EP3036941A1 - Method for inter-rat reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method - Google Patents
Method for inter-rat reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said methodInfo
- Publication number
- EP3036941A1 EP3036941A1 EP14744490.5A EP14744490A EP3036941A1 EP 3036941 A1 EP3036941 A1 EP 3036941A1 EP 14744490 A EP14744490 A EP 14744490A EP 3036941 A1 EP3036941 A1 EP 3036941A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- uplink
- communication
- wireless
- conditions
- uplink communication
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 31
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 222
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000010259 detection of temperature stimulus Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000013021 overheating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001690 polydopamine Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
- H04W48/18—Selecting a network or a communication service
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/06—TPC algorithms
- H04W52/14—Separate analysis of uplink or downlink
- H04W52/146—Uplink power control
Definitions
- the invention relates to a wireless communication device (UE) configured to operate in a wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard e.g. GPRS, UMTS or LTE.
- a wireless technology standard e.g. GPRS, UMTS or LTE.
- the problem to be solved is the situation where such wireless communication devices might face service degradation when the connection to the currently operated network node is disturbed.
- Such network node can be a base station (BS), a nodeB or an eNodeB, or any other network node representing at least a cell of a cellular network.
- the inventive method comprises the following steps for the wireless communication device (user equipment, UE):
- the UE is first normally operating within the currently selected wireless cellular network.
- the UE needs to be registered to the network.
- wireless technology standard compliant methods need to be fulfilled.
- Such wireless technology standard compliant methods comprise first a synchronisation of the wireless communication unit of the UE, which is in particular a radio frequency unit connected to an antenna, with a network node representing at least one cell of the wireless cellular network.
- the UE is registered to the network. It does not matter if this registration was done right before the following steps of the inventive method or earlier. The following steps can even be performed after the UE was in connected mode, made inter-RAT reselections based on downlink communication conditions, made cell handovers etc.
- the UE is then operated in idle mode, that is no active connection or context is set up.
- the UE itself is responsible for maintaining the wireless connection to the wireless cellular network.
- the UE is repeatedly measuring the downlink communication conditions.
- criteria for the downlink communication conditions according to the wireless technology standards there are in particular analysed one or more of CPICH-Ec/lo or CPICH-RSCP (received signal power) in 3G, in 2G RXLEV (reception level) or in 4G RSRQ (reference signal received quality) and RSRP (reference signal received power).
- the invention proposes a step of monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions. Based on the at least one monitored parameter it is then decided if uplink communication conditions fulfil predefined uplink threshold values or not. While also monitoring the downlink communication conditions according to the invention, the device is then able to detect an imbalance situation.
- uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values while downlink communication conditions are correct, it is decided that an inter-RAT reselection is to be initiated. It means that all the necessary steps of leaving the current cell and network, searching for a new network and camping on a cell of the selected appropriate network need to be executed based on this decision.
- the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communications comprises executing attempts of uplink communication, detecting if the attempts are unsuccessful and after a predetermined number of unsuccessful uplink communication attempts the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication. Based on the set value of the monitored parameter, the decision is to be made if predefined threshold values for uplink communication are not met, and thus the inter-RAT reselection is initiated. In this embodiment a value of the monitored parameter indicating a certain amount of unsuccessful uplink communication attempts leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
- the execution of attempts for uplink communication comprises in particular communication on uplink channels from UE to the network, in particular connection request messages on RACH channel or reporting of downlink traffic load measurements or other reporting towards wireless cellular network, like location area registration area and/or tracking area updates (LAU, RAU and/or TAU) .
- Attempts are rated as being unsuccessful in case they are not properly responded by the network node resp. the wireless cellular network.
- the network node in response to a connection request message, the network node is expected to respond with at least a failure or a confirmation response that can be used for subsequent handling of the requested resources. Failure messages from the network node are designed that way that they can include an error cause for the failure of the uplink communbation.
- Uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values, when the counter for unsuccessful attempts reaches a predetermined threshold.
- This threshold can advantageously be oriented on other wireless technology standard compliant thresholds indicating continuous degradations like the RLT counter in 2G.
- the problem is addressed that on the one hand the counter for unsuccessful attempts can only be increased even when in the meantime the uplink communication conditions are good and no unsuccessful attempts appear, on the other hand that by just one successful attempt the counter for unsuccessful attempts is immediately reset.
- This is resolved with the inventive method by decreasing the counter for unsuccessful attempts in case of a successful attempt by a predetermined value.
- the predetermined value can range between 1 and up to the current amount of the counter, which would then again mean a full reduction in case of only one successful attempt.
- the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication.
- value the parameter is about to represent There are various options what value the parameter is about to represent. One option is to set the monitored parameter to the number of unsuccessful attempts. Another option would be to provide a simple boolean indication that the predefined threshold of unsuccessful attempts has been reached. The latter would relief the reselection decision unit from too much detail of the reasons of uplink communication degradation. In case more than one counter or other values are maintained indicating a degradation of uplink communication, then each of them can be represented in each one monitored parameter or a consolidated monitored parameter indicating the overall status of degradation of the uplink communication is ascertained.
- the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises the detection of change of temperature conditions prior to an attempt of uplink communbation.
- the temperature conditions need to be monitored by one or more appropriate temperature sensors, and an increase of temperature, if an uplink communication is envisaged would indicate an expected degradation of uplink communbation.
- the monitored parameter is then set to a value indicating the change of temperature conditions, e.g. the absolute temperature value, a value showing the amount of increase or a boolean value indicating that the absolute value or the rate of increase or both are higher than a predetermined threshold.
- a value indicating the change of temperature conditions e.g. the absolute temperature value, a value showing the amount of increase or a boolean value indicating that the absolute value or the rate of increase or both are higher than a predetermined threshold.
- One of the main reasons for a degradation of the uplink communication due to a temperature increase is the known behaviour of UEs in response to a detected temperature increase to perform a transmission of data to the network node with reduced TX power. This reduction can be restricted to a single wireless technology standard or be applied in a broader sense.
- the detection of reduction of output power for uplink communication at the UE, in particular the wireless communbation unit of the UE indicates the temperature increase. It explains why the uplink communication is degraded. Indeed the at least one monitored parameter can be set to a value indicating the reduction of output power.
- the indication of a reduction of output power and of current temperature increase is effectively congruent to show an evolution towards degraded uplink communication.
- the problem is solved that prior to starting a transmission of a remarkable amount of data the temperature conditions might still be in a calm area, which does not indicate the necessity of a reduction of output power, but during the transmission the temperature increase gets evident.
- the problem occurs that, in connected mode, it is not the UE to decide about technology or cell changes but the wireless cellular network. However this last does not take into account the temperature conditions.
- the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises detection of temperature conditions by way of prediction of a temperature increase during a scheduled service fulfilment.
- the kind of transmission e.g. streaming, voice call, packet oriented data upload etc.
- a value indicating a temperature increase, an expected absolute temperature etc. is calculated prior to the transmission, and the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating one of the predicted temperature increase, in particular the expected temperature or the expected temperature change rate, and/or an expected reduction of output power in response to the predicted temperature increase.
- the determined value of the monitored parameter indicating an expected temperature increase and/or an expected reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
- the prediction of temperature increase is preferably based on the currently required RACH power in comparison to a power required in the wireless technology of the wireless cellular network the UE is currently operating in for the scheduled service fulfilment.
- the prediction can in particular be made more accurately after a RACH resp. PRACH power ramping for 3G, which is an increase of transmit power of the PRACH preamble power steps while no response is received from the network node.
- a wireless cellular network supporting the right wireless technology standard can even be selected a priori, and therefore increase reliability of data transmission by the UE.
- a degradation of uplink communication can be detected by way of executing uplink communication attempts to the network node where the wireless communication device is currently registered to.
- Such uplink communbation attempts can be executed on one or more channels and/or carriers and can be such connection request messages or reporting messages as stated above.
- the network node provides responses to the UE it is still possible that a degradation of the uplink communication affected the communbation attempts.
- said responses from network nodes can include information about the received uplink power.
- the at least monitored parameter is set to a value indicating degradation or the amount of degradation of the contested carriers and/or channels of uplink communication. Within the decision step this value is considered and therefore it can be determined if uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
- This embodiment is advantageous compared to above embodiments due to the fact that even when the network node provides an accurate response to an uplink communication attempt it can be detected that uplink communication conditions are already degraded by a lower amount, which on the other hand can be an early indication for an imminent major disruption.
- the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions shows that uplink communbation conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values, it is decided to initiate an inter-RAT reselection.
- the addressed problem is only resolved if the targeted wireless cellular network provides better uplink communication conditions.
- a monitoring parameter representing temperature conditions or the subsequent reduction of output power it is therefore advantageous to select a network that support a wireless technology standard which can be operated with lower power consumption than the network where the UE is currently operating in.
- the identified target network is only selected if the downlink communication conditions for the respective wireless technology standard fulfil predefined second downlink threshold values.
- the second downlink threshold values represent a range in which the wireless cellular network is operable.
- the invention also concerns wireless devices that can represent various classes of devices capable of operating in wireless cellular networks.
- the inventive wireless communication device comprises a wireless communication unit, a monitoring unit, a communication condition judgement unit and a reselection decision unit.
- the wireless communication device is characterized in that the wireless network communication unit is configured to:
- the monitoring unit is configured to
- the communication condition judgement unit is configured to
- the reselection decision unit is configured to:
- the single mentioned units the wireless communication device comprises are implemented in units that fulfil a combination of the mentioned units or are software modules operated within one or more central processing units.
- the wireless communication device is further characterized in that on one hand the wireless network communication unit is configured to execute attempts of uplink communication, detect if the attempts are unsuccessful, after a predetermined number of unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication; and on the other hand the communbation condition judgement unit is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communbation leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
- wireless network communication unit detects those unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication. It is advantageous that for detection of an unsuccessful attempt of uplink communication wireless communication device is configured to determine that the network node does not reply properly in response to the uplink communication.
- wireless communication device further comprises a temperature condition sensor characterized in that the temperature condition sensor is configured to detect a change of temperature conditions, the wireless network communication unit is configured to reduce in response to the detected change of temperature condition the output power of uplink communication and set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating the reduction of output power; additionally the communication condition judgement unit is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
- wireless communication device is further characterized that the wireless network communbation unit is configured to execute attempts of uplink communication to the network node on certain channels and/or carriers, receive response from the network node comprising reporting of received power, compare used power for said uplink communication attempt and reported received power, if the difference of used power for uplink communication and reported received power exceeds a predetermined threshold set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating a degradation of certain carriers and/or channels of uplink communication; further the communbation condition judgement unit is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
- the reselection decision unit is configured to target a second wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard which can be operated with lower power consumption than the wireless cellular network, the wireless communication device is currently operating in, and for which second wireless cellular network communication condition judgement unit decided based on the measurements of wireless network communication unit, if downlink communication conditions fulfils predefined second downlink threshold values.
- the wireless communbation device is a device that includes a module for performing the wireless communication, also known as machine-to-machine (M2M) module or modem .
- M2M machine-to-machine
- the inventive methods can thus be executed either in the device or in the M2M module or tasks are shared between both.
- Another type of device can be a device which only integrates baseband chips and fully includes the control of all operations.
- Such devices can be mobile phones, tablets, PDAs etc.
- one or more embodiments comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims.
- Figure 1 schematic structure of a wireless communication device in relation to the network node of a wireless cellular network
- Figure 3 a flow chart showing the general steps of the inventive method DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
- Fig. 1 The situation where the invention comes into play is schematically sketched in Fig. 1 .
- a wireless communication device 20 to a network node 10 of a wireless cellular network (not shown) is shown. It can be seen, that the wireless communication device 20 is via its antenna 21 registered to the wireless cellular network represented by a network node 10 which usually is configured to cover at least one cell.
- the wireless communbation between the wireless communication device 20 and the network node 10 comprises a couple of channels, here collectively displayed as downlink channels 32 and uplink channels 31.
- the wireless communication device 20 is operated in idle mode, only such channels, which are in use during idle mode are to be considered.
- the downlink channels in idle mode are the BCCH, PCCH, and for uplink communication it is the RACH.
- the situation described in Fig. 1 shows, as a specific situation, a disturbance on the air interface between wireless communication device 20 and the network node 10, but instead of a common disturbance that affects all channels - e.g. when the wireless communbation device 20 moves too far away from the network node 10 - in this case only a disturbance of the uplink channels occurs, while the downlink channels are undisturbed and can therefore be operated without limitation.
- a disturbance on the air interface between wireless communication device 20 and the network node 10 in this case only a disturbance of the uplink channels occurs, while the downlink channels are undisturbed and can therefore be operated without limitation.
- the wireless technology standard it is even thinkable that only a subset of the available channels of the uplink channels is disturbed. This would lead to the same result, that the uplink direction of communication between wireless communication device 20 and network node 10 is disturbed.
- the inventive wireless communication device 20 is in an exemplary embodiment displayed in Fig 2 and shows one preferred architecture of the device covered by the invention.
- the wireless communication device 20 comprises at least an antenna 21 connected to a wireless network communication unit 210. It is arbitrary if the wireless network communication unit 210 is a full- featured M2M module or only the baseband chips including protocol stack for plainly doing the wireless communication. It is further possible to have more than one wireless network communbation unit 210 for supporting different wireless technology standards, or at least parts of it are available for each supported technology standard. It nevertheless requires that, with the wireless communication device 20 as such, at least two wireless technology standards are supported.
- the additionally available units of the wireless communication device 20 can be singularly available. They can also be implemented within a block or as separate functional blocks of a firmware. Further the units can partly or in total be included in the wireless network communication unit 210, in particular if this is formed by a M2M module.
- the wireless communication device 20 comprises a control unit 220 which further comprises at least a monitoring unit 230, a communbation condition judgement unit 240, a reselection decision unit 250, and a temperature prediction unit 260. Additionally the temperature prediction unit 260 is linked to a temperature condition sensor 270, which is typically formed by a temperature sensor.
- Fig. 3 shows in a flow chart an exemplary procedure according to the inventive method. It starts with the step 300 of registering the wireless communication device 20 in the wireless cellular network, by way of building up a connection to a network node 10, walking through synchronisation and authentication steps (not displayed). The wireless communication device 20 is at the end of step 300 successfully registered to one wireless cellular network supporting a defined wireless technology standard.
- step 300 Between step 300 and step 310 many interactions can happen, including call setup, data connection etc.
- step 310 indeed the wireless communication device is operated in idle mode that means no connection is setup and a certain bouquet of uplink and downlink channels available only in idle mode are at hand. These steps are handled by wireless network communication unit 210.
- step 320 downlink communication conditions are detected. This can consist of listening to common downlink channels, and measuring respective power or deriving corresponding quality.
- step 330 it is examined if a degradation of downlink channels can be detected. This is the case if at least one of the measures does not match certain threshold for the particular measurement. These thresholds are usually even dependant of the wireless technology standard of the current wireless cellular network. If degradation is detected, the procedure jumps down to step 360, but the inventive method focuses on the situation if no degradation is detected in downlink communication. Only in this case the uplink communication conditions are examined in step 340 by the monitoring unit 230.
- the current temperature is measured, in particular by way of getting input from the temperature condition sensor 270. This temperature indicates then a reduction of output power under the condition that now a data transmission be started. Therefore this can lead to the assumptions that uplink communication conditions are degraded.
- step 350 it is now to decide by the communbation condition judgement unit 240 if an imbalance between uplink and downlink communication conditions is present. This is then the case if the downlink communication conditions are not disturbed but the uplink communication conditions are disturbed (if downlink communication conditions are disturbed, step 350 will not be reached, this is therefore not a possible scenario).
- the communication condition judgment unit 240 If an imbalance is detected by the communication condition judgment unit 240, this shows that the uplink communication conditions are bad, but the downlink communbation conditions are not, and therefore a successful communication within the current wireless cellular network are likely not successfully executed. Thus an inter-RAT reselection is then to be initiated, provided that another wireless cellular network without service degradations is available. This step is preferably executed by the reselection decision unit 260. With regards to a temperature driven uplink communication condition degradation, it is further advantageous if the target wireless cellular network supports a wireless technology standard which requires less output power than the one of the currently used wireless cellular network.
- a switch from a 3G network to a 2G network can solve the uplink problem and allow the wireless communication device to perform the envisaged data transmission even if the temperature conditions are such that within 3G the data transmission would fail.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a wireless communication device (UE) configured to be operating in a wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard. For solving the problem of blockage of the UE in regards with one cellular network the UE makes a comparison of communication conditions in downlink and in uplink in order to detect unbalanced communication conditions between downlink and uplink channels and,in case downlink communication conditions are acceptable, but uplink communication conditions show a degradation, initiate aninter-RAT reselection.
Description
Method for Inter-RAT reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions
and device for executing said method
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a wireless communication device (UE) configured to operate in a wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard e.g. GPRS, UMTS or LTE. The problem to be solved is the situation where such wireless communication devices might face service degradation when the connection to the currently operated network node is disturbed. Such network node can be a base station (BS), a nodeB or an eNodeB, or any other network node representing at least a cell of a cellular network. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Within the wireless technology standards it is defined, that communication conditions are measured in the UE and in case of being operated in connected mode, UE provides its measurements via network node to the respective wireless cellular network, which then decides about changes of cell (handover) or of technology (inter-RAT handover). In case of being operated in idle mode the UE still makes measurements and makes decisions on its own over reselection and inter-RAT reselection. This defined procedure known from wireless technology standard definition has some drawbacks due to the fact that decisions about a reselection are based on measurements concerning the downlink (DL) channels only.
There is by now no solution known, which solves the problem if uplink (UL) channel conditions are disturbed while downlink channel conditions are within the acceptable range. This leads to the situation that the UE is stuck to a network node representing a cell of the wireless cellular network although the communication conditions are in a situation where no reasonable service provision is possible.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is a goal of present invention to solve the addressed problem. For this it is suggested a method for providing seamless communication of a wireless communication device operating within a wireless cellular network according to claim 1 . It is further suggested a wireless communication device according to claim 13.
The inventive method comprises the following steps for the wireless communication device (user equipment, UE):
Registering to a cell of the wireless cellular network by communicating with a network node representing at least said cell,
- Operating in idle mode
Receiving downlink communication from the network node,
Measuring communication conditions of downlink communication
Deciding based on measurements that downlink communication conditions fulfil predefined downlink threshold values
- Monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions,
Deciding based on the at least one monitored parameter that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values
In such a case initiating an inter-RAT reselection.
According to this method, the UE is first normally operating within the currently selected wireless cellular network. In order to do this, the UE needs to be registered to the network. In order to do this, wireless technology standard compliant methods need to be fulfilled. Such wireless technology standard compliant methods comprise first a synchronisation of the wireless communication unit of the UE, which is in particular a radio frequency unit connected to an antenna, with a network node representing at least one cell of the wireless cellular network. After further steps including exchange of authentication information, the UE is registered to the network. It does not matter if this registration was done right before the following steps of the inventive method or earlier. The following steps can even be performed after the UE was in connected mode, made inter-RAT reselections based on downlink communication conditions, made cell handovers etc.
Typically the UE is then operated in idle mode, that is no active connection or context is set up. As a consequence the UE itself is responsible for maintaining the wireless connection to the wireless
cellular network. In order to do so, the UE is repeatedly measuring the downlink communication conditions. As criteria for the downlink communication conditions according to the wireless technology standards there are in particular analysed one or more of CPICH-Ec/lo or CPICH-RSCP (received signal power) in 3G, in 2G RXLEV (reception level) or in 4G RSRQ (reference signal received quality) and RSRP (reference signal received power).
It is mandatory in order to solve the addressed problems to detect an imbalance between the uplink conditions and the downlink conditions. For that the invention proposes a step of monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions. Based on the at least one monitored parameter it is then decided if uplink communication conditions fulfil predefined uplink threshold values or not. While also monitoring the downlink communication conditions according to the invention, the device is then able to detect an imbalance situation.
In case the uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values while downlink communication conditions are correct, it is decided that an inter-RAT reselection is to be initiated. It means that all the necessary steps of leaving the current cell and network, searching for a new network and camping on a cell of the selected appropriate network need to be executed based on this decision.
There are various ways to detect degraded uplink communbation conditions.
In an advantageous embodiment, the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communications comprises executing attempts of uplink communication, detecting if the attempts are unsuccessful and after a predetermined number of unsuccessful uplink communication attempts the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication. Based on the set value of the monitored parameter, the decision is to be made if predefined threshold values for uplink communication are not met, and thus the inter-RAT reselection is initiated. In this embodiment a value of the monitored parameter indicating a certain amount of unsuccessful uplink communication attempts leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
The execution of attempts for uplink communication comprises in particular communication on uplink channels from UE to the network, in particular connection request messages on RACH channel or reporting of downlink traffic load measurements or other reporting towards wireless cellular network, like location area registration area and/or tracking area updates (LAU, RAU and/or TAU) .
Attempts are rated as being unsuccessful in case they are not properly responded by the network node resp. the wireless cellular network. In particular, in response to a connection request message, the network node is expected to respond with at least a failure or a confirmation response that can be used for subsequent handling of the requested resources. Failure messages from the network node are designed that way that they can include an error cause for the failure of the uplink communbation. This gives an indication of a degradation of uplink communication, and thus can be counted as unsuccessful attempt of uplink communication. If no response at all is received from the network node within a predetermined timeframe, then the attempt is counted as unsuccessful and a counter for unsuccessful attempts is increased. The same applies if a wrong response from the network node is received, which is not expected to be received upon the request. This is an indication for a misread request from the UE to the network node.
Uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values, when the counter for unsuccessful attempts reaches a predetermined threshold. This threshold can advantageously be oriented on other wireless technology standard compliant thresholds indicating continuous degradations like the RLT counter in 2G.
In a further advantageous embodiment, the problem is addressed that on the one hand the counter for unsuccessful attempts can only be increased even when in the meantime the uplink communication conditions are good and no unsuccessful attempts appear, on the other hand that by just one successful attempt the counter for unsuccessful attempts is immediately reset. This is resolved with the inventive method by decreasing the counter for unsuccessful attempts in case of a successful attempt by a predetermined value. The predetermined value can range between 1 and up to the current amount of the counter, which would then again mean a full reduction in case of only one successful attempt.
When the counter for unsuccessful attempts reaches the predefined threshold, the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication. There are various options what value the parameter is about to represent. One option is to set the monitored parameter to the number of unsuccessful attempts. Another option would be to provide a simple boolean indication that the predefined threshold of unsuccessful attempts has been reached. The latter would relief the reselection decision unit from too much detail of the reasons of uplink communication degradation. In case more than one counter or other values are maintained indicating a degradation of uplink communication, then each of them can be represented in each one monitored parameter or a consolidated monitored parameter indicating the overall status of degradation of the uplink
communication is ascertained. With respect to the latter option the same advantages as stated above apply- In another advantageous embodiment, the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises the detection of change of temperature conditions prior to an attempt of uplink communbation. For this the temperature conditions need to be monitored by one or more appropriate temperature sensors, and an increase of temperature, if an uplink communication is envisaged would indicate an expected degradation of uplink communbation.
One of the reasons for this situation of temperature conditions change can be an overheating situation on side of the UE. In particular when the UE is about to send data to the network node, a remarkable amount of power is needed, which can lead to an overheating situation. The monitored parameter is then set to a value indicating the change of temperature conditions, e.g. the absolute temperature value, a value showing the amount of increase or a boolean value indicating that the absolute value or the rate of increase or both are higher than a predetermined threshold.
One of the main reasons for a degradation of the uplink communication due to a temperature increase is the known behaviour of UEs in response to a detected temperature increase to perform a transmission of data to the network node with reduced TX power. This reduction can be restricted to a single wireless technology standard or be applied in a broader sense.
Therefore in a further embodiment, the detection of reduction of output power for uplink communication at the UE, in particular the wireless communbation unit of the UE, indicates the temperature increase. It explains why the uplink communication is degraded. Indeed the at least one monitored parameter can be set to a value indicating the reduction of output power. For the decision step, if uplink communication conditions fulfil predefined uplink threshold, the indication of a reduction of output power and of current temperature increase is effectively congruent to show an evolution towards degraded uplink communication. In a further advantageous embodiment, the problem is solved that prior to starting a transmission of a remarkable amount of data the temperature conditions might still be in a calm area, which does not indicate the necessity of a reduction of output power, but during the transmission the temperature increase gets evident. Here the problem occurs that, in connected mode, it is not the UE to decide about technology or cell changes but the wireless cellular network. However this last does not take into account the temperature conditions. Currently, there is moreover no means to inform the wireless
cellular network about potential critical conditions. This leads to a massive reduction of output power and at the end of the day in a breakdown of communication or even registration, but not to a change to a wireless technology standard in which the envisaged data transmission could be effected even in the current temperature conditions. The problem is addressed by the inventive method wherein the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises detection of temperature conditions by way of prediction of a temperature increase during a scheduled service fulfilment. For this the kind of envisaged service, in particular the amount of data to be transmitted, the kind of transmission, e.g. streaming, voice call, packet oriented data upload etc. is taken into account and based on that a value indicating a temperature increase, an expected absolute temperature etc. is calculated prior to the transmission, and the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating one of the predicted temperature increase, in particular the expected temperature or the expected temperature change rate, and/or an expected reduction of output power in response to the predicted temperature increase.
The determined value of the monitored parameter indicating an expected temperature increase and/or an expected reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
The prediction of temperature increase is preferably based on the currently required RACH power in comparison to a power required in the wireless technology of the wireless cellular network the UE is currently operating in for the scheduled service fulfilment. The prediction can in particular be made more accurately after a RACH resp. PRACH power ramping for 3G, which is an increase of transmit power of the PRACH preamble power steps while no response is received from the network node. Once the device receives a positive indication from the network node, the necessary power for a successful payload transmission is known and based on this it can be derived which energy is required for a given amount of data to be uploaded and how the temperature situation will be affected by this. For 2G the indicated uplink power after a RACH exchange can be used.
With this embodiment a wireless cellular network supporting the right wireless technology standard can even be selected a priori, and therefore increase reliability of data transmission by the UE.
Furthermore asymmetric network conditions could also cause situation where the downlink is detectable but the uplink is disturbed due to load or interference conditions which may even be existing on purpose in the uplink direction In another embodiment a degradation of uplink communication can
be detected by way of executing uplink communication attempts to the network node where the wireless communication device is currently registered to. Such uplink communbation attempts can be executed on one or more channels and/or carriers and can be such connection request messages or reporting messages as stated above. In the event that the network node provides responses to the UE it is still possible that a degradation of the uplink communication affected the communbation attempts.
It is known that said responses from network nodes can include information about the received uplink power. By comparing the reported received uplink power with the used power for uplink communication it can be detected that a material reduction of power has happened. If this reduction exceeds a certain predefined threshold then the at least monitored parameter is set to a value indicating degradation or the amount of degradation of the contested carriers and/or channels of uplink communication. Within the decision step this value is considered and therefore it can be determined if uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
This embodiment is advantageous compared to above embodiments due to the fact that even when the network node provides an accurate response to an uplink communication attempt it can be detected that uplink communication conditions are already degraded by a lower amount, which on the other hand can be an early indication for an imminent major disruption.
When the step of monitoring at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions shows that uplink communbation conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values, it is decided to initiate an inter-RAT reselection. By doing so the addressed problem is only resolved if the targeted wireless cellular network provides better uplink communication conditions. With respect to a monitoring parameter representing temperature conditions or the subsequent reduction of output power it is therefore advantageous to select a network that support a wireless technology standard which can be operated with lower power consumption than the network where the UE is currently operating in.
To facilitate the selection it is advantageous to provide a table of standards and/or networks indicating the power consumption for at least one special reference service operated in this network. By this it is possible to quickly detect if a found network will help. In particular with respect to areas where now at least three major wireless technology standards (GSM, UMTS, LTE) are operated, an appropriate reaction on the network conditions can be selected. The method can further be enhanced by considering further substandards like EDGE, GPRS for 2G, HSPA, CDMA, 1 xRTT etc. for 3G and LTE standard / advanced for 4G networks plus a distinction with respect to the used frequency range per wireless technology standard or substandard.
Finally the identified target network is only selected if the downlink communication conditions for the respective wireless technology standard fulfil predefined second downlink threshold values. Due to the fact that, for each wireless technology standard, different network condition parameters are defined, a different set of threshold values per wireless technology standard is maintained. Hence the second downlink threshold values represent a range in which the wireless cellular network is operable. Provided that the target network fulfills the predefined second downlink threshold values, the switch to the target network can then be initiated.
The invention also concerns wireless devices that can represent various classes of devices capable of operating in wireless cellular networks. The inventive wireless communication device comprises a wireless communication unit, a monitoring unit, a communication condition judgement unit and a reselection decision unit. The wireless communication device is characterized in that the wireless network communication unit is configured to:
register to a cell of wireless cellular network by communicating with a network node representing at least said cell
- operate in idle mode,
receive downlink communication from the network node,
measure communbation conditions of downlink communication;
the monitoring unit is configured to
monitor at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions;
the communication condition judgement unit is configured to
decide based on the measurements of wireless network communication unit, if downlink communication conditions fulfil predefined downlink threshold values,
decide based on the at least one monitored parameter that uplink communbation conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values;
further the reselection decision unit is configured to:
initiate an inter-RAT reselection in case communication condition judgement unit decided that downlink communication conditions fulfil predefined downlink threshold values and uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
It is of course possible and part of the invention that the single mentioned units the wireless communication device comprises are implemented in units that fulfil a combination of the mentioned units or are software modules operated within one or more central processing units.
ln an advantageous embodiment the wireless communication device is further characterized in that on one hand the wireless network communication unit is configured to execute attempts of uplink communication, detect if the attempts are unsuccessful, after a predetermined number of unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication; and on the other hand the communbation condition judgement unit is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communbation leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
It is arbitrary how the wireless network communication unit detects those unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication. It is advantageous that for detection of an unsuccessful attempt of uplink communication wireless communication device is configured to determine that the network node does not reply properly in response to the uplink communication.
In a further advantageous embodiment wireless communication device further comprises a temperature condition sensor characterized in that the temperature condition sensor is configured to detect a change of temperature conditions, the wireless network communication unit is configured to reduce in response to the detected change of temperature condition the output power of uplink communication and set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating the reduction of output power; additionally the communication condition judgement unit is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
According to another advantageous embodiment wireless communication device is further characterized that the wireless network communbation unit is configured to execute attempts of uplink communication to the network node on certain channels and/or carriers, receive response from the network node comprising reporting of received power, compare used power for said uplink communication attempt and reported received power, if the difference of used power for uplink communication and reported received power exceeds a predetermined threshold set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating a degradation of certain carriers and/or channels of uplink communication; further the communbation condition judgement unit is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
ln a further advantageous embodiment the reselection decision unit is configured to target a second wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard which can be operated with lower power consumption than the wireless cellular network, the wireless communication device is currently operating in, and for which second wireless cellular network communication condition judgement unit decided based on the measurements of wireless network communication unit, if downlink communication conditions fulfils predefined second downlink threshold values.
In an advantageous embodiment, the wireless communbation device is a device that includes a module for performing the wireless communication, also known as machine-to-machine (M2M) module or modem . The inventive methods can thus be executed either in the device or in the M2M module or tasks are shared between both. Another type of device can be a device which only integrates baseband chips and fully includes the control of all operations. Such devices can be mobile phones, tablets, PDAs etc.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, one or more embodiments comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects and are indicative of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the embodiments may be employed. Other advantages and novel features will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings and the disclosed embodiments are intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents.
In the annexed drawings, figures 1 -3 show:
Figure 1 schematic structure of a wireless communication device in relation to the network node of a wireless cellular network
Figure 2 schematic structure of the inventive wireless communication device
Figure 3 a flow chart showing the general steps of the inventive method
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
The situation where the invention comes into play is schematically sketched in Fig. 1 . Here the relationship of a wireless communication device 20 to a network node 10 of a wireless cellular network (not shown) is shown. It can be seen, that the wireless communication device 20 is via its antenna 21 registered to the wireless cellular network represented by a network node 10 which usually is configured to cover at least one cell.
The wireless communbation between the wireless communication device 20 and the network node 10 comprises a couple of channels, here collectively displayed as downlink channels 32 and uplink channels 31. As, according to the invention, the wireless communication device 20 is operated in idle mode, only such channels, which are in use during idle mode are to be considered. E.g. for 3G networks the downlink channels in idle mode are the BCCH, PCCH, and for uplink communication it is the RACH.
The situation described in Fig. 1 shows, as a specific situation, a disturbance on the air interface between wireless communication device 20 and the network node 10, but instead of a common disturbance that affects all channels - e.g. when the wireless communbation device 20 moves too far away from the network node 10 - in this case only a disturbance of the uplink channels occurs, while the downlink channels are undisturbed and can therefore be operated without limitation. In dependence of the wireless technology standard it is even thinkable that only a subset of the available channels of the uplink channels is disturbed. This would lead to the same result, that the uplink direction of communication between wireless communication device 20 and network node 10 is disturbed.
The inventive wireless communication device 20 is in an exemplary embodiment displayed in Fig 2 and shows one preferred architecture of the device covered by the invention.
The wireless communication device 20 comprises at least an antenna 21 connected to a wireless network communication unit 210. It is arbitrary if the wireless network communication unit 210 is a full- featured M2M module or only the baseband chips including protocol stack for plainly doing the wireless communication. It is further possible to have more than one wireless network communbation unit 210 for supporting different wireless technology standards, or at least parts of it are available for each supported technology standard. It nevertheless requires that, with the wireless communication device 20 as such, at least two wireless technology standards are supported.
The additionally available units of the wireless communication device 20 can be singularly available. They can also be implemented within a block or as separate functional blocks of a firmware. Further the units can partly or in total be included in the wireless network communication unit 210, in particular if this is formed by a M2M module. In the displayed exemplary embodiment, the wireless communication device 20 comprises a control unit 220 which further comprises at least a monitoring unit 230, a communbation condition judgement unit 240, a reselection decision unit 250, and a temperature prediction unit 260. Additionally the temperature prediction unit 260 is linked to a temperature condition sensor 270, which is typically formed by a temperature sensor. Fig. 3 shows in a flow chart an exemplary procedure according to the inventive method. It starts with the step 300 of registering the wireless communication device 20 in the wireless cellular network, by way of building up a connection to a network node 10, walking through synchronisation and authentication steps (not displayed). The wireless communication device 20 is at the end of step 300 successfully registered to one wireless cellular network supporting a defined wireless technology standard. Between step 300 and step 310 many interactions can happen, including call setup, data connection etc. In step 310 indeed the wireless communication device is operated in idle mode that means no connection is setup and a certain bouquet of uplink and downlink channels available only in idle mode are at hand. These steps are handled by wireless network communication unit 210.
Whenever the wireless communbation device 20 is in idle mode, the next steps are to be performed, starting with step 320 where downlink communication conditions are detected. This can consist of listening to common downlink channels, and measuring respective power or deriving corresponding quality. As a result of the measures in step 320, in step 330, it is examined if a degradation of downlink channels can be detected. This is the case if at least one of the measures does not match certain threshold for the particular measurement. These thresholds are usually even dependant of the wireless technology standard of the current wireless cellular network.
If degradation is detected, the procedure jumps down to step 360, but the inventive method focuses on the situation if no degradation is detected in downlink communication. Only in this case the uplink communication conditions are examined in step 340 by the monitoring unit 230. As part of this examination certain embodiments described above are available. For the shown example here the current temperature is measured, in particular by way of getting input from the temperature condition sensor 270. This temperature indicates then a reduction of output power under the condition that now a data transmission be started. Therefore this can lead to the assumptions that uplink communication conditions are degraded.
In step 350 it is now to decide by the communbation condition judgement unit 240 if an imbalance between uplink and downlink communication conditions is present. This is then the case if the downlink communication conditions are not disturbed but the uplink communication conditions are disturbed (if downlink communication conditions are disturbed, step 350 will not be reached, this is therefore not a possible scenario).
If no imbalance is detected by the communication condition judgement unit 240, which means uplink communication conditions are undisturbed the procedure jumps again to step 310 and after a certain predetermined time the described steps start anew.
If an imbalance is detected by the communication condition judgment unit 240, this shows that the uplink communication conditions are bad, but the downlink communbation conditions are not, and therefore a successful communication within the current wireless cellular network are likely not successfully executed. Thus an inter-RAT reselection is then to be initiated, provided that another wireless cellular network without service degradations is available. This step is preferably executed by the reselection decision unit 260. With regards to a temperature driven uplink communication condition degradation, it is further advantageous if the target wireless cellular network supports a wireless technology standard which requires less output power than the one of the currently used wireless cellular network. For example, a switch from a 3G network to a 2G network can solve the uplink problem and allow the wireless communication device to perform the envisaged data transmission even if the temperature conditions are such that within 3G the data transmission would fail.
ln the above detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the invention, although different, are not necessarily mutually exclusive.. In addition, it is to be understood that the location or arrangement of individual elements within the disclosed embodiment may be modified without departing from the invention. The above detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, appropriately interpreted, along with the full range of equivalents to which the claims are entitled.
Claims
Method for providing seamless communication of a wireless communication device (20) operating within a wireless cellular network, the method including the steps for the wireless communication device (20):
- registering (300) to a cell of the wireless cellular network by communicating with a network node (10) representing at least said cell,
- operating (310) in idle mode,
- receiving downlink communication from the network node (10),
- measuring (320) communication conditions of downlink communication,
- deciding (330) based on measurement that downlink communbation conditions fulfil predefined downlink threshold values,
- monitoring (340) at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions,
- deciding (350) based on the at least one monitored parameter that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values,
- in such case initiating (360) an inter-RAT reselection.
Method according to claim 1 ,
wherein the step of monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises:
- executing attempts of uplink communbation,
- detecting if the attempts are unsuccessful,
- after a predetermined number of unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication,
- and wherein the step of deciding based on the monitored parameter comprises that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Method according to claim 2, wherein
wireless communication device (20) is detecting unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication in case said network node (20) does not reply properly in response to the uplink communication.
Method according to claim 1 ,
wherein the step of monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises detection of change of temperature conditions prior to an attempt of uplink communbation,
the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating the change of temperature conditions,
- and wherein the step of deciding based on the monitored parameter comprises that value indicating a change of temperature conditions in terms of temperature increase leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Method according to claim 1 ,
wherein the step of monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions comprises
detection of reduction of output power of uplink communication,
after a reduction of output power the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating the reduction of output power,
- and wherein the step of deciding based on the monitored parameter comprises that a value indicating a reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Method according to claim 1 , wherein
wherein monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communbation conditions comprises detection of temperature conditions by way of a prediction of a temperature increase during a scheduled service fulfilment,
and the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating one of:
- a predicted temperature increase and/or,
- a reduction of output power in response to predicted temperature increase,
- and wherein the step of deciding based on the monitored parameter comprises that a value indicating a predicted temperature increase or a reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
7. Method according to claim 6, wherein
prediction of temperature increase is based on currently required RACH power in
comparison to a power required in the wireless technology of the wireless cellular network the wireless communication device (20) is currently operating in for the scheduled service fulfilment.
Method according to claim 1 ,
wherein monitoring of at least one parameter relative to uplink communbation conditions comprises executing uplink communication attempts to the network node (10) on certain channels and/or carriers, receiving of response from the network node (10) comprising reporting of received power and comparing used power for said uplink communication attempt and reported received power,
the at least one monitored parameter is set to a value indicating a degradation of certain carriers and/or channels of uplink communication if the difference of used power for uplink communication and reported received power exceeds a
predetermined threshold,
- and wherein the step of deciding based on the monitored parameter comprises that a value indicating a degradation of certain carriers and/or channels leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Method according to claim 1 , wherein
the inter-RAT cell-reselection is targeting a second wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard which can be operated with lower power consumption than the wireless cellular network, the wireless communication device (20) is currently operating in, and which downlink communication conditions fulfil predefined second downlink threshold values.
Wireless communication device (20),
comprising a wireless network communication unit (210), a monitoring unit (230), a communication condition judgement unit (240) and a reselection decision unit (250), characterized in that
the wireless network communication unit (20) is configured to:
- register to a cell of wireless cellular network by communicating with a network node (10) representing at least said cell,
- operate in idle mode,
- receive downlink communication from the network node (10),
- measure communication conditions of downlink communication,
th e monitoring unit (230) is configured to
- monitor at least one parameter relative to uplink communication conditions, the communication condition judgement unit (240) is configured to,
- decide based on the measurements of wireless network communication unit (210), if downlink communication conditions fulfil predefined downlink threshold values,
- decide based on the at least one monitored parameter that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values,
the reselection decision unit (250) is configured to:
- initiate an inter-RAT reselection in case communication condition judgement unit (240) decided that downlink communication conditions fulfil predefined downlink threshold values and uplink communbation conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Wireless communication device (20) according to claim 10,
characterized in that the wireless network communication unit (210) is configured to:
- execute attempts of uplink communication,
- detect if the attempts are unsuccessful,
- after a predetermined number of unsuccessful attempts of uplink communication set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication,
the communication condition judgement unit (240) is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Wireless communication device (20) according to claim 1 1 ,
characterized in that for detection of an unsuccessful attempt of uplink communbation wireless communication device (20) is configured to determine that the network node (10) does not reply properly in response to the uplink communication.
13. Wireless communication device according to claim 10,
further comprising a temperature condition sensor (270),
characterized in that
- the temperature condition sensor (270) is configured to detect a change of temperature conditions,
- the wireless network communication unit (210) is configured to reduce in response to the detected change of temperature condition the output power of uplink
communication, and
- set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating the reduction of output power,
the communication condition judgement unit (240) is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communbation conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Wireless communication device (20) according to claim 10,
further comprising an temperature prediction unit (260),
characterized in that
- the temperature prediction unit (260) is configured to predict a temperature increase during a scheduled service fulfilment, and
- set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating one of:
- a predicted temperature increase, and/or
- a reduction of output power in response to predicted temperature increase, the communication condition judgement unit (240) is configured to decide based on the monitored parameter that a value indicating a predicted temperature increase or a reduction of output power leads to the decision that uplink communbation conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Wireless communication device (20) according to claim 10,
characterized in that the wireless network communication unit (210) is configured to:
- execute attempts of uplink communication to the network node (10) on certain channels and/or carriers,
- receive response from the network node (10) comprising reporting of received power
- compare used power for said uplink communication attempt and reported received power,
- if the difference of used power for uplink communication and reported received power exceeds a predetermined threshold, set the at least one monitored parameter to a value indicating a degradation of certain carriers and/or channels of uplink communication,
the communication condition judgement unit (240) is configured to decide based on
the monitored parameter that a value indicating a degradation of uplink communication leads to the decision that uplink communication conditions do not fulfil predefined uplink threshold values.
Wireless communication device (20) according to claim 10,
characterized in that the reselection decision unit (250) is configured to:
- target a second wireless cellular network supporting a wireless technology standard which can be operated with lower power consumption than the wireless cellular network, the wireless communbation device (20) is currently operating in, and for which second wireless cellular network the communication condition judgement unit (240) decided based on the measurements of wireless network communication unit (210), if downlink communication conditions fulfils predefined second downlink threshold values.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP14744490.5A EP3036941B1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2014-07-16 | Method for inter-rat reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP13181075.6A EP2840840A1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2013-08-20 | Method for Inter-RAT reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
| PCT/EP2014/065220 WO2015024713A1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2014-07-16 | Method for inter-rat reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
| EP14744490.5A EP3036941B1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2014-07-16 | Method for inter-rat reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP3036941A1 true EP3036941A1 (en) | 2016-06-29 |
| EP3036941B1 EP3036941B1 (en) | 2018-12-19 |
Family
ID=49035341
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP13181075.6A Withdrawn EP2840840A1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2013-08-20 | Method for Inter-RAT reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
| EP14744490.5A Active EP3036941B1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2014-07-16 | Method for inter-rat reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP13181075.6A Withdrawn EP2840840A1 (en) | 2013-08-20 | 2013-08-20 | Method for Inter-RAT reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US9615304B2 (en) |
| EP (2) | EP2840840A1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN105474708B (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2716108T3 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2015024713A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP3348088B1 (en) | 2015-09-07 | 2019-04-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Mitigation of uplink/downlink assymetry |
| US10623149B2 (en) * | 2017-01-24 | 2020-04-14 | Mediatek Inc. | Blockage detection in millimeter wave radio communications |
| US10193602B1 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2019-01-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Thermal throttling using RF diversity |
| US20200068482A1 (en) | 2018-08-27 | 2020-02-27 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Variable interval signal scanning in dual connectivity communication networks |
| US11116030B2 (en) | 2019-04-29 | 2021-09-07 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | 5G wireless network connection symbol policy |
| US11102627B1 (en) | 2020-02-14 | 2021-08-24 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Service type symbols |
| US11382106B2 (en) | 2020-04-22 | 2022-07-05 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Network symbol display for dual connectivity networks |
| US11950123B2 (en) | 2021-12-27 | 2024-04-02 | T-Mobile Usa, Inc. | Automated network state auditor |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6615044B2 (en) * | 2001-06-06 | 2003-09-02 | Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd. | Method of WCDMA coverage based handover triggering |
| EP2197236B1 (en) * | 2007-10-02 | 2013-11-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Handover control device, mobile station, base station, handover control server, and handover control method |
| US8417244B2 (en) * | 2010-04-23 | 2013-04-09 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Detection of early inter-radio access technology (IRAT) handover triggering |
| US8452323B2 (en) * | 2011-09-22 | 2013-05-28 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for selecting a thermally optimal uplink for a portable computing device |
| US9301161B2 (en) * | 2012-07-27 | 2016-03-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for available bandwidth estimation by a user equipment in idle and/or connected mode |
| GB2495008B (en) * | 2012-10-03 | 2014-03-05 | Broadcom Corp | A method, apparatus and computer program for controlling a communications state of an apparatus |
| US9232524B2 (en) * | 2013-01-05 | 2016-01-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multiple access scheme for multi-channels of a network with a limited link budget |
| US9198183B2 (en) * | 2013-06-19 | 2015-11-24 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Accommodating multi-SIM-multi-standby communication device tuneaway events at a communication network base station |
-
2013
- 2013-08-20 EP EP13181075.6A patent/EP2840840A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2014
- 2014-07-16 WO PCT/EP2014/065220 patent/WO2015024713A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-07-16 EP EP14744490.5A patent/EP3036941B1/en active Active
- 2014-07-16 CN CN201480046003.7A patent/CN105474708B/en active Active
- 2014-07-16 ES ES14744490T patent/ES2716108T3/en active Active
- 2014-07-16 US US14/908,011 patent/US9615304B2/en active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN105474708A (en) | 2016-04-06 |
| WO2015024713A1 (en) | 2015-02-26 |
| EP2840840A1 (en) | 2015-02-25 |
| EP3036941B1 (en) | 2018-12-19 |
| ES2716108T3 (en) | 2019-06-10 |
| US20160183155A1 (en) | 2016-06-23 |
| CN105474708B (en) | 2018-11-13 |
| US9615304B2 (en) | 2017-04-04 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9615304B2 (en) | Method for inter-RAT reselection decision based on unbalanced radio conditions and device for executing said method | |
| US10111265B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving measurement information in mobile communication system | |
| US10779349B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for logging information | |
| KR101950666B1 (en) | Method and arrangement for connection re-establishment in a telecommunication system | |
| KR101707683B1 (en) | Method of transmitting a measurement report in a wireless communication system | |
| US8909229B2 (en) | Fast reselection between different radio access technology networks | |
| US11184784B2 (en) | Method of UE autonomous measurement related actions upon implicit triggers | |
| WO2008090441A1 (en) | Rat priority list for multi-rat mobile devices | |
| WO2011128819A1 (en) | Ue-based mdt measuring and reporting after radio link failure in a cellular radio access network | |
| US20120252452A1 (en) | Fast Reselection Between Different Radio Access Technology Networks | |
| WO2018065050A1 (en) | Connection state-dependent channel measurement | |
| US20170195949A1 (en) | Radio terminal | |
| EP3119131B1 (en) | Cell access methods | |
| EP3335478B1 (en) | Relaxing cell search for a stationary enhanced coverage wireless communication device | |
| US10484919B2 (en) | Radio terminal configured to switch a standby target or a connection target between a mobile communication network and a wireless LAN | |
| JP5705595B2 (en) | Wireless terminal and control method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160321 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: GEMALTO M2M GMBH |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20170413 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180626 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
| GRAL | Information related to payment of fee for publishing/printing deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR3 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
| GRAR | Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20181113 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602014038216 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1080047 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190115 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190319 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190319 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1080047 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190320 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2716108 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20190610 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190419 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190419 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602014038216 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190920 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20190731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190716 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190716 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140716 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181219 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20230622 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230620 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230621 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20230622 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20230622 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230620 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20230801 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230620 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602014038216 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: TELIT CINTERION DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GEMALTO M2M GMBH, 81541 MUENCHEN, DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: HC Owner name: TELIT CINTERION DEUTSCHLAND GMBH; DE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), CHANGE OF OWNER(S) NAME; FORMER OWNER NAME: THALES DIS AIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH Effective date: 20240501 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602014038216 Country of ref document: DE |