EP2850877A2 - Classement de rapports de défaillance comme actuels ou périmés pour des réglages d'optimisation de robustesse de mobilité - Google Patents

Classement de rapports de défaillance comme actuels ou périmés pour des réglages d'optimisation de robustesse de mobilité

Info

Publication number
EP2850877A2
EP2850877A2 EP13787640.5A EP13787640A EP2850877A2 EP 2850877 A2 EP2850877 A2 EP 2850877A2 EP 13787640 A EP13787640 A EP 13787640A EP 2850877 A2 EP2850877 A2 EP 2850877A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
failure
base station
report
radio access
failure report
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP13787640.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2850877B1 (fr
EP2850877A4 (fr
Inventor
Icaro DA SILVA
Angelo Centonza
Oumer Teyeb
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Publication of EP2850877A2 publication Critical patent/EP2850877A2/fr
Publication of EP2850877A4 publication Critical patent/EP2850877A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2850877B1 publication Critical patent/EP2850877B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/14—Reselecting a network or an air interface
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/02—Arrangements for optimising operational condition
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/08—Testing, supervising or monitoring using real traffic
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/0005—Control or signalling for completing the hand-off
    • H04W36/0083—Determination of parameters used for hand-off, e.g. generation or modification of neighbour cell lists
    • H04W36/0085—Hand-off measurements
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/14—Reselecting a network or an air interface
    • H04W36/144—Reselecting a network or an air interface over a different radio air interface technology
    • H04W36/1443—Reselecting a network or an air interface over a different radio air interface technology between licensed networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/04—Arrangements for maintaining operational condition
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/0005—Control or signalling for completing the hand-off
    • H04W36/0083—Determination of parameters used for hand-off, e.g. generation or modification of neighbour cell lists
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/08—Access point devices

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to reporting connection failures in a cellular communications network.
  • a cellular communications network must enable handovers of mobile devices between cells within the same Radio Access Network (RAN) as well as enable handover of mobile terminals between different RANs.
  • RAN Radio Access Network
  • a common mobility issue is mobility connection failures, i.e., connection failures during or shortly after the handover process. In order to address this mobility issue, according to discussions in the 3 rd
  • a mobile device which is referred to as a User Equipment or User Element (UE) is required to transmit a failure report to the cellular communications network whenever a mobility connection failure occurs.
  • the failure report will then be used by a Mobility Robustness
  • MRO Mobility Optimization
  • an IRAT HO is a handover of a UE 10 between a cell 12 served by a base station (BS) 14 in a RAN operating according to one Radio Access Technology (RAT) (e.g., an enhanced Node B (eNB) in a RAN of a 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) cellular communications network) and a cell 16 served by a base station 18 in another RAN operating according to another RAT (e.g., a Node B in a Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) of a 3G Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) cellular
  • RAT Radio Access Technology
  • eNB enhanced Node B
  • LTE Long Term Evolution
  • UTRAN Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network
  • UMTS 3G Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
  • 3GPP RAN WG3 the scenarios identified by 3GPP RAN WG3 are:
  • Scenario 1 A mobility connection failure, specifically a Radio Link Failure (RLF), while in an LTE RAN or during a HO from the LTE RAN to a 2G/3G RAN (e.g., a UTRAN) followed by a reconnection to the 2G/3G RAN (i.e., a too late HO from an LTE RAN to a 2G/3G RAN).
  • RLF Radio Link Failure
  • Scenario 2 A mobility failure during or after a HO from a 2G/3G RAN (e.g., a UTRAN) to an LTE RAN followed by a reconnection back to the 2G/3G RAN (i.e., the source RAT).
  • the reconnection may be to the source cell for the HO or a different cell in the 2G/3G RAN. This is referred to herein as a too early HO from a 2G/3G RAN to an LTE RAN.
  • o Scenario 2a A handover failure (HOF) during the HO from the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN (i.e., a HOF during a Random
  • RACH Radio Access Channel
  • o Scenario 2b An RLF in the LTE RAN shortly after the HO from the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN (i.e., an RLF after successful RACH in the LTE RAN) followed by the reconnection back to the 2G/3G RAN.
  • Triggering of an I RAT HO from a cell in an LTE RAN to a cell in a UTRAN is controlled by mobility parameters in the LTE RAN associated with both Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) and Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ) measurement types. These mobility parameters in the LTE RAN form a HO threshold, which is referred to herein as ho threshjte.
  • RSRP Reference Signal Received Power
  • RSRQ Reference Signal Received Quality
  • ho threshjte One way to optimize Scenario 1 (i.e., too late HOs from LTE RAN to 2G/3G RAN, e.g., a UTRAN) is to increase the value of ho_thresh_lte in order to trigger HOs from the LTE RAN to the 2G/3G RAN earlier.
  • Triggering of an I RAT HO from a cell in a UTRAN to a cell in an LTE RAN is controlled by other mobility parameters in the UTRAN associated with both RSRP and RSRQ measurement types. These mobility parameters in the UTRAN form a HO threshold, which is referred to herein as ho_thresh_utran.
  • One way to optimize Scenario 2 i.e., too early HOs from 2G/3G RAN, e.g., a UTRAN or Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution (EDGE) RAN (GERAN), to an LTE RAN
  • GSM Global System for Mobile Communications
  • EDGE Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution
  • GERAN Global System for Mobile Communications
  • ho_thresh_utran in order to only trigger a HO to the LTE RAN when the signal from the LTE RAN is strong enough to retain the
  • reestablishmentCellld in the RLF report to a global cell identity of the selected cell. Additional information to be reported in support of the MRO function particularly with respect to IRAT HOs is currently under discussion in 3GPP RAN3. At this point, the discussions are initially progressing towards a decision about how to make the RLF reports available to the different RATs as explained below.
  • Solution 1 The first solution is reporting the RLF when returning to the LTE RAN. More specifically, for both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 discussed above, when the UE reconnects to the 2G/3G RAN after the mobility failure, the UE stores the necessary information for the corresponding failure report. Then, when the UE is back in the LTE RAN, the failure information is transmitted to the LTE RAN as, for example, an RLF report.
  • the base station in the LTE RAN that obtains the RLF report from the UE forwards the RLF to the base station that serves the cell where the corresponding mobility connection failure occurred via appropriate signaling (e.g., X2 or S1 signaling for Scenarios 1 and 2b and RAN Information Message (RIM) to the Radio Network Controller (RNC) of the base station serving the cell in the 2G/3G RAN before the IRAT HO for Scenario 2a).
  • appropriate signaling e.g., X2 or S1 signaling for Scenarios 1 and 2b and RAN Information Message (RIM) to the Radio Network Controller (RNC) of the base station serving the cell in the 2G/3G RAN before the IRAT HO for Scenario 2a).
  • RNC Radio Network Controller
  • Solution 1 for Scenario 1 is illustrated in Figure 5.
  • a UE experiences an RLF in the LTE RAN.
  • the UE connects to Cell Y in the 3G RAN and stores the RLF report.
  • the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN by, in this example, an IRAT HO from Cell Y in the 3G RAN to Cell B in the LTE RAN
  • the UE sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN.
  • the base station corresponding to Cell B sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A where the RLF occurred.
  • the MRO function of the base station for Cell A determines that an amount of time that the UE was connected to Cell A before the RLF (At) is greater than a predefined minimum amount of time (t_min) and, as such, the RLF was due to a too late IRAT HO from the LTE RAN to the 3G RAN.
  • Solution 1 for Scenario 2a is illustrated in Figure 6.
  • a HO failure i.e., unsuccessful RACH attempts
  • the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN by, in this example, an IRAT HO from Cell Y in the 3G RAN to Cell B in the LTE RAN the UE sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN.
  • the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN determines that the mobility failure is an IRAT HOF from Cell X in the 3G RAN and, as such, sends the RLF report to the RNC for the base station corresponding to Cell X of the 3G RAN via a RIM.
  • Solution 1 for Scenario 2b is illustrated in Figure 7. Shortly after an IRAT HO from Cell X of the 3G RAN to Cell A of the LTE RAN, the UE
  • the UE reconnects to Cell Y of the 3G RAN. Subsequently, when the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN by, in this example, an IRAT HO from Cell Y in the 3G RAN to Cell B in the LTE RAN, the UE sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN.
  • the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN determines that the mobility failure is an RLF shortly after the IRAT HO from Cell X in the 3G RAN to Cell A in the LTE RAN (i.e., the IRAT is a too early IRAT) and, as such, sends the RLF report to the RNC for the base station corresponding to Cell X of the 3G RAN via a RIM.
  • the base station corresponding to Cell B may send the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A in the LTE RAN where the RLF occurred via suitable signaling (e.g., X2 or S1).
  • Solution 2 The second solution is reporting the failure to the 2G/3G RAN and/or the LTE RAN where the UE reconnects after the mobility failure. More specifically, Solution 2 for Scenario 1 is illustrated in Figure 8. As illustrated, the UE experiences an RLF in Cell A of the LTE RAN due to a too late HO to the 3G RAN. After the RLF, the UE stores the RLF report and sends the RLF report to the 3G RAN upon reconnecting to Cell Y of the 3G RAN.
  • the RNC of the base station corresponding to Cell Y of the 3G RAN determines that the RLF report is the result of a too late IRAT HO from Cell A of the LTE RAN and therefore sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A of the LTE RAN via a RIM.
  • Solution 2 for Scenario 2a is illustrated in Figure 9.
  • the UE stores a corresponding RLF report and sends the RLF report to the 3G RAN upon reconnecting to Cell Y of the 3G RAN.
  • the RNC of the base station corresponding to Cell Y of the 3G RAN determines that the RLF report is the result of a too early IRAT HO from Cell X of the 3G RAN to Cell A of the LTE RAN.
  • the RNC may send the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A of the LTE RAN via a RIM.
  • the RLF report can be used by the MRO function of the RNC and/or an MRO function of the base station corresponding to Cell A of the LTE RAN. If the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN after the failure and the RLF report is not yet reported to the LTE RAN, the UE may send the RLF report to a serving base station in the LTE RAN. The serving base station can then forward the RLF report to the RNC of the base station corresponding to Cell X in the 3G RAN via a RIM and, if desired, send the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A in the LTE RAN.
  • Solution 2 for Scenario 2b is illustrated in Figure 10.
  • the UE shortly after an IRAT HO from Cell X of the 3G RAN to Cell A of the LTE RAN, the UE experiences an RLF.
  • the UE stores an RLF report and sends the RLF report to the 3G RAN upon reconnecting to Cell Y of the 3G RAN.
  • the RNC of the base station corresponding to Cell Y of the 3G RAN determines that the RLF report is the result of a too early IRAT HO from Cell X of the 3G RAN to Cell A of the LTE RAN.
  • the RNC may send the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A of the LTE RAN via a RIM.
  • the RLF report can be used by the MRO function of the RNC and/or an MRO function of the base station corresponding to Cell A of the LTE RAN. If the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN after the failure and the RLF report is not yet reported to the LTE RAN, the UE may send the RLF report to a serving base station in the LTE RAN. The serving base station can then forward the RLF report to the RNC of the base station corresponding to Cell X in the 3G RAN via a RIM and, if desired, send the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A in the LTE RAN.
  • Solution 3 The third solution is reporting the RLF to the RAT where the failure occurred and reporting the HO failure in the RAT of the cell in which the HO command was received. More specifically, Solution 3 for Scenario 1 is illustrated in Figure 1 1. Notably, Solution 3 for Scenario 1 is the same as
  • Solution 1 for Scenario 1 As illustrated, a UE experiences an RLF in the LTE RAN. After the RLF, the UE connects to Cell Y in the 3G RAN and stores the RLF report. Subsequently, when the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN by, in this example, an IRAT HO from Cell Y in the 3G RAN to Cell B in the LTE RAN, the UE sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN. The base station corresponding to Cell B sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A where the RLF occurred.
  • the MRO function of the base station for Cell A determines that an amount of time that the UE was connected to Cell A before the RLF (At) is greater than a predefined minimum amount of time (t_min) and, as such, the RLF was due to a too late IRAT HO from the LTE RAN to the 3G RAN.
  • Solution 3 for Scenario 2a is illustrated in Figure 12.
  • the UE stores a corresponding RLF report and sends the RLF report to the 3G RAN upon reconnecting to Cell Y of the 3G RAN.
  • the RNC of the base station corresponding to Cell Y of the 3G RAN determines that the RLF report is the result of a too early IRAT HO from Cell X of the 3G RAN to Cell A of the LTE RAN. If desired, the RNC sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A of the LTE RAN via a RIM.
  • Solution 3 for Scenario 2b is illustrated in Figure 13. Notably, Solution 3 for Scenario 2b is the same as Solution 1 for Scenario 2b.
  • the UE Shortly after an IRAT HO from Cell X of the 3G RAN to Cell A of the LTE RAN, the UE experiences an RLF. After the RLF, the UE reconnects to Cell Y of the 3G RAN. Subsequently, when the UE reconnects to the LTE RAN by, in this example, an IRAT HO from Cell Y in the 3G RAN to Cell B in the LTE RAN, the UE sends the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN.
  • the base station corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN determines that the mobility failure is an RLF shortly after the IRAT HO from Cell X in the 3G RAN to Cell A in the LTE RAN (i.e., the IRAT is a too early IRAT) and, as such, sends the RLF report to the RNC for the base station corresponding to Cell X of the 3G RAN via a RIM.
  • the base station corresponding to Cell B may send the RLF report to the base station corresponding to Cell A in the LTE RAN where the RLF occurred via suitable signaling (e.g., X2 or S1).
  • Solution 4 The fourth solution is sending the RLF report when returning to the LTE RAN in the case of a too late IRAT HO from the LTE RAN to the 2G/3G RAN and detecting the connection failure at the RNC of the 2G/3G RAN in the case of a too early IRAT HO from the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN.
  • Solution 4 for Scenario 1 is illustrated in Figure 14 and is the same as that for Solution 1 , Scenario 1.
  • Scenarios 2a and 2b the UE does not report the connection failure to the network. Rather, the RNC of the 2G/3G network can understand that the UE was previously camped on the 2G/3G network and is returning to the 2G/3G network after a connection failure during an IRAT HO to the LTE RAN.
  • a node in a cellular communications network receives a failure report associated with a connection failure for a User Equipment (UE) and determines when the connection failure occurred with respect to a most recent mobility adjustment made by the node. If the connection failure occurred before the most recent mobility adjustment made by the node, the node classifies the failure report as a stale failure report. In one embodiment, if the failure report is classified as a stale failure report, the node discards the failure report such that the failure report is not considered for a next iteration of a process to determine whether new mobility adjustments are desired. In another embodiment, if the failure report is classified as a stale failure report, the node considers the failure report with reduced relevance for a next iteration of a process to determine whether new mobility adjustments are desired.
  • UE User Equipment
  • the failure report includes timing data that is indicative of a time at which the connection failure occurred, and the node determines when the connection failure occurred with respect to the most recent mobility adjustment made by the node based on the timing data.
  • the timing data includes a first timer value that defines an amount of time that has expired between the time at which the connection failure occurred and a time at which the UE transmitted the failure report, and the node determines when the connection failure occurred with respect to the most recent mobility adjustment made by the node based on the first timer value and a second timer value that defines an amount of time that has expired since the most recent mobility adjustment was made by the node.
  • the node classifies the failure report as a current failure report. In one embodiment, if the failure report is classified as a current failure report, the node considers the failure report for a next iteration of a mobility optimization process.
  • a UE in a multiple Radio Access Technology (RAT) cellular communications system detects a connection failure and thereafter transmits a failure report, where the failure report is associated with the connection failure and includes timing data that is indicative of a time at which the connection failure occurred.
  • the timing data includes a timer value that defines an amount of time that has expired between a time at which the connection failure occurred and a time at which the UE transmitted the failure report to the cellular communications network.
  • the UE starts the timer in response to detecting the connection failure. Thereafter, the UE detects a triggering event for transmitting the failure report and, in response to the triggering event, stops the timer and transmits the failure report including a value of the timer to the cellular communications network.
  • the connection failure is a radio link failure in a cell served by a first base station in a first radio access network operating according to a first radio access technology, and the UE transmits the failure report to a base station in the first radio access network after reconnecting to the first radio access network.
  • the connection failure is a radio link failure in a cell served by a first base station in a first radio access network operating according to a first radio access technology, and the UE initially reconnects to a base station in a second radio access network operating according to a second radio access technology after the radio link failure.
  • the UE connects to a base station in the first radio access network to thereby reconnect to the first radio access network, and the UE transmits the failure report to the base station in the first radio access network after
  • the connection failure is a connection failure associated with a handover from a cell served by a first base station in a first radio access network operating according to a first radio access technology to a cell served by a second base station in a second radio access network operating according to a second radio access technology.
  • the UE transmits the failure report to a base station in the second radio access network operating according to the second radio access technology after subsequently connecting to the base station in the second radio access network.
  • the connection failure is a connection failure associated with a handover from a cell served by a first base station in a first radio access network operating according to a first radio access technology to a cell served by a second base station in a second radio access network operating according to a second radio access technology.
  • the UE initially connects to a base station in the first radio access network after the connection failure. Sometime thereafter, the UE connects to a base station in the second radio access network and transmits the failure report to the base station in the second radio access network after connecting to the base station in the second radio access network.
  • connection failure is a radio link failure in a cell served by a first base station in a first radio access network operating according to a first radio access technology
  • the UE transmits the failure report to a second base station in a second radio access network operating according to a second radio access technology after connecting to the second base station of the second radio access network.
  • the connection failure is a radio link failure in a cell served by a first base station in a first radio access network operating according to a first radio access technology.
  • the UE connects to a second base station in a second radio access network operating according to a second radio access technology and transmits the failure report to the second base station in the second radio access network after connecting to the second base station of the second radio access network.
  • Figures 1A and 1 B illustrate Inter-Radio Access Technology (IRAT) handovers (HOs) in a cellular communications network according to one embodiment of the present disclosure
  • Figure 2 illustrates a tradeoff between decreasing the number of Radio Link Failures (RLFs) due to too late IRAT HOs from a Long Term Evolution (LTE) Radio Access Network (RAN) to a Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) and increasing the number of unnecessary IRAT HOs from the LTE RAN to the UTRAN when increasing a corresponding IRAT HO threshold;
  • RLFs Radio Link Failures
  • Figure 3 illustrates a tradeoff between decreasing the number of HO Failures (HOFs) due to too early IRAT HOs from a UTRAN to an LTE RAN and unnecessarily increasing time in the UTRAN when increasing a corresponding IRAT HO threshold;
  • HAFs HO Failures
  • Figure 4 illustrates information stored in an RLF report according to the present version of 3 rd Generation Partnership Project Technical Specification (3GPP TS) 36.331 ;
  • Figures 5 through 14 graphically illustrate four different solutions for sending failure reports to the cellular communications network for different scenarios of connection failures associated with IRAT HOs;
  • Figure 15 illustrates late reporting of a connection failure to a node in a cellular communications network performing a Mobility Robustness Optimization (MRO) function, which can occur in many of the solutions and scenarios illustrated in Figures 5 through 14;
  • MRO Mobility Robustness Optimization
  • Figure 16 is a flow chart that illustrates a process for classifying a failure report received by a node that performs an MRO function as either current or stale according to one embodiment of the present disclosure
  • Figure 17 is a flow chart that illustrates the operation of a User
  • UE Equipment or User Element to send, or transmit, a failure report to a cellular communications network, where the failure report includes timing data that is indicative of a time at which an associated connection failure occurred according to one embodiment of the present disclosure
  • Figure 18 is a flow chart that illustrates the operation of a node in a cellular communications network that performs an MRO function to receive and classify failure reports based the timing data included in the failure reports according to the process of Figure 17 as well as timing data that defines a time at which a most recent MRO adjustment was made by the node according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
  • Figure 19 illustrates a cellular communications network that includes a 4G LTE cellular communications network and a 3G Universal Mobile Telephony System (UMTS) cellular communications network in which I RAT HOs occur between an LTE RAN of the 4G LTE cellular communications network and a UTRAN of the UMTS cellular communications network, wherein failure reports transmitted by UEs for connection failures include timing data that is utilized by appropriate MRO functions to classify the failure reports as current or stale according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
  • UMTS Universal Mobile Telephony System
  • Figure 20 through 29 illustrate transmission of failure reports for each of the solutions and scenarios of Figures 5 through 14 in which the failure reports including timing data that enable classification of the failure reports as either current or stale according to various embodiments of the present disclosure
  • Figure 30 is a block diagram of a UE according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • Figure 31 is a block diagram of a base station according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • FIG 32 is a block diagram of a Radio Network Controller (RNC) according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • RNC Radio Network Controller
  • 3GPP 3 rd Generation Partnership Project
  • RAN Radio Access Network
  • a mobility connection failure also referred to herein as simply a connection failure
  • RLF Radio Link Failure
  • LTE Long Term Evolution
  • 2G/3G RAN e.g., a Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN)
  • UTRAN Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network
  • Scenario 2 A mobility failure during or after a HO from a 2G/3G RAN (e.g., a UTRAN) to an LTE RAN followed by a reconnection back to the 2G/3G RAN (i.e., the source RAT).
  • the reconnection may be to the source cell for the HO or a different cell in the 2G/3G RAN. This is referred to herein as a too early HO from a 2G/3G RAN
  • o Scenario 2a A handover failure (HOF) during the HO from the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN (i.e., a HOF during a Random
  • RACH Radio Access Channel
  • o Scenario 2b An RLF in the LTE RAN shortly after the HO from the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN (i.e., an RLF after successful RACH in the LTE RAN) followed by the reconnection back to the 2G/3G RAN.
  • MRO Mobility Robustness Optimization
  • Solution 1 Reporting the RLF when returning to the LTE RAN.
  • Solution 2 Reporting the failure to the 2G/3G RAN and/or the LTE RAN where the UE reconnects after the mobility failure.
  • Solution 3 Reporting the RLF to the RAT where the failure occurred and reporting the HO failure in the RAT of the cell in which the HO command was received.
  • Solution 4 Reporting the RLF when returning to the LTE RAN in the case of a too late IRAT HO from the LTE RAN to the 2G/3G RAN and detecting the connection failure at the RNC of the 2G/3G RAN in the case of a too early IRAT HO from the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN.
  • the inventors have found that, when using the solutions discussed above for making failure reports available to the cellular communications network, one issue that arises is that there may be delays between a time at which a User Equipment or User Element (UE) experiences a connection failure and a time at which the UE reports the connection failure. Delays in reporting the connection failure may be due to a long delay before the UE reconnects to the RAN where the connection failure is to be reported (e.g., Solution 1 ), due to the UE transitioning to an idle mode for a long time before reconnecting to the RAN where the connection failure is to be reported, or due to a failure of the cellular communications network to request reporting of the RLF report for a long time.
  • UE User Equipment or User Element
  • an MRO function that performs MRO for a cell in, for example, an LTE RAN may perform an MRO process that results in adjustment(s) to mobility parameters (i.e., mobility adjustments) for the cell based on failure reports received in a timely manner.
  • the MRO function may continue to receive failure reports after the mobility
  • these "stale" failure reports are still considered with the same relevance as timely failure reports for the next iteration of the MRO process.
  • the stale failure reports may lead to incorrect or undesirable mobility adjustments and slow convergence of the cellular communications network to a state of stable mobility.
  • Figure 15 illustrates stale failure reports for Solution 1 , Scenario 1 after RLFs due to too late HOs from an LTE RAN to a 3G RAN.
  • Solution 1 UEs do not report failures until they return to the LTE RAN and, as a result, there is a delay if the UEs do not initially reconnect back to the LTE RAN after the RLF.
  • This delay may be quite long due to two reasons: (1 ) the HO from the 3G RAN to the LTE RAN may be disabled by operators in order to avoid ping pongs between the LTE RAN and the 3G RAN and (2) UEs reconnect to the LTE RAN via cell reselection, which is a UE controlled procedure (i.e., the UEs may decide to stay camped in the 3G RAN if desired). It is very likely that MRO functions running on the base stations in the LTE RAN and/or MRO functions running on Radio Network Controllers (RNCs) in the 3G RAN will trigger mobility adjustments periodically in response to some event occurrence and/or based on reception of a minimum number of reports, which can be RLF reports,
  • RNCs Radio Network Controllers
  • N1 of the UEs have reconnected to Cell B of the LTE RAN and transmitted corresponding RLF reports to a base station (eNB 1) corresponding to Cell B in the LTE RAN.
  • eNB 1 base station
  • an MRO process of the eNB 1 is triggered at a certain time (tO) to determine whether mobility adjustments, or MRO adjustments, are needed and, if so, make the mobility adjustments.
  • tO time
  • new UEs may eventually suffer from too late or unnecessary HOs and, when those new UEs return to the LTE RAN, the new UEs send new RLF reports to be used for a next iteration of the MRO process.
  • eNB1 After the time (tO), eNB1 will also receive RLF reports from the other N2 UEs if those UEs send RLF reports to the LTE RAN within 48 hours after the failure according to 3GPP Technical Specification (TS) 36.331.
  • TS 3GPP Technical Specification
  • eNB 1 In the current standard, there is no support for eNB 1 to recognize that the RLF reports from those N2 UEs are not associated with the current mobility parameter settings in eNB 1. Therefore, it is not possible for eNB 1 to discard the RLF reports from the N2 UEs such that the RLF reports are not considered for the subsequent iteration of the MRO process at eNB 1.
  • the RLF reports from the N2 UEs which are referred to herein as stale RLF reports, will impact the robustness of the MRO adjustments and the MRO convergence proportionally to N2/N.
  • RLF reports are made available to other nodes which possibly run MRO algorithms.
  • a stale RLF may occur, for example, if a UE goes to idle mode after the failure and returns to active mode after a long time or if the network fails to request reporting of the RLF report for a long time.
  • the problem of stale RLF reports will also exist even if the RLF reports are available faster than in Solution 1. For example, it can be assumed that a certain number of failures occur minutes before an iteration of the MRO process is performed and, even though
  • the present disclosure provides systems and methods that address stale reporting of connection failures in a cellular communication network.
  • Stale failure reports can be discarded such that they are not considered for a subsequent iteration of a mobility optimization process (e.g., an MRO process) or considered for the subsequent iteration of the mobility optimization process but with reduced relevance.
  • a mobility optimization process e.g., an MRO process
  • the concepts disclosed herein are equally applicable to failure reports for intra-RAT HOs (i.e., HOs between cells in the same RAT).
  • IRAT HOs i.e., HOs between cells in the same RAT.
  • the concepts described herein are not limited to any particular RATs.
  • Figure 16 is a flow chart that illustrates a process for characterizing a failure report according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the process of Figure 16 is performed by a node in a cellular communications network that performs a process for adjusting, or updating, mobility parameters, which is referred to herein as an MRO process.
  • a mobility parameter is a parameter utilized to control mobility, or HOs, of a wireless device, or UE, within a cellular communications network (e.g., a Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) or Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ) threshold).
  • RSRP Reference Signal Received Power
  • RSRQ Reference Signal Received Quality
  • a mobility parameter is a parameter utilized to control HOs from one cell to a neighboring cell, where the two cells may be in the same RAN (i.e., for intra-RAT HOs) or in different RANs operating according to different RATs (i.e., for IRAT HOs).
  • Mobility parameters generally include mobility thresholds (e.g., RSRP and/or RSRQ thresholds).
  • a mobility adjustment is an adjustment of one or more mobility parameters for a specific neighboring cell. Further, the mobility adjustment may affect mobility parameters such as mobility thresholds between different source and target entities. For example, the mobility adjustment may be applied between a source cell to a target cell or between a source cell to a target frequency or between a source cell to a target RAT.
  • the node that performs the process of Figure 16 can be, for example, a base station in the cellular communications network (e.g., an enhanced Node B (eNB) of an LTE cellular communications network), an RNC (e.g., an RNC of a base station in a Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) cellular communications network), or the like.
  • a base station in the cellular communications network e.g., an enhanced Node B (eNB) of an LTE cellular communications network
  • an RNC e.g., an RNC of a base station in a Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) cellular communications network
  • UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
  • the node receives a failure report associated with a connection failure for a UE (step 1000).
  • a failure report is generally information that notifies or reports a connection failure experienced by the UE, where the connection failure is more specifically a mobility connection failure.
  • the failure report is an RLF report.
  • the failure report includes timing data that is indicative of a time at which the connection failure occurred.
  • the timing data is or includes a timer value that defines an amount of time that has expired between the time at which the connection failure occurred and a time at which the UE reported the connection failure by transmitting the failure report to an appropriate node.
  • the timing data is not limited thereto.
  • the timing data may alternatively include an absolute time at which the connection failure occurred (e.g., a time and date at which the connection failure occurred).
  • an absolute time at which the connection failure occurred e.g., a time and date at which the connection failure occurred.
  • the manner in which the node receives the failure report can vary depending on the particular embodiment. In general, the node can receive the failure report from the UE, from another node in the same cellular communications network, or from another node in another cellular communications network operating according to a different RAT.
  • the node determines whether the associated connection failure occurred before a last, or most-recent, MRO adjustment made by the node (step 1002). In other words, the node determines when the associated connection failure occurred with respect to the most recent MRO adjustment(s) made by the node. More specifically, in one embodiment, the timing data included in the failure report includes timing data that is indicative of a time at which the connection failure occurred. The node then determines when the associated connection failure occurred with respect to the most recent MRO adjustment(s) based on the timing data in the failure report and timing data maintained by the node that defines a time at which the most recent MRO adjustment(s) was made by the node.
  • the timing data in the failure report is or includes a timer value that defines an amount of time that has expired between a time at which the connection failure occurred and a time at which the UE reported the connection failure by transmitting the failure report to the appropriate node
  • the timing data maintained by the node is or includes another timer value that defines an amount of time that has expired since the most recent MRO adjustment(s) was made by the node.
  • the node determines when the connection failure occurred with respect to the most recent MRO adjustment(s) made by the node based on a comparison of the two timer values while, in some embodiments, accounting for any delay between the reporting of the connection failure by the UE and reception of the failure report by the node.
  • another node e.g., an Operations and Maintenance (OAM) node
  • OAM Operations and Maintenance
  • the node sends the timer value from the failure report that defines the amount of time that expired between the time at which the connection failure occurred and the time at which the UE reported the connection failure by transmitting the failure report to the other node.
  • the other node compares the two timer values while, in some embodiments, accounting for any delay between the reporting of the connection failure by the UE and reception of the timer value in the failure report sent by the other node.
  • the other node then returns information to the node that is indicative of when the connection failure occurred with respect to the most recent MRO adjustment(s) made by the node.
  • the node classifies the failure report as a stale failure report (step 1004). As such, in one embodiment, the failure report is discarded or otherwise not considered for a next iteration of the MRO process. In another embodiment, the failure report is considered for the next iteration of the MRO process with reduced relevance (e.g., reduced weighting or scaling factor as compared to timely failure reports for the next iteration of the MRO process). If the connection failure occurred after the most recent MRO adjustment(s), the node classifies the failure report as a current, or timely, failure report (step 1006). As such, the failure report is considered with full weight for the next iteration of the MRO process.
  • FIG 17 is a flow chart that illustrates the operation of a UE to report a connection failure according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the UE detects a connection failure (step 2000).
  • the connection failure is preferably either an RLF or a HOF.
  • the connection failure may be an RLF due to a too late IRAT HO from an LTE RAN to a 2G/3G RAN.
  • the connection failure may be a HOF due to a too early IRAT HO from a 2G/3G RAN to an LTE RAN or an RLF shortly after an IRAT HO from a 2G/3G RAN to an LTE RAN due to a too early IRAT HO.
  • Other types of connection failures i.e., HO failures for an intra-RAT HO
  • the UE In response to detecting the connection failure, the UE starts a timer, which is referred to herein as timer (T F ) (step 2002). Thereafter, the UE continues to run the timer (T F ) until the UE determines that it is time to report the connection failure (step 2004). Once it is time to report the connection failure, the UE stops the timer (T F ) (step 2006). In this manner, the timer (T F ) defines an amount of time that has expired between a time at which the connection failure occurred and therefore detected by the UE and a time at which the connection failure is reported by the UE.
  • timer T F
  • the UE sends, or transmits, a failure report that reports the connection failure to an appropriate node where the failure report includes the value of the timer (T F ) (step 2008).
  • the node to which the UE sends the failure report can vary depending on the particular embodiment.
  • the UE can send the failure report to a base station in the same RAT, or same RAN, in which the connection failure occurred or a base station in a different RAT, or different RAN, than the RAT, or RAN, in which the connection failure occurred.
  • the connection failure is an RLF or a HOF
  • the connection failure is reported via an RLF report.
  • FIG 18 is a flow chart that illustrates the operation of a node that performs an MRO process to receive, classify, and utilize failure reports sent by UEs according to the process of Figure 17 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the node starts a timer (T M RO) upon making MRO adjustment(s) for a first iteration of the MRO process (step 3000).
  • the node receives failure reports and classifies the failure reports based on the timer (T M RO) and the timer (T F ) included in the failure reports (step 3002).
  • the failure reports can be failure reports for multiple cells, frequencies, and/or RATs.
  • each failure report is classified based on a comparison of the timer (T M RO) at the time that the failure report is received by the node and the timer (T F ) in the failure report such that the failure report is classified as a stale failure report if T F > T M RO and classified as a current, or timely, failure report if T F ⁇ T M RO- Note, however, that in some embodiments there may be a delay between the time at which the failure report is sent by the corresponding UE and the time at which the failure report is received by the node.
  • the failure report is sent by the UE to the 2G/3G RAN and then forwarded by an RNC of the 2G/3G RAN to the LTE RAN via RAN Information Message (RIM).
  • RIM RAN Information Message
  • the forwarding of the failure report has an associated delay, which may be compensated for by the node when comparing T F and T M RO- [0061]
  • the node performs a next iteration of the MRO process (step
  • stale failure reports are discarded such that the next iteration of the MRO process performed in step 3004 is performed based on the failure reports received and classified as current in step 3002 but not based on the failure reports received and classified as stale in step 3002.
  • stale failure reports are considered but with reduced relevance such that the next iteration of the MRO process performed in step 3004 is performed based on the failure reports received and classified as current in step 3002 as well as the failure reports received and classified as stale in step 3002 but where the stale failure reports are considered with reduced relevance compared to the current failure reports.
  • the relevance of the stale failure reports may be reduced by, for example, applying a suitable scaling or weighting factor to the stale failure reports.
  • the node determines whether any MRO adjustments were made during the iteration of the MRO process performed in step 3004 (step 3006). If not, the process returns to step 3002 and continues. If one or more MRO adjustments were made in step 3004, the node restarts the timer (T M RO) (step 3008) and then the process returns to step 3002 and continues.
  • T M RO timer
  • FIG 19 illustrate a multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 that enables reporting of connection failures and classification of corresponding failure reports according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • a multiple RAT cellular communications system includes multiple cellular communications networks that operate according to different RATs.
  • the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 includes an LTE cellular communications network 22 (specifically a 4G LTE cellular communications network 22) and a UMTS cellular communications network 23, which is a 3G network.
  • the LTE cellular communications network 22 includes a RAN, which is referred to herein as an LTE RAN.
  • the LTE RAN includes base stations (BSs) 24-1 and 24-2 (more generally referred to herein collectively as base stations 24 and individually as base station 24) that serve corresponding cells of the LTE cellular communications network 22.
  • BSs base stations
  • eNBs evolved Node B
  • the base station 24-1 serves UEs 26-1 through 26-Ni (more generally referred to herein collectively as UEs 26 and individually as UE 26) located within the cell served by the base station 24-1.
  • the base station 24-2 serves UEs 28-1 through 28-N 2 (more generally referred to herein collectively as UEs 28 and individually as UE 28) located within the cell served by the base station 24-2.
  • a UE is any type of device configured to operate in a cellular communications network and, in the embodiment of Figure 19, any type of device configured to operate in the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20.
  • the base station 24-1 is referred to herein as a serving base station 24-1 of the UEs 26, and the base station 24-2 is referred to herein as a serving base station 24-2 of the UEs 28.
  • the LTE cellular communications network 22 can include any number of base stations 24. Further, while not illustrated, each base station 24 may serve one or many cells or sectors.
  • the LTE cellular communications network 22 also includes a core network 30 that includes one or more Serving Gateways (S-GWs) and one or more Mobility Management Entities (MMEs) (not shown).
  • S-GWs Serving Gateways
  • MMEs Mobility Management Entities
  • the base stations 24-1 and 24-2 are connected to one another via an X2 connection.
  • the UMTS cellular communications network 23 includes a RAN, which is referred to herein as a UTRAN.
  • the UTRAN includes RNCs 32-1 and 32-2 (more generally referred to herein collectively as RNCs 32 and individually as RNC 32).
  • the RNC 32-1 controls a number of base stations 34-1 through 34-Mi (more generally referred to herein collectively as base stations 34 and
  • the RNC 32-2 controls a number of base stations 36-1 through 36-M 2 (more generally referred to herein collectively as base stations 36 and individually as base station 36).
  • the base station 34-1 serves UEs 38-1 through 38-N 3 (more generally referred to herein collectively as UEs 38 and individually as UE 38) located within a corresponding cell of the UMTS cellular communications network 23, and the base station 34-Mi serves UEs 40-1 through 40-N 4 (more generally referred to herein collectively as UEs 40 and individually as UE 40) located within a corresponding cell of the UMTS cellular communications network 23.
  • the base station 36-1 serves UEs 42-1 through 42-N 5 (more generally referred to herein collectively as UEs 42 and individually as UE 42) located within a corresponding cell of the UMTS cellular communications network 23, and the base station 36-M 2 serves UEs 44-1 through 44-N 6 (more generally referred to herein collectively as UEs 44 and individually as UE 44) located within a corresponding cell of the UMTS cellular communications network 23.
  • the UMTS cellular communications network 23 can include any number of RNCs 32 and associated base stations.
  • the UMTS cellular communications network 23 also includes a core network 46.
  • the RNCs 32 are connected to the core network 46 via corresponding connections.
  • the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 includes multiple MRO functions 48-1 through 48-4 (more generally referred to herein collectively as MRO functions 48 and individually as MRO function 48) that operate to optimize mobility parameters for the UEs 26, 28, 38, 40, 42, 44.
  • MRO functions 48-1 and 48-2 are implemented at, in this example, the base stations 24-1 and 24-2.
  • the MRO functions 48-3 and 48-4 are implemented at the RNCs 32-1 and 32-2.
  • the MRO function 48-1 performs an MRO algorithm to adjust, or update, one or more mobility parameters that control HOs from the cell(s) served by the base station 24-1. These mobility parameters can be associated with RSRP and/or RSRQ measurement types and operate to form a HO threshold for the cell(s) served by the base station 24-1 , which is referred to herein as ho thresh lte.
  • the MRO function 48-2 performs an MRO algorithm to adjust, or update, one or more mobility parameters that control HOs from the cell(s) served by the base station 24-2.
  • the MRO function 48-3 performs an MRO algorithm to adjust, or update, one or more mobility parameters that control HOs from the cells served by the base stations 34 controlled by the RNC 32-1. These mobility parameters can be associated with RSRP and/or RSRQ measurement types and operate to form a HO threshold for the cell(s) served by the base station(s) 34, which is referred to herein as ho_thresh_utran.
  • the MRO function 48-4 performs an MRO algorithm to adjust, or update, one or more mobility parameters that control HOs from the cells served by the base stations 36 controlled by the RNC 32-2.
  • the MRO functions 48 classify failure reports associated with connection failures experienced by the UEs 26, 28, 38, 40, 42, and 44 as either stale or current for a particular iteration of the MRO algorithms performed by the MRO functions 48.
  • each failure report includes timing data that is indicative of a time at which the corresponding connection failures occurred.
  • the MRO function 48 classifies the failure report as either current or stale based on the timing data as discussed above with respect to Figures 16-18. If the failure report is stale, then the MRO function 48 either discards the failure report or considers the failure report with reduced relevance for the next iteration of the MRO process, depending on the particular embodiment.
  • Figures 20-29 illustrate the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 according to several embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Figures 20-29 illustrate the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solutions 1-4 and Scenarios 1 , 2a, and 2b.
  • Figure 20 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 1 , Scenario 1 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN performs an iteration of the MRO process that results in one or more MRO adjustments (i.e., adjustments to one or more mobility parameters).
  • the base station 24 starts a timer (TMRO).
  • TMRO timer
  • two UEs UE1 and UE2 in the cell served by the base station 24 (eNB) experience RLFs.
  • the RLFs are due to too late HOs from the cell served by the base station 24 (eNB) to a cell served by one of the base stations 34, 36 in the UTRAN.
  • the RLFs are detected by the UEs (UE1 and UE2) and, in response, the UEs (UE1 and UE2) start corresponding timers (T F ).
  • the UEs (UE1 and UE2) reconnect to the UTRAN after the RLFs. Thereafter, at a time (t2), UE1 reconnects to the LTE RAN (e.g., by an IRAT HO from the UTRAN to the LTE RAN) and a triggering event for sending an RLF report for the RLF at tO occurs.
  • UE1 may reconnect to the same cell in the LTE RAN in which the RLF occurred or a different cell in the LTE RAN.
  • UE1 stops the timer (T F ) and transmits a failure report (i.e., an RLF report) including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 24 of UE1 in the LTE RAN. If the serving base station 24 is different than the base station 24 (eNB) serving the cell in which the RLF occurred, then the serving base station 24 forwards the failure report to the base station 24 (eNB) serving the cell in which the connection failure occurred.
  • a failure report i.e., an RLF report
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t2-t1 , and the value of the timer (TMRO) at the base station 24 (eNB) at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t2-t0.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is less than the value of the timer (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being current, or on time, for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) at a time (t3).
  • the timer (T M RO) is restarted at the time (t3) in response to one or more mobility adjustments made by the MRO function 48 at the time (t3).
  • UE2 reconnects to the LTE RAN (e.g., by an IRAT HO from the UTRAN to the LTE RAN). UE2 may reconnect to the same cell in the LTE RAN in which the RLF occurred or a different cell in the LTE RAN.
  • a triggering event for reporting the RLF failure that occurred at tO occurs at a time (t4).
  • the triggering event may be, for example, reception of a request for any failure reports from the LTE RAN.
  • UE2 stops the timer (T F ) and transmits a failure report (i.e., an RLF report) including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 24 of UE2 in the LTE RAN. If the serving base station 24 is different than the base station 24 (eNB) serving the cell in which the RLF occurred, then the serving base station 24 forwards the failure report to the base station 24 (eNB) serving the cell in which the connection failure occurred.
  • a failure report i.e., an RLF report
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t4-t1 , and the value of the timer (T RO) at the base station 24 (eNB) at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t4-t3.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is greater than the value of the timer (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being stale.
  • the failure report is not considered or considered with reduced relevance for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB).
  • Figure 21 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 1 , Scenario 2a according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the MRO function 48 of one of the RNCs 32 in the UTRAN performs an iteration of the MRO process that results in one or more MRO adjustments (i.e., adjustments to one or more mobility parameters).
  • the RNC 32 starts a timer (T M RO)- Sometime thereafter, at a time (t1), two UEs (UE1 and UE2) in the cell served by one of the base stations 34, 36 controlled by the RNC 32 in the UTRAN experience HOFs during IRAT HOs from the cell served by the base station 34, 36 to the cell served by one of the base stations 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN.
  • the HOFs are due to too early HOs.
  • the HOFs are detected by the UEs (UE1 and UE2) and, in response, the UEs (UE1 and UE2) start corresponding timers (T F ).
  • the UEs (UE1 and UE2) reconnect to the UTRAN after the HOFs. Thereafter, at a time (t2), UE1 reconnects to the LTE RAN (e.g., by an IRAT HO from the UTRAN to the LTE RAN) and a triggering event for sending a failure report for the HOF occurs. In response to the triggering event for sending a failure report, UE1 stops the timer (T F ) and transmits a failure report for the HOF including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 24 of UE1 in the LTE RAN.
  • T F timer
  • the serving base station 24 determines that the failure report is for a HOF for an IRAT HO from the cell served by the base station 34, 36 controlled by the RNC 32 and therefore forwards the failure report to the RNC 32 via a RIM.
  • the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t2-t1 , and the value of the timer (T M RO) at the RNC 32 at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t3-t0.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is less than the value of the timer (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being current, or on time, for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 at a time (t4).
  • the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 may compensate for a delay resulting from the forwarding of the failure report (i.e., the delay t3-t2).
  • the timer (T M RO) at the RNC 32 is restarted at the time (t4) in response to one or more mobility adjustments made by the MRO function 48 at the time (t4).
  • UE2 reconnects to the LTE RAN (e.g., by an IRAT HO from the UTRAN to the LTE RAN) and a triggering event for sending a failure report for the HOF occurs.
  • UE2 stops the timer (T F ) and transmits a failure report for the HOF including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 24 of UE2 in the LTE RAN.
  • the serving base station 24 determines that the failure report is for a HOF for an IRAT HO from the cell served by the base station 34, 36 controlled by the RNC 32 and therefore forwards the failure report to the RNC 32 via a RIM.
  • the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (TF) included in the failure report, which in this case is t5-t1 , and the value of the timer (T RO) at the RNC 32 at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t6-t4.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is greater than the value of the timer (TMRO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being stale for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32.
  • the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 may compensate for a delay resulting from the forwarding of the failure report (i.e., the delay t6-t5).
  • the timer (TMRO) at the RNC 32 is restarted at the time (t4) in response to one or more mobility adjustments made by the MRO function 48 at the time (t4).
  • the failure report from UE2 Since the failure report from UE2 is stale, the failure report is not considered or is considered with reduced relevance for the next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32. It should also be noted that the MRO function 48 of the cell in the LTE RAN may also receive and utilize the failure report, if desired.
  • Figure 22 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 1 , Scenario 2b according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. This embodiment is the same as that of Figure 21 but where the connection failure is an RLF failure shortly after a successful IRAT HO. As such, the details are not repeated.
  • FIG 23 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 2, Scenario 1 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the MRO function 48 of one of the base stations 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN performs an iteration of the MRO process that results in one or more MRO adjustments (i.e., adjustments to one or more mobility parameters).
  • the base station 24 (eNB) starts a timer (T M RO)- Sometime thereafter, at a time (t1), two UEs (UE1 and UE2) in the cell served by the base station 24 (eNB) experience RLFs.
  • T M RO timer
  • the RLFs are due to too late HOs from the cell served by the base station 24 (eNB) to a cell served by one of the base stations 34, 36 in the UTRAN.
  • the RLFs are detected by the UEs (UE1 and UE2) and, in response, the UEs (UE1 and UE2) start
  • UE1 reconnects to the cell of one of the base stations 34, 36 of one of the RNCs 32 in the UTRAN and a triggering event for sending an RLF report for the RLF at tO occurs.
  • UE1 stops the timer (TF) and transmits a failure report (i.e., an RLF report) including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 34, 36 of UE1 in the UTRAN, which in turn
  • the RNC 32 determines that the RLF report is associated with an RLF that occurred in the cell served by the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN and therefore forwards the RLF report to the base station 24 (eNB) via a RIM at a time (t3).
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t2-t1 , and the value of the timer (TMRO) at the base station 24 (eNB) at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t3-t0.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is less than the value of the timer (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being current, or on time, for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) at a time (t4).
  • the MRO function 48 may compensate for a delay associated with forwarding the RLF report from the RNC 32 to the base station 24 (eNB), which in this example is t3- t2.
  • the timer (T M RO) is restarted at the time (t3) in response to one or more mobility adjustments made by the MRO function 48 at the time (t4).
  • UE2 reconnects to the cell of one of the base stations 34, 36 of one of the RNCs 32 in the UTRAN and a triggering event for sending an RLF report for the RLF at tO occurs.
  • UE2 stops the timer (T F ) and transmits a failure report (i.e., an RLF report) including the value of the timer (T» to the serving base station 34, 36 of UE2 in the UTRAN, which in turn
  • the RNC 32 determines that the RLF report is associated with an RLF that occurred in the cell served by the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN and therefore forwards the RLF report to the base station 24 (eNB) via a RIM at a time (t6).
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t5-t1 , and the value of the timer (T M RO) at the base station 24 (eNB) at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t6-t4.
  • the value of the timer (TF) is greater than the value of the timer (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being stale for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB).
  • the MRO function 48 may compensate for a delay associated with forwarding the RLF report from the RNC 32 to the base station 24 (eNB), which in this example is t6-t5. Since the failure report from UE2 is stale, the failure report is not considered or is considered with reduced relevance for the next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB).
  • Figure 24 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 2, Scenario 2a according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • the MRO function 48 of one of the base stations 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN performs an iteration of the MRO process that results in one or more MRO adjustments (i.e., adjustments to one or more mobility parameters).
  • the base station 24 (eNB) starts a timer (T MR o).
  • the MRO function 48 of one of the RNCs 32 in the UTRAN performs an iteration of the MRO process that results in one or more MRO adjustments (i.e., adjustments to one or more mobility parameters).
  • the RNC 32 starts a timer (T M RO)-
  • T M RO timer
  • two UEs (UE1 and UE2) in the cell served by one of the base stations 34, 36 controlled by the RNC 32 in the UTRAN experience HOFs during I RAT HOs from the cell served by the base station 34, 36 to the cell served by one of the base stations 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN.
  • the HOFs are due to too early HOs.
  • the HOFs are detected by the UEs (UE1 and UE2) and, in response, the UEs (UE1 and UE2) start corresponding timers 0>).
  • UE1 reconnects to one of the cells in the UTRAN and a triggering event for sending a failure report for the HOF occurs.
  • UE1 may reconnect to the same cell in which the HOF occurred or a different cell.
  • UE1 stops the timer (TF) and transmits a failure report for the HOF including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 34, 36 of UE1 in the UTRAN.
  • the serving base station 34, 36 determines that the failure report is for a HOF for an I RAT HO from the cell served by the base station 34, 36 controlled by the RNC 32 to the cell served by one of the base stations 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN. If the RNC 32 of the serving base station 34, 36 is different than the RNC 32 of the base station 34, 36 serving the cell in which the HOF occurred, the RNC 32 forwards the failure report to the RNC 32 of the base station 34, 36 serving the cell in which the HOF occurred. In addition, in this example, the RNC 32 forwards the failure report to the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN that was the target of the failed I RAT HO via a RIM.
  • the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (TF) included in the failure report, which in this case is t2-t1 , and the value of the timer (T M RO) at the base station 24 (eNB) at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t3-t0.
  • the value of the timer (TF) is less than (T MRO ) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being current, or on time, for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) at a time (t4).
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) may compensate for a delay resulting from the forwarding of the failure report (i.e., the delay t3-t2).
  • the timer (T M RO) at the base station 24 (eNB) is restarted at the time (t4) in response to one or more mobility adjustments made by the MRO function 48 at the time (t4).
  • the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t2-t1 , and the value of the timer (T M RO) at the RNC 32 at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t2-t0'.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is less than (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being current, or on time, for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 at a time (t3').
  • the timer (T M RO) at the RNC 32 is restarted at the time (t3') in response to one or more mobility adjustments made by the MRO function 48 at the time (t3').
  • UE2 reconnects to one of the cells in the UTRAN and a triggering event for sending a failure report for the HOF occurs.
  • UE2 may reconnect to the same cell in which the HOF occurred or a different cell.
  • UE2 stops the timer (T F ) and transmits a failure report for the HOF including the value of the timer (T F ) to the serving base station 34, 36 of UE2 in the UTRAN.
  • the serving base station 34, 36 determines that the failure report is for a HOF for an I RAT HO from the cell served by the base station 34, 36 controlled by the RNC 32 to the cell served by one of the base stations 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN. If the RNC 32 of the serving base station 34, 36 is different than the RNC 32 of the base station 34, 36 serving the cell in which the HOF occurred, the RNC 32 forwards the failure report to the RNC 32 of the base station 34, 36 serving the cell in which the HOF occurred. In addition, in this example, the RNC 32 forwards the failure report to the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN that was the target of the failed I RAT HO via a RIM.
  • the base station 24 (eNB) in the LTE RAN classifies the failure report based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t5-t1 , and the value of the timer (T M RO) at the base station 24 (eNB) at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t6-t4.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is greater than (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being stale for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB).
  • the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB) may compensate for a delay resulting from the forwarding of the failure report. Since the failure report from UE2 is stale, the failure report is not considered or is considered with reduced relevance for the next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the base station 24 (eNB).
  • the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32 classifies the failure report from UE2 based on the value of the timer (T F ) included in the failure report, which in this case is t5-t1 , and the value of the timer (T M RO) at the RNC 32 at the time of receiving the failure report, which in this case is t5-t3'.
  • the value of the timer (T F ) is greater than (T M RO) and, as such, the failure report is classified as being stale for a next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32. Since the failure report from UE2 is stale, the failure report is not considered or is considered with reduced relevance for the next iteration of the MRO process performed by the MRO function 48 of the RNC 32.
  • Figure 25 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 2, Scenario 2b according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. This embodiment is the same as that of Figure 24 but where the connection failure is an RLF failure shortly after a successful IRAT HO. As such, the details are not repeated.
  • Figures 26-28 illustrate the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 21 for Solution 3, Scenarios 1 , 2a, and 2b, respectively.
  • Solution 3 an RLF is reported in the RAT where the connection failure occurred and a HOF is reported in the RAT of the cell in which the HO command was received.
  • Solution 3 for Scenarios 1 , 2a, and 2b are therefore the same as Solution 1 , Scenario 1 , Solution 2, Scenario 2a, and Solution 1 ,
  • Figure 29 illustrates the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 of Figure 19 for Solution 4, Scenario 1.
  • the operation of the multiple RAT cellular communications system 20 for this embodiment is the same as that discussed above with respect to Figure 20 (Solution 1 , Scenario 1). As such, the details are not repeated.
  • the connection failure is not reported by the UE, but is rather detected by the appropriate RNC 32.
  • Figures 20-29 focus on IRAT HOs, the systems and methods disclosed herein are equally applicable to reporting of other types of mobility connection failures such as, for example, connection failures for intra-RAT HOs.
  • FIG 30 is a block diagram of a UE 50 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. This discussion of the UE 50 is equally applicable to the UEs 26, 28, 38, 40, 42, and 44 of Figure 19.
  • the UE 50 includes a radio subsystem 52 and a processing subsystem 54.
  • the radio subsystem 52 includes one or more transceivers (not shown) generally including analog and, in some embodiments, digital components for sending and receiving data to and from the cellular communications networks 22 and 23 ( Figure 19).
  • each of the one or more transceivers may represent or include one or more Radio Frequency (RF) transceivers, or separate RF transmitter(s) and receiver(s), capable of transmitting suitable information wirelessly to and receiving suitable information from other network components or nodes.
  • RF Radio Frequency
  • the radio subsystem 52 implements at least part of Layer 1 (i.e., the Physical or "PHY" Layer).
  • the processing subsystem 54 generally implements any remaining portion of Layer 1 as well as functions for higher layers in the wireless
  • the processing subsystem 54 may comprise, for example, one or several general-purpose or special-purpose microprocessors or other microcontrollers programmed with suitable software and/or firmware to carry out some or all of the functionality of the UE 50 described herein.
  • the processing subsystem 54 may comprise various digital hardware blocks (e.g., one or more Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), one or more off-the-shelf digital and analog hardware components, or a combination thereof) configured to carry out some or all of the functionality of the UE 50 described herein.
  • ASICs Application Specific Integrated Circuits
  • the above- described functionality of the UE 50 may be implemented, in whole or in part, by the processing subsystem 54 executing software or other instructions stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, such as Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, or any other suitable type of data storage components.
  • RAM Random Access Memory
  • ROM Read Only Memory
  • magnetic storage device such as compact disc-read only memory
  • optical storage device any other suitable type of data storage components.
  • FIG 31 is a block diagram of a base station 56 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. This discussion of the base station 56 is equally applicable to the base stations 24, 34, and 36 of Figure 19. As illustrated, the base station 56 includes a radio subsystem 58, one or more communication interfaces 60, and a processing subsystem 62. While only one radio subsystem 58 is illustrated, the base station 56 may include multiple radio subsystems 58 (e.g., one radio subsystem 58 per sector). The radio subsystem 58 generally includes analog and, in some embodiments, digital components for sending and receiving data to and from UEs within the corresponding cell.
  • the radio subsystem 58 may represent or include one or more RF transceiver(s), or separate RF transmitter(s) and receiver(s), capable of transmitting suitable information wirelessly to and receiving suitable information from other network components or nodes. From a wireless communications protocol view, the radio subsystem 58 implements at least part of Layer 1 (i.e., the Physical or "PHY" Layer).
  • Layer 1 i.e., the Physical or "PHY" Layer
  • the one or more communication interfaces 60 provide connectivity to other network nodes as appropriate. For instance, the one or more
  • communication interfaces 60 may include communication interface(s) to other base stations 56 (e.g., an X2 interface in the LTE cellular communications network 22) and communication interface(s) to the corresponding core network 30, 46 (e.g., S1 communication interface in the LTE cellular communications network 22).
  • base stations 56 e.g., an X2 interface in the LTE cellular communications network 22
  • communication interface(s) to the corresponding core network 30, 46 e.g., S1 communication interface in the LTE cellular communications network 22.
  • the processing subsystem 62 generally implements any remaining portion of Layer 1 not implemented in the radio subsystem 58 as well as functions for higher layers in the wireless communications protocol (e.g., Layer 2 (data link layer), Layer 3 (network layer), etc.).
  • the processing subsystem 62 may comprise, for example, one or several general- purpose or special-purpose microprocessors or other microcontrollers
  • the processing subsystem 62 may comprise various digital hardware blocks (e.g., one or more ASICs, one or more off-the-shelf digital and analog hardware components, or a combination thereof) configured to carry out some or all of the functionality of the base station 56 described herein.
  • the above described functionality of the base station 56 may be implemented, in whole or in part, by the processing subsystem 62 executing software or other instructions stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, such as RAM, ROM, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, or any other suitable type of data storage components.
  • Figure 32 is a block diagram of one of the RNCs 32 of Figure 19 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. As illustrated, the RNC 32 includes one or more communication interfaces 64 and a processing subsystem 66. The one or more communication interfaces 64 provide
  • the one or more communication interfaces 64 include communication interface(s) to the corresponding base stations 34, 36 ( Figure 19) and communication interface(s) to the core network 46.
  • the processing subsystem 66 may comprise, for example, one or several general-purpose or special-purpose microprocessors or other microcontrollers programmed with suitable software and/or firmware to carry out some or all of the functionality of the RNC 32 described herein.
  • the processing subsystem 66 may comprise various digital hardware blocks (e.g., one or more ASICs, one or more off-the-shelf digital and analog hardware components, or a combination thereof) configured to carry out some or all of the functionality of the RNC 32 described herein.
  • the above described functionality of the RNC 32 may be implemented, in whole or in part, by the processing subsystem 66 executing software or other instructions stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, such as RAM, ROM, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, or any other suitable type of data storage components.
  • a non-transitory computer-readable medium such as RAM, ROM, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, or any other suitable type of data storage components.
  • connection failure reporting results in delays between the time at which connection failures occur and the time at which the connection failures are reported to the network. Delays in reporting the connection failure may be due to a long delay before the UE reconnects to the RAN where the connection failure is to be reported (e.g., Solution 1 ), due to the UE transitioning to an idle mode for a long time before reconnecting to the RAN where the connection failure is to be reported, or due to a failure of the cellular communications network to request reporting of the RLF report for a long time.
  • an MRO function that performs MRO for a cell in, for example, an LTE RAN may perform an MRO process that results in adjustment(s) to mobility parameters (i.e., mobility adjustments) for the cell based on failure reports received in a timely manner.
  • the MRO function may continue to receive failure reports after the mobility
  • failure reports are relevant to a time window prior to making the mobility adjustment(s).
  • these "stale" failure reports are still considered with the same relevance as timely failure reports for the next iteration of the MRO process.
  • the stale failure reports may lead to incorrect or undesirable mobility adjustments and slow convergence of the cellular communications network to a state of stable mobility.
  • the concepts disclosed herein are not limited to any particular advantage, the concepts disclosed herein address the issue of delayed connection failure reporting.
  • failure reports are classified as stale or current. Stale failure reports can then be discarded or used in a subsequent iteration of the MRO algorithm. As a result, incorrect or undesirable mobility adjustments and slow convergence of the cellular communications network to a state of stable mobility due to delayed failure reports are avoided.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne l'identification de rapports de défaillance périmés dans un réseau de communication cellulaire. Dans un mode de réalisation, un nœud dans un réseau de communication cellulaire reçoit un rapport de défaillance associé à une défaillance de connexion pour un équipement d'utilisateur et détermine lorsque la défaillance de connexion s'est produite par rapport à un réglage de mobilité le plus récent fait par le nœud. Si la défaillance de connexion s'est produite avant le réglage de mobilité le plus récent fait par le nœud, le nœud classe le rapport de défaillance comme un rapport de défaillance périmé. Dans un mode de réalisation, si le rapport de défaillance est classé comme un rapport de défaillance périmé, le nœud rejette la défaillance. Dans un autre mode de réalisation, si le rapport de défaillance est classé comme un rapport de défaillance périmé, le nœud tient compte du rapport de défaillance avec une pertinence réduite pour une prochaine itération d'un processus afin de déterminer si de nouveaux réglages de mobilité sont souhaités.
EP13787640.5A 2012-05-11 2013-05-10 Classement de rapports de défaillance comme actuels ou périmés pour des réglages d'optimisation de robustesse de mobilité Active EP2850877B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261645868P 2012-05-11 2012-05-11
PCT/SE2013/000069 WO2013169169A2 (fr) 2012-05-11 2013-05-10 Classement de rapports de défaillance comme actuels ou périmés pour des réglages d'optimisation de robustesse de mobilité

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2850877A2 true EP2850877A2 (fr) 2015-03-25
EP2850877A4 EP2850877A4 (fr) 2016-03-23
EP2850877B1 EP2850877B1 (fr) 2017-02-01

Family

ID=49548975

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13787640.5A Active EP2850877B1 (fr) 2012-05-11 2013-05-10 Classement de rapports de défaillance comme actuels ou périmés pour des réglages d'optimisation de robustesse de mobilité

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US9185581B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2850877B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP6193360B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN104322104B (fr)
AU (2) AU2013260235B2 (fr)
ES (1) ES2624252T3 (fr)
IN (1) IN2014DN08690A (fr)
WO (1) WO2013169169A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9226215B2 (en) * 2013-07-03 2015-12-29 Qualcomm Incorporated Inter radio access technology (IRAT) threshold adjustment
WO2015023067A1 (fr) 2013-08-12 2015-02-19 삼성전자 주식회사 Procédé pour traiter un échec de liaison radio dans un système de radiocommunication basé sur une connectivité à de multiples stations de base, et appareil associé
BR112016017476A8 (pt) * 2014-01-29 2020-06-16 Huawei Tech Co Ltd método e dispositivo para processamento de falha de enlace de rádio
US9655025B1 (en) 2014-03-24 2017-05-16 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Managing the performance of a wireless device handover
US9655008B2 (en) * 2014-09-30 2017-05-16 Apple Inc. Systems and methods for improved network scanning for quality of service applications
US10085181B2 (en) 2015-07-29 2018-09-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Mechanism to avoid ping pong during inter radio access technology redirection failure
CN107241756B (zh) * 2016-03-28 2020-11-10 中兴通讯股份有限公司 一种接入网间乒乓切换判决和互通的方法和装置
WO2018097073A1 (fr) * 2016-11-24 2018-05-31 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif de notification d'informations, procédé de notification d'informations, et support d'enregistrement contenant un programme enregistré
CN106535270B (zh) * 2016-12-15 2019-10-11 北京小米移动软件有限公司 网络选择方法及装置
EP3611963B1 (fr) 2017-04-14 2022-06-29 Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd. Procédé et dispositif de commutation de cellules et équipement d'utilisateur
WO2021088077A1 (fr) * 2019-11-08 2021-05-14 华为技术有限公司 Procédé d'optimisation de mobilité et appareil associé
US11895543B2 (en) * 2020-04-06 2024-02-06 Intel Corporation MRO for 5G networks
WO2022082505A1 (fr) * 2020-10-21 2022-04-28 Zte Corporation Système et procédés d'optimisation de performance de réseau

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010017961A1 (fr) * 2008-08-11 2010-02-18 Alcatel Lucent Procédé et appareil de transfert dans un réseau de communications sans fil
US8577360B2 (en) * 2010-04-12 2013-11-05 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) UE-based MDT measuring and reporting in a cellular radio access network
US9100858B2 (en) * 2010-10-04 2015-08-04 Kyocera Corporation Mobile communication method, radio terminal, and base station
US10595221B2 (en) * 2010-11-03 2020-03-17 Hfi Innovation, Inc. Method of MDT information logging and reporting
US9167447B2 (en) * 2011-03-31 2015-10-20 Mediatek Inc. Failure event report for initial connection setup failure

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2013260235B2 (en) 2015-11-26
CN104322104B (zh) 2018-04-20
JP6193360B2 (ja) 2017-09-06
EP2850877B1 (fr) 2017-02-01
WO2013169169A2 (fr) 2013-11-14
US9699697B2 (en) 2017-07-04
AU2013260235A1 (en) 2014-11-27
US20150382265A1 (en) 2015-12-31
ES2624252T3 (es) 2017-07-13
JP2015528219A (ja) 2015-09-24
WO2013169169A3 (fr) 2014-03-20
IN2014DN08690A (fr) 2015-05-22
US20130303155A1 (en) 2013-11-14
EP2850877A4 (fr) 2016-03-23
CN104322104A (zh) 2015-01-28
WO2013169169A8 (fr) 2014-11-06
US9185581B2 (en) 2015-11-10
AU2016200694A1 (en) 2016-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9699697B2 (en) Classifying failure reports as either current or stale for mobility robustness optimization adjustments
US11671310B2 (en) Mobility robustness in a cellular network
US11070996B2 (en) Method for controlling wireless link and wireless connection of terminal in wireless communication system, and apparatus supporting same
US8559397B2 (en) Handover-related radio link failure detection
US9578549B2 (en) Method and apparatus for supporting RLF reason detection or handover failure reason detection
US20160044518A1 (en) Methods of operating radio access network base stations and related network nodes
US9516533B2 (en) Method for reporting radio link failure information
JP5366888B2 (ja) 無線基地局及びその制御方法
US20140194123A1 (en) Method, apparatus, and system for detecting a radio network problem
US9532289B2 (en) Information processing method and apparatus
US20150373772A1 (en) Handover failure detection device, handover parameter adjustment device, and handover optimization system
US20160007252A1 (en) Radio Link Monitoring
US20130078993A1 (en) Radio base station and method of controlling the same
WO2022057783A1 (fr) Procédé de rapport de défaillance de liaison radio et équipement utilisateur
KR20170121877A (ko) 무선 통신 시스템에서 핸드오버를 지원하는 방법 및 장치
CN116489673A (zh) 信息报告方法以及用户设备
WO2024067624A1 (fr) Procédé de rapport d'informations et équipement utilisateur
CN118042643A (zh) 信息报告方法以及用户设备

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20141104

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20160218

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 24/04 20090101ALN20160212BHEP

Ipc: H04W 24/08 20090101AFI20160212BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/14 20090101ALN20160212BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/00 20090101ALN20160212BHEP

Ipc: H04W 88/08 20090101ALN20160212BHEP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602013017107

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04W0036000000

Ipc: H04W0024080000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 36/00 20090101ALN20161031BHEP

Ipc: H04W 24/08 20090101AFI20161031BHEP

Ipc: H04W 88/08 20090101ALN20161031BHEP

Ipc: H04W 36/14 20090101ALN20161031BHEP

Ipc: H04W 24/04 20090101ALN20161031BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161117

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 866404

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013017107

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 866404

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2624252

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20170713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170502

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170501

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170601

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170501

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013017107

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20171103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170510

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20210601

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20210527

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220510

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230523

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20230704

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220511

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20230526

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230525

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230530

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230529

Year of fee payment: 11