EP3089134B2 - Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained - Google Patents

Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3089134B2
EP3089134B2 EP16167183.9A EP16167183A EP3089134B2 EP 3089134 B2 EP3089134 B2 EP 3089134B2 EP 16167183 A EP16167183 A EP 16167183A EP 3089134 B2 EP3089134 B2 EP 3089134B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
remote control
code
key
storing
clone
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16167183.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3089134A1 (en
EP3089134B1 (en
Inventor
Luca DA CANAL
Michele Romano
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sice Tech Srl
Original Assignee
Sice Tech Srl
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=53385750&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3089134(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Sice Tech Srl filed Critical Sice Tech Srl
Priority to PL16167183T priority Critical patent/PL3089134T5/en
Publication of EP3089134A1 publication Critical patent/EP3089134A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3089134B1 publication Critical patent/EP3089134B1/en
Publication of EP3089134B2 publication Critical patent/EP3089134B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08CTRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
    • G08C17/00Arrangements for transmitting signals characterised by the use of a wireless electrical link
    • G08C17/02Arrangements for transmitting signals characterised by the use of a wireless electrical link using a radio link
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08CTRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
    • G08C2201/00Transmission systems of control signals via wireless link
    • G08C2201/20Binding and programming of remote control devices

Definitions

  • the present invention refers to a duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and to a remote control obtained according to said method.
  • the invention concerns a duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and capable of remotely control an electrical device by pressing at least one control key or button; said remote control including at least one memory, a transceiver and a microprocessor capable to execute a program.
  • a remote control is an electronic device that allows sending signals to another remotely placed device being controllable by means of those signals.
  • the remote control is a portable object having small dimensions, being battery operated and structured in order to being able to be easily kept and activated also with a single hand.
  • the most common remote controls in the domestic field are intended for opening and closing doors and gates or for controlling lighting systems.
  • a remote control is capable to emit electromagnetic signals that are picked up by the remotely controlled device by means of a dedicated receiver.
  • electromagnetic signals For short-range remote controls, infrared signals are used, while for longer distances, the radio waves are used and in that case, they are called radio remote controls.
  • remote controls in the domestic field which are defined as "universal" meaning that they have the peculiarity to be set in order to control a plurality of electrical devices such as a music center, a television and/or other apparatuses being present in the domestic field.
  • frequency counter which allows measuring the working frequency of the original radio remote control, usually being few dozens or hundreds of MHz.
  • the technical problem underlying the present invention is to conceive a method having such functional and structural characteristics as to allow duplicating an original remote control operating in radio frequency without needing to know anything about the receiver of radio frequency signals and even without needing to know the transmission protocols of the original remote control, which could have been manufactured by an unknown company or even being no more active in the sector.
  • the solution idea underlying the present invention is to provide for an apprenticeship step wherein the clone remote control is put listening a remote control to be duplicated; a recognition step of the working frequency and the code being transmitted by the original remote control to be duplicated, also in case of variable code, and a totally automatic storing control step, wherein the clone remote control initiates a recognition and accreditation procedure with the electrical device to be controlled, which, if it is permitted, stores also the new code of the clone remote control emulating the variable code of the original remote control to be duplicated.
  • said predetermined number of times is equal to four.
  • the step of storing in memory the recognized or emulated codes is implemented in three phases:
  • duration measurements are performed of n high-low and low-high transitions of the received radio signal obtaining the minimum and maximum duration values of these transitions. For the maximum duration of the transitions, the corresponding level of the radio signal is also stored.
  • the second stage of processing it is obtained the length of the period of the radio signal corresponding to the duration of the shorter transmission element, as well as the duration and the level of the pause corresponding to the duration and level of the longest transition.
  • the radio signal is sampled at different time instants, starting half a period after a transition and then continuing after each full period until the next transition from which it will be counted again half a period and so on.
  • the recognition procedure provides for the subsequent initiation of a storing step in case the recognized code is a fixed code or an emulation phase of a variable rolling-type code having a serial number different from the recognized code.
  • the storing procedure provides for the initiation of a procedure that automatically forces the storage of the new emulated code on the receiver of the electrical device to be controlled, said procedure generating alternative new and old codes transmitted in a predetermined sequence.
  • the invention refers also a remote control comprising at least one control key or button, a memory, a transceiver and a microprocessor capable to execute a program in order to implement the previously described steps of the method.
  • a remote control is schematically shown as a whole with 1, which will be defined in the following as "clone”, being realized according to the present invention by duplicating an original remote control.
  • the clone remote control 1 includes a casing 2 being essentially parallelepiped-shaped with rounded corners and having a reduced thickness.
  • the casing 2 contains and protects an electronic circuitry 3 including a microprocessor 4, a memory 5, a transceiver 6 and a pair of antennas 7 and 8. More particularly, the memory 5 is integrated in the microprocessor 4.
  • the double antenna has the advantage of increasing the radio frequency range and thus the effective action distance with respect to the controlled device.
  • All the electronic circuitry 3 is supplied by a small direct current battery being inserted in the casing 2, but not represented in the drawings because conventional.
  • buttons On the visible surface 9 of the casing 2 there are arranged few buttons among which: a control key or button 10, in order to control a main electrical device, a second programming key or button 11 and a third and fourth button 12, 13 in order to optionally control further electrical devices.
  • a signaling LED 14, being connected to the operation of the remote control 1 is also provided for.
  • the remote control 1 operates in radio frequency and, for this reason, in the following description it will be referred to using the term radio remote control.
  • the remote control 1 can also be defined as "universal", since it is capable to be used with a plurality of electrical devices to be controlled, particularly for a domotic use. Moreover, the remote control 1 is able to emulate the original remote controls being realized by a plurality of manufacturing companies, independently from their internal structure.
  • the clone remote control is structured in order to automatically force the storing of his codes on the receiver of the main controlled electrical device, but without a direct intervention on that receiver.
  • the emulation of the original remote control occurs after a learning procedure of the code of the original remote control, which in the following will be called copy procedure.
  • the method according to the invention initially provides for a procedure to be executed in order to put the clone remote control in "listening" mode and thus to be able to transmit to the clone remote control the same code and the same working frequency of the original remote control to be duplicated.
  • the replication procedure as a whole is innovative with respect to the similar products currently on the market and is extremely more simple and comfortable for the user.
  • the main advantage of the method of the present invention is given in that it allows working with both free hands.
  • the user can release all the keys without being forced to keep the "destination" key pressed, namely the key of the clone remote control which will duplicate the control function carried out by the original remote control to be duplicated.
  • the preset number of times has been chosen equal to four in order to avoid the accidentally start and enabling of the copy procedure.
  • Other keys combinations are used in order to enable more specific copy procedures, which will be described later.
  • the LED 14 of the remote control 1 starts flashing slowly.
  • the emitting end of an original remote control to be copied and the emitting end of the clone remote control of the present invention must be put near to each other and the desired key of the original remote control which is to be copied must be pressed.
  • the clone remote control searches the frequency of the original remote control for about thirty seconds, while the LED 14 flashes slowly.
  • the code of the original remote control is stored by means of a code writing method being described in the following; at this point, the LED 14 starts flashing quickly in order to show that the code has been learnt.
  • the remote control under consideration needs other information corresponding to a further pressing of the key of the original remote control or any other special key of the original remote control.
  • the LED will flash with a double flashing in order to signal the request for a further pressing.
  • variable code remote controls For few original variable code remote controls, the clone remote control is able to recognize the type of variable code, and for these remote controls, the remote control 1 will generate a similar code to be stored directly or with an automatic procedure in the memory 5 being associated to the receiver 6.
  • the variable codes generation occurs by means of proper algorithms being specific to each type of code. In all the other cases, it will be clone an identical copy of the original code.
  • the mode substantially occurs in three steps.
  • n duration measurements are carried out of the high-low and low-high transitions performed by the received radio signal; in a second step, those measurements are processed and in a third phase a sampling of the code is carried out.
  • duration measurements are performed of n high-low and low-high transitions of the received radio signal; in this way the minimum and maximum duration values of these transitions are obtained. For the maximum duration of the transitions, the corresponding level of the radio signal is also stored.
  • the second stage of processing it is obtained the length of the period of the radio signal corresponding to the duration of the shorter transmission element. Moreover, the duration and the level of the pause corresponding to the duration and level of the longest transition is obtained.
  • the radio signal is sampled at different time instants, starting half a period after a transition and then continuing after each full period until the next transition from which it will be counted again half a period and so on.
  • the remote control 1 is programmed to turn off if the code is of a fixed or variable type that does not allow the automatic storing.
  • the automatic storing procedure takes place if the code is of a variable type that allows the automatic storing.
  • the clone remote control 1 For the original variable code remote controls, the clone remote control 1 generates a code similar to the original, which is stored in the memory 5. This code must be stored also in the memory of the receiver of the controlled electrical device.
  • the storing procedure can automatically force the storing of the new code on the receiver, by generating for that purpose alternating old and new codes being transmitted in a sequence, called storing sequence, which is shown by way of example in the flowchart of figure 5 .
  • the alternating old and new codes allow the receiver to understand that the sequence of received signals does not represent an ordinary activation command, but a sequence for programming and storing the new alternate variable code similar to the cloned code.
  • the storing sequence is activated by keeping the key 10 of the remote control under consideration pressed for eight seconds.
  • the LED starts to flash quickly and the storing sequence is transmitted, after which the remote control turns off.
  • variable code is stored also on the receiver of the controlled device.
  • the new generation remote controls use variable codes and almost all the remote control manufacturers use "Rolling-codes", which instead of replicating the same code each time the control key is pressed, emit a totally different one generated by an algorithm being preset on both the transmitter and the respective receiver.
  • the clone remote control of the present invention includes a series of algorithms reproducing the storing sequences of the cloned variable codes for almost all the remote control manufacturers. Those sequences are automatically timed and executed each time a duplication is carried out of an original remote control using variable codes during transmission.
  • the clone remote control 1 continuously sends information being useful for its identification, and consequent use, based on the storing sequences contained in its memory and corresponding to almost all the remote control manufacturers.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention refers to a duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and to a remote control obtained according to said method.
  • More particularly, but not exclusively, the invention concerns a duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and capable of remotely control an electrical device by pressing at least one control key or button; said remote control including at least one memory, a transceiver and a microprocessor capable to execute a program.
  • Known art
  • As it is well known in this specific technical sector, a remote control is an electronic device that allows sending signals to another remotely placed device being controllable by means of those signals. The remote control is a portable object having small dimensions, being battery operated and structured in order to being able to be easily kept and activated also with a single hand.
  • The most common remote controls in the domestic field are intended for opening and closing doors and gates or for controlling lighting systems.
  • A remote control is capable to emit electromagnetic signals that are picked up by the remotely controlled device by means of a dedicated receiver. For short-range remote controls, infrared signals are used, while for longer distances, the radio waves are used and in that case, they are called radio remote controls.
  • There are also remote controls in the domestic field, which are defined as "universal" meaning that they have the peculiarity to be set in order to control a plurality of electrical devices such as a music center, a television and/or other apparatuses being present in the domestic field.
  • In this field, often it is needed to quickly duplicate a remote control without necessarily having to turn to skilled or professional staff.
  • However, for this purpose it is necessary to have available an instrument, called frequency counter, which allows measuring the working frequency of the original radio remote control, usually being few dozens or hundreds of MHz.
  • Once detected the working frequency of the original remote control to be duplicated, it is necessary to have available a programmable universal remote control having the same frequency and being capable to be programmed with the same radio code.
  • Although being relatively easy, the duplication operation is still left even nowadays to the skill of specialized operators.
  • However, sometimes, for security reasons, one would prefer to avoid having to request this service to a staff that is outside one's circle of close acquaintance.
  • Therefore, there is the need of being able to perform the duplication operation of a radio remote control independently, in an easy and quick way.
  • A possible known technical solution is described in the U.S. Patent Application no. US 2008/068205 . However, in that document there is described only a duplication mode of a radio remote control, which however does not allow automatically accrediting the new cloned radio remote control with the controlled electronic device.
  • The technical problem underlying the present invention is to conceive a method having such functional and structural characteristics as to allow duplicating an original remote control operating in radio frequency without needing to know anything about the receiver of radio frequency signals and even without needing to know the transmission protocols of the original remote control, which could have been manufactured by an unknown company or even being no more active in the sector.
  • This and other purposes must be able to be achieved with definitely reduced costs and with particularly simple operative modes, for example by means of a remote control having such structural and functional characteristics as to allow the realization of the above-mentioned method.
  • Summary of the invention
  • The solution idea underlying the present invention is to provide for an apprenticeship step wherein the clone remote control is put listening a remote control to be duplicated; a recognition step of the working frequency and the code being transmitted by the original remote control to be duplicated, also in case of variable code, and a totally automatic storing control step, wherein the clone remote control initiates a recognition and accreditation procedure with the electrical device to be controlled, which, if it is permitted, stores also the new code of the clone remote control emulating the variable code of the original remote control to be duplicated.
  • Based on said solution idea, the technical problem is solved by a method of the previously described type and characterized by including the following steps:
    • enabling the clone remote control to a duplication phase by pressing said control key and simultaneously pressing a programming key for a predetermined number of times;
    • releasing the said control and programming keys;
    • approaching the emitting ends of an original remote to be duplicated and the clone remote control in the duplicating phase;
    • pressing for a predetermined period of time a key of the original remote control, allowing said microprocessor to receive via the transceiver the working frequency and the code transmitted from the original remote control by means of a recognition and/or emulation procedure of the transmitted code;
    • pressing for a predetermined period of time a key of the clone remote control to which assign the same function of said key of the original remote control;
    • storing in said memory said working frequency, the recognized code and the assigned key;
    • starting an automatic storing procedure that provides for the transmission of predetermined sequences of recognized or emulated codes toward the electrical device to be controlled, said storing procedure automatically forcing the storing of the recognized or emulated code on a receiver of the electrical device to be controlled by generating alternating old and new codes being transmitted towards the electrical device to be controlled in a predetermined storing sequence; and
    • repeating said storing procedure for a plurality of storing sequences being stored in said memory of said clone remote control until said clone remote control is recognized by said electrical device to be controlled.
  • Advantageously, said predetermined number of times is equal to four.
  • The step of storing in memory the recognized or emulated codes is implemented in three phases:
    • a first phase wherein n duration measurements are carried out of the high-low and low-high transitions performed by the received radio signal;
    • a second step wherein said measurements are processed; and
    • a third phase wherein a sampling of the code is carried out.
  • In the first measuring step, duration measurements are performed of n high-low and low-high transitions of the received radio signal obtaining the minimum and maximum duration values of these transitions. For the maximum duration of the transitions, the corresponding level of the radio signal is also stored.
  • In the second stage of processing, it is obtained the length of the period of the radio signal corresponding to the duration of the shorter transmission element, as well as the duration and the level of the pause corresponding to the duration and level of the longest transition.
  • In the third sampling phase the radio signal is sampled at different time instants, starting half a period after a transition and then continuing after each full period until the next transition from which it will be counted again half a period and so on.
  • It should be noted that the recognition procedure provides for the subsequent initiation of a storing step in case the recognized code is a fixed code or an emulation phase of a variable rolling-type code having a serial number different from the recognized code.
  • Moreover, the storing procedure provides for the initiation of a procedure that automatically forces the storage of the new emulated code on the receiver of the electrical device to be controlled, said procedure generating alternative new and old codes transmitted in a predetermined sequence.
  • The invention refers also a remote control comprising at least one control key or button, a memory, a transceiver and a microprocessor capable to execute a program in order to implement the previously described steps of the method.
  • Characteristics and advantages of the method and the remote control of the present invention will be apparent from the following description of an exemplary embodiment given by way of non-limitative example with reference to the attached drawings.
  • Brief description of the drawings
    • Figure 1 shows a schematic and perspective view of a remote control being realized according to the present invention;
    • Figure 2 shows a schematic view of the essential electronic circuitry embedded in the remote control of figure 1;
    • Figure 3 shows a view of a flowchart illustrating the steps of the method of the present invention;
    • Figure 4 shows a further flowchart illustrating further realization steps of the method according to the invention;
    • Figure 5 shows a view of a flowchart illustrating a particular code storing phase according to the method of the present invention.
    Detailed description
  • With reference to those figures, and particularly to the example of figure 1, a remote control is schematically shown as a whole with 1, which will be defined in the following as "clone", being realized according to the present invention by duplicating an original remote control.
  • The clone remote control 1 includes a casing 2 being essentially parallelepiped-shaped with rounded corners and having a reduced thickness. The casing 2 contains and protects an electronic circuitry 3 including a microprocessor 4, a memory 5, a transceiver 6 and a pair of antennas 7 and 8. More particularly, the memory 5 is integrated in the microprocessor 4.
  • The double antenna has the advantage of increasing the radio frequency range and thus the effective action distance with respect to the controlled device.
  • All the electronic circuitry 3 is supplied by a small direct current battery being inserted in the casing 2, but not represented in the drawings because conventional.
  • On the visible surface 9 of the casing 2 there are arranged few buttons among which: a control key or button 10, in order to control a main electrical device, a second programming key or button 11 and a third and fourth button 12, 13 in order to optionally control further electrical devices.
  • On each of the four keys or buttons, there is a corresponding embossed character in braille code, which eases its identification with the touch alone.
  • A signaling LED 14, being connected to the operation of the remote control 1 is also provided for.
  • The remote control 1 operates in radio frequency and, for this reason, in the following description it will be referred to using the term radio remote control.
  • The remote control 1 can also be defined as "universal", since it is capable to be used with a plurality of electrical devices to be controlled, particularly for a domotic use. Moreover, the remote control 1 is able to emulate the original remote controls being realized by a plurality of manufacturing companies, independently from their internal structure. Advantageously, according to the invention, the clone remote control is structured in order to automatically force the storing of his codes on the receiver of the main controlled electrical device, but without a direct intervention on that receiver.
  • More particularly, the emulation of the original remote control occurs after a learning procedure of the code of the original remote control, which in the following will be called copy procedure.
  • There are fixed code remote controls, namely transmitting the same code every pressing of the control key; for them the emulation occurs by making an exact copy of the radio code, characterized by the radio signal, the modulation and the working frequency. Instead, for the original variable code remote controls, namely those remote controls that change the transmitted code every pressing of the control key, the emulation of the original remote control occurs by making a similar copy of the radio code, being characterized by the same modulation and working frequency, but by a partially different radio code.
  • The method according to the invention initially provides for a procedure to be executed in order to put the clone remote control in "listening" mode and thus to be able to transmit to the clone remote control the same code and the same working frequency of the original remote control to be duplicated. The replication procedure as a whole is innovative with respect to the similar products currently on the market and is extremely more simple and comfortable for the user.
  • The main advantage of the method of the present invention is given in that it allows working with both free hands. Actually, in a different way from all the other solutions being proposed in the known art, after pressing the keys in the exact sequence provided for in the cloning step, the user can release all the keys without being forced to keep the "destination" key pressed, namely the key of the clone remote control which will duplicate the control function carried out by the original remote control to be duplicated.
  • In this way, it is possible to carry out all the duplication operation in a much more practical way and to decide for example on which key of the clone remote control to store the code being learnt during the duplication, by pressing the related key at the end of the procedure.
  • According to the method of the present invention, now it is possible to see which steps are to be carried out in order to activate the copy procedure.
  • Firstly, it was chosen to enable the copy procedure by asking the user to keep two keys pressed at the same time. More particularly, while keeping the top left control key 10 pressed, the second top right programming key 11 must be pressed for a preset number of times on the remote control 1.
  • The preset number of times has been chosen equal to four in order to avoid the accidentally start and enabling of the copy procedure. Other keys combinations are used in order to enable more specific copy procedures, which will be described later.
  • After releasing both the buttons 10 and 11, and activating the copy procedure, the LED 14 of the remote control 1 starts flashing slowly. At this point, the emitting end of an original remote control to be copied and the emitting end of the clone remote control of the present invention must be put near to each other and the desired key of the original remote control which is to be copied must be pressed.
  • In this first step, the clone remote control searches the frequency of the original remote control for about thirty seconds, while the LED 14 flashes slowly. After finding the working frequency, the code of the original remote control is stored by means of a code writing method being described in the following; at this point, the LED 14 starts flashing quickly in order to show that the code has been learnt.
  • Therefore, it is necessary to push the key of the clone remote control where it is desired to store said code. Not necessarily that key corresponds in number and order to the one of the original remote control.
  • All the procedure is illustrated in detail in the flowchart of figure 3.
  • In few cases, the remote control under consideration needs other information corresponding to a further pressing of the key of the original remote control or any other special key of the original remote control. In this case, the LED will flash with a double flashing in order to signal the request for a further pressing.
  • For few original variable code remote controls, the clone remote control is able to recognize the type of variable code, and for these remote controls, the remote control 1 will generate a similar code to be stored directly or with an automatic procedure in the memory 5 being associated to the receiver 6. The variable codes generation occurs by means of proper algorithms being specific to each type of code. In all the other cases, it will be clone an identical copy of the original code.
  • Now, there will be described more in particular the modes by which the method of the present invention provides for writing the variable code acquired from the original remote control in the memory 5.
  • The mode substantially occurs in three steps.
  • In a first phase, n duration measurements are carried out of the high-low and low-high transitions performed by the received radio signal; in a second step, those measurements are processed and in a third phase a sampling of the code is carried out.
  • In the first measuring step, duration measurements are performed of n high-low and low-high transitions of the received radio signal; in this way the minimum and maximum duration values of these transitions are obtained. For the maximum duration of the transitions, the corresponding level of the radio signal is also stored.
  • In the second stage of processing, it is obtained the length of the period of the radio signal corresponding to the duration of the shorter transmission element. Moreover, the duration and the level of the pause corresponding to the duration and level of the longest transition is obtained.
  • In the third sampling phase the radio signal is sampled at different time instants, starting half a period after a transition and then continuing after each full period until the next transition from which it will be counted again half a period and so on.
  • Once obtained the samples sequence, it will be possible to recognize a known code called rolling-code, in order to realize a similar code, different in the serial number, or, on the contrary, it will be stored the code as it is.
  • All the procedure of recognizing and writing in memory the duplicate code is shown in detail in the flowchart of figure 4.
  • By pressing the key 10 of the remote control 1 where the duplicate radio code has been stored, it is obtained its ordinary transmission if the pressing time is less than eight seconds.
  • If instead the pressing time exceeds the eight seconds, the remote control 1 is programmed to turn off if the code is of a fixed or variable type that does not allow the automatic storing. The automatic storing procedure takes place if the code is of a variable type that allows the automatic storing.
  • Now, the automatic code storing procedure is described more in particular.
  • For the original variable code remote controls, the clone remote control 1 generates a code similar to the original, which is stored in the memory 5. This code must be stored also in the memory of the receiver of the controlled electrical device.
  • Actually, it is not possible to use the same code of the original remote control, because the two remote controls would interfere.
  • If the receiver of the controlled electrical device allows it, the storing procedure can automatically force the storing of the new code on the receiver, by generating for that purpose alternating old and new codes being transmitted in a sequence, called storing sequence, which is shown by way of example in the flowchart of figure 5.
  • The alternating old and new codes allow the receiver to understand that the sequence of received signals does not represent an ordinary activation command, but a sequence for programming and storing the new alternate variable code similar to the cloned code.
  • The storing sequence is activated by keeping the key 10 of the remote control under consideration pressed for eight seconds. The LED starts to flash quickly and the storing sequence is transmitted, after which the remote control turns off.
  • At this point, the variable code is stored also on the receiver of the controlled device.
  • Now, turning back to the recognizing procedure of the code called rolling-code, being previously outlined, it is appropriate to underline that it is a completely automatic procedure being carried out by the clone remote control 1.
  • More particularly, it is a function that allows the new universal clone radio remote control 1 to perform alone all the operative steps needed to be able to be recognized, and therefore used, by the electrical devices to be controlled.
  • As already mentioned, in contrast to the old and simpler fixed codes, the new generation remote controls use variable codes and almost all the remote control manufacturers use "Rolling-codes", which instead of replicating the same code each time the control key is pressed, emit a totally different one generated by an algorithm being preset on both the transmitter and the respective receiver.
  • In order to being able to duplicate a radio remote control operating with these modes, it would be necessary to perform a storing procedure on the receiver of the controlled electrical device that varies depending on the manufacturer.
  • Therefore, the clone remote control of the present invention includes a series of algorithms reproducing the storing sequences of the cloned variable codes for almost all the remote control manufacturers. Those sequences are automatically timed and executed each time a duplication is carried out of an original remote control using variable codes during transmission.
  • In other words, the sequence of steps shown in the flowchart of figure 5 is repeated for a series of sequences stored in the clone remote control 1 so that pressing the key being previously programmed according to the method of the invention, the step is autonomously activated which forces the storing of the new codes similar to those of the original remote control on the receiver of the controlled device.
  • Substantially, the clone remote control 1 continuously sends information being useful for its identification, and consequent use, based on the storing sequences contained in its memory and corresponding to almost all the remote control manufacturers.
  • In this way, errors by the final user are avoided and the accreditation step of the new clone remote control 1 with each electrical device to be controlled is much simplified.
  • It is clear that this fully automatic mode allows solving a problem that is considered as an obstacle when the identification function of the new clone remote control is managed by people that are totally lacking knowledge about the subject.
  • Thanks to this function, the final user must not know and be able to correctly carry out the insertion procedures in the respective receiver anymore. Until today, the difficulty was caused by each manufacturer applying its procedures, which are always different from brand to brand. With this innovation instead, they are perfectly and fully automatically and autonomously executed by the clone remote control, being unified in a single and simple prolonged pressing of the proper key.

Claims (14)

  1. Duplication method for a clone remote control (1) operating in radio frequency and capable to remotely control an electrical device by the pressure of at least one control key or button (10); said remote control comprising at least one memory (5), a transceiver (6) and a microprocessor (4) capable of executing a program for implementing the following steps:
    - enabling the clone remote control (1) to a duplication phase of said by pressing said control key (10) and simultaneously pressing a programming key (11) for a predetermined number of times;
    - releasing the said keys (10, 11);
    - approaching the emitting ends of an original remote to be duplicated and the clone remote control (1) in the duplicating phase;
    - pressing for a predetermined period of time a key of the original remote control, allowing said microprocessor (4) to receive via the transceiver (6) the working frequency and the code transmitted from the original remote control by means of a recognition and/or emulation procedure of the transmitted code;
    - pressing for a predetermined period of time a key of the clone remote control (1) to which assign the same function of said key of the original remote control;
    - storing in said memory (5) said working frequency, the recognized code and the assigned key;
    - starting an automatic storing procedure that provides for the transmission of predetermined sequences of recognized or emulated codes toward the electrical device to be controlled, said storing procedure automatically forcing the storing of the recognized or emulated code on a receiver of the electrical device to be controlled by generating alternating old and new codes being transmitted towards the electrical device to be controlled in a predetermined storing sequence; and
    - repeating said storing procedure for a plurality of storing sequences being stored in said memory (5) of said clone remote control (1) until said clone remote control (1) is recognized by said electrical device to be controlled.
  2. Method according to claim 1 wherein said predetermined number of times is equal to four.
  3. Method according to claim 1 in which an LED (14) of the clone remote control (1) clone flashes both during the storage phase of the transmitted code or during the assignment phase of the key having the same function, but with different flashing frequencies.
  4. Method according to claim 1 wherein said step of storing in memory the recognized or emulated codes is implemented in three phases:
    - a first phase wherein n duration measurements are carried out of the high-low and low-high transitions performed by the received radio signal;
    - a second step wherein these measurements are processed; and
    - a third phase wherein a sampling of the code is carried out.
  5. Method according to claim 4 wherein in said first measuring step duration n measurements are performed of the high-low and low-high transitions of the received radio signal obtaining the minimum and maximum duration values of these transitions.
  6. Method according to claim 5 wherein for the maximum duration of the transitions the corresponding level of the radio signal is also stored.
  7. Method according to claim 4 wherein in said second stage of processing it is obtained the length of the period of the radio signal corresponding to the duration of the shorter transmission element, as well as the duration and the level of the pause corresponding to the duration and level of the longest transition.
  8. Method according to claim 4 wherein in said third sampling phase the radio signal is sampled at different time instants, starting half a period after a transition and then continuing after each full period until the next transition from which it will be counted again half a period and so on.
  9. Method according to claim 1 wherein said recognition procedure provides for the subsequent initiation of a storing step in case the recognized code is a fixed code or an emulation phase of a variable rolling-type code having a serial number different from the recognized code.
  10. Method according to claim 1, wherein said step of initiating said storing procedure is started by keeping said control key (10) pressed for a predetermined period of time.
  11. Method according to claim 1, wherein said repeated storing sequences correspond to storing sequences of all the remote control manufacturers.
  12. Remote control (1) comprising at least one control key or button (10), a memory (5), a transceiver (6), a pair of antennas (7, 8) associated to said transceiver (6) and a microprocessor (4) being configured to execute a computer program in order to implement the method steps of claim 1.
  13. Remote control (1) according to claim 12, characterized by further including a programming key (11), a third key (12) and a fourth key (13) in order to optionally control further electrical devices.
  14. Remote control (1) according to claim 12, characterized in that said memory (5) includes a plurality of storing sequences corresponding to storing sequences of all the remote control manufacturers.
EP16167183.9A 2015-04-27 2016-04-27 Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained Active EP3089134B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL16167183T PL3089134T5 (en) 2015-04-27 2016-04-27 Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ITMI20150593 2015-04-27

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3089134A1 EP3089134A1 (en) 2016-11-02
EP3089134B1 EP3089134B1 (en) 2017-07-12
EP3089134B2 true EP3089134B2 (en) 2021-03-10

Family

ID=53385750

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16167183.9A Active EP3089134B2 (en) 2015-04-27 2016-04-27 Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3089134B2 (en)
ES (1) ES2642439T5 (en)
HU (1) HUE035100T2 (en)
IT (1) ITUA20162894A1 (en)
PL (1) PL3089134T5 (en)
PT (1) PT3089134T (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2019076946A1 (en) * 2017-10-16 2019-04-25 Sice Tech S.R.L. Improved remote control and corresponding operating method
IT202000014893A1 (en) * 2020-06-22 2021-12-22 Luigino Pellattiero METHOD FOR DUPLICATION OF A RADIOFREQUENCY OPERATING REMOTE CONTROL AND THE OBTAINED REMOTE CONTROL
IT202100008054A1 (en) * 2021-03-31 2022-10-01 Sice Tech S R L IMPROVED UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROLLER FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRICAL DEVICES
EP4258236B1 (en) * 2021-04-08 2024-05-08 Sice Tech S.r.l. New universal system for communication between a remote device and a receiving station

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5614891A (en) 1988-12-05 1997-03-25 Prince Corporation Vehicle accessory trainable transmitter
US5661804A (en) 1995-06-27 1997-08-26 Prince Corporation Trainable transceiver capable of learning variable codes
US5686903A (en) 1995-05-19 1997-11-11 Prince Corporation Trainable RF transceiver
US6078271A (en) 1998-02-20 2000-06-20 Lear Automotive Dearborn, Inc. Multiple-frequency programmable transmitter
US6486795B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2002-11-26 The Chamberlain Group, Inc. Universal transmitter
US7839263B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2010-11-23 Johnson Controls Technology Company System and method of training in a transmit/receive system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7889050B2 (en) 2006-08-31 2011-02-15 Johnson Controls Technology Company System and method for training a trainable transmitter

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5614891A (en) 1988-12-05 1997-03-25 Prince Corporation Vehicle accessory trainable transmitter
US5686903A (en) 1995-05-19 1997-11-11 Prince Corporation Trainable RF transceiver
US5661804A (en) 1995-06-27 1997-08-26 Prince Corporation Trainable transceiver capable of learning variable codes
US6078271A (en) 1998-02-20 2000-06-20 Lear Automotive Dearborn, Inc. Multiple-frequency programmable transmitter
US6486795B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2002-11-26 The Chamberlain Group, Inc. Universal transmitter
US7839263B2 (en) 2004-03-16 2010-11-23 Johnson Controls Technology Company System and method of training in a transmit/receive system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL3089134T5 (en) 2022-04-19
EP3089134A1 (en) 2016-11-02
HUE035100T2 (en) 2018-05-02
ES2642439T5 (en) 2021-10-28
PT3089134T (en) 2017-10-19
PL3089134T3 (en) 2017-12-29
EP3089134B1 (en) 2017-07-12
ITUA20162894A1 (en) 2017-10-26
ES2642439T3 (en) 2017-11-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3089134B2 (en) Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained
US10096188B2 (en) Fixed location based trainable transceiver for the control of remote devices systems and methods
US10481569B2 (en) Household appliance control method and device, and central processing device
US10796564B2 (en) Remote control apparatus capable of remotely controlling multiple devices
EP3555873B1 (en) Trainable transceiver for training and controlling multiple functions with a single channel
US9070280B2 (en) Remote and controller synchronization for automated furniture controls
CN104781860A (en) Frequency shifting method for universal transmitters
US10304322B2 (en) Remote control system for medical apparatus
CN108174456A (en) Passive and wireless switchs transmitter and receiver remote match method and receiver
US20070013544A1 (en) Wireless transceiver with multiple independent modulating transmitters
US9881495B1 (en) Duplication method for a remote control operating in radio frequency and remote control thus obtained
WO2004057551A3 (en) System with macrocommands
KR101166464B1 (en) Digital device control system using smart phone capable of infrared signal addition for digital device
CN107993422B (en) Method for duplicating a remote control device operating at radio frequencies and remote control device thus obtained
US8427357B2 (en) Remote control system and method for operating the same
EP4258236B1 (en) New universal system for communication between a remote device and a receiving station
US20130043984A1 (en) Smart Remote
KR102313299B1 (en) Remote controller capable of remotely controlling a plurality of device
CN114167740A (en) Equipment control method and device, remote control equipment and storage medium
KR101805204B1 (en) An unified remote controller and a control method the same
KR20130013786A (en) Method of automatic setup a universal remote control
CN208673510U (en) Universal remote control system and device
US9812005B1 (en) Method for creating a rolling code radio control
EP4169006A1 (en) Method for duplicating a rf remote control and remote control thereof
KR20180061519A (en) Smart bidet device and control system and method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170207

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170317

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G08C 17/02 20060101AFI20170228BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 909020

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016000134

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Ref document number: 3089134

Country of ref document: PT

Date of ref document: 20171019

Kind code of ref document: T

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20171009

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2642439

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20171116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 909020

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170712

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171012

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171112

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171012

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602016000134

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 3

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20170402766

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20180330

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: CLECOR

Effective date: 20180320

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E035100

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: HC9C

Owner name: SICE TECH S.R.L., IT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180427

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: CLECOR

Effective date: 20180320

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

PLAY Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170712

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170712

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20210310

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 602016000134

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200427

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20210401493

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20210709

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Ref document number: 2642439

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T5

Effective date: 20211028

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20230322

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20230323

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20230322

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 8

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230514

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230502

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230321

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20230329

Year of fee payment: 8