EP2970685B9 - Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure - Google Patents
Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2970685B9 EP2970685B9 EP14711114.0A EP14711114A EP2970685B9 EP 2970685 B9 EP2970685 B9 EP 2970685B9 EP 14711114 A EP14711114 A EP 14711114A EP 2970685 B9 EP2970685 B9 EP 2970685B9
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- particle size
- pigment component
- weight
- pigment
- basecoat
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title claims description 99
- 239000011087 paperboard Substances 0.000 title claims description 71
- 239000000049 pigment Substances 0.000 claims description 202
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 145
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 127
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 229940088417 precipitated calcium carbonate Drugs 0.000 claims description 14
- 241000276425 Xiphophorus maculatus Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000001023 inorganic pigment Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 33
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 description 14
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 description 14
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 13
- 238000003490 calendering Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000011362 coarse particle Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910052570 clay Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 7
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000002562 thickening agent Substances 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000005995 Aluminium silicate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000012211 aluminium silicate Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- NLYAJNPCOHFWQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N kaolin Chemical compound O.O.O=[Al]O[Si](=O)O[Si](=O)O[Al]=O NLYAJNPCOHFWQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000123 paper Substances 0.000 description 2
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000013361 beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011247 coating layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002270 dispersing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- -1 etc.) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002657 fibrous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012860 organic pigment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000454 talc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052623 talc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H19/00—Coated paper; Coating material
- D21H19/36—Coatings with pigments
- D21H19/38—Coatings with pigments characterised by the pigments
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H19/00—Coated paper; Coating material
- D21H19/36—Coatings with pigments
- D21H19/38—Coatings with pigments characterised by the pigments
- D21H19/385—Oxides, hydroxides or carbonates
Definitions
- This patent application is directed to coatings for paperboard and, more particularly, to basecoat compositions for forming smooth paperboard structures.
- Paperboard is used in various packaging applications. For example, aseptic liquid packaging paperboard is used for packaging beverage cartons, boxers and the like. Therefore, customers often prefer paperboard having a generally smooth surface with few imperfections to facilitate the printing of high quality text and graphics, thereby increasing the visual appeal of products packaged in paperboard.
- a basecoat composition for paperboard comprising a carrier and a pigment component dispersed in the carrier, the pigment component comprising all pigments in the basecoat composition, wherein the pigment component has a median particle size between about 3 and about 8 micrometers, and wherein at most about 15 percent by weight of the pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer.
- the median particle size is between about 3 and about 7 micrometers, preferably between about 3 and about 6 micrometers, more preferably between about 4 and about 5 micrometers.
- At most about 14 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, preferably at most about 13 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, more preferably at most about 12 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, more preferably at most about 11 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, most preferably at most about 10 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer.
- At most about 20 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers, preferably at most about 15 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers, more preferably at most about 10 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers.
- the pigment component comprises calcium carbonate.
- the pigment component comprises precipitated calcium carbonate.
- the precipitated calcium carbonate comprises at least 50 percent by weight of said pigment component, preferably at least 70 percent by weight of said pigment component, more preferably at least 80 percent by weight of said pigment component and most preferably said pigment component consists essentially of said precipitated calcium carbonate.
- the pigment component comprises a blend of pigments.
- the pigment component consists essentially of inorganic pigments.
- said pigment component is substantially free of platy pigments.
- a paperboard structure comprising a paperboard substrate comprising a first major surface and a second major surface and a basecoat applied to at least one of the first major surface and the second major surface, the basecoat comprising a pigment component, the pigment component comprising all pigments in the basecoat, the pigment component being defined in any of the relevant preceding paragraphs.
- the paperboard substrate has a basis weight of at least 0.138kg/m 2 (85 pounds/3,000 ft 2 ).
- the basecoat is applied at a coat weight of at most about 14.6 g/m 2 (9 pounds/3,000 ft 2 ), preferably at most about 13.0 g/m 2 (8 pounds per 3000 square feet).
- the paperboard structure further comprises a top coat positioned over said basecoat to form a top-coated paperboard structure having an outermost coating surface, wherein said outermost coating surface preferably has a Parker Print Surf smoothness (PPS 10S) of at most about 3 ⁇ m, more preferably at most about 2 ⁇ m.
- PPS 10S Parker Print Surf smoothness
- Paperboard structures having desired smoothness may be obtained by engineering the particle size distribution of the particles used in the associated basecoat composition. Specifically, it has now been discovered that the significant presence of excess fine particles, as well as excess coarse particles, has a detrimental effect on smoothness, and that smoothness can be enhanced by using particles having a relatively narrow particle size distribution within an optimized median particle size range.
- one embodiment of the disclosed paperboard structure may include a paperboard substrate 12, a basecoat 14 and, optionally, a top coat 16.
- the paperboard substrate 12 may include a first major surface 18 and a second major surface 20.
- the basecoat 14 may be applied only to the first major surface 18 (C1S) or to both the first major surface 18 and the second major surface 20 (C2S).
- the top coat 16 may be applied over the basecoat 14 to present an outermost coating surface 22. Additional coating layers (not shown) may be positioned between the basecoat 14 and the top coat 16 without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
- the paperboard substrate 12 may be any web of fibrous material that is capable of being coated with the disclosed basecoat 14.
- the paperboard substrate 12 may be bleached or unbleached, and may be paper or thicker and more rigid than paper.
- the paperboard substrate 12 may have an uncoated basis weight of about 85 pounds per 3000 ft 2 or more.
- Examples of appropriate paperboard substrates 12 include corrugating medium, linerboard, solid bleached sulfate (SBS) and aseptic liquid packaging paperboard
- the basecoat 14 may be applied to the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12 in a quantity sufficient to fill the pits and crevices in the first major surface 18 without the need for coating the entire first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12, thereby forming a discontinuous film on the first major surface 18.
- the basecoat 14 may be applied using a blade coater such that the blade coater urges the basecoat 14 into the pits and crevices in the first major surface 18 while removing the basecoat 14 from the first major surface 18.
- the basecoat 14 may be applied in a manner that is akin to spackling, wherein substantially all of the basecoat 14 resides in the pits and crevices in the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12 rather than on the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12.
- the spacing between the moving paperboard substrate 12 and the blade of the coater maybe minimized to facilitate filling the pits and crevices in the first major surface 18 without substantially depositing the basecoat 14 on the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12 (i.e., forming a discontinuous film on the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12).
- the blade of the coater maybe positioned sufficiently close to the first major surface 18 of the moving paperboard substrate 12 such that the blade of the coater urges the basecoat 14 into the pits and crevices in the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12, while removing excess basecoat 14 from the first major surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12.
- the top coat 16 may be any appropriate topcoat.
- the topcoat 16 may include calcium carbonate, clay and various other components and may be applied over the basecoat 14 as a slurry.
- Top coats are well known by those skilled in the art and any conventional or non-conventional top coat composition may be used without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
- the outermost coating surface 22 of the disclosed paperboard structure 10 maybe relatively smooth.
- the outermost coating surface 22 of the disclosed paperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 5 micrometers.
- the outermost coating surface 22 of the disclosed paperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 4 micrometers.
- the outermost coating surface 22 of the disclosed paperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 3 micrometers.
- the outermost coating surface 22 of the disclosed paperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 2 micrometers.
- the basecoat 14 may include a pigment component having an engineered particle size distribution, as discussed in greater detail herein.
- the basecoat 14 may be initially prepared as a basecoat composition that includes a pigment component and a carrier component.
- the carrier component may include any suitable carrier, such as water.
- the pigment component may be dispersed in the carrier component to facilitate application of the basecoat 14 to the paperboard substrate 12.
- the basecoat composition may have a solids content of at most about 70 percent by weight, such as at most about 67 percent by weight, though those skilled in the art will appreciate that the appropriate solids content may depend on various factors, such as the technique being used to apply the basecoat composition to the paperboard substrate 12. Additional components, such as binders (e.g., latex, starch, etc.), thickeners, stabilizers, dispersing agents and the like, maybe included in the basecoat composition without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
- binders e.g., latex, starch, etc.
- thickeners e.g.
- the pigment component of the basecoat 14 refers to all of the pigments within the basecoat 14 (or the basecoat composition).
- the pigment component may include a single type of pigment or, alternatively, maybe a blend of two or more different pigments.
- Fig. 2 provides a graphical representation of the mass particle size distribution of VICALITY ® Heavy precipitated calcium carbonate (“PCC”), which is commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc. of New York, New York.
- the VICALITY ® Heavy pigment has a median particle size of about 4.2 micrometers, a steepness parameter of about 1.0, and a fines content wherein at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- the "particle size" of a pigment refers to the equivalent spherical diameter of the pigment, which may be measured using a particle size analyzer regardless of whether the particles are spherical (or near spherical) or non-spherical.
- the data presented in Fig. 2 was collected using a SEDIGRAPH ® 5120 particle size analyzer, which is commercially available from Micrometrics Instrument Corporation of Norcross, Georgia.
- median particle size refers to the particle size at which 50 percent (by weight) of the pigment particles are less than that particle size. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 2 , the median particle size (D50) of VICALITY ® Heavy pigment is about 4.2 micrometers.
- ⁇ D 80 ⁇ D 20 D 50
- D50 is the median particle size
- D80 is the particle size at which 80 percent (by weight) of the pigment particles are smaller
- the fines content can be expressed at various particle sizes.
- the fines content can be expressed as the percentage (by weight) of particles having a particle size less than 1 micrometer. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 2 , VICALITY ® Heavy pigment has a fines content wherein at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- the median particle size of the disclosed pigment component maybe within a specific range. In one expression, the median particle size may range from about 3 micrometers to about 8 micrometers. In another expression, the median particle size may range from about 3 micrometers to about 7 micrometers. In another expression, the median particle size may range from about 3 micrometers to about 6 micrometers. In yet another expression, the median particle size may range from about 4 micrometers to about 5 micrometers.
- the steepness parameter of the disclosed pigment component may be less than a threshold value, which may correspond to a relatively narrow particle size distribution.
- the steepness parameter maybe at most about 1.3.
- the steepness parameter may be at most about 1.2.
- the steepness parameter may be at most about 1.1.
- the steepness parameter may be at most about 1.0.
- the fines content of the disclosed pigment component maybe relatively low.
- at most about 15 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- at most about 14 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- at most about 13 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- at most about 12 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- at most about 11 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- the coarse content of the disclosed pigment component may also be relatively low.
- at most about 20 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size greater than 8 micrometer.
- at most about 15 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size greater than 8 micrometer.
- at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size greater than 8 micrometer.
- the disclosed pigment component particle size distribution may be obtained by selecting a single pigment for use as the entire pigment component, wherein the single pigment provides the desired particle size distribution.
- VICALITY ® Heavy precipitated calcium carbonate a commercially available pigment, may have the desired particle size distribution, as shown in Fig. 2 .
- pigments and pigment blends may be engineered to have the disclosed pigment component particle size distribution.
- the disclosed particle size distribution may be achieved by mixing together various existing (e.g., commercially available) pigments in appropriate proportions.
- an existing pigment or pigment blend may be processed (e.g., sifting and separating) to achieve the disclosed particle size distribution.
- the pigment component may be substantially entirely comprised of inorganic pigments.
- the pigment component may include both inorganic and organic pigments.
- the pigment component may be substantially free of platy pigments (e.g., platy clays), wherein "platy” refers to pigments having a shape factor greater than 60.
- platy pigments e.g., platy clays
- Examples of pigments that may be used to design a pigment component having the disclosed particle size distribution include, but are not limited to, precipitated calcium carbonate, ground calcium carbonate, talc and clay (e.g., kaolin).
- Pigment 1 (“Fine Ground”) was a fine ground calcium carbonate, HYDROCARB ® 90, commercially available from Omya AG of Oftringen, Switzerland.
- Pigment 2 (“Coarse Ground”) was a coarse ground calcium carbonate, HYDROCARB ® 60, commercially available from Omya AG.
- Pigment 3 (“Extra-Coarse Ground”) was an extra-coarse ground calcium carbonate, HYDROCARB ® PG3, commercially available from Omya AG.
- Pigment 4 (“Fine Precipitated") was a fine prismatic precipitated calcium carbonate, ALBAGLOS ® S, commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc.
- Pigment 5 (“Coarse Precipitated") was a coarse rhombohedal precipitated calcium carbonate, VICALITY ® Heavy, commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc.
- Pigment 6 (“Extra-Coarse Precipitated”) was an extra-coarse rhombohedal precipitated calcium carbonate, CALESSENCE ® 1500, commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc.
- Table 1 In addition to providing the median particle size (shown as "Median Diameter”), the steepness parameter, percent less than 1 micrometer and percent greater than 8 micrometers, Table 1 also provides the modal diameter (the particle diameter that represents the highest point of each curve in Fig. 4 ), percent less than 0.5 micrometers, percent less than 2 micrometers, and percent greater than 10 micrometers.
- Pigments 1-6 have a wide range of particle size distributions.
- Pigment 1 (Fine Ground) has a small average particle size, a relatively wide size distribution, the most fines, and the least coarse particles.
- Pigment 2 (Coarse Ground) has substantially the same steepness parameter as Pigment 1, but a median particle size that is double. Pigment 2 has about half as many small particles as Pigment 1, but still virtually no particles larger than 8 micrometers.
- Pigment 3 (Extra-Coarse Ground) is the coarsest ground carbonate evaluated-it has a median particle size that is about double the median particle size of Pigment 2 and four times as large as Pigment 1.
- Pigment 3 has the broadest distribution of all the pigments. It still has a relatively large amount of fine particles, but also has a significant amount of coarse particles.
- Pigment 4 (Fine Precipitated) has a similar median particle size to Pigment 1, but a much narrower particle size distribution (steepness parameter of 1.0 versus 1.5). Pigment 4 has a much smaller amount of particles less than 0.5 micrometers, compared to Pigment 1, but a comparable amount less than 1 micrometer. Pigment 4 has very few coarse particles.
- Pigment 5 (Coarse Precipitated) has an average particle size larger than the Pigment 3, but has very few fine or coarse particles, and has a narrow particle size distribution. Therefore, Pigment 5 may be used as the pigment component of the disclosed basecoat (and basecoat composition).
- Pigment 6 (Extra-Coarse Precipitated) has a very large average particle size. The majority of its particles are greater than 8 microns. Pigment 6 has the lowest steepness index of any of the pigments evaluated in Example 1.
- a solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples.
- the board had an average basis weight of about 125 pounds per 3000 ft 2 and an average roughness of 7.5 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness.
- Three different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- a common top coat was applied to all three basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- the topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- Basecoat Composition 1 included 100 parts Pigment 1 (HYDROCARB ® 90) and 20 parts latex binder
- Basecoat Composition 2 included 100 parts Pigment 2 (HYDROCARB ® 60) and 20 parts latex binder
- Basecoat Composition 3 included 100 parts Pigment 5 (VICALITY ® Heavy) and 20 parts latex binder.
- Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 1-3 to achieve the required solids content for coating.
- An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust the Brookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 1-3 to about 2500 cP.
- Basecoat Compositions 1-3 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater.
- the test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 2, below: TABLE 2 Hydrocarb 90 Hydrocarb 60 Vicality Heavy Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 9 8.9 8.6 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 6.2 6.2 6.1 Basecoated PPS Smoothness ( ⁇ ) 4.79 5.46 4.82 Calendered Topcoated PPS ( ⁇ ) 1.65 1.64 1.14 IGT Pick strength 119.5 139.5 148.2
- Both HYDROCARB ® 90 and VICALITY ® Heavy produced substantially reduced basecoat-only roughness, but after topcoating, HYDROCARB ® 90 and HYDROCARB ® 60 gave equal roughness values, while VICALITY ® Heavy produced substantially reduced PPS roughness values.
- the IGT pick test measures surface strength. The IGT results show HYDROCARB ® 90 resulted in reduced coating strength, but VICALITY ® Heavy and HYDROCARB ® 60 were equivalent.
- a solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples.
- the board had an average basis weight of about 120 pounds per 3000 ft 2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness.
- Four different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- a common top coat was applied to all four basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- the topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- Basecoat Composition 4 included 100 parts Pigment 2 (HYDROCARB ® 60) and 20 parts latex binder
- Basecoat Composition 5 included 100 parts Pigment 5 (VICALITY ® Heavy) and 20 parts latex binder
- Basecoat Composition 6 included 100 parts Pigment 6 (CALESSENCE ® 1500) and 20 parts latex binder
- Basecoat Composition 7 included 100 parts Pigment 5 (HYDROCARB ® PG3) and 20 parts latex binder.
- Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 4-7 to achieve the required solids content for coating.
- An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust the Brookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 4-7 to about 2500 cP.
- Basecoat Compositions 4-7 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater.
- the test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 3, below: TABLE 3 Hydrocarb 60 Vicality Heavy Calessence Hydrocarb PG3 Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 9.5 6.4 9.6 8.9 Topocoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 7.3 5.9 6.2 5.5 Basecoated PPS Smoothness ( ⁇ ) 5.06 4.66 7.50 6.36 Calendered Topcoated PPS ( ⁇ ) 1.98 1.48 2.04 2.42 IGT Pick Strength 163 144 184 168
- VICALITY ® Heavy gave substantially improved roughness values compared to HYDROCARB ® 60, for both basecoat-only and topcoated calendered Parker Print Surf Smoothness.
- CALESSENCE ® 1500 gave very little improvement in basecoat-only smoothness of the uncoated board, but when topcoated, gave a topcoated smoothness comparable to HYDROCARB ® 60.
- HYDROCARB ® PG3 gave a substantially rougher surface than HYDROCARB ® 60 for both basecoat-only and topcoated smoothness.
- IGT Pick results show a slightly lower coating strength for VICALITY ® Heavy, compared to HYDROCARB ® 60.
- CALESSENCE ® 1500 was slightly stronger than HYDROCARB ® 60, and HYDROCARB ® PG3 was equal
- Example 4 The conditions and pigments of Example 4 were the same as Example 3, except for the weight and roughness of the uncoated board. Specifically, the uncoated board used for Example 4 had an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness, and the basis weight was 104 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- PPS 10S Parker Print Surf
- VICALITY ® Heavy gave a very large improvement in basecoat-only and topcoated smoothness, compared to HYDROCARB ® 60.
- CALESSENCE ® 1500 gave similar basecoat-only roughness values compared to HYDROCARB ® 60, but gave a substantial improvement in topcoated smoothness compared to HYDROCARB ® 60, but only about half of the benefit obtained by VICALITY ⁇ Heavy.
- HYDROCARB ® PG3 gave equivalent results compared to HYDROCARB ® 60.
- a solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples.
- the board had an average basis weight of about 120 pounds per 3000 ft 2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness.
- Three different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- a common top coat was applied to all three basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- the topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- Blends of a coarse precipitated calcium carbonate (VICALITY ® Heavy) with an ultrafine ground calcium carbonate (HYDROCARB ® HG) and an extra-coarse precipitated calcium carbonate (CALESSENCE ® 1500) were used to demonstrate the effect of increasing the percentage of fine or coarse particles in VICALITY ® Heavy on final double coated sheet smoothness.
- Basecoat Composition 8 included 100 parts VICALITY ® Heavy (Pigment 5) and 20 parts latex binder;
- Basecoat Composition 9 included 80 parts VICALITY ® Heavy (Pigment 5), 20 parts CALESSENCE ® 1500 (Pigment 6) and 20 parts latex binder;
- Basecoat Composition 10 included 80 parts VICALITY ® Heavy (Pigment 5), 20 parts HYDROCARB ® HG (an ultrafine ground calcium carbonate commercially available from Omya AG) and 20 parts latex binder.
- Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 8-10 to achieve the required solids content for coating.
- An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust the Brookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 8-10 to about 2500 cP.
- the blend with CALESSENCE ® 1500 has twice as many particles greater than 8 micrometers and the blend with HYDROCARB ® HG has three times as many particles less than 1 micrometers.
- Basecoat Compositions 8-10 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater.
- the test data for the double coated board samples (as well as a sample prepared using all HYDROCARB ® 60 as the pigment component) are presented in Table 6, below: TABLE 6 80-Vicality Heavy 80-Vicality Heavy Hydrocarb 60 Vicality Heavy 20-Hydrocarb HG 20-Calessence Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 8.7 8.2 9.1 9.7 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 5.8 7.2 6.2 7.2 Basecoated PPS Smoothness ( ⁇ ) 5.56 4.50 5.96 5.05 Calendered Topcoated PPS ( ⁇ ) 1.87 1.24 1.93 1.58 IGT Pick Strength 137 142 146 154
- VICALITY ® Heavy is shown to give a very large reduction in roughness compared to HYDROCARB ® 60. Adding 20 parts CALESSENCE ® 1500 to VICALITY ® Heavy reduced by half the smoothness benefit, as compared to VICALITY ® Heavy, but was still significantly better than HYDROCARB ® 60. Adding 20 parts HYDROCARB ® HG completely eliminated any smoothness benefit associated with using VICALITY ® Heavy.
- a solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples.
- the board had an average basis weight of about 125 pounds per 3000 ft 2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness.
- Three different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- a common top coat was applied to all three basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft 2 .
- the topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- Basecoat Composition 11 included 100 parts HYDROCARB ® 60 (Pigment 2 in Example 1) and 20 parts latex binder;
- Basecoat Composition 12 included 100 parts VICALITY ® Heavy (Pigment 5 in Example 1) and 20 parts latex binder;
- Basecoat Composition 13 included 100 parts ALBAGLOS ® S (Pigment 4) and 20 parts latex binder.
- Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 11-13 to achieve the required solids content for coating.
- An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust the Brookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 11-13 to about 2500 cP.
- Basecoat Compositions 11-13 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater.
- the test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 7, below: TABLE 7 Hydrocarb 60 Vicality Heavy Albaglos S Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 9.5 9.0 9.2 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft 2 ) 5.9 5.6 7.2 Basecoated PPS Smoothness ( ⁇ ) 5.86 4.28 5.11 Calendered Topcoated PPS ( ⁇ ) 2.18 1.34 2.11 IGT Pick Strength 148 152 160
- a series of pigment blends were formulated to produce a range of particle size distributions.
- the purpose of this series of pigments was to systematically add fine or coarse particles to a coarse narrow particle size calcium carbonate to ascertain the effect on coated smoothness.
- CALESSENCE ® 1500 was selected as an extra-coarse pigment, and was blended with VICALITY ® Heavy to produce blends containing 14, 25 and 40 percent by weight CALESSENCE ® 1500, respectively.
- Particle size distribution data for blends of VICALITY ® Heavy with CALESSENCE ® 1500 were collected using a SEDIGRAPH ® 5120 particle size analyzer. The results are shown in Figs. 7 and 8 .
- HYDROCARB ® 90 was selected as a fine pigment, and was blended with VICALITY ® Heavy to produce blends with 7, 14 and 21 percent by weight HYDROCARB ® 90, respectively.
- Particle size distribution data for blends of VICALITY ® Heavy with HYDROCARB ® 90 were collected using a SEDIGRAPH ® 5120 particle size analyzer. The results are shown in Figs. 9 and 10 .
- one pigment blend was prepared that included VICALITY ® Heavy with 14 percent by weight KAOBRITE ® clay (a commercially available #2 kaolin clay) and another pigment blend was prepared that includes VICALITY ® Heavy with 14 percent by weight HYDRAFINE ® clay (a #1 kaolin clay commercially available from Kamin, LLC, of Macon, Georgia).
- a solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples.
- the board had an average basis weight of about 125 pounds per 3000 ft 2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness.
- the pigment blends described above were used to prepare basecoat compositions that were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater.
- the basecoat compositions included 100 parts (by weight) pigment/pigment blend and 20 parts by weight binder. Water was used as the carrier component of basecoat compositions to achieve the required solids content for coating.
- An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust the Brookfield 20 rpm viscosity of basecoat compositions to about 2500 cP.
- the basecoat compositions were applied at the coat weights presented in Table 8, above.
- a common top coat was applied to all basecoated structures at the top coat weights presented in Table 8, above.
- the topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50. Smoothness data are provided in Table 8, above.
- Fig. 11 shows the effect of increasing coarse particles on calendered smoothness.
- VICALITY ® Heavy has about 6 percent greater than 8 micrometers. The roughness of the outermost coating surface increases substantially linearly as additional coarse particles are added to the pigment blend.
- Fig. 12 shows the effect of increasing the level of fine particles in the basecoat.
- VICALITY ® Heavy has about 10 percent less than 1 micrometer. Increasing the percentage of fine particles significantly increases the roughness. Doubling the percentage to 20 percent negates substantially all of the benefits related to using VICALITY ® Heavy.
- Fig. 13 contains data for VICALITY ® Heavy with 14 parts of CALESSENC ® 1500, HYDROCARB ® 90, KAOBRITETM and HYDRAFINE ® .
- the data show that adding fine clay particles has the same effect as adding fine calcium carbonate particles.
- Table 8 also contains data for ALBAGLOS ® S which was compared to VICALITY ® Heavy to demonstrate that a fine narrow particle size calcium carbonate does not give smoothness benefits.
Description
- This patent application is directed to coatings for paperboard and, more particularly, to basecoat compositions for forming smooth paperboard structures.
- Paperboard is used in various packaging applications. For example, aseptic liquid packaging paperboard is used for packaging beverage cartons, boxers and the like. Therefore, customers often prefer paperboard having a generally smooth surface with few imperfections to facilitate the printing of high quality text and graphics, thereby increasing the visual appeal of products packaged in paperboard.
- Manufacturers have attempted to smooth the surface of paperboard by coating the entire surface of the paperboard with a basecoat comprised of various pigments, such as clay, calcium carbonate, TiO2 and the like, then overcoating this base with a second and sometimes even a third coating, which is generally referred to as a topcoat. It was discovered that high quantities of relatively fine pigment particles applied to the surface of paperboard provided a smoother surface without sacrificing bulk. Indeed, it has been understood that the more pigment particles applied to the surface of the paperboard the better the resulting smoothness. However, the use of relatively high quantities of pigments substantially increases the cost of preparing smooth and highly printable paperboard.
- Accordingly, those skilled in the art continue with research and development efforts in the field of paperboard coating.
- According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a basecoat composition for paperboard, the composition comprising a carrier and a pigment component dispersed in the carrier, the pigment component comprising all pigments in the basecoat composition, wherein the pigment component has a median particle size between about 3 and about 8 micrometers, and wherein at most about 15 percent by weight of the pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer.
- Optionally, the median particle size is between about 3 and about 7 micrometers, preferably between about 3 and about 6 micrometers, more preferably between about 4 and about 5 micrometers.
- Optionally, at most about 14 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, preferably at most about 13 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, more preferably at most about 12 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, more preferably at most about 11 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, most preferably at most about 10 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer.
- Optionally, at most about 20 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers, preferably at most about 15 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers, more preferably at most about 10 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers.
- Optionally, the pigment component has a steepness index of at most about 1.3, preferably at most about 1.2, more preferably at most about 1.1, most preferably at most about 1.0, the steepness index (Ψ) being defined by the expression:
- Optionally, the pigment component comprises calcium carbonate.
- Optionally, the pigment component comprises precipitated calcium carbonate.
- Optionally, the precipitated calcium carbonate comprises at least 50 percent by weight of said pigment component, preferably at least 70 percent by weight of said pigment component, more preferably at least 80 percent by weight of said pigment component and most preferably said pigment component consists essentially of said precipitated calcium carbonate.
- Optionally, the pigment component comprises a blend of pigments.
- Optionally, the pigment component consists essentially of inorganic pigments.
- Optionally, with the proviso that said pigment component is substantially free of platy pigments.
- According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a paperboard structure comprising a paperboard substrate comprising a first major surface and a second major surface and a basecoat applied to at least one of the first major surface and the second major surface, the basecoat comprising a pigment component, the pigment component comprising all pigments in the basecoat, the pigment component being defined in any of the relevant preceding paragraphs.
- Optionally, the paperboard substrate has a basis weight of at least 0.138kg/m2 (85 pounds/3,000 ft2).
- Optionally, the basecoat is applied at a coat weight of at most about 14.6 g/m2 (9 pounds/3,000 ft2), preferably at most about 13.0 g/m2 (8 pounds per 3000 square feet).
- Optionally, the paperboard structure further comprises a top coat positioned over said basecoat to form a top-coated paperboard structure having an outermost coating surface, wherein said outermost coating surface preferably has a Parker Print Surf smoothness (PPS 10S) of at most about 3µm, more preferably at most about 2µm.
- Other embodiments of the disclosed basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure will become apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
-
-
Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the disclosed paperboard structure; -
Fig. 2 is a graphical representation of the mass percent particle size distribution of a pigment suitable for use as the pigment component of the disclosed pigment composition; -
Fig. 3 is a graphical representation of the mass percent particle size distribution of various calcium carbonate pigments; -
Fig. 4 is a graphical representation of the mass frequency particle size distribution of the calcium carbonate pigments ofFig. 3 ; -
Fig. 5 is a graphical representation of the mass percent particle size distribution of blended calcium carbonate pigments; -
Fig. 6 is a graphical representation of the mass frequency particle size distribution of the blended calcium carbonate pigments ofFig. 5 ; -
Fig. 7 is a graphical representation of the mass percent particle size distribution of various blends of coarse narrow particle size calcium carbonate pigments with extra-coarse calcium carbonate pigments; -
Fig. 8 is a graphical representation of the mass frequency particle size distribution of the pigment blends ofFig. 7 ; -
Fig. 9 is a graphical representation of the mass percent particle size distribution of various blends of coarse narrow particle size calcium carbonate pigments with fine calcium carbonate pigments; -
Fig. 10 is a graphical representation of the mass frequency particle size distribution of the pigment blends ofFig. 9 ; -
Fig. 11 is a graphical representation of smoothness versus percent of particles greater than 8 micrometers for a blend of coarse narrow particle size calcium carbonate with extra-coarse calcium carbonate; -
Fig. 12 is a graphical representation of smoothness versus percent of particles less than 1 micrometer for a blend of coarse narrow particle size calcium carbonate with fine ground calcium carbonate; and -
Fig. 13 is a graphical representation of smoothness obtained using various pigment blends. - Paperboard structures having desired smoothness may be obtained by engineering the particle size distribution of the particles used in the associated basecoat composition. Specifically, it has now been discovered that the significant presence of excess fine particles, as well as excess coarse particles, has a detrimental effect on smoothness, and that smoothness can be enhanced by using particles having a relatively narrow particle size distribution within an optimized median particle size range.
- Referring to
Fig. 1 , one embodiment of the disclosed paperboard structure, generally designated 10, may include a paperboard substrate 12, abasecoat 14 and, optionally, atop coat 16. The paperboard substrate 12 may include a firstmajor surface 18 and a secondmajor surface 20. Thebasecoat 14 may be applied only to the first major surface 18 (C1S) or to both the firstmajor surface 18 and the second major surface 20 (C2S). Thetop coat 16 may be applied over thebasecoat 14 to present anoutermost coating surface 22. Additional coating layers (not shown) may be positioned between thebasecoat 14 and thetop coat 16 without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. - The paperboard substrate 12 may be any web of fibrous material that is capable of being coated with the disclosed
basecoat 14. The paperboard substrate 12 may be bleached or unbleached, and may be paper or thicker and more rigid than paper. For example, the paperboard substrate 12 may have an uncoated basis weight of about 85 pounds per 3000 ft2 or more. Examples of appropriate paperboard substrates 12 include corrugating medium, linerboard, solid bleached sulfate (SBS) and aseptic liquid packaging paperboard - In one particular implementation, the
basecoat 14 may be applied to the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12 in a quantity sufficient to fill the pits and crevices in the firstmajor surface 18 without the need for coating the entire firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12, thereby forming a discontinuous film on the firstmajor surface 18. For example, thebasecoat 14 may be applied using a blade coater such that the blade coater urges thebasecoat 14 into the pits and crevices in the firstmajor surface 18 while removing thebasecoat 14 from the firstmajor surface 18. Specifically, thebasecoat 14 may be applied in a manner that is akin to spackling, wherein substantially all of thebasecoat 14 resides in the pits and crevices in the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12 rather than on the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12. - At this point, those skilled in the art will appreciate that when the
basecoat 14 is used in a blade coater the spacing between the moving paperboard substrate 12 and the blade of the coater maybe minimized to facilitate filling the pits and crevices in the firstmajor surface 18 without substantially depositing thebasecoat 14 on the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12 (i.e., forming a discontinuous film on the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12). In other words, the blade of the coater maybe positioned sufficiently close to the firstmajor surface 18 of the moving paperboard substrate 12 such that the blade of the coater urges thebasecoat 14 into the pits and crevices in the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12, while removingexcess basecoat 14 from the firstmajor surface 18 of the paperboard substrate 12. - The
top coat 16 may be any appropriate topcoat. For example, thetopcoat 16 may include calcium carbonate, clay and various other components and may be applied over thebasecoat 14 as a slurry. Top coats are well known by those skilled in the art and any conventional or non-conventional top coat composition may be used without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. - The
outermost coating surface 22 of the disclosedpaperboard structure 10 maybe relatively smooth. In one realization, theoutermost coating surface 22 of the disclosedpaperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 5 micrometers. In another realization, theoutermost coating surface 22 of the disclosedpaperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 4 micrometers. In another realization, theoutermost coating surface 22 of the disclosedpaperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 3 micrometers. In another realization, theoutermost coating surface 22 of the disclosedpaperboard structure 10 may have a Parker Print Surface (PPS 10S) smoothness of at most about 2 micrometers. - The
basecoat 14 may include a pigment component having an engineered particle size distribution, as discussed in greater detail herein. To facilitate application of the basecoat 14 (and its pigment component) to the paperboard substrate 12, thebasecoat 14 may be initially prepared as a basecoat composition that includes a pigment component and a carrier component. The carrier component may include any suitable carrier, such as water. The pigment component may be dispersed in the carrier component to facilitate application of thebasecoat 14 to the paperboard substrate 12. As an example, the basecoat composition may have a solids content of at most about 70 percent by weight, such as at most about 67 percent by weight, though those skilled in the art will appreciate that the appropriate solids content may depend on various factors, such as the technique being used to apply the basecoat composition to the paperboard substrate 12. Additional components, such as binders (e.g., latex, starch, etc.), thickeners, stabilizers, dispersing agents and the like, maybe included in the basecoat composition without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. - The pigment component of the basecoat 14 (or of the basecoat composition) refers to all of the pigments within the basecoat 14 (or the basecoat composition). The pigment component may include a single type of pigment or, alternatively, maybe a blend of two or more different pigments.
-
Fig. 2 provides a graphical representation of the mass particle size distribution of VICALITY® Heavy precipitated calcium carbonate ("PCC"), which is commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc. of New York, New York. The VICALITY® Heavy pigment has a median particle size of about 4.2 micrometers, a steepness parameter of about 1.0, and a fines content wherein at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. - As used herein, the "particle size" of a pigment refers to the equivalent spherical diameter of the pigment, which may be measured using a particle size analyzer regardless of whether the particles are spherical (or near spherical) or non-spherical. The data presented in
Fig. 2 was collected using a SEDIGRAPH® 5120 particle size analyzer, which is commercially available from Micrometrics Instrument Corporation of Norcross, Georgia. - As used herein, "median particle size" refers to the particle size at which 50 percent (by weight) of the pigment particles are less than that particle size. Therefore, as shown in
Fig. 2 , the median particle size (D50) of VICALITY® Heavy pigment is about 4.2 micrometers. - As used herein, "steepness parameter" (Ψ) refers to the narrowness of the particle size distribution and is calculated as follows:
Fig. 2 , the steepness parameter of VICALITY®Heavy pigment is about 1.0 (i.e., (6.05 -1.93) / 4.23 = 0.97). - The fines content can be expressed at various particle sizes. As one example, the fines content can be expressed as the percentage (by weight) of particles having a particle size less than 1 micrometer. Therefore, as shown in
Fig. 2 , VICALITY® Heavy pigment has a fines content wherein at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. - The median particle size of the disclosed pigment component maybe within a specific range. In one expression, the median particle size may range from about 3 micrometers to about 8 micrometers. In another expression, the median particle size may range from about 3 micrometers to about 7 micrometers. In another expression, the median particle size may range from about 3 micrometers to about 6 micrometers. In yet another expression, the median particle size may range from about 4 micrometers to about 5 micrometers.
- The steepness parameter of the disclosed pigment component may be less than a threshold value, which may correspond to a relatively narrow particle size distribution. In one expression, the steepness parameter maybe at most about 1.3. In another expression, the steepness parameter may be at most about 1.2. In another expression, the steepness parameter may be at most about 1.1. In yet another expression, the steepness parameter may be at most about 1.0.
- The fines content of the disclosed pigment component maybe relatively low. In one expression, at most about 15 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. In another expression, at most about 14 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. In another expression, at most about 13 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. In another expression, at most about 12 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. In another expression, at most about 11 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer. In yet another expression, at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size less than 1 micrometer.
- The coarse content of the disclosed pigment component may also be relatively low. In one expression, at most about 20 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size greater than 8 micrometer. In another expression, at most about 15 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size greater than 8 micrometer. In yet another expression, at most about 10 percent by weight of the pigment particles of the pigment component may have a particle size greater than 8 micrometer.
- The disclosed pigment component particle size distribution (combination of median particle size, fines content, steepness parameter and/or coarse content) may be obtained by selecting a single pigment for use as the entire pigment component, wherein the single pigment provides the desired particle size distribution. For example, VICALITY® Heavy precipitated calcium carbonate, a commercially available pigment, may have the desired particle size distribution, as shown in
Fig. 2 . - It is also contemplated that pigments and pigment blends may be engineered to have the disclosed pigment component particle size distribution. As one example, the disclosed particle size distribution may be achieved by mixing together various existing (e.g., commercially available) pigments in appropriate proportions. As another example, an existing pigment or pigment blend may be processed (e.g., sifting and separating) to achieve the disclosed particle size distribution.
- Thus, various pigments may be included in the disclosed pigment component. In one variation, the pigment component may be substantially entirely comprised of inorganic pigments. In another variation, the pigment component may include both inorganic and organic pigments. In yet another variation, the pigment component may be substantially free of platy pigments (e.g., platy clays), wherein "platy" refers to pigments having a shape factor greater than 60. Examples of pigments that may be used to design a pigment component having the disclosed particle size distribution include, but are not limited to, precipitated calcium carbonate, ground calcium carbonate, talc and clay (e.g., kaolin).
- The particle size distributions of six calcium carbonate pigments were measured and evaluated using a SEDIGRAPH® 5120 particle size analyzer. Pigment 1 ("Fine Ground") was a fine ground calcium carbonate,
HYDROCARB ® 90, commercially available from Omya AG of Oftringen, Switzerland. Pigment 2 ("Coarse Ground") was a coarse ground calcium carbonate,HYDROCARB ® 60, commercially available from Omya AG. Pigment 3 ("Extra-Coarse Ground") was an extra-coarse ground calcium carbonate, HYDROCARB® PG3, commercially available from Omya AG. Pigment 4 ("Fine Precipitated") was a fine prismatic precipitated calcium carbonate, ALBAGLOS® S, commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc. Pigment 5 ("Coarse Precipitated") was a coarse rhombohedal precipitated calcium carbonate, VICALITY® Heavy, commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc. Pigment 6 ("Extra-Coarse Precipitated") was an extra-coarse rhombohedal precipitated calcium carbonate,CALESSENCE ® 1500, commercially available from Minerals Technologies Inc. - The results are graphically presented in
Figs. 3 and4 , and specific data are presented in Table 1, below:TABLE 1 Fine Ground Coarse Ground Extra-Course Ground Fine Precipitated Coarse Precipitated Extra-Course Precipitated Hydrocarb 90Hydrocarb 60Hydrocarb PG3 Albaglos S Vicality Heavy Calessence Modal Diameter (µ) 0.89 2.00 4.22 0.79 5.01 11.89 Median Diameter (µ) 0.69 1.37 2.85 0.90 4.22 11.15 Mass %< 0.5µ 38.3 19.2 10.8 8.3 3.4 0.6 Mass %< 1µ 69.3 39.1 21.5 62.8 10.8 1.1 Mass %< 2µ 93.6 67.7 39.0 84.2 20.8 1.8 Mass %> 8µ 0.0 1.0 12.4 3.5 5.6 80.0 Mass %> 10µ 0.0 0.8 6.1 1.6 2.0 59.2 Steepness (D80-D20/D50) 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.6 - In addition to providing the median particle size (shown as "Median Diameter"), the steepness parameter, percent less than 1 micrometer and percent greater than 8 micrometers, Table 1 also provides the modal diameter (the particle diameter that represents the highest point of each curve in
Fig. 4 ), percent less than 0.5 micrometers, percent less than 2 micrometers, and percent greater than 10 micrometers. - As shown in
Figs. 3 and4 and Table 1, Pigments 1-6 have a wide range of particle size distributions. Pigment 1 (Fine Ground) has a small average particle size, a relatively wide size distribution, the most fines, and the least coarse particles. - Pigment 2 (Coarse Ground) has substantially the same steepness parameter as
Pigment 1, but a median particle size that is double.Pigment 2 has about half as many small particles asPigment 1, but still virtually no particles larger than 8 micrometers. - Pigment 3 (Extra-Coarse Ground) is the coarsest ground carbonate evaluated-it has a median particle size that is about double the median particle size of
Pigment 2 and four times as large asPigment 1.Pigment 3 has the broadest distribution of all the pigments. It still has a relatively large amount of fine particles, but also has a significant amount of coarse particles. - Pigment 4 (Fine Precipitated) has a similar median particle size to
Pigment 1, but a much narrower particle size distribution (steepness parameter of 1.0 versus 1.5).Pigment 4 has a much smaller amount of particles less than 0.5 micrometers, compared toPigment 1, but a comparable amount less than 1 micrometer.Pigment 4 has very few coarse particles. - Pigment 5 (Coarse Precipitated) has an average particle size larger than the
Pigment 3, but has very few fine or coarse particles, and has a narrow particle size distribution. Therefore,Pigment 5 may be used as the pigment component of the disclosed basecoat (and basecoat composition). - Pigment 6 (Extra-Coarse Precipitated) has a very large average particle size. The majority of its particles are greater than 8 microns.
Pigment 6 has the lowest steepness index of any of the pigments evaluated in Example 1. - A solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples. The board had an average basis weight of about 125 pounds per 3000 ft2 and an average roughness of 7.5 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness. Three different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft2. A common top coat was applied to all three basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft2. The topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- The three basecoat compositions were prepared as follows:
Basecoat Composition 1 included 100 parts Pigment 1 (HYDROCARB® 90) and 20 parts latex binder;Basecoat Composition 2 included 100 parts Pigment 2 (HYDROCARB® 60) and 20 parts latex binder; andBasecoat Composition 3 included 100 parts Pigment 5 (VICALITY® Heavy) and 20 parts latex binder. Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 1-3 to achieve the required solids content for coating. An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust theBrookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 1-3 to about 2500 cP. - Basecoat Compositions 1-3 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 2, below:
TABLE 2 Hydrocarb 90Hydrocarb 60Vicality Heavy Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 9 8.9 8.6 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 6.2 6.2 6.1 Basecoated PPS Smoothness (µ) 4.79 5.46 4.82 Calendered Topcoated PPS (µ) 1.65 1.64 1.14 IGT Pick strength 119.5 139.5 148.2 - Both
HYDROCARB ® 90 and VICALITY® Heavy produced substantially reduced basecoat-only roughness, but after topcoating,HYDROCARB ® 90 andHYDROCARB ® 60 gave equal roughness values, while VICALITY®Heavy produced substantially reduced PPS roughness values. The IGT pick test measures surface strength. The IGT results show HYDROCARB® 90 resulted in reduced coating strength, but VICALITY® Heavy andHYDROCARB ® 60 were equivalent. - A solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples. The board had an average basis weight of about 120 pounds per 3000 ft2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness. Four different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft2. A common top coat was applied to all four basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft2. The topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- The four basecoat compositions were prepared as follows:
Basecoat Composition 4 included 100 parts Pigment 2 (HYDROCARB® 60) and 20 parts latex binder;Basecoat Composition 5 included 100 parts Pigment 5 (VICALITY® Heavy) and 20 parts latex binder;Basecoat Composition 6 included 100 parts Pigment 6 (CALESSENCE® 1500) and 20 parts latex binder; andBasecoat Composition 7 included 100 parts Pigment 5 (HYDROCARB® PG3) and 20 parts latex binder. Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 4-7 to achieve the required solids content for coating. An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust theBrookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 4-7 to about 2500 cP. - Basecoat Compositions 4-7 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 3, below:
TABLE 3 Hydrocarb 60Vicality Heavy Calessence Hydrocarb PG3 Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 9.5 6.4 9.6 8.9 Topocoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 7.3 5.9 6.2 5.5 Basecoated PPS Smoothness (µ) 5.06 4.66 7.50 6.36 Calendered Topcoated PPS (µ) 1.98 1.48 2.04 2.42 IGT Pick Strength 163 144 184 168 - VICALITY® Heavy gave substantially improved roughness values compared to HYDROCARB® 60, for both basecoat-only and topcoated calendered Parker Print Surf Smoothness.
CALESSENCE ® 1500 gave very little improvement in basecoat-only smoothness of the uncoated board, but when topcoated, gave a topcoated smoothness comparable to HYDROCARB® 60. HYDROCARB® PG3 gave a substantially rougher surface than HYDROCARB® 60 for both basecoat-only and topcoated smoothness. IGT Pick results show a slightly lower coating strength for VICALITY® Heavy, compared to HYDROCARB® 60.CALESSENCE ® 1500 was slightly stronger thanHYDROCARB ® 60, and HYDROCARB® PG3 was equal - The conditions and pigments of Example 4 were the same as Example 3, except for the weight and roughness of the uncoated board. Specifically, the uncoated board used for Example 4 had an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness, and the basis weight was 104 pounds per 3000 ft2. The test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 4, below:
TABLE 4 Hydrocarb 60Vicality Heavy Calessence Hydrocarb PG3 Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2 10.0 9.0 9.9 9.4 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 6.2 6.0 5.9 6.1 Basecoated PPS Smoothness (µ) 7.64 5.83 8.02 7.30 Calendered Topcoated PPS (µ) 2.98 1.94 2.44 3.00 IGT Pick Strength 154 97 142 118 - VICALITY® Heavy gave a very large improvement in basecoat-only and topcoated smoothness, compared to HYDROCARB® 60.
CALESSENCE ® 1500 gave similar basecoat-only roughness values compared to HYDROCARB® 60, but gave a substantial improvement in topcoated smoothness compared to HYDROCARB® 60, but only about half of the benefit obtained by VICALITY© Heavy. HYDROCARB® PG3 gave equivalent results compared to HYDROCARB® 60. - A solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples. The board had an average basis weight of about 120 pounds per 3000 ft2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness. Three different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft2. A common top coat was applied to all three basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft2. The topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- Blends of a coarse precipitated calcium carbonate (VICALITY® Heavy) with an ultrafine ground calcium carbonate (HYDROCARB® HG) and an extra-coarse precipitated calcium carbonate (CALESSENCE® 1500) were used to demonstrate the effect of increasing the percentage of fine or coarse particles in VICALITY® Heavy on final double coated sheet smoothness. Therefore, the three basecoat compositions were prepared as follows:
Basecoat Composition 8 included 100 parts VICALITY® Heavy (Pigment 5) and 20 parts latex binder;Basecoat Composition 9 included 80 parts VICALITY® Heavy (Pigment 5), 20 parts CALESSENCE® 1500 (Pigment 6) and 20 parts latex binder; andBasecoat Composition 10 included 80 parts VICALITY® Heavy (Pigment 5), 20 parts HYDROCARB® HG (an ultrafine ground calcium carbonate commercially available from Omya AG) and 20 parts latex binder. Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 8-10 to achieve the required solids content for coating. An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust theBrookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 8-10 to about 2500 cP. - The particle size distributions of the pigment components of Basecoat Compositions 8-10 were measured and evaluated using a SEDIGRAPH® 5120 particle size analyzer. The results are graphically presented in
Figs. 5 and6 , and specific data are presented in Table 5, below:TABLE 5 Vicality Heavy 80 Parts Vicality Heavy 20Parts Calessence 80 Parts Vicality Heavy 20 Parts Hydrocarb HGModal Diameter (µ) 5.31 4.73 5.01 Median Diameter (µ) 4.44 5.14 3.61 Mass %< 0.5µ 1.0 1.4 12.3 Mass %< 1µ 8.1 7.0 24.4 Mass %< 2µ 20.8 17.2 36.4 Mass %> 8µ 10.9 24.1 9.0 Mass %> 10µ 3.5 14.5 2.9 Steepness (D80-D20/D50) 1.1 1.3 1.5 - Compared to VICALITY® Heavy, the blend with
CALESSENCE ® 1500 has twice as many particles greater than 8 micrometers and the blend with HYDROCARB® HG has three times as many particles less than 1 micrometers. - Basecoat Compositions 8-10 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The test data for the double coated board samples (as well as a sample prepared using all
HYDROCARB ® 60 as the pigment component) are presented in Table 6, below:TABLE 6 80-Vicality Heavy 80- Vicality Heavy Hydrocarb 60 Vicality Heavy 20-Hydrocarb HG 20-Calessence Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 8.7 8.2 9.1 9.7 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 5.8 7.2 6.2 7.2 Basecoated PPS Smoothness (µ) 5.56 4.50 5.96 5.05 Calendered Topcoated PPS (µ) 1.87 1.24 1.93 1.58 IGT Pick Strength 137 142 146 154 - VICALITY® Heavy is shown to give a very large reduction in roughness compared to HYDROCARB® 60. Adding 20
parts CALESSENCE ® 1500 to VICALITY® Heavy reduced by half the smoothness benefit, as compared to VICALITY® Heavy, but was still significantly better thanHYDROCARB ® 60. Adding 20 parts HYDROCARB® HG completely eliminated any smoothness benefit associated with using VICALITY® Heavy. - A solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples. The board had an average basis weight of about 125 pounds per 3000 ft2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness. Three different basecoat compositions were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions were applied at a coat weight of about 9 pounds per 3000 ft2. A common top coat was applied to all three basecoated structures to give a top coat weight of about 6 pounds per 3000 ft2. The topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50.
- The three basecoat compositions were prepared as follows:
Basecoat Composition 11 included 100 parts HYDROCARB® 60 (Pigment 2 in Example 1) and 20 parts latex binder; Basecoat Composition 12 included 100 parts VICALITY® Heavy (Pigment 5 in Example 1) and 20 parts latex binder; and Basecoat Composition 13 included 100 parts ALBAGLOS® S (Pigment 4) and 20 parts latex binder. Water was used as the carrier component of Basecoat Compositions 11-13 to achieve the required solids content for coating. An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust theBrookfield 20 rpm viscosity of Basecoat Compositions 11-13 to about 2500 cP. - Basecoat Compositions 11-13 were each applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The test data for the double coated board samples are presented in Table 7, below:
TABLE 7 Hydrocarb 60Vicality Heavy Albaglos S Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 9.5 9.0 9.2 Topcoat Weight (lb/3000 ft2) 5.9 5.6 7.2 Basecoated PPS Smoothness (µ) 5.86 4.28 5.11 Calendered Topcoated PPS (µ) 2.18 1.34 2.11 IGT Pick Strength 148 152 160 - The ALBAGLOS® S gave comparable results to HYDROCARB® 60, while the VICALITY® Heavy gave a very large reduction in roughness.
- A series of pigment blends were formulated to produce a range of particle size distributions. The purpose of this series of pigments was to systematically add fine or coarse particles to a coarse narrow particle size calcium carbonate to ascertain the effect on coated smoothness.
-
CALESSENCE ® 1500 was selected as an extra-coarse pigment, and was blended with VICALITY® Heavy to produce blends containing 14, 25 and 40 percent byweight CALESSENCE ® 1500, respectively. Particle size distribution data for blends of VICALITY® Heavy withCALESSENCE ® 1500 were collected using a SEDIGRAPH® 5120 particle size analyzer. The results are shown inFigs. 7 and8 . -
HYDROCARB ® 90 was selected as a fine pigment, and was blended with VICALITY® Heavy to produce blends with 7, 14 and 21 percent byweight HYDROCARB ® 90, respectively. Particle size distribution data for blends of VICALITY® Heavy withHYDROCARB ® 90 were collected using a SEDIGRAPH® 5120 particle size analyzer. The results are shown inFigs. 9 and10 . - Additionally, one pigment blend was prepared that included VICALITY® Heavy with 14 percent by weight KAOBRITE® clay (a commercially
available # 2 kaolin clay) and another pigment blend was prepared that includes VICALITY® Heavy with 14 percent by weight HYDRAFINE® clay (a #1 kaolin clay commercially available from Kamin, LLC, of Macon, Georgia). - The particle size distribution data of the various pigment blends was collected using a SEDIGRAPH® 5120 particle size analyzer. The results are presented in Table 8, below:
TABLE 8 Basecoat Pigment Properties Coated Board Characteristics Basecoat Pigment Median Particle Size Percent Less Than 1 Micron Percent Greater Than 8 Micron Steepness Index Basecoat Weight (lb/3000 ft3) Topcoat weight (lb/3000 ft3) Parker Print Smoothness (µ, 10kg-soft) Hydrocarb 601.35 38.6 1.3 1.6 8.0 6.4 2.24 Hydrocarb 90 0.7 68.8 0 14 7.5 6.3 2.34 Albaglos 50.87 62.3 3.6 1 8.1 6.6 2.32 Vicality Heavy 4.32 10 6.4 1 7.7 5.5 1.34 Vicality Heavy with 7 % Hydrocarb 903.96 14 5.4 1.1 8.5 6.3 1.92 Vicality Heavy with 14 % Hydrocarb 903.78 18.4 5 1.2 7.7 6.1 2.09 Vicality Heavy with 21 % Hydrocarb 903.45 22.1 4.7 1.4 7.9 5.9 2.12 Vicality Heavy with 14 % Calessence 15004.58 9.2 15.6 1.1 7.2 6.2 1.47 Vicality Heavy with 25 % Calessence 15005.03 7.5 24.4 1.3 8.3 6.2 1.53 Vicality Heavy with 40 % Calessence 15005.9 6.8 35.9 1.4 7.8 5.5 1.71 Vicality Heavy with 14% Kaobrite 4.02 13.9 6 1.1 8.3 6.0 2.13 Vicality Heavy with 14 % Kaofine 904.01 15.7 6.1 1.1 8.5 6.1 2.45 - A solid bleached sulfate (SBS) paperboard was used to make double-coated board samples. The board had an average basis weight of about 125 pounds per 3000 ft2 and an average roughness of 7.3 micrometers, as measured by Parker Print Surf (PPS 10S) smoothness.
- The pigment blends described above (Table 8) were used to prepare basecoat compositions that were applied to a continuous web of the SBS paperboard using a pilot coater. The basecoat compositions included 100 parts (by weight) pigment/pigment blend and 20 parts by weight binder. Water was used as the carrier component of basecoat compositions to achieve the required solids content for coating. An alkali-swellable thickener was used to adjust the
Brookfield 20 rpm viscosity of basecoat compositions to about 2500 cP. - The basecoat compositions were applied at the coat weights presented in Table 8, above. A common top coat was applied to all basecoated structures at the top coat weights presented in Table 8, above. The topcoated structures were gloss calendered, under common conditions, to produce a 75 degree gloss of about 50. Smoothness data are provided in Table 8, above.
-
Fig. 11 shows the effect of increasing coarse particles on calendered smoothness. VICALITY® Heavy has about 6 percent greater than 8 micrometers. The roughness of the outermost coating surface increases substantially linearly as additional coarse particles are added to the pigment blend. -
Fig. 12 shows the effect of increasing the level of fine particles in the basecoat. VICALITY® Heavy has about 10 percent less than 1 micrometer. Increasing the percentage of fine particles significantly increases the roughness. Doubling the percentage to 20 percent negates substantially all of the benefits related to using VICALITY® Heavy. -
Fig. 13 contains data for VICALITY® Heavy with 14 parts ofCALESSENC ® 1500,HYDROCARB ® 90, KAOBRITE™ and HYDRAFINE®. The data show that adding fine clay particles has the same effect as adding fine calcium carbonate particles. - Table 8, above, also contains data for ALBAGLOS® S which was compared to VICALITY® Heavy to demonstrate that a fine narrow particle size calcium carbonate does not give smoothness benefits.
- Although various embodiments of the disclosed basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure have been shown and described, modifications may occur to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. The present patent application includes such modifications and is limited only by the scope of the claims.
Claims (15)
- A basecoat composition for paperboard, the composition comprising:a carrier; anda pigment component dispersed in said carrier, said pigment component comprising all pigments in said basecoat composition,wherein said pigment component has a median particle size between about 3 and about 8 micrometers, andwherein at most about 15 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein said median particle size is between about 3 and about 7 micrometers, preferably between about 3 and about 6 micrometers, more preferably between about 4 and about 5 micrometers.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein at most about 14 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, preferably at most about 13 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, more preferably at most about 12 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, more preferably at most about 11 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer, most preferably at most about 10 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size smaller than 1 micrometer.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein at most about 20 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers, preferably at most about 15 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers, more preferably at most about 10 percent by weight of said pigment component has a particle size greater than 8 micrometers.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein said pigment component has a steepness index of at most about 1.3, preferably at most about 1.2, more preferably at most about 1.1, most preferably at most about 1.0, the steepness index (Ψ) being defined by the expression:
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein said pigment component comprises calcium carbonate.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein said pigment component comprises precipitated calcium carbonate.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 7 wherein said precipitated calcium carbonate comprises at least 50 percent by weight of said pigment component, preferably at least 70 percent by weight of said pigment component, more preferably at least 80 percent by weight of said pigment component and most preferably said pigment component consists essentially of said precipitated calcium carbonate.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein said pigment component comprises a blend of pigments.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 wherein said pigment component consists essentially of inorganic pigments.
- The basecoat composition of Claim 1 with the proviso that said pigment component is substantially free of platy pigments.
- A paperboard structure comprising:a paperboard substrate comprising a first major surface and a second major surface; anda basecoat applied to at least one of said first major surface and said second major surface, said basecoat comprising a pigment component, said pigment component comprising all pigments in said basecoat, wherein said pigment component is as defined in any of claims 1 to 11.
- The paperboard structure of Claim 12 wherein said paperboard substrate has a basis weight of at least 0.138kg/m2 (85 pounds/3,000 ft2).
- The paperboard structure of Claim 12 wherein said basecoat is applied at a coat weight of at most about 14.6 g/m2 (9 pounds/3,000 ft2), preferably at most about 13.0 g/m2 (8 pounds per 3000 square feet).
- The paperboard structure of Claim 12 further comprising a top coat positioned over said basecoat to form a top-coated paperboard structure having an outermost coating surface, wherein said outermost coating surface preferably has a Parker Print Surf smoothness (PPS 10S) of at most about 3µm, more preferably at most about 2µm.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/826,923 US9206553B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2013-03-14 | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure |
US13/826,764 US8916636B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2013-03-14 | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure |
PCT/US2014/020096 WO2014158776A1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-03-04 | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2970685A1 EP2970685A1 (en) | 2016-01-20 |
EP2970685B1 EP2970685B1 (en) | 2017-09-20 |
EP2970685B9 true EP2970685B9 (en) | 2017-12-20 |
Family
ID=50290324
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14711114.0A Not-in-force EP2970685B9 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-03-04 | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2970685B9 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014158776A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BR112021022644A2 (en) * | 2019-05-10 | 2022-01-18 | Westrock Mwv Llc | Smooth, low-density cardboard structures and methods for making them |
WO2023230372A1 (en) * | 2022-05-27 | 2023-11-30 | Westrock Mwv, Llc | Basecoat compositions and coated cellulosic structures |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2339785A (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2000-02-09 | Michael Ellis | Retroreflective PVC coatings |
US20080245273A1 (en) * | 2007-04-05 | 2008-10-09 | Jouko Vyorkka | Hydrophobic coatings |
MX2010009548A (en) * | 2008-03-21 | 2010-09-22 | Meadwestvaco Corp | Method for coating dry finish paperboard. |
US8142887B2 (en) * | 2008-03-21 | 2012-03-27 | Meadwestvaco Corporation | Basecoat and associated paperboard structure |
-
2014
- 2014-03-04 EP EP14711114.0A patent/EP2970685B9/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2014-03-04 WO PCT/US2014/020096 patent/WO2014158776A1/en active Application Filing
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2970685A1 (en) | 2016-01-20 |
EP2970685B1 (en) | 2017-09-20 |
WO2014158776A1 (en) | 2014-10-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9732473B2 (en) | Basecoat and associated paperboard structure | |
US8916636B2 (en) | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure | |
JP6082081B2 (en) | Coating composition comprising submicron calcium carbonate | |
US9181658B2 (en) | Basecoat and associated paperboard structure including a pigment blend of hyper-platy clay and calcined clay | |
FI128492B (en) | Aqueous dispersions of precipitated calcium carbonate | |
EP2970685B9 (en) | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure | |
US20190218719A1 (en) | Coating compositions and associated paperboard structures | |
US9206553B2 (en) | Basecoat composition and associated paperboard structure | |
CA2774481C (en) | Coarse pigment addition and high solids slurries for higher coating colour concentrations | |
EP3610067B1 (en) | Pigment-coated board having improved pe adhesion | |
CN111566168A (en) | Coating using clay having low bulk density | |
JP2005513296A (en) | High gloss calcium carbonate coating composition and coated paper and paperboard produced therefrom | |
WO2023230372A1 (en) | Basecoat compositions and coated cellulosic structures | |
RU2280115C2 (en) | Calcium carbonate coating compositions for imparting high gloss and paper and cardboard with coatings formed from these compositions | |
JP2006249590A (en) | Printing coated paper using composite pigment, and paperboard |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20151013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20160628 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: WESTROCK MWV, LLC |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170329 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 930099 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602014014786 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171220 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 930099 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171220 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180120 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602014014786 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180331 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140304 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20220328 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20220329 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220329 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20220327 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20220325 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602014014786 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GRAPE & SCHWARZENSTEINER, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602014014786 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230304 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20230304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230305 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230304 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231003 |