EP3135391A1 - A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank - Google Patents

A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3135391A1
EP3135391A1 EP16184057.4A EP16184057A EP3135391A1 EP 3135391 A1 EP3135391 A1 EP 3135391A1 EP 16184057 A EP16184057 A EP 16184057A EP 3135391 A1 EP3135391 A1 EP 3135391A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
interstitial space
storage tank
wall
space
inspection
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16184057.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3135391B1 (en
Inventor
Maciej Pawel WASIAK
Michal Mateusz WASIAK
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cortec SpZ OO
Original Assignee
Cortec SpZ OO
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cortec SpZ OO filed Critical Cortec SpZ OO
Priority to PL16184057T priority Critical patent/PL3135391T3/en
Publication of EP3135391A1 publication Critical patent/EP3135391A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3135391B1 publication Critical patent/EP3135391B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B08CLEANING
    • B08BCLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
    • B08B9/00Cleaning hollow articles by methods or apparatus specially adapted thereto 
    • B08B9/08Cleaning containers, e.g. tanks
    • B08B9/093Cleaning containers, e.g. tanks by the force of jets or sprays
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D90/00Component parts, details or accessories for large containers
    • B65D90/0093Devices for cleaning the internal surfaces of the container and forming part of the container

Definitions

  • the subject matter of the invention relates to a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank designed in particular for the storage of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials.
  • Storage tanks both underground and above ground storage tanks, should meet requirements concerning non-pressurized and low-pressure tanks designed in particular for the storage of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials. Such tanks must meet strict safety standards; namely, they must be, inter alia, equipped with monitoring and measurement devices signalling leakages of substances to the ground and ground waters. Moreover, rigorous safety requirements compel both the manufacturers and users of storage tanks to produce and use tanks having bottom interstitial spaces and/or wall interstitial spaces.
  • Such spaces should basically prevent penetration of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials directly to the ground and ground waters. They should thus form an additional protective space located at the bottom of a storage tank in the case of a bottom interstitial space, and an additional protective space located on the walls of a storage tank in the case of a wall interstitial space. These spaces are made during the construction of a storage tank or are added in the course of its operation. They are most frequently delimited by a secondary steel bottom or a secondary laminated bottom made of 3D mats and suitable resins.
  • storage tanks with a bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space are subject to damage due to sealing failure (unsealing) of said spaces. This may be caused by improper operation or by operational wear of the tank's parts when a sealing failure of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space occurs a result of which a product in the form of a liquid inflammable, toxic and/or caustic material penetrates into those spaces.
  • the process consists in pumping out sediments from technological and clean-out hatches through conduits forced into a tank for forcing in sediments. If it is not possible to take off the covers of hatches due to remaining pumpable and unpumpable sediments, starting removing residuals from the tank is performed through open technological hatches of the main tank. After pumping out sediments to a level that makes it possible to fully open technological and clean-out hatches cleaning works are started using the addition of water (in the amount not greater than 2% of the volume of sediments) and polymers which fluidize the residuals of liquid flammable materials to the state allowing their easy pumping and which are added before and while sediments move towards the vicinity of suction hosts of screw pumps.
  • the system of automatic cleaning is much more effective and safe for the health of workers.
  • An essential feature of the system is that the process is performed in a closed-circuit system without the necessity to expose the product in open containers outside a storage tank, which significantly reduces its adverse effect on the natural environment.
  • the subject matter of the present invention relates to providing a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, designed in particular for the storage of liquid inflammable, toxic and caustic materials, which has been damaged due to sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space.
  • the method must, on the one hand, ensure high efficiency of the whole cleaning process, and on the other, guarantee high accuracy while maintaining strict safety standards.
  • the present invention provides a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank in the event of a sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, which method consist in that the emptied storage space of a storage tank is supplied in a continuous manner with fresh air through at least one inspection hatch thus ventilating the storage space of the storage tank by means of ventilators, the cleaning process being performed with the continuous monitoring of the storage space of the storage tank by means of sensors measuring the level of an explosive atmosphere and determining the concentration of carbohydrates as percentage with respect to the lower and upper explosive limit of gases and oxygen content in the storage space of the storage tank, as well as the minimum admissible concentration of toxic gases in the storage space of the storage tank.
  • the method is characterized in that a fluid is sucked in, in the case of low-pressure function of bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, or forced in, in the case of high-pressure function of bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, and subsequently, after filling the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank with the fluid, the sucked-in or forced-in fluid, respectively, which has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, which product previously penetrated into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank due to sealing failure, is respectively sucked off or drained from the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space.
  • the fluid being, respectively, sucked into or forced into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is water or water with washing agents in the form of surfactants that react with the product, and corrosion inhibitors or reduced water vapour from a technological installation or a steam generator.
  • the fluid is sucked, through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pump, in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or other Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  • a pump in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or other Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  • the liquid is forced, through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pressure installation with a suitable pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure within the rage from 0 to 1 bar.
  • the fluid that has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space is sucked out through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages from the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pump, in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or another Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  • a pump in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or another Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  • the fluid that has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space is drained through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages from the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pressure installation with a suitable pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure within the rage from 0 to 1 bar.
  • neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages by means of gas regulators allowing suitable selection of pressure within the range from 0 to 1 bar, from bottle bundles or a cryogenic tank or a nitrogen generator or a technological installation.
  • nitrogen is used as a neutral gas to eliminate the explosive atmosphere inside the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank.
  • the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower explosive limit which is below 10% for all types of carbohydrate mixtures, below 4% for gaseous hydrogen, and oxygen content is below 5% for all types of gaseous mixtures.
  • inspection holes having 1 mm to 50 mm in diameter are drilled in the upper surface delimiting the bottom interstitial space and/or in the inner surfaces of walls delimiting the wall interstitial space in the amount from several to several tens depending of the size of the area of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank, and/or the number of inspection stub pipes of the system monitoring leakages in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank and/or depending on the size of sections into which the bottom interstitial space and/or the wall interstitial space of the storage tank has been divided.
  • the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space is measured by means of gas meters on at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages and/or in inspection holes in the upper surface delimiting the bottom interstitial space or in inspection holes in the inner surfaces of walls delimiting the wall interstitial space made for proper cleaning of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank.
  • inspection holes are plugged with magnet plugs with rubber gaskets providing additional sealing around the inspection holes in order to lock the outflow of a neutral gas into the storage space of the storage tank.
  • neodymium magnet plugs are used as magnet plugs.
  • the solution presented according to the aspect proposed above ensures a suitable method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space which consists inter alia in more efficient, more effective and more accurate cleaning of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space in accordance with strict safety standards.
  • this method is very universal and may be used with various storage tanks, in particular those in the form of both vertical and horizontal cylinders, small and large tanks. Thus, the method may be used with many different storage tanks.
  • the proposed method according to the invention may also be used in the case of both non-pressurized tanks and low-pressure ones as wells as many other tanks.
  • FIG. 1 presents a cross-section of a storage tank 100 which depicts, in a simplified way, a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of a storage tank 100.
  • the tank has the shape of a cylinder with a vertical axis and is designed for the storage of a product 150 in the form of a liquid flammable material, which is crude oil in the present case.
  • the storage tank 100 is also equipped with a system monitoring leakages in the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 to facilitate detection of damage, in particular sealing failure of those spaces.
  • Such sealing failure causes passage of a product 150 - which is crude oil in the present case - from the storage space 195 of a storage tank 100 to the bottom interstitial space 110 of the storage tank 100.
  • the bottom interstitial space 110 is a space located at the bottom of the storage tank between the secondary bottom 105, laminated and made of 3D mats and epoxy raisins, and the primary bottom 115 made of steel.
  • the bottom interstitial space 110 and the wall interstitial space 120 of a storage tank 100 that has been damaged due to sealing failure of these spaces first the storage space 195 is cleared of a product 150 remaining in the storage tank 100, and then the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100 is subjected to cleaning, washing and vaporising by methods known from the state of the art.
  • ventilators 160 which are located at the main shell 180 of the storage tank 100.
  • a special air sleeve is made between the protective shell and the main shell 180 so as to limit loss of fresh air forced into the storage tank 100.
  • the whole process of cleaning preceding the initiation of the proper process of cleaning the unsealed bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 is performed with the continuous monitoring of the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100 by means of sensors (not shown) measuring the level of explosive atmosphere and determining the concentration of hydrocarbons as percentage relative to the lower and upper explosive limit of gases and oxygen content in the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100, and the lower admissible concentration of toxic gases in the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100.
  • the operations defined above are performed in order to enable inner inspection of the storage tank 100, i.e. of the storage space 195, by relevant services including an authorised employee of the Office of Technical Inspection (UDT) and other competent persons who will verify the condition of the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 and determine whether a permission to operate the storage tank 100 may be issued.
  • relevant services including an authorised employee of the Office of Technical Inspection (UDT) and other competent persons who will verify the condition of the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 and determine whether a permission to operate the storage tank 100 may be issued.
  • UDT Office of Technical Inspection
  • the method consists in that a fluid in the form of water with surfactants reacting with a product 150 and corrosion inhibitors are forced through inspection stub pipe 130 of the system monitoring leakages to the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 by means of a pressure installation with a pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure, which is 0.5 bar in this case.
  • the fluid After filling the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 with the fluid, which has been mixed with a product 150 remaining in said spaces, which product penetrated earlier to said spaces due to sealing failure, the fluid is drained through a inspection stub pipe 130 of the system monitoring leakages from said spaces by means of a pressure installation with a pressure reducing valve allowing proper selection of pressure, which is 0.5 bar in this case.
  • a neutral gas in the form of nitrogen is forced in to eliminate explosive atmosphere inside the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100.
  • the above-mentioned nitrogen is forced into the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 through a inspection stub pipe 130 of the leakage monitoring system by means of gas reducers allowing suitable selection of pressure, which is 0.5 bar in this case, from a technological installation.
  • the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 is measured in a continuous manner by means of gas meters on two inspection stub pipes 130 of the leakage monitoring system in order to properly clean those spaces.
  • the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower explosive limit which is below 10% for all kinds of hydrocarbon mixtures, below 4% - for gaseous hydrogen, and oxygen content below 5% for all types of gaseous mixtures.
  • the lower explosive limit of the concentration of explosive gases was obtained after the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 was repeated twice.
  • FIG. 2 shows a cross-section of a storage tank 200 which depicts, in a simplified way, a method of cleaning the wall interstitial space 120 of a storage tank 200 after the occurrence of a sealing failure in that space.
  • the tank is a cylinder having a vertical axis, which is designed for the storage of a product 150 in the form of a liquid flammable material, which is unleaded petrol PB98 in this case.
  • inspection holes 250 having a diameter of 20 mm have been drilled in the inner surface delimiting the wall interstitial space 120, as illustrated in more detail in FIG. 3 which presents a pattern of inspection holes 250 drilled in the inner surface delimiting the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200 according to the invention.
  • the said inspection holes 250 are drilled by means of a pneumatically driven device equipped with a holder for mounting a core drill bit, the number thereof being dependent on the size of sections 280 into which the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200 has been divided.
  • a pneumatically driven device equipped with a holder for mounting a core drill bit
  • the number thereof being dependent on the size of sections 280 into which the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200 has been divided.
  • 20 inspection holes 250 should be drilled in the wall interstitial space 120.
  • the inspection holes 250 after cleaning the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200, are plugged with plugs of magnets with rubber gaskets providing additional sealing around the inspection holes 250 in order to lock the outflow of a neutral gas into the storage space 195 of the storage container 200.
  • plugs of neodymium magnets have been used as plugs magnets provided with rubber gaskets.
  • the solution according to the present invention uses the above specified technical means as shown in the FIGURES from FIG. 1 to FIG. 3 to offer a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, designed in particular for the storage of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials, which has been damaged due to the sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space.
  • the present invention may be applicable in particular in all cases of a damage consisting in the sealing failure of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, which results in the necessity of cleaning or sealing said space.
  • the present solution according to the invention is likely to be widely applied in particular in the petrochemical sector where the highest safety standards are required, especially in fuel depots and liquid fuel stations where storage tanks with bottom interstitial spaces and/or wall interstitial spaces are installed.
  • the invention may also be applicable in the case of some long-distance transmission pipelines equipped with interstitial spaces and used to transport oil and oil products.

Abstract

The subject matter of the invention relates to a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of a storage tank (100; 200), in the event of a sealing failure in those spaces and penetration of a product (150) thereinto.
The method of cleaning consists in that a fluid is sucked in, in the case of low-pressure function of bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), or forced in, in the case of high-pressure function of bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), into those spaces. After filling those spaces with the fluid, the sucked-in or forced-in fluid, which has been mixed with a product (150) remaining in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), is respectively sucked off or drained from those spaces. In the course of, respectively, sucking off or draining the fluid that was mixed with the product (150) a neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200), and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (110; 200) is measured in a continuous manner.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The subject matter of the invention relates to a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank designed in particular for the storage of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials.
  • Background of the Invention
  • Storage tanks, both underground and above ground storage tanks, should meet requirements concerning non-pressurized and low-pressure tanks designed in particular for the storage of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials. Such tanks must meet strict safety standards; namely, they must be, inter alia, equipped with monitoring and measurement devices signalling leakages of substances to the ground and ground waters. Moreover, rigorous safety requirements compel both the manufacturers and users of storage tanks to produce and use tanks having bottom interstitial spaces and/or wall interstitial spaces.
  • Such spaces should basically prevent penetration of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials directly to the ground and ground waters. They should thus form an additional protective space located at the bottom of a storage tank in the case of a bottom interstitial space, and an additional protective space located on the walls of a storage tank in the case of a wall interstitial space. These spaces are made during the construction of a storage tank or are added in the course of its operation. They are most frequently delimited by a secondary steel bottom or a secondary laminated bottom made of 3D mats and suitable resins.
  • Despite taking all due care and maintaining high quality safety standards, storage tanks with a bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space are subject to damage due to sealing failure (unsealing) of said spaces. This may be caused by improper operation or by operational wear of the tank's parts when a sealing failure of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space occurs a result of which a product in the form of a liquid inflammable, toxic and/or caustic material penetrates into those spaces.
  • If the presence of a product in detected in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank, it is necessary to take actions in order to clean those spaces of a storage tank and subsequently repair them in order to seal them and permit further operation thereof.
  • Description of Prior Art
  • Considering the above-described problem in order to eliminate damage caused by sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, there is provided a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank in order to subsequently repair it and permit further operation thereof.
  • In the prior art there are known such solutions that relate to a method of cleaning storage tanks designed in particular for liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials. However, said method of cleaning applies only to the interior of a water tank, called storage capacity or storage space of the storage tank, which method basically consists in that a product remaining in the storage tank is drained and subsequently the storage space of the storage tank is subjected to cleaning, washing and vaporization.
  • More specifically, the process consists in pumping out sediments from technological and clean-out hatches through conduits forced into a tank for forcing in sediments. If it is not possible to take off the covers of hatches due to remaining pumpable and unpumpable sediments, starting removing residuals from the tank is performed through open technological hatches of the main tank. After pumping out sediments to a level that makes it possible to fully open technological and clean-out hatches cleaning works are started using the addition of water (in the amount not greater than 2% of the volume of sediments) and polymers which fluidize the residuals of liquid flammable materials to the state allowing their easy pumping and which are added before and while sediments move towards the vicinity of suction hosts of screw pumps.
  • When removing pumpable, unpumpable and solid sediments from the inside of the tank has been finished, and a total lack of an explosive hazard area inside the tank has been confirmed, the whole surface is washed by means of hot-water high pressure washers with the addition of chemical substances making it possible to fully degrease the surfaces being washed.
  • In the prior art there are also known techniques of automatic cleaning of storage tanks that consist in dissolving accumulated sediments and cleaning large-size storage tanks. Since the majority of cleaning processes are automatized, the system makes it possible to eliminate the presence of workers inside the tanks, i.e. in the storage space, during the main operations of dissolving sediments until the moment when the operation of final cleaning and degreasing the storage tank and removing undissolved solid elements is performed. The final operations with the participation of workers in the working space are performed in the already safe space when the tank contains only trace amounts of carbohydrates and the surrounding atmosphere does not pose a threat to the life and health of people. Thanks to such solutions such systems fall within the category of "NON MAN ENTRY" systems.
  • Compared with traditional methods of manual cleaning and desludging storage tanks, the system of automatic cleaning is much more effective and safe for the health of workers. An essential feature of the system is that the process is performed in a closed-circuit system without the necessity to expose the product in open containers outside a storage tank, which significantly reduces its adverse effect on the natural environment.
  • The above-described prior art solutions and, more broadly, solutions related to cleaning the storage space of a storage tank fail to provide an answer to the basic question: what measures should be taken while maintaining high safety standards in the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank in the case the presence of a product is detected in those spaces due to sealing failure.
  • Essence of the Invention
  • Thus, the subject matter of the present invention relates to providing a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, designed in particular for the storage of liquid inflammable, toxic and caustic materials, which has been damaged due to sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space.
  • The method must, on the one hand, ensure high efficiency of the whole cleaning process, and on the other, guarantee high accuracy while maintaining strict safety standards.
  • To achieve the above purposes, the present invention provides a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank in the event of a sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, which method consist in that the emptied storage space of a storage tank is supplied in a continuous manner with fresh air through at least one inspection hatch thus ventilating the storage space of the storage tank by means of ventilators, the cleaning process being performed with the continuous monitoring of the storage space of the storage tank by means of sensors measuring the level of an explosive atmosphere and determining the concentration of carbohydrates as percentage with respect to the lower and upper explosive limit of gases and oxygen content in the storage space of the storage tank, as well as the minimum admissible concentration of toxic gases in the storage space of the storage tank. The method is characterized in that a fluid is sucked in, in the case of low-pressure function of bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, or forced in, in the case of high-pressure function of bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, and subsequently, after filling the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank with the fluid, the sucked-in or forced-in fluid, respectively, which has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space, which product previously penetrated into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank due to sealing failure, is respectively sucked off or drained from the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space. In the course of, respectively, sucking off or draining the fluid that was mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space a neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is measured in a continuous manner. In the case the measurement is beyond the admissible range, the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower limit explosive limit.
  • Preferably, the fluid being, respectively, sucked into or forced into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is water or water with washing agents in the form of surfactants that react with the product, and corrosion inhibitors or reduced water vapour from a technological installation or a steam generator.
  • Preferably, the fluid is sucked, through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pump, in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or other Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  • Preferably, the liquid is forced, through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages, into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pressure installation with a suitable pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure within the rage from 0 to 1 bar.
  • Preferably, the fluid that has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space is sucked out through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages from the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pump, in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or another Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  • Preferably, the fluid that has been mixed with the product remaining in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space is drained through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages from the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank by means of a pressure installation with a suitable pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure within the rage from 0 to 1 bar.
  • Preferably, neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank through at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages by means of gas regulators allowing suitable selection of pressure within the range from 0 to 1 bar, from bottle bundles or a cryogenic tank or a nitrogen generator or a technological installation.
  • Preferably nitrogen is used as a neutral gas to eliminate the explosive atmosphere inside the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank.
  • Preferably, the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower explosive limit which is below 10% for all types of carbohydrate mixtures, below 4% for gaseous hydrogen, and oxygen content is below 5% for all types of gaseous mixtures.
  • Preferably, in the case where the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank has been repeated at least twice and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank is outside the admissible range, inspection holes having 1 mm to 50 mm in diameter are drilled in the upper surface delimiting the bottom interstitial space and/or in the inner surfaces of walls delimiting the wall interstitial space in the amount from several to several tens depending of the size of the area of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank, and/or the number of inspection stub pipes of the system monitoring leakages in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank and/or depending on the size of sections into which the bottom interstitial space and/or the wall interstitial space of the storage tank has been divided.
  • Preferably, the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space is measured by means of gas meters on at least one inspection stub pipe of the system monitoring leakages and/or in inspection holes in the upper surface delimiting the bottom interstitial space or in inspection holes in the inner surfaces of walls delimiting the wall interstitial space made for proper cleaning of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank.
  • Preferably, after cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of the storage tank, inspection holes are plugged with magnet plugs with rubber gaskets providing additional sealing around the inspection holes in order to lock the outflow of a neutral gas into the storage space of the storage tank.
  • Preferably, neodymium magnet plugs are used as magnet plugs.
  • The solution presented according to the aspect proposed above ensures a suitable method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space which consists inter alia in more efficient, more effective and more accurate cleaning of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space in accordance with strict safety standards.
  • Additionally, this method is very universal and may be used with various storage tanks, in particular those in the form of both vertical and horizontal cylinders, small and large tanks. Thus, the method may be used with many different storage tanks. The proposed method according to the invention may also be used in the case of both non-pressurized tanks and low-pressure ones as wells as many other tanks.
  • Brief Description of Drawings
  • The subject matter of the invention is presented in an example embodiment in relation to the enclosed figures wherein:
  • FIG. 1
    shows a cross-section of a storage tank which depicts, in a simplified way, the method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank according to the invention after the occurrence of a sealing failure in the bottom interstitial and wall interstitial space;
    FIG. 2
    shows a cross-section of another storage tank which depicts, in a simplified way, the method of cleaning the wall interstitial space of a storage tank in another embodiment according to the invention, after the occurrence of a sealing failure in the wall interstitial space;
    FIG. 3
    presents an exemplary pattern of inspection holes drilled in the inner surface delimiting the wall interstitial space of a storage tank of FIG. 2 according to the invention.
    Detailed Description of the Invention
  • The subject matter of the invention is described in detail below in relation to the attached figures and embodiments. The present invention is not limited only to the detailed embodiments described herein.
  • The embodiment presented in FIG. 1 presents a cross-section of a storage tank 100 which depicts, in a simplified way, a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of a storage tank 100. The tank has the shape of a cylinder with a vertical axis and is designed for the storage of a product 150 in the form of a liquid flammable material, which is crude oil in the present case.
  • In the presented embodiment the storage tank 100 is also equipped with a system monitoring leakages in the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 to facilitate detection of damage, in particular sealing failure of those spaces.
  • Such sealing failure causes passage of a product 150 - which is crude oil in the present case - from the storage space 195 of a storage tank 100 to the bottom interstitial space 110 of the storage tank 100. The bottom interstitial space 110 is a space located at the bottom of the storage tank between the secondary bottom 105, laminated and made of 3D mats and epoxy raisins, and the primary bottom 115 made of steel.
  • Before initiating the method of cleaning, according to the invention, the bottom interstitial space 110 and the wall interstitial space 120 of a storage tank 100 that has been damaged due to sealing failure of these spaces, first the storage space 195 is cleared of a product 150 remaining in the storage tank 100, and then the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100 is subjected to cleaning, washing and vaporising by methods known from the state of the art.
  • Subsequently, fresh air is supplied in a continuous manner through inspection hatch 170 thus ventilating the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100 by means of ventilators 160, which are located at the main shell 180 of the storage tank 100. In the case of a storage tank 100 additionally placed in a protective shell (not shown), in order to mount ventilators 160 on the shell and outside the protective shell, a special air sleeve is made between the protective shell and the main shell 180 so as to limit loss of fresh air forced into the storage tank 100.
  • The whole process of cleaning preceding the initiation of the proper process of cleaning the unsealed bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 is performed with the continuous monitoring of the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100 by means of sensors (not shown) measuring the level of explosive atmosphere and determining the concentration of hydrocarbons as percentage relative to the lower and upper explosive limit of gases and oxygen content in the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100, and the lower admissible concentration of toxic gases in the storage space 195 of the storage tank 100.
  • The operations defined above are performed in order to enable inner inspection of the storage tank 100, i.e. of the storage space 195, by relevant services including an authorised employee of the Office of Technical Inspection (UDT) and other competent persons who will verify the condition of the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 and determine whether a permission to operate the storage tank 100 may be issued.
  • If a sealing failure is detected, as in the presented example, the proper process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 is initiated. The method consists in that a fluid in the form of water with surfactants reacting with a product 150 and corrosion inhibitors are forced through inspection stub pipe 130 of the system monitoring leakages to the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 by means of a pressure installation with a pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure, which is 0.5 bar in this case.
  • After filling the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 with the fluid, which has been mixed with a product 150 remaining in said spaces, which product penetrated earlier to said spaces due to sealing failure, the fluid is drained through a inspection stub pipe 130 of the system monitoring leakages from said spaces by means of a pressure installation with a pressure reducing valve allowing proper selection of pressure, which is 0.5 bar in this case.
  • During drainage of a fluid that was mixed with a product 150 remaining in the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120, a neutral gas in the form of nitrogen is forced in to eliminate explosive atmosphere inside the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100. The above-mentioned nitrogen is forced into the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 through a inspection stub pipe 130 of the leakage monitoring system by means of gas reducers allowing suitable selection of pressure, which is 0.5 bar in this case, from a technological installation.
  • Moreover, during drainage of the fluid the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 is measured in a continuous manner by means of gas meters on two inspection stub pipes 130 of the leakage monitoring system in order to properly clean those spaces. In the case the measurement is outside the admissible range, the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower explosive limit which is below 10% for all kinds of hydrocarbon mixtures, below 4% - for gaseous hydrogen, and oxygen content below 5% for all types of gaseous mixtures. In the presented embodiment the lower explosive limit of the concentration of explosive gases was obtained after the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 was repeated twice.
  • Another embodiment in FIG. 2 shows a cross-section of a storage tank 200 which depicts, in a simplified way, a method of cleaning the wall interstitial space 120 of a storage tank 200 after the occurrence of a sealing failure in that space. The tank is a cylinder having a vertical axis, which is designed for the storage of a product 150 in the form of a liquid flammable material, which is unleaded petrol PB98 in this case.
  • As in the example described above for the storage tank 100, a sealing failure has occurred and a product 150, which is unleaded petrol PB98 in this case, has penetrated from the storage space 195 of the storage tank 200 into the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200.
  • It this case, despite the fact that the process of cleaning the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200 has been repeated three times, the concentration of explosive gases in the wall interstitial space 120 continued to be outside the admissible range. Therefore, in order to improve the process of cleaning, inspection holes 250 having a diameter of 20 mm have been drilled in the inner surface delimiting the wall interstitial space 120, as illustrated in more detail in FIG. 3 which presents a pattern of inspection holes 250 drilled in the inner surface delimiting the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200 according to the invention.
  • The said inspection holes 250 are drilled by means of a pneumatically driven device equipped with a holder for mounting a core drill bit, the number thereof being dependent on the size of sections 280 into which the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200 has been divided. In the embodiment presented in FIG. 2 for a storage tank 200 in the form of a cylinder having a horizontal axis and the capacity of 50 m3, 20 inspection holes 250 should be drilled in the wall interstitial space 120. And in the case of a storage tank 100 in the form of a cylinder having a vertical axis and the capacity of 1000 m3 as illustrated in FIG. 1 it is assumed that 5 inspection holes 250 should be drilled in the wall interstitial space 120 and 10 inspection holes 250 - in the bottom interstitial space 110. The operation of drilling holes in the case of a storage tank 100 would be performed if it was impossible to obtain a concentration of explosive gases within an admissible range after the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space 110 and the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 100 has been repeated twice.
  • Referring again to the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 , the inspection holes 250, after cleaning the wall interstitial space 120 of the storage tank 200, are plugged with plugs of magnets with rubber gaskets providing additional sealing around the inspection holes 250 in order to lock the outflow of a neutral gas into the storage space 195 of the storage container 200. In the embodiment plugs of neodymium magnets have been used as plugs magnets provided with rubber gaskets.
  • The above description of presented embodiment has been provided to enable any person skilled in the art to carry out or use the invention. There are also possible various modifications of this embodiment including all such changes, modifications and variants that fall within the essence and scope of the attached patent claims. The basic principles defined herein may thus be applied in other embodiments without extending the scope of the invention. Therefore, the intention of the present invention is not to limit it to the presented embodiment but to make it consistent with the broadest possible scope corresponding to the principles and new features presented herein.
  • Thus, the solution according to the present invention uses the above specified technical means as shown in the FIGURES from FIG. 1 to FIG. 3 to offer a method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, designed in particular for the storage of liquid flammable, toxic and caustic materials, which has been damaged due to the sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space.
  • The present invention may be applicable in particular in all cases of a damage consisting in the sealing failure of the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, which results in the necessity of cleaning or sealing said space. Considering the above, the present solution according to the invention is likely to be widely applied in particular in the petrochemical sector where the highest safety standards are required, especially in fuel depots and liquid fuel stations where storage tanks with bottom interstitial spaces and/or wall interstitial spaces are installed.
  • The invention may also be applicable in the case of some long-distance transmission pipelines equipped with interstitial spaces and used to transport oil and oil products.

Claims (13)

  1. A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank in the event of a sealing failure in the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank, consisting in that the emptied storage space of a storage tank is supplied in a continuous manner with fresh air through at least one inspection hatch thus ventilating the storage space of the storage tank by means of ventilators, and consisting in the continuous monitoring of the storage space of the storage tank by means of sensors measuring the level of an explosive atmosphere and determining the concentration of carbohydrates as percentage with respect to the lower and upper explosive limit of gases and oxygen content in the storage space of the storage tank, as well as the minimum admissible concentration of toxic gases in the storage space of the storage tank, characterized in that a fluid is sucked in, in the case of low-pressure function of bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), or forced in, in the case of high-pressure function of bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), and subsequently, after filling the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of a storage tank (100; 200) with the fluid, the sucked-in or forced-in fluid, respectively, which has been mixed with the product (150) remaining in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), which product (150) previously penetrated into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) due to sealing failure, is respectively sucked off or drained from the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120), wherein in the course of, respectively, sucking off or draining the fluid that was mixed with the product (150) remaining in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) a neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200), and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (110; 200) is measured in a continuous manner, and in the case the measurement is beyond the admissible range, the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (110; 200) is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower explosive limit.
  2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the fluid being, respectively, sucked into or forced into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) is water or water with washing agents in the form of surfactants that react with the product (150), and corrosion inhibitors or reduced water vapour from a technological installation or a steam generator.
  3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the fluid is sucked, through at least one inspection stub pipe (130) of the system monitoring leakages, into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120)of the storage tank (100; 200) by means of a pump, in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or other Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  4. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the liquid is forced, through at least one inspection stub pipe (130) of the system monitoring leakages, into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) by means of a pressure installation with a suitable pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure within the rage from 0 to 1 bar.
  5. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the fluid that has been mixed with the product (150) remaining in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) is sucked off through at least one inspection stub pipe (130) of the system monitoring leakages from the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) by means of a pump, in particular a low-pressure pneumatic diaphragm pump or another Ex pump allowing suitable selection of low pressure within the rage from 0 to -1 bar.
  6. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, the fluid that has been mixed with the product (150) remaining in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) is drained through at least one inspection stub pipe (130) of the system monitoring leakages from the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) by means of a pressure installation with a suitable pressure reducing valve allowing suitable selection of pressure within the rage from 0 to 1 bar.
  7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, the neutral gas is forced into the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120)of the storage tank (100; 200) through at least one inspection stub pipe (130) of the system monitoring leakages by means of gas regulators allowing suitable selection of pressure within the range from 0 to 1 bar, from bottle bundles or a cryogenic tank or a nitrogen generator or a technological installation.
  8. The method according to claim 1 or 7, characterized in that, nitrogen is used as a neutral gas to eliminate the explosive atmosphere inside the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200).
  9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) is repeated until the concentration of explosive gases reaches the lower explosive limit which is below 10% for all types of carbohydrate mixtures, below 4% for gaseous hydrogen and oxygen content is below 5% for all types of gaseous mixtures.
  10. The method according to claim 1 or 9, characterized in that in the case where the process of cleaning the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) has been repeated at least twice and the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) is outside the admissible range, inspection holes (250) having 1 mm to 50 mm in diameter are drilled in the upper surface delimiting the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or in the inner surfaces of walls delimiting the wall interstitial space (120) in the amount from several to several tens depending of the size of the area of the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) and/or the number of inspection stub pipes (130) of the system monitoring leakages in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) and/or depending on the size of sections (280) into which the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or the wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200) has been divided.
  11. The method according to claim 1 or 9, characterized in that the concentration of explosive gases in the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120)is measured by means of gas meters on at least one inspection stub pipe (130) of the system monitoring leakages and/or in inspection holes (250) in the upper surface delimiting the bottom interstitial space (110) or in inspection holes (250) in the inner surfaces of walls delimiting the wall interstitial space (120) made for proper cleaning of the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (100; 200).
  12. The method according to claim 10, characterized in that the inspection holes (250) after cleaning the bottom interstitial space (110) and/or wall interstitial space (120) of the storage tank (110; 200), are plugged with magnet plugs with rubber gaskets providing additional sealing around the inspection holes (250) in order to lock outflow of a neutral gas into the storage space (195) of the storage tank (100; 200).
  13. The method according to claim 12, characterized in that, neodymium magnet plugs are used as magnet plugs.
EP16184057.4A 2015-08-31 2016-08-12 A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank Active EP3135391B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL16184057T PL3135391T3 (en) 2015-08-31 2016-08-12 A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL413758A PL228874B1 (en) 2015-08-31 2015-08-31 Method for cleaning of the space between the bottoms and/or between the walls of a storage tank

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3135391A1 true EP3135391A1 (en) 2017-03-01
EP3135391B1 EP3135391B1 (en) 2018-02-14

Family

ID=56883532

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16184057.4A Active EP3135391B1 (en) 2015-08-31 2016-08-12 A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3135391B1 (en)
NO (1) NO3135391T3 (en)
PL (2) PL228874B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114433580A (en) * 2020-10-20 2022-05-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Online oil sludge flushing device and method for storage tank bottom plate

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5096087A (en) * 1989-08-02 1992-03-17 Coretank, Inc. Double containment and leak detection apparatus
EP1316516A1 (en) * 2001-12-03 2003-06-04 Pti-Systems Oy System for cleaning and refilling of the intermediate space of a double shelled container

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5096087A (en) * 1989-08-02 1992-03-17 Coretank, Inc. Double containment and leak detection apparatus
EP1316516A1 (en) * 2001-12-03 2003-06-04 Pti-Systems Oy System for cleaning and refilling of the intermediate space of a double shelled container

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114433580A (en) * 2020-10-20 2022-05-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Online oil sludge flushing device and method for storage tank bottom plate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL413758A1 (en) 2017-03-13
PL3135391T3 (en) 2018-06-29
NO3135391T3 (en) 2018-07-14
EP3135391B1 (en) 2018-02-14
PL228874B1 (en) 2018-05-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7225664B2 (en) Secondary containment leak prevention and detection system and method
US9797395B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for identifying defective pumps
US20050247112A1 (en) Power head secondary containment leak prevention and detection system and method
US7461541B2 (en) Leak detection method for a primary containment system
EP3135391B1 (en) A method of cleaning the bottom interstitial space and/or wall interstitial space of a storage tank
RU2704184C2 (en) System of reservoirs
US8104327B1 (en) Leak detection method for a primary containment system
US20040149017A1 (en) Secondary containment leak prevention and detection system and method
TWI668168B (en) Oil leakage notification method for underground double-layered shell pipe with leak detection and double-shell structure of underground oil tank
RU2476758C2 (en) Tool and method for safe removal of valves installed in pipelines for transportation of liquids
KR20090053774A (en) Storage tank installation method for underground containment type
KR200398442Y1 (en) Oil leakage monitoring apparatus of pipe arrangement
Sokolkin et al. Prospects of applications of acoustic emission methods to testing bottoms of tanks for oil and oil derivatives
RU108027U1 (en) DOUBLE BOTTOM RESERVOIR EQUIPPED WITH A DEVICE FOR PREVENTING OVERFLOWS AND INSTALLING COLLECTION OF VAPORS OF OIL PRODUCTS
KR20170024633A (en) Apparatus of inspecting corrosion by seawater in welding flaw of pipe
RU101023U1 (en) DOUBLE BOTTOM GROUND VERTICAL RESERVOIR EQUIPPED WITH INSTALLATION OF VAPOR COUPLING FOR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
TW202032510A (en) Zero-pollution warning equipment of underground oil pipes at gas stations detecting and knowing whether there is leakage in the liquid storage tank at any time and preventing underground oil pipes from leaking
CN206624260U (en) Steel strengthened glass fiber double-decker oil storage tank
JP3209894U (en) Defect detection equipment for buried piping
CN205555117U (en) Surpass and descend stock solution storehouse safely
DE3218653A1 (en) Double-walled steel pressure container of composite construction with a double-walled jacket/base/manhole connecting stub with a liquid pressure testing device and a hydrostatic monitoring device
JP4879032B2 (en) Underground tank vent pipe equipment
EP1038831B1 (en) Piping system for chemical liquids, in particular oil products, such as fuels
Steigerwald et al. REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS FROM A UNIQUE PLAN 66A BUSHING DESIGN
EP1316516A1 (en) System for cleaning and refilling of the intermediate space of a double shelled container

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170713

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B08B 9/093 20060101AFI20170810BHEP

Ipc: B65D 90/02 20060101ALI20170810BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170904

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 969545

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180315

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016001638

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20180214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 969545

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180515

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180514

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016001638

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20181115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180214

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180614

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230513

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20230606

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20230706

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20230802

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230705

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20230728

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230718

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230706

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230705

Year of fee payment: 8