EP3357080A1 - Mass-selective axial ejection linear ion trap - Google Patents
Mass-selective axial ejection linear ion trapInfo
- Publication number
- EP3357080A1 EP3357080A1 EP16850477.7A EP16850477A EP3357080A1 EP 3357080 A1 EP3357080 A1 EP 3357080A1 EP 16850477 A EP16850477 A EP 16850477A EP 3357080 A1 EP3357080 A1 EP 3357080A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- voltage
- rods
- pair
- signal
- segmented
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
- H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
- H01J49/4205—Device types
- H01J49/422—Two-dimensional RF ion traps
- H01J49/4225—Multipole linear ion traps, e.g. quadrupoles, hexapoles
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/02—Details
- H01J49/06—Electron- or ion-optical arrangements
- H01J49/062—Ion guides
- H01J49/063—Multipole ion guides, e.g. quadrupoles, hexapoles
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
- H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
- H01J49/4205—Device types
- H01J49/421—Mass filters, i.e. deviating unwanted ions without trapping
- H01J49/4215—Quadrupole mass filters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
- H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
- H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
- H01J49/4205—Device types
- H01J49/4255—Device types with particular constructional features
Definitions
- Ion trap mass spectrometers typically allow ion scanning by essentially filling an ion trap in a mass-independent manner and emptying the trap in a mass-dependent manner by manipulating the RF and DC voltages applied to one or more of the electrodes.
- the ion storage and fast scanning capabilities of the ion trap are advantageous in analytical mass spectrometry.
- High analysis efficiency, compared to typical beam-type mass spectrometers, can be achieved if the time to eject and detect ions from the trap is smaller than the time required to fill a trap. If this condition is met, then very few ions are wasted.
- Linear quadrupoles have been widely used in some mass spectrometers for many years. Generally, these devices are constructed from four parallel rods within which a two- dimensional quadrupole field is established (in the x-y plane). Mass selection is achieved by appropriately choosing a combination of radiofrequency (RF) and direct-current (DC) voltages, such that ions within a very narrow mass-to-charge window are stable over the length of the quadrupole.
- RF radiofrequency
- DC direct-current
- Linear ion traps have a very high acceptance, since there is generally no quadrupole field along the z-axis (axial / parallel to the rods). Ions admitted into a pressurised linear quadrupole undergo a series of momentum dissipating collisions with a carrier gas in a collision cell, effectively reducing axial energy prior to encountering the end electrodes, thereby enhancing trapping efficiency. That is, the reduced momentum avoids requiring a large DC barrier to contain ions in the axial direction.
- Ions can be trapped within a linear ion trap and mass selectively ejected in a dimension perpendicular to the center axis of the trap, via radial excitation techniques.
- Exemplary devices for radial ejection trap ions in the radial dimension by an RF quadrupole field, and by static DC potentials at the ends of the rod structure can also be applied to these linear 2-D ion traps.
- Many of the scan functions commonly used in conventional 3-D ion traps can also be applied to these linear 2-D ion traps.
- ions emerge radially over the length of the quadrupole rod structure and can be detected using conventional means.
- Radial mass-selective ion ejection occurs when the RF voltage is ramped in the presence of a sufficiently intense auxiliary AC voltage.
- the auxiliary AC resonance-ejection voltage is applied radially and the ions emerge from the linear ion trap through slots cut in the quadrupole rods.
- Radial ejection requires that the RF Field be of high quality over the entire length of the ion trap in order to preserve mass spectral resolution, since resolution depends on the fidelity of the secular frequency of the trapped ions.
- very high mechanical precision is required in fabrication of the quadrupole rods in order to maintain the same secular frequency over the length of the device.
- MSAE Mass-selective axial ejection
- Trapped ions are given some degree of radial excitation via a resonance excitation process, and in the exit fringing-field, this radial excitation results in additional axial ion kinetic energy that can overcome an exit DC barrier.
- MSAE of ions from a linear quadrupole ion trap has been shown to add high-sensitivity and high-resolution capabilities to traditional triple quad mass spectrometers.
- thermal i/ed ions can be ejected axially in a mass- selective way by ramping the amplitude of the RF drive, to bring ions of increasingly higher ml/, (mass to charge ratio, )into resonance with a single-frequency dipolar auxiliary signal, applied between two opposing rods.
- ions gain radial amplitude until they are ejected axially or neutralized on the rods.
- the radial excitation voltage is lower than that used to perform mass-selective radial ejection since the goal is provide a degree of radial excitation rather than radial ejection.
- the superposition of a repulsive potential applied to an exit lens with the diminishing quadrupole potential in the fringing region near the end of a quadrupole rod array can give rise to an approximately conical surface on which the net axial force experienced by an ion, averaged over one RF cycle, is zero.
- This conical surface can be referred to as the cone of reflection because it divides the regions of ion reflection and ion ejection. Once an ion penetrates this surface, it feels a strong net positive axial force and is accelerated toward the exit lens.
- trapped thermalized ions can be ejected axially from a linear ion trap in a mass-selective way when their radial amplitude is increased through a resonant response to an auxiliary signal.
- the above mentioned MS AE ion trap systems are used in the ion path of a linear mass spectrometer. While this ion path may include a plurality of quadrupole sections, in general only the last quadrupole section is utilized as an ion trap, with initial quadrupole stages assisting in collimating the ion path in the axial direction. Ion injection is accomplished, in these examples, utilizing the fringing fields that occur at the radial and of the parallel rods that form the quadrupole of the ion trap.
- the quadrupole rods in the ion trap are substantially equal in length and parallel.
- Various embodiments address or overcome some of the problems of the prior art by providing a quadrupole having four rods that are substantially coextensive in the axial direction, where two of the rods (diagonally opposed) are segmented such that the two segments in a rod are capacitively coupled to facilitate an RF drop when an RF signal is applied to one segment and capacitively provided to the other segment.
- a linear ion trap configured for mass selective axial ejection includes a pair of parallel continuous conductive rods and a pair of parallel segmented conductive rods having a long segment and a shorter segment disposed at an exit end of the linear ion trap.
- the two pairs of conductive rods are axially aligned to be substantially parallel with one another and substantially coextensive in the axial direction.
- the pairs of rods can overlap 90% or more in the axial direction and are parallel to at least within two degrees.
- the rod pairs are also interleaved with one another such that each conductive rod in a pair is diagonal to the other conductive rod in that pair.
- the linear ion trap further includes an RF signal generating source configured to supply an RF signal having a first voltage and a first frequency to each rod in the pair of parallel continuous conductive rods and the long segment of each rod in the pair of parallel segmented conductive rods.
- a pair of capacitors electrically couples the RF signal from the long segments to the shorter segments such that a voltage of the RF signal applied to the shorter segment is reduced by at least 1% relative to the first voltage of the RF signal (e.g., 15-25% less than the first signal).
- the RF signal applied to the rods can comprise a first signal having a first phase provided to the pair of parallel continuous conductive rods and a second signal having a second opposite phase provided to the long segment of each rod in the pair of parallel segmented conductive rods.
- the RF signal generating source can be configured to apply an auxiliary AC signal, at a lower voltage and frequency than the RF signal, to the pair of parallel continuous conductive rods during an axial ejection procedure.
- the auxiliary RF signal comprises an auxiliary frequency having a predetermined value related to the first frequency of the RF signal.
- the linear ion trap can further comprise a DC voltage source configured to provide a first DC voltage to the long segment of each rod in the pair of parallel segmented conductive rods and a second higher DC voltage to the shorter segment of each rod in the pair of parallel segmented conductive rods.
- a mass spectrometer using mass selective axial ejection comprising an ion source configured to supply ions in an axial direction and located at one end of the axis; an ion detector located at the other end of the axis: a linear ion trap comprising two overlapping parallel pairs of conductive rods of substantially the same length located between the ion source and the ion detector along the axis of the ion trap, the two overlapping parallel pairs comprising a first pair of continuous rods and a second pair of segmented rods.
- the segmented rods each have a long segment and a shorter segment that is located closer to the ion detector end of the ion trap axis relative to the long segment, wherein each rod in the two pairs is located diagonally from the other rod in that pair, such that each rod in a pair is adjacent to the rods of the other pair.
- the mass spectrometer can also include an RF signal generating source configured to supply an RF signal, having a first voltage and a first frequency, to each rod in first pair of continuous rods and to the long segments of the segmented rods of the second pair.
- a pair of capacitors electrically couples the RF signal from the long segments to the shorter segments of each of the segmented rods of the second pair such that a second voltage is applied to the shorter segments reduced by at least 1% (e.g., 15-25%) relative to the first voltage of the RF signal.
- the RF signal applied to the rods comprises a first signal having a first phase coupled to the first pair of continuous rods and a second signal having a second opposite phase coupled to the second pair of segmented rods.
- the RF signal generating source can be configured to provide an auxiliary AC signal, at a lower voltage and frequency than the RF signal, to the first pair of continuous rods during an axial ejection procedure.
- the auxiliary RF signal can comprise an auxiliary frequency having a predetermined value related to the first frequency of the RF signal.
- the mass spectrometer can also comprise a DC voltage source configured to provide a first DC voltage to the long segment of each rod in the second pair of segmented rods and a second higher DC voltage to the shorter segment of each rod in the second pair of segmented rods.
- the mass spectrometer can further comprise an exit lens located between the linear ion trap and the ion detector. A third DC voltage that is higher than the second higher DC voltage can be applied to the exit lens during a trapping procedure and a fourth DC voltage that is lower than the second higher DC voltage can be applied to the exit lens during an axial ejection procedure.
- the mass spectrometer can also comprise a set of electrodes located at the ion source end of the linear ion trap that are configured to be energi/ed by a fifth DC voltage that is higher than the first DC voltage.
- a method for operating a mass spectrometer to facilitate mass selective axial ejection of ions can comprise steps of providing a linear ion trap comprising two axially aligned, interleaved pairs of parallel conductive rods that define an axial direction having an upstream end and an exit end, the pairs including a first pair of continuous rods and a second pair of segmented rods, each segmented rod having a long segment and a shorter segment that is located proximate to the exit end, wherein each long segment of each rod is electrically coupled to the shorter segment via a capacitor, such that an RF voltage applied to the long segments will result in a lower RF voltage being applied to the shorter segments, the lower RF voltage being at least 1% less than the RF voltage applied to the long segments.
- the method can also include creating a DC well in the axial direction by applying a first DC voltage to the first pair of continuous rods and the long segments of the second pair of segmented rods, applying a second DC voltage, higher than the first DC voltage, to the shorter segments of the second pair of segmented rods, applying a third DC voltage, higher than the second DC voltage, to an exit lens located at the exit end of the linear ion trap, and applying a fourth DC voltage, higher than the first DC voltage, to electrodes located upstream of the shorter segments of the second pair of segmented rods.
- Ions can be trapped in the linear ion trap by applying a first RF voltage to the first pair of continuous rods and a second RF voltage of the same frequency and substantially the same voltage to the long segments of the second pair of segmented rods.
- the method can also include injecting ions from an ion source upstream of the linear ion trap and ejecting ions axially in a mass dependent manner by applying a third auxiliary AC voltage at a lower voltage and frequency than the first RF voltage to the first pair of continuous rods, such that the third auxiliary AC voltage is of opposite phase at each continuous rod.
- each long segment of each segmented rod is electrically coupled to the shorter segment via the capacitor such that the second RF voltage applied to the long segments will result in a third RF voltage applied to the shorter segments having a voltage that is 15%-25% less than the second RF voltage.
- the first and second RF voltages can be of opposite phase.
- the step of ejecting ions can further comprise lowering the third DC voltage at the exit lens such that the third DC voltage is lower than the second DC voltage at the shorter segments of the second pair of segmented rods. Additionally or alternatively, the step of ejecting ions further comprises ramping the first and second RF and third auxiliary RF voltage over time.
- a quadrupole linear ion trap is proposed to facilitate mass-selective axial ejection (MSAE) to eject ions in the axial direction that utili7.es one set of segmented electrodes.
- MSAE mass-selective axial ejection
- embodiments of the present teachings utilizes capacitively coupled exit segments on a pair of electrodes to produce a reduced RF field in the quadrupole, outside of the area normally subjected to fringing fields. As explained below, this reduced RF field can induce an axial force on trapped ions to induce axial ejection outside of the end region normally subjected to fringing fields.
- FIG. 1 An exemplary system that can utilize a linear ion trap in accordance with the embodiments disclosed herein is shown in FIG. 1. Such a system is discussed in further detail in concurrently assigned US Patent 6,177,668, which is incorporated herein by reference. Whereas the ion traps disclosed therein utilize quadrupoles comprising a set of continuous conductive electrode rods, the electrode rods used in the present embodiments utilize an electrode set comprising a pair of continuous rods and a pair of capacitively- coupled segmented conductive electrode rods, allowing the introduction of an RF drop at the end segments of the rods.
- the capacitive coupling on the pair of segmented rods can be used to introduce a DC component to facilitate ion trapping and/or ejection.
- segmented ion traps disclosed herein can be readily substituted for the ion traps disclosed in US Patent 6,177,668 to create a mass spectrometer utilizing embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 shows a mass analyzer system 10 with which embodiments of the invention may be used.
- the system 10 includes a sample source 12 (normally a liquid sample source such as a liquid chromatograph) from a which sample can be supplied to a conventional ion source 14.
- Ion source 14 may be an electrospray, an ion spray, or a corona discharge device, or any other known ion source.
- Ions from ion source 14 are directed through an aperture 16 formed in an aperture plate 18.
- Plate 18 forms one wall of a gas curtain chamber 19 which is supplied with curtain gas from a curtain gas source 20.
- the curtain gas can be argon, nitrogen or other inert gas.
- the ions then pass through an orifice 22 in an orifice plate 24 into a first stage vacuum chamber 26, which can be evacuated by a pump 28 to an exemplary pressure of about 1 Ton * .
- the ions then pass through a skimmer orifice 30 in a skimmer plate 32 and into a main vacuum chamber 34 evacuated to an exemplary pressure of about 2 milli-Torr by a pump 36.
- the main vacuum chamber 34 contains a set of four linear conventional quadrupole rods 38.
- the quadrupole rods 38 can be segmented and operate in accordance with the quadrupole trap embodiments disclosed throughout.
- an exit lens 42 Located about 2 mm past the exit ends 40 of the rods 38 is an exit lens 42.
- the lens 42 is a plate with an aperture 44 therein, allowing passage of ions through aperture 44 to a conventional detector 46 (which may for example be a channel electron multiplier of the kind conventionally used in mass spectrometers).
- the rods 38 are connected to the main power supply 50 which applies a DC rod offset to all the rods 38 and also applies RF between the rods in any manner disclosed herein.
- the power supply 50 can also be connected (by connections not shown) to the ion source 14, the aperture and orifice plates 18 and 24, the skimmer plate 32, and to the exit lens 42.
- the ion source 14 may typically be at +5,000 volts, the aperture plate 18 may be at + 1 ,000 volts, the orifice plate 24 may be at +250 volts, and the skimmer plate 32 may be at ground (zero volts).
- the DC offset applied to rods 38 may be -5 volts.
- the axis of the device, which is the path of ion travel, is indicated at 52.
- ions of interest which are admitted into the device from ion source 14 move down a potential well and are allowed to enter the rods 38.
- Ions that are stable in the main RF Field applied to the rods 38 travel the length of the device undergoing numerous momentum dissipating collisions with the background gas.
- a trapping DC voltage typically -2 volts DC, is applied to the exit lens 42.
- the exit lens 42 Normally the ion transmission efficiency between the skimmer 32 and the exit lens 42 is very high and may approach 100%. Ions that enter the main vacuum chamber 34 and travel to the exit lens 42 are thermalized due to the numerous collisions with the background gas and have little net velocity in the direction of axis 52.
- the ions also experience forces from the main RF field which confines them radially.
- the RF voltage applied is in the order of about 4S0 volts (unless it is scanned with mass) and is of a frequency of the order of about 816 kHz.
- no resolving DC field is applied to rods 38.
- ions in region 54 in the vicinity of the exit lens 42 will experience fields that are not entirely quadrupolar, due to the nature of the termination of the main RF and DC fields near the exit lens. Such fields, commonly referred to as fringing fields, will tend to couple the radial and axial degrees of freedom of the trapped ions. This means that there will be axial and radial components of ion motion that are not mutually orthogonal. This is in contrast to the situation at the center of rod structure 38 further removed from the exit lens and fringing fields, where the axial and radial components of ion motion are not coupled or are minimally coupled.
- ions experience an axially varying field ahead of any fringing fields, due to the reduced RF field across the segment gap. It has been shown that fringing fields penetrate with substantial effect to about 2ro, where ro is the distance between each rod and the center axis of the quadrupole.
- fringing fields penetrate with substantial effect to about 2ro, where ro is the distance between each rod and the center axis of the quadrupole.
- the auxiliary AC field may be provided by an auxiliary AC supply 56, which for illustrative purposes is shown as forming part of the main power supply 50.
- the auxiliary AC field is in addition to the trapping DC voltage supplied to exit lens 42 and couples to both the radial and axial secular ion motions.
- the auxiliary AC field is found to excite the ions sufficiently that they surmount the axial DC potential barrier at the exit lens 42, so that they can leave axially in the direction of arrow 58.
- the deviations in the field in the vicinity of the exit lens 42 lead to the above described coupling of axial and radial ion motions enabling the axial ejection at radial secular frequencies.
- segmented rods discussed herein can achieve a similar effect to overcome DC potential by using the RF drop across the capacitively coupled segment gap.
- ion ejection in a sequential mass dependent manner can be accomplished by scanning the frequency of the low voltage auxiliary AC field.
- the frequency of the auxiliary AC field matches a radial secular frequency of an ion in the vicinity of the exit lens 42
- the ion will absorb energy and will now be capable of traversing the potential barrier present on the exit lens due to the radial/axial motion coupling.
- the ion exits axially it will be detected by detector 46.
- other ions upstream of the region 54 in the vicinity of the exit lens are energetically permitted to enter the region 54 and be excited by subsequent AC frequency scans.
- auxiliary AC voltage can be applied to a subset of the rods or segments, while applying a DC potential to the exit lens.
- the auxiliary AC voltage on exit lens 42 can be fixed and the main RF voltage applied to rods 38 can be scanned in amplitude, as will be described. While this does change the trapping conditions, a q of only about 0.2 to 0.3 is needed for axial ejection, while a q of about 0.907 is needed for radial ejection, allowing ions to be ejected axially more easily.
- q, mass (or mass to charge ml/) and RF frequency and amplitude is explained below.
- a further supplementary or auxiliary AC dipole voltage or quadrupole voltage may be applied to rods 38 (as indicated by dotted connection 57 in FIG. I ) and scanned, to produce varying fringing fields which will eject ions axially in the manner described.
- an auxiliary dipole voltage it is usually applied between an opposed pair of the rods 38, as indicated in FIG. la.
- a combination of some or all of the above three approaches can be used to eject ions axially and mass dependently past the DC potential barrier present at the exit lens 42.
- the ion trap illustrated in FIG. I can be used in conjunction with additional upstream quadrupoles to form multistage analyzer, as discussed in US Patent 6,177,668.
- FIG. 1 has been discussed generally with respect to an arbitrary quadrupole ion trap or an ion trap having four continuous rods
- embodiments of an ion trap for use with this invention generally use a quadrupole having a single pair of continuous rods and a single pair of segmented rods having short segments of the rods on the exit end of the quadrupole.
- An exemplary quadrupole for use with this invention is shown in FIG. 2.
- Quadrupole 100 comprises two pairs of parallel conductive rods, where each pair of rods is spaced diagonally, such that no pair of rods is adjacent to itself in the arrangement. This arrangement can be described as interleaved pairs. These rods are substantially completely aligned in the axial direction such that the extent of each pair of rods is substantially coextensive in the axial direction (e.g. overlapping at least 90%, parallel within at least 2 degrees, and having at least 95% the same overall length within the ion trap).
- Each rod in the pair of segmented rods 102 includes a first long conductive segment 102a and a second stubby conductive segment 102b. Stubby segment 102b is positioned at the exit end of the quadrupole.
- Segments 102a and 102b are capacitively coupled to one another.
- a discrete capacitor l()2c couples each pair of segments 102a and 102b.
- the value of capacitor 102c is chosen such that when an RF voltage is applied to long segment 102a at a frequency within a known range, the RF voltage that reaches segment 102b via capacitor 102c is substantially diminished by a predetermined amount relative to the main RF voltage applied to segment 102a.
- the RF voltage applied at segment 102b can be reduced by at least 1%.
- the preferred RF drop between segments 102a and 102b is between 15% and 25%.
- RF voltages are applied to both the long segments 102a of rods 102 and to rods 104, as explained below.
- Quadrupole 100 terminates at a conductive aperture referred to as an exit lens 105.
- Quadrupole 100 can be distinguished from other quadrupoles used in the prior art that utili/e segmented rods, for various reasons.
- Wineland (Ionic Crystals in a Linear Paul Trap" Phys. Rev. A, Vol.45, No. 9, 6493- 6501, May 1992) teaches a linear Paul trap that utilizes two pairs of segmented rods, arranged radially symmetrically, where the segments of adjacent pairs are offset in the axial direction relative to the other pair.
- Wineland treats each pair of segmented rods differently.
- One diagonal pair which has segments aligned in the axial direction, receives the same RF voltage with a different DC potential on each of the two segments for each rod.
- the other diagonal pair of segmented rods receives no RF voltage, instead receiving two different DC potentials at each segment.
- the second pair of segmented rods has segments that are aligned within the pair, but the segmentation gap is offset relative to the segmentation gap of the first diagonal pair, creating three regions of axial space that can be independently manipulated using DC voltages.
- This allows an RF field to be produced within the Paul trap, while allowing easy manipulation of DC axial fields to affect axial containment.
- the end segments defined by the shorter segments of the rods can be DC manipulated to create DC barriers to contain ions axially in the center section, where the long segments overlap.
- the quadrupole of Wineland is reproduced as FIG. 3, where ⁇ represents an RF frequency, and AU represents a DC voltage.
- US patent application No. 2011/49358 to Green also teaches a quadrupole having segmented rods. Like Wineland, Green also teaches that each rod in the quadrupole is segmented. Rather than providing an axial offset between segments in pairs of rods, each rod contains three segments: a first short segment, a long middle segment, and a short and segment. Like Wineland, the three regions defined by the segments, allow different DC potentials to be applied to the segments to produce a DC well in the axial direction to act as an ion trap. Unlike Wineland, all 4 rods in the quadrupole receive an RF signal. In each rod, the first two segments receive an RF signal in phase, while the end segment receives the RF signal out of phase.
- the entry segment and center segments can be capacitively coupled to receive the same phased RF signal
- the RF signal is swapped between adjacent pairs of rods and respective end segments, creating an RF barrier due to the phase change.
- an RF phase change is introduced at the exit end of the quadrupole, creating an RF barrier.
- the end segments of each rod are not capacitively coupled with the center segments of each rod, but rather coupled with the center segments of the adjacent rod pair.
- An exemplary quadrupole of Green is reproduced as FIG. 4, where like shaded rod segments utilize a signal of the same phase.
- quadrupole 100 in FIG. 2 utilizes one pair of segmented rods, arranged diagonally in the quadrupole, and one pair of continuous un-segmented rods, arranged diagonally, such that the pairs are interleaved. Both sets of rods receive an RF signal. The end segments of the segmented rod pair are capacitively coupled to the RF signal of the long segment of the RF pair, which results in an RF drop, but substantially the same RF phase.
- quadrupole 100 does not rely on all 4 rods being segmented, a DC well achieved by utilizing offset rods segments between adjacent rod pairs, or an RF phase change between exit segments and the main segments of a quadrupole rod, as in the prior art.
- FIG. 5 depicts the voltages applied to rod segments of quadrupole 100 (oriented the opposite way relative to that shown in FIG. 2). These voltages can be applied from power supply 50 of FIG. I or via any conventional circuit means capable of supplying RF and DC voltages disclosed herein.
- Continuous rods 104 receive a DC voltage and a main RF voltage at frequency ⁇ .
- rod segment 102a receives a DC voltage consistent with the DC voltage applied to rods 104, and RF voltage at substantially the same magnitude and frequency as, but out of phase with, the main RF voltage applied to rods 104. Because rods segments 102a and 102b are capacitively coupled using a capacitor 102c that facilitates a predetermined RF drop, rods segments 102b receive an RF signal in phase with that applied to rods segments 102a, but substantially diminished.
- the magnitude of the resulting RF signal applied to rod segments 102b is 85% of the RF signal applied to rod segments 102a, because the capacitive coupling (not shown) results in a 15% RF drop between the segments.
- Rod segments 102b also receive a DC potential that is more positive than that applied to rod segments 102a or rods 104. This results in a net DC barrier in the exit direction to help constrain positive ions within the ion trap. These ions, when excited by the auxiliary AC signal applied to rods 104, can overcome this DC barrier in a mass dependent manner.
- T electrodes 1 10 are placed between the rods and are energized to a positive DC potential (e.g., 200 V).
- FIGs. 6A and 6B illustrate the electric field exhibited between each pair of rods in two different conditions.
- FIG. 6A illustrates the equipotential lines when no rods are segmented, as in a conventional ion trap. As shown in FIG.
- FIG. 6A looking at the rods in the y-x plane, defined as the plane parallel to rod pair 104, the space between rods 104 results in equipotential lines 120 that run substantially parallel to the rods because the RF signal is applied continuously to the entirety of rods 104.
- FIG 6A only shows of the exit end of the rods, where the exit is to the left of the page.
- FIG. 6B illustrates the effect of adding segments to rods 102, and applying an RF drop across the segment gap.
- equipotential lines 122 show the effects of the RF drop between long rod segment 102a and stubby exit end rod segment 102b. Because of the reduced RF signal on segments 102, the electric field gradient between the center point and the rod segments is reduced. This results in electric field gradient that includes an axial component between segments 102a and 102b.
- ions can be selectively ejected from the trap due to the axial ejection resulting from the RF drop.
- RF voltages can be adjusted to scan for masses (or ml/, ratio) of ions, allowing the linear ion trap to be useful for mass spectrometry purposes. It should be appreciated, that the resulting ejected ions exhibit a detectable polarization due to the diminished RF potential and resulting reduced secular motion in the plane of the segmented rods 102 and the increased secular motion in the plane of rods 104, caused by the auxiliary RF signal that excites ions for ejection at frequency ⁇ .
- the extraction efficiency can be defined as the ratio of the total number of ions that get ejected from the trap versus the total number of ions in the trap. In general this extraction efficiency is less than 100 % since some of the ions, during the excitation process, can reach large radial kinetic energies that allow them to overcome the radial RF confinement field and hit the rods before being ejected.
- the increase in the RF drop across the gap improves the coupling between the axial and radial motion of the ions in the vicinity of the gap. Ions gain axial energy at a faster rate and are ejected with greater peak resolution and sensitivity especially at fast scan speeds. The improvements observed vary with scan rate. The higher the scan rate the greater the improvements in extraction efficiency that were observed.
- a DC barrier applied to the short segments ( 102b) was ramped during an MSAE scan.
- the DC applied, during MSAE, on the short T electrodes ( 1 10) was 200 V.
- the trap was tested with a 15 % and 25 % RF voltage drop across the segmented electrodes, using capacitor values of 1 X pf and 8.2 pF. The bigger the drop used the bigger the EXB barrier required to achieve a certain resolution.
- the trap defined by the distance from laser cuts that form a gap between segments 102b and 102a to the edge of the short T electrodes was 2.5 cm long.
- the trap showed an increase in resolution relative to the regular QTrap 4500 available from AB Sciex, 71 Four Valley Drive Concord, Ontario, L4K 4V8, Canada.
- the full-width half-height (FWHH) was 0.2Da at lOkDa/s and 0.3Da at 20kDa/s.
- FWHH full-width half-height
- FIGs. 8a and 8b The data from that experiment, using a 25% RF drop between segments 102a and 102b, is shown in FIGs. 8a and 8b.
- the regular exit lens was held at 15V attractive, relative to the rods, during ejection.
- Fig. 8A shows the mass spectrum observed by an ion detector at the exit lens aperture for a sample having a mass to charge ratio of 622 Da at an injection rate of 20kDa/s.
- the observed peak was at 625 Da with a resolution of 2022.69 and a peak observed intensity of 2.775e8 cps and a FWHH of .309 Da.
- 8B shows the mass spectrum observed by an ion detector at the exit lens aperture for a sample having a mass to charge ratio of 622 Da at an injection rate of lOkDa/s.
- the observed peak was at 623 Da with a resolution of 2998.46 and a peak observed intensity of 1.767e8 cps and a FWHH of .2087Da.
- Quadrupole 100 can be operated as an ion trap using MSAE as follows. Ions enter quadrupole 100 from an ion source, as explained with respect to FIG. 1. Because the axial velocities can be substantial until the ions cool, DC voltages can be utilized to create a DC well and barrier within trap 100. Collisions with gas from the collision cell can cool the ions in a fraction of a second, allowing the ion trap to fill, cool, and prepare the ions for mass scanning. With respect to FIG 5, ions enter from the right, passing T electrodes 110 and painted stripes 1 12. T electrodes and stripes can receive a large positive DC voltage, which pushes positive ions into the trap portion of rods 102 and 104.
- stripes 112 receive a 1500V positive DC potential, while T electrodes received 200V of positive DC potential.
- Exit lens 105 not shown in FIG. 5, which would be on the left side, receives a grounded DC potential.
- rods 104 receive a DC potential of- 160V, while the long portion 102a of rods 102 receives the same -160V DC potential.
- Stubby segments 102b located near the exit lens, receive a slightly higher potential of -150 V.
- an RF voltage of 800V at a frequency ⁇ is applied to rods 104 and rod segments 102a.
- a discrete capacitor 102c electrically couples each segment 102a and 102b.
- an exemplary RF voltage of 680V can be applied to segment 102b, which is necessarily at the same frequency.
- the RF signal applied to rods 104 and the RF signal applied to rods 102 is out of phase by 180°, which results in a radially confining field and introduces oscillatory and secular motion to the trapped ions.
- an auxiliary AC signal can be applied to continuous rods 104.
- the auxiliary AC voltage is applied at 1.5V, which is substantially less than the main RF voltage of 800V.
- the auxiliary RF voltage is applied at a different frequency ⁇ than the main RF signal at frequency ⁇ .
- the auxiliary RF voltage while small, can be used to mass selectively excite ions trapped in the axial well.
- a negative DC voltage such as - 175 V, can be applied to the exit lens, which provides an axial gradient to eject ions that overcome the DC well of stubby segments 102b, facilitating ejection.
- the frequency of the auxiliary RF voltage applied to continuous rods 104 can be varied to mass dependently resonate certain ions.
- the auxiliary frequency ⁇ and the main RF frequency ⁇ can be chosen to have a predetermined fixed relationship that defines the stability of ions in the trap.
- ion ejection can be carried out at a frequency of excitation, ⁇ , of 2 ⁇ x 383 kHz corresponding to excitation at a Mathieu stability parameter of q 0.846 as the drive (trapping field) frequency, ⁇ , is 2 ⁇ x 940 kHz.
- mass-dependent instability can be introduced by ramping up the RF voltage of the main RF signal and the auxiliary RF signal.
- This instability can readily result in axial ejection to overcome the DC barrier provided by the DC potential applied to the stubby rod segments 102b.
- an MSAE scan can be accomplished by ramping up the RF voltage applied to rods 104 and rod segments 102a (and capacitively segments 102b).
- ions are injected and trapped in the linear ion trap.
- a DC well is created by applying large positive voltage to T electrodes (e.g. 200V ) and/or stripes (e.g. 1500 V) on the injection/upstream side of the linear ion trap, a substantial negative voltage (e.g. -160 V) is applied to rods 104 and rod segments 102a to create a negative DC well, a slightly less negative DC voltage (e.g. -150 V)is applied to stubby segments 102b, and a more positive DC voltage to an exit lens (e.g. -70 V) to ensure positive ions are attracted toward the negative DC well created by the main rod segments.
- T electrodes e.g. 200V
- stripes e.g. 1500 V
- the RF frequency ⁇ is 940kHz.
- Ions are injected into the trap towards the exit lens end of the rods, such that they pass the T electrodes and become trapped in the DC well between the stubby segments and the T electrodes in the axial direction. This is accomplished while applying a large RF voltage to rods 104 and rod segments 102a (e.g. 800V RF, as shown in FIG. 5), which capacitively applies a smaller RF voltage to rod segments 102b.
- a large RF voltage to rods 104 and rod segments 102a e.g. 800V RF, as shown in FIG. 5
- ions are axially ejected in a mass-dependent manner.
- a dipolar auxiliary AC voltage is applied to the set of continuous rods 104. This increases the axial kinetic energy of the excited ions, and helps them overcome the DC well barrier.
- this auxiliary RF signal is l.SV at to of 383kHz.
- the exit lens can be made more attractive, for example at -17SVDC during this injection phase.
- the RF voltages of ⁇ and ⁇ can be ramped over time.
- the ions detected when the RF field is at a given voltage correspond to a predetermined m/z.
- FIGs. 9A-9C illustrate exemplary arrangements of the various components of a mass spectrometer that incorporates a linear ion trap in accordance with embodiments discussed.
- a conventional quadrupole QO focuses ions, which pass through an aperture and stubby quadrupole rods, which act as a Brubaker lens.
- Another quadrupole MS provides mass resolution to select ions of a certain mass consistent with a precursor ion.
- a collision cell allows ions to thermally interact with a carrier gas. Ions are then trapped in the linear ion trap, such as ion trap 100, where they can be mass-dependently scanned and observed at a detector via the exit lens.
- FIG. 9B is similar to 9A, but the linear ion trap is placed before the collision cell and the quadnipole MS can be used to mass-selectively scan ions for detection.
- FIG. 9C shows a system that foregoes the collision cell and the quadrupole MS, using a single linear ion trap to perform mass-dependent scans.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Electron Tubes For Measurement (AREA)
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201562235818P | 2015-10-01 | 2015-10-01 | |
| PCT/IB2016/055704 WO2017055978A1 (en) | 2015-10-01 | 2016-09-23 | Mass-selective axial ejection linear ion trap |
Publications (3)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3357080A1 true EP3357080A1 (en) | 2018-08-08 |
| EP3357080A4 EP3357080A4 (en) | 2019-06-12 |
| EP3357080B1 EP3357080B1 (en) | 2024-05-01 |
Family
ID=58422783
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP16850477.7A Active EP3357080B1 (en) | 2015-10-01 | 2016-09-23 | Mass-selective axial ejection linear ion trap |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US10381213B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP3357080B1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2017055978A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US11798797B2 (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2023-10-24 | Dh Technologies Development Pte Ltd | Effective potential matching at boundaries of segmented quadrupoles in a mass spectrometer |
| GB201907171D0 (en) | 2019-05-21 | 2019-07-03 | Thermo Fisher Scient Bremen Gmbh | Switchable ion guide |
| JP7521700B2 (en) * | 2021-05-31 | 2024-07-24 | 株式会社島津製作所 | Quadrupole mass spectrometer |
| US20250226199A1 (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2025-07-10 | Kimia Analytics Inc. | Method and apparatus to increase sensitivity of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
Family Cites Families (19)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3371204A (en) * | 1966-09-07 | 1968-02-27 | Bell & Howell Co | Mass filter with one or more rod electrodes separated into a plurality of insulated segments |
| US6177668B1 (en) | 1996-06-06 | 2001-01-23 | Mds Inc. | Axial ejection in a multipole mass spectrometer |
| US7060972B2 (en) | 2000-07-21 | 2006-06-13 | Mds Inc. | Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with capability to perform multiple mass analysis steps |
| US20050242281A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Gangqiang Li | Unevenly segmented multipole |
| JP4684287B2 (en) * | 2004-05-05 | 2011-05-18 | エムディーエス インコーポレイテッド ドゥーイング ビジネス アズ エムディーエス サイエックス | Method and apparatus for mass selective axial ejection |
| GB0425426D0 (en) | 2004-11-18 | 2004-12-22 | Micromass Ltd | Mass spectrometer |
| US7557343B2 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2009-07-07 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Segmented rod multipole as ion processing cell |
| EP1955359B1 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2015-04-01 | DH Technologies Development Pte. Ltd. | Method and apparatus for mass selective axial transport using pulsed axial field |
| KR100786621B1 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2007-12-21 | 한국표준과학연구원 | Quartz-plated hyperbolic quadrupole mass spectrometer |
| US20120256082A1 (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2012-10-11 | Hiroshima University | Phase shift rf ion trap device |
| GB0800526D0 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2008-02-20 | Micromass Ltd | Mass spectrometer |
| US9236235B2 (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2016-01-12 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Curved ion guide and related methods |
| US8822916B2 (en) * | 2008-06-09 | 2014-09-02 | Dh Technologies Development Pte. Ltd. | Method of operating tandem ion traps |
| JP5709742B2 (en) * | 2008-06-09 | 2015-04-30 | ディーエイチ テクノロジーズ デベロップメント プライベート リミテッド | Multipolar ion induction providing an axial electric field that increases in intensity with radial position |
| JP5686566B2 (en) * | 2010-10-08 | 2015-03-18 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Mass spectrometer |
| GB201116026D0 (en) * | 2011-09-16 | 2011-10-26 | Micromass Ltd | Performance improvements for rf-only quadrupole mass filters and linear quadrupole ion traps with axial ejection |
| EP2798663A4 (en) * | 2011-12-27 | 2015-09-02 | Dh Technologies Dev Pte Ltd | Method of extracting ions with a low m/z ratio from an ion trap |
| US9117646B2 (en) * | 2013-10-04 | 2015-08-25 | Thermo Finnigan Llc | Method and apparatus for a combined linear ion trap and quadrupole mass filter |
| GB201509243D0 (en) * | 2015-05-29 | 2015-07-15 | Micromass Ltd | Mass filter having extended operational lifetime |
-
2016
- 2016-09-23 WO PCT/IB2016/055704 patent/WO2017055978A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2016-09-23 US US15/763,878 patent/US10381213B2/en active Active
- 2016-09-23 EP EP16850477.7A patent/EP3357080B1/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP3357080A4 (en) | 2019-06-12 |
| WO2017055978A1 (en) | 2017-04-06 |
| US20180286659A1 (en) | 2018-10-04 |
| US10381213B2 (en) | 2019-08-13 |
| EP3357080B1 (en) | 2024-05-01 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3818671B2 (en) | Axial injection method of multipole mass spectrometer | |
| EP2113129B1 (en) | Mass spectrometer | |
| US8227748B2 (en) | Confining positive and negative ions in a linear RF ion trap | |
| US7858926B1 (en) | Mass spectrometry with segmented RF multiple ion guides in various pressure regions | |
| CN103460035B (en) | High Duty Cycling Ion Storage/Ion Mobility Separation Mass Spectrometers | |
| US7323683B2 (en) | Linear ion trap for mass spectrometry | |
| US7960692B2 (en) | Ion focusing and detection in a miniature linear ion trap for mass spectrometry | |
| US6177668B1 (en) | Axial ejection in a multipole mass spectrometer | |
| JP4918846B2 (en) | Mass spectrometer and mass spectrometry method | |
| US20130009051A1 (en) | Abridged ion trap - time of flight mass spectrometer | |
| CN103282998B (en) | Method and system for providing a substantially quadrupole field with significant hexapole and octopole components | |
| US20030222210A1 (en) | Axial ejection resolution in multipole mass spectrometers | |
| JP2007507064A (en) | Method and apparatus for providing a two-dimensional substantially quadrupole electric field having selected hexapole components | |
| US12476098B2 (en) | Ion transport between ion optical devices at different gas pressures | |
| EP3357080B1 (en) | Mass-selective axial ejection linear ion trap | |
| US9870911B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for processing ions | |
| JP4654087B2 (en) | Mass spectrometer and mass spectrometry method | |
| US7381947B2 (en) | Electrode networks for parallel ion traps | |
| EP2421023A1 (en) | Mass spectrometry with segmented rf multiple ion guides in various pressure regions | |
| US11031232B1 (en) | Injection of ions into an ion storage device | |
| US7180057B1 (en) | Two-dimensional quadrupole ion trap | |
| US11651948B2 (en) | Systems and methods of operation of linear ion traps in dual balanced AC/unbalanced RF mode for 2D mass spectrometry | |
| Berkout et al. | Improving the quality of the ion beam exiting a quadrupole ion guide |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20180430 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20190510 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H01J 49/42 20060101AFI20190506BHEP |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20230109 |
|
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230601 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20231120 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602016087323 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240901 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240802 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240902 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1683586 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240902 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240801 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240901 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240802 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240801 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602016087323 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20250204 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240923 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20240930 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240930 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240930 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240923 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250926 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20250923 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20250925 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20160923 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20160923 |