EP3281929A1 - Protective coating composition for molten aluminium and alkali metal environments - Google Patents

Protective coating composition for molten aluminium and alkali metal environments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3281929A1
EP3281929A1 EP17167349.4A EP17167349A EP3281929A1 EP 3281929 A1 EP3281929 A1 EP 3281929A1 EP 17167349 A EP17167349 A EP 17167349A EP 3281929 A1 EP3281929 A1 EP 3281929A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
coating composition
protective coating
weight
wetting agent
aqueous
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP17167349.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3281929B1 (en
Inventor
Madjid Soofi
Lara Binz
Michael W. Anderson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Magneco Metrel Inc
Original Assignee
Magneco Metrel Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US15/235,774 external-priority patent/US20180044252A1/en
Priority claimed from US15/235,740 external-priority patent/US20180044538A1/en
Priority claimed from US15/439,885 external-priority patent/US10590283B2/en
Priority claimed from US15/439,868 external-priority patent/US10233335B2/en
Application filed by Magneco Metrel Inc filed Critical Magneco Metrel Inc
Publication of EP3281929A1 publication Critical patent/EP3281929A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3281929B1 publication Critical patent/EP3281929B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B41/00After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
    • C04B41/80After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone of only ceramics
    • C04B41/81Coating or impregnation
    • C04B41/85Coating or impregnation with inorganic materials
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B41/00After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
    • C04B41/009After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone characterised by the material treated
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B41/00After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
    • C04B41/45Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements
    • C04B41/50Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements with inorganic materials
    • C04B41/5025Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements with inorganic materials with ceramic materials
    • C04B41/5037Clay, Kaolin
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B41/00After-treatment of mortars, concrete, artificial stone or ceramics; Treatment of natural stone
    • C04B41/45Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements
    • C04B41/50Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements with inorganic materials
    • C04B41/5076Coating or impregnating, e.g. injection in masonry, partial coating of green or fired ceramics, organic coating compositions for adhering together two concrete elements with inorganic materials with masses bonded by inorganic cements
    • C04B41/5089Silica sols, alkyl, ammonium or alkali metal silicate cements
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B2111/00Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
    • C04B2111/00474Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00
    • C04B2111/0087Uses not provided for elsewhere in C04B2111/00 for metallurgical applications
    • C04B2111/00879Non-ferrous metallurgy

Definitions

  • This invention is directed to a refractory composition that can be easily applied to molten metal containment vessels by brushing, rolling, spraying or the like.
  • the composition protects the vessel walls against corrosion and other degradation caused by exposure to molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors contained in the vessel.
  • Molten aluminum and molten alkali metals and vapors are known to attack refractory walls and linings made of alumina, silica, magnesia, magnesite, chromite, and other materials. Prolonged exposure to these molten metals and vapors promotes corrosion and degradation of various parts of furnaces and other containment vessels, including walls, ceilings, roofs, exhaust ducts, floors, ramps, skim shelves, spouts, tap holes, troughs, runners, launders, lentils, door jams, and doors. In the past, this required periodic replacement of the refractory linings and/or the containment vessels. This periodic replacement often entailed significant down time and expense.
  • the refractory wall or lining is formed of alumina-silicate, as is commonly the case, the molten aluminum chemically reacts with the refractory to form corundum, which is a mixture of Al 2 O 3 with unreacted Si and Al. This reaction product strongly attaches itself to the refractory by filling its porosity, and is very difficult to remove.
  • molten aluminum reacts with silica in the refractory wall or lining as follows: 4Al + 3SiO 2 ⁇ 2Al 2 O 3 + 3Si
  • the molten aluminum is a metal-bearing alloy, such as an aluminum-magnesium alloy
  • the following additional reactions may occur: 2Mg + SiO 2 ⁇ 2MgO + Si 3Mg + 4Al 2 O 3 ⁇ 3MgAl 2 O 4 + 2Al
  • Oxidides frequently found in refractories are also reduced by reaction with molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapor. These include oxides of titanium and iron, for example.
  • oxides of titanium and iron for example.
  • the present invention is directed to an aqueous coating composition that can be easily applied to any ceramic or masonry surface by brushing, rolling, spraying or the like, and subsequently dried.
  • the invention is also directed to the dried coating composition.
  • the dried coating composition protects the ceramic or masonry surface from chemical attack from molten aluminum and/or alkali metals and vapors.
  • the dried protective coating composition includes the following ingredients:
  • the aqueous coating composition includes about 5% to about 40% by weight water and about 60% to about 95% by weight solids.
  • the solids include, on a dry weight basis:
  • Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 are suitably in the form of mullite, having the chemical formula 3Al 2 O 3 •2SiO 2.
  • Some of the silica is suitably added with the water in the form of colloidal silica.
  • Some of the alumina can be in the form of calcined alumina. The non-wetting agent is believed to combine with the Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 to form a combination which resists penetration and reaction with molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors, thereby providing the protective coating.
  • the invention is directed to an aqueous protective coating composition that can be easily applied to a concrete or masonry surface by brushing, spraying, rolling or the like and subsequently dried.
  • the invention is also directed to the dried protective coating composition that provides effective protection in molten aluminum and alkali metal environments.
  • the dried protective coating composition comprises about 20% to about 90% by weight Al 2 O 3 .
  • the dried protective coating composition includes about 30% to about 70% by weight Al 2 O 3 , or about 40% to about 60% by weight Al 2 O 3 .
  • the dried protective coating composition comprises about 15% to about 55% by weight SiO 2 , suitably about 25% to about 50% by weight SiO 2 , or about 30% to about 45% by weight SiO 2 .
  • Some or all of the Al 2 O 3 and some of the SiO 2 can be provided as mullite having the chemical formula 3Al 2 SO 3 •2SiO 2 .
  • the mullite can be micronized to a median particle diameter of about 1-100 microns, suitably about 2-10 microns.
  • One suitable commercially available mullite is MJ5M micronized mullite, available from the Kyanite Mining Corporation in Dillwyn, Virginia.
  • MJ5M micronized mullite has a median particle diameter of about 5 to about 9 microns and contains about 55-60% by weight Al 2 O 3 , about 38-43% by weight SiO 2 , less than about 1% by weight Fe 2 O 3 , about 1-2% by weight TiO 2, and less than about 1% by weight alkali and alkaline earth metal oxides (e.g., CaO, MgO, Na 2 O, K 2 O).
  • the mullite may constitute about 30% to about 70% by weight of the dried protective coating composition, suitably about 40% to about 60% by weight.
  • the micronized mullite primarily benefits the stability of the wet mixture, helping to keep the components in suspension instead of settling out.
  • micronized mullite As an alternative to MJ5M micronized mullite, it has been found advantageous to use a mixture of micronized mullites having smaller and larger particle sizes.
  • the micronized mullite mixture has the advantage of being able to reduce the porosity of the dried protective coating composition by filling pores and voids that would otherwise be left open.
  • 325-mesh micronized mullite (325M) having a larger median particle diameter of about 10-15 microns can be mixed with MJ5M micronized mullite having a smaller median particle diameter of about 5-9 microns.
  • One suitable micronized mullite mixture contains about 10 to about 50% by weight of the smaller micronized mullite and about 50 to about 90% by weight of the larger micronized mullite, or about 20 to about 30% by weight of the smaller micronized mullite and about 70 to about 80% by weight of the larger micronized mullite.
  • micronized mullite having the following particle size distributions can be comined in any of the above weight ratios, or a weight ratio of about 25% smaller micronized mullite and about 75% larger micronized mullite.
  • Smaller Micronized Mullite (MJ5M) d10 1.28 microns d50 6.83 microns d90 21.72 microns
  • Larger Micronized Mullite (325M) d10 1.58 microns d50 11.43 microns d90 43.87 microns
  • the designation “d50” means that 50% of the smaller micronized mullite had a diameter of 6.83 microns or less, and 50% of the larger micronized mullite particles had a diameter of 11.43 microns or less.
  • the designators “d10” and “d90” have corresponding percentage-based meanings. This combination of smaller and larger micronized mullite particles has been shown to provide some reduction in porosity compared to using either the smaller or the larger micronized mullite alone.
  • the Al 2 O 3 can be calcined alumina, suitably having a median particle size of about 1 to about 50 microns, or about 2 to about 25 microns, or about 3 to about 10 microns.
  • the dried protective coating composition may include about 5% to about 40% by weight calcined alumina, or about 15% to about 35% by weight calcined alumina, or about 20% to about 30% by weight calcined alumina.
  • One suitable calcined alumina is sold under the name AC2-325M, available from AluChem, Inc. of Reading, Ohio. Calcined alumina can be purchased or made by calcining aluminum powder at 1200-1300°C to convert it to pure Al 2 O 3 .
  • Some of the SiO 2 can be colloidal silica having a median particle diameter of about 1-100 nanometers, suitably about 4-100 nanometers, or about 6-50 nanometers, or about 8-20 nanometers.
  • the colloidal silica is provided in an aqueous colloidal suspension that includes about 30-60% by weight colloidal silica particles and about 40-70% by weight water, suitably about 40% by weight colloidal silica particles and about 60% by weight water.
  • the colloidal silica particles act as a binder between the remaining ingredients and to the substrate.
  • the colloidal silica particles may constitute about 5% to about 30% by weight of the dried protective coating composition, suitably about 10% to about 25% by weight.
  • the particle sizes of the colloidal silica can be optimized in order to reduce the porosity of the protective coating composition by filling pores and voids that would otherwise be left open.
  • Smaller colloidal silica particles having a median particle diameter of 1 to less than 50 nanometers, or about 5 to about 20 nanometers can be combined with larger colloidal silica particles having a median particle diameter of about 50 to about 100 nanometers, or about 60 to about 80 nanometers.
  • Suitable weight ranges are from about 10 to about 90% smaller colloidal silica particles and about 10 to about 90% by weight larger colloidal silica particles, or about 20 to about 80% by weight smaller colloidal silica particles and about 20 to about 80% by weight larger colloidal silica particles.
  • the dried protective coating composition includes about 1% to about 15% by weight of a metallic non-wetting agent, suitably about 3% to about 13% by weight, or about 5% to about 12% by weight.
  • the metallic non-wetting agent is non-wetting as to molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors, and resists wetting by these metals. It is believed that the metallic non-wetting agent combines with the alumina and/or silica in the protective coating composition to provide the overall composition with non-wetting properties and substantial chemical inertness to molten aluminum (including aluminum-based alloys) and alkali metals and vapors.
  • metallic non-wetting agents can be employed in the protective coating composition.
  • metallic non-wetting agents include metal phosphates such as lanthanum phosphate, trisodium phosphate, tetrasodium phosphate, sodium pyrophosphate, magnesium phosphate, potassium phosphate, barium phosphate, iron (III) phosphate, copper (III) phosphate, iron (II) phosphate, calcium phosphate, nickel (II) phosphate, strontium phosphate, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydrogen phosphate, aluminum dihydrogen phosphate, aluminum pyrophosphate, aluminum perphosphate, aluminum metaphosphate, and combinations thereof. When heated to temperatures above 980°C to temperatures characteristic of an aluminum melting furnace, these phosphates can combine with the alumina to form an aluminum orthophosphate bond, providing the protective coating composition with a high degree of resistance to molten metal attack.
  • metallic non-wetting agents include zirconium silicates such as zirconium metasilicate (Zr (SiO 3 ) 2 ) and zirconium orthosilicate (ZrSiO 4 ); Group II metal sulfates such as barium sulfate, strontium sulfate, calcium sulfate and magnesium sulfate; and combinations thereof. These compounds may decompose at high temperatures to form oxides which in turn, react with alumina to form stable oxides phases.
  • zirconium silicates such as zirconium metasilicate (Zr (SiO 3 ) 2 ) and zirconium orthosilicate (ZrSiO 4 );
  • Group II metal sulfates such as barium sulfate, strontium sulfate, calcium sulfate and magnesium sulfate; and combinations thereof. These compounds may decompose at high temperatures to form oxides which in turn, react with alumina to form stable oxide
  • barium sulfate decomposes into barium oxide (BaO) at high temperatures, which in turn combines with the alumina to form barium hexaluminate (BaO•6Al 2 O 3 ) or the monaluminate spinel (BaO•Al 2 O 3 ), both of which are stable and resistant to molten metal attack.
  • metallic non-wetting agents include Group TI metal halides such as barium fluoride, barium chloride, barium bromide, strontium fluoride, strontium chloride, strontium bromide, calcium fluoride, calcium chloride, calcium bromide, magnesium fluoride, magnesium chloride, magnesium bromide, and combinations thereof. These compounds are thermodynamically stable, with relatively high heats of formation, and exhibit non-wetting and de-wetting behavior at temperatures exceeding 100°C.
  • metallic non-wetting agents include metallic nitrides such as boron nitride, zirconium nitride, aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, and the like; metallic carbides such as barium carbide, aluminum carbide, tungsten carbide, tungsten-nickel carbide complexes, and the like; and combinations thereof. These compounds are thermodynamically stable at high temperatures, and are non-wetting and resistant to chemical reaction with molten aluminum and alkali-based metals.
  • metallic non-wetting agents include compounds and complexes of aluminum and/or silicon that combine with the Al 2 O 3 and/or SiO 2 to provide reduced wetting and increased resistance to attack by molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors.
  • Examples include without limitation magnesium aluminate spinel (MgAl 2 O 4 ); stack structures of alumina and zirconia such as ZrO 2 •Al 2 O 3 , ZrO 2 •Al 2 O 3 •ZrO 2 , and Al 2 O 3 •ZrO 2 •Al 2 O 3 ; aluminum halides such as aluminum fluoride aluminum chloride, aluminum bromide, sodium aluminum tetrafluoride, sodium aluminum tetrachloride, sodium aluminum tetrabromide, potassium aluminum tetrafluoride, potassium aluminum tetrachloride, and potassium aluminum tetrabromide; calcium aluminate, calcium hexaluminate (C a O•6Al 2 O 3 ), aluminum titanate
  • metallic non-wetting agents include Group II metal carbonates and celsians such as barium carbonate, strontium carbonate, barium celsian, strontium celsian, and combinations thereof. Also included are fluorides, chlorides and bromides of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, copper and strontium, and combinations thereof.
  • the Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , and non-wetting agent together should constitute at least about 90% by weight, or at least about 94% by weight, or at least about 97% by weight of the dried protective coating composition. All other ingredients (including impurities, if any) should be kept to a minimum.
  • the dried protective coating composition may also include about 0.01% to about 2% by weight, suitably about 0.01% to about 1% by weight of a water-soluble thickening agent.
  • Suitable thickening agents include without limitation water-soluble synthetic or natural gums which help maintain the solid ingredients in suspension before drying.
  • Suitable gums include without limitation xanthan gum, guar gum, alginates, locust bean gum, and combinations thereof.
  • One suitable gum is xanthan gum sold under the name KELZAN ® by CP Kelco Co. of Atlanta, Georgia.
  • the dried protective coating composition is either free or substantially free of organic ingredients.
  • the sum of all organic ingredients, inclusive of the thickening agent is suitably not more than about 8% by weight, or not more than 5% by weight, or not more than about 2.5% by weight of the dried protective coating composition.
  • the relative absence of organic components promotes a healthy and safe work environment.
  • the protective coating compositions should also be free or substantially free of gelling agents, acidic compounds, alkali hydroxides and other strong bases.
  • the present invention also includes the aqueous protective coating composition prior to drying.
  • the aqueous protective coating composition comprises about 5% to about 40% by weight water, suitably about 10% to about 30% by weight water, or about 15% to about 25% by weight water. Most or all of the water is combined with colloidal silica in the amounts indicated above, to form an aqueous colloidal dispersion.
  • the aqueous colloidal dispersion is then mixed with the remaining ingredients of the protective coating composition to form an aqueous protective coating composition including about 60% to about 95% by weight solids, suitably about 70% to about 90% by weight solids, or about 75% to about 85% by weight solids.
  • Water can be the only liquid component.
  • the aqueous protective coating composition should be free, or substantially free, of organic liquids. The term "substantially free" indicates an organic liquid content of not more than about 8% by weight, or not more than about 5% based on the total liquid weight.
  • the aqueous colloidal silica dispersion and the remaining solid ingredients are mixed together to form an aqueous protective coating composition which, excluding the water, contains the same solid ingredients in the same amounts as described above for the dried protective coating composition.
  • the aqueous protective coating composition is then applied to a ceramic or masonry surface using brushing, spraying rolling, or another suitable technique. After application, the aqueous protective coating composition is dried with or without heat to provide the dried protective coating having the composition described above.
  • An aqueous protective coating composition was prepared by mixing the following materials together in the following amounts. No. Ingredient Weight Percent 1 Xanthan Gum (KELZAN ® ) 0.051 2 Water 1.698 3 Aqueous Colloidal Silica, 40% Silica 35.350 4 Micronized Mullite, 58% Al 2 O 3 , 40% SiO 2 (MJ5M) 37.740 5 Calcined Alumina, 6 microns (AC2 - 325M) 16.983 6 Metallic Non-wetting Agent 8.177 TOTAL 100.00
  • the aqueous protective coating composition contained the following: No. Ingredient Weight Percent 1 Xanthan Gum (KELZAN ® ) 0.051 2 Water 22.908 3 Colloidal Silica 14.140 4 Silica from Mullite 15.096 5 Al 2 O 3 from Mullite 21.890 6 Impurities from Mullite 0.755 7 Calcined Alumina 16.983 8 Metallic Non-wetting Agent 8.177 TOTAL 100.00
  • the aqueous protective coating composition can be provided as a two-part system, with one part containing wet ingredients and the other part containing dry ingredients.
  • the aqueous protective coating composition can be prepared by first combining and mixing the synthetic or natural gum (ingredient 1) with water (ingredient 2) to provide a first mixture.
  • the first mixture can be combined with the aqueous colloidal silica (40% silica) in a separate container using a stirring blade for about 5 minutes, or the time needed to achieve homogeneity, to provide a second mixture.
  • the mullite, calcined alumina and non-wetting agent can then be slowly added to the second mixture and stirred for about 10 minutes, or a time needed to achieve homogeneity.
  • the resulting aqueous protective coating composition can settle during prolonged storage, and can be stirred again prior to use.
  • the aqueous protective coating composition can then be applied to a concrete or masonry surface, such as a refractory wall or lining used to contain molten aluminum in a furnace or vessel. After drying, the resulting dried protective coating has the following composition. No. Ingredient Percent by Weight 1 Xanthan Gum 0.067 2 Colloidal Silica 18.342 3 Silica from Mullite 19.582 4 Al 2 O 3 from Mullite 28.421 5 Impurities from Mullite 0.980 6 Calcined Alumina 22.031 7 Metallic Non-wetting Agent 10.607 TOTAL 100.00
  • An aqueous protective coating composition prepared according to Example 1 was coated on one side of a 65% alumina refractory cup that had been pre-filled to 1832°F. The other side of the cup was uncoated. The cup was then filled with a 7075 molten aluminum alloy mixed with 2.5% magnesium and was maintained at a temperature of 1562°F for 120 hours. The cup was then emptied and observed. The coated side of the cup showed no visual evidence of reaction with the molten metal. The uncoated side of the cup showed substantial visual evidence of corrosion and degradation.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
  • Other Surface Treatments For Metallic Materials (AREA)

Abstract

The aqueous protective coating composition is provided for easy application to refractory linings and walls. When dried, the protective coating composition provides excellent chemical resistance to molten aluminum alkali metals and vapors. The protective coating composition includes alumina and silica, suitably provided as mullite, calcined alumina, and colloidal silica; and a metallic non-wetting agent.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention is directed to a refractory composition that can be easily applied to molten metal containment vessels by brushing, rolling, spraying or the like. The composition protects the vessel walls against corrosion and other degradation caused by exposure to molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors contained in the vessel.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Molten aluminum and molten alkali metals and vapors are known to attack refractory walls and linings made of alumina, silica, magnesia, magnesite, chromite, and other materials. Prolonged exposure to these molten metals and vapors promotes corrosion and degradation of various parts of furnaces and other containment vessels, including walls, ceilings, roofs, exhaust ducts, floors, ramps, skim shelves, spouts, tap holes, troughs, runners, launders, lentils, door jams, and doors. In the past, this required periodic replacement of the refractory linings and/or the containment vessels. This periodic replacement often entailed significant down time and expense.
  • Only a small amount of corrosion and degradation is required to adversely affect the thermal insulation properties of the refractory wall or lining. When the refractory wall or lining is formed of alumina-silicate, as is commonly the case, the molten aluminum chemically reacts with the refractory to form corundum, which is a mixture of Al2O3 with unreacted Si and Al. This reaction product strongly attaches itself to the refractory by filling its porosity, and is very difficult to remove.
  • By way of example, molten aluminum reacts with silica in the refractory wall or lining as follows:

            4Al + 3SiO2 → 2Al2O3 + 3Si

  • If the molten aluminum is a metal-bearing alloy, such as an aluminum-magnesium alloy, the following additional reactions may occur:

            2Mg + SiO2 → 2MgO + Si

            3Mg + 4Al2O3 → 3MgAl2O4 + 2Al

  • Other oxides frequently found in refractories are also reduced by reaction with molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapor. These include oxides of titanium and iron, for example. There is a need or desire for an easy-to-apply coating that protects refractory walls and linings from chemical attack by molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to an aqueous coating composition that can be easily applied to any ceramic or masonry surface by brushing, rolling, spraying or the like, and subsequently dried. The invention is also directed to the dried coating composition. The dried coating composition protects the ceramic or masonry surface from chemical attack from molten aluminum and/or alkali metals and vapors.
  • The dried protective coating composition includes the following ingredients:
    • about 20% to about 90% by weight Al2O3;
    • about 15% to about 55% by weight SiO2; and
    • about 1% to about 40% by weight of a metallic non-wetting agent;
    • wherein the Al2O3, SiO2, and non-wetting agent together
    • constitute at least about 90% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  • The aqueous coating composition includes about 5% to about 40% by weight water and about 60% to about 95% by weight solids. The solids include, on a dry weight basis:
    • about 20% to about 90% by weight Al2O3 (excluding calcined alumina);
    • about 15% to about 55% by weight SiO2; and
    • about 1% to about 15% by weight of a metallic non-wetting agent;
    • wherein the Al2O3, SiO2, and non-wetting agent together
      constitute at least about 90% by weight of the solids.
  • Some of the Al2O3 and SiO2 are suitably in the form of mullite, having the chemical formula 3Al2O3•2SiO2. Some of the silica is suitably added with the water in the form of colloidal silica. Some of the alumina can be in the form of calcined alumina. The non-wetting agent is believed to combine with the Al2O3 and SiO2 to form a combination which resists penetration and reaction with molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors, thereby providing the protective coating.
  • With the foregoing in mind, it is a feature and advantage of the invention to provide a protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments that can be easily applied and re-applied to a ceramic or masonry surface by brushing, spraying, rolling or similar techniques.
  • It is also a feature and advantage of the invention to provide an environmentally safe protective coating composition that is substantially free of organic components.
  • It is also a feature and advantage of the invention to provide a protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments, that is relatively inexpensive to formulate, purchase and use.
  • These and other features and advantages of the invention will become further apparent from the following detailed description of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention is directed to an aqueous protective coating composition that can be easily applied to a concrete or masonry surface by brushing, spraying, rolling or the like and subsequently dried. The invention is also directed to the dried protective coating composition that provides effective protection in molten aluminum and alkali metal environments.
  • The dried protective coating composition comprises about 20% to about 90% by weight Al2O3. Suitably, the dried protective coating composition includes about 30% to about 70% by weight Al2O3, or about 40% to about 60% by weight Al2O3. The dried protective coating composition comprises about 15% to about 55% by weight SiO2, suitably about 25% to about 50% by weight SiO2, or about 30% to about 45% by weight SiO2.
  • Some or all of the Al2O3 and some of the SiO2 can be provided as mullite having the chemical formula 3Al2SO3•2SiO2. The mullite can be micronized to a median particle diameter of about 1-100 microns, suitably about 2-10 microns. One suitable commercially available mullite is MJ5M micronized mullite, available from the Kyanite Mining Corporation in Dillwyn, Virginia. MJ5M micronized mullite has a median particle diameter of about 5 to about 9 microns and contains about 55-60% by weight Al2O3, about 38-43% by weight SiO2, less than about 1% by weight Fe2O3, about 1-2% by weight TiO2, and less than about 1% by weight alkali and alkaline earth metal oxides (e.g., CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O). The mullite may constitute about 30% to about 70% by weight of the dried protective coating composition, suitably about 40% to about 60% by weight. The micronized mullite primarily benefits the stability of the wet mixture, helping to keep the components in suspension instead of settling out.
  • As an alternative to MJ5M micronized mullite, it has been found advantageous to use a mixture of micronized mullites having smaller and larger particle sizes. The micronized mullite mixture has the advantage of being able to reduce the porosity of the dried protective coating composition by filling pores and voids that would otherwise be left open. In one embodiment, 325-mesh micronized mullite (325M) having a larger median particle diameter of about 10-15 microns can be mixed with MJ5M micronized mullite having a smaller median particle diameter of about 5-9 microns. One suitable micronized mullite mixture contains about 10 to about 50% by weight of the smaller micronized mullite and about 50 to about 90% by weight of the larger micronized mullite, or about 20 to about 30% by weight of the smaller micronized mullite and about 70 to about 80% by weight of the larger micronized mullite.
  • In one embodiment, micronized mullite having the following particle size distributions can be comined in any of the above weight ratios, or a weight ratio of about 25% smaller micronized mullite and about 75% larger micronized mullite. Smaller Micronized Mullite (MJ5M)
    d10 1.28 microns
    d50 6.83 microns
    d90 21.72 microns
    Larger Micronized Mullite (325M)
    d10 1.58 microns
    d50 11.43 microns
    d90 43.87 microns
  • In the above example, the designation "d50" means that 50% of the smaller micronized mullite had a diameter of 6.83 microns or less, and 50% of the larger micronized mullite particles had a diameter of 11.43 microns or less. The designators "d10" and "d90" have corresponding percentage-based meanings. This combination of smaller and larger micronized mullite particles has been shown to provide some reduction in porosity compared to using either the smaller or the larger micronized mullite alone.
  • Some of the Al2O3 can be calcined alumina, suitably having a median particle size of about 1 to about 50 microns, or about 2 to about 25 microns, or about 3 to about 10 microns. When calcined alumina is present, the dried protective coating composition may include about 5% to about 40% by weight calcined alumina, or about 15% to about 35% by weight calcined alumina, or about 20% to about 30% by weight calcined alumina. One suitable calcined alumina is sold under the name AC2-325M, available from AluChem, Inc. of Reading, Ohio. Calcined alumina can be purchased or made by calcining aluminum powder at 1200-1300°C to convert it to pure Al2O3.
  • Some of the SiO2 can be colloidal silica having a median particle diameter of about 1-100 nanometers, suitably about 4-100 nanometers, or about 6-50 nanometers, or about 8-20 nanometers. The colloidal silica is provided in an aqueous colloidal suspension that includes about 30-60% by weight colloidal silica particles and about 40-70% by weight water, suitably about 40% by weight colloidal silica particles and about 60% by weight water. When the protective coating composition is dried, the colloidal silica particles act as a binder between the remaining ingredients and to the substrate. The colloidal silica particles may constitute about 5% to about 30% by weight of the dried protective coating composition, suitably about 10% to about 25% by weight.
  • In one embodiment, the particle sizes of the colloidal silica can be optimized in order to reduce the porosity of the protective coating composition by filling pores and voids that would otherwise be left open. Smaller colloidal silica particles having a median particle diameter of 1 to less than 50 nanometers, or about 5 to about 20 nanometers, can be combined with larger colloidal silica particles having a median particle diameter of about 50 to about 100 nanometers, or about 60 to about 80 nanometers. Suitable weight ranges are from about 10 to about 90% smaller colloidal silica particles and about 10 to about 90% by weight larger colloidal silica particles, or about 20 to about 80% by weight smaller colloidal silica particles and about 20 to about 80% by weight larger colloidal silica particles.
  • The dried protective coating composition includes about 1% to about 15% by weight of a metallic non-wetting agent, suitably about 3% to about 13% by weight, or about 5% to about 12% by weight. The metallic non-wetting agent is non-wetting as to molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors, and resists wetting by these metals. It is believed that the metallic non-wetting agent combines with the alumina and/or silica in the protective coating composition to provide the overall composition with non-wetting properties and substantial chemical inertness to molten aluminum (including aluminum-based alloys) and alkali metals and vapors.
  • A wide variety of metallic non-wetting agents can be employed in the protective coating composition. Examples of metallic non-wetting agents include metal phosphates such as lanthanum phosphate, trisodium phosphate, tetrasodium phosphate, sodium pyrophosphate, magnesium phosphate, potassium phosphate, barium phosphate, iron (III) phosphate, copper (III) phosphate, iron (II) phosphate, calcium phosphate, nickel (II) phosphate, strontium phosphate, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydrogen phosphate, aluminum dihydrogen phosphate, aluminum pyrophosphate, aluminum perphosphate, aluminum metaphosphate, and combinations thereof. When heated to temperatures above 980°C to temperatures characteristic of an aluminum melting furnace, these phosphates can combine with the alumina to form an aluminum orthophosphate bond, providing the protective coating composition with a high degree of resistance to molten metal attack.
  • Other examples of metallic non-wetting agents include zirconium silicates such as zirconium metasilicate (Zr (SiO3)2) and zirconium orthosilicate (ZrSiO4); Group II metal sulfates such as barium sulfate, strontium sulfate, calcium sulfate and magnesium sulfate; and combinations thereof. These compounds may decompose at high temperatures to form oxides which in turn, react with alumina to form stable oxides phases. For example, barium sulfate decomposes into barium oxide (BaO) at high temperatures, which in turn combines with the alumina to form barium hexaluminate (BaO•6Al2O3) or the monaluminate spinel (BaO•Al2O3), both of which are stable and resistant to molten metal attack.
  • Other examples of metallic non-wetting agents include Group TI metal halides such as barium fluoride, barium chloride, barium bromide, strontium fluoride, strontium chloride, strontium bromide, calcium fluoride, calcium chloride, calcium bromide, magnesium fluoride, magnesium chloride, magnesium bromide, and combinations thereof. These compounds are thermodynamically stable, with relatively high heats of formation, and exhibit non-wetting and de-wetting behavior at temperatures exceeding 100°C.
  • Other examples of metallic non-wetting agents include metallic nitrides such as boron nitride, zirconium nitride, aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, and the like; metallic carbides such as barium carbide, aluminum carbide, tungsten carbide, tungsten-nickel carbide complexes, and the like; and combinations thereof. These compounds are thermodynamically stable at high temperatures, and are non-wetting and resistant to chemical reaction with molten aluminum and alkali-based metals.
  • Other examples of metallic non-wetting agents include compounds and complexes of aluminum and/or silicon that combine with the Al2O3 and/or SiO2 to provide reduced wetting and increased resistance to attack by molten aluminum and alkali metals and vapors. Examples include without limitation magnesium aluminate spinel (MgAl2O4); stack structures of alumina and zirconia such as ZrO2•Al2O3, ZrO2•Al2O3•ZrO2, and Al2O3•ZrO2•Al2O3; aluminum halides such as aluminum fluoride aluminum chloride, aluminum bromide, sodium aluminum tetrafluoride, sodium aluminum tetrachloride, sodium aluminum tetrabromide, potassium aluminum tetrafluoride, potassium aluminum tetrachloride, and potassium aluminum tetrabromide; calcium aluminate, calcium hexaluminate (CaO•6Al2O3), aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5), calcium silicate, and combinations thereof.
  • Other examples of metallic non-wetting agents include Group II metal carbonates and celsians such as barium carbonate, strontium carbonate, barium celsian, strontium celsian, and combinations thereof. Also included are fluorides, chlorides and bromides of titanium, zirconium, hafnium, copper and strontium, and combinations thereof.
  • The Al2O3, SiO2, and non-wetting agent together should constitute at least about 90% by weight, or at least about 94% by weight, or at least about 97% by weight of the dried protective coating composition. All other ingredients (including impurities, if any) should be kept to a minimum.
  • The dried protective coating composition may also include about 0.01% to about 2% by weight, suitably about 0.01% to about 1% by weight of a water-soluble thickening agent. Suitable thickening agents include without limitation water-soluble synthetic or natural gums which help maintain the solid ingredients in suspension before drying. Suitable gums include without limitation xanthan gum, guar gum, alginates, locust bean gum, and combinations thereof. One suitable gum is xanthan gum sold under the name KELZAN® by CP Kelco Co. of Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Except for the thickening agent, the dried protective coating composition is either free or substantially free of organic ingredients. When present, the sum of all organic ingredients, inclusive of the thickening agent, is suitably not more than about 8% by weight, or not more than 5% by weight, or not more than about 2.5% by weight of the dried protective coating composition. The relative absence of organic components promotes a healthy and safe work environment. The protective coating compositions should also be free or substantially free of gelling agents, acidic compounds, alkali hydroxides and other strong bases.
  • The present invention also includes the aqueous protective coating composition prior to drying. The aqueous protective coating composition comprises about 5% to about 40% by weight water, suitably about 10% to about 30% by weight water, or about 15% to about 25% by weight water. Most or all of the water is combined with colloidal silica in the amounts indicated above, to form an aqueous colloidal dispersion. The aqueous colloidal dispersion is then mixed with the remaining ingredients of the protective coating composition to form an aqueous protective coating composition including about 60% to about 95% by weight solids, suitably about 70% to about 90% by weight solids, or about 75% to about 85% by weight solids. Water can be the only liquid component. The aqueous protective coating composition should be free, or substantially free, of organic liquids. The term "substantially free" indicates an organic liquid content of not more than about 8% by weight, or not more than about 5% based on the total liquid weight.
  • The aqueous colloidal silica dispersion and the remaining solid ingredients are mixed together to form an aqueous protective coating composition which, excluding the water, contains the same solid ingredients in the same amounts as described above for the dried protective coating composition. The aqueous protective coating composition is then applied to a ceramic or masonry surface using brushing, spraying rolling, or another suitable technique. After application, the aqueous protective coating composition is dried with or without heat to provide the dried protective coating having the composition described above.
  • Example 1
  • An aqueous protective coating composition was prepared by mixing the following materials together in the following amounts.
    No. Ingredient Weight Percent
    1 Xanthan Gum (KELZAN®) 0.051
    2 Water 1.698
    3 Aqueous Colloidal Silica, 40% Silica 35.350
    4 Micronized Mullite, 58% Al2O3, 40% SiO2 (MJ5M) 37.740
    5 Calcined Alumina, 6 microns (AC2 - 325M) 16.983
    6 Metallic Non-wetting Agent 8.177
    TOTAL 100.00
  • Broken down by ingredients, the aqueous protective coating composition contained the following:
    No. Ingredient Weight Percent
    1 Xanthan Gum (KELZAN®) 0.051
    2 Water 22.908
    3 Colloidal Silica 14.140
    4 Silica from Mullite 15.096
    5 Al2O3 from Mullite 21.890
    6 Impurities from Mullite 0.755
    7 Calcined Alumina 16.983
    8 Metallic Non-wetting Agent 8.177
    TOTAL 100.00
  • The aqueous protective coating composition can be provided as a two-part system, with one part containing wet ingredients and the other part containing dry ingredients. In one embodiment, the aqueous protective coating composition can be prepared by first combining and mixing the synthetic or natural gum (ingredient 1) with water (ingredient 2) to provide a first mixture. The first mixture can be combined with the aqueous colloidal silica (40% silica) in a separate container using a stirring blade for about 5 minutes, or the time needed to achieve homogeneity, to provide a second mixture. The mullite, calcined alumina and non-wetting agent can then be slowly added to the second mixture and stirred for about 10 minutes, or a time needed to achieve homogeneity. The resulting aqueous protective coating composition can settle during prolonged storage, and can be stirred again prior to use.
  • The aqueous protective coating composition can then be applied to a concrete or masonry surface, such as a refractory wall or lining used to contain molten aluminum in a furnace or vessel. After drying, the resulting dried protective coating has the following composition.
    No. Ingredient Percent by Weight
    1 Xanthan Gum 0.067
    2 Colloidal Silica 18.342
    3 Silica from Mullite 19.582
    4 Al2O3 from Mullite 28.421
    5 Impurities from Mullite 0.980
    6 Calcined Alumina 22.031
    7 Metallic Non-wetting Agent 10.607
    TOTAL 100.00
  • Example 2
  • An aqueous protective coating composition prepared according to Example 1 was coated on one side of a 65% alumina refractory cup that had been pre-filled to 1832°F. The other side of the cup was uncoated. The cup was then filled with a 7075 molten aluminum alloy mixed with 2.5% magnesium and was maintained at a temperature of 1562°F for 120 hours. The cup was then emptied and observed. The coated side of the cup showed no visual evidence of reaction with the molten metal. The uncoated side of the cup showed substantial visual evidence of corrosion and degradation.
  • Example 3
  • Using the low cement castable (LCC) refractory cups, one cup was fully coated with the aqueous refractory composition of Example 1 and the other cup was left uncoated. Both cups were filled with K2CO3, sealed, and heated to 1100°C (2012°F) for five hours in a sealed sagar. Then, the cups were emptied and inspected. The coated cup showed no visual evidence of reaction with the molten alkali metal. The uncoated cup showed substantial visual evidence of corrosion and degradation.
  • The embodiments of the invention described herein are exemplary. Various modifications and improvements can be made without changing the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims, and all changes that fall within the meaning and scope of equivalents are intended to be embraced therein.

Claims (17)

  1. A protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments, comprising on a dry weight basis:
    20% to 90% by weight Al2O3;
    15% to 55% by weight SiO2; and
    1% to 15% by weight of a metallic non-wetting agent;
    wherein the Al2O3, SiO2, and non-wetting agent together constitute at least 90% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  2. The protective coating composition of Claim 1, wherein the Al2O3, SiO2, and metallic non-wetting agent together constitute at least 94% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  3. The protective coating composition of Claim 1, wherein the Al2O3, SiO2, and metallic non-wetting agent together constitute at least 97% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  4. The protective coating composition of any preceding claim, wherein some of the Al2O3, and some of the SiO2 are provided in the form of mullite, the mullite constituting 30% to 70% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  5. The protective coating composition of any preceding claim, wherein some of the SiO2 is provided in the form of colloidal silica particles having a mean particle diameter of 1 to 100 nanometers, the colloidal silica particles constituting 5% to 30% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  6. The protective coating composition of any preceding claim, wherein some of the Al2O3 is provided in the form of calcined alumina having a mean particles diameter of 1 to 100 microns, the calcined alumina constituting 5% to 40% by weight of the protective coating composition.
  7. The protective coating composition of any preceding claim, further comprising 0.01% to 2% by weight of a synthetic or natural gum.
  8. The protective coating composition of any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the metallic non-wetting agent is selected from the group consisting of metal phosphates, zirconium silicates, Group TI metal sulfates, Group TI metal halides, metallic nitrides, and combinations thereof.
  9. The protective coating composition of any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the metallic non-wetting agent is selected from the group consisting of magnesium aluminate spinel, stack structures of alumina and zirconia, alumina halides, calcium aluminate, calcium hexaluminate, calcium silicate, aluminum titanate, and combinations thereof.
  10. The protective coating composition of any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the metallic non-wetting agent is selected from the group consisting of Group TI metal oxides; Group IT metal celsians; fluorides, chlorides and bromides of titanium, zirconium, halfnium, copper and strontium; and combinations thereof.
  11. The protective coating composition of any preceding claim, wherein the metallic non-wetting agent is present at 5% to 12% by weight.
  12. The protective coating composition of any preceding claim, further comprising 0.01 % to 2% by weight of a synthetic or natural gum.
  13. An aqueous protective coating composition, comprising 5% to 40% by weight water and 60% to 95% of the protective coating composition of any preceding claim, wherein the aqueous protective coating composition is substantially free of organic liquids.
  14. A method of providing a protective coating composition according to Claim 13, comprising the steps of:
    a) combining and mixing a quantity of a water-soluble thickening agent with a quantity of water to provide a first mixture;
    b) combining and mixing the first mixture with an aqueous colloidal silica dispersion to provide a second mixture; and
    c) adding Al2O3, SiO2. and a non-metallic wetting agent to the second mixture, and mixing the ingredients together to form the aqueous protective coating composition.
  15. The method of Claim 14, wherein the aqueous colloidal silica binder comprises 30% to 60% by weight colloidal silica particles and 40% to 70% by weight water.
  16. The method of Claim 14 or 15, wherein the aqueous protective coating composition is free of organic components.
  17. The method of any of Claims 14 to 16, further, comprising the steps of:
    applying the aqueous coating composition to a refractory substrate;
    evaporating the water from the aqueous coating composition to yield the protective coating composition; and
    contacting the protective coating with molten aluminum or alkali metal vapor, wherein the protective coating composition protects the refractory substitute from chemical reaction with the molten aluminum or alkali metal vapor.
EP17167349.4A 2016-08-12 2017-04-20 Protective coating composition for molten aluminium and alkali metal environments Active EP3281929B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/235,774 US20180044252A1 (en) 2016-08-12 2016-08-12 Method of providing a protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
US15/235,740 US20180044538A1 (en) 2016-08-12 2016-08-12 Protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
US15/439,885 US10590283B2 (en) 2016-08-12 2017-02-22 Method of providing a protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
US15/439,868 US10233335B2 (en) 2016-08-12 2017-02-22 Protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3281929A1 true EP3281929A1 (en) 2018-02-14
EP3281929B1 EP3281929B1 (en) 2020-08-26

Family

ID=58692315

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17167349.4A Active EP3281929B1 (en) 2016-08-12 2017-04-20 Protective coating composition for molten aluminium and alkali metal environments

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3281929B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2965903C (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116875094A (en) * 2023-07-19 2023-10-13 攀钢集团攀枝花钢铁研究院有限公司 Method for preparing infrared radiation paint by utilizing aluminum slag

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2147893A (en) * 1983-10-13 1985-05-22 Didier Werke Ag Method of manufacturing refractory bodies or compositions
EP0165754A2 (en) * 1984-06-11 1985-12-27 Alcan International Limited Treatment of refractory articles
DE4141186A1 (en) * 1990-12-13 1992-06-17 Roux Johan Heindrich Le Monolithic refractory lining for aluminium melting furnace - contains aluminium oxide, silicon di:oxide and calcium oxide
US20020158373A1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2002-10-31 North American Refractories Co. Cristobalite-free mullite grain having reduced reactivity to molten aluminum and method of producing the same
DE102008003640A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Refratechnik Steel Gmbh An additive for forming a corrosion protection layer on a refractory lining of a molten furnace containing an aluminum alloy melt, and mineral material containing the additive for producing the refractory lining
WO2015173620A1 (en) * 2014-05-15 2015-11-19 Porvair Plc Boron-free aluminum castshop ceramic foam filter

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2147893A (en) * 1983-10-13 1985-05-22 Didier Werke Ag Method of manufacturing refractory bodies or compositions
EP0165754A2 (en) * 1984-06-11 1985-12-27 Alcan International Limited Treatment of refractory articles
DE4141186A1 (en) * 1990-12-13 1992-06-17 Roux Johan Heindrich Le Monolithic refractory lining for aluminium melting furnace - contains aluminium oxide, silicon di:oxide and calcium oxide
US20020158373A1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2002-10-31 North American Refractories Co. Cristobalite-free mullite grain having reduced reactivity to molten aluminum and method of producing the same
DE102008003640A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2009-07-16 Refratechnik Steel Gmbh An additive for forming a corrosion protection layer on a refractory lining of a molten furnace containing an aluminum alloy melt, and mineral material containing the additive for producing the refractory lining
WO2015173620A1 (en) * 2014-05-15 2015-11-19 Porvair Plc Boron-free aluminum castshop ceramic foam filter

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2965903A1 (en) 2018-02-12
EP3281929B1 (en) 2020-08-26
CA2965903C (en) 2022-03-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10233335B2 (en) Protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
CN107500747A (en) A kind of fine and close calcium hexaluminate castable and preparation method thereof
CA2622491C (en) Layer or coating and a composition for the production thereof
AU695855B2 (en) A process for forming a refractory repair mass
EP3281929B1 (en) Protective coating composition for molten aluminium and alkali metal environments
JP4234330B2 (en) Amorphous refractory composition
US10590283B2 (en) Method of providing a protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
JP5509016B2 (en) Lightweight insulation castable
US20180044252A1 (en) Method of providing a protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
US5149412A (en) Electrolysis cell and refractory material therefor
GB2246125A (en) Magnesia-alumina spine clinker and refractories
US20180044538A1 (en) Protective coating composition for molten aluminum and alkali metal environments
TW201441179A (en) Castable refractory for blast furnace trough
KR100407763B1 (en) Amorphous Refractory of Specific Matrix and Wet Spray Application Method
Adabifiroozjaei et al. Assessment of non-wetting materials for use in refractories for aluminium melting furnaces
JP6296635B1 (en) Casting irregular refractory
JP6098834B2 (en) Amorphous refractories for molten aluminum alloys
Yurkov et al. Corrosion of aluminosilicate refractories by molten aluminum and melts based upon it in melting and casting units
JP7441103B2 (en) Spraying material
Engel Refractory considerations
JPH01148757A (en) Patching repairing material
JP2023065003A (en) Easily dryable high strength monolithic refractory
JPH0725668A (en) Refractory for casting work
RU2497763C2 (en) Composition and coating from it
WO2021030211A1 (en) Lightweight refractory compositions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180808

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190314

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200403

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: TR-IP CONSULTING LLC, CH

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1306217

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017022231

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201126

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201126

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201127

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200826

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1306217

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017022231

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: NF05

Ref document number: 1306217

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210420

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: UEP

Ref document number: 1306217

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

PGRI Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 20210920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230424

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230502

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Payment date: 20230411

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230419

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230419

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200826