EP2756257A1 - Armour module for vehicle - Google Patents

Armour module for vehicle

Info

Publication number
EP2756257A1
EP2756257A1 EP12761582.1A EP12761582A EP2756257A1 EP 2756257 A1 EP2756257 A1 EP 2756257A1 EP 12761582 A EP12761582 A EP 12761582A EP 2756257 A1 EP2756257 A1 EP 2756257A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
armour
slats
vehicle
stand
armour module
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP12761582.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Paul BOURKE
Alasdair YORK
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ten Cate Advanced Armour UK Ltd
Original Assignee
Ten Cate Advanced Armour UK Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ten Cate Advanced Armour UK Ltd filed Critical Ten Cate Advanced Armour UK Ltd
Publication of EP2756257A1 publication Critical patent/EP2756257A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H7/00Armoured or armed vehicles
    • F41H7/02Land vehicles with enclosing armour, e.g. tanks
    • F41H7/04Armour construction
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/023Armour plate, or auxiliary armour plate mounted at a distance of the main armour plate, having cavities at its outer impact surface, or holes, for deflecting the projectile
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/023Armour plate, or auxiliary armour plate mounted at a distance of the main armour plate, having cavities at its outer impact surface, or holes, for deflecting the projectile
    • F41H5/026Slat armour; Nets
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/04Plate construction composed of more than one layer
    • F41H5/0414Layered armour containing ceramic material
    • F41H5/0428Ceramic layers in combination with additional layers made of fibres, fabrics or plastics

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to a lightweight armour module, in particular, a stand- off armour module for a vehicle or similar object.
  • the invention further relates to an arrangement of such modules and a vehicle comprising such armour.
  • Rocket Propelled Grenades are one form of weapon used by armies and also by terrorist groups to target military objects. In some countries they can be acquired relatively easily and yet are highly effective against even the most heavily armoured targets.
  • An RPG is generally shoulder fired from a launcher and flying at a maximum speed of around 300 m/s can hit a target at up to 1000m.
  • a contact fuse on the nose of the grenade causes an explosive charge to extrude a rapier like jet of copper through the nose cone.
  • this is capable of piercing in excess of 350 mm of steel plating and causing significant devastation thereafter - a phenomenon known as Behind Armour Effect.
  • a vehicle protected using steel plate alone, would therefore be extremely heavy, bulky and difficult to move.
  • additional armour concepts have been combined, capable of defeating different forms of weapon.
  • Armour systems designed for the defeat of RPGs often take the form of bar-shaped armour structures arranged at a certain distance or stand-off from the target or vehicle.
  • the stand-off distance is usually greater than 30 cm.
  • This bar-armour usually consists of a rigid array of steel or aluminium bars arranged in a relatively horizontal direction with vertical stabilizing elements. The spacing between the bars is such that an RPG will not be able to pass through and directly strike the body of the vehicle. Effective detonation of the explosive charge is thus avoided..
  • the deformation of the nose cone by the bar-armour should be sufficient to prevent effective initiation of the armour penetrating rapier. In combination with such bar-armour a relatively thinner form of plate armour may suffice.
  • the bar armour Due to its bulky nature and the additional vehicle width, the bar armour is also often the first part of a vehicle to contact an obstacle and for this reason is frequently damaged.
  • the robust nature of the fixed brackets for supporting bar-armour renders each bar- shaped armour module highly bulky and presents a logistical challenge for the transport of new or replacement panels which weigh little but take up a high volume of space. Normally the space requirement within a transport aircraft or vehicle is of greater concern to military operations than the weight.
  • US patent 7882776 discloses armour for a vehicle comprising a grid of horizontal carbon fibre bars arranged in slots formed in vertical metallic bars.
  • the structure is relatively lighter than a corresponding metal structure but nevertheless may be prone to damage and distortion due to the rigid nature of the grid.
  • EP2265889 Al discloses a vehicle and structure shield comprising a flexible net system carried by a frame with mounting brackets for positioning the frame at a stand-off from the vehicle.
  • a releasable fastener system such as hook and loop fasteners may be used for securing the net system to the frame and for securing the mounting brackets of the frame to the vehicle.
  • an armour module for a vehicle comprises a plurality of flexible vertical elements to be arranged substantially parallel to each other in a substantially vertical direction; a plurality of horizontal slats to be arranged substantially parallel to each other in a substantially horizontal direction; and a connection arrangement for supporting the armour module in a stand-off relation to the vehicle.
  • the use of flexible vertical elements in combination with horizontal slats provides a flexible, lightweight armour module that may be easy-to-store, easy-to-use and easy-to- replace.
  • a vehicle is intended to denote that the armour is suitable for being mounted to a vehicle such as a road vehicle, off-road vehicle, tank, boat, or even an aircraft such as a helicopter.
  • the same principle may be applied to fixed or semi-mobile structures such as armoured placements, observation platforms or the like.
  • vertical and horizontal elements it will be understood that such orientation is relative and not otherwise essential and that the armour module may be mounted at any angle with respect to the object which it protects.
  • the slats are also flexible, at least in a direction perpendicular to a plane of the slat. Preferably they have a flexural modulus of between 10 GPa and 200 GPa. The degree of flexibility may be adapted such that adjacent slats will not spread apart on impact to allow an RPG to pass through. The resulting module is thus flexible in multiple directions and may also be twisted without damage.
  • the slats are preferably made of composite material, in particular, glass or carbon-fibre reinforced materials including, but not limited to polyester, vinylester, PPS, PET and epoxy resins. By use of lightweight materials an areal density of the armour module of less than 25 kg/m 2 may be achieved.
  • the degree of flexibility may also determine the spacing of the vertical elements.
  • a highly rigid carbon fibre slat having a flexural modulus close to 200GPa may require relatively few vertical elements. Glass fibre slats are more compliant , and may have a flexural modulus of around 20GPa. In that case a closer spacing of the vertical elements may be desirable.
  • the term "slat” is intended to denote a relatively elongate element having a width and a relatively low profile or height, at least at a leading edge i.e. the side of the slat directed away from the vehicle and facing towards an oncoming projectile. In general such slats may be rectangular in cross- section although other shapes may be considered including triangular or curved shapes.
  • the slats have a width of between 4 cm and 10 cm, preferably around 5 cm.
  • the height of the profile at the leading edge is preferably less than 10 mm.
  • the slats will be straight although it will be understood that they may also be provided with complex shapes e.g. to match the body to which they are applied. In particular, for protecting a corner of an object, a hockey-stick shaped slat may be provided.
  • the spacing between adjacent slats should be sufficient to prevent an PvPG from passing through.
  • a spacing of from 3 cm to 8 cm is desirable, preferably between 4 cm and 6 cm and most preferably around 5 cm.
  • the vertical elements may extend through openings in the horizontal slats.
  • Such a structure is relatively simple to manufacture.
  • the vertical elements may be aligned with one another but may also be offset to different positions within the width of the slats. In this manner, the stability of the module may be adapted according to the degree of offset. It will be understood that as the offset of the vertical elements is increased, the ability to roll up the module is reduced.
  • a plurality of fastening elements may fasten the horizontal slats and vertical elements together. These may comprise crimps, clips, swages or the like applied to the vertical elements which serve to engage the horizontal slats.
  • the fastening elements may comprise flexible provisions that allow the horizontal slats limited movement with respect to the vertical elements. This relative movement may be vertical, horizontal, lateral or torsional and may increase the overall flexibility of the structure and assist in allowing the armour module to be rolled, folded or otherwise packed.
  • the flexible provisions may comprise appropriate gaps and may also include resilient washers and packings allowing such relative movement.
  • the slats may be fastened to each other and the vertical elements may e.g.
  • the vertical elements comprise steel cable of an appropriate gauge. For most purposes, cable gauges of from 4 mm to 12 mm may be sufficient, preferably around 6 mm.
  • the slats may be arranged to lie flat i.e. in a horizontal plane. Nevertheless, the slats may also be tilted upwards or downwards in the manner of Venetian blinds. This may further assist in deflecting or distorting an incoming RPG.
  • the slats comprise interconnections at their ends for connection to the slats of an adjacent armour module.
  • the interconnections may take various forms and may be provided by ancillary clips or connectors.
  • the slats may be provided with further openings near their ends through which a cable or the like may be threaded to retain both sets of slats together.
  • the invention also provides for a vehicle provided with one or more armour modules as described above.
  • Each armour module may be connected to an adjacent armour module by interconnections between ends of the slats.
  • stand-off armour for a vehicle comprising a flexible protecting element and one or more supports for securing the protecting element to the vehicle, wherein the supports are resilient and capable of being deformed in response to deformation of the protecting element and thereafter returning to a stand-off position.
  • Such an arrangement reduces damage to the vehicle or supports due to impact on the protecting element and furthermore allows the flexible protecting element to more adequately function.
  • the resiliency of the supports is such that they may deform e.g. in response to collision with an object during driving of the vehicle. It is not intended that they should significantly deform in response to impact by an RPG on the protecting element.
  • the protecting element may be as defined above although the skilled person will be aware that the use of resilient supports is not limited to slat based structures.
  • the supports comprise upper brackets from which an upper side of the protecting element is suspended.
  • the upper brackets support the weight of the protecting element and may provide the primary point of retention on the vehicle.
  • the upper brackets may themselves be resilient or may comprise rigid members connected together by flexible means such as resilient suspension blocks.
  • the supports further comprise one or more tensioning elements, arranged to apply a tension to a lower side of the protecting element.
  • the tensioning elements may comprise struts which may be biased in a bending mode to tension the protecting element and maintain the stand-off between the vehicle and the protecting element.
  • the struts may be formed of steel, aluminium, polymer or composite materials, preferably of fibre reinforced composites.
  • the supports may also be stowable, allowing the armour module to be retracted against the vehicle body for transportation purposes or to pass through a narrow space.
  • the supports may also be arranged to retract or fold flat against the vehicle structure when the armour module has been removed.
  • Figure 1 is a perspective view of an armour module according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a close up view of part of the armour module of Fig. 1 taken on line II-II;
  • Figure 3 is a perspective view of stand-off armour according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • Figure 4 is a side view of the stand-off armour of Fig 3;
  • Figure 5 is a perspective view of a vehicle with a plurality of stand-off armour modules.
  • Figure 6 A and 6B are side views of an upper bracket according to an alternative embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig.l a perspective view is shown of an armour module 1 according to an
  • the armour module 1 comprises flexible vertical elements 3 arranged generally parallel to each other and denoted 3A, 3B and 3C.
  • Horizontal slats 5, arranged substantially parallel to each other in a horizontal direction are supported from the vertical elements as described in further detail below.
  • a connection arrangement 7 is provided for supporting the armour module 1 in a standoff relation to a vehicle.
  • connection arrangement 7 comprises a top frame 31, a bottom frame 33 and a plurality of connecting elements 35.
  • the connecting elements 35 are located on both the top frame 31 and the bottom frame 33, preferably at the two end portions of both the top frame 31 and the bottom frame 33.
  • the vertical elements 3 are flexible steel braided cables having a diameter of around 6 mm.
  • the horizontal slats 5 comprises interconnection openings 11 for connecting to the slats 5 of an adjacent armour module.
  • the slats 5 are rectangular in cross-section with a width of 5 cm, a length of 100 cm and a height or thickness of around 5 mm. They are formed of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin and have a flexural modulus of around 200 GPa. The distance between the adjacent slats 5 is 5 cm. The skilled person will understand that this spacing may be chosen or varied according to the protection required.
  • the areal density of the armour module 1 is around 16 kg/m 2 .
  • Fig. 2 shows a close-up cross-sectional view of the armour module 1 taken in direction II-II in Fig. 1.
  • openings 9 are provided through the slats 5 which allow the vertical elements 3 to extend there through.
  • the slats 5 are held in place on the vertical elements 3 by fastening elements 13.
  • a swage 16 crimped onto the vertical element 3 A.
  • the swage 16 is an aluminium collar which may be crimped using conventional crimping procedures sufficient to provide a retention force of at least 90% of the cable breaking strength.
  • Fig. 3 is a perspective view of the armour module 1 of Fig. 1 mounted in stand-off arrangement from a vehicle 100.
  • the armour module 1 is carried by a support arrangement 140 which comprises a pair of upper brackets 141 from which the top frame 31 is suspended.
  • the upper brackets 141 are connected to the connecting elements 35 by snap links 142.
  • a pair of tensioning elements 145 is arranged to apply tension to the bottom frame 33.
  • the upper brackets 141 and tensioning elements 145 are provided with mounting plates 147 by which they can be bolted to a body of the vehicle 100.
  • the upper brackets 141 comprise resilient suspension blocks 143.
  • These blocks 143 are rubber pads that allow the brackets 141 to distort and return to their original position without exerting excessive force on the mounting plates 147 or causing permanent distortion. Although rubber pads are shown, other resilient connections may be used including springs and hinged arrangements.
  • the tensioning elements 145 are formed as struts of glass fibre composite and are also resilient. They are pre-biased to a downward position such that once connected to the connecting elements 35 on the bottom frame 33, they exert a downwardly directed force on the armour module 1 and also maintain the stand-off with the vehicle 100.
  • connection and disconnection of the armour module 1 from the support arrangement 140 is relatively simple.
  • the armour module 1 may be removed and repaired, stored or replaced as required.
  • the tensioning elements 145 lie flat against the side of the vehicle 100.
  • Disconnection of a lower bar 146 of the upper bracket 141 allows the upper brackets to fold flat against the vehicle 100.
  • the upper brackets 141 may also be completely disconnected at mounting plates 147 as required.
  • Fig. 4 shows a side view of the arrangement of Fig. 3. As can be seen the vertical elements 3 do not all lie in a single plane. Elements 3A and 3C are located closer to a leading edge 6 of the slats 5. This provides greater stability to the armour module 1.
  • Fig. 5 is a perspective view of a vehicle 100 showing a plurality of stand-off armour modules 1 A to 1G according to the present invention. In Fig. 5, the armour modules 1 are of different sizes and shapes corresponding to the shape of the vehicle 100. In order to link each armour module 1 with an adjacent armour module 1, the slats 5 overlap each other slightly such that the interconnection openings 11 align. Interconnection cables 12 are threaded through the interconnection openings 11.
  • FIGs 6 A and 6B show an alternative upper bracket 241 comprising a mounting plate 247, a four-bar linkage 248 and a connection fork 249 for connection to the connecting elements 35 of the armour module 1.
  • Resilient suspension blocks 243 are provided beneath the mounting plate 247. Additionally, the elements of the four-bar linkage 248 are formed of composite materials allowing flexibility in a lateral direction.
  • a spring biases the upper bracket from the extended position shown in Fig. 6B to the stowed position shown in Fig. 6A.
  • the four-bar linkage 248 maintains the connection fork 249 level during this movement allowing the armour module to be raised and stowed against the side of the vehicle once the connecting elements 35 on the bottom frame 33 have been released.

Abstract

The present invention relates to an armour module (1) for a vehicle. The armour module comprises a plurality of flexible vertical elements (3a, 3b, 3c), a plurality of horizontal slats (5) and a connection arrangement (35) for supporting the armour module in a stand-off relation to the vehicle. Both the armour and its support may be flexible and can resiliently deform in response to an impact and thereafter recover.

Description

ARMOUR MODULE FOR VEHICLE
Field of the invention
The present invention is related to a lightweight armour module, in particular, a stand- off armour module for a vehicle or similar object. The invention further relates to an arrangement of such modules and a vehicle comprising such armour.
Background of the invention
Rocket Propelled Grenades are one form of weapon used by armies and also by terrorist groups to target military objects. In some countries they can be acquired relatively easily and yet are highly effective against even the most heavily armoured targets. An RPG is generally shoulder fired from a launcher and flying at a maximum speed of around 300 m/s can hit a target at up to 1000m. On impact, a contact fuse on the nose of the grenade causes an explosive charge to extrude a rapier like jet of copper through the nose cone. Depending upon the type of warhead, this is capable of piercing in excess of 350 mm of steel plating and causing significant devastation thereafter - a phenomenon known as Behind Armour Effect. A vehicle protected using steel plate alone, would therefore be extremely heavy, bulky and difficult to move. In order to reduce the dependence on plate armour, additional armour concepts have been combined, capable of defeating different forms of weapon.
Armour systems designed for the defeat of RPGs often take the form of bar-shaped armour structures arranged at a certain distance or stand-off from the target or vehicle. The stand-off distance is usually greater than 30 cm. This bar-armour usually consists of a rigid array of steel or aluminium bars arranged in a relatively horizontal direction with vertical stabilizing elements. The spacing between the bars is such that an RPG will not be able to pass through and directly strike the body of the vehicle. Effective detonation of the explosive charge is thus avoided.. Even if the RPG does pass through the bar armour and the trigger is activated on impact, the deformation of the nose cone by the bar-armour should be sufficient to prevent effective initiation of the armour penetrating rapier. In combination with such bar-armour a relatively thinner form of plate armour may suffice.
Conventional bar armour used on vehicles is relatively heavy and robust in order to resist impact and general wear and tear during operation of the vehicle. It is generally rigidly mounted to the vehicle by welding or bolting and must often be made to measure in order to completely surround and protect the vehicle. Equipping a vehicle with bar armour is a costly exercise and once applied, removal or repair is difficult. A vehicle provided with bar armour becomes around 80 cm wider and may not be able to travel on normal roads or be transported e.g. in an aircraft or train without removal of the armour and supports. For instance, one of the current protected troop carrier vehicles in service with the UK Ministry of Defence is too wide to be legally driven on UK roads due to the fixed bar armour. Access to the vehicle and its running gear for maintenance may also be restricted. This is especially problematic for tracked vehicles. Due to its bulky nature and the additional vehicle width, the bar armour is also often the first part of a vehicle to contact an obstacle and for this reason is frequently damaged. The robust nature of the fixed brackets for supporting bar-armour renders each bar- shaped armour module highly bulky and presents a logistical challenge for the transport of new or replacement panels which weigh little but take up a high volume of space. Normally the space requirement within a transport aircraft or vehicle is of greater concern to military operations than the weight.
Adaptations of conventional bar-armour have been suggested. US patent 7882776 discloses armour for a vehicle comprising a grid of horizontal carbon fibre bars arranged in slots formed in vertical metallic bars. The structure is relatively lighter than a corresponding metal structure but nevertheless may be prone to damage and distortion due to the rigid nature of the grid.
EP2265889 Al discloses a vehicle and structure shield comprising a flexible net system carried by a frame with mounting brackets for positioning the frame at a stand-off from the vehicle. A releasable fastener system such as hook and loop fasteners may be used for securing the net system to the frame and for securing the mounting brackets of the frame to the vehicle. Although such systems are believed to be promising, they are not as robust and may not always provide comparable protection to bar-armour. The high strength polymer fabric material used for the net is also very expensive and can suffer from environmental degradation.
Summary of the invention
The current invention aims to provide a lightweight armour module capable of overcoming at least some of the above-mentioned drawbacks. According to the present invention, an armour module for a vehicle is provided. The armour module comprises a plurality of flexible vertical elements to be arranged substantially parallel to each other in a substantially vertical direction; a plurality of horizontal slats to be arranged substantially parallel to each other in a substantially horizontal direction; and a connection arrangement for supporting the armour module in a stand-off relation to the vehicle.
The use of flexible vertical elements in combination with horizontal slats provides a flexible, lightweight armour module that may be easy-to-store, easy-to-use and easy-to- replace. In the present context, reference to a vehicle is intended to denote that the armour is suitable for being mounted to a vehicle such as a road vehicle, off-road vehicle, tank, boat, or even an aircraft such as a helicopter. Nevertheless, it will be understood that the same principle may be applied to fixed or semi-mobile structures such as armoured placements, observation platforms or the like. Furthermore, although reference is given to vertical and horizontal elements, it will be understood that such orientation is relative and not otherwise essential and that the armour module may be mounted at any angle with respect to the object which it protects.
In a preferred embodiment, the slats are also flexible, at least in a direction perpendicular to a plane of the slat. Preferably they have a flexural modulus of between 10 GPa and 200 GPa. The degree of flexibility may be adapted such that adjacent slats will not spread apart on impact to allow an RPG to pass through. The resulting module is thus flexible in multiple directions and may also be twisted without damage. The slats are preferably made of composite material, in particular, glass or carbon-fibre reinforced materials including, but not limited to polyester, vinylester, PPS, PET and epoxy resins. By use of lightweight materials an areal density of the armour module of less than 25 kg/m2 may be achieved. The degree of flexibility may also determine the spacing of the vertical elements. A highly rigid carbon fibre slat having a flexural modulus close to 200GPa may require relatively few vertical elements. Glass fibre slats are more compliant , and may have a flexural modulus of around 20GPa. In that case a closer spacing of the vertical elements may be desirable. Within the context of the present invention, the term "slat" is intended to denote a relatively elongate element having a width and a relatively low profile or height, at least at a leading edge i.e. the side of the slat directed away from the vehicle and facing towards an oncoming projectile. In general such slats may be rectangular in cross- section although other shapes may be considered including triangular or curved shapes. Preferably, the slats have a width of between 4 cm and 10 cm, preferably around 5 cm. The height of the profile at the leading edge is preferably less than 10 mm. In general the slats will be straight although it will be understood that they may also be provided with complex shapes e.g. to match the body to which they are applied. In particular, for protecting a corner of an object, a hockey-stick shaped slat may be provided.
As discussed above, the spacing between adjacent slats should be sufficient to prevent an PvPG from passing through. In general, a spacing of from 3 cm to 8 cm is desirable, preferably between 4 cm and 6 cm and most preferably around 5 cm.
According to a further aspect of the invention, the vertical elements may extend through openings in the horizontal slats. Such a structure is relatively simple to manufacture. The vertical elements may be aligned with one another but may also be offset to different positions within the width of the slats. In this manner, the stability of the module may be adapted according to the degree of offset. It will be understood that as the offset of the vertical elements is increased, the ability to roll up the module is reduced.
In a further preferred embodiment, a plurality of fastening elements may fasten the horizontal slats and vertical elements together. These may comprise crimps, clips, swages or the like applied to the vertical elements which serve to engage the horizontal slats. The fastening elements may comprise flexible provisions that allow the horizontal slats limited movement with respect to the vertical elements. This relative movement may be vertical, horizontal, lateral or torsional and may increase the overall flexibility of the structure and assist in allowing the armour module to be rolled, folded or otherwise packed. The flexible provisions may comprise appropriate gaps and may also include resilient washers and packings allowing such relative movement. In an alternative arrangement, the slats may be fastened to each other and the vertical elements may e.g. pass through the horizontal slats without use of fastening elements. Such an arrangement allows the slats to be retracted in the manner of a domestic Venetian blind, whereby adjacent slats may stack together. Automatic retraction may also be provided. Other provisions for varying the distance between adjacent slats may be included. The skilled person will be aware of various structures which may be used to form the vertical elements including glass, carbon and other high-strength fibres, metal cable, belts, chains, links and other segmented elements. According to one preferred embodiment, the vertical elements comprise steel cable of an appropriate gauge. For most purposes, cable gauges of from 4 mm to 12 mm may be sufficient, preferably around 6 mm.
In general, the slats may be arranged to lie flat i.e. in a horizontal plane. Nevertheless, the slats may also be tilted upwards or downwards in the manner of Venetian blinds. This may further assist in deflecting or distorting an incoming RPG.
According to an important embodiment of the invention, the slats comprise interconnections at their ends for connection to the slats of an adjacent armour module. The interconnections may take various forms and may be provided by ancillary clips or connectors. In a simple embodiment, the slats may be provided with further openings near their ends through which a cable or the like may be threaded to retain both sets of slats together.
The invention also provides for a vehicle provided with one or more armour modules as described above. Each armour module may be connected to an adjacent armour module by interconnections between ends of the slats.
According to another aspect of the present invention, stand-off armour for a vehicle is provided comprising a flexible protecting element and one or more supports for securing the protecting element to the vehicle, wherein the supports are resilient and capable of being deformed in response to deformation of the protecting element and thereafter returning to a stand-off position. Such an arrangement reduces damage to the vehicle or supports due to impact on the protecting element and furthermore allows the flexible protecting element to more adequately function. It will be understood that the resiliency of the supports is such that they may deform e.g. in response to collision with an object during driving of the vehicle. It is not intended that they should significantly deform in response to impact by an RPG on the protecting element. The protecting element may be as defined above although the skilled person will be aware that the use of resilient supports is not limited to slat based structures.
In a preferred embodiment the supports comprise upper brackets from which an upper side of the protecting element is suspended. The upper brackets support the weight of the protecting element and may provide the primary point of retention on the vehicle. The upper brackets may themselves be resilient or may comprise rigid members connected together by flexible means such as resilient suspension blocks. Preferably, the supports further comprise one or more tensioning elements, arranged to apply a tension to a lower side of the protecting element. The tensioning elements may comprise struts which may be biased in a bending mode to tension the protecting element and maintain the stand-off between the vehicle and the protecting element. The struts may be formed of steel, aluminium, polymer or composite materials, preferably of fibre reinforced composites.
In addition to being resilient, the supports may also be stowable, allowing the armour module to be retracted against the vehicle body for transportation purposes or to pass through a narrow space. The supports may also be arranged to retract or fold flat against the vehicle structure when the armour module has been removed.
Brief description of the drawings
The features and advantages of the invention will be appreciated upon reference to the following drawings of an exemplary embodiment, in which:
Figure 1 is a perspective view of an armour module according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a close up view of part of the armour module of Fig. 1 taken on line II-II; Figure 3 is a perspective view of stand-off armour according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a side view of the stand-off armour of Fig 3;
Figure 5 is a perspective view of a vehicle with a plurality of stand-off armour modules.
Figure 6 A and 6B are side views of an upper bracket according to an alternative embodiment of the invention.
Detailed description of embodiments
In Fig.l a perspective view is shown of an armour module 1 according to an
embodiment of the current invention. The armour module 1 comprises flexible vertical elements 3 arranged generally parallel to each other and denoted 3A, 3B and 3C.
Horizontal slats 5, arranged substantially parallel to each other in a horizontal direction are supported from the vertical elements as described in further detail below. A connection arrangement 7 is provided for supporting the armour module 1 in a standoff relation to a vehicle.
The connection arrangement 7 comprises a top frame 31, a bottom frame 33 and a plurality of connecting elements 35. The connecting elements 35 are located on both the top frame 31 and the bottom frame 33, preferably at the two end portions of both the top frame 31 and the bottom frame 33.
The vertical elements 3 are flexible steel braided cables having a diameter of around 6 mm. The horizontal slats 5 comprises interconnection openings 11 for connecting to the slats 5 of an adjacent armour module.
In the depicted embodiment, the slats 5 are rectangular in cross-section with a width of 5 cm, a length of 100 cm and a height or thickness of around 5 mm. They are formed of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin and have a flexural modulus of around 200 GPa. The distance between the adjacent slats 5 is 5 cm. The skilled person will understand that this spacing may be chosen or varied according to the protection required. The areal density of the armour module 1 is around 16 kg/m2.
Fig. 2 shows a close-up cross-sectional view of the armour module 1 taken in direction II-II in Fig. 1. As can be seen, openings 9 are provided through the slats 5 which allow the vertical elements 3 to extend there through. The slats 5 are held in place on the vertical elements 3 by fastening elements 13. As can be seen, on either side of each slat 5 there is provided a swage 16, crimped onto the vertical element 3 A. The swage 16 is an aluminium collar which may be crimped using conventional crimping procedures sufficient to provide a retention force of at least 90% of the cable breaking strength. Between the slat 5 and the swage 16 are located two rubber washers 15, with one attached above the slat 5 and the other attached below. These rubber washers allow the horizontal slats 5 limited movement with respect to the vertical elements 3, in particular allowing twisting movement such that the armour module 1 may be rolled up. Although two rubber washers are shown, it is understood that a single washer or bushing either above or below the slat may suffice.
Fig. 3 is a perspective view of the armour module 1 of Fig. 1 mounted in stand-off arrangement from a vehicle 100. According to Fig. 3, the armour module 1 is carried by a support arrangement 140 which comprises a pair of upper brackets 141 from which the top frame 31 is suspended. The upper brackets 141 are connected to the connecting elements 35 by snap links 142. A pair of tensioning elements 145 is arranged to apply tension to the bottom frame 33. The upper brackets 141 and tensioning elements 145 are provided with mounting plates 147 by which they can be bolted to a body of the vehicle 100.
According to an important aspect of the invention, the upper brackets 141 comprise resilient suspension blocks 143. These blocks 143 are rubber pads that allow the brackets 141 to distort and return to their original position without exerting excessive force on the mounting plates 147 or causing permanent distortion. Although rubber pads are shown, other resilient connections may be used including springs and hinged arrangements. The tensioning elements 145 are formed as struts of glass fibre composite and are also resilient. They are pre-biased to a downward position such that once connected to the connecting elements 35 on the bottom frame 33, they exert a downwardly directed force on the armour module 1 and also maintain the stand-off with the vehicle 100.
Connection and disconnection of the armour module 1 from the support arrangement 140 is relatively simple. By releasing the snap-links 142, the armour module 1 may be removed and repaired, stored or replaced as required. Once released, the tensioning elements 145 lie flat against the side of the vehicle 100. Disconnection of a lower bar 146 of the upper bracket 141 allows the upper brackets to fold flat against the vehicle 100. The upper brackets 141 may also be completely disconnected at mounting plates 147 as required.
Fig. 4 shows a side view of the arrangement of Fig. 3. As can be seen the vertical elements 3 do not all lie in a single plane. Elements 3A and 3C are located closer to a leading edge 6 of the slats 5. This provides greater stability to the armour module 1. Fig. 5 is a perspective view of a vehicle 100 showing a plurality of stand-off armour modules 1 A to 1G according to the present invention. In Fig. 5, the armour modules 1 are of different sizes and shapes corresponding to the shape of the vehicle 100. In order to link each armour module 1 with an adjacent armour module 1, the slats 5 overlap each other slightly such that the interconnection openings 11 align. Interconnection cables 12 are threaded through the interconnection openings 11.
In use, an RPG fired at the vehicle 100 and impacting on the armour modules 1A-G will strike one or more slats 5. The nose cone of the RPG will be deformed by the impact to such an extent that even if the trigger is actuated, the RPG will not discharge and will not be effective in penetrating the vehicle body. Figs 6 A and 6B show an alternative upper bracket 241 comprising a mounting plate 247, a four-bar linkage 248 and a connection fork 249 for connection to the connecting elements 35 of the armour module 1. Resilient suspension blocks 243 are provided beneath the mounting plate 247. Additionally, the elements of the four-bar linkage 248 are formed of composite materials allowing flexibility in a lateral direction. A spring (not shown) biases the upper bracket from the extended position shown in Fig. 6B to the stowed position shown in Fig. 6A. The four-bar linkage 248 maintains the connection fork 249 level during this movement allowing the armour module to be raised and stowed against the side of the vehicle once the connecting elements 35 on the bottom frame 33 have been released.
Thus, the invention has been described by reference to certain embodiments discussed above. It will be recognized that these embodiments are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms well known to those of skill in the art. In particular, the flexible support arrangement may be used with other non-slat based armour modules and the slat armour disclosed may also be connected to alternative support arrangements.
Many modifications in addition to those described above may be made to the structures and techniques described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, although specific embodiments have been described, these are examples only and are not limiting upon the scope of the invention.

Claims

Claims
1. An armour module for a vehicle comprising:
a plurality of flexible vertical elements to be arranged substantially parallel to each other in a substantially vertical direction;
a plurality of slats to be arranged substantially parallel to each other in a substantially horizontal direction; and
a connection arrangement for supporting the armour module in a standoff relation to the vehicle.
2. Armour module according to claim 1, wherein the slats are flexible, preferably having a flexural modulus of between 20 GPa and 200 GPa.
Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the slats are made of composite, in particular, glass or carbon- fibre reinforced epoxy resin.
Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the slats have a width of between 4 cm and 10 cm, preferably around 5 cm.
Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the vertical elements extend through openings in the slats.
6. Armour module according to any one of preceding claims, further comprising a plurality of fastening elements that fasten the slats and vertical elements together.
7. Armour module according to claim 6, wherein the fastening elements comprise crimps, clips or swages applied to the vertical elements.
8. Armour module according to claims 6 or 7, wherein the fastening elements comprise flexible provisions that allow the slats to move with respect to the vertical elements.
9. Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the vertical elements comprise metal cables or chains.
10. Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the areal density of the armour module is less than 25 kg/m2 .
11. Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the slats may be tilted upwards or downwards relative to the horizontal axis.
12. Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the slats are retractable and a distance between adjacent slats is adjustable.
13. Armour module according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the slats comprise interconnections at their ends for connection to the slats of an adjacent armour module.
14. A vehicle provided with armour modules according any one of the preceding claims.
15. The vehicle according to claim 14, comprising a plurality of armour modules, each armour module being connected to an adjacent armour module by interconnections between ends of the slats.
16. Stand-off armour for a vehicle comprising:
a flexible protecting element;
one or more supports for securing the protecting element to the vehicle; wherein the supports are resilient and capable of being deformed in response to deformation of the protecting element and thereafter returning to the stand-off position.
17. Stand-off armour according to claim 16, wherein the supports comprise upper brackets from which an upper side of the protecting element is suspended.
18. Stand-off armour according to claim 17, wherein the upper brackets comprise resilient suspension blocks.
19. Stand-off armour according to any one of claims 16-18, wherein the supports comprise tensioning elements arranged to apply a tension to a lower side of the protecting element.
20. Stand-off armour according to claim 19, wherein the tensioning elements are struts, biased in a bending mode to tension the protecting element and maintain the stand-off between the vehicle and the protecting element.
21. Stand-off armour according to any of claims 16 to 20, wherein the protecting element is an armour module according to any one of the claims 1 to 13.
22. Stand-off armour according to any of claims 16 to 20, wherein the protecting element is retractable.
23. A vehicle comprising stand-off armour according any one of claims 16-21.
24. The vehicle according to claim 22, wherein the stand-off armour is
automatically retractable
EP12761582.1A 2011-09-12 2012-09-12 Armour module for vehicle Withdrawn EP2756257A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1115687.4A GB2494457A (en) 2011-09-12 2011-09-12 Armour module for a vehicle
PCT/EP2012/067836 WO2013037823A1 (en) 2011-09-12 2012-09-12 Armour module for vehicle

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2756257A1 true EP2756257A1 (en) 2014-07-23

Family

ID=44908385

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12761582.1A Withdrawn EP2756257A1 (en) 2011-09-12 2012-09-12 Armour module for vehicle

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20140338520A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2756257A1 (en)
KR (1) KR20140091675A (en)
AU (1) AU2012307460A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2494457A (en)
IL (1) IL231473A0 (en)
SG (1) SG11201400574WA (en)
WO (1) WO2013037823A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IL225826A (en) * 2013-04-18 2014-11-30 Shai Eyal Hybrid slat armor
IL232110A (en) * 2014-04-13 2015-11-30 Plasan Sasa Ltd Armor coupler
CN205440847U (en) * 2015-12-25 2016-08-10 广州亿航智能技术有限公司 Many rotors manned vehicle of putting can be rolled over to horn
US11733006B2 (en) * 2019-03-25 2023-08-22 United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Internally partitioned revetment container configured for rapid attainment of defense against small arms fire
WO2020213480A1 (en) 2019-04-15 2020-10-22 株式会社マーベラス Image display device and operation control method thereof
IL271158B2 (en) * 2019-12-03 2024-04-01 Cohen Michael Composite grid/slat-armor

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1385897A (en) * 1918-11-19 1921-07-26 Tresidder Tolmie John Device for decapping armor-piercing shells
US1657915A (en) * 1927-07-09 1928-01-31 Calamita Pietro Protective device for vessels
US3769142A (en) * 1970-12-04 1973-10-30 Mc Donnell Douglas Corp Non-woven locked ply composite structure
DE2409876A1 (en) * 1974-03-01 1975-09-04 Nikolaus Dipl Kfm Blenk Deflective or entrapping armouring - penetration of tank or similar is prevented by specially adapted configuration
US3942598A (en) * 1974-08-19 1976-03-09 Council Henry M Non-hostage vehicle
ATE358807T1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2007-04-15 Sgl Carbon Ag CERAMIC BALLISTIC PROTECTIVE LAYER
US7827900B2 (en) * 2004-10-07 2010-11-09 Innovative Survivability Technologies, Inc. Explosive round countermeasure system
US7866250B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2011-01-11 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle protection system
AU2007357832A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2009-05-22 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Apparatus and method for the protection of a vehicle from rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs)
ES2388935T3 (en) * 2007-01-10 2012-10-19 Fatzer Ag Drahtseilfabrik Device to defend against hollow load projectiles
GB2448477B (en) * 2007-04-20 2012-11-07 Np Aerospace Ltd Vehicle armour
BRPI0813995A2 (en) * 2007-07-05 2015-01-06 Bae Systems Land Systems South Africa Pty Ltd Shielding Arrangement
GR1005911B (en) * 2007-07-13 2008-05-16 Soukos Robots ���� Flexible lattice girder for the repulsion of rocket grenades with booster.
DE102007036393A1 (en) * 2007-07-31 2009-02-05 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh Mobile and preferably removable SLAT protective structure for vehicles
US8132495B2 (en) * 2008-01-23 2012-03-13 Force Protection Technologies, Inc. Multilayer armor system for defending against missile-borne and stationary shaped charges
US8464627B2 (en) * 2008-04-16 2013-06-18 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with improved hard points
US8468927B2 (en) * 2008-04-16 2013-06-25 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with a cable frame
US20110079135A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2011-04-07 Farinella Michael D Vehicle and structure shield net/frame arrangement
US8245620B2 (en) * 2008-04-16 2012-08-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Low breaking strength vehicle and structure shield net/frame arrangement
US8443709B2 (en) * 2008-04-16 2013-05-21 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield hard point
US8011285B2 (en) 2008-04-16 2011-09-06 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield
US8607685B2 (en) * 2008-04-16 2013-12-17 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Load sharing hard point net
US8453552B2 (en) * 2008-04-16 2013-06-04 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Method of designing an RPG shield
EP2202478A1 (en) * 2008-12-29 2010-06-30 Ruag Land Systems Protection of objects from hollow charges and manufacturing method therefor
US20110232472A1 (en) * 2010-03-25 2011-09-29 General Atomics Bar armor system for protecting against rocket-propelled grenades
US8677882B2 (en) * 2010-09-08 2014-03-25 QinetiQ North America, Inc. Vehicle and structure shield with flexible frame
FR2968755B1 (en) * 2010-12-10 2013-05-10 Nexter Systems BALLISTIC PROTECTION DEVICE DEPORTEE
FR2970773B1 (en) * 2011-01-21 2015-02-20 Nexter Systems PROTECTION GRID
FR2973868B1 (en) * 2011-04-07 2013-04-05 Nexter Systems BALLISTIC PROTECTION GRILL WITH ACCESS HATCH
US20120291616A1 (en) * 2011-05-17 2012-11-22 Andrewartha Michael I Shield kits for projectile protection
FR2978540B1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-07-26 Nexter Systems PROTECTIVE GRID FOR OPENING
US9476679B2 (en) * 2011-09-06 2016-10-25 Thomas Frederick Hafer Ultra light bar armor
US20140123842A1 (en) * 2012-03-06 2014-05-08 Meggitt (Rockmart) Inc. Blast shield

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2013037823A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20140338520A1 (en) 2014-11-20
GB201115687D0 (en) 2011-10-26
WO2013037823A1 (en) 2013-03-21
IL231473A0 (en) 2014-04-30
SG11201400574WA (en) 2014-09-26
GB2494457A (en) 2013-03-13
KR20140091675A (en) 2014-07-22
AU2012307460A1 (en) 2014-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20140338520A1 (en) Armour Module for Vehicle
US9441919B2 (en) RPG defeat method and system
EP2691730B1 (en) Low breaking strength shield system and method
US7975594B2 (en) Device for defense from projectiles, particularly shaped charge projectiles
US8443709B2 (en) Vehicle and structure shield hard point
JP5518842B2 (en) Vehicle and structure shield
EP2780657B1 (en) Vehicle and structure shield with improved hard points
US20120291616A1 (en) Shield kits for projectile protection
US8677882B2 (en) Vehicle and structure shield with flexible frame
US10215536B2 (en) Hard point net
RU2794373C1 (en) Additional protection of the body of an armoured vehicle (variants)
US20130092017A1 (en) Armour mounting system for a vehicle
CA2741059A1 (en) Shield kits for projectile protection
WO2014065924A1 (en) Vehicle and structure shield with flexible frame
US20130305914A1 (en) Vehicle Protection Grating
WO2013112218A1 (en) Load sharing hard point net

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140312

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20141125

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20150119