EP3055219B1 - Stopper for closing containers - Google Patents

Stopper for closing containers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3055219B1
EP3055219B1 EP14789415.8A EP14789415A EP3055219B1 EP 3055219 B1 EP3055219 B1 EP 3055219B1 EP 14789415 A EP14789415 A EP 14789415A EP 3055219 B1 EP3055219 B1 EP 3055219B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stopper
barrier
barrier layer
layer
barrier element
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP14789415.8A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3055219A1 (en
Inventor
Mattia BOSCHELLO
Roberto Casini
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microcell SRL
Original Assignee
Microcell SRL
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microcell SRL filed Critical Microcell SRL
Publication of EP3055219A1 publication Critical patent/EP3055219A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3055219B1 publication Critical patent/EP3055219B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D39/00Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers
    • B65D39/0052Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers made in more than one piece
    • B65D39/0058Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers made in more than one piece from natural or synthetic cork, e.g. for wine bottles or the like
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D39/00Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers
    • B65D39/0005Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers made in one piece
    • B65D39/0011Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers made in one piece from natural or synthetic cork, e.g. for wine bottles or the like

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a stopper for closing containers, such as bottles, in particular for fluid food substances.
  • the present invention relates in particular to a stopper designed to close bottles for wine, food oils, vinegar, spirits, etc.
  • Natural cork stoppers with a cylindrically shaped body to be inserted in the neck of the bottle or container to be closed are well known in the specific prior art.
  • stoppers made from normally expanded polymer material or from so-called composite cork i.e. comprising a plurality of natural cork granules aggregated together by resins, normally polyurethane resins, have been developed.
  • stoppers differ in terms of the granulometry of the cork granules and may possibly be provided with natural cork discs secured to both transverse bases of the stopper.
  • stoppers Although the performance of these stoppers is more uniform and they reduce the extent of organoleptic alterations of the wine in comparison with natural cork stoppers, they do not, however, ensure complete neutrality or a high barrier to the absorption of the aromatic fraction of the wine.
  • T-shaped stoppers are also known, and have a cylindrical body made from one of the materials discussed above and a head made from various different materials, for instance plastics, metal, glass, wood, etc., and are used for the closure of spirits, food oils, vinegar, etc.
  • the stoppers must make it possible to preserve the integrity of the product contained in the container closed by the stopper, preventing it from deteriorating over time in particular as a result of an undesired interaction between the product and the atmosphere outside the container and/or between the product and the stopper itself.
  • the bases of the natural cork stopper have been covered with a barrier designed to reduce the interaction between the stopper and the product.
  • stoppers are known for instance from WO 03/004367 which discloses a stopper with a body made from cork or synthetic material and provided with a protective film designed to control the passage of gas and reduce the transfer of molecules which may alter the beverage, including halo-anisolic compounds, through the stopper.
  • the protective film comprises a first 'barrier' layer made from polymer material having a low permeability to H 2 O, O 2 , CO 2 and impermeable to organic molecules.
  • the protective film further comprises a second adhesion layer so that the film may be applied to the body of the stopper, preferably at one end thereof.
  • the body of the stopper disclosed in WO03/004367 is tapered at the end to which the protective film is applied so as to limit the deformation of the film when the stopper is being inserted into the neck of the bottle.
  • the stopper disclosed in WO03/004367 does not, however, definitively resolve the problems of organoleptic neutrality as, since the membrane does not fully cover the base of the stopper, and/or may become at least partially detached from it, there may always be a risk of contamination.
  • a further drawback of the stopper disclosed in WO03/004367 is that the protective film is glued by a layer of adhesive to the base of the stopper and may become detached from the body of the stopper and fall into the bottle in which the stopper is inserted.
  • the protective film disclosed in WO03/004367 is not, moreover, stable over time but tends to change colour which users may find off-putting.
  • Another container stopper including a protective barrier is disclosed in WO2004/060764 A1 .
  • the problem underlying the present invention is one of providing a stopper functionally and structurally designed to remedy the drawbacks discussed with respect to the cited prior art.
  • a particular object of the invention is to provide a stopper provided with a barrier layer made from a material which makes it possible drastically to reduce or block the passage of gas through the stopper.
  • a further object of the invention is to provide a stopper in which the barrier layer is stably attached to the body of the stopper.
  • the stopper 100 is preferably designed to close containers by being inserted in the opening provided in the neck of the container, which is not shown in the Figures.
  • the stopper 100 comprises a compressible body 1 of a generally cylindrical shape with rounded corners extending along a longitudinal axis X between two longitudinally opposite base surfaces 2, 3.
  • the compressible body 1 has dimensions such that it may be housed and engaged in an opening of a container, which is not shown in the Figures.
  • the compressible body 1 is made from composite cork or from any other expanded polymer material having mechanical and leak-tightness properties suited for the purpose, for instance polyolefin materials with or without metallocene catalysts, styrene block polymers, EVA, TPV, TPU, TPE.
  • the material, or mixture of materials, of the compressible body 1 is selected so as to obtain a stopper 100 which can be radially compressed in order to be inserted in the opening of the container and then expands to lock the stopper in the neck of the bottle or container to be closed by the stopper 100.
  • the material of the compressible body 1 is also selected so as to have a limited weight, low relaxation and good resilient recall and structural fatigue strength.
  • the compressible body 1 is made from one or a plurality of the following materials: polyethylene, polyolefin materials with metallocene catalysts, or styrene polymers, for instance SEBS, SEPS and/or their polymer blends.
  • the stopper 100 is provided with a barrier element 4 made from a material having a high impermeability to gases in order drastically to limit the passage of gas through the stopper 10 and, at the same time, to reduce the absorption of the aromatic fraction of the wine or beverage with which the stopper 100 comes into contact.
  • the barrier element 4 is attached to the body 1 of the stopper 100 at a transverse surface portion 5 of the stopper 100 disposed transversely with respect to the longitudinal axis X so as to intercept the flow of gas through the stopper 100 in both directions of the arrow F, i.e. into or out from the container closed by the stopper 100.
  • the transverse surface portion 5 corresponds, in the versions shown, to a transverse section 5' of the body 1 defined by a cutting plane Y perpendicular to the longitudinal axis X of the body 1 at a desired position along the longitudinal axis X.
  • the transverse surface portion 5 may be a transverse section of the stopper 100 defined by a cutting plane inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis X.
  • the barrier element 4 of the stopper 100 is attached to one of the base surfaces 2, 3 of the body 1.
  • the transverse surface 5 corresponds to the one of the base surfaces 2, 3 of the body 1.
  • the barrier element 4 is provided on the base surface 3 designed to face, in use, the interior of the container closed by the stopper 100 in order to provide a better barrier to the aromatic substances present in the beverage contained therein.
  • the barrier element 4 comprises a barrier layer 41 made from a high-barrier plastics material.
  • a barrier layer 41 made from a high-barrier plastics material.
  • Use is preferably made of TPV, TPU or polyisobutylene, or a material comprising a polyisobutylene at a percentage of between 10% and 80%.
  • SIBS poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene), which is a material having a very high barrier to gases and having a high thermal stability and excellent resilience, or an SIBS-based polymer material.
  • SIBS is a an elastomer material which forms a high barrier drastically reducing the flow of gas from the atmosphere to the container and the flow of aromatic substances of the beverage from the container to the atmosphere, while at the same time retaining a high resilient capacity so that the plastics barrier layer 41 matches the deformations to which the body 1 of the stopper 100 is subject during the closing operation.
  • SIBS also has a good chemical affinity with the polymer materials from which the body 1 of the stopper 100 is made, as a result of which the barrier element 4 adheres in a stable manner to the body 1 of the stopper 100, creating chemical links with the material of the body 1.
  • the stopper 100 is made by co-moulding the body 1 and the barrier element 4 or by over-moulding the barrier element 4 on the body 1.
  • the barrier element 4 comprises a barrier layer 42 made from aluminium, or its alloys, or from another ductile metal, for instance tin or copper or, as an alternative, from plastic films of polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), a very effective barrier polymer, and/or ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH).
  • PVDC polyvinylidene chloride
  • EVOH ethylene vinyl alcohol
  • the metals listed above are materials with a high impermeability to gases, in particular oxygen, and to the aromatic substances contained in beverages in general and thus make it possible to provide an excellent barrier to the passage of these substances through the stopper 100.
  • PVDC and EVOH also make it possible to produce multi-layer films providing an excellent barrier to the passage of gas through the stopper 100.
  • the barrier layer 42 is made from aluminium.
  • the barrier element 4 further comprises an adhesion layer 421 designed to be interposed, in use, between the compressible body 1 and the barrier layer 42 and to promote the adhesion of the barrier layer 42 to the body 1.
  • the adhesion layer 421 is made from a polyolefin material such as PE or PP, EVA or even PET.
  • the adhesion layer 421 is made from a material having a good affinity with both the material of the barrier layer 42 and with the material of the body 1 so as to ensure good adhesion with both these materials and avoid any undesirable detachment of the barrier element 4 from the body 1 or the separation of the barrier layer 4 and the adhesion layer 421.
  • the barrier element 4 further comprises a further adhesion layer 422 designed to be applied externally to the barrier layer 42 so that the latter is interposed between the adhesion layer 421 and the further adhesion layer 422.
  • the further adhesion layer 422 is made from a polyolefin material, preferably high-barrier, usually PE or PP, EVA or even PET.
  • the further adhesion layer 422 is made from a material having a good affinity with the material of the barrier layer 42 in order to ensure that it adheres properly to the latter.
  • the material of the adhesion layer 421 and/or the further adhesion layer 422 is selected in line with the material used for the barrier layer 42.
  • the adhesion layer 421 is preferably made from PE, while the further adhesion layer 422 is made from PET or PE.
  • the further adhesion layer 422 is shaped so that it covers almost completely the barrier layer 42. In this way, with the stopper inserted in the bottle, the further adhesion layer 422 is interposed between the barrier layer 42 and the content of the bottle, preventing direct contact between the barrier layer 42 and the content of the bottle.
  • the barrier layer 42 is isolated from the beverage which is an important factor especially in cases in which the barrier layer 42 is made from metal, and the barrier element 4 is provided with greater structural resistance, preventing it from becoming detached from the body 1.
  • the further adhesion layer 422 also makes it possible to improve the structural compactness of the barrier element 4 in the various conditions of use, making it possible to prevent the barrier element 4 from being deformed following radial compression for the insertion of the stopper 100 in the container.
  • the barrier element 4 further comprises a further layer interposed between the barrier layer 42 and the adhesion layer 421 or the further adhesion layer 422 made from PET, or another appropriate material having a good chemical affinity with the materials used for the adjacent layers.
  • the further layer is made from a material which may be stamped and may be provided with a stamp in order to personalize the stopper, for instance stamped PET.
  • the further layer may also further increase the barrier effect and the stability of the barrier elements 4.
  • the stopper 100 described with reference to Fig. 3 may be made, for instance, by firstly forming the barrier element 4 and then attaching it to the body 1 in order to cause the adhesion layer 421 to adhere to the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • a plasma deposition of aluminium powder may possibly be made on the adhesion layer or on the further adhesion layer, and the metal barrier layer then covered with the further adhesion layer or vice versa with the adhesion layer and the barrier element obtained lastly attached to the body 1.
  • the plasma deposition of aluminium powder is preferably carried out under vacuum.
  • the stopper 100 comprises a barrier device 40 in turn comprising a barrier element 4 formed, for instance, as one of the versions described with reference to the preceding drawings and preferably as one of the versions described with reference to Fig. 3 , possibly provided with the further layer of PET, to which an additional barrier layer 43 shaped so as to encapsulate the previously formed barrier element 4 is applied.
  • the barrier device 40 may in particular comprise a barrier layer 42 made from aluminium, or its alloys, or from another ductile metal, for instance tin or copper or, as an alternative, from plastic films of polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), a very effective barrier polymer, and/or ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH); an adhesion layer 421 made from a polyolefin material such as PE or PP, EVA or even PET; a further adhesion layer 422 made from a polyolefin material, preferably high-barrier, normally PE or PP, EVA or even PET and a further barrier layer 43 formed as described below.
  • the barrier device 40 may possibly comprise a further layer interposed between the barrier layer 42 and the adhesion layer 421 or the further adhesion layer 422 made from PET, or another material having good chemical affinity with the materials used for the adjacent layers.
  • the barrier element 4 may first be formed and then attached to the body 1 of the stopper 100 and then the further barrier layer 43 may be over-moulded on the barrier element 4.
  • the further barrier layer 43 is made from a material having a good affinity with the material of the body 1 of the stopper so as to obtain good adhesion between the further barrier layer 43 and the body 1 of the stopper.
  • the further barrier layer 43 is made from a material having a good affinity with the material of the further adhesion layer 422.
  • the further barrier layer 43 is made from isobutylene-based elastomers, preferably SIBS, or also from TPU and/or TPV, SEBS, or their polymer blends.
  • the further barrier layer 43 may be slightly expanded and/or mixed with PE in order farther to improve the adhesion of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 of the stopper 100. If the further barrier layer 43 is made from SIBS, 1.5-2% by weight of NaHCO 3 may be added.
  • the further barrier layer 43 is made from the same material as the body 1 of the stopper 100 in order further to improve the adhesion of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • the further barrier layer 43 is injection moulded on the previously formed barrier element 4 so that the barrier element 4 is interposed and completely enclosed between the further barrier layer 43 and the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • This version also makes it possible to optimise the stability of the barrier device 40 on the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • the presence of the further barrier layer 43 makes it possible further to increase the barrier effect which may be obtained, i.e. further to increase the impermeability to gases and aromatic substances that may be obtained with the stopper 100.
  • the barrier element 4 in this version, is shaped such that it occupies a transverse surface portion 5" having a smaller extension than the extension of the normal transverse section 5', considered with reference to the longitudinal axis X of the body 1, so that an attachment area 6 for the further barrier layer 43 is defined on the base surface 3.
  • the barrier element 4 is in particular shaped such that an attachment area 6, shaped as a circular crown 6 to which the further barrier layer 43 is attached, is defined on the base surface 3 of the body 1.
  • the circular crown 6 has a width of between 0.5 and 2% of the diameter of the body of the stopper, preferably approximately 1%.
  • the body 1 is tapered along the longitudinal axis X at the longitudinal end portion 3a.
  • the latter therefore has a profile of generally frustoconical shape tapered along the longitudinal axis X, the base surface 3 forming the smaller base of the frustum having a smaller extension than the normal transverse section 5' of the body 1.
  • the smaller base of the frustum occupies a transverse surface portion 5" having a smaller extension than the extension of the normal transverse section 5'.
  • the barrier element 4 produced for instance in one of the ways discussed with reference to Fig. 3 , is applied to the smaller base of the frustum 5".
  • the further barrier layer 43 is applied to the body 1 so as to completely enclose, the barrier element 4.
  • the further barrier layer 43 is attached to the lateral surface 3b of the frustum so as to surround the longitudinal end portion 3a and to be attached to the lateral surface 3b itself.
  • the lateral surface 3b of the frustum forms the attachment area 6 for the further barrier layer 43.
  • the tapering takes place such that the lateral surface 3b is inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis by an angle ⁇ of between 25° and 75°.
  • This configuration makes it possible further to improve the attachment of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 and to obtain a stopper 100 with high mechanical properties.
  • the barrier element 4 is encapsulated between the body 1 of the stopper and the further barrier layer 43, obtaining a barrier device 40 having improved mechanical strength and improved performance.
  • the stopper 100 comprises two separate barrier elements 4 produced in any one of the ways discussed above and attached to the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1 respectively.
  • the stopper of the invention may be provided with two separate barrier devices 40 produced in any one of the ways discussed above and provided at the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1.
  • This provides a stopper 100 having a symmetrical configuration and means that it is not necessary to control the orientation of the stopper 100 when it is being applied to the neck of a container.
  • the stopper 100 provided with the two barrier elements 4, or barrier devices 40, may be inserted at either end 2, 3 in the container for which it is intended, thereby facilitating and speeding up the stoppering process.
  • the barrier element 4 is provided on a normal transverse section 5' of the body 1 disposed in an intermediate position along the longitudinal axis X between the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1.
  • the stopper 1 has two separate body portions 1a, 1b between which the barrier element 4 is interposed.
  • the barrier device 40 is provided on a normal transverse section 5 of the body 1 disposed in an intermediate longitudinal position between the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1, the barrier device 40 having a smaller transverse section than the normal transverse section 5 of the body 1 so that the barrier device 40 is completely embedded in the body of the stopper.
  • the barrier element 4 is provided with a plurality of holes provided in the barrier layer 42 and intended to enable the flow of gas through the stopper 100 to be regulated.
  • OTR oxygen transfer rate
  • the barrier element 4 is attached to a transverse surface portion 5 corresponding to a zone of a transverse section of the body 1 of the stopper 100 having a smaller extension than the transverse section 5 thereof.
  • Fig. 8 shows a stopper 100' comprising a head 7 from which a body 1' substantially of cylindrical shape extends along the longitudinal axis X of the stopper 100'.
  • the body may be made from one of the materials discussed above and the head 7 may be made from the same material as the body 1' or from a different material, usually a material with a different compressibility, preferably lower than the compressibility of the material of the body 1'.
  • the head 7 has a transverse section S1 of a greater extension than the transverse section 5 of the body 1'.
  • the barrier element 4' or respectively the barrier device 40' is provided at the base surface 3' of the compressible body 1' opposite the head 7, i.e. the barrier element 4' or respectively the barrier device is applied to the base surface 3' which is designed to face, in use, the interior of the container to which the stopper 100' is applied.
  • the barrier element 4' may be made in any one of the ways discussed above.
  • the T-shaped stopper 100' may also be provided with the barrier device made in any one of the ways discussed above.
  • the barrier element 4' may be provided with holes designed to enable the flow of gas through the stopper 100' to be regulated.
  • the invention thus resolves the stated problem, and achieves many advantages, including that of providing a stopper having a barrier state in respect of gases and aromatic substances which is particularly effective in comparison with known stoppers.
  • the invention advantageously makes it possible in particular to obtain a stopper which is structurally very compact, preventing the contamination of the beverage contained in the container to which the stopper is applied.
  • a stopper is also obtained whose oxygen transfer rate may be appropriately varied by adapting the stopper to the particular oxygenation requirements specific to the various types of beverages which may be contained in the container closed by the stopper.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Closures For Containers (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to a stopper for closing containers, such as bottles, in particular for fluid food substances.
  • The present invention relates in particular to a stopper designed to close bottles for wine, food oils, vinegar, spirits, etc.
  • Natural cork stoppers with a cylindrically shaped body to be inserted in the neck of the bottle or container to be closed are well known in the specific prior art.
  • In the technical sector of bottling of beverages, and in particular wine, it is known that there is a need to replace traditional cork stoppers with synthetic stoppers made from polymer material or other types of closure.
  • This need is shaped by specific economic factors and by the significant technical drawbacks connected with traditional stoppers, including the possibility that cork stoppers may release substances able to alter the taste of the wine as well as the fact that mechanical properties may vary from stopper to stopper.
  • In order to meet this need in a positive way, stoppers made from normally expanded polymer material or from so-called composite cork, i.e. comprising a plurality of natural cork granules aggregated together by resins, normally polyurethane resins, have been developed.
  • These latter stoppers differ in terms of the granulometry of the cork granules and may possibly be provided with natural cork discs secured to both transverse bases of the stopper.
  • Although the performance of these stoppers is more uniform and they reduce the extent of organoleptic alterations of the wine in comparison with natural cork stoppers, they do not, however, ensure complete neutrality or a high barrier to the absorption of the aromatic fraction of the wine.
  • T-shaped stoppers are also known, and have a cylindrical body made from one of the materials discussed above and a head made from various different materials, for instance plastics, metal, glass, wood, etc., and are used for the closure of spirits, food oils, vinegar, etc.
  • The stoppers must make it possible to preserve the integrity of the product contained in the container closed by the stopper, preventing it from deteriorating over time in particular as a result of an undesired interaction between the product and the atmosphere outside the container and/or between the product and the stopper itself.
  • In order to obtain stoppers suitable for the above purpose, the bases of the natural cork stopper have been covered with a barrier designed to reduce the interaction between the stopper and the product.
  • Examples of such stoppers are known for instance from WO 03/004367 which discloses a stopper with a body made from cork or synthetic material and provided with a protective film designed to control the passage of gas and reduce the transfer of molecules which may alter the beverage, including halo-anisolic compounds, through the stopper.
  • The protective film comprises a first 'barrier' layer made from polymer material having a low permeability to H2O, O2, CO2 and impermeable to organic molecules. The protective film further comprises a second adhesion layer so that the film may be applied to the body of the stopper, preferably at one end thereof.
  • The body of the stopper disclosed in WO03/004367 is tapered at the end to which the protective film is applied so as to limit the deformation of the film when the stopper is being inserted into the neck of the bottle.
  • The stopper disclosed in WO03/004367 does not, however, definitively resolve the problems of organoleptic neutrality as, since the membrane does not fully cover the base of the stopper, and/or may become at least partially detached from it, there may always be a risk of contamination.
  • A further drawback of the stopper disclosed in WO03/004367 is that the protective film is glued by a layer of adhesive to the base of the stopper and may become detached from the body of the stopper and fall into the bottle in which the stopper is inserted.
  • The protective film disclosed in WO03/004367 is not, moreover, stable over time but tends to change colour which users may find off-putting. Another container stopper including a protective barrier is disclosed in WO2004/060764 A1 . The problem underlying the present invention is one of providing a stopper functionally and structurally designed to remedy the drawbacks discussed with respect to the cited prior art.
  • A particular object of the invention is to provide a stopper provided with a barrier layer made from a material which makes it possible drastically to reduce or block the passage of gas through the stopper.
  • A further object of the invention is to provide a stopper in which the barrier layer is stably attached to the body of the stopper.
  • This problem is resolved by the invention by means of a stopper with a barrier layer embodied in accordance with the accompanying claims.
  • The characteristic features and advantages of the invention will become clear from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments shown, by way of non-limiting example, in the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Fig. 1 is a front view of a stopper provided with a barrier element; this stopper is not according to the invention;
    • Figs. 2-7 are views similar to Fig. 1 but relating to various embodiments of the barrier element, wherein only the embodiments of Figs. 4, 5 are according to the invention;
    • Fig. 8 is a diagrammatic front view of a T-shaped stopper with a barrier element according to an embodiment which is not part of the invention. Figs. 1-7 show a stopper 100 for containers.
  • The stopper 100 is preferably designed to close containers by being inserted in the opening provided in the neck of the container, which is not shown in the Figures.
  • The stopper 100 comprises a compressible body 1 of a generally cylindrical shape with rounded corners extending along a longitudinal axis X between two longitudinally opposite base surfaces 2, 3.
  • The compressible body 1 has dimensions such that it may be housed and engaged in an opening of a container, which is not shown in the Figures.
  • The compressible body 1 is made from composite cork or from any other expanded polymer material having mechanical and leak-tightness properties suited for the purpose, for instance polyolefin materials with or without metallocene catalysts, styrene block polymers, EVA, TPV, TPU, TPE.
  • The material, or mixture of materials, of the compressible body 1 is selected so as to obtain a stopper 100 which can be radially compressed in order to be inserted in the opening of the container and then expands to lock the stopper in the neck of the bottle or container to be closed by the stopper 100.
  • The material of the compressible body 1 is also selected so as to have a limited weight, low relaxation and good resilient recall and structural fatigue strength.
  • In some preferred versions, the compressible body 1 is made from one or a plurality of the following materials: polyethylene, polyolefin materials with metallocene catalysts, or styrene polymers, for instance SEBS, SEPS and/or their polymer blends.
  • The stopper 100 is provided with a barrier element 4 made from a material having a high impermeability to gases in order drastically to limit the passage of gas through the stopper 10 and, at the same time, to reduce the absorption of the aromatic fraction of the wine or beverage with which the stopper 100 comes into contact.
  • The barrier element 4 is attached to the body 1 of the stopper 100 at a transverse surface portion 5 of the stopper 100 disposed transversely with respect to the longitudinal axis X so as to intercept the flow of gas through the stopper 100 in both directions of the arrow F, i.e. into or out from the container closed by the stopper 100.
  • The transverse surface portion 5 corresponds, in the versions shown, to a transverse section 5' of the body 1 defined by a cutting plane Y perpendicular to the longitudinal axis X of the body 1 at a desired position along the longitudinal axis X.
  • In other versions which are not shown, however, the transverse surface portion 5 may be a transverse section of the stopper 100 defined by a cutting plane inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis X.
  • In other versions, for instance those shown in Figs. 1-5, the barrier element 4 of the stopper 100 is attached to one of the base surfaces 2, 3 of the body 1. In this case, the transverse surface 5 corresponds to the one of the base surfaces 2, 3 of the body 1.
  • In the versions shown, the barrier element 4 is provided on the base surface 3 designed to face, in use, the interior of the container closed by the stopper 100 in order to provide a better barrier to the aromatic substances present in the beverage contained therein.
  • In the version of Fig. 2, the barrier element 4 comprises a barrier layer 41 made from a high-barrier plastics material. Use is preferably made of TPV, TPU or polyisobutylene, or a material comprising a polyisobutylene at a percentage of between 10% and 80%.
  • In the more preferred version, use is made of SIBS, poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene), which is a material having a very high barrier to gases and having a high thermal stability and excellent resilience, or an SIBS-based polymer material.
  • SIBS is a an elastomer material which forms a high barrier drastically reducing the flow of gas from the atmosphere to the container and the flow of aromatic substances of the beverage from the container to the atmosphere, while at the same time retaining a high resilient capacity so that the plastics barrier layer 41 matches the deformations to which the body 1 of the stopper 100 is subject during the closing operation.
  • SIBS also has a good chemical affinity with the polymer materials from which the body 1 of the stopper 100 is made, as a result of which the barrier element 4 adheres in a stable manner to the body 1 of the stopper 100, creating chemical links with the material of the body 1.
  • In this case, the stopper 100 is made by co-moulding the body 1 and the barrier element 4 or by over-moulding the barrier element 4 on the body 1. In the version of Fig. 3, the barrier element 4 comprises a barrier layer 42 made from aluminium, or its alloys, or from another ductile metal, for instance tin or copper or, as an alternative, from plastic films of polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), a very effective barrier polymer, and/or ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH).
  • The metals listed above are materials with a high impermeability to gases, in particular oxygen, and to the aromatic substances contained in beverages in general and thus make it possible to provide an excellent barrier to the passage of these substances through the stopper 100. Aluminium, tin and copper, as they are highly ductile, moreover, may be formed as very thin layers.
  • PVDC and EVOH also make it possible to produce multi-layer films providing an excellent barrier to the passage of gas through the stopper 100.
  • In a preferred version, the barrier layer 42 is made from aluminium.
  • The barrier element 4 further comprises an adhesion layer 421 designed to be interposed, in use, between the compressible body 1 and the barrier layer 42 and to promote the adhesion of the barrier layer 42 to the body 1.
  • The adhesion layer 421 is made from a polyolefin material such as PE or PP, EVA or even PET. The adhesion layer 421 is made from a material having a good affinity with both the material of the barrier layer 42 and with the material of the body 1 so as to ensure good adhesion with both these materials and avoid any undesirable detachment of the barrier element 4 from the body 1 or the separation of the barrier layer 4 and the adhesion layer 421.
  • The barrier element 4 further comprises a further adhesion layer 422 designed to be applied externally to the barrier layer 42 so that the latter is interposed between the adhesion layer 421 and the further adhesion layer 422.
  • The further adhesion layer 422 is made from a polyolefin material, preferably high-barrier, usually PE or PP, EVA or even PET. The further adhesion layer 422 is made from a material having a good affinity with the material of the barrier layer 42 in order to ensure that it adheres properly to the latter.
  • The material of the adhesion layer 421 and/or the further adhesion layer 422 is selected in line with the material used for the barrier layer 42.
  • The adhesion layer 421 is preferably made from PE, while the further adhesion layer 422 is made from PET or PE.
  • The further adhesion layer 422 is shaped so that it covers almost completely the barrier layer 42. In this way, with the stopper inserted in the bottle, the further adhesion layer 422 is interposed between the barrier layer 42 and the content of the bottle, preventing direct contact between the barrier layer 42 and the content of the bottle.
  • In this way the barrier layer 42 is isolated from the beverage which is an important factor especially in cases in which the barrier layer 42 is made from metal, and the barrier element 4 is provided with greater structural resistance, preventing it from becoming detached from the body 1.
  • The further adhesion layer 422 also makes it possible to improve the structural compactness of the barrier element 4 in the various conditions of use, making it possible to prevent the barrier element 4 from being deformed following radial compression for the insertion of the stopper 100 in the container.
  • In other versions (not shown), the barrier element 4 further comprises a further layer interposed between the barrier layer 42 and the adhesion layer 421 or the further adhesion layer 422 made from PET, or another appropriate material having a good chemical affinity with the materials used for the adjacent layers. The further layer is made from a material which may be stamped and may be provided with a stamp in order to personalize the stopper, for instance stamped PET.
  • The further layer may also further increase the barrier effect and the stability of the barrier elements 4.
  • The stopper 100 described with reference to Fig. 3 may be made, for instance, by firstly forming the barrier element 4 and then attaching it to the body 1 in order to cause the adhesion layer 421 to adhere to the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • If the barrier layer 42 is made from aluminium, a plasma deposition of aluminium powder may possibly be made on the adhesion layer or on the further adhesion layer, and the metal barrier layer then covered with the further adhesion layer or vice versa with the adhesion layer and the barrier element obtained lastly attached to the body 1. The plasma deposition of aluminium powder is preferably carried out under vacuum.
  • In a further embodiment, shown for instance in Figs. 4 and 5, the stopper 100 comprises a barrier device 40 in turn comprising a barrier element 4 formed, for instance, as one of the versions described with reference to the preceding drawings and preferably as one of the versions described with reference to Fig. 3, possibly provided with the further layer of PET, to which an additional barrier layer 43 shaped so as to encapsulate the previously formed barrier element 4 is applied.
  • The barrier device 40 may in particular comprise a barrier layer 42 made from aluminium, or its alloys, or from another ductile metal, for instance tin or copper or, as an alternative, from plastic films of polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), a very effective barrier polymer, and/or ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH); an adhesion layer 421 made from a polyolefin material such as PE or PP, EVA or even PET; a further adhesion layer 422 made from a polyolefin material, preferably high-barrier, normally PE or PP, EVA or even PET and a further barrier layer 43 formed as described below. The barrier device 40 may possibly comprise a further layer interposed between the barrier layer 42 and the adhesion layer 421 or the further adhesion layer 422 made from PET, or another material having good chemical affinity with the materials used for the adjacent layers.
  • In this case as well, the barrier element 4 may first be formed and then attached to the body 1 of the stopper 100 and then the further barrier layer 43 may be over-moulded on the barrier element 4.
  • The further barrier layer 43 is made from a material having a good affinity with the material of the body 1 of the stopper so as to obtain good adhesion between the further barrier layer 43 and the body 1 of the stopper.
  • The further barrier layer 43 is made from a material having a good affinity with the material of the further adhesion layer 422.
  • In a version, the further barrier layer 43 is made from isobutylene-based elastomers, preferably SIBS, or also from TPU and/or TPV, SEBS, or their polymer blends.
  • In one version, the further barrier layer 43 may be slightly expanded and/or mixed with PE in order farther to improve the adhesion of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 of the stopper 100. If the further barrier layer 43 is made from SIBS, 1.5-2% by weight of NaHCO3 may be added.
  • In another version, the further barrier layer 43 is made from the same material as the body 1 of the stopper 100 in order further to improve the adhesion of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 of the stopper 100. The further barrier layer 43 is injection moulded on the previously formed barrier element 4 so that the barrier element 4 is interposed and completely enclosed between the further barrier layer 43 and the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • In this way, it is possible to improve the structural cohesion of the stopper 100 in the various conditions of use, and in particular to prevent damage to and deformations of the barrier device 40 following the radial compression of the stopper 100.
  • This version also makes it possible to optimise the stability of the barrier device 40 on the body 1 of the stopper 100.
  • It is possible, in particular, to improve the adhesion of the barrier element 4 to the body 1, preventing undesirable detachments and/or radial deformations thereof when the stopper 100 is being used.
  • The presence of the further barrier layer 43, moreover, makes it possible further to increase the barrier effect which may be obtained, i.e. further to increase the impermeability to gases and aromatic substances that may be obtained with the stopper 100.
  • With this version of the stopper 100 it is also possible to increase the integrity of the product contained in the stoppered container.
  • In order to improve the adhesion of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1, the barrier element 4, in this version, is shaped such that it occupies a transverse surface portion 5" having a smaller extension than the extension of the normal transverse section 5', considered with reference to the longitudinal axis X of the body 1, so that an attachment area 6 for the further barrier layer 43 is defined on the base surface 3.
  • The barrier element 4 is in particular shaped such that an attachment area 6, shaped as a circular crown 6 to which the further barrier layer 43 is attached, is defined on the base surface 3 of the body 1.
  • In a preferred version, the circular crown 6 has a width of between 0.5 and 2% of the diameter of the body of the stopper, preferably approximately 1%.
  • In order further to increase the attachment of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 of the stopper 100, in the version of Fig. 5, the body 1 is tapered along the longitudinal axis X at the longitudinal end portion 3a. The latter therefore has a profile of generally frustoconical shape tapered along the longitudinal axis X, the base surface 3 forming the smaller base of the frustum having a smaller extension than the normal transverse section 5' of the body 1.
  • The smaller base of the frustum occupies a transverse surface portion 5" having a smaller extension than the extension of the normal transverse section 5'.
  • The barrier element 4, produced for instance in one of the ways discussed with reference to Fig. 3, is applied to the smaller base of the frustum 5". The further barrier layer 43 is applied to the body 1 so as to completely enclose, the barrier element 4. The further barrier layer 43 is attached to the lateral surface 3b of the frustum so as to surround the longitudinal end portion 3a and to be attached to the lateral surface 3b itself.
  • The lateral surface 3b of the frustum forms the attachment area 6 for the further barrier layer 43. The tapering takes place such that the lateral surface 3b is inclined with respect to the longitudinal axis by an angle α of between 25° and 75°.
  • This configuration makes it possible further to improve the attachment of the further barrier layer 43 to the body 1 and to obtain a stopper 100 with high mechanical properties.
  • In this case as well, the barrier element 4 is encapsulated between the body 1 of the stopper and the further barrier layer 43, obtaining a barrier device 40 having improved mechanical strength and improved performance.
  • In other versions, as shown for instance in Fig. 6, the stopper 100 comprises two separate barrier elements 4 produced in any one of the ways discussed above and attached to the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1 respectively.
  • Similarly, in versions which are not shown, the stopper of the invention may be provided with two separate barrier devices 40 produced in any one of the ways discussed above and provided at the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1.
  • This provides a stopper 100 having a symmetrical configuration and means that it is not necessary to control the orientation of the stopper 100 when it is being applied to the neck of a container.
  • The stopper 100, provided with the two barrier elements 4, or barrier devices 40, may be inserted at either end 2, 3 in the container for which it is intended, thereby facilitating and speeding up the stoppering process.
  • In some versions, for instance as shown in Fig. 7, the barrier element 4 is provided on a normal transverse section 5' of the body 1 disposed in an intermediate position along the longitudinal axis X between the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1.
  • In this version, the stopper 1 has two separate body portions 1a, 1b between which the barrier element 4 is interposed.
  • In another version (not shown), the barrier device 40 is provided on a normal transverse section 5 of the body 1 disposed in an intermediate longitudinal position between the two opposite base surfaces 2, 3 of the compressible body 1, the barrier device 40 having a smaller transverse section than the normal transverse section 5 of the body 1 so that the barrier device 40 is completely embedded in the body of the stopper.
  • In some versions (not shown), the barrier element 4 is provided with a plurality of holes provided in the barrier layer 42 and intended to enable the flow of gas through the stopper 100 to be regulated.
  • By varying the dimensions and/or the number and/or the density of the holes, it is possible to regulate the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) between the interior and the exterior of the container to which the stopper of the invention is applied.
  • It is also possible, by calibrating and dimensioning the holes, to obtain an oxygen exchange that varies in an almost continuous manner, thus providing a level of permeability defined in accordance with the type of wine, or in general the product contained in the bottle closed by the stopper.
  • In this way, it is possible to obtain a stopper which is suitable for closing bottles containing various types of beverage and in particular various types of wines.
  • The various wines, if they are to "age" correctly, in practice require different amounts of oxygen from outside. For the majority of white wines, a high oxygen barrier is for instance necessary, whereas red wines, depending on the grape variety and the type of vinification and ageing, may require an appropriate and variable amount of oxygen to achieve their maximum aromatic level.
  • In other versions (not shown) of the stopper of the invention, the barrier element 4 is attached to a transverse surface portion 5 corresponding to a zone of a transverse section of the body 1 of the stopper 100 having a smaller extension than the transverse section 5 thereof.
  • This makes it possible to limit the radial deformation of the barrier element 4 during the compression of the stopper 100 for its insertion into the bottle to be closed. The transverse surface portion lacking the barrier element 4 enables, moreover, some gas to pass through the stopper 100.
  • Fig. 8 shows a stopper 100' comprising a head 7 from which a body 1' substantially of cylindrical shape extends along the longitudinal axis X of the stopper 100'. The body may be made from one of the materials discussed above and the head 7 may be made from the same material as the body 1' or from a different material, usually a material with a different compressibility, preferably lower than the compressibility of the material of the body 1'.
  • The head 7 has a transverse section S1 of a greater extension than the transverse section 5 of the body 1'.
  • In the stoppers configured in this way, known as T-shaped stoppers, the barrier element 4' or respectively the barrier device 40' is provided at the base surface 3' of the compressible body 1' opposite the head 7, i.e. the barrier element 4' or respectively the barrier device is applied to the base surface 3' which is designed to face, in use, the interior of the container to which the stopper 100' is applied.
  • The barrier element 4' may be made in any one of the ways discussed above.
  • In a version (not shown), the T-shaped stopper 100' may also be provided with the barrier device made in any one of the ways discussed above.
  • A T-shaped stopper is thus obtained which prevents the passage of gas through the stopper. In this case as well, moreover, the barrier element 4' may be provided with holes designed to enable the flow of gas through the stopper 100' to be regulated.
  • The invention thus resolves the stated problem, and achieves many advantages, including that of providing a stopper having a barrier state in respect of gases and aromatic substances which is particularly effective in comparison with known stoppers.
  • The invention advantageously makes it possible in particular to obtain a stopper which is structurally very compact, preventing the contamination of the beverage contained in the container to which the stopper is applied.
  • According to the invention, a stopper is also obtained whose oxygen transfer rate may be appropriately varied by adapting the stopper to the particular oxygenation requirements specific to the various types of beverages which may be contained in the container closed by the stopper.

Claims (15)

  1. Stopper (100; 100') for closing a container, comprising a main body (1; 1') so shaped as to be removably housed and engaged in an opening of said container, and extending along a longitudinal axis (X) thereof between two opposed base surfaces (2, 3) which face the outside and the inside of the containers, respectively, when said main body (1; 1') is housed and engaged in said opening, said stopper (100; 100') comprising a barrier element (4; 4') made from a material with high impermeability to gases and provided on a transverse surface portion (5") on a base surface (3) of said stopper (100; 100') positioned transversely with respect to said longitudinal axis (X) so as to intercept the flow of gas through said stopper (100; 100'), said barrier element (4; 4') being intended to reduce the passage of gas through said stopper (100), said barrier element (4, 4') comprising a plastic barrier layer (41; 43) made from polyisobutylene-based elastomers, preferably SIBS and/or TPV and/or TPU, characterized in that it further comprises a further barrier layer (43) applied onto said barrier element (4) so that the latter is enclosed between said further barrier layer (43) and said body (1; 1'), said transverse surface portion (5") having a smaller extension than the transverse section (5') of said body (1; 1') so that an attachment area (6) for said further barrier layer (43) is defined on said base surface (3).
  2. Stopper (100; 100') for closing a container, comprising a main body (1; 1') shaped so as to be removably housed and engaged in an opening of said container, and extending along a longitudinal axis (X) thereof between two opposed base surfaces (2, 3) which face the outside and the inside of the containers, respectively, when said main body (1; 1') is housed and engaged in said opening, said stopper (100; 100') comprising a barrier element (4; 4') made from a material with high impermeability to gases and provided on a transverse surface portion (5") on a base surface (3) of said stopper (100; 100') positioned transversely with respect to said longitudinal axis (X) so as to intercept the flow of gas through said stopper (100; 100'), said barrier element (4; 4') being intended to reduce the passage of gas through said stopper (100), said barrier element (4; 4') comprising a barrier layer (42) made from aluminium and/or alloys thereof, or tin and/or alloys thereof, or EVOH, or PVDC, characterized in that it further comprises a further barrier layer (43) applied onto said barrier element (4) so that the latter is enclosed between said further barrier layer (43) and said body (1; 1'), said transverse surface portion (5") having a smaller extension than the transverse section (5') of said body (1; 1') so that an attachment area (6) for said further barrier layer (43) is defined on said base surface (3).
  3. Stopper according to claim 2, wherein said barrier element (4; 4') additionally comprises an adhesion layer (421) intended to be interposed, in use, between said body (1; 1') and said barrier layer (42), and intended to promote the adhesion of said barrier layer (42) to said body (1; 1').
  4. Stopper according to claim 3, wherein said barrier element (4; 4') additionally comprises a further adhesion layer (422) intended to be applied to said barrier layer (42), so that the latter is interposed between said adhesion layer (421) and said further adhesion layer (422).
  5. Stopper according to claim 3 or 4, wherein said adhesion layer (421) and/or said further adhesion layer (422) is made from a polyolefin material, or from the same material as that of which said body is made.
  6. Stopper according to any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein said adhesion layer (421) and/or said further adhesion layer (422) is made from PE, PP, PET or EVA.
  7. Stopper according to any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein said barrier layer (42) has a plurality of holes for regulating the flow of gas through said body (1; 1').
  8. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said transverse surface portion (5") is provided on at least one of said base surfaces (2, 3) of said body (1; 1').
  9. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, and comprising a first and a second barrier element (4, 4') provided on the two opposite base surfaces (2, 3) of said body (1,1').
  10. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said further barrier layer (43) is made from polyisobutylene-based elastomers, preferably from SIBS, or possibly TPU and/or TPV.
  11. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said further barrier layer (43) is made from elastomers similar to the material from which said body (1; 1') is made.
  12. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein a longitudinal end (3a) of said body (1; 1') is tapered so as to define said attachment area (6) for said further barrier layer (43) on said body (1, 1').
  13. Stopper according to the preceding claim, wherein said longitudinal end (3a) is tapered so as to define an attachment wall (3b) inclined with respect to said longitudinal axis (X) by an angle (α) of between 25° and 75°.
  14. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said compressible body (1) is of cylindrical shape and is made from polyethylene and/or polyolefin materials with metallocene catalysts, or styrene polymers such as SEBS.
  15. Stopper according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising a head (7) provided at the longitudinal end (2) of said body (1') which is intended to face, in use, towards the outside of said container to be closed with said stopper, said head (7) having a cross section (S1) whose extension is greater than that of the cross section (5) of said body (1').
EP14789415.8A 2013-10-08 2014-10-08 Stopper for closing containers Not-in-force EP3055219B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT000277A ITPD20130277A1 (en) 2013-10-08 2013-10-08 PERFECTED CAP FOR CONTAINERS
PCT/IB2014/065140 WO2015052659A1 (en) 2013-10-08 2014-10-08 Stopper for closing containers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3055219A1 EP3055219A1 (en) 2016-08-17
EP3055219B1 true EP3055219B1 (en) 2017-10-04

Family

ID=49596369

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14789415.8A Not-in-force EP3055219B1 (en) 2013-10-08 2014-10-08 Stopper for closing containers

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20160297572A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3055219B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2654194T3 (en)
IT (1) ITPD20130277A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2015052659A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR996152A (en) * 1949-09-12 1951-12-14 Improvement in bottle capping
DE3940461A1 (en) * 1989-12-07 1991-06-13 Pfefferkorn & Co Plastic stopper for e.g. wine bottles - consist of e.g. foam body in two halves joined together by horizontal gas barrier of e.g. foil coated each side with polyethylene
NZ529774A (en) 2001-07-04 2004-10-29 Procork Pty Ltd Container stopper
US20030102283A1 (en) * 2001-12-03 2003-06-05 Fox Robert W. Composite closure for removable insertion into wine or similar style bottle
AU2003900033A0 (en) * 2003-01-07 2003-01-23 Procork Pty Ltd Container stopper
EP1473241A1 (en) * 2003-04-30 2004-11-03 Vintec S.r.l Cork closure for bottles and corresponding production method
AU2003241069A1 (en) * 2003-05-26 2004-12-13 Nicola Fantin Structure of closure for closing liquid containers
WO2006130923A1 (en) * 2005-06-10 2006-12-14 Advanced Beverage Closures Pty Ltd A stopper with a foamed core and an outer skin
US20080078737A1 (en) * 2006-10-02 2008-04-03 Brennan Christopher H Unique wine flavor protector
US20090123766A1 (en) * 2007-11-13 2009-05-14 G3 Enterprises Modified barrier layers in liners for container closures, capable of providing varible, controlled oxygen ingress
EP2485957B1 (en) * 2009-10-09 2013-12-11 West Pharmaceutical Services Deutschland GmbH & Co. Kg Elastomeric closure with barrier layer and method for its manufacture
JP6243096B2 (en) * 2011-11-16 2017-12-06 株式会社大協精工 Rubber stopper for vial
US9211977B2 (en) * 2013-08-30 2015-12-15 Jack E. Elder Bottle closure having a wood top

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2015052659A1 (en) 2015-04-16
US20160297572A1 (en) 2016-10-13
ES2654194T3 (en) 2018-02-12
EP3055219A1 (en) 2016-08-17
ITPD20130277A1 (en) 2015-04-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
RU2562501C2 (en) Glass container with neck having internal thread
US8640898B2 (en) Closure cap comprising a seal gasket
AU716641B2 (en) Sealing disc for a closure cap for containers
EP1487710B1 (en) Stoppers
US6874648B2 (en) Closure with gas-barrier liner and package incorporating same
US20100116770A1 (en) Container for wine or similar beverage
CN107567475A (en) The container being made up of metal or plastics covers
US20030222046A1 (en) Plastic barrier closure and method of fabrication
MX2011010587A (en) Glued synthetic cork and method of manufacture.
EP3055219B1 (en) Stopper for closing containers
US20160347513A1 (en) Metallic screw cap for bottle
WO2010099566A1 (en) A sealing member for a closure
US20040234713A1 (en) Multilayer cap liner, container cap or neck comprising same, and methods for making same
EP2225165B1 (en) Bottle with cap which keeps the liquid contained in it effervescent and fresh even after partial consumption of the liquid
CN105745157A (en) Sealing disk for a closure cap for containers, especially bottles
EP1539603A1 (en) Closing stopper for containers
EP3099595B1 (en) Cap closure for carbonated and oxygen sensitive beverages
WO2006130923A1 (en) A stopper with a foamed core and an outer skin
EP1705127B1 (en) Synthetic stopper for glass bottles
EP1473241A1 (en) Cork closure for bottles and corresponding production method
WO2006077603A1 (en) Self-uncorking bottle cap
CN108163350A (en) A kind of seal bottle cap
JPH0735351U (en) Synthetic resin plug of bottle for carbonated drink
ZA200407979B (en) Stopper
WO2011020147A1 (en) A wine bottle closure arrangement, a wine bottle and closure arrangement and a method of closing and/or stoppering a wine bottle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160224

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170420

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 933781

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602014015471

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20171004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2654194

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20180212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 933781

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180104

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180104

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180204

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180105

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602014015471

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171008

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180705

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171008

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171008

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20180809

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20181019

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20181023

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20181123

Year of fee payment: 5

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20181008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20141008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602014015471

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200501

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171004

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191008

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20210301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191009