EP3019585A1 - New cleaning formulation and method - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention provides a formulation and method for the treatment of a substrate, the method comprising the treatment of the substrate with the formulation, the formulation comprisinga multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein the dosing particles comprise at least one host material and atleast one releasable material, wherein the host material comprises, asthe shell of the dosing particles, at least one partially or completely water soluble polymeric material and theat least one releasable material comprises the core material of the dosing particles, comprising at least one cleaning or post-cleaning agentor other treatment additive for the treatment of the substrate, wherein the solid cleaning particles are polymeric and/or non- polymeric cleaning particles, wherein the polymeric solid cleaning particles have an average density in the range of 0.5-2.5 g/cm³ and an average volume in the range of 5-27 mm³. The method and formulation are advantageously applied to the cleaning of textile fabrics.

Description

NEW CLEANING FORMULATION AND METHOD

Field of the Invention

[0001] This invention is concerned with the treatment of substrates using a formulation comprising solid cleaning particles and dosing particles. Specifically, the invention discloses a method which involves the dosing of additives during the treatment of the substrate using dosing particles mixed in with the solid cleaning particles, and a formulation for use in said method. The dosing particles can comprise at least one releasable material comprising at least one cleaning and/or post-cleaning agent and/or other treatment additive. The method is especially suited to providing substrates, such as laundry, which are especially clean and hygienic.

Background to the Invention

[0002] Aqueous cleaning processes are a mainstay of both domestic and industrial textile fabric washing. This washing generally comprises agitating fabrics in an aqueous solution of detergent, often at elevated temperatures. Supplemental additives, such as fabric conditioners, dye transfer inhibitors, anti-redeposition agents, perfumes or products for enhancing hygiene are customarily added as separate dosing operations, often with the detergent.

[0003] On the assumption that the desired degree of cleaning is achieved, the efficacy of textile fabric washing processes is usually characterised by the levels of consumption of energy, water and detergent associated with the processes. In general, the lower the requirements with regard to these three parameters, the more efficient the washing process is deemed. The downstream effect of reduced water and detergent consumption is also significant, as this minimises the need for disposal of aqueous effluent, which is both extremely costly and detrimental to the environment. Similarly, the lower the quantity of any supplemental additive used - whilst providing the desired effect - the more efficient is the operation.

[0004] Such washing processes, whether involving domestic washing machines or their industrial equivalents (usually referred to as washer extractors), involve aqueous submersion of fabrics followed by soil removal, aqueous soil suspension, and water rinsing. Higher levels of energy (or temperature), water and detergent usually result in better cleaning. One key issue, however, concerns water consumption, as this sets the energy requirements (in order to heat the wash water), and the level of detergent dosage (to achieve the desired detergent concentration). In addition, the water usage level strongly influences the mechanical action of the process on the fabric, which is another significant performance parameter; this is the agitation of the cloth surface during washing, which plays a key role in releasing embedded soil. In aqueous laundry processes, such mechanical action is provided by the water usage level, in combination with the drum design for any particular washing machine. In general, it is found that the higher the water level in the drum, the better the mechanical action. Hence, there is a dichotomy created by the desire to improve overall process efficiency (i.e. the reduction of energy, water and detergent consumption), and the need for efficient mechanical action in the wash.

[0005] WO-A-2007/128962 discloses a method and formulation for cleaning a soiled substrate, which greatly reduces the usage of water, energy and detergent while still providing the mechanical action necessary for cleaning. The method comprises the treatment of the moistened substrate with a formulation comprising a multiplicity of polymeric particles, wherein the formulation is free of organic solvents. Preferably, the substrate is wetted so as to achieve a substrate to water ratio of between 1 :0.1 to 1 :5 w/w, and optionally, the formulation additionally comprises at least one cleaning material, which typically comprises a surfactant, which most preferably has detergent properties. In preferred embodiments, the substrate comprises a textile fibre and the polymeric particles may, for example, comprise polyamide, polyester, polyalkene, polyurethane or a copolymer thereof, but are most preferably in the form of nylon beads. WO-A- 2012/056252 describes a method for the most efficient use and removal of such polymeric particles in a cleaning process, and WO-A-2012/095677 extends this method to the use of non-polymeric cleaning particles, and mixtures of non-polymeric and polymeric cleaning particles.

[0006] The apparatus required to separate polymeric or non-polymeric cleaning particles from the cleaned substrate at the conclusion of the cleaning operation is addressed in WO- A-2010/094959. This provides a novel design of cleaning apparatus requiring the use of two internal drums capable of independent rotation, and which finds application in both industrial and domestic cleaning processes.

[0007] In WO-A-201 1/064581 , there is provided a further apparatus which facilitates efficient separation of cleaning particles from the cleaned substrate at the conclusion of the cleaning operation, and which comprises a perforated drum and a removable outer drum skin which is adapted to prevent the ingress or egress of fluids and solid particulate matter from the interior of the drum, the cleaning method requiring attachment of the outer skin to the drum during a wash cycle, after which the skin is removed prior to operating a separation cycle to remove the cleaning particles, following which the cleaned substrate is removed from the drum. [0008] In a further development of the apparatus, there is disclosed in WO-A- 2011/098815 a process and apparatus which provides for continuous circulation of the cleaning particles during the cleaning process, and thereby dispenses with the requirement for the provision of an outer skin.

[0009] The improvements to textile fabric cleaning disclosed in WO-A-2007/128962, WO- A-2012/056252, WO-A-2012/095677, WO-A-2010/094959, WO-A-2011/064581 , and WO- A-2011/098815 lead to reductions in the levels of water, energy and detergent used in the cleaning operation. WO-A-2011/128680 goes on to describe a method for the dosing of said detergent into such particle cleaning systems, whereby the detergent is split into its constituent chemical parts, these being added at different times during the cleaning operation. Specifically, it is required that the cleaning parts of the formulation are added before or during the main wash cycle in order to provide the degree of stain removal required, whilst the remaining, more expensive - and hence more value adding - parts of the formulation are added as a post-treatment, usually during rinsing, following removal of the polymeric particles from the wash process. Typically, the cleaning components comprise surfactants, enzymes and oxidising agents or bleaches, whilst the post-treatment components include, for example, anti-redeposition agents, perfumes and optical brighteners. Addition of the cleaning and post- treatment components in this way allows further reduction in levels of use, and hence significant cost savings in comparison to conventional all-in-one detergent formulations.

[0010] Whilst the method of WO-A-201 1/128680 allows the use of cleaning and post- treatment components in a detergent formulation at different times during the cleaning operation, it still requires transport of each component onto the fabric surface. This is typically achieved by dilution in a quantity of water, then spraying of this diluted solution onto the washload. Although the dilution in this case is much lower than in conventional wash processes, this is still essentially an inefficient means to dose the various detergent components. Furthermore, discrete time periods are required within the wash cycle for such dosing, resulting in an overall cycle time penalty.

[0011] A cartridge dosing system as described in WO-A-201 1/128676 may also be used for this purpose. In this system, each detergent component is typically concentrated such that a number of dosages are contained within the cartridge, these being used up gradually over a number of wash cycles. Hence, there is a convenience benefit for the user in not having to individually dose each wash. The cartridge itself and the docking system for insertion into the cleaning apparatus can, however, be complex in construction, and hence costly. [0012] In one aspect of the present invention, therefore, the inventors provide a process which addresses the difficulties of dilution and transport of detergent components as hereinbefore described. Thus, there are provided dosing particles which release additives over a wash cycle for use in conjunction with the solid cleaning particles. Release of the additives occurs through dissolution of the outer layer of the dosing particles, which are in the form of core-shell particles. The dosing particles can contain the detergent components preferred for effective cleaning and post treatment and, as they are intimately mixed with the solid cleaning particles, they are carried directly to the fabric surface, thereby delivering the detergent components to the washload in the most targeted way possible. Hence, there is neither a requirement for separate dilution in water and spraying in order to deliver the detergent components, nor for a complex cartridge dosing system.

[0013] The present invention also envisages the dosing of other beneficial additives via the dosing particles. Examples include the addition of antimicrobial agents in order to sterilise the fabric, or of boosted levels of optical brightening agents, anti-redeposition agents, fragrances or dye transfer inhibitors. In each case, the benefit of the dosing particle is its direct and targeted delivery of the specific additive to the fabric surface by a particularly elegant and effective means, i.e. in admixture with the solid cleaning particles.

[0014] The use of core-shall particles for the delivery of cleaning and post-treatment materials in substrate treatment processes is known from the prior art. Thus, WO-A- 2011/150138 discloses encapsulated, solid, water soluble benefit agents and products comprising such encapsulates, as well as processes for making and using the encapsulates and products. In a preferred embodiment, a melamine formaldehyde and/or urea formaldehyde encapsulation process is described.

[0015] US-A-2004/242133 teaches an abrasive cleaning article comprising spread abrasive particles and microencapsulated particles of a perfumed substance contained in urea-formaldehyde walls bonded to a three-dimensional non-woven fibre web by a resin adhesive and also refers to a process for the production process of the abrasive cleaning article.

[0016] US-A-201 1/245136 is concerned with encapsulated, solid, water soluble benefit agents and products comprising such encapsulates, in addition to processes for making and using the encapsulates and products. The disclosed invention seeks, by employing a protective suspension agent, to overcome emulsification problems and to minimise negative interactions between the benefit agents and shell materials that occur during particle production and processing.

[0017] WO- A-2010/079466 relates to encapsulated benefit agents, compositions comprising such encapsulated benefit agents, and processes for making and using the compositions. Disadvantages associated with prior art encapsulated benefit agents are eliminated or minimised so as to provide, for example, enhanced perfume delivery.

[0018] GB-A-2432844 describes polymer particles which comprise a perfume, a polymer and a cationic deposition aid which are delivered to fabric during laundering and provide long lasting adherence of the perfume to the fabric. A method of depositing perfume onto a substrate via such a composition is also disclosed. The particle optionally has a core/shell morphology and is prepared using miniemulsion polymerisation. The polymer of the particle is preferably butyl methacrylate, and a shell layer of vinyl acetate is optionally present; the cationic deposition aid may be a cationically modified cellulose or guar gum.

[0019] In WO-A-98/42818, there is disclosed a laundry additive particle having multiple coatings, together with compositions comprising such particles. The particle comprises a central core comprising a porous carrier core material and a glassy encapsulating material intermixed with the carrier material. The encapsulating material is derived from at least partially water-soluble hydroxylic compounds and an external coating material is coated on the core particle to provide a substantially non-tacky surface. The external coating material is derived from at least partially wash soluble or dispersible compounds selected from waxes, water-soluble polymers, fatty compounds, carbohydrates, cellulose and cellulose derivatives, natural and synthetic gums, silicates, borates, phosphates, chitin and chitosan, and mixtures thereof. A laundry or cleaning agent such as a perfume is preferably supported on or contained in the porous carrier.

[0020] None of these prior art documents, however, teaches a formulation for treatment of a substrate which includes a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of core-shell dosing particles which comprise a host material and a releasable material, wherein the shell is formed of a host material comprising a partially or completely water soluble polymeric material and the core comprises a releasable material which is a cleaning or post-cleaning agent or other additive for the treatment of the substrate.

[0021] The present invention thereby addresses, at least in part, one or more of the following technical problems:

(1) Improved cleaning performance;

(2) Reduced dye transfer;

(3) Reduced redeposition of soil onto the substrate;

(4) Improved hygiene of the cleaning apparatus; and

(5) Improved substrate hygiene, especially in relation to bacteria on laundry items such as textiles and fabrics. Summary of the Invention

[0022] The present invention derives from an appreciation on the part of the inventors that the above mentioned technical problems can be solved, at least in part, by the release of cleaning agents or post-cleaning agents, or other treatment additives, from dosing particles intimately mixed with the solid cleaning particles.

[0023] Thus, according to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a formulation comprising a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein said dosing particles comprise core-shell particles comprising at least one host material and at least one releasable material, wherein said host material comprises, as the shell of the dosing particles, at least one partially or completely water soluble polymeric material, and said at least one releasable material comprises the core material of the dosing particles, comprising at least one cleaning or post-cleaning agent or other treatment additive for the treatment of a substrate.

[0024] Merely for the purposes of clarification, it is emphasised that the present invention and the claims cover the possibility that the dosing particles comprise two or more releasable materials selected from any of the combinations of at least one cleaning agent, at least one post-cleaning agent and at least one other treatment additive.

[0025] Said shell material provides, inter alia, mechanical integrity to the particles and facilitates efficient handling and delivery of the particles.

[0026] The solid cleaning particles may comprise polymeric and/or non-polymeric cleaning particles.

[0027] Solid polymeric cleaning particles are typically substantially ellipsoidal, cylindrical or spherical in shape, typically having an average density in the range of 0.5-2.5 g/cm³ and typically having an average volume in the range of 5-275 mm³.

[0028] In certain embodiments, said formulation is used for the cleaning of soiled substrates and said at least one releasable material comprises at least one cleaning agent.

[0029] Most particularly, said at least one releasable material comprises at least one cleaning agent, most particularly at least one detergent, which typically comprises at least one surfactant. Optionally, said at least one releasable material additionally or solely comprises at least one post-cleaning agent.

[0030] Thus, said cleaning agents and post-cleaning agents are especially cleaning chemicals or post-cleaning chemicals which are typically components of the detergent formulation used in a wash process. Cleaning agents are, therefore, typically surfactants, enzymes, oxidising agents or bleaches, whilst suitable post-cleaning agents include, but are not limited to, optical brightening agents, anti-redeposition agents, dye transfer inhibition agents and fragrances.

[0031] Said host material comprises a non-active polymeric or non-polymeric material which serves to transport the releasable material to the washload surface in a controlled manner but plays no active part in the cleaning process. Various materials may be employed for this purpose including, for example, polymeric materials such as polyvinyl alcohol) (PVOH), copolymers of polyvinyl alcohol) and polyvinyl acetate), poly(ethyl vinyl alcohol) (EVOH), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), cellulose, starch, hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), polyvinyl pyrrolidinone) (PVP), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and gelatin, or salts thereof. Typical polyvinyl alcohols) for use in the present invention have a degree of hydrolysis of from 50 to 99%, more typically from 70 to 98%, and even more typically from 80 to 97%. The percentage is typically expressed as a molar percentage. Polyvinyl alcohol) having a degree of hydrolysis of 94% is typically suitable for the purposes of the invention. The degree of hydrolysis has an effect on the release rate of the releasable material. The typical degrees of hydrolysis correspond to the best release profile. Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) has also been found to be an especially suitable host material.

[0032] Said dosing particles are typically used and consumed in a single substrate treatment operation.

[0033] Said dosing particles may be obtained by means of any of the standard preparative methods for core-shell particles which are available and well known in the art, and which typically involve the coating of the core (releasable) material with the shell (host) material using any of a number of standard coating methods.

[0034] Typically the core is formed from powders or mixtures of powders comprising the cleaning or post-cleaning agent or other treatment additive and these materials are compressed under pressure to form a solid tablet by means of procedures which are well known in, for example, the pharmaceutical industry. The shell is conveniently formed on the core by coating the core with a solution of the host material by spray coating the solution onto the core or, alternatively, by dipping the core into the solution and then drying the particles; again, such techniques are well known in, for example, the pharmaceutical industry. In embodiments where the core material is soluble in water, the shell is applied as a solution of shell material in an organic liquid, optionally at ambient or elevated temperatures. One suitable organic liquid is ethanol, especially when the shell material is poly(ethylene glycol). [0035] Solid polymeric cleaning particles may comprise either foamed or unfoamed polymeric materials. Furthermore, the polymeric particles may comprise polymers which are either linear or crosslinked.

[0036] Solid polymeric cleaning particles preferably comprise polyalkenes such as polyethylene and polypropylene, polyamides, polyesters or polyurethanes. Typically, however, said polymeric particles comprise polyamide or polyester, most particularly nylon, polyethylene terephthalate or polybutylene terephthalate, often in the form of beads. Said polyamides and polyesters are found to be particularly effective for aqueous stain/soil removal, whilst polyalkenes are especially useful for the removal of oil-based stains.

[0037] Optionally, copolymers of the above polymeric materials may be included in said polymeric cleaning particles. Specifically, the properties of the polymeric materials may be tailored to specific requirements by the inclusion of monomeric units which confer particular properties on the copolymer. Thus, the copolymers may be adapted to attract particular staining materials by comprising monomers which, inter alia, are ionically charged, or include polar moieties or unsaturated organic groups.

[0038] Suitable solid non-polymeric cleaning particles may comprise particles of glass, silica, stone, wood, or any of a variety of metals or ceramic materials. Suitable metals include, but are not limited to, zinc, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, tungsten, aluminium, tin and lead, and alloys thereof. Suitable ceramics include, but are not limited to, alumina, zirconia, tungsten carbide, silicon carbide and silicon nitride. Each of said solid non-polymeric cleaning particles is typically substantially ellipsoidal, cylindrical or spherical in shape and typically has an average density in the range of 3.5-12.0 g/cm³ and typically has an average volume in the range of 5-275 mm³.

[0039] In certain embodiments of the invention, a mixture of polymeric and non-polymeric solid cleaning particles can be used.

[0040] According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for the treatment of a substrate, said method comprising the treatment of the substrate with a formulation according to the first aspect of the invention.

[0041] The method of the invention is typically carried out in an aqueous environment and, more typically, in the presence of limited quantities of water. In other words, the amount of water present during the performance of the method of the invention is far less than in the case of the methods of the prior art, thereby providing one of the principal benefits associated with said method. Thus, water is generally added so as to achieve a water to substrate ratio which is typically between 2.5: 1 and 0.1 : 1 w/w. [0042] In embodiments of the invention, said treatment method comprises a method for the cleaning of a soiled substrate and typically, therefore, said at least one releasable material comprises at least one cleaning agent, most particularly at least one detergent, which typically comprises at least one surfactant. Optionally, said at least one releasable material additionally or solely comprises at least one post-cleaning agent and/or at least one other treatment additive.

[0043] According to the method of the present invention, said releasable materials are typically delivered directly to the substrate surface by means of controlled localised release from dosing particles containing these agents. In this way the cleaning and post-cleaning agents, and/or other treatment additives, are delivered in the most targeted manner possible, thereby reducing the amount of releasable material required to achieve the desired cleaning, post-cleaning or treatment effect. Furthermore, there is no requirement for the use of complex cartridge or other dosage devices, and no need to use additional water to transport the agent to the fabric surface. The release of said releasable material from the dosing particle may be controlled by selection of a suitable host material as previously indicated, such that it completely releases in one wash cycle.

[0044] Polymeric or non-polymeric solid cleaning particles, or mixtures thereof, are typically added at a particle to substrate addition level of 0.1 : 1-30: 1 by dry mass of substrate (washload).

[0045] The substrate treated by the claimed method may comprise any of a wide range of substrates, including, for example, plastics materials, leather, paper, cardboard, metal, glass or wood. In practice, however, said substrate most preferably comprises a textile fibre, which may be either a natural fibre, such as cotton, or a synthetic textile fibre, for example nylon 6,6 or a polyester, or a blend of natural and synthetic fibres.

[0046] The dosing particles are typically added at a ratio from 0.1-50.0% w/w of the total mass of the cleaning particle formulation. Each of said dosing particles is typically substantially cylindrical or spherical in shape and typically has an average density in the range of 0.5-2.5 g/cm³ and typically has an average volume in the range of 5-500 mm³. In some embodiments, the dosing particles have an average volume in the range of from 5- 5000 mm³.

[0047] Further embodiments of the invention envisage a method for the treatment of a substrate wherein the surface of a substrate is treated with a post-cleaning agent, the method comprising treating the substrate with a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein said dosing particles comprise additives which are free from cleaning agents. Said embodiments are again carried out in the presence of wash water, and involve the use of dosing particles containing post-cleaning agents. Examples of such embodiments may, for example, involve dosing with an optical brightening agent, an anti-redeposition agent, a fragrance, or a dye transfer inhibition agent.

[0048] A third aspect of the invention provides a method for the cleaning of a cleaning apparatus, said method comprising the treatment of the internal systems of the apparatus with a formulation comprising a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein said dosing particles comprise at least one host material and at least one releasable material, wherein said host material comprises, as the shell of the dosing particles, at least one partially or completely water soluble polymeric material and said at least one releasable material comprises the core material of the dosing particles, comprising an antimicrobial agent. In the performance of said method, the formulation is circulated such that the antimicrobial agent is released within the washing apparatus internal water storage areas or conduits during idle periods between wash cycles, thereby enhancing the hygiene of the apparatus itself.

[0049] The wash system provided by the present invention is designed to improve mechanical interaction between all of the particles of the cleaning formulation and the fabrics, and facilitates the easy removal of the solid cleaning particles from the fabrics after the cleaning or other post-cleaning process is complete, thereby facilitating their re-use in subsequent processes according to the method. The invention, however, is not limited to procedures for cleaning, post-cleaning and other treatments of fabrics, and is applicable to any solid particle cleaning process, such as dish washing or carpet cleaning.

[0050] It should be mentioned that the use of dosing particles in the absence of solid cleaning particles is significantly less effective and, whilst not wishing to be limited by theory, it is considered that this is because the physical action of the solid cleaning particles enhances the disintegration of the dosing particles, the release of the releasable material, the dispersal of the releasable material throughout the washload, and the penetration of the releasable material into the fibres of fabrics and textiles.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0051] Embodiments of the invention are further described hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

Figure 1 is a graph illustrating the effect of the quantity of Dosing Particles according to the invention on measured values of a* using a 1.4 kg washload ;

Figure 2 is a graphical representation of the effect of the quantity of Dosing Particles according to the invention on measured values of L* for a 1.4 kg washload; Figure 3 shows a graph which illustrates the effect of the quantity of Dosing Particles according to the invention on measured values of b* for a 1.4 kg washload;

Figure 4 is a graph which shows DE Values observed after washing according to the invention for a 1.4 kg washload;

Figure 5 provides a photographic illustration of cloths washed according to various procedures;

Figure 6 is a graphical representation of the effect on Dye Transfer Inhibition performance of variations in the weight of Dye Eluting Material and of Chitosan Core-Shell Particles in the wash;

Figure 7 is a graph showing how the use of Core-Shell Dosing Particles with

Cores of CMC affects the value of L* over ten repeated wash cycles;

Figure 8 is a photograph showing residual powder on a cotton fabric; and

Figure 9 is a photograph which shows the powder recovered from the washing machine.

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0052] The first aspect of the invention envisages a formulation comprising a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein said dosing particles comprise at least one host material and at least one releasable material, as hereinbefore defined.

[0053] Typically, the cleaning agents dosed by the dosing particles comprise surfactants, enzymes, oxidising agents and bleach, whilst the post-cleaning agents include, for example, optical brightening agents, anti-redeposition agents, dye transfer inhibition agents and fragrances.

[0054] The cleaning agents may optionally also include, for example, builders, chelating agents, dye transfer inhibiting agents, dispersants, enzyme stabilizers, catalytic materials, bleach activators, polymeric dispersing agents, clay soil removal agents and suds suppressors.

[0055] Examples of suitable surfactants may be selected from non-ionic and/or anionic and/or cationic surfactants and/or ampholytic and/or zwitterionic and/or semi-polar nonionic surfactants. The surfactant is typically present at a level of from about 0.1 %, from about 1 %, or even from about 5% w/w of the dosing particle mass up to about 99.9%, to about 80%, to about 35%, or even to about 30% w/w of the dosing particle mass, or any of the ranges defined thereby.

[0056] Examples of suitable enzymes include, but are not limited to, hemicellulases, peroxidases, proteases, other cellulases, other xylanases, lipases, phospholipases, esterases, cutinases, pectinases, keratanases, reductases, oxidases, phenoloxidases, lipoxygenases, ligninases, pullulanases, tannases, pentosanases, malanases, [beta]- glucanases, arabinosidases, hyaluronidase, chondroitinase, laccase, mannanase and amylases, or mixtures thereof. A typical combination may comprise a mixture of enzymes such as protease, lipase, cutinase and/or cellulase in conjunction with amylase.

[0057] Optionally, enzyme stabilisers may also be included amongst the cleaning agents. In this regard, enzymes for use in detergents may be stabilised by various techniques, for example by the incorporation of water-soluble sources of calcium and/or magnesium ions in the compositions.

[0058] Examples of suitable bleach compounds include, but are not limited to, peroxygen compounds, including hydrogen peroxide, inorganic peroxy salts, such as perborate, percarbonate, perphosphate, persilicate, and mono persulphate salts (e.g. sodium perborate tetrahydrate and sodium percarbonate), and organic peroxy acids such as peracetic acid, monoperoxyphthalic acid, diperoxydodecanedioic acid, N,N'-terephthaloyl- di(6-aminoperoxycaproic acid), Ν,Ν'-phthaloylaminoperoxycaproic acid, phthalimido peroxy hexanoic acid and amidoperoxyacid. Percarbonates, and especially sodium percarbonate, are particularly preferred bleach compounds. Bleach activators include, but are not limited to, carboxylic acid esters such as sodium nonanoyloxybenzene sulfonate. Other bleach activators include tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED). Of these, TAED is especially preferred as a bleach activator. Most particularly, percarbonate/TAED combinations are especially preferred as they can provide substrates (such as textiles and fabrics) which are more hygienic. By hygienic it is preferably meant that the treated substrate has less bacteria, for example at least 1000x, at least 10,000x, at least 100,000x or even at least 1 ,000,000x less bacteria when compared to the untreated substrate. In the art this is often referred to by Log kills, which equate to Log 3, 4, 5 and 6 kills of bacteria. Log 5 and Log 6 kills are especially difficult to achieve without using high (>60°C) temperatures and/or high loadings of hypochlorite. In some embodiments this can be achieved by a treatment according to the method of the invention at a temperature of less than 50°C, at a temperature of less than 45°C, at a temperature of less than 40°C or even at a temperature of less than 35°C. Typically, the temperature of the treatment is more than 0°C, more typically more than 10°C. Such a treatment offers substantial energy savings and provides for good fabric/textile fibre care as compared to chlorine-based bleach chemicals which tend to slowly damage the fabric/textile fibres and which are more harmful to the environment.

[0059] In certain embodiments, the dosing particles comprise at least one releasable material comprising at least one bleach compound, which is preferably a percarbonate, more preferably sodium percarbonate. In some embodiments, the dosing particles comprise a bleach activator, which is preferably tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED). In some embodiments the dosing particles comprise both a bleach compound (as preferred above) and a bleach activator (as preferred above).

[0060] In certain embodiments, two or more types of dosing particles are present in the formulation. In certain specific embodiments, one dosing particle comprises a bleach compound (as preferred above) and another dosing particle comprises a bleach activator (as preferred above).

[0061] When the dosing particles comprise both a bleach compound and a bleach activator, the typical weight ratio of bleach compound to bleach activator is from 10: 1 to 1 : 10; more typically from 5:1 to 1 :5; even more typically from 3:1 to 1 :3; yet more typically from 2: 1 to 1 :2. When one dosing particle comprises a bleach compound and another dosing particle comprises a bleach activator, the amounts of bleach compound and bleach activator used in the method according to the present invention typically provide the abovementioned preferred weight ratios.

[0062] Suitable builders include, but are not limited to, the alkali metal, ammonium and alkanolammonium salts of polyphosphates, alkali metal silicates, alkaline earth and alkali metal carbonates, aluminosilicates, polycarboxylate compounds, ether hydroxypolycarboxylates, copolymers of maleic anhydride with ethylene or vinyl methyl ether, 1 ,3,5-trihydroxybenzene-2,4,6-trisulphonic acid, and carboxymethyl-oxysuccinic acid, various alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of polyacetic acids such as ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and nitrilotriacetic acid, as well as polycarboxylates such as mellitic acid, succinic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, polymaleic acid, benzene 1 ,3,5-tricarboxylic acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinic acid, and soluble salts thereof.

[0063] One or more copper, iron and/or manganese chelating agents and/or one or more dye transfer inhibiting agents may also be included. Suitable dye transfer inhibiting agents include chitosan, polyvinylpyrrolidone polymers (crosslinked or uncrosslinked), polyamine N-oxide polymers, polyvinyloxazolidones, polyvinylimidazoles, salts of all these polymers, sodium bentonite, calcium bentonite, montmorillionite, kaolinite, kaoline, or mixtures thereof. Especially suitable examples of dye transfer inhibiting agents are copolymers of N-vinylpyrrolidone and N-vinylimidazole. [0064] The cleaning agents can also optionally contain dispersants. Suitable water- soluble organic dispersants are homo- or co-polymeric polycarboxylic acids, or their salts, in which the polycarboxylic acid may comprise at least two carboxyl radicals separated from each other by not more than two carbon atoms.

[0065] Examples of post-cleaning anti-redeposition agents include, but are not limited to, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), polyacrylates and polyethylene glycol (PEG), or salts thereof. Of these, carboxymethylcellulose and salts thereof, e.g. the sodium salt thereof, are especially suitable.

[0066] Suitable post-cleaning fragrances include, but are not limited to, multi-component organic chemical formulations which can contain alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, esters, ethers and nitrile alkenes, and mixtures thereof. Commercially available compounds offering sufficient substantivity to provide residual fragrance include Galaxolide (1 ,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2-benzopyran), Lyral (3- and 4-(4-hydroxy-4-methyl-pentyl) cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde and Ambroxan ((3aR, 5aS,9aS,9bR)-3a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl-2,4, 5,5a, 7,8,9, 9b-octahydro-1 H- benzo[e][1]benzofuran). One example of a commercially available fully formulated perfume is Amour Japonais supplied by Symrise^® AG.

[0067] Suitable post-cleaning optical brightening agents include, but are not limited to, several organic chemical classes, of which the most popular are stilbene derivatives, whilst other suitable classes include benzoxazoles, benzimidazoles, 1 ,3-diphenyl-2-pyrazolines, coumarins, 1 ,3,5-triazin-2-yls and naphthalimides. Examples of such compounds include, but are not limited to, 4,4'-bis[[6-anilino-4(methylamino)-1 ,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]stilbene- 2,2'-disulfonic acid, 4,4'-bis[[6-anilino-4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)methylamino]-1 ,3,5-triazin-2- yl]amino]stilbene-2,2'- disulphonic acid, disodium salt, 4,4'-bis[[2-anilino-4-[bis(2- hydroxyethyl)amino]-1 ,3,5-triazin-6-yl]amino]stilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid, disodium salt, 4, 4'-bis[(4,6-dianilino-1 ,3, 5-triazin-2-yl)amino]stilbene-2, 2 -disulphonic acid, disodium salt, 7-diethylamino-4-methylcoumarin, 4,4'-bis[(2-anilino-4-morpholino-1 ,3,5-triazin-6- yl)amino]-2,2'-stilbene-disulfonic acid, disodium salt, and 2,5-bis(benzoxazol-2- yl)thiophene.

[0068] Other treatment additives which may be dosed according to the invention include antimicrobial agents, suitable examples of which include, but are not limited to, hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), ionic silver containing zeolites, benzalkonium choride, Triclosan^® and silver nitrate. The antimicrobial agent may also be generated in situ. In certain embodiments, at least one of the antimicrobial precursors is in the dosing particles as the releasable material. In some embodiments, all of the components needed to generate the antimicrobial compounds are present in the dosing particles as the releasable materials. Typically, combinations of TAED and percarbonate (as mentioned herein) can be used to generate the active antimicrobial compounds.

[0069] In typical embodiments of the invention, the dosing particles comprise a host material comprising a shell comprising polyvinyl alcohol) (PVOH), copolymers of polyvinyl alcohol) and polyvinyl acetate), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), lactose, cellulose, starch, hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC), polyvinyl pyrrolidinone) (PVP), crosslinked PVP, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and gelatin.

[0070] Typically, at least 50 wt%, more typically at least 75 wt%, and most typically all of the host material comprising the shell is comprised of one or more partially or completely water soluble polymeric materials. Typically, the host material comprising the shell comprises no water-insoluble polymeric materials.

[0071] The solid cleaning and dosing particles are of such a shape and size as to allow for good flowability and intimate contact with a soiled substrate, which typically comprises a textile fabric. In the context of the present invention, therefore, said particles typically comprise cylindrical or spherical beads; other shapes are possible, such as ellipsoidal, cuboid, etc. It is found that the combination of particle size, shape and density is such that the mechanical interaction of the particle with the fabric is optimised, it being sufficiently vigorous to provide effective cleaning but, at the same time, uniform and gentle enough to reduce fabric damage when compared with conventional aqueous processes. It is, in particular, the uniformity of the mechanical action generated by the chosen particles across the entire fabric surface that is the key factor in this regard. Such uniform mechanical action is also the key to localised and controlled application of the cleaning agents, post-cleaning agents and other treatment additives from the dosing particles across the entire substrate surface.

[0072] The particle parameters are also controlled so as to allow for easy separation of the particles from the washload at the end of the wash process. Thus, particle size and shape may be controlled in order to minimise entanglement with the substrate, and the combination of suitable particle density and high free volume (ullage) in the washing machine tumbling process together promote particle removal. This is especially relevant in the case of fabric treatment processes.

[0073] The solid cleaning particles typically have an average particle size of from 1 to 100 mm, more typically from 1 to 50 mm; even more typically from 1 to 15 mm, yet more typically from 2 to 10 mm and most typically from 3 to 6 mm. The size is typically the longest linear size measurable. [0074] The dosing particles typically have a particle size of from 1 to 100 mm; more typically from 5 to 50 mm. The dosing particles typically have a weight of from 1 to 50 g, more typically from 1 to 30 g and most typically from 5 to 30 g.

[0075] Typically, the dosing particles contain less than 5 wt%, more typically less than 1 wt% of liquid components, and most typically are substantially free of such liquid components.

[0076] Typically the weight ratio of solid cleaning particles to dosing particles is from 100,000:1 to 1 : 1 , more typically from 10,000:1 to 10: 1 and most typically from 10,000:1 to 100: 1

[0077] In the method according to the second aspect of the invention, the ratio of solid cleaning particles to substrate is generally in the range of from 30:1 to 0.1 :1 w/w (dry mass of substrate (washload)), preferably in the region of from 10: 1 to 1 : 1 w/w, with particularly favourable results being achieved with a ratio of between 5:1 and 1 :1 w/w, and most particularly at around 2:1 w/w. Thus, for example, for the cleaning of 5 g of fabric, 10 g of solid cleaning particles would be employed, and therefore up to a further 5 g of dosing particles would be used in addition to dose cleaning and post-cleaning agents, and other treatment additives.

[0078] In order to provide additional lubrication to the system, and thereby improve the transport properties within the system, water is added to the system. Optionally, a soiled substrate may be moistened by wetting with mains or tap water prior to loading into a cleaning apparatus. In any event, water is added to the process such that the washing treatment is carried out so as to achieve a water to substrate ratio which is typically between 2.5: 1 and 0.1 : 1 w/w; more frequently, the ratio is between 2.0:1 and 0.8: 1 , with particularly favourable results having been achieved at ratios such as 1.5: 1 , 1.2:1 and 1.1 : 1.

[0079] As previously noted, the method of the invention finds particular application in the cleaning of textile fibres and fabrics. The conditions employed in such a cleaning system are very much in line with those which apply to the conventional wet cleaning of textile fibres and, as a consequence, are generally determined by the nature of the fabric and the degree of soiling. Thus, typical procedures and conditions are in accordance with those which are well known to those skilled in the art, with fabrics generally being treated according to the method of the invention at, for example, temperatures of between 5 and 95°C, typically for a duration of between 10 minutes and 1 hour, then optionally being rinsed in water and dried. Typically, the release of additives from the dosing particles is controlled such that these release completely in one wash. This can provide increased convenience for the user. [0080] The localised delivery of cleaning and post-cleaning agents, and other treatment additives, to the fabric surface by the dosing particles is the predominant feature that ensures excellent cleaning and post-cleaning performance. No problems are observed with solid cleaning or dosing particles adhering to the fibres at the conclusion of the cleaning operation, and all particles may subsequently be removed from the substrate of the washload. The method of the invention may particularly advantageously be carried out by using, for example, cleaning apparatus as disclosed in WO-A-2010/094959, WO-A- 2011/064581 and especially WO-A-201 1/098815.

[0081] Additionally, as previously noted, it has been demonstrated that re-utilisation of the solid cleaning particles is possible. Preferably, the solid cleaning particles are re-used in further procedures according to the method of the present invention. However, the dosing particles are typically consumed in a single wash and are not usually available for re-use.

[0082] Release of the cleaning agents, post-cleaning agents or other treatment additives onto the soiled substrate from the dosing particle occurs through physical dissolution of the shell material during the wash or other treatment procedure. The solid, typically polymeric, cleaning particles are also active in this regard, in that they assist in promoting the disintegration of the core-shell particles, so as to aid in the release of the core material. Accordingly, the use of core-shell dosing particles in the absence of solid cleaning particles is sub-optimal because, in those circumstances, the dosing particles do not fully disintegrate and leave residues on the substrate (as illustrated in Example 1).

[0083] Further embodiments of the invention envisage a method for treating the surface of a substrate with an additive, the method comprising treating the soiled substrate with solid cleaning particles and wash water, and mixing in additional dosing particles containing an appropriate treatment additive. Suitable examples could include the release of an antimicrobial agent onto a fabric surface for sterilisation purposes.

[0084] In embodiments of the invention which envisage a method for treating the surface of a substrate with a post-cleaning agent or other additive, the method typically comprises treating the soiled substrate with solid cleaning particles and wash water, and mixing in dosing particles containing an appropriate post-cleaning agent or treatment additive, wherein the dosing particles are free from cleaning agents. Said treatments are optimally performed by mixing in said dosing particles during the rinse cycle of a cleaning operation, rather than at an earlier stage in the process. Suitable examples of such processes could include the release of an antimicrobial agent or other sterilising agent onto a fabric surface for sterilisation purposes or dosing with an optical brightening agent, an anti-redeposition agent, a fragrance, or a dye transfer inhibition agent. [0085] The invention also envisages a method by which the dosing particles release an antimicrobial agent within the washing apparatus internal water storage areas or conduits during idle periods between wash cycles, thereby enhancing the hygiene of the apparatus itself.

[0086] The method according to the second aspect of the invention typically involves the cleaning of a soiled substrate and comprises, in sequence, the steps of:

i. washing the soiled substrate with a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles;

ii. performing a first extraction of excess water;

iii. performing a first separation of said solid cleaning particles;

iv. rinsing;

v. performing a second extraction of excess water;

vi. optionally repeating steps (d) and (e) at least once; and

vii. performing a second separation of said solid cleaning particles.

[0087] The method of the second aspect of the present invention may be used for either small or large scale batchwise processes. It also finds application in both domestic and industrial cleaning processes.

[0088] The method of the invention may be applied to the cleaning of any of a wide range of substrates including, for example, plastics materials, leather, paper, cardboard, metal, glass or wood. In practice, however, said method is principally applied to the cleaning of substrates comprising textile fibres and fabrics, and has been shown to be particularly successful in achieving efficient cleaning of textile fabrics which may, for example, comprise either natural fibres, such as cotton, or man-made and synthetic textile fibres, for example nylon 6,6, polyester, cellulose acetate, or fibre blends thereof.

[0089] The conditions employed in such cleaning systems when applied to textile fabrics do, however, allow the use of surprisingly lower wash temperatures from those which typically apply to the conventional wet cleaning of textile fabrics and, as a consequence, offer significant environmental and economic benefits.

[0090] In other embodiments, the treatment in the method according to the second aspect of the present invention can comprise a rinse cycle. Accordingly, the treatment typically comprises rinsing the substrate in the presence of the dosing particles and cleaning particles. The rinsing typically comprises the addition of water which is subsequently or simultaneously removed. This embodiment of the method according to the second aspect of the present invention is especially suitable when the dosing particles comprise a bleach compound and/or a bleach activator and/or an antimicrobial agent as the releasable material.

[0091] In another embodiment according to the second aspect of the present invention the method can comprise: (i) washing the substrate in a wash formulation which comprises water and one or more cleaning agents (such as enzymes) either in the presence or absence of the cleaning particles; (ii) optionally rinsing the substrate (typically with water) and/or extracting the water from the substrate; (iii) adding cleaning particles if not already present from step (i); and (iv) treating the substrate in the presence of the cleaning particles and the dosing particles. The treatment step typically comprises agitation, more typically tumbling. Preferably, step (iv) is performed using a formulation which is free of any enzymes. Preferably, step (i) is performed using a formulation which comprises no bleach compound and/or no bleach activator. Preferably, the wash formulation in step (i) comprises one or more enzymes. This method is especially suitable when the dosing particles comprise a bleach compound and/or a bleach activator and/or an antimicrobial agent as the releasable material. This embodiment has the advantage that a better combination of cleaning and sterilisation can be achieved.

[0092] The invention will now be further illustrated, though without in any way limiting the scope thereof, by reference to the following examples.

Examples

Example 1 Dye Transfer Inhibition by "Core-Shell" Particles of Chitosan, Cross- linked Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP) and Sodium Bentonite

[0093] This Example shows how the use of single-use core-shell dosing particles in combination with cleaning beads reduces the amount of red dye transferred to a white cloth from a dye eluting material in a laundry "bead cleaning" process.

[0094] In this example, core-shell dosing particles are used in conjunction with polymeric cleaning beads; specifically, the cleaning beads consisted of nylon 6,6 filled with 40% barium sulphate (Technyl XA 1493). These were cut to an ellipsoid shape (-4.5 x 3.5 x 3.2 mm) by under-water die face cutting. The material was supplied by Solvay Chemicals, Lyon France.

Preparation of Dosing Particles

[0095] Powders of a) chitosan (ChitoClear 40400, from Primex EHF, Siglufjord, Iceland), b) chitosan (from Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK, product number 448869) and c) cross- linked polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) (Disintex 2000, Ashlands Speciality Ingredients, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA) were compressed in a Casburt tableting machine. The diameter of the tableting die was 10 mm. Tablet thickness values were measured with a Copley TBF100 device. The physical properties of the pellets are listed in Table 1 ; these tablets form the "core" of the core-shell pellets with cores of chitosan or PVP.

N.B. Errors are standard deviations

TABLE 1 PROPERTIES OF COMPRESSED TABLETS

[0096] Calcium bentonite in pelletised form ("Mikolit B") (obtained from Marton Geotechnical Services Ltd., Geotechnical Centre, Rougham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK) was also used. This material formed the "core" of the calcium bentonite particle.

Formation of Shell

[0097] Tablets were coated with a shell of polyvinyl alcohol (Elvanol 85-82, Du Pont, Wilmington, DE, USA) by pouring an 1 1 % solution of Elvanol 85-82 through a sieve containing the tablets. Tablets were then dried in an oven at 65°C.

Reduction of Transfer of Red Dye onto White Cotton by Core-Shell Dosing Particles

[0098] A 1.4 kg washload was used and the temperature of wash treatment was 40°C.

[0099] The source of red dye was two new, unwashed red tee shirts (Fruit of the Loom, size XXL). The ballast consisted of used polyester clean-room suits. The weight of the washload is defined as the weight of the tee shirts plus the weight of the ballast, and this was kept at 1.4 kg. In all cases the weight ratio of Technyl cleaning beads to washload was 2: 1.

[00100] One and a half sebum sheets (one sheet measuring 23 x 61cm) (Product code SBL 2004, WFK Testgewebe GmbH, D-41379, Germany) and four cotton cloths (17 x 28 cm) were also added to the washload.

[00101] The materials making up the wash are listed in Table 2 Technyl XA1493 beads 2.8 kg

Polyester clean room suits 0.95 kg

New, unwashed red cotton tee shirts 0.45 kg

(Fruit of the Loom)

Sebum cloths One and a half

White cotton cloths (17 x 28 cm) 4 cloths

TABLE 2 CONTENTS OF WASH FOR 1.4 KG WASHLOAD EXCLUDING CORE- SHELL PARTICLES

[00102] In addition to the items in Table 2, which were used in every wash cycle, the following quantities of core-shell dosing particles shown in Table 3 were also included.

TABLE 3 TYPE AND QUANTITY OF CORE-SHELL PARTICLES (1.4 kg

WASH LOADS)

[00103] The items for each wash load were placed in a net mesh bag; beads and/or dosing paricles were mixed thoroughly with the fabric materials. The fabric materials were inserted into the mesh bag in layers to disperse items evenly throughout the mesh bag, which was sealed by tying. [00104] The mesh bag was washed in a Beko domestic washing machine using a 40°C cotton cycle with 11.2 g of Pack I detergent available from Xeros Ltd. (a proprietary formulation comprising surfactants and enzymes). The spin speed set was 1200 rpm. The ratio (by weight) of wash load to Xeros Pack I detergent was therefore approximately 8 g/kg.

[00105] For comparison, a similar experiment was carried out using a commercial dye catching sheet (Dr Beckmann's "Colour Catcher") used in conjunction with the Technyl XA1493 beads (using the same conditions but without core-shell dosing particles). The weight of the dye catching sheet was 1.59 g.

[00106] At the end of each wash cycle, white cotton cloths were recovered, dried by hanging at room temperature and then analysed for colour character using a Konica Minolta CM-3600A photospectometer to obtain values of L*, a* and b*. The size of aperture on the photospectrometer was 25.4 mm using 100% UV component and excluding the specular component. Values of L*, a* and b* were also recorded for virgin, unwashed cloth. Measurements on 16 areas of the cloths (four areas per cloth) were averaged.

Results

[00107] The values of L*, a* and b* for unwashed cloth are shown in Table 4. The values are the means of 16 measurements and errors are standard deviations.

TABLE 4 VALUES OF L*, a*, b* FOR UNWASHED VIRGIN WHITE CLOTH

[00108] The values of a* for the cotton cloths after the wash tests described above are shown in Figure 1. The a* parameter is indicative of the red-green balance of the colour; a change to a more positive a* means an increasingly redder colour while a change to more negative a* means an increasingly green colour. Figure 1 shows that the value of a* with Technyl cleaning beads and no dosing particles was 8.17 ± 0.38. In all cases the use of dosing particles with Technyl cleaning beads reduced a* and brought it closer to the value for virgin, unwashed white cloth of -0.19 ± 0.02, thereby showing that the dosing particles suppressed transfer of red dye. The suppression of change in a* is particularly noteworthy in the case of core-shell particles with chitosan cores where 10 g of dosing particles reduced a* by ~ 6 units compared to the experiment without dosing particles.

[00109] Figure 1 also shows that the core-shell dosing particles compare very well with the commercial dye catching sheet, where the reduction of a* (compared to the experiment without dosing particles) was approximately 2.3.

[00110] Figure 2 provides an illustration of the use of core-shell dosing particles on a white-grey scale. It is apparent that particles with cores of PVP and chitosan both have the effect of brightening the fabric, which is a desirable effect.

[00111] In Figure 3, the effect of dosing particles on b* is illustrated. The b* parameter is indicative of the blue-yellow balance of the colour; a change to a more positive b* means an increasingly more yellow colour, while a change to more negative b* means an increasingly blue colour. Figure 3 shows that dosing particles with a calcium bentonite core impart a yellow colour to the white fabric compared to Technyl cleaning beads alone; however, dosing particles with cores of PVP and chitosan do not cause a significant yellowing effect. In fact, the use of PVP and chitosan particles bring the value of b* closer to that of virgin cloth (1.45 ± 0.05) than does the use of cleaning beads alone.

[00112] Values of DE for washes with dosing particles were calculated with respect to unwashed virgin white cloth where:

DE = ((L*-L*_v)²+(a*-a*_v)²+(b*-b*_v)²)¹

[00113] Values of DE are presented in Figure 4. Values of DE provide a measure of the overall change in appearance of cloth compared to unwashed, virgin cloth. The lower the value of DE, the closer the appearance of the material is to a reference material (in this case, virgin cloth). Figure 4 shows that the use of chitosan or PVP particles in conjunction with Technyl cleaning beads significantly reduces DE values when compared to the case of washing with Technyl cleaning beads alone.

[00114] It should be noted that a value of DE is simply an overall indication of the changes in the three parameters, L*, a* and b*, compared to the virgin cloth; it does not take into account whether a change in any of these individual parameters in desirable or not. In the cases of dosing particles of chitosan and PVP, the increase in L* is desirable (brighter cloth); nevertheless, this desirable change in L* leads to an increase in the value of DE. Consequently, the appearance of the final cloths washed in the presence of chitosan and PVP dosing particles is actually found to be better than would be suggested by the values of DE in Figure 4.

Role of Cleaning Beads

[00115] This assessment showed that the role of the polymeric cleaning beads (Technyl XA1493) is to prevent deposition of powder residue on fabric, and demonstrated that the use of dosing particles without the cleaning beads resulted in unacceptable powder residue on the fabrics.

[00116] The same wash protocol as described above was used with the modifications as shown in Table 5:

TABLE 5 REVISED TEST CONDITIONS

[00117] Runs A and B therefore simulated conventional washes (without cleaning beads) whilst Run C was a bead cleaning wash.

Results

[00118] The results of the tests are illustrated in the photographs of cloths from Runs A, B and C which are presented in Figure 5 which show, from left to right, A to B to C.

[00119] Thus, it is observed that, in the absence of the polymeric cleaning beads, an unacceptable powder deposit was left on the cloth (highlighted by the arrows). Moreover, creasing was also very noticeable. In the presence of the cleaning beads, however, no such deposit remained and creasing was reduced. Hence, it is seen that the role of the cleaning beads is to assist the disintegration and eventual removal of the chitosan powder from the wash and also to reduce creasing. Example 2 Dye Transfer Inhibition by Chitosan and PVP Used in Powder Form

[00120] Similar experiments were carried out to assess the dye transfer performance of chitosan (ChitoClear 40500) (10 g) and crosslinked PVP (Disintex 200) (2.5 g) when added in powder form compared with core-shell particle form. The experimental protocol was as described in Example 1 , with the cleaning beads, using a 1.4 kg washload. The data when the dosing material was in particle form is taken from Example 1. Calcium bentonite was not available in powder form, therefore precluding a similar comparison between particle and powder.

[00121] The observed values of L*, a*, b* and DE are shown in Table 6.

TABLE 6 VALUES OF L*, a*, b* AND DE FOR DYE TRANSFER MATERIAL IN

CORE-SHELL DOSING PARTICLE FORM AND POWDER FORM

[00122] Surprisingly, Table 6 shows that the a* value for PVP particles is 1.4 units below that for PVP powder, i.e. there is less red dye transfer with the particle than with the powder. Equally surprisingly, for 10 g of chitosan, the value of a* is 2.24 lower for chitosan in particle form than when in powder form, again showing there is less red dye transfer with the particle than with the powder. An additional benefit of dosing particles of precise weight is that they facilitate the introduction of precise levels of dosing materials to the wash (thereby reducing wastage) in a form which is highly convenient to the end-user.

Example 3 Effect of Quantity of Dye; Reduction of Transfer of Red Dye onto White Cotton by Chitosan Core-Shell Dosing Particles

[00123] This Example shows how the original quantity of source of vagrant dye affects degree of dye transfer in the presence of dye transfer inhibiting core-shell particles. Specifically, the amount of dye transferred to a cloth is lowered when there is less vagrant dye in the wash. [00124] The wash protocol was exactly as described in Example 1 , with the cleaning beads, except that the weight of dye eluting red tee shirt material was varied; additional ballast was added to keep the weight of the washload constant at 1.4k g. 2.5 g and 10 g of core-shell particles with Chitosan cores were used in this example. A 1.4 kg washload was used and the temperature of treatment was 40°C.

[00125] A control was carried out in which chitosan and the dye eluting tee shirts were omitted, the washload consisting entirely of 1.4 kg of polyester ballast.

[00126] The results, showing variations in dye transfer inhibition performance, are presented in Table 7 and in Figure 6.

*ChitoClear 40400; **Chitosan Sigma-Aldrich 448869

TABLE 7 EFFECT ON DTI OF VARIATION IN WEIGHT OF DYE ELUTING

MATERIAL AND WEIGHT OF CHITOSAN CORE-SHELL PARTICLES

[00127] It can be seen from the data presented in Table 7 and Figure 6 that the value of a* on the cloths (i.e. the amount of dye transfer) decreases linearly as the quantity of dye source in the wash decreases. Importantly, increasing the weight of chitosan core-shell particles also progressively lowers a* for a constant shirt weight.

[00128] Cloth washed without red shirts or chitosan particles had a value of a* of 0.65 ± 0.13; this is higher than that of virgin cloth (a* = -0.19 ± 0.02), showing there is some colour change on washing with detergent and ballast, even if no dye eluting material is present. In particular, for 0.13 kg of red shirt, a* reduced from 2.89 ± 0.17 (with no dosing particles) to 1.01 ± 0.33 (with 10 g of chitosan dosing particles). This is a difference of less than 1 unit from the value of a* for cloth washed without any dye eluting material of 0.65 ± 0.13. The significance of this is that the human eye can only detect differences larger than 1 unit, which means that the chitosan dosing particles have reduced dye transfer to the extent that the human eye cannot detect the difference between the cloth washed with a dye source and a cloth washed in detergent alone.

Example 4 Disinfection of Bacteria Contaminated Cloth by "Core-Shell" Dosing Particles comprising Sodium Percarbonate and TAED

[00129] This Example shows how the use of single-use core-shell dosing particles in combination with cleaning beads kills bacteria in a laundry "bead cleaning" process. The efficacy of disinfection was assessed by washing cloths inoculated with bacteria in a bead washing machine such as that described in WO-A-201 1/098815, and comparing the number of bacterial colony forming units (cfu) remaining per cloth after washing with the number of cfu per cloth on an inoculated unwashed cloth.

[00130] Two approaches employing single-use core-shell dosing particles were used:

a. Addition to the washing machine of sodium percarbonate and TAED formulated within the same core-shell dosing particle (Formulation "A"); and b. Addition to the washing machine of sodium percarbonate formulated within one type of core-shell dosing particle (Formulation "B") and TAED formulated within another type of core-shell dosing particle (Formulation "C"); both types of particle are added together to a washing machine.

[00131] In this example, core-shell dosing particles were used in conjunction with polymeric cleaning beads; specifically, the cleaning beads consisted of nylon 6,6 filled with 40% barium sulphate (Technyl XA 1493). These were cut to an ellipsoid shape (-4.5 x 3.5 x 3.2 mm) by under-water die face cutting. The material was supplied by Solvay Chemicals, Lyon France. The cleaning beads were used in a Xeros washing machine as described in WO-A-2011/098815.

Preparation of Core-Shell Dosing Particles

Preparation of Core of Particles; Dosing Particles Containing Sodium Percarbonate and TAED (Formulation "A")

[00132] Powders of a) sodium percarbonate (Oxyper 131S, Solvay, Warrington UK), b) TAED Mykon B610 (Warwick Chemicals Holywell, Flintshire, UK), c) microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) ("MCC102", Cambridge Commodities, Ely, UK), d) polyethylene glycol (PEG 600), and e) zeolite ("Doucil 24A" (PQ Corporation, 3800 AR Amersfoort, Netherlands) were blended and compressed into tablets by Stonehouse Tableting, Nottingham, UK. The composition of the formulation is shown in Table 8. The diameter of the tableting die was 19 mm and the weight of each tablet was 2.5 g. [00133] This formulation formed the "core" of the core-shell pellets of Formulation "A".

TABLE 8 A FORMULATION OF CORE OF HYGIENE TABLETS CONTAINING SPC

AND TAED (FORMULATION "A")

[00134] The powder particles of sodium percarbonate were supplied by the manufacturer, Solvay, coated with a protective surface layer.

Preparation of Core of Particles; Dosing Particles Containing Sodium Percarbonate (Formulation "B")

[00135] Powders of a) sodium percarbonate (Oxyper 131 S), b) microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) ("MCC102") and c) polyethylene glycol (PEG 600) were blended and compressed into tablets by Stonehouse Tableting. The composition of the formulation is shown in Table 9. The diameter of the tableting die was 19 mm and the weight of each tablet was 2.5 g.

TABLE 9 FORMULATION OF CORE OF HYGIENE TABLETS CONTAINING SPC

(FORMULATION "B") Preparation of Core of Particles; Dosing Particles Containing TAED (Formulation "C")

[00136] Powders of a) TAED (Mykon B610) and b) polyethylene glycol (PEG 600) were blended and compressed into tablets by Stonehouse Tableting. The composition of the formulation is shown in Table 10. The diameter of the tableting die was 19 mm and the weight of each tablet was 2.5 g.

TABLE 10 FORMULATION OF CORE OF HYGIENE TABLETS CONTAINING TAED

(FORMULATION "C")

Formation of the Shell

[00137] The shell of the particles (Formulations "A", "B" and "C") was formed from polyethylene glycol (PEG 2000, Merck, Hohenbrunn, Germany). This was achieved by dipping tablet cores in a 2% (by weight) solution of PEG 2000 in ethanol at room temperature, and allowing this to dry in air at room temperature. The rationale for using an ethanol solution of PEG 2000 rather than an aqueous solution was that the cores dissolved very rapidly on contact with water, thereby precluding the use of aqueous solution for shell formation; the use of an ethanol solution of PEG 2000 permitted the formation of the shell without compromise of the core material. Once dry, the PEG formed a water soluble shell around the core. PEG 2000 was chosen as the shell material because it is soluble in both ethanol (for pellet preparation) and water (for dissolution in use in a washing machine).

Inoculation of Cotton Cloth with Bacteria

[00138] 10 x 10 cm swatches of cotton cloth (supplied by Whaleys (Bradford) Ltd., Bradford, UK) were inoculated with five bacteria. A separate cloth was used for each bacterium. Inoculation was carried out by Microbiological Consulting Services Ltd. Tideswell, Derbyshire, UK. Cloths were inoculated with 1 ml of a suspension of test organism. These cloths were transported to Xeros Ltd. for treatment. Cloths were held in sterile plastic bags during transportation and storage to prevent drying out.

[00139] The bacteria used are listed in Table 11 ; the American Type Culture Collection (ATTC) identification codes for the bacterial strains are also shown. Bacteria ATCC number

Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 10788 6538

Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCIMB 10421 15442

Escherichia coli NCIMB 8879 10536

Enterococcus hirae NCIMB 8191 10541

Klebsiella pneumonia NC 09633 4352

TABLE 11 BACTERIA USED FOR HYGIENE TESTING

Washing Procedure

[00140] In each case a 6 kg washload consisting of cotton pillow-cases was used; two of the pillow-cases each had five bacterial inoculated swatches pinned to them (each swatch inoculated with one of the five bacteria). Three sebum sheets (one sheet measuring 23 x 61 cm) (Product code SBL 2004, WFK Testgewebe GmbH, D-41379, Germany) were also added to the washload.

[00141] 45 g of Pack 1 detergent available from Xeros Ltd. (a proprietary formulation comprising surfactants and enzymes) was added to each wash through the detergent dispensing unit. The temperatures of wash treatment were either a) 20°C or b) 40°C, respectively.

[00142] Washing was carried out in a Xeros bead cleaning washing machine as described in WO-A-201 1/098815 using one of two wash programs.

Program I (20°C Wash)

[00143] The key elements of this program were: a) 25 minutes of washing with beads using 22.5 litres of water at 20°C; b) 10 minutes of rinse with circulating beads using 15 litres of water; c) 3 minutes of a spray rinse using 5 litres of water;

10 minutes tumbling of wash load to separate beads from wash load.

Program II (40°C Wash)

[00144] The key elements of this program were:

a) 10 minutes of pre-wash using 22.5 litres of water; b) 30 minutes of washing using 18.5 litres of water at 40°C;

c) 10 minutes of rinse with circulating beads using 15 litres of water;

d) 3 minutes of a spray rinse using 5 litres of water;

e) 10 minutes tumbling of wash load to separate beads from wash load.

[00145] Dosing particles (or other hygiene promoting agents for control purposes) were added to the washing machine through the front loading door, as required, with the washload either:

a. At the start of the wash; or

b. At the end of the main wash element (element (a) in program I (20°C Wash) and element (b) in Program II (40°C Wash, above), and before the start of the "rinse with circulating beads" element of the program (element (b) in program I (20°C Wash) and element (c) in Program II (40°C Wash, above).

[00146] When hygiene promoting agents were added on completion of the main wash element of program ((b) above), the program was paused to enable the machine door to be opened.

Controls

[00147] Controls for assessment of disinfection efficacy were unwashed inoculated cloths, inoculated at the same time as the test cloths and kept under the same conditions as test cloths. New controls were prepared every day of testing and comparison of test samples were with respect to the controls prepared that day.

Tests

[00148] Hygiene promoting agents were added to the machine in the following forms:

1. SPC and TAED formulated together in dosing particles of Formulation "A";

2. Equivalent quantities of SPC and TAED formulated in dosing particles of Formulation "B" and Formulation "C", respectively;

3. Addition of equivalent quantities of SPC and TAED as powders to the wash- load;

4. Addition of SPC dosing particles (Formulation "B") only to the wash-load

[00149] Table 12 provides the details of the wash temperature, specific dosing particles (or other hygiene promoting agents) and point of introduction of the hygiene promoting agents used for each test. Test Hygiene promoting agents When Weight Weight Wash

hygiene of SPC of Temperature, material g TAED °C added g

1.1 7.5 g Formulation "A" Wash start 4.38 2.19 20

1.2 5.41 g Formulation "B" plus Wash start 4.24 2.21 20

2.25 g Formulation "C"

1.3 SPC powder plus TAED Wash start 4.24 2.20 20

powder

1.4 5.41 g Formulation "B" Wash start 4.24 0 20

2.1 7.5 g Formulation "A" Wash start 4.38 2.19 40

3.1 7.5 g Formulation "A" At bead 4.38 2.19 20

rinse cycle

3.2 15 g Formulation "A" At bead 8.76 4.38 20

rinse cycle

3.3 5.59 g Formulation "B" plus At bead 4.38 2.21 20

2.25 g Formulation "C" rinse cycle

3.4 SPC powder plus TAED At bead 4.24 2.20 20

powder rinse cycle

4.1 7.5 g Formulation "A" At bead 4.38 2.19 40

rinse cycle

4.2 15 g Formulation "A" At bead 8.76 4.38 40

rinse cycle

TABLE 12 DETAILS OF WASH TESTS USED

[00150] The following additional control tests were also conducted:

1. Washing in the absence of SPC or TAED (i.e. "normal" bead cleaning wash) at 20°C;

2. Washing in the absence of SPC or TAED (i.e. "normal" bead cleaning wash) at 40°C;

3. Addition of 22.5 g of 15% sodium hypochlorite to the main wash (20°C) - this distributes within the wash water (22.5L) to give a concentration of 0.015%;

4. 7.5 g of Formulation "A" particles added at start of main wash in the absence of cleaning beads (20°C)

[00151] Full details of these tests are given in Table 13: Control Conditions When Weight Weight of Wash number hygiene of SPC TAED Temperature material g g °C added

C1 No dosing particles NA 0 0 20

(i.e. "normal bead

cleaning wash")

C2 No dosing particles NA 0 0 40 (i.e. "normal bead

cleaning wash)

C3 22.5 g of 15% Wash N/A N/A 20 sodium start

hypochlorite

C4 7.5 g Formulation Wash N/A N/A 20

"A" and no start

cleaning beads

TABLE 13 DETAILS OF CONTROL WASH TESTS

Analysis of Inoculated Cloths

[00152] After washing, inoculated cloths were recovered from the wash-load, kept in sterile plastic bags (one cloth per bag) and returned the same day to Microbiological Consultant Services (MCS) for analysis.

[00153] On return to MCS the cloths were suspended in 9 ml of a diluent and vigorously agitated to resuspend any bacteria remaining. The resulting suspension was tested as below for each organism type:

Ps aeruginosa - Spread plates on CN agar. Incubation at 31 °C for 3 days.

E coli - Pour plates in TBX agar. Incubation at 44°C for 24 hours.

S aureus - Spread plates on Manitol Salt agar. Incubation at 31 °C for 3 days.

Ent hirae - Pour plates in KF Streptococcus agar. Incubation at 31 °C for 2 days.

K pneumonia - Pour plates in Tryptone Soya Agar. Incubation at 31 °C for 4 days.

[00154] After incubation, the number of colony forming units (cfu) of bacteria per cloth was determined. When two sets of swatches inoculated with the same bacteria were included in the same wash, the mean number of cfu per cloth was determined. The number of cfu/cloth for each bacterium on the test swatches (CFUtest) was compared to the number of cfu/cloth in the "unwashed" inoculated cloths (CFU unwashed) . The log reduction in bacterial level was expressed as:

Log reduction = log (CFUunwashed/CFUtest)

Results

[00155] The results of the tests are shown in Tables 14-A to 14-0.

TABLE 14-A TEST 1.1 - 7.5 g FORMULATION "A" ADDED AT START OF MAIN

WASH, 20°C

TABLE 14-B TEST 1.2 - 5.41 g FORMULATION "B" AND 2.25 g FORMULATION "C

ADDED AT START OF MAIN WASH, 20°C

TABLE 14-C TEST 1.3 - 4.24 g SPC POWDER AND 2.20 g TAED POWDER ADDED

AT START OF MAIN WASH; 20°C

TABLE 14-D TEST 1.4 - 5.41 g FORMULATION "B" ADDED AT START OF MAIN

WASH, 20°C Test 2.1 Cfu per cloth

Staph, Pseudomonas E. coli Enterococcus. Klebsiella aureus aeruginosa hirae Pneumonia

Initial 2.0 10⁸ 1.5 10⁸ 1.6 x 10⁸ 2.0 x 10⁸ 1.1 x 10⁸ inoculum

"unwashed" >10⁷ >10⁷ 1.3 x 10⁵ >10⁷ >10⁷

Test Cloth 1 <10 1.4 x 10³ 1.0 x 10² <10 6.8 x 10³

Test Cloth 2 <10 1.1 x 10³ 1.5 x 10³ <10 3.3 x 10²

Test cloth <10 1.3 x 10³ 8.0 x 10² <10 3.6 x 10³ average

Log reduction log 6 log 3.5 log 2 log 6 log 3

TABLE 14-E TEST 2.1 - 7.5 G FORMULATION "A" ADDED AT START OF MAIN

WASH, 40°C

TABLE 14-F TEST 3.1 - 7.5 g FORMULATION "A" ADDED IN BEAD RINSE, 20°C

TABLE 14-G TEST 3.2 - 15 g FORMULATION "A" ADDED IN BEAD RINSE, 20°C

TABLE 14-H TEST 3.3 - 5.59 g FORMULATION "B" AND 2.25 g FORMULATION

ADDED IN BEAD RINSE, 20°C Test 3.4 Cfu per cloth

Staph, Pseudomonas E. coli Enterococcus. Klebsiella aureus aeruginosa hirae Pneumonia

Initial 4.9 10⁸ 1.8 10⁸ 2.9 x 10⁸ 2.5 x 10⁸ 2.8 x 10⁸ inoculum

"unwashed" >10⁷ >10⁷ >10⁷ >10⁷ >10⁷

Test Cloth 1 <10 <10 <10 9.0 x 10³ <10

Test Cloth 2 <10 <10 <10 3.2 x 10⁴ <10

Test cloth <10 <10 <10 2.1 x 10⁴ <10 average

Log reduction log 6 log 6 log 6 log 2.5 log 6

TABLE 14-1 TEST 3.4 - 4.24 g OF SPC POWDER AND 2.20 g OF TAED POWDER

ADDED IN BEAD RINSE, 20°C

TABLE 14-J TEST 4.1 - 7.5 g FORMULATION "A" ADDED IN BEAD RINSE, 40°C

og re uc on og og og og og

TABLE 14-K TEST 4.2 - 15 g OF FORMULATION "A" ADDED IN BEAD RINSE, 40°C

TABLE 14-L TEST C1 - NO ADDITIONAL HYGIENE PROMOTING AGENTS (i.e.

DETERGENT ONLY WASH), 20°C

TABLE 14-M TEST C2 - NO ADDITIONAL HYGIENE PROMOTING AGENTS (i.e.

DETERGENT ONLY WASH), 40°C

TABLE 14-N TEST C3 - 22.5 g OF 15% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION

ADDED IN MAIN WASH, 20°C (0.015% IN WASH LIQUOR)

TABLE 14-0 TEST C4 - 7.5 g OF FORMULATION "A" ADDED IN MAIN WASH AND

NO CLEANING BEADS, 20°C WASH

Washing at 20°C

[00156] At 20°C, 7.5 g of particles of "Formulation "A" (containing both SPC and TAED) added in the main wash (Test 1.1 , Table 14-A) showed greatly improved reduction in bacterial levels for all 5 bacteria compared to the 20°C wash in the absence of dosing particles (Test C1 , Table 14-L). Similar reductions at 20°C were also found if the same amounts of SPC and TAED were added in separate dosing particles (Formulation "B" and "C", respectively) (Test 1.2, Table 14-B), except for the case of Enterococcus Hirae, where Formulation "A" was more effective than Formulation "B" plus Formulation "C" (reductions of log 4 and log 2, respectively). When SPC and TAED were added as loose powders (Test 1.3, Table 14-C), the reduction in bacterial levels was similar to when they were combined in the same particles of Formulation "A" (Test 1.1 , Table 14-A). In contrast, Test 1.4 (Table 14-D) shows that if only SPC containing particles were used without TAED, the reduction in bacterial levels were only slightly larger than for the control (Test C1 , Table 14-L), showing that, at 20°C, both SPC and TAED are required for effective antimicrobial effect.

[00157] Addition of 7.5 g of Formulation "A" in the bead rinse cycle (Test 3.1 , Table 14-F) provided similar levels of hygiene as when added in the main wash in (Test 1.1 , Table 14- A). Addition of SPC and TAED as powders to the bead rinse (Test 3.4, Table 14-1) also provided similar hygiene levels. However, when dosing particles of Formulation "B" and "C" were added to the bead rinse, the resulting hygiene levels were lower (Test 3.3, Table 14-H). There is, therefore, a significant advantage in combining SPC and TAED within the same dosing particle.

[00158] Test C4 (Table 14-0), in which 7.5 g of Formulation "A" was used in the absence of nylon cleaning beads, provided similar hygiene levels as Test 1.1 (Table 14-A), which was conducted in the presence of the nylon cleaning particles. This shows there is no reduction in the efficacy of the dosing particles by using them in conjunction with the nylon cleaning beads but, by using dosing particles in conjunction with cleaning beads, the benefits of improved low temperature hygiene and low temperature cleaning can be combined.

[00159] Comparison of the tests described above with the results of using 0.015% sodium hypochlorite (Test C3, Table 14-N), show the use of SPC and TAED in dosing particles provide the same level of hygiene as 0.015% sodium hypochlorite.

Washing at 40°C

[00160] Improved hygiene levels were found with the 40°C wash program using 7.5 g dosing particles of Formulation "A" added in the main wash (Test 2.1 , Table 14-E) or the bead rinse (Test 4.1 , Table 14-J), compared to the 40°C wash in the absence of dosing particles (Test C2, Table 14-M). The use of 15 g of Formulation "A" in the bead rinse in the 40°C wash was especially effective, with log 6 reduction found for all five bacteria (Test 4.2, Table 14-K). [00161] This example shows that antimicrobial action is achieved by dosing SPC and TAED into the washload via dosing particles used in conjunction with cleaning particles. It further shows that the improvement of hygiene is achieved with SPC and TAED formulated in the same dosing particle or, alternatively, formulated in separate dosing particles.

Example 5 Disinfection of Bacteria Contaminated Cloth by "Core-Shell" Particles of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)

[00162] This Example shows how the use of single-use core-shell dosing particles comprising a quaternary ammonium compound ("Cetrimide" (CTAB")) in combination with cleaning beads kills bacteria in a laundry "bead cleaning" process using the procedure described above in Example 4.

Preparation of Core-Shell Dosing Particles

Preparation of Core of Particles

[00163] Powders of a) CTAB ("Kern Quat CBP", KemCare Ltd., London, UK) and b) microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) ("MCC102", Cambridge Commodities, Ely, UK) were blended at a ratio of 75% CTAB:25% MCC and compacted into tablets using a tableting machine with a die diameter of 10 mm. The weight of each tablet was 2.5 g. Tablets were coated with a shell of hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) ("Benecel K100LV", Ashlands Industries Europe, Schaffhausen, Germany) by dipping tablets in a 1 % solution of HPMC in water at room temperature. Tablets were then dried in air at room temperature.

Antimicrobial Efficacy

[00164] The antimicrobial efficacy of the core-shell particles (comprising CTAB in the core) used in conjunction with cleaning particles was assessed using exactly the same procedure as described above in Example 4. Wash Program 1 (20°C wash) was used. In this case 6 g of the core-shell particles were added to the wash load at the start of the wash, as described in Example 4.

[00165] The results of the tests are shown in Table 15. Cfu per cloth

Staph, Pseudomonas E. coli Enterococcus. Klebsiella aureus aeruginosa hirae Pneumonia

Initial 3.0 10⁸ 7.8 x 10⁷ 1 .7 x 10⁸ 1 .8 x 10⁸ 1 .8 x 10⁸ inoculum

"unwashed" > 10⁷ 3.1 x 10⁶ 8.9 x 10⁵ >10⁷ >10⁷

Test Cloth 1 1 .3 x 10⁵ 1 .4 x 10⁵ 4.6 x 10⁴ 2.1 x 10⁶ 9.4 x 10⁵

Test Cloth 2 4.0 10⁴ 3.4 x 10⁵ 1 .6 x 10⁵ 1 .4 x 10⁶ 8.7 x 10⁵

Test Cloth 8.5 x 10⁴ 2.4 x 10⁵ 1 .0 x 10⁵ 1 .8 x 10⁶ 9.1 x 10⁵ average

Log reduction log 2 log 1 <log 1 <log 1 log 1

TABLE 15 ANTIMICROBIAL EFFICACY OF CORE-SHELL PARTICLES WITH A

CORE OF CTAB

[00166] Table 15 shows that use of core-shell particles with a core of CTAB in conjunction with solid cleaning particles reduce the level of Staphylococcus Aureus, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Klebsiella Pneumoniae by log 2, log 1 and log 1 , respectively. For E. Coli and Enterococcus Hirae, CTAB was not effective.

Example 6 Prevention of Re-Deposition of Soil on Fabric in a Laundry Wash

[00167] This Example shows how the use of single-use core-shell dosing particles in combination with cleaning beads inhibits re-deposition of removed soil onto fabric in a laundry "bead cleaning" process. This has the desirable effect of greatly reducing the "greying" of fabric during washing.

[00168] In this example, core-shell dosing particles are used in conjunction with polymeric cleaning beads; specifically, the cleaning beads consisted of nylon 6,6 filled with 40% barium sulphate (Technyl XA 1493). These were cut to an ellipsoid shape (-4.5 x 3.5 x 3.2 mm) by under-water die face cutting. The material was supplied by Solvay Chemicals, Lyon France.

Preparation of Dosing Particles

[00169] Powders of carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) ("FinnFix BDA", from Azelis, Runcorn, UK) were compressed in a tableting machine using a tableting die diameter of 10 mm. The weight of each tablet was 2.5 g. These formed the "core" of the core-shell pellets.

Formation of Shell

[00170] Tablets were coated with a shell of hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) ("Benecel K100LV", Ashlands Industries Europe, Schaffhausen, Germany) by dipping tablets in a 1 % solution of HPMC in water at room temperature. Tablets were then dried in air at room temperature.

Reduction of Transfer of Suspended Soil onto White Cotton by Core-Shell Dosing Particles

[00171] A washload consisting of 4 kg of used polyester clean-room suits was used. One and a half sebum sheets (one sheet measuring 23 x 61 cm) (Product code SBL 2004, WFK Testgewebe GmbH, D-41379, Germany) and four cotton cloths (17 x 28 cm) (Whaley's (Bradford) Ltd., Bradford UK) were added to the washload.

[00172] The source of soil was a "greying donor" swatch (Article 10991 , from WFK Testgewebe GmbH, Bruggen, Germany). In all cases 2 kg of Technyl cleaning beads were used; the weight ratio of Technyl cleaning beads to washload was therefore 1 :2. The temperature of wash treatment was 40°C.

[00173] The materials making up the wash are listed in Table 16.

TABLE 16 CONTENTS OF WASH FOR 4 KG WASHLOAD EXCLUDING CORE- SHELL PARTICLES

[00174] In addition to the items in Table 16, which were used in every wash cycle, the following quantities of core-shell dosing particles shown in Table 17 were also included in every wash cycle. Run Weight of "core-shell" particles

1 o g

2 2.5 g

3 5.0 g

TABLE 17 QUANTITY OF CORE-SHELL PARTICLES (2 KG WASHLOADS)

[00175] The items for each wash load were placed in a net mesh bag; beads were mixed thoroughly with the fabric materials. The fabric materials were inserted into the mesh bag in layers to disperse items evenly throughout the mesh bag, which was sealed by tying.

[00176] The mesh bag was washed in a Beko domestic washing machine using a 40°C cotton cycle with 32 g of Xeros Pack I detergent available from Xeros Ltd. (a proprietary formulation comprising surfactants and enzymes). The spin speed set was 1200 rpm. The ratio (by weight) of wash load to Xeros Pack I detergent was therefore approximately 8 g/kg.

[00177] At the end of each wash cycle, white cotton cloths were recovered, dried by hanging at room temperature and then analysed for colour character using a Konica Minolta CM-3600A photospectrometer to obtain values of L*, a* and b*. The size of aperture on the photospectrometer was 25.4 mm using 100% UV component and excluding the specular component. Values of L*, a* and b* were also recorded for virgin unwashed cloth. Measurements on 16 areas of the cloths (four areas per cloth) were averaged.

[00178] The cotton swatches were then re-washed, according to the procedure described above. This was repeated for a total of ten washes.

Results

[00179] The values of L*, a* and b* for the virgin, unwashed cotton cloth are as shown in Table 4. For the purposes of assessing effects on "greying", L* is the most relevant parameter.

[00180] Figure 7 shows how the use of core-shell dosing particles with cores of CMC affects the value of L* over ten repeated wash cycles, a) without core-shell dosing particles, b) with 2.5 g CMC dosing particles, and c) with 5 g CMC dosing particles (new dosing particles added to each wash). [00181] In the absence of core-shell particles there was very significant and progressive reduction in L* from 97.57 ± 0.02 (for virgin cloth) over repeated cycles, with L* decreasing by 6.9 units after 10 cycles. However, when core-shell particles with cores of CMC were used, the reduction in L* after 10 cycles was only -2.0 units. The effect of 5 g of CMC was greater than that of 2.5 g over the approximately first eight wash cycles; after this the values of L* were approximately the same as for 2.5 g of CMC. It is apparent that the use of cleaning beads in conjunction with core-shell particles with cores of CMC has the effect of maintaining the brightness of the fabric and reducing "greying", which is a highly desirable effect.

Role of Cleaning Beads

[00182] This assessment showed that the role of the polymeric cleaning beads (Technyl XA1493) is to prevent deposition of powder residue on fabric, and demonstrates that the use of dosing particles without the cleaning beads results in unacceptable powder residue on the fabrics.

[00183] The same wash protocol as described above was used with the modifications as shown in Table 18:

TABLE 18 REVISED TEST CONDITIONS

[00184] Run A was therefore a simulated conventional wash (without cleaning beads), whilst Run B was a bead cleaning wash.

Results

[00185] It was observed that, in the absence of the polymeric cleaning beads (Run A), an unacceptable powder deposit was left on the fabric (as illustrated in Figure 8), and in the interior of the machine. The deposit removed from the machine for Run A is shown in Figure 9. The presence of such a deposit is undesirable. In the presence of the cleaning beads (Run B), however, no such residues or deposits remained. Hence, it is seen that the role of the cleaning beads is to assist the disintegration of core shell particles and to assist in removing suspended CMC powder from the wash. This shows that the use of core-shell CMC particles in conjunction with solid cleaning particles is advantageous over the use of core-shell CMC particles alone.

[00186] Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the words "comprise" and "contain" and variations of them mean "including but not limited to", and they are not intended to (and do not) exclude other moieties, additives, components, integers or steps. Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the singular encompasses the plural unless the context otherwise requires. In particular, where the indefinite article is used, the specification is to be understood as contemplating plurality as well as singularity, unless the context requires otherwise.

[00187] Features, integers, characteristics, compounds, chemical moieties or groups described in conjunction with a particular aspect, embodiment or example of the invention are to be understood to be applicable to any other aspect, embodiment or example described herein unless incompatible therewith. All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of such features and/or steps are mutually exclusive. The invention is not restricted to the details of any foregoing embodiments. The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.

[00188] The reader's attention is directed to all papers and documents which are filed concurrently with or previous to this specification in connection with this application and which are open to public inspection with this specification, and the contents of all such papers and documents are incorporated herein by reference.

Claims

1. A formulation comprising a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein said dosing particles comprise core-shell particles comprising at least one host material and at least one releasable material, wherein said host material comprises, as the shell of the dosing particles, at least one partially or completely water soluble polymeric material and said at least one releasable material comprises the core material of the dosing particles, comprising at least one cleaning and/or post-cleaning agent and/or other treatment additive for the treatment of a substrate, wherein said solid cleaning particles are polymeric and/or non-polymeric cleaning particles, wherein said polymeric solid cleaning particles have an average density in the range of 0.5-2.5 g/cm³ and an average volume in the range of 5-275 mm³.

2. A formulation as claimed in claim 1 wherein said polymeric cleaning particles comprise foamed or unfoamed polymeric materials.

3. A formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2 wherein said polymeric cleaning particles comprise polymers which are either linear or crosslinked.

4. A formulation as claimed in claim 1 , 2 or 3 wherein said polymeric cleaning particles comprise a polymer selected from polyalkenes, polyamides, polyesters or polyurethanes.

5. A formulation as claimed in claim 4 wherein said polymeric particles comprise nylon, polyethylene terephthalate or polybutylene terephthalate.

6. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein said polymeric cleaning particles comprise copolymers comprising monomers which are ionically charged or include polar moieties or unsaturated organic groups.

7. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said non-polymeric cleaning particles comprise glass, silica, stone, wood, metals or ceramic materials.

8. A formulation as claimed in claim 7 wherein said metals are selected from zinc, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, tungsten, aluminium, tin and lead, and alloys thereof.

9. A formulation as claimed in claim 7 wherein said ceramics are selected from alumina, zirconia, tungsten carbide, silicon carbide and silicon nitride.

10. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein non-polymeric solid cleaning particles have an average density in the range of 3.5-12.0 g/cm³ and an average volume in the range of 5-275 mm³.

11. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said solid cleaning particles are substantially ellipsoidal, cylindrical or spherical in shape.

12. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said dosing particles are added at a ratio of from 0.1-50.0% w/w of the total mass of said formulation.

13. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said dosing particles are substantially cylindrical or spherical in shape.

14. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said dosing particles have an average density in the range of 0.5-2.5 g/cm³ and an average volume in the range of 5- 500 mm³.

15. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim which comprises two or more types of dosing particles.

16. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said host material is selected from at least one of polyvinyl alcohol, copolymers of polyvinyl alcohol) and polyvinyl acetate), poly(ethyl vinyl alcohol), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, cellulose, starch, hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidinone), poly(ethylene glycol) and gelatin, or salts thereof.

17. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim for the cleaning of a soiled substrate, wherein said at least one releasable material comprises at least one cleaning agent.

18. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said at least one releasable material comprises at least one post-cleaning agent.

19. A formulation as claimed in claim 18 wherein said post-cleaning agent comprises at least one optical brightening agent, anti-redeposition agent, fragrance or dye transfer inhibiting agent.

20. A formulation as claimed in claim 19 wherein said dye transfer inhibiting agent is selected from chitosan, polyvinylpyrrolidone polymers (crosslinked or uncrosslinked), polyamine N-oxide polymers, copolymers of N-vinylpyrrolidone and N-vinylimidazole, polyvinyloxazolidones, polyvinylimidazoles, salts of all these polymers, sodium bentonite, calcium bentonite, montmorillionite, kaolinite, kaoline, and mixtures thereof.

21. A formulation as claimed in claim 20 wherein said dye transfer inhibiting agent is selected from copolymers of N-vinylpyrrolidone and N-vinylimidazole.

22. A formulation as claimed in claim 19 wherein said at least one anti-redeposition agent is selected from polyacrylates and polyethylene glycol, or salts thereof.

23. A formulation as claimed in claim 19 wherein said at least one anti-redeposition agent is selected from carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) or salts thereof.

24. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said at least one other treatment additive comprises at least one anti-microbial agent.

25. A formulation as claimed in claim 24 wherein said anti-microbial agent is selected from ionic silver containing zeolites, benzalkonium choride, Triclosan^® and silver nitrate.

26. A formulation as claimed in claim 24 wherein said anti-microbial agent is hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB).

27. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said cleaning agent comprises at least one detergent.

28. A formulation as claimed in claim 27 wherein said detergent comprises at least one surfactant which is selected from non-ionic and/or anionic and/or cationic surfactants and/or ampholytic and/or zwitterionic and/or semi-polar non-ionic surfactants.

29. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said cleaning agent comprises at least one enzyme, oxidising agent or bleach.

30. A formulation as claimed in claim 28 wherein said surfactant is present at a level of from 5% to 30% of the dosing particle mass.

31. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said at least one cleaning agent additionally comprises builders, chelating agents, dye transfer inhibiting agents, dispersants, enzyme stabilizers, catalytic materials, bleach activators, polymeric dispersing agents, clay soil removal agents and/or suds suppressors.

32. A formulation as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said at least one cleaning agent comprises at least one bleach compound and/or at least one bleach activator.

33. A formulation as claimed in claim 32 wherein said at least one bleach is selected from peroxygen compounds, inorganic peroxy salts and organic peroxy acids.

34. A formulation as claimed in claim 33 wherein said inorganic peroxy salts are selected from percarbonates.

35. A formulation as claimed in claim 34 wherein said percarbonate comprises sodium percarbonate.

36. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 32 to 35 wherein said at least one bleach activator is selected from carboxylic acid esters.

37. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 32 to 35 wherein said at least one bleach activator comprises tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED).

38. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 32 to 37 which comprises sodium percarbonate and tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED).

39. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 32 to 38 which comprises two types of dosing particles, wherein a first type of dosing particle comprises a bleach compound and a second type of dosing particle comprises a bleach activator.

40. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 32 to 38 wherein the dosing particles comprise both a bleach compound and a bleach activator.

41. A formulation as claimed in claim 40 wherein the weight ratio of bleach compound to bleach activator is from 10: 1 to 1 : 10.

42. A formulation as claimed in claim 41 wherein said weight ratio is from 5:1 to 1 :5, more typically from 3:1 to 1 :3, most typically from 2:1 to 1 :2.

43. A formulation as claimed in claim 39 wherein the ratio of bleach compound to bleach activator is from 10:1 to 1 : 10.

44. A formulation as claimed in claim 43 wherein said weight ratio is from 5:1 to 1 :5, more typically from 3:1 to 1 :3, most typically from 2:1 to 1 :2.

45. A formulation as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 16 wherein said dosing particles comprise additives which are free from cleaning agents.

46. A formulation as claimed in claim 45 which comprises an antimicrobial agent for release onto a fabric surface for sterilisation purposes.

47. A method for the treatment of a substrate, said method comprising the treatment of the substrate with a formulation as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 46.

48. A method for the treatment of a substrate, said method comprising the treatment of the substrate with a formulation as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 44, wherein said method comprises a method for the cleaning of a soiled substrate, wherein said at least one releasable material comprises at least one cleaning agent.

49. A method as claimed in claim 47 or 48 wherein said at least one releasable material comprises at least one post-cleaning agent.

50. A method as claimed in claim 47, 48 or 49 for the cleaning of textile fibres and fabrics, wherein said treatment is performed at temperatures of between 5 and 95°C for a duration of between 10 minutes and 1 hour.

51. A method as claimed in claim 50 wherein said at least one cleaning agent comprises at least one bleach compound and at least one bleach activator and said treatment is performed at a temperature of less than 50°C.

52. A method for the treatment of a substrate, said method comprising the treatment of the substrate with a formulation as claimed in claim 45 or 46.

53. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 51 which additionally comprises treating the substrate according to the method of claim 52.

54. A method as claimed in claim 52 or 53 which comprises the release of an antimicrobial agent onto a fabric surface for sterilisation purposes.

55. A method as claimed in claim 54 wherein said anti-microbial agent is selected from ionic silver containing zeolites, benzalkonium choride, Triclosan^® and silver nitrate.

56. A method as claimed in claim 54 wherein said anti-microbial agent is hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB).

57. A method as claimed in claim 52 or 53 which comprises the treatment of a fabric with at least one anti-redeposition agent or dye transfer inhibiting agent.

58. A method as claimed in claim 57 wherein said dye transfer inhibiting agent is selected from chitosan, polyvinylpyrrolidone polymers (crosslinked or uncrosslinked), polyamine N-oxide polymers, copolymers of N-vinylpyrrolidone and N-vinylimidazole, polyvinyloxazolidones, polyvinylimidazoles, salts of all these polymers, sodium bentonite, calcium bentonite, montmorillionite, kaolinite, kaoline, and mixtures thereof.

59. A method as claimed in claim 58 wherein said dye transfer inhibiting agent is selected from copolymers of N-vinylpyrrolidone and N-vinylimidazole.

60. A method as claimed in claim 57 wherein said at least one anti-redeposition agent is selected from polyacrylates and polyethylene glycol, or salts thereof.

61. A method as claimed in claim 57 wherein said at least one anti-redeposition agent is selected from carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) or salts thereof.

62. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 61 wherein said method is performed in an aqueous environment wherein water is added to the system so as to provide a water to substrate ratio which is between 2.5: 1 and 0.1 : 1 w/w.

63. A method as claimed in claim 62 wherein said ratio is between 2.0:1 and 0.8: 1.

64. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 63 wherein said solid cleaning particles are added at a particle to substrate addition level of from 30: 1 to 0.1 : 1 by dry mass of substrate.

65. A method as claimed in claim 64 wherein the ratio of solid cleaning particles to substrate is in the range of from 10: 1 to 0.1 : 1 w/w by dry mass of substrate.

66. A method as claimed in claim 65 wherein said ratio is between 5:1 and 1 : 1 by dry mass of substrate.

67. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 66 wherein said substrate comprises plastics materials, leather, paper, cardboard, metal, glass or wood.

68. A method as claims in any one of claims 47 to 66 wherein said substrate comprises a textile fibre.

69. A method as claimed in claim 68 wherein said textile fibre comprises a natural fibre or a synthetic fibre or a blend thereof.

70. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 69 wherein said solid cleaning particles are re-used in further procedures according to the claimed method.

71. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 70 which comprises a rinse cycle.

72. A method as claimed in claim 71 which comprises rinsing said substrate in the presence of said solid cleaning particles and dosing particles.

73. A method as claimed in claim 72 which comprises the addition of water which is subsequently or simultaneously removed.

74. A method as claimed in claim 71 , 72 or 73 wherein said dosing particles comprise, as said releasable material, a bleach compound and/or a bleach activator and/or an antimicrobial agent.

A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 74 which comprises the steps of:

(i) washing the substrate in a wash formulation which comprises water and one or more cleaning agents either in the presence or absence of solid cleaning particles;

(ii) optionally rinsing the substrate with water and/or extracting the water from the substrate;

(iii) adding cleaning particles if not already present from step (i); and

(iv) treating the substrate in the presence of the cleaning particles and the dosing particles.

76. A method as claimed in claim 75 wherein said treatment step comprises agitation.

77. A method as claimed in claim 75 or 76 wherein said cleaning agents comprise enzymes.

78. A method as claimed in claim 75, 76 or 77 wherein step (iv) is performed using formulation which is free of any enzymes.

79. A method as claimed in any one of claims 75 to 78 wherein the wash formulation in step (i) comprises no bleach compound and/or no bleach activator.

80. A method as claimed in any one of claims 47 to 50 for the cleaning of a soiled substrate, said method comprising, in sequence, the steps of:

i. washing the soiled substrate with a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles;

ii. performing a first extraction of excess water;

iii. performing a first separation of said solid cleaning particles; IV. rinsing;

v. performing a second extraction of excess water;

VI. optionally repeating steps (d) and (e) at least once; and

VII. performing a second separation of said solid cleaning particles.

81. A method for the cleaning of a cleaning apparatus, said method comprising the treatment of the internal systems of the apparatus with a formulation comprising a multiplicity of solid cleaning particles and a multiplicity of dosing particles, wherein said dosing particles comprise at least one host material and at least one releasable material, wherein said host material comprises, as the shell of the dosing particles, at least one partially or completely water soluble polymeric material, and said releasable material comprises the core material of the dosing particles, comprising an antimicrobial agent.