EP2804401B1 - Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol - Google Patents

Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2804401B1
EP2804401B1 EP13167842.7A EP13167842A EP2804401B1 EP 2804401 B1 EP2804401 B1 EP 2804401B1 EP 13167842 A EP13167842 A EP 13167842A EP 2804401 B1 EP2804401 B1 EP 2804401B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hearing instrument
broadcasted
message
transmitter
broadcasted message
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13167842.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2804401A1 (en
Inventor
Brian Dam Pedersen
Peter Siegumfeldt
Hans Henrik Bjørstrup
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GN Hearing AS
Original Assignee
GN Hearing AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GN Hearing AS filed Critical GN Hearing AS
Priority to EP13167842.7A priority Critical patent/EP2804401B1/en
Priority to DK13167842.7T priority patent/DK2804401T3/en
Priority to US13/896,256 priority patent/US10652673B2/en
Priority to JP2014100754A priority patent/JP6050278B2/en
Priority to CN201410242451.6A priority patent/CN104168531B/en
Publication of EP2804401A1 publication Critical patent/EP2804401A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2804401B1 publication Critical patent/EP2804401B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/55Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using an external connection, either wireless or wired
    • H04R25/554Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using an external connection, either wireless or wired using a wireless connection, e.g. between microphone and amplifier or using Tcoils
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/43Electronic input selection or mixing based on input signal analysis, e.g. mixing or selection between microphone and telecoil or between microphones with different directivity characteristics
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/55Communication between hearing aids and external devices via a network for data exchange
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/61Aspects relating to mechanical or electronic switches or control elements, e.g. functioning
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/40Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
    • H04R25/405Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic by combining a plurality of transducers

Definitions

  • a new hearing instrument is provided with a receiver configured for reception of a broadcasted message and an authenticator configured for authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message, and wherein the new hearing instrument is further configured for converting the broadcasted message into an acoustic signal for transmission towards an eardrum of a user of the new hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  • hearing aids are capable of presenting sound received from various sources to a user of the hearing aid.
  • sources include mobile phones, radios, media players, companion microphones, broadcasting systems, e.g. used in a public place, e.g. in a church, an auditorium, a theatre, a cinema, etc., public address systems, e.g. used in a railway station, an airport, a shopping mall, etc., etc.
  • hearing aids For example, it is well known to use a telecoil to magnetically pick up audio signals generated, e.g., by telephones, FM systems (with neck loops), and induction loop systems (also called “hearing loops"), whereby sound may be transmitted to hearing aids with a high signal to noise ratio. More recently, hearing aids have been equipped with radio circuits for reception of radio signals, e.g. replacing or supplementing telecoils, for reception of streamed audio in general, such as streamed music and speech from media players, such as MP3-players, TV-sets, etc. Hearing aids have also emerged that connect with various sources of audio signals through a short-range network, e.g. including Bluetooth technology, e.g. to interconnect the hearing aid with cellular phones, audio headsets, computer laptops, personal digital assistants, digital cameras, etc. Other radio networks have also been suggested, namely HomeRF, DECT, PHS, Wireless LAN (WLAN), or other proprietary networks.
  • WLAN Wireless LAN
  • EP2337377 discloses an assistive listening system suitable for servicing a multitude of body worn listening devices in a wireless environment.
  • broadcasted messages such as public announcements, e.g. train, ship or flight departures or delays, with certainty that the transmitter of the broadcasted messages is authentic.
  • a method of authenticating broadcasted messages is also provided.
  • the hearing instrument may be a hearing aid, such as a BTE, RIE, ITE, ITC, CIC, etc, a binaural hearing aid; an Ear-Hook, In-Ear, On-Ear, Over-the-Ear, Behind-the-Neck, Helmet, Headguard, etc, headset, headphone, earphone, ear defender, earmuff, etc.
  • the broadcasted message may be a text message that is converted into speech in the hearing instrument.
  • the broadcasted message is a spoken message.
  • a broadcasted message is a message that can be received by a plurality of receivers in any form it may take from generation of the message, e.g.
  • the acoustic output from a human making an announcement to transmission towards an eardrum of a user of the hearing, including the digitized message in a form suitable for wireless transmission and in a form suitable for signal processing in the hearing instrument.
  • the hearing instrument may be configured for muting at least one other signal received by the hearing instrument, for example the signal from the microphone(s) of the hearing instrument, during transmission of the broadcasted message towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument, upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message. In this way, the user is allowed to concentrate on announcements while possible distractions are reduced.
  • the hearing instrument may be configured for ignoring the broadcasted message upon failed authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message, so that the hearing instrument user will not be bothered with messages from unauthorized transmitters.
  • the hearing instrument may have a mixer with an input connected to an output of the radio receiving the broadcasted message and other inputs connected to other transmitters of audio signals, such as microphone(s) of the hearing instrument, and an output providing an audio signal that is a weighted combination of the audio signals input to the mixer.
  • muting may be performed by setting the weights of other signals than the broadcasted message to zero.
  • ignoring messages from unauthorized transmitters may be performed by setting the weight of the broadcasted message to zero.
  • the hearing instrument may be configured to adjust the weights of the mixer so that other signals currently transmitted to the user are attenuated during transmission of the broadcasted message to the user so that the broadcasted message can be clearly heard by the user without the user simultaneously loosing connection with other signals received by the hearing instrument. For example, attenuation of acoustic signals from the surroundings of the user received by a microphone of the hearing instrument during transmission of the broadcasted message, allows the user to stay connected with the surroundings while simultaneously listening to the broadcasted message.
  • the hearing instrument may simultaneously receive more than one authenticated broadcasted message; i.e. one or more broadcasted messages may be received during ongoing reception of a previous broadcasted message, whereby more than one authenticated broadcasted message may overlap fully or partly in time.
  • broadcasted messages may have assigned priorities and may be transmitted together with information on the priority, e.g. an integer, e.g. larger than or equal to 1, e.g. the lower the integer, the higher the priority.
  • Alarm messages may for example have the highest priority, while traffic announcements may have the second highest priority, and possible commercials may have the lowest priority.
  • Successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be presented to the hearing instrument user one at the time in their order of priority, e.g. an authenticated broadcasted message of highest priority may be transmitted to the hearing instrument user without delay, while other broadcasted messages are stored intermediately for subsequent presentation to the hearing instrument user in their order of priority.
  • successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be presented to the hearing instrument user one at the time in the same order in which they have been received by the hearing instrument.
  • successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be transmitted to the user of the hearing instrument with substantially unchanged timing with relation to each other.
  • the mixer may treat each individual successfully authenticated broadcasted message as a separate input to the mixer similar to other audio transmitters input to the mixer as explained above.
  • the individual successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be weighted in the mixer, e.g. according to their priority.
  • the hearing instrument may be configured to always mute one or more other signals received by the hearing instrument during transmission of a broadcasted message of highest priority towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  • the hearing instrument may have a user interface, e.g. a push button, a remote control, etc. so that the user can switch muting of other signals on and off as desired in order to be able to or not be able to, respectively, continue to listen to other sound signals while receiving a broadcast, as desired.
  • a user interface e.g. a push button, a remote control, etc.
  • the user interface may further include means for user adjustment of the weights of the combination of the input audio signals, such as a dial, or a push button for incremental adjustment.
  • an electronic signature uniquely identifying the transmitter of the broadcasted message may be included in the broadcasted message.
  • the electronic signature is encrypted for secure authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  • the electronic signature may include a digital certificate issued by a certificate authority.
  • the electronic signature may include a hash code, such as a message authentication code, in order for the hearing instrument to be able to authenticate the transmitter of the broadcasted message in a cryptographically simple way.
  • a hash code such as a message authentication code
  • Signal processing in the new hearing instrument may be performed by dedicated hardware or may be performed in one or more signal processors, or performed in a combination of dedicated hardware and one or more signal processors.
  • processor As used herein, the terms "processor”, “signal processor”, etc., are intended to refer to CPU-related entities, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution.
  • a "processor”, “signal processor”, etc. may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable file, a thread of execution, and/or a program.
  • processor designate both an application running on a processor and a hardware processor.
  • processors may reside within a process and/or thread of execution, and one or more "processors”, “signal processors”, etc., or any combination hereof, may be localized on one hardware processor, possibly in combination with other hardware circuitry, and/or distributed between two or more hardware processors, possibly in combination with other hardware circuitry.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates exemplary hearing instrument circuitry 10 of the new hearing instrument.
  • the illustrated new hearing instrument is a hearing aid that may be of any suitable mechanical design, e.g. to be worn in the ear canal, or partly in the ear canal, behind the ear or in the concha, such as the well-known types: BTE, ITE, ITC, CIC, etc.
  • the illustrated hearing instrument circuitry 10 comprises a front microphone 12 and a rear microphone 14 for conversion of an acoustic sound signal from the surroundings into corresponding microphone audio signals 16, 18 output by the microphones 14, 16.
  • the microphone audio signals 16, 18 are digitized in respective A/D converters 20, 22 for conversion of the respective microphone audio signals 16, 18 into respective digital microphone audio signals 24, 26 that are optionally pre-filtered (pre-filters not shown) and combined in signal combiner 28, for example for formation of a digital microphone audio signal 30 with directionality as is well-known in the art of hearing instruments.
  • the digital microphone audio signal 30 is input to the mixer 32 configured to output a weighted sum 34 of signals input to the mixer 32.
  • the mixer output 34 is input to a hearing loss processor 36 configured to generate a hearing loss compensated output signal 38 based on the mixer output 34.
  • the hearing loss compensated output signal 38 is input to a receiver 40 for conversion into acoustic sound for transmission towards an eardrum (not shown) of a user of the hearing instrument.
  • the illustrated hearing instrument circuitry 10 is further configured to receive digital audio from various transmitters, such as mobile phones, radios, media players, companion microphones, broadcasting systems, such as in a public place, e.g. in a church, an auditorium, a theatre, a cinema, etc., public address systems, such as in a railway station, an airport, a shopping mall, etc., etc.
  • various transmitters such as mobile phones, radios, media players, companion microphones, broadcasting systems, such as in a public place, e.g. in a church, an auditorium, a theatre, a cinema, etc., public address systems, such as in a railway station, an airport, a shopping mall, etc., etc.
  • digital audio including broadcasted spoken messages
  • the radio receiver retrieves the digital data 46 from the received radio signal, including the digital audio, possible transmitter identifiers, possible network control signals, etc.
  • Signal extractor 48 extracts the digital audio 50 from the received digital data 46 and forwards the digital audio 50 to the mixer 32.
  • the digital audio 50 may include audio from a plurality of sources and thus, the digital audio 50 may form a plurality of input signals for the mixer 32, one input signal for each source of audio.
  • digital data of the broadcasted message also contains data 52 relating to the identity of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  • the signal extractor 48 extracts these data 52 from the digital data and forwards them to authenticator 54 that is configured to authenticate the transmitter of the broadcasted message as will be further explained below.
  • Output authentication signal 56 forms a control input to the mixer 32 for control of the weights of the sum of mixer input signals.
  • the corresponding weight is set to zero in the mixer 32 so that the broadcasted message 62 is not transmitted to the user; rather the broadcasted message 62 is ignored.
  • the broadcasted message is transmitted to the user while the other signals are attenuated during transmission of the broadcasted message.
  • the other signals may also be muted.
  • the user may enter a command through a user interface of the hearing instrument of a type well-known in the art, controlling whether the other signals are muted or attenuated.
  • the hearing instrument may simultaneously receive more than one authenticated broadcasted message; i.e. one or more broadcasted messages may be received during ongoing reception of a previous broadcasted message, whereby more than one authenticated broadcasted message may overlap fully or partly in time.
  • broadcasted messages may have assigned priorities and may be transmitted together with information on the priority, e.g. an integer, e.g. larger than or equal to 1, e.g. the lower the integer, the higher the priority.
  • Alarm messages may for example have the highest priority, while traffic announcements may have the second highest priority, and possible commercials may have the lowest priority.
  • Successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be handled by the mixer 32 as separate inputs like the other inputs to the mixer, whereby the mixer includes the individual broadcasted messages in the weighted sum of inputs output to the processor 36, whereby the broadcasted messages are transmitted to the user with substantially unchanged timing with relation to each other.
  • successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be transmitted to the hearing instrument user one at the time.
  • the mixer 32 may have memories for storage of broadcasted messages received during ongoing reception of a previous broadcasted message. Stored broadcasted messages may then be input to the mixer subsequent to finalized output of the previous broadcasted message of the mixer 32 in the same order in which they have been received by the hearing instrument; or, in order of priority, for inclusion in the output of the mixer 32 provided that the broadcasted message in question is successfully authenticated.
  • the hearing instrument may be configured to always mute one or more other signals received by the hearing instrument during transmission of a broadcasted message of highest priority towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates exemplary principles of operation of the authenticator 54 shown in Fig. 1 .
  • the transmitter 60 of broadcasted messages 62 may emit aural messages, such as departure announcements in an airport.
  • the broadcasted message 62 is transmitted wirelessly and in digital form to a plurality of receivers.
  • the message 62 is illustrated in digital form in Fig. 2 .
  • a message authentication algorithm 64 is used to calculate a message authentication code (MAC) 66 from the digitized message 62 in order to authenticate the transmitter 60 of the message 62 and thereby reduce the risk of spoofing.
  • the MAC algorithm 64 implements a cryptographic hash function having a private key as one input and a message of arbitrary length as another input.
  • the MAC algorithm 64 outputs a MAC 66, for example as specified in the various existing standards, such as ISO/IEC 9797-1 and -2 that define MAC algorithms.
  • the message 62 and the MAC 66 are then transmitted together wirelessly as indicated at 68 to various receivers, one of which resides in one of the new hearing instruments.
  • the authenticator 54 of the new hearing instrument inputs the received message 62 to the same MAC algorithm 64 as used by the transmitter 60 and uses the same private key to calculate a MAC 72 in the authenticator 54.
  • the authenticator 54 compares the transmitted MAC 66 to the MAC 72 calculated in the authenticator 54, and If the two MACs are identical, the transmitter 60 of the broadcasted message 62 is authenticated, and so is the message 62, since the private keys and the messages input to the MAC algorithms 64, respectively, have to be identical in order to generate identical MAC codes 66, 72.
  • the output 56 of the authenticator 54 is used to control the weights of the mixer 32 in response to the result of the authentication process as already explained with reference to Fig. 1 .
  • the authentication process illustrated in principle in Fig. 2 is relatively simple and suitable for implementation in a hearing instrument.
  • the private key has to be distributed to all possible receivers of broadcasted messages from the transmitter in question. Obviously, the distribution of the private key has to be performed with care, since anyone in possession of the private key will be able to generate messages that will be successfully authenticated in the new hearing instruments.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates another exemplary principle of operation of the authenticator 54 shown in Fig. 1 in which the private key is only in possession of the authentic transmitter.
  • the transmitter 80 of broadcasted messages 82 may emit aural messages, such as departure announcements in an airport.
  • the broadcasted message 82 is transmitted wirelessly and in digital form to a plurality of receivers.
  • the message 82 is illustrated in digital form in Fig. 3 .
  • the message 82 is authenticated using an asymmetric encryption scheme, e.g. a digital signature scheme, with a key pair in which one key is the private key that is in possession of the transmitter 80 to be authenticated.
  • the private key is used to encrypt the message 82 into a digital signature 88.
  • the other key is a public key that is distributed to the intended receivers of messages broadcasted by the transmitter 80 and used to decrypt the digital signature for authentication.
  • a hashing algorithm 84 calculates a hash code from the digital message 82 and outputs the hash code to an encryption algorithm 86 that uses the private key to encrypt the hash code into a digital signature 88 in order to authenticate the transmitter 80 of the message 82 and thereby reduce the risk of spoofing.
  • the message 82 and the digital signature 88 are then transmitted together wirelessly as indicated at 90 to various receivers, one of which resides in one of the new hearing instruments.
  • the authenticator 54 of the new hearing instrument inputs the received message 82 to the same hashing function 84 as used by the transmitter 80 to calculate a hash code 94 in the authenticator 54. Further, the authenticator 54 uses decryption algorithm 96 with the public key to decrypt the digital signature 88 into the hash code 98.
  • the authenticator 54 compares the hash code 94 with the hash code 98, and if the hash codes 94, 98 are identical, the transmitter 80 of the broadcasted message 82 is authenticated, and so is the message 82, since the private key has to be used in order for the public key to decrypt the digital signature 88 into the correct hash code 98, and the received and transmitted messages have to be identical for the hashing algorithm 84 to output the same hash code.
  • the output 56 of the authenticator 54 is used to control the weights of the mixer 32 in response to the result of the authentication process as already explained with reference to Fig. 1 .
  • the authentication scheme of Fig. 3 is somewhat more complex than the authentication scheme of Fig. 2 ; however the authentication scheme of Fig. 3 does not require distribution of a private key.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Headphones And Earphones (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY
  • A new hearing instrument is provided with a receiver configured for reception of a broadcasted message and an authenticator configured for authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message, and wherein the new hearing instrument is further configured for converting the broadcasted message into an acoustic signal for transmission towards an eardrum of a user of the new hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Recently hearing aids have emerged that are capable of presenting sound received from various sources to a user of the hearing aid. Examples of sources include mobile phones, radios, media players, companion microphones, broadcasting systems, e.g. used in a public place, e.g. in a church, an auditorium, a theatre, a cinema, etc., public address systems, e.g. used in a railway station, an airport, a shopping mall, etc., etc.
  • For example, it is well known to use a telecoil to magnetically pick up audio signals generated, e.g., by telephones, FM systems (with neck loops), and induction loop systems (also called "hearing loops"), whereby sound may be transmitted to hearing aids with a high signal to noise ratio. More recently, hearing aids have been equipped with radio circuits for reception of radio signals, e.g. replacing or supplementing telecoils, for reception of streamed audio in general, such as streamed music and speech from media players, such as MP3-players, TV-sets, etc. Hearing aids have also emerged that connect with various sources of audio signals through a short-range network, e.g. including Bluetooth technology, e.g. to interconnect the hearing aid with cellular phones, audio headsets, computer laptops, personal digital assistants, digital cameras, etc. Other radio networks have also been suggested, namely HomeRF, DECT, PHS, Wireless LAN (WLAN), or other proprietary networks.
  • EP2337377 discloses an assistive listening system suitable for servicing a multitude of body worn listening devices in a wireless environment.
  • SUMMARY
  • In some situations, for example in a public place, it is desirable for a user wearing a hearing instrument to be able to listen to broadcasted messages, such as public announcements, e.g. train, ship or flight departures or delays, with certainty that the transmitter of the broadcasted messages is authentic.
  • Thus, there is a need for a hearing instrument capable of authentication of a transmitter of broadcasted messages.
  • Accordingly, a new hearing instrument, according to the subject-matter of claim 1, is provided.
  • A method of authenticating broadcasted messages, according to the subject-matter of claim 13, is also provided.
  • Further, a broadcasting system, according to the subject-matter of claim 15, is provided.
  • The hearing instrument may be a hearing aid, such as a BTE, RIE, ITE, ITC, CIC, etc, a binaural hearing aid; an Ear-Hook, In-Ear, On-Ear, Over-the-Ear, Behind-the-Neck, Helmet, Headguard, etc, headset, headphone, earphone, ear defender, earmuff, etc. The broadcasted message may be a text message that is converted into speech in the hearing instrument. Preferably, the broadcasted message is a spoken message. Throughout the present disclosure a broadcasted message is a message that can be received by a plurality of receivers in any form it may take from generation of the message, e.g. the acoustic output from a human making an announcement, to transmission towards an eardrum of a user of the hearing, including the digitized message in a form suitable for wireless transmission and in a form suitable for signal processing in the hearing instrument. The hearing instrument may be configured for muting at least one other signal received by the hearing instrument, for example the signal from the microphone(s) of the hearing instrument, during transmission of the broadcasted message towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument, upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message. In this way, the user is allowed to concentrate on announcements while possible distractions are reduced.
  • The hearing instrument may be configured for ignoring the broadcasted message upon failed authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message, so that the hearing instrument user will not be bothered with messages from unauthorized transmitters.
  • The hearing instrument may have a mixer with an input connected to an output of the radio receiving the broadcasted message and other inputs connected to other transmitters of audio signals, such as microphone(s) of the hearing instrument, and an output providing an audio signal that is a weighted combination of the audio signals input to the mixer.
  • In the mixer, muting may be performed by setting the weights of other signals than the broadcasted message to zero.
  • In the mixer, ignoring messages from unauthorized transmitters may be performed by setting the weight of the broadcasted message to zero.
  • In the event that the authenticator does successfully authenticate the transmitter of the broadcasted message, the hearing instrument may be configured to adjust the weights of the mixer so that other signals currently transmitted to the user are attenuated during transmission of the broadcasted message to the user so that the broadcasted message can be clearly heard by the user without the user simultaneously loosing connection with other signals received by the hearing instrument. For example, attenuation of acoustic signals from the surroundings of the user received by a microphone of the hearing instrument during transmission of the broadcasted message, allows the user to stay connected with the surroundings while simultaneously listening to the broadcasted message.
  • The hearing instrument may simultaneously receive more than one authenticated broadcasted message; i.e. one or more broadcasted messages may be received during ongoing reception of a previous broadcasted message, whereby more than one authenticated broadcasted message may overlap fully or partly in time.
  • Such a situation may be handled in various ways. For example, broadcasted messages may have assigned priorities and may be transmitted together with information on the priority, e.g. an integer, e.g. larger than or equal to 1, e.g. the lower the integer, the higher the priority. Alarm messages may for example have the highest priority, while traffic announcements may have the second highest priority, and possible commercials may have the lowest priority.
  • Successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be presented to the hearing instrument user one at the time in their order of priority, e.g. an authenticated broadcasted message of highest priority may be transmitted to the hearing instrument user without delay, while other broadcasted messages are stored intermediately for subsequent presentation to the hearing instrument user in their order of priority.
  • Alternatively, successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be presented to the hearing instrument user one at the time in the same order in which they have been received by the hearing instrument.
  • Alternatively, successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be transmitted to the user of the hearing instrument with substantially unchanged timing with relation to each other. The mixer may treat each individual successfully authenticated broadcasted message as a separate input to the mixer similar to other audio transmitters input to the mixer as explained above. The individual successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be weighted in the mixer, e.g. according to their priority.
  • The hearing instrument may be configured to always mute one or more other signals received by the hearing instrument during transmission of a broadcasted message of highest priority towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  • The hearing instrument may have a user interface, e.g. a push button, a remote control, etc. so that the user can switch muting of other signals on and off as desired in order to be able to or not be able to, respectively, continue to listen to other sound signals while receiving a broadcast, as desired.
  • The user interface may further include means for user adjustment of the weights of the combination of the input audio signals, such as a dial, or a push button for incremental adjustment.
  • In order for the hearing instrument to be able to authenticate the transmitter of a broadcasted message, an electronic signature uniquely identifying the transmitter of the broadcasted message may be included in the broadcasted message.
  • Preferably, the electronic signature is encrypted for secure authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  • The electronic signature may include a digital certificate issued by a certificate authority.
  • The electronic signature may include a hash code, such as a message authentication code, in order for the hearing instrument to be able to authenticate the transmitter of the broadcasted message in a cryptographically simple way.
  • Signal processing in the new hearing instrument may be performed by dedicated hardware or may be performed in one or more signal processors, or performed in a combination of dedicated hardware and one or more signal processors.
  • As used herein, the terms "processor", "signal processor", etc., are intended to refer to CPU-related entities, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution.
  • For example, a "processor", "signal processor", etc., may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable file, a thread of execution, and/or a program.
  • By way of illustration, the terms "processor", "signal processor", etc., designate both an application running on a processor and a hardware processor. One or more "processors", "signal processors", and the like, or any combination hereof, may reside within a process and/or thread of execution, and one or more "processors", "signal processors", etc., or any combination hereof, may be localized on one hardware processor, possibly in combination with other hardware circuitry, and/or distributed between two or more hardware processors, possibly in combination with other hardware circuitry.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the following, preferred embodiments of the new hearing instrument are explained in more detail with reference to the drawing, wherein:
    • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates electronic circuitry of the new hearing instrument,
    • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates operation of the authenticator utilizing message authentication codes, and
    • Fig. 3 schematically illustrates operation of the authenticator utilizing digital certificates.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The new method and hearing instrument will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which various examples of the new method and hearing instrument are illustrated. The new method and hearing instrument according to the appended claims may, however, be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the examples set forth herein. Rather, these examples are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the appended claims to those skilled in the art.
  • It should be noted that the accompanying drawings are schematic and simplified for clarity, and they merely show details which are essential to the understanding of the new method and hearing instrument, while other details have been left out.
  • Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. Like elements will, thus, not be described in detail with respect to the description of each figure.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates exemplary hearing instrument circuitry 10 of the new hearing instrument. The illustrated new hearing instrument is a hearing aid that may be of any suitable mechanical design, e.g. to be worn in the ear canal, or partly in the ear canal, behind the ear or in the concha, such as the well-known types: BTE, ITE, ITC, CIC, etc.
  • The illustrated hearing instrument circuitry 10 comprises a front microphone 12 and a rear microphone 14 for conversion of an acoustic sound signal from the surroundings into corresponding microphone audio signals 16, 18 output by the microphones 14, 16. The microphone audio signals 16, 18 are digitized in respective A/ D converters 20, 22 for conversion of the respective microphone audio signals 16, 18 into respective digital microphone audio signals 24, 26 that are optionally pre-filtered (pre-filters not shown) and combined in signal combiner 28, for example for formation of a digital microphone audio signal 30 with directionality as is well-known in the art of hearing instruments. The digital microphone audio signal 30 is input to the mixer 32 configured to output a weighted sum 34 of signals input to the mixer 32. The mixer output 34 is input to a hearing loss processor 36 configured to generate a hearing loss compensated output signal 38 based on the mixer output 34. The hearing loss compensated output signal 38 is input to a receiver 40 for conversion into acoustic sound for transmission towards an eardrum (not shown) of a user of the hearing instrument.
  • The illustrated hearing instrument circuitry 10 is further configured to receive digital audio from various transmitters, such as mobile phones, radios, media players, companion microphones, broadcasting systems, such as in a public place, e.g. in a church, an auditorium, a theatre, a cinema, etc., public address systems, such as in a railway station, an airport, a shopping mall, etc., etc.
  • In the illustrated example, digital audio, including broadcasted spoken messages, is transmitted wirelessly to the hearing instrument and received by the hearing instrument antenna 42 connected to a radio receiver 44. The radio receiver retrieves the digital data 46 from the received radio signal, including the digital audio, possible transmitter identifiers, possible network control signals, etc. Signal extractor 48 extracts the digital audio 50 from the received digital data 46 and forwards the digital audio 50 to the mixer 32. The digital audio 50 may include audio from a plurality of sources and thus, the digital audio 50 may form a plurality of input signals for the mixer 32, one input signal for each source of audio.
  • As further explained below, digital data of the broadcasted message also contains data 52 relating to the identity of the transmitter of the broadcasted message. The signal extractor 48 extracts these data 52 from the digital data and forwards them to authenticator 54 that is configured to authenticate the transmitter of the broadcasted message as will be further explained below. Output authentication signal 56 forms a control input to the mixer 32 for control of the weights of the sum of mixer input signals.
  • In the event that the transmitter of the broadcasted message cannot be authenticated, the corresponding weight is set to zero in the mixer 32 so that the broadcasted message 62 is not transmitted to the user; rather the broadcasted message 62 is ignored.
  • In the event that the transmitter of the broadcasted message is authenticated, the broadcasted message is transmitted to the user while the other signals are attenuated during transmission of the broadcasted message. The other signals may also be muted. The user may enter a command through a user interface of the hearing instrument of a type well-known in the art, controlling whether the other signals are muted or attenuated.
  • The hearing instrument may simultaneously receive more than one authenticated broadcasted message; i.e. one or more broadcasted messages may be received during ongoing reception of a previous broadcasted message, whereby more than one authenticated broadcasted message may overlap fully or partly in time.
  • Such a situation may be handled in various ways. For example, broadcasted messages may have assigned priorities and may be transmitted together with information on the priority, e.g. an integer, e.g. larger than or equal to 1, e.g. the lower the integer, the higher the priority. Alarm messages may for example have the highest priority, while traffic announcements may have the second highest priority, and possible commercials may have the lowest priority.
  • Successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be handled by the mixer 32 as separate inputs like the other inputs to the mixer, whereby the mixer includes the individual broadcasted messages in the weighted sum of inputs output to the processor 36, whereby the broadcasted messages are transmitted to the user with substantially unchanged timing with relation to each other.
  • Alternatively, successfully authenticated broadcasted messages may be transmitted to the hearing instrument user one at the time.
  • The mixer 32 may have memories for storage of broadcasted messages received during ongoing reception of a previous broadcasted message. Stored broadcasted messages may then be input to the mixer subsequent to finalized output of the previous broadcasted message of the mixer 32 in the same order in which they have been received by the hearing instrument; or, in order of priority, for inclusion in the output of the mixer 32 provided that the broadcasted message in question is successfully authenticated.
  • The hearing instrument may be configured to always mute one or more other signals received by the hearing instrument during transmission of a broadcasted message of highest priority towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates exemplary principles of operation of the authenticator 54 shown in Fig. 1. The transmitter 60 of broadcasted messages 62 may emit aural messages, such as departure announcements in an airport. The broadcasted message 62 is transmitted wirelessly and in digital form to a plurality of receivers. The message 62 is illustrated in digital form in Fig. 2. A message authentication algorithm 64 is used to calculate a message authentication code (MAC) 66 from the digitized message 62 in order to authenticate the transmitter 60 of the message 62 and thereby reduce the risk of spoofing. The MAC algorithm 64 implements a cryptographic hash function having a private key as one input and a message of arbitrary length as another input. The MAC algorithm 64 outputs a MAC 66, for example as specified in the various existing standards, such as ISO/IEC 9797-1 and -2 that define MAC algorithms.
  • The message 62 and the MAC 66 are then transmitted together wirelessly as indicated at 68 to various receivers, one of which resides in one of the new hearing instruments. As illustrated by process 70, the authenticator 54 of the new hearing instrument inputs the received message 62 to the same MAC algorithm 64 as used by the transmitter 60 and uses the same private key to calculate a MAC 72 in the authenticator 54. The authenticator 54 then compares the transmitted MAC 66 to the MAC 72 calculated in the authenticator 54, and If the two MACs are identical, the transmitter 60 of the broadcasted message 62 is authenticated, and so is the message 62, since the private keys and the messages input to the MAC algorithms 64, respectively, have to be identical in order to generate identical MAC codes 66, 72.
  • The output 56 of the authenticator 54 is used to control the weights of the mixer 32 in response to the result of the authentication process as already explained with reference to Fig. 1.
  • The authentication process illustrated in principle in Fig. 2 is relatively simple and suitable for implementation in a hearing instrument. The private key has to be distributed to all possible receivers of broadcasted messages from the transmitter in question. Obviously, the distribution of the private key has to be performed with care, since anyone in possession of the private key will be able to generate messages that will be successfully authenticated in the new hearing instruments.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates another exemplary principle of operation of the authenticator 54 shown in Fig. 1 in which the private key is only in possession of the authentic transmitter.
  • As in Fig. 2, the transmitter 80 of broadcasted messages 82 may emit aural messages, such as departure announcements in an airport. The broadcasted message 82 is transmitted wirelessly and in digital form to a plurality of receivers. The message 82 is illustrated in digital form in Fig. 3.
  • In Fig. 3, the message 82 is authenticated using an asymmetric encryption scheme, e.g. a digital signature scheme, with a key pair in which one key is the private key that is in possession of the transmitter 80 to be authenticated. The private key is used to encrypt the message 82 into a digital signature 88. The other key is a public key that is distributed to the intended receivers of messages broadcasted by the transmitter 80 and used to decrypt the digital signature for authentication.
  • A hashing algorithm 84 calculates a hash code from the digital message 82 and outputs the hash code to an encryption algorithm 86 that uses the private key to encrypt the hash code into a digital signature 88 in order to authenticate the transmitter 80 of the message 82 and thereby reduce the risk of spoofing.
  • The message 82 and the digital signature 88 are then transmitted together wirelessly as indicated at 90 to various receivers, one of which resides in one of the new hearing instruments. As illustrated by process 92, the authenticator 54 of the new hearing instrument inputs the received message 82 to the same hashing function 84 as used by the transmitter 80 to calculate a hash code 94 in the authenticator 54. Further, the authenticator 54 uses decryption algorithm 96 with the public key to decrypt the digital signature 88 into the hash code 98. The authenticator 54 then compares the hash code 94 with the hash code 98, and if the hash codes 94, 98 are identical, the transmitter 80 of the broadcasted message 82 is authenticated, and so is the message 82, since the private key has to be used in order for the public key to decrypt the digital signature 88 into the correct hash code 98, and the received and transmitted messages have to be identical for the hashing algorithm 84 to output the same hash code. The output 56 of the authenticator 54 is used to control the weights of the mixer 32 in response to the result of the authentication process as already explained with reference to Fig. 1.
  • The authentication scheme of Fig. 3 is somewhat more complex than the authentication scheme of Fig. 2; however the authentication scheme of Fig. 3 does not require distribution of a private key.

Claims (15)

  1. A hearing instrument (10) comprising a radio (44) for reception of a broadcasted message (82) together with a signature (88), an authenticator (54) configured for authentication of a transmitter (80) of the broadcasted message based on the signature, and wherein
    the hearing instrument is further configured for converting the broadcasted message into an acoustic signal for transmission towards an eardrum of a user of the hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  2. A hearing instrument according to claim 1, wherein the hearing instrument is further configured for muting at least one other signal received by the hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message
  3. A hearing instrument according to claim 1, wherein the hearing instrument is further configured for mixing the broadcasted message with at least one other signal received by the hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message, and for converting the mixed output into the acoustic signal for transmission towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  4. A hearing instrument according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the hearing instrument is further configured for ignoring the broadcasted message upon failed authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  5. A hearing instrument according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the hearing instrument is further configured for mixing a plurality of broadcasted messages, parts of which are received simultaneously by the hearing instrument,
    upon successful authentication of the respective transmitters of the plurality of broadcasted messages, and for converting a mixed output into the acoustic signal
    for transmission towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  6. A hearing instrument according to any of claims 1 - 4, wherein the hearing instrument is further configured for storing a first broadcasted message that is received during transmission of a second broadcasted message towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  7. A hearing instrument according to claim 6, wherein the hearing instrument is further configured for converting the stored first broadcasted message into the acoustic signal for transmission towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument.
  8. A hearing instrument according to claim 7, wherein stored first broadcasted messages are converted into the acoustic signal for transmission towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument in the order in which they are received by the hearing instrument.
  9. A hearing instrument according to claim 6 or 7, wherein stored first broadcasted messages are converted into the acoustic signal for transmission towards the eardrum of the user of the hearing instrument in an order of priority.
  10. A hearing instrument according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the signature includes at least one of a digital certificate issued by a certificate authority and a hash code.
  11. A hearing instrument according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the authenticator is further configured for decrypting an encrypted message included in the broadcasted message for authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  12. A hearing instrument according to any of claims 1 - 10, wherein the authenticator is further configured for decoding a hash code included in the broadcasted message for authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  13. A method of authenticating broadcasted messages, comprising the steps of:
    generating a signature (88) identifying a transmitter (80) of a broadcasted message (82) to be
    broadcasted by the transmitter,
    broadcasting the signature together with the broadcasted message,
    in a hearing instrument (10) receiving the broadcasted message; authenticating the
    transmitter of the broadcasted message based on the broadcasted signature,
    converting the broadcasted message into an acoustic signal for transmission towards an eardrum of a user of the hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  14. A method according to claim 13, wherein the step of generating includes the step of:
    encrypting the signature, and wherein
    the step of authenticating includes the steps of:
    decrypting the encrypted signature included in the broadcasted message for authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
  15. A broadcasting system comprising
    a transmitter (80) configured for broadcasting a broadcasted message (82) to a plurality of hearing instruments (10), comprising an encoder (86) configured for encoding a signature (88) identifying the transmitter for broadcasting together with broadcasted messages to be broadcasted, and
    a hearing instrument comprising
    a radio (44) for reception of the broadcasted message together with the signature, an authenticator (54) configured for authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message based on the signature, and wherein
    the hearing instrument is further configured for converting the broadcasted message into an acoustic signal for transmission towards an eardrum of a user of
    the hearing instrument upon successful authentication of the transmitter of the broadcasted message.
EP13167842.7A 2013-05-15 2013-05-15 Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol Active EP2804401B1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13167842.7A EP2804401B1 (en) 2013-05-15 2013-05-15 Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
DK13167842.7T DK2804401T3 (en) 2013-05-15 2013-05-15 A hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
US13/896,256 US10652673B2 (en) 2013-05-15 2013-05-16 Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
JP2014100754A JP6050278B2 (en) 2013-05-15 2014-05-14 Hearing instrument with authentication protocol
CN201410242451.6A CN104168531B (en) 2013-05-15 2014-05-15 Hearing instrument with indentification protocol

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13167842.7A EP2804401B1 (en) 2013-05-15 2013-05-15 Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2804401A1 EP2804401A1 (en) 2014-11-19
EP2804401B1 true EP2804401B1 (en) 2018-11-21

Family

ID=48430540

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13167842.7A Active EP2804401B1 (en) 2013-05-15 2013-05-15 Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2804401B1 (en)
DK (1) DK2804401T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3668120A1 (en) 2014-12-12 2020-06-17 GN Hearing A/S Hearing device with service mode and related method
US10785578B2 (en) 2014-12-12 2020-09-22 Gn Hearing A/S Hearing device with service mode and related method
EP3236674A1 (en) 2016-04-19 2017-10-25 Sonova AG Hearing aid with public key security features and various systems comprising such
US20230247373A1 (en) * 2019-10-14 2023-08-03 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Hearing assistance system with automatic hearing loop memory

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK1889513T3 (en) * 2005-06-05 2017-01-09 Starkey Labs Inc Communication system for wireless audio devices
EP2337377A1 (en) * 2009-12-17 2011-06-22 Oticon A/S An assistive listening system adapted for using dect
EP2528358A1 (en) * 2011-05-23 2012-11-28 Oticon A/S A method of identifying a wireless communication channel in a sound system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2804401A1 (en) 2014-11-19
DK2804401T3 (en) 2019-03-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10652673B2 (en) Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
US11272298B2 (en) Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
EP3021545B1 (en) Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
DK201370266A1 (en) Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
EP2928212B1 (en) A hearing instrument with a separate link
US20200351598A1 (en) Hearing assistance device using unencoded advertisement for eavesdropping on bluetooth host device
CN109379732B (en) Method, system for wireless streaming of audio signals to multiple audio receiver devices
US11394699B2 (en) Encrypted audio streaming
US20110188662A1 (en) Method of rendering binaural stereo in a hearing aid system and a hearing aid system
JP6193844B2 (en) Hearing device with selectable perceptual spatial sound source positioning
JP6512815B2 (en) Hearing device using position data, voice system and related method
EP2804401B1 (en) Hearing instrument with an authentication protocol
US9451370B2 (en) Method for operating a hearing device as well as a hearing device
US10812916B2 (en) Hearing instrument with a separate link
US10694301B2 (en) Audio transmission system
CN116615918A (en) Sensor management for wireless devices

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130515

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

R17P Request for examination filed (corrected)

Effective date: 20150511

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20170831

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GN HEARING A/S

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180511

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAL Information related to payment of fee for publishing/printing deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR3

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAL Information related to payment of fee for publishing/printing deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR3

GRAR Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20181011

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013046987

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1068977

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20190304

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20181121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1068977

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190221

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190221

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190321

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190321

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190222

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013046987

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190822

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190515

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190515

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130515

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181121

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230516

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20230515

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230524

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230602

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230523

Year of fee payment: 11