EP2867192A1 - Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation - Google Patents

Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation

Info

Publication number
EP2867192A1
EP2867192A1 EP13732475.2A EP13732475A EP2867192A1 EP 2867192 A1 EP2867192 A1 EP 2867192A1 EP 13732475 A EP13732475 A EP 13732475A EP 2867192 A1 EP2867192 A1 EP 2867192A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
raw gas
gas
hydrogenation
reactor
process according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP13732475.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Christian Wix
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Topsoe AS
Original Assignee
Haldor Topsoe AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Haldor Topsoe AS filed Critical Haldor Topsoe AS
Priority to EP13732475.2A priority Critical patent/EP2867192A1/en
Priority claimed from PCT/EP2013/063481 external-priority patent/WO2014001438A1/en
Publication of EP2867192A1 publication Critical patent/EP2867192A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G70/00—Working-up undefined normally gaseous mixtures obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00, C10G11/00, C10G15/00, C10G47/00, C10G51/00
    • C10G70/02—Working-up undefined normally gaseous mixtures obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00, C10G11/00, C10G15/00, C10G47/00, C10G51/00 by hydrogenation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/002—Removal of contaminants
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/002—Removal of contaminants
    • C10K1/003—Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants, e.g. acid gas removal
    • C10K1/004—Sulfur containing contaminants, e.g. hydrogen sulfide
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10K—PURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/34—Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by catalytic conversion of impurities to more readily removable materials

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to purification of raw gas.
  • the invention concerns removal of sul- fur by adsorption and oxygen and olefins by hydrogenation.
  • Industrial raw gases arise typically from gasification of carbonaceous raw materials such as coal, oil petroleum coke, biomass and the like as a reformed hydrocarbon feed or as coke oven gas.
  • such a raw gas is obtained by the gasification process or as an off gas from the production of coke, the so called coke oven gas.
  • These gases contain hydrogen, which inter alia is a valuable reactant for use as alternative fuel or for use in the preparation of a number of bulk chemicals and of liquid or gaseous fuels.
  • gasifier gas and coke oven gas may be em ⁇ ployed in the preparation of substitute natural gas (SNG) .
  • a raw gas may also be converted into a liquid fuel, such as gasoline or diesel by the Fischer Tropsch process or by an oxygenate to gasoline process.
  • Olefins are undesired because they may result in deactiva ⁇ tion of catalysts by carbon formation which may take place when heating a gas comprising olefins.
  • Oxygen is similarly undesired because the presence of oxy ⁇ gen in downstream processes may be detrimental due to local hot-spots and oxidation of reduced catalysts.
  • the raw gas may be a mixture of e.g. natural gas comprising sulfur and process tail gases comprising olefins being directed for downstream processing, such as tail gases from processes for synthesis of hydrocarbons by Fischer-Tropsch, methanol-to-gasoline, TIGAS and similar processes.
  • olefins and oxygen together may be removed by hydro ⁇ genation over a hydrogenation catalyst, such cL S cL C3.talyst comprising one or more of Cu, Al ad Zn, while sulfur compounds may be adsorbed on said hydrogenation catalyst with ⁇ out influencing the catalytic activity.
  • a hydrogenation catalyst such as cL S cL C3.talyst comprising one or more of Cu, Al ad Zn
  • a temperature control may be im ⁇ portant, since increased temperatures due to the exothermal hydrogenation reaction may result in activation of exothermal reactions e.g. the exothermal production of CH 3 OH from 3 ⁇ 4 and CO on a catalyst comprising copper, methanation on a catalyst comprising nickel or Fischer Tropsch wax formation on a catalyst comprising iron.
  • the latter may result in a further undesired heating of the reactor, in activating the exothermal reaction such as methanol production further, and possibly also in a catalyst deactivation due to sinter ⁇ ing of the catalyst. It may also be a desire to control the output temperature to avoid damage of downstream equipment.
  • raw gas shall comprise any gas in which the combined concentration of hydrogen and carbon oxides is at least 60%.
  • the present disclosure relates to a pro ⁇ cess for hydrogenation of a raw gas feed, said process com ⁇ prising the steps of a) reacting the raw gas in the presence of a material being catalytically active in hydrogenation of oxygen and/or olefins, and being an adsorbent of 3 ⁇ 4S, and b) withdrawing a heated purified gas wherein said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb, and most preferably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as 3 ⁇ 4S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2% and most preferably at least 0.5% by volume of one or more further impurities taken from the group of O2 and C n H2 n , and wherein the temperature of the catalytically active material is sufficiently high to en ⁇ sure that the concentration of the sulfur impurity and said one or more further impurities in said purified gas is less than half the concentration in said raw gas.
  • the material used for capture of sulfur compounds may be the hydrogenation catalyst if it comprises a sulfur binding material known to the skilled person, such as compositions comprising ZnO.
  • the hydrogenation process is carried out in a reactor cooled by a cooling medium with the associated benefit.
  • the cooling medium is the raw gas, steam, water or another heat transfer medium with the associated benefit of being able to transfer heat to other pro- cess stages, such as preheating the raw gas e.g. to at least 60°C while the reactor temperature is maintained at a low level such that undesired exothermal reactions such as formation of methanol from CO and 3 ⁇ 4 are not activated.
  • the raw gas further comprises less than 5% 3 ⁇ 40. The presence of water allows the reaction forming 3 ⁇ 4S and CO 2 from COS and 3 ⁇ 40, but an excessive pres ⁇ ence of water may shift the adsorption equilibrium
  • the cooling medium is boiling water
  • the heated purified gas is withdrawn at a tempera ⁇ ture below 250°C with the associated benefit of the maximum temperature of the heated purified gas being well con- trolled due to the invariability of the boiling point.
  • the heated purified gas is with ⁇ drawn at a temperature below 220°C, preferably below 200°C, and even more preferably below 180°C with the associated effects of protecting equipment and catalysts and avoiding activation of undesired reactions.
  • the material being catalytically active in hydrogenation comprises at least one active ele ⁇ ment chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Al, and ZnO, with the associated benefit of providing a material having a high hydrogenation activity.
  • the sum of the volumetric concen ⁇ tration of CO and 3 ⁇ 4 in said raw gas is at least 60% with the associated benefit of providing a synthesis gas suita ⁇ ble for production of synthethic natural gas or for use as a feed to a Fischer-Tropsh process or for a liquid fuel production such as a TIGAS process or a methanol produc ⁇ tion.
  • the process further comprises con ⁇ tacting the raw gas with an additional sulfur capture mate ⁇ rial, which may be arranged outside the heat exchange sec ⁇ tion of the reactor.
  • an additional sulfur capture mate ⁇ rial which may be arranged outside the heat exchange sec ⁇ tion of the reactor.
  • the raw gas, the cooling medium and the raw gas are configured to flow in co-flow with the as- sociated benefit of an improved control of runaway tempera ⁇ tures which applies especially to varying inlet tempera ⁇ tures or varying compositions.
  • the raw gas, the cooling medium and the raw gas are configured to flow in counter flow with the associated benefit of an efficient cooling of the reaction while maintaining a reduced temperature of the catalytical- ly active material, which is especially relevant in case of high concentrations of the compounds to be hydrogenated .
  • the raw gas is pre-heated by an ex ⁇ ternal heat source, such as a steam heat exchange, an elec ⁇ trical heating or a heat exchange with a warm process stream prior to hydrogenation with the associated benefit of being able to adjust the raw gas temperature to the op ⁇ timal value.
  • an ex ⁇ ternal heat source such as a steam heat exchange, an elec ⁇ trical heating or a heat exchange with a warm process stream prior to hydrogenation with the associated benefit of being able to adjust the raw gas temperature to the op ⁇ timal value.
  • the pre-heating may be made upstream or downstream the cooling of the reactor.
  • a further aspect of the disclosure relates to a reactor for the production of a purified gas being configured to re ⁇ ceive a raw gas as heat exchange medium providing a heated raw gas, where said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb, and most preferably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as 3 ⁇ 4S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2%, and most preferably at least 0.5% by volume of a further impurity taken from the group of O 2 and C n H 2n , where the concentration of sulfur im- purity and said further impurity in said purified gas is less than half the concentration in said raw gas, and where said reactor is further configured to direct said heated raw gas to a material being catalytically active in the hydrogenation of olefins, oxygen or both, and having an adsorption capacity for sulfur, characterized in that said reactor is configured for the material being catalytically active to be in thermal contact with a cooling medium, such as steam, water or
  • the reactor may be configured for the raw gas to contact the material being catalytically ac ⁇ tive in hydrogenation inside tubes with the cooling medium flowing on the outer side of the tubes. In a further embodiment the reactor may be configured for the raw gas to contact the material being catalytically ac ⁇ tive in hydrogenation on the outside of tubes with the cooling medium flowing on the inside of the tubes. In a further embodiment the reactor further comprises one or more zones of sulfur capture material.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a process according to a first embodi ⁇ ment of the disclosure
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a process according to a second embodi- ment of the disclosure.
  • Fig. 1 shows a specific embodiment of the disclosure, in which a raw gas 10 is fed as a heat exchange medium to a gas cooled reactor 15 and withdrawn as a first heated raw gas 20.
  • the temperature of the heated raw gas may be fur- ther adjusted in an optional heat exchanger 25 providing a heated feed gas 30, having a temperature in the range 70- 170°C.
  • the heated feed gas 30 is then directed to contact an optional first sulfur capture material comprising ZnO and being active in adsorption or chemisorption of sulfur 35, then further to contact a catalytic material, such as
  • Cu, Al, or ZnO being active in hydrogenation 40, and finally to contact an optional second sulfur capture material comprising ZnO and being active in adsorption or chemisorption of sulfur 45, providing a heated purified gas 50.
  • Fig. 2 shows a further embodiment of the disclosure in which the reactor is cooled by a steam medium.
  • Water 60 is fed to a steam drum 65, from which water 70 is directed to the cooled reactor 40, in which the water is heated to steam 75, which is collected in the steam drum 65 from which it may be distributed in a steam line 80.
  • a feed composition comprising 0.31% ox ⁇ ygen was hydrogenated .
  • the feed gas of the first example was evaluated according to the prior art with hydrogenation in an adiabatic reactor.
  • the product gas comprised 1.20% methanol, and the temperature out of the reactor was raised to 230°C.
  • the feed gas of the first example was also evaluated ac ⁇ cording to the present disclosure with hydrogenation in a gas cooled reactor.
  • the product gas comprised no methanol, and the temperature was due to the gas cooling maintained at 160°C.
  • the feed gas of the second example was evaluated according to the prior art with hydrogenation in an adiabatic reactor.
  • the product gas comprised 0.50% methanol, and the temperature out of the reactor was raised to 177°C.
  • the feed gas of the second example was also evaluated ac ⁇ cording to the present disclosure with hydrogenation in a gas cooled reactor.
  • the product gas comprised no methanol and the temperature was maintained at 160°C by means of gas cooling.
  • Example 3 In a third example, a feed composition comprising 0.30% ox ⁇ ygen, 1.00% ethylene and 0.50% propylene was hydrogenated .
  • the feed gas of the third example was evaluated according to the prior art with hydrogenation in an adiabatic reactor. In this case the product gas comprised 1.92% methanol, and the temperature out of the reactor was raised to 277°C.
  • the feed gas of the third example was also evaluated ac ⁇ cording to the present disclosure with hydrogenation in a gas cooled reactor. In this case the product gas comprised no methanol and the temperature was maintained at 160°C by means of gas cooling.
  • the effect of the pre ⁇ sent disclosure is an ability to control the temperature in the reactor such that the undesired production of methanol is avoided, and such that the outlet gas is maintained at a temperature of 160°C protecting the process materials.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a process for hydrogenation of a raw gas feed, said process comprising the steps of a) reacting the raw gas in the presence of a material being catalytically active in hydrogenation of oxygen and/or olefins, and being an adsorbent of H2S, and b) withdrawing a heated purified gas wherein said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb,and most preferably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as H2S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2% and most preferably at least 0.5% by volume of one or more further impurities taken from the group of O2 and CnH2n, and wherein the temperature of the catalytically active material is sufficiently high to ensure that the concentration of the sulfur impurity and said one or more further impurities in said purified gas is less than half the concentration in said raw gas. This process has the benefit of removing multiple undesired impurities from the raw gas in a single reactor while maintaining the temperature at the outlet of the reactor sufficiently low to avoid production of alcohols.

Description

Title : Purification of a Raw Gas by Hydrogenation
The present invention is directed to purification of raw gas. In particular, the invention concerns removal of sul- fur by adsorption and oxygen and olefins by hydrogenation.
Industrial raw gases arise typically from gasification of carbonaceous raw materials such as coal, oil petroleum coke, biomass and the like as a reformed hydrocarbon feed or as coke oven gas.
Often, such a raw gas is obtained by the gasification process or as an off gas from the production of coke, the so called coke oven gas.
These gases contain hydrogen, which inter alia is a valuable reactant for use as alternative fuel or for use in the preparation of a number of bulk chemicals and of liquid or gaseous fuels.
As an example, gasifier gas and coke oven gas may be em¬ ployed in the preparation of substitute natural gas (SNG) . A raw gas may also be converted into a liquid fuel, such as gasoline or diesel by the Fischer Tropsch process or by an oxygenate to gasoline process.
Olefins are undesired because they may result in deactiva¬ tion of catalysts by carbon formation which may take place when heating a gas comprising olefins. Oxygen is similarly undesired because the presence of oxy¬ gen in downstream processes may be detrimental due to local hot-spots and oxidation of reduced catalysts. Alternatively, the raw gas may be a mixture of e.g. natural gas comprising sulfur and process tail gases comprising olefins being directed for downstream processing, such as tail gases from processes for synthesis of hydrocarbons by Fischer-Tropsch, methanol-to-gasoline, TIGAS and similar processes.
Now according to the present invention it has been realized that olefins and oxygen together may be removed by hydro¬ genation over a hydrogenation catalyst, such cL S cL C3.talyst comprising one or more of Cu, Al ad Zn, while sulfur compounds may be adsorbed on said hydrogenation catalyst with¬ out influencing the catalytic activity.
Furthermore, for the catalytic hydrogenation either of ole- fins to paraffins or of oxygen to water it has been found to be successful that a temperature control may be im¬ portant, since increased temperatures due to the exothermal hydrogenation reaction may result in activation of exothermal reactions e.g. the exothermal production of CH3OH from ¾ and CO on a catalyst comprising copper, methanation on a catalyst comprising nickel or Fischer Tropsch wax formation on a catalyst comprising iron. The latter may result in a further undesired heating of the reactor, in activating the exothermal reaction such as methanol production further, and possibly also in a catalyst deactivation due to sinter¬ ing of the catalyst. It may also be a desire to control the output temperature to avoid damage of downstream equipment.
Where concentrations are stated in % this shall be under- stood as volumetric %.
As used herein, "raw gas" shall comprise any gas in which the combined concentration of hydrogen and carbon oxides is at least 60%.
In a broad form, the present disclosure relates to a pro¬ cess for hydrogenation of a raw gas feed, said process com¬ prising the steps of a) reacting the raw gas in the presence of a material being catalytically active in hydrogenation of oxygen and/or olefins, and being an adsorbent of ¾S, and b) withdrawing a heated purified gas wherein said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb, and most preferably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as ¾S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2% and most preferably at least 0.5% by volume of one or more further impurities taken from the group of O2 and CnH2n, and wherein the temperature of the catalytically active material is sufficiently high to en¬ sure that the concentration of the sulfur impurity and said one or more further impurities in said purified gas is less than half the concentration in said raw gas. This process has the benefit of removing multiple undesired impurities from the raw gas in a single reactor while maintaining the temperature at the outlet of the reactor sufficiently low to avoid production of alcohols. For low concentrations of sulfur compounds, the material used for capture of sulfur compounds may be the hydrogenation catalyst if it comprises a sulfur binding material known to the skilled person, such as compositions comprising ZnO.
In a further embodiment the hydrogenation process is carried out in a reactor cooled by a cooling medium with the associated benefit.
In a further embodiment the cooling medium is the raw gas, steam, water or another heat transfer medium with the associated benefit of being able to transfer heat to other pro- cess stages, such as preheating the raw gas e.g. to at least 60°C while the reactor temperature is maintained at a low level such that undesired exothermal reactions such as formation of methanol from CO and ¾ are not activated. In a further embodiment the raw gas further comprises less than 5% ¾0. The presence of water allows the reaction forming ¾S and CO2 from COS and ¾0, but an excessive pres¬ ence of water may shift the adsorption equilibrium
ZnO+H2S=ZnS+H20.
In a further embodiment the cooling medium is boiling water, and the heated purified gas is withdrawn at a tempera¬ ture below 250°C with the associated benefit of the maximum temperature of the heated purified gas being well con- trolled due to the invariability of the boiling point. In a further embodiment the heated purified gas is with¬ drawn at a temperature below 220°C, preferably below 200°C, and even more preferably below 180°C with the associated effects of protecting equipment and catalysts and avoiding activation of undesired reactions.
In a further embodiment the material being catalytically active in hydrogenation comprises at least one active ele¬ ment chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Al, and ZnO, with the associated benefit of providing a material having a high hydrogenation activity.
In a further embodiment the sum of the volumetric concen¬ tration of CO and ¾ in said raw gas is at least 60% with the associated benefit of providing a synthesis gas suita¬ ble for production of synthethic natural gas or for use as a feed to a Fischer-Tropsh process or for a liquid fuel production such as a TIGAS process or a methanol produc¬ tion.
In a further embodiment the process further comprises con¬ tacting the raw gas with an additional sulfur capture mate¬ rial, which may be arranged outside the heat exchange sec¬ tion of the reactor. As a result, a separate zone of sulfur capture material is simpler than hitherto known to replace and compared to the catalytically active material in the reactor. The sulfur capture material may be present in the same reactor or in a separate reactor according to desire in the specific situation.
In a further embodiment the raw gas, the cooling medium and the raw gas are configured to flow in co-flow with the as- sociated benefit of an improved control of runaway tempera¬ tures which applies especially to varying inlet tempera¬ tures or varying compositions. In a further embodiment the raw gas, the cooling medium and the raw gas are configured to flow in counter flow with the associated benefit of an efficient cooling of the reaction while maintaining a reduced temperature of the catalytical- ly active material, which is especially relevant in case of high concentrations of the compounds to be hydrogenated .
In a further embodiment the raw gas is pre-heated by an ex¬ ternal heat source, such as a steam heat exchange, an elec¬ trical heating or a heat exchange with a warm process stream prior to hydrogenation with the associated benefit of being able to adjust the raw gas temperature to the op¬ timal value. If the reactor is cooled by the raw gas, the pre-heating may be made upstream or downstream the cooling of the reactor.
A further aspect of the disclosure relates to a reactor for the production of a purified gas being configured to re¬ ceive a raw gas as heat exchange medium providing a heated raw gas, where said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb, and most preferably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as ¾S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2%, and most preferably at least 0.5% by volume of a further impurity taken from the group of O2 and CnH2n, where the concentration of sulfur im- purity and said further impurity in said purified gas is less than half the concentration in said raw gas, and where said reactor is further configured to direct said heated raw gas to a material being catalytically active in the hydrogenation of olefins, oxygen or both, and having an adsorption capacity for sulfur, characterized in that said reactor is configured for the material being catalytically active to be in thermal contact with a cooling medium, such as steam, water or a raw gas with the associated benefit of providing a reactor well suited for controlling the temperature of the reaction. In a further embodiment the reactor may be configured for the raw gas to contact the material being catalytically ac¬ tive in hydrogenation inside tubes with the cooling medium flowing on the outer side of the tubes. In a further embodiment the reactor may be configured for the raw gas to contact the material being catalytically ac¬ tive in hydrogenation on the outside of tubes with the cooling medium flowing on the inside of the tubes. In a further embodiment the reactor further comprises one or more zones of sulfur capture material.
The invention is described in greater detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
Fig. 1 illustrates a process according to a first embodi¬ ment of the disclosure, and
Fig. 2 illustrates a process according to a second embodi- ment of the disclosure. Fig. 1 shows a specific embodiment of the disclosure, in which a raw gas 10 is fed as a heat exchange medium to a gas cooled reactor 15 and withdrawn as a first heated raw gas 20. The temperature of the heated raw gas may be fur- ther adjusted in an optional heat exchanger 25 providing a heated feed gas 30, having a temperature in the range 70- 170°C. The heated feed gas 30 is then directed to contact an optional first sulfur capture material comprising ZnO and being active in adsorption or chemisorption of sulfur 35, then further to contact a catalytic material, such as
Cu, Al, or ZnO being active in hydrogenation 40, and finally to contact an optional second sulfur capture material comprising ZnO and being active in adsorption or chemisorption of sulfur 45, providing a heated purified gas 50.
Fig. 2 shows a further embodiment of the disclosure in which the reactor is cooled by a steam medium. Water 60 is fed to a steam drum 65, from which water 70 is directed to the cooled reactor 40, in which the water is heated to steam 75, which is collected in the steam drum 65 from which it may be distributed in a steam line 80.
The effect of a purification process according to the pre¬ sent disclosure has been evaluated for the three feed com- positions, and process conditions shown in Table 1. Table 1
Example 1
In a first example, a feed composition comprising 0.31% ox¬ ygen was hydrogenated .
The feed gas of the first example was evaluated according to the prior art with hydrogenation in an adiabatic reactor. In this case the product gas comprised 1.20% methanol, and the temperature out of the reactor was raised to 230°C.
The feed gas of the first example was also evaluated ac¬ cording to the present disclosure with hydrogenation in a gas cooled reactor. In this case the product gas comprised no methanol, and the temperature was due to the gas cooling maintained at 160°C.
Example 2
In a second example, a feed composition comprising 0.15% ethylene was hydrogenated.
The feed gas of the second example was evaluated according to the prior art with hydrogenation in an adiabatic reactor. In this case the product gas comprised 0.50% methanol, and the temperature out of the reactor was raised to 177°C.
The feed gas of the second example was also evaluated ac¬ cording to the present disclosure with hydrogenation in a gas cooled reactor. In this case the product gas comprised no methanol and the temperature was maintained at 160°C by means of gas cooling.
Example 3 In a third example, a feed composition comprising 0.30% ox¬ ygen, 1.00% ethylene and 0.50% propylene was hydrogenated . The feed gas of the third example was evaluated according to the prior art with hydrogenation in an adiabatic reactor. In this case the product gas comprised 1.92% methanol, and the temperature out of the reactor was raised to 277°C. The feed gas of the third example was also evaluated ac¬ cording to the present disclosure with hydrogenation in a gas cooled reactor. In this case the product gas comprised no methanol and the temperature was maintained at 160°C by means of gas cooling.
As it is seen in the above examples, the effect of the pre¬ sent disclosure is an ability to control the temperature in the reactor such that the undesired production of methanol is avoided, and such that the outlet gas is maintained at a temperature of 160°C protecting the process materials.

Claims

Claims
1. A process for hydrogenation of a raw gas feed, said process comprising the steps of a) reacting the raw gas in the presence of a material being catalytically active in hydrogenation of oxygen and/or olefins and being an adsorbent of ¾S, and b) withdrawing a heated purified gas, wherein said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb, and most pref¬ erably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as ¾S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2%, and most prefera¬ bly at least 0.5% by volume of one or more further impuri¬ ties taken from the group of O2 and CnH2n, and wherein the temperature of the catalytically active ma¬ terial is sufficiently high to ensure that the concentra¬ tion of sulfur impurity and said one or more further impu¬ rities in said purified gas is less than half the concen- tration in said raw gas.
2. A process according to claim 1 and being carried out in a reactor cooled by a cooling medium, which may be the raw gas, steam, water or another heat transfer medium.
3. The process according to claim 1, 2, or 3 wherein the raw gas further comprises less than 5% ¾0.
4. The process according to claim 2 or 3 wherein the cooling medium is boiling water, and the heated purified gas is withdrawn at a temperature below 250 °C.
5. The process according to claim 2, 3 or 4 wherein the heated purified gas is withdrawn at a temperature below
220°C, preferably below 200°C and even more preferably be¬ low 180°C.
6. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the material being catalytically active in hydrogenation comprises at least one active element chosen from the group consisting of Cu, Al, and ZnO.
7. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6, wherein the sum of the volumetric concentration of
CO and ¾ in said raw gas is at least 60%.
8. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, said process further comprising contacting the raw gas with a sulfur capture material.
9. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8, wherein the cooling medium and the raw gas are configured to flow in co-flow.
10. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9, wherein the cooling medium and the raw gas are configured to flow in counter flow.
11. The process according to any one of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10, wherein the raw gas is pre-heated by an external heat source, such as a steam heat exchange, an electrical heating or a heat exchange with a warm process stream prior to hydrogenation .
12. A reactor for the production of a purified gas configured to receive a raw gas as heat exchange medium providing a heated raw gas, wherein said raw gas comprises at least 10 ppb, preferably at least 20 ppb, and most pref¬ erably at least 50 ppb of a sulfur impurity such as ¾S or COS, and at least 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2%, and most prefera- bly at least 0.5% by volume of a further impurity taken from the group of O2 and CnH2n, where the concentration of sulfur impurity and said further impurity in said purified gas is less than half the concen- tration in said raw gas, and where said reactor is further configured to direct said heated raw gas to a material being catalytically active in the hydrogenation of olefins, oxygen or both, and having an adsorption capacity for sulfur, characterized in that said reactor is configured for the material being catalytically active on the outside of the tubes to be in thermal contact with a cooling medium, such as steam, water or a raw gas.
13. A reactor according to claim 12 configured for the raw gas to contact the material being catalytically active in hydrogenation inside tubes with the cooling medium flowing on the outer side of the tubes.
14. A reactor according to claim 12 configured for the raw gas to contact the material being catalytically active in hydrogenation on the outside of tubes with the cooling medium flowing on the inside of the tubes.
15. A reactor according to claim 12, said reactor further comprising one or more zones of sulfur capture material.
EP13732475.2A 2012-06-29 2013-06-27 Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation Withdrawn EP2867192A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13732475.2A EP2867192A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-06-27 Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP2012002753 2012-06-29
EP13732475.2A EP2867192A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-06-27 Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation
PCT/EP2013/063481 WO2014001438A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-06-27 Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2867192A1 true EP2867192A1 (en) 2015-05-06

Family

ID=52780109

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13732475.2A Withdrawn EP2867192A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-06-27 Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2867192A1 (en)

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014001438A1 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN105308154B (en) Sour gas disposal in liquid fuel production method
JP6348120B2 (en) Method of using by-product gas, associated gas, and / or biological gas
EP3526313B1 (en) Gasification process employing acid gas recycle
CN101845319B (en) Process for producing wax and clean fuel oil by using biomass as raw material
CN108779404B (en) Process for producing synthesis gas
WO2013072660A1 (en) Process for increasing hydrogen content of synthesis gas
WO2014085109A1 (en) Hybrid plant for liquid fuel production and method for operating it where a gasification unit in the hybrid plant is operating at less than its design capacity or is not operational
KR20130102621A (en) Process
CN106573782A (en) Method for generating syngas
CN107032954A (en) The method that methanol and its derivative are produced using underground coal gasification(UCG) product gas
WO2014001438A1 (en) Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation
EP3018190A1 (en) Process for production of methane rich gas
WO2013072659A1 (en) Process for increasing hydrogen content of synthesis gas
AU2016384589B2 (en) Novel method for avoiding expensive sour water stripper metallurgy in a gasification plant
AU2012338629B2 (en) Process for increasing hydrogen content of synthesis gas
EP2867192A1 (en) Purification of a raw gas by hydrogenation
CN106553995B (en) Natural gas and carbon dioxide dry reforming process for preparing synthetic gas
EP2604672B1 (en) Biomass gasification gas purification system and method, and methanol production system and method
RU2776173C1 (en) Method for producing liquid hydrocarbons using the fischer-tropsch process integrated in petroleum refining plants
KR910009208B1 (en) Preparation of normally liquid hydrocarbons and a synthesis gas to make the same,from a normally gaseous hydrocarbon feed
JP2022500545A (en) Method of producing liquid hydrocarbon by Fischer-Tropsch process incorporated in refinery
Steinschlaeger Synthetical production of liquid hydrocarbons from carbon monoxide and hydrogen
Marion Production of cleaned and purified synthesis gas and carbon monoxide.[by partial oxidation of hydrocarbonaceous fuel]

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20141117

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: HALDOR TOPSOEE A/S

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160204

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20160615