EP3313761A1 - Dispositif de sécurité destiné à un niveleur de quai, niveleur de quai muni de ce dispositif de sécurité, procédé de fonctionnement d'un niveleur de quai et procédé de test du dispositif de sécurité - Google Patents

Dispositif de sécurité destiné à un niveleur de quai, niveleur de quai muni de ce dispositif de sécurité, procédé de fonctionnement d'un niveleur de quai et procédé de test du dispositif de sécurité

Info

Publication number
EP3313761A1
EP3313761A1 EP16745547.6A EP16745547A EP3313761A1 EP 3313761 A1 EP3313761 A1 EP 3313761A1 EP 16745547 A EP16745547 A EP 16745547A EP 3313761 A1 EP3313761 A1 EP 3313761A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
deck
movement
safety device
electronic sensor
velocity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16745547.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3313761C0 (fr
EP3313761B1 (fr
Inventor
Peter VAN DE WIEL
Rob KIKKERT
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Assa Abloy Entrance Systems AB
Original Assignee
Assa Abloy Entrance Systems AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Assa Abloy Entrance Systems AB filed Critical Assa Abloy Entrance Systems AB
Publication of EP3313761A1 publication Critical patent/EP3313761A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3313761C0 publication Critical patent/EP3313761C0/fr
Publication of EP3313761B1 publication Critical patent/EP3313761B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65G—TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS
    • B65G69/00—Auxiliary measures taken, or devices used, in connection with loading or unloading
    • B65G69/28—Loading ramps; Loading docks
    • B65G69/287—Constructional features of deck or surround
    • B65G69/2876—Safety or protection means, e.g. skirts
    • B65G69/2882—Safety or protection means, e.g. skirts operated by detectors or sensors
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65G—TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS
    • B65G69/00—Auxiliary measures taken, or devices used, in connection with loading or unloading
    • B65G69/28—Loading ramps; Loading docks
    • B65G69/2805—Loading ramps; Loading docks permanently installed on the dock
    • B65G69/2811—Loading ramps; Loading docks permanently installed on the dock pivoting ramps
    • B65G69/2817—Loading ramps; Loading docks permanently installed on the dock pivoting ramps with fluid-operated means

Definitions

  • Safety device for use in a dock leveller, dock leveller having such a safety device, method of operating a dock leveller and method of testing the safety device
  • the invention relates to a safety device for use in a dock leveller having a deck pivotally connected to a ramp, at least one electronically controlled valve for stopping a movement of the deck in response to a control signal, and at least one electronic sensor. Furthermore, the invention is related to a dock leveller having such a safety device and to a method of operating a dock leveller having a pivotable deck, comprising the steps of moving the deck over a preset range with an actuation arrangement, stopping the movement of the deck by at least one electronically controlled valve in response to a control signal. In addition to this the invention is directed to a method of testing an automatic fall-prevention of a safety device and/or dock leveller.
  • Dock levellers are commonly used at a ramp and/or loading dock to bridge a gap between a parked vehicle and the ramp and/or loading dock.
  • a vehicle parks near the ramp, but with some open space between the vehicle's cargo bed and the ramp.
  • the dock leveller is able to engage the bed of the vehicle to provide a continuous driving surface to the ramp and thereby facilitate loading and/or unloading.
  • a forklift may drive on the deck of the dock leveller for unloading and/or loading the vehicle.
  • the deck is able to ride and/or float with the bed of the vehicle during engagement and/or a normal operation mode as the bed of the vehicle floats.
  • the bed may float because different downward forces are exerted on the bed and a suspension system of the vehicle.
  • the deck may fall hitting a ground and/or a pit of the dock leveller, potentially causing injury to any personnel on the deck and/or damaging equipment and/or cargo.
  • the safety device can have a hydraulic hose break valve, which is installed in a hydraulic actuation arrangement for the dock leveller.
  • the hose break valve may be installed in hydraulic cylinders for moving the deck.
  • the deck is free floating.
  • the adjusting and/or type selection of the hose break valve is related to the geometry, dimension and/or mass of the dock leveller.
  • a safety device, dock leveller and/or methods according to the preceding introduction are known from document EP 1 71 1 422 B1 .
  • an electronic sensor is used as a position sensor for detecting the position of a vehicle in front of the dock leveller.
  • a signal is send to an electronically controlled valve, like a solenoid valve, for preventing a free-fall of the deck of the dock leveller.
  • a drawback of this solution is that the electronic sensor is used to detect the position of the vehicle. As the dimensions and designs of vehicles varies and the parking distance of the vehicle in regard to the ramp may vary also the free-fall protection may not be as reliable as desirable.
  • the functionality of the safety device to prevent a fall and/or free-fall of the deck should be tested from time to time. Preferably a testing should be performed on an annual base. The testing may be performed according to EN1398 Dock- Levellers-Safety-Requirements. A test load of 25 % or up to 35 % of the maximum and/or rated load is positioned on the dock leveller, preferably in the middle of the deck. Thus, in case of a 6 tons dock leveller the test load may be 1 .500 kg.
  • the dock leveller and/or the deck is aligned in a substantially horizontal position.
  • the dock leveller and/or the deck rest on a supporting element.
  • the temperature of the environment is 20°C ⁇ 10°C.
  • the support element is removed and the fall of the deck shall be stopped and/or a velocity of the falling movement shall be reduced by the safety device.
  • the maximum falling distance shall not be greater than 6 % of the length of the dock leveller and/or the deck.
  • the falling distance is measured from an axis of a deck joint for pivoting the deck to a front edge of the deck.
  • the velocity of the deck movement shall not be more than 0,05 m/s.
  • the object of the invention is accomplished by a safety device and/or a dock leveller as mentioned in the preceding introduction, wherein the electronic sensor is constructed and/or arranged for detecting a fall-movement of the deck. Furthermore, the object of the invention is accomplished by a method according to the preceding introduction, wherein a fall-movement of the deck is detected by monitoring a velocity and/or an acceleration of the deck with an electronic sensor and/or wherein the functionality of the electronic sensor, of the electronically controlled valve, of a control unit and/or of a warning system is tested.
  • the position and/or movement of the deck is directly monitored and/or controlled by the electronic sensor.
  • the detection of a fall condition and/or a free-fall condition depends not on the determination of the position of a vehicle in front of the dock leveller.
  • the direct monitoring of the deck leads to a more reliable detection of a falling movement and/or a free-fall movement of the deck.
  • the solution makes it possible to realise a method for testing the safety device in an effective, reliable and feasible way.
  • the safety device is an automatic safety device for automatic prevention of a fall and/or of a free-fall of the deck.
  • the deck can be hinged to the ramp.
  • the ramp can be a loading dock.
  • the ramp and/or loading dock has a substantially even floor and/or is part of a building and/or warehouse. It is a further advantage that the functionality of the safety device according to the invention is not dependent on the temperature as the electronic sensor and an electronically controlled valve are used. A fail safe is realisable as in case of an electric cable breakage and/or in case of losing electrical power the electronically controlled valve can automatically close, which will block any movement of the dock leveller.
  • electronic sensor is a position sensor and/or the electronic sensor is designed and/or arranged for monitoring a movement, velocity and/or an acceleration of the deck.
  • the electronic sensor may be an ultrasonic sensor, an infrared sensor, a laser, a laser photo-eye system, an encoder and/or a pulse counter.
  • the electronic sensor may be coupled to a control unit.
  • a sensing element of the electronic sensor can be directed towards the deck.
  • the electronic sensor itself may be stationary.
  • the electronic sensor is arranged at the deck for moving together with the deck.
  • a sensing element of the electronic sensor may be directed in this case towards a stationary element.
  • the stationary element may be a ground, a pit and/or a frame of the dock leveller or ramp.
  • the electronic sensor is equipped to monitor a change in position of the deck over time.
  • the electronic sensor can be designed and/or arranged for detecting a free- fall movement of the deck.
  • the data and/or measurements can be stored, especially preferred in a data storage of a control unit.
  • the collected date can be used to determine the movement, velocity and/or acceleration of the deck.
  • the electronic sensor may be arranged for detecting a fall-movement and/or a free-fall movement of the deck when a velocity of the deck exceeds a preset threshold.
  • the electronic sensor and/or a control unit provides a sensor signal and/or a control signal for stopping the movement of the deck when detecting a deck movement with a velocity exceeding a preset threshold.
  • an encoder, a pulse counter and/or a time measurement is arranged for providing the sensor signal and/or control signal for stopping the movement of the deck when the velocity of the deck exceeds the preset threshold for a preset time period.
  • This kind of a delay of the stopping of the movement prevents an unwanted stopping, preferably in case of a short time bouncing deck.
  • a short time bouncing of the deck can occur for example during loading and/or unloading and/or if a movement of the deck is suddenly stopped or reversed by an operator.
  • the falling of the deck is always stopped and/or the falling distance is within 6 % of the length of the deck.
  • the deck may comprise a pivotable mounted lip and the length of the deck may include the length of the lip, preferably from a front edge of the deck having a lip joint to a free edge of the lip.
  • the threshold for the velocity of the deck can be set within a range of 0,05 m/s to 0,20 m/s. Preferably the threshold is set at 0,05 m/s. In this case the requirement of EN1398 can be fulfilled saying that the velocity of the deck has to be reduced to not more than 0,05 m/s. More preferably the threshold is set at 0,12 m/s or at 0,14 m/s. In this case the requirements of EN1398 can be fulfilled by stopping the movement of the deck within 6 % of the length of the deck.
  • m/s is an abbreviation for meters per second.
  • the preset threshold for the velocity of the deck may be higher than a normal lowering speed of the deck.
  • the preset time period may be less than 1 second.
  • the movement of the deck may be stopped when a maximum velocity of the deck, preferably at a front edge of the deck, exceeds the threshold. Thus, the deck cannot be moved with a velocity over the threshold.
  • the preset threshold of the velocity of the deck and/or the preset time period may be measured by counting pulses of an encoder.
  • the control signal may be provided in case that a preset amount of pulses have been counted within a preset time period.
  • the preset period of time is defined by a bouncing distance of the deck divided by a respective bouncing velocity of the deck.
  • a bouncing of the deck may occur during normal loading and/or uploading operation.
  • the deck may move up and downwards. These up and downwards movements lead to a typical bouncing effect of the deck.
  • the downwards movement of the deck during this bouncing can exceed the preset threshold for the velocity of the deck.
  • the exceeding of the threshold is limited in time.
  • a blocking of the deck during typical bouncing of the deck is avoided.
  • a velocity exceeding the preset threshold may be ignored during the preset time period.
  • the preset period of time can be used to discriminate a typical bouncing of the deck from a fall-movement of the deck.
  • a blocking of the deck can be activated only when the deck is moving with a higher velocity than the threshold for a longer period of time than it can be caused by a typical bouncing effect.
  • the preset period of time can be calculated by dividing the bouncing distance of the deck by the corresponding bouncing velocity of the deck.
  • the bouncing velocity may exceed the preset threshold of the velocity of the deck and/or may be determined by the electronic sensor and/or a control unit.
  • the bouncing distance may be defined as the difference of the height of the front edge of the deck or lip between an uppermost position of the deck and a lowermost position of the deck during a bouncing situation or a loading and/or uploading situation.
  • the bouncing distance is a mean bouncing distance or a maximum bouncing distance.
  • the bouncing distance and/or the bouncing velocity may depend on the dimension and/or length of the deck.
  • the threshold, the preset period of time, the bouncing distance and/or the bouncing velocity may be precalculated.
  • the preset time period may be less than 1 second.
  • the preset time period can be set within a range of above 0 second to 0,9 second.
  • the preset time period is less than 0,5 second or less than 0,1 second.
  • the electronically controlled valve can be electronically opened and/or closed.
  • the electronically controlled valve can be in an open state in case of a normal operation mode of the dock leveller. In case of a fall detection and/or a free-fall detection the electronically controlled valve is in a closed state.
  • an actuation arrangement for moving the deck over a preset range is provided.
  • the electronically controlled valve can be coupled to the actuation arrangement for controlling the movement of the deck and/or a cylinder.
  • the cylinder is directly or indirectly coupled to the deck for moving the deck.
  • the movement of the cylinder can be stopped and/or blocked by the electronically controlled valve, especially preferred when the electronically controlled valve is closed.
  • the electronically controlled valve can be a magnetic valve and/or solenoid valve, preferably a normal closed magnetic valve.
  • a normal closed magnetic valve is closed in a deactivated mode and is open in an, preferably electrically, activated mode.
  • the safety device may replace an ordinary, preferably magnetic, valve.
  • an actuation arrangement for moving the deck comprises a fluid system and/or a hydraulic system.
  • the actuation arrangement is equipped and/or designed for driving the dock leveller and/or the deck.
  • the actuation arrangement comprises at least one fluid driven and/or hydraulically driven cylinder for the movement and/or rotation of the deck.
  • the safety device and/or the dock leveller can have one or more electronically controlled valves. When more than one electronically controlled valve is present, these several valves may be controlled and/or driven simultaneously for being closed and/or opened at the same time.
  • a first electronically controlled valve is assigned to a first fluid access for moving a piston in a first direction within the cylinder and a second electronically controlled valve is assigned to a second fluid access for moving the piston in a second direction within the cylinder.
  • a control unit can be coupled with the at least one electronic sensor and the at least one electronically controlled valve.
  • the control unit can have a microprocessor for controlling the operation of the dock leveller.
  • the control unit is designed and/or arranged for analysing the sensor signal and/or control signal of the at least one electronic sensor.
  • the control unit can receive one or several sensor signals and/or control signals of the electronic sensor, process the received data and/or control the at least one electronically controlled valve.
  • the control unit is designed and/or arranged for sending a control signal to the electronically controlled valve.
  • the control unit can send an actuation signal to the electronically controlled valve for opening the valve and/or a deactivation signal to the electronically controlled valve for closing the valve.
  • a testing unit is present for testing an automatic fall prevention and/or an automatic free-fall prevention.
  • the testing unit serves and/or is arranged for testing the functionality of the components of the safety device.
  • the testing unit serves and/or is equipped for testing the functionality of the at least one electronic sensor, of the at least one electronically controlled valve, of a control unit and/or of a warning system.
  • the testing can be performed electronically.
  • the testing unit can be connected with the electronic sensor, the electronically controlled valve, the control unit and/or the warning system. The connection can be established by a, preferably electric, line.
  • the testing unit is designed as a separate service tool which is connectable with a control unit.
  • the testing unit may be connected with the control unit just in case that a testing procedure shall be performed. After a successful testing of the safety device and/or of components of the safety device the testing unit can be disconnected.
  • the testing unit is an integrated part of the dock leveller and/or the control unit. In this embodiment the testing procedure may be performed continuously and/or at regular, preferably preset, time intervals.
  • the safety device can comprise a, preferably electronic, warning system for providing a sound alarm, an audio alarm, a visual alarm and/or a light signal.
  • the warning system can be activated in case of a detected falling movement and/or a free-fall movement of the deck and/or in case of a deactivated, preferably closed, electronically controlled valve.
  • the warning system can be activated in case of a movement of the deck with a velocity higher than a preset threshold, preferably when the velocity of the deck exceeds the preset threshold for a preset time period.
  • the warning system can be activated in case of a deactivated or closed electronically controlled valve.
  • the threshold is set at 0,05 m/s or at 0, 12 m/s or at 0, 14 m/s.
  • a dock leveller having a pivotable deck for docking the deck to a bed of a vehicle, and having a safety device according to the present invention.
  • the safety device can be refitted to a dock leveller.
  • an existing dock leveller can be retrofitted with the safety device.
  • the dock leveller is hydraulically operated.
  • the method of operating a dock leveller having a pivotable deck comprises the steps of moving the deck over a preset range with an actuation arrangement, stopping the movement of the deck by at least one electronically controlled valve in response to a sensor signal and/or a control signal of an electronic sensor and/or of a control unit.
  • the deck is movable by the actuation arrangement from a normal or stored position, also known as a dock level position, in which the deck is even with the ramp and/or loading dock of a building or warehouse, to several operating positions above and/or below the normal or stored position.
  • the range of operating positions is useful to engage vehicles of different bed heights and to maintain engagement with the bed as its height fluctuates with the reaction of the suspension of the vehicle during loading and/or unloading.
  • the method further comprises detecting a falling movement and/or a free-fall movement of the deck by monitoring a velocity and/or an acceleration of the deck with the electronic sensor.
  • the electronic sensor and/or a control unit sends a sensor signal and/or a control signal for stopping and/or blocking the movement of the deck when the electronic sensor and/or the control unit detects a deck movement with a velocity exceeding a preset threshold.
  • a time period of the velocity exceeding the preset threshold is measured and/or the control signal for stopping the movement of the deck is provided when the velocity of the deck exceeds the preset threshold for a preset time period.
  • the threshold is set at 0,05 m/s or at 0,12 m/s or at 0,14 m/s or the preset threshold for the velocity of the deck is higher than a normal lowering speed of the deck.
  • the electronic sensor monitors a change in position of the deck over time.
  • the electronic sensor may, preferably continuously, execute a self-test. In case of an error and/or a malfunction of the electronic sensor the safety device and/or the dock leveller can be deactivated and/or an error message can be displayed on a control unit.
  • the method of testing an automatic fall prevention and/or an automatic free-fall prevention for a dock leveller, preferably according to the present invention, having a safety device according to the present invention by a testing unit comprises the steps of testing the functionality of the electronic sensor, of the electronically controlled valve, of a control unit and/or of a warning system.
  • the testing of the functionality is performed only electronically.
  • the method of operation and the method of testing method are combined in one method or procedure.
  • the deck bridges a gap between the bed of the vehicle to the ramp.
  • the deck may float up and down to accord with variations in height of the bed during use of the dock leveller and when an end of the deck and/or the lip is arranged on the bed of a vehicle.
  • the velocity of the deck may be measured.
  • the safety device measures the velocity in relation to the ground on which the wheels of the vehicle stands on. The velocity can be determined by use of the measurements of the electronic sensor.
  • a limit or threshold for the velocity of deck has been set.
  • This preset threshold for the velocity of deck may be set to 0,05 ms or to 0,12 m/s or to 0,14 m/s.
  • a programmable logic controller can be used for setting this threshold.
  • the measured velocity of the dock leveller can be continuously compared, preferably by the control unit, with the set threshold. In more detail it can be controlled if the measured velocity is greater than the set threshold. If this is the case the movement of the deck is automatically blocked.
  • a control signal is send from the control unit to the at least one electronic valve for closing this valve. By closing valve a fluid flow of the actuation arrangement is blocked. As no fluid can flow into or out of the cylinder a movement of the deck is stopped. Thus, a fall and/or free-fall of the deck and/or the lip on the ground by a pivoting movement around the deck joint is prevented.
  • an alarm is, preferably automatically, set on.
  • the alarm may be a visual alarm and/or a sound alarm.
  • the dock leveller can be checked.
  • the dock leveller is checked by a qualified service field engineer.
  • the check may comprise inspections of all relevant parts of the dock leveller. For example the cylinder, the piston, the valve, the control unit and/or the electronic sensor, etc. may be checked.
  • the dock leveller comprises any damage. If a damage of the dock leveller is recognized the dock leveller has to be repaired.
  • the repair is done by a qualified service field engineer.
  • a reset software may be used for setting the dock leveller and/or the safety device to normal operation after a movement of the deck has been blocked.
  • the reset software may be no integrated part of the dock leveller and/or the safety device.
  • the reset software may be installed on a testing unit, device and/or service tool separate to the dock leveller and/or safety device.
  • the reset software is realized as an APP (Application software) for use on a mobile device.
  • the mobile device can be a tablet, a laptop, a notebook and/or any kind of a suitable mobile computer device.
  • the dock leveller and/or the safety device can be set to normal operation only by the use of the reset software.
  • the alarm is, preferably automatically, set off.
  • a testing method and/or a test procedure may be performed as mentioned above for testing an automatic fall prevention and/or an automatic free-fall prevention for a dock leveller.
  • a test software is used for performing the testing method and/or the test procedure.
  • the test software may be no integrated part of the dock leveller and/or the safety device.
  • the test software may be installed on a testing unit, device and/or service tool separate to the dock leveller and/or safety device.
  • the test software is realized as an APP (Application software) for use on a mobile device.
  • the test software may be a part of reset software.
  • the test software may be realized as a separate APP for use on a mobile device.
  • the test procedure is performed by a qualified service field engineer.
  • the function of the at least one electronic sensor and/or the function of the at least one electronically controlled valve may be tested.
  • the testing is initiated by a single action of an operator or a qualified service field engineer.
  • the dock leveller is operated like in normal operation by using the usual controls.
  • the test procedure may then be initiated, preferably by a single action.
  • the single action may be realized by pressing a button.
  • the button is arranged on a service tool having the test software and/or the reset software.
  • the button can be a real button or a virtual button.
  • the test procedure or testing method can simulate an increase of the velocity or the sinking speed of the deck.
  • a velocity of deck is simulated by the software that exceeds the set threshold.
  • the at least one electronic sensor has to cut off the power to the at least one electronically controlled valve.
  • the data measured by the electronic sensor is send to a control unit.
  • the control unit can determine by the measured data if the velocity of the deck exceeds the threshold. In case that the determined velocity exceeds the threshold the control unit can cut off the power to the valve.
  • the control unit sends a control signal to the valve that causes the electric cut-off of the valve.
  • causes the electric cut-off of the valve causes in its closed position which blocks the movement of the dock leveller and/or the deck.
  • a normal closed valve or a normal closed magnetic valve is used.
  • the sinking of the deck has to stop within a defined range and/or distance.
  • This range and/or distance may be dependent on the length of the deck and/or the dock leveller.
  • the range and/or distance can be defined by demanding that the deck has to stop within 6 % of the length of the deck and/or of the dock leveller.
  • the dropping height of the deck is limited to less or not more than 6 % of the length of the deck and/or dock leveller.
  • the movement of deck is stopped or blocked within a dropping height of the deck and/or the lip of less than 0,2 m or.0,12 m
  • the range, dropping height and/or distance may be set to 0,12 m.
  • the deck has to be stopped within a dropping range of 0,12 m.
  • the length of deck and/or of dock leveller is defined as the distance between a front edge of deck or lip and a ramp or deck joint for pivotally connecting the deck to the ramp.
  • the range, dropping height and/or distance can be measured at the front edge of the deck or of the lip.
  • the distance is determined as the difference of the height of the front edge of the deck or lip between a first position of the deck and a second position of the deck.
  • the first position may be the position of the deck or lip when the velocity of the deck exceeds the threshold the first time.
  • the second position is the position of the deck or lip when the movement is blocked by the safety device because the velocity of the deck exceeds the threshold. If the deck has been blocked within the set range and/or distance, the test has been passed successfully.
  • the velocity of deck is within an allowable range.
  • the velocity of the deck is not faster than 0,05 m/s or 0, 12 m/s.
  • a check of the safety device may be performed after a blocking by the safety device, after a repair, after a maintenance or as a periodically, preferably annular, appointed service or check.
  • an advantage of the invention is that the solution is not prone to temperature changes. Thus, it is operational in all usual environmental circumstances.
  • the safety device realizes a fail safe function. This means that a movement of the deck and/or the dock leveller is automatically stopped in case of a power failure and/or a wire breakage.
  • the safety device can be installed afterwards. This allows a retrofitting of existing dock levellers.
  • the safety device can be combined with a visual and/or auditory warning system.
  • a certification procedure may be performed before performing the testing method.
  • the certification procedure is performed in accordance with the EN1398 Dock-Levellers-Safety-Requirements.
  • a test load is positioned on the dock leveller in the middle of the deck.
  • the deck or a lip hinged to the deck rests on a supporting element. After removing the supporting element the deck makes a falling movement and/or a free-fall movement.
  • the electronic sensor and/or a control unit identifies the fall condition and/or the free-fall condition as the velocity of the deck exceeds the preset threshold.
  • a signal is provided by the electronic sensor and/or the control unit to close the electronically controlled valve such that the deck stops lowering within 6% of the deck length.
  • the dock leveller, the safety device, the electronic sensor, the electronically controlled valve and/or the control unit is set up in a way that the requirements according to EN1398 are fulfilled.
  • the safety device is certified once by a certification procedure the safety device can be used and/or installed on every dock leveller without the necessity of executing the certification procedure again.
  • the certification procedure is conducted with the highest rated load on the smallest dock leveller.
  • the regular and/or annual testing method for the installed and/or certified safety device can be executed without a test load on the deck.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic side view of a dock leveller having a safety device according to the present invention in a first operation mode, is a schematic side view of the dock leveller with the safety device according to figure 1 in a further operation mode, is a schematic side view of the dock leveller with the safety device according to figure 1 in a testing mode, is a schematic flowchart of an operation method according to the present invention, is a schematic flowchart of a testing method according to the present invention and is a schematic flow chart of a combined operation and testing method according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic side view of a dock leveller 10 having a safety device 1 1 according to the present invention in a first operation mode.
  • the dock leveller 10 is mounted to a ramp 12.
  • the ramp 12 serves as a dock platform for a vehicle 13.
  • the vehicle 13 has a bed 14.
  • the dock leveller 10 facilitates the loading and unloading of the vehicle 13 by providing a bridge-like structure from the ramp 13 to the bed 14 of the vehicle 13.
  • the dock leveller 10 comprises a deck 15.
  • Deck 15 is pivotable mounted to the ramp 12 by a deck joint 16.
  • An end of the deck 15 facing away from the deck joint 16 comprises a lip 17.
  • Lip 17 is pivotable mounted to a front edge 19 of the deck 15 by a lip joint 18.
  • the lip 17 spans a gap between the end of the bed 14 facing towards the ramp 12 and the front edge 10 of deck 15, whereby lip 17 rests upon the bed 14 of vehicle 13.
  • the deck 15 can be moved or swivelled by an actuation arrangement 20.
  • the actuation arrangement 20 By the actuation arrangement 20 the front edge 19 and the lip 17 can be raised and lowered to the approximate height of bed 14.
  • Lip 17 is pivotable between an extended lip position according to figure 1 and a retracted lip position according to figure 3.
  • the actuation arrangement 20 comprises a fluid system to drive the deck 15 and/or lip 17 by a fluid.
  • the actuation arrangement 20 provides a hydraulic drive.
  • the actuation arrangement has a cylinder 21 , which cooperates with a piston 22.
  • An electronically controlled valve 23 is assigned to the actuation arrangement 20.
  • the valve 23 is in connection with the cylinder 21 . Furthermore, the valve 23 is integrated in a fluid line of the actuation arrangement 20. In case that the valve
  • valve 23 is electronically activated the valve 23 is open and the fluid of the actuation arrangement 20 can flow into and out of the cylinder 21 . In case the valve 23 is electronically deactivated the valve 23 is closed to prevent, block or stop any fluid flow.
  • the valve 23 is a magnetic valve. In dependence of the actual design of the actuation arrangement 20 more than one valve 23 may be present for providing automatic fall prevention and/or free-fall prevention for the deck 15.
  • the dock leveller 10 has an electronic sensor 25 for monitoring the movement of the deck 15.
  • the electronic sensor 25 is also in connection with the control unit 24.
  • a fall-movement and/or a free-fall movement of the deck 25 is detectable in case the vehicle 13 moves prematurely or unintentionally away from the ramp 12.
  • the electronic sensor 25 is mounted at the deck 15 adjacent to the front edge 19.
  • the electronic sensor 25 is directed towards a stationary element, which is according to this exemplary embodiment a ground 26 below the deck 15. A distance between the electronic sensor 25 and the ground 26 is measured. In this embodiment the distance between the electronic sensor 25 and the ground 26 is continuously measured by the electronic sensor 25.
  • the data derived by the electronic sensor 25 is send to the control unit 24.
  • the control unit 24 evaluates and analyses the data to determine a movement and velocity of the deck 15.
  • the electronic sensor 25 is an ultrasonic sensor.
  • an alternative embodiment of the electronic sensor 25 is possible.
  • the dock leveller 10 comprises a warning system 27.
  • the warning system is connected with the control unit 24.
  • the warning system 27 is activated by the control unit 24 to provide a fault signal, which may be an acoustic and/or visual signal.
  • the deck 15 of dock leveller 10 is positioned such that a gap between the ramp 12 and the bed 14 of the vehicle 13 is bridged, whereby the lip 17 rests on the bed 14.
  • the lip 17 and deck 15 are able to ride with the vehicle bed 14 as the bed 14 floats, for example, as different downward forces are exerted on the bed 14 and a suspension system of the vehicle 13.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic side view of the dock leveller 10 with the safety device 1 1 according to figure 1 in a further operation mode.
  • the vehicle 13 has prematurely or unintentionally moved away from the ramp 12 and the dock leveller 10.
  • the support for the lip 17 and the deck 15 is removed and a fall condition and/or a free-fall condition is created.
  • the deck 15 falls towards the ground 26.
  • the deck 15 pivots around the axis of the deck joint 16 so that the deck 15 and lip 17 leaves the initial position, which is indicated by the dashed line 28.
  • the distance between the electronic sensor 25 and the stationary element, here the ground 26, is reduced.
  • the control unit 24 recognizes a fall-movement and/or free-fall movement of the deck 15.
  • the control unit 24 recognizes that the velocity of the deck exceeds a preset threshold for a preset time period.
  • the valve 23 is deactivated and closed by the control unit 24, which leads to a blocking of the actuation arrangement 20 and/or the cylinder 21 . Accordingly the fall-movement and/or free-fall movement of the deck 15 is stopped.
  • the warning system 27 is activated by the control unit 24.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of the dock leveller 10 with the safety device 1 1 according to figure 1 in a testing mode.
  • the testing mode no vehicle 13 is positioned in front of the dock leveller 10 and the deck 15 of the dock leveller 10 does not rest on a bed 14 or any other supporting element.
  • the lip 17 is in a retracted lip position. In the retracted lip position the lip 17 is pivoted around the lip joint 18 such that according to this embodiment the lip 17 is aligned in an substantially right angle to the plane of the deck 15, whereby a free end of the lip 17 is facing towards the ground 26.
  • a plane of deck 15 is according to this embodiment aligned in a substantially horizontal position.
  • a testing unit 29 is provided in the testing mode.
  • the testing unit 29 is connected with the control unit 24.
  • the testing unit 24 is a separate service tool which is connected with the control unit 24 by a line 30.
  • the testing unit 29 may be connected to the control unit by a wireless connection.
  • the separate testing unit 29 is coupled with the control unit 24 only for performing a test.
  • the testing unit 29 may be a permanent part of the dock leveller 10 and/or the control unit 24.
  • the testing unit 29 may be an integrated part of the control unit 24.
  • the testing unit 29 may be realized by a software. In this case the software solution of the testing unit 29 may run on any appropriate platform and/or service tool.
  • Fig. 4 is a schematic flowchart of an operation method according to the present invention. After starting the operation method according to step S10 a movement of the deck 15 of the dock leveller 10 according, for example, to figures 1 to 3 is monitored.
  • the electronic sensor 25 For monitoring a movement of deck 15 the electronic sensor 25 is used, which continuously measures or determines the distance of the electronic sensor 25 and/or the deck 15 to a stationary element, which is in this exemplary embodiment the ground 26. Because of the continuous measurements by the electronic sensor 25 and a continuous analysis of the data by the control unit 24 a change in the position of the electronic sensor 25 and/or deck 15 over time is determinable.
  • a velocity of a movement of deck 15 is determined and/or calculated.
  • An actual value of the velocity is compared to a preset threshold.
  • the threshold is set at 0, 12 m/s.
  • the dock leveller 10 is in a normal operation mode. Even if the threshold is exceeded by the velocity of the dock leveller 10, the dock leveller 10 remains in its normal operation mode as far as the velocity exceeds the preset threshold not longer than a preset time period.
  • step S12 In case a velocity of the deck 15 is detected according to step S12 which is over or exceeds the preset threshold for at least a preset time period, the electronically controlled valve 23 is closed according to step S13. For doing so the control unit 24 sends a deactivation signal to the electronically controlled valve 23. The valve 23 is deenergized by the deactivation signal. By closing the valve 23 a fluid flow of the actuation arrangement 20 is blocked. As no fluid can flow into or out of the cylinder 21 a movement of the deck 15 is stopped according to step S14. Thus, a fall and/or free-fall of the deck 15 and/or the lip 17 on the ground 26 by a pivoting movement around the deck joint 16 is prevented.
  • the operation mode for automatic fall prevention and/or free-fall prevention ends according to step S15.
  • control unit 24 activates the warning system 27 when the control unit 24 recognizes a velocity of the deck 15 above the threshold, preferably for a preset time period.
  • the warning system 27 releases an acoustic and visual signal for attracting attention of personnel.
  • Fig. 5 is a schematic flowchart of a testing method according to the present invention.
  • the testing method is started according to step S20.
  • a testing unit 29 is coupled to the dock leveller 10.
  • the testing unit 29 is a separate testing tool that is connected via a line 30 to the control unit 24.
  • the testing unit 29 is a permanent part of the control unit 24 and/or a software solution.
  • the functionality of defined or preset components of the dock leveller 10 are tested with the testing unit 29 according to step S22.
  • the operability and/or functionality of the electronic sensor 25, of the electronically controlled valve 23, of the control unit 24 and of the warning system 27 is tested.
  • step S23 the testing method ends with step S25.
  • step S24 a failure indication according to step S24 is released.
  • the release of the failure indication may cause an automatic deactivation of the dock leveller 10.
  • the deactivation of the dock leveller 10 may be revoked after inspection or repair of the defect component and successfully completing the testing method.
  • the testing method according to steps S20 to S25 may be performed on a preset regularly basis or on a continuously basis.
  • a certification procedure may be performed before performing the testing method.
  • the certification procedure is performed in accordance with the EN 1398 Dock- Levellers-Safety-Requirements.
  • a test load of at least 25 % or up to 35 % of the maximum load capacity, preferably 100 % of the maximum load capacity, of the dock leveller 10 is positioned on the dock leveller 10 in the middle of deck 15.
  • the lip 17 rests on a supporting element in a first operation mode according to figure 1 .
  • the deck 15 After removing the supporting element the deck 15 makes a fall- movement and/or a free-fall movement and the dock leveller 10 is in the further operation mode according to figure 2.
  • the dock leveller 10, the safety device 1 1 , the electronic sensor 25, the electronically controlled valve 23 and/or the control unit 24 is set up in a way that the requirements according to EN1398 are fulfilled. These requirements comprise that a falling distance of deck 15 is less than 6 % of the length of the dock leveller 10 or deck 15.
  • Fig. 6 is a schematic flow chart of a combined operation and testing method according to the present invention.
  • the method is started with step S30 and using the dock leveller 10 according to step S31 .
  • the deck 15 bridges a gap between the bed 14 of the vehicle 13 to the ramp 12.
  • Deck 15 may float up and down to accord with variations in height of the bed 14.
  • the safety device 1 1 measures during the use of the dock leveller 10 the velocity of the deck 15 according to step S32.
  • the safety device 1 1 measures the velocity in relation to the ground 26 on which the wheels of the vehicle 13 stands on.
  • the measured velocity is indicated by letter A.
  • the velocity is measured by the electronic sensor 25.
  • a limit or threshold for the velocity of deck 15 has been set.
  • This preset threshold for the velocity of deck 15 is indicated by letter B.
  • the threshold for the velocity of deck 15 is set to 0,14 m/s.
  • a programmable logic controller is used for setting the threshold.
  • the measured velocity A is compared by the control unit 24 with the set threshold B according to step S34, whereby it is controlled if the measured velocity A is greater than the set threshold B.
  • step 35 If this is the case the movement of the deck 15 is blocked according to step 35.
  • a control signal is send from the control unit 24 to the electronic valve 23 for closing it.
  • By closing valve 23 a fluid flow of the actuation arrangement 20 is blocked.
  • no fluid can flow into or out of the cylinder 21 a movement of the deck 15 is stopped.
  • a fall and/or free-fall of the deck 15 and/or the lip 17 on the ground 26 by a pivoting movement around the deck joint 16 is prevented.
  • the alarm may be a visual alarm and/or a sound alarm.
  • the dock leveller 10 has to be checked.
  • the dock leveller 10 is checked by a qualified service field engineer.
  • the check may comprise inspections of all relevant parts of the dock leveller, like for example cylinder 21 , piston 22, valve 23, control unit 24, electronic sensor 25, etc.
  • step S38 it is examined if there is any damage to the dock leveller 10 according to step S38. If a damage of the dock leveller 10 is recognized the dock leveller 10 has to be repaired according to step S39. Preferably the repair is done by a qualified service field engineer. In case that there is no damage of the dock leveller 10 step S39 can be skipped.
  • step S40 the dock leveller 10 and/or the safety device 1 1 is set to normal operation.
  • a reset software according to step S41 is used for setting the safety device 1 1 back to normal operation.
  • the reset software is realized as an APP (Application software) for use on a mobile device, like a tablet for example.
  • the safety device 10 can be only set to normal operation with the use of the reset software.
  • step S40 a test procedure is performed according to step S43.
  • a test software according to step S44 is used for performing the test procedure.
  • the test software may be a part of the APP for setting the safety device 10 to normal operation according to step S40.
  • the test software may be realized as a separate APP for use on a mobile device, like a tablet for example.
  • the test procedure is performed by a qualified service field engineer.
  • the function of the electronic sensor 25 and the function of the valve 23 is tested.
  • this is initiated by a single action of an operator.
  • First the dock leveller 10 is operated with the usual controls.
  • the test procedure is initiated by the single action.
  • the single action may be realized by pressing a button.
  • the button is arranged on a service tool having the test software.
  • the button can be a real button or a virtual button.
  • the test procedure or testing method simulates an increase of sinking speed of deck 15.
  • a velocity of deck 15 is simulated by the software that extends the set threshold.
  • the electronical sensor 25 has to cut off the power to the at least one valve 23.
  • the sinking of the deck 15 has to stop within a defined distance.
  • the range and/or distance can be defined by demanding that the deck has to stop within 6 % of the length of the deck and/or of the dock leveller.
  • the distance is set to 0,1 2 m. So, the deck 15 has to be stopped within a range of 0,12 m. The distance is measured at the front edge of the deck 15 or the lip 17. If this is the case, the test has been passed successfully.
  • step S34 In case that in step S34 the measured velocity A is not greater than the set threshold B the velocity of deck 15 is within an allowable range, preferably not faster than 0,05 m/s or 0,12 m/s. If this is the case step S45 will follow after step S34. According to step S46 it is decided if the safety device 10 is checked or not.
  • a check of the safety device 10 according to step S43 may be performed after a maintenance or as a periodically, preferably annular, appointed service or check. In case that no check has to be performed or after finishing the check of step S43 the method ends with step S45.
  • An advantage of the dock leveller 10 and/or safety device 1 1 according to the present invention is that the at least annular testing in accordance with EN1398 can be executed after completion of a certification procedure by the testing unit 29 without a test load on the deck 15.
  • Coupling testing unit to the dock leveller 522 Testing the functionality of defined components of the dock leveller

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Emergency Alarm Devices (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de sécurité (11) pour une utilisation dans un niveleur de quai (10) ayant un plateau (15) relié pivotant à une rampe (12), au moins une soupape commandée électroniquement, (23) servant à arrêter un déplacement du plateau (15) en réponse à un signal de commande, et au moins un capteur électronique (25). Pour améliorer le dispositif de sécurité (11) de sorte à améliorer la fonctionnalité et/ou pouvoir effectuer un test peut via un procédé fiable et efficace, le capteur électronique (25) est conçu et/ou ménagé pour détecter un mouvement de chute du plateau (15).
EP16745547.6A 2015-06-24 2016-06-16 Dispositif de sécurité destiné à un niveleur de quai, niveleur de quai muni de ce dispositif de sécurité, procédé de fonctionnement d'un niveleur de quai et procédé de test du dispositif de sécurité Active EP3313761B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE1550870 2015-06-24
PCT/SE2016/000036 WO2016209141A1 (fr) 2015-06-24 2016-06-16 Dispositif de sécurité destiné à un niveleur de quai, niveleur de quai muni de ce dispositif de sécurité, procédé de fonctionnement d'un niveleur de quai et procédé de test du dispositif de sécurité

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3313761A1 true EP3313761A1 (fr) 2018-05-02
EP3313761C0 EP3313761C0 (fr) 2023-11-01
EP3313761B1 EP3313761B1 (fr) 2023-11-01

Family

ID=56557876

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16745547.6A Active EP3313761B1 (fr) 2015-06-24 2016-06-16 Dispositif de sécurité destiné à un niveleur de quai, niveleur de quai muni de ce dispositif de sécurité, procédé de fonctionnement d'un niveleur de quai et procédé de test du dispositif de sécurité

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3313761B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016209141A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11305953B2 (en) 2016-05-03 2022-04-19 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Control systems for operation of loading dock equipment, and associated methods of manufacture and use
US11225824B2 (en) 2016-05-03 2022-01-18 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Control systems for operation of loading dock equipment, and associated methods of manufacture and use
US10878386B2 (en) 2018-11-26 2020-12-29 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Systems and methods for automated dock station servicing
US10494205B1 (en) 2018-12-06 2019-12-03 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Remote loading dock authorization systems and methods
WO2020157025A2 (fr) * 2019-01-30 2020-08-06 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Niveleur de quai et appareil, procédés, produit-programme informatique, agencement de sécurité et unité de commande associés
US11262747B2 (en) 2019-06-11 2022-03-01 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Vehicle identification and guidance systems and associated methods

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7134159B2 (en) 2004-01-13 2006-11-14 Rite-Hite Holding Corporation Stump-out apparatus for a dock leveler
US8065770B2 (en) * 2009-04-22 2011-11-29 Rite-Hite Holding Corporation Dock leveler with continuous position sensing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3313761C0 (fr) 2023-11-01
WO2016209141A1 (fr) 2016-12-29
EP3313761B1 (fr) 2023-11-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3313761B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité destiné à un niveleur de quai, niveleur de quai muni de ce dispositif de sécurité, procédé de fonctionnement d'un niveleur de quai et procédé de test du dispositif de sécurité
NL2009942C2 (en) A safety device for an aerial lift, a method of operation thereof, an aerial lift having the safety device, a kit of parts and a method of installation thereof for providing the safety device in an aerial lift.
EP2099706B1 (fr) Dispositif de sécurité d'ascenseur
US20120194359A1 (en) Aircraft door detector/warning device
CN101243000B (zh) 电梯系统
JP5516727B2 (ja) 電子安全エレベータ
US10723593B2 (en) Impact detection in an elevator door
CN104010958A (zh) 制动转矩监测和健康评估
KR20130030687A (ko) 스크린도어 안전장치
KR20140042767A (ko) 엘리베이터 작동 방법
JP2007137586A (ja) ボールねじ式エレベータの制御構造
JP5490662B2 (ja) 船舶昇降機の運転方法
CA2284629C (fr) Commande de frein hydraulique
KR101184268B1 (ko) 발전소 터빈용 유압 액추에이터의 안전 정지 동작 검사 장치 및 검사 방법
EP3918432A2 (fr) Niveleur de quai et appareil, procédés, produit-programme informatique, agencement de sécurité et unité de commande associés
KR102105761B1 (ko) 오토 레벨러 및 그 제어방법
CN217648667U (zh) 一种提升机监测装置及搅拌站
JP5168831B2 (ja) エレベータの地震管制装置
KR20200090290A (ko) 콘크리트 압송관 막힘 방지 시스템
JPH0784313B2 (ja) 間接式油圧エレベータの巻上ロープ伸び検出装置
JP2001278561A (ja) 油圧エレベータの沈下検出装置及び沈下検出方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20171122

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20210409

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230621

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016083819

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

U01 Request for unitary effect filed

Effective date: 20231128

U07 Unitary effect registered

Designated state(s): AT BE BG DE DK EE FI FR IT LT LU LV MT NL PT SE SI

Effective date: 20231204

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240301

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240202

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20240201

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231101

U20 Renewal fee paid [unitary effect]

Year of fee payment: 9

Effective date: 20240509