EP2630034A2 - System for motorized displacement of a mobile element, method of driving such a system and method of testing such a system - Google Patents
System for motorized displacement of a mobile element, method of driving such a system and method of testing such a systemInfo
- Publication number
- EP2630034A2 EP2630034A2 EP11833883.9A EP11833883A EP2630034A2 EP 2630034 A2 EP2630034 A2 EP 2630034A2 EP 11833883 A EP11833883 A EP 11833883A EP 2630034 A2 EP2630034 A2 EP 2630034A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- actuators
- actuator
- individual
- effort
- movable element
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01B—MACHINES OR ENGINES, IN GENERAL OR OF POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT TYPE, e.g. STEAM ENGINES
- F01B25/00—Regulating, controlling, or safety means
Definitions
- the invention relates to a motorized movement system for a mobile element, for example a motorized displacement system intended for the motorized moving system. displacement of mobile flying surfaces in an aircraft, such as control surfaces.
- the invention also relates to a method for controlling such a system and a method for testing such a system.
- An example of a motorized moving device moving system is a system comprising two actuators connected to the movable element and dimensioned to be able to maneuver only the movable element.
- the system also comprises a central control unit which is connected to the two actuators to send each actuator a position command.
- the control unit sends a position setpoint to one of the actuators said main actuator that responding to the position setpoint will generate a displacement force of the movable member.
- the second actuator said emergency actuator is not powered.
- the control unit sends a position command to the emergency actuator which will replace the main actuator to move the movable element.
- each actuator could alternatively act as a main actuator and an emergency actuator, but this would complicate the operation of the actuators.
- the emergency actuator is inactive and then generates a force at its connection to the movable element which tends to counter the force developed by the main actuator. to move the movable element.
- the main actuator must be dimensioned to be able to withstand this resisting force without affecting the movement of the movable element.
- a motorized displacement system for a movable element comprising two actuators which are each provided with means of their connection to the mobile element.
- the system comprises a central control unit which, in a nominal situation, sends a command setpoint to one of the actuators so that said actuator maneuvers only the movable element.
- the central control unit sends a control setpoint to each of the actuators so that the two actuators simultaneously maneuver the movable element.
- the use of one or two actuators thus depends solely on the power required to be able to maneuver the mobile element.
- An object of the invention is to provide a motorized moving system of a movable element obviant at least in part to the aforementioned problems.
- a motorized moving system of a movable element comprising at least two actuators which are provided each means of their connection to the movable element and are dimensioned to be able to maneuver only the movable element, a central control unit being connected to the two actuators to send to one or the other of the actuators a position command.
- the system comprises control means for simultaneously controlling the two actuators in response to the position instruction addressed to one of the actuators.
- the control means the effort to be developed to move the movable member is distributed between the two actuators so that neither of the two actuators is overly more stressed than the other.
- the other actuator is able to move alone the movable element.
- each actuator is substantially identical.
- the size and weight of the actuators are lower than those of actuators of a motorized movement system of the prior art comprising a single actuator since the fatigue design of the actuators of the invention is less restrictive.
- Another advantage is that there is less heating of the actuators than in a device of the prior art.
- the system according to the invention makes it possible to distribute the position reference coming from the central control unit between the two actuators without having to modify an operating algorithm of a current central control unit which is traditionally connected. with two actuators for sending a position setpoint destined for only one of the actuators in a nominal situation.
- the distribution of the position setpoint into a first effort setpoint and a second setpoint effort is made downstream of the generation of the position command to one of the actuators.
- the invention also relates to a method for controlling such a system and a method for testing such a system.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a motorized moving system of a movable element 1 according to the invention
- FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a motorized moving system of a movable element according to a second embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a motorized moving system of a movable element according to a third embodiment.
- a motorized displacement system 100 here allows, in an aircraft, the transmission of a movement of a steering element, such as the handle, to a movable member 200, such as a rudder.
- the displacement system comprises a first actuator 1 and a second actuator 2.
- Each actuator 1, 2 here comprises an electric motor, for example a brushless motor, having an output shaft driving a screw-nut assembly so that a rotation of the screw under the action of the motor causes a linear displacement without rotation of the nut.
- the nut of the screw-nut assembly of each actuator 1, 2 allows an attachment of one actuator corresponding to the movable member 200.
- actuator 1, 2 is dimensioned to be able to maneuver only the mobile element 200.
- the first actuator 1 is associated with a first sensor 4 for measuring a force exerted by the first actuator 1 on the movable element 200 in order to move said movable element 200.
- the second actuator 2 is associated with a second sensor 5 to measure a force exerted by the second actuator 2 on the movable member 200.
- the sensors 4, 5 are here axial force sensors integrated in the system 100.
- the system 100 also comprises a central control unit 3 connected to the first actuator 1 and the second actuator 2 so that the central control unit 3 can send to each of the actuators a position command Posi, P0S2.
- the system 100 also comprises at least one position sensor of the movable element 100 for measuring an actual position of the movable element 200.
- the system 100 comprises two position sensors 6, 7 which measure one as the real position of the mobile element 200 for a greater redundancy of said system 100.
- the measurement made by a first 6 of the two position sensors is therefore substantially equal to the measurement made by the second 7 of the two position sensors, under normal operating conditions of the two position sensors. If one of the two position sensors is faulty, the second position sensor can always provide only information representative of the position of the mobile element 200.
- the central unit 3 is thus connected to the two position sensors 6, 7 of the movable element.
- a first 6 of the two position sensors is integrated in the first actuator 1 and the second 7 of the two position sensors is integrated in the second actuator 2.
- the central control unit 3 addresses a Posi position setpoint only to the first actuator 1 said master actuator.
- the central control unit 3 then relies on the second actuator 2 said slave actuator to move the movable member 200.
- the central control unit 3 addresses the second actuator a position command P0S 2 .
- the system 100 comprises control means which, in use, make it possible to drive the two actuators 1, 2 simultaneously in response to the position instruction sent to one of the actuators by the central unit
- the control means comprise a first and a second individual control member 10, 20 respectively connected to the first and second actuators 1, 2.
- the two control members 10, 20 are also connected to the unit.
- control unit 3 to the force sensors 4, 5 respectively and to the position sensors 6, 7 respectively.
- the individual control members 10, 20 are arranged in the system 100 to be able to communicate with each other.
- the central control unit 3 In use, from a moving order of the movable member 200 from one of the control members 10, 20, the central control unit 3 generates a position command Posi to the first actuator 1.
- the first individual control member 10 then translates the position setpoint Posi into a force setpoint and communicates with the second individual control member 20 so that the first and second control members 10, 20 simultaneously generate two sets of instructions.
- Effi individual effort, Eff 2 respectively to the first actuator 1 and the second actuator 2.
- the individual effort instructions Effi, Eff 2 are calculated so that the first and second actuators produce an individual effort respectively Fi, F 2 on the movable element 200, the sum of the individual forces Fi + F 2 corresponding to a total effort to provide to reach the Posi position setpoint and the efforts Fi, F 2 being substantially equal.
- a measurement of the position Pos m of said movable element is carried out simultaneously by the position sensors 6, 7.
- the two individual control members 10, 20 determine the two individual effort setpoints Effi, Eff 2 taking into account an error between the Posi position setpoint and the Pos m measured position when the two actuators 1, 2 respectively exert the forces Fi and F 2 on the movable element 200.
- the individual forces Fi and F 2 we obtain the sum of the individual forces Fi + F 2 corresponding to the total effort required to achieve the Posi position setpoint, at least under normal operating conditions of the system 100.
- control unit 3 also receives the measured position Pos m of the mobile element 200.
- the control unit 3 can change the Posi position setpoint to reduce said gap.
- the other position sensor can still provide information representative of the position of the movable member 200 to the control unit 3 and the one of the two individual control organs which will then communicate with the other individual organs to share said information.
- a measurement of the force Fi m exerted by the first actuator 1 on the movable member 200 is performed by the first sensor 4.
- a measurement of the force F 2m exerted by the second actuator 2 on the movable element 200 is performed by the second sensor 5.
- the first and second individual control members 10, 20 determine the individual effort setpoints Effi, Eff 2 to reduce the error between the Posi position setpoint and the Pos m measured position when the two actuators 1, 2 respectively exert the efforts Fi and F 2 on the movable element 200.
- one of the actuators can develop only a limited effort preventing the achievement of the instruction of effort that is requested.
- This failure can be detected by the force sensor for example.
- a fault signal, Def 2 is sent by the first actuator 1 or the second actuator 2 concerned to the corresponding individual control member 10, 20.
- the control members 10, 20 then take account of this failure. to generate Effi, Eff 2 , individual effort set points, making it possible to get as close as possible to the total effort required to reach the Posi position setpoint.
- the failure signal may also be sent by the actuator concerned to the central control unit 3 which will take account of this signal to rely on the non-faulty actuator to move the element. 200. If the first actuator 1 is defective, the central control unit 3 will rely on the second actuator 2, the system 100 then operating in an identical manner that when the position command is sent to the first actuator 1.
- control means thus arranged in the system 100 make it possible to maintain programming of the central control unit 3 identical to that existing in the prior art.
- the central control unit 3 generates a position setpoint for one of the actuators as in a device of the prior art.
- control means communicate with each other in order to distribute this position setpoint in force instructions to the various actuators.
- the control means are thus programmed independently of the programming of the central control unit 3 for the generation of the position command to one of the actuators.
- Another advantage is that the two individual control members 10, 20 monitor the state of the two actuators 1, 2 as the central control unit which increases the reliability of the system 100. There is thus a double monitoring at the both from a global point of view at the central control unit 3 and from a local point of view at the level of the control means.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a second embodiment of the motorized displacement system according to the invention.
- the control means are directly integrated in said central control unit 3.
- the central control unit 3 is then programmed to perform the functions of the individual control members of the first embodiment.
- the central control unit 3 In use, from an order of movement of the movable member 200 from one of the control elements, such as the handle, the central control unit 3 initially calculates a posi position command to the first actuator 1. In a second time, from the Posi position setpoint, the control means simultaneously generate two individual effort orders Effi, Eff 2 respectively for the first and the second actuator 1, 2. The individual effort instructions Effi, Eff 2 are calculated so that the first and the second actuator produce an individual effort respectively Fi, F 2 on the movable member 200, the sum of the individual forces Fi + F 2 corresponding to a total effort to be provided to reach the position command Posi and the forces Fi, F 2 being substantially equal.
- a measurement of the position Pos m of said movable element is performed by the position sensors 6, 7. From the measured position Pos m and the setpoint of Posi position, the control means determine the two sets of individual effort Effi, Eff 2 taking into account an error between the Posi position setpoint and the Pos m measured position when the two actuators 1, 2 respectively exert the efforts Fi and F 2 on the movable member 200.
- control unit 3 also receives the measured position Pos m of the mobile element 200.
- the control unit 3 can change the Posi position setpoint to reduce said gap.
- a measurement of the force Fi m exerted by the first actuator 1 on the movable member 200 is performed by the first sensor 4.
- a measurement of the force F 2m exerted by the second actuator 2 on the movable element 200 is performed by the second sensor 5.
- the means of control determine the individual effort setpoints Effi, Eff 2 to reduce the error between the position setpoint Posi and the measured position Pos m when the two actuators 1, 2 respectively exert the forces Fi and F 2 on the movable element 200.
- a fault signal, Def 2 is sent by the first actuator 1 or the second actuator 2 concerned to the central control unit 3 which takes account of this signal to rely on the non-faulting actuator so that to move the movable member 200. If the first actuator 1 is defective, the central control unit 3 will rely on the second actuator 2, the system 100 then operating identically that when the position command is sent to the first actuator 1.
- the control means thus integrated in the central control unit 100 allow to maintain a programming of the central control unit 3 identical to that existing in the prior art. Said programming is only completed to integrate the functions of the individual control members of the first embodiment.
- the central control unit 3 generates a position setpoint for one of the actuators as in a device of the prior art.
- the control means communicate with each other in order to distribute this position setpoint in force instructions to the various actuators.
- the control means are thus programmed independently of the programming of the central control unit 3 for the generation of the position command to one of the actuators.
- Another advantage is that the control means monitor the state of the two actuators 1, 2 as the rest of the central control unit which increases the reliability of the system 100. There is thus a double monitoring both of a global point of view at the level of the central control unit 3 and from a local point of view at the level of the control means.
- the central control unit 3 generates a position setpoint for one of the actuators and allows servo positioning of this setpoint.
- the control means integrate this servocontrol in position and superimpose there a servocontrol in effort. There is thus enslavement from a total point of view at the central control unit 3 and from a local point of view at the control means which allows to maneuver very finely the movable element.
- the actuator 1 considered as the master actuator by the central control unit 3, exerts a force on the mobile element 200 not equal to that initially requested by the central unit control 3 but a reduced effort of the force exerted by the second actuator 2 on the movable member 200.
- the life of the actuator 1 is thereby elongated.
- the system 100 can have additional functions to the displacement of the mobile element 200.
- the system 100 according to the invention can make it possible to carry out a test of the actuators directly on the aircraft during pre-flight tests.
- the test can by example to break down into two phases to test in turn the two actuators 1, 2.
- the test will include the steps of:
- control means simultaneously with the preceding step, starting from a position / stress resistant profile and the position setpoint, generating, at the destination of the second actuator, said slave actuator, a resistant effort setpoint;
- test will comprise exactly the same steps but by switching the roles of slave and master of the two actuators so that each actuator in turn generates a resistant force.
- the test will evaluate each actuator in turn to deduce their performance and detect possible failures. By specific algorithms for exploiting test results, it will also be possible to anticipate future failures of these actuators.
- actuators 1, 2 are linear actuators, the actuators can of course be rotary actuators.
- actuators 1, 2 are electromechanical actuators, the actuators may be hydraulic actuators as shown in Figure 3.
- system 100 is here illustrated with two actuators simultaneously controlled effort, one It may be envisaged that the system 100 comprises a greater number of actuators, the control means then simultaneously controlling all the actuators in response to the position instruction addressed to one of the actuators.
- the individual control members 10, 20 generate individual effort orders Effi, Eff 2 substantially equal so that the first and second actuators produce an individual effort Fi, F 2 on the movable element such that Fi is substantially equal to F 2 .
- the individual effort instructions are calculated so that the first and second actuators produce an individual effort respectively Fi, F 2 on the movable element 200, the sum of the individual forces Fi + F 2 corresponding to a total effort to provide to reach the Posi position setpoint, without necessarily Fi being substantially equal to F 2 .
- the motorized displacement system 100 will, however, be less optimized: for example, the life of the actuator 1 will be less extended than when the actuator 1 exerts a force Fi on the movable element substantially equal to the force F 2 exerted by the second actuator 2.
- the motorized displacement system 100 has only one position sensor of the mobile element 200, said position sensor will be connected both to the central control unit 3 and to the two individual control members 10, 20 for the first embodiment and will be connected to the central control unit 3 for the second embodiment. Although in the first embodiment, each individual control member 10, 20 is connected to only one of the position sensors, the individual control members 10, 20 may each be connected to the two position sensors 6, 7.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1058486A FR2966124B1 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2010-10-18 | MOTORIZED DISPLACEMENT SYSTEM OF A MOBILE ELEMENT, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SUCH A SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR TESTING SUCH A SYSTEM |
PCT/EP2011/068190 WO2012052438A2 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2011-10-18 | System for motorized displacement of a mobile element, method of driving such a system and method of testing such a system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2630034A2 true EP2630034A2 (en) | 2013-08-28 |
Family
ID=44017144
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11833883.9A Withdrawn EP2630034A2 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2011-10-18 | System for motorized displacement of a mobile element, method of driving such a system and method of testing such a system |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9422813B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2630034A2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103201171B (en) |
BR (1) | BR112013007105A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2813655C (en) |
FR (1) | FR2966124B1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2531998C1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012052438A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6036420B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2016-11-30 | 株式会社Ihi | Actuator control device |
FR3020036B1 (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2017-11-24 | Airbus Operations Sas | ACTUATOR SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT GOVERNOR. |
FR3050552B1 (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2019-04-05 | Safran Electronics & Defense | METHOD FOR MONITORING THE CONDITION OF AN ELECTRO-MECHANICAL ACTUATOR |
US20170305530A1 (en) * | 2016-04-25 | 2017-10-26 | The Boeing Company | System and method for controlling aircraft wing flap motion |
GB2557273A (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2018-06-20 | Airbus Operations Ltd | Actuator testing |
US10501201B2 (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2019-12-10 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Aerodynamic control surface movement monitoring system for aircraft |
US11407496B1 (en) * | 2021-08-17 | 2022-08-09 | Beta Air, Llc | Systems and methods for redundant flight control in an aircraft |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1964771A2 (en) * | 2007-02-27 | 2008-09-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load optimized redundant flight control surface actuation system and method |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3638820A1 (en) * | 1986-09-12 | 1988-03-24 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | RUDDER CONTROL ARRANGEMENT FOR AIRCRAFT |
JPS6441498A (en) * | 1987-08-07 | 1989-02-13 | Teijin Seiki Co Ltd | Controller for rudder surface |
FR2760718B1 (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1999-05-28 | Aerospatiale | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A TILT OR DEPTH GOVERNOR OF AN AIRCRAFT |
US6755375B2 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2004-06-29 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for controlling aircraft devices with multiple actuators |
DE10313728B4 (en) * | 2003-03-27 | 2011-07-21 | Airbus Operations GmbH, 21129 | Flap system on the wing of a fixed-wing aircraft |
US20070007385A1 (en) * | 2005-06-27 | 2007-01-11 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Electric flight control surface actuation system electronic architecture |
FR2908107B1 (en) * | 2006-11-06 | 2008-12-19 | Airbus France Sa | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ESTIMATING THE FORCES EXERCISING ON A CONTROL SURFACE OF AN AIRCRAFT. |
-
2010
- 2010-10-18 FR FR1058486A patent/FR2966124B1/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-10-18 US US13/876,134 patent/US9422813B2/en active Active
- 2011-10-18 RU RU2013122776/11A patent/RU2531998C1/en active
- 2011-10-18 CA CA2813655A patent/CA2813655C/en active Active
- 2011-10-18 BR BR112013007105A patent/BR112013007105A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2011-10-18 EP EP11833883.9A patent/EP2630034A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2011-10-18 WO PCT/EP2011/068190 patent/WO2012052438A2/en active Application Filing
- 2011-10-18 CN CN201180050160.1A patent/CN103201171B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1964771A2 (en) * | 2007-02-27 | 2008-09-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Load optimized redundant flight control surface actuation system and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9422813B2 (en) | 2016-08-23 |
CA2813655A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 |
CN103201171B (en) | 2016-05-11 |
CA2813655C (en) | 2015-04-28 |
CN103201171A (en) | 2013-07-10 |
WO2012052438A2 (en) | 2012-04-26 |
WO2012052438A3 (en) | 2013-03-07 |
FR2966124A1 (en) | 2012-04-20 |
RU2531998C1 (en) | 2014-10-27 |
BR112013007105A2 (en) | 2016-06-14 |
FR2966124B1 (en) | 2013-08-09 |
US20130192453A1 (en) | 2013-08-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2630034A2 (en) | System for motorized displacement of a mobile element, method of driving such a system and method of testing such a system | |
EP2266878B1 (en) | Piloting assisting method, piloting assisting means and helicopter piloting assisting device which uses said piloting assisting means for implementing said piloting assisting method | |
EP0639499B1 (en) | Servo control device of an aircraft flight control member | |
EP3054277B1 (en) | Failure detection mechanism for electric actuator, and electric actuator having the same | |
FR2794835A1 (en) | METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A GEARBOX DEVICE AND CORRESPONDING DEVICE | |
FR2952448A1 (en) | DEVICE FOR ELECTRONIC CONTROL OF A MULTIFUNCTIONAL MICROCONTROLLER DRIVER, STEERING DEVICE AND AIRCRAFT | |
CA2803852C (en) | Direction control management process for an adjustable part of aircraft landing gear | |
EP3702269B1 (en) | A haptic alert mechanism for alerting an aircraft pilot, and an aircraft | |
EP0401079B1 (en) | Electromechanical control device usable for piloting a vehicle | |
FR2982239A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING THE BLOCKING OF AN AIRCRAFT GOVERNMENT | |
FR2803051A1 (en) | Helicopter rotor power pack for power regulation has a rotor speed detector signal with sum and derivative levels comparator applied providing fuel dosage reduction/increase drive level | |
EP3558816B1 (en) | Movable flight surface having at least one integrated actuator | |
FR2824804A1 (en) | Power regulating device for rotary wing aircraft e.g. helicopter, conforms speed of rotation of engine whose main regulating system has failed, to speed of rotation of another engine | |
FR3051026A1 (en) | SERVOVALVE WITH ASYMMETRICALLY REDUNDANT PIEZO ELECTRIC ACTUATOR. | |
EP3558817B1 (en) | Electromechanical actuator for a movable flight surface | |
EP2653701B1 (en) | Control apparatus for a variable section nozzle of an aircraft | |
FR2994220A1 (en) | Device for controlling variable section nozzle of nacelle of engine of aircraft, has regulation system connected to checking element to control actuator, and control device including controller allowing blocking moving parts in position | |
EP4091938B1 (en) | Electromechanical servo control system with swash plate having at least four electromechanical servo controls and rotorcraft | |
WO2006097418A1 (en) | Device for compensating helicopter flight control mechanical clearance | |
US20230002035A1 (en) | Monitoring actuator system health | |
EP2602601B1 (en) | System for monitoring a drive train | |
CA3146226A1 (en) | Control equipment capable of controlling braking in a self-driving vehicle and an associated vehicle | |
EP3555716A1 (en) | Method for automatic calibration and associated actuation device and seat | |
EP3227981A1 (en) | Method for detecting a blocking of a rotor of a motor driving an actuating member | |
WO2004009425A2 (en) | Vehicle steering system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130328 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20140217 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B64C 13/50 20060101AFI20151110BHEP Ipc: B64C 13/16 20060101ALI20151110BHEP Ipc: F01B 25/00 20060101ALI20151110BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20151123 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20160405 |