EP2819449B1 - Silence region setting method and device thereof for cognitive radio system - Google Patents
Silence region setting method and device thereof for cognitive radio system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2819449B1 EP2819449B1 EP13751607.6A EP13751607A EP2819449B1 EP 2819449 B1 EP2819449 B1 EP 2819449B1 EP 13751607 A EP13751607 A EP 13751607A EP 2819449 B1 EP2819449 B1 EP 2819449B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- quiet period
- duration
- base station
- value
- period parameter
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 42
- 230000001149 cognitive effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 6
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 claims description 40
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
- H04W16/14—Spectrum sharing arrangements between different networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
- H04W24/08—Testing, supervising or monitoring using real traffic
Definitions
- Examples of the present disclosure relate to wireless communication technologies, and more particularly, to a method for configuring a quiet period in a cognitive radio (CR) system and a device thereof.
- CR cognitive radio
- Radio communication spectrums are valuable natural resources. With rapid development of the wireless communication technologies, spectrum resources are increasingly scarce. In order to ease the strain on the spectrum resources, relevant departments and agencies have monitored and studied the wireless communication spectrums, and found that some frequency bands (such as a frequency band for television) are not used in most of time or not used within most areas, while multi-user or multi-system contention occurs in some other frequency bands. In other words, some systems with heavy service loads do not have sufficient spectrum resources, while other systems with small service loads take up too many resources.
- the concept of CR emerges under this background. The basic principle of CR is described as follows. Under the premise of not interfering an authorization system, a CR system may dynamically select a white space frequency for communication through monitoring changes of a current wireless environment.
- the protection mainly includes two aspects.
- One aspect is that the CR system may accurately determine which frequency of the authorization system is an available white space frequency (introduction of the CR system on this frequency may not affect normal work of the authorization system).
- the other aspect is that when an occupied frequency is no longer available, the CR system may timely return the occupied frequency to the authorization system.
- the first method is a database method, in which through accessing an information database of the authorization system, the CR system obtains using information about frequencies of an authorization system in a certain area, and further determines which frequency is free and available.
- the second method is a sensing/detecting method, in which a sensing/detecting module of the CR system detects authorization system signals on different frequencies. When it is detected that an input parameter is greater than a threshold, the sensing/detecting module determines that an authorization system signal exists on a frequency and the frequency is not available to the CR system. Otherwise, the frequency is available to the CR system.
- any of the sensing algorithms has requirements on receiving and collecting time of a signal and a receiving carrier interference ratio of the signal.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic flowchart illustrating a process for configuring the quiet period. As shown in FIG. 1 , when a quiet period parameter is defined, the quiet period parameter is sent to a terminal.
- the more frequently the sensing detecting is performed i.e., the more frequent the quiet is, the greater the chance for discovering the authorization system is, the more timely the operation of exiting the frequency of the authorization system is performed, and the smaller the interference to the authorization system is.
- the duration of the quiet period of the CR system is too long or the quiet is performed too often, the capacity of the CR system may be greatly affected, therefore there is no sense in using the white space frequency to improve the system capacity.
- the value of the quiet period parameter not only affects the interference to the authorization system and the capacity of the sensing system, but also affects the selection of the sensing algorithm, thereby affects the hardware complexity when the system is implemented.
- the quiet period parameter may be reasonably configured, so as to reduce the interference to the authorization system and control the loss of the CR system.
- US2011/263209A1 discloses a solution that an apparatus may listen for potential silent periods to occur in an environment, and if detected, the potential silent periods may be compared to quiet period criteria to determine if they are actual silent periods. If at least two subsequent actual silent periods are determined, the apparatus may adopt quiet timing and duration based on the actual silent periods. Alternatively, the apparatus may establish new quiet period timing and duration based on the quiet period criteria.
- Various examples of the present disclosure describe a method and a device for configuring a quiet period in a CR system, so as to improve the rationality of configuration of the quiet period parameter of the CR system.
- Examples of the present disclosure describe a method for configuring a quiet period in a cognitive radio (CR) system, including:
- Examples of the present disclosure describe a base station device, including:
- the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system is determined, the sensing algorithm meeting the detecting performance requirement is determined based on the maximum value of the quiet period parameter, and the value of the quiet period parameter is revised based on the sensing algorithm.
- the rationality of the configuration of the quiet period parameter of the CR system is improved and the capacity loss of the CR system is reduced when the interference to the authorization system is reduced.
- the quiet period parameters mainly include the duration of the quiet period and a cycle of the quiet period.
- the cycle of the quiet period is represented by SilenceCycle
- the duration of the quiet period is represented by SilenceDuration.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a process for configuring a quiet period, according to an example of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 2 , the process may include following operations.
- a base station may determine a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of a CR system.
- the base station may determine a sensing algorithm.
- the base station may determine a value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm determined at block 202.
- the base station may send the quiet period parameter determined at block 203 to a terminal.
- the base station and the terminal of the CR system perform a quiet procedure according to the quiet period parameter.
- the base station may determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on maximum duration of interference which a radio authorization system may tolerate and maximum loss of capacity which the CR system may tolerate.
- a constraint is proposed from the perspective of protecting the authorization system, i.e., the maximum duration of the interference which the authorization system may tolerate is T int erference , in order to reduce the interference to the authorization system resulting from the sensing detecting performed within the quiet period, a following requirement is required: SilenceCycle ⁇ SilenceDuration + M arg inTime ⁇ T int erference among them, M arg inTime is reserved time for other operations of the CR system after the authorization system is detected, such as system message transfer time, cell reestablishment time, etc.
- a constraint is proposed from the perspective of protecting the CR system, i.e., a maximum loss ratio of the capacity which the CR system may tolerate may be defined as P% in a time domain, in order to minimize the capacity loss of the CR system, a following requirement is required: SilenceDuration SilenceCycle ⁇ P %
- minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the base station is not greater than the maximum value of SilenceDuration determined by the base station at block 201.
- each sensing algorithm corresponds to a requirement on the minimum duration of the detecting time, i.e., corresponds to different requirements on the duration of the quiet period.
- a correspondence relationship between the sensing algorithm and the requirement on the minimum duration of the detecting time may be shown in Table 1.
- a sensing algorithm meeting the requirement on the minimum duration of the quiet period is determined.
- a sensing algorithm of which an index is x meets the detecting performance requirement.
- the base station may select, based on a predefined rule, a sensing algorithm from these sensing algorithms.
- a sensing algorithm having minimum calculation complexity may be determined as the ultimate sensing algorithm, or a sensing algorithm having a minimum detecting time may be determined as the ultimate sensing algorithm, or the sensing algorithm may be determined by considering both of these two aspects.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a process for determining the sensing algorithm, according to an example of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3 , the process may include following operations.
- a detecting performance requirement may be determined.
- the sensing algorithm meeting the requirement and a value of the minimum duration of the detecting time corresponding to the sensing algorithm are output.
- a sensing algorithm may be selected from the sensing algorithms meeting the detecting performance requirement according to a predefined rule.
- the ultimately-selected sensing algorithm and a value of the minimum duration of the detecting time corresponding to the sensing algorithm are output.
- the detecting performance requirement is lowered, and the operations at block 302 are performed.
- the process that the base station sends the quiet period parameter to the terminal is similar to the implementation in the prior art.
- the quiet period parameter is encapsulated into a dedicated channel or a common channel and transmitted to the terminal.
- a quiet timer T silence is introduced, so that the quiet procedure is performed based on the quiet timer.
- the base station side and the terminal side stop transmitting/receiving of CR system data on a corresponding frequency and perform sensing detecting.
- T silence is expired, the quiet procedure is ended and the normal data transmitting and receiving of the CR system is started.
- the base station and the terminal respectively configure the quiet timer T silence .
- a start cycle of T silence is SilenceCycle
- the timing duration of T silence is Silence Duration.
- SFN and subframe determine the start moment of the quiet procedure together.
- a range of values of the quiet period parameter is determined taking into account both the protection of the radio authorization system and the capacity loss of the CR system, so that the sensing algorithms are preliminarily filtered.
- the quiet period parameter is revised according to the sensing algorithm. As such, an appropriate sensing algorithm is selected and an appropriate quiet period parameter is determined in the case of controlling the interference to the authorization system, therefore the capacity loss of the CR system is greatly reduced.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a structure of the base station device, according to an example of the present disclosure.
- the base station device may include a quiet period parameter value configuring module 401, a sensing algorithm selecting module 402, and a quiet period parameter sending module 403.
- some system parameters and sensing algorithm parameters required during the process of configuring the quiet period parameter may be stored in storage modules of the base station device.
- These storage modules may include:
- the authorization system information database 405 may be located in the base station device, or located in a central control unit of the CR system so as to be accessed by multiple base stations of the CR system, or located outside the CR system in the form of a separate server which is maintained by a third party, the CR system may obtain an access right by paying costs.
- the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 may determine a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of the CR system, and send the maximum value of the quiet period parameter to the sensing algorithm selecting module 402.
- the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 may determine a value of the quiet period parameter based on a sensing algorithm determined by the sensing algorithm selecting module 402, and send the value of the quiet period parameter to the quiet period parameter sending module 403.
- the sensing algorithm selecting module 402 may determine the sensing algorithm based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter, and send the determined sensing algorithm to the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401.
- the quiet period parameter sending module 403 may send the quiet period parameter determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 to a terminal of the CR system.
- the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 may determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on maximum duration of interference that the radio authorization system may tolerate and maximum loss of capacity that the CR system may tolerate. For example, the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 may determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on formulae (1) and (2), in which parameter P% is from the CR system information database 404, parameter T int erference is from the authorization system information database 405, and parameter M arg inTime is from the CR system information database 404.
- minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the sensing algorithm selecting module 402 is not greater than a maximum value of duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401. Further, when there are multiple sensing algorithms and minimum duration of detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms is not greater than the maximum value of the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module, the sensing algorithm selecting module 402 may select a sensing algorithm from the multiple sensing algorithms based on calculation complexity of each of the multiple sensing algorithms and/or the minimum duration of the detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms.
- the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 may configure the duration of the quiet period as the minimum duration of the detecting time required by the sensing algorithm.
- the sensing algorithm is the sensing algorithm determined by the base station.
- the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401 may configure a cycle of the quiet period based on formula (5).
- the base station device may further include a timer configuring module 407.
- the timer configuring module 407 may configure a timer, so that the base station device performs a quiet procedure based on the timer.
- a start cycle of the timer is the cycle of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401
- the timing duration of the timer is the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module 401
- a start moment of the timer satisfies formula (6).
- modules in the device of example embodiments of the present disclosure may be located in the device as described in the example embodiments, or may be located in one or more devices of the example embodiments of the present disclosure when modified accordingly.
- the modules in examples of the present disclosure may be combined into one module, or may be further divided into multiple sub-modules.
- the software product may be stored in a storage medium, and includes a plurality of machine-readable instructions for making a terminal device (which can be a mobile phone, a personal computer, a server, or a network device) implement methods recited in the examples of the present disclosure.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Description
- Examples of the present disclosure relate to wireless communication technologies, and more particularly, to a method for configuring a quiet period in a cognitive radio (CR) system and a device thereof.
- Radio communication spectrums are valuable natural resources. With rapid development of the wireless communication technologies, spectrum resources are increasingly scarce. In order to ease the strain on the spectrum resources, relevant departments and agencies have monitored and studied the wireless communication spectrums, and found that some frequency bands (such as a frequency band for television) are not used in most of time or not used within most areas, while multi-user or multi-system contention occurs in some other frequency bands. In other words, some systems with heavy service loads do not have sufficient spectrum resources, while other systems with small service loads take up too many resources. The concept of CR emerges under this background. The basic principle of CR is described as follows. Under the premise of not interfering an authorization system, a CR system may dynamically select a white space frequency for communication through monitoring changes of a current wireless environment.
- When the CR system opportunistically uses the white space frequency of the authorization system, a basic premise is to protect the authorization system from interference. The protection mainly includes two aspects. One aspect is that the CR system may accurately determine which frequency of the authorization system is an available white space frequency (introduction of the CR system on this frequency may not affect normal work of the authorization system). The other aspect is that when an occupied frequency is no longer available, the CR system may timely return the occupied frequency to the authorization system.
- There are mainly two methods for detecting a white space frequency. The first method is a database method, in which through accessing an information database of the authorization system, the CR system obtains using information about frequencies of an authorization system in a certain area, and further determines which frequency is free and available. The second method is a sensing/detecting method, in which a sensing/detecting module of the CR system detects authorization system signals on different frequencies. When it is detected that an input parameter is greater than a threshold, the sensing/detecting module determines that an authorization system signal exists on a frequency and the frequency is not available to the CR system. Otherwise, the frequency is available to the CR system.
- There are three typical sensing algorithms (or referred to as detection algorithms) for detecting an authorized signal, i.e., energy detection, matched filter detection, and self-correlation detection. To achieve a certain detecting performance, any of the sensing algorithms has requirements on receiving and collecting time of a signal and a receiving carrier interference ratio of the signal.
- However, during the sensing detecting, since the CR system is also working on an authorized frequency, a signal of the CR system may interfere the sensing detecting on the authorization system signal. A commonly-used method is to configure a quiet period (also referred to as silence period). In this case, during the sensing detecting, the CR system stops sending any data on a corresponding frequency within the quiet period, so as to ensure that the frequency is not interfered. A typical quiet period mainly includes parameters such as a period cycle, the offset within the period cycle, and the duration of the quiet period, etc.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flowchart illustrating a process for configuring the quiet period. As shown inFIG. 1 , when a quiet period parameter is defined, the quiet period parameter is sent to a terminal. - As can be seen that the more frequently the sensing detecting is performed, i.e., the more frequent the quiet is, the greater the chance for discovering the authorization system is, the more timely the operation of exiting the frequency of the authorization system is performed, and the smaller the interference to the authorization system is. However, if the duration of the quiet period of the CR system is too long or the quiet is performed too often, the capacity of the CR system may be greatly affected, therefore there is no sense in using the white space frequency to improve the system capacity.
- Previous studies on the quiet period focus on how to configure and transfer the quiet period parameter among multiple terminals. However, the value of the quiet period parameter not only affects the interference to the authorization system and the capacity of the sensing system, but also affects the selection of the sensing algorithm, thereby affects the hardware complexity when the system is implemented. As such, the quiet period parameter may be reasonably configured, so as to reduce the interference to the authorization system and control the loss of the CR system.
-
US2011/263209A1 discloses a solution that an apparatus may listen for potential silent periods to occur in an environment, and if detected, the potential silent periods may be compared to quiet period criteria to determine if they are actual silent periods. If at least two subsequent actual silent periods are determined, the apparatus may adopt quiet timing and duration based on the actual silent periods. Alternatively, the apparatus may establish new quiet period timing and duration based on the quiet period criteria. - Various examples of the present disclosure describe a method and a device for configuring a quiet period in a CR system, so as to improve the rationality of configuration of the quiet period parameter of the CR system.
- Examples of the present disclosure describe a method for configuring a quiet period in a cognitive radio (CR) system, including:
- determining, by a base station, a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of a CR system;
- determining, by the base station, a sensing algorithm based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter;
- determining, by the base station, a value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm; and
- sending, by the base station, the value of the quiet period parameter to a terminal of the CR system;
- Examples of the present disclosure describe a base station device, including:
- a quiet period parameter value configuring module, to determine a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of a cognitive radio (CR) system, and determine a value of the quiet period parameter based on a sensing algorithm determined by a sensing algorithm selecting module;
- the sensing algorithm selecting module, to determine the sensing algorithm based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter; and
- a quiet period parameter sending module, to send the value of the quiet period parameter determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module to a terminal of the CR system;
- According to various examples of the present disclosure, the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system is determined, the sensing algorithm meeting the detecting performance requirement is determined based on the maximum value of the quiet period parameter, and the value of the quiet period parameter is revised based on the sensing algorithm. As such, the rationality of the configuration of the quiet period parameter of the CR system is improved and the capacity loss of the CR system is reduced when the interference to the authorization system is reduced.
-
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic flowchart illustrating a process for configuring a quiet period in the prior art. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a process for configuring a quiet period, according to an example of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a process for determining a sensing algorithm, according to an example of the present disclosure. -
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a structure of a base station device, according to an example of the present disclosure. - Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples.
- Hereinafter, the examples of the present disclosure are described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- As mentioned earlier, the quiet period parameters mainly include the duration of the quiet period and a cycle of the quiet period. For convenience of description, in various examples of the present disclosure, the cycle of the quiet period is represented by SilenceCycle, and the duration of the quiet period is represented by SilenceDuration.
-
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a process for configuring a quiet period, according to an example of the present disclosure. As shown inFIG. 2 , the process may include following operations. - At
block 201, a base station may determine a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of a CR system. - At
block 202, based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter determined atblock 201, the base station may determine a sensing algorithm. - At
block 203, the base station may determine a value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm determined atblock 202. - At
block 204, the base station may send the quiet period parameter determined atblock 203 to a terminal. - Afterwards, the base station and the terminal of the CR system perform a quiet procedure according to the quiet period parameter.
- At
block 201 of the process as shown inFIG. 2 , the base station may determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on maximum duration of interference which a radio authorization system may tolerate and maximum loss of capacity which the CR system may tolerate. - According to an example of the present disclosure, a constraint is proposed from the perspective of protecting the authorization system, i.e., the maximum duration of the interference which the authorization system may tolerate is T int erference, in order to reduce the interference to the authorization system resulting from the sensing detecting performed within the quiet period, a following requirement is required:
- According to another example of the present disclosure, a constraint is proposed from the perspective of protecting the CR system, i.e., a maximum loss ratio of the capacity which the CR system may tolerate may be defined as P% in a time domain, in order to minimize the capacity loss of the CR system, a following requirement is required:
-
- At
block 202 of the process as shown inFIG. 2 , minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the base station is not greater than the maximum value of SilenceDuration determined by the base station atblock 201. For a specific sensing detecting performance requirement, each sensing algorithm corresponds to a requirement on the minimum duration of the detecting time, i.e., corresponds to different requirements on the duration of the quiet period. For different detecting performances, a correspondence relationship between the sensing algorithm and the requirement on the minimum duration of the detecting time may be shown in Table 1.Table 1 A corresponding table of sensing detecting time required by the sensing algorithms under the sensing detecting performance requirements detecting performance requirement sensing algorithm requirement on the minimum duration of the detecting time requirement 1 sensing algorithm 1 T1,1 sensing algorithm 2 T1,2 ...... ...... requirement 2 sensing algorithm 1 T2,1 sensing algorithm 2 T2,2 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... - For a detecting performance requirement, a sensing algorithm meeting the requirement on the minimum duration of the quiet period is determined. According to an example of the present disclosure, when Tx ≤ SilenceDuration max (in which SilenceDuration max represents the maximum value of the duration of the quiet period), a sensing algorithm of which an index is x meets the detecting performance requirement. When there are multiple sensing algorithms meeting the detecting performance requirement, the base station may select, based on a predefined rule, a sensing algorithm from these sensing algorithms. When selecting from the multiple sensing algorithms meeting the detecting performance requirement, a sensing algorithm having minimum calculation complexity may be determined as the ultimate sensing algorithm, or a sensing algorithm having a minimum detecting time may be determined as the ultimate sensing algorithm, or the sensing algorithm may be determined by considering both of these two aspects.
- Based on the principle for determining the sensing algorithm as described above,
FIG. 3 illustrates a process for determining the sensing algorithm, according to an example of the present disclosure. As shown inFIG. 3 , the process may include following operations. - At
block 301, a detecting performance requirement may be determined. - At
block 302, whether minimum duration of detecting time required by each sensing algorithm is less than (or not greater than) a maximum value of SilenceDuration is determined. When a sensing algorithm meets the requirement, operations atblock 303 may be performed. Otherwise, operations atblock 307 may be performed. - At
block 303, the sensing algorithm meeting the requirement and a value of the minimum duration of the detecting time corresponding to the sensing algorithm are output. - At
block 304, whether there is another sensing algorithm meeting the requirement is determined. When there is the other sensing algorithm meeting the requirement, operations atblock 305 may be performed. Otherwise, operations atblock 306 may be performed. - At
block 305, a sensing algorithm may be selected from the sensing algorithms meeting the detecting performance requirement according to a predefined rule. - At
block 306, the ultimately-selected sensing algorithm and a value of the minimum duration of the detecting time corresponding to the sensing algorithm are output. - At
block 307, the detecting performance requirement is lowered, and the operations atblock 302 are performed. - At
block 203 of the process as shown inFIG. 2 , the base station configures a value of SilenceDuration as a value of the minimum duration of the detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined atblock 202. Based on the determined SilenceDuration , the base station configures SilenceCycle according to a following formula: - At
block 204 of the process as shown inFIG. 2 , the process that the base station sends the quiet period parameter to the terminal is similar to the implementation in the prior art. For example, the quiet period parameter is encapsulated into a dedicated channel or a common channel and transmitted to the terminal. - According to an example of the present disclosure, during the process of performing the quiet procedure by the base station and the terminal, a quiet timer Tsilence is introduced, so that the quiet procedure is performed based on the quiet timer. During the running period of Tsilence , the base station side and the terminal side stop transmitting/receiving of CR system data on a corresponding frequency and perform sensing detecting. When Tsilence is expired, the quiet procedure is ended and the normal data transmitting and receiving of the CR system is started.
- According to an example of the present disclosure, after the base station configures the quiet period parameter and the terminal receives the quiet period parameter sent from the base station, the base station and the terminal respectively configure the quiet timer Tsilence. In this case, a start cycle of Tsilence is SilenceCycle, and the timing duration of Tsilence is Silence Duration. Running of Tsilence is started at a moment meeting formula (6):
- As can be seen from the above description, according to the process for configuring the quiet period parameter described in various examples of the present disclosure, a range of values of the quiet period parameter is determined taking into account both the protection of the radio authorization system and the capacity loss of the CR system, so that the sensing algorithms are preliminarily filtered. The quiet period parameter is revised according to the sensing algorithm. As such, an appropriate sensing algorithm is selected and an appropriate quiet period parameter is determined in the case of controlling the interference to the authorization system, therefore the capacity loss of the CR system is greatly reduced.
- Based on the same technical concept, various examples of the present disclosure describe a base station device.
-
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a structure of the base station device, according to an example of the present disclosure. As shown inFIG. 4 , the base station device may include a quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401, a sensingalgorithm selecting module 402, and a quiet periodparameter sending module 403. - According to an example of the present disclosure, some system parameters and sensing algorithm parameters required during the process of configuring the quiet period parameter may be stored in storage modules of the base station device. These storage modules may include:
- a CR
system information database 404, configured to provide information of a CR system, e.g., provide capacity loss (P%) that a sensing system may tolerate to the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401 and provide other information related to the CR system, to assist other modules to make a decision; - an authorization
system information database 405, configured to provide system information of an authorization system, e.g., provide duration of interference (T int erference ) that the authorization system may tolerate to the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401 and provide other information, to assist corresponding modules of the CR system to make a decision; and - a sensing algorithm performance
information storage module 406, configured to store minimum duration of sensing detecting time associated with different sensing algorithms under different detecting performance requirements. - According to an example of the present disclosure, the authorization
system information database 405 may be located in the base station device, or located in a central control unit of the CR system so as to be accessed by multiple base stations of the CR system, or located outside the CR system in the form of a separate server which is maintained by a third party, the CR system may obtain an access right by paying costs. - The main functions of the modules may be described as follows.
- The quiet period parameter
value configuring module 401 may determine a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of the CR system, and send the maximum value of the quiet period parameter to the sensingalgorithm selecting module 402. The quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401 may determine a value of the quiet period parameter based on a sensing algorithm determined by the sensingalgorithm selecting module 402, and send the value of the quiet period parameter to the quiet periodparameter sending module 403. - The sensing
algorithm selecting module 402 may determine the sensing algorithm based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter, and send the determined sensing algorithm to the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401. - The quiet period
parameter sending module 403 may send the quiet period parameter determined by the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401 to a terminal of the CR system. - According to an example of the present disclosure, the quiet period parameter
value configuring module 401 may determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on maximum duration of interference that the radio authorization system may tolerate and maximum loss of capacity that the CR system may tolerate. For example, the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401 may determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on formulae (1) and (2), in which parameter P% is from the CRsystem information database 404, parameter T interference is from the authorizationsystem information database 405, and parameter M arg inTime is from the CRsystem information database 404. - According to an example of the present disclosure, minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the sensing
algorithm selecting module 402 is not greater than a maximum value of duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401. Further, when there are multiple sensing algorithms and minimum duration of detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms is not greater than the maximum value of the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module, the sensingalgorithm selecting module 402 may select a sensing algorithm from the multiple sensing algorithms based on calculation complexity of each of the multiple sensing algorithms and/or the minimum duration of the detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms. - According to an example of the present disclosure, when determining the value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm, the quiet period parameter
value configuring module 401 may configure the duration of the quiet period as the minimum duration of the detecting time required by the sensing algorithm. In this case, the sensing algorithm is the sensing algorithm determined by the base station. The quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401 may configure a cycle of the quiet period based on formula (5). - According to an example of the present disclosure, the base station device may further include a
timer configuring module 407. Thetimer configuring module 407 may configure a timer, so that the base station device performs a quiet procedure based on the timer. In this case, a start cycle of the timer is the cycle of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401, the timing duration of the timer is the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parametervalue configuring module 401, and a start moment of the timer satisfies formula (6). - Those skilled in the art can understand the modules in the device of example embodiments of the present disclosure may be located in the device as described in the example embodiments, or may be located in one or more devices of the example embodiments of the present disclosure when modified accordingly. The modules in examples of the present disclosure may be combined into one module, or may be further divided into multiple sub-modules.
- According to the description of the above examples, it can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art that the examples of the present disclosure can be implemented by software accompanying with necessary general hardware platforms, or by hardware. Based on this, the essential parts of the technical solution mentioned above or the part contributed to the prior art can be presented in the form of a software product. The software product may be stored in a storage medium, and includes a plurality of machine-readable instructions for making a terminal device (which can be a mobile phone, a personal computer, a server, or a network device) implement methods recited in the examples of the present disclosure.
- The above are several examples of the present disclosure, and are not used for limiting the protection scope of the present disclosure.
Claims (14)
- A method for configuring a quiet period in a cognitive radio ,CR, system, comprising:determining (201), by a base station, a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of a CR system;determining (202), by the base station, a sensing algorithm based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter;determining (203), by the base station, a value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm; andsending (204), by the base station, the value of the quiet period parameter to a terminal of the CR system;wherein the determined sensing algorithm meets (303) the detecting performance requirement and requires a minimum duration of detection time not greater than the maximum value of the quiet period parameter.
- The method of claim 1, wherein the operation of determining, by the base station, the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises:determining, by the base station, the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on maximum duration of interference which a radio authorization system tolerates and maximum loss of capacity which the CR system tolerates.
- The method of claim 2, wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises a cycle of a quiet period and duration of the quiet period; and
the base station determines a maximum value of the cycle of the quiet period and a maximum value of the duration of the quiet period based on following formulae: - The method of claim 1, wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises duration of a quiet period, and minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the base station is not greater than a maximum value of the duration of the quiet period determined by the base station.
- The method of claim 4, further comprising:when there are multiple sensing algorithms and minimum duration of detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms is not greater than the maximum value of the duration of the quiet period determined by the base station, selecting, by the base station, a sensing algorithm from the multiple sensing algorithms based on at least one of calculation complexity of each of the multiple sensing algorithms and the minimum duration of the detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms.
- The method of claim 1, wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises a cycle of a quiet period and duration of the quiet period;
the operation of determining, by the base station, the value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm comprises:configuring, by the base station, a value of the duration of the quiet period as a value of minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the base station; andwherein SilenceCycle is the cycle of the quiet period, SilenceDuration is the duration of the quiet period of which the value is equal to the value of the minimum duration of the detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the base station, M arg inTime is reserved time for other operations of the CR system after a radio authorization system is detected, and T int erference is maximum duration of interference which the radio authorization system tolerates. - The method of claim 1, further comprising:after the base station determines the value of the quiet period parameter and the terminal receives the value of the quiet period parameter sent from the base station, configuring, respectively by the base station and the terminal, a timer, and performing a quiet procedure based on the timer;wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises a cycle of a quiet period and duration of the quiet period, a start cycle of the timer is the cycle of the quiet period determined by the base station, timing duration of the timer is the duration of the quiet period determined by the base station, and a start moment of the timer satisfies a following formula:
- A base station device, comprising:a quiet period parameter value configuring module (401), to determine a maximum value of a quiet period parameter of a cognitive radio, CR, system, and determine a value of the quiet period parameter based on a sensing algorithm determined by a sensing algorithm selecting module (402); the sensing algorithm selecting module, to determine the sensing algorithm based on a detecting performance requirement and the maximum value of the quiet period parameter; anda quiet period parameter sending module (403), to send the value of the quiet period parameter determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module to a terminal of the CR system;wherein the determined sensing algorithm meets the detecting performance requirement and requires a minimum duration of detection time not greater than the maximum value of the quiet period parameter.
- The base station device of claim 8, wherein the quiet period parameter value configuring module is further to determine the maximum value of the quiet period parameter of the CR system based on maximum duration of interference which a radio authorization system tolerates and maximum loss of capacity which the CR system tolerates.
- The base station device of claim 9, wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises a cycle of a quiet period and duration of the quiet period; and
the quiet period parameter value configuring module is further to determine a maximum value of the cycle of the quiet period and a maximum value of the duration of the quiet period based on following formulae: - The base station device of claim 8, wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises duration of a quiet period, and minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the sensing algorithm selecting module is not greater than a maximum value of the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module.
- The base station device of claim 11, wherein when there are multiple sensing algorithms and minimum duration of detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms is not greater than the maximum value of the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module, the sensing algorithm selecting module is further to select a sensing algorithm from the multiple sensing algorithms based on at least one of calculation complexity of each of the multiple sensing algorithms and the minimum duration of the detecting time required by each of the multiple sensing algorithms.
- The base station device of claim 8, wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises a cycle of a quiet period and duration of the quiet period;
when determining the value of the quiet period parameter based on the sensing algorithm, the quiet period parameter value configuring module is further to:configure a value of the duration of the quiet period as a value of minimum duration of detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the sensing algorithm selecting module; andwherein SilenceCycle is the cycle of the quiet period, Silence Duration is the duration of the quiet period of which the value is equal to the value of the minimum duration of the detecting time required by the sensing algorithm determined by the sensing algorithm selecting module, M arg inTime is reserved time for other operations of the CR system after a radio authorization system is detected, and T interference is maximum duration of interference which the radio authorization system tolerates. - The base station device of claim 8, further comprising:a timer configuring module (407), to configure a timer, wherein the base station device performs a quiet procedure based on the timer;wherein the quiet period parameter of the CR system comprises a cycle of a quiet period and duration of the quiet period, a start cycle of the timer is the cycle of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module, timing duration of the timer is the duration of the quiet period determined by the quiet period parameter value configuring module, and a start moment of the timer satisfies a following formula:
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201210039077.0A CN102547749B (en) | 2012-02-20 | 2012-02-20 | Method and device for setting silence interval of cognitive radio (CR) system |
PCT/CN2013/071339 WO2013123852A1 (en) | 2012-02-20 | 2013-02-04 | Silence region setting method and device thereof for cognitive radio system |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2819449A1 EP2819449A1 (en) | 2014-12-31 |
EP2819449A4 EP2819449A4 (en) | 2015-07-01 |
EP2819449B1 true EP2819449B1 (en) | 2016-07-27 |
Family
ID=46353451
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13751607.6A Active EP2819449B1 (en) | 2012-02-20 | 2013-02-04 | Silence region setting method and device thereof for cognitive radio system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9936392B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2819449B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102547749B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013123852A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102547749B (en) * | 2012-02-20 | 2015-03-11 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Method and device for setting silence interval of cognitive radio (CR) system |
CN103973378B (en) * | 2013-02-06 | 2016-01-06 | 电信科学技术研究院 | A kind of perception detection method based on cognitive radio system and system |
US9578650B2 (en) * | 2013-09-04 | 2017-02-21 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Coordinated scheduling with adaptive muting |
US10045368B2 (en) * | 2015-12-02 | 2018-08-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Uplink channel selection using channel interference tolerance level feedback for grantless data transmission |
US10779126B2 (en) * | 2018-07-13 | 2020-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for PRS muting in a fifth generation wireless network |
CN117998536A (en) * | 2022-11-03 | 2024-05-07 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Information transmission method, base station, terminal and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101878664B (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2014-07-23 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Distributed scheduling of quiet-period for in-service channel monitoring |
TWI458284B (en) * | 2007-12-07 | 2014-10-21 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Multiple channel support in distributed wireless systems |
US8315645B2 (en) * | 2008-07-01 | 2012-11-20 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and method for scheduling of spectrum sensing in cognitive radio systems |
CN101677257B (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2013-09-11 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, device and system for obtaining silent period parameters |
US8699430B2 (en) * | 2008-10-10 | 2014-04-15 | The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for dynamic spectrum access |
KR101536921B1 (en) * | 2009-01-07 | 2015-07-15 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for synchronizing quiet period in cognitive radio system |
JP5571699B2 (en) * | 2009-02-27 | 2014-08-13 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェ | Scheduling and protection of silence periods in silence zones against incumbent signal detection |
US20100232380A1 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2010-09-16 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | System and method for utilizing spectrum operation modes in dynamic spectrum access systems |
JP2013511240A (en) * | 2009-11-16 | 2013-03-28 | インターデイジタル パテント ホールディングス インコーポレイテッド | Silent period adjustment for Dynamic Spectrum Manager (DSM) |
US8774209B2 (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2014-07-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and method for spectrum sharing using listen-before-talk with quiet periods |
US20110263209A1 (en) * | 2010-04-22 | 2011-10-27 | Nokia Corporation | Quiet period formation and maintenance in radio systems |
US8983484B2 (en) * | 2010-11-05 | 2015-03-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Methods and devices for intersystem quiet period synchronization |
CN103202084B (en) * | 2010-11-05 | 2018-01-16 | 交互数字专利控股公司 | Quiet period method and apparatus for Dynamic Spectrum Management |
CN102547749B (en) * | 2012-02-20 | 2015-03-11 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Method and device for setting silence interval of cognitive radio (CR) system |
-
2012
- 2012-02-20 CN CN201210039077.0A patent/CN102547749B/en active Active
-
2013
- 2013-02-04 WO PCT/CN2013/071339 patent/WO2013123852A1/en active Application Filing
- 2013-02-04 US US14/375,807 patent/US9936392B2/en active Active
- 2013-02-04 EP EP13751607.6A patent/EP2819449B1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9936392B2 (en) | 2018-04-03 |
CN102547749A (en) | 2012-07-04 |
EP2819449A1 (en) | 2014-12-31 |
EP2819449A4 (en) | 2015-07-01 |
CN102547749B (en) | 2015-03-11 |
US20150003273A1 (en) | 2015-01-01 |
WO2013123852A1 (en) | 2013-08-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2819449B1 (en) | Silence region setting method and device thereof for cognitive radio system | |
US11032761B2 (en) | Method and device for selecting camping cell | |
EP2717499B1 (en) | Method and device for acquiring idle frequency spectrum | |
CN100433589C (en) | Method for establishing communication channel to reduce interference of inter communication system and communication control equipment | |
US8879576B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for unlicensed band operation | |
EP3226445A1 (en) | Channel detection method and system, device having functions of base station, and terminal | |
US8270355B2 (en) | Radio communication control device, radio communication control system, radio communication control method, radio communication control program and recording medium | |
US11510159B2 (en) | Signal transmission method, network device, and terminal device | |
CN104955053B (en) | Wireless communication control method and device | |
CN105704819A (en) | Systems and methods for LTE and WLAN coexistence | |
EP3231096B1 (en) | Intelligent skipping of interfering frequency measurements in ue measurement gaps | |
EP3941152B1 (en) | Signal transmission method and device | |
US20210400581A1 (en) | Terminal wake-up control method, device and storage medium | |
US20160249226A1 (en) | Wireless communication method and apparatus | |
US20210250792A1 (en) | Wireless Communication Method and Terminal Device | |
CN106455108B (en) | listen-before-talk method and device | |
CN101754234B (en) | Opportunistic spectrum access method based on Markov chain and CSMA | |
US20160316376A1 (en) | Method, System, and Device for Downlink Transmission | |
CN104012007A (en) | Wireless communication apparatus | |
CN103458435A (en) | Interference channel avoidance method for common-frequency networking base stations | |
CN105516993A (en) | Spectrum resource distribution method and apparatus in cognitive network | |
CN102457889B (en) | A kind of method and device reducing the common equipment interference of LTE and ISM | |
CN106793106B (en) | uplink signal configuration method, sending method, base station and user terminal | |
CN103634858B (en) | A kind of switching method of user equipment, base station, user equipment and switching system | |
AU2017445534A1 (en) | Wireless communication method, network device, and terminal device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140904 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20150603 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H04W 16/14 20090101AFI20150528BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160216 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 816661 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602013009913 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 816661 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161127 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161027 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161128 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602013009913 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161027 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170502 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170204 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602013009913 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: DATANG MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT CO., LT, CN Free format text: FORMER OWNER: CHINA ACADEMY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, BEIJING, CN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20210729 AND 20210804 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240219 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240219 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240221 Year of fee payment: 12 |