EP2758506B1 - Use of iron(iii) hydroxymonocarboxylate complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems - Google Patents

Use of iron(iii) hydroxymonocarboxylate complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2758506B1
EP2758506B1 EP11764703.2A EP11764703A EP2758506B1 EP 2758506 B1 EP2758506 B1 EP 2758506B1 EP 11764703 A EP11764703 A EP 11764703A EP 2758506 B1 EP2758506 B1 EP 2758506B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
composition
source
cleaned
iii
iron
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP11764703.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2758506B8 (en
EP2758506A1 (en
Inventor
Achim BÖHME
Virginie MAAS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ecolab USA Inc
Original Assignee
Ecolab Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=44759663&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2758506(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Ecolab Inc filed Critical Ecolab Inc
Publication of EP2758506A1 publication Critical patent/EP2758506A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2758506B1 publication Critical patent/EP2758506B1/en
Publication of EP2758506B8 publication Critical patent/EP2758506B8/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/39Organic or inorganic per-compounds
    • C11D3/3902Organic or inorganic per-compounds combined with specific additives
    • C11D3/3905Bleach activators or bleach catalysts
    • C11D3/3907Organic compounds
    • C11D3/391Oxygen-containing compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/83Mixtures of non-ionic with anionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0017Multi-phase liquid compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/20Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • C11D3/2075Carboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/39Organic or inorganic per-compounds
    • C11D3/3947Liquid compositions

Definitions

  • the term “about” refers to variation in the numerical quantity that may occur, for example, through typical measuring and liquid handling procedures used for making concentrates or use solutions in the real world; through inadvertent error in these procedures; through differences in the manufacture, source, or purity of the ingredients used to make the compositions or carry out the methods; and the like.
  • the term “about” also encompasses amounts that differ due to different equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term “about”, the claims include equivalents to the quantities.
  • compositions of the present invention may include builders and/or additional chelating agents.
  • Builders and/or chelating agents may be used to keep an active form on the activator complex in solution/suspension. This aids in providing suitable activity for reuse of the solutions as well.
  • Exemplary peroxycarboxylic acids for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, peroxypentanoic, peroxyhexanoic, peroxyheptanoic, peroxyoctanoic, peroxynonanoic, peroxyisononanoic, peroxydecanoic, peroxyundecanoic, peroxydodecanoic, peroxyascorbic, peroxyadipic, peroxycitric, peroxypimelic, or peroxysuberic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • the amount of active oxygen source present in the compositions of the present invention is dependent on a variety of factors including, for example, the type of surface to be cleaned, and the amount and type of soil present on the surface. In some embodiments, the amount of active oxygen source present is between about ⁇ 5 wt.-% and about ⁇ 70 wt.-%. Acceptable levels of active oxygen source present are ⁇ 10 wt.-% and about ⁇ 60 wt.-%, or ⁇ 15 wt.-% and about ⁇ 50 wt.-%; ⁇ 20 wt.-% and about ⁇ 40 wt.-% is a particularly suitable level.
  • compositions of the present invention include a source of alkalinity.
  • alkaline sources suitable for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, basic salts, amines, alkanol amines, carbonates and silicates, and mixtures thereof.
  • Other exemplary alkaline sources for use with the methods of the present invention include NaOH (sodium hydroxide), KOH (potassium hydroxide), TEA (triethanol amine), DEA (diethanol amine), MEA (monoethanolamine), sodium carbonate, and morpholine, sodium metasilicate and potassium silicate.
  • the alkaline source selected may be compatible with the surface to be cleaned.
  • the source of alkalinity is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or a mixture thereof, most preferred is sodium hydroxide.
  • the amount of alkaline source present is dependent on a variety of factors including, for example, the type of surface to be cleaned, and the amount and type of soil present on the surface. In some embodiments, the amount of alkaline source present is about 5 wt.-% to about 70 wt.-%. Suitable levels of alkaline include about 10 wt.-% to about 60 wt.-% and about 20 wt.-% to about 50 wt.-%.
  • a surfactant or mixture of surfactants may be used in the methods of the present invention.
  • the surfactant chosen may be compatible with the surface to be cleaned.
  • a variety of surfactants may be used, including anionic, nonionic, cationic, and zwitterionic surfactants, which are commercially available from a number of sources.
  • Suitable surfactants include nonionic surfactants, for example, low foaming non-ionic surfactants.
  • the level and degree of foaming under the conditions of use and in subsequent recovery of the composition may be a factor for selecting particular surfactants and mixtures of surfactants. For example, in certain applications it may be desirable to minimize foaming and a surfactant or mixture of surfactants that provides reduced foaming may be used. In addition, it may be desirable to select a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants that exhibits a foam that breaks down relatively quickly so that the composition may be recovered and reused with an acceptable amount of down time. In addition, the surfactant or mixture of surfactants may be selected depending upon the particular soil that is to be removed.
  • the surfactants described herein may be used singly or in combination in the methods of the present invention.
  • the nonionics and anionics may be used in combination.
  • the semi-polar nonionic, cationic, amphoteric and zwitterionic surfactants may be employed in combination with nonionics or anionics.
  • the above examples are merely specific illustrations of the numerous surfactants which may find application within the scope of this invention. It should be understood that the selection of particular surfactants or combinations of surfactants may be based on a number of factors including compatibility with the surface to be cleaned at the intended use concentration and the intended environmental conditions including temperature and pH.
  • the amount of total surfactant in the compositions is ⁇ 0.01 wt.-% to about ⁇ 30 wt.-%.
  • Acceptable levels of surfactant include ⁇ 0.1 wt.-% to about ⁇ 20 wt.-%, or ⁇ 0.5 wt.-% to about ⁇ 15 wt.-%.
  • nonionic surfactants suitable for use in the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, those having a polyalkylene oxide polymer portion include nonionic surfactants of C6-C24 alcohol ethoxylates, preferably C6-C14 alcohol ethoxylates having 1 to about 20 ethylene oxide groups, preferably about 9 to about 20 ethylene oxide groups; C6-C24 alkylphenol ethoxylates, preferably C8-C10 alkylphenol ethoxylates) having 1 to about 100 ethylene oxide groups, preferably about 12 to about 20 ethylene oxide groups; C6-C24 alkylpolyglycosides, preferably C6-C20 alkylpolyglycosides, having 1 to about 20 glycoside groups, preferably about 9 to about 20 glycoside groups; C6-C24 fatty acid ester ethoxylates, propoxylates or glycerides; and C4-C24 mono or dialkanolamides.
  • Suitable amphoteric surfactants include, but are not limited to, amine oxide compounds having the formula: where R, R', R", and R"' are each a C 1 -C 24 alkyl, aryl or arylalkyl group that may optionally contain one or more P, O, S or N heteroatoms.
  • Suitable surfactants may also include food grade surfactants, linear alkylbenzene sulfonic acids and their salts, and ethylene oxide/propylene oxide derivatives sold under the PluronicTM trade name. Suitable surfactants include those that are compatible as an indirect or direct food additive or substance.
  • anionics include, but are not limited to, sodium alkylarylsulfonate, alpha-olefin sulfonate, and fatty alcohol sulfates.
  • suitable anionic surfactants include sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, potassium laureth-7 sulfate, and sodium tetradecenyl sulfonate.
  • the amount of anionic surfactant in the compositions is ⁇ 0.1 wt.-% to about ⁇ 30 wt.-%.
  • Acceptable levels of surfactant include ⁇ 0.5 wt.-% to about ⁇ 20 wt.-%, or ⁇ 1 wt.-% to about ⁇ 15 wt.-%.
  • Exemplary additional components that may be provided within the compositions used in the methods of the present invention include builders, water conditioning agents, nonaqueous components, adjuvants, carriers, processing aids, enzymes, penetrants, antimicrobial agents, buffers, and pH adjusting agents.
  • Builders and builder salts may be inorganic or organic.
  • builders suitable for use with the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, phosphonic acids and phosphonates, phosphates, aminocarboxylates and their derivatives, pyrophosphates, polyphosphates, ethylenediamene and ethylenetriamene derivatives, hydroxyacids, and mono-, di-, and tri-carboxylates and their corresponding acids.
  • Other builders include aluminosilicates, nitroloacetates and their derivatives, and mixtures thereof.
  • Still other builders include aminocarboxylates, including salts of hydroxyethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (HEDTA), and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.
  • HEDTA hydroxyethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid
  • Exemplary commercially available chelating agents for use with the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to: sodium tripolyphosphate available from Innophos; Trilon A® available from BASF; Versene 100®, Low NTA Versene ®, Versene Powder®, and Versenol 120® all available from Dow; Dissolvine D-40 available from BASF; and sodium citrate.
  • a biodegradable aminocarboxylate or derivative thereof is present as a builder in the methods of the present invention.
  • exemplary biodegradable aminocarboxylates include, but are not limited to: Dissolvine GL-38® and Dissolvine GL-74 ® both available from Akzo; Trilon M® available from BASF; Baypure CX100® available from Bayer; Versene EDG® available from Dow; HIDS® available from Nippon Shakubai; Octaquest E30® and Octaquest A65® both available from Finetex/Innospec Octel.
  • organic chelating agent may be used.
  • Organic chelating agents include both polymeric and small molecule chelating agents.
  • Organic small molecule chelating agents are typically organocarboxylate compounds or organophosphate chelating agents.
  • Polymeric chelating agents commonly include polyanionic compositions such as polyacrylic acid compounds.
  • Small molecule organic chelating agents include N-hydroxy-ethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), nitrilotriaacetic acid (NTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), ethylenediaminetetraproprionic acid triethylenetetraaminehexaacetic acid (TTHA), and the respective alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts thereof.
  • Aminophosphonates are also suitable for use as chelating agents with the methods of the invention and include ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonates, nitrilotrismethylene phosphonates, and diethylenetriamine-(pentamethylene phosphonate) for example. These aminophosphonates commonly contain alkyl or alkenyl groups with less than 8 carbon atoms.
  • sequestrants include water soluble polycarboxylate polymers.
  • Such homopolymeric and copolymeric chelating agents include polymeric compositions with pendant (-CO 2 H) carboxylic acid groups and include polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, acrylic acid-methacrylic acid copolymers, acrylic-maleic copolymers, hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, hydrolyzed methacrylamide, hydrolyzed acrylamidemethacrylamide copolymers, hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile, hydrolyzed polymethacrylonitrile, hydrolyzed acrylonitrile methacrylonitrile copolymers, or mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred builders for use with the methods of the present invention are water soluble.
  • Water soluble inorganic alkaline builder salts which may be used alone or in admixture with other builders include, but are not limited to, alkali metal or ammonia or substituted ammonium salts of carbonates, silicates, phosphates and polyphosphates, and borates.
  • Water soluble organic alkaline builders which are useful in the present invention include alkanolamines and cyclic amines.
  • Particularly preferred builders include PAA (polyacrylic acid) and its salts, phosphonobutane carboxylic acid, EDTA and sodium gluconate.
  • the amount of builder present in the compositions for use with the methods of the present invention is about 0.001 wt.-% to about 30 wt.-%. In some embodiments, about 0.005 wt.-% to about 20 wt.-% of builder is present. Acceptable levels of builder include about 0.05 wt.-% to about 15 wt.-%.
  • compositions for use with the methods of the present invention do not include a gelling agent.
  • a penetrant may be used with the methods of the present invention.
  • the penetrant may be combined with an alkaline source in the cleaning composition, or, the penetrant may be used without an alkaline source.
  • the penetrant is water miscible.
  • suitable penetrants include, but are not limited to, alcohols, short chain ethoxylated alcohols and phenol (having 1-6 ethoxylate groups).
  • Organic solvents are also suitable penetrants.
  • suitable organic solvents, for use as a penetrant include esters, ethers, ketones, amines, and nitrated and chlorinated hydrocarbons.
  • Ethoxylated alcohols are also suitable for use with the methods of the present invention.
  • ethoxylated alcohols include, but are not limited to, alky, aryl, and alkylaryl alkloxylates. These alkloxylates may be further modified by capping with chlorine-, bromine-, benzyl-, methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl- and alkyl-groups.
  • Ethoxylated alcohols may be present in the cleaning composition from about 0.1 wt% to about 20 wt%.
  • Fatty acids are also suitable for use as penetrants in the methods of the present invention.
  • Some non-limiting examples of fatty acids are C 6 to C 12 straight or branched fatty acids.
  • fatty acids used in the methods of the present invention are liquid at room temperature.
  • a penetrant for use in the methods of the present invention includes water soluble glycol ethers.
  • glycol ethers include dipropylene glycol methyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL DPM from Dow Chemical Co.), diethylene glycol methyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL DM from Dow Chemical Co.), propylene glycol methyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL PM from Dow Chemical Co.), and ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL EB from Dow Chemical Co.).
  • a glycol ether is present in an amount of from about 1.0 wt.-% to about 20 wt.-%.
  • the present invention provides methods for removing soil from a surface.
  • the methods for removing soil from a surface include using a clean out of place (COP) or clean in place (CIP) cleaning process.
  • the methods include applying to the surface a composition of the invention, preferably in form of foam, including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, preferably an iron(III) gluconate, a source of alkalinity, preferably NaOH, and an active oxygen source, preferably H 2 O 2 . Additional ingredients may also be present in the compositions.
  • the iron(III) activator complex, source of alkalinity, and active oxygen source may be applied to the surface in a variety of ways.
  • the activator complex, source of alkalinity, and active oxygen source may be applied to the surface as part of a single composition, preferably in form of foam (COP).
  • combinations of each of the components may be applied to the surface.
  • the activator complex and source of alkalinity are applied in a first step, preferably as foam, and the active oxygen source is applied in a second step, preferably as foam, without a rinse step between the first and the second steps.
  • Additional ingredients including, but not limited to, builders, surfactants, and chelating agents may be added to the compositions used in the first step, the second step, or both the first and the second steps.
  • the composition of the first step may be applied to the surface for an amount of time effective to penetrate the soil.
  • the first step may be applied to the surface to be cleaned for between about ⁇ 5 minutes to about ⁇ 30 minutes.
  • an active oxygen source and a source of alkalinity are applied as stable foam to the surface in a first step, and an iron(III) activator complex is applied to the surface in second step, without a rinse step between the first and the second steps.
  • the methods and compositions of the present invention are applied to surfaces which are normally cleaned using a clean out of place or in place cleaning technique.
  • surfaces include hard and soft surface, for example of upper outer and/or inner outer surfaces of materials such as ceramic, metal, plastic and/or glas, surface that came into contact with beverages and/or food, beverages such alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages such as beer or milk, food such as meat, vegetables and/or grain-products.
  • instruments and apparatus for example used in sanitary or medical services, evaporators, heat exchangers, including tube-in-tube exchangers, direct steam injection, and plate-in-frame exchangers, heating coils including steam, flame or heat transfer fluid heated re-crystallizers, pan crystallizers, spray dryers, drum dryers, and tanks.
  • evaporators heat exchangers, including tube-in-tube exchangers, direct steam injection, and plate-in-frame exchangers
  • heating coils including steam, flame or heat transfer fluid heated re-crystallizers, pan crystallizers, spray dryers, drum dryers, and tanks.
  • Additional surfaces capable of being cleaned using the methods and compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to membranes, medical devices, laundry and/or textiles, and hard surfaces, e.g., walls, floors, dishes, flatware, pots and pans, heat exchange coils, ovens, fryers, smoke houses, sewer drain lines, and vehicles.
  • the surfaces may be cleaned using a clean in place method.
  • the methods of the present invention may also be used to remove dust from air handling equipment, for example, from air conditioners and refrigeration heat exchangers.
  • the methods of the present invention may be used for drain line microbial control, e.g., to reduce or remove biofilm formation.
  • Exemplary industries in which the methods and compositions of the present invention may be used include, but are not limited to: the food and beverage industry, e.g., the dairy, cheese, sugar, and brewery industries; oil processing industry; industrial agriculture and ethanol processing; and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry.
  • the methods and compositions of the present invention provide for soil removal from surfaces at reduced temperatures, e.g., from about ⁇ 5° C to about ⁇ 23° C, preferably at about ⁇ 7° C to about ⁇ 18° C, preferably about ⁇ 10° C to about ⁇ 15° C compared to conventional cleaning techniques, e.g., clean out of place and/or clean in place techniques.
  • conventional cleaning techniques e.g., clean out of place and/or clean in place techniques.
  • the ability of stable foam formation and to clean at reduced temperatures, preferably at about 15° C results in energy and cost savings compared to traditional cleaning techniques that require increased temperatures. Further, the present invention provides for effective soil removal on surfaces that cannot withstand high temperatures.
  • the methods of the present invention provide for soil removal at reduced temperatures, and using reduced amounts of chemistry, compared to conventional cleaning methods.
  • the methods of the present invention use about 25% to about 50% less chemistry, e.g., source of alkalinity and/or active oxygen source, than conventional cleaning methods.
  • the methods of the present invention may effectively remove soil at both low temperatures, and using a low concentration of chemicals, providing both an energy savings and a reduction in the amount of chemistry consumed per cleaning.
  • compositions for use with the methods of the present invention are applied as stable foam to the surface for a sufficient amount of time such that the composition penetrates into the soil to be removed. This penetration into the soil allows for oxygen gas generation to occur in the soil.
  • the methods of the present invention are carried out at lower temperatures than conventional cleaning methods, an increased cleaning time is not required to achieve equal or better cleaning results than conventional cleaning methods.
  • a composition including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, an active oxygen source, and a source of alkalinity and an excess of C 4 to C 18 hydroxymonocarboxylate is applied as a stable foam to a surface for an amount of time sufficient to substantially remove a soil from the surface.
  • the composition is applied to the surface for about 1 minutes to about 60 minutes, preferably about 5 minutes to about 55 minutes, further preferred about 10 minutes to about 50 minutes.
  • the composition is applied to the surface for about 20 to about 40 minutes. It is to be understood that all values and ranges between these values and ranges are encompassed by the methods of the present invention.
  • a pre-treatment foamed composition including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, an active oxygen source, and a source of alkalinity, is applied to the surface for an amount of time sufficient to substantially penetrate a soil on the surface.
  • the pre-treatment foamed composition of the invention is applied to the surface to be cleaned for about 1 to about 30 minutes.
  • the pre-treatment foamed composition is applied to the surface to be cleaned for about 5 to about 15 minutes.
  • the pre-treatment foamed composition is applied to the surface for about 10 minutes. It is to be understood that any value between these ranges is to be encompassed by the methods of the present invention.
  • an foamed composition including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, an active oxygen source, and a source of alkalinity, is applied as a stable foam to a surface to be cleaned after a pre-treatment foamed composition has been applied to the surface, i.e., there is no rinse step between the application of the pre-treatment foamed composition and the foamed composition.
  • the -foamed composition is applied to the surface for an amount of time sufficient to effectively clean the selected surface, and to activate the pre-treatment chemistry, e.g., generate oxygen gas.
  • the foamed composition is applied for about 1 to about 30 minutes.
  • the use foamed composition is applied for about 5, about 10, or about 15 minutes. It is to be understood that all values and ranges between these values and rages are encompassed by the methods of the present invention.
  • This test method provides a basis to assess the foam compositions according to the invention for cleaning efficiency of glass surfaces contaminated with tallow soils.
  • Transparent plastic sticks 500 ml beaker Acetone Tallow (soil) Spattle Stainless steel test plates of 10 cm x 5 cm x 0,5 cm (The stainless steel test plates are cleaned with acetone before use) Clean paper toweling Stop watch Drying oven Analytical balance capable of weighing to 0.0001 g.
  • the stainless steel test plates were cleaned before use with acetone, cleaned thereafter with a clean paper toweling and allowed to dry at room temperature for about 12 hours.
  • the upper surface of said stainless steel test plates were homogenously coated with tallow (see table II) so that a boundary area of 10% remains not coated. Thereafter the coated stainless steel test plates were weighed and the weight was recorded respectively (see table II). Then, the plates were cooled at 2° C for about 12 hours.
  • the cooled tallow coated test plates were completely soaked and up right placed in the cleaning composition of examples 1 to 4 of table II at a temperature of 15° C. After 10 minutes the so treated stainless steel test plate were allowed to dry at ambient temperature at about 23° C for 15 hours.
  • examples 3 and 4 comprising an activator complex of Iron(III) gluconic acid show excellent cold cleaning activity compared to an Iron(II) activator complex. It can be further taken from table II that an excess of gluconic acid increase the soil removal activity of the activator complex of the present invention.
  • This test method provides a basis to assess the foam formation properties of the foam cleaning composition of the invention.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to compositions and methods for removing soils from surfaces, such as hard surfaces, by generating a gas on and in the soil, at reduced temperatures.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In many industrial applications, such as the manufacture of foods and beverages, especially in the meat processing industry, hard surfaces commonly become contaminated with soils such as carbohydrate, proteins, blood and water hardness soils, food oil soils, fat soils and other soils. Such soils can arise from the manufacture of both liquid and solid foodstuffs. Meat soils and residues such as proteins, fats, blood and oils, especially when dried, can be hard to remove soil. Similarly, carbohydrate soils, such as cellulosic, monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, starches, gums and other complex materials, when dried, can form tough, hard to remove soils, particularly when combined with other soil components such as proteins, blood, fats, oils, minerals, and others. The removal of such food soil, such as meat soils and residues, can be a significant problem.
  • Clean in place (CIP) cleaning techniques are a specific cleaning regimen adapted for removing soils from the internal components of tanks, lines, pumps and other process equipment used for processing typically liquid product streams such as beverages, milk, juices, etc. Clean in place cleaning involves passing cleaning solutions through the system without dismantling any system components. The minimum clean-in-place technique involves passing the cleaning solution through the equipment and then resuming normal processing. Any product contaminated by cleaner residue can be discarded.
  • Clean out of place systems (COP) cleaning techniques are a specific cleaning regimen adapted for removing soils from interior and exterior surfaces of a wide variety of parts, such as ceramic surfaces, metal surfaces, walls, wash tanks, soaking vessels, mop buckets, holding tanks, scrub sinks, vehicle parts washers, non-continuous batch washers and systems, ceilings, external parts of production machinery and the like.
  • Often clean in place as well as clean out of place methods can involve a first rinse, the application of the cleaning solutions, and a second rinse with potable water followed by resumed operations. The process can also include any other contacting step in which a rinse, acidic or basic functional fluid, solvent or other cleaning component such as hot water, cold water, etc. can be contacted with the equipment at any step during the process. Conventional clean in place as well as clean out of place methods require high temperatures, e.g., of about 40° C to about 80° C. In production rooms, the elevated water temperature currently used for that kind of cleaning processes is in the range of about 40° C to about 60° C. Conventional clean in place techniques (CIP) as well as clean out of place techniques (COP) thus require the consumption of large amounts of energy.
  • Further cleaning compositions used in clean in place as well as clean out of place processes, in particular in the food and meat processing industry are non-foaming or low foaming liquid compositions. Non foaming or low foaming cleaning compositions have the drawback that the soaking time on an upright tiled wall is short due to a good flow rate of the liquid cleaning composition.
  • Furthermore, non foaming or low foaming cleaning compositions have the drawback that the user cannot easily track the areas that are processed or not processed due to the brief residence time of the cleaning composition and low foam stability. There is a tendency that surfaces to be cleaned are treated twice thus require the consumption of large amounts of water and cleaning composition.
  • What is needed therefore is an improved low temperature cleaning composition for removing soils that are not easily removed at reduced temperatures, having an increased dwell time and being traceable.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The object addressed by the present invention is to provide a cleaning composition that minimizes energy and having excellent soil removal properties, preferably in the food and meat processing industry.
  • According to the present invention an aqueous composition for removing soil at low temperatures from a surface to be cleaned is provided, comprising a source of alkalinity, a surfactant, an iron(III) activator complex and a source of peroxide as defined in claim 1.
  • In some embodiments, the aqueous composition is an aqueous two-component composition for removing soil at low temperatures from a surface to be cleaned, comprising a component A) and a component B),
    wherein the component A) comprises:
    • a source of alkalinity,
    • a surfactant,
    • an iron(III) activator complex, preferably and iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex; and
    wherein the component B) comprises:
    • a source of as defined in claim 2.
  • A solvent, preferably water, can be added 100 wt.-% to the cleaning composition of the invention. The solvent content, preferably water, of the cleaning composition according to the invention is simply determined by subtracting the amounts of all the usual components from 100 wt. %.
  • Generally, in meat production rooms for cleaning processes the elevated water temperature is about 40° C to 60° C. According to the present invention the water temperature used for pre-rinsing, foaming and final rinse can be adjusted to about ≥ 10° C to about ≤ 20° C, preferably ≥ 12° C to about ≤ 15° C.
  • The weight amount (wt.-%) is calculated on the total weight amount of the liquid cleaning composition, if not otherwise stated. The total weight amount of all components of the liquid cleaning composition does not exceed 100 wt.-%.
  • As used herein, "weight percent," "wt-%," "percent by weight," "% by weight," and variations thereof refer to the concentration of a substance as the weight of that substance divided by the total weight of the composition and multiplied by 100. It is understood that, as used here, "percent," "%," and the like are intended to be synonymous with "weight percent," "wt-%," etc.
  • As used herein, the term "about" refers to variation in the numerical quantity that may occur, for example, through typical measuring and liquid handling procedures used for making concentrates or use solutions in the real world; through inadvertent error in these procedures; through differences in the manufacture, source, or purity of the ingredients used to make the compositions or carry out the methods; and the like. The term "about" also encompasses amounts that differ due to different equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term "about", the claims include equivalents to the quantities.
  • It should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing "a compound" includes a composition having two or more compounds. It should also be noted that the term "or" is generally employed in its sense including "and/or" unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
  • As used herein, the term "cleaning" refers to a method or process used to facilitate or aid in soil removal, bleaching, microbial population reduction, and any combination thereof. The methods, and compositions of the present invention can include, consist essentially of, or consist of the steps, and ingredients of the present invention as well as other ingredients described herein.
  • As used herein, "consisting essentially of" means that the methods, and compositions may include additional steps, or ingredients, but only if the additional steps, or ingredients do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed methods, and compositions.
  • In some embodiments, the compositions for use with the methods of the present invention are at an alkaline pH, e.g., about 11 to about 14. In some embodiments, all components may be applied to the surface to be cleaned as part of a foam composition. In other embodiments, the components A) comprising the activator complex and the source of alkalinity may be applied to the surface as part of one composition and the active oxygen source of component B) may be applied as part of another separate composition. In still yet other embodiments, the active oxygen source and the activator complex may be applied to the surface as part of one composition, and the source of alkalinity may be applied to the surface as part of another separate composition. The activator complex, the source of alkalinity and the active oxygen source may be applied in any combination, and in any stepwise order, to the surface to be cleaned, whereby the application in form of foam to the surface to be cleaned is most preferred.
  • A preferred embodiment of the present invention can be a foam composition comprising the mixed components A) and B).
  • Still another embodiment of the present is directed to a method for removing soil from a surface to be cleaned comprising applying to the surface a composition of the present invention.
  • It has been surprisingly found that the aqueous composition can be used for removal of soil at reduced temperatures, while still providing excellent soil removal properties. Thus, the compositions of the present invention provide for reduced energy consumption, e.g., lower cleaning temperatures.
  • The composition of the invention is applied to the surface to be cleaned in the form of foam. The foam has compared to a liquid composition an increased dwell time and the foam treated areas can be easily tracked that avoids multiple treatment of the same area. Thus, the compositions of the present invention provide for reduced water and reduced chemical consumption.
  • It can be preferred that the aqueous liquid cleaning composition comprises a component A) and a component B) that are separated from each other. At the time of use, a foam of component A) and component B) is generated, which is applied to the surface to be cleaned.
  • The aqueous cleaning composition of the invention can be a concentrated solution. A concentrated solution has advantages in transporting and storing. The concentrated solution can be further diluted, for example prior use, by admixing a solvent, preferably water.
  • It should be understood that the aqueous cleaning composition of the invention can be free of at least one additive, preferably all additives, selected from the group of dye, color transfer inhibitor, anti-redeposition agents, optical brighteners, builder, oil and water repellant agents, color fastness agents, starch/sizing agents, fabric softening agents, anti-microbials, fungicides, UV absorbers, thickeners, oxidizers, fragrances and/or mixtures thereof.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In some aspects, the present invention relates to compositions and methods for removing soils from surfaces to be cleaned. Surfaces to be cleaned are hard and/or soft surfaces. In some embodiments, the composition of the invention is applied in a clean in place process (CIP) and/or in a clean out of place process (COP). According to the present invention it is preferred that the clean in place process (CIP) is a fully automated cleaning process that requires no reconstruction of the production plant before execution of the cleaning.
  • In other embodiments, the compositions of the invention may be manually applied to the surface to be cleaned. In particular the compositions of the invention can be used in the food processing industry, such as meat processing industry, for cleaning purposes.
  • The composition of the invention can be a two component composition that can be mixed in situ. The mixed composition can be shelf stable for about 30 minutes to about 60 minutes. The compositions of the invention can be applied to the surfaces to be cleaned in form of a foam. Applying a foam to an upright surface to be cleaned provides a prolonged contact time and the treated areas can be easily traced. The foam stability may be in the range of about 10 minutes to about 20 minutes.
  • The cleaning methods and compositions may be used at lower temperatures than those used in conventional cleaning methods. The compositions of the invention are activated for example by contact with an iron(III) activator complex. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that the use of the selected activator complexes allows for the lowering of the cleaning temperature. It is thought that the activator complexes act as a catalyst for the active oxygen source to produce oxygen gas at lower temperatures than those temperatures at which the active oxygen source conventionally degrades to produce oxygen gas. In some embodiments, the use of an iron(III) activator complex in combination with an active oxygen source allows for the production of oxygen gas in situ on and in a soil, and/or in solution. It is thought that the mechanical action of the oxygen gas generation aids in breaking up soils present on the contacted surfaces.
  • In some embodiments, the use of an iron(III) activator complex in the methods of the present invention allows for the use of reduced levels of chemistry, e.g., an alkaline source and/or an active oxygen source, during cleaning, because the cleaning composition of the invention has a remarkable increased cleaning efficiency that allows the use of a lower concentrated cleaning composition. Thus, the methods of the present invention provide for reduced energy consumption, e.g., lower cleaning temperatures, and reduced chemical consumption.
  • In some embodiments, the compositions of the invention including the foam can have an alkaline pH, e.g., a pH of about 10 to about 14.
  • To prevent the decomposition of the activator complex to an inactive form, e.g., iron (II) or other inactive forms, the compositions of the present invention may include builders and/or additional chelating agents. Builders and/or chelating agents may be used to keep an active form on the activator complex in solution/suspension. This aids in providing suitable activity for reuse of the solutions as well.
  • The methods, and compositions of the present invention can include, consist essentially of, or consist of the steps, and ingredients of the present invention as well as other ingredients described herein. As used herein, "consisting essentially of" means that the methods, and compositions may include additional steps, or ingredients, but only if the additional steps, or ingredients do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed methods, and compositions.
  • In some aspects, the methods and compositions of the present invention may be applied to equipment generally cleaned using clean in place cleaning procedures. Examples of such equipment include evaporators, heat exchangers (including tube-in-tube exchangers, direct steam injection, and plate-in-frame exchangers), heating coils (including steam, flame or heat transfer fluid heated) re-crystallizers, pan crystallizers, spray dryers, drum dryers, and tanks.
  • The methods and compositions of the present invention may be used in any application where thermally degraded soils, i.e., caked on soils or burned on soils, such as proteins or carbohydrates, need to be removed. As used herein, the term "thermally degraded soil" refers to a soil or soils that have been exposed to heat and as a result have become baked on to the surface to be cleaned. Exemplary thermally degraded soils include food soils that have been heated during processing, e.g., dairy products heated on pasteurizers, fructose, or corn syrup.
  • The methods and compositions of the present invention may also be used to remove other non-thermally degraded soils that are not easily removed using conventional cleaning techniques. Soil types suited to cleaning with the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, starch, cellulosic fiber, protein, simple carbohydrates and combinations of any of these soil types with mineral complexes. Examples of specific food soils that are effectively removed using the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, meat residues, blood residues, protein residues, vegetable and fruit juices, brewing and fermentation residues, soils generated in sugar beet and cane processing, and soils generated in condiment and sauce manufacture, e.g., ketchup, tomato sauce, barbeque sauce. These soils can develop on heat exchange equipment surfaces and on other surfaces during the manufacturing and packaging process.
  • Exemplary industries in which the methods and compositions of the present invention can be used include, but are not limited to: the food and beverage industry, e.g., the meat processing industry; dairy, cheese, sugar, and brewery industries; oil processing industry; industrial agriculture and ethanol processing; and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry.
  • Conventional CIP as well as COP processing is generally well-known. The process includes applying a foam composition of the invention onto the surface to be cleaned. The foam adheres on the surface for slowly removing the soil.
  • The process to remove a soil according to the invention can includes an alkaline foam wash. According to one embodiment of the invention a process to remove a soil can include a fresh water rinse and an alkaline foam wash or a fresh water rinse, an alkaline foam wash and a fresh water rinse. Another embodiment of a process of the invention to remove soil can comprise at least three steps: an alkaline foam wash, an acid solution wash, and then a fresh water rinse. The alkaline foam softens the soils and removes the organic alkaline soluble soils. The subsequent acid solution removes mineral soils left behind by the alkaline cleaning step. The strength of the alkaline and acid solutions and the duration of the cleaning steps are typically dependent on the durability of the soil. The water rinse removes any residual solution and soils, and cleans the surface prior to the equipment being returned on-line.
  • The methods and compositions of the present invention provide for enhanced soil removal at reduced temperatures, e.g., about ≥ 10° C to ≤ 20° C, preferably at about 15° C. The present invention also provides for a reduction in the amount of chemistry and water consumed during the cleaning process. Thus, the present invention provides both energy and water savings, while achieving effective soil removal.
  • The composition of the invention can be applied by spray as foam to the surface to be cleaned. By "spray" the present invention means a spray of discrete droplets or a j et of foam. The operative consideration being that one or preferably both of the components A) and B) compositions are ejected from the unit with sufficient force that can be deposited upon a surface that is displaced horizontally from the unit.
  • The process for making the foam according to the invention may involve the use of a foam cleaning device, comprising a double injection system. This system enables the mixing of component A) and component B) with water by means of the Venturi Principle, followed by the addition of compressed air to produce foam. Using the double injection system described above components A) and B) are diluted on-line, with water under pressure at the time of application, to a concentration of between 0.1 and 10 wt.-%, preferably 0.1 to 5 wt.-%, and most preferably 0.5 and 3 wt.-%.
  • According to one embodiment, the foam composition of the invention has a foam stability, wherein the reduction of foam volume after 1 minute is about 10 vol.-% to 20 vol.-%, after 2 minute is about 15 vol.-% to 25 vol.-%, after 5 minute is about 30 vol.-% to 40 vol.-% and after 10 minute is about 75 vol.-% to 85 vol.-%, based on the initial foam volume.
  • The foam stability allows an improved cleaning effect, because the foam as such can be considered as a carrier for the cleaning solution. It ensures that the solution can also adhere to vertical surface and ceilings. As a result, longer contact is achieved between the cleaning solution and the surface to be cleaned. The foam layer on the cleaning agent film has a repository effect, i.e. through destruction of further foam bubbles new cleaning agent solution is constantly transported to the surface.
  • According to one preferred embodiment, the foam composition of the invention having a mean foam pore size D50 in the range of ≥ 10 µm to about ≤ 2000 µm, preferably ≥ 80 µm to about ≤ 1000 µm, and more preferred ≥ 100 µm to about ≤ 500 µm.
  • The increased foam stability and foam pore size of the foamed composition according to the present invention provides beside the improved cleaning activity of the selected components an additional increase of the cleaning effect.
  • The aqueous composition for removing soil at low temperatures from a surface to be cleaned, comprising a source of alkalinity, a surfactant, an iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex and a source of peroxide provides excellent soil removal properties. Low temperatures are temperatures at between about ≥ 1° C to about ≤ 30° C, preferably at between about ≥ 5° C to about ≤ 25° C, further preferred at between about ≥ 7° C to about ≤ 20° C and more preferred about ≥ 10° C to about ≤ 15° C. The composition of the invention can be used at low temperatures in form of foam cleaner in order to change the current cleaning process for example in the meat processing industry. The benefit of the use of the composition of the invention is a decrease of the water temperature used for pre-rinsing, foaming and final rinse.
  • A preferred embodiment of the present invention is an aqueous two component composition for removing soil at low temperatures from a surface to be cleaned, comprising a component A) and a component B), wherein the component A) comprises at least one source of alkalinity, at least one surfactant, at least one iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex; and wherein the component B) comprises at least one source of peroxide.
  • An improved cold cleaning performance at temperatures about ≤ 20° C, preferably at about ≤ 15° C, can be obtained by choosing the mol ratio of iron(III) to C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate is about 1 : > 1, preferably in the range of about 1 : 1.1 to 1 : 10, further preferred in the range of about 1 : 1.5 to 1 : 8 and more preferred in the range of about 1 : 2 to 1 : 5.
  • The present invention provides an aqueous composition including an iron(III) activator complex. As used herein the term "activator complex" or "activation complex" refers to an iron(III) activator complex capable of reacting with an active oxygen source and/or a soil to enhance production of oxygen gas in situ on and in the soil. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that the iron(III) activator complex acts as a catalyst for oxygen gas generation during cleaning. That is, it is thought that the iron(III) activator complex degrades an active oxygen source to generate oxygen gas in situ on and in the soil, during cleaning, without being degraded itself.
  • Additional methods for enhancing the alkaline stability of an iron(III) activator complex include, but are not limited to, encapsulating the activator complex.
  • Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that the iron(III) activator complexes facilitate and enhance the ability of the compositions to clean surfaces at reduced temperatures, e.g., between about 5°C and about 20°C. That is, the use of an iron(III) activator complex allows for oxygen gas production on and in the soil to be removed without the use of elevated temperatures. Further, the iron(III) activator complex aids in the production of oxygen gas at an alkaline pH.
  • Such oxygen production aids in facilitating soil removal by generating mechanical action on and in the soil, in addition to the normal bleaching and cleaning action of an oxygen producing source. It is thought that the active oxygen source penetrates the soil. When the active oxygen source within the soil is contacted by the iron(III) activator complex, oxygen gas is produced within the soil. As the oxygen gas is being produced, it breaks up the soil from within. As an aqueous solution, preferably foam, is passed over or through the surface, the broken up soil is washed away.
  • Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that foam compositions including iron(III) activator complexes and active oxygen sources are also activated upon contact with a soil. That is, although some bubbling and gas generation may occur when an iron(III) activator complex contacts an active oxygen source, when the compositions including an iron(III) activator complex and an active oxygen source contact a soil the amount of bubbling and oxygen gas generated substantially increases. This increased gas generation upon contact with a soil may be due in part to the soil providing nucleation sites for the active oxygen source and/or the iron(III) activator complex. It may also be due to the presence of electrons in the soil, which may cause the iron(III) activator complex to act as a catalyst and recycle itself.
  • The amount of iron(III) activator complex used in the methods of the present invention is dependent on a variety of factors including, the active oxygen source used, the type of surface to be cleaned, and the amount and type of soil present on the surface. The amount of iron(III) activator complex used is also dependent on the size of the particular iron(III) activator complex chosen.
  • In some embodiments, the compositions of the present invention include about 0.0001 wt.-% to about 1.0 wt.-% of the iron(III) activator complex, based on total weight of the cleaning composition. In other embodiments, the amount of iron(III) activator complex present is about 0.1 wt.-% to about 5 wt.-% of the compositions of the present invention. Acceptable levels of iron(III) activator complex include about 0.0005 wt.-% to about 0.002 wt.-%, or about 0.005 wt.-% to about 0.02 wt.-%; 0.01 wt.-% is a particularly suitable level.
  • In some embodiments, the amount of iron(III) activator complex added may be such that the production of oxygen from the reaction between the iron(III) activator complex and the active oxygen source is controlled over time. This is particularly desirable when cleaning surfaces using a clean out of place (COP) and/or clean in place (CIP) method so as to not damage the surface or the equipment to be cleaned due to large amounts of oxygen gas production. In some embodiments, the concentration of the activator complex added is varied to provide a controlled release of oxygen gas on the surface to be cleaned.
  • In some embodiments, the reaction rate between the activator complex, and the active oxygen source, and/or the soil, may be controlled. Certain compounds and compositions may be used to increase the activity of the iron(III) activator complex, e.g., increase the amount of oxygen gas generated. Certain compounds and compositions may also be used to reduce the activity of the iron(III) activator complex, e.g., decrease the amount of oxygen gas generated. Exemplary activity reducers include, for example, ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EDTA).
  • In some embodiments of the present invention the composition comprises:
    • ≥ 5 wt.-% to about ≤ 70 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 10 wt.-% to about ≤ 60 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 20 wt.-% to about ≤ 50 wt.-%, of the source of alkalinity, preferably sodium hydroxide;
    • ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to about ≤ 30 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to about ≤ 20 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 0.5 wt.-% to about ≤ 15 wt.-%, of a surfactant;
    • ≥ 0.001 wt.-% to about ≤ 10 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to about ≤ 5 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to about ≤ 3 wt.-%, of an iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex, preferably an iron(III) gluconate activator complex;
    • ≥ 10 wt.-% to about ≤ 80 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 20 wt.-% to about ≤ 70 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 30 wt.-% to about ≤ 50 wt.-%, of a solvent, preferably water;
    • ≥ 5 wt.-% to about ≤ 70 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 10 wt.-% to about ≤ 60 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 15 wt.-% to about ≤ 40 wt.-%, of a source of peroxide, preferably hydrogen peroxide;
      ≥ 10 wt.-% to about ≤ 80 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 20 wt.-% to about ≤ 70 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 30 wt.-% to about ≤ 60 wt.-%, of a solvent, preferably water; wherein the weight % of the components are based on the total weight of the composition and the total wt.-% of all components of the composition does not exceed 100 wt.-%.
  • The composition of the present invention can be applied on the surface to be cleaned in form of a foam. The foam comprises the mixed components of the aqueous composition of the invention.
  • According to a preferred embodiment, the foam provides adhesive properties.
  • According to a further embodiment, the foam has a small pore size. Preferably, the pore size D50 is in the range of about ≥ 10 µm to about ≤ 2000 µm, preferably ≥ 80 µm to about ≤ 1000 µm, and more preferred ≥ 100 µm to about ≤ 500 µm.
  • D50 means that 50% of the total foam pores are in the defined range pore size.
  • Complexing Agents
  • The transition metal complex includes an iron(III) ions and an alkaline stable complexing agent. Exemplary sources of iron(III) ions for use in preparing an alkaline stable transition metal complex include, but are not limited to, iron (III) sulfate, iron(III) chloride, iron (III) oxide, iron (III) acetate, iron(III) gluconate, iron(III) nitrate and combinations thereof. Exemplary alkaline stable complexing agents include, but are not limited to sodium C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylates.
  • Suitable C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylates and components for use can be selected from the group comprising citrate; propionate; gluconate; glycolate; glucoheptanoate; succinate; lactate; methyllactate; 2- hydroxybutanoate; mandelate; atrolactate; phenyllactate; glyerate; 2,3, 4-trihydroxybutanoate; alpha hydroxylaurate; benzillate; isocitrate; citramalate; agaricate; quinate; uronates, including glucuronate, glucuronolactonate, galaturonate, galacturonolactonate; hydroxypyruvate; ascorbate; and/or tropate. However, most preferred can be gluconate.
  • Active Oxygen Source
  • In some embodiments, the compositions of the present invention include an active oxygen source. As used herein, the term "active oxygen source," refers to any composition capable of generating oxygen gas in situ on and in a soil, as well as in solution. In some embodiments, the active oxygen source is a compound capable of providing oxygen gas in situ on and in the soil upon contact with an iron(III) activator complex. The compound may be organic, or inorganic.
  • Exemplary active oxygen sources for use in the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, peroxygen compounds, bromates, iodates, permanganates, perborates, and gaseous oxidants such as ozone, oxygen, chlorine dioxide, sulfur dioxide and derivatives thereof. In some embodiments, the active oxygen source does not include a chlorine containing group. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that reaction of the active oxygen source with the soil and/or the activator complex creates vigorous mechanical action on and within the soil due to the oxygen gas released. The mechanical action may break up the soil from within. It is thought that this mechanical action enhances removal of the soil beyond that caused by the chemical and bleaching action of the active oxygen source alone.
  • In some embodiments, the active oxygen source includes at least one peroxygen compound. Peroxygen compounds including, but not limited to, peroxides and various percarboxylic acids, including percarbonates, may be used in the methods of the present invention. Peroxycarboxylic (or percarboxylic) acids generally have the formula R(CO3H)n, where, for example, R is an alkyl, arylalkyl, cycloalkyl, aromatic, or heterocyclic group, and n is one, two, or three, and named by prefixing the parent acid with peroxy. The R group may be saturated or unsaturated as well as substituted or unsubstituted. Medium chain peroxycarboxylic (or percarboxylic) acids may have the formula R(CO3H)n, where R is a C5-C11 alkyl group, a C5-C11 cycloalkyl, a C5-C11 arylalkyl group, C5-C11 aryl group, or a C5-C11 heterocyclic group; and n is one, two, or three. Short chain perfatty acids may have the formula R(CO3H)n where R is C1-C4 and n is one, two, or three.
  • Exemplary peroxycarboxylic acids for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, peroxypentanoic, peroxyhexanoic, peroxyheptanoic, peroxyoctanoic, peroxynonanoic, peroxyisononanoic, peroxydecanoic, peroxyundecanoic, peroxydodecanoic, peroxyascorbic, peroxyadipic, peroxycitric, peroxypimelic, or peroxysuberic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • Branched chain peroxycarboxylic acids include peroxyisopentanoic, peroxyisononanoic, peroxyisohexanoic, peroxyisoheptanoic, peroxyisooctanoic, peroxyisonananoic, peroxyisodecanoic, peroxyisoundecanoic, peroxyisododecanoic, peroxyneopentanoic, peroxyneohexanoic, peroxyneoheptanoic, peroxyneooctanoic, peroxyneononanoic, peroxyneodecanoic, peroxyneoundecanoic, peroxyneododecanoic, and mixtures thereof.
  • Additional exemplary peroxygen compounds for use with the methods of the present invention include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), peracetic acid, peroctanoic acid, a persulphate, a perborate, or a percarbonate. In some embodiments, the active oxygen source includes hydrogen peroxide.
  • In some embodiments, compositions for use in the methods of the present invention include at least one active oxygen source. In other embodiments, compositions for use in the methods of the present invention include at least two, at least three, or at least four active oxygen sources. For example, combinations of active oxygen sources for use with the methods of the present invention may include, but are not limited to, peroxide/peracid combinations, or peracid/peracid combinations. In other embodiments, the active oxygen use source includes a peroxide/acid or a peracid/acid composition.
  • Active oxygen sources include commercially available active oxygen sources and/or active oxygen sources that may be generated on site. Active oxygen sources may also be generated in situ. That is, in some embodiments, active oxygen sources may be generated directly in the compositions of the present invention. For example, peroxidases and other enzymes, e.g., those found within peroxizomes, may be included in the compositions of the present invention. For example, D-amino oxidases such as glucose oxidase readily utilize oxygen to convert D-glucose into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide. In some embodiments of the present invention, enzymes capable of converting sugars in the system into hydrogen peroxide can be included. The hydrogen peroxide produced may then generate oxygen gas when contacted with the activator complex. In yet other embodiments, enzymes such as the superoxide dismutases may be used to convert the superoxide anion into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen.
  • According to the present invention the source of peroxide can be preferably selected from the group comprising hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, peroctanoic acid, a persulphate, a perborate, a percarbonate and mixtures and derivatives thereof, preferably hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, peroctanoic acid and mixtures and derivatives thereof. However, most preferred is hydrogen peroxide.
  • The amount of active oxygen source present in the compositions of the present invention is dependent on a variety of factors including, for example, the type of surface to be cleaned, and the amount and type of soil present on the surface. In some embodiments, the amount of active oxygen source present is between about ≥ 5 wt.-% and about ≤ 70 wt.-%. Acceptable levels of active oxygen source present are ≥ 10 wt.-% and about ≤ 60 wt.-%, or ≥ 15 wt.-% and about ≤ 50 wt.-%; ≥ 20 wt.-% and about ≤ 40 wt.-% is a particularly suitable level.
  • Alkalinity Source
  • In some aspects, the compositions of the present invention include a source of alkalinity. Exemplary alkaline sources suitable for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, basic salts, amines, alkanol amines, carbonates and silicates, and mixtures thereof. Other exemplary alkaline sources for use with the methods of the present invention include NaOH (sodium hydroxide), KOH (potassium hydroxide), TEA (triethanol amine), DEA (diethanol amine), MEA (monoethanolamine), sodium carbonate, and morpholine, sodium metasilicate and potassium silicate. The alkaline source selected may be compatible with the surface to be cleaned. Preferably, the source of alkalinity is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or a mixture thereof, most preferred is sodium hydroxide.
  • The amount of alkaline source present is dependent on a variety of factors including, for example, the type of surface to be cleaned, and the amount and type of soil present on the surface. In some embodiments, the amount of alkaline source present is about 5 wt.-% to about 70 wt.-%. Suitable levels of alkaline include about 10 wt.-% to about 60 wt.-% and about 20 wt.-% to about 50 wt.-%.
  • Surfactants
  • A surfactant or mixture of surfactants may be used in the methods of the present invention. The surfactant chosen may be compatible with the surface to be cleaned. A variety of surfactants may be used, including anionic, nonionic, cationic, and zwitterionic surfactants, which are commercially available from a number of sources. Suitable surfactants include nonionic surfactants, for example, low foaming non-ionic surfactants. For a discussion of surfactants, see Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedic of Chemical Technology, Third Edition, volume 8, pages 900-912.
  • According to the present invention the surfactant can be preferably selected from the group comprising anionic surfactant and/or non-ionic surfactant. It can be preferred that the surfactant is selected from the group comprising of linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfonates, amine oxides, alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, polyethylene glycol esters, EO/PO block copolymers, and mixtures thereof.
  • In addition, the level and degree of foaming under the conditions of use and in subsequent recovery of the composition may be a factor for selecting particular surfactants and mixtures of surfactants. For example, in certain applications it may be desirable to minimize foaming and a surfactant or mixture of surfactants that provides reduced foaming may be used. In addition, it may be desirable to select a surfactant or a mixture of surfactants that exhibits a foam that breaks down relatively quickly so that the composition may be recovered and reused with an acceptable amount of down time. In addition, the surfactant or mixture of surfactants may be selected depending upon the particular soil that is to be removed.
  • The surfactants described herein may be used singly or in combination in the methods of the present invention. In particular, the nonionics and anionics may be used in combination. The semi-polar nonionic, cationic, amphoteric and zwitterionic surfactants may be employed in combination with nonionics or anionics. The above examples are merely specific illustrations of the numerous surfactants which may find application within the scope of this invention. It should be understood that the selection of particular surfactants or combinations of surfactants may be based on a number of factors including compatibility with the surface to be cleaned at the intended use concentration and the intended environmental conditions including temperature and pH.
  • In some embodiments, the amount of total surfactant in the compositions is ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to about ≤ 30 wt.-%.Acceptable levels of surfactant include ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to about ≤ 20 wt.-%, or ≥ 0.5 wt.-% to about ≤ 15 wt.-%.
  • Nonionic Surfactants
  • Nonionic surfactants suitable for use in the composition of the present invention include, but are not limited to, those having a polyalkylene oxide polymer as a portion of the surfactant molecule. Exemplary nonionic surfactants include, but are not limited to, chlorine-, benzyl-, methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl- and other like alkyl-capped polyethylene and/or polypropylene glycol ethers of fatty alcohols; polyalkylene oxide free nonionics such as alkyl polyglycosides; sorbitan and sucrose esters and their ethoxylates; alkoxylated ethylene diamine; carboxylic acid esters such as glycerol esters, polyoxyethylene esters, ethoxylated and glycol esters of fatty acids; carboxylic amides such as diethanolamine condensates, monoalkanolamine condensates, polyoxyethylene fatty acid amides; and ethoxylated amines and ether amines commercially available from Tomah Corporation and other like nonionic compounds. Silicone surfactants such as the ABIL B8852 (Goldschmidt) may also be used.
  • Additional exemplary nonionic surfactants suitable for use in the methods of the present invention, include, but are not limited to, those having a polyalkylene oxide polymer portion include nonionic surfactants of C6-C24 alcohol ethoxylates, preferably C6-C14 alcohol ethoxylates having 1 to about 20 ethylene oxide groups, preferably about 9 to about 20 ethylene oxide groups; C6-C24 alkylphenol ethoxylates, preferably C8-C10 alkylphenol ethoxylates) having 1 to about 100 ethylene oxide groups, preferably about 12 to about 20 ethylene oxide groups; C6-C24 alkylpolyglycosides, preferably C6-C20 alkylpolyglycosides, having 1 to about 20 glycoside groups, preferably about 9 to about 20 glycoside groups; C6-C24 fatty acid ester ethoxylates, propoxylates or glycerides; and C4-C24 mono or dialkanolamides.
  • Exemplary alcohol alkoxylates include, but are not limited to, alcohol ethoxylate propoxylates, alcohol propoxylates, alcohol propoxylate ethoxylate propoxylates, alcohol ethoxylate butoxylates; nonylphenol ethoxylate, polyoxyethylene glycol ethers; and polyalkylene oxide block copolymers including an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymer such as those commercially available under the trademark PLURONIC (BASF-Wyandotte).
  • Examples of suitable low foaming nonionic surfactants also include, but are not limited to, secondary ethoxylates, such as those sold under the trade name TERGITOL™, such as TERGITOL™ 15-S-7 (Union Carbide), Tergitol 15-S-3, Tergitol 15-S-9 and the like. Other suitable classes of low foaming nonionic surfactants include alkyl or benzyl-capped polyoxyalkylene derivatives and polyoxyethylene/polyoxypropylene copolymers.
  • An additional useful nonionic surfactant is nonylphenol having an average of 12 moles of ethylene oxide condensed thereon, it being end capped with a hydrophobic portion including an average of 30 moles of propylene oxide. Silicon-containing defoamers are also well-known and may be employed in the methods of the present invention.
  • In some embodiments, the amount of nonionic surfactant in the compositions is ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to about ≤ 30 wt.-%. Acceptable levels of surfactant include ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to about ≤ 20 wt.-%, or ≥ 0.5 wt.-% to about ≤ 15 wt.-%.
  • Amphoteric Surfactants
  • Suitable amphoteric surfactants include, but are not limited to, amine oxide compounds having the formula:
    Figure imgb0001
    where R, R', R", and R"' are each a C1-C24 alkyl, aryl or arylalkyl group that may optionally contain one or more P, O, S or N heteroatoms.
  • Another class of suitable amphoteric surfactants includes betaine compounds having the formula:
    Figure imgb0002
    where R, R', R" and R"' are each a C1-C24 alkyl, aryl or aralkyl group that may optionally contain one or more P, O, S or N heteroatoms, and n is about 1 to about 10.
  • Suitable surfactants may also include food grade surfactants, linear alkylbenzene sulfonic acids and their salts, and ethylene oxide/propylene oxide derivatives sold under the Pluronic™ trade name. Suitable surfactants include those that are compatible as an indirect or direct food additive or substance.
  • In some embodiments, the amount of amphoteric surfactant in the compositions is ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to about ≤ 30 wt.-%.Acceptable levels of surfactant include ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to about ≤ 20 wt.-%, or ≥ 0.5 wt.-% to about ≤ 15 wt.-%.
  • Anionic surfactans
  • Anionic surfactants suitable for use with the disclosed methods may also include, for example, carboxylates such as alkylcarboxylates (carboxylic acid salts) and polyalkoxycarboxylates, alcohol ethoxylate carboxylates, nonylphenol ethoxylate carboxylates, and the like; sulfonates such as alkylsulfonates, alkylbenzenesulfonates, alkylarylsulfonates, sulfonated fatty acid esters, and the like; sulfates such as sulfated alcohols, sulfated alcohol ethoxylates, sulfated alkylphenols, alkylsulfates, sulfosuccinates, alkylether sulfates, and the like; and phosphate esters such as alkylphosphate esters, and the like. Exemplary anionics include, but are not limited to, sodium alkylarylsulfonate, alpha-olefin sulfonate, and fatty alcohol sulfates. Examples of suitable anionic surfactants include sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, potassium laureth-7 sulfate, and sodium tetradecenyl sulfonate.
  • In some embodiments, the surfactant includes linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfonates, amine oxides, linear and branched alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl polyglucosides, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, polyethylene glycol esters, EO/PO block copolymers and combinations thereof.
  • In some embodiments, the amount of anionic surfactant in the compositions is ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to about ≤ 30 wt.-%.Acceptable levels of surfactant include ≥ 0.5 wt.-% to about ≤ 20 wt.-%, or ≥ 1 wt.-% to about ≤ 15 wt.-%.
  • Additional Components
  • Exemplary additional components that may be provided within the compositions used in the methods of the present invention include builders, water conditioning agents, nonaqueous components, adjuvants, carriers, processing aids, enzymes, penetrants, antimicrobial agents, buffers, and pH adjusting agents.
  • Builders
  • In some embodiments, compositions for use with the methods of the present invention include a builder or builders. Builders include chelating agents (chelators), sequestering agents (sequestrants), detergent builders, and the like. The builder often stabilizes the composition or solution. In some embodiments, builders suitable for use with the methods of the present invention preferably do not complex with the activator complex. That is, the builder or builders for use with the present invention are selected such that they preferentially complex with the mineral soil broken up after the oxygen gas has been generated in situ on and in the soil, rather than with the activator complex.
  • Builders and builder salts may be inorganic or organic. Examples of builders suitable for use with the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, phosphonic acids and phosphonates, phosphates, aminocarboxylates and their derivatives, pyrophosphates, polyphosphates, ethylenediamene and ethylenetriamene derivatives, hydroxyacids, and mono-, di-, and tri-carboxylates and their corresponding acids. Other builders include aluminosilicates, nitroloacetates and their derivatives, and mixtures thereof. Still other builders include aminocarboxylates, including salts of hydroxyethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (HEDTA), and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.
  • Exemplary commercially available chelating agents for use with the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to: sodium tripolyphosphate available from Innophos; Trilon A® available from BASF; Versene 100®, Low NTA Versene ®, Versene Powder®, and Versenol 120® all available from Dow; Dissolvine D-40 available from BASF; and sodium citrate.
  • In some embodiments, a biodegradable aminocarboxylate or derivative thereof is present as a builder in the methods of the present invention. Exemplary biodegradable aminocarboxylates include, but are not limited to: Dissolvine GL-38® and Dissolvine GL-74 ® both available from Akzo; Trilon M® available from BASF; Baypure CX100® available from Bayer; Versene EDG® available from Dow; HIDS® available from Nippon Shakubai; Octaquest E30® and Octaquest A65® both available from Finetex/Innospec Octel.
  • In some embodiments, an organic chelating agent may be used. Organic chelating agents include both polymeric and small molecule chelating agents. Organic small molecule chelating agents are typically organocarboxylate compounds or organophosphate chelating agents. Polymeric chelating agents commonly include polyanionic compositions such as polyacrylic acid compounds. Small molecule organic chelating agents include N-hydroxy-ethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), nitrilotriaacetic acid (NTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), ethylenediaminetetraproprionic acid triethylenetetraaminehexaacetic acid (TTHA), and the respective alkali metal, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts thereof. Aminophosphonates are also suitable for use as chelating agents with the methods of the invention and include ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonates, nitrilotrismethylene phosphonates, and diethylenetriamine-(pentamethylene phosphonate) for example. These aminophosphonates commonly contain alkyl or alkenyl groups with less than 8 carbon atoms.
  • Other suitable sequestrants include water soluble polycarboxylate polymers. Such homopolymeric and copolymeric chelating agents include polymeric compositions with pendant (-CO 2 H) carboxylic acid groups and include polyacrylic acid, polymethacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, acrylic acid-methacrylic acid copolymers, acrylic-maleic copolymers, hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, hydrolyzed methacrylamide, hydrolyzed acrylamidemethacrylamide copolymers, hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile, hydrolyzed polymethacrylonitrile, hydrolyzed acrylonitrile methacrylonitrile copolymers, or mixtures thereof. Water soluble salts or partial salts of these polymers or copolymers such as their respective alkali metal (for example, sodium or potassium) or ammonium salts may also be used. The weight average molecular weight of the polymers is from about 4000 to about 12,000. Preferred polymers include polyacrylic acid, the partial sodium salts of polyacrylic acid or sodium polyacrylate having an average molecular weight within the range of 4000 to 8000.
  • Preferred builders for use with the methods of the present invention are water soluble. Water soluble inorganic alkaline builder salts which may be used alone or in admixture with other builders include, but are not limited to, alkali metal or ammonia or substituted ammonium salts of carbonates, silicates, phosphates and polyphosphates, and borates. Water soluble organic alkaline builders which are useful in the present invention include alkanolamines and cyclic amines.
  • Particularly preferred builders include PAA (polyacrylic acid) and its salts, phosphonobutane carboxylic acid, EDTA and sodium gluconate.
  • In some embodiments, the amount of builder present in the compositions for use with the methods of the present invention is about 0.001 wt.-% to about 30 wt.-%. In some embodiments, about 0.005 wt.-% to about 20 wt.-% of builder is present. Acceptable levels of builder include about 0.05 wt.-% to about 15 wt.-%.
  • Optional Adjuvants
  • In addition, various other additives or adjuvants may be present in compositions of the present invention to provide additional desired properties, either of form, functional or aesthetic nature, for example:
    1. a) Solubilizing intermediaries called hydrotropes may be present in the compositions of the invention of such as xylene-, toluene-, or cumene sulfonate; or n-octane sulfonate; or their sodium-, potassium- or ammonium salts or as salts of organic ammonium bases. Also commonly used are polyols containing only carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms. They preferably contain from about 2 to about 6 carbon atoms and from about 2 to about 6 hydroxy groups. Examples include 1,2-propanediol, 1,2-butanediol, hexylene glycol, glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, and glucose.
    2. b) Nonaqueous liquid carriers or solvents may be used for varying compositions of the present invention.
    3. c) Viscosity modifiers may be added to the compositions of the present invention.
  • These may include natural polysaccharides such as xanthan gum, carrageenan and the like; or cellulosic type thickeners such as carboxymethyl cellulose, and hydroxymethyl-, hydroxyethyl-, and hydroxypropyl cellulose; or, polycarboxylate thickeners such as high molecular weight polyacrylates or carboxyvinyl polymers and copolymers; or, naturally occurring and synthetic clays; and finely divided fumed or precipitated silica, to list a few. In some embodiments, the compositions for use with the methods of the present invention do not include a gelling agent.
    • d) Solidifiers may be used to prepare solid forms of compositions of the present invention. These could include any organic or inorganic solid compound having a neutral inert character or making a functional, stabilizing or detersive contribution to the intended embodiment. Examples are polyethylene glycols or polypropylene glycols having molecular weight of from about 1,400 to about 30,000; and urea.
    Penetrants
  • In some aspects, a penetrant may be used with the methods of the present invention. The penetrant may be combined with an alkaline source in the cleaning composition, or, the penetrant may be used without an alkaline source. In some embodiments, the penetrant is water miscible.
  • Examples of suitable penetrants include, but are not limited to, alcohols, short chain ethoxylated alcohols and phenol (having 1-6 ethoxylate groups). Organic solvents are also suitable penetrants. Examples of suitable organic solvents, for use as a penetrant, include esters, ethers, ketones, amines, and nitrated and chlorinated hydrocarbons.
  • Ethoxylated alcohols are also suitable for use with the methods of the present invention. Examples of ethoxylated alcohols include, but are not limited to, alky, aryl, and alkylaryl alkloxylates. These alkloxylates may be further modified by capping with chlorine-, bromine-, benzyl-, methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, butyl- and alkyl-groups. Ethoxylated alcohols may be present in the cleaning composition from about 0.1 wt% to about 20 wt%.
  • Fatty acids are also suitable for use as penetrants in the methods of the present invention. Some non-limiting examples of fatty acids are C6 to C12 straight or branched fatty acids. In some embodiments, fatty acids used in the methods of the present invention are liquid at room temperature.
  • In some embodiments, a penetrant for use in the methods of the present invention includes water soluble glycol ethers. Examples of glycol ethers include dipropylene glycol methyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL DPM from Dow Chemical Co.), diethylene glycol methyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL DM from Dow Chemical Co.), propylene glycol methyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL PM from Dow Chemical Co.), and ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (available under the trade designation DOWANOL EB from Dow Chemical Co.). In some embodiments, a glycol ether is present in an amount of from about 1.0 wt.-% to about 20 wt.-%.
  • Methods of Cleaning
  • In some aspects, the present invention provides methods for removing soil from a surface. In some embodiments, the methods for removing soil from a surface include using a clean out of place (COP) or clean in place (CIP) cleaning process. The methods include applying to the surface a composition of the invention, preferably in form of foam, including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, preferably an iron(III) gluconate, a source of alkalinity, preferably NaOH, and an active oxygen source, preferably H2O2. Additional ingredients may also be present in the compositions. The iron(III) activator complex, source of alkalinity, and active oxygen source may be applied to the surface in a variety of ways. For example, the activator complex, source of alkalinity, and active oxygen source may be applied to the surface as part of a single composition, preferably in form of foam (COP).
  • In other embodiments, combinations of each of the components may be applied to the surface. For example, in some embodiments, the activator complex and source of alkalinity are applied in a first step, preferably as foam, and the active oxygen source is applied in a second step, preferably as foam, without a rinse step between the first and the second steps. Additional ingredients including, but not limited to, builders, surfactants, and chelating agents may be added to the compositions used in the first step, the second step, or both the first and the second steps. The composition of the first step may be applied to the surface for an amount of time effective to penetrate the soil. For example, the first step may be applied to the surface to be cleaned for between about ≥ 5 minutes to about ≤ 30 minutes.
  • In other embodiments, an active oxygen source and a source of alkalinity are applied as stable foam to the surface in a first step, and an iron(III) activator complex is applied to the surface in second step, without a rinse step between the first and the second steps.
  • Surfaces
  • In some embodiments, the methods and compositions of the present invention are applied to surfaces which are normally cleaned using a clean out of place or in place cleaning technique. Examples of such surfaces include hard and soft surface, for example of upper outer and/or inner outer surfaces of materials such as ceramic, metal, plastic and/or glas, surface that came into contact with beverages and/or food, beverages such alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverages such as beer or milk, food such as meat, vegetables and/or grain-products. Other surfaces that can be cleaned are instruments and apparatus, for example used in sanitary or medical services, evaporators, heat exchangers, including tube-in-tube exchangers, direct steam injection, and plate-in-frame exchangers, heating coils including steam, flame or heat transfer fluid heated re-crystallizers, pan crystallizers, spray dryers, drum dryers, and tanks.
  • Additional surfaces capable of being cleaned using the methods and compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to membranes, medical devices, laundry and/or textiles, and hard surfaces, e.g., walls, floors, dishes, flatware, pots and pans, heat exchange coils, ovens, fryers, smoke houses, sewer drain lines, and vehicles. In some embodiments, the surfaces may be cleaned using a clean in place method. The methods of the present invention may also be used to remove dust from air handling equipment, for example, from air conditioners and refrigeration heat exchangers. In other embodiments, the methods of the present invention may be used for drain line microbial control, e.g., to reduce or remove biofilm formation.
  • Exemplary industries in which the methods and compositions of the present invention may be used include, but are not limited to: the food and beverage industry, e.g., the dairy, cheese, sugar, and brewery industries; oil processing industry; industrial agriculture and ethanol processing; and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry.
  • Temperature
  • The methods and compositions of the present invention provide for soil removal from surfaces at reduced temperatures, e.g., from about ≥ 5° C to about ≤ 23° C, preferably at about ≥ 7° C to about ≤ 18° C, preferably about ≥ 10° C to about ≤ 15° C compared to conventional cleaning techniques, e.g., clean out of place and/or clean in place techniques. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is thought that the use of an iron(III) activator complex in conjunction with an active oxygen source and a source of alkalinity and an excess of C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate allows for the generation of oxygen gas on and in a soil, without the use of heat activation.
  • The ability of stable foam formation and to clean at reduced temperatures, preferably at about 15° C results in energy and cost savings compared to traditional cleaning techniques that require increased temperatures. Further, the present invention provides for effective soil removal on surfaces that cannot withstand high temperatures.
  • It has also been found that the methods of the present invention provide for soil removal at reduced temperatures, and using reduced amounts of chemistry, compared to conventional cleaning methods. In some embodiments, the methods of the present invention use about 25% to about 50% less chemistry, e.g., source of alkalinity and/or active oxygen source, than conventional cleaning methods. Thus, the methods of the present invention may effectively remove soil at both low temperatures, and using a low concentration of chemicals, providing both an energy savings and a reduction in the amount of chemistry consumed per cleaning.
  • Time
  • In some aspects of the invention, the compositions for use with the methods of the present invention are applied as stable foam to the surface for a sufficient amount of time such that the composition penetrates into the soil to be removed. This penetration into the soil allows for oxygen gas generation to occur in the soil. Although the methods of the present invention are carried out at lower temperatures than conventional cleaning methods, an increased cleaning time is not required to achieve equal or better cleaning results than conventional cleaning methods.
  • In some aspects, a composition including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, an active oxygen source, and a source of alkalinity and an excess of C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate is applied as a stable foam to a surface for an amount of time sufficient to substantially remove a soil from the surface. In some embodiments, the composition is applied to the surface for about 1 minutes to about 60 minutes, preferably about 5 minutes to about 55 minutes, further preferred about 10 minutes to about 50 minutes.
  • In other embodiments, the composition is applied to the surface for about 20 to about 40 minutes. It is to be understood that all values and ranges between these values and ranges are encompassed by the methods of the present invention.
  • In some aspects, a pre-treatment foamed composition including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, an active oxygen source, and a source of alkalinity, is applied to the surface for an amount of time sufficient to substantially penetrate a soil on the surface. In some embodiments, the pre-treatment foamed composition of the invention is applied to the surface to be cleaned for about 1 to about 30 minutes. In some embodiments, the pre-treatment foamed composition is applied to the surface to be cleaned for about 5 to about 15 minutes. In some embodiments, the pre-treatment foamed composition is applied to the surface for about 10 minutes. It is to be understood that any value between these ranges is to be encompassed by the methods of the present invention.
  • In some aspects of the present invention, an foamed composition including at least one of an iron(III) activator complex, an active oxygen source, and a source of alkalinity, is applied as a stable foam to a surface to be cleaned after a pre-treatment foamed composition has been applied to the surface, i.e., there is no rinse step between the application of the pre-treatment foamed composition and the foamed composition.
  • In some embodiments, the -foamed composition is applied to the surface for an amount of time sufficient to effectively clean the selected surface, and to activate the pre-treatment chemistry, e.g., generate oxygen gas. In some embodiments, the foamed composition is applied for about 1 to about 30 minutes. In some embodiments, the use foamed composition is applied for about 5, about 10, or about 15 minutes. It is to be understood that all values and ranges between these values and rages are encompassed by the methods of the present invention.
  • In some other embodiments, the source of peroxide source is added before, after and/or simultaneous with the application of the composition of component A to the surface to be cleaned, preferably the peroxide source is added simultaneous with the application of the composition of component A to the surface to be cleaned.
  • In some embodiments, the method of cleaning comprises the steps:
    1. a) optional applying a pre-treatment solution to the surface to be cleaned for an amount of time sufficient to substantially penetrate a soil on the surface to be cleaned and/or pre-clean a soil on the surface to be cleaned;
    2. b) applying a foamed composition of claims 1 to 11 to the surface to be cleaned for an amount of time for cleaning the surface to be cleaned;
    3. c) optional a rinsing step before and/or after the application (a) and/or (b).
  • In a further embodiment, the pre-treatment foamed composition is applied to the surface to be cleaned at between about ≥ 1° C to about ≤ 30° C, preferably at between about ≥ 5° C to about ≤ 25° C, further preferred at between about ≥ 7° C to about ≤ 20° C and more preferred about ≥ 10° C to about ≤ 15° C.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The present invention is more particularly described in the following examples that are intended as illustrations only. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages, and ratios reported in the following examples are on a weight basis, and all reagents used in the examples were obtained, or are available, from the chemical suppliers described below, or may be synthesized by conventional techniques.
  • The cleaning composition as shown in table is a mixture of component A) and component B), wherein the component A) comprises:
    • NaOH as source of alkalinity,
    • X as surfactant,
    • an iron(III) activator complex, see table II below; and
    wherein the component B) comprises:
    • H2O2 as a source of peroxide.
  • Exemplary liquid cleaning compositions used for providing a foam by spray technique are shown in the table I below. Table I
    Cleaning compositions + activator complex Concentration (wt.- %)
    Source of alkalinity Iron activator complex see table II Examples 1 to 4
    NaOH 15.0 wt.-%
    N,N-dimethyl dodecyl amine N-oxide 6.0 wt.-% (Surfactant)
    Water Add. water to 100 wt.%
    Source of peroxide H2O2 30.0 wt.-%
    Water Add. water to 100 wt.%
  • The cleaning compositions of examples 1 to 4 of table I contain various activator complexes as outlined in table II of examples 1 to 4. Examples 1 and 2 are foamed cleaning compositions containing an Fe(II)SO4/gluconic acid activator complex. Examples 3 and 4 are foamed cleaning compositions containing an Fe(III)2(SO4)3/gluconic acid activator complex.
  • The average cleaning efficiency for the cleaning compositions of examples 1 to 4 for removing tallow soil at a temperature of 15° C for a period of 15 minutes are recorded in table II below.
  • Cleaning Efficiency Test Method
  • This test method provides a basis to assess the foam compositions according to the invention for cleaning efficiency of glass surfaces contaminated with tallow soils.
  • Equipment
  • Transparent plastic sticks
    500 ml beaker
    Acetone
    Tallow (soil)
    Spattle
    Stainless steel test plates of 10 cm x 5 cm x 0,5 cm (The stainless steel test plates are cleaned with acetone before use)
    Clean paper toweling
    Stop watch
    Drying oven
    Analytical balance capable of weighing to 0.0001 g.
  • The stainless steel test plates were cleaned before use with acetone, cleaned thereafter with a clean paper toweling and allowed to dry at room temperature for about 12 hours. The upper surface of said stainless steel test plates were homogenously coated with tallow (see table II) so that a boundary area of 10% remains not coated. Thereafter the coated stainless steel test plates were weighed and the weight was recorded respectively (see table II). Then, the plates were cooled at 2° C for about 12 hours. The cooled tallow coated test plates were completely soaked and up right placed in the cleaning composition of examples 1 to 4 of table II at a temperature of 15° C. After 10 minutes the so treated stainless steel test plate were allowed to dry at ambient temperature at about 23° C for 15 hours. After that, the stainless steel test plates were scaled again to determine tallow removal effectiveness as shown in table II. Table II
    Cleaning composition of examples 1 to 5 [wt.-%] steel plate weight [g] steel plate + tallow [g] Amount of tallow added [g] after cleaning [g] Amount of tallow removed [g] Cleaning efficiency [%] Average [%]
    Example 1 Fe(II)SO4/gluconic acid (1:3), 0.015 wt.-% 38,2734 38,2945 0,0211 38,2908 0,0037 18
    38,8765 38,8982 0,0217 38,8916 0,0066 30
    38,7534 38,7706 0,0172 38,7698 0,0008 5
    38,5025 38,5273 0,0248 38,5227 0,0046 19
    39,4998 39,5087 0,0089 39,5072 0,0015 17 18
    Example 2 Fe(II)SO4 gluconic acid (1:3), 0.03 wt.-% 38,8416 38,8698 0,0282 38,8593 0,0105 37
    38,4698 38,4926 0,0228 38,4825 0,0101 44
    38,7517 38,7792 0,0275 38,7706 0,0086 31
    38,1001 38,1207 0,0206 38,1133 0,0074 36
    40,0634 40,0816 0,0182 40,0747 0,0069 38 37
    Example 3 Fe2(III)(SO4)3/gluconic acid (1:3), 0.015 wt.-% 38,7293 38,7576 0,0283 38,7432 0,0144 51
    38,8203 38,8698 0,0495 38,8400 0,0298 60
    37,4999 37,5377 0,0378 37,5097 0,0280 74
    37,4925 37,5241 0,0316 37,5008 0,0233 74
    38,9410 38,9730 0,0320 38,9540 0,0190 59 64
    Example 4 Fe2(III)(SO4)3/gluconic acid (1:3), 0.03 wt.-% 38,5052 38,5474 0,0422 38,5073 0,0401 95
    38,7708 38,7951 0,0243 38,7717 0,0234 96
    38,9710 38,9946 0,0236 38,9725 0,0221 94
    37,7078 37,7294 0,0216 37,7087 0,0207 96
    38,7008 38,7330 0,0322 38,7036 0,0294 91 94
  • As can be seen from these results of table I, examples 3 and 4 comprising an activator complex of Iron(III) gluconic acid show excellent cold cleaning activity compared to an Iron(II) activator complex. It can be further taken from table II that an excess of gluconic acid increase the soil removal activity of the activator complex of the present invention.
  • Foam Formation Test
  • This test method provides a basis to assess the foam formation properties of the foam cleaning composition of the invention.
  • Foam testing equipment
    • 250 ml long-necked glass cylinder
    • Rubber stopper to close the long-necked glass cylinder
    Test method
  • 50 ml of the cleaning compositions of examples 3 to 4 were filled each into a long-necked glass cylinder, respectively. The long-necked glass cylinder was then turned up and down 20 times in 20 seconds. Thereafter the glass cylinder was placed and the foam depth of each cylinder was scaled in ml to determine the foam formation. This test was carried out at a temperature of the cleaning foamed composition at ambient temperature, 15° C and 23° C. The results are shown in table III below. Table III
    Example 3 Time Foam height at 15° C Foam reduction [%] Foam height at 23° C Foam reduction [%]
    0 216 ml 0 220 ml 0
    1 174 ml 19 188 ml 15
    2 164 ml 24 170 ml 23
    5 138 ml 36 140 ml 36
    10 40 ml 81 50 ml 77
    Example 4 Time Foam height at 15° C Foam reduction [%] Foam height at 23° C Foam reduction [%]
    0 236 ml 0 240 ml 0
    1 204 ml 14 210 ml 13
    2 186 ml 21 196 ml 18
    5 142 ml 40 160 ml 33
    10 40 ml 83 60 ml 75
  • Other Embodiments
  • It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate, and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
  • In addition, the contents of all patent publications discussed supra are incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
  • It is to be understood that wherever values and ranges are provided herein, all values and ranges encompassed by these values and ranges, are meant to be encompassed within the scope of the present invention. Moreover, all values that fall within these ranges, as well as the upper or lower limits of a range of values, are also contemplated by the present application.

Claims (15)

  1. An aqueous composition for removing soil at low temperatures from a surface to be cleaned, comprising a source of alkalinity, a surfactant, an iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex or an iron(III) activator complex comprising a component selected from the group consisting of citrate, propionate, glycolate, succinate, lactate, methyllactate, glycerate, isocitrate, citramalate, agaricate, hydroxypyruvate, and/or ascorbate; and a source of peroxide.
  2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is an aqueous two component composition for removing soil at low temperatures from a surface to be cleaned, comprising a component A) and a component B), wherein the component A) comprises:
    - a source of alkalinity,
    - a surfactant,
    - an iron(III) activator complex, preferably an iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex, comprising C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate in excess ; and
    wherein the component B) comprises:
    - a source of peroxide.
  3. The composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein the mol ratio of iron(III) to C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate is 1 : > 1, preferably in the range of 1 : 1.1 to 1 : 10, further preferred in the range of 1 : 1.5 to 1 : 8 and more preferred in the range of 1 : 2 to 1 : 5.
  4. The composition of claims 1 to 3, wherein the C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate or the component is selected from the group comprising; citrate; propionate; gluconate; glycolate; glucoheptanoate; succinate; lactate; methyllactate; 2-hydroxybutanoate; mandelate; atrolactate; phenyllactate; glycerate; 2,3, 4-trihydroxybutanoate; alpha hydroxylaurate; benzillate; isocitrate; citramalate; agaricate; quinate; uronates, including glucuronate, glucuronolactonate, galaturonate, galacturonolactonate; hydroxypyruvate; ascorbate; and/or tropate, most preferred is gluconate.
  5. The composition of claims 1 to 4, wherein the source of alkalinity is selected from the group comprising basic salts, amines, alkanol amines, carbonates, silicates, and mixtures thereof, preferably the source of alkalinity is selected from the group comprising sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or a mixture thereof, most preferred is sodium hydroxide.
  6. The two component composition of claims 2 to 5, wherein the surfactant is selected from the group comprising of a anionic surfactant and/or a non-ionic surfactant, preferably the surfactant is selected from the group comprising of linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, alcohol sulfonates, amine oxides, alkyl glucosides, alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, polyethylene glycol esters, EO/PO block copolymers, and mixtures thereof, preferably the surfactant is selected from the group comprising of linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, amine oxides, alkyl glucosides and mixtures thereof and most preferred the surfactant is selected from the group comprising of amine oxides, alkyl glucosides and mixtures thereof.
  7. The two component composition of claims 2 to 6, wherein the source of peroxide is selected from the group comprising hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, peroctanoic acid, a persulphate, a perborate, a percarbonate and mixtures and derivatives thereof, preferably hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, peroctanoic acid and mixtures and derivatives thereof, and most preferred hydrogen peroxide.
  8. The two component composition of claims 2 to 7, wherein the composition comprises:
    - ≥ 5 wt.-% to ≤ 70 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 10 wt.-% to ≤ 60 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 20 wt.-% to ≤ 50 wt.-%, of the source of alkalinity, preferably sodium hydroxide;
    - ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to ≤ 30 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to ≤ 20 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 0.5 wt.-% to ≤ 15 wt.-%, of a surfactant;
    - ≥ 0.001 wt.-% to ≤ 10 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 0.01 wt.-% to ≤ 5 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 0.1 wt.-% to ≤ 3 wt.-%, of an iron(III) C4 to C18 hydroxymonocarboxylate activator complex, preferably an iron(III) gluconate activator complex; - ≥ 10 wt.-% to ≤ 80 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 20 wt.-% to ≤ 70 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 30 wt.-% to ≤ 50 wt.-%, of a solvent, preferably water;
    - ≥ 5 wt.-% to ≤ 70 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 10 wt.-% to ≤ 60 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 15 wt.-% to ≤ 40 wt.-%, of a source of peroxide, preferably hydrogen peroxide;
    - ≥ 10 wt.-% to ≤ 80 wt.-%, preferably ≥ 20 wt.-% to ≤ 70 wt.-%, and more preferred ≥ 30 wt.-% to ≤ 60 wt.-%, of a solvent, preferably water; wherein the weight % of the components are based on the total weight of the composition and the total wt.-% of all components of the composition does not exceed 100 wt.-%.
  9. A foam composition comprising the mixed components of claims 1 to 8.
  10. The foam composition of claim 9 having a foam stability, wherein the reduction of foam volume after 1 minute is 10 vol.-% to 20 vol.-%, after 2 minute is 15 vol.-% to 25 vol.-%, after 5 minute is 30 vol.-% to 40 vol.-% and after 10 minute is 75 vol.-% to 85 vol.-%, based on the initial foam volume.
  11. The foam composition of claim 9 or 10 having a mean foam pore size D50 in the range of ≥ 10 µm to ≤ 2000 µm, preferably ≥ 80 µm to ≤ 1000 µm, and more preferred ≥ 100 µm to ≤ 500 µm.
  12. A method for removing soil from a surface to be cleaned comprising applying to the surface a composition of claims 1 to 11.
  13. The method of claim 12, wherein the source of peroxide source is added before, after and/or simultaneous with the application of the composition of component A to the surface to be cleaned, preferably the peroxide source is added simultaneous with the application of the composition of component A to the surface to be cleaned.
  14. The method of claim 12 or 13 comprising:
    c) optional applying a pre-treatment solution to the surface to be cleaned for an amount of time sufficient to substantially penetrate a soil on the surface to be cleaned and/or pre-clean a soil on the surface to be cleaned;
    d) applying a foamed composition of claims 1 to 11 to the surface to be cleaned for an amount of time for cleaning the surface to be cleaned;
    e) optional a rinsing step before and/or after the application (a) and/or (b).
  15. Use of the composition of claims 1 to 11 for removing soil from a surface to be cleaned, preferably in a clean-out-of-place systems (COP) or in a clean-in-place system (CIP).
EP11764703.2A 2011-09-21 2011-09-21 Use of iron(iii) hydroxymonocarboxylate complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems Not-in-force EP2758506B8 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2011/066389 WO2013041131A1 (en) 2011-09-21 2011-09-21 Use of iron(iii) hydroxymonocarboxylate complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2758506A1 EP2758506A1 (en) 2014-07-30
EP2758506B1 true EP2758506B1 (en) 2016-12-28
EP2758506B8 EP2758506B8 (en) 2017-05-24

Family

ID=44759663

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11764703.2A Not-in-force EP2758506B8 (en) 2011-09-21 2011-09-21 Use of iron(iii) hydroxymonocarboxylate complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20140366920A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2758506B8 (en)
WO (1) WO2013041131A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160326461A1 (en) * 2014-01-22 2016-11-10 Rochester Midland Corporation Industrial process equipment cleaning of ester-based soils and materials utilizing acyl transfer reactions
EP3559190A1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2019-10-30 Ecolab USA Inc. Aqueous foaming detergent composition with increased foam dwell time and moistening content
EP4238663A1 (en) * 2022-03-03 2023-09-06 Arva Greentech AG Method for removing organic polluntants from surfaces through in situ generated persulfates and persulfonates

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1541576A (en) * 1975-06-20 1979-03-07 Procter & Gamble Ltd Inhibiting dye ltransfer in washing
US4728455A (en) * 1986-03-07 1988-03-01 Lever Brothers Company Detergent bleach compositions, bleaching agents and bleach activators
DE19719397A1 (en) * 1997-05-07 1998-11-12 Clariant Gmbh Bleach-active metal complexes
US7799751B2 (en) * 2000-12-14 2010-09-21 The Clorox Company Cleaning composition
US6579444B2 (en) * 2000-12-28 2003-06-17 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Removal of sulfur compounds from hydrocarbon feedstreams using cobalt containing adsorbents in the substantial absence of hydrogen
DE102004003710A1 (en) * 2004-01-24 2005-08-11 Clariant Gmbh Use of transition metal complexes as bleaching catalysts in detergents and cleaners
US20090325841A1 (en) * 2008-02-11 2009-12-31 Ecolab Inc. Use of activator complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems
US8940682B2 (en) * 2009-05-14 2015-01-27 Ecolab Usa Inc. Peroxygen catalyst-containing fabric and use for in situ generation of alkalinity

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2758506B8 (en) 2017-05-24
WO2013041131A1 (en) 2013-03-28
EP2758506A1 (en) 2014-07-30
US20140366920A1 (en) 2014-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2252683B1 (en) Use of activator complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems
US10260025B2 (en) Use of activator complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems
CA2619007C (en) Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
EP1781763B1 (en) Methods for cleaning industrial equipment with pre-treatment
AU2012245234B2 (en) Calcium sequestering composition
AU2012245236B2 (en) Calcium sequestering composition
WO2010146543A2 (en) High alkaline cleaners, cleaning systems and methods of use for cleaning zero trans fat soils
CN109477042A (en) Purposes, cleaning compositions and the method for washing of enzyme
EP2758506B1 (en) Use of iron(iii) hydroxymonocarboxylate complexes to enhance lower temperature cleaning in alkaline peroxide cleaning systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140411

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C11D 1/83 20060101ALI20160623BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/66 20060101ALI20160623BHEP

Ipc: C11D 17/00 20060101ALI20160623BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/02 20060101ALI20160623BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/39 20060101AFI20160623BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/20 20060101ALI20160623BHEP

Ipc: C11D 11/00 20060101ALI20160623BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160715

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 857307

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170115

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: ECOLAB USA INC.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011033861

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170328

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170329

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 857307

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170428

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: ECOLAB USA INC.

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170428

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170328

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602011033861

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Effective date: 20170928

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011033861

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180404

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 602011033861

Country of ref document: DE

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20190208

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228