EP3130277A1 - Universal objective refraction - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention in one aspect relates to an improved acquisition of a set of individual user data of a spectacle wearer for the adaptation and optimization of spectacles comprising the following steps in this order: - acquiring first aberrometric data of a first eye of the spectacle wearer for a first accommodation state of the first eye at a first primary brightness (ST1A), wherein first primary pupillometric data for the first eye are detected together with the acquisition of first aberrometric data; and - Acquire secondary pupillometric data for the first eye of the wearer at a secondary brightness higher than the first primary brightness (ST1C).

Description

The present invention relates to an improved objective refraction determination involving an objective fraction of a fraction. In particular, the present invention relates in one aspect to a method, a device and a computer program product for a rapid yet reliable determination of individual data for at least one eye of a spectacle wearer, which are as flexible as possible for an individual adjustment of a spectacle lens.

For the adaptation of spectacles by the eyeglass lens manufacturers increasingly mature methods for the individual calculation of optical surfaces taking into account numerous individual data of the wearer, in particular with regard to its refraction and the individual situation of use used. On the one hand, this results in a not inconsiderable added value for the spectacle wearer due to the better adaptation of the spectacles or the spectacle lenses to the individual requirements. However, this will only really be useful if the individual data are already determined by the optician in advance with sufficient accuracy. In addition, since different products of eyeglass lens manufacturers often consider different information (eg, different optical and / or geometric data), it often means a significant amount of time for the optician and leads to inconvenience for the wearer when each time the required individual data recorded with sufficient precision become.

While subjective subjective perception of the subject is always taken into account in a subjective refraction determination, objective refraction determinations are made on the basis of measurements, in particular by means of corresponding (preferably automated) measuring instruments, in particular without the subject (eg wearer of glasses) takes influence on the measuring procedure or the measured values by statements about his subjective perception.

The objective of an objective refraction determination is to determine as reliably as possible those refraction values that are required for the correction of a defective vision with a spectacle lens. This is usually done e.g. used an autorefractor or an aberrometer to determine an objective refraction. Traditionally, these devices determine the refraction when looking into the distance. Either the refraction values are determined directly (autorefractor), or else the device internally determines wavefront data including the aberrations of higher order and then determines a refraction for the distance into the distance. Objective measurements for near vision are not performed, especially because the necessary accommodation is difficult to control metrologically and therefore measurement data are difficult to interpret.

In particular, aberrometers are increasingly used to support the objective of refractive determination in the optician. In contrast to conventional eye refractometers, not only are the aberrations of low order (in particular prism, sphere, cylinder and axis position) determined, but also the aberrations of higher order (eg three-blade error, spherical aberration, coma) are recorded. Thus, the measurement already takes into account the fact that some spectacle lens manufacturers also take into account these higher-order aberrations in the optimization of some spectacle lens models. In order to be able to optimally use the improvement that can be achieved therewith, however, an exact knowledge of the individual size (and preferably also position) of the pupil in the respective situation of use would also be desirable. After this use situation in turn for the respective eyeglass lens model (reading glasses, car glasses, sports glasses) would have to be determined specifically, it is already recognizable that the sufficiently accurate and adapted to the individual situation determination of user data for the adjustment and optimization of glasses with a significant time and technical effort for the Optician and may be associated with corresponding inconvenience to the wearer of glasses.

The object of the present invention is therefore to provide a rapid yet reliable determination of individual data for at least one eye of a spectacle wearer, which can be used as flexibly as possible for an individual adaptation of a spectacle lens. In particular, it is an object of the present invention to improve the objective refraction determination in such a way that also near-refraction values (near-prescription values) can be determined more reliably. This object is achieved in particular by a method, a device and a computer program product having the features specified in the independent claims 1, 11 and 15, respectively. Preferred embodiments are the subject of the corresponding subclaims.

$c_{2,F}^2$

und $c_{2,F}^{-2}$

zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Fernakkommodation des Auges und einem für die Nutzung des gewünschten Brillenglases relevanten Pupillenradius r ₀ des Auges, also einem Pupillenradius r ₀ bei einer gewünschten Gebrauchssituation für das geplante Brillenglas, sowie einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,N}^0,$

$c_{2,N}^2$

und $c_{2,N}^{-2}$

zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Nahakkommodation des Auges und dem Pupillenradius r ₀ einer Gebrauchssituation festlegen.Thus, in one aspect, the invention provides a method of objective refraction determination for an eye of a spectacle wearer. This method includes acquiring measurement data for the wearer's eye that includes at least a first set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.F}^0.$

$c_{2.F}^2$

and $c_{2.F}^{-2}$

for describing a wavefront aberration in a remote accommodation of the eye and a relevant for the use of the desired spectacle lens pupil radius r _{0 of} the eye, ie a pupil radius r ₀ in a desired situation of use for the intended lens, and a second set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.N}^0.$

$c_{2.N}^2$

and $c_{2.N}^{-2}$

for describing a wavefront aberration in a Nahakkommodation the eye and the pupil radius r ₀ specify a use situation.

Each of the sets of Zernike coefficients thus describes aberrations of the eye based on the wavefront aberrations caused by the eye due to refractive errors. They are based on actual measurements on the eye of the spectacle wearer, which in a known manner, for example by means of a Autorefraktors or an aberrometer. The Zernike coefficients in distance vision, ie the coefficients of the first set, can be measured quite reliably and reproducibly in a known manner, since, in particular, the remote accommodation of the eye can be measured or stimulated comparatively well by measurement. For the measurement during a close look, that is to say for a determination of the second set of Zernike coefficients, preferably the greatest possible accommodation of the eye to the near vision is stimulated. Conventionally, it is difficult to assign the degree of close accommodation reliably and reproducibly to a specific object distance or a particular accommodation stimulus. For the method according to the invention, however, it does not matter which stimulus or which object distance actually corresponds to the greatest possible accommodation during the measurement.

Preferably, the refraction data objectively determined by the invention, which can then be used directly for the optimization and production of a spectacle lens. In particular, the values for sphere, cylinder and axial position of the eye which are valid at an evaluation position for spectacle lens optimization (eg vertex sphere) are thus determined for a close look at a pupil radius prevailing in the actual situation of use of the spectacle lens to be produced. The wave fronts change by propagation and their best approximation by Zernike coefficients depends on the actual pupil radius. The first and / or second set of Zernike coefficients thus defines preferably determine the Zernike coefficients in the evaluation position, and when the pupil radius r ₀ of the desired usage situation. It is not necessarily required that the wavefront aberrations be measured directly at this position and at the expected brightness. Rather, the measurement of the wavefront aberrations can, for example, also take place at a different position (eg at the corneal vertex) and / or in other light conditions. However, as far as the position of the evaluation position relative to the measuring position is known, the relevant Zernike coefficients at the evaluation position are also derivable, ie (at least indirectly) determined. Preferred implementations for this will be explained in more detail later. Correspondingly, the Zernike coefficients at the pupil radius r _{0 of} the desired use situation can also be derived from measurements at other (preferably larger) pupillary radii, as far as, for example, the respective pupil radii are known. Again, preferred implementations will be presented later.

The acquired measurement data must therefore not directly encompass the first and / or second set of Zernike coefficients and thus define "directly". Rather, the measurement data can set the first and / or second set of Zernike coefficients "indirectly" insofar as they can be derived from the acquired measurement data. The "acquisition of measurement data" in a method according to the invention does not have to include the process of measuring directly either. Rather, the measurements on the spectacle wearer's eye may also be pre-performed separately from the present invention (e.g., by an optometrist or ophthalmologist) and the resulting results stored in a user database. For the objective refraction determination according to the invention, the measurement data are then acquired, for example, from this database or from an order data record.

The pupil radius resulting for the expected lighting conditions in the desired situation of use is occasionally referred to in the context of this description as a photopic pupil radius, without the invention being limited in principle to certain brightnesses of the desired use situation. This terminology is only intended to delimit against preferred lighting conditions during a wavefront measurement or aberration measurement of the eye. Thus, wavefront measurements are preferably carried out with comparatively little light in order to still be able to reliably measure wavefront coefficients (Zernike coefficients) and thus higher-order aberrations on account of the resulting large pupil radius. The usually larger pupil radius of a measurement situation in this case could therefore also be referred to as mesopic pupil radius in the context of this description - again without the measurements being made for specific light conditions restrict.

Zylinder $\left({\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right),$

und Achslage $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$

des Auges für einen Blick in die Nähe derart ermittelt, dass die objektiven Refraktionsdaten in Abhängigkeit vom ersten und zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten die Gleichungen $${\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}},-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$

für einen korrigierten Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$

für den Blick in die Nähe erfüllt, wobei der korrigierte Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$

in Abhängigkeit von einer Differenz $$\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }M\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$$

zwischen einem ersten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$

und einem zweiten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$

• -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
  
  entspricht, falls ΔM > A _1N , insbesondere falls 0 ≥ ΔM> A _1N ; und
• -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{{\mathrm{\Delta }}_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
  
  entspricht, falls ΔM≤A _1N ,

wobei $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$

das sphärische Äquivalent eines vorgegebenen Objektabstands d für die Sicht in die Nähe ist, und wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,x<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,x<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,y>0\\ -\pi /2,x=0,y<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$

According to the invention now objective refraction data for sphere $\left({\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right).$

cylinder $\left({\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right).$

and axis position $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$

of the eye for a close look such that the objective refraction data, in dependence on the first and second set of Zernike coefficients, the equations $${\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}.-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$

for a corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$

met for a close look, being the corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$

depending on a difference $$\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }M\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$$

between a first power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$

and a second power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$

• - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
  
  corresponds to if Δ M > A _{1 N} , in particular if 0 ≥ Δ M > A _{1 N} ; and
• - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{{\mathrm{\Delta }}_{1N}}{\mathrm{.DELTA.M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
  
  corresponds to if Δ M ≦ A _{1 N} ,

in which $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$

is the spherical equivalent of a given object distance d for near vision, and where $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .x<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .x<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.y>0\\ -\pi /2.x=0.y<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$

The present invention thus overcomes the difficulty in interpreting conventional close-up measurements. For this purpose, the invention includes a very reliable and objective possibility with which one can derive both the far-refraction and the far-end fraction from a given wavefront measurement for the distance vision and a given second wavefront measurement for the near vision.

In principle, wavefront measurements by means of, for example, Shack-Hartmann sensors are known. However, the problem of every wavefront measurement is always the accommodation of the subject, through which an objective measurement (in principle also the subjective refraction) can turn out to be myopia. Whereas it has hitherto been customary for a remote measurement to achieve as much as possible by a correspondingly metered misting when looking at a target so that the test person accommodates as little as possible, so far there have been no corresponding approaches for close measurement.

The present invention now makes a corresponding misting in the close measurement dispensable and still allows to get meaningful near-measurement data. For this purpose, in particular a remote measurement is used, which provides Zernike coefficients for the distance and a corresponding pupil radius. Further, a close measurement is used which provides Zernike coefficients for proximity at an associated pupil radius. For the close measurement, it is only necessary for the subject to be accommodated, while it is largely unimportant to which accommodation stimulus this close measurement belongs. Furthermore, it is completely irrelevant how the device causes the patient to accommodate. Of course, a method is preferred that stimulates the patient to accommodate as much as possible. For this purpose, for example, a sequence of close measurements may take place whose accommodation stimulus increases successively, and then that close measurement is selected at which the strongest accommodation has taken place. The invention therefore offers a particularly advantageous procedure, from the given two measurements (distance and proximity) to arrive at suitable refraction data for a spectacle lens.

Thus, the acquisition of measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer preferably comprises acquisition of first measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer for a look into the distance, which define the first set of Zernike coefficients; acquiring a series of second measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer for a close look at at least partially different accommodation of the eye; and selecting those measurement data from the series in which the strongest accommodation of the eye occurs as second measurement data defining the second set of Zernike coefficients. It thus does not matter in the procedure according to the invention to which distances of the individual states of accommodation of near vision belong.

As already mentioned, it is not necessary for the distance and / or close measurement to be carried out at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ . Rather, it is even preferred that the measurements of the wavefront aberrations be made at a larger pupil radius. Thus, capturing measurement data for the The eye of the spectacle wearer preferably detecting first measured data for the eye of the wearer for a look into the distance, which has a first pupil radius R _F (ie, a pupil radius R _F in a first measurement situation) and a first set of Zernike coefficients to describe a comprise wavefront aberration measured at the first pupil radius R _F and the distance of the eye. Thus, in addition to an autorefractor or an aberrometer measurement, the pupil radius R _F prevailing during this measurement is preferably also measured and optionally stored in a user data record as part of the first measurement data.

In addition, the acquisition of measurement data in this embodiment preferably comprises analogously acquiring second measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer for a close look, which has a second pupil radius R _N and a second set of Zernike coefficients for describing one in the second Pupillary radius R _N and Nahakkommodation measured wavefront aberration include. The light conditions and / or the pupil radii R _F and R _N may be the same for the first and second measured data, ie for the telemetry and the close measurement.

des photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ zum ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Pupillenradius R_i festgelegt. Besonders bevorzugt umfassen die in den bzw. für die Messsituationen erfassten Sätze Zernike-Koeffizienten zumindest teilweise Zernike-Koeffizienten bis zur vierten Ordnung (z.B. sphärische Aberration) oder sogar teilweise bis zur sechsten Ordnung, zumindest "teilweise" heißt dabei, dass nicht notwendigerweise alle Zernike-Koeffizienten der jeweiligen Ordnung enthalten sein müssen.In addition, the photopic pupillary radius r ₀ for the eye of the spectacle wearer (ie the pupil radius r ₀ expected or measured in the situation of use is preferably detected independently of the distance and / or close measurement of the aberrations, in particular measured or retrieved from stored individual data. Preferably, the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients are used to describe the wavefront aberrations at the eye's photopic pupil radius r ₀ by scaling the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients to describe the measured wavefront aberrations versus ratio ${\lambda }_i=\frac{r_0}{R_i}$

photopic pupil radius r ₀ for the first (i = F) and second (i = N) pupil radius R _i established. Zernike coefficients particularly preferably comprise Zernike coefficients up to the fourth order (eg spherical aberration) or even partially up to the sixth order, at least "partial" means that not necessarily all Zernike Coefficients of the respective order must be included.

$$c_{2,i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_2^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

$$c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

vom ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration ab. Der erste bzw. zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $\left(c_{2,i}^0\left(r_{0.}\right),c_{2,i}^2\left(r_0\right),c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)\right)$

zur Beschreibung der Wellenfrontaberrationen bei dem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ umfasst somit insbesondere Zernike-Koeffizienten zweiter Ordnung und wird vorzugsweise durch Skalierung gemäß obigem Zusammenhang aus den Zernike-Koeffizienten zweiter und vierter Ordnung $\left(c_{2,i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right),c_{2,i}^2\left(R_i\right),c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right),c_{4,i}^0\left(R_i\right),c_{4,i}^2\left(R_i\right),$

der Messdaten ermittelt.In a preferred embodiment, the first or second set of Zernike coefficients encompassed by the first and second measurement data for describing the measured wavefront aberrations comprises at least partially Zernike coefficients up to the fourth order, in particular at least the second and fourth order Zernike coefficients. Here, the first or second set of Zernike coefficients depends on the description of the wavefront aberrations at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ $$c_{2.i}^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

$$c_{2.i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_2^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

$$c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

from the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) set of Zernike coefficients of the measured wavefront aberration. The first or second set of Zernike coefficients $\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(r_{\mathrm{0th}}\right).c_{2.i}^2\left(r_0\right).c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)\right)$

for describing the wavefront aberrations at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ thus particularly comprises second order Zernike coefficients and is preferably obtained by scaling according to the above relationship from the Zernike coefficients of the second and fourth order $\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right).c_{2.i}^2\left(R_i\right).c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right).c_{4.i}^0\left(R_i\right).c_{4.i}^2\left(R_i\right).$

the measured data determined.

$$c_{2,i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6,i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

$$c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

vom ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration ab. Der erste bzw. zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $\left(c_{2,i}^0\left(r_{0.}\right),c_{2,i}^2\left(r_0\right),c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)\right)$

zur Beschreibung der Wellenfrontaberrationen bei dem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ umfasst somit insbesondere Zernike-Koeffizienten zweiter Ordnung und wird vorzugsweise durch Skalierung gemäß obigem Zusammenhang aus den Zernike-Koeffizienten zweiter, vierter und sechster Ordnung ( $c_{2,i}^0\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{2,i}^2\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{4,i}^0\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{4,i}^2\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{4,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{6,i}^0\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{6,i}^2\left(R_i\right),$

$c_{6,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right),$

) der Messdaten ermittelt.In another preferred embodiment, the first and second set of Zernike coefficients comprised by the first and second measurement data, respectively, for describing the measured wavefront aberrations comprises at least some Zernike coefficients up to the sixth order, in particular at least some of Zernike coefficients of the second, fourth and sixth order. Here, the first or second set of Zernike coefficients depends on the description of the wavefront aberrations at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ $$c_{2.i}^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6.i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

$$c_{2.i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6.i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

$$c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$

from the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) set of Zernike coefficients of the measured wavefront aberration. The first or second set of Zernike coefficients $\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(r_{\mathrm{0th}}\right).c_{2.i}^2\left(r_0\right).c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)\right)$

for describing the wavefront aberrations at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ thus comprises in particular second-order Zernike coefficients and is preferably obtained by scaling according to the above connection from the Zernike coefficients of the second, fourth and sixth order ( $c_{2.i}^0\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{2.i}^2\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{4.i}^0\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{4.i}^2\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{4.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{6.i}^0\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{6.i}^2\left(R_i\right).$

$c_{6.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right).$

) of the measured data.

As already mentioned, it is not necessary for the wavefront aberration to be measured at the same position as the evaluation. Thus, the measurement of wavefront aberration and its representation by Zernike polynomials, e.g. in the area of the corneal vertex, while the corresponding wavefront aberrations at the vertex sphere are taken into account for the optimization and production of a spectacle lens.

Preferably, the acquisition of measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer thus comprises acquiring first measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer for a look into the distance, which comprises a first set of Zernike coefficients for describing a wavefront aberration measured during the remote accommodation of the eye at a first Include measuring position. This set of Zernike coefficients can turn either directly to the photopic Pupillenradius or refer to a deviating pupillary radius, which in the latter case preferably again can be scaled.

In addition, acquiring eye wear data preferably includes acquiring second eye wear data for a close-up eye view that includes a second set of Zernike coefficients to describe a wavefront aberration measured during close-up accommodation of the eye include second measuring position. The first and second measuring positions can match.

• ein Ermitteln des ersten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathrm{VD}}_F\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\left({\mathrm{VD}}_F\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\left({\mathrm{VD}}_F\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  aus dem von den ersten Messdaten umfassten oder gemäß einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform in Abhängigkeit von ${\lambda }_F=\frac{r_0}{R_F}$
  
  skalierten ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Abstand VD_F einer Auswertungsposition von der ersten Messposition derart, dass M_F (VD_F ) das sphärische Äquivalent und J _F (VD_F ) den zylindrischen Anteil der Wellenfrontaberration an der Auswertungsposition bei der Fernakkommodation des Auges beschreiben; und
• ein Ermitteln des zweiten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  aus dem von den zweiten Messdaten umfassten oder gemäß einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform in Abhängigkeit von ${\lambda }_N=\frac{r_0}{R_N}$
  
  skalierten zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Abstand VD_N der Auswertungsposition von der zweiten Messposition derart, dass M_N (VD_N ) das sphärische Äquivalent und J _N (VD_N ) den zylindrischen Anteil der Wellenfrontaberration an der Auswertungsposition bei der Nahakkommodation des Auges beschreiben.

The determination of objective refraction data of the eye for a close look preferably comprises:

• determining the first power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathrm{VD}}_F\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\left({\mathrm{VD}}_F\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\left({\mathrm{VD}}_F\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  from that covered by the first measurement data or according to a preferred embodiment as a function of ${\lambda }_F=\frac{r_0}{R_F}$
  
  scaled first set of Zernike coefficients versus distance VD _{F of} an evaluation position from the first measurement position such that M _F ( VD _F ) is the spherical equivalent and J _F ( VD _F ) is the cylindrical portion of the wavefront aberration at the evaluation position in the remote accommodation of the To describe the eye; and
• determining the second power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  from that encompassed by the second measurement data or according to a preferred embodiment as a function of ${\lambda }_N=\frac{r_0}{R_N}$
  
  scaled second set of Zernike coefficients as a function of distance VD _{N of} the evaluation position from the second measurement position such that M _N ( VD _N ) is the spherical equivalent and J _N ( VD _N ) is the cylindrical portion of the wavefront aberration at the evaluation position in the near-accommodation Describe the eye.

As the evaluation position, for example, a position can be used on the spectacle lens (eg, lens rear surface position on the vertex sphere), that in particular a position having the first and / or second measurement position a distance VD _i, for example, the individual corneal vertex distance of Eyeglass wearer for a selected spectacle frame corresponds.

• Erfassen von ersten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Ferne, welche einen ersten Pupillenradius R_F und einen ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten (zumindest bis zur 2. Ordnung) zur Beschreibung einer bei dem ersten Pupillenradius R_F und einer Fernakkommodation des Auges gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration an einer ersten Messposition festlegen;
• Erfassen von zweiten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Nähe, welche einen zweiten Pupillenradius R_N und einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten (zumindest bis zur 2. Ordnung) zur Beschreibung einer bei dem zweiten Pupillenradius R_N und einer Nahakkommodation gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration an einer zweiten Messposition festlegen;
• Erfassen zumindest eines photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ für das Auge des Brillenträgers;
• Skalieren des ersten und zweiten Satzes von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Verhältnis ${\lambda }_i=\frac{r_0}{R_i}$
  
  des photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ zum ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Pupillenradius R_i zur Beschreibung einer ersten bzw. zweiten skalierten Wellenfrontaberration für das Auge bei dem photopischen Pupillenradius an der ersten bzw. zweiten Messposition (dies führt zum entsprechenden skalierter Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten);
• Ermitteln eines ersten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  aus dem skalierten ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Abstand VD_F einer Auswertungsposition von der ersten Messposition derart, dass M_F (VD_F ) das sphärische Äquivalent und J _F (VD_F ) den zylindrischen Anteil der Wellenfrontaberration an der Auswertungsposition bei der Fernakkommodation des Auges beschreiben;
• Ermitteln eines zweiten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  aus dem skalierten zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Abstand VD_N der Auswertungsposition von der zweiten Messposition derart, dass M_N (VD_N ) das sphärische Äquivalent und J _N (VD_N ) den zylindrischen Anteil der Wellenfrontaberration an der Auswertungsposition bei der Nahakkommodation des Auges beschreiben;
• Ermitteln eines korrigierten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
  
  für den Blick in die Nähe in Abhängigkeit von einer Differenz $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathrm{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)-{\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)$
  
  zwischen dem ersten und zweiten Power-Vektor derart, dass der korrigierte Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
  
  • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
    
    entspricht, falls ΔM > Δ_1N , insbesondere falls 0 ≥ ΔM > A _1N ; und
  • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
    
    entspricht, falls ΔM ≤ A _{1 N}, wobei $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
    
    das sphärische Äquivalent eines vorgegebenen Objektabstands d für die Sicht in die Nähe ist; und
• Ermitteln von objektiven Refraktionsdaten für Sphäre $\left({\mathit{Sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\right),$
  
  Zylinder $\left({\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  und Achslage $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  des Auges für den Blick in die Nähe aus dem korrigierten Power-Vektor $P_N^{\mathit{corr}}\mathrm{.}$
  

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the invention thus provides a method for the objective refraction determination for an eye of a spectacle wearer, comprising:

• Obtaining first eyeball wearer eye measurement data for a distance view, which includes a first pupil radius R _F and a first set of Zernike coefficients (at least to the second order) for describing one at the first pupil radius R _F and a remote accommodation determine the wavefront aberration measured at the eye at a first measurement position;
• For obtaining a close-up view of the spectacle wearer's second eye, a second pupil radius R _N and a second set of Zernike coefficients (at least up to the second order) are described for describing a second pupil radius R _N and a close-up accommodation determine measured wavefront aberration at a second measurement position;
• Detecting at least one photopic pupil radius r ₀ for the eye of the spectacle wearer;
• Scale the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients as a function of the ratio ${\lambda }_i=\frac{r_0}{R_i}$
  
  of the photopic pupil radius r ₀ to the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) pupil radius R _i for describing a first or second scaled wavefront aberration for the eye at the photopic pupil radius at the first and second measurement positions (this leads to corresponding scaled set of Zernike coefficients);
• Determining a first power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  from the scaled first set of Zernike coefficients as a function of the distance VD _F an evaluation position from the first measurement position such that M _F ( VD _F ) describes the spherical equivalent and J _F ( VD _F ) the cylindrical portion of the wavefront aberration at the evaluation position in the remote accommodation of the eye;
• Determining a second power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\end{array}\right)$
  
  from the scaled second set of Zernike coefficients versus the distance VD _{N of} the evaluation position from the second measurement position such that M _N ( VD _N ) is the spherical equivalent and J _N ( VD _N ) is the cylindrical portion of the wavefront aberration at the evaluation position at the Describe near-accommodation of the eye;
• Determining a corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
  
  for a close look depending on a difference $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathrm{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)-{\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)$
  
  between the first and second power vector such that the corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
  
  • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
    
    corresponds to if Δ M> Δ _{1 N} , in particular if 0 ≥ Δ M> A _{1 N} ; and
  • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
    
    corresponds to if Δ M ≦ A _{1 N} , where $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
    
    is the spherical equivalent of a given object distance d for near vision; and
• Determine objective refraction data for sphere $\left({\mathit{sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\right).$
  
  cylinder $\left({\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  and axis position $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  of the eye for the close look from the corrected power vector $P_N^{\mathit{corr}}\mathrm{,}$
  

Zylinder $\left({\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$

und Achslage $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$

des Auges für den Blick in die Nähe gemäß $${\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}},-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$

aus dem korrigierten Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$

ermittelt.In particular, the refraction data for sphere $\left({\mathit{sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\right).$

cylinder $\left({\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$

and axis position $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$

eye for a look near $${\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}.-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$

from the corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$

determined.

mit $${\mathit{Sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$

$${\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times \left({\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left(0\right)\right)}-\frac{{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)={\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)$$

und $${\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}{c}_{2,i}^0+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2,i}^2\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2,i}^2\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(c_{2,i}^2,c_{2,i}^{-2}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$

für i = F, N erfüllt, wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,x<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,x<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,y>0\\ -\pi /2,x=0,y<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$

und wobei $c_{2,i}^0,$

$c_{2,i}^2$

und $c_{2,i}^{-2}$

die von den ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Messdaten umfassten bzw. gemäß einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform skalierten Zernike-Koeffizienten zweiter Ordnung für den Blick in die Ferne (i = F) bzw. den Blick in die Nähe (i = N) bezeichnen.Preferably, the first power vector and / or the second power vector is determined such that it satisfies the equation $${\mathbf{P}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{\mathit{sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)+\frac{{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\\ -\frac{{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\cos 2{\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)\\ -\frac{{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\sin 2{\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)\end{array}\right)$$

With $${\mathit{sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$

$${\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times \left({\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left(0\right)\right)}-\frac{{\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)={\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)$$

and $${\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}{c}_{2.i}^0+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2.i}^2\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{cyl}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2.i}^2\right)}^2}$$

$${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(c_{2.i}^2,c_{2.i}^{-2}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$

for i = F, N satisfies, where $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .x<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .x<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.y>0\\ -\pi /2.x=0.y<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$

and where $c_{2.i}^0.$

$c_{2.i}^2$

and $c_{2.i}^{-2}$

the Zernike coefficients of the second order encompassed by the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) measurement data or scaled according to a preferred embodiment for looking into the distance ( i = F ) or looking into the vicinity ( i = N ).

In a preferred embodiment, the detection of the first and / or second measurement data comprises measurement of refraction data and / or wavefront aberrations of the eye by means of an autorefractor and / or by means of an aberrometer.

• ein erfindungsgemäßes Verfahren zur objektiven Refraktionsbestimmung für das zumindest eine Auge des Brillenträgers insbesondere gemäß einer der hier beschriebenen bevorzugten Ausführungsformen;
• ein Optimieren oder Berechnen eines Brillenglases zur Korrektion der objektiv bestimmten Refraktion; und
• ein Herstellen des Brillenglases gemäß dem Ergebnis des Optimierens bzw.

Preferably, the invention provides a method for optimizing and producing a spectacle lens for at least one eye of a spectacle wearer, comprising:

• an inventive method for the objective refraction determination for the at least one eye of the spectacle wearer, in particular according to one of the preferred embodiments described herein;
• optimizing or calculating a spectacle lens to correct the objectively determined refraction; and
• a production of the spectacle lens according to the result of optimizing or

Calculating.

• - eine Messdatenerfassungsschnittstelle zum Erfassen von Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers, welche zumindest einen ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,F}^0,$
  
  $c_{2,F}^2$
  
  und $c_{2,F}^{-2}$
  
  zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Fernakkommodation und einem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ des Auges und einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,N}^0,$
  
  $c_{2,N}^2$
  
  und $c_{2,N}^{-2}$
  
  zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Nahakkommodation und dem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ des Auges festlegen; und
• - eine Refraktionsdatenermittlungseinrichtung zum Ermitteln von objektiven Refraktionsdaten für Sphäre $\left({\mathit{Sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\right),$
  
  Zylinder $\left({\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  und Achslage $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  des Auges für einen Blick in die Nähe derart, dass die objektiven Refraktionsdaten in Abhängigkeit vom ersten und zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten die Gleichungen $${\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}},-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
  
  für einen korrigierten Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$
  
  für den Blick in die Nähe erfüllt, wobei der korrigierte Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
  
  in Abhängigkeit von einer Differenz $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$
  
  zwischen einem ersten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
  
  und einem zweiten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
  
  • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
    
    entspricht, falls ΔM > A _1N , insbesondere falls 0 ≥ ΔM> A _1N ; und
  • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
    
    entspricht, falls ΔM≤A _1N ,
  wobei $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
  
  das sphärische Äquivalent eines vorgegebenen Objektabstands d für die Sicht in die Nähe ist, und wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,x<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,x<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,y>0\\ -\pi /2,x=0,y<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$
  

In a further aspect, the invention provides an apparatus for objective refraction determination for an eye of a spectacle wearer, comprising:

• - A measurement data acquisition interface for acquiring measurement data for the eye of the wearer, which at least a first set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.F}^0.$
  
  $c_{2.F}^2$
  
  and $c_{2.F}^{-2}$
  
  for describing a wavefront aberration in a remote accommodation and a photopic pupil radius r _{0 of} the eye and a second set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.N}^0.$
  
  $c_{2.N}^2$
  
  and $c_{2.N}^{-2}$
  
  for describing a wavefront aberration in a near-accommodation and the photopic pupil radius r _{0 of} the eye; and
• a refraction data determination device for determining objective refraction data for sphere $\left({\mathit{sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\right).$
  
  cylinder $\left({\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  and axis position $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
  
  of the eye for a close look such that the objective refraction data depends on the first and second set of Zernike coefficients the equations $${\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}.-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
  
  for a corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$
  
  met for a close look, being the corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
  
  depending on a difference $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$
  
  between a first power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
  
  and a second power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
  
  • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
    
    corresponds to if Δ M > A _{1 N} , in particular if 0 ≥ Δ M > A _{1 N} ; and
  • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
    
    corresponds to if Δ M ≦ A _{1 N} ,
  in which $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
  
  is the spherical equivalent of a given object distance d for near vision, and where $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .x<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .x<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.y>0\\ -\pi /2.x=0.y<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$
  

Preferably, the device comprises calculating means which are designed to calculate the refraction data according to a refraction determination method according to the present invention, in particular in a preferred embodiment.

In a further aspect, which may preferably be used in conjunction with the aspects described above or independently, the invention provides a method for capturing a set of individual user data for the adaptation and optimization of spectacles, comprising the following steps: First, the method comprises a step of detecting the first aberrometric data of a first eye of the spectacle wearer for a first accommodation state of the first eye at a first primary brightness. It is particularly preferable to provide remote accommodation as the first accommodation state. The first primary brightness is preferably a brightness in the regime of mesopic vision (preferred luminance in the range of about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 30 cd / m ² , more preferably in the range of about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 3 cd / m ² , more preferably in the range of about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 0.3 cd / m ² , most preferably in the range of about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 0.03 cd / m ² ). Brightness is understood to mean, in particular, always the brightness to be detected at the location of the eye or the eye to be detected.

In the context of this description, "aberrometric data" (or "aberrometric measurements") is taken to mean data for describing the aberrations of an eye (measurements for obtaining these data) whose information content is at least the term of the "defocus" order when displayed with Zernike coefficients but ideally includes higher orders (eg cylinder error, coma and spherical aberrations).

After the step of acquiring first aberrometric data of the first eye, the method preferably comprises a step of acquiring second aberrometric data of the first eye of the spectacle wearer for one. second accommodation state of the first eye at a second primary brightness. In this case, the second primary brightness preferably coincides with the first primary brightness. The second primary brightness is preferably also a brightness in the regime of mesopic vision (preferred luminance in the range from about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 30 cd / m ² , particularly preferably in the range from about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 3 cd / m ² , more preferably in the range of about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 0.3 cd / m ² , most preferably in the range of about 0.003 cd / m ² to about 0.03 cd / m ² ). Particularly preferably, a Nahakkommodation is provided as a second Akkommodationszustand.

In this case, first or second primary pupillometric data for the first eye are recorded together with the detection of first aberrometric data and / or the acquisition of second aberrometric data (ie at the first or second primary brightness and at the first or second accommodation state). The term "pupillometric data" (or pupillometric measurements) refers here to information about the size of the pupil (or measurements for obtaining this data), the at least one size specification (for example in the form of a radius) but also includes the shape of the pupil in a more complex form can play. In addition, the pupillometric data may include information about the position of the pupil (eg, relative to the corneal vertex or to the optical axis of the eye).

Particularly preferably, first primary pupillometric data for the first accommodation state are acquired together with the acquisition of first aberrometric data, and second primary pupillometric data for the second accommodation state are acquired together with the acquisition of second aberrometric data.

Additionally, after acquiring the first and preferably the second aberrometric data (and thus also after acquiring primary pupillometric data, particularly the first and second primary pupillometric data), the method includes a step of acquiring secondary pupillometric data for the first eye of the wearer a secondary brightness whose value is above that of the first (and preferably second) primary brightness. As the secondary brightness, preferably, a brightness is provided in the photopic vision regime (preferred luminance ranging from about 3 cd / m ² to about 30 cd / m ² ).

The terms "primary" and "secondary" for the brightnesses and the In this description, pupillometric data serve merely to better understand the assignment of the individual variables in the course of the process and moreover have no technical relevance. Thus, to simplify the traceability of the description, the quantities defined or recorded together with the aberrometric data are given the additional designation "primary", while the quantities set or acquired according to the aberrometric data or measurements are referred to as "secondary".

The brightnesses used for the acquisition of the pupillometric data can either be at least partially adapted to the circumstances corresponding to the individual situation of use or independently specified. In the latter case, if desired, the values of the individual data corresponding to an individual usage situation can be very easily determined, for example, by interpolation and / or extrapolation, in particular on the basis of an adapted analytical function.

Thus, the invention provides a very efficient way of determining a universal objective refraction with as little effort as possible for users (e.g., opticians) and subjects (e.g., customers). The term universal objective refraction refers to an objective refraction, the aberrometric values of the entire eye (ie the imaging of objects on the retina) in at least one, preferably two accommodation conditions (eg distance and proximity) and pupillometric data in at least two illumination states (eg photopic and mesopically), from which very simple and yet very reliable a variety of different usage situation can be derived.

• Erfassen erster aberrometrischer Daten eines zweiten Auges des Brillenträgers für einen ersten Akkommodationszustand des zweiten Auges bei der ersten primären Helligkeit; und
• Erfassen zweiter aberrometrischer Daten des zweiten Auges des Brillenträgers für einen zweiten Akkommodationszustand des zweiten Auges bei der zweiten primären Helligkeit.

Preferably, after the step of acquiring first aberrometric data of the first eye, optionally after the step of acquiring second aberrometric data of the first eye and before the step of acquiring secondary pupillometric data of the first eye, the method further comprises the following steps in this order:

• Acquiring first aberrometric data of a second eye of the Spectacle wearer for a first accommodation state of the second eye at the first primary brightness; and
• Detecting second aberrometric data of the second eye of the wearer for a second state of accommodation of the second eye at the second primary brightness.

Analogously to the first eye, the first accommodation state of the second eye is preferably a remote accommodation and the second accommodation state of the second eye is a near accommodation. Also in analogy to the first eye, first or second primary pupillometric data for the second eye are detected in this preferred embodiment together with the detection of first aberrometric data and / or second aberrometric data of the second eye (ie at the first or second primary brightness). In addition, after detecting the first and second aberrometric data of the second eye and before acquiring secondary pupillometric data of the first eye, the method further comprises a step of acquiring secondary pupillometric data of the second eye of the spectacle wearer at the secondary brightness.

Preferably, the first accommodation state of the first and / or second eye corresponds to a remote accommodation and the second accommodation state of the first and / or second eye corresponds to a Nahakkommodation. Preferably, the accommodation states of the first and / or second eyes are stimulated by projecting a virtual target into the respective eye. Particularly preferably, the method between the detection of the first and second aberrometric data of the first and / or second eye comprises a step of continuously approaching a virtual position of the virtual target to the first and second eye. In this way, the correct accommodation of the eye to the virtual target is effected in a particularly reliable manner, which leads to a particularly reliable measurement of the aberrometric data and optionally of the pupillometric data for the lower brightness (here also referred to in particular as primary pupillometric data).

Preferably, the method further comprises detecting further (third or even fourth, etc.) aberrometric data of the first and / or second eye of the spectacle wearer for a third (or fourth, etc.) accommodation state of the first and second eyes in a third (FIG. fourth, etc.) primary brightness, preferably along with the detection of third (or fourth, etc.) aberrometric data of the first and second eyes, third (fourth, etc.) primary pupillometric data for the first and second eyes, respectively be recorded. Preferably, this is done after detecting first aberrometric data of the first or second eye. Particularly preferably, the second, third, fourth, etc. accommodation correspond to different Nahakkommodationen. In a further preferred aspect, all primary brightnesses are the same.

In a further preferred embodiment, together with the acquisition of the secondary pupillometric data of the first and / or second eye, a capture of topographical data of the first or second eye takes place in the secondary brightness. "Topographical data" (or "topographical measurements") is taken to mean data for describing the topography of a cornea (or measurements for obtaining this data) whose information content corresponds at least to the term of the order "defocus" when displayed with Zernike coefficients, ideally, however, includes higher orders (eg, cylinder error, coma, and spherical aberrations).

After the topographical data are recorded together with the pupillometric data for the high brightness (also referred to here in particular secondary pupillometric data), no additional measurement time and no additional adjustment of the respective eye is required. The additional topographical data are then also available for improved optimization of a spectacle lens without the optician having to operate a recognizable additional effort. As will be explained later, a pattern projector used for the topographic measurement can simultaneously provide the secondary brightness at which the pupillometric data of the higher brightness (in particular photopic pupillometric data).

Preferably, the acquisition of topographical data comprises projecting a light pattern onto the eye and acquiring image data of the eye by means of a single image capture device (camera), from which both the light reflections generated by the projected light pattern for the evaluation of the topographic data and the pupillometric data are determined become. In a preferred embodiment, the image capture device comprises a color camera, wherein the projected light pattern can be differentiated in color from the pupil detected in the image data. Thus, a simpler evaluation of the pupillometric data and the topographic data from the same image data set can be achieved. Alternatively, it is also possible to provide two different cameras for recording the topographical data and the pupillometric data, which have, for example, different color filters, in order in turn to achieve a simpler evaluation of the respective picture elements.

• eine Aberrometereinrichtung zum Erfassen aberrometrischer Daten zumindest eines Auges des Brillenträgers zumindest für einen ersten Akkommodationszustand des Auges bei einer ersten primären Helligkeit und vorzugsweise für einen zweiten Akkommodationszustand des Auges bei einer zweiten primären Helligkeit;
• eine Beleuchtungseinrichtung zum Erzeugen einer sekundären Helligkeit, welche größer ist als die erste (und vorzugsweise zweite) primäre Helligkeit; und
• eine Pupillometereinrichtung, welche ausgelegt ist, erste primäre pupillometrische Daten des zumindest einen Auges bei der ersten primären Helligkeit und/oder zweite primäre pupillometrische Daten des zumindest einen Auges bei der zweiten primären Helligkeit zu erfassen und sekundäre pupillometrische Daten des zumindest einen Auges bei der sekundären Helligkeit zu erfassen,

wobei die Vorrichtung ausgelegt ist, ein Verfahren gemäß der vorliegenden Erfindung insbesondere in einer der hier beschriebenen bevorzugten Ausführungsformen auszuführen.In a further aspect, which may preferably be used in conjunction with the aspects described above or independently, the invention provides a device for acquiring a set of individual user data for the adaptation and optimization of spectacles, the device comprising:

• an aberrometer device for acquiring aberrometric data of at least one eye of the spectacle wearer at least for a first accommodation state of the eye at a first primary brightness and preferably for a second accommodation state of the eye at a second primary brightness;
• illumination means for generating a secondary brightness which is greater than the first (and preferably second) primary brightness; and
• a pupillometer device configured to acquire first primary pupillometric data of the at least one eye at the first primary brightness and / or second primary pupillometric data of the at least one eye at the second primary brightness and secondary pupillometric data of the at least one eye at the secondary brightness capture,

the device being designed to provide a method according to the present invention Invention in particular in one of the preferred embodiments described herein.

Preferably, the aberrator means comprises accommodation stimulation means configured to project a virtual target into the at least one eye and to change the virtual position of the virtual target between a position for stimulating remote accommodation and a position for stimulating proximity accommodation. In particular, an optical projection into the subject's eye is regarded as a virtual target in such a way that this projection on the retina of the eye produces an image which corresponds to the image of a real object at a specific distance from the eye. This particular distance is also referred to here for the virtual target as a virtual location. Since, in particular, it is not a real object, a virtual position beyond infinity can be simulated by suitable design of the optical system for projection.

• einen Musterprojektor zur Projektion eines Lichtmusters auf das zumindest eine Auge (insbesondere auf die Hornhaut des zumindest einen Auges); und
• eine Topographie-Auswerteeinrichtung, welche ausgelegt ist, aus Reflexionen des Lichtmusters am Auge (insbesondere an der Hornhaut des Auges) topographische Daten zu ermitteln.

In einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform dient der Musterprojektor gleichzeitig als die bereits oben beschriebene Beleuchtungseinrichtung zum Erzeugen der sekundären Helligkeit.Preferably, the device comprises:

• a pattern projector for projecting a light pattern on the at least one eye (in particular on the cornea of the at least one eye); and
• a topography evaluation device which is designed to determine topographical data from reflections of the light pattern on the eye (in particular on the cornea of the eye).

In a preferred embodiment, the pattern projector simultaneously serves as the illumination means for generating the secondary brightness already described above.

In addition to corresponding methods, in particular for refraction determination, preferably involving one or more of the corresponding method steps implemented as functional sequences in the devices according to the invention, the invention also provides a computer program product, in particular in the form of a storage medium or a signal sequence, comprising computer-readable instructions which, when loaded into a memory of a Computers, preferably in the memory of a data processing unit of a device according to the present invention, and executed by the computer, which is in particular designed to control or control a device according to the invention or is included in a device according to the invention, cause the computer (and thus in particular the computer Device according to the invention) performs or controls a method according to the present invention, in particular in a preferred embodiment.

Fig. 1

ein Flussdiagramm zur schematischen Veranschaulichung eines Verfahrensablaufs gemäß einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform der Erfindung.

Fig. 2

eine schematische Darstellung eines Ablaufs eines Verfahren gemäß einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform der vorliegenden Erfindung.

The invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings with reference to preferred embodiments. Showing:

Fig. 1

a flowchart for schematically illustrating a method sequence according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.

Fig. 2

a schematic representation of a flow of a method according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

In a preferred embodiment, the Zernike coefficients for looking into the distance and looking into the vicinity are retrieved from a record provided to the eyeglass wearer. This data set can be created in separate measurements and saved for further processing and evaluation or for ordering glasses. Thus, for example, an optician can create the data set by measuring wavefronts on the eye of the spectacle wearer and, for further processing, in particular for use for a method according to the invention, be transmitted to a spectacle lens manufacturer or an optical calculation office. It is also possible that the optician already has available a corresponding computer system which, in the manner according to the invention, determines near-refraction data corrected on the basis of the data set determined for the spectacle wearer in a separate measurement, which can be transmitted to a spectacle lens manufacturer, for example. On the other hand, it is also possible that Nah- and / or Remote refraction data or Zernike coefficients for near and far vision after the measurement are processed further directly in a manner according to the invention for the (objective) refraction determination, in particular without being stored beforehand in a user database.

(erster Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten), welche die Wellenfrontaberration z.B. am Hornhautscheitel bei einer Fernakkommodation des Auges beschreiben.Regardless of how the measured values or measured data are acquired for a refraction determination according to the invention, the method comprises in Fig. 1 illustrated preferred embodiment of a section ST10 of the detection of first measurement data, which may in particular based on a conventional objective refraction determination for a view into the distance, so with the least possible accommodation of the eye. In a preferred embodiment, the measurement data includes a plurality of Zernike coefficients measured under mesopic conditions and a pupil radius R ₀ resulting therefrom. The first measurement data therefore particularly includes the pupil radius, which is preferably also measured during the objective refraction determination, as well as a set of Zernike coefficients $c_{n.F}^m\left(R_0\right)$

(first set of Zernike coefficients), which describe the wavefront aberration eg at the corneal vertex in the case of a remote accommodation of the eye.

(zweiter Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten), welche die Wellenfrontaberration z.B. am Hornhautscheitel bei einer Nahakkommodation des Auges beschreiben. Welcher Akkommodationsreiz bzw. welche Objektentfernung zur maximalen Akkommodation geführt hat spielt dabei keine wesentliche Rolle.Based on this, in a step ST12, measurement data for a close-up accommodation of the eye is acquired or measured. For this purpose, for example, a sequence (series) of close-up measurements take place whose accommodation signal increases successively. That near-distance measurement is then in step ST14 is selected, has taken place at the strongest accommodation, so as later described Δ M in equation (9b) having the most negative value. The measurement data acquired in steps ST12 and ST14 thus preferably include the pupil radius R ₀ during the measurement and a set of Zernike coefficients $c_{n.N}^m\left(R_0\right)$

(second set of Zernike coefficients), which describe the wavefront aberration eg at the corneal vertex during a close accommodation of the eye. Which accommodative stimulus or which object distance has led to the maximum accommodation plays no essential role.

Insofar as subsequent remarks apply analogously to distance and near-distance accommodation, it is possible to dispense with the corresponding index (" F " for far and " N " for near) in the formulas.

gegeben sind, dann besitzt der konzentrische Ausschnitt der gleichen Wellenfront für einen (photopischen) Pupillenradius r ₀<R ₀ Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_n^m\left(r_0\right),$

die aus den $c_n^m\left(R_0\right)$

und dem Radienverhältnis λ = r ₀/R ₀ vorzugsweise mittels der Skalierungsrelation $$\begin{array}{l}{c}_2^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }^2\left(c_2^0\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)c_4^0\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }^2-2\right)c_6^0\left(R_0\right)\right)\\ c_2^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }^2\left(c_2^2\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)c_4^2\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }^2-2\right)c_6^2\left(R_0\right)\right)\\ c_2^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }^2\left(c_2^{-2}\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)c_4^{-2}\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }^2-2\right)c_6^{-2}\left(R_0\right)\right)\end{array}$$

abgeleitet werden können. Dazu umfasst das Verfahren zunächst vorzugsweise einen Schritt ST16 des Erfassens bzw. Messens eines vorzugsweise individuellen photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀. Vorzugsweise wird in einem Schritt ST18 des Skalierens der Zernike-Koeffizienten sowohl für die Fernsicht als auch für die Nahsicht die Relation gemäß Gleichung (0) genutzt, um eine Messung, die zu einer (großen) mesopischen Pupille gehören, auf eine (kleinere) photopische Referenzpupille herunterzuskalieren.If the information contained in the acquired measurement data Zernike coefficients for a (mesopic) pupil radius R _{0 and} $c_n^m\left(R_0\right)$

are given, then has the concentric section of the same wavefront for a (photopic) pupil radius r ₀ < R ₀ Zernike coefficients $c_n^m\left(r_0\right).$

those from the $c_n^m\left(R_0\right)$

and the radii ratio λ = r ₀ / R _0, preferably by means of the scaling relation $$\begin{array}{l}{c}_2^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }^2\left(c_2^0\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)c_4^0\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }^2-2\right)c_6^0\left(R_0\right)\right)\\ c_2^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }^2\left(c_2^2\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)c_4^2\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }^2-2\right)c_6^2\left(R_0\right)\right)\\ c_2^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }^2\left(c_2^{-2}\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)c_4^{-2}\left(R_0\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }^2-2\right)c_6^{-2}\left(R_0\right)\right)\end{array}$$

can be derived. For this purpose, the method preferably initially comprises a step ST16 of detecting or measuring a preferably individual photopic pupil radius r ₀ . Preferably, in a step ST18 of scaling the Zernike coefficients for both far vision and near vision, the relation of equation (0) is used to obtain a measurement belonging to a (large) mesopic pupil to a (smaller) photopic one To scale down the reference pupil.

genutzt. Zur späteren Vereinfachung wird der zylindrische Teil von P als $$\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{J}_0\\ J_{45}\end{array}\right)$$

zusammengefasst, so dass sich der Power-Vektor auch in der Form $$\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}M\\ \mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$$

schreiben lässt.For further description, preferably power vectors $$\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}M\\ J_0\\ J_{45}\end{array}\right)$$

used. For later simplification, the cylindrical part of P is called $$\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{J}_0\\ J_{45}\end{array}\right)$$

summarized, so that the power vector also in the form $$\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}M\\ \mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$$

let write.

entweder als Funktion der Refraktionsdaten Sph, Cyl, Axis oder als Funktion der Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_2^0,c_2^2,c_2^{-2}$

betrachtet werden kann, wobei r ₀ der Pupillenradius ist. Hierzu wird auch auf Seite 334 in "Adaptive Optics for Vision Science", Porter et al., Wiley 2006 verwiesen. Daraus ergibt sich $$\begin{array}{l}\mathit{Sph}=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}{c}_2^0+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_2^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_2^2\right)}^2}\\ \mathit{Cyl}=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_2^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_2^2\right)}^2}\\ \mathit{Axis}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(c_2^2,c_2^{-2}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}\end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{l}\mathit{Sph}=M+\sqrt{J_0^2+J_{45}^2}\\ \mathit{Cyl}=-2\sqrt{J_0^2+J_{45}^2}\\ \mathit{Axis}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-J_0,-J_{45}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}\end{array}$$

wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,x<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,x<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,y>0\\ -\pi /2,x=0,y<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$

In order to establish a relationship between Zernike coefficients and SZA values (refraction data for sphere, cylinder, axis) which are to apply in the same reference plane (ie the same evaluation position), the following formulas are preferably used, according to which the power vector $$\mathbf{P}\left(\mathit{Shp},\mathit{cyl},\mathit{Axis}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathit{Shp}+\frac{\mathit{cyl}}{2}\\ -\frac{\mathit{cyl}}{2}\cos 2\mathit{Axis}\\ -\frac{\mathit{cyl}}{2}\sin 2\mathit{Axis}\end{array}\right)\mathbf{P}\left(c_2^0,c_2^{-2},c_2^2\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_2^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_2^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_2^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$

either as a function of the refraction data Sph, Cyl, Axis or as a function of the Zernike coefficients $c_2^0.c_2^2.c_2^{-2}$

can be considered, where r _{0 is} the pupil radius . This is also on Page 334 in "Adaptive Optics for Vision Science", Porter et al., Wiley 2006 directed. This results in $$\begin{array}{l}\mathit{sph}=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}{c}_2^0+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_2^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_2^2\right)}^2}\\ \mathit{cyl}=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_2^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_2^2\right)}^2}\\ \mathit{Axis}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(c_2^2,c_2^{-2}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}\end{array}$$

$$\begin{array}{l}\mathit{sph}=M+\sqrt{J_0^2+J_{45}^2}\\ \mathit{cyl}=-2\sqrt{J_0^2+J_{45}^2}\\ \mathit{Axis}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-J_0.-J_{45}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}\end{array}$$

in which $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .x<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .x<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.y>0\\ -\pi /2.x=0.y<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$

Equations (3a) and (3b) are equivalent to Equations (2) and provide Sph, Cyl, Axis for given Zernike coefficients in the same reference plane and pupil radius.

If the measurement position (s) (eg, the plane of the corneal vertex) differs from the plane of interest or the evaluation position (eg, the lens plane or vertex sphere) and is away from it by a corneal vertex distance VD , then the propagated refraction data becomes preferably determined by $$\begin{array}{l}\mathit{sph}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\frac{\mathit{sph}\left(0\right)}{1+\mathit{VD}\times \mathit{sph}\left(0\right)}\\ \mathit{cyl}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\frac{\mathit{sph}\left(0\right)+\mathit{cyl}\left(0\right)}{1+\mathit{VD}\times \left(\mathit{sph}\left(0\right)+\mathit{cyl}\left(0\right)\right)}-\frac{\mathit{sph}\left(0\right)}{1+\mathit{VD}\times \mathit{sph}\left(0\right)}\\ \mathit{Axis}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\mathit{Axis}\left(0\right)\end{array}$$

Accordingly, the method preferably comprises a step ST20 of determining or calculating propagated refraction values, that is to say the refraction values for sphere, cylinder and axis position of propagated wavefronts, from the refraction values at the measurement positions, which are determined in particular from the original or the scaled Zernike coefficients according to equation (3a).

In order to determine the objective refraction, the entire method preferably provides objective refraction values for both far vision and near vision. The steps ST18 of scaling the Zernike coefficients and ST20 of determining propagated refraction values are performed both for the first measurement data (far vision) and for the second measurement data (near vision).

gegeben sind können, zuerst in Schritt ST18 zu den Werten $c_{2,F}^0\left(r_0\right),c_{2,F}^2\left(r_0\right),c_{2,F}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

beim photopischen Pupillenradius mittels Gleichung (0) herunterskaliert mit λ = r ₀/R _0,F . Dabei ist R _0,F der gemessene mesopische Pupillenradius, der zu den Daten der Fernmessung gehört, während r ₀ der photopische Pupillenradius ist, der aus einer separaten Messung ST16 stammen kann.Preferably, the measured Zernike coefficients of the telemetering, which in 2nd order by $c_{2.F}^0\left(R_{0.F}\right).c_{2.F}^2\left(R_{0.F}\right).c_{2.F}^{-2}\left(R_{0.F}\right)$

may be given first in step ST18 to the values $c_{2.F}^0\left(r_0\right).c_{2.F}^2\left(r_0\right).c_{2.F}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

at the photopic pupil radius by means of equation (0) scaled down with λ = r ₀ / R _{0, F.} Where R _{0 , F is} the measured mesopic pupil radius associated with the data from the telemetry, while r _{0 is} the photopic pupil radius, which may be from a separate measurement ST16.

durch die photopischen Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,F}^0\left(r_0\right),c_{2,F}^2\left(r_0\right),c_{2,F}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

für die Ferne ersetzt werden, die vorzugsweise gemäß Gleichung (0) bestimmt werden.The scaled Zernike coefficients resulting in step ST18 are then converted to refraction data Sph _F (0), Cyl _F (0), Axis _F (0) for distance using equation (3a), where in equation (3a) the Zernike coefficients $c_2^0.c_2^2.c_2^{-2}$

through the photopic Zernike coefficients $c_{2.F}^0\left(r_0\right).c_{2.F}^2\left(r_0\right).c_{2.F}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

be replaced for the distance, which are preferably determined according to equation (0).

The remote-refraction Sph _F (0), Cyl _F (0), Axis _F (0) are transformed in step ST20 preferably based on equation (4) to the valid at the evaluation position refraction Sph _F (VD), Cyl _F ( VD ), Axis _F ( VD ) at the distance VD from the measuring position. In step ST22, the propagated remote refraction data Sph _F ( VD ), Cyl _F ( VD ), Axis _F ( YD ) are then considered objective Refraction values for the distance view issued.

For the determination of the near refraction values, the method according to the invention comprises, in particular, in Fig. 1 In the preferred embodiment illustrated, it is preferable first to perform analogous steps as for the remote refraction values. Since the data of the remote measurement are also relevant for the interpretation of the close measurement, both near and far refraction data are determined from the existing Zernike coefficients. With regard to the far-refraction, Sph _F ( VD ), Cyl _F ( VD ), Axis _F ( VD ) can be used here for the results as described above. For close measurement, analogous steps are preferably initially carried out.

gegeben sein können, zuerst in Schritt ST18 zu den Werten $c_{2,N}^0\left(r_0\right),c_{2,N}^2\left(r_0\right),c_{2,N}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

beim photopischen Pupillenradius mittels Gleichung (0) herunterskaliert mit λ = r ₀/R _{0, N}. Dabei ist R _0,N der gemessene mesopische Pupillenradius, der zu den Daten der Nahmessung gehört, während r ₀ der photopische Pupillenradius ist, der aus einer separaten Messung ST16 stammen kann.Preferably, the measured Zernike coefficients of the close measurement, which in 2nd order by $c_{2.N}^0\left(R_{0.N}\right).c_{2.N}^2\left(R_{0.N}\right).c_{2.N}^{-2}\left(R_{0.N}\right)$

may be given first to the values in step ST18 $c_{2.N}^0\left(r_0\right).c_{2.N}^2\left(r_0\right).c_{2.N}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

at the photopic pupil radius by means of equation (0) downscaled with λ = r ₀ / R _{0, N.} Where R _{0, N is} the measured mesopic pupil radius associated with the close measurement data, while r _{0 is} the photopic pupil radius, which may be from a separate measurement ST16.

durch die photopischen Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,N}^0\left(r_0\right),c_{2,N}^2\left(r_0\right),c_{2,N}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

für die Nähe ersetzt werden, die vorzugsweise gemäß Gleichung (0) ermittelt werden.The scaled Zernike coefficients resulting in step ST18 are then converted to refraction data Sph _N (0), Cyl _N (0), Axis _N (0) for proximity by equation (3a), where in equation (3a) the Zernike coefficients $c_2^0.c_2^2.c_2^{-2}$

through the photopic Zernike coefficients $c_{2.N}^0\left(r_0\right).c_{2.N}^2\left(r_0\right).c_{2.N}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)$

be replaced for proximity, which are preferably determined according to equation (0).

The near-refraction data Sph _N (0), Cyl _N (0), Axis _N (0) are transformed in step ST20, preferably by equation (4), to obtain the refraction data Sph _N ( VD ), Cyl _N (valid at the evaluation position). VD ), Axis _N ( VD ) at the distance VD from the measuring position.

und analog wird der Power-Vektor gebildet, der zu den propagierten Nah-Refraktionsdaten Sph_N (VD),Cyl_N (VD),Axis_N (VD) gehört, durch $${\mathbf{P}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\mathbf{P}\left({\mathit{Sph}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right),{\mathit{Cyl}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right),{\mathit{Axis}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\right)$$

In a subsequent step ST24, preferably the propagated remote refraction data Sph _F ( VD ), Cyl _F ( VD ), Axis _F ( VD ) are transformed into power vectors by means of equation (2), ie $${\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\mathbf{P}\left({\mathit{sph}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{cyl}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{Axis}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\right)$$

and analogously, the power vector which belongs to the propagated near-refraction data Sph _N ( VD ), Cyl _N ( VD ), Axis _N ( VD ) is formed $${\mathbf{P}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\mathbf{P}\left({\mathit{sph}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{cyl}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{Axis}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\right)$$

gebildet. Separat in sphärischen und zylindrischen Komponenten geschrieben entspricht das $$\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{\Delta }M=M_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-M_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}={\mathbf{J}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-{\mathbf{J}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\end{array}$$

In order to interpret the near measurement data now, in step ST26 in the power vector space, the difference between the distance measurement data and the close measurement data, that is, the difference power vector, becomes $$\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}={\mathbf{P}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-{\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$$

educated. Separately written in spherical and cylindrical components that corresponds $$\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{\Delta }M=M_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-M_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}={\mathbf{J}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-{\mathbf{J}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\end{array}$$

der Nahmessung zu bilden, werden in Schritt ST28 eines Vergleichs der sphärischen Komponente des Differenz-Power-Vektors vorzugsweise drei Fälle unterschieden:

1. a) $$\mathrm{\Delta }M>0$$
   
   In diesem Fall ist die Akkommodation während der Nahmessung sogar geringer als während der Fernmessung. Dies weist beispielsweise darauf hin, dass entweder zumindest eine der beiden Messungen nicht vertrauenswürdig ist, oder dass das Rauschen in den Messdaten den Fall ΔM>0 verursacht hat. In einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform wird daher im Fall ΔM>0 in Schritt ST30a eine der beiden Messungen verworfen und durch die andere ersetzt. Besonders bevorzugt wird in diesem Fall die ursprüngliche Nahmessung ersetzt durch $${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$$
   
   In einer anderen bevorzugten Ausführungsform werden in Schritt ST30a die beiden Messungen vertauscht. In dieser Ausführungsform werden die korrigierten Power-Vektoren daher bestimmt durch: $$\begin{array}{l}{\mathbf{P}}_F^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ {\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)\end{array}$$
   
2. b) $$A_{1N}<\mathrm{\Delta }M\le 0,\mathrm{wobei\; vorzugsweise}{A}_{1N}=-2.5\mathit{dpt}$$
   
   In diesem Fall findet eine geringfügige Akkommodation statt, aber nicht genug, um bei einem verlangten Objektabstand, der vorzugsweise bei A _1N= -2.5dpt liegt, scharf zu sehen. Dann benötigt die korrigierte sphärische Komponente des Brillenglases eine Addition, die durch den korrigierten Nahwert $$M_N^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=M_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-A_{1N}$$
   
   gegeben ist, während des zylindrischen Komponenten unverändert bleiben: $${\mathbf{J}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{J}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$$
   
   Somit lautet der in Schritt ST30b ermittelte korrigierte Nah-Power-Vektor vorzugsweise $${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$$
   
3. c) $$\mathrm{\Delta }M\le A_{1N}$$
   

The power vector in equation (8b) primarily describes the properties of the wavefront during the measurement. In order to arrive at refraction data, which are relevant as a correction for a spectacle lens, it is now taken into account that the spectacle lens in the near part is not intended to assist in vision in the distance, but rather when looking close, preferably when seeing at an object distance is preferably a _{1 N} = -2.5 dpt, which corresponds to an object distance of 40 cm. The power vector is compared to equation (8b) still corrected by contributions from the Depend on object distance. To get a corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$

In the step ST28 of a comparison of the spherical component of the differential power vector, three cases are preferably distinguished:

1. a) $$\mathrm{\Delta }M>0$$
   
   In this case, the accommodation during the close measurement is even lower than during the telemetry. This indicates, for example, that either at least one of the two measurements is untrustworthy, or that the noise in the measurement data has caused the case ΔM > 0. In a preferred embodiment, therefore, in the case of ΔM > 0, in step ST30a, one of the two measurements is discarded and replaced by the other. In this case, the original close measurement is particularly preferably replaced by $${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$$
   
   In another preferred embodiment, in step ST30a the two measurements are interchanged. In this embodiment, the corrected power vectors are therefore determined by: $$\begin{array}{l}{\mathbf{P}}_F^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ {\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)\end{array}$$
   
2. b) $$A_{1N}<\mathrm{\Delta }M\le 0.\mathrm{preferably}{A}_{1N}=-2.5\mathit{dpt}$$
   
   In this case, a slight accommodation takes place, but not enough, at a required object distance is preferably A _{1 N} = -2.5 diopters to see spicy. Then, the corrected spherical component of the spectacle lens requires addition by the corrected near value $$M_N^{\mathrm{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=M_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-A_{1N}$$
   
   is given while the cylindrical components remain unchanged: $${\mathbf{J}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{J}}_N\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$$
   
   Thus, the corrected near-power vector detected in step ST30b is preferably $${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$$
   
3. c) $$\mathrm{\Delta }M\le A_{1N}$$
   

In this case, enough accommodation is available to meet any near vision requirement without spherical addition in the spectacle lens. Therefore, preferably the corrected spherical component of the near vision is set equal to the telemetering: $$M_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=M_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$$

However, the cylindrical component of the measurement corresponds to an accommodation of - Δ M , although the proportion of interest would correspond to only one accommodation of - A _{1 N.} Therefore, the cylindrical component is preferably according to $${\mathbf{J}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)={\mathbf{J}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }M}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}$$

bestimmt wird.scaled back so that the corrected near-power vector determined in step ST30c is preferably according to $${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_F\left(\mathit{VD}\right)+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }M}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$$

is determined.

vorzugsweise entsprechend der Gleichung (3b). In Schritt ST34 werden dann die korrigierten Nah-Refraktionsdaten ${\mathit{Sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right),{\mathit{Cyl}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right),{\mathit{Axis}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$

als objektive Refraktionswerte für die Nahsicht ausgegeben.The corrected near-power vector is finally transformed back to corrected near-refraction data in step ST32 ${\mathit{sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{cyl}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{Axis}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$

preferably according to equation (3b). In step ST34, then, the corrected near refraction data becomes ${\mathit{sph}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{cyl}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right).{\mathit{Axis}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\left(\mathit{VD}\right)$

as objective refraction values for near vision.

- ST1A:

Ermittlung aberrometrischer Daten des ersten Auges für die Fernsicht

- ST1 B:

Ermittlung aberrometrischer Daten des ersten Auges für die Nahsicht

- ST2A:

Ermittlung aberrometrischer Daten des zweiten Auges für die Fernsicht

- ST2B:

Ermittlung aberrometrischer Daten des zweiten Auges für die Nahsicht

- ST2C:

Ermittlung topographischer Daten des zweiten Auges

- ST1 C:

Ermittlung topographischer Daten des ersten Auges

In a further aspect, which can preferably be used together with one or more of the aspects described above or independently, a very specific sequence of method steps according to a preferred embodiment will first be described, whose individual method steps are described in more detail in the following sections. In this preferred embodiment, as in Fig. 2 1, a method comprises the following steps in this order:

- ST1A:

Determination of aberrometric data of the first eye for distance vision

- ST1 B:

Determination of aberrometric data of the first eye for near vision

- ST2A:

Determination of aberrometric data of the second eye for long-distance vision

- ST2B:

Determination of aberrometric data of the second eye for near vision

- ST2C:

Determination of topographical data of the second eye

- ST1 C:

Determination of topographical data of the first eye

If only one eye is to be measured, the determination of the corresponding data of the second eye can be dispensed with. In this case can immediately after the step ST1B, the step ST1 C follow. This is in Fig. 2 represented by a dashed arrow.

An interesting aspect is the acquisition of pupillometric data for at least two different conditions of the brightness detected by the respective eye. It is particularly preferred if the pupillometric data are determined together with the aberrometric or topographical data.

In a preferred embodiment, two different desired brightness values are determined for the acquisition of the pupillometric data, which in particular correspond to two actual expected brightness values of an individual use situation. Thus, preferably the measurement conditions under which the aberrometric data or the topographical data are determined are selected such that the respective eye is exposed to a respective brightness in accordance with the specified brightness values.

This is not necessary. Thus, in another preferred embodiment, the pupillometric data expected for the actual (individual) use situation can be derived from the pupillometric data acquired under other measurement conditions. For this, however, the brightness is preferably measured during the pupillometric measurement or it is known from the outset. In a simplified example, the size (and position) of the pupil could be detected for two different measurement conditions "very bright" and "very dark", whereas the brightnesses actually expected under the usage situation have deviating values "light" and "dark". The size (and position) of the pupil for the situation of use is thus calculated in particular by (for example linear or logarithmic) interpolation from the measured quantities. In an analogous manner, an extrapolation can also be used.

Preferably, the aberrometric data are determined under measurement conditions with low brightness. This achieves a large pupil diameter, which in turn results in a high accuracy of the measurement. Preferably, under the measurement conditions of the aberrometric measurement, that is to say at low brightness, the pupillometric measurement is carried out for the lower brightness. This is particularly preferably carried out simultaneously with the aberrometric measurement or the two measurements take place in immediate succession, ie without the brightness being changed in a manner which could lead to a change in the pupil.

The topographic data are preferably determined under measurement conditions with high brightness (as secondary brightness). Preferably, a light pattern (for example in the form of placido rings) is projected onto the cornea, whose reflections on the cornea are detected and evaluated to determine the topographical data. By using measurement conditions with high brightness, a higher reliability and accuracy of the evaluation of the reflections and thus a higher precision in the determination of the topographical data can be achieved. Preferably, the pupillometric measurement for the high brightness is performed under the measurement conditions of the topographical measurement, ie at high brightness (secondary pupillometric data). This is particularly preferably carried out simultaneously for topographical measurement or the two measurements take place in direct succession, i. without changing the brightness in a way that could lead to a change in the pupil.

Since the brightness of the projected light pattern can be changed very easily, a preferred measuring system is preferably designed to adapt the brightness of the light pattern for the topographical measurement to the brightness desired for the pupillometric measurement. The measuring system is preferably designed to adapt an image acquisition device used for the evaluation of the reflections to the brightness desired for the pupillometric measurement.

Most preferably, the pupillometric data is from the same image data recorded like the topographical data. Thus, preferably only one image (image data set) is generated by means of a camera, which is used for the evaluation of both the pupillometric data and the topographical data, which leads to a particularly rapid acquisition of the user data with little technical outlay. However, this procedure requires that the pupil boundaries are determined in an image in which, for example, the placido rings are also visible. However, this can be done by a suitable manual, semi-automatic or automatic approach. In this case, additional information, such as, for example, a color resolution of the camera or a second camera for the pupillometric measurement with a (different) color filter (as the first camera used for the topographical measurement), can help the relevant structures for the pupillometric measurement and the topographical measurement in FIG Picture or to distinguish in the pictures. However, the pupillometric and topographical data can also be determined from a common, monochrome image if, for example, one considers geometric boundary conditions for the respective structures.

It is not always necessary (or desired) to collect topographic data. Even in a preferred device, which in particular comprises a topography unit with a pattern projector and a topography evaluation device, the pupillometric data can also be acquired at a high brightness value without capturing topographical data. In this case, in a preferred embodiment, the pattern projector of the topography unit is used to illuminate the at least one eye of the spectacle wearer to a desired or suitable high brightness, which is used for capturing the pupillometric data at high brightness. In another preferred embodiment, the device additionally or instead of the pattern projector on a lighting device (eg, one or more lamps), which provides the required brightness for the detection of pupillometric data and particularly preferably in the brightness is controllable, for example, according to an individual Use situation required brightness to adjust.

If the device has a topography unit, it is preferred if the device effects a shadowing of the eye against ambient light, in order to achieve the best possible contrast of the projected pattern or the reflections in the edge regions of the cornea in the image data. On the other hand, a pupillometric measurement can be carried out at low brightness even in a brightly lit room due to the shading of the eye.

The pupil size depends not only on the illumination state, but also on the accommodative stimulation. It is therefore particularly preferred to set the accommodation stimulus means (i.e., the virtual target) to the individual usage situation for which the pupillometric data is to be acquired.

The integration of pupillometric measurements in aberrometric and topographical measurements for measurement conditions (in particular the brightness and / or the accommodation state), which correspond to the individual situations of use, or the determination of information for conditions (in particular with regard to brightness and / or accommodation state) which are not correspond to the measured conditions, can be done in an analogous manner to the procedure described above for the brightness (in particular by interpolation or extrapolation).

While the term "far-field view" gives the impression that the accommodation stimulus means describe a far-off but finite position or an infinitely-distant position, in practice it is preferred that for "far-sightedness" the eye be in an unaccommodated state. fogged state ") is added. This unaccommodated state of an eye is preferably achieved by virtue of the fact that the virtual target is moved (virtually) beyond an infinitely distant position. That is, the optical system used to project the target (eg, a slide) into the eye is set to a refractive power slightly larger than the refraction of the eye.

Thus, the subject can no longer accommodate the target and the eye reaches a relaxed, unaccommodated state.

In order to obtain reliable values in the determination of aberrometric data, it is preferable that the optical power of the imaging unit of the accommodation stimulation means is larger than the power of the eye as an optical system. Otherwise, the subject could achieve accommodation to the target. The result of the aberrometric measurement could then reflect the refractive power of the imaging unit rather than the refractive power of the relaxed eye. Preferably, an approximate value of the refraction is determined by a preliminary examination. This information is then used for the virtual positioning of the target.

In the context of this invention, the term "far-sightedness" generally includes for an accommodation stimulus either in a fogged state or for an infinite distance or a predetermined (large) distance (e.g., about 50 m).

Preferably, each step of determining aberrometric and / or pupillometric and / or topographic data may comprise a plurality of measurements under the same measurement conditions. This multiplicity of measurements is then preferably combined by a statistical evaluation in order to obtain a more accurate and reliable result. For example, an average of many measurements may be formed, ignoring outliers in the measurements, and / or repeating implausible measurements. This applies preferably not only to the far-field measurements, but alternatively or additionally also to the pupillometric measurements and / or the topographical measurements and / or the near-vision measurements.

Preferably, the data for the near-vision measurement has the analog structure as the data for the far-vision measurement. Preferably, the only difference in principle is the position of the virtual target. While for a typical far-vision measurement, the target is moved to a virtual position beyond infinity so that the eye can no longer accommodate, the near-vision measurement target is moved to a virtual position closer to the subject's eye. Preferably, the virtual position (Dp) of the target is closely visualized from the refractive power (D _f ) in the far vision determined in the far vision measurement and the refractive power of the accommodation stimulus (D _a ) according to the formula Dp = D _f + D _a calculated, with the accommodation stimulus is usually negative (eg -2.5 D). In order to facilitate the subject sufficient accommodation for near vision, it is preferable to approach the target continuously and at a not too high speed to the eye.

For a single near-sight measurement, the target is preferably moved from a home position (eg, the far-vision position or another position, which is preferably farther away than the near-vision position) to the near-vision position Dp, and only measurements are made at Dp. For more refined examinations, several near-vision measurements can be performed one after the other. For example, two near-vision measurements can be made: one at a first position D _p1 with D _a1 = -1.0 dpt and another at a second position D _p2 with D _a2 = -2.5 dpt. Preferably, for this purpose, the target is moved from a starting position to the first position D _p1 , where the first near-sight measurement is performed. Preferably, without further delay, the target is advanced to the second position D _p2 where the second near-sight measurement is performed. Of course, the subject must try to follow the accommodation stimulus all the time.

Regardless of the number of near-vision measurements that are actually performed, it is critical that the subject follow the virtual target as closely as possible through the accommodation of the eye. Otherwise, the eye could stay in a state that is less accommodated or even relaxed, which would falsify the measurement. The always sufficient accommodation is preferably supported by initially presenting the target in a virtual position to which the subject can easily accommodate.

Subsequently, the virtual position of the target is continuously changed at not too high speed.

Preferably, topographic data are acquired together with the pupillometric data for the high brightness, since this is preferably possible without additional expenditure of time in the measurement. However, as already stated, it is not necessary for topographic data to be captured, for example, if the eye is not to be exposed to the necessary or desirable brightness or if this additional information is not required. In this case, it would also be possible to dispense with the correspondingly high sensitivity of the image recording device and / or the pattern projector as well as a topographical evaluation unit.

Even if a topographical measurement is performed, the accommodation stimulus is preferably adapted to the requirements of the pupillometric measurement, since the state of accommodation of the eye leaves the topography of the cornea substantially unaffected or this influence is preferably neglected. As for the aberrometric measurements, it is thus preferable to carry out measurements at different accommodation states and / or different brightnesses for the pupillometric measurements in the bright state. As already stated above, the topographic data are preferably used for optimizing the refraction and / or the glass based on more complex eye models.

The chosen order of measurements brings significant advantages over other approaches. Thus, for example, the fact that the measurements are carried out at higher brightness after the measurements at lower brightness improves the accuracy of the aberrometric measurements, but preferably also of the pupillometric measurements, without significantly increasing the overall time required for data acquisition. This can be explained by the fact that the pupil takes some time to get used to a lower brightness, while the reduction of the pupil for the Adjustment to a higher brightness can be done much faster.

If measurements are to be performed for both eyes, preferably the pupillometric data for the brighter illumination state of both eyes (and in particular also the topographical measurements) are only performed after the aberrometric measurements of both eyes. Thus, an adverse effect on the measurement accuracy due to mutual interference of the two eyes reduced. In particular, it was found that the negative influence on the measurement accuracy due to a mutual accommodative influence of the two eyes is far less than a negative influence on the measurement accuracy due to a mutual adaptive influence of the brightness.

In addition, it has been found that the measurement accuracy, in particular aberrometric measurements, is improved to a certain extent with habituation of the subject or of the eye to the target and its virtual movement. It is therefore preferable to perform both or all aberrometric measurements of one eye first, before the other eye is measured. In addition, this reduces the cost of a new adjustment of the device to the eye when changing eyes. For this reason, the measurement order of the two eyes is preferably reversed for the pupillometric measurement in the brighter state or for the topographic measurement. Thus, immediately after the last aberrometric measurement no eye change and thus no new adjustment is required.

1. 1. Beginn mit dem ersten Auge, umfassend:
   • Vorrichtung wird auf das erste Auge justiert
   • Proband erfasst das Target mit dem ersten Auge
2. 2. Aberrometrische Messung des ersten Auges in Fernsicht (erste aberrometrische Daten des ersten Auges), umfassend:
   • Vorabmessung zur Bestimmung der erforderlichen virtuellen Distanz des Targets zur Stimulation des nicht akkommodierten Zustands ("fogged state")
   • Pupillometrische Messung des ersten Auges für den dunkleren Zustand in Fernsicht (erste primäre pupillometrische Daten des ersten Auges)
3. 3. Aberrometrische Messung des ersten Auges in Nahsicht (insbesondere basierend auf den Ergebnissen des vorangegangenen Schritts zur Ermittlung der virtuellen Position D_a des Targets in der Nahsicht) (zweite aberrometrische Daten des ersten Auges), umfassend:
   • Pupillometrische Messung des ersten Auges für den dunkleren Zustand in Nahsicht (zweite primäre pupillometrische Daten des ersten Auges)
4. 4. Erster Augenwechsel, umfassend:
   • Vorrichtung wird auf das zweite Auge justiert
   • Proband erfasst das Target mit dem zweiten Auge
5. 5. Aberrometrische Messung des ersten Auges in Fernsicht (erste aberrometrische Daten des zweiten Auges), umfassend:
   • Vorabmessung zur Bestimmung der erforderlichen virtuellen Distanz des Targets zur Stimulation des nicht akkommodierten Zustands ("fogged state")
   • Pupillometrische Messung des zweiten Auges für den dunkleren Zustand in Fernsicht (erste primäre pupillometrische Daten des zweiten Auges)
6. 6. Aberrometrische Messung des zweiten Auges in Nahsicht (insbesondere basierend auf den Ergebnissen des vorangegangenen Schritts zur Ermittlung der virtuellen Position D_a des Targets in der Nahsicht) (zweite aberrometrische Daten des zweiten Auges), umfassend:
   • Pupillometrische Messung des zweiten Auges für den dunkleren Zustand in Nahsicht (zweite primäre pupillometrische Daten des zweiten Auges)
7. 7. Topographische und pupillometrische Messung des zweiten Auges für den helleren Zustand (topographische Daten und sekundäre pupillometrische Daten des zweiten Auges)
8. 8. Zweiter Augenwechsel, umfassend:
   • Vorrichtung wird auf das erste Auges justiert
   • Proband erfasst das Target mit dem ersten Auge
9. 9. Topographische und pupillometrische Messung des ersten Auges für den helleren Zustand (topographische Daten und sekundäre pupillometrische Daten des ersten Auges)

In a preferred embodiment, the method for acquiring a set of individual user data for the adjustment and optimization of a pair of eyeglasses preferably in the following steps 1 to 9 in this order:

1. 1. beginning with the first eye, comprising:
   • Device is adjusted to the first eye
   • Subject captures the target with the first eye
2. 2. Distant aberrometric measurement of the first eye (first aberrometric data of the first eye) comprising:
   • Pre-measurement to determine the required virtual distance of the target for stimulation of the non-accommodated state ("fogged state")
   • Pupillometric measurement of the first eye for the darker state in distance vision (first primary pupillometric data of the first eye)
3. 3. Aberrometrically measuring the first eye in near vision (in particular based on the results of the previous step for determining the virtual position D _{a of} the target in the near vision) (second aberrometric data of the first eye), comprising:
   • Pupillometric measurement of the first eye for the darker state in near vision (second primary pupillometric data of the first eye)
4. 4. First eye change, comprising:
   • Device is adjusted to the second eye
   • Subject captures the target with the second eye
5. 5. Aberrometric measurement of the first eye in distance vision (first aberrometric data of the second eye), comprising:
   • Pre-measurement to determine the required virtual distance of the target for stimulation of the non-accommodated state ("fogged state")
   • Pupillometric measurement of the second eye for the darker state in far vision (first primary pupillometric data of the second eye)
6. 6. Aberrometrically measuring the second eye in near vision (in particular based on the results of the previous step for determining the virtual position D _a of the near-sight target) (second aberrometric data of the second eye), comprising:
   • Pupillometric measurement of the second eye for the darker state in near vision (second primary pupillometric data of the second eye)
7. 7. Topographical and pupillometric measurement of the second eye for the lighter state (topographical data and secondary pupillometric data of the second eye)
8. 8. Second eye change, comprising:
   • Device is adjusted to the first eye
   • Subject captures the target with the first eye
9. 9. Topographic and pupillometric measurement of the first eye for the brighter state (topographical data and secondary pupillometric data of the first eye)

If only one eye is to be measured, preferably all steps for the second eye are omitted.

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS

ST10

Acquisition of first measurement data

ST12

Capture a series of second measurement data

ST14

Select second measurement data

ST16

Detecting a photopic pupil radius

ST18

Scale the Zernike coefficients

ST20

Determination of propagated refraction values

ST22

Output of remote refraction values

ST24

Transformation to power vectors

ST26

Determination of the difference power vector

ST28

Checking the spherical component of the differential power vector

ST30a, ST30b, ST30c

Determination of a corrected power vector

ST 32

Transformation of the corrected power vector into refraction data

ST 34

Output of corrected near-refraction data

ST1A

aberrometric measurement of the first eye for distance vision

ST1B

aberrometric measurement of the first eye for near vision

ST1 C

aberrometric measurement of the second eye for long-distance vision

ST2A

aberrometric measurement of the second eye for near vision

ST2B

topographic measurement of the second eye

ST2C

topographic measurement of the first eye

• Aspekt 1. Verfahren zur objektiven Refraktionsbestimmung für ein Auge eines Brillenträgers, umfassend:
  • - Erfassen von Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers, welche zumindest einen ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,F}^0,$
    
    $c_{2,F}^0$
    
    und $c_{2,F}^{-2}$
    
    zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Fernakkommodation des Auges und einem Pupillenradius r ₀ einer Gebrauchssituation und einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,N}^{-0},$
    
    $c_{2,N}^2$
    
    und $c_{2,N}^{-2}$
    
    zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Nahakkommodation des Auges und dem Pupillenradius r ₀ einer Gebrauchssituation festlegen;
  • - Ermitteln von objektiven Refraktionsdaten für Sphäre ${\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}},$
    
    Zylinder ${\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    und Achslage ${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    des Auges für einen Blick in die Nähe derart, dass die objektiven Refraktionsdaten in Abhängigkeit vom ersten und zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten die Gleichungen $${\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}},-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
    
    für einen korrigierten Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$
    
    für den Blick in die Nähe erfüllt, wobei der korrigierte Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    in Abhängigkeit von einer Differenz $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathrm{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$
    
    zwischen einem ersten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    und einem zweiten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
      
      entspricht, falls ΔM > A _{1 N} ; und
    • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
      
      entspricht, falls ΔM ≤ A1 _N,
  wobei $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
  
  das sphärische Äquivalent eines vorgegebenen Objektabstands d für die Sicht in die Nähe ist, und wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),\mathit{x}>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,x<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,\mathit{x}<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,\mathit{y}>0\\ -\pi /2,\mathit{x}=0,y<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$
  
• Aspekt 2. Verfahren nach Aspekt 1, wobei das Erfassen von Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers umfasst:
  • Erfassen von ersten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Ferne, welche den ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten festlegen;
  • Erfassen einer Serie von zweiten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Nähe bei zumindest teilweise unterschiedlicher Akkommodation des Auges; und
    • Auswählen derjenigen Messdaten aus der Serie, bei denen die stärkste Akkommodation des Auges auftritt, als zweite Messdaten, welche den zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten festlegen.
• Aspekt 3. Verfahren nach Aspekt 1 oder 2, wobei das Erfassen von Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers umfasst:
  • Erfassen von ersten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Ferne, welche einen ersten Pupillenradius R_F und einen ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung einer bei dem ersten Pupillenradius R_F und der Fernakkommodation des Auges gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration umfassen;
  • Erfassen von zweiten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Nähe, welche einen zweiten Pupillenradius R_N und einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung einer bei dem zweiten Pupillenradius R_N und der Nahakkommodation gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration umfassen; und
  • Erfassen des Pupillenradius r ₀ der Gebrauchssituation,
  wobei der erste und der zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung der Wellenfrontaberrationen bei dem Pupillenradius r ₀ der Gebrauchssituation durch Skalieren des ersten bzw. zweiten Satzes von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberrationen in Abhängigkeit vom Verhältnis ${\lambda }_i=\frac{r_0}{R_i}$
  
  des Pupillenradius r ₀ zum ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Pupillenradius R_i festgelegt ist.
• Aspekt 4. Verfahren nach Aspekt 3, wobei der von den ersten bzw. zweiten Messdaten umfasste erste bzw. zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberrationen zumindest Zernike-Koeffizienten bis zur vierten Ordnung umfasst und wobei der erste bzw. zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung der Wellenfrontaberrationen bei dem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ gemäß $$c_{2,i}^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2,i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_2^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  vom ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration abhängt.
• Aspekt 5. Verfahren nach Aspekt 3, wobei der von den ersten bzw. zweiten Messdaten umfasste erste bzw. zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberrationen zumindest Zernike-Koeffizienten bis zur sechsten Ordnung umfasst und wobei der erste bzw. zweite Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung der Wellenfrontaberrationen bei dem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ gemäß $$c_{2,i}^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6,i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2,i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6,i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6,i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  vom ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten der gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration abhängt.
• Aspekt 6. Verfahren nach einem der vorangegangenen Aspekte, wobei das Erfassen von Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers umfasst:
  • Erfassen von ersten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Ferne, welche einen ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung einer bei der Fernakkommodation des Auges gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration an einer ersten Messposition umfassen; und
  • Erfassen von zweiten Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers für einen Blick in die Nähe, welche einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten zur Beschreibung einer bei der Nahakkommodation des Auges gemessenen Wellenfrontaberration an einer zweiten Messposition umfassen; und wobei das Bestimmen von objektiven Refraktionsdaten des Auges für einen Blick in die Nähe umfasst:
  • Ermitteln des ersten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\end{array}\right)$
    
    aus dem von den ersten Messdaten umfassten oder gemäß einem der Ansprüche 3 bis 5 skalierten ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Abstand VD_F einer Auswertungsposition von der ersten Messposition derart, dass M_F (VD_F ) das sphärische Äquivalent und J _F (VD_F ) den zylindrischen Anteil der Wellenfrontaberration an der Auswertungsposition bei der Fernakkommodation des Auges beschreiben; und
  • Ermitteln des zweiten Power-Vektors ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\end{array}\right)$
    
    aus dem von den zweiten Messdaten umfassten oder gemäß einem der Ansprüche 3 bis 5 skalierten zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten in Abhängigkeit vom Abstand VD_N der Auswertungsposition von der zweiten Messposition derart, dass M_N (VD_N ) das sphärische Äquivalent und J _N (VD_N ) den zylindrischen Anteil der Wellenfrontaberration an der Auswertungsposition bei der Nahakkommodation des Auges beschreiben.
• Aspekt 7. Verfahren nach Aspekt 6, wobei der erste Power-Vektor und/oder der zweite Power-Vektor derart ermittelt wird, dass er die Gleichung $${\mathbf{P}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)+\frac{{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\\ -\frac{{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\cos 2{\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)\\ -\frac{{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\sin 2{\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)\end{array}\right)$$
  
  mit $${\mathit{Sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times \left({\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left(0\right)\right)}-\frac{{\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)={\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)$$
  
  und $${\mathit{Sph}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}{c}_{2,i}^0+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2,i}^2\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Cyl}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2,i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2,i}^2\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(c_{2,i}^2,c_{2,i}^{-2}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
  
  für i = F, N erfüllt, wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),\mathit{x}>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,\mathit{x}<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,\mathit{x}<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,\mathit{y}>0\\ -\pi /2,x=0,\mathit{y}<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$
  
  und wobei $c_{2,i}^0,$
  
  $c_{2,i}^2$
  
  und $c_{2,i}^{-2}$
  
  die von den ersten (i = F) bzw. zweiten (i = N) Messdaten umfassten bzw. gemäß einem der Ansprüche 3 bis 5 skalierten Zernike-Koeffizienten zweiter Ordnung für den Blick in die Ferne (i = F) bzw. den Blick in die Nähe (i = N) bezeichnen.
• Aspekt 8. Verfahren nach einem der vorangegangenen Aspekte, wobei das Erfassen der ersten und/oder zweiten Messdaten ein Messen von Refraktionsdaten des Auges mittels eines Autorefraktors und/oder mittels eines Aberrometers umfasst.
• Aspekt 9. Vorrichtung zur objektiven Refraktionsbestimmung für ein Auge eines Brillenträgers, umfassend:
  • - eine Messdatenerfassungsschnittstelle zum Erfassen von Messdaten für das Auge des Brillenträgers, welche zumindest einen ersten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,F}^0,$
    
    $c_{2,F}^2$
    
    und $c_{2,F}^{-2}$
    
    zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Fernakkommodation und einem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ des Auges und einen zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten $c_{2,N}^0,$
    
    $c_{2,N}^2$
    
    und $c_{2,N}^{-2}$
    
    zur Beschreibung einer Wellenfrontaberration bei einer Nahakkommodation und dem photopischen Pupillenradius r ₀ des Auges festlegen; und
  • - eine Refraktionsdatenermittlungseinrichtung zum Ermitteln von objektiven Refraktionsdaten für Sphäre $\left({\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right),$
    
    Zylinder $\left({\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
    
    und Achslage $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
    
    des Auges für einen Blick in die Nähe derart, dass die objektiven Refraktionsdaten in Abhängigkeit vom ersten und zweiten Satz von Zernike-Koeffizienten die Gleichungen $${\mathit{Sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{Cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},0}^{\mathit{corr}},-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N},45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
    
    für einen korrigierten Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N,45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$
    
    für den Blick in die Nähe erfüllt, wobei der korrigierte Power-Vektor ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    in Abhängigkeit von einer Differenz $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathrm{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$
    
    zwischen einem ersten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    und einem zweiten Power-Vektor $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2,N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
      
      entspricht, falls ΔM > A _{1 N}; und
    • -- dem Wert ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
      
      entspricht, falls ΔM ≤ A _{1 N},
  wobei $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
  
  das sphärische Äquivalent eines vorgegebenen Objektabstands d für die Sicht in die Nähe ist, und wobei $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right),x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi ,x<0,y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi ,x<0,y<0\\ \pi /2,x=0,y>0\\ -\pi /2,x=0,y<0\end{array}\mathrm{.}$$
  

In summary, the following aspects are preferably also provided in connection with the present invention:

• Aspect 1. A method of objective refraction determination for an eye of a spectacle wearer, comprising:
  • - acquiring measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer, which comprises at least a first set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.F}^0.$
    
    $c_{2.F}^0$
    
    and $c_{2.F}^{-2}$
    
    for describing a wavefront aberration in a remote accommodation of the eye and a pupil radius r _{0 of} a usage situation and a second set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.N}^{-0}.$
    
    $c_{2.N}^2$
    
    and $c_{2.N}^{-2}$
    
    for describing a wavefront aberration in a Nahakkommodation of the eye and the pupil radius r ₀ specify a use situation;
  • - Determine objective refraction data for sphere ${\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}.$
    
    cylinder ${\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    and axis position ${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    of the eye for a close look such that the objective refraction data depends on the first and second set of Zernike coefficients the equations $${\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}.-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
    
    for a corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$
    
    met for a close look, being the corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    depending on a difference $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathrm{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$
    
    between a first power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    and a second power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
      
      corresponds to if Δ M > A _{1 N} ; and
    • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
      
      corresponds to if Δ M ≦ A 1 _N ,
  in which $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
  
  is the spherical equivalent of a given object distance d for near vision, and where $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).\mathit{x}>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .x<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .\mathit{x}<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.\mathit{y}>0\\ -\pi /2.\mathit{x}=0.y<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$
  
• Aspect 2. The method of aspect 1, wherein acquiring measurement data for the eye of the wearer comprises:
  • Acquiring first eyeglass wearer eye-tracking data defining the first set of Zernike coefficients;
  • Acquiring a series of second measurement data for the eye of the spectacle wearer for a close look at at least partially different accommodation of the eye; and
    • Selecting those measurement data from the series in which the strongest accommodation of the eye occurs, as second measurement data defining the second set of Zernike coefficients.
• Aspect 3. The method of aspect 1 or 2, wherein acquiring measurement data for the eye of the wearer comprises:
  • Acquiring first eyeball wearer eye measurement data for a distance view comprising a first pupil radius R _F and a first set of Zernike coefficients for describing a wavefront aberration measured at the first pupil radius R _F and the faraccommodation of the eye;
  • Acquiring second eyeball wearer eye measurement data for proximity, comprising a second pupil radius R _N and a second set of Zernike coefficients for describing a wavefront aberration measured at the second pupil radius R _N and the close-up accommodation; and
  • Detecting the pupil radius r _{0 of} the situation of use,
  wherein the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients describe the wavefront aberrations at the pupil radius r _{0 of} the usage situation by scaling the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients to describe the measured wavefront aberrations as a function of the ratio ${\lambda }_i=\frac{r_0}{R_i}$
  
  of the pupil radius r ₀ to the first ( i = F ) and second ( i = N ) pupil radius R _{i is} fixed.
• Aspect 4. The method of aspect 3, wherein the first and second set of Zernike coefficients comprised of the first and second measurement data for describing the measured wavefront aberrations comprises at least Zernike coefficients up to the fourth order, and wherein the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients describing the wavefront aberrations at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ according to FIG $$c_{2.i}^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2.i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_2^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  depends on the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) set of Zernike coefficients of the measured wavefront aberration.
• Aspect 5. The method of aspect 3, wherein the first and second set of Zernike coefficients comprised of the first and second measurement data for describing the measured wavefront aberrations comprises at least Zernike coefficients up to the sixth order, and wherein the first and second sets of Zernike coefficients describing the wavefront aberrations at the photopic pupil radius r ₀ according to FIG $$c_{2.i}^0\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^0\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6.i}^0\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2.i}^2\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^2\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6.i}^2\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  $$c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(r_0\right)={\lambda }_i^2\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{15}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)c_{4.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)+\sqrt{21}\left({\lambda }_i^2-1\right)\left(3{\lambda }_i^2-2\right)c_{6.i}^{-2}\left(R_i\right)\right)$$
  
  depends on the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) set of Zernike coefficients of the measured wavefront aberration.
• Aspect 6. The method of any one of the preceding aspects, wherein acquiring measurement data for the eye of the wearer comprises:
  • Acquiring first eyeball wearer eye measurement data for a distance view comprising a first set of Zernike coefficients for describing a wavefront aberration measured in the remote accommodation of the eye at a first measurement position; and
  • Acquiring second eyeball wearer eye measurement data for proximity, which includes a second set of Zernike coefficients for describing wavefront aberration measured in close-up accommodation of the eye at a second measurement position; and wherein determining objective refraction data of the eye for a close look comprises:
  • Determining the first power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\left({\mathit{VD}}_F\right)\end{array}\right)$
    
    from the first set of Zernike coefficients included in the first measurement data or scaled according to one of claims 3 to 5 as a function of the distance VD _{F of} an evaluation position from the first measurement position such that M _F ( VD _F ) is the spherical equivalent and J _F ( VD _F ) describe the cylindrical portion of the wavefront aberration at the evaluation position in the remote accommodation of the eye; and
  • Determining the second power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\left({\mathit{VD}}_N\right)\end{array}\right)$
    
    from the second set of Zernike coefficients included in the second measurement data or scaled according to one of claims 3 to 5 as a function of the distance VD _{N of} the evaluation position from the second measurement position such that M _N ( VD _N ) the spherical equivalent and J _N ( VD _N ) describe the cylindrical portion of the wavefront aberration at the evaluation position in the near-accommodation of the eye.
• Aspect 7. The method of aspect 6, wherein the first power vector and / or the second power vector is determined to satisfy the equation $${\mathbf{P}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}{\mathit{sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)+\frac{{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\\ -\frac{{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\cos 2{\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)\\ -\frac{{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)}{2}\sin 2{\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)\end{array}\right)$$
  
  With $${\mathit{sph}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$
  
  $${\mathit{cyl}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)=\frac{{\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times \left({\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)+{\mathit{cyl}}_i\left(0\right)\right)}-\frac{{\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}{1+{\mathit{VD}}_i\times {\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left({\mathit{VD}}_i\right)={\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)$$
  
  and $${\mathit{sph}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}{c}_{2.i}^0+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2.i}^2\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{cyl}}_i\left(0\right)=-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{r_0^2}\sqrt{{\left(c_{2.i}^{-2}\right)}^2+{\left(c_{2.i}^2\right)}^2}$$
  
  $${\mathit{Axis}}_i\left(0\right)=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(c_{2.i}^2,c_{2.i}^{-2}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
  
  for i = F, N satisfies, where $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).\mathit{x}>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .\mathit{x}<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .\mathit{x}<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.\mathit{y}>0\\ -\pi /2.x=0.\mathit{y}<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$
  
  and where $c_{2.i}^0.$
  
  $c_{2.i}^2$
  
  and $c_{2.i}^{-2}$
  
  the Zernike coefficients of the second order encompassed by the first ( i = F ) or second ( i = N ) measurement data or scaled according to one of Claims 3 to 5, for looking into the distance ( i = F ) or the view in denote proximity ( i = N ).
• Aspect 8. Method according to one of the preceding aspects, wherein acquiring the first and / or second measurement data comprises measuring refraction data of the eye by means of an autorefractor and / or by means of an aberrometer.
• Aspect 9. Device for objective refraction determination for an eye of a Spectacle wearer, comprising:
  • - A measurement data acquisition interface for acquiring measurement data for the eye of the wearer, which at least a first set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.F}^0.$
    
    $c_{2.F}^2$
    
    and $c_{2.F}^{-2}$
    
    for describing a wavefront aberration in a remote accommodation and a photopic pupil radius r _{0 of} the eye and a second set of Zernike coefficients $c_{2.N}^0.$
    
    $c_{2.N}^2$
    
    and $c_{2.N}^{-2}$
    
    for describing a wavefront aberration in a near-accommodation and the photopic pupil radius r _{0 of} the eye; and
  • a refraction data determination device for determining objective refraction data for sphere $\left({\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right).$
    
    cylinder $\left({\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
    
    and axis position $\left({\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)$
    
    of the eye for a close look such that the objective refraction data depends on the first and second set of Zernike coefficients the equations $${\mathit{sph}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}={\mathit{M}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}+\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{cyl}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=-2\sqrt{{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2+{\left({\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)}^2}$$
    
    $${\mathit{Axis}}_{\mathit{N}}^{\mathit{corr}}=\frac{1}{2}\arctan \left(-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.0}^{\mathit{corr}}.-{\mathit{J}}_{\mathit{N}.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\right)+\frac{\pi }{2}$$
    
    for a corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.0}^{\mathit{corr}}\\ J_{N.45}^{\mathit{corr}}\end{array}\right)$
    
    met for a close look, being the corrected power vector ${\mathbf{P}}_N^{\mathit{corr}}$
    
    depending on a difference $\mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{P}=\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{\Delta }\mathrm{M}\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)={\mathbf{P}}_N-{\mathbf{P}}_F$
    
    between a first power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_F=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_F\\ {\mathbf{J}}_F\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.F}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    and a second power vector $${\mathbf{P}}_N=\left(\begin{array}{c}{M}_N\\ {\mathbf{J}}_N\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}-\frac{4\sqrt{3}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^0\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^2\\ -\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{{r_0}^2}{c}_{2.N}^{-2}\end{array}\right)$$
    
    • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_N-\left(\begin{array}{c}{A}_{1N}\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right)$
      
      corresponds to if Δ M> A _{1 N} ; and
    • - the value ${\mathbf{P}}_F+\frac{A_{1N}}{\mathrm{\Delta }\mathit{M}}\left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ \mathrm{\Delta }\mathbf{J}\end{array}\right)$
      
      corresponds to if Δ M ≦ A _{1 N} ,
  in which $A_{1N}=-\frac{1}{d}$
  
  is the spherical equivalent of a given object distance d for near vision, and where $$\arctan \left(x,y\right):=\{\begin{array}{c}\arctan \left(y/x\right).x>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)+\pi .x<0.y>0\\ \arctan \left(y/x\right)-\pi .x<0.y<0\\ \pi /2.x=0.y>0\\ -\pi /2.x=0.y<0\end{array}\mathrm{,}$$
  

Claims (15)

A method of capturing a set of individual user data of a spectacle wearer for adjusting and optimizing a pair of glasses comprising the following steps in this order: - acquiring first aberrometric data of a first eye of the spectacle wearer for a first accommodation state of the first eye at a first primary brightness (ST1A), wherein first primary pupillometric data for the first eye are detected together with the acquisition of first aberrometric data; and - Acquire secondary pupillometric data for the first eye of the wearer at a secondary brightness higher than the first primary brightness (ST1 C). The method of claim 1, further comprising prior to the step of acquiring secondary pupillometric data: Detecting second aberrometric data of the first eye of the spectacle wearer for a second accommodation state of the first eye at a second primary brightness whose value is below that of the secondary brightness (ST1B). The method of claim 2, wherein second primary pupillometric data for the first eye is acquired along with detection of second aberrometric data. The method of any of claims 1 to 3, further comprising following the step of acquiring first aberrometric data of the first eye, optionally after the step of acquiring second aberrometric data of the first eye, and before the step of acquiring secondary pupillometric data of the first eye Steps in this Order includes: - acquiring first aberrometric data of a second eye of the spectacle wearer for a first accommodation state of the second eye at the first primary brightness (ST2A), wherein first primary pupillometric data for the second eye are detected along with the detection of first aberrometric data of the second eye; and Capturing secondary pupillometric data of the second eye of the spectacle wearer at the secondary brightness (ST2C), the method preferably further comprising prior to the step of acquiring secondary pupillometric data of the second eye: - Detecting second aberrometric data of the second eye of the wearer for a second accommodation state of the second eye at the second primary brightness (ST2B). The method of claim 4, wherein second primary pupillometric data for the second eye is acquired along with detecting second aberrometric data of the second eye. The method of any of claims 2 to 5, further comprising: Detecting third aberrometric data of the first and / or second eye of the spectacle wearer for a third accommodation state of the first or second eye at a third primary brightness, preferably together with the detection of third aberrometric data of the first and second eye third primary pupillometric data for the first or second eye are detected. A method according to any one of claims 2 to 6 or claim 13, when referring back to claim 11 or 12, wherein the first accommodation state determines a remote accommodation or an unaccommodated state, and wherein the second accommodation state determines a close accommodation. Method according to one of the preceding claims 1 to 7, wherein the accommodation conditions by projecting a virtual target in the between the detection of the first and second aberrometric data of the first and / or second eye, a step of continuously approaching a virtual position of the virtual target to the first and second eye, respectively. Method according to one of the preceding claims 1 to 8, wherein, together with the detection of the secondary pupillometric data of the first and second eye, a capture of topographic data of the first and second eye in the secondary brightness. The method of claim 9, wherein acquiring topographic data comprises projecting a light pattern onto the eye and acquiring image data of the eye from which both the light reflections generated by the projected light pattern to evaluate the topographic data and the secondary pupillometric data are determined , Apparatus for capturing a set of individual user data spectacle wearers for the adjustment and optimization of spectacles, the apparatus comprising: a aberrometer device for detecting aberrometric data of at least one eye of the spectacle wearer, at least for a first accommodation state of the eye at a first primary brightness; a lighting device for generating a secondary brightness that is greater than the first primary brightness; and a pupillometer device, which is designed to detect first primary pupillometric data of the at least one eye at the first primary brightness and to detect secondary pupillometric data of the at least one eye in the secondary brightness, wherein the apparatus is adapted to carry out a method according to one of the preceding claims. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the aberrator means is further configured to acquire aberrometric data of the at least one eye for a second state of accommodation of the eye at a time second primary brightness whose value is below that of the secondary brightness, wherein the pupillometer means is preferably adapted to detect second primary pupillometric data of the at least one eye at the second primary brightness. The apparatus of any one of claims 11 to 12, wherein the aberrator comprises accommodation stimulation means configured to project a virtual target into the at least one eye and the virtual position of the virtual target between a remote accommodation stimulation position and a stimulation stimulation position To change near accommodation. Apparatus according to any one of claims 11 to 13, which comprises: a pattern projector for projecting a light pattern onto the at least one eye; and a topography evaluation device which is designed to determine topographical data from reflections of the light pattern on the eye. A computer program product comprising computer readable instructions which, when loaded into a memory of a computer and executed by the computer, cause the computer to perform a method according to any one of claims 1 to 10.

Images