019-11-12 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Managing session secrets for continuous packet capture systems
US11677757B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2023-06-13 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Initialization vector identification for encrypted malware traffic detection
US9967292B1 (en) 2017-10-25 2018-05-08 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Inline secret sharing
US11979422B1 (en) 2017-11-27 2024-05-07 Lacework, Inc. Elastic privileges in a secure access service edge
US10419469B1 (en) * 2017-11-27 2019-09-17 Lacework Inc. Graph-based user tracking and threat detection
US10735441B2 (en) * 2017-12-20 2020-08-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Correlating endpoint and network views to identify evasive applications
US10389574B1 (en) 2018-02-07 2019-08-20 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Ranking alerts based on network monitoring
US10270794B1 (en) 2018-02-09 2019-04-23 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Detection of denial of service attacks
US11055411B2 (en) * 2018-05-10 2021-07-06 Acronis International Gmbh System and method for protection against ransomware attacks
US10411978B1 (en) 2018-08-09 2019-09-10 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Correlating causes and effects associated with network activity
WO2020053292A1 (fr) 2018-09-12 2020-03-19 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Détermination de graine de clé de chiffrement
EP3623980B1 (fr) 2018-09-12 2021-04-28 British Telecommunications public limited company Détermination d'algorithme de chiffrement de logiciel rançonneur
EP3623982B1 (fr) 2018-09-12 2021-05-19 British Telecommunications public limited company Restauration ransomware
US10965702B2 (en) 2019-05-28 2021-03-30 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Detecting injection attacks using passive network monitoring
JP2021009625A (ja) * 2019-07-02 2021-01-28 コニカミノルタ株式会社 情報処理装置、文字認識方法および文字認識プログラム
US11388072B2 (en) 2019-08-05 2022-07-12 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Correlating network traffic that crosses opaque endpoints
US10742530B1 (en) 2019-08-05 2020-08-11 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Correlating network traffic that crosses opaque endpoints
US10742677B1 (en) 2019-09-04 2020-08-11 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Automatic determination of user roles and asset types based on network monitoring
US11165823B2 (en) 2019-12-17 2021-11-02 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Automated preemptive polymorphic deception
EP4218212A4 (fr) 2020-09-23 2024-10-16 Extrahop Networks Inc Surveillance de trafic réseau chiffré
US11463466B2 (en) 2020-09-23 2022-10-04 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Monitoring encrypted network traffic
US12118077B2 (en) * 2021-01-21 2024-10-15 Intuit Inc. Feature extraction and time series anomaly detection over dynamic graphs
US11296967B1 (en) 2021-09-23 2022-04-05 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Combining passive network analysis and active probing
US11843606B2 (en) 2022-03-30 2023-12-12 Extrahop Networks, Inc. Detecting abnormal data access based on data similarity

Family Cites Families (87)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US306691A (en) 1884-10-14 Cord-holder for assisting in tying plants
US410817A (en) 1889-09-10 Carrying apparatus
US315727A (en) 1885-04-14 Odometer for vehicles
US405524A (en) 1889-06-18 Whip-socket
US303013A (en) 1884-08-05 Pen-holder
US7904187B2 (en) * 1999-02-01 2011-03-08 Hoffberg Steven M Internet appliance system and method
AU2001262958A1 (en) 2000-04-28 2001-11-12 Internet Security Systems, Inc. Method and system for managing computer security information
US6745310B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2004-06-01 Yan Chiew Chow Real time local and remote management of data files and directories and method of operating the same
US20020186875A1 (en) * 2001-04-09 2002-12-12 Burmer Glenna C. Computer methods for image pattern recognition in organic material
US20030084349A1 (en) 2001-10-12 2003-05-01 Oliver Friedrichs Early warning system for network attacks
US20030126464A1 (en) * 2001-12-04 2003-07-03 Mcdaniel Patrick D. Method and system for determining and enforcing security policy in a communication session
US7370360B2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2008-05-06 International Business Machines Corporation Computer immune system and method for detecting unwanted code in a P-code or partially compiled native-code program executing within a virtual machine
US7376969B1 (en) 2002-12-02 2008-05-20 Arcsight, Inc. Real time monitoring and analysis of events from multiple network security devices
US9818136B1 (en) 2003-02-05 2017-11-14 Steven M. Hoffberg System and method for determining contingent relevance
US8201249B2 (en) 2003-05-14 2012-06-12 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Steady state computer intrusion and misuse detection
US7503071B1 (en) 2003-10-01 2009-03-10 Symantec Corporation Network traffic identification by waveform analysis
US8898788B1 (en) 2004-04-01 2014-11-25 Fireeye, Inc. Systems and methods for malware attack prevention
US8042180B2 (en) * 2004-05-21 2011-10-18 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Intrusion detection based on amount of network traffic
US8738708B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2014-05-27 Mcafee, Inc. Bounce management in a trusted communication network
US7546471B2 (en) 2005-01-14 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for virus detection using pattern matching techniques
US7716739B1 (en) 2005-07-20 2010-05-11 Symantec Corporation Subjective and statistical event tracking incident management system
US9064115B2 (en) 2006-04-06 2015-06-23 Pulse Secure, Llc Malware detection system and method for limited access mobile platforms
US8365286B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2013-01-29 Sophos Plc Method and system for classification of software using characteristics and combinations of such characteristics
US8069484B2 (en) 2007-01-25 2011-11-29 Mandiant Corporation System and method for determining data entropy to identify malware
JP2008292852A (ja) 2007-05-25 2008-12-04 Hitachi Ltd ディスクアレイ制御装置とディスクアレイ制御方法およびストレージシステム
US20090034423A1 (en) 2007-07-30 2009-02-05 Anthony Terrance Coon Automated detection of TCP anomalies
AU2008100698B4 (en) 2007-07-30 2009-04-02 REAPP Technology Pty Limited REAPP fourier transform computer security methodology
US8091093B2 (en) 2007-10-05 2012-01-03 Equilibrium Networks, Incorporated System and method for information assurance based on thermal analysis techniques
KR100949803B1 (ko) 2007-12-18 2010-03-30 한국전자통신연구원 아이피 주소 분할 표시 장치 및 방법
US8719936B2 (en) 2008-02-01 2014-05-06 Northeastern University VMM-based intrusion detection system
GB2461870B (en) 2008-07-14 2012-02-29 F Secure Oyj Malware detection
US8341724B1 (en) 2008-12-19 2012-12-25 Juniper Networks, Inc. Blocking unidentified encrypted communication sessions
US8448245B2 (en) * 2009-01-17 2013-05-21 Stopthehacker.com, Jaal LLC Automated identification of phishing, phony and malicious web sites
US8914878B2 (en) 2009-04-29 2014-12-16 Juniper Networks, Inc. Detecting malicious network software agents
US8776218B2 (en) 2009-07-21 2014-07-08 Sophos Limited Behavioral-based host intrusion prevention system
US8245301B2 (en) 2009-09-15 2012-08-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Network intrusion detection visualization
US8949987B2 (en) 2010-01-06 2015-02-03 Alcatel Lucent Computer security process monitor
US8707440B2 (en) 2010-03-22 2014-04-22 Tenable Network Security, Inc. System and method for passively identifying encrypted and interactive network sessions
US8584241B1 (en) 2010-08-11 2013-11-12 Lockheed Martin Corporation Computer forensic system
US8468599B2 (en) 2010-09-20 2013-06-18 Sonalysts, Inc. System and method for privacy-enhanced cyber data fusion using temporal-behavioral aggregation and analysis
GB2484278A (en) 2010-10-04 2012-04-11 Airspan Networks Inc Suppressing co-channel interference in dependence upon probabilities of establishing a link between a base station and a terminal via resource blocks
GB2484279B (en) 2010-10-04 2014-11-12 Airspan Networks Inc Apparatus and method for controlling a wireless feeder network
US20120167218A1 (en) 2010-12-23 2012-06-28 Rajesh Poornachandran Signature-independent, system behavior-based malware detection
US8689328B2 (en) 2011-02-11 2014-04-01 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Maliciouis user agent detection and denial of service (DOS) detection and prevention using fingerprinting
US9122877B2 (en) 2011-03-21 2015-09-01 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for malware and network reputation correlation
IL212344A (en) 2011-04-14 2015-03-31 Verint Systems Ltd A system and method for selectively controlling encrypted traffic
US9754130B2 (en) 2011-05-02 2017-09-05 Architecture Technology Corporation Peer integrity checking system
US9106680B2 (en) 2011-06-27 2015-08-11 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for protocol fingerprinting and reputation correlation
US8719232B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-05-06 Verisign, Inc. Systems and methods for data integrity checking
CN102915421B (zh) 2011-08-04 2013-10-23 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 文件的扫描方法及系统
WO2013027970A1 (fr) * 2011-08-19 2013-02-28 고려대학교 산학협력단 Procédé et appareil de détection d'intrusion basée sur une anomalie dans un réseau
US9122870B2 (en) 2011-09-21 2015-09-01 SunStone Information Defense Inc. Methods and apparatus for validating communications in an open architecture system
US8677487B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2014-03-18 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for detecting a malicious command and control channel
US9197606B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2015-11-24 Bmc Software, Inc. Monitoring network performance of encrypted communications
US9973473B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2018-05-15 The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Methods, systems, and computer readable media for rapid filtering of opaque data traffic
WO2013172750A1 (fr) 2012-05-15 2013-11-21 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Radiomessagerie sécurisée
US20130326494A1 (en) 2012-06-01 2013-12-05 Yonesy F. NUNEZ System and method for distributed patch management
US8953584B1 (en) 2012-06-05 2015-02-10 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for accessing route information in a distributed switch
US9818109B2 (en) 2012-08-16 2017-11-14 Danny Loh User generated autonomous digital token system
US20140157405A1 (en) 2012-12-04 2014-06-05 Bill Joll Cyber Behavior Analysis and Detection Method, System and Architecture
EP3876107A1 (fr) * 2013-03-15 2021-09-08 Factual Inc. Appareil, systèmes et procédés pour analyser des mouvements d'entités cibles
US9491070B2 (en) 2013-04-12 2016-11-08 Symantec Corporation Apparatus and method for utilizing fourier transforms to characterize network traffic
US9009825B1 (en) 2013-06-21 2015-04-14 Trend Micro Incorporated Anomaly detector for computer networks
US9336389B1 (en) * 2013-08-19 2016-05-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Rapid malware inspection of mobile applications
US9547588B1 (en) 2013-09-10 2017-01-17 Violin Memory Inc. System and method of data storage in flash memory
US9595034B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2017-03-14 Stellenbosch University System and method for monitoring third party access to a restricted item
US9288220B2 (en) 2013-11-07 2016-03-15 Cyberpoint International Llc Methods and systems for malware detection
KR101468336B1 (ko) 2013-11-25 2014-12-04 성균관대학교산학협력단 데이터 압축률 예측 기법에 기반한 데이터 분산 저장 방법, 이를 이용한 저장 장치 및 시스템
WO2015128613A1 (fr) 2014-02-28 2015-09-03 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
US10419454B2 (en) 2014-02-28 2019-09-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Malicious encrypted traffic inhibitor
WO2015128609A1 (fr) 2014-02-28 2015-09-03 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Profilage d'identification d'un trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
WO2015179020A2 (fr) 2014-03-27 2015-11-26 Ent Technologies, Inc. Translation de réseau d'entités généralisée (gent)
US10340038B2 (en) 2014-05-13 2019-07-02 Nant Holdings Ip, Llc Healthcare transaction validation via blockchain, systems and methods
US9462008B2 (en) * 2014-05-16 2016-10-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Identifying threats based on hierarchical classification
US20170142133A1 (en) 2014-06-20 2017-05-18 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Ineffective network equipment identification
WO2016090093A1 (fr) * 2014-12-04 2016-06-09 Shin James Système et procédé de fabrication de modèles cliniques et de prothèses
US9934376B1 (en) * 2014-12-29 2018-04-03 Fireeye, Inc. Malware detection appliance architecture
US10891383B2 (en) 2015-02-11 2021-01-12 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Validating computer resource usage
WO2016146610A1 (fr) 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant au moyen d'une transformation de fourier
WO2016146609A1 (fr) 2015-03-17 2016-09-22 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Profils appris pour une identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
US9438612B1 (en) * 2015-03-23 2016-09-06 Fortinet, Inc. Calculating consecutive matches using parallel computing
US9740862B1 (en) * 2015-06-29 2017-08-22 Juniper Networks, Inc. Identifying malware based on a relationship between a downloader file and a downloaded file
EP3125489B1 (fr) 2015-07-31 2017-08-09 BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company Atténuation d'attaques de chaînes de blocs
WO2017108575A1 (fr) 2015-12-24 2017-06-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification de logiciels malveillants
WO2017109135A1 (fr) 2015-12-24 2017-06-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identification d'un trafic réseau malveillant
US10771483B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2020-09-08 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Identifying an attacked computing device
US10546143B1 (en) * 2017-08-10 2020-01-28 Support Intelligence, Inc. System and method for clustering files and assigning a maliciousness property based on clustering

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3394783A1 (fr) 2018-10-31
US20190012457A1 (en) 2019-01-10
US10891377B2 (en) 2021-01-12
WO2017108576A1 (fr) 2017-06-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3394783B1 (fr) Identification de logiciels malveillants
EP3394784B1 (fr) Identification de logiciels malveillants
US10931689B2 (en) Malicious network traffic identification
EP3111612B1 (fr) Profilage pour l'identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
EP3111614B1 (fr) Identification du trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
EP3111613B1 (fr) Inhibiteur de trafic chiffré malveillant
EP3602999B1 (fr) Identification de vecteur d'initialisation pour la détection de trafic de maliciel chiffré
EP3272096B1 (fr) Apprentissage de profils pour l'identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant
EP3272095B1 (fr) Identification de trafic de réseau chiffré malveillant utilisant une transformée de fourier
GB2545910A (en) Malicious software identification
EP3395035B1 (fr) Identification d'un trafic malveillant de réseau
US20200050760A1 (en) Initialization vector identification for malware detection
GB2545745A (en) Malicious software identification
GB2545744A (en) Malicious network traffic identification

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180625

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200430

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1319535

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016045079

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201230

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1319535

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210201

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016045079

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201231

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201215

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201215

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210130

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230623

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231122

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 8