EP2758143A1 - Novel demulsifiers - Google Patents

Novel demulsifiers

Info

Publication number
EP2758143A1
EP2758143A1 EP12773099.2A EP12773099A EP2758143A1 EP 2758143 A1 EP2758143 A1 EP 2758143A1 EP 12773099 A EP12773099 A EP 12773099A EP 2758143 A1 EP2758143 A1 EP 2758143A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
alkoxylated
ester
demulsifier
dicarboxylic acid
reaction product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12773099.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2758143B1 (en
Inventor
Hanamanthsa Shankarsa Bevinakatti
Neil Grainger
Tracey Joanne WARDELL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Croda International PLC
Original Assignee
Croda International PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Croda International PLC filed Critical Croda International PLC
Publication of EP2758143A1 publication Critical patent/EP2758143A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2758143B1 publication Critical patent/EP2758143B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G33/00—Dewatering or demulsification of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G33/04—Dewatering or demulsification of hydrocarbon oils with chemical means
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D17/00—Separation of liquids, not provided for elsewhere, e.g. by thermal diffusion
    • B01D17/02—Separation of non-miscible liquids
    • B01D17/04—Breaking emulsions
    • B01D17/047—Breaking emulsions with separation aids
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C69/00—Esters of carboxylic acids; Esters of carbonic or haloformic acids
    • C07C69/34—Esters of acyclic saturated polycarboxylic acids having an esterified carboxyl group bound to an acyclic carbon atom
    • C07C69/44—Adipic acid esters
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11B—PRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B13/00—Recovery of fats, fatty oils or fatty acids from waste materials
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
    • Y02W30/74—Recovery of fats, fatty oils, fatty acids or other fatty substances, e.g. lanolin or waxes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to novel demulsifiers for use in the demulsification of oils, including crude oil.
  • the present invention relates to novel demulsifiers which are environmentally friendly, or 'green', and which can be used without restriction on-site in offshore oil drilling fields, for example in the North Sea.
  • the novel demulsifiers are based on alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan esters with dicarboxylic acid.
  • Demulsifiers or emulsion breakers, are chemicals which are used to separate salted water from crude oil emulsions. They are used in the processing of crude oil which is typically recovered along with significant quantities of brine, usually in the form of sea/ocean water. It is important to remove the brine from the crude oil as quickly as possible to allow dry oil to be stored and shipped as necessary, and to allow 'clean' brine, i.e. brine containing no oil, to be discharged.
  • Common demulsifiers are generally polymeric surfactants such as copolymers of polyoxyethylene and polypropylene or alkylphenol-formaldehyde resins and/or blends of various surface active substances.
  • Demulsifiers like those of the type described above, are contained within the 'clean' brine after demulsification.
  • the easiest and most cost effective way of discharging the 'clean' brine from the cruse oil stream is by pumping it back into the sea/ocean onsite. Therefore, the demulsifiers present in the 'clean' brine are also discharged back into the sea/ocean with the brine.
  • Demulsifiers of the types described above comprise phenol groups, and as such are not environmentally friendly. The discharging of these demulsifiers into the sea increases the levels of phenol groups present in the sea and thus harms marine life present in the area.
  • a novel demulsifier comprising the reaction product of:
  • dicarboxylic acid refers to an acid comprising two functional groups, i.e. carboxylate groups.
  • dicarboxylic acid defines the group of compounds containing both bi-functional carboxylic acids and dimer acids.
  • the demulsifier is operable to separate oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions.
  • the demulsifier is operable to separate water-in-oil emulsions of the type commonly harvested in crude oil drilling.
  • the demulsifier is operable to separate brine from crude oil.
  • the polyol in the alkoxylated species preferably comprises at least 3 hydroxyl groups.
  • the polyol in the alkoxylated species comprises up to 9 hydroxyl groups.
  • the polyol has an average of 1 or 2 primary hydroxyl groups and at least 1 , preferably 1 to 4 secondary hydroxyl groups.
  • the polyol in the alkoxylated species has the formula (I):
  • n is from 3 to 8 and particularly from 3 to 6.
  • the group R 1 is desirably an aliphatic hydrocarbyl group.
  • the group R is saturated.
  • R has from 3 to 10 carbon atoms, preferably from 3 to 8, and especially from 3 to 6 carbon atoms.
  • R will usually be linear, though it may include branching.
  • the polyol in the alkoxylated species has the general formula (la):
  • p is from 1 to 6, more preferably from 1 to 4.
  • Suitable polyols include glycerol, C4 polyols such as threitol and erythritol, C5 polyols such as inositol, arabitol and xylitol and Cg polyols such as sorbitol, and compounds derived therefrom, for example sorbitan.
  • the C4 to Cg polyols are commonly the reduced or hydrogenated forms of corresponding tetrose, pentose and hexose sugars.
  • the polyol is glycerol or a derivative thereof, particularly sorbitol or sorbitan (usually derived in situ from sorbitol) or a mixture or combination of these.
  • the polyol may be present in the demulsifier in an esterified form.
  • the sorbitan is present in the demulsifier in the form of an ester derived from the reaction of the sorbitan with a fatty acid or derivative thereof.
  • Preferred fatty acids or derivatives thereof comprise in the range from 6 to 24, more preferably 8 to 20, particularly 10 to 18, and especially 12 to 16 carbon atoms.
  • Linear fatty acids are preferred. Suitable fatty acids include capric, lauric, myristic, palmitic, stearic, and/or behenic acid.
  • Suitable fatty acids or derivatives thereof for reaction with the sorbitol or derivative thereof are preferably derived from natural sources, preferably from vegetable sources.
  • lauric acid is the main acid in coconut oil and in palm kernel oil. It may also be found in animal milk, for example cow's milk and goat's milk.
  • the fatty acids or derivatives thereof may be derived from palm oil, American oil palm oil, nutmeg oil, peach palm seed oil, betel nut, date seed, macadamia nut oil, watermelon seed oil, pumpkin seed or flower oil, and other vegetable sources.
  • the polyol or ester thereof is a sorbitan compound, more specifically, a sorbitan ester.
  • Suitable sorbitan esters include sorbitan cocoate, sorbitan caprate, sorbitan laurate, sorbitan myristate, sorbitan palmitate and/or sorbitan stearate.
  • Preferred sorbitan esters are sorbitan caprate and/or sorbitan laurate, preferably sorbitan monolaurate.
  • the polyol present in the demulsifier is alkoxylated.
  • the alkoxylated polyol preferably comprises residues of an alkoxy group, preferably a univalent radical R 2 - 0-, or anion R 2 -0 ⁇ , where R 2 is an alkyl group, preferably a Ci to C 6 alkyl group, preferably Ci to C 4 and more preferably C 2 to C 3 .
  • the alkoxy group is a methoxy group, ethoxy group or propoxy group, preferably ethoxy or propoxy.
  • An increase in the presence of ethoxy groups in the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof increases the solubility of the demulsifier in water, or in aqueous phases of oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions.
  • An increase in the presence of propoxy groups in the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof decreases the solubility of the demulsifier in water, or in aqueous phases of oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions.
  • HLB hydrophilic- lipophillic balance
  • ethoxy groups are present in the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof at a pre-determined concentration to provide the desired water solubility and/or HLB in the demulsifier.
  • a mixture of ethoxy and propoxy groups may be present to provide the desired water solubility and/or HLB in the demulsifier.
  • the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof is derived from the reaction of an alkylene oxide with the polyol or ester thereof.
  • One or more equivalents of alkylene oxide may react with each polyol molecule or molecule of the ester thereof.
  • the polyol is polyalkoxylated.
  • the alkylene oxide is selected from the group comprising Ci to C 6 alkylene oxides, preferably Ci to C 4 and more preferably C 2 to C 3 alkylene oxides.
  • the alkylene oxide is ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or a mixture thereof.
  • the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200 and most preferably between 2 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule.
  • the number of equivalents of alkylene oxide is given in terms of per molecule, preferably, this is the average number of equivalents per molecule in a sample of the product. Individual molecules in the sample may have fewer or greater than the stated number of equivalents of alkylene oxide, but on average, the sample will comprise molecules having an average of the stated number of equivalents of alkylene oxide.
  • the demulsifier comprises an alkoxylated polyol
  • the demulsifier comprises an alkoxylated ester of a polyol
  • the alkoxylated polyol is preferably an alkoxylated sorbitol, more preferably an ethoxylated sorbitol.
  • the alkoxylated polyol comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200 and most preferably between 2 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per sorbitol molecule.
  • the alkoxylated sorbitol has the general structure (II): where a,b,c,d,e and f may each independently be any number between 0 and 100; AO is an alkylene oxide residue, preferably an ethylene oxide (EO) residue; and where a+b+c+d+e+f is between 1 and 500, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200, even more preferably between 2 and 100 and most preferably between 10 and 40.
  • AO is an alkylene oxide residue, preferably an ethylene oxide (EO) residue
  • a+b+c+d+e+f is between 1 and 500, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200, even more preferably between 2 and 100 and most preferably between 10 and 40.
  • the alkoxylated polyol is an ethoxylated sorbitol, more preferably a polyoxyethylene (X) sorbitol, wherein X is a number between 1 and 40, preferably polyoxyethylene (10) sorbitol or polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitol, where a+b+c+d+e+f in formula (II) is 10 or 40, most preferably polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitol, where a+b+c+d+e+f in formula (II) is 40.
  • Polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitol is available commercially from Croda under the trade name AtlasTM G2004.
  • the alkoxylated polyol ester is preferably an alkoxylated sorbitan ester, more preferably an ethoxylated sorbitan ester.
  • the alkoxylated polyol ester comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200 and most preferably between 2 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per sorbitan ester molecule.
  • the alkoxylated sorbitan ester has the general structure (III):
  • AO is an alkylene oxide residue, preferably an ethylene oxide (EO) residue;
  • R is an alkyl group
  • w+x+y+z is between 1 and 300, preferably between 2 and 200, more preferably between 3 and 100 and most preferably between 5 and 50.
  • R may be saturated or unsaturated, preferably saturated.
  • R preferably comprises between 1 and 29 carbon atoms, preferably between 5 and 25, preferably between 9 and 21 , more preferably between 1 1 and 17.
  • R is derived from a fatty acid, preferably selected from the group comprising lauric acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid and oleic acid.
  • the alkoxylated polyol ester is an ethoxylated sorbitan ester, preferably an ethoxylated sorbitan monolaurate, monopalmitate, monostearate or monooleate, more preferably an ethoxylated sorbitan monolaurate, and most preferably polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate, where w+x+y+z in formula (III) is 20.
  • Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate is available commercially from Croda under the trade name TweenTM 20.
  • the dicarboxylic acid present in the demulsifier preferably has from 4 to 40 carbon atoms.
  • the dicarboxylic acid is aliphatic.
  • the dicarboxylic acid is of the formula (IV):
  • R is a C2 to 035 hydrocarbyl group which can be saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched and can be aromatic e.g. a phenyl ring (thus giving a phthalic, terephthalic or iso-phthalic dicarboxylic acid) or, desirably, aliphatic e.g. an alkylene or alkenylene group, and may be cyclic though it is desirably open chain.
  • aromatic e.g. a phenyl ring (thus giving a phthalic, terephthalic or iso-phthalic dicarboxylic acid) or, desirably, aliphatic e.g. an alkylene or alkenylene group, and may be cyclic though it is desirably open chain.
  • R is a group: -(CH2) m -, where m is from 2 to 36.
  • Suitable reactive derivatives of the dicarboxylic acids include lower e.g. C-
  • the dicarboxylic acid has at least 4 carbon atoms, preferably at least 5 and more preferably at least 6 carbon atoms.
  • the dicarboxylic acid preferably comprises up to 36 carbon atoms, preferably up to 20 carbon atoms, more preferably up to 12 carbon atoms and most preferably up to 10 carbon atoms.
  • the dicarboxylic acid may be selected from the group comprising malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, axelaic acid and sebacic acid, preferably adipic acid, suberic acid and sebacic acid, more preferably adipic acid.
  • the dicarboxylic acid is preferably a dimer acid.
  • the dimer acid preferably comprises from 24 to 52 carbon atoms, preferably from 28 to 48 carbon atoms, more preferably from 32 to 46 carbon atoms and most preferably from 36 to 44 carbon atoms.
  • the dimer acid is a C36 dimer acid.
  • dimer fatty acid is well known in the art and refers to the dimerisation product of mono- or polyunsaturated fatty acids and/or esters thereof.
  • Preferred dimer acids are dimers of Ci 0 to C 30 , more preferably C12 to C 24 , particularly C to C 22 , and especially Ci 8 alkyl chains.
  • Suitable dimer fatty acids include the dimerisation products of oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid, and elaidic acid.
  • the dimerisation products of the unsaturated fatty acid mixtures obtained in the hydrolysis of natural fats and oils, e.g. sunflower oil, soybean oil, olive oil, rapeseed oil, cottonseed oil and tall oil, may also be used. Hydrogenated, for example by using a nickel catalyst, dimer fatty acids may also be employed.
  • dimerisation usually results in varying amounts of oligomeric fatty acids (so-called “trimer”) and residues of monomeric fatty acids (so- called “monomer”), or esters thereof, being present.
  • the amount of monomer can, for example, be reduced by distillation.
  • Particularly preferred dimer fatty acids have a dicarboxylic (or dimer) content of greater than 70%, more preferably greater than 85%, and particularly greater than 94% by weight.
  • the molar ratio of alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to dicarboxylic acid in the reaction product is at least 0.05:1 , preferably at least 0.1 :1 , more preferably at least 0.5:1 and most preferably at least 1 :1 .
  • the molar ratio of alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to dicarboxylic acid in the reaction product is up to 20:1 , preferably up to 10:1 , more preferably up to 5:1 and most preferably up to 3:1 .
  • the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid may further comprise an end-cap.
  • the end-cap comprises a monovalent radical.
  • the end-cap comprises a monocarboxylic acid.
  • the monocarboxylic acid is a fatty acid.
  • the monocarboxylic acid comprises from 2 to 30 carbon atoms preferably between 12 and 26, more preferably between 14 and 22 carbon atoms and most preferably between 18 and 22 carbon atoms.
  • the monocarboxylic acid may be selected from the group comprising lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid and behenic acid, preferably stearic acid and behenic acid.
  • Fatty acids suitable for use herein can be obtained from natural sources such as, for example plant or animal esters.
  • the acids may be obtained from palm oil, rape seed oil, palm kernel oil, coconut oil, babassu oil, soybean oil, castor oil, sunflower oil, olive oil, linseed oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, tallow, whale or fish oils, grease, lard and mixtures thereof.
  • the fatty acids can also be synthetically prepared. Relatively pure unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid, and elaidic acid may be isolated, or relatively crude unsaturated fatty acid mixtures employed. Resin acids, such as those present in tall oil, may also be used.
  • the monocarboxylic acid is saturated.
  • the fatty acid may be either a branched fatty acid or a linear fatty acid.
  • a mixture of fatty acids may be present. In this case, the mixture may comprise branched fatty acids, linear fatty acids, or a mixture thereof.
  • the molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is at least 0.05:1 , preferably at least 0.1 :1 , more preferably at least 0.2:1 and most preferably at least 0.35:1 .
  • molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is up to 20:1 , preferably up to 10:1 , more preferably up to 5:1 and most preferably up to 2:1 .
  • the molar ratio of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to the dicarboxylic acid to the end-cap is at least 1 :0.1 :1 and more preferably at least 1 :0.5:1 .
  • molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is up to 1 :1 :5 and more preferably up to 1 :1 :2.
  • the reaction product has a molecular weight of greater than 700 Daltons, preferably greater than 1000 Daltons, more preferably greater than 1500 Daltons and most preferably greater than 2000 Daltons.
  • the reaction product has a molecular weight of less than 100000 Daltons, preferably less than 80000 Daltons, more preferably less than 50000 Daltons and most preferably less than 20000 Daltons.
  • the reaction product has a relative solubility number (RSN) of at least 2, preferably at least 4, more preferably at least 6 and most preferably at least 8.
  • RSN relative solubility number
  • the reaction product has an RSN of up to 100, preferably up to 60, more preferably up to 30 and most preferably up to 20.
  • the RSN is a measure of the solubility of the demulsifier and corresponds to the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance of the demulsifier.
  • the RSN can be determined according to the method set out in Wu et al, Colloids and surfaces: A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects; 2004; Vol. 232(2-3); pages 229-237.
  • the reaction product has a toxicity of less than 20,000mg/l, preferably less than 15,000 mg/l, preferably less than 10,000 mg/l and most preferably less than 5,500mg/l.
  • the toxicity is determined according to the method set out below in Experimental Example 2.
  • the reaction product shows a biodegradation of at least 1 %, preferably at least 5%, more preferably at least 8% and most preferably at least 10%.
  • the biodegradation is determined according to the method set out below in Experimental Example 2
  • the reaction product has a viscosity at 25 Q C of greater than l OOmPa.s, preferably greater than 300m Pa.s, more preferably greater than 500m Pa.s and most preferably greater than 900mPa.s.
  • the viscosity is measured at 25 °C on a Brookfield viscometer using a 29 Spindle at a shear rate of 0.25N.
  • the reaction product has a pour point of less than 100 Q C, preferably less than 80 Q C, more preferably less than 50 Q C and most preferably less than 30 Q C.
  • the reaction product has a pour point of greater than 1 Q C, preferably greater than 5 Q C, more preferably greater than 10 Q C.
  • the pour point is measured on an ISL MPP 5Gs automated pour point analyser according to the ASTM D97 standard method.
  • the reaction product has a pH which is approximately neutral.
  • the reaction product has a pH of between 3 and 12, preferably between 4 and 10, more preferably between 5 and 8 and most preferably between 6 and 7.
  • the pH of the reaction product is measured at a concentration of 1 % in an 85% IPA solution using an HI 8424 portable pH probe.
  • the reaction product has a density at 25 Q C of at least 0.1 g/cm 3 , preferably at least 0.5g/cm 3 , more preferably at least 0.8g/cm 3 , and most preferably at least 1 .Og/cm 3 .
  • the reaction product has a density at 25 Q C of up to 10g/cm 3 , preferably up to 5g/cm 3 , more preferably up to 3g/cm 3 , and most preferably up to 2g/cm 3 .
  • the density may be determined by pouring 10ml of sample into a measuring cylinder and calculating the approximate density from the weight.
  • the reaction product has good thermal stability in air and/or nitrogen.
  • the reaction product is stable in air up to a temperature of at least 50 Q C, preferably at least 100 Q C, more preferably at least 150 Q C and most preferably at least 200 Q C before the product starts to degrade.
  • the reaction product is stable in nitrogen up to a temperature of at least 50 Q C, preferably at least 100 Q C, more preferably at least 150 Q C and most preferably at least 200 Q C before the product starts to degrade.
  • the thermal stability in air and nitrogen was measured according to the method set out in Experimental Example 1 below.
  • the reaction product shows a mass loss in air over a period of 1 hour at 150 Q C of less than 50%, preferably less than 30%, more preferably less than 15% and most preferably of less than 7%.
  • the reaction product shows a mass loss in air over a period of 1 hour at 200 Q C of less than 90%, preferably less than 85%, more preferably less than 80% and most preferably of less than 75%.
  • the mass loss was measured according to the method set out in Experimental Example 1 below.
  • the demulsifier is used at a dosage rate of between 0.01 and " l OOOppm, preferably between 0.05 and 800ppm, more preferably between 0.1 and 500ppm and most preferably between 0.5 and 100ppm in the emulsion to be demulsified.
  • l OOOppm preferably between 0.05 and 800ppm, more preferably between 0.1 and 500ppm and most preferably between 0.5 and 100ppm in the emulsion to be demulsified.
  • particular demulsifiers can be extremely emulsion-specific. Therefore, the failure of a demulsifier to work on one or two tests does not mean that the demulsifier is unsuitable everywhere. This fact makes it extremely difficult to judge the worth of a particular potential demulsifier based on a few negative results alone. Positive results, however, may point to the worth not only of the demulsifier itself, but of the class of chemistry that that particular demulsifier represents. Consequently, the existence of several cases of outstanding positive performance gives credibility to this invention
  • a demulsification formulation comprising a demulsifier which is the reaction product of: a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester;
  • the demulsification formulation is for demulsifying an oil-in-water or a water-in-oil emulsion.
  • the demulsifier which is the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof, dicarboxylic acid and optional end-cap is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 2%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 5%w/w, more preferably at least 10% w/w and most preferably at least 15%w/w.
  • the demulsifier is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 80%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 60%w/w, more preferably up to 50% w/w and most preferably up to 30%w/w.
  • the demulsification formulation also comprises a solvent.
  • the solvent is preferably a derivative of the oil phase of the emulsion to be demulsified.
  • the solvent may be selected from xylene, heavy or light aromatic naphtha, IPA, methanol 2EH, diesel or toluene.
  • the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 20%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 30%w/w, more preferably at least 40% w/w and most preferably at least 50%w/w.
  • the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 98%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 90%w/w, more preferably up to 80% w/w and most preferably up to 70%w/w.
  • the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a ratio to the demulsifier of up to 50:1 , preferably up to 30:1 , more preferably up to 20:1 and most preferably up to 10:1 .
  • the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a ratio to the demulsifier of at least 1 :10, preferably at least 1 :5, more preferably at least 1 :2 and most preferably at least 1 :1 .
  • the demulsification formulation may optionally further comprise a wetting agent.
  • the wetting agent is a surfactant, preferably an anionic surfactant.
  • the wetting agent is or comprises an ester. Any suitable surfactant, particularly an ester-containing surfactant, or mixtures thereof may be used as the wetting agent in the present invention.
  • suitable wetting agents include, but are not limited to alkyl sulfates, such as ammonium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate; alkyl ether sulfates, such as sodium laureth sulfate, also known as sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES), sodium myreth sulfate; sulfonates such as dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorobutanesulfonate; alkyl benzene sulfonates; phosphates such as alkyl aryl ether phosphate, akyl ether phosphate, carboxylates such as alkyl carboxylates, i.e.
  • alkyl sulfates such as ammonium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate
  • alkyl ether sulfates
  • the wetting agent is preferably present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 1 %w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 3%w/w, more preferably at least 6% w/w and most preferably at least 8%w/w.
  • the wetting agent is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 25%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 20%w/w, more preferably up to 15% w/w and most preferably up to 12%w/w.
  • the demulsification formulation may optionally further comprise an alkylene oxide block copolymer, for example an ethylene oxide (EO)/propylene oxide (PO) block copolymer.
  • the block copolymer may be either an EO-PO copolymer, EO-PO-EO copolymer or PO-EO-PO copolymer.
  • the block copolymer has a molecular weight of between approximately 1000 and 10000, preferably between 1500 and 8000, more preferably between 2000 and 7000.
  • the block copolymer has an HLB of between 0.1 and 20, preferably between 0.5 and 17, and ore preferably between 1 and 15.
  • suitable block copolymers include, but are not limited to SurfonicTM EO/PO block copolymers ex Huntsman and EO/PO block copolymers from Ineos Oxide.
  • the alkylene oxide block copolymer is preferably present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 1 %w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 3%w/w, more preferably at least 6% w/w and most preferably at least 8%w/w.
  • the alkylene oxide block copolymer is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 25%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 20%w/w, more preferably up to 15% w/w and most preferably up to 12%w/w.
  • the demulsification formulation is anhydrous.
  • the demulsification formulation comprises less than 5% water, preferably less than 3%, more preferably less than 2% and most preferably less than 1 % water.
  • the exact composition of demulsifying formulations will vary according to the particular emulsion it is to be used on, and even for crude oil obtained from the same well, over time, the optimum amount of demulsifier will vary as the production conditions change. For example, different temperature and pressure conditions, concentrations of naturally occurring emulsifiers, production techniques, etc., make it impossible to predict in advance the demulsifier proportions required.
  • the demulsification formulation is used at a dosage rate of between 1 and " l OOOppm, preferably between 5 and 800ppm, more preferably between 15 and 500ppm and most preferably between 20 and 200ppm in the emulsion to be demulsified.
  • the emulsion is a water-in-oil emulsion.
  • the emulsion is an emulsion of water, preferably salted water, more preferably sea/ocean water in crude oil.
  • the reaction product is used in the demulsification of an oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion, preferably a crude oil emulsion.
  • an oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion preferably a crude oil emulsion.
  • a composition comprising sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate and adipic acid in a 2:1 molar ratio was produced.
  • a composition comprising sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate, adipic acid and stearic acid in a 2:1 :2 molar ratio was produced.
  • a composition comprising sorbitol (40EO), adipic acid and stearic acid in a 1 :1 :2 molar ratio was produced. 299kg of sorbitol (40EO) was added to the reaction vessel and heated to 60 °C whilst stirring. 86kg of stearic acid flake was slowly added to the warm stirred sorbitol (40EO) and the resulting mixture heated to 80 ' ⁇ . 23kg of adipic acid flake was then added to the mixture in the reaction vessel. The mixture was heated to 235 ⁇ observing distillation water removal. The reaction was continued until an acid value of the less than 5mgKOH/g was observed.
  • the reaction yielded 400 kg of reaction product and 8.3kg water.
  • composition comprising sorbitol (40EO) and C 36 dimer acid in a 4:3 molar ratio was produced.
  • a formulation comprising the following:
  • EO/PO block polymer (SurfonicTM block copolymer, ex Huntsman) 10%
  • Ester/wetting agent ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer, based on a C13/C15 alcohol, for example SynperonicTM LF/30, ex Croda
  • ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer based on a C13/C15 alcohol, for example SynperonicTM LF/30, ex Croda
  • a formulation was prepared comprising the following: Demulsifier 3 30%
  • EO/PO block polymer (SurfonicTM block copolymer, ex Huntsman) 12%
  • Ester/wetting agent ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer, based on a C13/C15 alcohol, for example SynperonicTM LF/30, ex Croda
  • the present invention therefore, provides a demulsifier which shows the same or superior properties and efficacy as the standard production chemicals, but which is environmentally friendly and reaches or surpasses the rules of the OSPAR.
  • the demulsifier of the present invention shows good stability, so it can easily be stored onsite at off-shore drilling locations until required for use.
  • the demulsifier shows good efficacy in demulsifying crude oil emulsions, and has superior biodegradability and toxicity properties meaning it can safely be discharged into the sea/ocean without further treatment of the aqueous phase of the demulsified emulsion being required.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Polyethers (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Lubricants (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to novel demulsifiers for use in the demulsification of oils from water and vice versa, including the demulsification of crude oil from sea water or brine. In particular, the present invention relates to novel demulsifiers which are environmentally friendly, or 'green', and which can be used without restriction on-site in offshore oil drilling fields, for example in the North Sea. The novel demulsifiers are based on the reaction product of alkoxylated polyols or polyol esters with dicarboxylic acids.

Description

Novel Demulsifiers
The present invention relates to novel demulsifiers for use in the demulsification of oils, including crude oil. In particular, the present invention relates to novel demulsifiers which are environmentally friendly, or 'green', and which can be used without restriction on-site in offshore oil drilling fields, for example in the North Sea. The novel demulsifiers are based on alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan esters with dicarboxylic acid.
Demulsifiers, or emulsion breakers, are chemicals which are used to separate salted water from crude oil emulsions. They are used in the processing of crude oil which is typically recovered along with significant quantities of brine, usually in the form of sea/ocean water. It is important to remove the brine from the crude oil as quickly as possible to allow dry oil to be stored and shipped as necessary, and to allow 'clean' brine, i.e. brine containing no oil, to be discharged.
Common demulsifiers are generally polymeric surfactants such as copolymers of polyoxyethylene and polypropylene or alkylphenol-formaldehyde resins and/or blends of various surface active substances.
Demulsifiers, like those of the type described above, are contained within the 'clean' brine after demulsification. The easiest and most cost effective way of discharging the 'clean' brine from the cruse oil stream is by pumping it back into the sea/ocean onsite. Therefore, the demulsifiers present in the 'clean' brine are also discharged back into the sea/ocean with the brine.
Demulsifiers of the types described above comprise phenol groups, and as such are not environmentally friendly. The discharging of these demulsifiers into the sea increases the levels of phenol groups present in the sea and thus harms marine life present in the area.
In the oilfield industry, there is a move towards more environmentally acceptable chemicals that are less hazardous than the standard production chemicals described above. For example, drilling sites in the North Sea are regulated by the rules of the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR). These rules restrict the toxicity of allowed demulsifiers and place stringent values on the biodegradability and the like of all chemicals to be used in the marine environment. However, it has been generally found that the more environmentally acceptable demulsifiers do not have the same level of efficacy as the standard production chemicals.
There is, therefore, a need for a demulsifier which shows the same or superior properties and efficacy as the standard production chemicals, but which is environmentally friendly and reaches or surpasses the rules of the OSPAR.
It is an object of the present invention to address at least one of the above or other disadvantages associated with the prior art. According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a novel demulsifier comprising the reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof; and
b) a dicarboxylic acid. According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a novel demulsifier obtainable by reacting:
a) an alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof; and
b) a dicarboxylic acid. When used herein, the term "dicarboxylic" refers to an acid comprising two functional groups, i.e. carboxylate groups. The term dicarboxylic acid defines the group of compounds containing both bi-functional carboxylic acids and dimer acids.
The demulsifier is operable to separate oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions. Preferably, the demulsifier is operable to separate water-in-oil emulsions of the type commonly harvested in crude oil drilling. Preferably, the demulsifier is operable to separate brine from crude oil.
The polyol in the alkoxylated species preferably comprises at least 3 hydroxyl groups. Preferably, the polyol in the alkoxylated species comprises up to 9 hydroxyl groups. Desirably, the polyol has an average of 1 or 2 primary hydroxyl groups and at least 1 , preferably 1 to 4 secondary hydroxyl groups.
Preferably, the polyol in the alkoxylated species has the formula (I):
R1 -(OH)n (I)
where n is from 3 to 8 and particularly from 3 to 6.
The group R1 is desirably an aliphatic hydrocarbyl group. Preferably, the group R is saturated. Preferably, R has from 3 to 10 carbon atoms, preferably from 3 to 8, and especially from 3 to 6 carbon atoms. R will usually be linear, though it may include branching.
Desirably, the polyol in the alkoxylated species has the general formula (la):
HOH2C-(CHOH)p-CH2OH (la)
where p is from 1 to 6, more preferably from 1 to 4.
Suitable polyols include glycerol, C4 polyols such as threitol and erythritol, C5 polyols such as inositol, arabitol and xylitol and Cg polyols such as sorbitol, and compounds derived therefrom, for example sorbitan. The C4 to Cg polyols are commonly the reduced or hydrogenated forms of corresponding tetrose, pentose and hexose sugars. Desirably the polyol is glycerol or a derivative thereof, particularly sorbitol or sorbitan (usually derived in situ from sorbitol) or a mixture or combination of these.
The polyol may be present in the demulsifier in an esterified form. Preferably, when the polyol is sorbitan, the sorbitan is present in the demulsifier in the form of an ester derived from the reaction of the sorbitan with a fatty acid or derivative thereof.
Preferred fatty acids or derivatives thereof comprise in the range from 6 to 24, more preferably 8 to 20, particularly 10 to 18, and especially 12 to 16 carbon atoms.
Linear fatty acids are preferred. Suitable fatty acids include capric, lauric, myristic, palmitic, stearic, and/or behenic acid.
Suitable fatty acids or derivatives thereof for reaction with the sorbitol or derivative thereof are preferably derived from natural sources, preferably from vegetable sources. For example, lauric acid is the main acid in coconut oil and in palm kernel oil. It may also be found in animal milk, for example cow's milk and goat's milk. The fatty acids or derivatives thereof may be derived from palm oil, American oil palm oil, nutmeg oil, peach palm seed oil, betel nut, date seed, macadamia nut oil, watermelon seed oil, pumpkin seed or flower oil, and other vegetable sources.
In one embodiment, the polyol or ester thereof is a sorbitan compound, more specifically, a sorbitan ester. Suitable sorbitan esters include sorbitan cocoate, sorbitan caprate, sorbitan laurate, sorbitan myristate, sorbitan palmitate and/or sorbitan stearate. Preferred sorbitan esters are sorbitan caprate and/or sorbitan laurate, preferably sorbitan monolaurate.
The polyol present in the demulsifier is alkoxylated. The alkoxylated polyol preferably comprises residues of an alkoxy group, preferably a univalent radical R2- 0-, or anion R2-0~, where R2 is an alkyl group, preferably a Ci to C6 alkyl group, preferably Ci to C4 and more preferably C2 to C3.
Preferably, the alkoxy group is a methoxy group, ethoxy group or propoxy group, preferably ethoxy or propoxy. An increase in the presence of ethoxy groups in the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof increases the solubility of the demulsifier in water, or in aqueous phases of oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions. An increase in the presence of propoxy groups in the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof decreases the solubility of the demulsifier in water, or in aqueous phases of oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions. The presence of ethoxy groups in the alkoxylated species increases the hydrophilic- lipophillic balance (HLB) of the alkoxylated species. The presence of propoxy groups in the alkoxylated species lowers the HLB of the alkoxylated species.
Preferably, ethoxy groups are present in the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof at a pre-determined concentration to provide the desired water solubility and/or HLB in the demulsifier. Alternatively, a mixture of ethoxy and propoxy groups may be present to provide the desired water solubility and/or HLB in the demulsifier.
Preferably, the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof is derived from the reaction of an alkylene oxide with the polyol or ester thereof. One or more equivalents of alkylene oxide may react with each polyol molecule or molecule of the ester thereof. Preferably, the polyol is polyalkoxylated. Preferably, the alkylene oxide is selected from the group comprising Ci to C6 alkylene oxides, preferably Ci to C4 and more preferably C2 to C3 alkylene oxides. Preferably, the alkylene oxide is ethylene oxide or propylene oxide or a mixture thereof.
Preferably, the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200 and most preferably between 2 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule.
Where the number of equivalents of alkylene oxide is given in terms of per molecule, preferably, this is the average number of equivalents per molecule in a sample of the product. Individual molecules in the sample may have fewer or greater than the stated number of equivalents of alkylene oxide, but on average, the sample will comprise molecules having an average of the stated number of equivalents of alkylene oxide.
Where the demulsifier comprises an alkoxylated polyol, there are preferably between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 2 and 400, more preferably between 5 and 200 and most preferably between 10 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per polyol molecule.
Where the demulsifier comprises an alkoxylated ester of a polyol, there are preferably between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 2 and 300, more preferably between 3 and 150 and most preferably between 5 and 50 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule.
In one embodiment, the alkoxylated polyol is preferably an alkoxylated sorbitol, more preferably an ethoxylated sorbitol. Preferably, the alkoxylated polyol comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200 and most preferably between 2 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per sorbitol molecule. Preferably, the alkoxylated sorbitol has the general structure (II): where a,b,c,d,e and f may each independently be any number between 0 and 100; AO is an alkylene oxide residue, preferably an ethylene oxide (EO) residue; and where a+b+c+d+e+f is between 1 and 500, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200, even more preferably between 2 and 100 and most preferably between 10 and 40.
Preferably, in this embodiment, the alkoxylated polyol is an ethoxylated sorbitol, more preferably a polyoxyethylene (X) sorbitol, wherein X is a number between 1 and 40, preferably polyoxyethylene (10) sorbitol or polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitol, where a+b+c+d+e+f in formula (II) is 10 or 40, most preferably polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitol, where a+b+c+d+e+f in formula (II) is 40. Polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitol is available commercially from Croda under the trade name Atlas™ G2004.
In another embodiment, the alkoxylated polyol ester is preferably an alkoxylated sorbitan ester, more preferably an ethoxylated sorbitan ester. Preferably, the alkoxylated polyol ester comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule, preferably between 1 and 400, more preferably between 1 and 200 and most preferably between 2 and 100 alkylene oxide equivalents per sorbitan ester molecule. Preferably, the alkoxylated sorbitan ester has the general structure (III):
(IN) where w,x,y and z may each independently be any number between 0 and 100; AO is an alkylene oxide residue, preferably an ethylene oxide (EO) residue;
R is an alkyl group; and
where w+x+y+z is between 1 and 300, preferably between 2 and 200, more preferably between 3 and 100 and most preferably between 5 and 50.
In formula (III), R may be saturated or unsaturated, preferably saturated. R preferably comprises between 1 and 29 carbon atoms, preferably between 5 and 25, preferably between 9 and 21 , more preferably between 1 1 and 17. Preferably R is derived from a fatty acid, preferably selected from the group comprising lauric acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid and oleic acid.
Preferably, in this embodiment, the alkoxylated polyol ester is an ethoxylated sorbitan ester, preferably an ethoxylated sorbitan monolaurate, monopalmitate, monostearate or monooleate, more preferably an ethoxylated sorbitan monolaurate, and most preferably polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate, where w+x+y+z in formula (III) is 20. Polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate is available commercially from Croda under the trade name Tween™ 20. The dicarboxylic acid present in the demulsifier preferably has from 4 to 40 carbon atoms. Preferably, the dicarboxylic acid is aliphatic. Typically, the dicarboxylic acid is of the formula (IV):
HOOC-R3-COOH (IV)
3
where R is a C2 to 035 hydrocarbyl group which can be saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched and can be aromatic e.g. a phenyl ring (thus giving a phthalic, terephthalic or iso-phthalic dicarboxylic acid) or, desirably, aliphatic e.g. an alkylene or alkenylene group, and may be cyclic though it is desirably open chain. Commonly
3
R is a group: -(CH2)m-, where m is from 2 to 36. Suitable reactive derivatives of the dicarboxylic acids include lower e.g. C-| to C4 and particularly methyl, alkyl esters (usually diesters) and anhydrides, particularly cyclic anhydrides such as succinic, maleic and phthalic anhydrides.
In one embodiment, the dicarboxylic acid has at least 4 carbon atoms, preferably at least 5 and more preferably at least 6 carbon atoms. In this embodiment, the dicarboxylic acid preferably comprises up to 36 carbon atoms, preferably up to 20 carbon atoms, more preferably up to 12 carbon atoms and most preferably up to 10 carbon atoms. In this embodiment, the dicarboxylic acid may be selected from the group comprising malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, axelaic acid and sebacic acid, preferably adipic acid, suberic acid and sebacic acid, more preferably adipic acid.
In another embodiment, the dicarboxylic acid is preferably a dimer acid. In this embodiment, the dimer acid preferably comprises from 24 to 52 carbon atoms, preferably from 28 to 48 carbon atoms, more preferably from 32 to 46 carbon atoms and most preferably from 36 to 44 carbon atoms. Preferably the dimer acid is a C36 dimer acid.
The term dimer fatty acid is well known in the art and refers to the dimerisation product of mono- or polyunsaturated fatty acids and/or esters thereof. Preferred dimer acids are dimers of Ci0 to C30, more preferably C12 to C24, particularly C to C22, and especially Ci8 alkyl chains. Suitable dimer fatty acids include the dimerisation products of oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid, and elaidic acid. The dimerisation products of the unsaturated fatty acid mixtures obtained in the hydrolysis of natural fats and oils, e.g. sunflower oil, soybean oil, olive oil, rapeseed oil, cottonseed oil and tall oil, may also be used. Hydrogenated, for example by using a nickel catalyst, dimer fatty acids may also be employed.
In addition to the dimer fatty acids, dimerisation usually results in varying amounts of oligomeric fatty acids (so-called "trimer") and residues of monomeric fatty acids (so- called "monomer"), or esters thereof, being present. The amount of monomer can, for example, be reduced by distillation. Particularly preferred dimer fatty acids have a dicarboxylic (or dimer) content of greater than 70%, more preferably greater than 85%, and particularly greater than 94% by weight.
Preferably, the molar ratio of alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to dicarboxylic acid in the reaction product is at least 0.05:1 , preferably at least 0.1 :1 , more preferably at least 0.5:1 and most preferably at least 1 :1 . Preferably, the molar ratio of alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to dicarboxylic acid in the reaction product is up to 20:1 , preferably up to 10:1 , more preferably up to 5:1 and most preferably up to 3:1 . Optionally, the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid may further comprise an end-cap. Preferably, the end-cap comprises a monovalent radical. Preferably, the end-cap comprises a monocarboxylic acid.
Preferably, the monocarboxylic acid is a fatty acid. Preferably, the monocarboxylic acid comprises from 2 to 30 carbon atoms preferably between 12 and 26, more preferably between 14 and 22 carbon atoms and most preferably between 18 and 22 carbon atoms. The monocarboxylic acid may be selected from the group comprising lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid and behenic acid, preferably stearic acid and behenic acid.
Fatty acids suitable for use herein can be obtained from natural sources such as, for example plant or animal esters. For example, the acids may be obtained from palm oil, rape seed oil, palm kernel oil, coconut oil, babassu oil, soybean oil, castor oil, sunflower oil, olive oil, linseed oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, tallow, whale or fish oils, grease, lard and mixtures thereof. The fatty acids can also be synthetically prepared. Relatively pure unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, palmitoleic acid, and elaidic acid may be isolated, or relatively crude unsaturated fatty acid mixtures employed. Resin acids, such as those present in tall oil, may also be used.
Preferably, the monocarboxylic acid is saturated. The fatty acid may be either a branched fatty acid or a linear fatty acid. A mixture of fatty acids may be present. In this case, the mixture may comprise branched fatty acids, linear fatty acids, or a mixture thereof.
Preferably, the molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is at least 0.05:1 , preferably at least 0.1 :1 , more preferably at least 0.2:1 and most preferably at least 0.35:1 . Preferably, molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is up to 20:1 , preferably up to 10:1 , more preferably up to 5:1 and most preferably up to 2:1 . Preferably, the molar ratio of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to the dicarboxylic acid to the end-cap is at least 1 :0.1 :1 and more preferably at least 1 :0.5:1 . Preferably, molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is up to 1 :1 :5 and more preferably up to 1 :1 :2.
Preferably, the reaction product has a molecular weight of greater than 700 Daltons, preferably greater than 1000 Daltons, more preferably greater than 1500 Daltons and most preferably greater than 2000 Daltons. Preferably, the reaction product has a molecular weight of less than 100000 Daltons, preferably less than 80000 Daltons, more preferably less than 50000 Daltons and most preferably less than 20000 Daltons.
Preferably, the reaction product has a relative solubility number (RSN) of at least 2, preferably at least 4, more preferably at least 6 and most preferably at least 8. Preferably, the reaction product has an RSN of up to 100, preferably up to 60, more preferably up to 30 and most preferably up to 20. The RSN is a measure of the solubility of the demulsifier and corresponds to the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance of the demulsifier. The RSN can be determined according to the method set out in Wu et al, Colloids and surfaces: A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects; 2004; Vol. 232(2-3); pages 229-237.
Preferably, the reaction product has a toxicity of less than 20,000mg/l, preferably less than 15,000 mg/l, preferably less than 10,000 mg/l and most preferably less than 5,500mg/l. The toxicity is determined according to the method set out below in Experimental Example 2.
Preferably, the reaction product shows a biodegradation of at least 1 %, preferably at least 5%, more preferably at least 8% and most preferably at least 10%. The biodegradation is determined according to the method set out below in Experimental Example 2
Preferably, the reaction product has a viscosity at 25QC of greater than l OOmPa.s, preferably greater than 300m Pa.s, more preferably greater than 500m Pa.s and most preferably greater than 900mPa.s. The viscosity is measured at 25 °C on a Brookfield viscometer using a 29 Spindle at a shear rate of 0.25N.
Preferably, the reaction product has a pour point of less than 100QC, preferably less than 80QC, more preferably less than 50QC and most preferably less than 30QC. Preferably, the reaction product has a pour point of greater than 1 QC, preferably greater than 5QC, more preferably greater than 10QC. Preferably, the pour point is measured on an ISL MPP 5Gs automated pour point analyser according to the ASTM D97 standard method.
Preferably, the reaction product has a pH which is approximately neutral. Preferably, the reaction product has a pH of between 3 and 12, preferably between 4 and 10, more preferably between 5 and 8 and most preferably between 6 and 7. The pH of the reaction product is measured at a concentration of 1 % in an 85% IPA solution using an HI 8424 portable pH probe.
Preferably, the reaction product has a density at 25QC of at least 0.1 g/cm3, preferably at least 0.5g/cm3, more preferably at least 0.8g/cm3, and most preferably at least 1 .Og/cm3. Preferably, the reaction product has a density at 25QC of up to 10g/cm3, preferably up to 5g/cm3, more preferably up to 3g/cm3, and most preferably up to 2g/cm3. The density may be determined by pouring 10ml of sample into a measuring cylinder and calculating the approximate density from the weight.
Preferably, the reaction product has good thermal stability in air and/or nitrogen. Preferably, the reaction product is stable in air up to a temperature of at least 50QC, preferably at least 100QC, more preferably at least 150QC and most preferably at least 200QC before the product starts to degrade. Preferably, the reaction product is stable in nitrogen up to a temperature of at least 50QC, preferably at least 100QC, more preferably at least 150QC and most preferably at least 200QC before the product starts to degrade. The thermal stability in air and nitrogen was measured according to the method set out in Experimental Example 1 below.
Preferably, the reaction product shows a mass loss in air over a period of 1 hour at 150QC of less than 50%, preferably less than 30%, more preferably less than 15% and most preferably of less than 7%. Preferably, the reaction product shows a mass loss in air over a period of 1 hour at 200QC of less than 90%, preferably less than 85%, more preferably less than 80% and most preferably of less than 75%. The mass loss was measured according to the method set out in Experimental Example 1 below.
Preferably, the demulsifier is used at a dosage rate of between 0.01 and "l OOOppm, preferably between 0.05 and 800ppm, more preferably between 0.1 and 500ppm and most preferably between 0.5 and 100ppm in the emulsion to be demulsified. It should be noted that particular demulsifiers can be extremely emulsion-specific. Therefore, the failure of a demulsifier to work on one or two tests does not mean that the demulsifier is unsuitable everywhere. This fact makes it extremely difficult to judge the worth of a particular potential demulsifier based on a few negative results alone. Positive results, however, may point to the worth not only of the demulsifier itself, but of the class of chemistry that that particular demulsifier represents. Consequently, the existence of several cases of outstanding positive performance gives credibility to this invention as a whole.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a demulsification formulation comprising a demulsifier which is the reaction product of: a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester;
b) a dicarboxylic acid; and
c) optionally, an end-cap. Preferably, the demulsification formulation is for demulsifying an oil-in-water or a water-in-oil emulsion.
Preferably, the demulsifier which is the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof, dicarboxylic acid and optional end-cap is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 2%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 5%w/w, more preferably at least 10% w/w and most preferably at least 15%w/w. Preferably, the demulsifier is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 80%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 60%w/w, more preferably up to 50% w/w and most preferably up to 30%w/w. Preferably, the demulsification formulation also comprises a solvent. The solvent is preferably a derivative of the oil phase of the emulsion to be demulsified. For example, for crude oil, the solvent may be selected from xylene, heavy or light aromatic naphtha, IPA, methanol 2EH, diesel or toluene.
Preferably, the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 20%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 30%w/w, more preferably at least 40% w/w and most preferably at least 50%w/w. Preferably, the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 98%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 90%w/w, more preferably up to 80% w/w and most preferably up to 70%w/w. Preferably, the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a ratio to the demulsifier of up to 50:1 , preferably up to 30:1 , more preferably up to 20:1 and most preferably up to 10:1 . Preferably, the solvent is present in the demulsification formulation at a ratio to the demulsifier of at least 1 :10, preferably at least 1 :5, more preferably at least 1 :2 and most preferably at least 1 :1 .
The demulsification formulation may optionally further comprise a wetting agent. Preferably, the wetting agent is a surfactant, preferably an anionic surfactant. Preferably, the wetting agent is or comprises an ester. Any suitable surfactant, particularly an ester-containing surfactant, or mixtures thereof may be used as the wetting agent in the present invention. Examples of suitable wetting agents include, but are not limited to alkyl sulfates, such as ammonium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl sulfate; alkyl ether sulfates, such as sodium laureth sulfate, also known as sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES), sodium myreth sulfate; sulfonates such as dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorobutanesulfonate; alkyl benzene sulfonates; phosphates such as alkyl aryl ether phosphate, akyl ether phosphate, carboxylates such as alkyl carboxylates, i.e. Fatty acid salts (soaps), sodium stearate, Sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, carboxylate fluorosurfactants (perfluorononanoate, perfluorooctanoate (PFOA or PFO)) and Synperonic™ LF/30 (ex Croda). When present, the wetting agent is preferably present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 1 %w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 3%w/w, more preferably at least 6% w/w and most preferably at least 8%w/w. Preferably, when present, the wetting agent is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 25%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 20%w/w, more preferably up to 15% w/w and most preferably up to 12%w/w. The demulsification formulation may optionally further comprise an alkylene oxide block copolymer, for example an ethylene oxide (EO)/propylene oxide (PO) block copolymer. The block copolymer may be either an EO-PO copolymer, EO-PO-EO copolymer or PO-EO-PO copolymer. Preferably, the block copolymer has a molecular weight of between approximately 1000 and 10000, preferably between 1500 and 8000, more preferably between 2000 and 7000. Preferably, the block copolymer has an HLB of between 0.1 and 20, preferably between 0.5 and 17, and ore preferably between 1 and 15. Examples of suitable block copolymers include, but are not limited to Surfonic™ EO/PO block copolymers ex Huntsman and EO/PO block copolymers from Ineos Oxide.
When present, the alkylene oxide block copolymer is preferably present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of at least 1 %w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably at least 3%w/w, more preferably at least 6% w/w and most preferably at least 8%w/w. Preferably, when present, the alkylene oxide block copolymer is present in the demulsification formulation at a concentration of up to 25%w/w based on the total weight of the demulsification formulation, preferably up to 20%w/w, more preferably up to 15% w/w and most preferably up to 12%w/w. Preferably, the demulsification formulation is anhydrous. Preferably, the demulsification formulation comprises less than 5% water, preferably less than 3%, more preferably less than 2% and most preferably less than 1 % water. It will be appreciated that the exact composition of demulsifying formulations will vary according to the particular emulsion it is to be used on, and even for crude oil obtained from the same well, over time, the optimum amount of demulsifier will vary as the production conditions change. For example, different temperature and pressure conditions, concentrations of naturally occurring emulsifiers, production techniques, etc., make it impossible to predict in advance the demulsifier proportions required.
Preferably, the demulsification formulation is used at a dosage rate of between 1 and "l OOOppm, preferably between 5 and 800ppm, more preferably between 15 and 500ppm and most preferably between 20 and 200ppm in the emulsion to be demulsified.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of demulsifying an oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion, the method comprising adding a reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester;
b) a dicarboxylic acid; and
c) optionally, an end-cap
to the emulsion.
Preferably, the emulsion is a water-in-oil emulsion. Preferably, the emulsion is an emulsion of water, preferably salted water, more preferably sea/ocean water in crude oil.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided the use of a reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester;
b) a dicarboxylic acid; and
c) optionally, an end-cap
as a demulsifier.
Preferably, the reaction product is used in the demulsification of an oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion, preferably a crude oil emulsion. Any of the above features of the invention may be combined in any combination and with any aspect of the invention.
Examples
The present invention will now be described further, for illustrative purposes only, in the following examples. All parts and percentages are given by weight unless otherwise stated.
Preparation Process
Demulsifier 1
A composition comprising sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate and adipic acid in a 2:1 molar ratio was produced.
384kg of sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate was added to the reaction vessel and heated to 80 °C whilst stirring. 23kg of adipic acid flake was slowly added to the warm stirred sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate. The mixture was heated to 235°C observing distillation water removal. The reaction was continued until an acid value of the less than 5mgKOH/g was observed. The reaction yielded 400 kg of reaction product and 5.8kg water.
Demulsifier 2
A composition comprising sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate, adipic acid and stearic acid in a 2:1 :2 molar ratio was produced.
313kg of sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate was added to the reaction vessel and heated to 60 °C whilst stirring. 73kg of stearic acid flake was slowly added to the warm stirred sorbitan (20EO) monolaurate and the resulting mixture heated to 80 'Ό. 19kg of adipic acid flake was then added to the mixture in the reaction vessel. The mixture was heated to 235 'Ό observing distillation water removal. The reaction was continued until an acid value of the less than 5mgKOH/g was observed.
The reaction yielded 400 kg of reaction product and 4.8kg water. Demulsifier 3
A composition comprising sorbitol (40EO), adipic acid and stearic acid in a 1 :1 :2 molar ratio was produced. 299kg of sorbitol (40EO) was added to the reaction vessel and heated to 60 °C whilst stirring. 86kg of stearic acid flake was slowly added to the warm stirred sorbitol (40EO) and the resulting mixture heated to 80 'Ό. 23kg of adipic acid flake was then added to the mixture in the reaction vessel. The mixture was heated to 235^ observing distillation water removal. The reaction was continued until an acid value of the less than 5mgKOH/g was observed.
The reaction yielded 400 kg of reaction product and 8.3kg water.
Demulsifier 4
A composition comprising sorbitol (40EO) and C36 dimer acid in a 4:3 molar ratio was produced.
72kg of C36 dimer acid was added to the reaction vessel and heated to 80 °C whilst stirring. 335kg of sorbitol (40EO) was slowly added to the warm stirred L>36 dimer acid. The mixture was heated to 235°C observing distillation water removal. The reaction was continued until an acid value of the less than 5mgKOH/g was observed
The reaction yielded 400 kg of reaction product and 5kg water. Formulation 1
A formulation was prepared comprising the following:
Demulsifier 1 20%
EO/PO block polymer (Surfonic™ block copolymer, ex Huntsman) 10%
Ester/wetting agent (ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer, based on a C13/C15 alcohol, for example Synperonic™ LF/30, ex Croda) 10%
Solvent (diesel) 60% Formulation 2
A formulation was prepared comprising the following: Demulsifier 3 30%
EO/PO block polymer (Surfonic™ block copolymer, ex Huntsman) 12%
Ester/wetting agent (ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer, based on a C13/C15 alcohol, for example Synperonic™ LF/30, ex Croda) 8%
Solvent (methanol) 50%
Experimental
Physical Properties and Thermal Stability
A) The physical properties of the demulsifiers 1 -4 were tested. The results and standard testing methods are detailed in Table 1 below.
Table 1 : Physical properties
B) The thermal stability of the demulsifiers was then tested in air. The tests were performed at 150QC and 200QC. The experimental method was as follows.
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) at 150 °C over 1 hour
Between 10 and 15 mg of the sample to be tested was weighed into a
70μΙ_ alumina crucible put into the thermogravimetric analyser's
(Mettler TG50) furnace and run under air at the following conditions:
Gas (flow rate): Air (200 ml/min)
Temperature range:
30-150°C at 50°C/min then
150 'Ό for one hour then
150-600 °C at 50<€/min then
600 <€ for five minutes.
TGA Analysis at 200 °C over 1 hour
The method as described above was performed, but over the below temperature range:
30-200 °C at 50°C/min then
200 <€ for one hour then
200-600 <€ at 50<€/min then
600 <€ for five minutes.
The percentage mass lost was calculated by step horizontal analysis using STARe software (version 9.2) on the results of the two methods described above. The results are shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2 : Mass loss results
Toxicity and Biodegradation
The biodegradation of the demulsifiers was tested according to the guidelines set out in OECD 306 "Biodegradability in Sea Water" (Adopted: 17.07.92). The method set out on pages 10 to 17 of the guidelines, i.e. the closed bottle method, was performed. The results are given in Table 3 below.
The toxicity of the demulsifiers was tested according to ISO 10253 (Second edition, 15.04.2006). The results are given in Table 3 below.
Table 3 : Toxicity and Biodegradation Results
From the results it can be seen that all of the demulsifiers have low toxicity and good biodegradation properties.
Efficacy Tests
Samples of crude oil used was classified using the American Petroleum Institute (API) test guidelines. The oil was obtained from a UK onshore source at Star Energy located near to Lincoln in April 201 1 . The crude oil samples were cut with water at the percentages described below in Table 4.
Table 4 : Crude Oil Water Cut
Water Cut (%) API (°) Crude Oil Type
10 14.4 Heavy
30 15.9 Heavy
50 1 1 .4 Heavy
70 1 1 .4 Heavy Tests were performed on the oil samples from Table 4 to determine the effectiveness of the Demulsifiers described above. The tests were carried out using a TurbiScan TLab Thermo manufactured by Formulaction. The demulsifiers were added to the crude oil at a concentration of 100 ppm (in xylene) and analysed in the TurbiScan at 1 scan per minute for 60 minutes. The temperature of the TurbiScan was 60 °C. The TurbiScan monitors the duration of the demulsification, along with the transmission level and clarity of the resulting water phase and the quality of the interface between the resulting water and oil phases. The results of the TurbiScan tests are given in Table 5
T Dlifiemseruable 5 : TurbiScan test results
C O Cdil Wtt reaeruu
( )%
Ti Dlifiitmeemscaonu
Sd (i)tttaremnesu
1 10 8 30 55 > 80 Very Excellent
Ti Dlifiitmeemscaonu
clear
fiihd (i)tnsemnesu
1 30 34 > 60 55 > 80 Very Excellent clear
O W ()%ttaeru
1 50 32 55 55 > 80 Very Excellent clear
1 70 4 12 68 > Tii Llransmssoneev60 Average Excellent
2 10 10 50 52 > 80 ()% Very Excellent clear
2 30 31 > 60 40 > 80 V C Wlittaeraryery Excellent clear
2 50 29 50 49 > 80 Very Excellent
Q Iflittneraceauy clear
2 70 6 50 66 > 70 Clear Excellent
3 10 8 20 56 = 40 Poor Average
3 30 8 20 59 = 50 Average Average
/ Poor
3 50 8 35 56 = 60 Average Average
3 70 2 50 62 = 30 Poor / Average cloudy
4 10 6 > 60 33 > 80 Very Excellent clear
4 30 44 > 60 7 > 80 Very Excellent clear
4 50 29 > 60 31 > 80 Very Excellent clear
4 70 3 55 58 > 70 Clear Excellent The present invention, therefore, provides a demulsifier which shows the same or superior properties and efficacy as the standard production chemicals, but which is environmentally friendly and reaches or surpasses the rules of the OSPAR.
The demulsifier of the present invention shows good stability, so it can easily be stored onsite at off-shore drilling locations until required for use. When used, the demulsifier shows good efficacy in demulsifying crude oil emulsions, and has superior biodegradability and toxicity properties meaning it can safely be discharged into the sea/ocean without further treatment of the aqueous phase of the demulsified emulsion being required.
Any or all of the disclosed features, and/or any or all of the steps of any method or process described, may be combined in any combination.
Each feature disclosed herein may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent or similar purpose. Therefore, each feature disclosed is one example only of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.
The above statements apply unless expressly stated otherwise. The term specification, for these purposes, includes the description and any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings.

Claims

Claims
1 . A novel demulsifier comprising the reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof; and
b) a dicarboxylic acid.
2. A novel demulsifier obtainable by reacting:
a) an alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof; and
b) a dicarboxylic acid.
3. The novel demulsifier according to either claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the demulsifier is operable to separate oil-in-water and/or water-in-oil emulsions.
4. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the polyol in the alkoxylated species preferably comprises at least 3 hydroxyl groups.
5. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the polyol in the alkoxylated species has the general formula (la):
HOH2C-(CHOH)p-CH2OH (la)
where p is from 1 to 6.
6. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the alkoxylated polyol preferably comprises residues of a univalent radical R2-0-, or anion R2-0~, where R2 is an alkyl group.
7. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof comprises between 1 and 500 alkylene oxide equivalents per molecule.
8. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the dicarboxylic acid is of the formula (IV):
HOOC-R3-COOH (IV) where R is a C2 to C36 hydrocarbyl group which can be saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched, and can be aromatic or aliphatic, and may be cyclic.
9. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the molar ratio of alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to dicarboxylic acid in the reaction product is at least 0.05:1 and up to 20:1 .
10. The novel demulsifier according to any preceding claim, wherein the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid further comprises an end-cap.
1 1 . The novel demulsifier according to claim 10, wherein the end-cap comprises a monocarboxylic acid.
12. The novel demulsifier according to either claim 10 or claim 1 1 , wherein the molar ratio of the end-cap to the reaction product of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof and the dicarboxylic acid is at least 0.05:1 and up to 20:1 .
13. The novel demulsifier according to any of claims 10 to 12, wherein the molar ratio of the alkoxylated polyol or ester thereof to the dicarboxylic acid to the end-cap is at least 1 :0.1 :1 and up to 1 :1 :5.
14. A demulsification formulation comprising a demulsifier which is the reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester;
b) a dicarboxylic acid; and
c) optionally, an end-cap.
15. A method of demulsifying an oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion, the method comprising adding a reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester;
b) a dicarboxylic acid; and
c) optionally, an end-cap
to the emulsion.
16. The use of a reaction product of:
a) an alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester; b) a dicarboxylic acid; and
c) optionally, an end-cap
as a demulsifier.
EP12773099.2A 2011-09-23 2012-09-21 Reaction products of alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester with dicarboxylic acids as demulsifiers Active EP2758143B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB1116419.1A GB201116419D0 (en) 2011-09-23 2011-09-23 Novel demulsifiers
PCT/GB2012/052340 WO2013041876A1 (en) 2011-09-23 2012-09-21 Novel demulsifiers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2758143A1 true EP2758143A1 (en) 2014-07-30
EP2758143B1 EP2758143B1 (en) 2016-11-02

Family

ID=44937712

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12773099.2A Active EP2758143B1 (en) 2011-09-23 2012-09-21 Reaction products of alkoxylated sorbitol or sorbitan ester with dicarboxylic acids as demulsifiers

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US9695366B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2758143B1 (en)
GB (2) GB201116419D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2013041876A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20140103654A (en) * 2013-02-19 2014-08-27 현대자동차주식회사 Hydraulic engine mount solution composition
WO2014130257A1 (en) * 2013-02-22 2014-08-28 Croda, Inc. Treatment of hard surfaces
GB201408823D0 (en) * 2014-05-19 2014-07-02 Croda Int Plc Demulsifiers
EP3245278B1 (en) * 2015-01-16 2019-08-28 Croda, Inc. Method of separating oil
WO2016114982A2 (en) * 2015-01-16 2016-07-21 Croda, Inc. Method of separating oil
WO2017096129A1 (en) 2015-12-02 2017-06-08 Ecolab Usa Inc. Methods of and compositions for treating a stream comprising crude oil and water
EA202091138A1 (en) * 2017-11-14 2020-10-06 Дау Глоубл Текнолоджиз Ллк COMPOSITION AND SYNTHESIS OF HIGH MOLECULAR MASS AROMATIC POLYESTER POLYOLS
MX2020004978A (en) * 2017-11-14 2020-08-24 Dow Global Technologies Llc Method of using high molecular weight aromatic polyol diesters as demulsifiers for crude oil treatment.
AU2019395820B2 (en) * 2018-12-11 2023-04-13 Nouryon Chemicals International B.V. Polyester demulsifier
US11123658B2 (en) 2019-05-20 2021-09-21 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Demulsification methods using palm oil fuel ash
US11008526B2 (en) 2019-07-23 2021-05-18 Croda Inc. Demulsifier for quaternary ammonium salt containing fuels
US11452950B2 (en) * 2019-07-24 2022-09-27 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Demulsifying additive for separation of oil and water
US20220410037A1 (en) * 2021-06-09 2022-12-29 Nouryon Chemicals International B.V. Polyester demulsifier
US11981871B1 (en) 2023-03-13 2024-05-14 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Methods of designing green demulsifiers

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4402857A (en) 1979-10-26 1983-09-06 Texaco, Inc. Demulsifier for produced oil-in-water emulsions containing spent mud acids
US4321146A (en) * 1980-05-22 1982-03-23 Texaco Inc. Demulsification of bitumen emulsions with a high molecular weight mixed alkylene oxide polyol
DE10240817A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2004-03-11 Basf Ag Process for the production of hyperbranched, water-soluble polyester
DE102005006030A1 (en) * 2005-02-09 2006-08-10 Basf Ag Hyperbranched polymers as demulsifiers for cracking crude oil emulsions
US20080200544A1 (en) 2007-02-09 2008-08-21 Kokyu Alcohol Kogyo Co., Ltd. Oil agent and lubricant agent, moisturizer and external preparation composition containing the same
BRPI0818359A2 (en) * 2007-10-08 2015-04-07 Basf Se Use of non-dendrimeric hyperbranched polyesters and non-dendrimeric hyperbranched polyester
MX2011006960A (en) 2008-12-29 2011-07-20 Basf Se Hyperbranched polyesters and polycarbonates as demulsifiers for cracking crude oil emulsions.

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2013041876A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9695366B2 (en) 2017-07-04
WO2013041876A1 (en) 2013-03-28
GB201404791D0 (en) 2014-04-30
GB201116419D0 (en) 2011-11-02
EP2758143B1 (en) 2016-11-02
GB2508559A (en) 2014-06-04
US20140228456A1 (en) 2014-08-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9695366B2 (en) Demulsifiers
DE102005045133B4 (en) Additives for crude oils
EP3145979B1 (en) Demulsifiers
US20100137167A1 (en) Method for preventing the formation of calcium carboxylate deposits in the dewatering process for crude oil/water streams
US20150031594A1 (en) Oil recovery
US6368422B1 (en) Process for removing solid asphalt residues produced in the petroleum industry
DE10224275B4 (en) demulsifiers
CA3122650C (en) Polyester demulsifier
CA2939962A1 (en) Poly alkanolamine emulsion breakers
AU2019395820B2 (en) Polyester demulsifier
CA3122713C (en) Polyester demulsifier
WO2017211748A1 (en) Emulsion, method for the production thereof and use thereof
CN107109291B (en) Alpha-olefin adsorption-inhibiting lubricant composition, adsorption-inhibiting method, and adsorption inhibitor
JP5057721B2 (en) Spilled oil treatment agent
NO315548B1 (en) Process for treating an aqueous environment contaminated by hydrocarbons, as well as demulsifying and dispersing mixture based on polyglycol esters
BR112021011346B1 (en) DEMULSIFIER, METHOD OF DEMULSIFICATION OF AN EMULSION, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A DEMULSIFIER
JP6470259B2 (en) Spilled oil treatment agent and method of treating attached spilled oil
BR102014009691B1 (en) COMPOUNDS CONTAINING SULFUR BRIDGES; MIXTURES CONTAINING ONE OF THE COMPOUNDS CONTAINING SULFUR BRIDGES; METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS CONTAINING SULFUR BRIDGES; AND; USE OF COMPOUNDS CONTAINING SULFUR BRIDGES
PL186031B1 (en) Emulsifier for slow-burning hydraulic fluids

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140304

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150414

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160622

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 841235

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20161115

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012024907

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20161102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 841235

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20161102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20161102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170203

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170302

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170302

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012024907

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170202

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161102

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230531

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20230823

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240820

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240820

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240820

Year of fee payment: 13