EP3137688B1 - Procédé et système de détection de coulis magnétique - Google Patents

Procédé et système de détection de coulis magnétique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3137688B1
EP3137688B1 EP15720771.3A EP15720771A EP3137688B1 EP 3137688 B1 EP3137688 B1 EP 3137688B1 EP 15720771 A EP15720771 A EP 15720771A EP 3137688 B1 EP3137688 B1 EP 3137688B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
grout
magnetic
injected
injection
borehole
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15720771.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3137688A1 (fr
Inventor
Rebecca J LUNN
Grainne El MOUNTASSIR
Simon L HARLEY
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Strathclyde
Original Assignee
University of Strathclyde
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Strathclyde filed Critical University of Strathclyde
Publication of EP3137688A1 publication Critical patent/EP3137688A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3137688B1 publication Critical patent/EP3137688B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
    • E02D3/12—Consolidating by placing solidifying or pore-filling substances in the soil

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system and method for detecting the extent of penetration of grout, for example during or after injection into a subsurface region.
  • Grouting is commonly used for ground strengthening, for example to support surface construction (e.g. buildings, roads and bridges) or to strengthen ground for subsurface tunnelling/mining. Grouting is also used for the creation of hydraulic barriers. Hydraulic barriers may include, for example, barriers for reservoir dams and barriers for the prevention of contaminant migration in groundwater.
  • the subsurface is made up of soil and rock, which may contain voids in the form of pores and/or fractures. In many engineering contexts it is necessary to inject grout into these voids in order to stabilise the ground or to reduce its permeability.
  • Grout may be injected into boreholes that extend into the subsurface. For example, grout may be injected into a line of boreholes that are drilled into the subsurface at appropriate intervals such that a grout curtain (continuous grout barrier) may be formed.
  • Grout may comprise a combination of water and cement or a cement-alternative material such as colloidal silica.
  • Grout may additionally comprise further materials, for example superplasticisers, stabilising agents, accelerators, setting/hardening agents or fly ash.
  • a controlling GIN (also called a limiting GIN) may be determined for a particular grout injection.
  • the controlling GIN may be a GIN that should not be exceeded in operation.
  • the GIN method may prevent an injection having a combination of high pressure and high volume. By restricting the use of injections having both high volume and high pressure, the risk of ground heave may be reduced.
  • the controlling GIN for a specific zone of a site can be determined by the experimental method (Lombardi, 1996).
  • the experimental method requires the ability to determine the penetration distance of the grout in a trial injection, which is not routinely achievable in practice.
  • GIN curves (which may be referred to as standard GIN curves) may often be used along with the observational method (Lombardi, 1996).
  • FIGs 1a to 1d are schematic diagrams presenting an example of a grouting campaign comprising the injection of grout into multiple boreholes.
  • the grouting campaign of Figure 1 is a grouting campaign (carried out by Bam Ritchies) intended to hydraulically isolate a vertical shaft containing nuclear waste at Dounreay, UK. Grouting proceeded via a series of concentric borehole injection stages. To ensure integrity of the resulting hydraulic barrier, grout injection was designed with significant overlaps between the regions of grout intended to be produced from adjacent boreholes (the split-spacing borehole technique).
  • Figures 1a to 1d show the borehole drilling and injection sequence in plan view. Desired grout penetration circles 2, 4 represent desired grout penetration.
  • Figure 1a shows the first stage of the grouting campaign.
  • Vertical shaft PW2 is the vertical shaft containing nuclear waste.
  • Vertical shaft PW2 is surrounded by eight first-stage injection boreholes DBB1 to DBB8, which are equally spaced around a first ring of boreholes centred on vertical shaft PW2.
  • Each first-stage borehole has an associated desired grout penetration distance, which is represented for each first-stage borehole by a desired grout penetration circle 2.
  • Figure 1b represents the second stage of the grouting campaign.
  • grout was injected into 3 m vertical intervals in each of eight second-stage injection boreholes DB101 to DB108.
  • the second-stage boreholes DB101 to DB108 are equally spaced around a second, larger ring of boreholes centred on vertical shaft PW2.
  • Each of the second-stage boreholes DB101 to DB108 has an associated desired grout penetration distance which is represented for each second injection borehole by a desired grout penetration circle 4.
  • the desired grout penetration circle 4 for each second-stage borehole DB101 to DB108 is larger than the desired grout penetration circle 2 for each first-stage borehole DBB1 to DBB8.
  • Figure 1c represents the third stage of the grouting campaign.
  • third-stage injection boreholes DB201 to DB208 were drilled on the second ring at intermediate positions between the second-stage boreholes DB101 to DB108. Therefore the third-stage boreholes are at the same distance from the vertical shaft PW2 as the second-stage boreholes.
  • Grout was injected into 3 m vertical intervals in each of the eight third-stage boreholes DB201 to DB208.
  • Each third-stage borehole has a desired grout penetration circle 4 that is the same size as the desired grout penetration circle for each of the second-stage boreholes DB101 to DB108.
  • Figure 1d represents the fourth stage of the grouting campaign.
  • sixteen fourth-stage injection boreholes DB301 to DB316 were drilled at positions on the second ring such that each fourth-stage borehole is positioned between a second-stage borehole and its neighbouring third-stage borehole.
  • Each fourth-stage borehole DB301 to DB316 has a desired grout penetration circle 4 that is the same size as the desired grout penetration circle for each of the second-stage boreholes DB101 to DB108 and third-stage boreholes DB201 to DB208.
  • Figures 2a and 2b are taken from the precursory trial.
  • pH and temperature were investigated as an indication of grout breakthrough, as described in Henderson, A. E., Robertson, I. A., Whitfield, J. M., Garrard, G. F. G., Swannell, N. G. and Fisch, H. (2008) A new method for real-time monitoring of grout spread through fractured rocks, MRS Proceedings, Vol. 1107 .
  • Figure 2a shows the layout of six observation boreholes (Obs. 1 to Obs. 6) and a central injection borehole (Injection).
  • Observation boreholes Obs. 1 to Obs. 3 are placed at a 4 m distance from the injection borehole.
  • Observation boreholes Obs. 4 to Obs. 6 are placed at a 6 m distance from the injection borehole.
  • Grout was injected into the injection borehole within a 3 m borehole interval between 15 m and 18 m below ground surface. Temperature and pH were measured at each of the observation boreholes during a time range starting before the start of the grout injection and finishing after the end of the grout injection.
  • Figure 2b shows the temporal evolution of temperature and pH at three of the observation boreholes, Obs. 1 to Obs. 3, each of which is placed at a 4 m distance from the injection borehole.
  • Each of lines P011 pH, P012 pH, P013 pH represents the measured pH against time at a respective one of observation boreholes Obs. 1 to Obs. 3.
  • Each of lines P011 °C, P012 °C, P013 °C represents the temperature against time at a respective one of observation boreholes Obs. 1 to Obs. 3.
  • Figure 2b also shows the injected grout volume expressed in litres per metre length of the injection interval against time (indicated by the Volume line).
  • the initial rise in pH appears to correspond to the expected pH for grout dilutions.
  • the grout dilutions may be bleed water and grout diluted by groundwater. Bleed water is water that accumulates at the surface of freshly mixed grout. The peak pH readings appear to correspond to the expected values for neat grout. Physical grout arrival was confirmed by the presence of grout coating some observation instruments.
  • the precursory trial using pH has possible drawbacks. Firstly, it may not be possible to locate the penetration front of the grout itself. From Figure 2b , it appears that the penetration front of the grout may be non-radially symmetric (contrasting with the common assumption of radial penetration), since the recorded rise in pH occurs at different times for each of the three observation boreholes Obs. 1 to Obs. 3. Secondly, the observation boreholes are located within the grouted rock volume. Location of observation boreholes within the grouted rock volume may be suitable for a precursory field trial (which may take place in an adjacent and similar rock volume to the rock volume in which a final grouting campaign will take place). However, location of observation boreholes within the grouted rock volume may not be suitable for a final grouting campaign.
  • GPR ground penetrating radar
  • Zhang et al. used GPR as a non-destructive testing method to attempt to determine the thickness of grout behind lining segments of metro lines in Shanghai, China ( Zhang, F., Xie, X. and Huang, H. (2010) Application of ground penetrating radar in grouting evaluation for shield tunnel construction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 25, 99-107 ). The GPR was found to be successful in this scenario.
  • JP 2012 127913 A describes a survey method that includes injecting into soil a cement-based material that includes a magnetic substance mixed therein.
  • a method comprising injecting magnetic grout into an injection region by injecting the magnetic grout into a borehole that extends into the injection region, detecting the injected magnetic grout to provide an indication of penetration into an injection region of the injected magnetic grout, characterised in that detecting the injected magnetic grout comprises detecting a magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout using a magnetometer positioned in a further borehole adjacent the borehole.
  • an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout into an injection region may be provided. For example, the extent to which the magnetic grout has penetrated in one, two, or three dimensions may be determined. It may thereby be possible to determine whether the grout has penetrated up to a predicted penetration distance, or whether the grout has penetrated to a greater or lesser distance than the predicted penetration distance in any given direction.
  • An injection region may be any region into which grout may be injected.
  • an injection region may comprise a subsurface region, a region which is to be strengthened, a ground region for which ground strengthening is required, a region associated with tunnelling or mining, or a region in which a hydraulic barrier is to be formed.
  • Grout may be injected into the injection region in order to strengthen at least part of the injection region or to reduce the permeability of at least part of the injection region. Knowledge of the extent of penetration may enable assessment of the effectiveness of the grouting, for example whether the grouting is likely to have an adequate strengthening effect or form an adequate hydraulic barrier.
  • Grout may be considered to have penetrated into an injection region if the grout extends into at least part of the injection region. Grout may extend into an injection region if the grout fills at least some pores, voids, fractures or cracks in the injection region.
  • Injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region may comprise injecting the magnetic grout into a plurality of injection boreholes, each of which extends into the injection region. On injection, grout may spread from the or each injection borehole into at least part of the injection region.
  • Magnetic grout may be injected into the injection region and then non-magnetic grout may be injected into the injection region.
  • the furthest extent of the injected grout may be detected without requiring all the injected grout to be magnetic.
  • Using magnetic grout only for the first part of a given injection may reduce cost in some cases.
  • the magnetic grout may be injected into the injection region for a selected time before the non-magnetic grout is injected.
  • a selected volume of magnetic grout may be injected into the injection region before the non-magnetic grout is injected.
  • the magnetic grout may be injected for a predetermined time, or a predetermined volume of magnetic grout may be injected. By selecting a time for which to inject magnetic grout, or a volume of magnetic grout to inject, a suitable quantity of magnetic grout may be injected. The quantity of magnetic grout may be enough for the magnetic grout to be detectible. The quantity of magnetic grout may be restricted to limit cost in some cases.
  • Detecting the injected magnetic grout may comprise detecting at least one magnetic property associated with the magnetic grout.
  • a magnetic property may comprise at least one of magnetic susceptibility, magnetisation, or a parameter associated with any of magnetic field, magnetic susceptibility or magnetisation.
  • the method may comprise obtaining detection data by the detection of the injected magnetic grout and processing the detection data to determine the indication of penetration into the injection region of the injected magnetic grout.
  • the detecting of the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise detecting a change in magnetic field, the change in the magnetic field being caused by or associated with the magnetic grout.
  • the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may, in some cases, comprise an alteration in a background magnetic field (for example comprising the Earth's magnetic field) that is caused by the presence of the magnetic grout.
  • a background magnetic field for example comprising the Earth's magnetic field
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise detecting a background magnetic field before injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region (which may be the Earth's magnetic field and/or an initial applied magnetic field) and detecting a further magnetic field during or after injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region, thereby to determine a change in magnetic field due to the injected magnetic grout.
  • the method may comprise applying a magnetic field to the injection region.
  • the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may, in some cases, comprise an alteration to an applied magnetic field (for example a magnetic field applied to the injection region) that is caused by the presence of the magnetic grout.
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise detecting a background magnetic field before injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region and detecting a further magnetic field during or after injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region, thereby to determine a change in the applied magnetic field due to the injected magnetic grout.
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise detecting a first magnetic field before injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region and detecting a second magnetic field during or after injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region.
  • the first magnetic field may be a background magnetic field (which may comprise the Earth's magnetic field and/or an applied magnetic field).
  • a change in field due to the injected magnetic grout may be determined.
  • a change in field due to the magnetic grout injected during that stage may be determined.
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may further comprise subtracting the first magnetic field and the second magnetic field to obtain a subtracted magnetic field.
  • Either of the first and second magnetic field may be subtracted from the other of the first and second magnetic field, thereby obtaining a signal that is the difference between the first and second magnetic fields.
  • the difference signal may represent a magnetic field anomaly that is caused by the injected magnetic grout.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise using the change in magnetic field to determine an extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise inverting the subtracted magnetic field.
  • the subtracted magnetic field may be inverted to determine a shape and position of the injected magnetic grout.
  • the further borehole may be a monitoring borehole.
  • the further borehole may be a borehole into which grout will later be injected.
  • the magnetometer may be placed in the injection borehole vertically above the injection interval.
  • the magnetometer may be placed at the ground surface.
  • a magnetometer placed at the ground surface may be used to detect the upper boundary of the injected magnetic grout volume.
  • the magnetometer may be placed in a subsurface tunnel or shaft.
  • the magnetometer, or other magnetic field detector may be placed at a distance from the injection borehole such that the magnetic grout may be detected.
  • the magnetometer, or other magnetic field detector may be placed at a distance such that the injected grout does not spread as far as the magnetometer.
  • the distance from the injection borehole to the magnetometer may be between 1 m and 50 m, optionally between 5 m and 15 m, optionally between 5 m and 10 m.
  • the distance from the injection borehole to the magnetometer may be greater than 1 m, optionally greater than 5 m, optionally greater than 10 m.
  • the distance from the injection borehole to the magnetometer may be less than 50 m, optionally less than 15 m, optionally less than 10 m.
  • a plurality of magnetometers, or other magnetic field detectors may be positioned adjacent to the injection borehole.
  • Each of the plurality of magnetometers may be positioned in a respective monitoring borehole.
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise combining signals from the plurality of magnetometers.
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise, for each magnetometer, performing a series of magnetic field measurements at different positions, for example at different heights in the further borehole. Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise performing magnetic field measurements in the injection borehole. Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise performing magnetic field measurements at the ground surface.
  • Detecting the injected magnetic grout may comprise non-intrusively detecting the injected magnetic grout.
  • the magnetic field of the injected magnetic grout may be detected without making contact with the magnetic grout, for example without bringing the magnetometer in contact with the magnetic grout.
  • the injected magnetic grout may be detected without drilling a borehole into the injected magnetic grout.
  • the injected magnetic grout may be detected without drilling a borehole into the injected non-magnetic grout.
  • the injected grout may be detected without compromising the integrity of the injected grout, for example without compromising the low permeability function of the injected grout.
  • the method may be non-intrusive in the sense that it is not intrusive to the grouted volume (or grout curtain).
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise determining a shape representative of the extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise determining a three-dimensional shape representative of the extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout.
  • Determining a shape representative of the extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise determining a shape representative of a leading edge of the injected magnetic grout.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise determining a three-dimensional shape of the leading edge of the injected magnetic grout.
  • the shape of the leading edge of the injected magnetic grout may represent the furthest extent to which any injected grout (magnetic or non-magnetic) has penetrated from the injection borehole.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise forming an image of an extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout into the injection region.
  • the extent of penetration of the injected grout may be displayed to a user.
  • the user may take further action in response to the displayed extent of penetration, for example in planning further grouting.
  • the method may further comprise determining a location for a further injection borehole in dependence on the indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout.
  • the determination of the location for the further injection borehole may be performed automatically or by a user.
  • a user or program may determine a suitable distance from the first injection borehole to place a further injection borehole, such that the extent of the grout injected at the further injection borehole may be expected to join up or overlap with the grout injected at the first injection borehole.
  • the injection boreholes may be placed so as to create a grout curtain.
  • An automatic or semi-automatic method for example a computer program, may be used to determine the distance from the first injection borehole to the further injection borehole.
  • the injection region may comprise a subsurface region.
  • the injection borehole may extend from the surface to the subsurface region.
  • the injection region may comprise at least one of a subsurface region, a foundation, a mining region, a tunnelling region, a structural region, a region required to perform a hydraulic function.
  • the method may further comprise adding a magnetic additive to grout to form the magnetic grout.
  • the magnetic grout may comprise a magnetic material.
  • the magnetic material may comprise any material giving a suitable signal in a magnetic field.
  • the magnetic grout may comprise at least one of: a ferromagnetic material, a ferrimagnetic material, a super-paramagnetic material.
  • the magnetic material may be present in the magnetic grout in suitable proportions to create a suitable signal in a magnetic field.
  • the magnetic material may be any material having a suitable magnetic susceptibility or magnetic moment.
  • the magnetic material and the proportion of magnetic material in the magnetic grout may be selected such that the magnetic grout has a suitable magnetic susceptibility or magnetic moment.
  • the magnetic grout may have a suitable magnetic susceptibility for measurement with a magnetometer at a given distance.
  • the magnetic grout may have a suitable magnetic susceptibility such that the induced magnetic field is measurable using a magnetometer at a given distance.
  • the proportion of magnetic material in the magnetic grout may be, by weight or volume, between 0.1 and 25%, optionally between 1 and 10%, optionally between 2 and 5%, optionally between 5 and 10%, optionally less than 5%, optionally less than 10%, optionally less than 25%, optionally more than 0.1%, optionally more than 0.5%, optionally more than 1%, optionally more than 5% or more than 10%.
  • the magnetic material may comprise, for example, at least one of: magnetite, maghemite, iron filings, neodymium (and neodymium compounds), ilmenite (iron titanium oxide, FeTiO 3 ), jacobsite (manganese iron oxide), magnesioferrite (manganese iron oxide), gregite (iron sulphide), samarium-cobalt magnets (Sm 2 (Co, Fe, Cu, Zr) 17 in either standard or high temperature magnet variants), NEO magnets (Nd 2 Fe 14 B and variants with some Al, Nb, Dy and including N42 grade NEO magnet that is Ni-Cu-Ni coated), AINiCo magnets (for example AlNiCo 5 grade LNG37), ferrite magnets (ceramic magnets made up of complex oxides with compositions XOFe 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 as the main component, for example ferrite grade C5 or Y30 magnets), or super-paramagnetic nanop
  • Each of the magnetic grout and the non-magnetic grout may comprise a cement or cement-alternative material.
  • the cement or alternative to cement may comprise, for example, an Ordinary Portland Cement (for example, Lafarge blue circle, 42.5 CEM1, 52.5 CEM1), a microfine or ultrafine cement (for example, Ultrafin from Cementa, Rheocem 650/900 from BASF, Spinor from Holcim, TamCrete MFC from TAM UK,
  • Microcem 550, 650, 650 SR, 900 all produced by Lafarge), a colloidal silica/silica sol (for example MP320 colloidal silica, sold by MEYCO BASF), a silicate grout (for example sodium silicate grout such as N(R) sodium silicate sold by PQR Corporation).
  • a colloidal silica/silica sol for example MP320 colloidal silica, sold by MEYCO BASF
  • a silicate grout for example sodium silicate grout such as N(R) sodium silicate sold by PQR Corporation.
  • the grout may further comprise at least one of a superplasticiser (for example Glenium 51 from BASF), a stabilising agent (for example Grout Aid from Elken Multigrout), an accelerator for silica sol (for example NaCI or CaCl 2 ), a setting or hardening agent for silicate grout, or fly ash.
  • a superplasticiser for example Glenium 51 from BASF
  • a stabilising agent for example Grout Aid from Elken Multigrout
  • an accelerator for silica sol for example NaCI or CaCl 2
  • a setting or hardening agent for silicate grout for example fly ash.
  • the injection region may comprise a construction site, for example a construction volume beneath a surface construction area, and the method may further comprise injecting the magnetic grout into a borehole that extends into the construction site.
  • the injection region may comprise a region in which construction is taking place.
  • the injection region may comprise a region in which hydraulic barriers are being formed (for example, for drinking water protection).
  • the injection region may comprise a region of ground improvement (for example for improving ground stability by, for example, filling in sinkholes or remediating differential settlements).
  • the injection borehole may extend from above ground to a subsurface construction site.
  • the injection borehole may extend upwards from a subsurface construction site, for example, wherein the subsurface construction site comprises a volume of ground surrounding a tunnel.
  • a system for detecting grout comprising an injector for injecting the magnetic grout into an injection region by injecting magnetic grout into a borehole that extends into the injection region; and a detector for detecting injected magnetic grout to provide an indication of penetration into an injection region of the injected magnetic grout, wherein the detector comprises a magnetometer.
  • the system is characterised in that the magnetometer is positioned in a further borehole adjacent the borehole into which grout is being injected.
  • the injector may be operable to inject magnetic grout into the borehole and then inject non-magnetic grout into the borehole.
  • the injector may be configured to inject the magnetic grout into the borehole for a selected time before injecting the non-magnetic grout into the borehole.
  • the injector may be configured to inject a selected volume of the magnetic grout into the borehole before injecting the non-magnetic grout into the borehole.
  • the system may be operable in use to apply a magnetic field to the injection region.
  • the system may comprise a magnetic field source, for example an electromagnet.
  • Detecting the magnetic grout may comprise detecting a background magnetic field before injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region and a further magnetic field during or after injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region, thereby to determine a change in magnetic field due to the injected magnetic grout.
  • Detecting the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise detecting a background magnetic field before injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region and detecting a further magnetic field during or after injecting the magnetic grout into the injection region, thereby to determine a change in the applied magnetic field due to the injected magnetic grout.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise using the change in magnetic field to determine an extent of the injected magnetic grout.
  • the injection region may comprise a construction site.
  • the injection region may comprise a subsurface region.
  • the injector may be operable to inject the magnetic grout into a borehole that extends into the construction site.
  • the detector may be configured to be positioned in use in the borehole into which grout is injected.
  • the detector may be configured to be positioned in use at the ground surface adjacent to the borehole into which grout is injected.
  • the detector may be configured to be positioned in use in a tunnel or shaft adjacent to the borehole into which grout is injected.
  • Detecting the injected magnetic grout may comprise non-intrusively detecting the injected magnetic grout.
  • the system may comprise a processing resource configured to receive detection data and to process the detection data to provide the indication of penetration into the injection region.
  • Providing an indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout may comprise forming an image of an extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout into the injection region.
  • the system for example the processing resource, may be configured to use the detected magnetic signal from the injected magnetic grout to form an image of an extent of penetration of the injected magnetic grout into the construction site.
  • the system for example the processing resource, may be further configured to determine a location for a further injection borehole in dependence on the indication of penetration of the injected magnetic grout.
  • the magnetic grout may comprise at least one of: a ferromagnetic material, a ferrimagnetic material, a super-paramagnetic material.
  • a grout penetration detection system according to an embodiment is illustrated in Figure 3 .
  • a first injection borehole 10 (which may also be called an injection well) extends into a subsurface, which may comprise soil and/or rock. Further injection boreholes 40 may be subsequently drilled into the subsurface.
  • Several monitoring boreholes 12 (which may also be called monitoring wells, observation wells or observation boreholes) also extend into the subsurface. The distance between each monitoring borehole 12 and the first injection borehole 10 is known.
  • a magnetometer 14 is placed in each monitoring borehole 12.
  • the magnetometer 14 is a G-882 magnetometer adapted for downhole application.
  • any appropriate magnetometer may be used.
  • any magnetic field detector suitable for measuring magnetic field or other magnetic parameter may be used in place of or in addition to magnetometer 14.
  • Each magnetometer 14 may have an integrated GPS for accurate positioning in 3D.
  • Each magnetometer 14 may be capable of easy motion up and down the borehole and capable of real-time data acquisition.
  • a data acquisition unit 5 is connected to each of the magnetometers 14.
  • the connection between the data acquisition unit 5 and the magnetometers 14 is a wired connection.
  • the connection between the data acquisition unit 5 and the magnetometers 14 may be a wireless connection.
  • the data acquisition unit 5 is connected to a processing resource in the form of computing apparatus 6.
  • the connection between the data acquisition unit 5 and computing apparatus 6 may be permanent or temporary and may be wireless or wired.
  • Computing apparatus 6 is configured to run analysis software 8.
  • the computing apparatus 6 is a general purpose personal computer (PC). In other embodiments, computing apparatus 6 may be any suitable apparatus capable of running analysis software 8, for example a laptop or tablet, or a high-performance computer. In the present embodiment, the computing apparatus 6 is present at the grouting site. In other embodiments, the computing apparatus 6 may be remote from the grouting site. While in the present embodiment, the magnetic field functionality is implemented in analysis software 8, in other embodiments it may be implemented in any hardware, software, or combination of hardware and software. Although in the present embodiment, a separate data acquisition unit 5 and computing apparatus 6 are used, in other embodiments the data acquisition unit 5 and computing apparatus 6 may be replaced by a single unit having the functionality of both the data acquisition unit 5 and the computing apparatus 6. In further embodiments, the functionality of the data acquisition unit 5 and/or computing apparatus 6 may be split over multiple units.
  • magnetic grout 16 is injected into a 3 m interval of the injection borehole 10 for a period of time.
  • the magnetic grout 16 spreads into the subsurface.
  • the injection of magnetic grout 16 is followed by injection of normal (non-magnetic) grout 18 which also spreads into the subsurface. The injection may then be repeated for further intervals of the injection borehole, moving upwards.
  • Figure 4 is a flowchart illustrating in outline a method according to an embodiment, in which magnetic grout is injected into the first injection borehole 10 and (optionally) into further injection boreholes 40 and the penetration of the grout is monitored using magnetometers 14 in monitoring boreholes 12.
  • the magnetic grout may be injected by an injector.
  • a magnetic grout 16 is selected or designed.
  • the magnetic grout 16 may also be described as a detectible grout.
  • the magnetic grout 16 is selected or designed to have sufficiently high magnetic susceptibility or other magnetic property that, once injected, it can be detected using the magnetometers 14.
  • the magnetic grout 16 is designed to have sufficiently high magnetic susceptibility or other magnetic property that it can be detected with a desired accuracy, from the distance of the monitoring boreholes 12.
  • the monitoring boreholes are placed around 10 m from the injection borehole 10. In other embodiments, any suitable distance may be used, such that the monitoring boreholes are far enough away from the injection borehole not to interfere with the grouting, and close enough to the injection borehole to be capable of detecting the magnetic grout 16.
  • the distance between an injection borehole and a monitoring borehole may be between 5 and 15 m. In other embodiments, the distance between an injection borehole and a monitoring borehole may be between 5 and 10 m. In some embodiments, the distance between an injection borehole and a monitoring borehole may be up to 50 m. Such embodiments may use magnetic materials with a high magnetic susceptibility. In other embodiments, the distance between an injection borehole and a monitoring borehole may be less than 5 m, for example in embodiments for which the desired grout penetration is in the range of 1 to 2 m.
  • a magnetic grout 16 which comprises cement, water, and a magnetic additive (which may be described as a magnetic mineral additive).
  • the magnetic additive has an appropriate magnetic susceptibility and the magnetic grout 16 contains a given percentage of the magnetic additive.
  • the choice of magnetic grout 16 (for example, the percentage of magnetic additive and/or the choice of magnetic additive) may be dependent on a length of time for which grout containing the magnetic additive is intended to be injected into the injection borehole. Therefore, a length of time for which magnetic grout 16 will be injected is also determined at stage 20.
  • a change in the properties of a magnetic grout 16 may be achieved by (i) altering the magnetic susceptibility of the additive, (ii) increasing the percentage of magnetic mineral additive or (iii) by injecting the magnetic grout 16 for a longer time period (thereby increasing the mass of magnetic material).
  • Design or selection considerations for the magnetic grout 16 may also include consideration of the magnetic grout performance (e.g. flowability and bleed) to ensure that the grout remains workable, and the cost of the magnetic additive.
  • the magnetic grout performance e.g. flowability and bleed
  • the magnetic grout 16 is selected from a range of potential magnetic grouts.
  • data on various properties of the potential magnetic grout is available. The properties may include percentage of magnetic additive, magnetic susceptibility, flowability, bleed, and cost.
  • Magnetic additives used in one or more of the magnetic grouts may comprise at least one of magnetite, maghemite, iron filings, neodymium (and neodymium compounds), ilmenite (iron titanium oxide, FeTiO 3 ), jacobsite (manganese iron oxide), magnesioferrite (manganese iron oxide), gregite (iron sulphide), samarium-cobolt magnets (Sm 2 (Co, Fe, Cu, Zr) 17 ) in either standard or high temperature magnet variants), NEO magnets (Nd 2 Fe 14 B and variants with some Al, Nb, Dy and including N42 grade NEO magnet that is Ni-Cu-Ni coated), AINiCo magnets (for example AlNiCo 5 grade LNG37), ferrite magnets (ceramic magnets made up of complex oxides with compositions XOFe 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 as the main component, for example ferrite grade C5 or Y30 magnets), or super
  • any appropriate ferromagnetic, ferrimagnetic or super-paramagnetic material may be used. Any material having appropriate magnetic properties such that it may be detected using a magnetometer or other magnetic field detector may be used. Any material having an appropriate magnetic susceptibility or magnetic moment may be used. In some embodiments, the material may be a material that only shows magnetisation when an external magnetic field is applied.
  • the magnetic grout 16 comprises Procem 52.5N + 5% magnetite.
  • Procem is an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), which is produced by Lafarge and has a grain size between 5 and 30 ⁇ m.
  • OPC Ordinary Portland Cement
  • the cement is mixed with water at a ratio of 1 part water to 2 parts of cement/.
  • Magnetite is then added at 5% by mass of cement. Therefore the magnetic grout has a ratio of 1 part water to 2.1 parts cement/magnetite mix.
  • any suitable amount of magnetic material and any suitable ratio of water to cement may be used.
  • any suitable cement or alternative to cement may be used, for example, an Ordinary Portland Cement (for example, Lafarge blue circle, 42.5 CEM1, 52.5 CEM1), a microfine or ultrafine cement (for example, Ultrafin from Cementa, Rheocem 650/900 from BASF, Spinor from Holcim, TamCrete MFC from TAM UK, Microcem 550, 650, 650 SR, 900 all produced by Lafarge), a colloidal silica/silica sol (for example MP320 colloidal silica, sold by MEYCO BASF), a silicate grout (for example sodium silicate grout such as N(R) sodium silicate sold by PQR Corporation).
  • an Ordinary Portland Cement for example, Lafarge blue circle, 42.5 CEM1, 52.5 CEM1
  • a microfine or ultrafine cement for example, Ultrafin from Cementa, Rheocem 650/900 from BASF, Spinor from Holcim, TamCrete MFC from TAM UK, Microcem
  • a superplasticiser for example Glenium 51 from BASF
  • a stabilising agent for example Grout Aid from Elken Multigrout
  • an accelerator for silica sol for example NaCl or CaCl 2
  • a setting or hardening agent for silicate grout for example fly ash.
  • the magnetic grout 16 is selected from a range of potential magnetic grouts
  • the magnetic grout 16 may be designed by performing experiments as described below with reference to Figures 5 and 6 .
  • the grout may be designed by determining a magnetic additive, a percentage of magnetic additive, and a cement or cement-alternative.
  • a magnetic grout additive (mass and susceptibility) may be designed such that the grout has the desired detection accuracy, grout properties (such as flowability and bleed) and can be used at an appropriate distance from the monitoring boreholes 12.
  • the selected magnetic material has a susceptibility that does not change much with time.
  • magnetic materials may be chosen that produce a change in magnetic signal with time (which may be described as an evolving magnetic field) corresponding to changes in the cement due to grouting.
  • a look-up table of magnetic grouts and/or of magnetic additives may be provided, and the magnetic grout 16 or a magnetic additive to form the magnetic grout 16 may be selected at stage 20.
  • the magnetic grout 16 is pre-selected and stage 20 is omitted from the process of Figure 4 .
  • a magnetic grout 16 may be used that has been previously selected or designed for a different grouting campaign.
  • a background measurement of the magnetic field is taken using the magnetometers 14.
  • Each magnetometer 14 is swept throughout the length of its respective monitoring borehole 12.
  • the magnetometer 14 starts at the bottom of the borehole and is moved through the borehole from bottom to top, taking magnetic field measurements as it is moved up the borehole.
  • the magnetometer records continuously while it is swept up the borehole.
  • a GPS is used to enable accurate location determination during the measurement.
  • the magnetometer 14 is moved from top to bottom while measurements are taken, or measurements can be taken in either direction of movement. Measurements may be taken continuously or at any appropriate time increment or distance increment.
  • the magnetometer 14 moves through the entire length of the monitoring borehole 12 while taking magnetic field measurements, in other embodiments the magnetometer 14 may be moved through a portion of the monitoring borehole 12 or may remain stationary.
  • measurements are taken in the monitoring boreholes
  • measurements may alternatively or additionally be made in the injection borehole (for example, at a position vertically above the interval in which grout is being injected) and/or in one or more boreholes in which grout is subsequently to be injected.
  • measurements may alternatively or additionally be made within a subsurface tunnel or shaft.
  • measurements of the magnetic field may alternatively or additionally be made at the ground surface.
  • cement grouts not be used in the upper 15 m of the subsurface due to possible ground heave
  • alternative grouts such as silica sol may be used in the 15 m nearest the surface.
  • measurements made from magnetometers placed on the ground surface may be appropriate. Magnetometers placed at the ground surface may be used to detect the distance to the upper boundary of the injected magnetic grout volume and may also be used to estimate the shape of the injected magnetic grout volume.
  • Magnetic field data is transmitted from each magnetometer 14 to data acquisition unit 5 and from data acquisition unit 5 to computing apparatus 6.
  • the result of each measurement taken by each magnetometer 14 is transmitted to the data acquisition unit 5 and computing apparatus 6 in real time or near-real time.
  • data may be stored at the magnetometer 14 for a time before being transmitted to the data acquisition unit 5, or may be stored at the data acquisition unit 5 for a time before being transmitted to the computing apparatus 6.
  • measurements may be taken for the entire sweep of the monitoring borehole 12 and then transmitted as a batch.
  • grout is injected into the bottom 3 m interval of first injection borehole 10. Although in the present embodiment, 3 m intervals are used, in other embodiments any suitable interval size may be used.
  • magnetic grout 16 is injected.
  • the magnetic grout may be injected for a time between 10 and 30 minutes. In other embodiments, any appropriate time period may be used.
  • injection of normal (non-magnetic) grout 18 is performed.
  • the injection of normal grout 18 is stopped when a maximum pressure is reached or when a maximum volume of grout is injected. Therefore the injection of the bottom 3 m interval of injection borehole 10 comprises an injection of magnetic grout 16 and subsequent injection of normal grout 18 into the same interval.
  • the total grout injection (magnetic grout plus normal grout) may take, for example, between half an hour and two hours. In other embodiments, any suitable injection duration may be used.
  • the normal (non-magnetic) grout 18 is made from the same cement as the magnetic grout 16 but without the magnetic additive.
  • the normal grout comprises 1 part of water mixed with 2 parts of Procem 52.5N.
  • Normal or non-magnetic grout may refer to grout to which no magnetic additive has been added.
  • Normal or non-magnetic grout may itself have an inherent susceptibility, but the susceptibility of the normal or non-magnetic grout is lower than that of the magnetic grout 16.
  • the magnetic grout 16 has a susceptibility such that the magnetic grout 16 may be detected by the magnetometer 14, and the non-magnetic grout 18 has a susceptibility such that the non-magnetic grout may not be detected by the magnetometer 14 (or may not easily be detected by the magnetometer 14).
  • the magnetic grout 16 spreads through the subsurface, forming a grouted volume of which the leading edge may be described as a grout front.
  • the normal grout 18 follows behind the magnetic grout 16.
  • the furthest grout from the injection borehole 10 is expected to be magnetic grout 16, and therefore detection of the magnetic grout 16 may be used to determine the extent of grout penetration into the subsurface.
  • both magnetic grout 16 and non-magnetic grout 18 are injected into the injection interval
  • only magnetic grout may be injected without subsequent injection of non-magnetic grout 18 into that injection interval. For example, if the desired penetration distance is relatively small and/or the grout volume is small, then only magnetic grout may be used.
  • the subsurface region into which the borehole is drilled, and into which the grout is injected, may be referred to as an injection region.
  • the grout may be said to extend into or penetrate the injection region if the grout extends into at least part of the injection region.
  • the grout may be said to extend into or penetrate the injection region if the grout fills at least some pores, voids, cracks or fractures in the injection region.
  • the grout may not fill the whole injection region.
  • each magnetometer 14 is swept throughout the entire length of its monitoring borehole 12. In other embodiments, each magnetometer is swept through only a portion of the length of the observation borehole at stage 26. For example, the magnetometer 14 may be swept through a length that extends above and below the interval in which the magnetic grout is being injected into the injection borehole 10. For example, if the grout is injected into the 15 to 18 m interval, the magnetometer 14 may be swept between 10 and 23 m in its monitoring borehole 12.
  • Magnetic field data is transmitted from each magnetometer 14 to data acquisition unit 5 and from data acquisition unit 5 to computing apparatus 6.
  • the transmission of data may be in real time or as a batch.
  • the measurements of magnetic field recorded after the grout injection, with the magnetic grout present, are expected to be different to the background measurements of magnetic field that were collected at stage 22.
  • the background measurements of magnetic field from stage 22 are subtracted from the post-injection magnetic field measurements taken at stage 26.
  • the resulting magnetic field data should represent the magnetic signal produced by the injected grout volume.
  • the background magnetic field measurements from stage 22 are subtracted from the magnetic field measurements from stage 26, in other embodiments the magnetic field measurements from stage 26 are subtracted from the background magnetic field measurements from stage 22.
  • the resulting magnetic field measurements that were determined in stage 28 are used to estimate the 3D shape of the leading edge of the volume of magnetic grout 16 that has been injected into the subsurface.
  • the measurements of the magnetic field thereby provide a non-intrusive method of detecting the injected magnetic grout, since no contact with the injected magnetic grout is required.
  • monitoring boreholes are drilled into the subsurface, there is no need to drill into the grouted volume (or grout curtain) and the method is therefore non-intrusive to the grouted volume.
  • the analysis software 8 performs a 3D inversion of the resulting magnetic signal determined in stage 28 to estimate the position of the grout front for the grouted interval.
  • the analysis software 8 performs a method using known equations for 3D inversion of magnetic anomalies (see, for example, Reid, Allsop, Granser, Millet and Somerton, 1990, Geophysics, Vol. 55, No. 1 (January 1990) pp 80-91 ; Li and Oldenburg, 1996. Geophysics, Vol. 61, No. 2 (March-April 1996); P. 394-408 ).
  • the analysis software 8 makes use of the fact that the magnetic susceptibility of the injected magnetic grout 16 is known from stage 20.
  • the background (ambient) magnetic field prior to the injection is also known, having been detected at stage 22.
  • the magnetic susceptibility and ambient magnetic field give known parameters for the inversion process.
  • the analysis software 8 allows the information gained from multiple data sets to be maximised.
  • any suitable method for determining a shape representative of the injected magnetic grout from the magnetic field data may be used.
  • the method may comprise an inversion of the magnetic field to determine what 3D shape of magnetic grout would lead to the observed resulting magnetic field.
  • the method may comprise forward modelling of possible shapes representative of the injected magnetic grout, and fitting those shapes to the observed magnetic field data.
  • the 3D shape of the leading edge of the magnetic grout is an indication of the penetration of the magnetic grout into the subsurface.
  • the extent to which the magnetic grout has penetrated is represented by the 3D shape.
  • a different indication of penetration may be used.
  • 2D distances may be provided, such as the distance from each magnetometer or monitoring borehole to the leading edge of the magnetic grout.
  • the indication of penetration may be an indication of whether or not the magnetic grout has reached a desired point (for example, a message indicating whether grouting should be terminated or not).
  • the indication of penetration may or may not be communicated with a user at stage 30.
  • an image is formed of the determined 3D shape of the leading edge and the image is displayed to a user.
  • the analysis software 8 performs both the determination of the magnetic field due to the injected magnetic grout and the inversion of the magnetic field to determine the 3D shape of the magnetic grout, in other embodiments two or more programs may be used.
  • the shape of the leading edge of the magnetic grout that was determined at stage 30 is added to an overall penetration shape estimate.
  • the overall penetration shape is the combined shape of penetration determined for each injection interval along the length of the borehole.
  • the overall penetration shape estimate is the shape of the leading edge that was determined at stage 30.
  • the overall penetration shape estimate may combine the shape estimated for the first injection with the shape estimated for a second and subsequent injections.
  • an image representing the overall penetration shape estimate is displayed on a display screen where it may be viewed by a user. In other embodiments, the overall penetration shape estimate may not be displayed.
  • images representing the background magnetic field and magnetic field after injection are also available to the user. For example, images of the background magnetic field and magnetic field after injection may be displayed alongside images of the grout penetration shape estimate for each injection interval or the overall penetration shape estimate for the length of the borehole, or on different screens or frames.
  • Stage 34 is a decision point in the flow chart which depends on whether more grout is being injected in the borehole. If more grout is to be injected into the borehole, then the process of the flow chart returns to stage 24.
  • a second injection into the second-to-bottom 3 m interval of the first injection borehole 10 is performed.
  • the injection once again comprises an injection of magnetic grout 16 for a predetermined time followed by non-magnetic grout 18.
  • the injection time for the magnetic grout 16 for the second interval is the same as the injection time for the magnetic grout 16 in the first interval. In other embodiments, different times may be used.
  • magnetic grout 16 is injected for a given time, in alternative embodiments a given volume of magnetic grout 16 may be injected.
  • each magnetometer 14 acquires magnetic field data over depth for its respective monitoring borehole 12 and transmits the data to data acquisition unit 5 and computing apparatus 6, in the same manner as in the first iteration of stage 26.
  • the magnetometer is swept over the full length of the monitoring borehole 12, but in other embodiments the magnetometer may be swept over only a portion of the monitoring borehole 12.
  • the analysis software 8 subtracts the magnetic field data from the first iteration of stage 26 (the data for the first injection interval) from the magnetic field data from the second iteration of stage 26 (the data for the second injection interval). Therefore the magnetic field measured after the previous injection is now considered to be the background (ambient) magnetic field.
  • the computing apparatus 6 estimates the 3D shape of the magnetic grout that has just been injected (the magnetic grout that was injected into the second interval) by inverting the magnetic field data from the second iteration of stage 28 using analysis software 8.
  • the computing apparatus 6 adds the 3D shape of the leading edge that was determined for the second interval to the 3D shape of the leading edge that was determined for the first interval, thereby obtaining an overall penetration shape estimate comprising grout from both injections.
  • the overall penetration shape estimate is displayed on a display screen for viewing by a user.
  • the previous penetration shape estimate, from before the most recent injection, is also available to the user.
  • stage 34 At the second iteration of stage 34, more grout is still required in the first injection borehole 10, and stages 24 to 32 are repeated until the grouting of the first injection borehole 10 has been completed.
  • stages 24 to 32 are repeated until the grouting of the first injection borehole 10 has been completed.
  • the previously-detected magnetic field is removed from newly-detected magnetic field at stage 28 so that just the signal from the new injection interval remains. This can then be used to estimate the shape of the leading grout edge for that interval alone.
  • a location has previously been proposed for a second injection borehole 40, which has not yet been drilled.
  • the overall penetration shape estimate (which may also be called a 3D grouted volume estimate) is used to review the location of the second injection borehole 40.
  • the shape of the final penetrated volume for the first injection borehole 10 can be used to determine the optimal location for the second injection borehole 40. For example, if the penetration of the grout (as determined by the detection of the magnetic grout front) from the first injection borehole 40 has been greater than expected, the second injection borehole 40 may be drilled further away from the first injection borehole 10 than was originally planned. Conversely, if the penetration of the grout has been less than expected, the second injection borehole 40 may be drilled closer to the first injection borehole 40 than was originally planned. The second injection borehole 40 may be drilled in a position such that the extent of the grout injected at the further injection borehole may be expected to join up or overlap with the grout injected at the first injection borehole. For example, the injection boreholes may be placed so as to create a grout curtain.
  • analysis software 8 reviews the proposed location for the second injection borehole 40 and, if necessary, determines a revised location for the second injection borehole 40 based on the determined 3D grout penetration.
  • different software may be used to determine the location of the second borehole location than is used to determine the 3D grout penetration.
  • the position of the second injection borehole 40 may be determined by a user, for example by viewing a 3D image of the extent of penetration of the grout injected into the first injection borehole 10. In other embodiments, any manual, automatic, or semi-automatic method of determining the position of the second injection borehole 40 may be used.
  • the location of the second injection borehole 40 may be predetermined and may not be altered at stage 36.
  • the second injection borehole 40 may already have been drilled.
  • stage 36 may be omitted.
  • the same monitoring boreholes 12 containing the magnetometers 14 are used to measure magnetic field for the injection of grout into the second injection borehole 40 as were used to measure magnetic field for the injection of grout into the first injection borehole 10.
  • additional monitoring boreholes 12 are also drilled along with the second injection borehole 40.
  • some of the same monitoring boreholes are used as were used for the first injection borehole.
  • boreholes that will later be injected into may be used as monitoring boreholes before they are used as injection boreholes.
  • Stages 24 to 32 are repeated for all the intervals at the second injection borehole 40 until the second injection borehole 40 is complete.
  • a third borehole and subsequent boreholes may be drilled and grout injected.
  • the penetration shape estimate is updated for each injection at each borehole, until the grout curtain is complete.
  • the same set of monitoring boreholes 12 are used to monitor injections for each of the injection boreholes 10, 40.
  • additional monitoring boreholes 12 may be drilled when a further injection borehole 40 is drilled.
  • only some of the monitoring boreholes 12 have magnetometers 14 present for any given injection, for example the monitoring boreholes 12 within a given distance (for example, 10 m) of the borehole that is currently being injected.
  • all the monitoring boreholes 12 contain magnetometers 14, but only data from the magnetometers 14 nearest to the borehole that is currently being injected are used.
  • stage 26 After a final injection is performed on a final borehole 40, a final magnetic field measurement is taken in a final iteration of stage 26. The penultimate magnetic field data is subtracted from the final magnetic field data at stage 28, and the results are used to determine the extent of the grout at stage 30. At stage 32 the determined extent of the grout is added to the overall grout penetration estimate. The overall grout penetration estimate is displayed to the user, and the flowchart terminates at stage 38 with a completed grouting campaign.
  • each set of magnetic field data is stored to a data store, and each 3D estimate of the grout penetration volume due to each injection and overall penetration estimate is also stored to a data store.
  • the magnetic field is measured after each grout injection, and the magnetic field prior to a given injection is subtracted from the magnetic field after the injection.
  • the background magnetic field is subtracted from the magnetic field after the first injection.
  • the magnetic field after the injection immediately previous to the current injection is subtracted from the magnetic field after the current injection.
  • the magnetic field is measured after each injection
  • the magnetic field may be repeatedly or continuously measured during an injection.
  • Several magnetic field measurements are taken during the injection, with the magnetometers 14 fixed in one location (at a depth corresponding to the injection interval) within each monitoring borehole.
  • the magnetic field prior to injection is subtracted from the magnetic field measured during injection.
  • the resulting magnetic field may be used to determine the extent of the magnetic grout in real time while the injection is being performed.
  • the determined extent of the magnetic grout may be used to control the injection, for example to determine a time at which to stop the injection.
  • the time at which to stop the injection may be the time at which the desired grout penetration has been achieved, as indicated by the magnetic field measurement.
  • the magnetic field for the first (or other) injection stage, or multiple stages may be monitored in real time to monitor the grout penetration during that stage as described above.
  • the results of the real-time monitoring of the grout penetration during the first (or other) injection stage(s) may be used to determine an appropriate GIN for the rock volume.
  • Real time measurement may further be of use where the magnetic material is a material that produces a change in magnetic signal with time.
  • the change in magnetic signal with time may correspond to changes in the cement due to setting or curing.
  • the magnetic signal may therefore be monitored in real time to monitor changes in the cement.
  • magnetic grout 16 is injected at the start of the injection for each interval, followed by normal grout 18, in other embodiments, magnetic grout may be repeatedly introduced during the injection. In further embodiment, magnetic grout 16 is used for the entire injection and no normal grout 18 is used. In alternative embodiments, magnetic grout 16 is only used in certain selected injections, and other injections are carried out using only normal grout 18.
  • the magnetic field of the magnetic grout 16 is determined using the method of Figure 3 without an external magnetic field being applied to the magnetic grout 16 (other than the Earth's magnetic field), in other embodiments an external magnetic field is applied to the magnetic grout 16, for example an external magnetic field is applied to the injection region.
  • the magnetic field associated with the magnetic grout may comprise an alteration to the applied magnetic field that is caused by the presence of the magnetic grout 16.
  • the apparatus may comprise a magnetic field source, for example an electromagnet, for applying the magnetic field. Any suitable magnetic field source may be used.
  • grouting with magnetic grout 16 may be used in ground strengthening, for example to support surface construction or to strengthen ground for subsurface tunnelling or mining.
  • the injection region may comprise a region of ground improvement (for example for improving ground stability by, for example, filling in sinkholes or remediating differential settlements).
  • Grouting with magnetic grout 16 may be used for the creation of hydraulic barriers, for example barriers for reservoir dams and barriers for the prevention of contaminant migration in groundwater.
  • Grouting with magnetic grout may be used in any appropriate application, for example in any appropriate ground engineering application.
  • Procem 52.5N and Ultrafin 16 have been used.
  • Procem 52.5N and Ultrafin 16 are common in the grouting industry.
  • Procem is an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), which is produced by Lafarge and has a grain size between 5 and 30 ⁇ m.
  • OPC Ordinary Portland Cement
  • Ultrafin 16 is a microcement produced by Cementa where 95% of the cement material has a grain size less than 16 ⁇ m.
  • Samples were created by mixing cement with water in the ratios of 1 part water to 2 parts cement for the OPC and 1 part water to 1 part cement for the Ultrafin Cement. Magnetic minerals were then added to the cement. A number of different materials were trialled at different percentages (by solid mass). Results presented below primarily focus on magnetite, with 95% purity and a particle size of less than 5 ⁇ m.
  • the volume magnetic susceptibilities of the pure Ordinary Portland Cement and pure Ultrafin Cement mixed with water in the ratios listed are 5.7460 x 10 -4 and 2.2307 x 10 -4 respectively.
  • susceptibility did not vary much with time.
  • the variation of susceptibility with time may depend on the magnetic mineral and cement used.
  • Figure 5 is a plot of volume magnetic susceptibility against percentage of magnetic material (expressed as a percentage of the mass of cement).
  • the magnetic susceptibilities of OPC and Ultrafin with 1%, 2.5%, 5% and 10% quantities of magnetite are plotted in Figure 5 .
  • the susceptibilities of OPC with 5% maghemite and OPC with 5% iron filings are also plotted.
  • Figure 5 shows that the magnetic susceptibility of the grouting mixture increases in a predictable way for the magnetic additives shown: susceptibility increases linearly with increasing mass of the magnetic additive. This predictability may indicates that the grout mixture may be designed to achieve a desired volume magnetic susceptibility by either changing the type of magnetic mineral added, or the mass of magnetic mineral added.
  • Cement properties of the detectable grout were established to ensure usability.
  • Cement properties of the cements include bleed and time of efflux through the flow cone.
  • the time of efflux of a specified volume of grout (1.725 l) through a standardised flow cone allow the flowability of the cement to be established.
  • the time of efflux may be required to be in the range of 31 to 35 s.
  • Other grouting applications may require the time of efflux to be within alternative ranges to ensure usability.
  • the bleed of the cement refers to the accumulation of water at the surface of freshly mixed grout.
  • a stable grout with less than 2% bleed after 2 hours is usually required.
  • Other grouting applications may have alternative requirements for bleed.
  • Bleed tests were carried out in accordance with ASTM International standard C940. Bleed is the volume of accumulated surface water divided by the initial grout volume. Bleed was measured for 800 ml samples measured in a 1000 ml graduated cylinder. Grout mixtures were prepared for the OPC and Ultrafin cements in the following water to cement ratios: 1:2 and 1:1.5 respectively.
  • Figure 6 presents the bleed test results for the magnetic grout mixtures (OPC plus 5% magnetite, Ultrafin plus 5% magnetite) and for the corresponding normal grouts (without any magnetite present). The bleed for the detectible grout was found to be similar to that of the pure cement grouts containing no magnetic additives and was within the acceptable range, having less than 2% bleed after 2 hours.
  • samples of cement and magnetite mix were cast for burial.
  • the two cements used were again Procem 52.5N and Ultrafin 16.
  • the magnetic grout mixture deployed used the addition of Magnetite.
  • the Magnetite was in powder form with a particle size of less than 5 ⁇ m and was 95% pure.
  • Samples of detectible grout cement were produced by mixing the cement and Magnetite with water in the ratios of 1 part water to 2 parts cement for the Ordinary Portland Cement and 1.5 parts water to 2 parts cement for the Ultrafin Cement.
  • the samples used contained either 5% or 10% Magnetite.
  • the detectible grout mixture was poured into cylindrical and rectangular shaped moulds and left for several days to cure.
  • the volumes of the final samples for burial, and subsequent detection were between 760 cm 3 and 1200 cm 3 .
  • a G-858 MagMapper Magnetometer was used for the field trials.
  • the G-858 is a high performance caesium vapour magnetometer, which has a high sensitivity of 0.01nT.
  • the G-858 has two magnetometers, which can be deployed vertically, one above the other.
  • FIG. 7 An example of magnetic field maps collected from the field trial is shown in Figure 7 . To determine the location and depth of a grout sample, the magnetic field was mapped before and after burial of the sample.
  • Figure 7a is a magnetic field map showing the ambient magnetic field over the 25 m 2 area (the 5m by 5m square) prior to burial of the grout sample.
  • the results of Figure 7a may be considered to be a measurement of the earth's magnetic field.
  • Figure 7b shows a map of magnetic field which was taken after the burial of the grout sample, and includes the influence of the buried grout sample.
  • the grout sample in this trial was three bricks of magnetic grout prepared using Ultrafin cement with 10% magnetite. All bricks were buried at the same depth. The bricks were buried centred around point (2.75 m, 2.75 m) at a depth of 15 cm below the ground surface.
  • Figure 9 plots the magnetic field of the grouted objects 70 against their distance from the magnetometer (for samples buried at different depths as shown in Figure 8 ).
  • the magnetometer used is the lower magnetometer 66.
  • Magnetic field data (shown as points) is plotted alongside a model of the decay of the magnetic field (shown as a solid line)
  • Figure 9 demonstrates that the magnetic field appears to be inversely proportional to the cube of the distance between the grouted object 70 and the magnetometer 66. This is as expected based on theoretical predictions for the decay of a magnetic dipole point anomaly. This may demonstrate that the magnetic field due to the presence of a magnetic grout 16 may be used to predict the distance of the magnetic grout 16 from a magnetometer 66.
  • the main source of error in these walk-over field trials may be a lack of precise knowledge of where the sensor itself is, both laterally and vertically, since it is handheld by a person walking across the site.
  • the embodiment described above with relation to Figures 3 and 4 may be expected to have smaller positioning errors, as the sensor will be within a monitoring borehole and GPS technology may be able to determine its 3D coordinates with mm-scale precision.
  • magnetic field data is processed to determine penetration into an injection region of injected magnetic grout.
  • detection data other than magnetic field data may be obtained, for example one or more of magnetic susceptibility data, magnetisation data, or further data associated with any of magnetic field, magnetic susceptibility or magnetisation may be obtained, and that detection data may be processed to determine the penetration into the injection region of the injected magnetic grout.
  • embodiments may implement certain functionality by way of a computer program or computer programs having computer-readable instructions that are executable to perform the method of the embodiments.
  • the computer program functionality could be implemented in hardware (for example by means of CPU).
  • the embodiments may also be implemented by one or more ASICs (application specific integrated circuit) or by a mix of hardware or software.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)

Claims (13)

  1. Procédé comprenant :
    l'injection d'un mastic magnétique dans une région d'injection en injectant le mastic magnétique dans un trou de forage (10) qui s'étend dans la région d'injection ; et
    la détection du mastic magnétique injecté permettant de fournir une indication de pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté dans la région d'injection,
    caractérisé en ce que :
    la détection du mastic magnétique injecté comprend la détection d'un champ magnétique associé au mastic magnétique en utilisant un magnétomètre (14) positionné dans un autre trou de forage (12) adjacent au trou de forage (10).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le mastic magnétique est injecté dans la région d'injection et ensuite un mastic non-magnétique est injecté dans la région d'injection.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2 dans lequel au moins un de a) et b) :
    a) le mastic magnétique est injecté dans la région d'injection pendant un temps sélectionné avant que le mastic non-magnétique ne soit injecté ;
    b) un volume sélectionné de mastic magnétique est injecté dans la région d'injection avant que le mastic non-magnétique ne soit injecté.
  4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la détection du champ magnétique associé au mastic magnétique comprend la détection d'un champ magnétique de fond avant d'injecter le mastic magnétique dans la région d'injection et la détection d'un autre champ magnétique pendant ou après l'injection du mastic magnétique dans la région d'injection, afin de déterminer un changement de champ magnétique du fait du mastic magnétique injecté.
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, le procédé comprenant en outre l'application d'un champ magnétique à la région d'injection, dans lequel la détection du champ magnétique associé au mastic magnétique comprend la détection d'un champ magnétique de fond comprenant le champ magnétique appliqué avant l'injection du mastic magnétique dans la région d'injection et la détection d'un autre champ magnétique pendant ou après l'injection du mastic magnétique dans la région d'injection, afin de déterminer ainsi un changement dans le champ magnétique de fond dû au mastic magnétique injecté.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 4 ou 5, dans lequel la fourniture d'une indication de pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté comprend l'utilisation du changement de champ magnétique permettant de déterminer une ampleur du mastic magnétique injecté.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un de a), b) et c) :
    a) le magnétomètre (14) est positionné dans le trou de forage d'injection (10) ;
    b) le magnétomètre (14) est positionné à la surface du sol ;
    c) le magnétomètre (14) est positionné dans un tunnel ou puits sous la surface.
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la détection du mastic magnétique injecté comprend la détection non-intrusive du mastic magnétique injecté.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la fourniture d'une indication de pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté comprend au moins un de a) ou b) :
    a) la détermination d'une forme représentative de l'ampleur de la pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté, et éventuellement dans lequel la détermination d'une forme représentative de l'ampleur de pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté comprend la détermination d'une forme représentative d'un bord d'attaque du mastic magnétique injecté ;
    b) la formation d'une image d'une ampleur de pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté dans la région d'injection.
  10. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, le procédé comprenant en outre au moins un de a) ou b) :
    a) la détermination d'un emplacement pour un trou de forage d'injection ultérieur en fonction de l'indication de pénétration du mastic magnétique injecté ;
    b) l'ajout d'un additif magnétique au mastic permettant de former le mastic magnétique.
  11. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un de a) ou b) :
    a) la région d'injection comprend une région souterraine ;
    b) la région d'injection comprend un site de construction et le procédé comprend en outre l'injection du mastic magnétique dans un trou de forage qui s'étend dans le site de construction.
  12. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le mastic magnétique comprend au moins un parmi : un matériau ferromagnétique, un matériau ferrimagnétique, un matériau super-paramagnétique.
  13. Système de détection de mastic, le système comprenant :
    un injecteur permettant d'injecter le mastic magnétique dans une région d'injection en injectant un mastic magnétique dans un trou de forage (10) qui s'étend dans la région d'injection ; et
    un détecteur permettant de détecter du mastic magnétique injecté afin de fournir une indication de pénétration dans une région d'injection du mastic magnétique injecté, dans lequel le détecteur comprend un magnétomètre (14),
    dans lequel la détection du mastic magnétique comprend la détection d'un champ magnétique associé au mastic magnétique en utilisant le magnétomètre (14),
    caractérisé en ce que :
    le magnétomètre (14) est positionné dans un autre trou de forage (12), adjacent au trou de forage dans lequel un mastic est injecté.
EP15720771.3A 2014-05-02 2015-05-01 Procédé et système de détection de coulis magnétique Active EP3137688B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB1407796.0A GB201407796D0 (en) 2014-05-02 2014-05-02 Magnetic grout detection method and system
PCT/GB2015/051297 WO2015166281A1 (fr) 2014-05-02 2015-05-01 Procédé et système de détection de coulis magnétique

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3137688A1 EP3137688A1 (fr) 2017-03-08
EP3137688B1 true EP3137688B1 (fr) 2018-12-05

Family

ID=50980512

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15720771.3A Active EP3137688B1 (fr) 2014-05-02 2015-05-01 Procédé et système de détection de coulis magnétique

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3137688B1 (fr)
GB (1) GB201407796D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2015166281A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108445074B (zh) * 2018-02-05 2021-12-28 浙江大学宁波理工学院 混凝土裂缝修复效果的检验装置和方法
US10995466B1 (en) * 2020-02-24 2021-05-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Polymer geo-injection for protecting underground structures
CN112730742B (zh) * 2020-12-18 2023-03-10 三峡大学 一种研究水下构筑物裂隙封堵的可视化装置及使用方法
CN114414438B (zh) * 2022-01-24 2024-01-26 中国矿业大学 一种基于质子磁力仪检测注浆扩散范围的识别方法

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2504653B2 (ja) * 1991-12-16 1996-06-05 株式会社エステック 硬化材注入構造体の造成域確認方法
JP5646309B2 (ja) * 2010-12-17 2014-12-24 鹿島建設株式会社 探査方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201407796D0 (en) 2014-06-18
WO2015166281A1 (fr) 2015-11-05
EP3137688A1 (fr) 2017-03-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ding et al. The behavior of synchronous grouting in a quasi-rectangular shield tunnel based on a large visualized model test
EP3137688B1 (fr) Procédé et système de détection de coulis magnétique
Shi et al. Geological investigation and tunnel excavation aspects of the weakness zones of Xiang’an subsea tunnels in China
CN104929146B (zh) 一种多层岩溶发育带桩基础工程施工方法
Hui et al. Application of ground penetrating radar in dam body detection
Wan et al. Lessons learnt from installation of field instrumentation
Li Displacement monitoring during the excavation and support of deep foundation pit in complex environment
Croce et al. Jet grouting
Garašić et al. Investigation and remediation of the cavern in the vrata tunnel on the Zagreb–Rijeka highway (Croatia)
Shamet et al. Development of a point-based index for Sinkhole Vulnerability Evaluation in Central Florida’s Karst Terrain
Corson et al. Field validation of a detectable, magnetic, cementitious grout for rock fracture grouting
Lunn et al. Could magnetic properties be used to image a grouted rock volume?
Mahouti et al. Ultimate bond stress between the cement grout and Tabriz marl soil measured by laboratory and full-scale experiments
Bao et al. Integrated Treatment Technology of Storage‐Mining Inclined Goaf under Expressway
Lee et al. Evaluation of grout penetration in single rock fracture using electrical resistivity
Garbin et al. Earth retention using the TRD method
Wu et al. Grouting Treatment and Parameters Optimization in Watery Karst Areas of High Speed Railway Tunnel Based on Comprehensive Geological Forecast: A Case Study
Moradi et al. Field study of the effect of grout used on tensile strength and creep behavior of grout nails in green marl
Lindh et al. Ultrasonic P-and S-Wave Reflection and CPT Soundings for Measuring Shear Strength in Soil Stabilized by Deep Lime/Cement Columns in Stockholm Norvik Port
Roadifer et al. Characterization and treatment of mélange and sandstone foundation at Calaveras Dam
Miliziano et al. Design of an underground railway station beneath a historic building in Rome and class A predictions of the induced effects
Howell Novel methods for monitoring grout penetration in hard rock
OKAZAKI et al. Groundwater management for hydraulic containment type underground LPG storage cavern excavation with the observational grouting method
TASSE LOUOKDOM Critical study of compaction grouting as a soil improvement method in Douala-Bassa industrial zone
Köpüklü et al. A Constructability Problem in a Deep Shoring System

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161128

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20171211

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180607

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1073239

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602015020862

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20181205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1073239

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190305

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190305

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190405

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190405

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602015020862

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190906

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190531

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181205

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230517

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230519

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240507

Year of fee payment: 10