EP2790876A1 - Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface - Google Patents

Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface

Info

Publication number
EP2790876A1
EP2790876A1 EP12798774.1A EP12798774A EP2790876A1 EP 2790876 A1 EP2790876 A1 EP 2790876A1 EP 12798774 A EP12798774 A EP 12798774A EP 2790876 A1 EP2790876 A1 EP 2790876A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
progressive
defect
addition
initial
reference points
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12798774.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2790876B1 (en
Inventor
Eric Gacoin
Laurent HUPREL
Jérôme Moine
Jean-Marc Padiou
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EssilorLuxottica SA
Original Assignee
Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA filed Critical Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA
Priority to PL12798774T priority Critical patent/PL2790876T3/en
Publication of EP2790876A1 publication Critical patent/EP2790876A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2790876B1 publication Critical patent/EP2790876B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02C—SPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00—Optical parts
    • G02C7/02—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/06—Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses bifocal; multifocal ; progressive
    • G02C7/061—Spectacle lenses with progressively varying focal power
    • G02C7/063—Shape of the progressive surface
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
    • B24B13/06—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor grinding of lenses, the tool or work being controlled by information-carrying means, e.g. patterns, punched tapes, magnetic tapes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for transforming an initial progressive surface that has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, as well as a method for manufacturing a progressive surface and a computer program product comprising a series of instructions which, when loaded on a computer, results in the execution by said computer of the steps of the methods according to the invention .
  • an ophthalmic lens comprises a visual correction which is determined by a prescription established for the wearer of the lens.
  • Such a prescription notably indicates an optical power value and an astigmatism value suitable for correcting a wearer for far vision.
  • These values are usually obtained by combining the anterior face of the lens with a posterior face which is generally spherical or sphero-toroidal .
  • a posterior face which is generally spherical or sphero-toroidal .
  • at least one of the two faces of the lens exhibits variations of sphere and of cylinder, from which result variations of optical power and of astigmatism between different directions of observation through the lens.
  • the optical power difference between the two points dedicated to the far vision and to the near vision is called the optical addition, and its value must also correspond to the value prescribed for a presbyopic wearer .
  • a progressive lens is manufactured in two successive steps.
  • the first step consists in manufacturing a semi-finished lens, the anterior face of which may exhibit variations of sphere and of cylinder defined in relation to the optical performance levels desired for the finished lens. It is executed in a factory, for example by molding or injection.
  • the semi-finished lenses are divided up into a plurality of articles, which may differ, notably, by the base, by the distribution of the spheres and cylinders of the anterior face, or by the addition.
  • the base is the mean sphere at the point of the lens corresponding to the far vision.
  • the vertical and horizontal distances between the near and far vision points, the respective widths of the areas of the lens corresponding to the near vision and to the far vision, the refractive index of the transparent material which constitutes the semi-finished lens, etc., may also differ from one article to another. Each combination of these characteristics corresponds to a different semi-finished lens article.
  • the second step consists in manufacturing the posterior face of the lens.
  • the posterior face of the lens may comprise variations of sphere and of cylinder such that the association of the two faces produces the desired optical performance levels.
  • the optical surfaces may, after manufacture, exhibit defects of form, in particular the optical surfaces exhibiting addition between two points of this surface may exhibit surface addition defects.
  • a defect is generally due to a step of polishing the surface of the lens or of the mold, the polishing not uniformly removing the material from the surface to be polished thus deforming said surface.
  • a known method consists in producing the optical surface first, by measuring for example the surface addition defect, and remanufacturing the same optical surface to which the negative of the defect measured on the first manufactured surface will previously have been added. Thus, the second surface produced will be closer to the theoretical nominal surface.
  • the drawback of such a method is that it entails manufacturing two surfaces to arrive at a satisfactory surface.
  • Another known method consists in producing a power adjustment at the far vision point.
  • This adjustment consists of producing a certain number of lenses, by measuring the power defect at the far vision point, in other words the deviation between the power at the far vision point obtained relative to the far vision point of the nominal and providing a correction of this power by adding a spherical surface to the entire nominal surface before producing it.
  • This method makes it possible to adjust a local value on the basis of a defect observed on a certain number of lenses or surfaces for which the semifinished version used is common.
  • this criterion is not entirely satisfactory; in practice, the polishing step does not uniformly impact on the entirety of the surface.
  • the present invention relates in particular to the correction of surface defects introduced in a reproducible manner by a given manufacturing method.
  • a surface defect introduced by a manufacturing method is said to be reproducible if it is introduced in a robust and repeatable manner by the manufacturing method.
  • a surface defect is considered to be reproducible if, for a given manufacturing method, the independent production in N copies of one and the same given progressive surface generates a defect, said defect being identical qualitatively (nature of the defect and, where appropriate, its location on the progressive surface) and quantitatively for the N copies.
  • a defect is considered to be identical quantitatively if the dispersion of the value of the defect over the N copies is less than or equal to the tolerance set for the quantity considered, the dispersion corresponding to the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of the quantity over the N copies.
  • N takes a value greater than 15.
  • a surface addition defect [respectively a surface addition defect between two reference points on a progressive surface; respectively a mean sphere defect; respectively a cylinder defect; respectively a polishing ring defect] associated with a given manufacturing method is considered to be reproducible if the independent production in N copies of one and the same given progressive ophthalmic surface by said manufacturing method generates a surface addition defect [respectively a surface addition defect between two reference points on a progressive surface; respectively a mean sphere defect; respectively a cylinder defect; respectively a polishing ring defect] , the value of the surface addition defect [respectively of the surface addition defect between two reference points on a progressive surface; respectively of the mean sphere defect; respectively of the cylinder defect; respectively of the polishing ring defect] (deviation relative to the nominal value) being identical subject to a variation of +/- 0.12 diopter, preferably +/- 0.10 diopter.
  • N is as defined above.
  • the reproducible nature of the defect makes it possible to use a predictive model, before any production of the surface, in order to anticipate and compensate for the defect associated with the manufacturing method.
  • the invention proposes a method for transforming an initial progressive surface that has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, the transformation method comprising:
  • the method according to the invention implements a predictive model of a reproducible surface defect.
  • the predictive model of the reproducible surface defect has been previously established, i.e. established before the actual production of the progressive surface to be manufactured.
  • the surface transformation method is implemented prior to the actual manufacture of the progressive surface.
  • the present invention relates to a method for transforming an initial progressive ophthalmic surface which has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, the transformation method comprising:
  • the step of selecting a manufacturing method generally comprises the choice of a manufacturing method, including the choice of the equipment, of the toolage, of the procedure, etc.
  • the person skilled in the art will be able to choose a manufacturing method, notably on the basis of the characteristics of the progressive ophthalmic surface to be produced (geometry, material) .
  • the surface defect may be introduced by a surfacing method, a polishing method, or by a combination of a surfacing and a polishing.
  • the manufacturing method introduces at least one reproducible surface defect.
  • the method according to the invention may comprise the choice of a plurality of predictive models, i.e. one model per defect.
  • the method according to the invention makes it possible to enhance the initial progressive surface production precision without in any way requiring the prior production of a surface affected by an error.
  • a method for transforming an initial progressive surface according to the invention may also comprise one or more of the optional characteristics below, considered individually in all possible combinations:
  • the surface defect is a surface addition and/or sphere and/or cylinder defect and/or a polishing ring defect;
  • the surface defect is a surface addition defect which depends on the surface addition of the initial progressive surface, on the diameter of the progressive surface to be manufactured and on the progression length of the initial progressive surface.
  • the transformed surface has substantially the same sphere and cylinder values at at least one of the two reference points as the initial surface.
  • the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two initial reference points chosen on the initial progressive surface and in which the transformation step comprises :
  • ⁇ a step of selecting a generic progressive surface during which a generic progressive surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having, within an area of
  • the surface defect is a surface addition defect and the transformation step comprises:
  • the surface defect is a surface addition defect and the transformation step comprises:
  • a method for transforming an initial progressive surface according to the invention may also comprise one or more of the optional characteristics below, considered individually in all possible combinations:
  • the generic reference points are situated respectively at less than 3 mm from the initial reference points, preferably respectively at less than 1 mm from the initial reference points;
  • the reference points are the near and far vision points
  • the progressive surface is a surface of a progressive lens or a surface of a mold intended to manufacture a semi- finished lens.
  • the invention also relates to a method for obtaining a progressive surface of a progressive ophthalmic lens comprising the following steps:
  • said production comprises the steps of:
  • the ophthalmic lens may be a lens of a pair of glasses, a finished or semi-finished lens, a contact lens or an intraocular lens.
  • the progressive surface may be a front face or a rear face.
  • Another subject of the invention is a computer program product comprising a series of instructions which, when loaded in a computer, results in the execution by said computer of the steps of a method according to the invention .
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the steps of a method making it possible to establish a defect model
  • - figure 3 illustrates steps of the transformation step according to one embodiment
  • - figure 4 illustrates steps of the transformation step according to an embodiment different from that of figure 3
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the steps of a manufacturing method according to the invention.
  • method for manufacturing a progressive surface will be understood to mean a method comprising at least a machining step and a polishing step.
  • progression length will be understood to mean the distance which is measured vertically on the complex surface of the lens between the mounting cross and a point of the meridian line for which the mean sphere presents a deviation equal to 85% of the surface addition relative to the far vision reference point.
  • surface addition between two points of a surface will be understood to mean the mean sphere variation between these two points.
  • the two points may be the near vision point
  • NV NV
  • FV far vision point
  • the near vision point is horizontally offset relative to a vertical straight line which passes through the far vision point, when the lens is in a position of use by a wearer thereof.
  • This offset which is toward the nasal side of the lens, is commonly called inset.
  • the method for transforming an initial progressive surface that has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method comprises:
  • the method according to the invention comprises, prior to the step of determining a surface defect, a methodical analysis of the surface defects, for example of the surface addition defects generated in order to identify the influencing characteristics thereof.
  • a surface component is added to the theoretical nominal surface, said component containing, for example, a surface addition with a value opposite to the foreseen (predicted) defect.
  • the method according to the invention makes it possible to foresee (anticipate) the value of the surface defect, for example of the surface addition defect, even before the manufacture of the surface, based on known parameter values of the surface to be manufactured.
  • the method according to the invention makes it possible to modify, in a simple manner, the surface before its manufacture and with a moderate computation power.
  • the method according to the invention may comprise a modeling method consisting in establishing a defect model.
  • the object of this modeling method is to establish a predictive model that makes it possible, based on the characteristics of an initial surface intended to be manufactured by a method, to provide the value D of a surface defect.
  • the value D of the surface defect being the difference between the value of a surface parameter that the surface would exhibit if it were manufactured by said method and the value desired for said surface parameter.
  • the surface defect may be a surface addition defect; the surface addition being defined between two reference points on the surface, for example the near and far vision points.
  • the surface addition defect then corresponding to the difference between, on the one hand, the surface addition value that the progressive surface would exhibit if it were manufactured by the method and, on the other hand, the desired surface addition value for the progressive surface.
  • the method for modeling a surface defect introduced by a manufacturing method comprises:
  • the manufacturing and measurement steps being repeated a plurality of times before the identification step.
  • a set of progressive surfaces having different surface characteristics are selected.
  • the number of progressive surfaces in this set depends on the number of surface characteristics of interest.
  • the surface set comprises fewer than 100, preferably fewer than 80, preferably fewer than 60 surfaces that are different from one another.
  • the expression "different surfaces” should be understood to mean surfaces that have at least one surface characteristic differing from one to the other.
  • the step Ml makes it possible to select a set of surfaces exhibiting various combinations of values for the surface characteristics, notably the surface characteristics mentioned above.
  • the modeling method according to the invention comprises a manufacturing step M2 during which each of the progressive surfaces of the set of selected progressive surfaces are manufactured by using the manufacturing method for which the aim is to establish a model associated with a surface defect.
  • the progressive surfaces are produced by machining one of the faces of a semi-finished lens or by machining one of the faces of a mold for ophthalmic lens.
  • Each progressive surface manufactured during the manufacturing step M2 is measured during the measurement step M3.
  • the surface defect that is to be modeled is quantified.
  • the surface defect for a given manufactured surface is defined by the difference between the value of a surface parameter measured on this progressive surface and the desired value for this surface parameter .
  • the manufacturing M2 and measurement M3 steps are repeated a plurality of times.
  • the defect values can thus be averaged between the different surfaces manufactured for one and the same desired initial surface.
  • this makes it possible to determine an average surface defect for each of the surfaces of the chosen set and to take account of the dispersion of the method .
  • the influence of each of the surface characteristics selected during the selection step Ml, on the surface defect to be modeled is determined. For example, it is possible, by using a statistical method of the design of experiments type, to determine the surface characteristics that have an influence on the surface defect to be modeled.
  • a surface defect model is established for the manufacturing method during the determination step M5.
  • the surface defect model makes it possible to link, for a given manufacturing method, the surface characteristics of the surface to be manufactured and the surface defect to be modeled.
  • One example that can be cited as surface defect is a surface addition defect between two reference points. By convention, it is possible to select the near vision and far vision points as reference points.
  • ⁇ (Add initial) being the value of the desired surface addition between two reference points
  • a and B being constants whose value depends on the manufacturing method used and on the reference points .
  • A, B, C and D being constants whose value depends on the manufacturing method used and on the reference points.
  • the defect model established by the modeling method according to the invention makes it possible, during the determination step SI, to determine the value of a surface defect which would be introduced by the manufacturing method modeled during surface manufacture .
  • the initial progressive surface is transformed by compensating the value D of the surface defect determined during the determination step SI.
  • the transformation of the initial progressive surface is produced in such a way that the manufactured progressive surface conforms to the initial progressive surface.
  • a manufactured progressive surface that conforms to the initial progressive surface should be understood to mean a progressive surface manufactured by the manufacturing method that exhibits substantially the same surface characteristics as the initial progressive surface and for which the value of the surface defect is less, as an absolute value, than the value D of the surface defect determined during the determination step SI; preferably, the value of the surface defect is less than or equal, as an absolute value, to the tolerance set.
  • an optical defect surface addition defect, mean sphere defect, cylinder defect, polishing ring defect
  • the surface is said to substantially conform if the absolute value of the actual defect on the surface obtained is less than or equal to 0.12 diopter, preferably 0.10 diopter.
  • the progressive surface manufactured by means of the method according to the invention corresponds to the initial progressive surface within the limits of the accuracy of the defect model and the repeatability of the manufacturing method.
  • the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two reference points on the progressive surface and the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at the reference points.
  • an operation for derivation of a surface within the meaning of the invention is defined in the document US 6,955,433, the content of which is incorporated by reference.
  • an operation for derivation of a surface comprises the following steps:
  • the transformation step S2 comprises:
  • a generic progressive surface is selected.
  • a generic surface should be understood to be a surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times its surface addition in the area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two reference points.
  • the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain a unitary addition adjustment surface, the unitary addition adjustment surface being a surface that has less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, with y being between 0.05 and 0.2 diopter, for example substantially equal to 0.1 diopter.
  • the initial reference points may correspond to the near vision and far vision points.
  • the unitary addition adjustment surface exhibits less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at the far vision point and a surface addition of y diopter between the far vision points and the near vision points, with y being between 0.05 and 0.2 diopter, for example substantially equal to 0.1 diopter.
  • the addition-adjusted surface is such that, during its manufacture by the manufacturing method, the progressive surface obtained corresponds to the initial progressive surface.
  • the initial progressive surface is the surface of an ophthalmic lens to be manufactured.
  • the ophthalmic lens to be manufactured exhibits a given optical function.
  • the generic progressive surface may be a surface which, combined with a spherical surface, makes it possible to obtain the optical function of the ophthalmic lens to be manufactured. It is possible to determine this generic progressive surface, for example by means of the method described in the application WO 2007/017766.
  • the transformation step S2 comprises: - a step of selection of a generic progressive surface S220,
  • a generic progressive surface is selected.
  • a generic surface should be understood to be a surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times its surface addition in the area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two reference points.
  • the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain an addition adjustment surface.
  • the addition adjustment surface being a surface that has less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, y being substantially equal to the opposite of the value of the addition defect.
  • the initial reference points may correspond to the near vision and far vision points.
  • the addition adjustment surface exhibits less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at the far vision point and a surface addition of y diopter between the far vision points and near vision points, with y being substantially equal to the opposite of the value of the addition defect.
  • the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface.
  • the addition-adjusted surface is such that, during its manufacture by the manufacturing method, the progressive surface obtained corresponds to the initial progressive surface.
  • the method according to the invention may comprise a first test step S10, which, according to the value of the cylinder at at least two points of the initial surface, makes it possible to decide to apply the transformation step according to one or other of the embodiments described previously .
  • the transformation method applies the transformation step according to figure 1 and if the initial progressive surface exhibits 0.25 diopter or more of cylinder at at least two initial reference points then the transformation method applies the transformation step according to figures 3 or 4.
  • the method according to the invention may also comprise a test step S20 which makes it possible to determine, for example according to the available computation power or the architecture of the information system, whether the transformation method applies the transformation step according to figures 3 or 4.
  • the invention also relates to a method for manufacturing a progressive surface as described in figure 5.
  • the manufacturing method according to the invention comprises: - a step of determining a surface defect SI,

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for transforming an initial progressive ophthalmic surface which has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, the transformation method comprising: • a step of selecting a manufacturing method intended to be implemented, in which said manufacturing method introduces a reproducible surface defect, • a step of selecting a predictive model of said reproducible surface defect, • a step of selecting an initial progressive ophthalmic surface S intended to be manufactured, • a step of determining (S1), during which there is determined, by means of said predictive model, a surface defect value D which would be introduced if the initial progressive ophthalmic surface S were produced by said manufacturing method, • a transformation step (S2), during which said initial progressive ophthalmic surface S is transformed into a transformed progressive ophthalmic surface S* by compensating the defect value D determined during the step (S1), such that the subsequent manufacture of the transformed ophthalmic surface S* by said manufacturing method makes it possible to obtain a progressive ophthalmic surface which substantially conforms to the initial progressive ophthalmic surface S.

Description

METHOD FOR TRANSFORMING A PROGRESSIVE OPHTHALMIC SURFACE
The present invention relates to a method for transforming an initial progressive surface that has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, as well as a method for manufacturing a progressive surface and a computer program product comprising a series of instructions which, when loaded on a computer, results in the execution by said computer of the steps of the methods according to the invention .
Usually, an ophthalmic lens comprises a visual correction which is determined by a prescription established for the wearer of the lens.
Such a prescription notably indicates an optical power value and an astigmatism value suitable for correcting a wearer for far vision. These values are usually obtained by combining the anterior face of the lens with a posterior face which is generally spherical or sphero-toroidal . For a progressive lens, at least one of the two faces of the lens exhibits variations of sphere and of cylinder, from which result variations of optical power and of astigmatism between different directions of observation through the lens. In particular, the optical power difference between the two points dedicated to the far vision and to the near vision is called the optical addition, and its value must also correspond to the value prescribed for a presbyopic wearer .
Commonly, a progressive lens is manufactured in two successive steps. The first step consists in manufacturing a semi-finished lens, the anterior face of which may exhibit variations of sphere and of cylinder defined in relation to the optical performance levels desired for the finished lens. It is executed in a factory, for example by molding or injection. The semi-finished lenses are divided up into a plurality of articles, which may differ, notably, by the base, by the distribution of the spheres and cylinders of the anterior face, or by the addition. The base is the mean sphere at the point of the lens corresponding to the far vision. The vertical and horizontal distances between the near and far vision points, the respective widths of the areas of the lens corresponding to the near vision and to the far vision, the refractive index of the transparent material which constitutes the semi-finished lens, etc., may also differ from one article to another. Each combination of these characteristics corresponds to a different semi-finished lens article.
The second step consists in manufacturing the posterior face of the lens.
The posterior face of the lens may comprise variations of sphere and of cylinder such that the association of the two faces produces the desired optical performance levels.
The optical surfaces may, after manufacture, exhibit defects of form, in particular the optical surfaces exhibiting addition between two points of this surface may exhibit surface addition defects. Such a defect is generally due to a step of polishing the surface of the lens or of the mold, the polishing not uniformly removing the material from the surface to be polished thus deforming said surface.
The optical function of the final lens can be very sensitive to these surface defects. There is therefore a need for a method that makes it possible to reduce these surface defects. A known method consists in producing the optical surface first, by measuring for example the surface addition defect, and remanufacturing the same optical surface to which the negative of the defect measured on the first manufactured surface will previously have been added. Thus, the second surface produced will be closer to the theoretical nominal surface. The drawback of such a method is that it entails manufacturing two surfaces to arrive at a satisfactory surface.
Another known method consists in producing a power adjustment at the far vision point. This adjustment consists of producing a certain number of lenses, by measuring the power defect at the far vision point, in other words the deviation between the power at the far vision point obtained relative to the far vision point of the nominal and providing a correction of this power by adding a spherical surface to the entire nominal surface before producing it. This method makes it possible to adjust a local value on the basis of a defect observed on a certain number of lenses or surfaces for which the semifinished version used is common. However, this criterion is not entirely satisfactory; in practice, the polishing step does not uniformly impact on the entirety of the surface.
There is therefore a need for a method that makes it possible to enhance the progressive surface production precision which is simple to implement, suited to all types of progressive surfaces and that ensures a good efficiency.
The present invention relates in particular to the correction of surface defects introduced in a reproducible manner by a given manufacturing method.
Within the meaning of the present invention, a surface defect introduced by a manufacturing method is said to be reproducible if it is introduced in a robust and repeatable manner by the manufacturing method.
A surface defect is considered to be reproducible if, for a given manufacturing method, the independent production in N copies of one and the same given progressive surface generates a defect, said defect being identical qualitatively (nature of the defect and, where appropriate, its location on the progressive surface) and quantitatively for the N copies. A defect is considered to be identical quantitatively if the dispersion of the value of the defect over the N copies is less than or equal to the tolerance set for the quantity considered, the dispersion corresponding to the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of the quantity over the N copies. Preferentially, N takes a value greater than 15.
A surface addition defect [respectively a surface addition defect between two reference points on a progressive surface; respectively a mean sphere defect; respectively a cylinder defect; respectively a polishing ring defect] associated with a given manufacturing method is considered to be reproducible if the independent production in N copies of one and the same given progressive ophthalmic surface by said manufacturing method generates a surface addition defect [respectively a surface addition defect between two reference points on a progressive surface; respectively a mean sphere defect; respectively a cylinder defect; respectively a polishing ring defect] , the value of the surface addition defect [respectively of the surface addition defect between two reference points on a progressive surface; respectively of the mean sphere defect; respectively of the cylinder defect; respectively of the polishing ring defect] (deviation relative to the nominal value) being identical subject to a variation of +/- 0.12 diopter, preferably +/- 0.10 diopter. N is as defined above.
The reproducible nature of the defect makes it possible to use a predictive model, before any production of the surface, in order to anticipate and compensate for the defect associated with the manufacturing method.
For this, the invention proposes a method for transforming an initial progressive surface that has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, the transformation method comprising:
- a step of determining a surface defect during which the value D of a surface defect introduced in a reproducible manner by the manufacturing method is determined by means of a defect model previously established for said manufacturing method,
- a transformation step, during which the initial progressive surface is transformed by compensating the value D of the surface defect determined by means of the defect model such that, when the progressive surface is manufactured by means of said manufacturing method, the progressive surface manufactured substantially conforms to the initial progressive surface.
Advantageously, the method according to the invention implements a predictive model of a reproducible surface defect. In the method according to the invention, the predictive model of the reproducible surface defect has been previously established, i.e. established before the actual production of the progressive surface to be manufactured. In practice, the surface transformation method is implemented prior to the actual manufacture of the progressive surface. The present invention relates to a method for transforming an initial progressive ophthalmic surface which has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, the transformation method comprising:
· a step of selecting a manufacturing method intended to be implemented, in which said manufacturing method introduces a reproducible surface defect,
• a step of selecting a predictive model of said reproducible surface defect,
· a step of selecting an initial progressive ophthalmic surface S intended to be manufactured,
• a step of determining (SI), during which there is determined, by means of said predictive model, a surface defect value D which would be introduced if the initial progressive ophthalmic surface S were produced by said manufacturing method,
• a transformation step (S2) during which said initial progressive ophthalmic surface S is transformed into a transformed progressive ophthalmic surface S* by compensating the defect value D determined during the step (SI), such that the subsequent manufacture of the transformed ophthalmic surface S* by said manufacturing method makes it possible to obtain a progressive ophthalmic surface which substantially conforms to the initial progressive ophthalmic surface S.
The step of selecting a manufacturing method generally comprises the choice of a manufacturing method, including the choice of the equipment, of the toolage, of the procedure, etc. The person skilled in the art will be able to choose a manufacturing method, notably on the basis of the characteristics of the progressive ophthalmic surface to be produced (geometry, material) . Typically, the surface defect may be introduced by a surfacing method, a polishing method, or by a combination of a surfacing and a polishing.
According to the invention, the manufacturing method introduces at least one reproducible surface defect. In the case where the manufacturing method introduces a plurality of reproducible surface defects, the method according to the invention may comprise the choice of a plurality of predictive models, i.e. one model per defect.
Advantageously, the method according to the invention makes it possible to enhance the initial progressive surface production precision without in any way requiring the prior production of a surface affected by an error. A method for transforming an initial progressive surface according to the invention may also comprise one or more of the optional characteristics below, considered individually in all possible combinations:
- the surface defect is a surface addition and/or sphere and/or cylinder defect and/or a polishing ring defect;
- the predictive surface defect model has been previously established by means of a method comprising:
• a selection step during which a set of progressive ophthalmic surfaces having different surface characteristics is selected,
· a manufacturing step, during which each of the progressive surfaces of the set of progressive surfaces are manufactured by means of said manufacturing method,
• a measurement step during which each of the manufactured surfaces is measured and at least one surface defect relative to the desired surfaces is quantified, the surface defect corresponding to the difference between the value of a characteristic measured on the manufactured surface and the desired value for this characteristic,
• an identification step during which characteristics of the progressive surfaces having an influence on the surface defect are identified,
• a determination step during which a predictive surface defect model for said manufacturing method linking the identified characteristics and the at least one defect introduced by the manufacturing method is determined,
the manufacturing and measurement steps being repeated a plurality of times before the identification step; - the surface defect is a surface addition defect which depends on the surface addition of the initial progressive surface, on the diameter of the progressive surface to be manufactured and on the progression length of the initial progressive surface.
Furthermore, according to a first aspect of the invention, the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two reference points on the progressive surface, the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at the reference points, and the transformation step comprises a derivation step during which the initial surface is derived so as to obtain an adjusted surface, observing: (Add transformed) = (Add initial) - (D) , with
· (Add transformed) corresponding to the surface power addition between the far vision point and the near vision point of the transformed surface, • (Add initial) corresponding to the surface power addition between the far vision point and the near vision point of the initial surface, and
• (D) corresponding to the surface addition defect introduced by the manufacturing method;
- the transformed surface has substantially the same sphere and cylinder values at at least one of the two reference points as the initial surface.
Furthermore, according to a second aspect of the invention:
- the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two initial reference points chosen on the initial progressive surface and in which the transformation step comprises :
· a step of selecting a generic progressive surface during which a generic progressive surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having, within an area of
50 mm diamter centered on the mid-point of the two generic reference points, a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times the surface addition of this generic progressive surface is selected,
• a derivation step during which the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain a unitary addition adjustment surface having less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, with y being between 0.05 and 0.2 diopter, • a step for multiplying the unitary addition adjustment surface during which the unitary addition adjustment surface is multiplied by a factor k defined by k= -D/y in order to obtain an addition adjustment surface,
• a summation step during which the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface, or
- the surface defect is a surface addition defect and the transformation step comprises:
• a step for selecting a generic progressive surface during which a generic progressive surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having, within an area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two generic reference points, a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times the surface addition of this generic progressive surface is selected,
• a derivation step during which the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain an addition adjustment surface having less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, y being substantially equal to the opposite of the addition defect value, • a summation step during which the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface.
According to a third aspect of the invention, the surface defect is a surface addition defect and the transformation step comprises:
· the steps according to the first aspect of the invention when the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two initial reference points, and
• the steps according to the second aspect of the invention when the initial progressive surface exhibits 0.25 diopter or more of cylinder at at least two initial reference points.
A method for transforming an initial progressive surface according to the invention may also comprise one or more of the optional characteristics below, considered individually in all possible combinations:
- the generic reference points are situated respectively at less than 3 mm from the initial reference points, preferably respectively at less than 1 mm from the initial reference points;
- the reference points are the near and far vision points;
- the progressive surface is a surface of a progressive lens or a surface of a mold intended to manufacture a semi- finished lens. The invention also relates to a method for obtaining a progressive surface of a progressive ophthalmic lens comprising the following steps:
- transformation of the progressive surface to be manufactured according to a method according to the invention,
- production of the transformed progressive ophthalmic surface S* by means of said manufacturing method.
According to one aspect of the invention, said production comprises the steps of:
- surfacing the surface of the ophthalmic lens according to the transformed progressive surface, and
- polishing the surface of the lens obtained from the preceding step.
The ophthalmic lens may be a lens of a pair of glasses, a finished or semi-finished lens, a contact lens or an intraocular lens. The progressive surface may be a front face or a rear face.
Another subject of the invention is a computer program product comprising a series of instructions which, when loaded in a computer, results in the execution by said computer of the steps of a method according to the invention . The invention will be better understood on reading the following description, given solely as an example and with reference to the appended drawings in which:
- figure 1 illustrates the steps of the transformation method according to the invention,
- figure 2 illustrates the steps of a method making it possible to establish a defect model,
- figure 3 illustrates steps of the transformation step according to one embodiment, - figure 4 illustrates steps of the transformation step according to an embodiment different from that of figure 3, and
- figure 5 illustrates the steps of a manufacturing method according to the invention.
Within the meaning of the invention, the expression
"method for manufacturing a progressive surface" will be understood to mean a method comprising at least a machining step and a polishing step.
Within the meaning of the invention, the expression
"progression length" will be understood to mean the distance which is measured vertically on the complex surface of the lens between the mounting cross and a point of the meridian line for which the mean sphere presents a deviation equal to 85% of the surface addition relative to the far vision reference point.
Within the meaning of the invention, the expression
"surface addition between two points of a surface" will be understood to mean the mean sphere variation between these two points. The two points may be the near vision point
(NV) and the far vision point (FV) .
In a progressive ophthalmic lens, the near vision point is horizontally offset relative to a vertical straight line which passes through the far vision point, when the lens is in a position of use by a wearer thereof.
This offset, which is toward the nasal side of the lens, is commonly called inset.
As represented in figure 1, the method for transforming an initial progressive surface that has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method comprises:
- a step of determining a surface defect SI, and
- a transformation step S2. According to one embodiment, the method according to the invention comprises, prior to the step of determining a surface defect, a methodical analysis of the surface defects, for example of the surface addition defects generated in order to identify the influencing characteristics thereof.
This makes it possible to establish a defect model and therefore to determine the defect value as a function of the value of the characteristics of the progressive surface to be manufactured. Then, during the determination step, the value of the surface defect can be determined by means of the previously established model.
And finally, during the transformation step, a surface component is added to the theoretical nominal surface, said component containing, for example, a surface addition with a value opposite to the foreseen (predicted) defect. There is thus obtained a transformed surface which, once produced given the defect generated by the method, will have a surface addition closer to the nominal value.
Advantageously, the method according to the invention makes it possible to foresee (anticipate) the value of the surface defect, for example of the surface addition defect, even before the manufacture of the surface, based on known parameter values of the surface to be manufactured.
Furthermore, the method according to the invention makes it possible to modify, in a simple manner, the surface before its manufacture and with a moderate computation power.
As illustrated in figure 2, prior to the step of determining a surface defect SI, the method according to the invention may comprise a modeling method consisting in establishing a defect model. The object of this modeling method is to establish a predictive model that makes it possible, based on the characteristics of an initial surface intended to be manufactured by a method, to provide the value D of a surface defect.
The value D of the surface defect being the difference between the value of a surface parameter that the surface would exhibit if it were manufactured by said method and the value desired for said surface parameter. For example, the surface defect may be a surface addition defect; the surface addition being defined between two reference points on the surface, for example the near and far vision points. The surface addition defect then corresponding to the difference between, on the one hand, the surface addition value that the progressive surface would exhibit if it were manufactured by the method and, on the other hand, the desired surface addition value for the progressive surface.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the method for modeling a surface defect introduced by a manufacturing method comprises:
- a selection step Ml,
- a manufacturing step M2,
- a measurement step M3,
- an identification step M4, and
- a determination step M5,
the manufacturing and measurement steps being repeated a plurality of times before the identification step.
During the selection step Ml, a set of progressive surfaces having different surface characteristics are selected. The number of progressive surfaces in this set depends on the number of surface characteristics of interest. Advantageously, efforts will be made to minimize the number of surfaces of this set. Typically, the surface set comprises fewer than 100, preferably fewer than 80, preferably fewer than 60 surfaces that are different from one another. The expression "different surfaces" should be understood to mean surfaces that have at least one surface characteristic differing from one to the other.
In practice, prior to the selection of a surface set, a set of surface characteristics likely to have an influence on the value of the surface defect to be modeled is selected.
The possible surface characteristics that can be selected include:
- the curvature of the progressive surface at at least one point,
- the cylinder of the progressive surface at at least one point,
- the axis of the cylinder at at least one point of the progressive surface,
- the surface addition of the progressive surface between two reference points on this progressive surface, for example between the far vision point and the near vision point,
- the diameter of the progressive surface to be machined,
- the progressive length of the progressive surface, or even
- the inset between two reference points of this progressive surface, for example between the near vision point and the far vision point of the surface. In order to facilitate the analysis of the results, it is desirable to select the surface characteristics and their value by having previously established a test plan using a statistical method, for example by using the design of experiments method. Thus, the step Ml makes it possible to select a set of surfaces exhibiting various combinations of values for the surface characteristics, notably the surface characteristics mentioned above.
Following the selection step Ml, the modeling method according to the invention comprises a manufacturing step M2 during which each of the progressive surfaces of the set of selected progressive surfaces are manufactured by using the manufacturing method for which the aim is to establish a model associated with a surface defect.
Typically, the progressive surfaces are produced by machining one of the faces of a semi-finished lens or by machining one of the faces of a mold for ophthalmic lens.
On completion of the manufacturing step M2, there is a set of progressive surfaces having different surface characteristics .
Each progressive surface manufactured during the manufacturing step M2 is measured during the measurement step M3. During the measurement step M3, the surface defect that is to be modeled is quantified. The surface defect for a given manufactured surface is defined by the difference between the value of a surface parameter measured on this progressive surface and the desired value for this surface parameter .
According to one embodiment of the invention, the manufacturing M2 and measurement M3 steps are repeated a plurality of times. The defect values can thus be averaged between the different surfaces manufactured for one and the same desired initial surface.
Advantageously, this makes it possible to determine an average surface defect for each of the surfaces of the chosen set and to take account of the dispersion of the method . During the identification step M4 , the influence of each of the surface characteristics selected during the selection step Ml, on the surface defect to be modeled is determined. For example, it is possible, by using a statistical method of the design of experiments type, to determine the surface characteristics that have an influence on the surface defect to be modeled.
Following the identification step M4, a surface defect model is established for the manufacturing method during the determination step M5. The surface defect model makes it possible to link, for a given manufacturing method, the surface characteristics of the surface to be manufactured and the surface defect to be modeled. One example that can be cited as surface defect is a surface addition defect between two reference points. By convention, it is possible to select the near vision and far vision points as reference points.
In the context of progressive surfaces of molds intended for the manufacture of semi-finished lenses, the inventors have established a surface addition defect model between the near vision point and the far vision point of type:
D = A* (Add initial) + B, with
• D being the surface addition defect value,
· (Add initial) being the value of the desired surface addition between two reference points, and
• A and B being constants whose value depends on the manufacturing method used and on the reference points .
In the context of progressive surfaces of ophthalmic progressive lenses, the inventors have established a first surface addition defect model between the near vision point and the far vision point of type: D = A* (Add initial) + B + C* (dia) + D* (LP) with
• D being the surface addition defect value,
• (Add initial) being the value of the desired surface addition between two reference points, · (dia) being the diameter of the progressive surface to be manufactured,
• (LP) being the progression length of the progressive surface to be manufactured, and
• A, B, C and D being constants whose value depends on the manufacturing method used and on the reference points.
In the context of progressive surfaces of ophthalmic progressive lenses, the inventors have established a second surface addition defect model between the near vision point and the far vision point of type:
D = A* (Addini) + B + C* (dia) + D* (LP) + E*(dia)2 + F*(LP)2 + G* (Addini) 2 + H* (dia) * (LP) + I* (dia) * (Addini) + J* (LP) * (Addini) with
• D being the surface addition defect value,
• (Addini) being the value of the desired surface addition between two reference points,
• (dia) being the diameter of the progressive surface to be manufactured,
• (LP) being the progression length of the progressive surface to be manufactured, and
• A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and J being constants whose value depends on the manufacturing method used and on the reference points. Advantageously, the defect model established by the modeling method according to the invention makes it possible, during the determination step SI, to determine the value of a surface defect which would be introduced by the manufacturing method modeled during surface manufacture .
During the transformation step S2, the initial progressive surface is transformed by compensating the value D of the surface defect determined during the determination step SI. The transformation of the initial progressive surface is produced in such a way that the manufactured progressive surface conforms to the initial progressive surface.
The expression "a manufactured progressive surface that conforms to the initial progressive surface" should be understood to mean a progressive surface manufactured by the manufacturing method that exhibits substantially the same surface characteristics as the initial progressive surface and for which the value of the surface defect is less, as an absolute value, than the value D of the surface defect determined during the determination step SI; preferably, the value of the surface defect is less than or equal, as an absolute value, to the tolerance set. Typically, with respect to an optical defect (surface addition defect, mean sphere defect, cylinder defect, polishing ring defect) , the surface is said to substantially conform if the absolute value of the actual defect on the surface obtained is less than or equal to 0.12 diopter, preferably 0.10 diopter.
As will appear clearly to the person skilled in the art, the progressive surface manufactured by means of the method according to the invention corresponds to the initial progressive surface within the limits of the accuracy of the defect model and the repeatability of the manufacturing method.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two reference points on the progressive surface and the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at the reference points.
The transformation step S2 comprises a derivation step during which the initial surface is derived so as to obtain an adjusted surface, observing: (Add transformed) = (Add initial) - D, with
• (Add transformed) corresponding to the surface power addition between the far vision point and the near vision point of the transformed surface,
· (Add initial) corresponding to the surface power addition between the far vision point and the near vision point of the initial surface, and
• D corresponding to the surface addition defect introduced by the manufacturing method.
The operation for derivation of a surface within the meaning of the invention is defined in the document US 6,955,433, the content of which is incorporated by reference. In particular, an operation for derivation of a surface comprises the following steps:
- computation of the sphere and cylinder distribution of the initial surface,
- transformation of the sphere and cylinder distribution, then
- performing a double integration of the transformed sphere and cylinder distribution so as to obtain the derived surface. According to one embodiment of the invention illustrated in figure 3 and according to which the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two initial reference points on the progressive surface, the transformation step S2 comprises:
- a step of selection of a generic progressive surface S210,
- a derivation step S211,
a step of multiplication of the unitary surface addition adjustment surface S212, and
- a summation step S213.
During the step of selection of a generic progressive surface, a generic progressive surface is selected. Within the meaning of this embodiment, a generic surface should be understood to be a surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times its surface addition in the area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two reference points.
During the derivation step, the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain a unitary addition adjustment surface, the unitary addition adjustment surface being a surface that has less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, with y being between 0.05 and 0.2 diopter, for example substantially equal to 0.1 diopter.
The initial reference points may correspond to the near vision and far vision points. In this case, the unitary addition adjustment surface exhibits less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at the far vision point and a surface addition of y diopter between the far vision points and the near vision points, with y being between 0.05 and 0.2 diopter, for example substantially equal to 0.1 diopter.
Following the derivation step, the unitary addition adjustment surface is multiplied by a factor k defined by k= -D/y in order to obtain an addition adjustment surface, during the multiplication step.
Finally, the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface. The addition-adjusted surface is such that, during its manufacture by the manufacturing method, the progressive surface obtained corresponds to the initial progressive surface.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the initial progressive surface is the surface of an ophthalmic lens to be manufactured. The ophthalmic lens to be manufactured exhibits a given optical function. The generic progressive surface may be a surface which, combined with a spherical surface, makes it possible to obtain the optical function of the ophthalmic lens to be manufactured. It is possible to determine this generic progressive surface, for example by means of the method described in the application WO 2007/017766.
According to one embodiment of the invention illustrated in figure 4 and according to which the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two initial reference points on the progressive surface, the transformation step S2 comprises: - a step of selection of a generic progressive surface S220,
- a derivation step S221,
- a summation step S222.
During the step of selection of a generic progressive surface, a generic progressive surface is selected. Within the meaning of this embodiment, a generic surface should be understood to be a surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times its surface addition in the area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two reference points.
During the derivation step, the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain an addition adjustment surface. The addition adjustment surface being a surface that has less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, y being substantially equal to the opposite of the value of the addition defect.
The initial reference points may correspond to the near vision and far vision points. In this case, the addition adjustment surface exhibits less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value, for example less than 0.05 diopter or even substantially zero diopter, at the far vision point and a surface addition of y diopter between the far vision points and near vision points, with y being substantially equal to the opposite of the value of the addition defect. Finally, the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface. The addition-adjusted surface is such that, during its manufacture by the manufacturing method, the progressive surface obtained corresponds to the initial progressive surface.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the method according to the invention may comprise a first test step S10, which, according to the value of the cylinder at at least two points of the initial surface, makes it possible to decide to apply the transformation step according to one or other of the embodiments described previously .
For example, if the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two initial reference points then the transformation method applies the transformation step according to figure 1 and if the initial progressive surface exhibits 0.25 diopter or more of cylinder at at least two initial reference points then the transformation method applies the transformation step according to figures 3 or 4.
The method according to the invention may also comprise a test step S20 which makes it possible to determine, for example according to the available computation power or the architecture of the information system, whether the transformation method applies the transformation step according to figures 3 or 4.
The invention also relates to a method for manufacturing a progressive surface as described in figure 5.
As illustrated in figure 5, the manufacturing method according to the invention comprises: - a step of determining a surface defect SI,
- a step of transforming S2 the progressive surface to be manufactured according to one of the embodiments of the invention,
- a step of surfacing S3 the surface of the ophthalmic lens according to the transformed progressive surface, and
- a step of polishing S4 the surface of the lens.
Finally, it is understood that the invention can be reproduced in forms different from those of the embodiments which have been described in detail. The person skilled in the art will have understood, according to the present description, that the method according to the invention can be used for surface defect types other than those described in detail .
The invention is not limited to the embodiments which have been described and which should be interpreted in a nonlimiting manner and encompassing all equivalent embodiments .

Claims

1. A method for transforming an initial progressive ophthalmic surface which has to be manufactured by a manufacturing method, the transformation method comprising:
• a step of selecting a manufacturing method intended to be implemented, in which said manufacturing method introduces a reproducible surface defect,
• a step of selecting a predictive model of said reproducible surface defect,
• a step of selecting an initial progressive ophthalmic surface S intended to be manufactured,
• a step of determining (SI), during which there is determined, by means of said predictive model, a surface defect value D which would be introduced if the initial progressive ophthalmic surface S were produced by said manufacturing method,
• a transformation step (S2) during which said initial progressive ophthalmic surface S is transformed into a transformed progressive ophthalmic surface S* by compensating the defect value D determined during the step (SI), such that the subsequent manufacture of the transformed ophthalmic surface S* by said manufacturing method makes it possible to obtain a progressive ophthalmic surface which substantially conforms to the initial progressive ophthalmic surface S.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which the surface defect is a surface addition and/or mean sphere and/or cylinder defect and/or a polishing ring defect.
3. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims, in which the predictive surface defect model has been previously established by means of a method comprising:
a selection step (Ml) during which a set of progressive ophthalmic surfaces having different surface characteristics is selected,
- a manufacturing step (M2), during which each of the progressive surfaces of the set of progressive surfaces are manufactured by means of said manufacturing method,
- a measurement step (M3) during which each of the manufactured surfaces is measured and at least one surface defect relative to the desired surfaces is quantified, the surface defect corresponding to the difference between the value of a characteristic measured on the manufactured surface and the desired value for this characteristic,
an identification step (M4) during which characteristics of the progressive surfaces having an influence on the surface defect are identified,
- a determination step (M5) during which a predictive surface defect model for said manufacturing method linking the identified characteristics and the at least one defect introduced by the manufacturing method is determined,
the manufacturing (M2) and measurement (M3) steps being repeated a plurality of times before the identification step.
4. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the surface defect is a surface addition defect which depends on the surface addition of the initial progressive surface, on the diameter of the progressive surface to be manufactured and on the progression length of the initial progressive surface.
5. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two reference points on the progressive surface, the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at the reference points, and in which the transformation step comprises a derivation step during which the intial surface is derived so as to obtain an adjusted surface, observing: (Add transformed) = (Add initial) - (D) , with
(Add transformed) corresponding to the surface power addition between the far vision point and the near vision point of the transformed surface,
(Add initial) corresponding to the surface power addition between the far vision point and the near vision point of the initial surface, and
(D) corresponding to the surface addition defect introduced by the manufacturing method.
6. The method as claimed in claim 5, in which the transformed surface has substantially the same sphere and cylinder values at at least one of the two reference points as the initial surface.
7. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, in which the surface defect is a surface addition defect between two initial reference points chosen on the initial progressive surface and in which the transformation step comprises :
- a step of selecting a generic progressive surface (S210) during which a generic progressive surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times its surface addition in the area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two reference points is selected,
- a derivation step (S211) during which the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain a unitary surface addition adjustment surface having less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, with y being between 0.05 and 0.2 diopter,
a step of multiplying the unitary addition adjustment surface (S212) during which the unitary addition adjustment surface is multiplied by a factor k defined by k= -D/y in order to obtain an addition adjustment surface, - a summation step (S213) during which the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface.
8. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, in which the surface defect is a surface addition defect and in which the transformation step comprises:
a step of selecting a generic progressive surface (S220) during which a generic progressive surface exhibiting less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two generic reference points as well as a surface addition between these same two reference points, and having a maximum cylinder less than or equal to 1.5 times its surface addition in the area of 50 mm diameter centered on the mid-point of the two reference points is selected,
- a derivation step (S221) during which the generic progressive surface is derived so as to obtain an addition adjustment surface having less than 0.1 diopter of mean sphere as an absolute value at one of the generic reference points and a surface addition of y diopter between the two generic reference points, y being substantially equal to the opposite of the addition defect value,
- a summation step (S222) during which the initial progressive surface and the addition adjustment surface are summed point by point on the altitudes of the two surfaces in order to obtain an addition-adjusted surface.
9. The method as claimed in any one of claims 7 or 8, in which the generic reference points are respectively less than 3 mm remote from the intitial reference points.
10. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, in which the surface defect is a surface addition defect and in which the transformation step comprises:
- the steps as claimed in one of claims 5 or 6 when the initial progressive surface exhibits less than 0.25 diopter of cylinder at at least two initial reference points, and
- the steps as claimed in one of claims 7 or 8 when the initial progressive surface exhibits 0.25 diopter or more of cylinder at at least two initial reference points.
11. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the reference points are the near and far vision points.
12. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the progressive surface is a surface of a progressive lens or a surface of a mold intended to manufacture a semi-finished lens.
13. A method for obtaining a progressive surface of a progressive ophthalmic lens comprising the following steps:
- transformation (SI, s2) of the progressive surface to be manufactured as claimed in any one of the preceding claims ,
- production of the transformed progressive ophthalmic surface S* by means of said manufacturing method.
14. The obtaining method as claimed in claim 13, in which said production comprises the steps of:
- surfacing (S3) the surface of the ophthalmic lens according to the transformed progressive surface and
- polishing (S4) the surface of the lens obtained from the step (S3) .
15. A computer program product comprising a series of instructions which, when loaded in a computer, results in the execution by said computer of the steps of the method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.
EP12798774.1A 2011-12-15 2012-12-12 Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface Active EP2790876B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL12798774T PL2790876T3 (en) 2011-12-15 2012-12-12 Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1161702A FR2984197B1 (en) 2011-12-15 2011-12-15 PROCESS FOR TRANSFORMING AN INITIAL PROGRESSIVE SURFACE
PCT/EP2012/075236 WO2013087696A1 (en) 2011-12-15 2012-12-12 Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2790876A1 true EP2790876A1 (en) 2014-10-22
EP2790876B1 EP2790876B1 (en) 2015-08-12

Family

ID=47326203

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12798774.1A Active EP2790876B1 (en) 2011-12-15 2012-12-12 Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface

Country Status (15)

Country Link
US (1) US9709823B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2790876B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6300729B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102018628B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103987492B (en)
AU (1) AU2012350695B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112014014360B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2552182T3 (en)
FR (1) FR2984197B1 (en)
HU (1) HUE026248T2 (en)
IN (1) IN2014CN04909A (en)
MX (1) MX353039B (en)
PL (1) PL2790876T3 (en)
PT (1) PT2790876E (en)
WO (1) WO2013087696A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4257286A1 (en) 2022-04-05 2023-10-11 Essilor International Computer-implemented method and manufacturing system for manufacturing by machining an ophthalmic device

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3292447B1 (en) 2015-05-29 2022-10-12 Essilor International System and method for compensating deviations in an optical lens manufacturing process
JP7042140B2 (en) 2018-03-30 2022-03-25 株式会社Provigate Sensor chip
EP4276555A1 (en) 2022-05-11 2023-11-15 Essilor International A method for surfacing a lens blank with a cutting tool

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10020914B4 (en) * 2000-04-28 2020-07-02 Carl Zeiss Vision Gmbh Method for calculating a plurality of spectacle lenses from a spectacle lens family and method of manufacturing an spectacle lens from a spectacle lens family
CN100495124C (en) * 2003-11-27 2009-06-03 Hoya株式会社 Both-sided aspherical varifocal lens and method of designing it
JP4437482B2 (en) * 2003-11-27 2010-03-24 Ｈｏｙａ株式会社 Double-sided aspherical progressive-power lens and design method thereof
US6955433B1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2005-10-18 Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Methods for designing composite ophthalmic lens surfaces
ATE535346T1 (en) * 2005-05-06 2011-12-15 Satisloh Gmbh METHOD FOR THE AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION OF TOOLS IN A LATHE USED FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ESPECIALLY EYEGLASSE LENSES
US20090168015A1 (en) * 2005-06-20 2009-07-02 Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) Method for providing dual surface progressive addition lens series
EP1752815A1 (en) 2005-08-11 2007-02-14 Essilor International (Compagnie Generale D'optique) Method of manufacturing an optical system
DE102005050205A1 (en) * 2005-10-20 2007-04-26 Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh Method and device for compensating position and shape deviations
FR2908191B1 (en) * 2006-11-07 2008-12-26 Essilor Int OPHTHALMIC LENS
FR2911696B1 (en) * 2007-01-24 2009-10-30 Essilor Int PROGRESSIVE OPHTHALMIC GLASS WITH PERSONALIZED INSET.
US8386203B2 (en) * 2007-08-31 2013-02-26 Hoya Corporation Method and device for evaluating graduated refraction power lens and method for manufacturing graduated refraction power lens

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2013087696A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP4257286A1 (en) 2022-04-05 2023-10-11 Essilor International Computer-implemented method and manufacturing system for manufacturing by machining an ophthalmic device
WO2023194284A1 (en) 2022-04-05 2023-10-12 Essilor International Computer-implemented method and manufacturing system for manufacturing by machining an ophthalmic device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9709823B2 (en) 2017-07-18
PT2790876E (en) 2015-11-23
BR112014014360B1 (en) 2022-04-26
MX2014007192A (en) 2014-08-21
FR2984197A1 (en) 2013-06-21
CN103987492B (en) 2016-12-21
HUE026248T2 (en) 2016-05-30
KR102018628B1 (en) 2019-09-05
MX353039B (en) 2017-12-18
US20140307223A1 (en) 2014-10-16
JP6300729B2 (en) 2018-03-28
IN2014CN04909A (en) 2015-09-18
PL2790876T3 (en) 2016-01-29
KR20140111252A (en) 2014-09-18
EP2790876B1 (en) 2015-08-12
WO2013087696A1 (en) 2013-06-20
BR112014014360A2 (en) 2017-06-13
AU2012350695A1 (en) 2014-06-05
CN103987492A (en) 2014-08-13
ES2552182T3 (en) 2015-11-26
AU2012350695B2 (en) 2017-05-11
FR2984197B1 (en) 2014-01-03
JP2015507759A (en) 2015-03-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9910294B2 (en) Eyeglass optimization using an individual eye model
US9482884B2 (en) Method of determining an ophthalmic lens
JP5795362B2 (en) Method for calculating spectacle lenses using prescription data depending on viewing angle
JP4656530B2 (en) Mold design method
JP5107359B2 (en) Progressive power lens evaluation method and evaluation apparatus, and progressive power lens manufacturing method
JP4656531B2 (en) Mold design method
EP2790876B1 (en) Method for transforming a progressive ophthalmic surface
CN104823098B (en) Eyeglass, manufacturing equipment and manufacturing method for eyeglass
US8608312B2 (en) Method for determining an aspherization layer for an ophthalmic lens
AU2012257790B2 (en) Process for determining position parameters of a manufactured surface relative to a reference surface
JP5107358B2 (en) Lens evaluation method, lens evaluation apparatus, lens manufacturing method, and lens characteristic display method
US8272735B2 (en) Lens design simplification process
US8646909B2 (en) Method for determining, optimizing and producing an ophthalmic lens and set of ophthalmic lenses
CN115461653A (en) Optical lens
JP6703001B2 (en) A method of making a prescription surface design of a multifocal lens and a multifocal lens having the prescription surface.
US20140098341A1 (en) Method for calculating and optimizing an eyeglass lens taking into consideration higher-order imaging errors
JP5495529B2 (en) Manufacturing method of lens mold and manufacturing method of lens
EP2920640A2 (en) Method for determining the feasibility of an ophthalmic lens
EP4354210A1 (en) Eyeglass lens and eyeglass lens manufacturing method
CN113995552A (en) Method for manufacturing artificial lens for precise surface shape control and artificial lens

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140616

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150416

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 741701

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012009674

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20151106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2552182

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20151126

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 741701

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151113

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151112

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20151231

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151212

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20151228

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012009674

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E026248

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151231

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20151120

Year of fee payment: 4

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160513

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602012009674

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL, FR

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GENERALE D'OPTIQUE), CHARENTON-LE-PONT, FR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL, FR

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GENERALE D'OPTIQUE), FR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20180625

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL, FR

Effective date: 20180601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150812

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20221122

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230109

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20221228

Year of fee payment: 11

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20231123

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20231124

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20231123

Year of fee payment: 12