EP2904530B1 - Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant de déterminer le placement d'intervalles de perforation utilisant le faciès, les limites fluides, les corps géographiques et les propriétés fluides dynamiques - Google Patents

Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant de déterminer le placement d'intervalles de perforation utilisant le faciès, les limites fluides, les corps géographiques et les propriétés fluides dynamiques Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2904530B1
EP2904530B1 EP12890006.5A EP12890006A EP2904530B1 EP 2904530 B1 EP2904530 B1 EP 2904530B1 EP 12890006 A EP12890006 A EP 12890006A EP 2904530 B1 EP2904530 B1 EP 2904530B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
perforation
geobody
geobodies
cells
connectivity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP12890006.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2904530A1 (fr
EP2904530A4 (fr
Inventor
Alain Dupuy
Travis St. George Ramsay
Steven Paul Crockett
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Landmark Graphics Corp
Original Assignee
Landmark Graphics Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Landmark Graphics Corp filed Critical Landmark Graphics Corp
Publication of EP2904530A1 publication Critical patent/EP2904530A1/fr
Publication of EP2904530A4 publication Critical patent/EP2904530A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2904530B1 publication Critical patent/EP2904530B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V20/00—Geomodelling in general
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/11—Perforators; Permeators
    • E21B43/119—Details, e.g. for locating perforating place or direction

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to hydrocarbon reservoir modeling and, more specifically, to a system which determines placement of perforation intervals along a well trace within a reservoir model using a variety of perforation filters.
  • Unconventional reservoirs typically have poorer porosity and permeability as compared to conventional reservoirs.
  • Such unconventional reservoirs comprise, for example, shale or tight gas sand, or may even possess highly permeable rock types, yet have an egregiously viscous hydrocarbon component that must be mined or aggressively heated to induce flow (i.e., viscosity reduction).
  • both conventional and unconventional reservoirs are contained by seals (cap rock) of even further diminished petrophysical property.
  • a computer-implemented method to determine placement of a perforation interval comprising determining a location of a perforation interval along a well trace using a perforation filter defining a perforation interval by geobody, wherein determining the location of the perforation interval further comprises: generating a plurality of first generation geobodies; calculating a connectivity score for each first generation geobody; and utilizing the connectivity scores to determine the location of a plurality of perforation intervals.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a perforation evaluation system 100 according to certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
  • exemplary embodiments of the present invention determine the location of perforation intervals along a well trace using one or more distinct perforation filters.
  • filters include, for example, perforation by rock property (petrophysical or mechanical), perforation by facies (or rock type), perforation by fluid boundary, perforation by connected volume index (or "geobody”), and perforation by dynamic fluid property.
  • Each category represents a distinct filter that may be utilized individually or in combination with one or more other filters.
  • exemplary embodiments of the present invention intelligently analyze a static or dynamic earth model to locate perforation intervals along the well trace which intersect with grid cells comprising geological characteristics defined by the perforation filters. Thereafter, the resulting model, including the perforation intervals, is presented to a dynamic simulator to model a variety of reservoir operations. Accordingly, the location and amount of the perforation intervals along the well trace is optimized.
  • exemplary perforation evaluation system 100 includes at least one processor 102, a non-transitory, computer-readable storage 104, transceiver/network communication module 105, optional I/O devices 106, and an optional display 108 (e.g., user interface), all interconnected via a system bus 109.
  • Software instructions executable by the processor 102 for implementing software instructions stored within perforation evaluation engine 110 in accordance with the exemplary embodiments described herein, may be stored in storage 104 or some other computer-readable medium.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 may be connected to one or more public and/or private networks via one or more appropriate network connections.
  • the software instructions comprising perforation evaluation engine 110 may also be loaded into storage 104 from a CD-ROM or other appropriate storage media via wired or wireless methods.
  • the invention may be practiced with a variety of computer-system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable-consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Any number of computer-systems and computer networks are acceptable for use with the present invention.
  • the invention may be practiced in distributed-computing environments where tasks are performed by remote-processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
  • program modules may be located in both local and remote computer-storage media including memory storage devices.
  • the present invention may therefore, be implemented in connection with various hardware, software or a combination thereof in a computer system or other processing system.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 comprises database module 112 and earth modeling module 114.
  • Database module 112 provides robust data retrieval and integration of historical and real-time reservoir related data that spans across all aspects of the well planning, construction and completion processes such as, for example, drilling, cementing, wireline logging, well testing and stimulation.
  • data may include, for example, logging data, well trajectories, petrophysical rock property data, mechanical rock property data, surface data, fault data, data from surrounding wells, data inferred from geostatistics, etc.
  • the database (not shown) which stores this information may reside within database module 112 or at a remote location.
  • An exemplary database platform is, for example, the INSITE® software suite, commercially offered through Halliburton Energy Services Inc. of Houston Texas. Those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure realize there are a variety of software platforms and associated systems to retrieve, store and integrate the well related data, as described herein.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 also includes earth modeling module 114 to integrate with the data contained within database module 112 in order to provide subsurface stratigraphic visualization including, for example, geo science interpretation, petroleum system modeling, geochemical analysis, stratigraphic gridding, facies, net cell volume, and petrophysical property modeling.
  • earth modeling module 114 models well traces, perforation intervals, as well as cross-sectional through the facies and porosity data.
  • Exemplary earth modeling platforms include, for example, DecisionSpace®, as well as its PerfWizard® functionality, which is commercially available through the Assignee of the present invention, Landmark Graphics Corporation of Houston, Texas.
  • those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure realize a variety of other earth modeling platforms may also be utilized with the present invention.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 may also include multi-domain workflow automation capabilities that may connect any variety of desired technical applications. As such, the output from one application, or module, may become the input for another, thus providing the capability to analyze how various changes impact the well placement and/or fracture design.
  • multi-domain workflow automation capabilities may connect any variety of desired technical applications. As such, the output from one application, or module, may become the input for another, thus providing the capability to analyze how various changes impact the well placement and/or fracture design.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 detects entry of a statically defined well trace within the reservoir model simulated by earth modeling module 114. Such entry may be entered into a graphical user interface, for example, using a collection of coordinate that depict the spatial trajectory of the well trace along the subsurface, as understood in the art.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 will then utilize the well trace as the basis for the remainder of the simulation in which the perforation filters will be applied. Accordingly, perforation evaluation system 100 will optimize the placement of perforation intervals in a planned or existing well.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 utilizes only the perforation filters described herein to determine the location of a well trace and its perforation intervals, as will be readily understood by those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 detects entry of one or more perforation filters entered via a user interface such as, for example, a graphical user interface, as understood in the art.
  • the perforation filters include, for example, perforation by rock property (204(i)), perforation by facies (204(ii)), perforation by fluid boundary (204(iii)), perforation by geobody (204(iv)), and perforation by dynamic fluid property (204(v)).
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 analyzes the reservoir model for cells meeting the criteria defined by the perforation filters. Ultimately, the perforation intervals are placed along the sections of the well trace comprising those cells meeting the criteria defined by the perforation filters.
  • perforation by rock property filter may be defined using any provided rock property volume (petrophysical and/or mechanical). In this example, however, it will be described with relation to petrophysics as the filtering criterion. However, those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure will realize the same logic holds for mechanical rock properties.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 applies petrophysical property filtering by automatically identifying where the well trace intersects with cells in the specified volume. In addition, those intersected cells must be within a petrophysical data range expressly defined via a user interface at block 204(i). In other words, the filter requires well path cell intersections and that the grid cell contains petrophysical properties in the filter range (in terms of porosity and/or permeability).
  • the petrophysical filter would be bounded by a data range (minimum and maximum data values existing for each property, for example).
  • a data range minimum and maximum data values existing for each property, for example.
  • one property may be used in the filter while the other is omitted.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 determines those perforation locations along the defined well trace and that comprise the defined porosity or permeability data range.
  • a perforation by facies filter may be defined by stipulating facies as the filtering property via the user interface.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 detects such entry and, as a result, determines one or more locations along the well trace intersections with cells that have the defined facies, or rock type. In other words, to meet the criteria of this defined filter, perforation evaluation engine 110 traverses the reservoir model to locate those cells that intersect the well trace and that comprise the defined rock type (delta, crevasse splay, channel sand, etc., for example).
  • facies filter may be bounded, for example, by those defined in the lithotype definition of an earth modeling session, as will be understood by those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. Accordingly, through utilization of this filter, perforation evaluation engine 110 includes all porosity and permeability value ranges that existed in a certain lithotype definition.
  • the perforation by distance from fluid boundary filter allows a user to restrict the creation of well perforations in a production or injection well based on a prescribed distance from a fluid phase boundary (i.e., water-oil or gas-oil contact, for example).
  • a fluid phase boundary i.e., water-oil or gas-oil contact, for example.
  • Perforation evaluation engine 110 would then restrict the determination of the perforation intervals accordingly such that they are inclusive or exclusive of the defined depth restriction(s) depending on the hydrocarbon target. For production wells, this would prohibit the definition of a perforation below the water-oil contact, as well as ensure that the perforations are located in cells above oil saturation greater than residual oil saturation.
  • this filter may be defined via a suitable user interface and, thereafter, detected by perforation evaluation engine 110, whereby the necessary filter is then applied.
  • a perforation by dynamic fluid property filter may also be defined at block 204(iv).
  • Such an exemplary filter would facilitate workflows involving history matching or the addition of new wells to a history matched dynamic model.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 would conduct uncertainty assessment of multiple probable historically matched models based on an analysis of dynamic saturation and pressure profiles.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 utilizes, for example, volumes of oil, gas or water saturation, dynamic streamlines, static inter-well tortuosity rankings and residual saturation filtering (based on relative permeability and an initialized dynamic model) to assess dynamic ranking characteristic of the proposed new wells.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 utilizes the pressure and/or saturation profiles resulting from a numerical flow model in a reservoir simulator as the criterion to assess existing or potential perforation intervals. Similar to the perforation by rock property filter, this filter allows a user to utilize a numerical data range constraint to identify where the well trace intersects with grid cells in the specified property volume, given that the cells belonging to the volume occur within the range specified by the dynamic property filter. In other words, cell volumes meeting this criterion must both intersect the well trace and contain the dynamic fluid property defined by the user in specified filter range.
  • the perforating by dynamic fluid property fluid is an enhancement to the aforementioned listed perforation filters, as those previously described are static in nature (i.e., time invariant properties). However, dynamic properties are time dependent, thus providing the user with the ability to update perforation intervals as a result of transitory behavior in the subsurface.
  • Embodiments of perforation evaluation system 100 utilizing such a dynamic filter will facilitate reservoir prediction/forecasting by allowing users to, for example,: model new (open) perforation intervals given agglomerated hydrocarbons in new locations resulting from a modeled production scenario, perform sensitivity analysis of potential perforation intervals locations given hydrocarbon accumulation proximal to the well trace, determine optimal perforation interval shut-in given fluid distribution and associated flow unit connectivity, and determine where re-perforation may be appropriate to exploit bypassed pay.
  • the perforation by geobody filter utilizes geocellular connectivity in order to distinguish between the flowing and non-flowing conduits existing in saturated subsurface porous media.
  • the reservoir, or bulk medium is categorized as containing static conduits of flow and barriers to flow, each being distinguishable by a magnitude of porosity/permeability. Some pore spaces are effectively connected between each other, thus constituting a flow region whereby single and/or multiphase flow is permitted. Barriers may also be interconnected, potentially rendering total obfuscation of a floodable pore space.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 utilizes a connectivity algorithm as described herein to analyze connected cells possessing petrophysical properties in order to assess the net reservoir volume, thus producing one or more reservoir regions of connected bodies, or geobodies, in the context of a porosity or permeability range (i.e., connectivity scores).
  • a modified Euler Characteristic is utilized to evaluate and rank those geobodies based upon their cell connectivity, thus identifying a range of geological realizations that include, for example, optimistic, intermediate, and pessimistic geobodies.
  • the location of one or more perforation intervals along a well trace may then be determined and ranked according to the connectivity scores. Accordingly, those geobodies and perforation intervals may then be realized in an earth model to simulate various downhole operations.
  • Flowing conduits consist of porosity and permeability within a range that, for given fluid properties, permit the transport of those fluids.
  • Non-flowing conduits act as barriers/inhibitors to fluid flow in the rock matrix, although it may possess trapped/immobile hydrocarbons.
  • the geobody filter quantifies the static connectivity for a specific petrophysical earth model having grid volumes of porosity and permeability, and utilizes the Euler Characteristic as a ranking tool for connected geocellular bodes of multiple stochastic realizations.
  • an inverse cumulative distribution function (“ICDF”) may be utilized to interpret probabilities of occurrence.
  • the modified Euler Characteristic is utilized to enhance the topological assessment by numerical quantifying the connectivity of cells within a static reservoir model over a range of porosity and permeability values (i.e., connectivity scores).
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 ranks the connectedness of disparate earth modeling petrophysical realizations, or geobodies. Thereafter, static determination of optimally connected geobodies is determined by perforation evaluation engine 110, wherein the location of one or more perforation intervals are then determined along a defined well trace.
  • the resulting static reservoir model is subjected to fluid flow simulation for further analysis as desired.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 analyzes the reservoir model to determine the location of one or more perforation intervals based upon the defined perforation filters. As stated above, in doing so perforation evaluation engine 110 will traverse the model to identify those cells that intersect the well trace and that meet the criteria defined in the perforation filters. At block 208, perforation evaluation engine 110 then outputs the resulting perforation intervals accordingly.
  • the perforation filters may be output in a variety of ways, such as, for example, using a 3D reservoir model.
  • the modeled perforation filters may then be utilized in a dynamic simulation, as understood in the art.
  • exemplary embodiments of the present invention facilitate faster assessment of allocating perforations and advantageously considering well communication through static properties before perforating the well and progressing to full-field flow simulation.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 utilizes one or more geobodies that were previously generated by the system. In other words, perforation evaluation system 100 did not require the user to define the geobody. However, in other exemplary methodologies, perforation evaluation engine 110 may prompt the user to define the geobody using a variety of "geobody filters.” An exemplary methodology to generate and utilize such geobodies is described below. In addition, those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure will also realize that the descriptions provided below may also be utilized to generate geobodies for application in a variety of other applications.
  • FIG. 3A is a flow chart illustrating yet another exemplary methodology 300 of the present invention wherein the perforation by geobody filter has been detected by perforation evaluation engine 110.
  • blocks 202 and 204(v) operate as previously described in relation to FIG. 2 .
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 detects entry of one or more geobody filters defined using a characteristic of a desired geobody at block 302. Such geobody characteristics may be, for example, related to petrophysical, mechanical, geometric, or volumetric properties.
  • the geobody filters may be entered, or defined, via a user interface (display 108 and I/O device 106, for example), as understood in the art.
  • the geobody filters may define (1) a numerical range of porosity values that cells within the reservoir grid must meet to be eligible to form part of a geobody, (2) a numerical range of permeability values cells must meet in order to be eligible to form part of the geobody, (3) a minimum number or total pore volume of connected cells that a geobody must have, and (4) a required cell connection geometry for the geobodies.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 utilizes the specification of respective porosity and permeability ranges for the interrogation of cell connectivity in an earth model in order to identify and isolate those geobodies having reservoir properties that are to be exploited.
  • Exemplary porosity/permeability ranges may include, for example, porosity in the range of 0.25 pore units (or 25%) to 0.35 pore units (or 35%) or permeability in range of 200 mD (milli-Darcy) to 1.5 D (Darcy), as will be understood by those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 may also utilize specifications of other properties to determine connectivity, such as, for example, facies, TOC, brittleness, Poisson's ratio, or any individual or combination of indicator or continuous variable (e.g., mechanical, petrophysical, or lithotype), as would be understood by those same skilled persons.
  • specifications of other properties to determine connectivity such as, for example, facies, TOC, brittleness, Poisson's ratio, or any individual or combination of indicator or continuous variable (e.g., mechanical, petrophysical, or lithotype), as would be understood by those same skilled persons.
  • geobody filter (3) another exemplary specification is that of the minimum connected cell count or total pore volume necessary to constitute a geobody.
  • isolated sets of range inclusive geobodies may be created. In such embodiments, if those geobodies are separated by an impermeable barrier (remaining truly isolated), they would not contribute to fluid flow (or oil and gas production). In addition, such geobodies are likely to be very trivial in fluid volume.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 utilize a minimal connected cell count or total pore volume constraint as a filter to exclude small-isolated geobodies from the selection process and, thus, prevent them from hindering proper assessment of grid connectivity.
  • a 100 cell threshold may be utilized as the geobody filter and, in such case, those connected cell volumes having less than 100 cells are discarded.
  • a volume of 8.2 x 10 6 m3 (cubic meters) may be used as the geobody filter and, in such case, those connected cells with total pore volume having less than 8.2 x 10 6 m3 are discarded.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 analyzes the reservoir grid to determine those geobodies comprised of cells in the amount of the minimum connected cell constraint, by count or total pore volume.
  • the porosity/permeability geobody filter is also entered, cells recognized by processor 102 as possessing porosity/permeability within the given range yet lacking sufficient cell connectivity as per the minimum cell constraint are considered non-net reservoir (i.e., will not be selected as geobodies).
  • the connected cells may be defined in terms of their geometry.
  • conjoined cells in a reservoir model grid may be connected by vertices, edges and faces.
  • the geometric grid is typically stacked in rectilinear/structured sets -i.e. in Cartesian or pseudo-Cartesian space, accounting for stratigraphy and displacement attributed to faulting.
  • FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary cell 320 being comprised of six faces 322, twelve edges 324 and eight vertices 326 (or corner-point connections).
  • the stacked cell connectivity to be utilized by perforation evaluation engine 110 is then determined by defining how or if adjacent faces 322, edges 324 and vertices 326 are connected to one another in the entire volume or specified three-dimensional zone of interest.
  • the defined geobody filter may require that only edges and vertices be connected, thus those cells not so connected are discarded.
  • one or more geometrical connectivity geobody filters may be utilized alone or in combination. The function and operation of such geometric connectivity algorithms will be understood by those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • processor 102 utilizes earth modeling module 114 to traverse the reservoir grid by incrementing along the X axis, then incrementing along the Y axis and then by incrementing along the Z axis cell by cell, establishing whether the necessary cell connections exist, as will be understood by those persons ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • FIG. 3C demonstrates stacked cells 320 and their interconnectedness that would be assessed for a central cell (i,j,k) within a reservoir grid, as described in Deutsch, C.; Fortran Programs for Calculating Connectivity of Three-Dimensional Numerical Models and for Ranking Multiple Realizations; Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 69-76, 1998 ).
  • connectivity may be determined from any permutation or exclusive implementation of face, edge or vertex based connectivity between cells 320 within a given volume of the reservoir grid.
  • 3D illustrates three exemplary respective geometric connectivity methods for cells 320, A showing face-to-face, B showing edge-to-edge, and C showing vertices-to-vertices, as described in Zhang, M., Yonigjia, H., Ye, G., Lange, D. and van Breugel, K.; Computational investigation on mass diffusivity in Portland cement paste based on X-ray computed microtomography ( ⁇ CT) image; Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 472-481, 2012 ).
  • ⁇ CT X-ray computed microtomography
  • the connectivity algorithm and connection configurations utilized by processor 102 to achieve this functionality may be, for example, those as described in Deutsch, C.; Fortran Programs for Calculating Connectivity of Three-Dimensional Numerical Models and for Ranking Multiple Realizations; Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 69-76, 1998 .
  • those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure realize there are a variety of other connectivity methodologies which may be utilized with the present invention.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 then generates one or more first generation geobodies based upon the defined geobody filters at block 304. To do so, perforation evaluation system 100 assigns a new index (a unique numerical number) to those cells comprising the characteristic properties expressed by the user (i.e., geobody filters). After the index is assigned to the qualifying cells, perforation evaluation engine 110 makes each cell part of a connected net reservoir group (or, geobody). In those instances where two disparately indexed geobody groups are determined to be connected, perforation evaluation engine 110 re-indexes geobody groups to become a part of the same geobody numerical index.
  • a new index a unique numerical number
  • FIG. 3E illustrates an exemplary connected pore volume index for a membrane at micro-meter scale (obtained through microCT segmentation, for example), with the non-connected field being omitted from the display, as described in Pölt, P.; In situ experiments in the ESEM (Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope); Austrian Centre for Election Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Retirved June 5, 2012 .
  • ESEM End-SEM
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 then calculates a connectivity score for each of the first generation geobodies.
  • a Euler Characteristic is utilized to assign a numerical quantification, or connectivity score, to each geobody correlating to rock physics or mechanical rock property.
  • a Euler Characteristic is a non-dimensional number that may be negative or positive.
  • V is defined as the number of connected components of G (pores)
  • E is the number of tunnels in G (number of redundant connections within the pore space)
  • F is the number of enclosed cavities (occluded pore space), as described in Vogel, H. J.; Topological Characterization of Porous Media; in K.R. Mecke, D. Stoyan (Eds.), LNP 600, pp.75-92, 2002 .
  • certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention as described herein produces a quasi-binary reservoir system that is comprised of connected and non-connected pore spaces defined by petrophysical data cutoffs (geobody filters, as previously described).
  • one or more exemplary embodiments of the present invention utilize a modified Euler Characteristic.
  • the modified Euler Characteristic again note that the geobodies defined by the applied static connectivity filters (block 302) act as the connected pore space in the Euler equation.
  • V is now expressed as: ⁇ ⁇ , K
  • the minimum count and total pore volume of connected cells defined in the filter is expressed as: min i ⁇ G ⁇ i and min i ⁇ G ⁇ v i , where G is the static model, i is an individual cell in G, and v( i ) is the total pore volume of an individual cell in G.
  • the cell connection constraint is governed by, for example, 6, 8, 12, 14, 18, 20 or 26 point geometrical cell connections established by permutations of face, edge and vertex connectivity in the volume.
  • Perforation evaluation engine 110 assesses the redundant connections during the static connectivity process (block 304). Perforation evaluation engine 110 considers connections to be redundant when at least one dependent connection exists that allows fluid entry and exit from a cell (i.e. mass is conserved and non-dependent connections are redundant). An abundance of redundant connections is therefore interpreted as healthy connectedness of the volume.
  • the final term in the Euler Characteristic (Eq. (1)) is the occluded non-solid reservoir space, represented as an F, which is the portion of porosity omitted by the petrophysical constraint of the static connectivity geobody filter.
  • the cell(s) found to be isolated are then included in the assessment of reservoir connectivity.
  • the isolated cell(s) may also be treated as a solid rock matrix (i.e. omitted per the defined geobody filter, thus indicating it does not participate in flow), which is dependent on the defining capillary pressure and relative permeability that may be assigned to the cells during dynamic flow simulation in a numerical reservoir simulator.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 calculates and assigns a numerical quantification indicating the connectivity for each geobody, also referred to herein as a connectivity score.
  • a connectivity score a numerical quantification indicating the connectivity for each geobody
  • largely connected geobodies are attributed with a more negative Euler Characteristic, while the opposite exists for less connected geobodies.
  • a largely connected geobody may be assigned a connectivity score of -2500, an intermediate connected geobody assigned a connectivity score of -0.45, and a poorly connected geobody assigned a connectivity score of 2500, depending on the volume of the initial reservoir grid and the determined geobodies, respectively.
  • the modified Euler Characteristic when the modified Euler Characteristic is normalized by volume it yields the Euler Number -i.e. a numerically quantified connectivity without the effect of the volume.
  • the connected portions of porosity constitute the flow region while the solid matrix, or zones possessing an excessively high entry pressure, act as barriers to flow and thus connectivity.
  • the same is analogous to porosity and permeability cutoffs in the reservoir which delineate the flow region of the reservoir.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 determines the optimal location for one or more perforation intervals along the defined well trace suing the connectivity scores.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 ranks the first generation geobodies in relation to one another based on their connectivity scores.
  • the perforation intervals may be evaluated individually or as a group for a given well trace.
  • non-dimensional values of tortuosity equal to, or slightly above one may denote preferential connections as the tortuosity of a straight line is equal to one.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 graphically analyzes the amount of preferential rock properties in contact with the perforation intervals defined along the well trace as described herein, and then utilizes, for example, a 3D tornado plot to visualize reservoir accordingly.
  • a tornado plot may be defined vertically by K layer, horizontally by the azimuth of the static model, and quantified according to any available static or dynamic property volume, as will be understood by those ordinarily skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 may output the well trace, geobodies and perforations, and/or presented them to a dynamic simulator for modeling of a variety of reservoir applications such as, for example, as a target for well planning or well drilling.
  • Perforation evaluation system 100 may output the well trace, geobodies and perforation intervals in a variety of forms such as, for example, positioning each geobody and perforation along the well trace within a 3D earth model, or via a textual description of the same.
  • perforation evaluation system 100 may also utilize the ranked geobodies to determine the probability of locating a third geobody that is similar to one or more of the ranked geobodies.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 may utilize an ICDF to determine P10, P50 and P90 probabilistic realizations. It should be noted that the most likely realization defined by static connectivity may differ from that based on static volumetric calculations. Due to the petrophysical property realizations being equi-probable, large variations of in-place fluids are not expected in most examples. This leads to minor variations in the computed in-place fluids.
  • the modified Euler Characteristic is utilized to measure the effect of petrophysical property spatial distribution between specific wells and throughout the entire reservoir model, which varies more widely from realization to realization.
  • the modified Euler Characteristic may be used in conjunction with traditional static volumetric ranking methods to further rank multiple stochastic realizations generated from traditional earth modeling processes.
  • FIG. 4 is flow chart illustrating yet another exemplary methodology perform using one or more embodiments of the present invention.
  • Methodology 400 begins at block 304 of the methodology 300 described in relation to FIG. 3A above.
  • processor 102 may continuously run method 400 in the background in order to continuously detect entry of refined geobody filters.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 prompts a user via the interface to enter one or more refined geobody filters at block 402.
  • the refined geobody filters may loosen or restrict the connectivity requirements necessary for cells to form geobodies.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 may utilize an iterative loop to continuously monitor the system for entry of refined geobody filters.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 utilizes a dilation/erosion technique to refine any of the rock property, the minimum cell constraint and/or topology.
  • dilation/erosion would be used to determine potential agglomeration (e.g., expansion or shrinkage) of disparate geobodies through connectivity via cells lacking the pass criterion of the petrophysical geobody filters.
  • the present invention takes into account the assumption that, for spatially distinct geobodies, the uniqueness of distinct geobodies may be entirely trivial if the amount of cells separating them is very low (topological consideration) or if flow is expected to occur in the particular system due to effects of capillarity (dynamic consideration).
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 Upon specifying a refined geobody filter, perforation evaluation engine 110 uses the dilation/erosion technique to determine if cell volumes adjacent the geobodies are actually conjoined solitary volumes with petrophysical heterogeneity. As a result, the geobodies may be expanded or shrunk. To achieve this functionality, a volume of examination criterion, possessing dimensions defined by height, width and length, would be specified by a user of the system. Perforation evaluation engine 110 would then utilize the examination volume to search adjacent, but non-connected geobody(ies) or cells, residing proximal to a given geobody within the reservoir grid.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 determines that the respective geobodies are conjoined as a solitary geobody. Thereafter, at block 404, perforation evaluation engine 110 proceeds with the erosion process to reconfigure/re-index those geobodies determined to be connected as a solitary unique geobody (i.e. aggregating the net reservoir volume, and subsequently deleting the volume of examination), also referred to as the creation of second generation geobodies.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 proceeds with the erosion process to reconfigure/re-index those geobodies determined to be connected as a solitary unique geobody (i.e. aggregating the net reservoir volume, and subsequently deleting the volume of examination), also referred to as the creation of second generation geobodies.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 then re-analyzes the one or more second generation geobodies to determine if they still meet the requirements defined by the geobody filters entered at block 204.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 may also utilize an iterative loop to continuously monitor the system for input of refined geobody filter parameters. In such alternative embodiments, perforation evaluation engine 110 would determine if the second generation geobodies meet the definition of the newly inputted geobody filters. Nevertheless, if at block 406 it is determined that one or more of the geobodies do not meet the geobody filter criteria, the algorithm loops back to step 302. However, for those geobodies that do meet the geobody filter criteria, the algorithm goes on to block 408 wherein the geobodies are output as previously described. Thereafter, the algorithm loops back to block 306 whereby the second generation geobodies are utilized to determine the perforation intervals as previously described.
  • perforation evaluation engine 110 may also evaluate and determine the inlet to outlet static connections between an injector/producer well pair that is connected through determined geobodies. Enforcing inlet/outlet conditions provide a process by which connectivity can be assessed with the a priori assumption of potential communication between wells. Such exemplary embodiments would permit the determination of dependent connectivity from a source to a sink, much like a streamline. Independent connectivity would remain as defined previously by the filtered petrophysical, volumetric and geometrical components. However, in this alternative embodiment, the injector well would act as a start point and the producer as the end point.
  • Perforation evaluation engine 110 would then initiate the previously described connectivity algorithms from the injection well, as opposed to simply following the increasing X, Y and Z coordinates in the grid.
  • such an embodiment would allow for the combined analysis of interpreted well test permeability and earth modeled interpreted flow regions based primarily on petrophysical analysis.
  • exemplary embodiments of the present invention faciliate faster assessment of allocating perforations and advantageously considering well communication through static properties before perforating the well and progressing to full-field flow simulation.
  • the system utilizes one or more perforation filters to identify optimal perforation intervals along a defined well trace within a reservoir model. Thereafter, a wellbore may be simulated, planned and perforated using the determined perforation intervals, an existing wellbore may be perforated in real-time and/or further operations may be altered. In addition, well equipment may be identified and prepared based upon the well placement or stimulation plan, and the wellbore is drilled, stimulated, altered and/or completed in accordance to the well placement or stimulation plan.
  • the present invention provides a variety of advantages. First, it allows the perforation of wells for the purpose of executing a flow simulation using non-esoteric methods. Second, the present invention provides optimization of perforation intervals since flow regions are assessed earlier using static properties, thus saving money. Third, time and money may be saved by gaining an understanding of reservoir flow regions earlier, through their petrophysical properties, and in conjunction with dynamic property modeling. Fourth, static models may be refined based upon determined communication between wells and sector/regional fluid displacement exclusively using static properties. Fifth, the static earth model may be adjusted to be consistent with production data. Sixth, fine tuning of the static model is encouraged before flow simulation, thus reducing the necessity to introduce porosity/permeability modifiers in the model during history match.
  • An exemplary methodology of the present invention provides a computer-implemented method to determine placement of a perforation interval, the method comprising determining a location of a perforation interval along a well trace using a perforation filter defining at least one of a: perforation interval by facies; perforation interval by fluid boundary; perforation interval by geobody; or perforation interval by dynamic fluid property.
  • the one or more perforation intervals are utilized within a planned well or an existing well.
  • the entered perforation filter defines the one or more perforation intervals by geobody, and determining the location of the one or more perforation intervals further comprises detecting entry of one or more geobody filters defined using one or more characteristics of a desired geobody; generating a plurality of first generation geobodies based upon at least one of the geobody filters; calculating a connectivity score for each first generation geobody using a Euler Characteristic; and determining the location of one or more perforation intervals along the define well trace using the connectivity scores of each first generation geobody.
  • the method further comprises ranking the perforation intervals based upon the connectivity scores of each first generation geobody.
  • the connectivity score calculated using the Euler Characteristic comprises numerical ranges of rock physics or mechanical rock properties.
  • the one or more geobody filters comprise at least one of: a range of porosity for a cell forming part of the first generation geobodies; a range of permeability for a cell forming part of the first generation geobodies; a minimum count or total pore volume of connected cells for the first generation geobodies; or a cell connection geometry for the first generation geobodies.
  • the method further comprises detecting entry of one or more refined geobody filters and generating at least one second generation geobody based upon the refined geobody filters.
  • generating the second generation geobody further comprises: generating a first volume of cells based upon the refined geobody filters; performing a dilation/erosion technique to determine if the first volume of cells should be expanded or shrunk; and generating a second volume of cells based upon the determination of whether the first volume of cells should be expanded or shrunk, wherein the second volume of cells is the second generation geobody.
  • a location of the well trace is defined before the location of the perforation interval is determined.
  • the perforation filter defines a perforation by geobody, and determining the location of the perforation interval further comprises generating a plurality of first generation geobodies; calculating a connectivity score for each first generation geobody; and utilizing the connectivity scores to determine the location of a plurality of perforation intervals.
  • calculating the connectivity scores further comprises utilizing a Euler Characteristic to calculate a numerical range of rock physics or mechanical rock properties.
  • the perforation interval is utilized in a planned well or an existing well.
  • the method further comprises ranking the plurality of perforation intervals based upon the connectivity scores.
  • exemplary methodologies described herein may be implemented by a system comprising processing circuitry or a computer program product comprising instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, causes the processor to perform any of the methodology described herein.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur pour déterminer le placement d'un intervalle de perforation, le procédé comprenant la détermination (206) d'un emplacement d'un intervalle de perforation le long d'une trace de puits à l'aide d'un filtre de perforation définissant un intervalle de perforation par géocorps (204(v)), dans lequel la détermination de l'emplacement de l'intervalle de perforation comprend en outre :
    la génération (304) d'une pluralité de géocorps de première génération ;
    le calcul (306) d'un score de connectivité pour chaque géocorps de première génération ; et
    l'utilisation (308) des scores de connectivité pour déterminer l'emplacement d'une pluralité d'intervalles de perforation.
  2. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon la revendication 1, dans lequel un emplacement de la trace de puits est défini avant que l'emplacement de l'intervalle de perforation ne soit déterminé.
  3. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon les revendications 1 ou 2, dans lequel le calcul des scores de connectivité comprend en outre l'utilisation d'une caractéristique d'Euler pour calculer une plage numérique de propriétés physiques de la roche ou de propriétés mécaniques de la roche.
  4. Procédé selon les revendications 1, 2 ou 3, dans lequel le procédé comprend en outre la classification (310) de la pluralité d'intervalles de perforation sur la base des scores de connectivité.
  5. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon la revendication 1, 2, 3 ou 4, dans lequel l'intervalle de perforation est utilisé dans un puits planifié.
  6. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon la revendication 1, 2, 3 ou 4, dans lequel l'intervalle de perforation est utilisé dans un puits existant.
  7. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon les revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel les un ou plusieurs filtres de géocorps comprennent au moins l'un parmi :
    une plage de porosité pour une cellule faisant partie des géocorps de première génération ;
    une plage de perméabilité pour une cellule faisant partie des géocorps de première génération ;
    un nombre minimum ou un volume de pore total de cellules connectées pour les géocorps de première génération ; ou
    une géométrie de connexion de cellules pour les géocorps de première génération.
  8. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon une quelconque revendication précédente, comprenant en outre :
    la détection de l'entrée d'un ou de plusieurs filtres de géocorps affinés ; et
    la génération (404) d'au moins un géocorps de seconde génération sur la base des filtres de géocorps affinés.
  9. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon la revendication 8, dans lequel la génération (404) du géocorps de seconde génération comprend en outre :
    la génération d'un premier volume de cellules sur la base des filtres de géocorps affinés ;
    la réalisation d'une technique de dilatation/d'érosion pour déterminer si le premier volume de cellules doit être étendu ou rétréci ; et
    la génération d'un second volume de cellules sur la base de la détermination consistant à savoir si le premier volume de cellules doit être étendu ou rétréci, dans lequel le second volume de cellules est le géocorps de seconde génération.
  10. Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur selon une quelconque revendication précédente, comprenant en outre la détermination d'un emplacement d'un intervalle de perforation le long d'une trace de puits à l'aide d'un filtre de perforation définissant au moins l'un parmi :
    un intervalle de perforation par faciès (204(ii)) ;
    un intervalle de perforation par limite fluide (204(iii)) ; ou
    un intervalle de perforation par propriété de fluide dynamique (204(iv)).
  11. Système comprenant un circuit de traitement pour mettre en oeuvre l'un quelconque des procédés selon les revendications 1 à 10.
  12. Produit de programme informatique comprenant des instructions qui, lorsqu'elles sont exécutées par au moins un processeur, amènent le processeur à mettre en oeuvre l'un quelconque des procédés selon les revendications 1 à 10.
EP12890006.5A 2012-12-13 2012-12-13 Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant de déterminer le placement d'intervalles de perforation utilisant le faciès, les limites fluides, les corps géographiques et les propriétés fluides dynamiques Active EP2904530B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2012/069515 WO2014092712A1 (fr) 2012-12-13 2012-12-13 Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant de déterminer le placement d'intervalles de perforation utilisant le faciès, les limites fluides, les corps géographiques et les propriétés fluides dynamiques

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2904530A1 EP2904530A1 (fr) 2015-08-12
EP2904530A4 EP2904530A4 (fr) 2016-08-31
EP2904530B1 true EP2904530B1 (fr) 2018-10-10

Family

ID=50934782

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12890006.5A Active EP2904530B1 (fr) 2012-12-13 2012-12-13 Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant de déterminer le placement d'intervalles de perforation utilisant le faciès, les limites fluides, les corps géographiques et les propriétés fluides dynamiques

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US10495782B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2904530B1 (fr)
AR (1) AR093936A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2890817C (fr)
RU (1) RU2015123274A (fr)
WO (1) WO2014092712A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
MX2016008720A (es) * 2014-01-30 2016-09-06 Landmark Graphics Corp Leyenda de agrupamiento inteligente.
WO2016093794A1 (fr) * 2014-12-08 2016-06-16 Landmark Graphics Corporation Définition de faciès pétrographique non linéaire pour un modèle de simulation de réservoir
WO2016140699A1 (fr) * 2015-03-02 2016-09-09 C&J Energy Services, Inc. Système et procédé de complétion
CN106285598B (zh) * 2015-06-03 2019-04-02 中国石油化工股份有限公司 一种页岩缝网压裂射孔簇间距优化方法和系统
CN107871023B (zh) * 2016-09-23 2020-10-23 中国石油化工股份有限公司 优化径向射孔轨迹的方法
CN106372446B (zh) * 2016-10-12 2018-12-18 中国地质大学（北京） 流动单元的划分方法和装置及井间对比方法和装置
US10928548B2 (en) 2017-03-14 2021-02-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Rock type based free water level inversion
US10832152B2 (en) 2017-11-29 2020-11-10 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Wet well prediction using real time data
CN110858260B (zh) * 2018-08-17 2023-08-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 一种三角洲相单一期次河道砂体平面分布的描述方法
US11487032B2 (en) * 2019-07-16 2022-11-01 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Characterizing low-permeability reservoirs by using numerical models of short-time well test data
US20220213775A1 (en) * 2021-01-04 2022-07-07 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determining composite matrix-fracture properties of naturally fractured reservoirs in numerical reservoir simulation
US11680475B2 (en) * 2021-01-29 2023-06-20 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Linear calibration method for lithostatic stress results from basin modeling

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5757663A (en) * 1995-09-26 1998-05-26 Atlantic Richfield Company Hydrocarbon reservoir connectivity tool using cells and pay indicators
US6549879B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2003-04-15 Mobil Oil Corporation Determining optimal well locations from a 3D reservoir model
US6415864B1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-07-09 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for separately producing water and oil from a reservoir
US7835893B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2010-11-16 Landmark Graphics Corporation Method and system for scenario and case decision management
AU2006249641B2 (en) 2005-05-26 2010-12-23 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company A rapid method for reservoir connectivity analysis using a fast marching method
US9074454B2 (en) 2008-01-15 2015-07-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Dynamic reservoir engineering
US8793111B2 (en) 2009-01-20 2014-07-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Automated field development planning
NZ588826A (en) * 2008-05-22 2012-10-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Transforming seismic survey data to assess an area for hydrocarbon production potential
US8200465B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2012-06-12 Terratek Inc. Heterogeneous earth models for a reservoir field
US8301426B2 (en) * 2008-11-17 2012-10-30 Landmark Graphics Corporation Systems and methods for dynamically developing wellbore plans with a reservoir simulator
US10060245B2 (en) 2009-01-09 2018-08-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Systems and methods for planning well locations with dynamic production criteria
US8949173B2 (en) * 2009-10-28 2015-02-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pay zone prediction
US8302688B2 (en) * 2010-01-20 2012-11-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of optimizing wellbore perforations using underbalance pulsations
US9229129B2 (en) * 2010-12-10 2016-01-05 Conocophillips Company Reservoir geobody calculation
GB2500332B (en) 2010-12-30 2018-10-24 Schlumberger Holdings System and method for performing downhole stimulation operations
WO2014092713A2 (fr) * 2012-12-13 2014-06-19 Landmark Graphics Corporation Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant d'évaluer et de classer des corps géologiques à l'aide d'une caractéristique d'euler

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2904530A1 (fr) 2015-08-12
AR093936A1 (es) 2015-07-01
CA2890817A1 (fr) 2014-06-19
WO2014092712A1 (fr) 2014-06-19
US10495782B2 (en) 2019-12-03
AU2012396845A1 (en) 2015-05-21
EP2904530A4 (fr) 2016-08-31
CA2890817C (fr) 2017-10-17
RU2015123274A (ru) 2017-01-18
US20150276978A1 (en) 2015-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2904530B1 (fr) Système, procédé et produit de programme informatique permettant de déterminer le placement d'intervalles de perforation utilisant le faciès, les limites fluides, les corps géographiques et les propriétés fluides dynamiques
RU2669948C2 (ru) Оптимизация многоступенчатого проекта нефтяного месторождения в условиях неопределенности
US10787887B2 (en) Method of performing integrated fracture and reservoir operations for multiple wellbores at a wellsite
RU2575947C2 (ru) Моделирование взаимодействия трещин гидравлического разрыва в системах сложных трещин
US9836561B2 (en) Optimizing multistage hydraulic fracturing design based on three-dimensional (3D) continuum damage mechanics
US20150204174A1 (en) System and method for performing stimulation operations
US10866340B2 (en) Integrated oilfield asset modeling using multiple resolutions of reservoir detail
US20170002630A1 (en) Method of performing additional oilfield operations on existing wells
Niu et al. Integration of Core Analysis, Pumping Schedule and Microseismicity to Reduce Uncertainties of Production Performance of Complex Fracture Networks for Multi-Stage Hydraulically Fractured Reservoirs
US11500123B2 (en) Hybrid 3D geocellular representation of selected natural fracture network subsets
Buijs et al. Building Multifrac Completion Strategies in Tight Gas Reservoirs: A North Sea Case
CA2889722C (fr) Systeme, procede et produit de programme informatique permettant d'evaluer et de classer des corps geologiques a l'aide d'une caracteristique d'euler
AU2012396845B2 (en) System, method and computer program product for determining placement of perforation intervals using facies, fluid boundaries, geobodies and dynamic fluid properties
Moradi et al. Learning from Behavioral Frac Maps: A Montney Case Study in Integration of Modern Microseismic and Production Data Analyses
Hernandez et al. Drill Cutting Reinjection Feasibility Study in a Critical Environment, Apaika Field, Ecuador
Tamulonis A methodology for integrating unconventional geologic and engineering data into a geocellular model
Xu Shale Gas Production Forecasting Using Reservoir Simulation With Hydraulic Fracture Mapping
Nenasheva et al. Probabilistic assessment of single well source rock oil recovery in terms of geological and technological uncertainties
Cozby Fracture Conductivity and Its Effects on Production Estimation in Shale
Fargo Department of Earth Science and Engineering Centre for Petroleum Studies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150508

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: DUPUY, ALAIN

Inventor name: CROCKETT, STEVEN PAUL

Inventor name: RAMSAY, TRAVIS ST. GEORGE

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20160728

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E21B 43/119 20060101ALI20160722BHEP

Ipc: G06F 19/00 20110101AFI20160722BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20180116

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180615

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1052079

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012052205

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602012052205

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G06F0019000000

Ipc: G16Z0099000000

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20181010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20181010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1052079

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190210

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190110

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190210

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012052205

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181213

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190711

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20181231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181213

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190702

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181231

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181213

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20191230

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181010

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20121213

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231106

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20231123

Year of fee payment: 12