EP3085057B1 - Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a p2p network - Google Patents
Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a p2p network Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3085057B1 EP3085057B1 EP14793868.2A EP14793868A EP3085057B1 EP 3085057 B1 EP3085057 B1 EP 3085057B1 EP 14793868 A EP14793868 A EP 14793868A EP 3085057 B1 EP3085057 B1 EP 3085057B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- peer
- data content
- content stream
- requested data
- uploading
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 claims description 50
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 23
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/104—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks
- H04L67/1074—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks for supporting data block transmission mechanisms
- H04L67/1078—Resource delivery mechanisms
- H04L67/1085—Resource delivery mechanisms involving dynamic management of active down- or uploading connections
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/04—Protocols specially adapted for terminals or networks with limited capabilities; specially adapted for terminal portability
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Two-Way Televisions, Distribution Of Moving Picture Or The Like (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a network supervising device and a method at a network supervising device of managing distribution of data content in a segment of a peer-to-peer (P2P) network. The invention further relates to a peer device and a method of downloading data content at a peer being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers in a segment of a P2P network.
- Peer-to-peer (P2P) streaming has been gaining a great deal of attention due to its ability to distribute content in a relatively inexpensive manner as compared to traditional client-server solutions. In the art, live streaming has been effectuated by a streaming server uploading to peers or clients requesting a live content stream. Such a unicast content distribution structure can however not scale to a large number of clients, as bandwidth and processing requirements on the streaming server will be severe. An alternative is to use Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) instead of a single streaming source but this solution is also relatively costly as the number of clients becomes large. In order to address the operating cost of the CDNs for a large number of clients, P2P live streaming systems were proposed to significantly reduce the bandwidth requirement of the P2P streaming source(s) or distribution server(s) in a CDN. P2P live streaming systems are based on the concept of utilizing upload bandwidth of peers in order to save some of the bandwidth required from the streaming source, by allowing peers to stream to each other. However, use of P2P upload might not be applicable to all devices as the uploading of content from one uploading peer to several other peers could affect the uploading peer negatively in terms of processing power and battery life. This is exemplified by resource constrained devices such as smart phones and tablets. An obvious workaround to this problem is to simply prevent such resource constrained devices from uploading data and instead rely on non-constrained peers for uploading content. This solution could be considered provided that there are a sufficient number of peers that can act as uploaders for the resource constrained peers. If there are an insufficient number of such non-constrained peers, the resource constrained peers would have to download from a P2P streaming server or a CDN.
- The situation is made significantly more complex when a mix of different types of peers exists inside a private network. Such private networks are common in corporate and enterprise settings. A private network can be divided into any number of network segments representing for example different geographic premises, offices and/or departments. In such setting, there is a desire to minimize the amount of data traffic flowing in or out of any particular network segment. Having a significant number of resource constrained peers in such network segment is bound to increase the traffic in and out of the segment with existing P2P approaches. Document
WO 2013/072284 discloses a P2P network with peers constrained from uploading. - An object of the present invention is to solve, or at least mitigate, one or more of these problems in the art. The invention is disclosed in the appended claims. This object is attained in a first aspect of the present invention by a method at a network supervising device of managing distribution of data content streams in a segment of a P2P network, which network segment comprises one or more peers being constrained from uploading the data content streams to further peers. The method comprises receiving a request for a data content stream from at least one of the peers being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers, identifying whether at least one peer exists within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer is downloading the requested data content stream. If no peer within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream, it is identified whether at least one currently idle peer exists within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream. Thereafter, the method comprises assigning to the at least one peer downloading the requested data content stream, or in case no such peer is available, to the at least one currently idle peer, to upload the requested data content stream to the peer being restrained from uploading data content to further peers.
- This object is attained in a second aspect of the present invention by a peer device being constrained from uploading data content to further peer devices in a segment of a P2P network. The peer device comprises a processing unit being arranged to receive from the other peer devices in the network segment broadcast information regarding which streams of data content the other peer devices in the network segment are capable of uploading, or whether there are any currently idle peer devices in the network segment capable of uploading streams of data content. The processing unit is further arranged to make a request for a data content stream to a peer device within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer device is downloading the requested data content stream, or if no peer device within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream, to a currently idle peer device within the network segment, which currently idle peer device is capable of uploading the requested data content stream. Further, the processing unit of the peer device is arranged to download the requested data content stream from the peer device downloading the requested data content stream, or from the currently idle peer device in case no peer in the segment is downloading the requested content data stream.
- This object is further attained according to the first aspect of the present invention by a network supervising device for managing distribution of data content in a segment of a P2P network, which network segment comprises one or more peers being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers. The network supervising device comprises a processing unit being arranged to receive a request for a data content stream from at least one of the peers being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers, and to identify whether at least one peer exists within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer is downloading the requested data content stream. If no peer within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream, the processing unit identifies whether at least one currently idle peer exists within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream. Further, the processing unit is arranged to assign to the at least one peer downloading the requested data content stream, or in case no such peer is available, to assign to the at least one currently idle peer, to upload the requested data content stream to the peer being restrained from uploading data content to further peers.
- This object is further attained according to the second aspect of the present invention by a peer device being constrained from uploading data content to further peer devices in a segment of a P2P network. The peer device comprises a processing unit being arranged to receive from the other peer devices in the network segment broadcast information regarding which streams of data content the other peer devices in the network segment are capable of uploading, or whether there are any currently idle peer devices in the network segment capable of uploading streams of data content. The processing unit is further arranged to make a request for a data content stream to a peer device within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer device is downloading the requested data content stream, or if no peer device within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream, to a currently idle peer device within the network segment, which currently idle peer device is capable of uploading the requested data content stream. Moreover, the processing unit of the peer device is arranged to download the requested data content stream from the peer device downloading the requested data content, or from the currently idle peer device, if no peer in the segment is downloading the requested segment.
- Advantageously, with the present invention, a peer being constrained from uploading data content to other peers, i.e. a peer referred to as "resource constrained" will turn to a peer being capable of uploading data content to other peers, i.e. a peer referred to as "non-constrained" within the same network segment. In this context, it should be noted that the peers referred to as "resource constrained" generally not is restrained from uploading one or more streams of data content due to limitations in upload capacity. Rather, they are resource restrained in that they have limited processing power and battery life for effecting uploads of data streams as compared to e.g. a PC or even a laptop (in particular when connected to a grid), which generally do not have these restrictions. A resource constrained peer device is typically a mobile phone or a tablet.
- Thus, the resource constrained peer advantageously requests a desired stream of content data from a non-constrained peer which is downloading the requested stream of content data. If no non-constrained peer in the segment is downloading the requested content data stream, the resource constrained peer will request the stream of content data from a currently idle non-constrained peer in the segment. Advantageously, with the present invention, the number of incoming connections to a given network segment can be greatly reduced, while needs of the resource constrained peers are catered to, which is achieved by making effective use of available upload capacity of the non-constrained peers.
- As is reflected in the first and second aspect of the present invention, respectively, this can either be managed by a network supervising device known as a tracker or by the peer devices themselves. When the distribution of data content is triggered in a centralized manner, where the tracker coordinates the process, an advantage is that the tracker is generally a computationally more powerful device than the peer devices, e.g. embodied n the form of a high-speed server. Further advantageous is that tracker knows the status and capabilities of the peers in the network segment(s) and possibly of the remaining peers in the P2P network on which the segment is a part.
- If the process is triggered in a decentralized manner, where the respective resource constrained peer coordinates the process, an advantage is that there is no need to have a centralized device (i.e. the tracker) keeping track of the status and capabilities of the peers. Instead, the peers themselves keep track of status and capabilities, which can be implemented by having the network peers broadcast to the other network peers their status and capabilities.
- In an embodiment of the present invention, the tracker or requesting peer determines, in order of priority, whether (1) any non-constrained peer is rendering the requested data stream, (2) any non-constrained relaying peer is uploading the requested content data stream to further peer(s), a relaying peer being a peer used for the purpose of uploading data content to further peers, but which does not render the data content itself, or (3) any non-constrained idle peer exist which can upload the requested data content stream. The peer subsequently uploads the requested data content stream in accordance with this order of priority. Advantageously, by checking whether relaying peers exists (unless a currently rendering peer exist), the number of idle peers to be recruited may be reduced. Further advantageous is that by selecting a rendering peer before a relaying peer, resources could potentially be freed up, since the relaying peer does not download the data stream for its own benefit, but only for the benefit of the resource constrained downloaders residing downstream of the relaying peer, and thus will become idle once it is freed from the task of relaying data.
- Generally, all terms used in the claims are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning in the technical field, unless explicitly defined otherwise herein. All references to "a/an/the element, apparatus, component, means, step, etc." are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of the element, apparatus, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise. The steps of any method disclosed herein do not have to be performed in the exact order disclosed, unless explicitly stated.
- The invention is now described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
Figure 1 shows a part of a P2P network comprising a network segment; -
Figure 2 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention where the number of incoming connections has been reduced by triggering an idle non-constrained peer to download a requested data content stream on behalf of three resource constrained peers; -
Figure 3 shows a flowchart illustrating a method performed at a tracker according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
Figures 4a-c illustrate a further embodiment of the present invention taking into account whether an uploading peer acts as a rendering peer or a relaying peer; -
Figure 5 shows a flowchart illustrating a method performed at a peer according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
Figure 6 shows a flowchart illustrating a method performed at a peer according to a further embodiment of the present invention taking into account whether an uploading peer acts as a rendering peer or a relaying peer; -
Figure 7 illustrate a further embodiment of the present invention solving a problem which arises when a relaying peer starts downloading a different piece of content; -
Figure 8 illustrates yet a further embodiment of the present invention where in case another non-constrained peer in the segment starts rendering a desired piece of conten3, the resource constrained peers abandon their currently uploading relaying peer; -
Figure 9 illustrates a state machine for a non-constrained peer according to an embodiment of the present invention; and -
Figure 10 illustrates a state machine for a resource constrained peer according to an embodiment of the present invention. - The invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which certain embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided by way of example so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout the description.
- Throughout the drawings, peers indicated with a square shape are considered non-constrained, peers indicated with a rectangular shape are considered resource constrained, and peers indicated with dashed lines are relaying peers. Further, non-connected peers within a segment are idle peers.
-
Figure 1 shows a part of aP2P network 10, which part comprises anetwork segment 11, e.g. embodied in the form of a private network, accommodating nine non-constrained peers p1-p9 as well as five resource-constrained peers t1-t5 (which "peers" in practice imply peer devices such as television sets, mobile phones, computers, laptops, smart phones, tablets, etc.). Of these 14 peers, two are in idle mode; peers t2 and p9, i.e. they are not currently participating in the downloading and/or uploading of three streams c1, c2, c3 of data content entering thenetwork segment 11. Further shown inFigure 1 are three peers ep1, ep2, ep3 residing outside the network segment 11 (i.e. they reside in one or more other network segments) and delivering two of the streams c2, c3 of data content distributed via four separate channels into the network segment 11 (content stream c1 being delivered via a fifth channel to peer p2). Finally, astreaming source 12 or CDN streams three of the streams c2, c3, c4 of data content to the peers ep1, ep2, ep3 residing outside thenetwork segment 11 and a fourth stream c1 of data content directly into thenetwork segment 11. As can be seen inFigure 1 , the resource-constrained peers t3, t4, t5 download the stream c3 of data content from outside thenetwork segment 11 viacommunication channel - In this context, it should be noted that the peers referred to as "resource constrained" are generally not restrained from uploading one or more streams of data content due to limitations in upload capacity. Rather, they are resource restrained in that they have limited processing power and battery life for effecting uploads of data streams as compared to e.g. a PC or even a laptop (in particular when connected to a grid), which generally do not have these restrictions. Thus, a mobile terminal such as a smart phone or a tablet could certainly upload one or more data streams if their potential upload capacity was the only concern; in e.g. a Local Area Network (LAN), peers within the LAN have a upload capacity that is only limited by the router of the LAN (which is usually very high). However, their processing and battery power would be severely taxed if they were to upload many data streams. Therefore, these resource constrained peers within a given network segment are restricted from uploading data content to other peers. This could e.g. be included in a network segment policy for the distribution of data within the segment; for instance, in an embodiment of the invention, when a new peer device is added to the network segment, it is classified as a resource constrained peer device if it belongs to a particular group of equipment (e.g. smart phone, tablet, etc.). Correspondingly, the peers referred to as "non-constrained" is capable of uploading data content to other peers, and do not have these limitations in CPU power and/or battery life, even though no peer of course has an infinite upload capacity.
-
Figure 2 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention where the number of incoming connections have been reduced by triggering an idle non-constrained peer p9 to download the data content stream c3 on behalf of three resource constrained peers t4, t5, t6 (i.e. peers constrained/restricted from uploading data content) who are seeking a common content. - In this particular embodiment, this is triggered in a centralized manner, where a network or segment supervising device known as a
tracker 20 coordinates the process. The tracker is generally a computationally more powerful device than the peer devices, such as a server. This is advantageous in that thetracker 20 knows the status and capabilities of the peers in thenetwork segment 11 and possibly of the remaining peers in theP2P network 10, depending on the network range thetracker 20 is configured to cover. Thus, thetracker 20 receives a request for a particular data content from one or more of the peers being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers; in this exemplifying embodiment, the resource constrained peers makes a request to download the stream c3 of content data. Thetracker 20 then identifies an idle peer p9 within the segment (since there are no peers currently rendering the data content stream c3, or no peers relaying the requested stream c3 to other peers), which idle peer has capacity to upload the data content. Thereafter, thetracker 20 terminates the communication channels via which the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 receives the stream c3 of data content (i.e. thecommunication channels Figure 1 ). This is in practice performed by either having thetracker 20 actively terminating the respective channel, or by having thetracker 20 instructing the respective peer t3, t4, t5 to terminate the channel via which it communicates with the supplier ep3 of data content from outside thenetwork segment 11. Then, thetracker 20 assigns to the currently idle peer p9 a task of establishing anew communication channel 16 with the supplier ep3 of the stream c3 of data content outside thenetwork segment 11, and further to upload the stream c3 of data content to the peers t3, t4, t5 being restrained from uploading the data content. The idle peer p9 has thus become a relaying peer, i.e. a peer used for the purpose of uploading data content to further peers, but which has no interest in rendering the data content itself. It is to be noted that the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 may connect to the currently idle peer p9 before terminating theconnections Figure 2 , since the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 already were downloading the content data stream c3 from outside thenetwork segment 11 viacommunication channels network segment 11; only oneincoming channel 16 carries content data stream c3 in contrast toFigure 1 where threeincoming channels - In an alternative embodiment, the process described in the above is triggered in a decentralized manner, where the respective resource constrained peer t3, t4, t5 coordinate the process. This is advantageous in that there is no need to have a centralized device such as the
tracker 20 keeping track of the status and capabilities of the peers. Instead, the peers themselves keep track of status and capabilities, which can be implemented by having the network peers broadcast to the other network peers their status and capabilities using for instance User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Thus, any resource constrained peer t3, t4, t5 desiring to make use of a currently idle peer p9 (not being restricted from uploading data content) instead of directly communicating with a supplier ep3 of data content residing outside thenetwork segment 11 identifies the currently idle peer p9 within the segment, which idle peer has capacity to upload the data content, and makes the request for a desired piece of content to the currently idle peer p9. Thereafter, the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 terminate the communication channels via which they receive the stream c3 of data content (i.e. thecommunication channels Figure 1 ) from the content-supplying peer ep3 outside thenetwork segment 11. Subsequently, the requested stream c3 of content data is instead downloaded from the identified currently idle peer p9, which establishes anew communication channel 16 with the supplier ep3 of the stream c3 of data content outside thenetwork segment 11, and further uploads the requested stream c3 of data content to the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5. In an embodiment of the present invention, the request for the stream c3 of content data to the currently idle peer p9 comprises destination information of the supplier ep3 of the stream c3 of content data, or destination information to any other supplier of the stream c3 of content data being requested. - With reference to
Figure 2 , of all streams of data content c1, c2, c3, the stream c1 is most popular, i.e. the most requested data content stream in thenetwork segment 11, which stream c1 is brought into thenetwork segment 11 by the peer p2. The peers p1, p3, p6 downloads the data stream c1 directly from p2, while peer p4 downloads c1 from p1, and peers p5 and p8 downloads c1. The resource constrained peer t1 will download the desired content stream c1 from peer p5. - Both these aspects of the present invention, i.e. the centralized solution as well as the decentralized solution, are advantageous since the number of incoming connections to a given network segment, in this case embodied by the
network segment 11, are reduced while needs of the resource constrained peers are catered to, which is achieved by making effective use of available upload capacity of the non-constrained peers. - With further reference to
Figure 2 ,tracker 20 comprises a controller/processing unit 21 embodied in the form of one or more microprocessors arranged to execute acomputer program 22 downloaded to asuitable storage medium 23 associated with the microprocessor, such as a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Flash memory or a hard disk drive. Thecontroller 21 is arranged to carry out a method according to embodiments of the present invention when theappropriate computer program 22 comprising computer-executable instructions is downloaded to thestorage medium 23 and executed by thecontroller 21. Thestorage medium 23 may also be a computer program product comprising thecomputer program 22. Alternatively, thecomputer program 22 may be transferred to thestorage medium 23 by means of a suitable computer program product, such as a digital versatile disc (DVD), compact disc (CD) or a memory stick. As a further alternative, thecomputer program 22 may be downloaded to thestorage medium 23 over a network. Thecontroller 21 may alternatively be embodied in the form of a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a complex programmable logic device (CPLD), etc. It should be noted that the peer device correspondingly comprises a microprocessor, computer program and storage medium. - With further reference to
Figure 2 , if theP2P network 10 was not carefully arranged, there would be no guarantee that only one incoming connection is set up for delivering the content c1 to the network segment, in particular given that the data content stream c1 is requested by a majority of the peers in thesegment 11. In an embodiment of the present invention, a managing peer is assigned for thenetwork segment 11. In the case of the exemplifying embodiment illustrated inFigure 2 , the peer p2 is assigned as the managing peer for the content stream c1. Hence, via a coordination mechanism undertaken e.g. by thetracker 20, the managing peer p2 becomes the peer which solely downloads the content stream c1 from outside thenetwork segment 11. This particular embodiment of assigning a managing peer p2 in thenetwork segment 11 provides a highly efficient approach of performing live streaming in a network segment, for instance a private network, since the number of incoming channels to thenetwork segment 11 are even further reduced, possibly down to a single incoming channel, although that would require that the peers p7 and p9 would connect to any one of the other non-constrained peers p1-p6 or p8 in thenetwork segment 11. Typically, this type of network structure is in the art implemented by means of using one or more routers to multicast the data content within and across the segments. With this embodiment of the present invention, expensive and network-specific multicast routers are not needed. Peers are arranged in either a tree or a mesh P2P connectivity overlay within a given segment and thus exchanges streaming data in an efficient manner. In practice, a private network may comprise tens of different network segments and thousands of peers. - In an embodiment of the present invention, the managing peer p2 of the
network segment 11 is assigned by considering a ranking of the segment peers and selecting the peer having the highest ranking as the managing peer. The ranking of the segment peers is based on information regarding status of the peers and includes one or more of peer upload bandwidth, peer download bandwidth, most recently downloaded part for each requested data content stream, Network Address Translation (NAT) compatibility type, peer Central Processing unit (CPU) load, peer (Internet Protocol) IP address, position in data stream for the data content to be downloaded, etc. - The content distribution tree shown for the data content stream c1 in
Figure 2 does not have to be static, it can be transient while making sure that the managing peer p2 is at the root of the tree (at least inside the network segment 11) and that t1 is a leaf node in the tree. - Thus, with reference to the flowchart of
Figure 3 , a method performed at a tracker according to an embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. Reference is further made toFigure 2 for illustrating various nodes of theP2P network 10, and the result achieved after the method ofFigure 3 has been performed. In a first step S101, thetracker 20 receives a request from any one (or all) of the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5, i.e. peers being restricted from uploading content to other network peers as previously has been described, to access a particular stream of the data content, in this case c3. Thetracker 20 will respond to the request received from the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 by determining in step S102 whether any one of the non-constrained peers p1-p8 is downloading the requested data content stream c3 and thus is capable of uploading the requested data content stream c3. However, although at least peers p3, p4, p5, p7 and p8 appear to have spare upload capacity, none of them is rendering the request data content stream c3 (p7 renders stream c2, while the remaining peers render stream c1). However, in case any non-constrained peer would have rendered the requested data content, it would have been preferred to direct the requesting constrained resource peer(s) t3, t4, t5 to such a non-constrained peer in step S103 in order to advantageously reduce the number of data flowing into thenetwork segment 11, i.e. to reduce the number of incoming communication channels to thenetwork segment 11. - Further with reference to
Figure 3 , since in this exemplifying embodiment none of the non-constrained peers already is downloading the requested data content stream c3 and thus cannot provide the requested stream c3 to the requesting resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5, thetracker 20 proceeds to step S104 where thetracker 20 determines whether there are any currently idle non-constrained peers residing in thenetwork segment 11. As can be deducted fromFigure 2 , idle peer p9 can indeed by assigned in step S105 to bring the requested content stream c3 into thenetwork segment 11 by establishing a communication with peer ep3 residing outside thesegment 11 and subsequently upload the requested content stream c3 to the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5. The currently idle peer p9 is after this process consequently viewed upon as a relaying peer. If there had not been any currently idle peers residing in thesegment 11 with capability to upload data content, the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 would have had to recourse to peer ep3 outside thesegment 11 or ultimately thestreaming source 10 in step S106. - In case the process is undertaken by the peers themselves as previously discussed, similar steps are undertaken. In case the peers interact with each other without consulting the
tracker 20, each peer transmits broadcast information to indicate (a) what content the peer is currently rendering or relaying (i.e. whether the peer is downloading a requested stream or not), (b) whether the peer is currently idle, and (c) whether the peer is capable of uploading content data to further peers (i.e. whether the peer is categorized as "non-constrained" or "resource constrained"). - In a further embodiment of the present invention described with reference to the flowchart of
Figure 4a , not only is it considered whether a non-constrained peer to which a request is addressed for data content download either (a) is downloading the requested content data stream or (b) is idle, but further whether the non-constrained peer (if any) downloading the requested stream either is (1) a peer currently rendering the requested stream, or (2) a peer merely relaying the requested stream to further peers (without rendering it). Reference will further be made toFigures 4b and4c as well as the previously describedFigure 2 for illustrating different data content streaming arrangements in various situations. - Thus, with reference to the flowchart of
Figure 4a , a method performed at a tracker according to a further embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. Reference is further made toFigure 4b for illustrating a first selected streaming arrangement in thesegment 11 of theP2P network 10. In this exemplifying embodiment, in a first step S101, thetracker 20 receives a request from any one (or all) of the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5, i.e. peers being restricted from uploading content to other network peers as previously has been described, to access a particular stream of the data content, in this case c1. Thetracker 20 will respond to the request received from the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 by determining in step S102a whether any one of the non-constrained peers pi-p8 already rendering data content is capable of uploading the requested data content stream c1. All peers p1-p8 are in this example capable of uploading the requested stream c1, wherein thetracker 20 assigns to any of these peers, e.g. peers p3, p6 and p8 in step S103a to upload the requested data content stream c1 to the resource constrained peer(s) t3, t4, t5, respectively. Further, non-constrained peer p7 is relaying data content stream c2 to resource constrained peer t2. - Now, with reference to
Figure 4a and further toFigure 4c , a second selected streaming arrangement in thesegment 11 of theP2P network 10 is illustrated. In this exemplifying embodiment, in a first step S101, thetracker 20 receives a request from any one (or all) of the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5, i.e. peers being restricted from uploading content to other network peers as previously has been described, to access a particular stream of the data content, in this case c2. The tracker cannot find any peer currently rendering the requested content stream c1, and proceeds to step S102b, where thetracker 20 identifies a relaying peer p7 which is downloading the requested content stream c2 and distributing the content stream c2 to resource constrained peer t2. Thus, thetracker 20 assigns in step S103b to the relaying peer p7 the task of uploading the requested data content stream c2 to the resource constrained peer(s) t3, t4, t5. As previously has been discussed with reference toFigure 2 , if no peer is currently rendering or relaying a requested content data stream totracker 20 moves on to step S104 to find a non-constrained idle peer to be assigned in step S105, or to find an external peer in step S106. Advantageously, by checking whether relaying peers exists (unless a currently rendering peer exist), the number of idle peers to be recruited may be reduced. Further advantageous is that by selecting a rendering peer before a relaying peer, resources could potentially be freed up, since the relaying peer does not download the data stream for its own benefit, but only for the benefit of the downloaders residing downstream of the relaying peer. - In case the process is undertaken by the peers themselves as previously discussed, similar steps are undertaken. In case the peers interact with each other without consulting the
tracker 20, each peer transmits broadcast information to indicate (a) what content the peer is currently rendering or relaying, (b) whether the peer is currently idle, and (c) whether the peer is capable of uploading content data to further peers (i.e. whether the peer is categorized as "non-constrained" or "resource constrained"). - With reference to the flowchart of
Figure 5 , a method performed at a requesting peer according to an embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. In a first step S201, the requesting peer receives from the other peers in the network segment broadcast information regarding which streams of data content the other peers in the network segment are capable of uploading, or whether there are any currently idle peers in the network segment capable of uploading data content streams. Thereafter, in step S202, the requesting peer sends a request for a data content stream to a peer within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer is downloading the requested data content stream. If no peer within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream, the requesting peer sends in step S204 a request to a currently idle peer within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream. In step S203, the requesting peer downloads the requested data content stream from the peer being capable of uploading the requested data content, or if no such peer is available, downloads the requested data content stream from the currently idle peer in step S205. - With reference to the flowchart of
Figure 6 , a method performed at a requesting peer according to another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. In a first step S201, the requesting peer receives from the other peers in the network segment broadcast information regarding which streams of data content the other peers in the network segment are capable of uploading, or whether there are any currently idle peers in the network segment capable of uploading data content streams. Thereafter, in step S202a, the requesting peer sends a request to the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which is currently rendering the requested data content stream, and if no such peer is available, the requesting peer sends in step S202b a request to the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which is a peer currently relaying the requested data content stream to at least one further peer If no rendering peer or no relaying peer exists within the segment, the requesting peer sends in step S203 a request to a currently idle peer within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream. Finally, the requesting peer downloads the requested data content stream from (1) the rendering peer in step S204a, (2) the relaying peer in step S204b, or (3) the idle peer in step in S205, in that order of priority. As a last resort, the requesting peer will turn to an external peer or source in step S206. -
Figure 7 illustrates a further embodiment of the present invention solving a problem which arises when a relaying peer p9 responsible for uploading data to other peers t3, t4, t5 suddenly starts downloading a different piece of content (reference is made toFigure 2 for a scenario before p9 downloads the different stream); in this case a change is made from content c3 to content c2. In this exemplifying embodiment, non-constrained and previous idle peer p7 starts downloading the requested content c3, in which case the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 turns to the (now) relaying peer p7 for the requested piece of content c3 (or is directed to peer p7 by the tracker upon requesting the particular data content stream c3). Further inFigure 7 can be seen that peer p3 stops rendering content c3 and enters into an idle mode. -
Figure 8 illustrates yet a further embodiment of the present invention where in case another non-constrained peer p3 in thesegment 11 starts rendering the desired piece of content c3, the resource constrained peers t3, t4, t5 abandons their currently uploading peer p7 for peer p3 (compared toFigure 7 ). This is advantageous since the resource provided by peer p7 is freed up for future use (and peer p7 may not be interested in rendering data content c3 anyway, it may download it as a relaying peer only for the purpose of forwarding it to the peers t3, t4, t5 in view of their earlier requests). This is further advantageous in case e.g. the upload capacity of peer p7 is becoming strained. - As previously has been mentioned, the peers in the
P2P network 10 may broadcast their status on the network, or in asegment 11. This may include having the peers announce which particular stream of content they are currently rendering and/or uploading to further peer(s) in order to facilitate a handover of a downloading peer from one uploading peer to another uploading peer. -
Figure 9 illustrates a state machine for a non-constrained peer according to an embodiment of the present invention. As can be seen, the non-constrained peer can transit between three different states. When in the Idle state, the peer would make a transition R to the Relaying state if a request for upload of a data content stream is received (by the peer itself or the previously discussed tracker). In the Relaying state, the peer does not render the downloaded content itself, but only downloads it for the benefit of uploading the content to further peer(s), and the relaying peer will revert to the Idle state via transition N, if the resource restrained peer no longer requests download of the data content stream. In the Idle state, the peer may start rendering a data content stream, in which case a transition P is made to the Rendering state, where the peer will remain if either a transition Sw for switching to downloading another data content stream is made or if a transition R is undertaken caused by a request from another peer to download the rendered data content stream. The peer will revert to the Idle state via transition S if it stops rendering the content. Finally, when in the Relaying state, the peer will transition P to the Rendering state if it would start rendering the requested data content stream previously only relayed to further peers. -
Figure 10 illustrates a state machine for a resource constrained peer according to an embodiment of the present invention. As can be seen, the resource constrained peer can transit between six different states. From any uploading state, if the peer stops playing, a transition PSP is made to the Idle state. In the Idle state, a peer may start requesting content be making transition SP to state Request content. Then, in order of priority: (1) a transition FP is made to state Upload from renderer if any rendering peer can upload the requested content stream, (2) a transition FR is made to state Upload from relay if any relaying peer can upload the requested content stream, (3) a transition FI is made to state Upload from idle if any relaying peer can upload the requested content stream, or (4) a transition FE is made to state Upload from external if no peers can be found in the segment capable of uploading the requested content stream. From the state Upload from renderer, the peer will make a transition PS to state Request content if the uploading rendering peer switches content or stops rendering the requested content (or leaves the segment or switches off). From the state Upload from relay, the peer will make a transition RPS to state Upload from renderer if a relaying peer starts rendering the same content as the relaying peer, or will make a transition OPS to state Upload from renderer if another peer in the network segment starts rendering the requested data content stream; such transition will free up the relaying peer so that is becomes idle (per transition R infigure 9 ). From state Upload from relay, a transition RP to state Request content if the relaying peer starts playing a different content (or leaves the segment or switches off). From the state Upload from idle, the peer will make a transition IPR to state Upload from relay if an idle peer starts relaying a requested piece of content, Finally, from the state Upload from external, a transition FP is made to state Upload from renderer if a rendering peer is found for the requested content in the network segment, a transition FR is made to state Upload from relay if a relaying peer is found (but no rendering peer) for the requested content, and a transition FI is made to state Upload from idle if no rendering peer or relaying peer can be found for the requested content. - The invention has mainly been described above with reference to a few embodiments. However, as is readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art, other embodiments than the ones disclosed above are equally possible within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended patent claims.
Claims (15)
- A method at a network supervising device of managing distribution of data content streams in a segment of a peer-to-peer, P2P, network, said network segment comprising one or more peers being constrained from uploading the data content streams to further peers, comprising:receiving (S101) a request for a data content stream from at least one of the peers being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers;identifying (S102) whether at least one peer exists within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer is downloading the requested data content stream; or if no peer within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream:identifying (S104) whether at least one currently idle peer exists within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream; andassigning (S103) to said at least one peer downloading the requested data content stream, or if no such peer is available, assigning (S105) to said at least one currently idle peer, to upload the requested data content stream to the peer being constrained from uploading the data content to further peers.
- The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of identifying (S102) whether at least one peer exists within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream further comprises:identifying (S102a) whether the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream is a peer currently rendering the requested data content stream; or if not:identifying (S102b) whether the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream is a peer currently relaying the requested data content stream to at least one further peer; wherein the step of assigning (S103) upload of the requested content data stream further comprises:assigning (S103a) to said at least one peer currently rendering the requested data content stream, or if no such rendering peer is available, assigning (S103b) to the currently relaying peer to upload the requested data content stream to the peer being restrained from uploading the data content to further peers.
- The method according to claims 1 or 2, further comprising:assigning to said currently idle peer a task of establishing a new communication channel with a supplier of the requested data content stream residing outside the network segment.
- The method according to any one of claims 1-3, further comprising:terminating a communication channel via which the peer being constrained from uploading data content to further peers currently downloads the requested data content stream from outside the network segment.
- The method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising:assigning a managing peer in the network segment responsible to download data content streams from a supplier residing outside the network segment and to distribute the downloaded data content streams to at least one further peer in the network segment.
- A method of downloading data content streams at a peer being constrained from uploading the data content streams to further peers in a segment of a peer-to-peer, P2P, network comprising:receiving (S201) from the other peers in the network segment broadcast information regarding which data content streams the other peers in the network segment are capable of uploading, or whether there are any currently idle peers in the network segment capable of uploading the data content streams;sending a request (S202) for a data content stream to a peer within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer is downloading the requested data content stream, or if no peer within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream:sending a request (S203) to a currently idle peer within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream; anddownloading (S204) the requested data content stream from said peer downloading the requested data content stream, or if no such peer is available, downloading (S205) the requested data content stream from the currently idle peer.
- The method according to claim 6, wherein the step of sending a request (S202) for a data content stream to a peer within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream further comprises:sending a request (S202a) to the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which is currently rendering the requested data content stream; and if no such peer is available:sending a request (S202b) to the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which is a peer currently relaying the requested data content stream to at least one further peer; wherein the step of downloading (S204) the requested content data stream further comprises:downloading (S204a) the requested data content stream from said at least one peer currently rendering the requested data content stream, or if no such rendering peer is available, downloading (S204b) the requested data content stream from the currently relaying peer.
- A network supervising device (20) for managing distribution of data content streams in a segment (11) of a peer-to-peer, P2P, network (10), said network segment comprising one or more peers (t3, t4, t5) being constrained from uploading the data content streams to further peers, comprising a processing unit (21) being arranged to:receive a request for a data content stream (c3) from at least one of the peers being constrained from uploading the data content streams to further peers;identify whether at least one peer exists within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer is downloading the requested data content stream; and if no peer within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream:identify whether at least one currently idle peer (p9) exists within the network segment, which currently idle peer is capable of uploading the requested data content stream; andassign to said at least one peer currently downloading the requested data content stream, or if no such peer is available, assigning to said at least one currently idle peer, to upload the requested data content stream to the peer being constrained from uploading data content to further peers.
- The network supervising device (20) according to claim 8, the processing unit (21) further being arranged to:identify whether the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream is a peer currently rendering the requested data content stream; or if not:identify whether the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream is a peer currently relaying the requested data content stream to at least one further peer; andassign to said at least one peer currently rendering the requested data content stream, or if no such rendering peer is available, assign to the currently relaying peer to upload the requested data content stream to the peer being restrained from uploading the data content to further peers.
- The device (20) according to claim 8 or 9, the processing unit (21) further being arranged to:assign to said currently idle peer (p9) a task of establishing a new communication channel (16) with a supplier (ep3) of the requested data content stream (c3) residing outside the network segment (11).
- The device (20) according to any one of claims 8-10, the processing unit (21) further being arranged to:terminate a communication channel (13,14,15) via which the at least one peer (t3, t4, t5) being constrained from uploading the data content streams to further peers currently downloads the requested data content stream (c3) from outside the network segment (11).
- A peer device (t3, t4, t5) being constrained from uploading data content streams to further peer devices in a segment (11) of a peer-to-peer, P2P, network (10), comprising a processing unit being arranged to:receive from the other peer devices in the network segment broadcast information regarding which data content streams the other peer devices in the network segment are capable of uploading, or whether there are any currently idle peer devices in the network segment capable of uploading the data content streams;make a request for a data content stream (c3) to a peer device within the network segment being capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which peer device is downloading the requested data content stream, or if no peer device within the segment is downloading the requested data content stream, to a currently idle peer device (p9) within the network segment, which currently idle peer device is capable of uploading the requested data content stream; anddownload the requested data content stream from the peer device downloading the requested data content stream, or from the currently idle peer device.
- The peer device (t3, t4, t5) according to claim 12, the processing unit further being arranged to:send a request to the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which is currently rendering the requested data content stream; and if no such peer is available:send a request to the at least one peer capable of uploading the requested data content stream, which is a peer currently relaying the requested data content stream to at least one further peer;downloading the requested data content stream from said at least one peer currently rendering the requested data content stream, or if no such rendering peer is available, downloading the requested data content stream from the currently relaying peer.
- A computer program (22) comprising computer-executable instructions for causing a device (20) to perform the steps recited in any one of claims 1-7 when the computer-executable instructions are executed on a processing unit (21) included in the device.
- A computer program product comprising a computer readable medium (23), the computer readable medium having the computer program (22) according to claim 14 embodied therein.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/134,938 US9967336B2 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2013-12-19 | Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a P2P network |
SE1351527 | 2013-12-19 | ||
PCT/EP2014/074035 WO2015090725A1 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2014-11-07 | Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a p2p network |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3085057A1 EP3085057A1 (en) | 2016-10-26 |
EP3085057B1 true EP3085057B1 (en) | 2017-05-17 |
Family
ID=51866164
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14793868.2A Active EP3085057B1 (en) | 2013-12-19 | 2014-11-07 | Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a p2p network |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3085057B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN105814865B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2014365592B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2933106C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015090725A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109981376A (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2019-07-05 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Pre-download method and system, network quality acquire server-side, business service end |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050091399A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-04-28 | Candan Kasim S. | Resource-aware adaptive multicasting in a shared proxy overlay network |
US7593333B2 (en) * | 2004-07-07 | 2009-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient one-to-many content distribution in a peer-to-peer computer network |
US8340131B2 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2012-12-25 | Sentilla Corporation, Inc. | Efficient broadcast of data in a communication network |
US9270748B2 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2016-02-23 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method for content delivery involving a policy database |
US11064023B2 (en) * | 2009-05-27 | 2021-07-13 | Verizon Media Inc. | Method for actively sharing available bandwidth to consumer nodes in a peer-to-peer network for delivery of video streams |
WO2010145199A1 (en) * | 2009-06-17 | 2010-12-23 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | Method, system and device for searching active nodes in p2p streaming media system |
CN102244670B (en) * | 2010-05-13 | 2013-11-06 | 北京大学 | Idle node assistance method for P2P (peer-to-peer) file transmission |
CN101938484B (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2013-05-15 | 奇智软件(北京)有限公司 | Distributed flow control method and system |
ES2539615T3 (en) * | 2011-11-18 | 2015-07-02 | Peerialism AB | Method and device for peer arrangement in overlapping P2P networks of restricted continuous flow |
-
2014
- 2014-11-07 AU AU2014365592A patent/AU2014365592B2/en active Active
- 2014-11-07 CN CN201480064171.9A patent/CN105814865B/en active Active
- 2014-11-07 WO PCT/EP2014/074035 patent/WO2015090725A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-11-07 EP EP14793868.2A patent/EP3085057B1/en active Active
- 2014-11-07 CA CA2933106A patent/CA2933106C/en active Active
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109981376A (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2019-07-05 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Pre-download method and system, network quality acquire server-side, business service end |
CN109981376B (en) * | 2019-04-09 | 2021-10-01 | 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 | Pre-downloading method and system, network quality acquisition server and service server |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2014365592A1 (en) | 2016-05-12 |
CN105814865B (en) | 2019-03-01 |
EP3085057A1 (en) | 2016-10-26 |
CA2933106A1 (en) | 2015-06-25 |
CN105814865A (en) | 2016-07-27 |
AU2014365592B2 (en) | 2018-06-07 |
CA2933106C (en) | 2022-05-17 |
WO2015090725A1 (en) | 2015-06-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Anjum et al. | Survey on peer-assisted content delivery networks | |
US20240022464A1 (en) | Managing a network overlaid on another network | |
EP2058980B1 (en) | A method, system and device for establishing a peer to peer connection in a p2p network | |
US9083709B2 (en) | Virtual internet protocol migration and load balancing | |
JP5948345B2 (en) | Virtual application delivery chassis system | |
US9876756B2 (en) | Network access method and device for equipment | |
US20190081856A1 (en) | Deployment of network-related features over cloud network | |
US9967336B2 (en) | Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a P2P network | |
CN103581245A (en) | Content delivery method and system of content delivery network | |
JP7375203B2 (en) | Account access methods and devices, storage media, and electronic devices | |
EP3095229B1 (en) | Method and nodes for configuring a communication path for a media service | |
CN104350725A (en) | Method of seamless integration and independent evolution of information-centric networking via software defined networking | |
CN114731296A (en) | Method and system for distributed edge cloud computing | |
US10250671B2 (en) | P2P-based file transmission control method and P2P communication control device therefor | |
CN104394221B (en) | Utilize edge service node for Stream Media Application carry out accelerate process method and system | |
EP3085057B1 (en) | Distributing content data to resource constrained devices in a segment of a p2p network | |
US20090028110A1 (en) | Seamless Establishment and Maintenance of Network Connections for Mobile Applications | |
CN101686172B (en) | Method, system and equipment for selecting gateway node | |
EP3022887B1 (en) | Distributing data content in private networks | |
JP5726302B2 (en) | Secret or protected access to a network of nodes distributed across a communication architecture using a topology server | |
CN114979098A (en) | WebRTC-based communication method and device and electronic equipment | |
JP2012078903A (en) | Node device, program for node device and information processing method | |
Stiemerling et al. | A Network Virtualisation Concept based on the Ambient Networks SATO System | |
Canonico et al. | Content Networks for Communities: An Architectural Framework | |
SE539564C2 (en) | Site detection |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160617 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: HIVE STREAMING AB |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170214 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 895394 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170615 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602014010027 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 895394 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170818 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170817 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170917 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170817 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602014010027 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180220 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171107 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20171130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20141107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170517 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602014010027 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0029080000 Ipc: H04L0065000000 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230601 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231115 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231121 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20231201 Year of fee payment: 10 |