EP2792849B1 - Developments in or relating to rotor balancing - Google Patents

Developments in or relating to rotor balancing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2792849B1
EP2792849B1 EP14170640.8A EP14170640A EP2792849B1 EP 2792849 B1 EP2792849 B1 EP 2792849B1 EP 14170640 A EP14170640 A EP 14170640A EP 2792849 B1 EP2792849 B1 EP 2792849B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
blade
blades
rotor assembly
bladed rotor
axial
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP14170640.8A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2792849A1 (en
Inventor
Andrew Rix
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rolls Royce PLC
Original Assignee
Rolls Royce PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rolls Royce PLC filed Critical Rolls Royce PLC
Priority to EP14170640.8A priority Critical patent/EP2792849B1/en
Publication of EP2792849A1 publication Critical patent/EP2792849A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2792849B1 publication Critical patent/EP2792849B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/02Blade-carrying members, e.g. rotors
    • F01D5/027Arrangements for balancing
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01DNON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/30Fixing blades to rotors; Blade roots ; Blade spacers
    • F01D5/3007Fixing blades to rotors; Blade roots ; Blade spacers of axial insertion type

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to rotor balancing and, in particular, to a method of reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings.
  • the invention is particularly suitable for use in weight-critical applications such as in bladed rotor assemblies in gas turbines for aerospace applications.
  • the invention is not, however, limited to gas turbine applications.
  • the blades are manufactured separately and then assembled together on one or more rotor discs using suitable blade fixings.
  • the blade fixings generally take the form of either circumferential blade fixings, where a root portion of each blade is located in a circumferential slot machined out of the rotor disc, or axial blade fixings, where the blades comprise an axial root portion which slides axially into respective axial mounting slots in the rotor disc.
  • a two plane balancing correction is typically carried out by addition or removal of mass from the bladed rotor assembly in two spaced apart correction planes which extend perpendicular to the geometric axis of the bladed rotor assembly.
  • this involves a weight penalty, either from the direct effect of adding a balancing mass, or because the removal of material means that sacrificial balancing lands need to be provided which add to the weight of the bladed rotor assembly.
  • the weight penalty can in principle be reduced by increasing the separation of the correction planes along the geometric axis of rotation to increase the coupling moment of the balancing masses, but in practical terms this is often not viable due to space constraints.
  • an increased separation of the balancing masses tends to increase bending of the rotor shaft at or near resonant frequencies of the bladed rotor assembly.
  • This bending of the rotor shaft can be reduced or nearly eliminated by using multi-plane balancing techniques, but again space constraints can make it difficult to provide multiple balancing lands, or sufficient space for mounting balancing masses in multiple planes.
  • EP 0 609 979 A1 discloses a balanced rotor for a gas turbine engine comprises a disc having an annular array of aerofoil blades each of which has a fir-tree root portion which locates in a corresponding groove in the disc.
  • the blade root portions are retained axially by retention plates located in an annular array on the rotor adjacent the root portions. A minority of the retention plates are lighter than the remainder. The lighter plates are so distributed around the rotor as to ensure the balance of the rotor.
  • EP 1 995 456 A2 discloses a fan blade retaining structure comprising a disk having a plurality of circumferentially spaced dovetail grooves each of which accommodates a fan blade.
  • the disk further comprises a radially outwardly extending flange positioned ahead of the dovetail grooves.
  • a ring-shape retainer member locates the blade against the flange.
  • EP 1 452 687 A2 discloses a method of balancing a rotor, by first determining the position of the centre of mass of a rotor to be balanced prior to the rotor being machined to its final dimensions, and subsequently machining the rotor to its final dimensions by removing material along the length of the rotor. The material is removed in the direction of its axis such that the centre of mass of the rotor is adjusted to be substantially co-incident with its axis of rotation.
  • EP 2 677 119 A2 discloses a method of balancing a rotor in which a balance correction mass is identified, with a material deposition process being subsequently performed on the rotor to add the selected balance correction mass. It is an object of the present invention to seek to provide an improved method for reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings.
  • a method of reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings wherein the reduction in dynamic imbalance is provided at least in part by axial adjustment of one or more of the blades so as to redistribute mass along the geometric axis of rotation of the bladed rotor assembly.
  • the reduction in dynamic imbalance may be provided at least in part by axially offsetting a pair of the blades so as to form a counterbalancing couple.
  • the counterbalancing couple may be provided by axially offsetting a diametrically opposed pair of the blades.
  • the counterbalancing couple may be provided by axially offsetting a plurality of such pairs of blades.
  • the method may comprise providing a supplementary balancing correction by adding mass to, or removing mass from, the bladed rotor assembly in one or more correction planes positioned along the geometric axis of rotation of the rotor.
  • the bladed rotor assembly may be a turbine assembly, compressor assembly or fan assembly for a gas turbine.
  • a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings, at least one of the blades being secured by an axial blade fixing comprising a set screw acting between the rotor disc and the blade for axially adjusting the position of the blade, and a biasing member acting between the blade and the rotor disc for holding the blade in axial position against the set screw.
  • Figure 1 shows a bladed rotor assembly 1 for a gas turbine.
  • the bladed rotor assembly 1 comprises a plurality of separately manufactured blades 2 (only two of which are visible in Figure 1 ) mounted on a rotor disc 3.
  • the blades 2 incorporate axial root portions (not shown) which locate in corresponding axial slots machined out of the rotor disc 3.
  • the rotor disc 3 is carried on a rotor shaft 4 which, in operation of the bladed rotor assembly 1, rotates about a centreline (CL) of the bladed rotor assembly (representing the geometric axis of rotation of the bladed rotor assembly 1).
  • the centreline will coincide with a principal axis of inertia of the bladed rotor assembly, so that the bladed rotor assembly is dynamically balanced.
  • the dynamic imbalance in the final bladed rotor assembly will include a so-called “couple imbalance”, wherein equal mass imbalances located in angular opposition to one another (ie 180° apart) form a 'couple', tending angularly to misalign the principal axis of inertia and the centreline.
  • Figure 1 shows the bladed rotor assembly 1 having a couple imbalance caused by angularly opposed “heavy spots” 5, and the resulting angular misalignment ⁇ of the principal axis of inertia (PIA) with the centreline.
  • the couple imbalance is indicated by the arrows F1 and F2.
  • the dynamic imbalance of the bladed rotor assembly 1 is reduced in accordance with the present invention by axially offsetting a diametrically opposed pair of the blades 2, thus re-distributing mass along the centreline of the bladed rotor assembly 1, as shown in Figure 2
  • the off-set blades 2 form a "two-plane" counterbalancing couple, indicated by the arrows F blade1 and F blade2 in Figure 2 , which counteracts the couple imbalance F1, F2.
  • this counterbalancing couple F blade1 , F blade2
  • the principal axis of inertia may thus be realigned with the centreline, as indicated by the arrow A in Figure 2 .
  • a counterbalancing couple is formed by axially off-setting only a single pair of diametrically opposed blades 2, a plurality of pairs of blades may alternatively be axially-offset to form a corresponding, resultant counterbalancing couple.
  • the magnitude and plane of the resultant counterbalancing couple may be determined for a given plurality of axially-offset blade pairs using conventional vector addition.
  • a larger counterbalancing couple can be achieved using multiple blade pairs than would be possible using only a single blade pair.
  • the axial off-set of each individual blade pair may be smaller than in the case where only a single blade pair is used to form the counterbalancing couple; this may be particularly advantageous in the case where large individual blade off-sets would compromise the aerodynamic efficiency of the rotor.
  • the correction masses 6 may also be used to correct any static component of dynamic imbalance in the bladed rotor assembly 1, in particular where static imbalance in the bladed rotor assembly cannot be fully corrected by interchanging the location of the blades according to their inertial mass moment.
  • FIG. 4 shows an alternative embodiment for reducing a dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly 1 in accordance with the present invention, in this case following correction of a static imbalance in the bladed rotor assembly 1.
  • the static imbalance has been corrected by removing part of a balancing land 6a (the removed part of the balancing land 6a is indicated in phantom in Figure 4 ).
  • Resulting couple imbalance between the balancing land 6a and the centre of gravity C disc is corrected by axially off-setting single blade 2a to form a suitable counterbalancing couple.
  • the reduction in dynamic imbalance of the bladed rotor assembly 1 is provided at least in part by axial adjustment of the blade 2a.
  • Figure 5 shows an axial blade fixing 7 for allowing convenient axial adjustment of a blade 2 on the rotor disc 3.
  • the axial blade fixing 7 comprises a set screw 8, in this case a grub screw, extending through a segmented lock plate 9 which sits in a circumferential channel 10 fixed on the rotor disc 3.
  • a biasing member in the form of a spring clip 11 acts between the rotor disc 3 and the blade root 2b to hold the blade 2 against the set screw 8, thus locking the lock plate 9 against the side of the channel 10, as indicated by the arrow A.
  • the set screw 8 thus acts between the rotor disc 3 and the blade 2 and can be used to axially adjust the position of the blade root 2b in the respective blade slot, as indicated by the arrow B.
  • the spring clip 11 retains the blade 2 in axial position against the set screw 8, both during and in between axial adjustments.
  • corresponding circumferential channel sections 12 may be provided on the rotor disc 3, in between blade slots (only one channel section 12 is visible in Figure 5 ).
  • any other suitable axial blade fixing may be provided for the blades.
  • the blades may be axially secured using an adjustable shim.
  • the present invention finds particular application in high speed rotating machinery such as bladed rotor assemblies in gas turbines, including fan assemblies, turbines assemblies and compressor assemblies.
  • the invention is not intended to be limited to such applications and, in general, may be used on any suitable bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings.

Description

  • The present invention relates to rotor balancing and, in particular, to a method of reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings.
  • The invention is particularly suitable for use in weight-critical applications such as in bladed rotor assemblies in gas turbines for aerospace applications. The invention is not, however, limited to gas turbine applications.
  • In a bladed rotor assembly such as a fan blade assembly in a gas turbine, the blades are manufactured separately and then assembled together on one or more rotor discs using suitable blade fixings. The blade fixings generally take the form of either circumferential blade fixings, where a root portion of each blade is located in a circumferential slot machined out of the rotor disc, or axial blade fixings, where the blades comprise an axial root portion which slides axially into respective axial mounting slots in the rotor disc.
  • During manufacture of the components making up the bladed rotor assembly, efforts are made to minimise mass imbalances in the individual components. Nevertheless, mass imbalances will tend to arise in the completed assembly, for example due to manufacturing tolerances on the blades. Consequently, the assembly as a whole must undergo an initial balancing operation in order to prevent subsequent stress and vibration during operation of the bladed rotor assembly.
  • In order to balance the final bladed rotor assembly, a two plane balancing correction is typically carried out by addition or removal of mass from the bladed rotor assembly in two spaced apart correction planes which extend perpendicular to the geometric axis of the bladed rotor assembly. In either case this involves a weight penalty, either from the direct effect of adding a balancing mass, or because the removal of material means that sacrificial balancing lands need to be provided which add to the weight of the bladed rotor assembly. The weight penalty can in principle be reduced by increasing the separation of the correction planes along the geometric axis of rotation to increase the coupling moment of the balancing masses, but in practical terms this is often not viable due to space constraints. In addition, an increased separation of the balancing masses tends to increase bending of the rotor shaft at or near resonant frequencies of the bladed rotor assembly. This bending of the rotor shaft can be reduced or nearly eliminated by using multi-plane balancing techniques, but again space constraints can make it difficult to provide multiple balancing lands, or sufficient space for mounting balancing masses in multiple planes.
  • EP 0 609 979 A1 discloses a balanced rotor for a gas turbine engine comprises a disc having an annular array of aerofoil blades each of which has a fir-tree root portion which locates in a corresponding groove in the disc. The blade root portions are retained axially by retention plates located in an annular array on the rotor adjacent the root portions. A minority of the retention plates are lighter than the remainder. The lighter plates are so distributed around the rotor as to ensure the balance of the rotor.
  • EP 1 995 456 A2 discloses a fan blade retaining structure comprising a disk having a plurality of circumferentially spaced dovetail grooves each of which accommodates a fan blade. The disk further comprises a radially outwardly extending flange positioned ahead of the dovetail grooves. A ring-shape retainer member locates the blade against the flange.
  • EP 1 452 687 A2 discloses a method of balancing a rotor, by first determining the position of the centre of mass of a rotor to be balanced prior to the rotor being machined to its final dimensions, and subsequently machining the rotor to its final dimensions by removing material along the length of the rotor. The material is removed in the direction of its axis such that the centre of mass of the rotor is adjusted to be substantially co-incident with its axis of rotation.
  • EP 2 677 119 A2 discloses a method of balancing a rotor in which a balance correction mass is identified, with a material deposition process being subsequently performed on the rotor to add the selected balance correction mass.
    It is an object of the present invention to seek to provide an improved method for reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings.
  • According to the present invention there is provided a method of reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings, wherein the reduction in dynamic imbalance is provided at least in part by axial adjustment of one or more of the blades so as to redistribute mass along the geometric axis of rotation of the bladed rotor assembly.
  • The reduction in dynamic imbalance may be provided at least in part by axially offsetting a pair of the blades so as to form a counterbalancing couple. In particular, the counterbalancing couple may be provided by axially offsetting a diametrically opposed pair of the blades.
  • The counterbalancing couple may be provided by axially offsetting a plurality of such pairs of blades.
  • The method may comprise providing a supplementary balancing correction by adding mass to, or removing mass from, the bladed rotor assembly in one or more correction planes positioned along the geometric axis of rotation of the rotor.
  • The bladed rotor assembly may be a turbine assembly, compressor assembly or fan assembly for a gas turbine.
  • According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings, at least one of the blades being secured by an axial blade fixing comprising a set screw acting between the rotor disc and the blade for axially adjusting the position of the blade, and a biasing member acting between the blade and the rotor disc for holding the blade in axial position against the set screw.
  • Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is a schematic plan view of a bladed rotor assembly;
    • Figure 2 is a view corresponding to Figure 1, but illustrating axial offsetting of a pair of rotor blades in accordance with the present invention;
    • Figure 3 is a view corresponding to Figure 1, illustrating a supplementary two plane balancing correction on the bladed rotor assembly according to a further aspect of the present invention;
    • Figure 4 is a view of corresponding to Figure 1, illustrating use of a single axially-offset blade to form a counterbalancing couple with a correction mass, according to a further aspect of the present invention; and
    • Figure 5 is a schematic cross-sectional view through part of a bladed rotor assembly illustrating one possible axial blade fixing for allowing convenient axial adjustment of the blades.
  • Figure 1 shows a bladed rotor assembly 1 for a gas turbine.
  • The bladed rotor assembly 1 comprises a plurality of separately manufactured blades 2 (only two of which are visible in Figure 1) mounted on a rotor disc 3. The blades 2 incorporate axial root portions (not shown) which locate in corresponding axial slots machined out of the rotor disc 3. The rotor disc 3 is carried on a rotor shaft 4 which, in operation of the bladed rotor assembly 1, rotates about a centreline (CL) of the bladed rotor assembly (representing the geometric axis of rotation of the bladed rotor assembly 1).
  • Ideally, the centreline will coincide with a principal axis of inertia of the bladed rotor assembly, so that the bladed rotor assembly is dynamically balanced.
  • In practice, however, mass imbalances caused by manufacturing and fitting tolerances will tend to misalign the principal inertial axis with the centreline of the bladed rotor assembly, with the result that the final bladed rotor assembly will often suffer a dynamic imbalance.
  • In general, the dynamic imbalance in the final bladed rotor assembly will include a so-called "couple imbalance", wherein equal mass imbalances located in angular opposition to one another (ie 180° apart) form a 'couple', tending angularly to misalign the principal axis of inertia and the centreline.
  • Figure 1 shows the bladed rotor assembly 1 having a couple imbalance caused by angularly opposed "heavy spots" 5, and the resulting angular misalignment θ of the principal axis of inertia (PIA) with the centreline. The couple imbalance is indicated by the arrows F1 and F2.
  • The dynamic imbalance of the bladed rotor assembly 1 is reduced in accordance with the present invention by axially offsetting a diametrically opposed pair of the blades 2, thus re-distributing mass along the centreline of the bladed rotor assembly 1, as shown in Figure 2
  • The off-set blades 2 form a "two-plane" counterbalancing couple, indicated by the arrows Fblade1 and Fblade2 in Figure 2, which counteracts the couple imbalance F1, F2. By controlling the moment arm of this counterbalancing couple (Fblade1, Fblade2), corresponding to the blade offset x, the principal axis of inertia may thus be realigned with the centreline, as indicated by the arrow A in Figure 2.
  • It is envisaged that use of the blades 2 to form a counterbalancing couple will reduce the weight penalty associated with conventional two-plane balancing correction by addition or removal of mass from the bladed rotor assembly (in the latter case, by reducing the need for relatively heavy balancing lands).
  • Although in the embodiment shown in Figure 2, a counterbalancing couple is formed by axially off-setting only a single pair of diametrically opposed blades 2, a plurality of pairs of blades may alternatively be axially-offset to form a corresponding, resultant counterbalancing couple. In this case, the magnitude and plane of the resultant counterbalancing couple may be determined for a given plurality of axially-offset blade pairs using conventional vector addition.
  • For a given rotor, a larger counterbalancing couple can be achieved using multiple blade pairs than would be possible using only a single blade pair. In addition, where multiple blade pairs are used to form a given counterbalancing couple, the axial off-set of each individual blade pair may be smaller than in the case where only a single blade pair is used to form the counterbalancing couple; this may be particularly advantageous in the case where large individual blade off-sets would compromise the aerodynamic efficiency of the rotor.
  • Depending upon the magnitude of the imbalance couple, it may be necessary to carry out a supplementary two plane balancing correction by adding correction masses 6 as shown in Figure 3. Nevertheless, it will be appreciated that axial adjustment of the blades 2 to reduce the dynamic imbalance will allow for the correction masses 6 to be smaller than would ordinarily be the case carrying out a conventional two plane balancing correction. The use of additional correction masses may be required in particular where a counterbalancing couple is formed by off-setting a pair of blades 2 which are not diametrically opposed to one another.
  • The correction masses 6 may also be used to correct any static component of dynamic imbalance in the bladed rotor assembly 1, in particular where static imbalance in the bladed rotor assembly cannot be fully corrected by interchanging the location of the blades according to their inertial mass moment.
  • Figure 4 shows an alternative embodiment for reducing a dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly 1 in accordance with the present invention, in this case following correction of a static imbalance in the bladed rotor assembly 1. Here, the static imbalance has been corrected by removing part of a balancing land 6a (the removed part of the balancing land 6a is indicated in phantom in Figure 4). Resulting couple imbalance between the balancing land 6a and the centre of gravity Cdisc is corrected by axially off-setting single blade 2a to form a suitable counterbalancing couple. It will be appreciated here that the reduction in dynamic imbalance of the bladed rotor assembly 1 is provided at least in part by axial adjustment of the blade 2a.
  • Figure 5 shows an axial blade fixing 7 for allowing convenient axial adjustment of a blade 2 on the rotor disc 3.
  • The axial blade fixing 7 comprises a set screw 8, in this case a grub screw, extending through a segmented lock plate 9 which sits in a circumferential channel 10 fixed on the rotor disc 3. A biasing member in the form of a spring clip 11 acts between the rotor disc 3 and the blade root 2b to hold the blade 2 against the set screw 8, thus locking the lock plate 9 against the side of the channel 10, as indicated by the arrow A. The set screw 8 thus acts between the rotor disc 3 and the blade 2 and can be used to axially adjust the position of the blade root 2b in the respective blade slot, as indicated by the arrow B. It will be appreciated that the spring clip 11 retains the blade 2 in axial position against the set screw 8, both during and in between axial adjustments.
    Though not essential, corresponding circumferential channel sections 12 may be provided on the rotor disc 3, in between blade slots (only one channel section 12 is visible in Figure 5).
  • Any other suitable axial blade fixing may be provided for the blades. For example, the blades may be axially secured using an adjustable shim.
  • It will be appreciated that although embodiments of the invention have been described in relation to dynamic imbalances caused by irregular mass distribution within one or more components of the bladed rotor assembly, the present invention is equally suitable for reducing dynamic imbalances caused by misalignment between components within a bladed rotor assembly, including angular misalignment of a rotor disc.
  • The present invention finds particular application in high speed rotating machinery such as bladed rotor assemblies in gas turbines, including fan assemblies, turbines assemblies and compressor assemblies. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to such applications and, in general, may be used on any suitable bladed rotor assembly having axial blade fixings.

Claims (7)

  1. A method of reducing dynamic imbalance in a bladed rotor assembly (1) having axial blade fixings (7), characterised in that the reduction in dynamic imbalance is provided at least in part by axial adjustment of one or more of the blades (2) so as to redistribute mass along the geometric axis of rotation of the bladed rotor assembly (1).
  2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the reduction in dynamic imbalance is provided at least in part by axially offsetting a pair of the blades (2) so as to form a counterbalancing couple.
  3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the counterbalancing couple is provided by axially offsetting a diametrically opposed pair of the blades (2).
  4. A method according to claim 2 or 3, wherein the counterbalancing couple is provided by axially offsetting a plurality of such pairs of blades (2).
  5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, comprising providing a supplementary balancing correction by adding mass to, or removing mass from, the bladed rotor assembly (1) in one or more correction planes positioned along the geometric axis of rotation of the rotor (3).
  6. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the bladed rotor assembly (1) is a turbine assembly, compressor assembly or fan assembly for a gas turbine.
  7. A bladed rotor assembly (1) comprising a plurality of blades (2) mounted in axial blade slots on a rotor disc (3), at least one of the blades (2) being secured in the respective blade slot by an axial blade fixing (7), characterised in that the axial blade fixing comprises a set screw (8) acting between the rotor disc and the blade (2) for axially adjusting the position of the blade (2), the bladed rotor assembly further comprises a biasing member (11) acting between the blade (2) and the rotor disc (3) for holding the blade (2) in axial position against the set screw (8).
EP14170640.8A 2014-05-30 2014-05-30 Developments in or relating to rotor balancing Not-in-force EP2792849B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14170640.8A EP2792849B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2014-05-30 Developments in or relating to rotor balancing

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14170640.8A EP2792849B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2014-05-30 Developments in or relating to rotor balancing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2792849A1 EP2792849A1 (en) 2014-10-22
EP2792849B1 true EP2792849B1 (en) 2016-07-13

Family

ID=50943069

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14170640.8A Not-in-force EP2792849B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2014-05-30 Developments in or relating to rotor balancing

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2792849B1 (en)

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9302064D0 (en) * 1993-02-03 1993-03-24 Rolls Royce Plc Balanced rotor
GB2398882B (en) * 2003-02-27 2007-09-05 Rolls Royce Plc Rotor balancing
JP2007247406A (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-27 Ihi Corp Holding structure of fan blade
GB201210870D0 (en) * 2012-06-20 2012-08-01 Rolls Royce Plc Rotor balancing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2792849A1 (en) 2014-10-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2938124C (en) Mistuned fan
KR101711374B1 (en) A turbine wheel fitted with an axial retaining ring that locks the blades relative to a disk
CN102996185B (en) Turbine rotor blade assembly and assembling method thereof
EP2825746B1 (en) Turbomachine rotor balancing system, a turbomachine rotor and a method for using this system
EP3093435B1 (en) Rotor damper
RU2525363C2 (en) Turbine wheel and turbomachine with such wheel
US9540093B2 (en) Bladed rotor wheel for a turbine engine
US10436224B2 (en) Method and apparatus for balancing a rotor
EP1452687B1 (en) Rotor balancing
US20140072432A1 (en) Blade arrangement for a turbo engine
CN111630249B (en) Damping device
CN103534443A (en) Turbine engine impeller
CA2888008C (en) Method of balancing a spool of a gas turbine engine
US20190186270A1 (en) Dispositif amortisseur
US20200340364A1 (en) Turbine wheel assembly with ceramic matrix composite blades
US9951623B2 (en) Blade cascade for a turbomachine
US9506372B2 (en) Damping means for damping a blade movement of a turbomachine
EP2792849B1 (en) Developments in or relating to rotor balancing
US8974185B2 (en) Balancing of rotatable components
EP2508710B1 (en) Locking device arrangement for a rotating bladed stage and corresponding assembly method
US9624775B2 (en) Developments in or relating to rotor balancing
CN112313396B (en) Retaining system for removing a blade wheel
GB2428396A (en) A method of manufacturing an article with a reference datum feature
GB2472621A (en) Impeller hub
EP2631427B1 (en) Balancing of Rotors

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140530

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

R17P Request for examination filed (corrected)

Effective date: 20150310

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150630

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ROLLS-ROYCE PLC

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160212

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 812510

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160715

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602014002627

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 812510

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161113

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161013

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161014

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602014002627

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161013

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140530

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190530

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190527

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190528

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602014002627

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200530

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201201