EP2951654B1 - Procédés et systèmes de surveillance en ligne utilisant un taux d'échantillonnage de données variable - Google Patents

Procédés et systèmes de surveillance en ligne utilisant un taux d'échantillonnage de données variable Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2951654B1
EP2951654B1 EP14702333.7A EP14702333A EP2951654B1 EP 2951654 B1 EP2951654 B1 EP 2951654B1 EP 14702333 A EP14702333 A EP 14702333A EP 2951654 B1 EP2951654 B1 EP 2951654B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
sampling rate
state
physical environment
computer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14702333.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2951654A1 (fr
Inventor
Olga Malakhova
John Wesley GRANT
Mel Gabriel MAALOUF
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Publication of EP2951654A1 publication Critical patent/EP2951654A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2951654B1 publication Critical patent/EP2951654B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/02—Capturing of monitoring data
    • H04L43/022—Capturing of monitoring data by sampling
    • H04L43/024—Capturing of monitoring data by sampling by adaptive sampling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B21/00—Systems involving sampling of the variable controlled
    • G05B21/02—Systems involving sampling of the variable controlled electric
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S40/00—Systems for electrical power generation, transmission, distribution or end-user application management characterised by the use of communication or information technologies, or communication or information technology specific aspects supporting them

Definitions

  • the field of the invention relates generally to monitoring and sampling data, and more particularly to methods and systems for use in online monitoring using a variable data sampling rate.
  • Known methods of monitoring physical environments may include monitoring data received from physical environments and components of physical environments.
  • Physical environments may include physical machines, physical systems, or combinations thereof.
  • Received data may come in a variety of forms including scalar data, wave form data, and object-based data.
  • wave form data receiving such data may require significant resources, especially computational, storage, and network resources.
  • a monitored physical environment may have many independent components which are being monitored. Thus, in such cases, complete monitoring of all received data may be a significant burden on the system by straining resources including computational resources and networking resources.
  • sampling involves taking a fraction of received data and thereby reducing the burden on system resources.
  • sampling introduces an additional complexity, however, by reducing or impacting the responsiveness of a monitoring system to a change in state of the physical environment. If a sampling rate is set infrequently, a change in state may be detected slowly and accordingly, responded to slowly.
  • US7647131 and EP2042960 disclose a system and a method to automatically and dynamically determine a rate at which data associated with an I/O port are to be sampled based upon the received data.
  • the system further comprises a sampling component that samples data at the rate determined by the analysis component.
  • the sampling rate is increased upon detection of predetermined events such as alerts.
  • US2012029314 describes systems and methods of physiological monitoring which dynamically adjust a sampling rate depending on values of the vital sign of interest.
  • the monitor Under normal patient conditions, the monitor generates data samples at a first (normal) sampling rate.
  • an alert condition e.g., a vital-sign value reaching and staying above a threshold limit
  • the monitor automatically changes from the first (normal) sampling rate to a second (alert) sampling rate.
  • the monitor also reverts to the first (normal) sampling rate when the vital-sign value returns to a value below the threshold limit.
  • US2009082919 discloses a system for collecting and storing performance data for an engine.
  • the system includes one or more sensors configured to generate sensor data, a data sampling component configured to sample the sensor data signals at a data sampling rate and a data storage sampling rate component configured to determine a data storage sampling rate for the data samples, based on an analysis of at least a subset of the data samples.
  • a down select rate is determined, at which the sampled sensor data signals need to be stored in order to be able to reproduce the quantized data samples with sufficient accuracy, while reducing the amount of data to be stored.
  • a method for online monitoring of a physical environment using a variable data sampling rate is provided.
  • the method is implemented by a computing device.
  • the method includes sampling, at the computing device, at least one data set using at least one sampling rate.
  • the method also includes processing the at least one data set with condition assessment rules.
  • the method further includes determining whether the at least one data set indicates a change in state of the physical environment.
  • the method additionally includes updating the at least one sampling rate.
  • a computer-implemented system for online monitoring of a physical environment using a variable data sampling rate includes a monitoring system capable of monitoring the physical environment using a plurality of sensors.
  • the system also includes a computing device configured to communicate with the online monitoring system.
  • the computing device includes a processor and a memory device coupled to the processor.
  • the computing device also includes a storage device coupled to the memory device and to the processor.
  • the computing device is configured to sample at least one data set using at least one sampling rate from the online monitoring system.
  • the computing device is also configured to process the at least one data set with condition assessment rules.
  • the computing device is further configured to determine whether the at least one data set indicates a change in state of the physical environment.
  • the computing device is additionally configured to update the at least one sampling rate.
  • a computer for online monitoring of a physical environment using a variable data sampling rate includes a processor and a memory device coupled to the processor.
  • the computer also includes a storage device coupled to the memory device and to the processor.
  • the computer is configured to sample at least one data set using at least one sampling rate from an online monitoring system.
  • the computer is also configured to process the at least one data set with condition assessment rules.
  • the computer is further configured to determine whether the at least one data set indicates a change in state of the physical environment.
  • the computer is additionally configured to update the at least one sampling rate.
  • Physical system and related terms, e.g., “physical systems,” refers to any system composed of one or more parts that has a physical presence.
  • Physical systems may include, without limitation, vehicles, transportation systems, manufacturing facilities, chemical processing facilities, power generation facilities, infrastructure systems, and communication systems.
  • Physical systems may also include, without limitation, complex chemical or biological systems where components of such systems may have sensor measurements associated.
  • sensors refers to a devices attached to a monitoring system that may detect condition data related to a physical system at a given point in time. Also, as used herein, sensors facilitate the detection of condition data and the transmission of the condition data to a monitoring system.
  • online monitoring refers to the use of a monitoring system to continuously monitor a physical system. Also, as used herein, online monitoring is used to create the condition data set from which the system described herein samples data.
  • condition data refers to the data detected by the online monitoring systems through the use of sensors where the condition data indicate the condition of the physical system.
  • condition data may refer to data including, without limitation, vibration data, thermal data, pressure data, electric data, or any other data that may be useful in determining the state of the physical system.
  • condition data are typically sampled at a variable sampling rate to yield sampling data.
  • sampling data refers to any form of data that may be detected using an online monitoring system and sampled using the methods and systems described herein.
  • Sampling data may include, without limitation, wave form data, scalar data, vector data, numeric data, or any other data capable of being detected using the sensors in an online monitoring system and sampled using the sampling method and system described herein.
  • sampling rate refers to the frequency with which continuously monitored data are selected in order to have a representative sample of such data.
  • the sampling rate is used in an online monitoring system to convert condition data to sampling data. As a sampling rate increases or becomes more frequent, sampling data more closely approximates condition data.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary computing device 105 that may be used in a computer-implemented system for online monitoring of a physical system using a variable data sampling rate.
  • Computing device 105 includes a memory device 110 and a processor 115 operatively coupled to memory device 110 for executing instructions.
  • Processor 115 may include one or more processing units (e.g., in a multi-core configuration).
  • executable instructions are stored in memory device 110.
  • Computing device 105 is configurable to perform one or more operations described herein by programming processor 115.
  • processor 115 may be programmed by encoding an operation as one or more executable instructions and providing the executable instructions in memory device 110.
  • memory device 110 is one or more devices that enable storage and retrieval of information such as executable instructions and/or other data.
  • Memory device 110 may include one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable media, such as, without limitation, random access memory (RAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), a solid state disk, a hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), and/or non-volatile RAM (NVRAM) memory.
  • RAM random access memory
  • DRAM dynamic random access memory
  • SRAM static random access memory
  • SSD solid state disk
  • ROM read-only memory
  • EPROM erasable programmable ROM
  • EEPROM electrically erasable programmable ROM
  • NVRAM non-volatile RAM
  • non-transitory computer-readable media is intended to be representative of any tangible computer-based device implemented in any method or technology for short-term and long-term storage of information, such as, computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and sub-modules, or other data in any device. Therefore, the methods described herein may be encoded as executable instructions embodied in a tangible, non-transitory, computer readable medium, including, without limitation, a storage device and/or a memory device. Such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform at least a portion of the methods described herein.
  • non-transitory computer-readable media includes all tangible, computer-readable media, including, without limitation, non-transitory computer storage devices, including, without limitation, volatile and nonvolatile media, and removable and non-removable media such as a firmware, physical and virtual storage, CD-ROMs, DVDs, and any other digital source such as a network or the Internet, as well as yet to be developed digital means, with the sole exception being a transitory, propagating signal.
  • memory device 110 includes a sparse distributed memory (SDM) configuration, wherein such SDM configuration is defined using software.
  • SDM configuration is defined using any combination of SDM-capable hardware and SDM-compatible software that enables online monitoring of a physical system using a variable data sampling rate as described herein.
  • the terms "software” and “firmware” are interchangeable, and include any computer program stored in memory for execution by devices that include, without limitation, mobile devices, clusters, personal computers, workstations, clients, and servers.
  • Memory device 110 may be configured to store operational measurements from an online monitoring system including, without limitation, wave form data, vector data, numeric data, and/or any other type of data.
  • processor 115 removes or "purges" data from memory device 110 based on the age of the data. For example, processor 115 may overwrite previously recorded and stored data associated with a subsequent time and/or event. In addition, or alternatively, processor 115 may remove data that exceeds a predetermined time interval.
  • memory device 110 includes, without limitation, sufficient data, algorithms, and commands to facilitate operation of the online monitoring of a physical system using a variable data sampling rate (discussed further below).
  • computing device 105 includes a presentation interface 120 coupled to processor 115.
  • Presentation interface 120 presents information, such as a user interface and/or an alarm, to a user 125.
  • presentation interface 120 includes one or more display devices.
  • computing device 105 includes a user input interface 130.
  • user input interface 130 is coupled to processor 115 and receives input from user 125.
  • User input interface 130 may include, for example, a keyboard, a pointing device, a mouse, a stylus, a touch sensitive panel (e.g., including, without limitation, a touch pad or a touch screen), and/or an audio input interface (e.g., including, without limitation, a microphone).
  • a single component, such as a touch screen may function as both a display device of presentation interface 120 and user input interface 130.
  • a communication interface 135 is coupled to processor 115 and is configured to be coupled in communication with one or more other devices, such as a sensor or another computing device 105, and to perform input and output operations with respect to such devices.
  • communication interface 135 may include, without limitation, a wired network adapter, a wireless network adapter, a mobile telecommunications adapter, a serial communication adapter, and/or a parallel communication adapter.
  • Communication interface 135 may receive data from and/or transmit data to one or more remote devices.
  • Presentation interface 120 and/or communication interface 135 are both capable of providing information suitable for use with the methods described herein (e.g., to user 125 or another device). Accordingly, presentation interface 120 and communication interface 135 may be referred to as output devices. Similarly, user input interface 130 and communication interface 135 are capable of receiving information suitable for use with the methods described herein and may be referred to as input devices.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer-implemented system 200 that may be used for online monitoring of a physical system 220 using a variable data sampling rate that may include computing device 105 (shown in FIG. 1 ).
  • Computer-implemented system 200 includes a monitoring system 210 capable of monitoring physical system 220 using a plurality of sensors 215.
  • monitoring system 210 is a condition monitoring system capable of monitoring physical system 220.
  • Monitoring system 210 is capable of diagnostics, alerts, and coordinating maintenance of problems in physical system 220.
  • monitoring system 210 may include additional attributes or subsets of these capabilities.
  • physical system 220 is a hydro turbine generator.
  • physical system may include, without limitation, wind turbines, electrical equipment, reciprocating compressors, turbomachinery, oil and/or gas refineries, petroleum processing systems, or any other physical system capable of being monitored by computer-implemented system 200.
  • Computer-implemented system 200 also includes a computing device 105 capable of communicating with monitoring system 210.
  • computing device 105 and monitoring system 210 are distinct.
  • computing device 105 and monitoring system 210 may be co-resident on the same computing device.
  • monitoring system 210 may represent multiple physical monitoring systems.
  • Computing device 105 includes processor 115 and memory device 110.
  • Computing device 105 also includes storage device 235.
  • Storage device 235 is coupled to processor 115 and to memory device 110. Storage device 235 is configured to be capable of storing received data including, without limitation, data described below.
  • monitoring system 210 detects condition data from sensors 215.
  • sensors 215 include a first sensor 217 and a second sensor 219.
  • sensors 215 may include any number of sensors.
  • first sensor 217 and second sensor 219 detect data from different physical sections of physical system 220.
  • Monitoring system 210 detects condition data from each sensor distinctly.
  • sensors 215 may detect data from the same sections or different sections of physical system 220 and may generate similar types of data or divergent types of data.
  • monitoring system 210 detects first condition data 240 from first sensor 217 and second condition data 245 from second sensor 219.
  • first condition data 240 and second condition data 245 are both waveform data. Waveform data can consume significant resources in terms of network bandwidth, storage, and memory. Because of this, monitoring system 210 samples data at a particular sampling rate to generate sampled data.
  • Sampled data represent a "snapshot" of condition data at a point in time and each "snapshot" is separated by an interval corresponding to the sampling rate.
  • first condition data 240 and second condition data 245 are sampled at distinct sampling rates. In alternative embodiments, they may be sampled at identical sampling rates. Sampling rates may be at any interval of time including, without limitation, a number of hours, a number of minutes, a number of seconds, a number of milliseconds, a number of microseconds, and a number of nanoseconds.
  • Monitoring system 210 transmits sampled data as first sampled data 250 corresponding to first condition data 240 and second sampled data 255 corresponding to second condition data 245 to computing device 105.
  • Computing device 105 receives first sampled data 250 and second sampled data 255 through a data network (not shown).
  • the data network may include, without limitation, local area networks (LAN), wireless networks, wide area networks (WAN), backbone networks, or any other kind of network capable of transmitting and receiving information described in this system.
  • Computing device 105 is capable of processing data at processor 115 to determine sampling rates.
  • processor 115 initially defines unique schedules for each sampled data. For example, in the exemplary embodiment, processor 115 will set a sampling rate and schedule for first condition data 240 and second condition data 245 so that first condition data 240 are minimally sampled at the same time as second condition data 245. This scheduling minimizes the impact on system resources including, without limitation, bandwidth, processing, and storage.
  • Processor 115 determines unique schedules for each sampled data using distinct-prime factorization methods. These methods use distinct-prime numbers as factors of sampling rates. Because prime factors are inherently unique, this allows for distinct sampling rates. In most cases this will ensure that sampling will not overlap. However, overlapping may become necessary even when applying such methods if sufficient numbers of waveform data and/or frequency of sampling are required.
  • Computing device 105 is also capable of changing the sampling rates of sampling using processor 115 by applying condition assessment rules.
  • Computing device 105 initially receives sampled data (e.g., first sampled data 250 and second sampled data 255) at a given sampling rate determined by the distinct-prime factorization method described above.
  • Computing device 105 also includes condition assessment rules which can be run against sampled data.
  • Condition assessment rules may be stored on memory device 110, storage device 235, external storage (not shown), or may be input by a user (not shown in FIG. 2 ).
  • Condition assessment rules are used to determine whether a change in state has occurred in physical system 220 based upon sampled data.
  • Condition assessment rules are executed by processor 115 applying the rules to sampled data.
  • processor 115 When condition assessment rules are executed by processor 115, processor 115 will determine a new sampling rate that updates the previous sampling rate for each sampled data. Updating the rate may include increasing the sampling rate, reducing the sampling rate, or holding the sampling rate substantially constant. For example, the rate may be increased if physical system 220 is determined by the condition assessment rules to have entered an anomalous state. In such cases, there is value in increasing the frequency of monitoring to assess the severity or validity of the anomalous state. Increased frequency of monitoring, caused by the increase in sampling rate, can allow for system 200 and the individuals who maintain physical system 220 to be more responsive to diagnostic, maintenance, or other issues created by a potential anomalous condition. The rate may be decreased if physical system 220 is determined by the condition assessment rules to have left an anomalous state.
  • the rate may be increased if physical system 220 is determined by the condition assessment rules to have left an anomalous state. In such a situation, it may be valuable to quickly validate that physical system 220 has actually left an anomalous state and resources used by increased sampling will be justified. The rate may also be decreased if physical system 220 is determined by the condition assessment rules to be in an anomalous condition but such condition has been confirmed. In cases where diagnostics or maintenance may be time consuming, it may no longer be valuable to continue to monitor physical system 220 heavily if its condition of anomaly is already known. The rate may be left unchanged if physical system 220 has not changed based upon the application of condition assessment rules.
  • a threshold setting for a minimum time threshold between changes in physical state may be defined.
  • the minimum time threshold may define the minimum time that must pass between two determinations of a change in state.
  • the minimum time threshold may be stored in computing device 105 at memory device 110 or storage device 235.
  • condition assessment rules may indicate that a change in state of physical system 220 has occurred previously and is now occurring again but a change in the sampling rate will not occur.
  • This threshold may be defined in situations where a system has recently been repaired and is recovering or where data may be unreliable.
  • the threshold may alternatively be defined when a change in state has been previously reported, maintenance has not been scheduled for an extended period of time, and there is no reason to repeat the event and thereby increase the sampling rate. This may occur, for example, when the change in state is from a normal state to a low severity level anomaly state.
  • computing device 105 may record the change in state as a historical event.
  • the historical event may be saved at memory device 110, storage device 235, or on external storage.
  • computing device 105 will also transmit the change in state to an external system including, for example, monitoring system 210.
  • Monitoring system 210 may record historical detections of changes in state and sampling rates in conjunction with other monitoring records.
  • computing device 105 despite a change in state of physical system 220, computing device 105 will delay at least one of updating the sampling rate and transmitting the change in state to an external system. A delay may be made for several reasons. First, updating the sampling rate may be delayed to avoid simultaneous sampling from different components of the physical system.
  • a delay may occur if a machine in physical system 220 is expected to go through a sequence of known states where rapid sampling would be inappropriate. Transmitting the change in state may be delayed because it may be valuable to wait longer to confirm the change in state of physical system 220, to avoid redundant data, or to minimize resource overhead. Delaying may occur based upon a threshold waiting period defined by a user, computing device 105 applying heuristic algorithms, or externally received data.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an exemplary method 300 that may be implemented to be used in online monitoring of physical system 220 using a variable data sampling rate using computer-implemented system 200 (shown in FIG. 2 ).
  • Method 300 is executed at processor 115 in computing device 105.
  • Processor 115 samples 305 at least one data set scheduled for sampling using at least one sampling rate.
  • Sampling 305 represents receiving sampled data (e.g., first sampled data 250 and second sampled data 255) from monitoring system 210 where sampled data represents data sampled from condition data using at least one sampling rate.
  • Processor 115 also processes 315 at least one data set with condition assessment rules. Processing 315 at least one data set with condition assessment rules represents applying condition assessment rules stored in memory device 110 or storage device 235 on the sampled data.
  • Processor 115 further determines 325 whether the at least one data set indicates a change in state of the physical environment. Determining 325 whether the at least one data set indicates a change in state of the physical environment represents processor 115 identifying whether a change in state of physical system 220 has occurred. Processor 115 finally updates 335 the at least one sampling rate. Updating 335 the at least one sampling rate represents increasing, reducing, or holding constant the sampling rate. In some embodiments, updating 335 the at least one sampling rate also represents changing sampling rate for a first condition data 240 so that first sampled data 250 is not sampled at the same time as second sampled data 255.
  • FIG. 4 is a simplified illustration 400 of data sampled at varying rates by computer-implemented system 200 (shown in FIG. 2 ).
  • Illustration 400 displays a graph indicating sampled data over a time period.
  • the vertical axis 405, labeled "Extracted Characteristic” reflects a scalar value associated with waveform data. Therefore, as there are twenty-three values for "Extracted Characteristic” 405, this reflects twenty-three waveforms which were sampled and from which twenty-three "Extracted Characteristic” 405 values were determined.
  • the label "Extracted Characteristic” 405 reflects the isolation of the values from the sampled waveform data that are of interest in determining the condition of physical system 220.
  • "Extracted Characteristic" 405 may not be representable by a scalar value and instead may require multidimensional analysis or other complex analysis. Illustration 400 presents particular values of "Extracted Characteristic” 405 presented over the horizontal axis 410 representing time. Illustration 400 presents values 420 of "Extracted Characteristic" 405 for points in time 410.
  • Illustration 400 demonstrates the application of condition assessment rules. Initially “Extracted Characteristic” 405 values 420 are sampled at a first sampling rate 425. On the fourth data point of “Extracted Characteristic” 405 values 420, “Extracted Characteristic” 405 exceeds a threshold value 435 indicated by the solid line. At this point, the sampling rate is changed to a second sampling rate 430 because of a first condition assessment rule 431.
  • Condition assessment rule 431 has identified a potential change in physical system 220 because of the value for "Extracted Characteristic" 405 exceeding threshold value 435 and accordingly changes sampling rate to second sampling rate 430.
  • a second condition assessment rule 440 is now invoked to confirm the presence of a change in physical system 220.
  • Rule 440 represents a condition assessment rule for a Severity 3 or Sev 3 Event.
  • the Severity 3 event is used when there is confirmation that physical system 220 has changed.
  • Rule 440 defines a Severity 3 event as four consecutive "Extracted Characteristic" 405 values 420 exceeding threshold value 435. Although the fourth "Extracted Characteristic" 405 value 420 exceeds the line threshold value 435 associated with rule 440, a Sev 3 Event is not triggered until the ninth "Extracted Characteristic" 405 value 420.
  • the sampling rate moves from second sampling rate 430 back to first sampling rate 425 because there is no need for frequent sampling.
  • a third condition assessment rule 433 is invoked on the sixteenth "Extracted Characteristic" 405 value 420 when "Extracted Characteristic" drops back below reset threshold value 455. At this point, the sampling rate is changed back to second sampling rate 430 because third condition assessment rule 433 is satisfied.
  • Condition assessment rule 433 has identified a new potential change in physical system 220 because of the value for "Extracted Characteristic" 405 has fallen below reset threshold value 455.
  • a fourth condition assessment rule 450 is now invoked to confirm the presence of a change in physical system 220.
  • Rule 450 represents a condition assessment rule for a reset or end of a Severity 3 or Sev 3 Event. The reset of Severity 3 event is confirmed when there is confirmation that physical system 220 has changed back to a normal state.
  • Rule 450 defines a Severity 3 reset event as three consecutive "Extracted Characteristic" 405 values 420 falling below reset threshold value 455. Although the sixteenth "Extracted Characteristic" 405 value 420 falls below reset threshold 455, a Sev 3 Event reset is not triggered until the twenty-first "Extracted Characteristic" 405 value 420.
  • the systems and methods as described herein facilitate increasing the efficiency and responsiveness of the online monitoring of a physical system. Also, such systems and methods facilitate reducing the cost of monitoring a physical system. Further, such systems and methods facilitate improving the monitoring of the physical system by selectively altering sampling rates at relevant times.
  • An exemplary technical effect of the methods, systems, and apparatus described herein includes at least one of: (a) improving the resource utilization of online monitoring systems through effective scheduling of sampling that is responsive to conditions and interdependencies; (b) improving responsiveness of online monitoring systems to changes in conditions by selectively altering sampling rates; (c) improving the maintenance of physical systems by efficient and responsive monitoring; and (d) reducing redundant identifications of changes in state of physical system.
  • Some embodiments involve the use of one or more electronic or computing devices.
  • Such devices typically include a processor or controller, such as a general purpose central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), a microcontroller, a reduced instruction set computer (RISC) processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic circuit (PLC), and/or any other circuit or processor capable of executing the functions described herein.
  • the methods described herein may be encoded as executable instructions embodied in a computer readable medium, including, without limitation, a storage device and/or a memory device. Such instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform at least a portion of the methods described herein.
  • the above examples are exemplary only, and thus are not intended to limit in any way the definition and/or meaning of the term processor.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Cardiology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)

Claims (7)

  1. Procédé de surveillance en ligne d'un environnement physique (220) en utilisant une fréquence variable d'échantillonnage de données, ledit procédé implémenté par un dispositif informatique (105), ledit procédé comprenant :
    la réception, depuis un système de surveillance (210) en utilisant le dispositif informatique (105), d'un premier ensemble de points de données associé à l'environnement physique (220)
    l'utilisation d'une première fréquence d'échantillonnage tandis que l'ensemble de données indique que l'environnement physique est dans un premier état ;
    à la réception d'un premier point de données d'un deuxième ensemble de points de données suivants qui indique que l'environnement physique est dans un deuxième état,
    la mise à jour de la première fréquence d'échantillonnage à une deuxième fréquence d'échantillonnage pour amener le système de surveillance à échantillonner le deuxième ensemble de points de données de l'environnement physique à la deuxième fréquence d'échantillonnage ; et
    caractérisé par, à la réception d'un nombre de points de données consécutifs d'un troisième ensemble de points de données suivants qui indiquent que l'environnement physique est dans le deuxième état, la mise à jour de la deuxième fréquence d'échantillonnage à la première fréquence d'échantillonnage pour amener le système de surveillance à échantillonner le troisième ensemble de points de données de l'environnement physique à la première fréquence d'échantillonnage.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le système de surveillance est configuré pour échantillonner l'ensemble de données, dans lequel le système de surveillance comprend au moins l'un parmi :
    un système de surveillance externe (210) :
    une pluralité de systèmes de surveillance externes ; et
    ledit dispositif informatique (105).
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, comprenant :
    le fait de déterminer si l'ensemble de données indique un changement d'état vers un deuxième état parmi un ou plusieurs états de l'environnement physique sur la base de la réception du nombre prédéterminé de points de données consécutifs de l'ensemble de données qui indiquent que l'environnement physique est dans le deuxième état, dans lequel le fait de déterminer que l'ensemble de données indique le changement d'état vers le deuxième état parmi le ou les états de l'environnement physique (220) comprend :
    le stockage du changement d'état vers le deuxième état de l'environnement physique (220) dans au moins l'un parmi un dispositif de mémoire, un dispositif de stockage et un dispositif de stockage externe ; et
    la transmission du changement d'état à un système externe ; et
    le fait de retarder au moins l'une parmi :
    la mise à jour de ladite première ou deuxième fréquence d'échantillonnage ; et
    la transmission du changement d'état à un système externe, sur la base de seuils incluant au moins l'un parmi :
    des seuils définis par l'utilisateur ;
    des seuils d'apprentissage automatique ; et
    des données reçues de façon externe.
  4. Programme informatique comprenant un moyen de code de programme informatique conçu pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, lorsqu'il est exécuté par un ordinateur.
  5. Programme informatique selon la revendication 4, mis en pratique sur un support lisible par ordinateur.
  6. Ordinateur (105) pour la surveillance en ligne d'un environnement physique en utilisant une fréquence variable d'échantillonnage de données comprenant :
    un processeur (115) ;
    un dispositif de mémoire (110) couplé audit processeur (115) ; et
    un dispositif de stockage (235) couplé audit dispositif de mémoire (110) et audit processeur (115), ledit ordinateur configuré pour : exécuter le programme informatique selon la revendication 4 pour mettre en œuvre le procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3.
  7. Système implémenté sur un ordinateur pour la surveillance en ligne d'un environnement physique en utilisant une fréquence variable d'échantillonnage de données comprenant :
    un système de surveillance en ligne (210) capable de surveiller l'environnement physique en utilisant une pluralité de capteurs ; et
    l'ordinateur (105) selon la revendication 6 configuré pour communiquer avec ledit système de surveillance en ligne (210).
EP14702333.7A 2013-01-31 2014-01-06 Procédés et systèmes de surveillance en ligne utilisant un taux d'échantillonnage de données variable Active EP2951654B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/756,330 US10250463B2 (en) 2013-01-31 2013-01-31 Methods and systems for online monitoring using a variable data sampling rate
PCT/US2014/010318 WO2014120390A1 (fr) 2013-01-31 2014-01-06 Procédés et systèmes de surveillance en ligne utilisant un taux d'échantillonnage de données variable

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2951654A1 EP2951654A1 (fr) 2015-12-09
EP2951654B1 true EP2951654B1 (fr) 2020-02-26

Family

ID=50031552

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14702333.7A Active EP2951654B1 (fr) 2013-01-31 2014-01-06 Procédés et systèmes de surveillance en ligne utilisant un taux d'échantillonnage de données variable

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (3) US10250463B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2951654B1 (fr)
DK (1) DK2951654T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014120390A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6539272B2 (ja) 2013-08-07 2019-07-03 ナイキ イノベイト シーブイ コンピュータにより実現される方法、非一時的かつコンピュータが読み取り可能な媒体、および単一装置
KR101555919B1 (ko) * 2014-08-11 2015-09-30 엘에스산전 주식회사 전력설비의 온라인 상태진단 방법
US20160301581A1 (en) * 2015-04-08 2016-10-13 Amiigo, Inc. Dynamic adjustment of sampling rate based on a state of the user
ES2727199T3 (es) * 2017-01-30 2019-10-14 Abb Schweiz Ag Método y equipo para capturar datos operativos de una aplicación de robot industrial
WO2021033132A1 (fr) * 2019-08-20 2021-02-25 Abb Schweiz Ag Dispositif de surveillance d'état et procédé associé
CN110474812A (zh) * 2019-08-22 2019-11-19 中国工商银行股份有限公司 采样率自适应调整方法及装置
CN116668311A (zh) * 2020-07-12 2023-08-29 华为技术有限公司 一种数据采集方法及设备
US11533687B2 (en) * 2020-09-25 2022-12-20 Cypress Semiconductor Corporation Dynamic switching of power levels in device having different wireless communication circuits

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1403968A (en) 1973-01-18 1975-08-28 Marconi Co Ltd Monitoring arrangements
US5231872A (en) 1991-02-21 1993-08-03 Ttc/Truck Tech Corp. Tire monitoring apparatus and method
US6016550A (en) * 1997-12-02 2000-01-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for audio sample rate conversion within a data-processing system
US6681331B1 (en) 1999-05-11 2004-01-20 Cylant, Inc. Dynamic software system intrusion detection
US6442496B1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2002-08-27 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic sampling of a production line
US7263597B2 (en) * 2001-04-19 2007-08-28 Ciena Corporation Network device including dedicated resources control plane
US7626508B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2009-12-01 Aeromesh Corporation Monitoring system and method
TWI328164B (en) 2002-05-29 2010-08-01 Tokyo Electron Ltd Method and apparatus for monitoring tool performance
US7257515B2 (en) 2004-03-03 2007-08-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Sliding window for alert generation
DE102004010665B4 (de) 2004-03-04 2014-09-18 Infineon Technologies Ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Ermitteln eines Zustandsparameters eines zu überwachenden Objektes
US7558687B1 (en) * 2004-09-02 2009-07-07 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic adjustment of a sensor sampling rate
US7672737B2 (en) * 2005-05-13 2010-03-02 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Hierarchically structured data model for utilization in industrial automation environments
US7647131B1 (en) * 2006-03-09 2010-01-12 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of sampling rates
US7733220B2 (en) * 2006-10-05 2010-06-08 Northrop Grumman Corporation System and methods for detecting change in a monitored environment
US7866204B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2011-01-11 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The United States Environmental Protection Agency Adaptive real-time contaminant detection and early warning for drinking water distribution systems
US7730364B2 (en) 2007-04-05 2010-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation Systems and methods for predictive failure management
US8116936B2 (en) * 2007-09-25 2012-02-14 General Electric Company Method and system for efficient data collection and storage
US7657333B2 (en) 2007-09-27 2010-02-02 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Adjustment of data collection rate based on anomaly detection
US9055925B2 (en) * 2010-07-27 2015-06-16 Carefusion 303, Inc. System and method for reducing false alarms associated with vital-signs monitoring
CN103562941B (zh) * 2011-05-26 2017-10-03 飞利浦灯具控股公司 用于资源分配的控制装置
US9816370B2 (en) * 2012-09-19 2017-11-14 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for optimizing an operation of a sensor used with wellbore equipment

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20200259725A1 (en) 2020-08-13
WO2014120390A1 (fr) 2014-08-07
US20190288925A1 (en) 2019-09-19
EP2951654A1 (fr) 2015-12-09
US11115295B2 (en) 2021-09-07
US20140215056A1 (en) 2014-07-31
DK2951654T3 (da) 2020-05-18
US10250463B2 (en) 2019-04-02
US10637751B2 (en) 2020-04-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11115295B2 (en) Methods and systems for online monitoring using a variable data
CN106104496B (zh) 用于任意时序的不受监督的异常检测
US20190392252A1 (en) Systems and methods for selecting a forecast model for analyzing time series data
US10747188B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and, recording medium
US10558545B2 (en) Multiple modeling paradigm for predictive analytics
US10228994B2 (en) Information processing system, information processing method, and program
RU2724716C1 (ru) Система и способ формирования данных для мониторинга кибер-физической системы с целью раннего определения аномалий в системе графического интерфейса пользователя
US20160231738A1 (en) Information processing apparatus and analysis method
WO2014103134A1 (fr) Prédiction du temps de panne d'un dispositif predicting a time of failure of a device
EP3795975B1 (fr) Appareil de détection d'anomalie, procédé de détection d'anomalie, et programme de détection d'anomalie
US11165799B2 (en) Anomaly detection and processing for seasonal data
EP3495905A2 (fr) Dispositif de calcul d'effet d'amélioration opérationnelle, procédé de calcul d'effet d'amélioration opérationnelle et support d'enregistrement
JP6718500B2 (ja) 生産システムにおける出力効率の最適化
US20140188777A1 (en) Methods and systems for identifying a precursor to a failure of a component in a physical system
CN110187980A (zh) 消息队列监控方法、装置、电子设备及可读存储介质
CN114065627A (zh) 温度异常检测方法、装置、电子设备和介质
EP3190519B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance et procédé de surveillance associé, système de surveillance, et support d'enregistrement dans lequel un programme informatique est stocké
JP6582527B2 (ja) アラーム予測装置、アラーム予測方法及びプログラム
CN114169604A (zh) 性能指标的异常检测方法、异常检测装置、电子设备和存储介质
EP3999983B1 (fr) Condensation de données chronologiques et analyse de signature graphique
WO2016141007A1 (fr) Gestion d'alarmes à l'aide de règles de masquage
CN113468021A (zh) 监控性能数据的方法、装置、设备以及存储介质
CN113123955B (zh) 柱塞泵异常检测方法、装置、存储介质及电子设备
US11228606B2 (en) Graph-based sensor ranking
WO2016143337A1 (fr) Dispositif de traitement d'informations, procédé de traitement d'informations et support d'enregistrement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150831

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20171117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602014061466

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G05B0023020000

Ipc: G05B0021020000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G05B 21/02 20060101AFI20190730BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190827

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1238406

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602014061466

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20200511

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200526

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200626

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200526

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1238406

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602014061466

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20201127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230526

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240202

Year of fee payment: 11