EP3229592A1 - Use of active culture of lactic acid bacteria for the preparation of a compound for capturing to control of drosophila suzukii and related compound - Google Patents
Use of active culture of lactic acid bacteria for the preparation of a compound for capturing to control of drosophila suzukii and related compoundInfo
- Publication number
- EP3229592A1 EP3229592A1 EP15804575.7A EP15804575A EP3229592A1 EP 3229592 A1 EP3229592 A1 EP 3229592A1 EP 15804575 A EP15804575 A EP 15804575A EP 3229592 A1 EP3229592 A1 EP 3229592A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- compound
- lactic acid
- acid bacteria
- wine
- use according
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 241001136566 Drosophila suzukii Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 title description 7
- 241000192134 Oenococcus oeni Species 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 235000014101 wine Nutrition 0.000 claims description 21
- 235000021419 vinegar Nutrition 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000000052 vinegar Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 150000007524 organic acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 claims description 7
- 235000015203 fruit juice Nutrition 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000012190 activator Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000620 organic polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 16
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 16
- ROWKJAVDOGWPAT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetoin Chemical compound CC(O)C(C)=O ROWKJAVDOGWPAT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 10
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 8
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 235000014680 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 239000005667 attractant Substances 0.000 description 6
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 6
- BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-REOHCLBHSA-N (S)-malic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](O)CC(O)=O BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 5
- QSJXEFYPDANLFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diacetyl Chemical group CC(=O)C(C)=O QSJXEFYPDANLFS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- GFAZHVHNLUBROE-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydroxymethyl propionaldehyde Natural products CCC(=O)CO GFAZHVHNLUBROE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 5
- 241000255601 Drosophila melanogaster Species 0.000 description 4
- BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-hydroxysuccinic acid Natural products OC(=O)C(O)CC(O)=O BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 235000021425 apple cider vinegar Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 229940088447 apple cider vinegar Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 230000031902 chemoattractant activity Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 235000011090 malic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetic acid Chemical compound CC(O)=O QTBSBXVTEAMEQO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 3
- KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N citric acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CC(O)(C(O)=O)CC(O)=O KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000001630 malic acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940099690 malic acid Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000017448 oviposition Effects 0.000 description 3
- CZUGFKJYCPYHHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-methylthiopropanol Chemical compound CSCCCO CZUGFKJYCPYHHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IKHGUXGNUITLKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetaldehyde Chemical compound CC=O IKHGUXGNUITLKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001295 Levene's test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 2
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006114 decarboxylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006353 environmental stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002917 insecticide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010150 least significant difference test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005923 long-lasting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004060 metabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000005985 organic acids Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000020095 red wine Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229930000044 secondary metabolite Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 229960004793 sucrose Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- CRORGGSWAKIXSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-methylbutyl 2-hydroxypropanoate Chemical compound CC(C)CCOC(=O)C(C)O CRORGGSWAKIXSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-{[2-carboxy-4,5-dihydroxy-6-(phosphanyloxy)oxan-3-yl]oxy}-4,5-dihydroxy-3-phosphanyloxane-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound O1C(C(O)=O)C(P)C(O)C(O)C1OC1C(C(O)=O)OC(OP)C(O)C1O FHVDTGUDJYJELY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 1
- FERIUCNNQQJTOY-UHFFFAOYSA-M Butyrate Chemical compound CCCC([O-])=O FERIUCNNQQJTOY-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- FERIUCNNQQJTOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Butyric acid Natural products CCCC(O)=O FERIUCNNQQJTOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DKMROQRQHGEIOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl succinate Chemical compound CCOC(=O)CCC(=O)OCC DKMROQRQHGEIOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000255581 Drosophila <fruit fly, genus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001149671 Hanseniaspora uvarum Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000186660 Lactobacillus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000192001 Pediococcus Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004098 Tetracycline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009754 Vitis X bourquina Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012333 Vitis X labruscana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000006365 Vitis vinifera Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014787 Vitis vinifera Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009418 agronomic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001476 alcoholic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940072056 alginate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000010443 alginic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920000615 alginic acid Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001851 biosynthetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229960004106 citric acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000013065 commercial product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004817 gas chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- -1 hexose sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229940116298 l- malic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940039696 lactobacillus Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000028161 membrane depolarization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000005706 microflora Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen group Chemical group [N] QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000003170 nutritional factors Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000020477 pH reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009928 pasteurization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008786 sensory perception of smell Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011146 sterile filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002180 tetracycline Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229930101283 tetracycline Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 235000019364 tetracycline Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000003522 tetracyclines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N63/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
- A01N63/20—Bacteria; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom
Definitions
- a scope of the invention is to propose a new, effective, economical, and long lasting preparation alternative to the treatments based on chemical pesticides for controlling Drosophila suzukii.
- This scope is achieved by using a culture of lactic acid bacteria, belonging to the Oenocccus oeni species, and put in a condition to warranty the production of metabolites strongly attractive for Drosophila suzukii for a long period of time, thanks to the original composition of the attractive blend contained in a trap.
- Drosophila suzukii is an insect capable of causing substantial damage in different high-value arboreal, frutescent and vegetable cultures, including soft fruits, drupaceous fruits, and grape. Aggressiveness and adaptability to numerous contexts make it one of the major adversities in the agricultural field, capable of causing step-downs of production even greater than 90%. At present, the struggle against this insect is performed through the use of insecticides, massive capture traps, and other agronomic practices. None of these solutions led to a resolution of the problem.
- the experimental data clearly shows that Drosophila melanogaster is more attracted by substrates being in fermentation, thanks to the presence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast, as compared to what observed in tests where the same, non-yeasting substrates were present.
- Drosophila suzukii Little information is present in the literature on the chemical ecology of Drosophila suzukii. With respect to Drosophila melanogaster and to all remaining species of the same genus, Drosophila suzukii has a peculiarity in that it lays eggs on unwounded and healthy fruits, whereas it is attracted by marcescent and fermenting substrates for feeding purposes (Cini et al., 2012). Consequently, the knowledge acquired on the Drosophila melanogaster model insect and on other closely- related species cannot provide an exhaustive information for understanding the behavior of Drosophila suzukii.
- the most effective traps for capturing Drosophila suzukii are those baited with different types of vinegar and wine (Landolt et al., 2012). Both these substrates result from fermentation, mediated both by yeast and by acetic bacteria, of carbonaceous compounds, mainly hexose sugars present in the raw material (McKenzie and Parsons, 1972; Becher et al., 2010, 2012; Barata et al., 2012). Other secondary compounds are also apparently relevant in attracting these insects, which justifies the greater effectiveness observed in the case of using food matrices like vinegar and wine to bait traps, with respect to that of pure compounds, for instance acetic acid and ethanol.
- traps are marketed containing wine vinegar, apple vinegar, wine, fruit juices (Grassi et al., 2014).
- such matrices are sterilized via pasteurization during the production step.
- the traps known so far are not sufficiently active against Drosophila suzukii and feature a short duration in time. In order for the control strategies to provide acceptable results, it is therefore necessary to use a high number of traps per hectare, which can be estimated to amount to different thousands. Furthermore, the traps known so far require weekly service of the bait. The high number of traps and the complex operativity necessary for their maintenance make the current solution ineffective and unsustainable from the economical point of view.
- the present invention refers to a bait aimed at monitoring and controlling Drosophila suzukii, which comprises the use of an active culture of lactic acid bacteria, preferably of the Oenococcus oeni species, preferably of the type used in oenology.
- the concentration of the lactic acid bacteria equals at least 10 8 cells/ g and the mixture also comprises at least apple cider vinegar or wine vinegar or wine or fruit juices taken individually or added with at least one organic acid, sugar, preferably a fermentable one, and a fermentation activator, or with all of the three additives, namely organic acid, preferably fermentable sugar, and a fermentation activator.
- Drosophila suzukii is an invasive species capable of causing major damages to cultivated fruits. For this reason it is presently managed by using chemical insecticides with big risks of damages to the environment, to the operator's health and to the population who stands on the cultivation areas of the cultures infected by Drosophila suzukii.
- chemical insecticides with big risks of damages to the environment, to the operator's health and to the population who stands on the cultivation areas of the cultures infected by Drosophila suzukii.
- mass trapping of the population of insects by means of specific traps.
- so far traps did not demonstrate to be capable of solving the problem, as it appears from the major losses of production recorded even in the presence of these devices, because an adequately attractive and long-lasting bait has not been identified yet.
- Studies carried out by the applicant demonstrate that Drosophila suzukii is particularly sensitive to some molecules like acetoin and diacetyl.
- Oenococcus oeni a species of lactic acid bacteria exclusively isolated in oenological environments like wine in malolactic fermentation (Liu, 2002).
- lactic acid bacteria belonging to the Oenococcus oeni species which is the scope of the present invention, in traps baited with properly modified mixes of vinegar and wine, makes it possible very effective massive captures, capable of representing an alternative to chemical treatments.
- Oenococcus oeni is a species of lactic acid bacteria of a typically oenological origin (Versari, 1999). Such species is the only one belonging to the Oenocccus genus and its presence has been exclusively described in an oenological environment, in particular in wines during the malolactic fermentation. The very restricted environmental allocation of the species under consideration, as well as its poor intraspecific variability, is due to some of its physiological characteristics. In particular, Oenococcus oeni exhibits a poor vigor and a very low growth rate, thereby being rapidly overtaken in the colonization of the common fermentable substrate, including sugary juices of vegetal origins, by other species of bacteria or yeasts.
- Oenococcus oeni exhibits an excellent resistance to low pH values and to the presence of ethanol in the environment, thereby resulting the dominant species in wine at the end of alcoholic fermentation, wherein it finds the organic acids, among which in particular the malic acid, as a primary feeding source (Liu, 2002).
- Its characteristic metabolism consists of the decarboxylation of the malic acid into lactic acid, from which Oenococcus oeni is capable of taking energy thanks to the protonic gradient that is thus generated; it also produces secondary matabolites, including acetoin, diacetyl, and acetaldehyde (Liu, 2002).
- Oenococcus oeni is also capable of warranting an increased attractive capacity of the conventional traps already in use, as demonstrated by experiments carried out by the applicant.
- the applicant experimentally ascertained that adding Oenococcus oeni to the common attractants present in the traps for Drosophila suzukii induces a higher number of captures than that observed with traps baited with other microorganisms or other attractive formulations; such difference can be attributed, according to the present references and to experiments carried out by the applicant, to the production by Oenococcus oeni of volatile molecules that are attractive to Drosophila suzukii, for instance acetoin or diacetyl, significantly higher with respect to other species of microorganisms.
- Droskidrink consisting of apple cider vinegar, wine vinegar, wine, fruit juices taken individually or mixed together
- Oenococcus oeni do not enable Oenococcus oeni to express its metabolic activity at the best.
- Droskidrink consisting of apple cider vinegar, wine vinegar, wine, fruit juices taken individually or mixed together
- Oenococcus oeni do not enable Oenococcus oeni to express its metabolic activity at the best.
- a better result is achieved with completely new modifications in the composition of the attractant, consisting of adding to a 3: 1 mix of apple cider vinegar and red wine of exogenous components like organic acids, for instance citric acid and L-malic acid, cane sugar, and nutritional factors including nitrogenous sources and vitamins.
- the acidity of the mix has also been corrected, by adjusting its pH to a value ranging from 3.5 to 5 in order to warrant a maximum efficiency, in energy terms, of the decarboxylation reaction of the malic acid.
- Such liquid bait is stabilized via a sterile filtration and is not thermally treated because it has been possible to experimentally demonstrate that the attractiveness of baits containing non thermally-treated substrates is greater, probably thanks to the preservation of the compounds with high biological activity, but thermolabile, secondary constituents, for instance vitamins.
- the use of an immobilized bacterial culture makes it possible to recover the biomass in the periodical service and/ or replacement of the attractive substrate, making it possible its use in subsequent batches with surprising increases in the activity period of the trap. Note that the current time of use of the commercial traps is as low as one week.
- Figure 1 graphically represents a gaschromatography recording coupled with an electroantennography (GC-EAD) carried out by the applicant.
- GC-EAD electroantennography
- this preparation emits high quantities of diacetyl (the arrow indicates the peak of diacetyl at approximately lOmin of retention time) and of acetoin (the arrow indicates the peak of acetoin at approximately 13min of retention time). Both compounds induce significant electroantennographic responses (their corresponding arrows on the bottom side).
- Droskidrink is normally formed of a mix of apple cider vinegar and red wine in a proportion 3: 1 with the addition of 4 gr of raw cane sugar.
- the pH of the commercial Droskidrink is approximately 3.
- Figure 2 shows the average number of captures of Drosophila suzukii by means of traps (no. 3/ theses 4/ weeks 5) by using an attractive mix inoculated with Oenococcus oeni, the result of the previously described test.
- the values are represented in a logarithmic scale. Letters that are different for every week of checks indicate significant differences (ANOVA, Levene test; LSD test, PO.05).
- the traps baited with a Droskidrink inoculated with a culture of O. oeni are always significantly more attractive than the remaining theses containing Droskidrink only in different conditions. Also, the presence of the bacteric culture in active growth made it possible to keep the trap effective for all the duration of the test without the need for completely replacing the liquid mix but just weekly refilling the contents lost by evaporation with new Droskidrink.
- Figure 3 shows the results of a test carried out by the applicant similar to that previously described wherein different species of lactic acid bacteria, in particular of the Pediococcus and Lactobacillus genera, have been compared to each other.
- the diagram shows the total number of captures during the 5 weeks of test of such species as compared to Oenococcus oeni, which results to always be significantly more attractive to Drosophila suzukii.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITMI20141905 | 2014-11-06 | ||
| PCT/IB2015/002054 WO2016071749A1 (en) | 2014-11-06 | 2015-11-05 | Use of active culture of lactic acid bacteria for the preparation of a compound for capturing to control of drosophila suzukii and related compound |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3229592A1 true EP3229592A1 (en) | 2017-10-18 |
Family
ID=52014248
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP15804575.7A Withdrawn EP3229592A1 (en) | 2014-11-06 | 2015-11-05 | Use of active culture of lactic acid bacteria for the preparation of a compound for capturing to control of drosophila suzukii and related compound |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP3229592A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2016071749A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2020129096A1 (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2020-06-25 | PRANTIL, Irene | Composition for monitoring and catching pests, such as drosophila suzukii fruit midge, preparation and use thereof |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4439086B2 (en) * | 2000-07-03 | 2010-03-24 | アース製薬株式会社 | Fly attractant and fly trap |
| CA2676382C (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2014-11-18 | Contech Enterprises Inc. | Method and composition for attracting fruit flies to traps |
| WO2013156492A2 (en) * | 2012-04-16 | 2013-10-24 | Biobest N.V. | Compositions for attracting drosophila |
-
2015
- 2015-11-05 EP EP15804575.7A patent/EP3229592A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2015-11-05 WO PCT/IB2015/002054 patent/WO2016071749A1/en not_active Ceased
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| None * |
| See also references of WO2016071749A1 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2016071749A1 (en) | 2016-05-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Epsky et al. | History and development of food-based attractants | |
| Becher et al. | Chemical signaling and insect attraction is a conserved trait in yeasts | |
| Witzgall et al. | “This is not an apple”–yeast mutualism in codling moth | |
| Navarro-Llopis et al. | Mass trapping for fruit fly control | |
| Todd Kabaluk et al. | An attract and kill tactic for click beetles based on Metarhizium brunneum and a new formulation of sex pheromone | |
| KR101205934B1 (en) | Composition for controlling insect pests and manufacturing methof therof | |
| CA2676382C (en) | Method and composition for attracting fruit flies to traps | |
| US8076119B2 (en) | Brevibacillus laterosporus strain compositions containing the same and method for the biological control of Dipters | |
| Uriel et al. | The fly factor phenomenon is mediated by interkingdom signaling between bacterial symbionts and their blow fly hosts | |
| Bharathi et al. | Attractiveness of some food baits to the melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)(Diptera: Tephritidae) | |
| KR101820485B1 (en) | Flying insect attracting composition and manufacturing method of plane trap comprising thereof | |
| CN110545664A (en) | Arthropod-beneficial yeast | |
| Babcock et al. | Inter‐kingdom signaling—symbiotic yeasts produce semiochemicals that attract their yellowjacket hosts | |
| WO2016071749A1 (en) | Use of active culture of lactic acid bacteria for the preparation of a compound for capturing to control of drosophila suzukii and related compound | |
| Meats et al. | Bacteria as food had no effect on fecundity during domestication of the fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni | |
| US20220152128A1 (en) | Bee gut microbial formulation for use as a probiotic for improved bee health and pathogen resistance | |
| Robert et al. | The microbiome of fruit flies as novel targets for pest management | |
| JP6103759B2 (en) | Aqueous attracting insecticidal composition and insect attractant | |
| WO1994018847A1 (en) | Method of ensilage of fodder | |
| Baig | Chemical ecology of Carpophilus beetles and their yeast symbionts | |
| KR102056539B1 (en) | Composition for attracting hazardous creature comprising culture medium containing of Bacillus jeotagli BV-1 and a method for producing thereof | |
| Maddalena | Identification and evaluation of attractiveness of lactic acid bacteria as a bait for Drosophila suzukii Matsumura | |
| Logan et al. | Vector control using semiochemicals. | |
| Choi et al. | Biocontrol of moth pests in apple orchards: preliminary field study of application potential for mass trapping | |
| Maddalena | Liquid Baits with Oenococcus oeni Increase Captures of Drosophila suzukii |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170508 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: A01N 37/02 20060101ALI20191023BHEP Ipc: A01N 63/02 20060101AFI20191023BHEP Ipc: A01P 19/00 20060101ALN20191023BHEP |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: A01P 19/00 20060101ALN20191105BHEP Ipc: A01N 37/02 20060101ALI20191105BHEP Ipc: A01N 63/02 20060101AFI20191105BHEP |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20191129 |
|
| INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: FONDAZIONE EDMUND MACH |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20191213 |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20191213 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
| 18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20200603 |